![](http://serviteca.online/777/templates/cheerup2/res/banner1.gif)
An Inspector Calls Essays
One of the best things you can do to revise for any english exam is to read examples of essays. below you'll find a range of essays which you can read at your leisure., though there are always benefits in reading essays, becoming use to "active reading" is also important. to do this, use one of these strategies to help:, print the essay off and highlight key phrases or pieces of analysis that you like, keep some notes on the ways the essays use key vocabulary, cherry-picking the best phrases for use yourself, note down the structures of the essays but making a note of the focus of each paragraph, remember that there are hundreds of ways to write a successful essay, as the examples below will highlight. but they all manage to link the big ideas of the play with the language and structure; they all write about priestley's intentions and the audience's responses; they all recognise that this play is written to make a political point, not just to entertain the audience., a) how does priestley explore responsibility in an inspector calls , in the play, priestly wanted the audience to take responsibility for each other, to see that society was "one body." he wanted the audience in 1945 to recognise that although there had been positive changes since 1912, he didn't want them to regress and, in fact, wanted them to demand even more social reform., firstly , priestley uses the inspector to demonstrate to his audience that morality is a much more admirable quality in a person than mr birling's selfish manner. in act 3 mr birling offers "thousands" to help eva, though the inspector tells him that he is “offering money at the wrong time.” this shows that the inspector has the moral high ground and, although from a lower class, is holding all the power over the birling's treasured reputation. to the audience it would be obvious that birling should have given the money earlier, that it was inevitable that eva would end up costing him. it is also revealing that birling wouldn't give eva smith a small pay rise as it would have meant he couldn't "lower prices" but when it came to saving his status he was prepared to “give thousands.” by this stage, mr birling seems quite flustered and somewhat embarrassed as although in the outside world his authority is growing in his own home he can't control a man of “that class.” from a psychoanalytic perspective you could argue that this reflects birlings upbringing and the values that he was taught to respect as a younger man when he worked had and was kept poor in a way that taught him the value of hard work. in this way, mr birling feels that all the people who have money deserve it while the people who don't have money clearly don't deserve it. also, it is from his background that birling being taught to prioritise materialistic things could be the root of his difficult relationship with eric; he comes across as very cold and unforgiving which possibly reflected onto his son. this could easily be a subconscious cause of eric's addiction (looking for escape and comfort in the absence of his father's approval) and be linked to why eva viewed him to be more juvenile than gerald. the need for superficial things in his life like power and wealth is portrayed in the play as quite harmful and only something which will hold a person back, the inspector seems to be free from all these hindering social constructs and is definitely a much more favourable character because of this., in spite of their strong differences in beliefs, both mr birling and the inspector are very self-assured characters who are equally set in their ways . this is not mirrored in the younger characters like eric or sheila. priestly emphasizes a message directed towards the younger generations that they are the hope for change. throughout the play birling refuses to accept the need for reform or responsibility , he represents the stereotypical man of his age and class that priestley uses to contradict sheila's growing outward-looking empathy. when she promises the inspector that she will “never never do it again to anybody” she is acknowledging her privileges and shows that she understands how people must take responsibility for each other. i would say that her materialistic upbringing and the damage that has done makes her incredibly naive and impacts hugely on her opinion of others' worth. when talking about eva smith in act 1 one of the first things she asked was “is she pretty” from this line alone it is clear to the audience where her priorities lie and what kinds of values were instilled in her from a young age probably by her shallow mother. priestly highlights that it's the duty of the young to bring about reform and for this to happen they firstly need to realise the older generations won't do it for them. he also stresses that it's not ok for people like the birlings to take credit for their achievements but never accept responsibility for the consequences of their profit., priestley uses the contrast between age groups and class to explore universal divides caused by pride, reputation and lack of accountability, things that mr and mrs birling value highly but sheila is willing to let go of by accepting her mistakes and returning gerald's engagement ring (also rejecting her father's business interest in gerald.).
Examiners commentary:
The simple, clear first paragraph is fine.
The second paragraph, however, contains some interesting points that could be related to the question but which aren't. As a result, a lot of what's good in this paragraph is lost. This could have been easily fixed if the student had remembered to continually link their points back to the question.
The third paragraph is an improvement in that it does mention responsibility more often and has some interesting observations about the generation gap.
The third paragraph feels unfinished and unclear - it sounds like it's saying that Mr and Mrs Birling value accountability highly, or that the view a "lack of accountability" highly, neither of which are true.
AO1: Lots of AO1, though it isn't connected to the question often enough
AO2: Not enough AO2 at all - hardly any specific language analysis
AO3: Nothing of note outside of the first paragraph
Grade: This is a difficult essay to grade. There are lots of interesting points, especially about how our upbringings affect our outlook, but they're not always linked to the question which means they won't score as well as they should. Also, a complete lack of AO2 causes real problems. This is probably a G5 though with a few minor changes it could easily be pushed up two grades.
B) How does Priestley explore responsibility in An Inspector Calls ?
Priestley presents a strong message about responsibility throughout the play. he wants us all to take more responsibility for each other., firstly, he uses the character of mr birling to convey the ignorance of those who refuse to take responsibility. we can see this when mr birling says, “community and all that nonsense”. the use of the noun “nonsense” shows the audience that mr birling is mocking socialists and those who believe society should be a community. you can almost hear his sarcastic tone as if ‘community’ is an absurd idea. the word “all” also highlights his belief that anything to do with community, such as helping others and being responsible for one another, is ridiculous. this links to when he says, “a man has to mind his own business and look after himself and his own.” the repetition of the pronoun “his” emphasises that he only takes care of his possessions and doesn’t think twice about others. also, it exposes to the audience his sense of higher class entitlement linked to his lack of responsibility for things that are not directly his fault. the audience of 1945 would have been shocked because by this time, after the labour movement and war, people were becoming more open-minded about mixing social classes and community responsibility. this links to priestley’s message because he was a socialist and believed people should have equal rights., in contrast to mr birling, priestley uses the character of sheila to present those who are willing to take responsibility. we see this in the line, “i’ll never, never do it again to anyone”. the repetition of “never, never” reveals that sheila feels guilty and deeply regrets her actions. it also tells the audience that she is open-minded about changing how she behaves, regardless of her social class. the use of the noun “anyone” reveals that she doesn’t care if the person is upper class or lower class. she doesn’t want to put anyone in that position again and has taken full responsibility. if this play had been shown in 1912, the audience may have been more likely to agree with the birling’s ideas and would have thought sheila may be acting foolishly. however, the audience of 1945 would have been more sympathetic towards sheila because at this time, society was shifting towards the creation of the nhs, the introduction of education for all and the building of social housing. this reflected how society was coming together more and caring more for the poor instead of brushing them aside., similarly, the character of inspector goole is the main voice of responsibility in the play and is the voice of priestley himself as he is trying to show the birling family that being upper class doesn’t make them any less responsible for the community than the next person. this sense of responsibility is also reflected in the stage directions when the light goes from “pink and intimate” and “brighter and harder”, when the inspector enters. immediately, this tells us that the i nspector has a presence on the stage and that he has come to say something important. perhaps it is about bri nging light to the things that the upper classes like to hide in the shadows, or the harsh lighting works almost like he is interrogating the family. the spotlight is now on them and what they have done., additionally, priestley conveys a message of responsibility through the inspector when he says, “we are members of one body.” the noun “members” highlights that we are all joined together and if one member falls, then it brings everything down. furthermore, it links to the idea that community is like a family who should take care of each other no matter what. it could also have religious connotations because in the last supper jesus said, “this is my body that will be given up for you, take this in memory of me.” here, jesus said that people should eat the bread because it would bring everyone together and he always believed that people should be equal. in 1912, people were very divided and the poor would rarely move up to the higher classes. priestley was aiming to ensure that the shifts in society happening in 1945 were strengthened and that everyone felt that responsibility for others was important..
Really clear structure, with a clear target for each paragraph
Doesn't make a wide range of points but has a quote to backup each point and explores the quote in depth
Each section ends with something about the context
Though each point is presented with a quote attached, this could have been improved with some other references from the play even if those quotes or references weren't analysed in depth
AO1: Not much AO1 really, no real refernces to key moments of plot
AO2: Lots of great AO2 - quotes analysed in depth
AO3: Good AO3, all key points linked to context
Grade: A really neat, clear and well organised essay. A lack of AO1 is a problem, as is the fact that although each paragraph was linked to an idea connected to responsibility the link isn't always made clear. However, there's loads of AO2 and AO3 so it would be a comfortable G7. With a couple of sentences added to each paragraph which referenced a few key moments of plot it would go up to a G8.
C) How does Priestley explore responsibility in An Inspector Calls ?
Priestley explores ideas about responsibility through the way the birlings behave towards eva smith. arthur birling explains the family’s capitalist philosophy when he says ‘a man has to mind his own business and look after himself and his own’ which suggests that he feels that he only has responsibility for his own family and himself . this is reinforced by the way the birlings treat eva smith. first of all, arthur fires her from his factory to make an example of her because she asks for higher wages and dares to take responsibility for others by speaking up on their behalf. it is revealed that arthur’s prime motive is to keep wages down so that he could make more profits. priestley reinforces this through arthur’s constant repetition of ‘hard headed man of business’, to remind the audience that he is representative of capitalism and the damage it causes. the word ‘business’ is later used by birling to refer to the death of eva smith as he states how her death is ‘horrid business’ which emphasises the message that birling only sees people’s lives in terms of profit. priestley is showing the audience that a blind belief that generating profits and prosperity for the good of everyone is fundamentally wrong as it causes innocent people to suffer tragic consequences., although all the birlings are responsible for eva’s mistreatment and death in some way, they react differently when they find this out from the inspector. mr and mrs birling do not change and are only concerned about their reputation - the possible ‘scandal’ or arthur’s ‘knighthood’. however, priestley’s intention is give the audience a message of hope as sheila and eric do recognise that they have behaved badly by the end of the play and therefore he is suggesting that it is the younger generation that have the responsibility for adopting more socialist principles. through the younger birlings’ attitudes, priestley suggests that socialism is the modern way and that it is young people who will change society for the better., this change of views in the younger generation is also shown through the play’s structure as eric dramatically exits the stage at a crucial point suggesting he is struggling to contain his guilt over his mistreatment of eva smith. likewise, sheila is struggling with her guilt and tries to show that she has changed by directing others to realise their own responsibility in eva smith’s suicide. for example, sheila warns her mother not to ‘build up a wall’ this metaphor describes the separation of the social classes as mrs birling believes she is superior to the lower classes. the irony is that the opposite is true as priestley reveals how mrs birling’s behaviour is morally wrong – she punished a pregnant girl by refusing her charity when she needed it the most just because the girl used her name and in doing so angered mrs birling., through using the form of a morality play, priestley is able to identify what each family member’s sins and how it was these sins that they demonstrated and caused their mistreatment of eva smith. for instance, eric’s lust for eva smith meant that he forced himself upon eva and then his sloth – his inability to earn his own money meant he stole money from his father instead of facing up to his responsibility and earning money himself. by the end of the play, priestley shows that eric fully accepts his responsibility and describes how he cannot even remember his assault of eva as being a ‘hellish thing’. the use of this metaphor implies he is being tortured by his own guilt and knows he has been committed to hell due to his sins., priestley constructs the inspector’s role as that of a priest as he extracts all the confessions from the birlings and attempts to force them to accept their responsibilities through asking questions which challenge their capitalist way of life and challenges their edwardian values of social class and hierarchy. in addition, the inspector’s language has religious tones to it as he warns the birlings and gerald croft that if they do not stop exploiting the poor, they will learn their lesson with ‘fire, blood and anguish’. there is an inference that they will be punished in hell for not caring about the way those less fortunate are treated. through the inspector’s voice, the audience hear the socialist message that the birlings are being taught and we left knowing that this is a warning to us all – we need to accept responsibility and take better care of others around us., how does sheila change during an inspector calls, - summary paragraph, - stage directions, - confrontation with the inspector – she takes responsibility, - standing up to her parents, - the young are more impressionable, - ending – grown up, throughout inspector calls, sheila is the character who changes the most. at the beginning of the play she is a young, naïve girl who is happy to be told what to think and do; by the end she is the only character who really takes responsibility for the death of eva and is happy to tell her parents that she thinks they are wrong., the stage directions describe her as being “very pleased with life” a phrase which reflects her luxurious upbringing. she’s also described as being “excited” an adjective that suggests she is looking forward to her life. in both these respects she could be viewed as being ignorant to the reality of what her luxury costs others, or how difficult the times ahead will be., sheila refers to her parents as “mummy” and “daddy,” nouns that are associated with young children and not young adults; she is also told off by her mother for squabbling with her brother, a fact that reinforces our vision of her as being infantilised by her parents. sheila is then given a ring by her fiancé gerald. “is it the one you wanted me to have” she asks him, a phrase that suggests she wasn’t really interested in what she wanted but only what gerald wanted her to have. throughout the opening she is presented as a child, with no real desires or wishes of her own. in many respects, she is the traditional rich young woman – without a real mind of her own by virtue of her gender., when the inspector arrives, he explains how her spoilt behaviour in a shop led to eva being sacked. “then i’m really responsible,” she accepts, quickly recognising her role in the girl’s downfall. also, she observes that the inspector is getting ready to speak to gerald next and pushes this through, asking direct questions to gerald and working out the reasons why he wasn’t where he said he was the summer before. in both these cases, she is showing independent thought – by accepting responsibility even when others don’t and by pushing gerald against his wishes., during their time with the inspector, her parents and gerald repeatedly try to send sheila out of the room to protect her from his news – her mother argues that she is “looking tired,” something that we would only really say to a very small child. sheila repeatedly refuses, arguing that she will stay until “i know why that girl killed herself.” here, she clearly shows herself standing up to her parents, sticking to her desire to discover the truth of the situation., at one point arthur argues that the inspector is making “quite an impression” on sheila, suggesting that she’s coming around to the inspector’s way of thinking. “we often do on the young ones,” the inspector replies, suggesting that his socialist values are more affective on younger people. this reflects a view of priestley’s which was that socialism and left wing values are more impactful on younger people, a fact that’s often reflected in even modern opinion polls where right wing conservatives tend to be older. this is also shown in how, by the end of the play, mr and mrs birling remain unchanged by the arrival of the inspector, while their children change – even gerald admits that the events “affected him,” before he reverts back to his old ways., even after the inspector leaves, sheila continues to push his ideas trying to make sure that her family don’t forget him. she claims they are beginning to “pretend” that nothing has happened, clearly accepting that things won’t be the same again. her use of the verb is interesting as well, as games of “pretend” are really childish things. it seems that the girl who was once infantilised is now accusing her parents of playing make-believe. she also argues that her parents “don’t seem to have learnt anything,” behaving almost like a school mistress arguing that a lesson has been missed. she also says, in response to a speech from eric in which he accepts responsibility, that he makes her feel a little less “ashamed” of them, a word which really shows just how powerfully sheila sees her parents’ remorseless behaviour., her frustration is clear throughout the ending, where she says her parents’ behaviour “scares” her. this clearly references the inspectors closing words about “fire and blood and anguish” which referenced the years of war that would follow the period between the play being written and being performed. the audience at this point would doubtless be agreeing with sheila regarding her fear. her parents continue to ignore her desire to grow up, infantilising her again by suggesting that she’s just “tired” and “hysterical,” though they can’t ignore her final words when she refuses gerald’s ring again which clearly shows that she has grown up enough to express herself completely, how does priestley present mrs birling as an unlikeable character (high level response), priestley presents mrs birling as an unlikable character as she doesn’t change throughout the play. in acts 1 and 2 she doesn’t say much about the tragic death of eva at all, showing her lack of remorse., on the other hand, characters like sheila do realise the horror of the suicide. in act 2, gerald says “sorry, i’ve just realised a girl has died”. this is ironic [sic] as he had found out in act 1, but it had only sunken in in act 2. the word “sorry” shows he feels embarrassed about his emotional side, as many men of the time (1912) did., sheila also changes throughout, creating a stark contrast to her mother. in act 1 she refers to her mother as “mummy” like when she says “mummy, isn’t it a beauty” this shows she was dependant on her and worried about material things. she later says, “but these girls aren’t cheap labour, they’re people” to mr birling, showing his daughter isn’t afraid to voice her opinion but her mother is. in act 2, sheila says, “we really must stop these silly pretences”. the inclusive pronoun “we” not only presents sheila as the family member doing the right thing and trying to influence others, as her mother should, but also involves the audience, trying to give them a message. the noun “pretences” is significant as it was mrs birling who pretended not to remember eva smith., when she was shown the photo it was evident that mrs birling didn’t change throughout as at the end of the play in act 3 gerald suggests that “he’s been had”, and the birlings are keen to accept it, whilst sheila and gerald remain guilt-stricken. the audience of the time, in 1945, would have just experienced the war and realised everyone must start taking care of one another. they may have not been so quick to change, as, at the time, only rich, most-likely capitalist, people would have gone to the theatre to see the play, whereas a modern audience is more diverse and open., priestley also presents mrs birling as an unlikable character as she is dismissive towards many different groups. for example, she says “a girl of that class” when her part in the suicide is revealed. the noun “girls” shows mrs birling’s views that working class girls are undeserving of names. this derogatory comment would have infuriated an audience of 1945 as the working class were extremely beneficial during the war, though the class divide was massive in 1912. she is even misogynist, like mr birling, who says “clothes mean something different to women”. she says “sheila and i had better go to the drawing room”, which shows her views on women’s place in society, due to gender roles. she also says men have to spend a lot of time working away, but sheila challenges it and says she won’t get used to it. it is obvious priestley has used the younger generations as a symbol for more open-minded people as eric also challenges mr birling on war. mr birling says the titanic is “unsinkable, absolutely unsinkable”. the repetition and qualifiers enhance the dramatic irony as he was wrong about both of these things. it is almost as though priestley is mocking people like mr birling., mrs birling also has capitalist views which don’t change throughout the play. she believes in a social hierarchy as seen in the stage directions before the play begin, where the characters are placed around a rectangular table which gives power to those at the top and bottom, and when she says, “be quiet and let your father think of what we should do next”. the imperative verb “be” shows how she is even being rude towards her own children., this contrast with shelia’s feminism, which was popular due to the suffragette movement in 1912, significant after 1945 as many women helped the war effort and important to a modern audience who have achieved so much. mrs birling uses her powers for bad as she “influenced” the committee to refuse eva help., priestley uses the play as an allegory for his socialist views. by inducing a sense of hatred towards mrs birling he allows the audience to see the flaws in a capitalist mind-set. priestley, having served in the war himself, developed strong socialist views. this is reflected in the inspector, who is a mouthpiece for priestley as he uses the metaphor, “we are all part of one body” to imply everyone should look after one another. priestley had a popular radio programme which was cancelled for being too “left wing” by the bbc. as time progresses, the audience becomes more socialist and the play is more effective., priestley presents mrs birling as having double standard. this can be seen in the quotation, “i’m sorry eric… didn’t know”, after finding out it was her son she was talking about when she said he should take full responsibility for eva’s pregnancy., despite stage directions calling for pink, intimate lighting at the beginning, mrs birling never seems to be intimate with her children. when the inspector asks if eric drinks, she says “of course not, he’s only a boy”, which shows she is either lying or not close with her family. however, sheila says he’s been “steadily drinking for two years”, showing she is either trying to get him into trouble or is keen to get him help. either way, she is closer with him than his own mother. the siblings also exchange comments when she calls him “squiffy”. the colloquialism has mrs birling unaware of the changes and reluctant to change her mind-set. this also foreshadows the importance of alcohol in the play as it was the cause of eric’s behaviour., how does priestley present the views of the inspector in an inspector calls (high level response), inspector goole is presented as an omnipotent, powerful figure throughout the whole play; his presence immediately has the power to change the light and cheerful atmosphere of the birlings' dinner party. the lighting changes from "pink and intimate" to "brighter and harder" once the inspector arrives. here, priestley's use of the adjectives "pink and intimate" suggests a warm and happy atmosphere whereas the adjective "harder" opposes this. priestley uses the inspector as a dramatic device. not only could it be argued that the inspector is an immensely powerful figure but also that priestley uses the stage directions that inspector goole's arrival to act as a symbol for how he wants society to improve. the lighting before the inspector arrives suggests that the birling family – who are a stereotypical portrayal of a middle class family – were happy whilst they were ignorant to the working class. the lighting change tells us how priestley wants society to change; he wants society to stop being ignorant to the working class., furthermore, j. b. priestley uses the inspector to convey that he wants society to change and become more empathetic towards the working class instead of perceiving them as being disposable. when the inspector arrives, he tells the birling family about eva smith’s suicide in which she drank a lot of strong disinfectant that “burnt her inside out”. priestley’s language persuades the audience to feel immense sympathy not only for eva smith but also for all of the working class; it could be argued that eva smith’s suffering and suicide is used as a metaphor to highlight the continuous struggled faced by the working class, throwing into relief the issues within society and how these problems are ignored by the wealthier classes. priestley’s gory imagery alternately makes the audience feel guilty because they may realise how ignorant they have been to ignore the struggles of the working class and persuade them to change by being more empathetic., priestley suggests that a pressing issue with the twentieth century society is that people are reluctant to take responsibility for their actions. this view is encapsulated through the use of the elder members of the birling family, arthur birling and his wife mrs birling – who do not take responsibility for their actions towards eva smith. however, priestley uses the inspector to try to change this. the inspector states that if we share nothing else, “we have to share our guilt”. here priestley uses the personal pronoun “we” to give society a sense of unity, implying everyone must do the same and follow the inspector’s teachings. ‘an inspector calls’ was set in 1912, a time in which society was divided by not only gender but by social class. priestley wants the middle and upper classes to transform from abusing their power to dominate and exploit the working class to instead being more responsible for their actions and treating people more sympathetically ., priestley uses the inspector to convey the consequences of what will happen if members of society do not change. he states that we will be “taught” in “fire and blood and anguish”. priestley’s use of a triplet of nouns act as metaphors for the two world wars. the entire play is used as a motif for the wars; if society proceeds to not improve the way in which members of society treat each other, the world wars will repeat in an endless cycle until we learn. here, the inspector is presented as an omnipotent being. ‘an inspector calls’ was written and first performed at the end of the second world war therefore the contemporary audience will have experienced the perpetual suffering that comes with them. priestley uses the inspector to make the audience fearful as they are persuaded to think that the inspector is a god-like character imposing judgement on society. this will persuade all audiences to change their actions and embrace socialist ideologies of caring for other members of society which is what priestley intended them to do., priestley wants the middle and upper classes to stop being selfish and exploiting the poor for their own financial gain, but instead be more generous and empathetic towards other members of the working class. the inspector is almost an impartial figure in the play because he does not fit into the distinct levels of society. this gives the audience the impression that the inspector is an unbiased figure; they will be persuaded to listen to him and change their views., compare priestley’s presentation of eva smith and shelia birling., in the play ‘an inspector calls’ we see a family called the birlings that consist of many different characters, personalities and beliefs. we only begin to see these different aspects when the family begin to learn how each one of them was involved in causing the chain of events which led a girl, eva smith to commit suicide. there are two characters in particular who are very different in the way that they live their lives and their own outlook on life. these two characters are eva smith and shelia birling., shelia is the daughter of sybil and arthur birling. they are a well-known family in brumley and are in the public eye constantly because of the position her father holds within the town as he is on the bench and the owner of the big birling and company and is due to marry gerald croft whose parents are very well-known also., eva smith is almost the opposite of the social scale to shelia. she has no friends or family to rely on and is quite an independent woman. she struggles to get by and is unable to cope with the strains that she is forced to be under at her age., at the beginning of the play we see shelia at the table with her family and how she is influenced by her family’s thoughts. she was quite childish and used petty excuses for her actions ‘i told him that if they didn’t get rid of that girl, i’d never go near the place again’. this shows that shelia had the same approach about how to treat others of the lower class as her father, which is not a good quality that shelia and arthur birling share., when we first hear of eva smith in the play we learn about the time that she experienced while working at birling and company. she was outspoken, resilient and gutsy as she led a group of workers on strike in an attempt to get higher wages ‘she’d had a lot to say-far too much- so she had to go’., there we see the huge difference in the lives that each of them live, but it is the way that shelia changes as the play goes on and learns more about eva smith’s life., once shelia knows more about the family’s effect on eva’s life she becomes more defiant, and mature. she begins to stand up to her parents who still look down on eva. she realises that there is no need to treat a person the way that the birling family did, no matter whether it was the same girl or not ‘everything we said had happened really hadn’t happened. if it didn’t end tragically, then that’s lucky for us. but it might have done.’ she has a more compassionate approach to eva and her life as she learns about the suffering that this girl the same age as herself had to go through., priestly shows the importance of caring for others within your community by showing that if the birling’s had looked after eva smith and treated her with any respect then maybe it would have prevented her suicide, because she would have been in a lot happier state of mind. this also takes place near to every one of us. if you treat one person unacceptably then you never know what effect that may have on them and others around them, if you do your bit to treat every person with decency that you meet then you will have no regrets with what you have done., priestly also shows through shelia that she was the next generation, with the new ideas of how people of another class should be treated and how the other birling’s are still living in the old, traditional frame of mind, which is harsh and uncaring to others. whereas shelia would be a middle aged woman when priestly wrote the book, he wanted to show the difference of views between the younger and older generations of 1912., shelia birling and eva smith are very different characters, but it is the effect that they can have on each other’s lives which highlights priestley’s views about community., to what extent could you argue that mr birling is the most important character in an inspector calls , as the ‘head of the household’ mr birling is, arguably, the central character to an inspector calls. throughout the beginning of the play he displays the kind of arrogance that priestley expected to see from a selfish capitalist; throughout the exchange, he is completely unapologetic about the death of eva; and after the inspector leaves, he tries his hardest to get out of trouble. also, if you argued that an inspector calls is really a morality play, then you could see mr birling as representing the deadly sins of greed and pride, both things that priestly attacked capitalists for., at the beginning of the play, mr birling is described as “heavy looking” which immediately reminds us of a large, well fed, rich man, enjoying the luxuries of life. his “easy manners” but “provincial speech” remind us that although he is now rich (as symbolised by his knowledge of manners) he is from working class roots (provincial means from the country, or of a lower class.) mr birling is one of those men who had made money during the industrial revolution and, priestley argues, was then exploiting the working classes for his own profit., during the opening exchanges over dinner, birling shows off to gerald croft – his daughter’s new fiancé – by mentioning some rather expensive port he bought, and then gives a long and stuffy speech about how lucky his children are to be born into a time of such good fortune. throughout the speech priestley uses a lot of dramatic irony as he mentions birling’s belief that there would be no labour issues (despite the fact that the russian revolution was just five years away;) there would be no war in germany (despite two being on the horizon,) and – in a moment of comedy – that the titanic was “unsinkable.” throughout this speech, audience members are reminded of how little we know about the future, and how important it is that we prepare for the unexpected. birling is shown to be arrogant, small minded, and selfish; all features that a socialist like priestley would expect to see in a capitalist like birling., priestly times the inspector’s arrival so that he cuts birling off during one of his selfish rants: “a man has to mind his own business and look after himself,” he is saying as the doorbell rings. his initial response to the inspector is immediately defensive: he delivers a short speech detailing the members of the local police force that he knows, and the fact that he used to be mayor. the inspector seems uninterested though. throughout their exchange birling makes it clear that he feels no responsibility saying a number of times that he had nothing to do with this “wretched” girl’s death. the use of this adjective is interesting as “wretched” can mean poor or downtrodden, but it can also mean disliked and disgusting; birling, we have to assume, feels both are true. at one point he argues, perfectly summarising priestley’s feelings about the attitude of people like birling: “i can't accept any responsibility. if we were all responsible for everything that happened to everybody we’d had anything to do with, it would be very awkward.”, during the remainder of the play, mr birling continues to reveal himself as being selfish and without regret. he is continually worried about the threat to his dreamt of knighthood and, when the chance arises, is even happy to direct all the blame at his young son, eric. he also tries to bribe the inspector, offering him “thousands” now it has all gone wrong, despite the fact that he wouldn’t pay her even a few shillings more at the time. throughout act 3, it is mr birling who leads the campaign to recognise the inspector as being a fraud and he is the most relieved when it turns out that there is no dead girl. however, unlike sheila, he isn’t relieved that no-one had died but is simply pleased to have saved his own hide., however, as the main character in the play mr birling receives both the opening and closing lines. in the end, it is him who is stuck, holding the phone and revealing that there is and “inspector on the way,” and in many ways it is him that the audience will be most pleased to see get his just deserts., what is the role of the inspector in an inspector calls , an inspector calls is a parable that was set during the belle époque (meaning the beautiful period) which lasted from 1870-1914. in the play, a family have their dinner party interrupted by an inspector who comes to visit. though this is a morality play in the traditional sense, its moral compass is very much set by the author’s belief in socialism ., the inspector arrives at a critical point. mr birling, the patriarch of his family, is delivering a lecture to his son and future son-in-law, about how “men must look after themselves…” in this way he is exposing his deep selfishness – one that priestly believed was at the heart of all capitalists. at this point there is a “sharp ring on the doorbell,” the adverb perhaps foreshadowing how the inspectors arrival will cut through the birlings’ veneer of respectability ., almost as soon as he arrives, mr birling reminds him of his own social standing – that he used to be mayor and has played golf with the chief inspector. the fact that mr birling is threatening the inspector is barely concealed , though the inspector brushes it aside. as a morality play, all the characters in an inspector calls represent something else - an ideal or social group or class. here, the birlings represent the wealthy and privileged elite while the inspector represents the newly educated middle classes, who would rise up and form a bridge between the elite and the working classes below them. the inspector, as becomes clear, is here to ensure that the birlings do not get away with how they treated eva smith., the inspector is described as giving an “impression of massiveness.” this is interesting as it makes it clear that he isn’t massive but should give that “impression.” as a direction this is a bit of a nightmare for a casting agent . he shouldn’t be big, but should have a gravitas that makes him seem huge. fortunately, however, priestley has written a part that gives every opportunity for moral superiority for an actor., also, from the moment he arrives the stage directions call for the lighting to change from “pink and intimate” – perhaps reflecting the rose - tinted spectacles through which the birlings view the world – and to something more “harsh.” perhaps this change is designed to highlight how the inspector’s arrival puts the birlings behaviour in the spotlight or exposes the lies they kept hidden in the shadows ., the first to fall to his inspection is mr birling, who sacked eva after she arranged for a strike amongst his workers while they demanded more pay. though birling admitted that she was a good worker, he clearly saw his profits threatened by her behaviour and made an example of her. mr birling’s children, however, do not share his selfishness and, as his son points out, “why shouldn’t they try for higher wages we try for bigger profits.” in many ways this quote exposes the selfish, unreasonable nature of capitalists : that they see their own right to desire more profits as god given , while those who resist are “troublemakers” and “cranks.”, after mr birling, the inspector turns to sheila, who had eva sacked from her job in a local department store. it is clear from the story – which sheila tells – that she was jealous of eva’s good looks. it is also clear, however, that sheila deeply regrets her actions. not long after this, mrs birling comments that sheila’s feelings have been changed and claims that the inspector has made an “impression” on her. this is a telling word – an “impression” is something that is the result of pressure, as though she’s been bullied into seeing things differently; but it is also something that often disappears over time. mrs birling’s feelings are clear: that the inspector’s ideas have affected sheila, but only fleetingly . the inspector replies dryly , acknowledging that he will often have an effect on the young. in many ways this reflects the old adage that young people are more socialist by nature, gradually turning to the more self-centred right as they grow. this is certainly the point that is being made by priestley, as the inspector affects the younger generation far more than their elders., after sheila, he turns to gerald who, again, reveals his own role in the death of eva. by this stage she is known as daisy renton – a name that perhaps reflects the fact her position: daisies are simple flowers that call to mind the innocence of daisy chains; while the appearance of “rent” in her name reminds us of what she did to her body in order to survive., the play continues to get darker as the inspector turns to mrs birling. under pressure she tells the inspector, and the audience, about how she turned away a young pregnant woman and that if the inspector was doing his job properly he should be chasing down the father. at this point, the audience know that she is talking about eric and are tensely waiting for the big reveal. in many respects it is also at this point that the audience is forced to reflect on the nature of this play: up until this moment, the action seems relatively realistic and, although the focus has been on only one character at any time, the focus has shifted around the room without any seeming construction . this time, however, the structure is too neat to be believed; it’s too well constructed to maintain the illusion of realism , and we know that we are watching a parable in which the inspector has an almost divine control over the action., after exposing the family’s “crimes” the inspector finally delivers his closing speech, which has all the hallmarks of a sermon that is delivered to the audience as much as it is to the family. in it, he reminds us of all the eva smiths and john smiths there are in the world, and that we are “one body.” here, the inspector is addressing both the audience in 1945 and the audience in 1912. the telling difference was the two world wars, during which the working classes proved themselves to be every bit as strong and resilient as their “social superiors.” the sense of national bonding that took place during the wars led to significant social changes in the uk, not least the creation of the nhs and the welfare state, and it was characters like the inspector (and priestley) who made sure this happened., his final warning, however, that “if we do not learn this lesson we will be taught it in fire and blood and anguish,” has a slightly different meaning in the two time periods. for the family in 1912 it was prophetic ; but for an audience in 1945 it would have been suggesting that the wars were almost a punishment for their behaviour, and a way of suggesting that if they didn’t embrace socialism now then the wars, and all the horrors that came with them, would return again., at the end of the play, the birlings receive a phone call which tells them that a real police inspector is on the way, to talk about a girl who has recently died. this final moment raises questions about the role of the inspector goole we’ve just watched, and it is at this point that his name seems important: is he a goole, or a ghoul, or something else from some other world is he some angelic messenger send to bring divine judgement that question is never answered, though the audience – or the young ones at least – should have no doubts that his understanding of the world is from a “higher” place., another essay on the role of the inspector in an inspector calls ., this essay's structure is as follows:, a summary paragraph, how the inspector is introduced, mr birling and the inspector – good for ao2, a “panic” paragraph – without quotes – that picks up on some key moments from the rest of the play – good for ao1, the inspector at the end, in the play an inspector calls, a police inspector brings judgement to a rich family who live in 1912. the play is a morality play, in which each of the characters represents a particular role or opinion. in this morality play, the inspector promotes a socialist understanding of the world in a way that reflects the views of the play’s author jb priestley., when the inspector arrives he cuts off mr birling’s lecture when he is saying that “ a man must look after himself and his family …” this interruption symbolises the way that inspector is going to stop mr birling’s views. also, it says that there is a “ sharp ring on the doorbell .” the word “ sharp ” suggests that the inspector will cut through mr birling’s selfish ideas. also, from the moment he arrives the stage directions call for the lighting to change from “ pink and intimate ” to something more “ harsh .” this is because the birlings see the world through as being nice and friendly while the inspector will bring a “ harsh ” judgement on them., in the play, the inspector works as a foil to mr birling’s selfish capitalism. at the beginning of the play, mr birling calls socialists “ cranks ” – which means crazy – and says that if we all listened to socialists we’d be like “ bees in a hive .” this remark criticises socialists as bees lack individuality, they work almost like a big machine, and only do what they’re told and mr birling doesn’t want the world to be like this. the inspector, however, believes that we are “ members of one body ” and that we are “ responsible for each other .” in this way, the inspector is talking about the socialist ideas which suggest that because we all live together we should look after each other. in fact, he goes on to suggest that if we don’t learn to do this we will “ taught it in fire and blood and anguish .” this is clearly a reference to the two world wars which were fought between the time the play was set and when it was written. it is also telling that mr birling didn’t think the wars would happen – he would probably have referred to that as being an idea from some kind of “ crank .”, at the beginning of the play mr birling threatens the inspector by saying that he plays golf with the chief inspector. the inspector, however, doesn’t care and carries on his investigation. throughout the play, the inspector acts like he doesn’t care about the characters social standings and only wants to focus on the facts. he is someone logical and he doesn’t care what people think of him. he just wants the truth about eva’s death. he also has a habit of looking “hard” at the person he is addressing. this is because he is inspecting them, almost as though he’s looking through them and into their soul., in the end the inspector leaves and we are left unsure as to whether he was real or not. however, because his name is inspector goole – which sounds similar to ghoul (which is a kind of spirit or ghost) – the audience would be within their rights to think of him as a kind of spiritual prophet or divine messenger., a third essay on the role of the inspector in an inspector calls , jb priestley uses the story of an inspector calls to contrast the differences between upper/upper-middle and working class people in society during the edwardian times. the inspector questions the birling family to think about the consequences of their actions on others – predominately the working class and people whom they believe to be inferior to them. priestley uses the inspector to make society question their morals and think about accepting responsibility for their actions. each character reacts differently to the inspector and priestley uses this to represent capitalist vs socialist ideals., - nice opening – clear and specific and leaves the examiner comfortable that you know what you’re doing. may be a bit long – though it is all meaningful, when the inspector enters the birling household, the stage directions states that the lights change from ‘pink and intimate’ to ‘brighter and harder’. this shows how the presence of the inspector changes the atmosphere and how he is here for a purpose. the lighting change from ‘pink and intimate’ to ‘brighter and harder’ almost shows how the inspector is going to burst the birling’s protected, capitalist bubble. the idea of the lights being ‘brighter and harder’ create the idea of a spotlight shining on the birling family and how the inspector is there to expose them to the truth. in the stage directions, it also says that the inspector ‘creates an impression of massiveness’. this shows that although the birling’s are superior to him in class, the inspector still holds the authority over them all. it could also be foreshadowing that the inspector is going to create a lasting ‘impression’ over the birling family and impact their lives hopefully for the better., - super cool lots of detail, specific things being said and focusing on sections of the text. this is what you want to do, in act one, mr birling makes several threats to the inspector about his connections with the chief constable. this shows how mr birling feels threatened and uncomfortable with the inspectors presence. he tries to assert his authority over the inspector to protect himself and his pride as he’s being questioned by someone who is inferior to himself. he doesn’t want to damage his reputation and all he is thinking about is himself. this represents the capitalist society and how they refuse to think of any but themselves and how they will go to any measure to protect their reputation. mr birling also tries to emphasise his importance to the inspector by mentioning gerald and his family name. he says, “perhaps i ought to explain first that this is mr gerald croft – the son of sir george croft – you know, crofts limited.” by mentioning gerald’s family name, it shows how mr birling is trying to intimidate the inspector. also, mr birling could be mentioning the croft name to try to make himself feel more in control of the situation and back in the superior position in the room. priestley uses the reaction of mr birling to the inspector to represent how people of the upper capitalist class use their positions of power as an excuse to be ignorant to their actions. priestley wanted make people aware of this to questions their own ignorance., - again, this is great. you show a clear understanding of the relationship between birling and the inspector and clearly explain the power dynamic in the room, at the end of the play, the inspector makes a big final speech to the birling family. it opens with a reminder that there are thousands of “john smiths and eva smiths” in the world. this reminds the audience that we all have to accept responsibility for our actions and realise it is not enough to only think of ourselves but we must think of others as well. the inspector then goes on to say that “we don't live alone. we are members of one body. we are responsible for each other.” these three concise sentences summarise the lesson priestley was trying to convey to the audience. by keeping the sentences short but powerful, it leaves a lasting impression on the birling family but more importantly, the audience. this links to the beginning stage direction of the inspector creating an ‘impression of massiveness’. he then warns the family (and audience) that if ‘men don’t soon learn their lesson they will be taught in fire and blood and anguish’. this is a reference to the many years of war that had taken place between when the play was set and when it was performed. it could be seen to be served as a warning to the people that they need to change their actions or history will repeat itself., - really good as well. you’ve focused in on specific techniques here and shown a clear understanding of how those techniques have effects., overall, this is a very good essay – it’s got a wide range of detailed quotes, points and pieces of analysis. it could be improved with a few moments where you zoom in on specific words and explore the meaning of them – think about mr birling saying he “can’t” take responsibility, or mrs birling saying she “won’t” take responsibility and the inspector saying “we are responsible.” this kind of link will push this essay up into the 8-9 category., what is the significance of the ending in an inspector calls , in effect, ‘an inspector calls’ has arguably three endings, or climaxes. the first is the final speech of the inspector, before he exits dramatically, walking ‘straight out’. the second is as the family think it all may have been a ‘fake’. the third represents the justice in the final words of the play., priestly ensures that the inspector says little in the way of moral judgment until just before he exits. this in itself increases dramatic tension – the audience is waiting for a confrontation which is dependent on all the facts of the story finally emerging. his final speech is based on the great moral authority he has gained through the entirety of the play and is in a sense cathartic. as an ‘inspector’, he is symbolic of the moral and legal authority of the police force. ‘inspecting’ carries the idea of sifting carefully though the actions of the birlings in a detailed and objective manner. priestley adds objectivity and legal precision to the inspector’s character; thus by the climax of his investigation, we, the audience, instinctively trust his moral conclusions also. there is a sense of relief in hearing the birlings finally being condemned for their actions., the inspector’s final speech is, in tone, almost a sermon. the frequent use of blunt, short diction is combined with imperatives which make him seem almost a preacher or a prophetic figure, as he tells the birlings to “remember this”, and tells them that “we are responsible for each other.” although he uses often the first person plural to emphasise their common humanity, he is also accusatory with his use of ‘you’ as he threatens them with what will come if they fail to learn this lesson. the imagery priestley draw from is biblical by nature. from the eucharist service, the inspector uses the biblical metaphor that we are all “members of one body”. the well-known nature of this metaphor makes it seemingly self-evidently true to the audience. the apocalyptic imagery that follows is equally well-known, as the inspector promises “fire and blood and anguish”. the tricolon is heavily emphatic and emotive – the birlings’ rejection of it, which follows swiftly, creates a further sense of their moral vacuity. this sermonic end to the inspector’s presence onstage makes him seem a didactic mouthpiece for the play – he speaks in effect as much to the audience as to the birlings. although it is a relatively brief and restrained speech, nonetheless it is a powerful end – it seems – to the drama., birling’s absence of moral epiphany is enacted in the second ‘ending’ of the play in the ‘huge sigh of relief’ he emits when he discovers that the inspector is not actually from the police station. he rejects the inspector’s final words through this stage direction which creates a dramatic hyperbole that it is impossible for the audience to miss. eva smith’s name suggests that she represents all of the ordinary humanity, eva suggesting eve of genesis, symbolically the mother of humanity, and smith being a stereotypical working-class surname. thus birling’s ‘huge’ indifference is, symbolically, to the suffering of any human being, particularly those who are his socially inferior. indeed, his estimations of people’s worth have been entirely based on their money or their social connections; early on in the play he attempts at first to threaten the inspector by explicitly ‘warning him that the chief constable, colonel roberts, is an ‘old friend’ of his. birling’s ‘relief’ therefore is that his place in society is not damaged after all – even though it is based on corruption and inhumanity towards whose who are weaker and more socially vulnerable than him. thus birling has learned nothing at all in the play., further, birling is ‘triumphant’ when he decides that the story is nothing more than ‘moonshine’. ‘triumph’ suggests victory and winning – birling’s delight is based on his perception that he will not be in any way held to account for his misdeeds. ‘moonshine’ is a dismissive colloquialism – priestley uses this to emphasise that there is no emotional impact whatsoever on birling for the suffering of eva smith and those whom she represents. this is accentuated by mrs birling’s suggestion that in the morning eric and sheila will be as ‘amused’ as they are. the tragedy of what happened to eva through her circumstances and through the undeserved actions of others is in effect diminished to a joke. priestley ensures that this anticlimactic interpretation of the play’s events by mrs birling is morally repugnant to the audience. the older birlings and gerald are villainesque, antagonistic figures., sheila is partly redeemed from the birling’s self-seeking immorality. sheila’s response to birling’s ‘relief’ is to accuse him of ‘pretending’ that all is well. this accusation of play-acting creates an ironic role-reversal, as though birling is the one childishly refusing to engage with reality, and she becomes the parent-figure who rebukes him for his immaturity. this childishness is not an indication of birling’s innocence, but of his lack of responsibility. sheila is the youthful one in the conversation, but she is the one who is vulnerable to the corruption of her parents, and she lacks meaningful power. partly also because of her gender, she is, like eva, the victim of birling’s philosophy of greed – and yet the awakening of her moral awareness is presented as a coming-of-age epiphany. she learns to reject the selfishness and inhumanity of her parents as she realises that all the working-class are intrinsically human beings. she absorbs the relatively complex moral didacticism the inspector represents with regards to the interconnectedness of human society. this is particularly shown by her quoting the exact words of the inspector’s apocalyptic list of consequences if the rich fail to heed the social situation: she quotes his words of ‘fire and blood and anguish’. although she shows no explicit awareness of the social apocalypse of which the inspector warns, she recalls what ‘he made me feel’. her emotional engagement is presented in ironic juxtaposition with her parents’ emotional disengagement. priestley redeems her partly to show the morally repugnant nature of the birlings’ lack of redemption, through juxtaposing their response with hers., the unrepentant birlings are presented by priestley as grotesque not only through their failure to realise their wrong-doing, but also, and more importantly in their seeking of moral superiority over eva smith and the workers she represents. the callous self-righteousness they exhibit is best portrayed in mrs birling’s rhetorical question, ‘why shouldn’t we’ when sheila asks how they possibly can continue as they were before. the fact she considers the question to need no actual answer indicates her moral blindness – it indicates her assumption that the rightr of the powerful to abuse the poor is irrefutable and self-evident. priestley, through the drama, shows how society creates moral indifference to the working-class., the superficiality is also epitomised in gerald’s statement that ‘everything is all right now.’ this bland cliché becomes ironically extremely emotive for the audience as we know that the lack of a moral compass for the birlings and gerald means that others will be treated just as eva was. the superficiality of this analysis has great dramatic power to repulse the audience – and perhaps to begin to effect the social change priestley desired., the third and final ‘ending’ is mysterious. at one level, it satisfies the audience’s hope that there will be justice for eva. by instructing the actors to look ‘guiltily’ around, priestly ensures that the moral indifference of the second ending is not the concluding note of the play. birling speaking on the phone when the person has ‘rung off’ indicates also that his social authority is over; creating the sense that there is justice has lost what he really cared about. the inspector’s semi-comical surname, ‘goole’ also seems relevant right at the play’s climax. there is the suggestion that he did indeed in some way represent supernatural forces intervening in the birlings’ lives to bring justice for eva. however, the play by its nature ends inconclusively. in effect, we are left on a cliffhanger wondering what the ‘real’ police inspector will do. perhaps this reflects priestley’s aim for the audience to think about the play’s social message. the ending of ‘an inspector calls’ is a strong statement of the responsibility of those who seek money and social rank at the expense of humanity. it is strongly didactic and powerful., check this essay.
There are drastic differences that are seen in people who are born in different generations. One may argue that the younger generations are more impressionable and naive while the older generations are very hardheaded and assertive. By creating characters like Sheila and Eric with a large age gap between Mr. and Mrs. Birling in the play An Inspector Calls, tension is created through their differences clashing. J.B. Priestley’s use of contrasting characterization within the Birling family in the play An Inspector Calls creates tension and communicates his theme that one must take into consideration the consequences of their actions and take responsibility for them.
The Birling’s children, Erica and Sheila, are presumed to be very naive and still listening and agreeing with their parent’s words due to their ages. Yet, thought the play both Eric and Sheila prove to be mentally mature and responsible while directly reflect the inspector’s message. Eric Birling was caught up in the complicated situation relating to the death of Eva Smith through his role in impregnating her. Although he is ashamed, he steps up to the plate and confesses his actions and even admits to the fact that “I wasn’t in love with her or anything”, yet he understands that his actions did produce consequences and he takes responsibility for them. He insists on giving her enough money to keep her going, even though it included stealing money from his father (Priestley 50). This action was done unjustly, yet it shows how determined Eric was in order to fix his mistake and take responsibility for his actions- exactly what the Inspector teaches. Sheila Birling, the sister of Eric, also starts out by admitting to her role in the death of Eva. She expresses her sorrow and regret for her actions stating how “It was my own fault… and if I could help her now, I would” right away (24-25). Even though she did not take action like Eric did, she still takes responsibility for her actions and shows that she really does care about the consequences she was unable to attend to. As the play continues and everyone finds out that inspector Goole was a fake, the parents of Sheila and Eric both start to downplay the events of that evening. Suddenly the tension starts to rise as soon as the children speak directly against their parents stating “if you must know it’s you two who are being childish” (55). Sheila is so disgusted by the actions of her parents, that her character takes an unpredictable turn and she evolves into a brave young woman annoyed enough to scold her own parents. Even Eric states directly to his parents that “well, I don’t blame you. But don’t forget i’m ashamed of you as well. Yes- both of you” (54). The characters Sheila and Eric create tension in the play through their differences regarding their view on taking responsibility that contrasts greatly with their parents. The fact that the younger generation is standing up to the older generation and doing unconventional actions like scolding them, the main theme of the novel is clearly represented.
The older generation in the Birling family consists of strong characters: unlikely to sway in their ideas easily, hard headed, and arrogant. Arthur too is confronted about his dealings with Eva Smith, but immediately states that “the girl has been causing trouble in the works. I was quite justified (19). Here, he is seemingly ok knowing that she was forced to kill herself all because of something that started out with him originally and a sign of regret is not to be found. The younger generation, prominently Sheila is verbally pointing out her contrasting viewpoint directly saying (to Mr. Birling) “I think it was a mean thing to do” (21). Tension is created as a result of her comment, but in a way she forces her father to re-examine at his actions by him hearing an opposite viewpoint and internally contemplate her and the Inspector’s message. Another situation that increases the tension overall is when Sheila hears her father describe Eva as cheap labour, and automatically she jumps in stating “but these girls aren’t cheap labour – they’re people” clearly showcasing the differences in the mindset of the two generations (19). Lastly, Mrs. Birling gets confronted with her mistake and does admit to her actions. Her arrogance shows through when she plainly lays out her thoughts to the inspector that “if you think you can bring any pressure to bear upon me, Inspector, you’re quite mistaken. Unlike the other three, I did nothing I’m ashamed of or that won’t bear investigation… You have no power to change my mind” and like Mr. Birling does not have a hint of regret in her (44). Sybil Birling is blinded to the problems within her household and herself, and therefore tension is created when she directly contradicts the viewpoints of her children. The theme of the play is brought out because of this, when the children start to argue their point about accepting responsibility for their actions’ consequences.
Through tension between the characters, the main theme that we don’t live alone, are members of one body, and are responsible for each other is revealed. Sadly for this to be revealed, tension is built greatly dividing the Birling family- the younger vs the older generation. The children desperately try to get their parents to accept what they believe is the inspector’s lesson and purpose for visiting, yet Arthur and Sybil are set on the idea that they are just “the famous younger generation who know it all. And they can’t even take a joke” (72). Although it may be true that the inspector is not real and the older generation will never learn, the main theme is being communicated successfully to the audience. By looking at Mr. and Mrs. Birling and the way they instigate an attack on themselves by their children, the audience feels disgusted by them and the theme reaches the audience.
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay The LitCharts.com logo.](https://assets.litcharts.com/assets/reskin/small-logo-a5f71ddf742efc8224556c5af660e50a78055adc5f4beaf27d9b589498298326.png)
- Ask LitCharts AI
- Discussion Question Generator
- Essay Prompt Generator
- Quiz Question Generator
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Guides](https://assets.litcharts.com/assets/reskin/promo/pdf-downloads-75c06148cea63e2260e73ef26ed7f5a40621da89b65622ab42e07ba5441e8eeb.png)
- Literature Guides
- Poetry Guides
- Shakespeare Translations
- Literary Terms
An Inspector Calls
J. b. priestley.
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay mrs birling an inspector calls essay](https://assets.litcharts.com/assets/reskin/mobile-menu/pdf-fan-dfd1c1a7ddc45b11f06d3dcff0a4d52c148abd2b517bf3a410f632ecb66bd51d.png)
Ask LitCharts AI: The answer to your questions
Character Analysis |
Mrs. Birling Quotes in An Inspector Calls
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Wealth, Power, and Influence Theme Icon](https://assets.litcharts.com/icons/an-inspector-calls-wealth-power-and-influence.small.white.desktop.png)
You know, of course, that my husband was Lord Mayor only two years ago and that he’s still a magistrate?
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Wealth, Power, and Influence Theme Icon](https://assets.litcharts.com/icons/an-inspector-calls-wealth-power-and-influence.medium.white.desktop.png)
You’ve had children. You must have known what she was feeling. And you slammed the door in her face.
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Blame and Responsibility Theme Icon](https://assets.litcharts.com/icons/an-inspector-calls-blame-and-responsibility.medium.white.desktop.png)
There’ll be plenty of time, when I’ve gone, for you all to adjust your family relationships.
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Public versus Private Theme Icon](https://assets.litcharts.com/icons/an-inspector-calls-public-versus-private.medium.white.desktop.png)
This girl killed herself—and died a horrible death. But each of you helped to kill her. Remember that. Never forget it. But then I don’t think you ever will.
Whoever that chap was, the fact remains that I did what I did. And Mother did what she did. And the rest of you did what you did to her. It’s still the same rotten story whether it’s been told to a police inspector or to somebody else.
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Morality and Legality Theme Icon](https://assets.litcharts.com/icons/an-inspector-calls-morality-and-legality.medium.white.desktop.png)
- Quizzes, saving guides, requests, plus so much more.
An Inspector Calls: Characters ( AQA GCSE English Literature )
Revision note.
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Nick](https://www.savemyexams.com/cdn-cgi/image/f=auto,width=3840/https://cdn.savemyexams.com/uploads/2023/03/nick---english-literature-revision-expert---save-my-exams.jpg)
It is vital that you understand that characters are often used symbolically to express ideas. Priestley uses all of his characters to symbolise various ideas prevalent in his society, and the differences between characters reflect contemporary debates. Therefore it is very useful not only to learn about each character individually but how they compare and contrast to other characters in the play. Below you will find character profiles of:
Arthur Birling
Sybil birling, sheila birling, eric birling, gerald croft, inspector goole, eva smith/daisy renton.
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay an-inspector-calls-arthur-birling](https://cdn.savemyexams.com/cdn-cgi/image/f=auto,width=402,height=241/uploads/2024/01/an-inspector-calls-arthur-birling.png)
- Birling is the patriarch of the family and is presented as an arrogant and pompous character throughout the play
- Priestley’s description conveys Birling’s self-indulgence and self-importance, arrogantly trying to impress all around him
- His regional accent signifies his lower-class status in comparison to his wife and Gerald Croft
- By the end of the play, Arthur faces exposure to a public scandal and loss of his reputation which would present a terrible downfall for him
- As a wealthy factory owner, Priestley presents Birling as a caricature of a Capitalist businessman which is in direct opposition to Inspector Goole’s Socialist aspirations
- While he is indifferent to the plight of his workers, it could be argued that there is nothing dreadfully abhorrent about his treatment of his workers
- Priestley does not indicate that Arthur delights in punishing his workers but simply that any empathy towards them is severely lacking
- He believes everyone should be responsible for themselves and is devoid of any sympathy for those less fortunate than himself
- Birling’s optimism for the future is superficial and his predictions demonstrate his complacency
- However, this suits him, for he has much to lose if things were to change
- He is brusque towards the Inspector and treats Eric and Sheila as foolish and naïve
- Arthur is unwilling to change because his personal beliefs do not allow him to do this
- He is blind to the consequences of his own actions and repeatedly defends himself, directs blame at others and tries desperately to try and cover up the tragedy
- Arthur tries to limit the damage to himself and his family but he can only do so by distorting or minimising the truth
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay an-inspector-calls-sybil-birling](https://cdn.savemyexams.com/cdn-cgi/image/f=auto,width=397,height=238/uploads/2024/01/an-inspector-calls-sybil-birling.png)
- Her demeanour throughout the play is unchanged and she remains snobbish, uncaring and dismissive of others
- Similar to her husband, she is extremely conscious of her high social position
- However, she is presented as more arrogant, dismissive and prejudiced than him
- She treats the Inspector as socially inferior
- She refuses to believe that Eva would turn down stolen money as she is not capable of the same level of morality as the upper classes
- She refuses to use Eva’s name and refers to her only as a “girl”, as though Eva is not worthy of being recognised as an individual
- She is a prominent member of a local women’s charity but her role is not due to a concern for others less fortunate than herself, but as a symbol of status
- She is indifferent to the fact that she refused assistance to Eva and her grandchild and is devoid of any empathy for them
- In Act III, her callousness is further revealed:
- When she realises her son is the father of the child, she still maintains that the charity ought to deny assistance to people it considers undeserving of aid
- To an audience, Sybil’s appalling behaviour and cold detachment would be incomprehensible:
- This would be heightened further as she is both a woman and a mother
- As a character, Sybil could be perceived as someone who fails fully to perceive those around her:
- Alternatively, she may be deliberately turning a blind eye to any reality which contradicts her reassuring image of both herself and her family
- When confronted by the revelation that she indirectly contributed to the death of Eva and her grandchild, she comforts herself by insisting that she had done her duty
- She initially refuses to believe Eric could be the father of Eva’s child and refuses to acknowledge he has a problem with alcohol
- Both Sybil and her husband are concerned with preserving a respectable fa ç ade
- By the end of the play, Sybil remains deeply entrenched in her prejudiced ways and unchanged:
- She is the least affected character by the tragedy and could be perceived to be the most resistant to the Inspector’s message
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay an-inspector-calls-eric-birling](https://cdn.savemyexams.com/cdn-cgi/image/f=auto,width=394,height=236/uploads/2024/01/an-inspector-calls-eric-birling.png)
- Eric’s description at the beginning of the play denotes his lack of confidence and social awkwardness
- This is in stark contrast to the other characters on stage, especially Gerald
- However, he struggles to confront them to any great extent and they are largely dismissive of any opinions he puts forward
- He contradicts his parents on many occasions in Act I:
- While this could be perceived to be displaying some sympathy towards the strikers in his father’s factory, his retorts to his parents may simply be due to his hostility towards them
- Eric is presented as a weak character:
- Eric tries to leave when he suspects the Inspector may want to question him and initially avoids taking responsibility for his actions
- Eric plays a largely insignificant role in the first two acts of the play:
- This enables the other characters in the play to dominate proceedings
- It is not until Act III when Priestley forces Eric to confess his affair with Eva and to admit she was pregnant with his child
- He develops at the end of the play and becomes more assertive towards his parents
- During Eric’s confession, his language is emotional (“you killed them both – damn you, damn you”) and sharply contrasted with that of his parents’:
- He heavily criticises his mother’s treatment of Eva Smith
- Arthur, Sybil and Gerald rejoice on having discovered the Inspector was a fraud:
- In contrast, both Eric and his sister are at pains to focus on the lessons that they all must now learn, regardless of whether the Inspector was real
- He reveals Eva did not want him to enter her room until he issued a threat, thus exposing the vulnerability of women
- While Gerald hints that he may have been in love with Eva, Eric admits he was not and so his behaviour could be viewed as more cruel
- In his confession, Eric hints at the potential for sexual violence:
- Despite being first presented as weak, Eric becomes a much more assertive character by the end of the play:
- He is ashamed and regretful over his conduct with Eva
- In part, he presents a symbol of hope for the attitudes of the younger generation
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay an-inspector-calls-sheila-birling](https://cdn.savemyexams.com/cdn-cgi/image/f=auto,width=401,height=240/uploads/2024/01/an-inspector-calls-sheila-birling.png)
- At the beginning of Act I, she appears self-interested, relishing her engagement to Gerald which initially aligns her with her family’s shallow and materialistic outlook
- She dramatically exits the stage when first shown a photograph of Eva and appears genuinely regretful of her actions
- Although many of the others refuse to accept responsibility, Sheila quickly shows a greater maturity than to how she is first depicted by Priestley
- Further, when Gerald’s affair is exposed, she again demonstrates maturity in her understanding of his affair and applauds his honest confession
- She comments how Gerald stayed away from her all the previous summer, alluding to his affair with Eva/Daisy
- She accuses Eric of being drunk, foreshadowing his drinking problem
- She is the first to suspect the inauthenticity of the Inspector, though understands this is irrelevant
- This is sharply contrasted with the pompous language of her father and the condescending tone of her mother
- Her dialogue reveals her sensitive nature and her compassion and empathy for others less fortunate than herself
- Similarly, her dialogue demonstrates her increasing assertiveness toward her parents
- While Eric echoes many of his sister’s sentiments, Sheila is a much more assertive and alluring character than her brother
- By the end of the play, she refuses to continue her engagement with Gerald even though he claims “everything’s all right now”
- She represents the younger generation and provides an element of hope
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay an-inspector-calls-gerald-croft](https://cdn.savemyexams.com/cdn-cgi/image/f=auto,width=402,height=241/uploads/2024/01/an-inspector-calls-gerald-croft.png)
- Gerald’s description presents him in a positive light and he is shown to be confident, amiable and polite
- As the social superior of the Birling family, he represents immense privilege
- He agrees with Arthur’s dismissal of Eva because of her participation in a pay strike
- This is in sharp contrast to Mr and Mrs Birling’s confrontational behaviour
- He can be viewed as a more sympathetic character:
- He is open to the Inspector’s questioning and to some extent appears to present an honest account of his dealings with Eva
- He presents himself having rescued Eva, though this could be viewed as self-justification for his actions
- However, his affair could be perceived to demonstrate upper-class sexual hypocrisy and irresponsibility:
- He discards Eva when he loses interest in her
- He first attempts to hide details of his affair from Sheila
- His first reaction to the dead girl is to distance himself from it though he does show empathy towards her
- Although he is still culpable, Gerald could be perceived to be the least blameworthy character in the play:
- While both Gerald and Eric exploit Eva/Daisy, Gerald’s behaviour towards her was not cruel and he appears to have been sincerely concerned for her
- While Gerald feels genuine regret for his treatment of Eva, it is short-lived and he ultimately fails to change:
- His guilt is only temporary and he celebrates with the Birlings on avoiding a scandal
- By offering the ring again to Sheila at the end of the play, he shows he has not learnt anything from the Inspector
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay an-inspector-calls-inspector-goole](https://cdn.savemyexams.com/cdn-cgi/image/f=auto,width=399,height=239/uploads/2024/01/an-inspector-calls-inspector-goole.png)
- He is presented as a powerful figure with an imposing presence
- Priestley deliberately presents the Inspector as a mysterious character and this is further heightened by the series of revelations at the end the play
- Priestley enables the Inspector to have an apparent awareness of Eva’s death before it has occurred, which also adds an almost supernatural element
- The lighting changes from “pink and intimate” to “brighter and harder” to suggest that the Inspector will place the characters under great scrutiny
- He exudes an air of authority through his language and actions
- The Inspector controls when each character sees the photograph of Eva, creating intrigue and suspense
- He also controls the unfolding of events and the characters themselves
- The Inspector’s language is carefully composed and moralistic in tone
- The Inspector speaks purposefully and with great assurance which conveys an impression of great knowledge
- All of the characters are judged by him but he offers neither punishment nor forgiveness as the characters must judge themselves and others
- The Inspector tries to prevent the group from evading responsibility
- The Inspector delivers the most significant and weighty statements in the play
- As a character he does not change or develop
- Presented as the play’s victim, the audience never meets Eva Smith/Daisy Renton:
- The audience relies on the Inspector, and his interrogation of the other characters, to reveal her character
- The Inspector also uses Eva’s diary as a device to reveal her personal feelings and intimate account of events
- She is first introduced to the audience through a graphic and horrific account of her suicide:
- This imagery is used to shock the audience and create empathy for her predicament
- The revelation that Eva was pregnant at the time, makes her death appear even more ruthless and pitiable
- Eva is used as a symbol of the working-classes and is presented as a vulnerable working-class woman, exploited and marginalised by those within a privileged Capitalist system:
- Eva is exploited by all of the Birling family and Gerald
- She is presented as the innocent and principled victim
- She has higher moral standards than the Birling family and Gerald:
- Her moral code makes her death more shocking
- While Eva is inevitably the victim of the play, it could be viewed that Priestley has depicted her as a very idealised character:
- She is presented as entirely flawless throughout the play which makes the other characters appear even worse
In the exam, the idea of character as a conscious construct should be evident throughout your response. You should demonstrate a firm understanding that Priestley has deliberately created these characters to perform certain functions within his play.
For instance, you could begin to consider why Priestley has chosen to present the character of Eva Smith in the way that he does. As an audience, we only learn about her through fragmented information from what the other characters say about her. Try to explore reasons as to why Priestley may have chosen to present her in this way.
You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes
Get unlimited access.
to absolutely everything:
- Downloadable PDFs
- Unlimited Revision Notes
- Topic Questions
- Past Papers
- Model Answers
- Videos (Maths and Science)
Join the 100,000 + Students that ❤️ Save My Exams
the (exam) results speak for themselves:
Did this page help you?
Author: Nick
Nick is a graduate of the University of Cambridge and King’s College London. He started his career in journalism and publishing, working as an editor on a political magazine and a number of books, before training as an English teacher. After nearly 10 years working in London schools, where he held leadership positions in English departments and within a Sixth Form, he moved on to become an examiner and education consultant. With more than a decade of experience as a tutor, Nick specialises in English, but has also taught Politics, Classical Civilisation and Religious Studies.
PMT Education is looking for a full-time Customer Support Specialist
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay PMT](https://www.physicsandmathstutor.com/wp-content/uploads/Header-Physics-Maths-Tutor.png)
An Inspector Calls
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Dalia 's Profile Picture](https://d2zflxi8c5z44f.cloudfront.net/public/tutor/images/U5yFol9GtPHraql2vAdDlIyVxExW0CW1.jpg)
University of Leeds - MA International Education Policy and Leadership
Oxford qualified and experienced teacher offering tuition in English Language and Literature
- Qualified Teacher
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay PMT Education](https://www.physicsandmathstutor.com/wp-content/uploads/favicon-pmt.png)
Notes || Exam Prep || Character Profiles || Themes || Additional Reading & Videos
This topic is included in Paper 2 . You can find notes and guides for it below.
- Overview and Key Scenes
- Glossary of Key Terms
- Definitions Flashcards
- Guide to Paper 2
- How to plan and write a top mark essay
- Question Bank - Characters
- Question Bank - Relationships
- Question Bank - Themes
Additional Reading & Videos
- An Inspector Calls (2017 film version)
Character Profiles
- Eric Birling
- Gerald Croft
- Mrs Birling
- Sheila Birling
- The Inspector
- Capitalism vs Socialism
- Exploitation
- Generations Young vs Old
- Social Class
- Social Responsibility
- Wealth and Materialism
Connect with PMT Education!
- Revision Courses
- Past Papers
- Solution Banks
- University Admissions
- Numerical Reasoning
- Legal Notices
Mr Birling Analysis
Role of mr birling.
Mr Birling is head of the household and family and displays a stereotypical upper-class pre-war attitude.
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Illustrative background for Role in the family](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2018-03/28081f54-87c9-4160-8f72-7c246a3f88f3/shutterstock_213645808,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
Role in the family
- He is the head of the household and family in a patriarchal (male ruled) society.
- He is in charge of the finances (money).
- He is the owner of a factory.
- He encourages Sheila’s marriage to Gerald to secure his links to the upper-class Croft family.
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Illustrative background for Role in the play](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2018-03/9c741c17-141e-4710-9b03-db303ad3a90a/shutterstock_708489058,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
![](http://serviteca.online/777/templates/cheerup2/res/banner1.gif)
Role in the play
- He portrays a stereotypical upper-class pre-war attitude – people should only help themselves and not take responsibility for others.
- His priorities are to make money and cement his high social status.
- He is only concerned about himself – he wants the knighthood and the marriage to take place so he can improve his social status.
- He believes that people have to make their own ways in life, and that everyone should look after themselves.
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Illustrative background for Connection to Eva](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2018-03/29d69613-faec-4553-af47-bff4dead303d/shutterstock_2164828,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
Connection to Eva
- Mr Birling fired Eva Smith because she led a group of workers in seeking a pay rise and going on strike.
- He takes no responsibility for his actions.
Mr Birling - Character Development
Here's an overview of how Mr Birling's character evolves (or does not evolve!) over the play:
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Illustrative background for Foolish](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2018-03/49602ee0-90fd-4acf-840c-3b0099219373/shutterstock_744196837,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
- Priestley highlights Mr Birling as an ultimately foolish character, who likes to tell everyone how great their future will be.
- Priestley uses dramatic irony (when the audience knows something the characters don’t) here to show the audience that Birling was naïve and idiotic.
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Illustrative background for Obsessed with power](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2018-03/9fe7397f-451b-4cfa-905b-7d480012c8ec/shutterstock_245161015,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
Obsessed with power
- Mr Birling is shown as being in control and in charge right from the start of the play.
- Mr Birling tries to intimidate Inspector Goole into leaving or changing his questioning. He doesn’t know how to cope with the fact that Goole isn’t impressed, or intimidated, by him.
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Illustrative background for Obsessed with social status](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2018-03/daf01400-543c-4342-a5ab-563fca1b63b9/shutterstock_583543753,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
Obsessed with social status
- He is furious that a man of a lower social class treats Birling like everyone else – he doesn’t receive special treatment because of his higher social class, something he cannot accept.
- Mr Birling is obsessed with his future knighthood, as he feels that this will increase his social status and make him look great among his upper-class peers.
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Illustrative background for Unwilling to change or learn from actions](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2018-03/936cb0a1-5ab0-4df1-9d1d-e105a7cddde6/shutterstock_195618725,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
Unwilling to change or learn from actions
- When the family discover that Inspector Goole does not work for the local police force, Birling is very happy to forget the whole thing and to forget any possible consequences of his actions.
- Mr Birling does not learn from the story of Eva Smith – instead, he only cares about it when he fears that the story might be made public, which could damage his reputation.
- He cares about himself, not about how his actions affect others.
- By the end of the play, Mr Birling has not changed at all – is this why they get a second visit from a real police inspector? Does Inspector Goole act as a warning, which they do not take?
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Illustrative background for Bad father](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2018-03/f0da0c36-515d-4c53-b205-2de0ab5f69ce/shutterstock_289096661,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
- We also learn that Mr Birling has alienated (isolated) his son – when he tells Eric he should have come to him for help, Eric replies that Birling isn’t the type of father a son could ask for help.
- Even within their family, their relationships are fragile (could break easily) and fake – Birling seems to be the caring father so he looks good, but is actually not.
Significance of Mr Birling
Priestley uses Mr Birling to show the negative aspects of wealth and capitalism. Mr Birling represents the older, upper-class generation that caused many deaths in war. Priestley also uses Mr Birling's character to explore ideas such as the oppression of women and the consequences of our actions.
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Illustrative background for Dangers of capitalism](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2018-03/ee3dca1d-6747-4404-8d14-e62cff01c588/shutterstock_145245337,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
Dangers of capitalism
- Mr Birling represents higher class, wealthy businessmen who only care about making money.
- Priestley created him as a villainous character to highlight the dangers of selfish capitalism.
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Illustrative background for Actions have consequences](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2018-03/b5c9ebe7-7ab2-418b-b216-1c4e060388e0/shutterstock_478061149,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
Actions have consequences
- Priestley uses Mr Birling to present the initial idea that every action has a consequence – something as seemingly simple as firing someone can have a huge impact on their life.
- Priestley makes the audience dislike Mr Birling because he will not accept that he did anything wrong.
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Illustrative background for Exclusion of women](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2018-03/eac37f2f-fc23-469d-9927-7c7b19498201/shutterstock_552131713,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
Exclusion of women
- This is characteristic of pre-war society, which tried to shield and protect women because they were viewed as less intelligent than men, more emotionally unstable, and more fragile.
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Illustrative background for Older, upper-class generation](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2018-03/19e7877f-b817-44ad-ba8f-efa22264ea6b/shutterstock_128414762,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
Older, upper-class generation
- Mr Birling represents the older, upper-class generation, who would go on to cause numerous deaths in World War One and Two.
- They did not care about the welfare of the lower-class, even though the lower-class men were the ones fighting the war for them.
1 Plot Summary
1.1.1 Act 1 Summary
1.1.2 Act 1 Key Quotes
1.2.1 Act 2 Summary
1.2.2 Act 2 Key Quotes
1.3.1 Act 3 Summary
1.3.2 Act 3 Key Quotes
1.3.3 Act 3 More Key Quotes
1.3.4 End of Topic Test - Acts 1, 2 & 3
2 Context & Key Themes
2.1 Context & Key Themes
2.1.1 Social Class & Equality
2.1.2 Class Tension
2.1.3 Abuse of Power & Corruption
2.1.4 Socialism vs Capitalism
2.1.5 Blame & Responsibility
2.1.6 Attitudes to Women
2.1.7 Characterisation of Women
2.1.8 Dramatic Function of Characters
2.1.9 End of Topic Test - Context & Key Themes
2.1.10 End of Topic Test - Context & Key Themes 2
2.1.11 Grade 9 - Key Themes
3 Key Characters
3.1 Mr Birling
3.1.1 Mr Birling Analysis
3.1.2 Mr Birling Quotes
3.2 Mrs Birling
3.2.1 Mrs Birling Analysis
3.2.2 Mrs Birling Quotes
3.2.3 Exam-Style Questions - Mrs Birling
3.3.1 Sheila Analysis
3.3.2 Sheila Quotes
3.3.3 End of Topic Test - The Birlings & Sheila
3.4.1 Eric Analysis
3.4.2 Eric Quotes
3.5.1 Gerald Analysis
3.5.2 Gerald Quotes
3.6 Inspector Goole
3.6.1 Inspector Goole Analysis
3.6.2 Inspector Goole Quotes
3.6.3 End of Topic Test - Eric, Gerald & Inspector Goole
3.7 Grade 9 - Key Characters
3.7.1 Grade 9 - Key Characters
4 Authorial Method
4.1 Arrangement & Structure of the Play
4.1.1 Setting, Lighting & Dramatic Irony
4.1.2 Structure & Chronology
4.1.3 Structure & Chronology 2
4.1.4 End of Topic Test - Authorial Method
Jump to other topics
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Go student ad image](https://senecalearning.com/en-GB/revision-notes/_next/image?url=%2Fen-GB%2Frevision-notes%2Fimages%2Fgo-student-uk-ad.jpg&w=640&q=100)
Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring
Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home
Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs
30+ school subjects covered
Grade 9 - Key Themes
Mr Birling Quotes
- International
- Education Jobs
- Schools directory
- Resources Education Jobs Schools directory News Search
Mrs Birling
Subject: English
Age range: 14-16
Resource type: Worksheet/Activity
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay HMBenglishresources1984's Shop](https://d2w4qhtqw2dbsq.cloudfront.net/profile_live/4193543/small.jpg?_=1724708895528)
Last updated
15 June 2023
- Share through email
- Share through twitter
- Share through linkedin
- Share through facebook
- Share through pinterest
This comprehensive lesson and pack contains a full range of resources to help students understand the character of Mrs Birling in ‘An Inspector Calls’. The resources have been created for the AQA 9-1 2017 onwards English Literature Paper 2 examination.
A list of her lines throughout the play A mid/high level model essay An incomplete model essay to develop A differentiated carousel activity to promote insightful thinking about the character An essay plan An essay checklist An evidence finding worksheet A mind map to complete There is also an essay plan for a response on Mr Birling.
Tes paid licence How can I reuse this?
Get this resource as part of a bundle and save up to 84%
A bundle is a package of resources grouped together to teach a particular topic, or a series of lessons, in one place.
An Inspector Calls
A term of resources covering everything you need to teach 'An Inspector Calls' for the 9-1 GCSE. Includes lessons, essay plans on all 7 characters, various model responses, carefully selected quotations, notes on themes and relevant points about context for A03 and lots of helpful worksheets! Check out the many previews to see what you will be getting. The pack includes: differentiated vocabulary activity differentiated context activity differentiated activity on the stage directions differentiated resources for teaching Mrs Birling differentiated resources for teaching Mr Birling differentiated resources for exploring who is responsible for Eva Smith's death test on who speaks each line detailed plan for essay on Sheila detailed essay plan with answers on Gerald detailed essay plan with answers on Eric planning sheet for Inspector Goole detailed planning sheet with answers for Eva Smith A quotation sheet containing 32 quotations about Eva to match to the character who said it. Plus lots more that I keep adding. New for 2023, I have collated some of the best resources into a 43 page revision booklet for ease of printing and downloading.
Your rating is required to reflect your happiness.
It's good to leave some feedback.
Something went wrong, please try again later.
This resource hasn't been reviewed yet
To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it
Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch.
Not quite what you were looking for? Search by keyword to find the right resource:
Get to a grade 9 help//mrs birling essay
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Avatar for Hannah47123](https://static.thestudentroom.co.uk/forum/images/avatars/Various/amber.png)
Quick Reply
Related discussions.
- GCSE English Literature
- How does Priestley present ideas about responsibility in 'An Insector Calls'? (30 Mar
- English lit - An Inspector Calls
- An Inspector Calls
- hey i accidently did mr birling instead of mrs birling in inspector calls today😭
- AN INSPECTOR CALLS: Birling essay, Please Mark!
- Please can someone mark my essay on how Mr Birling is presented throughout the play?
- How cooked am I
- An Inspector Calls: The Theme of Capitalism
- Grade 9 analysis for 'An Inspector Calls':
- Eng Lit - what happens if you write a good answer about the wrong thing?
- Inspector Calls Essay :)
- inspector calls help
- AQA GCSE English Literature Paper 2 (8702/2) - 20th May 2024 [Exam Chat]
- Help needed for an inspector calls grade 9 analysis
- My GCSE essay - An Inspector Calls (Mr Birling)
- I need help on my inspector calls essay
- Can someone please mark my AIC essay (my teacher is such an unreliable marker)
- Could someone grade my GCSE English Lit essay?
Last reply 11 hours ago
Last reply 6 days ago
Last reply 1 week ago
Last reply 2 weeks ago
Last reply 3 weeks ago
Last reply 4 weeks ago
Last reply 1 month ago
Last reply 2 months ago
Articles for you
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Your guide to the ultimate essay](https://static.thestudentroom.co.uk/cms/sites/default/files/2023-03/proofreading%20article.png)
Your guide to the ultimate essay
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Finding a university place in Ucas Clearing 2024: 10 top tips to help you get ready](https://cdn.theuniguide.co.uk/uploads/image/file/11924/at_85_percent_quality_student_checking_phone.png)
Finding a university place in Ucas Clearing 2024: 10 top tips to help you get ready
Top 10 tips for Ucas Clearing 2024
![mrs birling an inspector calls essay Bringing business people into the classroom: what students learn from industry professionals](https://static.thestudentroom.co.uk/cms/sites/default/files/2024-07/business%20people.png)
Bringing business people into the classroom: what students learn from industry professionals
![](http://serviteca.online/777/templates/cheerup2/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Mrs Birling. JB Priestley wrote an Inspector calls in 1945 after the devastation of two world wars. He uses the inspector as a mouthpiece to confront each character on class, responsibility, women's rights and age gap. Priestley uses Mrs Birling to represent the rich, upper class, capitalist women.
This essay will explore how Mrs Birling's behaviour reflects that of, and is bound by the expectations of, an upper-class wife and mother in Edwardian England. In the opening of Act One, Mrs Birling's desire to be a dedicated wife and mother is apparent. Her response to both her husband's and daughter's commands ('you must take a ...
An Inspector Calls Essays. One of the best things you can do to revise for any English exam is to read examples of essays. Below you'll find a range of essays which you can read at your leisure. ... The play continues to get darker as the inspector turns to Mrs Birling. Under pressure she tells the inspector, and the audience, about how she ...
Mrs Birling, A Character Analysis This is the second in our series of articles on the themes of the play, 'An Inspector Calls' and the two, the first article can be read by clicking on here. Mr Birling, a character analysis.The role/function of the Mr Birling character in the play.To understand Mrs Birling we need to
So when Eva Smith, who is pregnant, asks for help and calls herself Mrs Birling, Sybil Birling is extremely angry and tells her committee not to assist. This is an example of irony, because Sybil Birling doesn't know that Eric is the unborn baby's father. To make things worse, she then tells the Inspector when he is questioning her that the ...
Interactions with Inspector Goole. She is the only character to stay completely unaffected by Inspector Goole's revelations - she shows no emotion about Eva until she learns about Eric's involvement. Mrs Birling also tries to intimidate Inspector Goole into leaving and lies to him outright. Later in the play, she tries to deny truths that ...
Mrs. Birling is described as being "cold" and Mr. Birling's "social superior.". Throughout the questioning process, she resists the Inspector 's inquiries and reminds him, to Sheila 's frustration, of the Birlings' high social status. Despite her reluctance, Mrs. Birling finally admits to having used her influence in the Women ...
Learn a quick and easy Technique to write your paragraphs for your exam essay on Mr Birling. Include all the Assessment Objectives in your answer with this ...
This essay is going to explore how J.B. Priestley creates such a disagreeable character and why the audience feels this way about her. Priestley represents Mrs Birling, as a very posh and high class woman. She, like her husband, can be very self-important, for example, when the Inspector says, "You're not telling me the truth" and she replies ...
This implies that Mrs Birling is small minded; having come in contact with a small minority of the lower class women around at that time, she assumes that all of them are the same. Mr and Mrs Birling both have the same attitudes towards the lower class; they both make the lower class seem like a collective, an identical group of people.
Buy my revision guides in paperback on Amazon*:Mr Bruff's Guide to 'An Inspector Calls' https://amzn.to/2GxXJKT Mr Bruff's Guide to GCSE English Language ht...
Therefore it is very useful not only to learn about each character individually but how they compare and contrast to other characters in the play. Below you will find character profiles of: Arthur Birling. Sybil Birling. Sheila Birling. Eric Birling. Gerald Croft. Inspector Goole. Eva Smith/Daisy Renton.
University of Leeds - BA Criminal Justice and Criminology. Professional playwright and published poet offering support with GCSE English Language and Literature. £35 / hour. SEND. Graduate. Book Tutor. This topic is included in Paper 2. You can find notes and guides for it below.
why the playwright uses Mrs Birling in the play to make a point about the misuse of power. The student shows the range of her power and writes fluently. As the essay progresses, several effective references are used which show Mrs Birling's character, and these are all tied to the sense of power she wields. The student sees clearly
Mr Birling represents the older, upper-class generation, who would go on to cause numerous deaths in World War One and Two. They did not care about the welfare of the lower-class, even though the lower-class men were the ones fighting the war for them. Mr Birling is head of the household and family and displays a stereotypical upper-class pre ...
This comprehensive lesson and pack contains a full range of resources to help students understand the character of Mrs Birling in 'An Inspector Calls'. The resources have been created for the AQA 9-1 2017 onwards English Literature Paper 2 examination. There is also an essay plan for a response on Mr Birling. Tes paid licence How can I ...
Mr. Arthur Birling, a prominent character in J.B. Priestley's play "An Inspector Calls," is a complex individual whose perspectives and actions offer insight into the prevailing attitudes of his time. This essay delves into the multifaceted nature of Mr. Birling, examining his personality traits, beliefs, and the thematic role he plays in the ...
Mrs Birling is an elitist, dismissive and injudicious character used by Priestley as a dramatic. vehicle to criticise capitalism, the arrogance of the upper classes and the ignorance of the. elder generation. Priestley deliberately presents her as a morally inferior and detestable. character in order to encourage the audience to dislike her ...
Get to a grade 9 help//mrs birling essay. I have written an essay on Mrs Birling from the book An Inspector Calls, could someone please mark the essay and tell me any improvements I could make. Thank you. Sybil Birling seems to regard everyone as beneath her which may because of her social superiority; this is supported by 'I'm Mrs Birling ...