essay on moral values in islam

• Evidence Islam is Truth
• The Benefits of Islam
• Beliefs of Islam
• How to Convert to Islam
• Worship and Practice
• The Hereafter
• Stories of New Muslims
• Comparative Religion
• The Holy Quran
• The Prophet Muhammad
• Current Issues
• Islamic History
• Systems in Islam

Evidence Islam is Truth 159 articles

• The Scientific Miracles of the Holy Quran 15 articles
• The Scientific Miracles of the Prophet Muhammad Sayings 2 articles
• Muhammad in the Bible and Other Scriptures 4 articles
• The Authenticity and Preservation of the Holy Quran 21 articles
• Evidence of Muhammad’s Prophethood 29 articles
• Logical Proofs 45 articles
• The Existence of God 62 articles

The Benefits of Islam 62 articles

• The Door to Eternal Paradise 3 articles
• Salvation from Hellfire 1 articles
• True Happiness and Inner Peace 28 articles
• Forgiveness for All Previous Sins 1 articles
• Benefits to Society 15 articles
• Benefits to Science and Civilization 7 articles
• What Others Say about Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran 7 articles

Beliefs of Islam 211 articles

• What is Islam 21 articles
• The Six Pillars of Faith and Other Islamic Beliefs 49 articles
• About God 63 articles
• The Purpose of Life 22 articles
• Stories of the Prophets 64 articles

How to Convert to Islam 13 articles

• How to Convert to Islam and Become a Muslim 13 articles

Worship and Practice 115 articles

• The Five Pillars of Islam and Other Acts of Worship 49 articles
• Islamic Morals and Practices 66 articles

The Hereafter 35 articles

• Paradise 8 articles
• Hellfire 9 articles
• The Journey after Death 12 articles
• The Day of Judgement and Its Signs 9 articles

Stories of New Muslims 278 articles

• Men 98 articles
• Women 133 articles
• Priests and Religious Figures 20 articles
• Personalities 32 articles

Comparative Religion 160 articles

• Jesus 59 articles
• The Bible 21 articles
• Christianity 26 articles
• Mary 10 articles
• Judaism 20 articles
• Hinduism 5 articles
• Buddhism 2 articles
• Sikhism 2 articles
• Scientology 2 articles
• Tolerance in Islam 6 articles
• Uncommon Faiths 17 articles

The Holy Quran 234 articles

• The Authenticity and Preservation of the Holy Quran 26 articles
• Structure and Attributes of the Quran 17 articles
• Selected Topics from the Quran 25 articles
• A Summary of the Quranic Chapters 123 articles
• Essential Verses in the Quran 28 articles

The Prophet Muhammad 124 articles

• Pearls from His Sayings 19 articles
• His Characteristics 22 articles
• His Biography 19 articles
• Evidence of His Prophethood 29 articles
• About His Sayings 15 articles
• Stories of His Companions 22 articles

Current Issues 92 articles

• Human Rights 14 articles
• Jihad and Terrorism 2 articles
• Women 39 articles
• Islam and Non-Muslims 23 articles
• Sects Attributed to Islam 14 articles

Islamic History 25 articles

• In Brief 15 articles
• In Detail 10 articles

Systems in Islam 77 articles

• Family 18 articles
• Politics 3 articles
• Economy 11 articles
• Justice 6 articles
• Crime and Punishment 7 articles
• Health and Nutrition 19 articles
• The Environment 13 articles
• Islamic Songs (Nasheed)
• New Muslims
• Short Videos About Islam

Evidence Islam is Truth 122 videos

• The Scientific Miracles of the Holy Quran 17 videos
• The Scientific Miracles of the Prophet Muhammad Sayings 2 videos
• Muhammad in the Bible and Other Scriptures 2 videos
• The Authenticity and Preservation of the Holy Quran 25 videos
• Evidence of Muhammad’s Prophethood 6 videos
• Logical Proofs 33 videos
• The Existence of God 38 videos

The Benefits of Islam 102 videos

• The Door to Eternal Paradise 3 videos
• Salvation from Hellfire 6 videos
• True Happiness and Inner Peace 36 videos
• Benefits to Society 39 videos
• Benefits to Science and Civilization 13 videos
• What Others Say about Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran 6 videos

Beliefs of Islam 176 videos

• What is Islam 43 videos
• The Six Pillars of Faith and Other Islamic Beliefs 37 videos
• About God 53 videos
• The Purpose of Life 24 videos
• Stories of the Prophets 15 videos

How to Convert to Islam 8 videos

• How to Convert to Islam and Become a Muslim 8 videos

Worship and Practice 16 videos

• The Five Pillars of Islam and Other Acts of Worship 7 videos
• Islamic Morals and Practices 8 videos

The Hereafter 17 videos

• Paradise 3 videos
• Hellfire 2 videos
• The Journey after Death 5 videos
• The Day of Judgement and Its Signs 8 videos

Stories of New Muslims 235 videos

• Men 180 videos
• Women 34 videos
• Priests and Religious Figures 5 videos
• Personalities 18 videos

Comparative Religion 123 videos

• Jesus 65 videos
• The Bible 20 videos
• Christianity 27 videos
• Mary 2 videos
• Judaism 6 videos
• Tolerance in Islam 9 videos

The Holy Quran 51 videos

• The Scientific Miracles of the Holy Quran 9 videos
• The Authenticity and Preservation of the Holy Quran 31 videos
• Jewels from the Quran 7 videos
• A Summary of the Meanings of Its Verses 1 videos

The Prophet Muhammad 71 videos

• Pearls from His Sayings 2 videos
• His Characteristics 32 videos
• His Biography 21 videos
• Evidence of His Prophethood 9 videos
• About His Sayings 1 videos
• Stories of His Companions 5 videos

Current Issues 64 videos

• Human Rights 14 videos
• Jihad and Terrorism 30 videos
• Women 20 videos
• Islam and Non-Muslims 10 videos

Islamic History 21 videos

• In Brief 3 videos
• In Detail 18 videos

Systems in Islam 25 videos

• Family 4 videos
• Politics 1 videos
• Economy 2 videos
• Justice 13 videos
• Crime and Punishment 2 videos
• Health and Nutrition 3 videos

Islamic Songs (Nasheed) 14 videos

• NBN Band 1 videos
• Zain Bhikha 1 videos
• Ahmad Bukhatir 2 videos
• Yusuf Islam (Cat Stevens) 2 videos
• Kamal Uddin 2 videos
• Labbayk 1 videos
• TalkIslam 2 videos

New Muslims 148 videos

• Merits of Islam 8 videos
• Islamic Beliefs 11 videos
• Acts of Worship 27 videos
• Islamic Lifestyle, Morals and Practices 23 videos
• The Holy Quran 11 videos
• Prophet Muhammad 32 videos
• Social Interaction 22 videos
• Increasing faith 23 videos

Short Videos About Islam 26 videos

• Islam in 3 Minutes 18 videos
• Understanding Islam By Yusuf Estes 8 videos

Islam at a Glance

• Intro E-books
• Islamic Morals and Practices

Morality and Ethics in Islam

Description: the place of morality in islam and its relation to worship..

• By Khalid Latif (edited by IslamReligion)
• Published on 22 Dec 2008
• Last modified on 22 Dec 2008
• Printed: 1,500
• Viewed: 202,471 (daily average: 35)
• Rating: 2.9 out of 5
• Rated by: 114
• Emailed: 18
• Commented on: 1

Islam is a comprehensive way of life, and morality is one of the cornerstones Islam.  Morality is one of the fundamental sources of a nation’s strength, just as immorality is one of the main causes of a nation’s decline.  Islam has established some universal fundamental rights for humanity as a whole, which are to be observed in all circumstances.  To uphold these rights, Islam has provided not only legal safeguards, but also a very effective moral system.  Thus, whatever leads to the welfare of the individual or the society and does not oppose any maxims of the religion is morally good in Islam, and whatever is harmful is morally bad.

Given its importance in a healthy society, Islam supports morality and matters that lead to it, and stands in the way of corruption and matters that lead to it.  The guiding principle for the behavior of a Muslim is “Virtuous Deeds”.  This term covers all deeds, not only acts of worship.  The Guardian and Judge of all deeds is God Himself.

The most fundamental characteristics of a Muslim are piety and humility.  A Muslim must be humble with God and with other people:

“And turn not your face away from people (with pride), nor walk in insolence through the earth.  Verily, God likes not each arrogant boaster.  And be moderate (or show no insolence) in your walking, and lower your voice.  Verily, the harshest of all voices is the voice (braying) of the ass.”  (Quran 31:18-19)

Muslims must be in controls of their passions and desires.

A Muslim should not be vain or attached to the ephemeral pleasures of this world. While most people allow the material world to fill their hearts, Muslims should keep God in their hearts and the material world in their hand.  Instead of being attached to the car and the job and the diploma and the bank account, all these things become tools to make us better people.

“The Day whereon neither wealth nor sons will avail, but only he (will prosper) that brings to God a sound heart.” (Quran: 26:88-89)

Principles of Morality in Islam

God sums up righteousness in verse 177 of Surat Al Baqarah:

“It is not righteousness that you turn your faces towards East or West; but it is righteousness (the quality of ) the one who believes in God and the Last Day and the Angels, and the Book, and the Messengers; who spends of his wealth, in spite of love for it, to the kinsfolk, to the orphans, to the needy, to the wayfarer, to those who ask and for the freeing of slaves; and who is steadfast in prayers, and gives Zakah (Alms); and those who fulfill their covenants which they made; and who are patient and perseverant in poverty and ailment and throughout all periods of fighting.  Such are the people of truth, the pious.”

This verse teaches us that righteousness and piety is based before all else on a true and sincere faith.  The key to virtue and good conduct is a strong relation with God, who sees all, at all times and everywhere.  He knows the secrets of the hearts and the intentions behind all actions.  Therefore, a Muslim must be moral in all circumstances; God is aware of each one when no one else is.  If we deceive everyone, we cannot deceive Him.  We can flee from anyone, but not from Him.  The love and continuous awareness of God and the Day of Judgment enables man to be moral in conduct and sincere in intentions, with devotion and dedication:

“Indeed, the most honorable among you in the sight of God is the most pious.” (Quran 49:13)

Then come deeds of charity to others, especially giving things we love. This, like acts of worship, prayers and Zakah (mandatory alms), is an integral part of worship.  A righteous person must be reliable and trustworthy.

Finally, their faith must be firm and should not wane when faced with adversity.  Morality must be strong to vanquish corruption:

“And God loves those who are firm and steadfast.”  

Patience is often hardest and most beautiful when it’s against one’s own desires or anger:

“And march forth toward forgiveness from your Lord, and for Paradise as wide as are the heavens and the earth, prepared for the pious.  Those who spend (in the way of God) in prosperity and in adversity, who repress anger, and who pardon people; verily, God loves the doers of the good deeds.”  (Quran 3:133)

These three acts are among the hardest things for most people, but they are also the key to forgiveness and to paradise.  Are they not the best, those who are able to exercise charity when they are in need themselves, control when they are angry and forgiveness when they are wronged?

This is the standard by which actions are judged as good or bad.  By making pleasing God the objective of every Muslim, Islam has set the highest possible standard of morality.

Morality in Islam addresses every aspect of a Muslim’s life, from greetings to international relations.  It is universal in its scope and in its applicability.  Morality reigns in selfish desires, vanity and bad habits.  Muslims must not only be virtuous, but they must also enjoin virtue.  They must not only refrain from evil and vice, but they must also forbid them.  In other words, they must not only be morally healthy, but they must also contribute to the moral health of society as a whole.

“You are the best of the nations raised up for (the benefit of) men; you enjoin what is right and forbid the wrong and believe in God; and if the followers of the Book had believed it would have been better for them; of them (some) are believers and most of them are transgressors.” (Quran: 3:110)

The Prophet, may the mercy and blessings of God be upon him, summarized the conduct of a Muslim when he said:

“My Sustainer has given me nine commands: to remain conscious of God, whether in private or in public; to speak justly, whether angry or pleased; to show moderation both when poor and when rich, to reunite friendship with those who have broken off with me; to give to him  who refuses me; that my silence should be occupied with thought; that my looking should be an admonition; and that I should command what is right.”

Add a comment

• Country: Select Country Afghanistan Albania Antarctica Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Antigua and Barbuda Azerbaijan Argentina Australia Austria Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Armenia Barbados Belgium Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil Belize British Indian Ocean Territory Solomon Islands Virgin Islands, British Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Myanmar Burundi Belarus Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Sri Lanka Chad Chile China Taiwan, Province of China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Mayotte Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czechia Benin Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Ethiopia Eritrea Estonia Faroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Fiji Finland Åland Islands France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Djibouti Gabon Georgia Gambia Palestine Germany Ghana Gibraltar Kiribati Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Côte d'Ivoire Jamaica Japan Kazakhstan Jordan Kenya Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Lesotho Latvia Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Monaco Mongolia Moldova, Republic of Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Oman Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Curaçao Aruba Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba New Caledonia Vanuatu New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Norway Northern Mariana Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Micronesia, Federated States of Marshall Islands Palau Pakistan Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Guinea-Bissau Timor-Leste Puerto Rico Qatar Réunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Anguilla Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Viet Nam Slovenia Somalia South Africa Zimbabwe Spain South Sudan Sudan Western Sahara Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Eswatini Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Tajikistan Thailand Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago United Arab Emirates Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine North Macedonia Egypt United Kingdom Guernsey Jersey Isle of Man Tanzania, United Republic of United States Virgin Islands, U.S. Burkina Faso Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Wallis and Futuna Samoa Yemen Zambia

(Not shown to the public)

Your comment will be reviewed and should be published within 24 hours.

Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.

Other Articles in the Same Category

Other Videos in the Same Category

Article Categories

Video categories, most viewed, editor’s pick, list contents, most popular, your favorites.

Your favorites list is empty. You may add articles to this list using the article tools.

Your History

Your history list is empty.

Retrieve Your Password

Forgot your password? No problem. Just let us know your email address and we will email you a password reset link that will allow you to choose a new one.

Registration

Why register? This web site has several customizations made specifically for you, such as: your favorites, your history, marking articles you have previously viewed, listing articles published since your last visit, changing font size, and more. These features are based on cookies and will work correctly only when you use the same computer. To enable these features from any computer, you should login while browsing this site.

The field(s) below are optional

• Discover Islam
• Quran Recitations

• Welcome to Islam

Morality in Islam

• Section: Islam in Brief

He even clarified that people will be on different levels in Paradise based on their good manners saying: “The dearest and nearest among you to me on the Day of Resurrection will be the one who is the best in conduct…” [Ibn An-Najjar]

Now let's talk about ethics in Islam, and how it is differs from all the other ethical systems that remain today.

Unlike other ethical systems, the ethical system of Islam inevitably derives from a divine source. This divine source is the revelation from Allah. Therefore, this system cannot be changed, or manipulated to fit our desires and conveniences. It applies regardless of time or place. This system has not been changed for thousands of years, it cannot be changed today, and it will never change until the Day of Judgement. No one has the authority to change or alter this system, even if the whole world wants to do so. What was considered good morals in the past will remain as good morals throughout time.

What was considered as sin or bad morals in the past will also remain so forever, even if society accepts it as a norm. The system of ethics is not affected by cultural norms, because Allah is the One who determines what is acceptable and what is not.

The Noble Quran is very detailed and clearly mentions the significance of good manners, just like it mentions the importance of belief, worship, and all our daily affairs.

The Noble Quran mentions several good acts of morality repeatedly, for example:

• Dealing with one’s parents in the best manner
• Being nice to one’s relatives and neighbors
• Taking care of orphans and the poor
• Being honest
• Being sincere in all of one’s intentions
• Fulfilling one’s promises
• Treating all people fairly

The Noble Quran goes as far as to teach us the way that we should walk. Allah Says (what means): “And, be moderate in your walking…” [Quran: 31:19] Allah also Says (what means): “And the servants of the Most Merciful are those who walk upon the earth in modesty, and when the ignorant address them [harshly], they say [words of] peace.” [Quran, 25:63]

The Noble Quran even tells us the proper etiquette of visiting one another. Allah Says (what means): “O you who have believed! Do not enter houses other than your own houses until you ascertain welcome and greet their inhabitants. That is best for you; perhaps you will be reminded [i.e., advised].” [Quran, 24:27]

The Quran also teaches us the way we should behave in a gathering, Allah Says (what means): “O you who have believed! When you are told: 'Space yourselves' in assemblies, then make space; Allah will make space for you…” [Quran, 58:11]

Unlike other ethical systems, Islam's moral system is a very detailed and complete package of morality. Islam addresses every aspect of human life, no matter how minor. It is a complete package - it does not lack anything that needs to be completed nor does it have any defects that need to be amended.

The Islamic religion guides our morals that deal with the individual, the community, and Muslims and non-Muslims alike. It also guides us on how to deal with rulers and how to honor and respect scholars. Islam even directs us on how to act during times of peace and war.

No other ethical system can match Islam's one. Only Allah, with His Great Wisdom, could have made such a system that teaches humans how to deal with every aspect of their lives. This is because Islam is not a man-made system; it is the religion of Allah. He made it complete and integrated. No man has, can or ever will come up with a system that is so perfect. If you want a successful and happy life, then simply apply Islam to it. Indeed, you will explicitly experience that difference and gradually you will have wonderful results.

Related Articles

Worship in Islam

Islam is not a new message, islam: basic principles & characteristics -ii.

• Islamic Songs

Special Folders

• Hajj & Umrah
• Xmas & New Year's
• Sacred Months
• Inheritance
• Prayer Times
• Calendar Converter

Copyright © IslamWeb 2024. All rights reserved.

The Ethical Worldview of the Qur'an

Published: April 25, 2019 • Updated: July 22, 2024

Author : Dr. Yasien Mohamed

بِسْمِ اللهِ الرَّحْمٰنِ الرَّحِيْمِ

In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.

Introduction

Piety is not to turn your faces towards the East and the West; piety is he who believes in Allah, the Last Day, the angels, the Book and the Prophets; who gives of his money, in spite of loving it, to the near of kin, the orphans, the needy, the wayfarers and the beggars, and for the freeing of slaves. [And truly pious] are those who keep their word whenever they promise, and are patient in misfortune and hardship and in times of peril; it is they that have proved themselves true, and it is they who are conscious of God. 4  

Man was created for three purposes. Man’s first purpose is in the cultivation of the earth, as is implied in the verse: He brought you out from the earth and made you inhabit it (Q. 11:61). So man must earn his livelihood, for his own sake and for the benefit of others. Man’s second purpose is to worship God. As He says: I have not created jinn and mankind except to worship Me (Q. 51.56). This means that man should obey God’s commandments and prohibitions. Man’s third purpose is his vicegerency, referred to in: He will make you successors in the land and then observe what you will do (Q. 7:129), and in other verses. Vicegerency is the imitation of God in accordance with one’s ability to rule by applying the noble virtues of the Law: wisdom, justice, forbearance, beneficence, and graciousness. These virtues draw Man to Paradise and close to God Most High . 6  

Morality in the Qur’ān

When the unbelievers instilled in their hearts fierceness, the fierceness of paganism ( ḥamiyyat al-jāhiliyyah ), Allah then sent down His serenity upon His apostle and upon the believers, and imposed on them the word of piety, they being more deserving and worthier. Allah has knowledge of everything. 11

O my son, perform the prayer, command the honorable and forbid the dishonorable and bear patiently what has befallen you. …Do not turn your face away from people and do not walk in the land haughtily. Allah does not love any arrogant or boastful person. Be modest in your stride and lower your voice; for the most hideous voice is that of asses. 15  

Responsibility                

The truth is from your Lord. Whoever wishes, let him believe; and whoever wishes, let him disbelieve. 21   O Children of Adam, when apostles from your own people come to you reciting to you My revelations, then those who fear God and mend their ways have nothing to fear and they will not grieve. But those who deny Our revelations and reject them arrogantly—those are the people of the Fire; therein they shall abide forever. 22  

It means that ‘Allah Ta’alla does not change the state of peace and security enjoyed by people into a state of distress and instability until such time that those people themselves change their deeds into evil and disorder. 30  

When we act, we have no intentions of acting as instruments of God’s Holy will, since we know nothing of this divine will in advance. Leaving all other considerations aside, we accept it pure and simply as our own and thereby sign our agreement. So man becomes responsible in doing so, as if he becomes a debtor as soon as he surrenders his surety. We can now see why the Qur’ān insists on proclaiming our responsibility before God. The human will seems entirely [subject] to divine will, [as the Qur’an states: ‘And you shall surely be questioned about that which you used to do.’  (Qur’an 16:93) 31

Sin and repentance

And give his other hand to the seeking of forgiveness so that it may be short for evil deeds and will not reach the Zakkum tree of Hell, which is one fruit of that accursed tree. That is, just as supplication and reliance on God greatly strengthen the inclination to good, so too repentance and the seeking of forgiveness cut the inclination to evil and break its transgressions. 47  

Intention and sincerity

Actions are but by intention and every man shall have but that which he intended. He who migrates for God and His messenger does so for God and His Messenger. But he who migrates for a worldly gain or a woman to wed migrates to whatever he migrates to. 52  

Volition is the orientation of the ideal towards the real; and it is along this trajectory, from the inside to the outside, from conscience to experience, that the moral deed is found. It is not a static state, a solitary act of worship enclosed within the sanctuary of the heart; it is a living force, a movement of expansion which has its point of departure at the center, and its point of arrival at the outside. Thus, not only does intention call for action and wait to be followed by it, but it contains it in the form of a seed, if not in a nascent state. 53

So give their due to the near relative, the needy, and the wayfarer—that is best for those whose goal is God’s Face: these are the ones who will prosper. Whatever you lend out in usury to gain value through people’s wealth will not increase in God’s eyes, but whatever you give in charity, in your desire for God’s Face, will earn multiple rewards. 64   [God’s servants] give food to the poor, the orphan, and the captive, though they love it themselves, [saying] ‘We feed you for the sake of God’s Face alone. We seek neither recompense nor thanks from you.’ 65  

All this enables one to draw close to God, since any means that preserve the body and free the heart of the body’s requirements are an aid to religion. He who intends by eating to protect his acts of worship and by physical union to fortify his religion to gratify his family’s hearts, and to beget a righteous child who worships God after him, and through him increases the community of Muhammad, is obedient in both food and  marriage. 66  

He may perform ablution to cool himself off; wash to give himself an agreeable scent; …live secluded in a mosque to avoid renting a dwelling, fast to spare himself from frequent cooking of food, …give alms to a beggar to end his wearisome begging; visit an ailing person, that he, in turn, be visited should he fall ill; attend a funeral that the funerals of his own family be attended. He may do any of these just to be known by his good works, remembered and regarded for his probity and dignity. 68  

Although it is of an inferior degree in relation to the former [higher level of intention], it is acceptable all the same. Those people resemble bad merchants but their level is that of those who have simple understanding. 70  

Justice and benevolence

He is God, other than Whom there is no god. He knows the unseen and the seen. He is the Merciful, The Compassionate. …To Him belong the most beautiful names. Whatever is in the heavens and on Earth glorifies Him and He is the Exalted in Might, the Wise. 77  

1  Hodges, H. A. (1952)  The Philosophy of Wilhelm Dilthey , Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, p. 92. Also see Dilthey, W. (1960)   Gesammelte Schriften, Band VIII  (Weltaushauunslehre), Stuttgart: Abhandlung zur Philosophie der Philosophie.

2  Fakhry, M. (1991)  Ethical Theories in Islam , Leiden: E. J. Brill, pp. 6-7.                                                 

3  Qur’an 2:231.

4  Qur’an 2:177.

5  Qur’an 33:73.

6  Iṣfahānī, R. (1987)  al-Dharī‘ah ilā Makārim al-Sharī‘ah , Cairo: Dār al-Wafā’, pp. 91-92.

7  Mohamed, Y. (2006)  The Path to Virtue , Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, p. 214.

8  Iṣfahānī, R. (1987)  al-Dharī‘ah ilā Makārim al-Sharī‘ah ,  p. 59.

9  Mohamed,  The Path to Virtue , p. 215.

10  Goldziher, I. (1967)  Muslim Studie s , vol. 1, London: George Allen and Unwin, p. 202f.

11  Qur’an 48:26.

12  Izutsu, T. (1959)  The structure of the ethical terms in the Koran , 23f.

13  Qur’an 13:89, 31:32.

14  Qur’an 18:105.

15  Qur’an 31:17-19.

16  Qur’an 2:211.

17  Qur’an 2:104.

18  Draz, M. A. (2011)  Introduction to the Qur’an , London: I. B. Taurus, p. 63.

19  Qur’an 2:30.

20  Qur’an 2:31.

21  Qur’an 18:29.

22  Qur’an 7:35.

23  Qur’an 16:104.

24  Qur’an 2:24.

25  Qur’an 40:37.

26  Qur’an 53:39.

27  Qur’an 13:11.

28  Asad, M. (1980)  The Message of the Qur’ān , Gibraltar: Darul Andalus, p. 360.

29  Idris, G. S. (1983)  The Process of Islamization , USA: Muslim Students Association of America and Canada,  pp. 3-5.

30  Shafi, M.  Ma’arif al-Qur’an , trans Muhammad Shamim, Maktaba e Darul-Uloom, vol. 5, p. 200.

31  Draz, M. A. (2008)  The Moral World of the Qur’an , trans. D. Robinson and R. Masterton, London: I. B. Tauris, p. 108.

32  Qur’an 45:22.

33  Qur’an 11:7.

34  Qur’an 17:14.

35  Qur’an 81:14.

36  Qur’an 31:32.

37  Qur’an 16:106.

38  Qur’an 24:33.

39  Draz,   The Moral World of the Qur’an , p. 100.

40  Qur’an 16:93; 35:8.

41  Qur’an 2:36-37.

42  Qur’an 20:84.

43  Qur’an 95: 4-7.

44  Qur’an 17:62.

45  Qur’an 30:41.

46  Haleem, M. A. (2011)  Understanding the Qur’an: Themes and Styles , London: I. B. Tauris, pp. 139-140.

47  Nursi, S. (1997)  The Words , vol. 2, Izmir: Kaynak, p. 483.

48  Qur’an 75:1-4.

49  Qur’an 5:33-34.

50  Draz,  The Moral World of the Qur’an , p. 112.

51  Ibid., p. 176.

52   Sahih Bukhari   (1). Also see, Ibrahim, E. and D. J. Davies, trans. (1979)  Al-Nawawi’s Forty Hadith , Lahore: S. H. Ashraf, p. 26.

53  Draz,  The Moral World of the Qur’an ,  p. 187.

54  Shaker, Anthony F (2016)  Al-Ghazālī: On Intention, Sincerity, and Truthfulness , Book XXXVII of the Revival of the Religious Sciences , Translated with an introduction and notes by A. F. Shaker, Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society,   pp. 14-16.

55  Draz,  The Moral World of the Qur’an ,  p. 20.

56  Ibid., p. 21.

57  Rahman, F. (1983) “Some key ethical concepts of the Qur’ān,”  Journal of Religious Ethics ,  11 (2): 170-185.

58  Qur’an 22:31.

59   Draz,  The Moral World of the Qur’an , p. 200.

60  Qur’an 92:17-20.

61  Qur’an 6:52.

62  Nasr, S. H. (1981)  Islamic Life and Thought , London: Allen and Unwin, p. 358 .

63  Haleem, M. A. (2011)  Understanding the Qur’an: Themes and Style s , pp. 115-116.

64  Qur’an 30:38-39.

65  Qur’an 76:8-9.

66  Draz,  The Moral World of the Qur’an , p. 33.

67  Ibid., p. 60.

68  Ibid., p. 59.

69  Qur’an 2:272.

70  Draz,   The Moral World of the Qur’an , p. 224.

71  Wild, Stefan (2006)  ‘Hell’ in The Qur’an: an Encyclopedia , ed. Oliver Leaman, London and New York: Routledge, p. 262.

72  Qur’an 5:8.

73  Qur’an 5:42.

74  Qur’an 4:58.

75  Qur’an 2:237.

76  Qur’an 10:26; Isfahani, 1987, p. 356.

77  Qur’an 59:23-24.

78  Qur’an 14:48.

79  Iṣfahānī, R. (1987)  al-Dharī‘ah ilā Makārim al-Sharī‘ah ,  p. 355.

80  Knysh, A. (2007) “Multiple areas of influence,” in  The Cambridge Companion to the Qur’an , ed. Jane Dammen McAuliffe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211-212.

Disclaimer: The views, opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in these papers and articles are strictly those of the authors. Furthermore, Yaqeen does not endorse any of the personal views of the authors on any platform. Our team is diverse on all fronts, allowing for constant, enriching dialogue that helps us produce high-quality research.

Additional resources

Jurisprudence (fiqh)

Slavery and Emancipation in the Sharia: The Islamic Framework for Ethical Treatment of Slaves in the Minhāj fī shuʿab al-īmān of al-Ḥalīmī

Islamic Ethics

Saving Truth and Beauty: The Destruction of Nature and the Islamic Solution

Prophetic Ethics: A Model for those Seeking God and Eternal Life

Cultivating Faithful Enthusiasm: How the Qur'an Creates Transformative Willpower

Being a "Good Person" is Not Enough: Why Ethics Need Islam

Cultivating Faithful Enthusiasm: How the Qur'an Creates Transformative Willpower

Being a "Good Person" is Not Enough: Why Ethics Need Islam

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

topic Moral Teachings Of Islam topic Moral Teachings Of Islam{/archive-page-title}-->

Most recent.

• Covered Topics
• Agnosticism
• Contentment
• Fasting (Sawm)
• Government And Politics
• Hadith And Sunnah
• Humanitarian Aid
• Ihsan (Excellence In Faith)
• Information Age
• Islamic Art And Architecture
• Islamic Culture And Civilization
• Islamophobia
• Life And Death
• Materialism
• Modern Science
• Modern Society
• Moral Teachings Of Islam
• Muslim Life
• Paradise (Jannah)
• Popular Culture
• Prophet Muhammad (S)
• Responsible
• Satan (Iblis)
• Social Justice
• Social Media
• Social System Of Islam
• Soul (Nafs)
• Spirituality
• Taqwa (God Consciousness)
• The Renaissance
• Trustworthiness
• Truthfulness

Most Contributing Authors in Moral Teachings Of Islam

Welcome to the New IslamiCity

Let's begin.

Topics Menu - Always one click away

Site search & most popular, login & login status, main hubs & home pages, inspiring themes.

We feature each theme with a beautiful image. Click on these beautiful images & start exploring the theme/value behind it.

• Publish your article

The Moral System of Islam

Maulana Sayed Abul A`la Al-Maududi stated that : “Man has been blessed with an innate sense of morality, which has served to guide him through the age, enabling him to distinguish between right and wrong, good and evil. Although the degree to which a certain quality is interpreted as being either good or evil may vary from person to person, there is more or less a universal consensus regarding the classification of what constitutes a moral deed or attribute and what does not. thus, virtues such as bravery and truthfulness have always elicited praise. In contrast to this, we find that at no time in the history of man have qualities such as dishonesty and breach of trust ever been upheld or regarded as worthy of praise. Fidelity, magnanimity and integrity have always been valued, whilst selfishness, cruelty, miserliness and bigot, have never received the approbation of society at large. Perseverance, determination and courage are qualities that are much admired and appreciated by Man, whereas impatience, fickleness and cowardice are given little consideration.

Dignity, restraint, politeness and amiability have always been regarded as virtues as opposed to snobbery, arrogance and discourteousness, which have never been recognized as good moral qualities. A person who possesses a sense of responsibility and devotion to duty has always been highly regarded and respected whilst he who is lazy, negligent of his duties and undisciplined is largely ignored and looked down upon.

Similarly, a society that is founded upon and actively promotes equality, justice and freedom is looked upon as a positive light. A society in which injustice, disorganization, disunity and social imbalance manifest themselves is considered to be on the verge of collapse, having allowed itself to decay over time through the implementation of policies destructive to the very core upon which it is based.

Robbery, larceny, murder, adultery and fraud have always been condemned. Slander, blackmail and bribery have never been regarded as wholesome social activities. Contrary to this, loyalty to friends, helping one’s kith and kin in times of need, concern for neighbors, assisting the weak and oppressed and nursing the sick are all activities that have been highly valued since the dawn of civilization.

People who are polite, sincere, upright, dependable, who are prompt in discharging their obligations to others, who live in peace and allow others to do likewise have always formed the core of any healthy society. Good and evil are not myths awaiting resurrection, they are a real part of our everyday lives and hence, Allah has blessed mankind with an inherent sense of right and wrong. Allah says in the Qur’an: ‘(Allah) has revealed to human nature the consciousness and the cognition of good and evil.’ (Ash-Shams: 8) the questions that now arise are: If the basic values of good and evil are universally recognized, why then, do varying patterns of moral behaviour exist in the world? Why are there so many conflicting moral philosophies? Where does the root of these differences lie? What is the position of Islam with respect to other ethical systems? How can we justify the claim that Islam provides us with a perfectly balanced moral system? What is the distinctive contribution that Islam has made in the realm of ethics?

These questions are important and must be dealt with in a direct manner. However, given the limitations of space we shall only be able to touch upon these issues very briefly. The following points will serve to outline the answers to the above questions:

1- The present moral systems fail to integrate moral virtues and norms by prescribing specific limits and as a consequence of this, a balanced and coherent plan for social conduct has not been devised.

2- Each moral system presents a different interpretation of what is good and what is evil, hence moral standards differ. The vindication of a particular viewpoint is complicated further when we realize that the sanction or the authority behind it also differs from one system to another. Likewise, the theories that are formulated to determine the motives that impel someone to follow one pattern of behaviour as opposed to another also differ

3- We find on deeper reflection, that these differences emerge from the conflicting views and concepts regarding the universe, Man’s place in that universe and man’s purpose of existence on Earth. The multitude of religions, philosophies, ideologies and theories that exist are a testament to and a reflection upon the diversity and the divergence of man’s views in regard to these fundamental questions and others such as: Does God exist? What are His attributes? What is the relationship between Man and God? Will Man be held accountable for what he does in this life? Why was Man created?

A Man’s way of life and his patterns of moral behavior will be determined by his response to the above questions. Once more, due to a shortage of space we find ourselves unable to consider in depth the various ethical systems that exist in the world today, to expound the solutions proposed by each in response to fundamental issues and describe what impact these solutions have had on the moral evolution of societies founded on such concept. Therefore, in light of these limitations, we shall only consider the Islamic concept of morality.

The Islamic Concept of Life and Morality

According to Islam, the universe is Allah’s creation. He is the Sovereign and Sustainer of the universe. He is All Wise, All-Powerful, Omniscient. His Godhood is free from injustice and impartiality. Man is the creation of Allah, His subject and servant born to obey and worship Him. Man has been commanded to live his life in total compliance to the laws of Allah.

Over the course of time, Allah sent Prophets to mankind to guide and instruct them in these matters. Man is given a choice as to whether or not he wishes to follow the message of the Prophets and adhere to their teachings, yet whichever path he chooses he will be held accountable for it and any consequent actions based upon it. Hence, man’s time on this earth may be perceived as an opportunity to prepare himself, as best he is able, for the life Hereafter. Everyone is responsible for his own actions and no one be made to bear the burdens of another. Judgment Day provides incentive for all believers to act in accordance with the teachings of Islam, in the hope that they may achieve salvation.

The previous exposition of the Islamic concept of life and morality has shown us that the aim of man is to seek the pleasure of Allah. In Islam, this is a standard by which a particular mode of conduct may be judged and classified as being either good or bad. This standard provides the nucleus around which moral conduct should evolve. Man is not left like a ship without moorings to be tossed hither and thither at the mercy of the winds and the tides. Islam provides Man with a stable and balanced set of values and norms for all morally-based activities. Moreover, in establishing the pleasure of Allah, as the objective of man’s existence, windows of unlimited possibilities are opened for his moral evolution since, at no time will it be overshadowed by selfishness, bigotry, arrogance or pride.

Our knowledge of vice and virtue should not be based upon mere intellect, desire, intuition or experience, since these factors are subject to constant change, modifying themselves and evolving in accordance with the dictates of external influences. Thus, they are unable to provide us with definitive and categorical standards of morality. Rather, Islam provides us with Divine revelation embodied in the Qur’an and the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him). This source of knowledge prescribes a standard of moral conduct that is both permanent and universal, applicable to all times and circumstances. The Islamic moral code covers the smallest details of domestic life and extends to accommodate the broader aspects of national and international modes of behaviour. These regulations free us from the exclusive dependence upon any other source of knowledge.

The Sanction Behind Morality

The Islamic concept of the universe and Man’s place therein furnishes the sanction that must support all morally-based injunctions. Islam presents powerful arguments, with the aim of inducing mankind to abide by its principles of morality and to construct a political system that would enforce the moral law through its legislative and executive powers. Islam relies upon the inherent urge for good that resides in everyone’s heart which in turn is based upon the love and fear of Allah, the awareness of accountability on the Day of Judgment and the promise of eternal bliss.

Thus, before enforcing any moral injunctions Islam seeks to implant firmly in Man’s heart the conviction that all his dealings in this world relate directly to Allah. A man may be able to conceal certain deeds from others, he may be successful in deceiving others, but Allah is fully aware of that which has transpired. Allah is All-Knowing, All-Seeing, All-Wise. Allah knows Man’s innermost intentions and desires and thus, whatever Man does in this life he cannot escape from the fact that one day he will die and be compelled to account for what has passed. On that Day there will be no favours, no impartiality, fraud and deception will be of no avail; justice will be done.

Therefore, it has become clear that only a deep-rooted belief can motivate Man to incorporate these moral injunctions into his everyday life. If popular opinion and the coercive powers of the state enforce these injunctions so much the better, otherwise the true believer must rely solely upon his faith in Allah.

Distinctive Features of the Islamic Moral Code

Islam has furnished mankind with the highest possible standards of morality making Divine Pleasure one of Man’s main objectives in life.

Islam does not provide any novel moral virtues, nor does it seek to minimize the significance of established moral norms. Morality is approached with a sense of balance and proportion assigning a suitable place and function to each moral virtue within the total scheme of life. Indeed, their scope of application is widened somewhat to cater for every aspect of man’s life on both an individual and a collective basis from the cradle to the grave.

Islam enjoins upon man a way of life that promotes goodness and frees society from evil. Muslims are invoked not only to practice virtue but to actively establish it in their immediate environment and to eradicate vice and corruption. This task is the collective responsibility of the Muslims and it would be a day of mourning indeed if the efforts of a particular community were directed towards establishing evil and suppressing good.”

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Significance of moral values of Islam in the contemporary world

The total degeneration of our moral values is the real cause of our present predicament. Therefore, this study shows the influence and relationship of Islamic moral values to human beings’ behaviour in the rapid change in social life. The moral and spiritual teachings of the noble prophet are a living reality and still dominate different spheres of daily life in the Muslim world.

Related Papers

International Journal of Cultural and Religious Studies

Triyo Supriyatno

There is no separate discipline of ethics in Islam, and the comparative importance of reason and revelation in determining moral values is open to debate. For most Muslims, what is considered halāl (permitted) and harām (forbidden) in Islam is understood in terms of what God defines as right and good. There are three main kinds of values: (a) akhlāq, which refers to the duties and responsibilities set out in the shari‘ah and in Islamic teaching generally; (b) adab, which refers to the manners associated with good breeding; and (c) the qualities of character possessed by a good Muslim, following the example of the Prophet Muhammad. Among the main differences between Islamic and western morality is the emphasis on timeless religious principles, the role of the law in enforcing morality, the different understanding of rights, the rejection of moral autonomy as a goal of moral education, and the stress on reward in the Hereafter as a motivator of moral behavior. An Islamic life system c...

Ali Razavian

Researchers World : Journal of Arts, Science and Commerce

Muhammad Syukri Salleh

http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/wpcontent/ uploads/2009/02/khazaei-paper.pdf

Zahra Khazaei

Journal of Islamic and Religious Studies

Umbreen Ishfaq

This study is descriptive in nature and main focus of this paper is to consult Qur’ān and Ahdiths for understanding the concept of morality. Verses from the Holy Qur’ān and sayings of Prophet Muhammad (peace be on him) are consulted to portray a paramount role of parents and teachers that is played as family and public institutions respectively. Moral values like, good manners, respect, loyalty, truth, altruism, reliability, fairness, cooperation, collaboration, honesty, companionship, decency, acceptance, compliance, love, patience and forgiveness are also studied in the light of Qur’ān and Ahdiths. As an end product, inculcation of moral values in youth by their parents and teachers is also delineated.

Jurnal Al-Tamaddun

Prof. Benaouda Bensaid

The argument inherent in this study is that the Islamic framework on social coexistence and harmony stipulates moral capital as a bridge for community's inter-connectivity, interaction, and development, and that, for Muslims, morals act as an effective catalyst for constructing social coexistence and harmony. This study discusses the concept of Islamic social ethics and moral development in the context of society, followed by an inquiry into the ways and means according to which Muslim ethics may contribute and sustain social rapprochement, mutual support and social justice. The study aims to identify the prevalent framework for Muslim social morality, which can be of benefit to effective social policy, increasing civic engagement, developing an inclusive universal moral education, or furthering multicultural tolerance. Using textual approach, this study shows how Islam capitalizes on individual and collective morality towards the effective engineering of sustainable communities' relations and development. Further empirical studies on the contribution of Muslim morals in lieu of fortifying community development and social harmony would contribute to the way of elucidating the Muslim projection of theoretical moral ideals in real life conditions as well as tracing the convergences and divergences between Muslim theory and practices with regards to the application of morals to personal and communal settings, and more importantly in our context the shaping of communities' rapprochement, coexistence and harmony.

AL-WIJDÃN Journal of Islamic Education Studies

Siti Nur Hadis Rahman

Islam is a comprehensive religion, it contains strong principles and resources such as ‘aqidah, worship, shari‘a and morals that aim to regulate the life and journey of human beings in this world and in the afterlife in the aspects of individual management, household, education, economy, politics, social law, culture, etc. The Al-Quran and al-Sunnah, as well as the great heritage of Islamic scholars, contain all human life guides. The purpose of life and the human role in the world is to 'ubudiyyah (worship) Allah swt. Therefore, every act and movement of people in this world should be focused on the goal of carrying out their duties as khalifatullah, that is, the caliph of God on this earth. This concept paper aims to explore the practise of social life in the time of the Prophet Muhammad, explaining the basic concessions of social life and society based on Islamic education. This article uses library method and document analysis. This paper will help to provide some sources of...

Psikis : Jurnal Psikologi Islami

Ditta Febrieta

Meher Afroj Lutfa

Nowadays human beings are extremely cruel selfish and inhuman in their behavior to other human beings. As a result peace becomes rare in society. But human nature is pure. Indifference to religious teachings and lack of morality work as prime reasons behind this situation. Religion provides lessons on pacifism, nonviolence, tolerance, moderation and holism to its followers. The heart of all religions is ‘love one another’. Religion encourages virtues such as self-restraint, patience, forgiveness and compassion. Similarly Religion discourages bad conducts and evil deeds. By practicing the moral teachings of religion, people can make the ideal social behavior that ensures a peaceful environment. As a religion, Islam urges its followers to practice appropriate and tasteful social behavior at all times to maintain a peaceful society and a peaceful world.

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP)

Ahmad Bello Gidadawa

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Shavkat Saidov

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Zakiyu Ubale

Dr Farhat Rahman

DrFarhat Rahman

Afeksi: Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan

Ahmad Shofiyuddin Ichsan

abdul hakim abdullah

IAMURE International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research

ramezan mahdavi azadboni

Tafazul Ijaz

rahatulquloob

Musferah Mehfooz

Dr. Muhammad A Hafeez

HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies

Ravil Akhmadeev

P3M As-Sunnah

Abdulrahman Wandati

Proceedings of the Proceedings of 1st Workshop on Environmental Science, Society, and Technology, WESTECH 2018, December 8th, 2018, Medan, Indonesia

Afiful Ikhwan

Dr Muhammadullah Khalili

Journal of Religious Education

Nafees Akhtar

Islam - Believers' Covenant with God: Chapter 4

Journal of Positive School Psychology

Dr. Shammem Akhtar

NATIONAL PRINTERS & PUBLISHERS H.No. 4/131A-1, Nagla Mallah, St. 6, Tayyab Colony New Sir Syed Nagar, Aligarh-202 002, (U.P.) INDIA

imran hayat

Mohammad Jalaluddin

Al-Milal: Journal of Religion and Thought

Farhat Nisar , ڈاکٹر آسیہ رشید

European Scientific Journal ESJ

Hossein Serajzadeh

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

" title="Advertise and Market to Muslims" target="_blank">Ads by Muslim Ad Network

Muslim's Character

• Book title: Muslim's Character
• Muhammad Al-Ghazali
• Muslim Character

PILLARS OF ISLAM AND MORAL VALUES

Purpose of prophet hood -- perfection of morals, prayer prevents commitment of evil, zakat is a means of purification, fasting is a stepping stone to righteousness, hajj is a compulsory pilgrimage to weaken the love for the world, spread knowledge.

• What’s new?
• Pick of the month
• Islambasics Exclusive
• Discover Islam
• Prophet Muhammad

Please Donate generously to help bring more books to spread the word of Islam

Top Viewed Books

• Stories Of The Quran (72,260)
• Bible,Quran and Science (69,904)
• Most Common Questions asked by Non-Muslims (54,269)
• Transliteration of the Qur’an (42,749)
• The Three Fundamental Priciples & The Four Basic Rules (38,129)
• The Ten Nullifiers of Islam (37,271)
• Towards Understanding Islam (36,972)
• Men Around The Prophet (36,442)
• He is Allah (34,980)
• Islam Basics FAQ (34,659)

Translate IslamBasics

Library display options.

• By Book Category
• By Book Author
• By Book Title
• Advanced Search

" title="Advertise and Market to Muslims" target="_blank"> Ads by Muslim Ad Network

Makkah Live Stream

+201 112 195 086

[email protected]

The moral values in Islam

by adminalq | Feb 19, 2021 | ISLAM | 0 comments

“ Religion without morality is a superstition and a curse, and morality without religion is impossible.” (Hopkins)

           Have you ever asked yourself these questions; How can we differentiate what is right from what is wrong? What are the sound principles that we should follow in life? I am sure you did. The right answer to these questions can be summarized in just one term which is “the moral values”. Moral values are the principles that guide our life in the righteous path, help us to handle any situation and do not allow us to do any harm to others.

          In addition, these values help us to stand as unique creatures in this world. So, from where do we get these values that we learn since childhood? Every religion has its own basic values and in Islam, the Holy Qur’an and the traditions of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) serve as the primary source of these values. There are several morals values we should follow and in this essay we will concentrate on three of them which are Honesty, kindness and forgiveness.

                Honesty implies the meaning of sincerity in everything man does. It is related to all aspects of his life such as his actions, transactions and other dealings in which one should be fair and avoid deception and falsehood.

        In addition, Honesty serves as an umbrella term that has some basic components such as fulfilling commitments, telling truth, keeping the promise, doing one’s work as sincerely as possible, carrying out the duties as fully and completely as possible whether the person is under supervision or not and giving everyone their full deserved rights without their asking for them.

          The importance of honesty lies in the fact that it has a great place in the Holy Qur’an as it is the core of the message of Islam and the main characteristic of Muslims. It also has a great role in strengthening the relationship between individuals and society members. The Holy Qur’an and the teachings of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) orders people to be honest in their dealings with each other and always tell the truth even if it is against their own will or benefit.

 Thus, Honesty is one of the greatest traits one must have as Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) was known as “the trustworthy Muhammad” and Allah the Almighty said in the Holy Qur’an:

        “O you who believe!  Fear God, and be with those who are true (in word and deeds).” (Quran 9:119)

2/kindness (Ihsan)

            Kindness is one of the greatest moral values that man should have. The term kindness, in Islam, implies the meaning of giving charity and when the word kindness is mentioned, the first thing that comes into mind is giving or helping those in need from the provisions and sustenance bestowed by Allah to the rich. Allah the Almighty encourages the believers to practice kindness by declaring competition with each other in performing good deeds. This means that we are responsible for the money that Allah the Almighty bestowed upon us and on the Day of Judgment, we will be asked about how we earned and spent it.

          Furthermore, the importance of kindness lies in the fact that when we give charity, we are rewarded in return. The forms of this reward are that charity atones for our sins, increases our good deeds, purifies our hearts from greed, increases our sensation of the poor, protects us from Hell and the Angels pray on behalf of us when we give charity.

       In Islam, The greatest character who gave charity is our prophet Muhammad (PBUH). Some features of kindness in the Prophet’s life are that He fed the poor, gave water to the needy, took care of the widows, helped the orphans and said: “None of you have faith until you love for your neighbor what you love for yourself.’’ (Muslim)

Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) said, “Every act of kindness is a Sadaqa (charity)” (Bukhari, Muslim). This text from the tradition of the Prophet (PBUH) shows the importance of kindness in Muslims’ life.

3/Forgiveness (Afw)

                  We live in a world in which there are people with whom we have to interact. As a result of this interaction, there will be some fights or abuses due to any reason that will cause anger and violence. There may be some injuries or others harms and it will be difficult to forgive the offenders; However, Allah the Almighty orders us to forgive those who abused us and He will bless us with a lot of mercy after forgiving them due to complying with Allah’s command.

       Forgiveness in Islam can be taken into two forms; Allah’s forgiveness of our sins and people’s forgiveness of those who harm them and the earlier can be a result of the latter. Allah the Almighty said in the Holy Qur’an “whoever pardons [his foe] and makes peace, his reward rests with God – for, verily, He does not love evildoers” (Qur’an 42:40)

           The importance of forgiveness is that it is a form of high morals that the human soul needs to get rid of all impurities and grudges that may be attached to the heart from the impact of harm. It is also a way to enjoy goodness and love between people. There is no doubt that preferring forgiveness and tolerance to punishment will prevent the individuals from the acute conflicts that may arise among them. Furthermore, forgiveness has a great effect in man’s life as it helps to strengthen the social ties that are weakened and broken by abusing one another and it is reason for obtaining the pardon of Allah, his forgiveness and consent.

                   This shows us that forgiveness helps us to deserve Allah’s mercy upon us as Prophet Muhammad PBUH said:  

“Have mercy on those on the earth, and the One in heaven will have mercy on you” [Tirmidhi]

             The role model of forgiveness in Islam is our Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) who was always forgiving those who wronged him and meets wrong with good deeds even the disbelievers.  Prophet Muhammad was described as a “Mercy for all the Worlds”. His mercy wasn’t limited to his Muslim nation, but was extended to the non-Muslim nation. Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) said that the Prophet never took revenge on his own behalf on anyone.

         In the earlier portion of his mission, the Prophet traveled to the city of Taif, a city located in the mountains nearby to Mecca, in order to invite them to accept Islam. The leaders of Taif were tough and mistreated the Prophet Muhammad PBUH and the children followed him, threw stones and hurt him. The prophet endured all these injuries and more obstacles than he had to endure in Mecca. Out of his great tolerance and mercy, prophet Muhammad refused to punish them as one day, they may be guided to the right path. This shows us the importance of forgiveness in the earthy life and the hereafter.

In short, the importance of the three above-mentioned moral values, the sayings of the Prophet, the Qur’anic verses and the reward of these values urge all people to follow them.

Submit a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Posts

• Religious tourism
• Rituals of Hajj and Umrah
• Abraham in the Quran: Great stories and Major incidents
• Islam quotes in English: great wisdoms in short words 
• How to pray in Islam step by step in English

Recent Comments

WhatsApp us

Islam, Social Work and Common Good in the Muslim Minority Context of Europe: Rethinking Shariʿa as Relational Ethics

• Open Access
• First Online: 21 May 2022

Cite this chapter

You have full access to this open access chapter

• Abdullah Sahin 5  

Part of the book series: Muslims in Global Societies Series ((MGSS,volume 9))

3933 Accesses

1 Citations

4 Altmetric

This chapter explores the interface between Islam, social work and the common good within the Muslim minority context of Europe. The ethics-law nexus in Muslim tradition is examined to argue for a transformative Islamic engagement with the secular public space. Literature on Islam and social work is limited to providing basic information about Islam to frontline practitioners. The current inquiry intends to develop an Islamic perspective on social work and wellbeing. Increasing association of Muslims with extremism form negative public perceptions of Islam in Europe. Within this discourse of suspicion, Islam is coded as a cause of public harm and ‘Shariʿa law’ is often associated with human rights violations. This study argues that a critical dialogue among the faith-embedded and secular traditions of social ethics in Europe remains vital to fostering a shared sense of common good. Contemporary discussions on social ethics in Islam are dominated by maqāṣid ash-sharī ʿa (objectives of Islamic law) and fiqh al-ʿaqalliyyāt (Muslim minority law). Whilst the former is purported to be a metaethical discourse and the latter implying a contextualising intent, both operate within strict juristic hermeneutics. Alternatively, this inquiry rethinks Shariʿa as relational ethics and practical wisdom ( ḥikma ), closer to the concept of phronesis in ancient Greek philosophy, guiding human relations as imagined in Qurʾanic anthropology and its vision of a just society. Shariʿa is framed within Islam’s transformative view of human flourishing, tarbiyya . The notion of relational ethics is further grounded in dialogue with phenomenology-informed discussions on ethics, particularly in the work of Levinas, and Habermas’s ‘theory of communicative action’.

You have full access to this open access chapter,  Download chapter PDF

Similar content being viewed by others

Social Justice and Social Work

Ethical Pluralism and Social Work

• European Islam
• Relational ethics
• Social work
• Common good
• Transformative education
• Phenomenology

Introduction: Context, Questions and Methodology of the Inquiry

This chapter explores the interface between Islam, social work and the common good within the Muslim minority context of Europe. The ethics-law nexus in Muslim tradition is reconsidered with the view of generating a transformative Islamic engagement with the secular public space in modern multicultural European societies. The discussion is grounded in the Islamic values of relational ethics embodied in the concept of Shariʿa, applied wisdom ethics where Islam’s moral teachings are brought to bear on a range of real-world practical concerns. The idea of the public sphere in democratic societies assumes citizens actively involved in a decision-making process that facilitates the ethical pursuit of the common good. Social work, education, community cohesion and wellbeing are central to generating the public good.

There are challenges related to the post-World War II Muslim presence in Europe and the difficulties in defining common good in modern European societies where religion is often considered a private affair. Furthermore, there are diverse settlement models of the separation of Church and the state in Europe which inform how ‘public Islam’ is regulated. Questions concerning the compatibility of Islam with secularity and facilitating a settlement model between Islam and European states are explored in a separate study (Sahin, 2011 ). The main argument of the present inquiry builds on the previous studies, examining the role of religion and education in contributing to the common good and social cohesion in contemporary Europe (Sahin, 2010 , 2018 ).

This study’s problematic is framed around wider questions about ‘public Islam’ in European societies: (a) how do secular democratic states manage the public visibility of Islam and accommodate the faith-based needs of their Muslim citizens?; (b) to what extent do Muslims, most of whom exhibit transnational identities and share a sense of belonging to the worldwide Muslim community, ʾ umma, remain open to relating positively to the wider cultural/religious plurality of European societies? (c) does Islamic activism exploit public spaces (i. e., education, social work, chaplaincy and charity work) as sites for its missionary activities ( daʿwa ) or contribute to the common good and welfare for all?

In the aftermath of 9/11 and the 7/7 London bombings, the faith dimension within the ethnically and culturally diverse Muslim communities in Europe has gained more recognition. The challenge of public Islam in European societies is exemplified by discussions on Islamic extremism, Shariʿa law, state-funded Islamic schooling and Islamic sociopolitical activism (Martensson, 2014 ). This has led to the need for secular professionals such as social workers, who frequently engage with communities, to learn about the beliefs and practices of Muslims. There is a small body of literature which provides social work practitioners with information on Islam. This helps towards understanding the family values, youth problems and subcultures, mental health, wellbeing and social needs in the European Muslim diaspora (Barise, 2005 ; Ashencaen Crabtree et al., 2008 ; Robinson et al., 2017 ; Hodge, 2005 ; Ragab, 2016 ; Joshanloo, 2017 ). This literature is informative yet has worrying limitations. It does not contextualise Islamic social work and the concept of wellbeing within Muslim tradition or in the reality of European Muslim communities. The current study aims to fill this lacuna within the existing literature.

The inquiry employs a cross-disciplinary methodology that draws on theology and wider philosophical, social scientific study of ethics represented in the works of Husserl ( 2017 ), Levinas ( 1990 , 1998 , 1999 ) and Habermas ( 1984 , 1990 ). Hull ( 2006 ) argued that in modern plural societies peaceful coexistence can emerge if worldviews, including religions, are willing to show a degree of ‘self-relativisation’, which helps to avoid being trapped in absolutism, leading to fanaticism and even violence. This is a form of self-contextualisation close to Husserl’s phenomenological method of “bracketing” one’s perception of the world in order to “transcend” its limitations and be emphatically open to the other (Husserl, 2017 ). In such a contextual dialogue, worldviews could still retain their distinctiveness while maintaining relevance in the modern world. Communities experience social inequalities across intersecting identity categories, such as gender, race, class and faith, all of which are also subject to internal debate, conflict and negotiations. Addressing such inequalities requires critical reflection on one’s identity and the recognition of its limitations. This can further cultivate the virtue of ‘epistemic humility’, which can be traced back to the humility theory of wisdom attributed to Socrates (Whitcomb, 2011 ). Hull’s concept of self-relativisation and transcendence leads to the condition of being ‘critically open to the other’ and is argued to be compatible with the Islamic educational principle of taʿāruf (learning from one another) (Sahin, 2014 ).

The concepts of social and public theology are closely related to the notion of political theology in terms of engaging with issues around social justice. However, the latter implies a more direct engagement with governmental policies, whereas the former’s concern is with the affairs of civil society and how to nurture values of trust, respect and solidarity within communities to promote the common good. Islamic social work, like Islamic education, is a field of practical theology that has a strong empirical dimension, where conducting interdisciplinary social science research will enrich the theological thinking. Theological reflection can be grounded in this specific area of practice where it mediates Islamic values in daily life and, in turn, theology becomes shaped by practical encounters, a process which can facilitate indigenous articulations of Islam in Europe. A contextual model of practical Islamic theology is suggested by Sahin ( 2014 , 2018 ,  2019 ), originally developed through responding to the educational and identity needs of British Muslim youth. Too often, Muslim faith leaders use text-centred normative legal hermeneutics ( fiqh ) or speculative and defensive theology ( kalām ), where the contextual reality is considered as secondary. This inquiry argues that invoking the notion of relational ethics might facilitate a gradual shift from the dominance of text-centredness towards a better recognition of how texts are interpreted within the lived reality of communities and how they relate to wider society. Such experiential hermeneutics might inspire new models of practical Islamic theologies, capable of guiding practitioners in the applied fields of education and social work.

Religion, like the rest of human experience, is not free from ambiguity. As a powerful source of identity, religion can give rise to conflict, particularly when it enjoys political power and when religious identity disintegrates. Today, much of the violence committed in the name of Islam can partially be attributed to the reality of insecure Islamic identities seeking to retrieve long-lost imperial power and dignity in the face of daily experienced helplessness. The claim propagated chiefly by Orientalists like B. Lewis ( 1990 ) that Islam presents an exceptionally violence-prone religious culture has not been supported by empirical studies (Mabry, 2015 ; Fish, 2011 ). Contemporary Muslim societies have failed to nurture a democratic culture but there appears to be no fundamental difference between autocrats in Muslim states and those in non-Muslim states.

Religion can also be a powerful humanising force. Recent empirical studies demonstrate that religious affiliation has consistently predicted higher scores on measures of prosociality, altruism and public service (Neusner & Chilton, 2005 ). The latest psychological and sociological literature continues to demonstrate the social relevance of religion in contemporary western societies (Francis & Ziebertz, 2011 ; Trigg, 2008 ). The once taken-for-granted theory that equated modernisation with inevitable secularisation has long lost its empirical appeal (Berking et al., 2018 ). As Berger ( 2014 ) argues, increasing social pluralisation expressed as a diversity of religious and non-religious worldviews has been unfolding. The presence of religious communities in large European cities is being recognised as pointing towards a new urban, post-secular social condition (Nynäs et al., 2012 ), an observation first made by J. Habermas ( 2008 ). However, there are also renewed debates over whether ‘public religion’ can limit itself to social volunteerism contributing to the common good or harm in resisting plurality and liberal values of modern Europe where religion, especially Islam, has already been associated with violence and extremism.

The Common Good in Culturally and Religiously Plural European Societies

The European Enlightenment, part of overcoming centuries old European intra-religious warfare which ended with the famous Peace of Westphalia in 1684, promoted the value of tolerance, in an effort to contain sectarian conflict and ensure the freedom to practise religion, as well as freedom from religion, within its broader narrative of secular modernity. The value of tolerance was powerful enough to lay the foundations for new European constitutions (Classen, 2018 ). However, as Hollenbach ( 2002 ) argues, the notion of common good implies dimensions of mutual respect, trust and, above all else, interrelatedness, that are not present in the notion of tolerance. Serving the common good requires communities to develop enough mutual trust to share a vision of a good society. Habermas’ theory of ‘communicative action’ argues that the public sphere in democratic societies is where individuals and groups, representing diverse worldviews, can come together to freely discuss common problems. Faith communities, like other interest clusters, might put aside their theological differences and join forces to act as unified, civic pressure groups. Through such inclusive discussions, related to the practical realities of everyday life, and living together they can produce political action for the common good.

Habermas’ theory is rooted in the progressive values of the European Enlightenment and adopts Marxian features. As such, it is often argued (Bowen, 2016 ) that while the theory accommodates religion(s) in the secular public space, it also expects them to translate their traditional self-understandings into a universalist liberal language of intelligibility. This can be seen as an implicit secularisation demand, if not an unconscious Eurocentric bias. However, Habermas argues that mutual trust and understanding(s) emerge out of communities’ everyday practical interactions, requiring them to go beyond their particular identity politics in favour of preserving the common good. Habermas’s theory is based on the belief that the human capacity for rationality can facilitate intersubjective communication; an occasion for “ideal speech”, debate and dialogue in arriving at consensus(es) for taking collective actions to promote social justice. Habermas locates rationality as a capacity inherent within language, especially in the form of public debates expressing views on issues that concern the wider public. His conception of rationality goes beyond the confines of an instrumentalist scientific rationalism. It is framed as an expression of the human communicative power of language, which reflects what ancient philosophers called rhetoric, the art of persuasion, facilitating relational good and practical refinement or wisdom ( phronesis ), recognised in classical Muslim education as balāgha and ḥikma , competence for eloquent, intelligent speech and conduct.

The exclusion of minority voices in the public sphere and the inequalities they experience are recognised as a challenge in Habermas’ theory. A life with dignity requires recognition for one’s contribution to socially shared goals and one’s equal status within the society. As far as Europe’s minority faith communities are concerned, the forces of mistrust can be traced back to the aftermath of War World II. The early twentieth century mass population movements have occurred as a natural outcome of the workforce needs of a rapidly expanding global capitalist market. European powers mostly turned to their ex-colonies to fill the labour shortage. However, migration has gradually gained a ‘racial, cultural and religious turn’, going well beyond its initial economic focus. This has led to sociopolitical discontent in the so-called host societies, often expressed as racial and religious exclusion. Minorities have begun to experience life in what can be described as a perceptual state of liminality (Turner, 1974 ) i. e., anxiety, ambiguity and disorientation. A synchronic analysis reveals the dynamics of a specific historical period, such as the post-war migration and settlement of Muslim communities in Western Europe or the painful memories of European colonialism, behind the emergence of such an experience of liminality (Pugh, 2019 ). A more diachronic analysis, revealing how inequalities experienced across minority communities have, over time, gained a systemic character, is needed to fully understand the impact of the persisting racial and religious marginalisation in contemporary Europe. More recently, the mismanagement of migration from newly admitted EU member states and the economic recession of 2008 have triggered a wave of new nationalist populism formed around the ‘othering’ of migrants, particularly Muslims, who are increasingly stereotyped as ‘Islamists’ holding an intransigent political ideology (Islam) that needs policing (Abbas, 2018 ). For Example, the UK Prevent legislation has been expanded to traditionally non-security areas such as child-protection, family law and education (Ahdash, 2020 ). European security policies continue to focus more on Islamic radicalism and less on far-right extremism.

Relational Ethics and a Convergent View of the Common Good

Human autonomy, literally self-rule, remains a critical issue in contemporary philosophical discussions on moral agency. The perception of autonomy as the rational capacity of self-mastery, symbolised by the philosophies of Descartes and Kant, is often criticised as a male-coded concept shaped by the atomistic, rights-bearing privileged “white” European individuals (Oshana, 2006 ). The notion of relational autonomy has been proposed (Mackenzie, 2019 ) as an alternative, stressing that persons are socially-embedded beings with intersecting identity markers of gender, ethnicity, class and religion. In phenomenological tradition, human autonomy is perceived as an embodied agency articulated out of a world of relatedness to a body and a contextual, intersubjective processes of unfolding. Phenomenologically considered, ethical agency emerges out of this relational and dialogical character of human existence and a moral demand intrinsic to other persons (Ricoeur, 1992 ; Smith, 2012 ; Mensch, 2003 ).

The lived reality of communities in a racially, culturally and religiously plural Europe points towards a moral dissonance in meeting liberal ideals. This is not to invoke Humean moral scepticism, but contemporary plural societies present an ethical dilemma which calls into question how diverse communities find recognition, experience respect and develop a sense of belonging in secular multicultural societies. A rigid interpretation of the secular, secularism, could imply an exclusivist perspective that struggles to deal with diversity and to facilitate a fair common ground in public space. Such a position may even deem religions to be irrelevant in public life. There is also a tension between promoting individual flourishing and protecting the social common good in secular polities, where a sharp distinction between the private and public realms of life is often observed. Rawls ( 2001 ) argued that the pluralism of contemporary Western secular societies makes it impossible to envision a social good on which all can agree. Rawls does not seem to consider that the everyday practical reality of a shared social life can naturally generate knowledge of the common good.

MacIntyre ( 1994 , 2007 ) draws attention to the fact that post-enlightenment Western moral philosophy has roots in the discussions on ‘good life’ which originated in ancient Greek philosophy, at the expense of ignoring Europe’s faith-based ethical traditions. MacIntyre, by adopting neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics, suggests returning to a narrative-shaped tradition theory of morality, illustrated by Christian virtue ethics. Aristotle argued in Nicomachean Ethics ( 1976 ) that a good life is one devoted to the pursuit of good purposes. A good life is also oriented toward goods shared with others. Virtue ( arete , excellence or fulfilment) was perceived as a habitual disposition to do good. The practice of virtue and wisdom ( phronesis ) has a relational goal ( telos) . In Plato’s dialogues (Cooper, 1997 ), Socrates is depicted arguing for the need to turn guardians into the future rulers of the city, through a complex system of education to form their character so that they serve the common good as if it were their very own. For him, the real goal was to establish an ordered, just regime within oneself first. Socratic education is not just meant to educate civic rulers, but also to educate humans to be excellent rulers of themselves within a just society where the common good is served. This practical virtue ethics of “moderation, courage, wisdom and justice” shaped medieval moral thought, including Muslim thinkers’ perspectives on ethics.

For example, the ancient Greek idea of eudaimonia (happiness, human flourishing, prosperity) was formed around an individual sense of goodness (Lafollette, 2014 ). Naturally, the religious eudaimonia focused on active participation in a life of community. Muslim philosophical schools, and to some extent theological traditions, as part of their critical reception of ancient Greek thought, developed an Islamic view of eudaimonia . Al-Farabi (d. 850) in his Attainment of Happiness ( taḥṣīl al-sa ʿ āda ), modelled on the Republic of Plato, promotes political moderation in a time of sociopolitical and sectarian conflicts and argues for the need to form a virtuous society where the common good is served (Parens, 2006 ). Al-Farabi’s work ( 1995 ) seeks to educate young and politically ambitious Muslims to temper their desire to spread the truths of Islam through a jihad of military expansionism, by pursuing a jihad of truth spreading and living by the truth. For him, seeking happiness ( saʿāda ) is linked with the pursuit of the common good and achieving a virtuous society ( al-madīna al-fāḍila ). Similarly, friendship was a favourite theme within the humanistic ( insāniyya ) discourse of the Muslim philosophers and theologians such as Ibn Miskawayh (d. 1030) and Abu Hayyan al-Tahwdi (d. 1023). The latter wrote a distinctive work on friendship ( ukhuwwa ), rearticulating the Aristotelian concept of philia (friendship) within a wider Islamic perception of the human self and the other. Ancient Greek and Persian moral thought had a profound impact on Muslim ethical traditions. It is important to note that classical Islamic works on ethics, like their inherited Greek and Persian counterparts, often exclude women and assume the moral subject to be an elite male.

The Islamic tradition preserved the Greek idea of eudaimonia but often gave it a distinctive Islamic idiom by using Qurʾanic ethical vocabulary such as faḍl, divine grace, and iḥsān , excellence, kindness, generosity and ʿadl , justice. However, women appear to be excluded from this Qurʾanic egalitarian ethics. Al-Isfahani (d. 1108), whose work ( 1985 , 116–118) will shortly be discussed, suggested limitations in female moral agency as “the social status of women require exhibiting an inferior version of the virtues which reach their peak in man ( muruwwa /manliness)”. He immediately recognises this contradicts the Qurʾan’s gender inclusive notion of humanity and its egalitarian moral ethos (Q 49:13) Footnote 1 and tries, rather unconvincingly, to justify his apparently self-contradictory position on the issue. The pursual of a good life in Islam is also tied to fulfilling one’s obligation ( taklīf ) which is rooted in a novel juridical concept i. e., the rights that humans and God possess ( ḥuqūq Allah / ʿibād ). This legalistic rights approach, prioritising the value of justice was given a moral sense by promoting virtue as self-care ( tazkiyya / riʿāya ). Overall, a more personalist and relational perception of human moral agency seems well-founded in Muslim core sources (Al-Halbabi, 1969 ). The prophetic traditions emphasise the significance of personal intentions ( niyya ) in human conduct and cultivating a sense of personal moral autonomy and responsibility. When asked to define “goodness and sin” the prophet was reported to have simply said “search your hearts rather than seek a legal opinion ( fatwā )”, highlighting the significance of personal moral consciousness in human life.

It is often assumed that there is no exact cognate for ethics in the Islamic intellectual tradition (Bucar, 2018 ). The legal concept of fiqh is suggested as exhibiting moral connotations, as it regulates human behaviours. Some do mention that moral issues are dealt with in the domains of akhlāq (morals), taṣawwuf (spirituality), falsafa (philosophy), kalām (speculative theology) and adab (etiquette). Nearly all ignore approaching Shariʿa as source of Muslim ethics. The interpretation of Shariʿa as law, the Divine commandments backed by the threat of punishment, has led to an assumption that it promotes a simple transactional ethics of reward and punishment.

Even the depiction of God in the Qurʾan could be perceived as a fearful judge. An original study (Rahbar, 1960 ) exploring the principal motive of good conduct in the Qurʾan, argues that the Qurʾanic God can best be described as God of Justice. The Qurʾan upholds the human capacity for freedom as evident in its formulae of connecting faithfulness with doing good (ʾ āmanū wa ʿamilū aṣ-ṣāliḥāt ) (Hourani, 1985 ). An early human freedom-centred Islamic ethics is exemplified by the muʿtazila , a rationalist school of Islamic theology that flourished during the eighth to tenth centuries. Muʿtazila theologians showed tendencies of ethical objectivism and a natural law perspective that are justified by appealing to God’s creation of a good, beneficial world. They argued that the natural value of justice needed to be observed by God and humans equally. However, in Rahbar’s ( 1960 ) exceptionally rigorous study, God emerges as a stern, legally-minded deity who does not act arbitrarily but is incapable of love and intimacy with humanity. The study overlooks the moral qualities embedded in God’s names ( al- ʾ asmā ʾ al-ḥusnā ) and the ethics of mutual recognition and care informing the Divine-human relations revealed by the central description of God in the Qurʾan as al-Rabb ; the Educator, Nourisher and Guide par excellence . A key ethical concept of the Qurʾan, taqwā , is erroneously associated in this work with a fear of God rather than with the moral awareness of self, others and the Divine (Rahman, 1983 ).

Asad ( 1986 ) invoked the notion of ‘tradition’ à la MacIntyre to deconstruct perceptions of Islam within secular modernity. Asad advises western anthropologists to take the idea of tradition, or more accurately, “discursive tradition”, seriously when studying Islam. He tries to overcome the “essentialist” and “nominalist” dichotomy in defining Islam and argues that a practice becomes Islamic because it is authorised by the discursive traditions of Islam and backed up by shared communal practices. He does not elaborate but, as will be discussed shortly, early Islamic epistemology, before the encounter with Hellenistic thought, was shaped by dynamic, contextual hermeneutics, where textual authority was mediated through sound reason ( ijtihād ), consensus building ( ijmaʿ ), customs ( ʿurf ), and taking into account the needs of a changing society ( istiṣlaḥ ). Such an open-ended interpretative epistemology leaves ample room for new contextual expressions of being Muslim to emerge from a dynamic living tradition.

Asad and MacIntyre seem to show a conservative reactionary attitude to secular modernity. Appealing to the notion of tradition can increase self-confidence among faith communities, but it does not necessarily empower them to engage and to be part of a common good formed within the diversity of modern world. Today, the increasing presence of religion in the public sphere requires religious communities to reflect upon their normative religious structures and not simply to insist on their mere preservation, if an open dialogue with the wider society is to be possible (Casanova, 1994 ). Public religions, including Islam in secular polity, are better served if they bring their moral teachings to bear on issues of civic space and contribute to the emergence of an inclusive common good.

What Is Relational Ethics?

Ethics or moral philosophy is a branch of philosophy that explores what constitutes right or wrong, virtue or vice. It is closely related to discussions of axiology and aesthetics, as well as to moral psychology and theoretical discussions on values. The terms ethics and moral philosophy can be understood differently. Ethics, particularly in Aristotelian sense, refer to a teleological concern i. e., character formation and good life, while morality may mean obligations and norms governing actions. The study of ethics is usually carried out in three distinctive aspects: metaethics, where truth in moral propositions is examined; normative ethics, related to the principles of ethical decision making; and applied ethics, which is concerned with the application of moral values in life. The most common ethical theories are consequentialist, deontological and virtue-based theories. A consequentialist theory suggests that an action is morally permissible if it maximises overall goodness. Consequentialist theories are specified according to what they take to be intrinsically good. For example, classical utilitarianism considered intrinsic goodness to be happiness and pleasure (Lafollette, 2014 ). In the deontological perspective, associated with Kant, the emphasis is placed on individual duty. Kant argued that dignity is a kind of intrinsic worth inherent in rational individuals who set their goals according to certain universal maxims. Thus, acting rightly requires being motivated by universal principles that treat everyone with respect. The divine command theory is considered deontological, in that an action is right if God has decreed it.

The concept of relational ethics, proposed in this inquiry, is grounded in the relational and dialogical nature of human existence discussed above. The moral obligation resides in the call to respond to the relationality defining the human condition. An influential form of a relational ethics where moral normativity is grounded in the ethical demand of the other is offered by E. Levinas. Levinas’ ( 1979 , 1990 ) ethical theory originates in a critical dialogue with phenomenology and his faith heritage, Judaism. Levinas’s thinking is couched in phenomenological method and integrates rabbinic exegetical-interpretative features. Levinas, after breaking away from Heidegger and his phenomenology of Being, which Levinas once admired, identified ethics to be the foremost concern of philosophy rather than epistemology or metaphysics. The phenomenological reflection in the early works of Husserl on ethics was dominated by axiological discussions and acts of feeling, where objects are assigned values as likes and dislikes. Husserl later moved towards examining the intersubjective and social aspects of moral life (life-world) (Drummond & Embree, 2002 ). However, Levinas is the chief figure in advancing a phenomenological analysis that grounds ethics in the obligating presence of the “other”. The other symbolises the phenomenological feeling of an ethical relationship. He developed a philosophy of subjectivity, paradoxically defined within the framework of responsibility for the other. His work challenges philosophies that seek to “totalise” (reduce) otherness into sameness, by apportioning difference into pre-established characteristics, properties, and categories. Levinas shows how the ‘infinite’ can be interpreted as involved in “finity” but without becoming “finity” (objectified). He draws on the metaphors of the human-divine encounter depicted in the Hebrew Bible, which overwhelms the human thinking faculty and reveals fundamental human fragility and limitations. The encounter with a human “other”, is likened to the spiritual encounter with the “Divine Other”. He argues that when the self is true to itself, it is nothing but a response to the other.

Levinas engaged with Jewish sources through a series of Talmudic readings, combining the insights of western philosophy with rabbinic interpretive methods. His hermeneutic strategy takes the textual legacy of his faith tradition and contemporary intellectual discourses seriously. The aim of exegesis is to extract the universal from the apparent particularism of the tradition. In Levinas’ relational ethics, the concept of “alterity” (otherness) plays a significant role. Alterity does not refer to mere difference or otherness, but to an irreducible sense of singularity and subjectivity that needs to be recognised and responded to. Levinas’ perception of singularity lies in his understanding of transcendence, which reflects his critical engagement with Husserlian phenomenology. The transcendence of the other does include an embodied, worldly, immanent presence. This opening of transcendence within the immanence of being makes possible a relationship with the other which is not reducible to an objectification. Paradoxically, it becomes a “relationship without relation”, in which the other is greeted or received without becoming assimilated into known categories. This points towards an ethics of hospitality in which intra-human relations such as education and social work become humane and empowering. Welcoming the other as oneself facilitates a natural pedagogic desire to learn from the other (Todd, 2008 ), which in Muslim education is expressed by the concept taʿāruf , “openness to learning from one another” (Sahin, 2017 ).

In Totality and Infinity , Levinas ( 1999 ) argues that the concept of responsibility is not based on a demand for ethical justification issued once and for all, but a continually renewed covenant in living encounters with every stranger. Levinas uses the symbol of the “face of the other” to illustrate the other’s resistance to comprehension and assimilation. In the Hebrew Bible, ‘face’ represents the presence of God (Isaiah 63:9), a depiction also found frequently in the Qurʾan (Q 18:28). The face cannot be described or represented (objectified), since it is not a phenomenon with particular qualities, but rather depicted as a horizon , where relations become meaningful. Face is not a mere abstraction or mystical apparition but symbolises a deeper ethical recognition of living in the presence of an irreducible other. The face is discursive more than visual; it commands the individual to respond to the call from the other.

However, Levinas’ philosophy may come across as inherently apolitical and quasi-mystical (Wolin, 2008 ). The question of the political is seen as consistently troubling Levinas’s thought (Caygill, 2002 ; Critchley, 1999 ). There is always a tension between ethics and politics in a world where violence against the other, or by the other, remains a reality. The other can cause injustice and commit the violence of ‘othering’ by marginalising people unlike her or him. The real task is how to establish an ethical awareness that is capable of upholding dignity and holiness in the humanity of one’s vulnerable neighbour. Relational ethics requires replacing tribal self-understandings shaped by mutually exclusive in- and out-group selfish interests with a willingness to be ‘critically faithful’ (Sahin, 2017 ) to one’s identity, so that injustice caused by one’s own self or community to other(s) can be acknowledged and addressed. Levinas insists that responsibility pre-supposes response. The real ethical danger is not where responsibility is rejected in scepticism but where it is ignored in an apathy of moral blindness (Perpich, 2008 ). In his Talmudic reflections, Levinas ( 1990 ) considers the experience of the Exodus, led by Moses to the Promised Land, which turned into a nightmare of 40 years of desperate wandering in the desert. It appears that Moses’ followers decided to enter the land with violence and without respect for the native population living there, naively assuming the unconditional approval of God for their invasion of the other’s homeland. They even started to deviate from the Divine commandment to worship God alone (the Golden Calf episode) and to observe justice. As a consequence of their transgression, the Israelites, God’s ‘treasured people’, were no longer ‘permitted’ to enter the ‘promised’ land until they reflected on their wrong doings and changed themselves.

Islam and Judaism are often considered as religions of law. However, scholars suggest that Judaism in its biblical stage did not seem to have been a law-based tradition. J. Kugel ( 2007 ) points out that the great figures of Judaism, Abraham and Moses, are not depicted in the Bible as observing any law or ritual. Furthermore, it appears that the origins of the Mosaic covenant reflect the structure of the suzerainty treaties of the ancient world agreed between a powerful state and its smaller vassal states. The concept of humans being created in the image of God ( imago dei ) in the Bible, which does not occur in the Qurʾan, appears as such to be a borrowed metaphor from the widely circulated ancient political culture in Mesopotamia, where kings were often depicted in the images of their deities. It is possible that the Qurʾanic depiction of human distinctiveness with the word khalīfa / khalā ʾ if , God’s representatives and stewardship on earth (Q 2:34), has roots in the imperial imagination of the Near East. In the Hebrew Bible, God demands that Israel be a kingdom of priests and a holy nation (Exodus 19:6). Kugel argues that a significant implication of being a holy nation was that all people needed to observe the rituals and commandments of God. In Christianity, law was superseded by Divine love. Paul saw law as having the function of pedagogues (not to be confused with today’s use of the word as teachers), who in antiquity were usually slaves and looked after children (Young, 1987 ). With the arrival of Christ, Paul argued there was no longer a need for a primitive protective measure such as law. In Muslim tradition, Shariʿa integrates law, ethics and spirituality. Bearing the knowledge of Shariʿa is not intended to be merely having legal expertise but embodying moral, spiritual authority and guidance.

Shariʿa as Relational Ethics

The word Shariʿa in Arabic refers to a path that leads to a spring vital for human survival. Its frequent use in the Qurʾan would have immediately attracted the attention of seventh century Arabs familiar with desert life. Such a pedagogic use of language is a significant aspect of the Qurʾan’s rhetorical discourse, deliberately employed to provoke human imagination. Similarly, the evidence-based thinking in the Qurʾan is expressed with the word istinbāṭ – literally searching for water i. e. evidence (Q 4:83). As a technical religious concept in the Qurʾan, Shariʿa symbolises a pattern of meaning humans need to form around certain core values for life (i. e. ethics) (Q 42:13). Shariʿa secondarily refers to rules and regulations (Q 5:48) recognised as fiqh / aḥkām that classifies acts and duties of Muslims into categories of farḍ / wājib (obligatory), makrūh (disliked), mustaḥabb (recommended), and ḥarām (forbidden). Shariʿa has two interrelated dimensions: the divine-human relationship, consisting of a vertical axis of serving God and a horizontal axis of intersubjective, intra-human conduct, serving God’s people. The former ( ʿibādāt ) is recognised as the domain of God’s rights and the latter ( muʿāmalāt ) as the domain of individual and public human rights.

Shariʿa is related to the central Qurʾanic concepts of religion ( dīn ), human nature ( fiṭra ) and a deep sense of moral obligation ( taklīf ). The word religion, dīn and religiosity ( tadayyun ) in Arabic, are interwoven with meanings of leading a “reflective, accountable life of gratitude, justice and care”. Dīn/tadayyun is the natural expression of meaning-making and lifestyle forming feature of human nature ( fiṭra ), and Shariʿa is a distinctive path ordained by God (Q 5:48, 45:18) with boundaries ( ḥudūd ) (Q 2:229, 58:4) to facilitate achieving wellbeing and prosperity ( falāḥ ) in this world and the world to come. Adopting the divinely sanctioned straight path, dīn qayyim (Q 6:161), a balanced religiosity must be based on individual consent as “religion” is considered to be nothing but sincere counsel ( naṣīha ). Interestingly, the concept of obedience, ṭāʿa , in the Qurʾan literally means engaging in a reciprocal relationship and taking a decision freely , hence, willingly entering into a dialogue with God through responding to the Divine call ( taklīf ) (Q 3:83). The Qurʾanic word for volunteering, taṭawwuʿ , comes from the same verbal root: “whoever does an act of goodness voluntarily, God will show His gratitude by rewarding the person.” (Q 2:168, 9:53) Furthermore, the words for creation ( khalq ) and moral character ( akhlāq / khuluq ) share the same etymology and are semantically linked to the concept of religion ( dīn ), all have the meanings of measure, esteem and discernible, balanced conduct. Humans are created with an innate capacity of forming a moral character and a way of life or custom (religion/ dīn ) (Q 26:137). Muhammad in the Qurʾan is depicted as having a sublime moral character ( khuluq ʿ aẓīm 68:4) (being on a distinctive path or custom/life style i. e. dīn ) (Al-Isfahani, 2009 ).

The Qurʾan is aware that there are diverse human lifestyles where God may not be recognised but more significantly that there could be extreme and corrupt interpretations of the Divine path leading to the formation of unhealthy religiosities ( tadayyun ) (Q 4:171, 5:77). Similarly, empathy with the other is a crucial dimension of the Islamic sense of being religious. The poor have the right to share in the wealth of the rich, the obligatory zakāt, literally purification and growth. Zakāt that purifies one’s wealth is an integral part of individual piety and self-development ( tazkiyyat an-nafs) . Human dignity in the Qurʾan is expressed with karāma and khilāfa (stewardship of earth). Karāma has meanings of being generous, welcoming, free and noble, showing ethical conduct. Finally, the Qurʾan recognises that the embodiment of Shariʿa in life will necessarily be context-dependent, reflecting individual differences and social conditions. Therefore, it acknowledges the inevitable diversity in the historical applications of Shariʿa (Q 5:48, 45:18) and its universal values. As the social context of Muslim communities changed, Muslim scholars reinterpreted core Muslim teachings.

In Islam, the formation of the first faithful community (ʾ umma ) and completion of the Divine revelation are considered co-temporal. This historical experience has shaped a distinctive Islamic perception of what constitutes a sacred scripture and how it should be interpreted. Muslim belief that the Qurʾan is literally Divine speech, has erroneously led to the conclusion that this necessarily implies a literalist perception of scripture. On the contrary, the prophetic and early Muslim attitude towards the Qurʾan shows more dynamic and contextual interpretative features (Sahin, 2013 ). The interpretation occurs in the text itself since parts of the scripture explain other parts (intra-textual hermeneutics). The Qurʾan emphasises that human reason cannot exhaust all the meanings and wisdom embedded in the Divine word (Q 18:109, 31:27). The original intended authorial meanings cannot always be traced backed to an objectified, literal meaning, hence the human interpretive act, ta ʾ wīl (tracing the origins), remains polyvocal and future orientated taking into account the changing life conditions of the communities.

A central task of the prophet was to explain the Qurʾan to its first audience which has a normative function in Muslim tradition. The prophet embodies the Divine message in real life. Thus, his prophetic conduct, sunna , became a wisdom tradition, acting as guide to all aspects of Muslim life. The sunna , originally transmitted orally, came to be written down as reports, Hadith. The Qurʾan and the prophetic sunna remained open to new interpretations ( ijtihād ). The interpretation of Islam by the first generations, through adopting a consensus-based decision-making process, is also considered normative, worthy of emulation. Most of the legal edicts in the Qurʾan are often qualified with an ethical alternative i. e. ‘an eye for an eye’, retributive justice, is moderated by restorative justice, encouraging the victim to forgive the offender or accept a monetary compensation. Moreover, as circumstances changed, the legal positions were revised by abrogation or, as the second Caliph Omar famously did, by suspending some of the scripture-based laws. Unlike later Muslim hermeneutics that saw Islam mainly from the prism of law, early Islamic interpretative engagement had an ethical, contextual focus. This has enabled growth and development within the Muslim living tradition through a progressive agenda of continuous social reform toward realising the Qurʾan’s ethical demand of forming a compassionate, just society (Rahman, 1995 ).

This rather egalitarian interpretive attitude can be seen in the Islamic perception of community, ʾ umma , as an inclusive polity responding to the reality of plurality in the city where Islam gained its first social expression. The famous ‘Medinah Pledge’ (622), led by the prophet, envisioned an inclusive civic polity that contained diverse faith communities and aimed to safeguard the wellbeing of all. The Qurʾanic concept of “people of the Book” indicates recognition of the religious other. However, it is often forgotten that prophetic traditions also emphasise the notion of “God’s people” ( ʿiyāal Allah ), a more inclusive category that is open to the non-religious other. Thus, within the first city where Islam emerged as a social reality, the public space was used to facilitate peaceful coexistence. This seems to have shaped the prophet’s style of leadership, as he is reported to have said “a person’s goodness lies in her or his willingness to be part of a community or to bring people together as a community”.

The fundamental ethical logic that permeates the Qurʾan can be summarised as follows: God, by virtue of gifting humanity with life, expects recognition and gratitude for this act of Divine generosity. Upon reflection, those who choose to acknowledge God’s favour and willingly express their gratitude by worshiping Him alone, became “faithful” (literally experience safety, trust). Existentially, faithfulness is tied to the ethical attitude of gratefulness i. e. engaging with a relationship of care and respect towards oneself and others, including the environment and the Creator. In Islam’s core narrative, the Divine-human relationship reflects a relational ethics of mutual recognition and cooperation for establishing justice on earth. The Qurʾan encourages meaningful debate, consensus building and taking into account the lived reality of the community. The early Islamic contextual epistemology shares some interesting features with Habermas’ ( 1990 ) debate, dialogue and consensus-centred theory of knowledge, and negotiating the common good within contemporary plural, secular societies. Within the Qurʾanic discourse there is a trust in human capacity to discover truth, good and bad, and engage with consensus building ( ijmāʿ ), essential for the survival and coexistence of communities. During the prophet-led formation of Muslim society, there seemed to have been a shared clarity on the basic ethical values necessary for communal wellbeing. There appear to have been few abstract theological discussions on what constitutes good ( ḥusn ) or bad ( qubḥ ) and whether Divine commands determine the nature of good or bad. This typical Hellenic way of framing moral discussions dominated medieval Muslim theological and philosophical discussions. In this sense, the prophet’s city, Medinah, should neither be confused with ancient Athens nor with the cosmopolitan medieval Baghdad. The Qurʾanic approach to social ethics seems to follow common sense and work through a consensus-based epistemology, where goodness or harm to society are clearly discernible without much metaphysical discussion.

The Danger of Reifying Shariʿa into a Body of Ahistorical Laws

Interpreting Shariʿa as relational ethics does not mean reducing Islam to the level of private morality, a charge levelled against postcolonial Islamic modernist reformism. Al-Isfahani (d. 1086), a well-regarded mediaeval Muslim scholar for example, offered educationally-informed ethical hermeneutics to discern the moral values of Shariʿa. His work, al-dharīʿa ilā makārim ash-sharīʿa (the means to achieving moral excellence and dignity of the divine path) (Al-Isfahani, 1985 ), articulates social ethics rooted in Qurʾanic anthropology. The book begins with a discussion on the human condition including its biological ( ṭabʿ / fiṭra ) givenness and its central ethical and educational character that individuals acquire within a given social context. Law is defined as an aid to moral agency and not the other way around. Al-Isfahani critically integrates elements of ancient Greek practical virtue ethics ( phronesis ) in formulating his version of Islamic relational ethics. The ethical character of Shariʿa was not recognised as an after-thought to a legal system but as shaping the very fabric of what it means to be a human being. He distinguishes between rules discerned from Shariʿa ( aḥkām ) and its core humanising moral ethos as makārim . The latter enables humans to develop an inner ethical competence guiding human transformation ( tarbiyya ) and qualifying humans for stewardship of the earth ( khalifa ) which signifies dignity ( karāma ) bestowed by God on humanity.

Classical Muslim legal scholars identified five rights that summarised the ultimate purpose of Islamic law ( maqāṣid al-sharīʿa ): protecting life, family, property, religion and the human reasoning capacity to preserve human sanity (Sahin, 2011 ). These aims are sometimes considered alongside a hierarchy of needs (i. e. essential, required and aesthetic) that individuals or communities exhibit. This metalegal discourse appears to have emerged from analysing the raison d’être of the laws ( taʿīl al-aḥkām ) and discerning ( istiqrā ʾ/ istinbāṭ) the Divine intentions in the revelation. The preoccupation with authorial intentions seems to have led to text-focused legal interpretations, at the expense of the gradually disappearing earlier context-based hermeneutics evident in the hermeneutical approach of authoritative figures like Imam Malik (d. 795) who considered the entire experience of Medina, where Islamic society first emerged, as normative. Apart from the Zahiri school of thought, which limited textual engagement to its external sense only (the ẓahir ), all other Islamic legal schools were in favour of discerning the objectives intended to protect human good by the scripture. Ibrahim al-Nakhaʿi (d. 717), an early legal authority (Qalʿajī, 1979 ) who advocated the use of reason while engaging with the Qurʾan, argued that “the Divine revelation demands to be reasoned with, in order to discern its objectives and wisdom, meant to protect human wellbeing”. Subsequently, the concept of the higher objectives of law was worked out by scholars until it was systematised by Izz b. Abdassalaam (d. 1262) and al-Shatibi (d. 1388). However, the ethics seem largely perceived as a complementary aspect ( taḥsīniyyāt ) to this overwhelmingly legal interpretative framework.

Today, the relational ethics integral to the concept of Shariʿa, have been eclipsed to such an extent that they are increasingly perceived, by Muslims and wider society, as a reified, ahistorical, rigid system of rules and regulations. Without reclaiming this human dignity-focussed relational ethics embedded in Shariʿa, pressing issues like gender-inequality and attitudes towards religious or non-religious others in the modern Muslim communities cannot be adequately addressed. The call for the application of Shariʿa becomes empty political rhetoric, completely disassociated from protecting human freedom, dignity, welfare and the common good. Even a distinctive socio-ethical principle enshrined in the Qurʾan, such as “enjoining good and preventing harm” to ensure public welfare is maintained can be reduced to an apparatus of inhumane control, as briefly exemplified by the totalitarian hysteria of the so-called Islamic State (IS).

The main shortcoming in the maqāṣid discourse lies in its legalistic framing and ahistorical application, which prevents it from acting at a higher critical ethical hermeneutics level. The actual determination of the good ( maṣlaḥa ) intended to be protected, is subject to numerous legal conditions ( ḍawābiṭ ) and focused on discerning the authorial intentions rather than recognizing the lived reality of the faithful. This legal perception of the maqāṣid is evident in the theological discourse of its early proponents. Al-Ghazali (d. 1111), one of the first formulators of the concept, for example, mostly invokes maqāṣid in its legal sense and often omits its ethical prerequisites. While trying to reconcile divine omnipotence and human moral responsibility, he does not seem to be particularly bothered with the apparent contradiction in saying that Shariʿa protects human reason (ʾ aql ) and yet severely curtails human agency and responsibility in producing moral actions. In his best-known work, iḥyā ʾ, completed after an experience of spiritual transformation and synthesising his most mature understanding of Islam, Al-Ghazali largely abandons legalism in recapturing the holistic moral and spiritual guidance embedded in Shariʿa. Abu Bakr ibn Al-Arabi (d. 1148) in his Apologia ( 2001 ) ( al-ʿawāṣim min al-qawāṣim ), written to justify the innocence of all companions involved in the first civil war ( fitna 656–661), and which fundamentally shaped the medieval Sunni quietist political theology until modern times, does not once raise the issue of justice or remember the Qurʾanic ethical principle: “killing an innocent soul amounts to killing all humanity.” (Q 5:32)

Similarly, the classical genres on ethics such as adab and the faḍā ʾ il (the excellences of rulers, judges) do not go beyond a well-crafted hyperbolic discourse. The ethical sense invoked by the concept of ʾ adab originally meant a particular set of moral norms for a good life, cultivated by a class of literati in the context of Muslim court culture, and mostly remained an elitist pursuit which for commoners meant moral coercion ( ta ʾ dīb ). Within the politically quietist and heavily legalistic Sunni piety and theological discourse, justice and ethics, two fundamental values of the Qurʾan, have often been marginalised. I. Güler ( 2011 ) offers a critical analysis as to how the Qurʾan’s human freedom and justice-focused ethics of care were eroded within the predestinarian Sunni theological discourse, originally designed to justify suppressing political dissent, which has contributed to cultural stagnation in modern Muslim societies. The encounter with western secular modernity pushed early Muslim reformists to stress the moral character of Shariʿa, through popularising the notions of maqāṣid and common good ( maṣlaḥa ) (Salvatore, 2009 ; Salvatore & Eickelman, 2005 ). However, the political motive of trying to reconcile Islam with secular modernity has often yielded to a secular temptation to simply abrogate the Qurʾan’s Medinan chapters, which cover complex sociopolitical issues.

The concept fiqh al-ʿaqalliyyāt , minority jurisprudence (Hassan, 2013 ), is an extension of a similar legal epistemology that does not actually help to contextualise Islam in the modern world. Some aspects of Islamic law (family law) are accommodated within secular legal systems of Europe (the UK’s common law) which, in varying degrees, acknowledge legal pluralism in order to accommodate minority communities’ claims to their own distinctive legal traditions when resolving family disputes. Accommodation of Shariʿa is now slowly happening in the areas of finance, family matters, and food industry. There are even Shariʿa courts, mostly acting as Muslim arbitration tribunals; and a European fatwā council overseeing an expanding ‘halalification’ industry. However, tensions between upholding the liberal principle of equality which informs secular democratic citizenship and the demand for recognition of difference in multicultural societies can cause conflict (Turner & Possamai, 2015 ). While analysing Muslim scholars’ legal response to issues affecting Muslim women in Britain, Larsen ( 2018 ) suggests that the maqāṣid discourse is similar to a secular, common morality. She seems unaware that fatwās are legal verdicts based on the premodern fiqh regulating female conduct. Maqāṣid and fiqh al-ʿaqalliyyāt do not seem to act as metaethical discourses. As legal concepts they reflect a wider medieval politico-legal idea that divides the world into the “abode of Islam” and the “abode of non-Islam”. Within such an imperial political framing, ahistorical approaches to the Qurʾan become dominant. Verses like “don’t take Jews or Christians as your friends” (Q 6:66) tend to be perceived literally, ignoring the contextual reality of war as the background of the verse that was extensively commented on, while other verses praising people of the book are not remembered. This ahistorical literalism ignores the Qurʾan’s rhetorical discourse and takes the complex politico-legal doctrine of al-walāʾ wa-l-barā ʾ, “disassociation from non-Muslims” to be a categorical ban on Muslim involvement with secular public space.

However, stripped of its legal shell, the notion of fiqh al-ʿaqalliyyāt could actually be a powerful theological concept; it literally refers to facilitating an understanding of Islam within the reality of being a minority community. This indicates a radical rethink of what it means to be a Muslim in the modern world, where Muslims no longer hold political power nor form a majority. In its legalistic framing fiqh al-ʿaqalliyyāt is limited to an ahistorical application of a particular school of thought’s jurisprudence on complex and sensitive issues of the contemporary world such as gender relations and social work; controversial issues such as the non-religious other, blasphemy and apostacy, which might cause more harm than benefit. This would even violate legal maxims in Islamic law suggesting “preventing common harm” ( sadd adh-dharā ʾ iʿ ) always has priority. What is more important is to carefully consider whether the application of specific, pre-modern fiqh rules enables the protection of human dignity embedded in the Islamic core narrative, while addressing contemporary issues and guiding Muslim communities’ relationships with wider society.

This inquiry emphasised the need to rediscover the relational ethics embedded in the concept of Shariʿa and its significance in facilitating a transformative Islamic engagement with the public space and contributing to the common good within the Muslim minority context of Europe. Shariʿa is further grounded in the holistic Islamic educational view of human flourishing, tarbiyya , that aims to facilitate a human formation characterised by gratitude, dignity and just living. The concept of relational ethics was discussed in a reflective dialogue with Levinas’ phenomenology-informed ethical philosophy and Habermas’s ‘theory of communicative action’.

The study argued the need for an inclusive public space where religious minorities are welcomed, without, fear of being stereotyped, policed or pressured to self-censure. The communicative process within the cultural and religious plurality of European societies cannot be limited to having mere conversations , often occurring between communities living parallel lives, but should also be producing concrete convergences in addressing inequalities, renewing public trust and working towards peaceful coexistence. The role of Muslim faith leaders in guiding their communities to take part in such a convergent public engagement, and thus facilitating a sense of belonging to the European Muslim ʾ umma , is undeniable. European Muslim leadership education needs to equip young faith leaders to facilitate contextual understandings of Islam and to prepare them for working within a societal reality of great religious and cultural diversity and interdependence.

The political developments of the last two decades have hindered European Muslims’ openness to critically address their internal problems and to engage actively with wider society. In social work which addresses social deprivation and wellbeing issues, the level of public and community engagement does not seem to be either inclusive or transformative. There is an urgent need to conduct empirical research to understand the changing needs of Muslim youth, the impact of religious extremism, poverty, mental health, delinquency and intra-community tensions within the European Muslim diaspora. Cultivating the values of shared relational ethics remains an effective way of responding to the plurality defining European societies, generating awareness about the responsibility of “living the face of one another” and renewing public trust in forming an inclusive conception of the common good.

All translations of the Qurʾan are the author’s own.

Abbas, M.-S. (2018). Producing ‘internal suspect bodies’: Divisive effects of UK counter-terrorism measures on Muslim communities in Leeds and Bradford. British Journal of Sociology, 70 (1), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12366

Article   Google Scholar  

Ahdash, F. (2020). Childhood radicalisation and parental extremism: How should family law respond? Insights from a local authority V, X, Y and Z. In J. Rehman, A. Sahid, & S. Foster (Eds.), The Asian yearbook of human rights and humanitarian law (pp. 160–182). Brill.

Google Scholar  

Al-Farabi, A. N. (1995). In A. Bumolham (Ed.), Taḥṣīl al-Saʿāda (Attainment of happiness) . Dar Al-Hilal.

Al-Halbabi, M. A. (1969). al-Shakṣaniyyah al-Islamiyyah (Islamic personalism) . Dar-al-Maarif.

Al-Isfahani, R. (1985). al-Dhariʿah ʾ ilā Makārim al-Shariʿah, (Path to noble values) . Dar al-Shawa.

Al-Isfahani, R. (2009). Mufradāt alfāẓ al-Qur’an (Classical Qur’an Dictionary) . Dar Alqalm.

Aristotle. (1976). The Nicomachean ethics (trans. J. A. K. Thomson). Penguin.

Asad, T. (1986). The idea of an anthropology of Islam . Center for Contemporary Arab Studies, Georgetown University.

Ashencaen Crabtree, S., Husain, F., & Spalek, B. (2008). Islam and social work: Debating values, transforming practice . The Policy Press.

Barise, A. (2005). Social work with Muslims: Insights from the teachings of Islam. Critical Social Work, 6 (2). https://doi.org/10.22329/csw.v6i2.5660

Berger, P. L. (2014). The many altars of modernity: Toward a paradigm for religion in a pluralist age . de Gruyter.

Book   Google Scholar  

Berking, H., Steets, S., & Schwenk, J. (Eds.). (2018). Religious pluralism and the city: Inquiries into post-secular urbanism . Bloomsbury.

Bowen, J. (2016). On British Islam: Religion, law, and everyday practice in Shariʿa Councils . Princeton University Press.

Bucar, E. M. (2018). Islamic virtue ethics. In N. E. Snow (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of virtues (pp. 207–223). Oxford University Press.

Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world . University of Chicago Press.

Caygill, H. (2002). Levinas and the political . Routledge.

Classen, A. (2018). Toleration and tolerance in mediaeval and early modern European literature . Routledge.

Cooper, J. M. (Ed.). (1997). Plato: Complete works . Hackett.

Critchley, S. (1999). The ethics of deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas . Edinburgh University Press.

Drummond, J., & Embree, L. (Eds.). (2002). Phenomenological approach to moral philosophy . Springer.

Fish, S. (2011). Are Muslims distinctive? A look at the evidence . Oxford University Press.

Francis, L., & Ziebertz, H.-G. (Eds.). (2011). The public significance of religion . Brill.

Güler, I. (2011). Allah’ın Ahlakiliği Sorunu (The problem of god’s morality: A critical approach to perception of god in the theological discourse of Sunni Islam) . AO.

Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society . Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action . The MIT Press.

Habermas, J. (2008). Notes on post-secular society. New Perspective Quarterly, 25 (4), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5842.2008.01017.x

Hassan, S. F. (2013). Fiqh al-ʿaqaliyyāt: History, development and progress . Palgrave.

Hodge, D. (2005). Social work and the house of Islam: Orienting practitioners to the beliefs and values of Muslims in the United States. Social Work, 50 (2), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/50.2.162

Hollenbach, D. (2002). The common good and Christian ethics . Cambridge University Press.

Hourani, G. F. (1985). Reason and tradition in Islamic ethics . Cambridge University Press.

Hull, J. M. (2006). Religion, violence and religious education. In M. de Souza, G. Durka, K. Engebretson, R. Jackson, & A. McGrady (Eds.), International handbook of the religious, moral and spiritual dimensions in education (pp. 591–605). Springer.

Husserl, E. (2017). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology . Routledge.

Ibn al-Arabi, A. A. (2001). al-ʿAwasim min al-Qawasim (Defence against disaster) . Dar alTurath.

Joshanloo, M. (2017). Islamic conceptions of well-being. In R. Estes & J. Sirgy (Eds.), The pursuit of human well-being (pp. 109–134). Springer.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Kugel, J. (2007). How to read the Bible: A guide to scripture then and now . Free Press.

Lafollette, H. (Ed.). (2014). Ethics in practice: An anthology . Blackwell.

Larsen, L. (2018). How muftis think: Islamic legal thought and Muslim women in Western Europe . Brill.

Levinas, E. (1979). The contemporary criticism of the idea of value and the prospects for humanism. In E. A. Maziarz (Ed.), Value and values in evolution (pp. 179–192). Gordon & Breach.

Levinas, E. (1990). Nine Talmudic readings . Indiana University Press.

Levinas, E. (1998). Otherwise than being or beyond essence . Duquesne University Press.

Levinas, E. (1999). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority . Duquesne University Press.

Lewis, B. (1990). The roots of Muslim rage. Atlantic Monthly , September. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1990/09/the-roots-of-muslim-rage/304643/ . Accessed 29 Oct 2020.

Mabry, T. J. (2015). Nationalism, language, and Muslim exceptionalism . Pennsylvania University Press.

MacIntyre, A. (1994). Three rival versions of moral enquiry encyclopaedia genealogy and tradition . University of Notre Dame Press.

MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue. A study in moral theory . University of Notre Dame Press.

Mackenzie, C. (2019). Relational autonomy: State of the art debate. In A. Armstrong, K. Green, & A. Sangiacomo (Eds.), Spinoza and relational autonomy (pp. 10–32). EUP.

Martensson, U. (2014). ‘Public Islam’ and the Nordic welfare state: Changing realities? The Nordic Welfare State, 8 (1), 4–55. https://doi.org/10.7146/tifo.v8i1.25322

Mensch, J. (2003). Ethics and selfhood: Alterity and the phenomenology of obligation . State University of New York Press.

Neusner, J., & Chilton, B. (Eds.). (2005). Altruism in world religions . Georgetown University Press.

Nynäs, P., Lassander, M., & Utriainen, T. (Eds.). (2012). Post-secular society . Transaction Publishers.

Oshana, M. (2006). Personal autonomy in society . Ashgate Publishing.

Parens, J. (2006). An Islamic philosophy of virtuous religions: Introducing Alfarabi . SUNY Press.

Perpich, D. (2008). The ethics of Emanuel Levinas . Stanford University Press.

Pugh, M. (2019). Britain and Islam . Yale University Press.

Qalʿajī, M. R. (1979). Mawsuʿat Fiqh al-Nakhaʿī (Encyclopaedia of al-Nakhaʿī’s Jurisprudence) . Dar al-ʿilmiyya.

Ragab, I. A. (2016). The Islamic perspective on social work: A conceptual framework. International Social Work, 59 (3), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872815627120

Rahbar, D. (1960). God of justice: A study in the ethical doctrine of the Qur’an . Brill.

Rahman, F. (1983). Some key ethical concepts of the Qur’an. The Journal of Religious Ethics, 11 (2), 170–185.

Rahman, F. (1995). Islamic methodology in history . Islamic Research Institute.

Rawls, J. (2001). The law of peoples . Harvard University Press.

Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another . Chicago University Press.

Robinson, L., Gardee, R., Chaudhry, F., & Collins, H. (2017). Muslim youth in Britain: Acculturation, radicalization, and implications for social work practice/training. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work, 36 (1–2), 266–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2017.1311244

Sahin, A. (2010). The contribution religious education to social and community cohesion. In M. Grimmitt (Ed.), Religious education and social and community cohesion (pp. 165–185). McCrimmons.

Sahin, A. (2011). Islam, secularity and the culture of critical openness: A theological reflection. In Y. Birt, D. Hussain, & A. Siddiqui (Eds.), British secularism and religion (pp. 3–24). Kube.

Sahin, A. (2013). Authority and autonomy: An Islamic education perspective on human agency. In M. Bernards & M. Buitelaar (Eds.), Negotiating autonomy and authority in Muslim contexts (pp. 67–85). Peeters.

Sahin, A. (2014). New direction in Islamic education: Pedagogy and identity formation . Kube.

Sahin, A. (2017). Education as compassionate transformation: The ethical heart of Islamic pedagogy. In P. Gibbs (Ed.), The pedagogy of compassion at the heart of higher education (pp. 127–137). Springer.

Sahin, A. (2018). The contribution of religions to the common good in pluralistic societies: An Islamic perspective in public theology. In M. Pirner, J. Lähnemann, W. Haussmann, & S. Schwarz (Eds.), Public theology religious diversity and interreligious learning (pp. 27–40). Routledge.

Sahin, A. (2019). Islam, Muslims and education: Framing an interdisciplinary field of research, critical scholarship and professional practice. The Muslim World Book Review, 40 (1), 6–29.

Salvatore, A. (2009). The reform project in the emerging public sphere. In M. K. Masud, A. Salvatore, & M. van Bruinessen (Eds.), Islam and modernity: Key issues and debates (pp. 186–205). Edinburgh University Press.

Salvatore, A., & Eickelman, D. F. (Eds.). (2005). Public Islam and the common good . Brill.

Smith, W. (2012). The phenomenology of moral normativity . Routledge.

Todd, S. (2008). Welcoming and difficult learning: Reading Levinas with education. In D. Egéa-Kuehne (Ed.), Levinas and education (pp. 170–185). Routledge.

Trigg, R. (2008). Religion in public life: Must faith be privatized? Oxford University Press.

Turner, V. (1974). Liminal to liminoid, in play, flow, and ritual: An essay in comparative symbology. Rice University Studies, 60 (3), 53–92.

Turner, B. S., & Possamai, A. (2015). Introduction: Legal pluralism and Shariʿa. In A. Possamai, J. Richardson, & B. Turner (Eds.), The sociology of Shariʿa: Case studies from around the world (pp. 6–12). Springer.

Whitcomb, D. (2011). Wisdom. In S. Bernecker & D. Pritchard (Eds.), The Routledge companion to epistemology (pp. 95–106). Routledge.

Wolin, R. (2008). Heidegger and Levinas: The anxiety of influence. In S. Fleischhacker (Ed.), Heidegger’s Jewish followers (pp. 219–244). Duquesne University Press.

Young, N. H. (1987). Paidagogos: The social setting of a Pauline Metaphor. Novum Testamentum, 29 (2), 150–176. https://doi.org/10.2307/1560794

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

Abdullah Sahin

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdullah Sahin .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Swiss Center for Islam and Society, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland

Hansjörg Schmid

Department of Social Work Social Policy and Global Development, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland

Amir Sheikhzadegan

Rights and permissions

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Sahin, A. (2022). Islam, Social Work and Common Good in the Muslim Minority Context of Europe: Rethinking Shariʿa as Relational Ethics. In: Schmid, H., Sheikhzadegan, A. (eds) Exploring Islamic Social Work. Muslims in Global Societies Series, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95880-0_11

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95880-0_11

Published : 21 May 2022

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-95879-4

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-95880-0

eBook Packages : Religion and Philosophy Philosophy and Religion (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research