why is critical thinking important in media literacy brainly

Common Sense Media

Movie & TV reviews for parents

• For Parents
• For Educators
• Our Work and Impact

Or browse by category:

• Movie Reviews
• Best Movie Lists
• Best Movies on Netflix, Disney+, and More

Common Sense Selections for Movies

50 Modern Movies All Kids Should Watch Before They're 12

• Best TV Lists
• Best TV Shows on Netflix, Disney+, and More
• Common Sense Selections for TV
• Video Reviews of TV Shows

Best Kids' Shows on Disney+

Best Kids' TV Shows on Netflix

• Book Reviews
• Best Book Lists
• Common Sense Selections for Books

8 Tips for Getting Kids Hooked on Books

50 Books All Kids Should Read Before They're 12

• Game Reviews
• Best Game Lists

Common Sense Selections for Games

• Video Reviews of Games

Nintendo Switch Games for Family Fun

• Podcast Reviews
• Best Podcast Lists

Common Sense Selections for Podcasts

Parents' Guide to Podcasts

• App Reviews
• Best App Lists

Social Networking for Teens

Gun-Free Action Game Apps

Reviews for AI Apps and Tools

• YouTube Channel Reviews
• YouTube Kids Channels by Topic

Parents' Ultimate Guide to YouTube Kids

YouTube Kids Channels for Gamers

• Preschoolers (2-4)
• Little Kids (5-7)
• Big Kids (8-9)
• Pre-Teens (10-12)
• Teens (13+)
• Screen Time
• Social Media
• Online Safety
• Identity and Community

How to Help Kids Build Character Strengths with Quality Media

• Family Tech Planners
• Digital Skills
• All Articles
• Latino Culture
• Black Voices
• Asian Stories
• Native Narratives
• LGBTQ+ Pride
• Best of Diverse Representation List

Multicultural Books

YouTube Channels with Diverse Representations

Podcasts with Diverse Characters and Stories

What is media literacy, and why is it important?

The word "literacy" usually describes the ability to read and write. Reading literacy and media literacy have a lot in common. Reading starts with recognizing letters. Pretty soon, readers can identify words -- and, most importantly, understand what those words mean. Readers then become writers. With more experience, readers and writers develop strong literacy skills. ( Learn specifically about news literacy .)

Media literacy is the ability to identify different types of media and understand the messages they're sending. Kids take in a huge amount of information from a wide array of sources, far beyond the traditional media (TV, radio, newspapers, and magazines) of most parents' youth. There are text messages, memes, viral videos, social media, video games, advertising, and more. But all media shares one thing: Someone created it. And it was created for a reason. Understanding that reason is the basis of media literacy. ( Learn how to use movies and TV to teach media literacy. )

The digital age has made it easy for anyone to create media . We don't always know who created something, why they made it, and whether it's credible. This makes media literacy tricky to learn and teach. Nonetheless, media literacy is an essential skill in the digital age.

Specifically, it helps kids:

Learn to think critically. As kids evaluate media, they decide whether the messages make sense, why certain information was included, what wasn't included, and what the key ideas are. They learn to use examples to support their opinions. Then they can make up their own minds about the information based on knowledge they already have.

Become a smart consumer of products and information. Media literacy helps kids learn how to determine whether something is credible. It also helps them determine the "persuasive intent" of advertising and resist the techniques marketers use to sell products.

Recognize point of view. Every creator has a perspective. Identifying an author's point of view helps kids appreciate different perspectives. It also helps put information in the context of what they already know -- or think they know.

Create media responsibly. Recognizing your own point of view, saying what you want to say how you want to say it, and understanding that your messages have an impact is key to effective communication.

Identify the role of media in our culture. From celebrity gossip to magazine covers to memes, media is telling us something, shaping our understanding of the world, and even compelling us to act or think in certain ways.

Understand the author's goal. What does the author want you to take away from a piece of media? Is it purely informative, is it trying to change your mind, or is it introducing you to new ideas you've never heard of? When kids understand what type of influence something has, they can make informed choices.

When teaching your kids media literacy , it's not so important for parents to tell kids whether something is "right." In fact, the process is more of an exchange of ideas. You'll probably end up learning as much from your kids as they learn from you.

Media literacy includes asking specific questions and backing up your opinions with examples. Following media-literacy steps allows you to learn for yourself what a given piece of media is, why it was made, and what you want to think about it.

Teaching kids media literacy as a sit-down lesson is not very effective; it's better incorporated into everyday activities . For example:

• With little kids, you can discuss things they're familiar with but may not pay much attention to. Examples include cereal commercials, food wrappers, and toy packages.
• With older kids, you can talk through media they enjoy and interact with. These include such things as YouTube videos , viral memes from the internet, and ads for video games.

Here are the key questions to ask when teaching kids media literacy :

• Who created this? Was it a company? Was it an individual? (If so, who?) Was it a comedian? Was it an artist? Was it an anonymous source? Why do you think that?
• Why did they make it? Was it to inform you of something that happened in the world (for example, a news story)? Was it to change your mind or behavior (an opinion essay or a how-to)? Was it to make you laugh (a funny meme)? Was it to get you to buy something (an ad)? Why do you think that?
• Who is the message for? Is it for kids? Grown-ups? Girls? Boys? People who share a particular interest? Why do you think that?
• What techniques are being used to make this message credible or believable? Does it have statistics from a reputable source? Does it contain quotes from a subject expert? Does it have an authoritative-sounding voice-over? Is there direct evidence of the assertions its making? Why do you think that?
• What details were left out, and why? Is the information balanced with different views -- or does it present only one side? Do you need more information to fully understand the message? Why do you think that?
• How did the message make you feel? Do you think others might feel the same way? Would everyone feel the same, or would certain people disagree with you? Why do you think that?
• As kids become more aware of and exposed to news and current events , you can apply media-literacy steps to radio, TV, and online information.

Common Sense Media offers the largest, most trusted library of independent age-based ratings and reviews. Our timely parenting advice supports families as they navigate the challenges and possibilities of raising kids in the digital age.

• Interactive Videos
• Overview & Comparison
• THINKING PRO - Curriculum Unit
• Benefits for School Admin
• Benefits for Teachers
• English Language Learners
• Foundation Giving
• Corporate Giving
• Individual Giving
• Partnerships

The Importance of Critical Thinking for News Media Literacy

With news available at the tap of a finger, keyboard, or remote, we are often exposed to a barrage of news media. Some of it is high quality, informational news, while other pieces may be riddled with biases, inaccuracies, and misinformation. That’s why it’s so important for students to learn to properly evaluate the news they’re consuming. Read on for an exploration of news media literacy and the importance of critical thinking in supporting it.

News Media Literacy

News media literacy is the ability to critically analyze, evaluate, and interpret the information presented in news media. It involves understanding how news is produced, identifying bias and misinformation, and being able to distinguish between fact and opinion. In our modern world, where information is instantly available and constantly changing, news media literacy has become an essential skill for individuals of all ages to navigate the media landscape and make informed decisions.

Students being taught news media literacy develop a variety of interrelated and crucial skills and knowledge. They learn to identify when news sources are presenting biased or misleading information and to seek out additional sources to confirm or refute claims. News literacy also helps students understand how news is produced and distributed, including the role of journalists, media organizations, and the impact of social media on the news cycle.

A study in the Journal of Media Literacy Education found that highly news literate teens were:

• More intrinsically motivated to consume news
• More skeptical
• More knowledgeable about current events

This is important because it can help prevent the spread of misinformation and disinformation, both of which can have serious consequences, such as spreading false information about health, elections, or social issues. News media literacy skills can help students recognize harmful reporting or sharing, and take steps to stop their spread.

The difference news media literacy makes is not limited to the student alone, but can also impact their wider community. Authors Hobbs et al. explore this concept in their article “Learning to Engage: How Positive Attitudes about the News, Media Literacy, and Video Production Contribute to Adolescent Civic Engagement.” They found that “the best predictors of the intent to participate in civic engagement are having positive attitudes about news, current events, reporting, and journalism.”

Given its importance and wide-ranging impact, news media literacy is an essential part of education today. Here’s how teachers can use critical thinking to build up news literacy—and vice versa—in their students.

Critical Thinking Skills for News Literacy

Critical thinking is a key component of news media literacy, as it allows individuals to assess the accuracy and credibility of news sources, identify biases and misinformation, and make informed decisions. Critical thinking involves questioning assumptions, evaluating evidence, and considering multiple perspectives, which are all crucial skills for navigating our complex and constantly evolving media landscape. Let’s explore these critical thinking skills and their impact on news literacy in more depth.

Evaluating Sources and Evidence

One essential critical thinking skill that supports news literacy is the ability to evaluate sources. In today's world, where anyone can publish information online, it is important to be able to distinguish between credible sources and those that lack credibility. This means understanding the differences between primary and secondary sources, recognizing when a source is biased or unreliable, and evaluating the credentials of the author or publisher.

Being able to evaluate sources and evidence for credibility and accuracy allows students to identify fake news and other harmful media. Research on fake news and critical thinking highlights critical thinking as “an essential skill for identifying fake news.”

Analyzing Information

Another critical thinking skill that supports news literacy is the ability to analyze information. This involves breaking down complex information into its component parts, evaluating the evidence presented, and considering the implications of the information. For example, if a news article presents statistics about a particular issue, it is important to evaluate the methodology used to collect the data, the sample size, and the relevance of the statistics to the issue at hand.

Identifying and Evaluating Biases

Critical thinking also allows students to identify and evaluate biases. News sources may have biases based on political or social values, financial interests, or personal opinions. It is important to be able to recognize these biases and to evaluate how they may affect the presentation of information. By developing these critical thinking skills, students can become more discerning consumers of news media, and better equipped to make informed decisions based on the information presented.

How Practicing News Literacy Develops Critical Thinking

Becoming more news literate can also help develop critical thinking skills in turn. By engaging with news media and seeking out diverse perspectives on issues, individuals can develop their ability to question assumptions, evaluate evidence, and consider multiple perspectives. This can lead to a more nuanced understanding of complex issues and a greater appreciation for the diverse perspectives that exist in society.

This creates a powerful education win-win. News literacy and critical thinking effectively support each other and allow students to become informed and discerning consumers of media.

How THINKING PRO Helps Students Build News Literacy

Our THINKING PRO system is built around local news media and teaches students media literacy and critical thinking in a meaningful and impactful way. It walks students through a simple but effective process for analyzing news media, involving:

• Differentiating simple statements (answers to who, what, when, and where questions) and complex claims (answers to why and how questions)
• Evaluating evidence supporting each
• Differentiating evidence and opinion in complex claims

Our interactive learning videos allow students to hone these media literacy and critical thinking skills. With THINKING PRO, students will learn to:

• Identify various categories of claims that can be made within an informational text (e.g.: cause and effect, problem and solution, value judgments)
• Evaluate internal logic of informational text by:
• analyzing the consistency of information within the text and with one’s own background knowledge, and
• identifying conflicting information within the text.
• Synthesize information, as well as claims and their supporting evidence, across multiple passages of texts, and integrate it with one’s own understanding

Here at Thinking Habitats, we use thinking tools to empower young people to lead successful lives and contribute to the wellbeing of their communities. Our online platform has helped students improve their critical thinking, reading comprehension, and news media literacy, and has had significant individual and community impacts. Try THINKING PRO today , and join our students who feel more empowered in decision-making, more mindful with their news engagement, and more connected to their local community!

Hobbs, R., Donnelly, K., Friesem, J., & Moen, M. (2013). Learning to engage: How positive attitudes about the news, media literacy, and video production contribute to Adolescent Civic engagement. Educational Media International , 50 (4), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2013.862364  

Machete, P., & Turpin, M. (2020). The use of critical thinking to identify fake news: A systematic literature review. Lecture Notes in Computer Science , 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45002-1_20  

Maksl, A., Ashley, S., & Craft, S. (2015). Measuring News Media Literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education , 6 (3), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.23860/jmle-6-3-3  

Research guides: Identifying bias: What is bias? . University of Wisconsin Green Bay. (n.d.). https://libguides.uwgb.edu/bias  

What is media literacy and why do we need it?

Blog category: Industry Date: 23 February 2021

In an information-saturated world, understanding the media we consume is important. Media impacts our life directly and indirectly, especially now during a time of unprecedented change.

So what is media literacy and why does it matter? Media literacy is the ability to apply critical thinking skills to the media we engage with. It helps students discern both covert and overt messages and to recognise different points of view and/or bias. Media literacy is most important for students who are going to navigate a world that will become increasingly complex.

Media literacy applies to all forms of media, both print and digital. Students are often exposed to many different media types including social media, where media authors may be peers or people without any type of credential. Recognising that media comes in all forms and has the potential to influence how we see the world is key.

Developing media literacy skills is pivotal for students. Media literacy helps them:

Depict false or misleading information Anyone can create content in today’s online world. For this reason, the ability to discern whether a media source is misleading or providing false information is important. For example, an article on a newsworthy topic may be news from a source with no credibility or from a source that is intending to manipulate its audience.

Understand bias Most media, especially opinion pieces, have bias. Bias isn’t right or wrong; but knowing when bias is the overriding object is important to detect. Every media creator has perspective but understanding where their perspective comes from helps students understand what worldview is being proclaimed.

Use critical thinking skills Effective media literacy skills means students can question what they are watching or listening to and to analyse what opinions underlie the content they are engaging with. Media literacy also involves understanding the purpose of a particular form of media and questioning why some information may have been omitted.

Select your localisation:

• Privacy Overview
• Strictly Necessary Cookies
• 3rd Party Cookies
• Cookie Policy

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

This website uses third-party tools to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, the source of those visitors and the most popular pages.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website and marketing activities.

Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!

More information about our Cookie Policy

• Bipolar Disorder
• Therapy Center
• When To See a Therapist
• Types of Therapy
• Best Online Therapy
• Best Couples Therapy
• Managing Stress
• Sleep and Dreaming
• Understanding Emotions
• Self-Improvement
• Healthy Relationships
• Student Resources
• Personality Types
• Sweepstakes
• Guided Meditations
• Verywell Mind Insights
• 2024 Verywell Mind 25
• Mental Health in the Classroom
• Editorial Process
• Meet Our Review Board
• Crisis Support

Media Literacy in the Modern Age

How to understand the messages we observe all day every day

Morsa Images / Getty Images

How to Practice Media Literacy

Media literacy is the ability to apply critical thinking skills to the messages, signs, and symbols transmitted through mass media .

We live in a world that is saturated with media of all kinds, from newspapers to radio to television to the internet. Media literacy enables us to understand and evaluate all of the media messages we encounter on a daily basis, empowering us to make better choices about what we choose to read, watch, and listen to. It also helps us become smarter, more discerning members of society.

Media literacy is seen as an essential 21st-century skill by educators and scholars, including media psychologists . In fact, the mission statement of Division 46 of the American Psychological Association , the Society for Media Psychology and Technology , includes support for the development of media literacy.

Despite this, many people still dismiss media as harmless entertainment and claim they aren't influenced by its messages. However, research findings consistently demonstrate that people are impacted by the media messages they consume.

Media literacy interventions and education help children and adults recognize the influence media has and give them the knowledge and tools to mitigate its impact.

History of Media Literacy

The earliest attempts at media literacy education are often traced back to the British Film Institute's push in the late 1920s and early 1930s to teach analytical skills to media users. Around the same time in America, the Wisconsin Association for Better Broadcasters sought to teach citizens to be more critical consumers of media.

However, the goal of these initial media literacy efforts, which continued into the 1960s, was to protect students from media by warning them against its consumption. Despite this perspective, the dominance of media—and television in particular—continued to grow, even as interest in media literacy education waned.

More recently, the advent of the internet and portable technologies that enable us to consume media anywhere and anytime has led to a resurgence in the call for media literacy. Yet the goal is no longer to prevent people from using media, but to help them become more informed, thoughtful media consumers.

Although media literacy education has now become accepted and successful in English-speaking countries including Australia, Canada, and Britain, it has yet to become a standard part of the curriculum in the United States, where a lack of centralization has led to a scattershot approach to teaching practical media literacy skills.

Impact of Media Literacy

Despite America's lack of a standardized media literacy curriculum, study after study has shown the value of teaching people of all ages media literacy skills.

For example, a review of the research on media literacy education and reduction in racial and ethnic stereotypes found that children as young as 12 can be trained to recognize bias in media depictions of race and ethnicity and understand the harm it can cause.

Though the authors note that this topic is still understudied, they observe that the evidence suggests media literacy education can help adolescents become sensitive to prejudice and learn to appreciate diversity.

Meanwhile, multiple studies have shown that media literacy interventions reduce body dissatisfaction that can be the result of the consumption of media messages.

In one investigation, adolescent girls were shown an intervention video by the Dove Self-Esteem Fund before being shown images of ultra-thin models. While a control group reported lower body satisfaction and body esteem after viewing the images of the models, the group that viewed the intervention first didn't experience these negative effects.

Similarly, another study showed college women (who were at high risk for eating disorders ) reported less body dissatisfaction, a lower desire to be thin, and reduced internalization of societal beauty standards after participating in a media literacy intervention. The researchers concluded that media literacy training could help prevent eating disorders in high-risk individuals.

Moreover, studies have shown that media literacy education can help people better discern the truth of media claims, enabling them to detect "fake news" and make more informed decisions.

For instance, research into young adults' assessment of the accuracy of claims on controversial public issues was improved if the subjects had been exposed to media literacy education. In addition, another study showed that only people who underwent media literacy training engaged in critical social media posting practices that prevented them from posting false information about the COVID-19 pandemic.

The evidence for the benefits of media literacy suggests it is valuable for people of all ages to learn to be critical media consumers. Media scholar W. James Potter observes that all media messages include four dimensions:

• Cognitive : the information that is being conveyed
• Emotional : the underlying feelings that are being expressed
• Aesthetic: the overall precision and artistry of the message
• Moral : the values being conveyed through the message

Media psychologist Karen Dill-Shackleford suggests that we can use these four dimensions as a jumping off point to improve our media literacy skills. For example, let's say while streaming videos online we're exposed to an advertisement for a miracle weight loss drug. In order to better evaluate what the ad is really trying to tell us, we can break it down as follows:

• On the cognitive dimension we can assess what information the ad is conveying to us by asking some of the following questions: What does the ad promise the drug will do? Does it seem likely the drug can deliver on those promises? Who would need this kind of drug?
• On the emotional dimension, we can evaluate the feelings the creator of the ad wants us to feel: Do they want us to feel insecure about our weight? Do they want us to imagine the positive ways this drug could change our lives? Do they want us to envision the satisfaction we would feel after the drug delivers its quick fix?
• On the aesthetic dimension, we can determine how the ad employs messages and images to make us believe the product will deliver on its promises: Does the ad show "before" and "after" images of someone who supposedly took the drug? Does the "before" image look sad and the "after" image happy? Does the ad offer testimonials from people that are identified as experts?
• On the moral dimension, we can examine what the ad makers wanted to say: Are they equating thinness with happiness? Are they sending the message that it's a moral failing when someone is overweight? Are they saying that one has to be thin to be loved and respected?

This is one avenue for learning to practice media literacy in everyday life. Remember, the purpose of media literacy isn't to enjoy media less, it's to give people the tools to be active media consumers.

Not only will media literacy enable you to detect, analyze, and evaluate negative or false media messages, it will actually enable you to enjoy media more because it puts control over the media back into your hands. And research shows this is likely to increase your health and happiness.

About the Society for Media Psychology & Technology . Society for Media Psychology & Technology, Division 46 of the American Psychological Association. 2013.

Dill-Shackleford KE.  How Fantasy Becomes Reality . New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.

Arke ET. Media Literacy: History, Progress, and Future Hopes . In: Dill-Shackleford KE, ed.  The Oxford Handbook Of Media Psychology . 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398809.013.0006

Scharrer E, Ramasubramanian S. Intervening in the Media's Influence on Stereotypes of Race and Ethnicity: The Role of Media Literacy Education .  Journal of Social Issues . 2015;71(1):171-185. doi:10.1111/josi.12103

Halliwell E, Easun A, Harcourt D. Body dissatisfaction: Can a short media literacy message reduce negative media exposure effects amongst adolescent girls?  Br J Health Psychol . 2011;16(2):396-403. doi:10.1348/135910710x515714

Coughlin JW, Kalodner C. Media literacy as a prevention intervention for college women at low- or high-risk for eating disorders .  Body Image . 2006;3(1):35-43. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.01.001

Kahne J, Bowyer B. Educating for Democracy in a Partisan Age: Confronting the Challenges of Motivated Reasoning and Misinformation .  Am Educ Res J . 2016;54(1):3-34. doi:10.3102/0002831216679817

Melki J, Tamim H, Hadid D, Makki M, El Amine J, Hitti E. Mitigating infodemics: The relationship between news exposure and trust and belief in COVID-19 fake news and social media spreading .  PLoS One . 2021;16(6). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0252830

Potter WJ.  Media Literacy . 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2008.

By Cynthia Vinney, PhD Cynthia Vinney, PhD is an expert in media psychology and a published scholar whose work has been published in peer-reviewed psychology journals.

Niall McNulty

Importance of Media Literacy: Navigating the Digital Information Landscape

Media literacy  has become an essential skill in the  digital age , where the internet and various forms of media play a pivotal role in the daily lives of individuals. As an ability to critically understand and evaluate content across diverse media platforms, it ensures that individuals are not passive consumers but rather equipped to navigate the complex landscape of modern information. The abundance of sources and the speed at which information spreads online demand that one possesses the skills to distinguish between credible news and misleading or biased content.

With the evolving nature of media, media literacy is not just about understanding content but also involves a critical approach to assessing the purpose, message, and impact of what is consumed. It incorporates the capacity to recognise and evaluate the techniques used by media producers to convey their messages.  Developing media literacy skills  is crucial for individuals to interpret the reliability of different information sources, which fosters informed decision-making and encourages participation in democratic processes.

The future of media literacy lies in integrating these skills into educational curricula and everyday practices, enabling younger generations to adapt to the challenges posed by  emerging technologies . As the media landscape continues to broaden, the importance of fostering media literacy will only grow, ensuring individuals are prepared to confront the complexities of the media they interact with daily.

Defining Media Literacy

Media literacy encompasses an individual’s ability to engage with media in all its forms critically. This critical engagement implies an understanding of the nature of media content and the ability to analyse and respond to media messages effectively.

Key Components

Media literacy consists of several key components:

• Access : The ability to obtain and use media in various formats.
• Analysis : Deciphering and understanding the meanings behind media messages.
• Evaluation : Critically assessing media content for quality and credibility.
• Creation : The capability to produce media content responsibly.
• Action : Engaging with media in a productive and socially responsible manner.

These components empower individuals to navigate the complex landscape of modern communication with knowledge and confidence.

Historical Context

The concept of media literacy has evolved significantly over time. Initially concerned with the content produced by traditional mediums such as television, radio, newspapers, and magazines, the term has expanded to encompass digital media and the internet.

Historically, scholars have debated the scope and application of media literacy. The British Film Institute and Oxford University Press have contributed to this subject’s academic discourse. Throughout history, the rise of new media technologies has consistently prompted a reassessment of what constitutes literacy in a media context.

The Role of Media Literacy in Society

Media literacy is essential for fostering critical thinking and informed engagement with the content that shapes public opinion. It enables individuals to navigate the complexities of the modern information environment, discern truth from misinformation, and participate actively in democratic processes.

Critical Thinking and Democracy

Critical thinking, a cornerstone of democracy, is greatly enhanced by media literacy. It equips individuals to analyse and evaluate the credibility and intent of media messages. The National Association for Media Literacy Education underscores the importance of these competencies as they relate to active and informed citizenship within a democracy.

Human Rights and Access to Information

Media literacy also intersects with human rights, particularly the right to access information. UNESCO highlights the role of Media and Information Literacy (MIL) in promoting critical approaches to literacy, affirming that access to diverse and reliable information is crucial for the realisation of human rights globally.

Influence of Media on Public Opinion

The media exerts a significant influence on public opinion. Understanding media literacy empowers individuals to recognise and resist this influence when necessary. It helps identify biases and perspectives, ensuring that opinions are formed based on truthful information, not misrepresented or sensationalised. Misinformation, which can spread rapidly in the digital age, is one of the major challenges that media literacy actively combats.

Media Literacy in Education

Media literacy education equips students with the  critical skills  to engage with the ever-evolving media landscape. It highlights the role of educators in integrating these competencies within the curriculum while  utilising technology  to  enhance learning experiences  in the digital age.

Integration into Curriculum

Media literacy is an additional subject and an integral part of the holistic learning experience. Within the curriculum, media literacy is woven through various subjects, where students learn to  analyse  and  evaluate  information from different media sources. Lessons are designed to address various aspects of media, from understanding how mass media works to recognising bias and misinformation. This infusion across disciplines ensures that media literacy is a cornerstone of literacy education from early childhood.

Educators and Literacy Skills

Educators play a pivotal role in media literacy by modelling and teaching the necessary skills. They are tasked with not only possessing a robust set of media literacy skills themselves but also with continuous professional development to stay abreast of the latest media trends and technologies. The competencies include creating and analysing media content and fostering a critical approach towards media consumption among pupils. Therefore, training and resources for educators become fundamental to effective  media literacy education .

Digital Media in the Classroom

Incorporating digital media in the classroom transforms learning by providing real-world contexts for students to apply their media literacy skills. Technology-based tasks, such as creating  digital presentations  or analysing online content, prepare students for active participation in today’s media-rich society. By using technology thoughtfully, students practise these skills in an environment that closely mirrors their experiences outside of school. It’s not only about consumption; students also learn to become responsible digital content creators.

Analytical Tools and Techniques

In media literacy, individuals benefit from a robust toolkit for dissecting and understanding media content. The following section navigates through essential practices such as evaluating sources and identifying bias, which is critical to ascertaining the truth in news consumption and ensuring news literacy.

Evaluating Sources

When reading news, one must first consider the source’s credibility. Key questions to discern the trustworthiness of a source include examining the author’s qualifications, the publication’s reputation, and any potential affiliations that may impact the objectivity of the reporting. The reader should also:

• Look for cited evidence to support claims, such as  statistics  or expert opinions.
• Notice the date of the information to ensure relevance.

Identifying Bias and Fact-Checking

Recognising bias in news and media is paramount to clearly understand how facts are presented. The reader should:

• Analyse the language used for signs of emotive phrasing or unbalanced viewpoints.
• Cross-reference information with multiple sources to see if the reporting is consistent.

A systematic approach towards social media and other digital communications involves:

• Utilising third-party  fact-checking tools  to verify claims.
• Check the intentions behind social media posts—whether to inform or influence.

Through these methods, media literacy extends beyond basic reading and encourages a thorough evaluation of all media forms.

Developing Literacy Skills

Developing media literacy skills involves transitioning from merely consuming media to understanding and participating in media production. This process is essential for creating responsible content and engaging with various perspectives in today’s media-saturated environment.

From Consumption to Production

Through media literacy education, individuals learn to critically  analyse  media messages and the underlying  purposes  of different media  platforms . They move beyond passive consumption to active production, crafting messages with deliberate consideration of  language ,  images , and the  cognitive  and  emotional  impact on their audience.

Creating Responsible Content

Responsible content creation on  mass media  and  social media  platforms requires a clear understanding of the ethical implications of one’s  writing  and imagery. Content creators must take  accountability  for the accuracy of their information and the potential impact of their  point of view .

• Check Accuracy: Confirm all facts before publication.
• Consider Impact: Reflect on how the content can affect others emotionally and cognitively.
• Respect Privacy: Protect the personal information of individuals featured or discussed in content.

Engaging with Diverse Perspectives

Media literacy empowers individuals to seek out and  engage  with a wide range of  perspectives , which fosters a more  inclusive  understanding of society. This engagement enhances critical thinking and allows a more comprehensive understanding of global issues and cultural contexts.

• Exposure to Variety: Encourage reading and viewing content from various sources.
• Challenging Assumptions: Question underlying assumptions and biases in media messages.
• Respectful Discourse: Promote respectful exchange of ideas and viewpoints.

The Digital Landscape

The expansion of the Internet has catalysed a transformative digital age where effective navigation through vast amounts of online information is crucial.

Navigating Online Information

In the current digital landscape, the Internet is a vast and varied information repository where individuals encounter a spectrum of content.  Media and information literacy (MIL)  is vital for discerning the reliability and relevance of online resources. The skill to differentiate between fact and fiction is not just a personal asset but a critical societal function, encouraging informed citizenship and sustainable development.

New Forms of Communication

Social and digital media platforms have revolutionised communication, fostering new forms and forums where public discourse is instant and global. Policymakers, educators, and citizens must understand these tools to utilise digital literacy strategically, ensuring responsible participation in digital communities and effectively utilising these resources for personal and societal gains.

The Impact of Technology on Literacy

Technology has both broadened and complicated traditional concepts of literacy. The aptitude to process information from multifaceted digital media formats and evaluate the credibility of various digital content sources is integral to  MIL competency. Utilising tools like MIL CLICKS, which promotes critical thinking and informed decision-making regarding media consumption, has become fundamental in the digital age for fostering resilient and informed societies.

Protecting Against Misinformation

Media literacy is a crucial defence mechanism in an era where misinformation and disinformation can spread rapidly via mass media, including television and radio. By harnessing critical thinking skills, individuals shield themselves from harm and enhance their satisfaction in confidently navigating media.

Combating Fake News

Fake news, defined as deliberate misinformation or hoaxes spread via traditional or digital media, poses risks that necessitate a strategic approach to media consumption. To combat this,  critical thinking skills  serve as a primary tool. Individuals must:

• Evaluate sources critically , questioning the credibility and intentions behind the information.
• Cross-check facts  with multiple trusted sources before accepting information as true.
• Reflect  on biases that might influence one’s perception and acceptance of news.

Integrating these practices into daily media interaction protects them and contributes to an informed society.

Media Literacy as a Shield against Extremism

Media literacy equips individuals to discern and question extremist content that often preys on vulnerabilities and misinformation. It serves as a protective barrier by:

• Promoting understanding  of how media messages shape societal views and media’s potential in radicalisation.
• Encouraging engagement  in civil discourse, thus providing an alternative path to those at risk of radicalisation.
• Instilling resilience , enabling consumers to resist extremist narratives and reducing the potential harm caused by radical ideologies.

Media literacy empowers individuals to navigate the media landscape safely and fortifies society against the divisive impacts of extremism.

Media Literacy for Empowerment

Media literacy empowers individuals by furnishing them with essential competencies to navigate and influence the media-saturated world around them with purpose and control.

Promoting Civic Engagement

Civic engagement  is strengthened through proficiency in media literacy. Individuals who are media literate can discern the relevance and veracity of information, which is crucial for informed participation in democratic processes. Organisations like the National Association for Media Literacy Education outline that such competencies enable people to engage with current events critically, fostering active and responsible citizenship.

• Knowledge : Understanding the structures of media influence and its impact on society.
• Tools : Leveraging social media and other platforms to promote civic dialogue and social change.
• Respect : Acknowledging diverse perspectives and engaging with respect in public discourse.

Encouraging Healthy Media Habits

Healthy media habits are essential for mental and physical  health , and media literacy directly contributes to this. Being media literate means having the capacity to:

• Analyse  various genres of media, including video games and social media, recognising potential issues such as violence and cyberbullying.
• Control Consumption : Setting limits on media consumption to maintain a healthy balance in life, thus enhancing personal satisfaction.

Resources for Lifelong Media Literacy

The journey towards media literacy is ongoing, and numerous resources are available to support this educational pathway. Massive Open Online Courses ( MOOCs ) offer accessible learning in Media and Information Literacy ( MIL ), while organisations provide age-appropriate  tools  and  knowledge  bases for various aspects of media education.

• Social Media : Guides on navigating platforms with critical thought and care.
• Educational Tools : Strategies for parents and teachers to facilitate the development of MIL  competencies  in children.
• Engagement : Platforms encouraging the application of media literacy skills in real-world scenarios.

Frequently Asked Questions

This section addresses common inquiries regarding media literacy, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of its significance in contemporary society.

What constitutes media literacy, and why is it vital in today’s digital landscape?

Media literacy encompasses accessing, analysing, evaluating, and creating content across various platforms. In the digital era, it’s vital as it equips people with skills to navigate the vast swathes of information, separating fact from misinformation.

How does media literacy empower individuals to interpret news and information critically?

It empowers individuals by providing tools to question the authenticity and biases in news and media content. This is critical for informed decision-making and civic engagement.

In what ways can media literacy contribute to discerning the credibility of online content?

Media literacy aids in identifying credible sources by teaching how to look for signs of reliability, such as citations and cross-referencing with reputable outlets. This reduces the risk of consuming and sharing false information.

How does media literacy enhance responsible participation on social media platforms?

Responsibility on social media stems from understanding the impact of sharing and creating content. Media literacy helps individuals recognise the significance of their online actions and encourages ethical participation.

Can media literacy impact one’s understanding of advertising and its influence on consumer behaviour?

Yes, individuals with media literacy can deconstruct advertisements, understanding the strategies used to influence consumers and potentially counteract undesired persuasive effects.

How does media literacy education equip students to navigate the complexities of the modern information environment?

Through media literacy education, students learn to critically assess media messages and the diverse channels through which information is distributed, enabling them to function as informed citizens in a complex information landscape.

8 thoughts on “Importance of Media Literacy: Navigating the Digital Information Landscape”

• Pingback: Unit 5: Why Should We Increase Media Literacy? – Skyler's Blog!
• Pingback: Media Literacy – Massiel Chavez
• Pingback: Why is Media Creation Critical to Media Literacy? – Jacqui Delbert
• Pingback: Why is media creation critical to media literacy? – My blog
• Pingback: 5 WAYS TO BUILD CONSUMER RELATIONSHIPS USING MEDIA LITERACY – AUTHEN
• Pingback: The Art of Media Creation – Ellington Nichols
• Pingback: Top 10+ what is media literacy
• Pingback: Why is media creation a critical component of media literacy? – My blog

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Search form

You are here, why media literacy is important.

Why is media literacy important? Here's a beginning list of reasons from thinkers and leaders in the field.

•    20 Important Reasons to Study the Media •    Bombarded by Barbie •    Breaking Boundaries with Video Production: Inteview with Steve Goodman •    Carnegie Corporation Endorses Media Literacy Education for Young Adolescents •    Case FOR Media Literacy in Today's Schools •    Catholic Church's Challenge: Critical Consciousness •    Criteria for A Successful Media Education Program •    Empowered Parents: Role Models for Taking Charge of TV Viewing •    Finding Media Literacy Lessons Across the Curriculum •    Freeing Ourselves from the Tyranny of Print •    Literacy for the 21st Century: An Overview & Orientation Guide to Media Literacy Education •    Literacy for the 21st Century: The Hope and the Promise •    Making a Case for Media Literacy in the Classroom •    Making Media Skills •    Media Literacy Across the Curriculum •    Media Literacy In Middle School •    Media Literacy: Education for a Technological Age •    Parents and Teachers: Team Teaching Media Literacy •    Questioning the Media — Plus Essential Questions for Teachers •    Screen-Agers...and the Decline of the "Wasteland" •    Seven Great Debates in the Media Literacy Movement -- Circa 2001 •    Teaching the Media Child in the Digital Swarm: The Case for Media Education •    Think. Interpret. Create: How Media Education Promotes Critical Thinking, Democracy, Health and Aesthetic Apppreciation •    Thinking Critically about Media: Schools and Families in Partnership •    We Learn by Doing: Making Media in the Classroom •    Why Bother Watching? •    Why Media Literacy? A Catholic Reflection •    Why Study the Media? Thoughts from John Culkin •    WORKSHOP REPORT: Integrating Media Literacy Across the Curriculum  

• Reading Room
• CML MediaLit Kit
• Rights & Permissions
• Site Overview

Media and Information Literacy, a critical approach to literacy in the digital world

What does it mean to be literate in the 21 st century? On the celebration of the International Literacy Day (8 September), people’s attention is drawn to the kind of literacy skills we need to navigate the increasingly digitally mediated societies.

Stakeholders around the world are gradually embracing an expanded definition for literacy, going beyond the ability to write, read and understand words. Media and Information Literacy (MIL) emphasizes a critical approach to literacy. MIL recognizes that people are learning in the classroom as well as outside of the classroom through information, media and technological platforms. It enables people to question critically what they have read, heard and learned.

As a composite concept proposed by UNESCO in 2007, MIL covers all competencies related to information literacy and media literacy that also include digital or technological literacy. Ms Irina Bokova, Director-General of UNESCO has reiterated significance of MIL in this media and information landscape: “Media and information literacy has never been so vital, to build trust in information and knowledge at a time when notions of ‘truth’ have been challenged.”

MIL focuses on different and intersecting competencies to transform people’s interaction with information and learning environments online and offline. MIL includes competencies to search, critically evaluate, use and contribute information and media content wisely; knowledge of how to manage one’s rights online; understanding how to combat online hate speech and cyberbullying; understanding of the ethical issues surrounding the access and use of information; and engagement with media and ICTs to promote equality, free expression and tolerance, intercultural/interreligious dialogue, peace, etc. MIL is a nexus of human rights of which literacy is a primary right.

Learning through social media

In today’s 21 st century societies, it is necessary that all peoples acquire MIL competencies (knowledge, skills and attitude). Media and Information Literacy is for all, it is an integral part of education for all. Yet we cannot neglect to recognize that children and youth are at the heart of this need. Data shows that 70% of young people around the world are online. This means that the Internet, and social media in particular, should be seen as an opportunity for learning and can be used as a tool for the new forms of literacy.

The Policy Brief by UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education, “Social Media for Learning by Means of ICT” underlines this potential of social media to “engage students on immediate and contextual concerns, such as current events, social activities and prospective employment.

UNESCO MIL CLICKS - To think critically and click wisely

For this reason, UNESCO initiated a social media innovation on Media and Information Literacy, MIL CLICKS (Media and Information Literacy: Critical-thinking, Creativity, Literacy, Intercultural, Citizenship, Knowledge and Sustainability).

MIL CLICKS is a way for people to acquire MIL competencies in their normal, day-to-day use of the Internet and social media. To think critically and click wisely. This is an unstructured approach, non-formal way of learning, using organic methods in an online environment of play, connecting and socializing.  

MIL as a tool for sustainable development

In the global, sustainable context, MIL competencies are indispensable to the critical understanding and engagement in development of democratic participation, sustainable societies, building trust in media, good governance and peacebuilding. A recent UNESCO publication described the high relevance of MIL for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

“Citizen's engagement in open development in connection with the SDGs are mediated by media and information providers including those on the Internet, as well as by their level of media and information literacy. It is on this basis that UNESCO, as part of its comprehensive MIL programme, has set up a MOOC on MIL,” says Alton Grizzle, UNESCO Programme Specialist. 

UNESCO’s comprehensive MIL programme

UNESCO has been continuously developing MIL programme that has many aspects. MIL policies and strategies are needed and should be dovetailed with existing education, media, ICT, information, youth and culture policies.

The first step on this road from policy to action is to increase the number of MIL teachers and educators in formal and non-formal educational setting. This is why UNESCO has prepared a model Media and Information Literacy Curriculum for Teachers , which has been designed in an international context, through an all-inclusive, non-prescriptive approach and with adaptation in mind.

The mass media and information intermediaries can all assist in ensuring the permanence of MIL issues in the public. They can also highly contribute to all citizens in receiving information and media competencies. Guideline for Broadcasters on Promoting User-generated Content and Media and Information Literacy , prepared by UNESCO and the Commonwealth Broadcasting Association offers some insight in this direction.

UNESCO will be highlighting the need to build bridges between learning in the classroom and learning outside of the classroom through MIL at the Global MIL Week 2017 . Global MIL Week will be celebrated globally from 25 October to 5 November 2017 under the theme: “Media and Information Literacy in Critical Times: Re-imagining Ways of Learning and Information Environments”. The Global MIL Feature Conference will be held in Jamaica under the same theme from 24 to 27 October 2017, at the Jamaica Conference Centre in Kingston, hosted by The University of the West Indies (UWI).

Alton Grizzle , Programme Specialist – Media Development and Society Section

More on this subject

Other recent news

Do You Consider Yourself Media Literate?

“you have a brain and mind of your own. use it and reach your own decisions.”.

Posted December 21, 2023 | Reviewed by Michelle Quirk

• Our brains are susceptible to manipulation and coercive control.
• Consumption of media can accelerate prejudice and bias and narrow our viewpoints.
• Media literacy can be improved through lateral thinking, specifically testing our assumptions and beliefs.

As we find ourselves caught up in the maelstrom of modern media, it can be challenging to separate fact from fiction. Furthermore, as the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) accelerates, and in some instances is nefariously used to fuel misinformation and disinformation campaigns, it’s not hard to understand the rising distrust in modern communications. The question is, do you consider yourself media literate and, therefore, somewhat immune to the influence?

According to a 2010 report , children between the ages of 8 and 18 years spent just over 7.5 hours per day consuming entertainment media outside of school. Updated reports such as Guttmann (2023) highlight little change, with the average adult worldwide consuming 7 hours, 52 minutes of media per day. In and of itself, time spent on media is not the problem, it is the potential exposure to content with a specific agenda, bias, or general negative influence that creates the need for improved media literacy.

Victoria Short, executive director of the Open Minds Foundation highlights

“At Open Minds, we bring together a group of individuals with direct or indirect lived experience of coercion and coercive control. Through high control religious groups, or membership of cults, our benefactors understand the reality of manipulation and misdirection employed to influence an individual. Regardless of race, intelligence , and socio-economic factors, every individual is potentially at risk of being manipulated, and the consequences can be disastrous.”

She continues,

“One of the key attributes underpinning coercion and coercive control is the control of information. How and what information is shared, can have a direct impact on victim susceptibility. In the age of modern media, it can become additionally challenging to differentiate truth from lies. Critical thinking, and importantly the practise of media literacy, should not be underestimated. They are the fastest, most reliable methods for inoculating your psyche from external manipulation.”

To be media literate is to be able to think critically about information consumed through media and specifically is our ability to apply critical thinking to retain an objective viewpoint. Psychologically, being objective is not a natural human forte, and we are already grappling with the realities of aspects such as groupthink , truth bias, the illusory truth effect, and confirmation bias , for example, which naturally narrow our viewpoints in favour of expedited cognitive reasoning. Add to this the tsunami of content that we consume on a daily basis, and it is no surprise that our already saturated brains seek familiarity to simplify our information processing.

As explored by Dill-Shackleford in her book How Fantasy Becomes Reality (2009), “it is a widespread belief that when one reaches the age that one can differentiate between fact and fiction in the media, one is no longer subject to learning or persuasion through fictional media.” This could not be further from the truth, and additional studies consistently highlight a typically poor ability to differentiate.

Improved media literacy is essential, not only to curb the impact of coercion within society but also to help undermine and reduce other social challenges. Scharrer and Ramasubramanian (2015) note that media can fuel racial and ethnic stereotyping, but media literacy education can result in a reduction in prejudice and an appreciation for diversity. More recent studies such as Kahne & Bowyer (2016) and Melki et al. (2021) have explored the connection between improved media literacy and better identification of misinformation and fake news finding that practised critical thinking can offer better identification. What these studies have in common is that improved media literacy can drive a reduction in negative influence by the media, which can only be a good thing.

One key aspect of media literacy, which can be specifically used to challenge our thinking and improve our abilities, is to employ lateral thinking. The word lateral may have most of us thinking of lateral flow tests thanks to the pandemic, but lateral thinking refers to the capacity for nonselective reading, specifically seeking multiple sources and incorporating alternative viewpoints that challenge our own. A 2017 study published by Stanford found that people typically fall into two groups—vertical thinkers and lateral thinkers or “fact checkers,” with vertical thinkers being more common. Traditionally, Western education systems focus on the pursuit of facts, commonly rely on a single source of information, and encourage us to read “vertically,” starting with a core subject and then branching down tangents into other related content. Lateral thinking is the opposite. It encourages us to focus on a single or small group of details and then to seek multiple sources to corroborate or refute the claims, including sources that conflict with our own viewpoints. The intention is to test, rationalise, and maintain an objective viewpoint.

But how often do you practise your lateral thinking skills and test your own opinions? We are constantly externally influenced, and we can develop skewed opinions because of it, so it’s important to practice this skill regularly.

“You have a brain and mind of your own. Use it and reach your own decisions” – Napoleon Hill, author.

6 Simple Ways to Improve Your Lateral Thinking

The brain is like a muscle and needs regular workouts to stay healthy. Use these six simple ways to try out and improve your lateral thinking.

• Use books and podcasts: Reading a wide range of books, ideally in different genres, or listening to a variety of podcasts is a good way to challenge your thinking or gain a new perspective and deeper understanding of a topic. Lateral reading is also a good skill to practise when evaluating sources.
• Use key exercises and techniques: By using techniques such as random word association, SCAMPER, or even mind mapping, you can flex your lateral thinking muscles and improve this underutilised critical thinking skill.
• Try experimentation and reflection: Why not test your assumptions in real-life situations? By doing so, you can reflect on the outcomes and your learnings. Applying lateral thinking to real-life situations helps to make things less abstract and improve your overall performance.
• Seek feedback and collaboration : The key thing about lateral thinking is the idea of approaching a problem differently. By collaborating with different groups and individuals, you can get a fresh perspective and come up with ideas outside of your usual.
• Play games and puzzles: Playing games and doing puzzles such as sudokus and crosswords can help you develop your mental flexibility and curiosity, and further develop your cognitive skills. Plus, research has shown that performing moderately difficult cognitive tasks is helpful for cognitive and brain health.
• Rework your mindset and habits: It is possible to rework your mindset to establish new habits that you wish to develop. For example, you can try being more playful or curious in your daily life. With practice, this will become easier and can help you embrace lateral thinking as a way of life, not just a skill.

Dill-Shackleford KE. How Fantasy Becomes Reality. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009

Scharrer E, Ramasubramanian S. Intervening in the Media’s Influence on Stereotypes of Race and Ethnicity: The Role of Media Literacy Education. Journal of Social Issues. 2015

Kahne J, Bowyer B. Educating for Democracy in a Partisan Age: Confronting the Challenges of Motivated Reasoning and Misinformation. Am Educ Res J. 2016

Melki J, Tamim H, Hadid D, Makki M, El Amine J, Hitti E. Mitigating infodemics: The relationship between news exposure and trust and belief in COVID-19 fake news and social media spreading. PLoS One. 2021

Wineburg, Sam and Mcgrew, Sarah, Lateral Reading: Reading Less and Learning More When Evaluating Digital Information (October 6, 2017). Stanford History Education Group Working Paper No. 2017-A1 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3048994 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3048994

Guttman, A, Media usage in the U.S. (Dec 18, 2023, Accessed online at: https://www.statista.com/topics/1536/media-use/#topicOverview

Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds. Accessed online at https://www.kff.org/other/report/generation-m2-media-in-the-lives-of-8-…

The Open Minds Foundation is dedicated to undermining the effects of coercive control, through critical thinking education and training.

• Find a Therapist
• Find a Treatment Center
• Find a Psychiatrist
• Find a Support Group
• Find Online Therapy
• United States
• Brooklyn, NY
• Chicago, IL
• Houston, TX
• Los Angeles, CA
• New York, NY
• Portland, OR
• San Diego, CA
• San Francisco, CA
• Seattle, WA
• Washington, DC
• Asperger's
• Bipolar Disorder
• Chronic Pain
• Eating Disorders
• Passive Aggression
• Personality
• Goal Setting
• Positive Psychology
• Stopping Smoking
• Low Sexual Desire
• Relationships
• Child Development
• Self Tests NEW
• Therapy Center
• Diagnosis Dictionary
• Types of Therapy

Sticking up for yourself is no easy task. But there are concrete skills you can use to hone your assertiveness and advocate for yourself.

• Emotional Intelligence
• Gaslighting
• Affective Forecasting
• Neuroscience

Ways to Build Media Literacy in Your Students, and Why You Should

By dustin hughes.

• February 2, 2021

“A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes.” – Mark Twain (but not really).[1]

Thanks to the Internet, news can travel around the world at the speed of light. So can lies, conspiracy theories, and misinformation. The spread of wild conspiracy theories online is more than just confusing, as evidenced by trying to figure out who really said that ‘Mark Twain’ quote; it can even lead to violence and real-world harm.

While some look to technology regulations to combat the scourge of fake news, the strongest defense may well be in building a citizenry with strong media literacy skills.[2] Read on to learn how we got here, why it matters, and how teachers can build media literacy in the classroom.

Media Literacy: Why It’s Critical Now More Than Ever

A functioning democracy depends on an informed public. The good news is that information is easier to come by than ever before—many students, even at an elementary age, have access to smartphones, the Internet, and a pervasive, never-ending flow of social media. But the big question is: of what quality is that information?

Within the past generation, the news ecosystem was well-established. Cities and even the smallest of towns had newspapers delivering local information, from zoning boards to youth sports up to national happenings, right to people’s front steps. Meanwhile, state, national, and world news organizations were the primary sources of information.

But with the rise of the Internet, that ecosystem grew unstable. Digital advertising revenues for news operations increased slightly, but print ad revenue crashed. In the past 15 years, more than 1 in 5 newspapers in America has closed. The number of journalists working for papers has been cut in half.[4]

This has created “News Deserts” across America. Now, more than 65 million Americans live in counties with only one local newspaper, or none at all.[5]

Today, social media plays an outsized role in how people get their information. In 2020, about 1 in 5 American adults said they got their political news primarily through social media.[6] In this landscape, unfounded conspiracy theories, outright false news, or shoddy third-hand accounts can spread just as easily as a legitimately reported story. Sometimes easier.

That’s why it’s critical to teach children how to think critically about the media they consume and how to evaluate their sources of information.

The Benefits of Media Literacy

Teaching media literacy to students will benefit them as they grow. According to Fresno Pacific University, “Media literacy helps students become wiser consumers of media as well as responsible producers of their own media. Along those same lines, teaching media literacy helps to foster critical thinking in students. This type of thinking can eventually become second nature, which will help them in many areas as they grow older.”[12]

How Teens Can Combat Misinformation on Social Media

Addressing social media misinformation is one way to empower children to fight back against fake news. Here are some online resources devoted to social media misinformation.

Take a News Literacy Quiz

This online quiz lets teens test whether or not they can evaluate what should be shared on social media . The user can choose to see a news feed aimed at conservatives or liberals, and try to determine whether a post has enough verified information to share.

Learn Why Your News Feed Sucks

This 12-minute video from Smarter Every Day[9] is appropriate for middle- to high-school-aged students. It does an elegant job of pointing out why social media news feeds are terrible for gathering unbiased, accurate news. Students can learn how to determine if a post in their social media feed is “share-worthy” as presenters track down the accuracy of a viral photograph with tools and information students can use themselves.

Sanitize Before Your Share

“Sanitize Before You Share” uses something all students are familiar with—like using good hygiene—and relates that to using good information hygiene to stop the spread of fake news . This project is suitable for elementary through high school students.

More Online Resources for Teaching Media Literacy Skills in the Classroom

In addition to the above resources, there are plenty of quality online activities and curriculum for combating misinformation and teaching media literacy.

NewseumED’s Media Literacy Booster Pack

The Media Literacy Booster Pack is a free resource and a good starting point for teaching media literacy to grade 6-12 students.[7] Free exercises and activities include evaluating information, recognizing bias, and filtering out fake news, along with several other important media and digital literacy skills.

National Association for Media Literacy Education

NAMLE’s website includes resources for the classroom, as well as for parents and families at home. Particularly useful is their material dedicated to teaching how to spot and fight misinformation.

Media Literacy Week

The website dedicated to Media Literacy Week has resources for classrooms ranging from elementary school to high school and higher-education level.

The News Literacy Project has educator resources for use in elementary through high school. Resources include “InfoZones,” which helps students understand not all information is equal , and credibility is often correlated with purpose.

Students will learn to categorize information by its purpose, and how to use that to determine the credibility.

Challenging Confirmation Bias

Confirmation Bias is when our brain looks for information that confirms what we already think we know.[8] It’s one reason people are more likely to share news that confirms what they already think. Common Sense Education offers an activity for helping high school students understand confirmation bias , why it occurs, and how to confront their own biases.

Stanford’s Civic Online Reasoning

Stanford University hosts the Civic Online Reasoning website , dedicated to helping students evaluate online information. The COR curriculum is available for free online, and it includes skills such as Teaching Lateral Reading—helping students go beyond what’s posted online by seeing what other information is available about the source. Other topics include how to find better sources of online information, “click restraint,” and more.

Make Your Own News With These Student Journalism Ideas

Taking a hands-on approach is one way to help students see what’s necessary for a news source to be reliable and fact-based. Helping your students produce their own newspaper or website can give them the tools needed to be a responsible information consumer.

From the Newsroom to the Classroom

Why not get the scoop straight from a real journalist? The News Literacy Project coordinates with educators to bring journalists into middle or high school classrooms to share what they do in their job. The program allows students to hear from actual reporters and enhance their media literacy.

Find Resources for Starting a Student Newspaper

Student newspapers can be in-class bulletins, website posts, or near-professional printed papers. Once permission is secured and an adviser selected, involve students in producing the newspaper by finding writers, editors, photographers, and multimedia specialists, as well as other roles. By working in these roles, students can develop a sense of what goes into the production of a responsible, fact-based news story.

Depending on the product (web, print, or both), setup can take some time, effort, and money. For more reading on what educators should know about launching a newspaper, visit the American Press Institute’s Student Journalism Resources .

• Chokshi, Niraj. “That Wasn’t Mark Twain: How a Misquotation Is Born.” New York Times. April 26, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/26/books/famous-misquotations.html
• Hobbs, Renee. “Building Citizenship Skills Through Media Literacy Education.” Center for Media LIteracy. 1998. http://www.medialit.org/reading-room/building-citizenship-skills-through-media-literacy-education
• Center for Media Literacy. “Media Literacy: A Definition and More.” https://www.medialit.org/media-literacy-definition-and-more
• University of North Carolina Hussman School of Journalism and Media. “The Loss of Local News: What It Means for Communities.” USNewsdeserts.com. https://www.usnewsdeserts.com/reports/expanding-news-desert/loss-of-local-news/
• Hendrickson, Clara. “Local Journalism in Crisis: Why America Must Revive Its Local Newsrooms.” Brookings. Nov. 12, 2019. https://www.brookings.edu/research/local-journalism-in-crisis-why-america-must-revive-its-local-newsrooms/
• Mitchell, Amy, Mark Jurkowitz, J. Baxter Oliphant, and Elisa Shearer. “Americans Who Mainly Get Their News on Social Media Are Less Engaged, Less Knowledgeable.” Pew Research Center on Journalism & Media. July 30, 2020. https://www.journalism.org/2020/07/30/americans-who-mainly-get-their-news-on-social-media-are-less-engaged-less-knowledgeable/
• Newseumed.org. “Filtering Out Fake News.” https://newseumed.org/curated-stack/filtering-out-fake-news
• Common Sense Education. “Challenging Confirmation Bias.” https://www.commonsense.org/education/digital-citizenship/lesson/challenging-confirmation-bias
• Smarter Every Day. “Why Your Newsfeed Sucks.” https://youtu.be/MUiYglgGbos
• Common Sense Education. “Help Your Students Fact-Check the Web Like Professionals.” https://www.commonsense.org/education/videos/help-your-students-fact-check-the-web-like-professionals
• Mayo Clinic. “Teens and Social Media Use: What’s the Impact?” Tween and Teen Health. December 2019. https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/tween-and-teen-health/in-depth/teens-and-social-media-use/art-20474437
• Fresno Pacific University. “Why Today’s Students Need Media Literacy More Than Ever.” December 2018. https://ce.fresno.edu/news/why-todays-students-need-media-literacy-more-than-ever

More education articles

Don’t Prevent Summer Slide—Build Student Strengths Instead

MacKenzie Scott’s Yield Giving Awards Waterford.org a $10 Million Grant

• Management Accounting
• Personal Finances
• Finance Fundamentals
• Financial Modeling & Analysis
• Cryptocurrency
• Business Strategy
• Entrepreneurship Fundamentals
• Business Fundamentals
• Microsoft Office
• Communication Skills
• Negotiation
• Interviewing Skills
• Public Speaking
• Sales Skills
• Customer Experience
• Data Analysis
• Key Performance Indicators
• Management Skills
• Product Management
• Project Management
• Human Resources
• Event Management
• Environmental, Social & Governance
• Video Editor
• Video Design
• Portrait Photography
• Commercial Photography
• Digital Photography
• Graphic Design
• Interior Design
• Design Thinking
• UX/UI Design
• Instruments
• Music & Audio Fundamentals
• Acrylic Painting
• Watercolor Painting
• Digital Painting
• 3D & Animation
• Fashion Design
• Esoteric Practices
• Spirituality
• Mental Health
• Pastry & Desserts
• Online Business
• Marketing Strategy
• Content Marketing
• Social Media Marketing
• Search Engine Optimization
• Marketing Fundamentals
• Marketing Analytics
• Public Relations
• Video & Mobile Marketing
• Affiliate Marketing
• Product Marketing
• Advertising
• Personal Transformation
• Time Management
• Decluttering
• Career Development
• Parenting & Relationships
• Personal Branding
• Self-Esteem & Confidence
• Neuro-Linguistic Programming
• Stress Management
• Anger Management
• Conflict Management
• Engineering
• Memory & Study Skills
• International Relations
• Web Development
• Mobile Development
• Data Science
• Programming Languages
• Database Design & Development
• Software Testing & Engineering
• Network & Security
• Operating Systems

• Teams Solutions
• Teach/Coach/Mentor

Add Comment

Media literacy: what it is and why it is essential.

Media literacy is a term that is becoming increasingly important in today's society. With the rise of digital media and the internet, the ability to critically analyze and understand the messages conveyed through various forms of media, including digital media, has become essential. In this blog, we will explore the basics of media literacy, its impact on society, and why media literacy education is crucial.

Media literacy encompasses a range of skills and knowledge, including media and information literacy, which involves the ability to access, evaluate, and analyze information from various forms of media. Understanding the different types of media literacy, such as social media literacy and digital citizenship, plays a pivotal role in navigating the complex landscape of digital media. By honing these skills, individuals can strengthen their ability to differentiate between reliable and misleading information and become more discerning consumers of media.

Digital media, encompassing various platforms and technologies, has revolutionized the way information is disseminated and consumed. However, it has also brought forth new challenges, such as cyberbullying, which highlights the importance of media literacy education. By equipping individuals with the skills to recognize and respond to instances of cyberbullying, media literacy education promotes digital citizenship and fosters a safer online environment.

In essence, media literacy education is indispensable in today's society. As the influence and power of media continue to grow, individuals must possess the necessary tools and knowledge to critically evaluate and interpret the messages they encounter. By promoting media literacy education, we empower individuals to navigate the ever-evolving media landscape, safeguard themselves from misinformation, and actively participate in shaping the narrative.

Learn from the Best

Eric Lofholm

Subjects of Expertise

Arvee Robinson

Brad Hussey

Carol Marzouk

Valerie Sargent

Scott Robertson

Paul Banoub

Jump To Section

What is media.

Oughts, Experiences, and Expertise: The Power of Written Articles

In today's media landscape, individuals have found a unique and authentic voice through written articles. Whether it's a fashion blog, a travel blog, or a food blog, these platforms provide a space for people to express themselves and connect with like-minded individuals.

The Rise of Podcasts: A Convenient Way to Consume Audio Content

Podcasts have gained immense popularity in recent years, offering a convenient and portable way to consume audio content. From true crime stories to self-help advice, podcasts cover a wide range of topics and cater to diverse interests. They provide a platform for experts and enthusiasts to share their knowledge and insights, allowing listeners to learn and be entertained on the go.

The Revolution of Online Streaming Services

Online streaming services have revolutionized the way we consume entertainment. Platforms like Netflix , Hulu , and Amazon Prime Video offer a vast library of movies, TV shows, and documentaries, allowing us to binge-watch our favorite content at our convenience. These services have not only changed the way we watch television but have also given rise to original content, with streaming platforms producing their own series and movies.

The Importance of Critical Analysis and Media Literacy

As digital media continues to evolve and expand, it is crucial to critically analyze the information we consume. With the rise of fake news and misinformation, it is essential to be discerning and verify the credibility of sources. Additionally, media literacy has become an essential skill in today's digital age, enabling individuals to navigate the vast landscape of media and make informed decisions.

The Ever-Expanding World of Media

In conclusion, media has come a long way from traditional forms of communication. From social media platforms to websites, blogs to podcasts, and online streaming services, media offers a wide range of information and entertainment. It has become an integral part of our daily lives, shaping the way we connect, learn, and consume content. As technology continues to advance, the world of media will undoubtedly continue to expand and evolve, offering new and exciting possibilities.

Earn As You Learn

Earn 25% commission when your network purchase Uplyrn courses or subscribe to our annual membership. It’s the best thing ever. Next to learning, of course.

What is Media Literacy?

Developing Media Literacy Skills

Media literacy skills are essential in today's media-saturated world. By developing these skills, individuals can critically examine the messages they encounter, identify bias and manipulation, and separate fact from fiction.

Analyzing Media Messages

One aspect of media literacy is the ability to analyze media messages. This involves understanding the techniques used to convey information, such as visual and auditory elements, language, and persuasive strategies. By analyzing these elements, individuals can uncover hidden agendas, stereotypes, and manipulative tactics employed by media producers. This critical analysis empowers individuals to question and challenge the messages they encounter, rather than passively accepting them.

Evaluating Credibility and Reliability

Another important aspect of media literacy is the ability to evaluate the credibility and reliability of sources. With the rise of fake news and misinformation, it is crucial to discern trustworthy sources from those that are unreliable or biased. Media literacy equips individuals with the skills to assess the credibility of information, fact-check claims, and verify sources. This helps individuals make informed decisions and avoid spreading false or misleading information.

Understanding the Influence of Media

Furthermore, media literacy involves understanding the role of media in shaping our beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors. Media has a powerful influence on society, and being media literate allows individuals to critically examine the impact of media messages on themselves and others. By understanding how media can shape our perceptions and values, individuals can become more conscious consumers and creators of media.

Media literacy is a vital skill in today's media-saturated world. It enables individuals to navigate the complex landscape of media, analyze messages critically, evaluate sources, and understand the influence of media on society. By developing media literacy skills, individuals can become active and responsible participants in the digital age, making informed decisions and contributing to a more media-literate society.

Media Literacy and Its Impact on Society

Media literacy plays a significant role in shaping society. The media exposes us to a diverse array of ideas, beliefs, and opinions, which in turn shape our worldview and understanding of the world. By developing media literacy skills, individuals can navigate this landscape more critically. They are empowered to question and analyze the information presented to them, comprehend the intentions behind the media, and ultimately make informed decisions.

Reasons to Promote Media Literacy Education

The Importance of Media Literacy Education

Media literacy education plays a crucial role in equipping individuals with the necessary tools to navigate the complex media landscape. By promoting media literacy in schools, colleges, and communities, we empower individuals to develop critical thinking skills and media analysis abilities. This, in turn, enables them to become active and responsible participants in the digital age.

Fostering Informed Citizens

A comprehensive media literacy education program is essential for fostering informed citizens who can engage in civil discourse and make informed choices. By teaching media literacy, we can create a society that questions the media's agenda, demands transparency, and values diverse perspectives.

The Benefits of Media Literacy

Media literacy goes beyond the ability to discern accurate information. It also enhances individual communication skills, helping people express themselves effectively and understand others' perspectives. Moreover, it promotes empathy, critical thinking, and an appreciation for the role and power of media in society.

Empowering Media Creators

In today's digital landscape, anyone can be a content creator, whether through blogging, podcasting, or social media platforms. Media literacy education equips individuals with the knowledge and skills necessary to create media responsibly, ethically, and effectively.

The Importance of Media Literacy in the Formation of Attitudes and Opinions

Media literacy, which includes understanding and analyzing both traditional and digital media, plays a crucial role in the formation of attitudes, opinions, and citizenship. Media messages, whether spread through traditional channels or the vast realm of digital media, have the power to shape public perception and influence decision-making. By being media literate, individuals can recognize the strategies employed to manipulate emotions, understand the role of advertising in promoting risky behaviors, and critically evaluate the information they encounter online, ensuring their own online safety. This empowers individuals to form their own opinions based on reliable information and personal values, contributing to a society where advocacy and responsible digital citizenship prevail.

Why is Media Literacy Important for a 21st Century Audience

As technology evolves and media consumption habits change, digital media literacy skills must adapt to suit the needs of a 21st-century audience. This includes being aware of the challenges posed by deep fake videos, understanding the impact of social media algorithms, and navigating the ethical implications of data privacy. Information and media literacy education needs to equip individuals with the skills necessary to thrive in a digitally connected world while also addressing the potential consequences of risky behaviors. By fostering an understanding of intellectual property rights, individuals can engage critically with the vast amount of digital media available, ensuring they are responsible consumers and creators. Media literacy education plays a pivotal role in empowering individuals to make informed decisions and navigate the complex landscape of digital media.

Media Literacy Challenges

While media literacy is undoubtedly crucial, it is not without its challenges. The constant influx of information, the fast-paced nature of media, and the ever-evolving digital landscape make it difficult for individuals to maintain their media literacy skills. Therefore, it is important to adapt media literacy education to effectively address these challenges. By doing so, individuals can be equipped with the necessary tools and strategies to navigate the complexities of the modern media landscape.

Media literacy is an essential skill in today's society. It provides individuals with the ability to analyze and evaluate media messages critically. This skill enables them to make informed decisions and engage responsibly with the media landscape. By promoting media literacy education, we empower individuals with the necessary tools to navigate the vast sea of information, recognize biases, and actively participate in shaping our media-driven world.

Leave your thoughts here...

• 2024-01-26 22:25:17

• 2024-01-23 00:34:51

• 2024-01-22 18:32:56

All Comments

Find your place in the world, top companies choose uplyrn to look for talent..

© 2024 Uplyrn PL

• Affiliate Partners
• Partnership
• Refer a Friend
• Be a Lecturer
• Lecturer Guide
• Expert Referral
• Be a Mentor

Welcome Back!

Explore . Discover . Grow

• Tools and Resources
• Customer Services
• Original Language Spotlight
• Alternative and Non-formal Education 
• Cognition, Emotion, and Learning
• Curriculum and Pedagogy
• Education and Society
• Education, Change, and Development
• Education, Cultures, and Ethnicities
• Education, Gender, and Sexualities
• Education, Health, and Social Services
• Educational Administration and Leadership
• Educational History
• Educational Politics and Policy
• Educational Purposes and Ideals
• Educational Systems
• Educational Theories and Philosophies
• Globalization, Economics, and Education
• Languages and Literacies
• Professional Learning and Development
• Research and Assessment Methods
• Technology and Education
• Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

Article contents

Critical media literacy in teacher education, theory, and practice.

• Jeff Share , Jeff Share University of California Los Angeles
• Tatevik Mamikonyan Tatevik Mamikonyan School of Education, University of California Los Angeles
•  and  Eduardo Lopez Eduardo Lopez University of California Los Angeles
• https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1404
• Published online: 30 September 2019
• This version: 20 September 2023
• Previous version

Democracy in the digital networked age of “fake news” and “alternative facts” requires new literacy skills and critical awareness to read, write, and use media and technology to empower civic participation and social transformation. Unfortunately, not many educators have been prepared to teach students how to think critically with and about the media and technology that engulf us. Across the globe there is a growing movement to develop media and information literacy curriculum (UNESCO) and train teachers in media education (e-Media Education Lab), but these attempts are limited and in danger of co-optation by the faster growing, better financed, and less critical education and information technology corporations. It is essential to develop a critical response to the new information communication technologies, artificial intelligence, and algorithms that are embedded in all aspects of society. The possibilities and limitations are vast for teaching educators to enter K-12 classrooms and teach their students to use various media, critically question all types of texts, challenge problematic representations, and create alternative messages. Through applying a critical media literacy framework that has evolved from cultural studies and critical pedagogy, students at all grade levels can learn to critically analyze the messages and create their own alternative media. The voices of teachers engaging in this work can provide pragmatic insight into the potential and challenges of putting the theory into practice in K-12 public schools.

• critical literacy
• critical pedagogy
• media education
• media literacy
• critical media literacy
• social justice
• politics of representation
• cultural studies
• teacher education

Updated in this version

The authors made minor revisions to this text to reflect more recent scholarship. The reference list and further readings have similarly been updated.

Introduction

It is a formidable challenge to prepare critical educators to work inside a system in which every brick in the wall has been laid to transmit the information, skills, and ideas necessary to reproduce the social norms, inequities, ideologies, and alienation that are undermining the quality and sustainability of life on this planet. However, education can be a powerful tool to challenge these problems and create opportunities for students to work in solidarity with others to create a more socially and environmentally just world. To support these changes, we need teachers ready to engage students in critical inquiry by posing questions about systemic and structural issues of power, hierarchies of oppression, and social injustice. In the current media and information age, information communication technologies (ICTs) are available to either continue the control and degradation or to deconstruct the systems of oppression and reconstruct a more just and sustainable society.

Digital technology is opening opportunities for individual participation and alternative points of view, while at the same time a handful of enormous media and technology corporations have become the dominant storytellers, often repeating the same story at the expense of countless different perspectives and creative ways of thinking. Many of these storytellers are actually story-sellers, more interested in peddling ideas and products than informing, enlightening, inspiring, or challenging. While young people are using more media, they are also being used more by media companies. Giant transnational corporations are targeting youth as one of the most valuable markets for building brand loyalty and selling to advertisers. Researchers found 8- to 18-year-olds in the United States spend well over 10 hours a day interacting with various forms of media, such as music, computers, video games, television, film, and print ( Rideout et al., 2011 ). Another investigation discovered that 95% of American 13- to 17-year-olds have access to a smartphone and 97% say they are online daily and 46% use it constantly ( Vogels et al., 2022 ).

Not only is the amount of time with media increasing but the quality of that engagement is also changing by becoming more commercial and rarely critical. Researchers at Stanford University administered six tasks to 3,466 high schools across 14 states in the US to judge their ability to assess online information. In one task, students were asked to evaluate the credibility of a website that claimed to “disseminate factual reports” and 96% failed to learn about the site’s ties to the fossil fuel industry. In a different task, over half of students believed an anonymously posted video purporting to show voter fraud in the US was real, even though it was filmed in Russia ( Breakstone et al., 2021 ). In another study, Vosoughi et al. (2018) examined approximately 126,000 stories tweeted over 4.5 million times between 2006 and 2017 . The researchers were interested in understanding what accounted for the differential diffusion of verified true and false news stories. They found that false news stories spread “farther, faster, deeper, and more broadly than the truth because humans, not robots, are more likely to spread it” (p. 5). In analyzing the tweets, the authors concluded, false stories were 70% more likely to be retweeted because people found them not only more novel but the stories also inspired emotional responses of fear, disgust, or surprise.

The concern about “fake news” has encouraged many people to recognize the need for critical readers and writers of media. Some have suggested that we simply need better cognitive skills to determine truth from lies. However, making sense of the media and our information society is far more complicated than a reductionist idea of simply finding the truth. Rather than judging information as either true or false, students need to learn to search for multiple sources, different perspectives, and various types of evidence to triangulate and evaluate findings. In order to best evaluate and understand the information, they also need to question the influence of media in shaping the message and positioning the audience. Since all knowledge is an interpretation ( Kincheloe, 2007 ), interpreting the meaning of a message is a complex process that requires skills to probe empirical evidence, evaluate subjective biases, analyze the medium and construction of the text, and explore the social contexts.

This is an opportunity for educators to guide their students to think critically with and about the ICTs and media that surround them. Morrell et al. (2013) argue that the technology itself will not bring about transformative educational change. “That change will only come through teachers who draw on critical frameworks to create learning communities where the use of these tools becomes an empowering enterprise” (p. 14). Therefore, the changes in media, technology, and society require critical media literacy (CML) that can support teachers and students to question and create with and about the very tools that can empower or oppress, entertain or distract, inform or mislead, and buy or sell everything from lifestyles to politicians. Now more than ever, teachers should encourage students to be reading, viewing, listening to, interacting with, and creating a multitude of texts, from digital podcasts to multimedia productions.

Teacher Education

Even though youth are immersed in a world in which media and technology have entered all aspects of their lives and society, few teacher education programs are preparing teachers to help their students to critically understand the potential and limitations of these changes. It is crucial that new teachers learn how to teach their K-12 students to critically read and write everything, from academic texts to social media.

This means that schools of education responsible for training the new wave of teachers must be up to date, not just with the latest technology, but more importantly, with critical media literacy (CML) theory and pedagogy in order to prepare teachers and students to think and act critically with and about media and technology. In Canada, where media literacy is mandatory in every grade from 1 to 12, most new teachers are not receiving media literacy training in their preservice programs ( Wilson & Duncan, 2009 ). Researchers investigating media education in the United Kingdom and the US have found that many teachers are unprepared to teach media education and that professional learning opportunities are limited ( Butler, 2020 ; Kirwan et al., 2003 ). The progress has been slow, especially considering that inclusion of media literacy in formal public education has a history dating back to the 1980s in Australia, Britain, and Canada. However, nonformal media education has been occurring in many parts of the world for decades ( Hart, 1998 ; Kaplún, 1998 ; Kubey, 1997 ; Pegurer Caprino & Martínez-Cerdá, 2016 ; Prinsloo & Criticos, 1991 ).

While it is difficult to know for sure who is and who is not teaching critically about media and technology ( Mihailidis, 2008 ), there seems to be an increased interest in media literacy in the United States. In 2022 , the National Council of Teachers of English published a position statement recommending implementation of media education in English Language Arts along with two special issue journal publications ( Lynch, 2021 ; Kist & Christel, 2022 ) devoted to critical media literacy, arguing that “media education must be an essential component of the professional identity of teachers” ( National Council of Teachers of English, 2022 ).

As technology and media continue to evolve and increasingly enter public and private spaces, more educators are recognizing the need for training new teachers about media literacy ( Domine, 2011 ; Goetze et al., 2005 ; Hobbs, 2007a ) and some are even addressing the need to teach about CML ( Flores-Koulish et al., 2011 ; Funk et al., 2016 ; Robertson & Hughes, 2011 ; Trust et al., 2022 ). Researchers Tiede et al. (2015) studied 64 universities or colleges of teacher education in Germany and 316 U.S. public educational institutions that provide teacher training and graduate studies, concluding that very few offer more than media didactics (basic educational technology that teaches with media, not about media). From their data in the United States, they report, “media education, with emphasis on the instructional practices associated with the critical evaluation of media, culture, and society, were scarce, representing only 2% of all study programs in teacher training programs” (pp. 540−541). In Germany, the percentage increases to 25%, but “media didactics tends to be emphasized to the disadvantage of media education in both countries” (p. 542).

In 2011 , the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) published a curriculum guide online in 11 languages for training teachers in media education ( Grizzle & Wilson, 2011 ), declaring that “teacher training in media and information literacy will be a major challenge for the global education system at least for the next decade” ( Pérez-Tornero & Tayie, 2012 , p. 11). 1 In Europe, Ranieri and Bruni (2018) analyzed the successes and challenges of training preservice and in-service teachers about media and digital literacy. An initiative called e-Media Educational Lab, funded by the European Commission, provided blended training to 279 preservice teachers and 81 in-service teachers in six countries. Based on surveys and fieldnotes, Ranieri and Bruni (2018) reported that the preservice and in-service teachers found critical media analysis and media production to be very important; they described their intent to transfer their media competency to their classrooms and expressed a desire to learn more practical ways to help their students develop media competencies.

UNESCO’s approach to media education combines media and information literacy (MIL) to include many competencies, from learning about and using information communication technologies to thinking critically about ethics and democracy. Carolyn Wilson (2012) explains, “MIL is both a content area and way of teaching and learning; it is not only about the acquisition of technical skills, but the development of a critical framework and approaches” (p. 16).

Combining information technology with media-cultural studies is essential, but still infrequent. Within the current wave of educational reform that prioritizes the newest technology and career readiness over civic engagement and critical inquiry, schools are more likely to adopt only information technology or information literacy and not critical media education. In the United States, few universities offer more than a single course in media literacy and most do not even offer that ( Goetze et al., 2005 ; Meehan et al., 2015 ).

Schwarz (2001) asserts that because of the power of emerging literacies, “teacher education needs media literacy as an essential tool and an essential topic in the new millennium” (pp. 111−112). She calls for integrating media literacy across all subject areas of teacher education, “from methods courses and educational psychology to foundational courses and student teaching” (p. 118). This interdisciplinary approach for media education could be easier now for K-12 teachers in the United States since the Common Core State Standards require literacy to be taught and technology to be used across the curriculum ( California Common Core State Standards, 2013 ; Moore & Bonilla, 2014 ; Trust et al., 2022 ).

Two studies with a total of 31 preservice teachers found a discrepancy between their positive attitudes for teaching media literacy and the lack of attention and support in their teacher education programs to prepare them to teach MIL ( Gretter & Yadav, 2018 ). Based on interviews with these preservice teachers, Gretter and Yadav (2018) report that they associated MIL with critical thinking skills and expressed concerns about not knowing how to teach MIL because their teacher preparation program encouraged “teaching with technology and not necessarily about technology” (p. 115). These preservice teachers complained about “a lack of preparation to help them transfer their knowledge of digital media to MIL pedagogies that would benefit students” (p. 111). This highlights the importance of preparing educators with the theory and conceptual understandings as well as the pedagogy and practical applications for how to teach their students to critically analyze and create media.

Teaching Teachers Critical Media Literacy

Transforming education to critically use media, technology, and popular culture for social and environmental justice is the overarching goal of a critical media literacy (CML) course in the teacher education program at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). The authors of this article have been involved in designing and teaching this course to in-service and preservice teachers. Through combining theory from cultural studies and critical pedagogy with practical classroom applications of digital media and technology, this course prepares K-12 educators to teach their students how to critically analyze and create all types of media. In 2011 , this four-unit course on CML was officially approved and became a required class for all students working on their teaching credential at UCLA.

The teacher education program at UCLA is primarily a two-year master’s and credential program that accepts about 130 candidates annually. The program is committed to developing social justice educators to work with and improve the schooling conditions of California’s ethnically, culturally, and linguistically diverse children. While most of the students go through the two-year program, additional pathways for earning a teaching credential and master’s degree have been offered, such as a master’s-only program for in-service teachers with two years or more of full-time teaching experience.

The CML class is taught in separate sections, usually divided by subjects, with 25−50 students per section. Most of the candidates taking the class are student teaching at the same time, except for the master’s-only candidates, who were teaching full-time while attending the class once a week in the evening. The class includes lectures, discussions, and activities interwoven into each session during the 10-week quarter.

Beginning with a theoretical overview, the course explores the development of media education that is defined less as a specific body of knowledge or set of skills and more as a framework of conceptual understandings ( Buckingham, 2003 ). Much of the theory behind CML has evolved from cultural studies, a field of critical inquiry that began in the 20th century in Europe and continues to grow with new critiques of media and society. From the 1930s through the 1960s, researchers at the Frankfurt Institute for Social Research used critical social theory to analyze how media culture and the new tools of communication technology induce ideology and social control. In the 1960s, researchers at the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies at the University of Birmingham added to the earlier concerns of ideology with a more sophisticated understanding of the audience as active constructors of reality, not simply mirrors of an external reality. Kellner (1995) explains that cultural studies has continued to grow and incorporate concepts of semiotics, feminism, multiculturalism, and postmodernism. Incorporating a dialectical understanding of political economy, textual analysis, and audience theory, cultural studies critiques media culture as dynamic discourses that reproduce dominant ideologies as well as entertain, educate, and offer the possibilities for counter-hegemonic alternatives ( Hammer & Kellner, 2009 ).

Critical media literacy includes three dimensions ( Share & Gambino, 2022 ). The first involves the content students learn about systems, structures, and ideologies that reproduce hierarchies of power and knowledge concerning race, gender, class, sexuality and other forms of identity and environmental justice, as well as general understandings about how media and communication function. The second dimension engages the skills to critically think and question media representations and biases, to deconstruct and reconstruct media texts, and use a variety of media to access, analyze, evaluate, and create. The third involves developing a disposition for empathy, critical consciousness, and empowerment to take action to challenge and transform society to be more socially and environmentally just. This third dimension is based on Freire’s (2010) notion of conscientização , a revolutionary critical consciousness that involves perception as well as action against oppression. These three dimensions of critical media literacy pedagogy are supported through an inquiry-based democratic approach that follows ideas of transformative educators like John Dewey and Paulo Freire. We incorporate feminist theory and critical pedagogy to analyze relationships between media and audiences, information and power ( Carlson et al., 2013 ; Garcia et al., 2013 ). When we first began teaching the course, we used a simple framework with five core concepts and key questions from the Center for Media Literacy. 2 To emphasize the critical potential of these ideas, while providing an accessible tool for teachers to use in the classroom, the following critical media literacy framework was developed, with six conceptual understandings and questions, as shown in Table 1 ( Kellner & Share, 2019 ).

These six conceptual understandings and questions are referred to regularly and are addressed in all lesson plans. It is important for teachers to understand the concepts and questions because theory should inform practice for all three dimensions. However, it is better for K-12 students to learn to ask the questions rather than memorize the concepts, since the questions, with appropriate guidance, can lead students on a path of inquiry where they are more likely to make meaning themselves, related to the conceptual understandings.

The CML framework is designed to help teachers and their students question the role of power and ideology that socialize and control society through making some people and ideas seem “normal” and “natural” while the rest are “othered” and “marginalized” ( Hall, 2003 ). This critical framing supports teachers and students to deepen their explorations of racism, sexism, classism, homophobia, overconsumption, environmental exploitation, and other problematic representations in media. Candidates analyze and discuss current media examples, while also learning how to use various ICTs to create their own media with alternative counter-hegemonic representations. Using an inquiry process and democratic pedagogy, problems are posed to the students to collaboratively wrestle with, unpack, and respond to through media production.

Critical media literacy promotes an expansion of our understanding of literacy to include many types of texts, such as images, sounds, music, video games, social media, advertising, popular culture, and print, as well as a deepening of critical analysis to explore the connections between information and power. In our digital networked media age, it is not enough to teach students how to read and write just with print while their world has moved far beyond letters on a page. Literacy education in the 21st century requires breaking from traditional practices to include all the varied ways people communicate with media, technology, and any tool that facilitates the transfer of information or connects people. This calls for new skills and understandings to decode and analyze as well as to create and produce all types of texts. The California Teaching Performance Expectations also require teacher education programs to expand this view of literacy and integrate media and technology into coursework in order to “deepen teaching and learning to provide students with opportunities to participate in a digital society and economy” ( California Commission on Teacher Credentialing, 2016 , p. 9).

Each class starts by reviewing and applying the conceptual understandings and questions. Since one goal of the course is for candidates to understand that literacy includes reading and writing all types of texts, we encourage students to analyze as well as produce media. A series of assignments requires candidates to work together to create various types of media projects such as visual posters, photographs, podcasts, memes, digital stories, and social media. The candidates are also expected to work collaboratively on a CML lesson plan and learning segment that they write up, present a summary of to the whole class, and when possible, also teach it. For a detailed description of this course, see Share (2015) and visit the UCLA Library Critical Media Literacy Research Guide for links to articles, videos, and websites used in the course. 3

Table 1. Critical Media Literacy Framework

From a desire to explore if and how former students are applying the skills and knowledge gained from the critical media literacy (CML) course into their teaching practice, we created an online survey for students who had taken the course. Through purposeful sampling, we sent out the survey to the 738 students who had taken the CML course and ended up with 185 usable responses (25% response rate), 153 preservice and 32 in-service teachers. Of the 185 respondents, 53 taught elementary school and 132 were secondary-level teachers. The breakdown of the middle school and high school teachers was: 38 science, 34 math, 33 social sciences, 28 English, and several reported teaching a combination of subjects as well as some who taught other areas such as music, visual arts, Spanish, English language development, or adult education. The span of experience was wide; some just started teaching and some had been teaching over seven years, yet most of the teachers (52%) had been teaching between two and three years.

The mixed method survey included 20 questions. The first eight sought to identify participants’ teaching background. The remaining 12 questions inquired about their experiences teaching CML skills and concepts to their K-12 students. Ten quantitative questions used a Likert scale with a choice of responses, including very frequently, frequently, occasionally, rarely, and never, as well as an option to choose not applicable. The final two qualitative questions were open-ended in which respondents could type their thoughts about any “memorable moment(s) teaching critical media literacy” and “any additional comments.” During the analysis phase, we found it helpful to combine the categories very frequently and frequently and refer to them as VF/F.

Voices From the Field

Using mixed methods of quantitative and qualitative data, we analyzed the survey responses to explore teachers’ ideas about what they had been doing with their students. The overall feedback suggested that the majority of the respondents had brought aspects of media literacy education into their K-12 classrooms, and sometimes even incorporated CML. One of the most recurring patterns we noticed was that these teachers had been expanding the traditional concept of literacy by engaging their students with various types of media.

Teaching With Media

In reply to the first question, most of the respondents reported having integrated media into their class activities: 64% VF/F, 30% occasionally, 6% rarely, and no one responded never ( N = 185). The responses to Question 1 were very similar for elementary and secondary teachers, with only a 1% to 5% difference. Where we saw greater variation was when comparing the subject matter of secondary teachers. The English and science teachers had the highest percentages (75% and 76%) of VF/F responses to Question 1 about integrating media into class activities. Math teachers, by contrast, reported the lowest percentage, with 44% reporting VF/F and 15% rarely integrating media into the curriculum (see Figure 1 ).

Figure 1. Responses from secondary teachers to Question 1 about how often they integrated media into class activities.

While these responses demonstrated an overall high amount of media integration, it was not clear how the teachers integrated media and what students were doing with the media. The responses from Question 5 (“my students have created the following media”) provided more information about the students’ interactions with media, showing that the vast majority of respondents (92%) had their students create some type of media (see Figure 2 for a list of the various media students created).

Since the question only asked teachers to check the box for the type of media their students created, we did not know how often this occurred or with what degree of analysis. Questions 1 and 5 indicated that teaching with media occurred with over 90% of the respondents.

Figure 2. Responses to Question 5 about the different types of media that all 185 respondents report their students have created. They were asked to choose all that apply.

Teaching About Media

The second question tried to find out more about those interactions with media by asking respondents to rate how often they had given their “students opportunities to engage in media analysis.” For Question 2, about one-third of all 185 respondents, 32%, reported VF/F, 43% occasionally, 21% rarely, and 4% never. When comparing responses from Questions 1 and 2, the respondents seemed to have been doing more teaching with media (Question 1) than teaching about media (Question 2) (see Figure 3 ). A similar finding was mentioned in the research conducted in Germany and the United States by Tiede et al. (2015) .

Figure 3. Comparing all responses from Question 1 about integrating media into class activities (teaching with media) with Question 2 about engaging in media analysis (teaching about media).

A more nuanced perspective of Question 2 is possible when comparing the responses about media analysis from different content area secondary teachers. In response to Question 2, the teachers who reported VF/F were the following: 63% of English teachers reported giving the most opportunities for their students to engage in media analysis, as compared to almost half as often by 32% of science teachers and about five times less often by 12% of math teachers (see Figure 4 ). Since literacy is a primary goal of English instruction, it is not surprising that English teachers reported the highest levels of media analysis ( Hobbs, 2007b ).

It is important to recognize that teaching about media can be a highly complex and multifaceted undertaking, especially when done through a CML lens. For example, the second conceptual understanding encourages students to analyze the codes and conventions of the media text and the medium through which they travel by asking how the text was constructed and delivered or accessed. This, in itself, can have many layers and yet is just one of six questions intended to help students think critically about media. Livingstone (2018) asserts, “media literacy is needed not only to engage with the media but to engage with society through the media .” As Luke and Freebody (1997) argue, it is not enough to only have a psychological approach to literacy, as if reading and writing is just an individual cognitive process. We need to also bring a sociological lens into the process of questioning the contexts, the dominant ideologies, and the systems that make some things seem “natural” or “normal.” The CML framework is a holistic tool for thinking about and questioning the dynamic role media play in our relationships with ourselves, each other, and society. Responses and comments to other questions in the survey provide more insight into how some teachers have engaged their students in various types of media analysis.

Figure 4. Comparing responses from different content areas about Question 2 regarding how often secondary teachers gave their students opportunities to engage in media analysis.

Evaluating Information and Advertising

In the qualitative responses to Questions 11 and 12, teachers mentioned embracing basic media literacy principles in the ways students were evaluating the credibility of information and advertising as well as creating different types of media. The popularity of the term “fake news” and the growing amount of disinformation have increased the challenge to distinguish misinformation and propaganda from journalism and scientifically researched facts ( Rogow, 2018 ). An elementary teacher who reported “frequently” integrating media into the classroom, asserted:

Though my students are younger and some of these concepts are more difficult to teach than others, I find it important to bring up especially in terms of making sure they don’t believe every YouYube video they watch. We’ve had many meaningful discussions about what can be created for a video shouldn’t just be accepted as the truth. For example, the ‘mermaid’ documentary that came out a few years ago had all of my students convinced that they had found a mermaid. It led to an interesting discussion on hoaxes and further reading about Bigfoo[t] and other such stories.

Since all media contain bias because they are created by subjective humans, it is important for teachers to help their students to recognize the bias and also be able to judge the credibility of information. A high school math teacher wrote:

It has not happened until this school year, when I began teaching Statistics. I introduced some pictographs for students to analyze and an article for students to read about how a website stated that if polls were unskewed, Trump would be leading the polls for election. I had students read and discuss about the validity and why/why not it is trustable.

Several respondents mentioned having their students study political advertising, and since all U.S. elections are now multimillion-dollar advertising campaigns (e.g., Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign won the top prizes at the Cannes Lions International Advertising Awards), there is little distinction between selling products, ideas, and political candidates.

Analyzing advertising is an important aspect of media education because advertising is the motor that drives commercial media and has become so common in our lives that there are few spaces that are completely ad-free ( Jhally, 2003 ). Several respondents reported about their students investigating advertisements for false health messages, misleading packaging, political campaigns, tobacco, alcohol, and different perspectives. One secondary English teacher wrote, “My students took pictures of advertisements that surrounded their neighborhood and we analyzed them for patterns, themes, and purposes.” A high school science teacher reported, “I had many times this past year where students were able to reflect on marketing strategies and how they affect the viewer’s perspective of their life and themselves. Students made great connections.”

During the critical media literacy (CML) class, students scrutinize consumer culture and the role advertising plays in creating anxieties, shaping desires, and normalizing representations about all things, from consumption to gender, race, and class. Candidates in the CML class learn about these ideas through readings, by analyzing advertisements, and also by creating ads for different target audiences. When asked about the media their students had created, one third reported their students created advertisements.

Creating Different Types of Media

When students are taught print literacy, they are instructed how to decode letters on a page and how to write with those letters to construct words, sentences, and paragraphs. The same process of teaching reading and writing should be applied to visual images, movies, songs, video games, social media, and all the various multimedia texts that students are encountering daily. In responses from the survey, teachers reported about having their students write and create many different types of texts beyond print (see Figure 2 ).

One English teacher wrote that having students create media was “very successful. They loved being able to create memes, posters, Prezis, etc. to present their work.” An elementary teacher shared about students “creating podcasts/npr style news stories regarding UN sustainability goals.” Several respondents commented on their students designing commercials or challenging ads by producing spoofs that parody the ads. One middle school teacher shared, “students analyzed ads for nicotine and alcohol products, then used the practice with critical media skills to create ‘anti-ads’ with Google drawings.”

During the first year of teaching, a high school science teacher reported about a memorable moment when “creating a multi-lingual, easy-to-understand and scientifically supported pamphlet on the hazards in LA’s environment.” A high school Spanish teacher wrote about his students creating critical memes in Spanish, like the ones they created in the critical media literacy (CML) class. During the session exploring racism and media, candidates challenge racist representations through creating racial myth-busting memes. As a strategy to demonstrate the value of media production, the CML class has students create various media in almost every session, and these activities are often the favorite lessons mentioned in the end of course evaluations.

Increasing Engagement

While engagement is not a learning objective, all teaching benefits from students being engaged in their learning. One of the patterns that emerged from the responses was teachers’ observations that student engagement increased. An eighth-grade English teacher wrote that after incorporating media literacy, the students’ “entire attitude toward learning shifted. Especially the hard to reach students.” An elementary teacher reported, “Media literacy has made great contributions in my class with science research in the past. The simple act of using google images, google maps and finding credible sources has sparked learning and interest in my class.” Another elementary teacher shared about using critical media literacy (CML) to analyze food justice issues: “They were instantly engaged and students who had a difficult time writing and with critical thinking then did not.”

A secondary science teacher reported, “Students spent the entire class engaged in discussion when I intended for it to only be an introduction to the unit.” Another high school science teacher wrote, “When I did teach a class specifically geared towards media literacy, it was great because students were engaged. They were quick at analyzing images and creating their own.” A third science teacher wrote, “using critical media literacy made engaging my students in abstract chemistry concepts more meaningful and engaging.” Engagement tends to increase when students are genuinely interested and intrinsically motivated, something that often comes out of personal connection, a sense of meaningfulness, and an authentic belief in the value of the learning ( Dewey, 1963 ). These are all elements of good CML pedagogy. A high school science teacher described the feelings of students and their parents as they responded to their CML work: “My favorite moments are students exuding pride and passion over the work they are creating that speaks to their perspectives and experiences; parents proud of their students’ media creations.” Feelings of pride and passion are important for all students to experience; they help lower students’ affective filters for learning ( Krashen, 1995 ) and increase intrinsic motivation to want to learn.

Critical Media Literacy

As we analyzed teachers’ written responses, we saw a number of comments in which they were taking basic media literacy concepts to deeper levels of criticality. Several mentioned how useful the class was to understanding critical theory and be able to see how it can be enacted in their K-12 classroom. Similar findings were mentioned after Joanou (2017) analyzed data about a critical media literacy (CML) class taught to master’s-level practicing K-12 educators. Joanou (2017) reported, “critical media literacy helps bridge the gap between theory and practice” (p. 40). The use of media texts and popular culture can provide relevant examples for entry into abstract concepts that are often politically and emotionally charged, and sometimes too sensitive or too distant to begin discussing on a personal level.

Teaching about the connections between information and power reflects a key goal of CML ( Kellner & Share, 2007 ) and our respondents demonstrated this through their qualitative comments about recreating counter-narratives, analyzing the politics of representation, making critical connections between history and current events with media texts, and engaging in political, social, and environmental media activism. Questions 3 and 4 attempted to assess the frequency in which teachers were bringing critical aspects of media education to their students.

Question 3 asks teachers to rate how often: “My students have engaged in media analysis by exploring media representations of ideology, race, class, gender, sexuality, environmentalism, and/or other social justice issues.” Elementary and secondary teachers reported almost identical frequencies in response to Question 3: 22% in both groups reported VF/F while 42% (elementary) and 45% (secondary) stated occasionally. When asked Question 4 about making connections between information and power, the differences increased: 39% of the secondary teachers responded doing this VF/F while just 23% of the elementary teachers reported doing this VF/F.

In-service teachers reported higher frequencies for Question 3: 54% of in-service teachers reported VF/F while preservice teachers reported 14% VF/F. For Question 4: 56% of in-service teachers reported VF/F compared with 30% of preservice teachers who reported VF/F.

When comparing responses separated by subject matter with secondary teachers, 33% of English teachers and 30% of social science teachers reported VF/F for engaging in critical media analysis, as seen in Question 3 about exploring media representations. This is considerably higher than the 16% of science teachers and 9% of math teachers reporting VF/F. The math and science teachers reported the highest percentages for rarely or never having their students explore media representations of social justice issues (see Figure 5 ). The literature supports similar findings. Garii and Rule (2009) reported that student teachers had a difficult time integrating social justice into math and science content due to several factors. In their research with novice elementary teachers, Garii and Rule discovered that the candidates were not confident in their ability to teach math and science and had limited and unsophisticated knowledge of the content. They also viewed math and science “to be a set of routinized, algorithmic practices that lead to a single, correct answer and neither science nor mathematics are assumed to be closely connected to real-world issues and concerns” (p. 491). Given that they are struggling to learn and understand the content, math and science candidates turned to classroom textbooks to guide instructional practices. Incorporating nontraditional practices or making connections to students’ lives becomes a challenge because they disconnect social justice from their teaching and focus on teaching to the content ( Garii & Rule, 2009 ).

Figure 5. Responses to Question 3 from secondary teachers about how often they engaged their students in critical “media analysis by exploring media representations of ideology, race, class, gender, sexuality, environmentalism, and/or other social justice issues.”

One of the more significant findings of the study is the number of respondents reporting they “noticed that using critical media literacy encourages critical thinking among students” (Question 9). Of the preservice respondents, 61% reported VF/F, and for the in-service teachers, the percentages jump to 81% who reported VF/F. In both cases, the majority of respondents expressed their feelings that CML promotes critical thinking most of the time (see Figure 6 ). A middle school social science teacher wrote that after teaching CML, “students were deeper thinkers and our discussions were so much richer. Students were highly engaged and more invested in the classroom.” When comparing grade levels for Question 9, we see 78% of elementary teachers reported that using CML VF/F encourages critical thinking, and 61% of secondary teachers reported VF/F. This large percentage of elementary teachers reporting about CML encouraging critical thinking shows great promise for the potential of CML in the early grades.

Figure 6. Comparison of preservice and in-service teachers’ responses to Question 9 about how often they have noticed CML encourages critical thinking among their students.

Creating Counter Narratives and Supporting Students’ Voices

Many of the responses regarding transformative education centered on guiding students to create counternarratives and supporting student ideas and voices. Respondents mentioned activities that enabled their students to recreate media texts with a critical lens. These counternarratives included recreating superhero comic books, news, advertisements, digital storytelling, national holiday observances, and poems. A high school English teacher noted, “after analyzing recent and popular superhero comic books, my students used the comic medium to tell an autobiographical story wherein they exhibited power in the face of oppression.” A middle school English teacher reported:

The most memorable lesson I’ve taught involving critical media literacy was a unit based on perseverance and the power of the human spirit in regards to power structures and oppression. After analyzing multiple types of media, students created their own VoiceThread using spoken word in order to share their own messages of perseverance. It was incredibly powerful to hear their messages.

For most respondents, the notion of enabling their students to share personal stories using multimedia tools meant that they were integrating critical media pedagogy into their teaching practice. Traditionally, personal and experiential knowledge as a form of literacy is not often valued; thus, it is a critical pedagogical orientation to encourage students to recreate media texts that reflect their intersecting realities and challenge the pervasive dominant ideologies. Students’ personal histories become scholarly pursuits when digital storytelling encompasses media production skills taught through a critical media literacy (CML) framework. Vasquez (2017) asserts, “students learn best when what they are learning has importance in their lives, using the topics, issues, and questions that they raise should therefore be an important part of creating the classroom curriculum” (p. 8). A middle school math and technology teacher commented about incorporating CML into her master’s inquiry project:

The project we ultimately created was a digital storytelling project, in which students interviewed their parents or someone they admire and created some sort of media project around that story to tell counter-narratives to the dominant story told in media about people of color.

Guiding students to create counternarratives can be an empowering instructional strategy that nurtures their personal realities and supports their voice. Considering the context of urban education, it becomes particularly important for low-income students and students of color, who have been historically denied the power to be heard, to engage in their learning as empowered subjects through creating digital counter-narratives.

Politics of Representation

A major difference between critical media literacy (CML) and the more common media literacy practiced in the United States is the rigorous examination of the politics of representation; an analysis of how historically disenfranchised social groups are represented in media ( Funk et al., 2016 ). Many of the respondents discussed analyzing issues related to representations of different identities with their students. A high school visual arts teacher reported that through “using current events in the media, students created headline news with people of color perspective.” The majority of the responses highlighted engaging in discussions related to gender and a few responses about race. One elementary teacher noted:

My grade level did a Critical Media Literacy unit and after it was over, a week later, a student showed me a box of Chips Ahoy cookies and said that it was made to be sold to boys and girls. She compared it to a rainbow pop tarts box made for girls and a basketball cereal box made for boys that we had discussed during the CML unit.

A high school social science teacher reported:

My 11th and 12th grade Sociology class created representation boards. Each group was assigned an identity (‘white male,’ ‘Asian male,’ ‘black female,’ etc.). When each group was done, we compared the images and discussed the similarities between representations of race and gender. It really opened their eyes.

The politics of representation explores the complexities and intersections of identity markers, such as ethnicity, culture, gender, class, sexual orientation, religion, and ableism. Several candidates alluded to the intersectionality between race and gender in their responses, mostly engaging their students in discussions related to the unequal representation and socialization of gender roles. They also noted that discussing stereotypical gender roles challenged their students’ internalized notions of gender. Responses such as the following highlight the shift in their students’ perspectives about gender: An elementary teacher wrote, “We’ve had some successful discussions around gender stereotypes and I’ve heard the language change in the classroom and students be more thoughtful about others’ choices.” Another elementary teacher reported, “My students showed greater acceptance. After teaching a lesson invoking gender all my male students felt accepted to choose any color paper—the favorite was pink for the rest of the year.”

Making Critical Connections

In response to the open-ended questions, an array of items was mentioned that demonstrate critical engagement, from teaching about racism and whitewashing, to numerous examples of analyzing gender and sexism, as well as projects on environmental justice and climate change at all grade levels. Some respondents discussed their transformative practice through the way their students analyzed and created media to make critical connections between historical and current events.

A high school social science teacher stated, “I had students create videos explaining the situation in Ukraine and relating it to the Cold War. In United States history, I often had students look at political cartoons and think about current examples of imperialism and how they’re represented in media.” Similarly, another social science teacher described a memorable moment of teaching critical media literacy (CML) as: “When students could make the connection between yellow journalism in Spanish-American War and media sensationalism during the War on Terror.” An elementary school teacher wrote:

My students began to think critically about history after showing them the spoken word poem ‘History Textbooks,’ which talked about world history being American Propaganda. Through this poem, they began questioning: who gets to write history and whose stories are told? It was a really powerful lesson we returned to over and over again throughout my course.

Analyzing media texts by acknowledging their historical continuity is vital because marginalization and exploitation are historically bound. Discovering these historical connections helps teachers and students learn how dominance and ideology are perpetuated, transcending time and space. Bridging the gap between the past and the present enables students to identify the common thread of hegemony across various spheres of social life. This instructional approach of CML promotes critical thinking with a social justice emphasis.

Another topic on which respondents commented was using CML to teach about environmental issues, especially the climate crisis. This is an important area for CML, since so many media messages about climate change distort the scientific evidence and mislead the public ( Beach et al., 2017 ; Share & Beach, 2022 ). A high school science teacher reported, “My class analyzed the politics behind climate change denial and how climate change is represented in the media. It was very easy for my students to see the connection between the message and its creators.” Exploring the connection between media ownership and media messages, another high school science teacher commented that a memorable moment was having a “discussion with students about where they were getting their information about environmental issues, and talking about who owns and controls Univision.”

In addition to becoming more aware, being engaged in critical analysis and creating counternarratives, some respondents noted that their students had engaged in political, environmental, and social media activism. A high school science teacher mentioned:

My class was looking at environmental justice and one student took that information and used it for an English project she was working on and that project transformed into a petition to the city council to plant more trees as her contribution to offsetting pollution in the inner city.

Another science teacher reported about how his “students created social media campaigns to raise awareness about animals affected by climate change. Different groups created the ‘Puffin Dance’ and #peekatmypika to help their campaigns get going.” A kindergarten teacher wrote about her students creating a video with opinion posters for change they shared with their school community.

Activism can be enacted in multiple ways; some efforts are more explicit, like petitions and protests, while others are more subtle, such as creating alternative media. Teacher responses reflect their students’ activism related to social, environmental, and political issues materialized through local and issue-specific efforts.

In analyzing the responses, we found many encouraging and hopeful comments about how critical media literacy (CML) has helped teachers rethink their pedagogy and increase student engagement. However, the responses also highlight challenges for implementing CML, such as limited resources, support, and clarity about how to integrate it into the curriculum. An elementary teacher wrote about the scarcity of technology at the school and how that “makes it difficult to do anything around critical media.” From the answers to Question 7 (incorporating CML into my teaching is difficult), secondary teachers reported more difficulty teaching CML (35% VF/F) than elementary teachers (26% VF/F). This is another place where the potential for CML in the lower grades surfaced, since they seem to have less difficulty incorporating it than secondary teachers. The design of most elementary classrooms, which requires the same teacher to cover all subject matter to the same group of students throughout the day, opens the potential for integrating CML pedagogy through thematic teaching, project-based learning, or problem-posing pedagogy.

A first-year middle school social science teacher shared wanting to use more CML, but had little departmental and administrative support. An elementary teacher shared about an administrator who “is reluctant to have me teach how to be critical of all media.” Three responses focused on wanting more resources, instructional strategies, and school-appropriate material in order to be able to implement CML in their classrooms. These qualitative statements of lack of support can be seen in the quantitative responses to Question 10 in which respondents rated the statement: “I feel supported by people at my school when teaching critical media literacy”: 36% VF/F, 24% occasionally, 18% rarely, 6% never felt supported, and 17% not applicable.

The group that shared the most challenges for implementing CML consisted of five teachers who taught secondary math and science. Their qualitative responses broadly discussed the difficulty of integrating CML into their content and finding only limited application. One of these responses from a high school math teacher mentioned:

I remember how when I was in the [CML] class, it seemed all over the place. I was unable to fully find the purpose of the class and how we can use it in a math class. In a traditional math class, such as Pre-Calculus or Calculus, it was rather difficult to find ways to incorporate the idea of CML.

This same person also commented that once he began teaching statistics, he was able to find ways to integrate CML. Of the 34 math teachers who answered Question 7, 59% of them reported that incorporating CML into their teaching was difficult VF/F. This is about double the VF/F responses from the other subjects.

A high school math teacher saw the value in teaching students CML but limited its application to challenging students’ misinformation about math and who is or is not a mathematician:

Critical Media Literacy is pretty important for students, especially in an age where they’re exposed to various forms of media, a lot of which is very skewed in one way or the other, and usually takes a reductionist viewpoint of the issues it addresses. I try to use CML to help students understand the misinformation about mathematics, the nature of mathematics, and challenge stereotypes of who is or isn’t a mathematician (examples: Not all mathematicians are white or Asian, there are Latino and African/African American mathematicians, there are mathematicians from faith backgrounds, mathematics isn’t just about calculations, etc.).

Two additional respondents also acknowledged the benefits of CML but felt challenged by the additional work needed to integrate it into the curriculum. A high school science teacher shared:

When I took the Critical Media Literacy class, it felt like it was more geared towards the humanities and not necessarily for the sciences. While it would be great to come up with lessons that connect chemistry and critical media literacy, it is immensely time-consuming when I can’t find other people to brainstorm with.

Another secondary science teacher also felt CML was important but struggled to find ways to integrate it into the classroom:

It was a great shared learning space and I got a ton of inspiration from taking the class; however, it has been difficult to use CML when direct instruction does focus on the explanation of scientific concepts. That’s not to say it is impossible, it just does take one more step of planning and student buy in.

Researchers in Canada found that after teaching CML concepts and skills in a Language Arts methods course, their preservice teachers felt enthusiastic about teaching media literacy, but challenged when designing CML lessons ( Robertson & Hughes, 2011 , p. 51). Robertson and Hughes (2011) list five reasons why teaching CML was so challenging for their students: (1) when these preservice teachers were K-12 students, most did not experience CML lessons; (2) the majority of their mentor teachers did not teach CML or know much about it; (3) critical analysis practices are not easy; (4) few resources are available; and (5) some schools have little technology and technical support. These are many of the same challenges that our teachers reported.

Intent and Importance of Incorporating Critical Media Literacy

Numerous teachers wrote about how meaningful, vital, transformative, and important this class was for them. A high school science teacher shared that the critical media literacy (CML) class, “was transformative! I’m still working on ways to fully integrate what I learned, but I have had my students creating media ever since.” A middle school English teacher commented about how the CML class “gave us techniques, projects, lessons that we can incorporate in our classrooms. Teaching students how to be critical of information related through the media is highly important because student[s] gain that critical awareness necessary for a technology-based society!”

A desire to bring more CML into the classroom surfaced throughout many of the qualitative responses. When asked to indicate any additional comments, 16 out of 64 respondents (25%) expressed their intention to integrate concepts related to media literacy or CML. A high school math teacher who wrote about having students create ads to represent data in graphs stated, “I wish I could incorporate more. I’ll keep trying.” A kindergarten teacher commented, “I wish I had more time to engage my students in this topic. As I grow in experience and expertise, I incorporate it more and more. Teaching in urban areas is a challenge but I do find the ideas of the course to be valuable in the classroom.”

The data and voices of these teachers raise practical, theoretical, and policy implications for future work in supporting teachers in adopting a pedagogical approach that can ignite engagement, make learning relevant, and deepen critical thinking with media, technology, and all information. In order for this to happen, teacher education programs need to address some of the challenges and limitations highlighted in the study.

The teachers surveyed reported challenges for implementing critical media literacy (CML) such as limited access to resources, lack of support, and a struggle to understand how to integrate it into the curriculum. This was especially evident for the math and science teachers. CML courses need to help teachers in all content areas rethink the silo approach to separate subject matter instruction and recognize the ways literacy is used in all areas and how information is connected to students’ lives through issues of power, privilege, and pleasure. To help teachers integrate CML into the curriculum, it is important for them to see content and grade-level examples while also receiving ongoing support and resources.

One way to support teachers in various subject matter is to create groups or projects modeled after the Stanford History Education Group (SHEG) or the Center X professional development projects. 4 The SHEG is a research and development group that provides free online resources and lesson plans for history teachers to support students in developing historical thinking skills. In a similar way, the Center X projects provide resources, lesson ideas, and professional development to support working teachers and administrators, while also creating curriculum, providing trainings, and engaging in research. The creation of a CML project or research and development group could provide ongoing professional development for new and experienced teachers in order to sustain CML implementation and support the growth of CML as an important field of investigation.

In-service teachers in our survey reported higher rates of integration of CML, perhaps because experienced teachers have figured out issues of classroom management, lesson planning, and how to balance work and life expectations. As a result, they are better situated to build and expand their curricula and teaching practices to bring CML into their classrooms. While creating a site modeled after the SHEG or Center X projects will require a significant investment of time and money, a more immediate and economical way to provide support for preservice teachers could be through integrating CML across various teacher preparation courses, especially in methods classes. This integration would require working with teacher educators to explore the CML theoretical framework and co-construct new practices and curricula for integrating these ideas throughout different content areas.

Despite the challenges reported by our teachers, the data also suggest promising possibilities for CML. While we do not claim causality between their teaching and the CML course, the data provide a window into how our preservice and in-service teachers have supported critical engagement with the information, entertainment, and social media embedded in the lives of students.

The similarities between elementary and secondary teachers suggest that CML can be just as appropriate for lower grades as it is commonly assumed to be for older students. The work in critical literacy by Comber (2013) and Vasquez (2014) offers support for the notion that young children can engage deeply in critical thinking and social justice education. The elementary teachers in our study demonstrate these ideas through the work they have done to engage their young students with media analysis and critical media production from kindergarten on up. While some teachers reported deep levels of critical analysis more often than others, many expressed their belief in the importance of CML and their desire to teach about social justice. Vasquez (2017) reminds us that critical literacy should not be a topic to teach: “Instead it should be looked on as a lens, frame, or perspective for teaching throughout the day, across the curriculum, and perhaps beyond. What this means is that critical literacy involves having a critical perspective or way of being” (p. 8). Developing social justice educators who internalize a critical way of looking at the world and questioning systems of power is the project for which CML provides a pragmatic framework and pedagogy.

It is impressive to see the majority of teachers reporting that using CML encourages critical thinking, something more important than ever in the age of fake news and alternative facts. There is hope in the teachers’ voices as they describe the activities they have been doing with their students, the successes they have encountered, and the challenges they have struggled to overcome. The comments about their intentions to teach CML and the importance they attribute to teaching these concepts provide encouragement for teacher educators to embrace CML. More than anything, the data demonstrate the potential for teaching CML in elementary and secondary settings with preservice and in-service teachers and in all content areas, even though some are more challenging than others. The use of media and technology offers opportunities for teachers to build on students’ prior knowledge, create a bridge to connect the outside world with school learning, and provide the raw material to examine everyday experiences of power, marginalization, and resistance.

Simply integrating media into the curriculum is not enough to develop critical literacies given the changing and multiple literacies associated with new digital information and communication technologies and practices. In the contemporary moment, there is a pressing pedagogical need to navigate the increasingly consequential artificial intelligence (AI) systems that collect, collate, process, predict and disseminate information determined by algorithms. Data from the survey suggest that our teachers are teaching more with media than critically analyzing it. Further studies are needed in order to better understand how to develop teachers’ CML frameworks and support more implementation.

Preparing educators to teach CML is not easy, and unfortunately, few institutes of higher education are attempting the challenge. However, it is possible, and in fact, it can be highly rewarding. By listening to the voices of teachers who have taken a CML course, we see the potential. As one high school science teacher commented, “CML changed me, changed my teaching, continues to change my students.”

While information communication technologies are integrating into all aspects of our lives, we are also witnessing increasing divisions between the haves and have nots, out-of-control climate change, and the weaponization of information and media. In order to create a socially just democratic society and sustainable planet, we must have people who can critically read and write the word and the world ( Freire & Macedo, 1987 ). The need for CML has never been greater. A high school English teacher wrote, “there is no literacy without media literacy. There is not critical pedagogy without critical media literacy.” It is our hope that this article serves as a resource to continue exploring the potential that CML offers to transform students, schools, and society.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the following educators who helped us design and teach this critical media literacy course: Shani Byard, Peter Carlson, Steven Funk, Antero Garcia, Mark Gomez, Clifford Lee, Elexia Reyes-McGovern, and Martin Romero. We are grateful to Megan Franke for her guidance with the creation of the survey. We also appreciate the assistance of Jarod Kawasaki, Jose-Felipe Martinez, and Brandon McMillan with helping to organize the survey data.

Further Reading

• Funk, S. , Kellner, D. , & Share, J. (2016). Critical media literacy as transformative pedagogy. In M. N. Yildiz & J. Keengwe (Eds.), Handbook of research on media literacy in the digital age (pp. 1–30). IGI Global.
• Goodman, S. (2003). Teaching youth media: A critical guide to literacy, video production, and social change . Teachers College Press.
• Hammer, R. , & Kellner, D. (Eds.). (2009). Media/cultural studies: Critical approaches . Peter Lang.
• Kellner, D. , & Share, J. (2019). The critical media literacy guide: Engaging media and transforming education . Brill/Sense Publishers.
• López, A. (2021). Ecomedia literacy: Integrating ecology into media education . Routledge.
• Luke, A. , & Freebody, P. (1997). Shaping the social practices of reading. In S. Muspratt , A. Luke , & P. Freebody (Eds.), Constructing critical literacies: Teaching and learning textual practice (pp. 185–225). Allen & Unwin, Hampton Press.
• Morrell, E. , Dueñas, R. , Garcia, V. , & López, J. (2013). Critical media pedagogy: Teaching for achievement in city schools . Teachers College Press.
• Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression . New York University Press.
• O’Connor, A. (2006). Raymond Williams . Rowman & Littlefield.
• Share, J. (2015). Media literacy is elementary: Teaching youth to critically read and create media (2nd ed.). Peter Lang.
• Vasquez, V. (2014). Negotiating critical literacies with young children (10th anniversary ed.). Routledge.
• Beach, R. , Share, J. , & Webb, A. (2017). Teaching climate change to adolescents: Reading, writing, and making a difference . Routledge.
• Breakstone, J. , Smith, M. , Wineburg, S. , Rapaport, A. , Carle, J. , Garland, M. , & Saavedra, A. (2021). Students’ civic online reasoning: A national portrait . Educational Researcher , 50 (8), 505–515.
• Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture . Polity Press.
• Butler, A. (2020). Educating media literacy: The need for teacher education in media literacy . Brill-Sense.
• California Commission on Teacher Credentialing . (2016). California teaching performance expectations .
• California Common Core State Standards . (2013). https://www.cde.ca.gov/be/st/ss/documents/finalelaccssstandards.pdf
• Carlson, P. , Share, J. , & Lee, C. (2013). Critical media literacy: Pedagogy for the digital age. Oregon English Journal , 35 (1), 50–55.
• Comber, B. (2013). Critical literacy in the early years: Emergence and sustenance in an age of accountability. In J. Larson & J. Marsh (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of early childhood literacy (pp. 587–601). SAGE.
• Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and education . Macmillan.
• Domine, V. (2011). Building 21st-century teachers: An intentional pedagogy of media literacy education. Action in Teacher Education , 33 (2), 194–205.
• Flores-Koulish, S. A. , Deal, D. , Losinger, J. , McCarthy, K. , & Rosebrugh, E. (2011). After the media literacy course: Three early childhood teachers look back. Action in Teacher Education , 33 , 127–143.
• Freire, P. (2010). Pedagogy of the oppressed ( M. B. Ramos, Trans.). The Continuum International Publishing Group.
• Freire, P. , & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word & the world . Bergin & Garvey.
• Garcia, A. , Seglem, R. , & Share, J. (2013). Transforming teaching and learning through critical media literacy pedagogy. LEARNing Landscapes , 6 (2), 109–124.
• Garii, B. , & Rule, A. C. (2009). Integrating social justice with mathematics and science: An analysis of student teacher lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies , 25 (3), 490–499.
• Gretter, S. , & Yadav, A. (2018). What do preservice teachers think about teaching media literacy? An exploratory study using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Media Literacy Education , 10 (1), 104–123.
• Grizzle, A. , & Wilson, C. (Eds.). (2011). Media and information literacy: Curriculum for teachers . United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
• Hall, S. (2003). The whites of their eyes: Racist ideologies and the media. In G. Dines & J. M. Humez (Eds.), Gender, race, and class in media: A text reader (2nd ed., pp. 89–93). SAGE.
• Hart, A. (Ed.). (1998). Teaching the media: International perspectives . Erlbaum.
• Hobbs, R. (2007a). Approaches to instruction and teacher education in media literacy (Research paper commissioned within the United Nations Literacy Decade). UNESCO Regional Conferences in Support of Global Literacy.
• Hobbs, R. (2007b). Reading the media: Media literacy in high school English . Teachers College Press.
• Hobbs, R. , Moen, M. , Tang, R. , & Steager, P. (2022). Measuring the implementation of media literacy instructional practices in schools: Community stakeholder perspectives . Learning, Media and Technology .
• Jhally, S. (2003). Image-based culture: Advertising and popular culture. In G. Dines & J. M. Humez (Eds.), Gender, race, and class in media: A text-reader (2nd ed.). SAGE.
• Joanou, J. P. (2017). Examining the world around us: Critical media literacy in teacher education. Multicultural Perspectives , 19 (1), 40–46.
• Kaplún, M. (1998). Una pedagogía de la comunicación . Ediciones de la Torre.
• Kellner, D. (1995). Media culture: Cultural studies, identity and politics between the modern and the postmodern . Routledge.
• Kellner, D. , & Share, J. (2007). Critical media literacy, democracy, and the reconstruction of education . In D. Macedo & S. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Media literacy: A reader (pp. 3–23). Peter Lang.
• Kincheloe, J. (2007). Critical pedagogy: Primer . Peter Lang.
• Kirwan, T. , Learmonth, J. , Sayer, M. , & Williams, R. (2003). Mapping media literacy: Media education 11–16 years in the United Kingdom . British Film Institute, Broadcasting Standards Commission, Independent Television Commission.
• Kist, W. , & Christel, M. T. (Eds.). (2022). Special issues: Critical media literacy: Bringing critical media literacy into ELA Classrooms, 2 . National Council of Teachers of English.
• Krashen, S. (1995). Bilingual education and second language acquisition theory. In D. Durkin (Ed.), Language issues: Readings for teachers (pp. 90–116). Longman.
• Kubey, R. (Ed.). (1997). Media literacy in the information age: Current perspectives . Transaction.
• Livingstone, S. (2018, May 8). Media literacy—everyone’s favourite solution to the problems of regulation [Web log post].
• Lynch, T. L. (2021). (Ed.). Special issues: Critical media literacy: Bringing lives to texts, 1 . National Council of Teachers of English.
• Meehan, J. , Ray, B. , Walker, A. , Wells, S. , & Schwarz, G. (2015). Media literacy in teacher education: A good fit across the curriculum. Journal of Media Literacy Education , 7 (2), 81–86.
• Mihailidis, P. (2008). Are we speaking the same language? Assessing the state of media literacy in U.S. higher education. Studies in Media & Information Literacy Education , 8 (4), 1–14.
• Moore, D. C. , & Bonilla, E. (2014). Media literacy education & the common core state standards: NAMLE an educator’s guide . National Association for Media Literacy Education.
• National Council of Teachers of English . (2022, April 9). Media Education in English Language Arts .
• Pegurer Caprino, M. , & Martínez-Cerdá, J. (2016). Media literacy in Brazil: Experiences and models of non-formal education. Comunicar , 24 (49), 39–48.
• Pérez-Tornero, J. M. , & Tayie, S. (2012). Introduction. Teacher training in media education: Curriculum and international experiences . Comunicar , 20 (39), 10–14.
• Prinsloo, J. , & Criticos, C. (Eds.). (1991). Media matters in South Africa . Media Resource Centre.
• Ranieri, M. , & Bruni, I. (2018). Promoting digital and media competencies of pre- and in-service teachers: Research findings of a project from six European countries. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society , 14 (2), 111–125.
• Rideout, V. , Lauricella, A. , & Wartella, E. (2011). Children, media, and race: Media use among white, black, hispanic, and Asian American children . Center on Media and Human Development School of Communication, Northwestern University.
• Robertson, L. , & Hughes, J. M. (2011). Investigating pre-service teachers’ understandings of critical media literacy. Language & Literacy , 13 (2), 37–53.
• Rogow, F. (2018, August 1). How to adjust your “brights” to see through the fog of “fake” news [Web log post]
• Schwarz, G. (2001). Literacy expanded: The role of media literacy in teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly , 28 (2), 111–119.
• Share, J. , & Beach, R. (2022). Critical media literacy analysis and production for systems thinking about climate change . The Journal of Media Literacy: Research Symposium Issue.
• Share, J. , & Gambino, A. (2022). A framework, disposition, and pedagogy for teaching critical media literacy. In W. Kist & M. T. Christel (Eds.), special issues: Critical media literacy, volume 2 : Bringing critical media literacy into ELA classrooms (pp. 11–17). National Council of Teachers of English.
• Tiede, J. , Grafe, S. , & Hobbs, R. (2015). Pedagogical media competencies of preservice teachers in Germany and the United States: A comparative analysis of theory and practice. Peabody Journal of Education , 90 (4), 533–545.
• Trust, T. , Maloy, R. , Butler, A. & Goodman, L. (2022). Critical media literacy in teacher education: Discerning truth amidst a crisis of misinformation and disinformation. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education , 30 (2), 167–176.
• Vasquez, V. M. (2017). Curriculum and pedagogy, educational purposes and ideals, education theories and philosophies . In G. W. Noblit (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of education . Oxford University Press.
• Vogels, E. , Gelles-Watnick, R. , & Massarat, N. (2022). Teens, social media & technology 2018 . Pew Research Center.
• Vosoughi, S. , Roy, D. , & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science , 359 (6380), 1146–1151.
• Wilson, C. (2012). Media and information literacy: Pedagogy and possibilities . Comunicar , 20 (39), 15–22.
• Wilson, C. , & Duncan, B. (2009). Implementing mandates in media education: The Ontario experience. Comunicar , 32 (16), 127–140.

1. The UNESCO Media and Information Literacy Curriculum can be found at the following location.

2. These can be found at the Center for Media Literacy website .

3. See The UCLA Library Critical Media Literacy Research Guide .

4. The Stanford History Education Group (SHEG) and the Center X site is at UCLA CENTER X PREPARES & SUPPORTS EDUCATORS .

Printed from Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Education. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 29 August 2024

• Cookie Policy
• Privacy Policy
• Legal Notice
• Accessibility
• [185.194.105.172]
• 185.194.105.172

Character limit 500 /500