In Praise Of The F Word Rhetorical Analysis

In Mary Sherry’s essay, “In Praise of the F Word,” she praises the power of the f-word. She argues that the word is a source of strength and liberation for women. Sherry believes that the f-word can be used to empower women and to encourage them to take control of their lives.

The use of ethos in Mary Sherry’s essay is very effective. By praising the power of the f-word, Sherry is able to convince her readers that the word is a valuable tool for women. She uses personal anecdotes and examples to support her argument, and she makes it clear that she is not advocating for violence or vulgarity. Rather, she believes that the f-word can be used as a means of self-empowerment and liberation.

Ultimately, Mary Sherry’s essay is a powerful argument in favor of the f-word. She makes a convincing case that the word can be a source of strength for women, and she provides concrete examples of how the word can be used to empower individuals. Her use of ethos is very effective, and her essay is sure to provoke debate and discussion.

There are always those who do not comprehend in school, but they receive passing grades. In Mary Sherry’s essay In Praise of the F Word, she discusses the subject in greater depth. The essay explores how the American education system passes you along without considering your pace or skill level. She also talks about how unready the American public is after high school and college. Her essay also covers her son and one of his experiences at high school. Her ethos usage isn’t very significant in the essay itself, but it accounts for most of her ethos in her bio.

Mary Sherry is a high school graduate, which gives her some ethos because she has been in the schooling system. Mary Sherry has also been teaching for about twenty years. This would be another example of ethos due to her experience in the field. Mary Sherry’s use of logos is present throughout her essay In Praise of the F Word. An example of logos would be, “The average American worker today is vastly better educated than his or her counterpart of a generation ago” (Sherry Mary 1). Mary uses this quote to back up her opinion that the education today is not good enough.

Another example of logos used by Mary Sherry, would be “We need to radically redefine ‘competence’ and ‘ success’”(Sherry Mary 1). She uses this logos to try and get her opinion point of view across to the audience. The pathos that Mary Sherry uses is shown best towards the end of her essay In Praise of the F Word. An example of pathos would be, “We need to radically redefine ‘competence’ and ‘success’” (Sherry Mary 8).

Mary Sherry is trying to evoke an emotional response from the reader so they will agree with her opinion. Another example of pathos that Mary Sherry uses is when she talks about her son Joe, and his experience in school. She states, “Joey was bored and unchallenged in high school. He coasted along, doing the minimum to get by” (Sherry Mary 3). Mary Sherry is trying to evoke sympathy from the reader so they feel bad for her son and his experience in high school.

In her essay, she employs a relatively little amount of ethos, regardless. Her pathos, on the other hand, is considerably more abundant. She utilizes a variety of anecdotes to elicit certain emotions regarding the issue under consideration. Words with a negative meaning are also used effectively to affect our emotions. In Mary Sherry’s essay in praise of the F word, there was less logos than in the other two appeals.

However, even though her ethos is low, it is still there. And although her pathos is high, it does not mean that her logos is not effective. In fact, I believe that Mary Sherry’s essay would not be as successful if she had not used logos in addition to ethos and pathos.

All three appeals are important in order to get her message across effectively. The use of ethos allows Mary Sherry to establish credibility with her audience. The use of pathos helps to engage the audience emotionally, and the use of logos provides logical reasoning for why the audience should agree with Mary Sherry’s opinion.

The ethos employed by Mary was effective in establishing trust, but it wasn’t very widespread throughout her essay. For example, the bulk of her ethos is found in the preface before the essay really begins. She claims to have a bachelor’s degree from Rosary College. She also runs a business that specializes in economic development research. The publication of other magazines and papers, as well as teaching adult literacy courses outside of it all, are all excellent examples of ethos.

After the biography, Mary doesn’t really use ethos again until the end of her essay. She says that the F Word isn’t a bad word, and is used to describe feelings that people have. In order to make her point stronger, she provides examples of how the F Word has been used in a positive way by famous people.

Overall, Mary Sherry did a good job of establishing ethos. However, she could have done a better job of spreading it out throughout her essay. By including it at the beginning and end, she bookends her essay nicely. However, ethos could have been used more throughout the body of her work in order to make her argument even stronger.

This is all due to the trust that readers have in her life story. Because all of this faith in her life narrative is centered on her biography, if someone skips over that chapter, they will miss out on all of the trust that was built throughout reading it. This isn’t to say Mary Sherry’s essay had terrible ethos; in fact, In Praise of the F word has enough ethos to persuade readers to believe what Mary has to say.

Mary Sherry talks about how the F word is not a bad thing, and that it can be used in good ways. In Mary’s essay, she does a great job of showing how the F word can be beneficial to someone who is trying to get their point across. Mary also uses ethos when talking about how the F word was used in her life. She talks about how it has helped her, and how it has been a part of her life for many years. The use of ethos allows Mary to connect with her audience on a personal level, and makes them more likely to trust what she has to say.

The use of ethos is important in any persuasive text because it allows the writer to connect with their audience on a personal level. When someone is able to connect with their audience, they are more likely to trust what the writer has to say. Mary Sherry does a great job of using ethos in her essay In Praise of the F word, and because of this, her argument is more persuasive.

More Essays

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of It Is Cheaper To Be Poor By Barbara Ehrenreich Essay
  • Black Men And Public Space Rhetorical Analysis Research Paper
  • Ethos Of Native Americans Rhetorical Analysis Essay
  • Rhetorical Analysis: The Humane Society Of El Paso Essay
  • Rhetorical Analysis: American Sniper Essay
  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Carlton W. Reeves Essay
  • Essay on Rhetorical Analysis Of Robert Farrington’s Community College Is Not The Answer
  • Diamonds Are A Girl’s Best Friend Rhetorical Analysis Essay
  • Rhetorical Analysis: Victor Rios Essay
  • Rhetorical Analysis Of The Crisis No. 1 By Thomas Paine Essay

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

what is the thesis of in praise of the f word

In Praise of the F Word by Mary Sherry Critical Analysis

The article "In Praise of the F Word" by Mary Sherry calls attention to the problems that she has found in our school system. Being a teacher and parent of students, she discovered schools are allowing students to pass without proper knowledge of the material. The author successfully argues that having fear of failing will motivate them to put school and education higher as a priority.

Mary Sherry believes that schools are failing students' futures by handing out pointless diplomas. These diplomas do not help them in their careers as students have never learned the subject. Relieving the students' trouble of failing a class in school might seem helpful, but if they don't know what to do later in life it could hurt them tremendously. One of her students told her, "I was a good kid and didn't cause any trouble, so they just passed me along even though I didn't read and couldn't write" (Paragraph 3). Students' degrees tell employers that they can work as employees. Sadly, some students aren't ready as they never learned. Another problem she discusses is that students aren't motivated about school. Students don't make school a priority because they don't see anything at risk. If schools were to use the "F word" students' would have something to lose. Sherry tells about her son's school,“‘She's going to flunk you,’ I told my son. I did not discuss it any further. Suddenly English became a priority in his life. He finished out the semester with an A” (Paragraph 6). This provides an example to support her claim that fear of failure can motivate students to work harder and make school a priority in their life. A teacher who emphasized failure as a consequence caught his attention to focus in school.

The author Mary Sherry, a teacher and parent gives her insight on the issue. Her intention for writing this article was to share and convince parents and teachers how the school system should change. She does so in an organized manner with a serious and somewhat aggressive tone. Her claim of using the “F Word" to push students to care about school is well supported in her article. She gives many examples of her teaching and parenting experiences to persuade the reader. The end of her article closes with "succeed--or fail. It's time we return this choice to all students". The author makes the reader aware that things must change to reduce the number of students without that chance.

Related Samples

  • Relationship Between Mind And Body Research Paper
  • Homelessness by Anna Quindlen Article Analysis
  • Wilhelm Heinrich Otto Dix’s "The Skat Players" Article Analysis Essay Example
  • "The Silent Struggle of Living with Undiagnosed Mental Illnesses" Article Analysis (Free Essay Sample)
  • Article Critique Example: Visible Only in Speech
  • Happiness Literary Analysis Essay
  • Negative Effects Of Instagram Essay Example
  • "Why Pugs Are the Perfect Family Pet" Article Analysis (Free Essay Sample)
  • The Stories We Tell Ourselves Article Analysis Essay
  • Analysis Essay of A Personal Mission: Sammy Younge Jr.

Didn't find the perfect sample?

what is the thesis of in praise of the f word

You can order a custom paper by our expert writers

  • Arts & Humanities
  • Communications

In Praise of the F Word - Fundamentals of College Writing

what is the thesis of in praise of the f word

Related documents


Add this document to collection(s)

You can add this document to your study collection(s)

Add this document to saved

You can add this document to your saved list

Suggest us how to improve StudyLib

(For complaints, use another form )

Input it if you want to receive answer

Dozens Arrested at U.Va. as Others Show Defiance at Commencement

  • Share full article

People in the foreground wearing goggles. One is facing the camera and is wearing a black mask. The others are facing away from the camera toward a line of police officers in riot gear.

Here is the latest on campus protests.

At least 25 people were arrested on Saturday at the University of Virginia, as protests over the war in Gaza continued to disrupt university campuses and puncture the celebratory atmosphere around graduation ceremonies across the country.

The arrests and aggressive efforts to clamp down on protests underscored just how tumultuous the end of the spring semester has been for universities, many of which are now holding commencement ceremonies this weekend against the backdrop of tense protests on their campuses.

Pro-Palestinian students, for their part, have signaled that they will continue to challenge their universities over their financial ties to Israel and military companies; express outrage over the violence in Gaza; and condemn aggressive treatment of protesters on campus. At one point on Saturday, police in riot gear sprayed dozens of people at the University of Virginia with chemical irritants.

Other protests have extended from campus property to commencement. At the University of Michigan’s ceremony, pro-Palestinian supporters briefly disrupted the ceremony and were met by state police. At Indiana University in Bloomington, students walked out of the commencement remarks in protest.

School officials have struggled with how to respond to the protests as they try to balance free speech with campus security. For the graduation ceremonies, some universities plan to set up designated areas for protests in an attempt to allow the ceremonies to go forward without suppressing speech.

Among other schools set to hold ceremonies this weekend are Northeastern University and Ohio State University — both universities that have grappled with unrest over student protests.

Across the country, more than 2,300 people have been arrested or detained on campuses in the past two weeks, according to a tally by The New York Times .

Here is what else to know:

In Charlottesville, Va., at least three law enforcement agencies moved in to clear out the protesters at the University of Virginia, who said their demonstration was peaceful. Police officials said two people had been released, and all those arrested had been charged with trespassing.

Dozens of protesters were arrested at the Art Institute of Chicago on Saturday, after the school asked the police to intervene and remove demonstrators from school property.

The University of Mississippi said it was investigating at least one student after counterprotesters directed racist taunts at pro-Palestinian protesters this week, school officials said. The university chancellor, Glenn F. Boyce, said that statements made at the demonstration were “offensive, hurtful and unacceptable.”

The University of Michigan has seen repeated protests during its graduation festivities. One person was arrested Friday evening during a protest outside a dinner for recipients of honorary degrees, while the Saturday graduation ceremony saw cheers and boos as people brought Palestinian flags down the venue’s aisles.

At the University of Chicago, which adopted a set of free speech standards in 2015 that have been adopted by colleges across the country, the school’s president said an encampment there “cannot continue,” citing disruptions and vandalism .

A handful of universities have agreed to some of the protesters’ demands , bringing peaceful ends to demonstrations but also criticism from some Jewish groups. The schools announcing agreements this week included the University of California, Riverside ; Brown ; Northwestern ; Rutgers ; and the University of Minnesota . It is unclear how many of them might work .

— Emily Cochrane ,  John Yoon ,  Ryan Patrick Hooper and Jackson Landers

Police aggressively push U.Va. protesters off a campus lawn and arrest 25 people.

Video player loading

The police arrested at least 25 pro-Palestinian protesters on Saturday at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville after aggressively clearing demonstrators off a university lawn and at one point using chemical irritants on dozens of people.

Like hundreds of students, faculty and staff across the country, students in Charlottesville protested this week in the heart of their campus, calling for the university to divest from Israel, weapons manufacturers and companies with ties to Israeli institutions, and to pledge to protect students’ right to peacefully protest. Tents were set up Friday, but cleared the next day.

In a news release, the university said the protesters had violated school policy on Friday by setting up tents on the lawn and by using megaphones. But the encampment was not forcibly removed then, the statement read, “given continued peaceful behavior and the presence of young children at the demonstration site, and due to heavy rain Friday night.”

Jim Ryan, the university president, wrote in a letter to the campus, “I sincerely wish it were otherwise, but this repeated and intentional refusal to comply with reasonable rules intended to secure the safety, operations and rights of the entire university community left us with no other choice than to uphold the neutral application and enforcement of those rules.”

By Saturday afternoon, protesters were met with police officers in riot gear. At one point, the police used chemical irritants against the crowd to get people to disperse.

The university said it was not immediately clear how many of the 25 who were arrested were affiliated with the school. All were charged with trespassing, according to a police official.

“Shame on you, shame on you!” chanted a crowd of hundreds of students and Charlottesville locals as a combined force of dozens of officers from at least three law enforcement agencies pushed them into the street in front of the university’s Rotunda building.

“This is absolutely obscene,” said Colden Dorfman, a third-year student majoring in computer science, who faced down the cordon as the police sprayed chemical irritants. “This is insanity. Everyone came here with peaceful intentions. I’m ashamed that this is what our police force is being used for.”

Some protesters and their supporters directly questioned the magnitude of the police response, particularly compared with the school’s response in 2017 to hundreds of white nationalists marching on campus with torches .

“What did you do when the K.K.K. came to town?” protesters could be heard yelling, as the police moved to push them into University Avenue, which had been blocked off to traffic.

Even as it began to rain, hundreds of people remained for hours before dispersing. Some people headed to the Albemarle-Charlottesville Regional Jail, where a new protest was forming.

— Jackson Landers ,  Hawes Spencer and Emily Cochrane Jackson Landers and Hawes Spencer reported from Charlottesville, Va.


At Michigan, commencement is briefly disrupted by dozens of pro-Palestinian graduates.

Pro-palestinian graduates briefly interrupt michigan’s commencement, protesters holding flags and signs marched toward the stage during the university of michigan’s commencement ceremony..

“Arrest them.” [crowd boos] [expletives] [expletives]

Video player loading

On a balmy Saturday in Ann Arbor, Mich., thousands of graduates in caps and gowns filed into the biggest stadium in the country for the University of Michigan’s graduation ceremony.

As tens of thousands of spectators found their seats in the packed Michigan Stadium, planes with dueling messages circled overhead: one with a banner that read, “We stand with Israel. Jewish lives matter,” and another with the message, “Divest from Israel now! Free Palestine!”

Then, dozens of pro-Palestinian graduates draped in flags, kaffiyeh and graduation caps marched down the center aisle toward the stage. They chanted, “Regents, regents, you can’t hide! You are funding genocide!” calling for the university to divest from investments that have benefited Israel.

At least a dozen officers from the Michigan State Police quickly followed to block the parade from making it to the stage, urging protesters to retreat to the back of the graduates section.

As the chants reverberated throughout the stadium and demonstrators talked to the police, some students got up from their seats and joined in, disobeying police officers who told them to sit down.

But other students — some with the Star of David on their caps — were enraged by the disruption and demanded that the protesters be kicked out. “You’re ruining our graduation!” one yelled. Some patrons in private boxes hung Israeli flags from their seats.

Once the demonstrators moved to the back of the ceremony, tensions simmered, and the protest remained peaceful. University officials said that peaceful protests are not uncommon at graduation or university events.

The chants never stopped — though how audible and distracting it was might have depended on where people sat in the stadium — but the audience returned their attention to the stage as the ceremony carried on.

About a mile away from graduation, a pro-Palestinian encampment on the university’s Diag, a central quadrangle on campus, was abuzz with campers, activists and recently graduated students and their parents.

Nestled between brick academic buildings and lush greenery, the encampment sits just outside the steps of a library and not far from a busy pedestrian strip of shops and restaurants. The occupation has seen as many as 200 protesters overnight and includes dozens of tents.

Salma Hamamy, 22, one of the organizers of the encampment, was still wearing her graduation cap and gown after marching down the aisle in protest at commencement. She does not regret protesting at her graduation — a “once in a lifetime” moment, she said.

“It would feel completely wrong of me to not use graduation as an opportunity to call attention to this. That’s where all the regents are,” she said. “It’s important that they can physically see us. They can’t ignore us.”

Jonathan Ellis contributed reporting.

— Ryan Patrick Hooper Reporting from Ann Arbor, Mich.

At least one student at Ole Miss is being investigated after racist counterprotest.

The University of Mississippi is investigating the conduct of at least one student after counterprotesters directed racist taunts at pro-Palestinian protesters this week, school officials said.

In a letter to students, faculty and staff members on Friday evening, Glenn F. Boyce, the university chancellor, said the school had begun to investigate one student and may look at more.

“From yesterday’s demonstration, university leaders are aware that some statements made were offensive, hurtful and unacceptable, including actions that conveyed hostility and racist overtones,” Mr. Boyce wrote. He did not identify the student, citing privacy law.

He added, “To be clear, people who say horrible things to people because of who they are will not find shelter or comfort on this campus.”

Video captured by the Mississippi Free Press and the Daily Mississippian showed a crowd of white male students jeering and taunting a lone Black woman standing in front of the protest on campus, with one man making monkey gestures and hooting at her. Another video compilation showed the men yelling profane and derogatory insults.

The few dozen pro-Palestinian protesters appeared widely outnumbered by the crowd of counterdemonstrators, though university officials said no one was arrested or injured.

Gov. Tate Reeves of Mississippi, a Republican, approvingly captioned a separate video of the demonstrations that showed the counterprotesters singing “The Star-Spangled Banner” over the protest chants, though he made no mention of the other video clips that soon circulated. And former President Donald J. Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for president, also shared a separate video on social media from the protests where the men could be heard chanting “we want Trump.”

The university has a painful history of racist episodes, and, for some, the videos evoked the mob and deadly riots that sought to stop the enrollment of James Meredith, the first Black student at the school, in 1962. And while the school has shed some of its Confederate imagery, in 2012, two students were arrested after racial slurs were chanted at a protest over former President Barack Obama’s re-election. In 2014, a noose was placed around a statue of Mr. Meredith.

“It is important to acknowledge our challenging history, and incidents like this can set us back,” Mr. Boyce wrote. “It is one reason why we do not take this lightly and cannot let the unacceptable behavior of a few speak for our institution or define us.”

— Emily Cochrane

Vassar protesters removed their tents after the college agreed to review its investments.

Pro-Palestinian protesters dismantled their encampment at Vassar College in Poughkeepsie, N.Y., on Saturday after reaching an agreement with the institution that requires administrators to review a divestment proposal.

Student demonstrators pitched dozens of tents on Vassar’s campus, starting on Tuesday. The liberal arts college is a bastion of progressive ideas with a long history of student protest , and Vassar’s president said in a statement this week that she hoped to resolve the current disagreement with pro-Palestinian demonstrators peacefully.

In the agreement reached on Saturday, Vassar officials agreed to review a proposal to divest funds from “defense-related investments, such as militarized surveillance and arms production,” and to support student fund-raising efforts in support of refugees, according to a statement by the president , Elizabeth H. Bradley.

The divestment language did not mention Israel or the war in the Gaza Strip, as the protesters had in their demands.

But Ms. Bradley said administrators had also agreed to “recruit and support Palestinian students and scholars-at-risk, who have lost educational and professional opportunities” since Oct. 7, a reference to the attacks in Israel by Hamas and its allies that prompted Israel’s war in Gaza.

“With these commitments, the college will work to improve our understanding, dialogue about, and educational programming concerning peace and conflict, with focus on Gaza and the Middle East,” she said.

The Vassar agreement is one of several in which student protesters have agreed to clear camps in exchange for commitments to discuss institutional investment policies around Israel. Students for Justice in Palestine at Vassar, the group that organized the encampment and negotiated with administrators, said in a statement on social media that it did not feel like a victory.

“We are not happy about the concessions we’ve made, but our work is not done,” the group said in the statement, adding that the administration had not agreed to all of the demands laid out by protesters when they launched the encampment. Those demands included calls for the Vassar administration to release a public statement calling for “an immediate end to Israel’s siege on Gaza and an end to U.S. aid for Israel,” and to completely boycott Israeli academic institutions, including Vassar-sponsored study abroad programs in Israel.

“At this time, we believe this is the most strategic decision we can make in order to further our efforts for divestment and Palestinian liberation,” the students said of the agreement.

They said they would donate the roughly $7,000 they had raised since launching their encampment to families in Gaza, and redistribute any donated supplies to people and organizations in Poughkeepsie.

— Erin Nolan

Echoing Vietnam War protests, demonstrators at Kent State University call for the university to divest.

Hundreds of pro-Palestinian demonstrators gathered at Kent State University in Ohio on Saturday to protest the war in Gaza, exactly 54 years after a similar campus demonstration ended in four student deaths.

The activists were silent but impossible to miss. They assembled in a semicircle around a stage on Kent State’s commons where speakers were commemorating the events of May 4, 1970: James Rhodes, then the governor of Ohio, had called in the National Guard to quell a demonstration against U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War. The troops opened fire. Four people — Allison Krause, William Schroeder, Sandra Scheuer and Jeffrey Miller — were killed. Several others were wounded.

The campus still bears the scars of the 1970 shooting. Illuminated columns mark the precise spots where the four students were killed, and the tragedy was immortalized in the song “Ohio” performed by the folk-rock quartet Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young.

In a speech on Saturday to honor the victims, Sophia Swengel, a sophomore and the president of the May 4 Task Force, a group formed in 1975 to keep the students’ legacy alive, also acknowledged the protesters. Many of them were hoisting signs calling on the university to divest from weapons manufacturers and military contractors.

“Once again students are taking a stand against bloodshed abroad,” she said, referring to Israel’s assault on Gaza, which followed the Hamas-led attack of Oct. 7. “Much like they did against the Vietnam War back in the ’60s,” Ms. Swengel added.

Among the student demands in 1970 were abolishing the R.O.T.C. program, ending the university’s ties with police training programs and halting the research and development of the liquid crystal used in heat detectors that guided bombs dropped on Cambodia.

Today, demonstrators at Kent State are asking the university to divest its portfolio of instruments of war. “The university is profiting from war, and they were arguing in ’69 and ’70 that the university was also profiting from war,” said Camille Tinnin, a 31-year-old Ph.D. student studying political science who has met with the school’s administration to discuss divestiture.

While Kent State cannot end the war in Gaza, “what the university can control is its own investment portfolio,” said Yaseen Shaikh, 19, a member of Students for Justice in Palestine who is about to graduate with a degree in computer science.

Ms. Tinnin and Mr. Shaikh, along with two other students, met with Mark Polatajko, senior vice president for finance and administration for Kent State, on Dec. 4, a meeting confirmed in a statement from Rebecca Murphy, a Kent State spokeswoman. Mr. Polatajko shared the university’s investment portfolio with the four activists during the meeting, Ms. Tinnin said in an interview before Saturday’s protest. She said activists who scrutinized the portfolio found that it included investments in weapons manufacturers.

On Saturday, in a nod to nationwide student demonstrations against the war in Gaza, Ms. Swengel said that encampments and demonstrations “stand as living, breathing monuments of the willingness of students to stand up against genocide and for what they believe in.”

In a statement emailed to reporters, Ms. Murphy said the university “upholds the First Amendment rights of free speech and peaceful assembly for all.”

“Consistent with our core values, we encourage open dialogue and respectful civil discourse in an inclusive environment,” she added.

— Patrick Cooley

Dozens of Indiana University graduates walked out in protest during commencement.

Dozens of students walked out of Indiana University’s graduation ceremony on Saturday in protest of the war in Gaza, moving instead to a green space on campus where students had been demonstrating for weeks .

More than 6,700 graduates filed into Memorial Stadium in Bloomington, Ind., to receive their diplomas. There were more than 40,000 people in attendance, according to the university. Outside the stadium, the police presence was heavy. Above it, a plane circled towing a banner that said, “let Gaza live.”

The students walked out in two groups. The first briefly interrupted the ceremony, leaving and chanting “Shut it down” and “Free, free Palestine” as the school’s embattled president, Pamela Whitten, opened the program. The beginning of her remarks was largely drowned out by jeers, but she continued without pausing.

“We have been looking forward to celebrating this moment with you,” she said at one point in her brief remarks. She made no mention of the protests.

The second batch of protesters walked out during a speech by the commencement speaker, the tech entrepreneur Scott Dorsey. Protesters chanted “Free, free Palestine” as they filed out. They were drowned out by boos.

Lauren Ulrich, 21, of Rolla, Mo., graduated on Saturday with degrees in journalism and environmental studies. But she did not stay at the commencement ceremony long enough to turn her tassel. Her decision to walk out was one that Ms. Ulrich said she had not made lightly.

“I think sometimes it is scary to do the right thing,” she said. “I was scared. But people are dying and there’s no way I could not do something about it.”

After months of participating in protests and the school’s encampment, Ms. Ulrich said she planned to leave campus the day after graduation. She said she was “incredibly sad” but felt that the protest movement had enough supporters to keep up momentum over the summer.

“I think they will get creative in how they will continue it,” Ms. Ulrich said.

Liz Capp, 22, of Indianapolis, graduated on Saturday with a degree in therapy and did not participate in the protest. Before the ceremony, she anticipated that there would be some kind of demonstration. But it had not concerned her.

“Everyone has the right to peacefully protest,” she said.

— Kevin Williams

The president of the University of Chicago says an ‘encampment cannot continue.’

The president of the University of Chicago said on Friday that the pro-Palestinian encampment on his campus’s quad “cannot continue,” a position that was being closely watched in higher education because the university has long held itself up as a national model for free expression.

Administrators had initially taken a permissive approach to the camp and pointed toward what is known as the Chicago statement, a set of free speech standards adopted in 2015 that have become a touchstone and guide for colleges across the country. But President Paul Alivisatos said on Friday that those protections were not absolute, and that the encampment had run afoul of university policies.

“On Monday, I stated that we would only intervene if what might have been an exercise of free expression blocks the learning or expression of others or substantially disrupts the functioning or safety of the university,” Dr. Alivisatos said in a message to the campus. “Without an agreement to end the encampment, we have reached that point.”

In the hours after his announcement, hundreds of protesters remained at the encampment, where they chanted and held signs as counterprotesters gathered nearby. At one point, some pro-Palestinian demonstrators and counterprotesters briefly fought one another. By early afternoon, more police officers, both from the university and the city, were visible near the quad.

The scene had quieted down, at least temporarily, by early Friday evening. Several security guards were stationed around the quad, where protesters moved quietly around their encampment while others studied or walked nearby. There was no effort by law enforcement to forcibly disband the encampment.

Chicago’s mayor, Brandon Johnson, issued a statement saying he had been in touch with Dr. Alivisatos and had “made clear my commitment to free speech and safety on college campuses.”

Like at dozens of colleges across the country, Chicago students have erected tents on campus and issued a set of demands to administrators, including divesting from weapons manufacturers. A member of a group leading the encampment, UChicago United for Palestine, accused the university of “negotiating in bad faith” in a statement on Friday.

The protest group “refuses to accept President Alivisatos’s repeated condescending offer of a public forum to discuss ‘diverse viewpoints’ on the genocide, as this is clearly a poor attempt at saving face without material change,” said Christopher Iacovetti, a student who participated in negotiations.

Dr. Alivisatos, a chemist who became president of the university in 2021, said in his message to campus that the encampment had become far more than a cluster of tents. He accused protesters of vandalizing buildings, blocking walkways, destroying a nearby installation of Israeli flags and flying a Palestinian flag from a university flagpole.

“The encampment has created systematic disruption of campus,” Dr. Alivisatos said. “Protesters are monopolizing areas of the Main Quad at the expense of other members of our community. Clear violations of policies have only increased.”

The University of Chicago, a private college that is one of the country’s most selective, has been praised by conservatives and free speech advocates in recent years for its approach to expression on its campus.

As part of its free speech philosophy, the university also put forward the principle of institutional neutrality.

In a 1967 declaration , the university called for schools to remain neutral on political and social matters, saying a campus “is the home and sponsor of critics; it is not itself the critic.” But at other colleges, students over the years have frequently and successfully pressed their administrations to take positions on matters like police brutality and global warming.

In August 2016, the University of Chicago informed incoming freshmen : “We do not support so-called trigger warnings, we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual safe spaces where individuals can retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own.”

Versions of the university’s declaration of free speech principles have been adopted by dozens of other colleges in recent years.

“In a word, the university’s fundamental commitment is to the principle that debate or deliberation may not be suppressed because the ideas put forth are thought by some or even by most members of the university community to be offensive, unwise, immoral or wrong-headed,” that declaration said.

But the statement also describes clear limits, including a right to prohibit illegal activities and speech “that constitutes a genuine threat or harassment.”

— Mitch Smith and Robert Chiarito Reporting from Chicago

Encampment ends at U.C. Riverside after protesters and school officials reach a deal.

Protesters took down their encampment at the University of California, Riverside, Friday night after they came to an agreement with school administrators.

As part of the deal, the school agreed to disclose and examine its investments; create a task force made of students and faculty members to look at the administering of its endowment; and end a business school study-abroad program in Israel, Jordan, Egypt and other countries because the school said it was not consistent with university policies.

The task force will produce a report by the end of the winter quarter of 2025 to present to the board of trustees, the school said.

In a letter to the campus community on Friday, the school’s chancellor, Kim Wilcox, said that his goal had been to resolve this peacefully and that he was encouraged by the result. He said that school leaders had been meeting with leaders of the student encampment on campus since Wednesday.

The school’s chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine called the agreement “a win for all of us” in a statement posted on Instagram , adding that all of its demands were met.

The school also agreed, at the request of students, to review the availability of Sabra hummus on campus. Pro-Palestinian activists have frequently called on people to boycott the brand over the years, as one of Sabra’s joint owners is the Strauss Group, an Israeli food company. In 2010, the Strauss Group said on its website that it had provided financial support to part of Israel’s military force . And today it says it maintains contact with “IDF divisions.” Sabra is co-owned by PepsiCo. Efforts to reach that company were unsuccessful.

The agreement at U.C. Riverside is not the first between protesters and universities since protests on campus began against the war in Gaza.

Earlier this week, officials at Brown University also made an agreement with pro-Palestinian protesters. Demonstrators agreed to dismantle their encampment at Brown, which had been removed by Tuesday evening, and university leaders said they would discuss, and later vote on, divesting funds from companies connected to the Israeli military campaign in Gaza.

Several days ago, an agreement was reached between Northwestern University and the pro-Palestinian demonstrators on campus. The agreement included a promise by the university to be more transparent about its financial holdings. In turn, demonstrators removed the tent camp they built last week at Deering Meadow, a stretch of lawn on campus.

Jewish leaders, including officials from the American Jewish Committee , strongly objected to the agreement at Northwestern, saying it “succumbed to the demands of a mob,” and seven members of a Northwestern committee created to advise the university’s president on preventing antisemitism stepped down in protest on Wednesday.

Agreements between school administrators and student protesters have also taken place at other schools, including Rutgers University .

— Anna Betts

Police treatment of a Dartmouth professor stirs anger and debate.

The video is jarring: A gray-haired woman tumbles, gets up to reach for her phone, held by police officers, and is yanked and taken to the ground. “Are you kidding me?” a bystander asks.

“What are they doing to her?” another adds.

Annelise Orleck, a labor historian who has taught at Dartmouth College for more than three decades, was at a protest for Palestinians in Gaza on Wednesday night, when she was knocked to the ground. Dr. Orleck, 65, was zip-tied and was one of 90 people who were arrested, according to the local police.

The professor walked away with a case of whiplash. But a short video clip of the episode flew around the internet, intensifying the debate over the relatively swift decision by Dartmouth’s president, Sian Leah Beilock, to call in police to arrest students and clear out an encampment.

Unlike other campuses where tents were tolerated for days, the police action at Dartmouth began a little more than two hours after the encampment first appeared, according to the college’s newspaper, The Dartmouth , and students who observed the events on Wednesday.

Dr. Beilock defended her decision.

“Last night, people felt so strongly about their beliefs that they were willing to face disciplinary action and arrest,” Dr. Beilock said in a message to campus on Thursday. “While there is bravery in that, part of choosing to engage in this way is not just acknowledging — but accepting — that actions have consequences.”

Dr. Beilock did not directly address the treatment of Dr. Orleck, who called the message “outrageous.”

“Her actions have consequences, too,” Dr. Orleck said in an interview. “The campus is in an uproar. Neither the students nor the faculty have been as radicalized in a long time as they’re feeling today.”

“I’ve been teaching here for 34 years,” she added. “There have been many protests, but I’ve never, ever seen riot police called to the green.” Dartmouth declined to comment on the incident.

How to handle the encampments has become a grinding challenge for university administrators. Earlier this month, the decision by Columbia University’s president to call in police stirred up protests at campuses across the country.

Demonstrations over the war in Gaza have led to more than 2,000 arrests over the last two weeks at universities across the country, according to a New York Times tally . The arrests have also angered some faculty, who have sometimes stepped in to try to help students.

The police in Hanover, N.H., the home of Dartmouth, said that the arrested included students and nonstudents, but did not provide a breakdown. The charges included criminal trespassing and resisting arrest. When the Hanover Police Department and the state police asked students to disperse, some did and others didn’t, police officials said.

It was unclear what disciplinary action, if any, the arrested students would face from the university.

Dr. Orleck said she was charged with criminal trespass and temporarily banned from campus, as a condition of her bail. The college’s administrators said on Thursday that the suspension was an error in the bail process, which they were working to fix.

In her message, Dr. Beilock strongly defended the decision to sweep away the encampment. And, she said, a key demand of protesters — that trustees vote on divestment from companies connected with Israel — violated the rules for making such decisions.

“Dartmouth’s endowment is not a political tool,” she said, “and using it to take sides on such a contested issue is an extraordinarily dangerous precedent to set.”

Dr. Orleck, who once served as the head of Jewish studies at the university, said she had watched with unease as police confrontations with student protesters escalated across the country.

She said she wanted to be at the Dartmouth protest because as an older Jewish professor — joined by many other older Jewish professors — her presence, she thought, could help keep her students safe.

As the police moved in, arresting students, Dr. Orleck said she started taking videos.

“I said to them, and I said it with some anger, ‘Leave our students alone. They’re students. They’re not criminals,’” she said. “The next thing I knew, I was rushed from the back.”

Messages left for the local and state police were not immediately returned.

One of the short viral videos begins with Dr. Orleck tumbling to the ground. She gets up. She moves toward an officer with her hand extended — grasping for her phone, she said. She is jerked and knocked down again. It is unclear what took place before the video begins.

Ivy Schweitzer, a recently retired English professor at the college, said the situation took a turn when campus security stepped back, and outside law enforcement moved in to make the arrests.

Dr. Orleck, she said, was recording the police with her phone.

“Annelise would never be physical with a police officer,” Dr. Schweitzer said. “But she would put her phone in their face, and I’m sure they wouldn’t like that.”

Jenna Russell contributed reporting. Sheelagh McNeill contributed research.

— Vimal Patel

Columbia’s president urges the university to ‘rebuild community’ in a video.

Columbia University’s president, Nemat Shafik, released a video message late on Friday, following several weeks of tension over Gaza war protests on campus that have spawned a wave of antiwar activism at universities across the country.

On Tuesday, those tensions erupted after Dr. Shafik asked the New York Police Department to clear a building occupied by pro-Palestinian protesters and encampments on campus. Police officers in riot gear arrested more than 100 demonstrators at Columbia University .

It was the second time in two weeks that Columbia officials had asked the police to enter the Manhattan campus to remove demonstrators. On April 18, another 100 or so Columbia students were arrested . The decision to bring law enforcement on campus, and also to request that they remain on campus until May 17 , has drawn criticism from many members of the Columbia community, including faculty, alumni and students.

Over the last six months, the university has released numerous letters to its students, faculty and alumni regarding the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack, the war in Gaza and the related protests and unrest on campus. But the video released on Friday was the first one by Dr. Shafik released on the school’s Vimeo page in months.

In the video message, Dr. Shafik discussed the need for the community to work together to return civility to the campus after weeks of unrest.

“These past two weeks have been among the most difficult in Columbia’s history,” Dr. Shafik said. “The turmoil and tension, division and disruption have impacted the entire community.”

Speaking directly to the students, Dr. Shafik highlighted the fact that many seniors are now spending their final days in college the way they began in 2020 — online.

“No matter where you stand on any issue, Columbia should be a community that feels welcoming and safe for everyone,” she said.

In the video, Dr. Shafik said that her administration tried “very hard to resolve” the issue of the encampment through dialogue and discussion with the student protesters, but that, ultimately, they could not reach an agreement.

When a group of protesters broke into and occupied Hamilton Hall, Dr. Shafik said, it “crossed a new line,” and put students at risk.

Despite the turmoil of the last few weeks and months, Dr. Shafik told the Columbia community that she has confidence in the future.

“During the listening sessions I held with many students in recent months, I’ve been heartened by your intelligence, thoughtfulness and kindness,” she said.

“Every one of us has a role to play in bringing back the values of truth and civil discourse that polarization has severely damaged,” she added. “Here at Columbia, parallel realities and parallel conversations have walled us off from other perspectives. Working together, I know we can break down these barriers.”

In a break from what the Columbia community may be used to from Dr. Shafik, she also shared personal anecdotes about her upbringing in the video.

“As many of you know, I was born in the Middle East. I grew up in a Muslim family, with many Christian and Jewish friends,” she said. “I spent two decades working in international organizations with people from every nationality and religion in the world where if you can’t bridge divides and see each other’s point of view, you can’t get anything done.”

Dr. Shafik said that she learned from that experience, that “people can disagree and still make progress.”

The issues that are challenging us, she said, namely “the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, antisemitism, and anti-Arab and anti-Muslim bias” have existed for a long time, she said, adding that Columbia University cannot solve them single-handedly.

“What we can do is be an exemplar of a better world where people who disagree do so civilly, recognize each other’s humanity, and show empathy and compassion for one another,” she said. “We have a lot to do, but I am committed to working at it, every day and with each of you, to rebuild community on our campus.”

Earlier on Friday, more than 700 Columbia University community members attended an online meeting of the university’s Senate, a policymaking body made up of faculty members, students and others.

During the meeting, many expressed a lack of confidence in university leadership. Eventually, the chat was shut down because of arguing.

Jeanine D’Armiento, chair of the Senate, said in the meeting that the group’s executive committee had recommended the university continue negotiations with students instead of calling in the police on Tuesday. But, she said, “We were not asked for our opinion.”

Sharon Otterman contributed reporting.

Opinion Readers critique The Post: Get Trump’s face out of our face

Plus: A small rise in grocery prices and the biggest f-bomb ever dropped.

Every week, The Post runs a collection of letters of readers’ grievances — pointing out grammatical mistakes, missing coverage and inconsistencies. These letters tell us what we did wrong and, occasionally, offer praise. Here, we present this week’s Free for All letters.

Thank you for running Jabin Botsford’s excellent photo, in which former president Donald Trump’s face is blurred while the people behind him can be clearly seen, to accompany Robin Givhan’s excellent April 24 The Critique column, “ Trump’s characteristic bombast fades under the courtroom lights .”

When reading the print Post, I always cover images of Trump’s face, as I feel his face detracts from the seriousness of the article. The Post saved me a Post-it with this choice.

Jill Taylor, Fairfax

An immersion program in immiseration

Philip Kennicott’s ideological rant in the guise of art review, the April 23 Style Critic’s Notebook “ At Venice Biennale, art transcends the woes of the world ,” achieved the exact opposite of the spirit for which he applauds the Venice Biennale. His pervasive commentary on world affairs undermined and distracted from his arguments about the triumph of art and beauty and the highest expressions of world culture.

To take one example, presented as established fact, Kennicott wrote: “The world is worse than it ever was.” I respectfully submit that life in the 1930s and 1940s would at least compete in status for “worse than.” And that’s just going back into recent memory of world history. I’m looking forward to attending the Biennale in hopes that experiencing the power and unifying force of human artistic expression will lift my spirits and in so doing provide an escape from, and not immersion in, the sort of political posturing that defined this review.

Helen West , Washington

The floccinaucinihilipilification of erudition

I find, to my consternation, that I often agree with George F. Will. But whom does he think he is writing for? The language he used in the first sentence of his April 25 op-ed, “ 112 House Republicans tried to give Putin a leg up ” (with which I eventually sort of agreed, once I deciphered it), was incomprehensible. “The nihilism of a febrile minority”? What? I am a retired PhD journalism professor and recovering English major. If this is how the “thinkers” in the modern media try to communicate their ideas to the hoi polloi, no wonder no one subscribes to newspapers anymore.

Ted Pease , Trinidad, Calif.

The mother lode of mother odes

Regarding Sebastian Smee’s April 21 Great Works, In Focus essay, “ Boldly going where billions have gone before ” [Arts & Style]:

While Smee’s commentary on the Rineke Dijkstra photograph “Julie, Den Haag, Netherlands, February 29, 1994” is worth a read, his musings on motherhood are the real treasure. Just as insightfully as Smee opines about art, he manages to capture the essence, beauty and miracle of becoming a mother in a few well-penned paragraphs. Perhaps he should have waited and gifted us this essay on Mother’s Day.

Sandy Pugh , Vienna

Though I enjoyed the April 22 Style article “ Why you’re always the right age to don a bow ,” I was disappointed the author did not mention that men, too, wear bows: bow ties. They do not come in such variety, but they are stylish and appropriate for any age (including for women).

Carl E. Nash , Washington

Only a little finger of the student body is raising a little finger

The April 27 front-page article “ At Columbia, the seeds of a revolt ” claimed that protests by students at Columbia University against Israel’s war “lit a fire now consuming U.S. campuses.” Reading the article, one might think American colleges and universities have fallen into anarchy. The truth is, protests are not occurring at most U.S. colleges. Where they are, they involve a small minority of the student body. Most students are busy preparing for final exams or trying to line up a summer internship. It’s troubling that this context is missing from The Post’s coverage of these disturbances.

Bryan Fichter , Ellicott City

Closing the book on closing the book

Years ago, The Post was pilloried for severely curtailing its coverage of books and the literary world. We wish to thank the paper for what feels like its rediscovery of the world of books. The second section (after Sports) we read every Sunday is Book World. We especially value and love the retrospectives by Michael Dirda. Ron Charles deserves praise for the breadth and readability of his reviews. We also appreciate that The Post covers mysteries and audiobooks.

Bob and Carol Hopper , Falls Church

Paper or plastic?

I read with interest Eve O. Schaub’s April 23 Tuesday Opinion essay, “ How to celebrate Earth Day? Just dump this toxic stuff .” Schaub identified the problems and implications of plastic recycling and concluded we need to make a lot less plastic rather than rely on recycling. I have long wondered at The Post’s use of plastic bags to deliver newspapers. This has always seemed extremely wasteful, as well as expensive. Take a look at this practice and change to something more appropriate in light of what we now know about plastic pollution.

Jeanne Beare , Fairfax

Calling up memories of a legend before he was called up

The April 17 obituary for Carl Erskine, “ Dodgers pitching great was last of the ‘Boys of Summer’ ” [Metro], was a fitting tribute to an outstanding pitcher and a terrific human being. As an “ice cold pop” kid at Danville Stadium in Illinois, part of the Three-I League — Illinois, Indiana and Iowa — I saw Erskine pitch for the Danville Dodgers right after he came out of the Navy. Danville was then managed by Paul Chervinko , who predicted that Erskine would soon be promoted to the big leagues. Many players who made it into the big leagues played in the Three-I League, and Erskine was one of the best. Thanks to The Post for an obituary that called up these great memories.

R.C. Notar , Lewes, Del.

Missing the boat

Please stop referring to the “collapse” of the Francis Scott Key Bridge. The bridge did not collapse. It was knocked down by an out-of-control boat. “Collapse” implies that the bridge fell into the water below without any external force or impetus, and we know that was not the case. A collapse occurs when something is wrong with the engineering, the materials, the construction or the maintenance. That bridge was just fine until the boat toppled it. By continuing to say the bridge collapsed, The Post enables a false narrative to take hold.

Robert Tiller , Silver Spring

Them’s the brakes

The headline for the April 24 news article “ Canada, long big on immigration, is pumping the brakes ” used an evocative colloquial term at risk of giving bad advice to drivers. Since 2013 , the United States has required new cars to have anti-lock braking systems, and AAA warns that it is unnecessary, even dangerous, to pump such brakes. Contrary to popular expectation, pumping anti-lock brakes sends a signal to the car that the automatic pumping system isn’t necessary and prevents it from kicking in. The Post should pick expressions that don’t have the side effect of conveying mistaken ideas about driving, especially driving in risky situations.

Edwin Stromberg , Takoma Park

Why your homemade bread just won’t rise

Michael Ramirez’s April 20 editorial cartoon, “ Food inflation ,” repeated the common view that food prices are a major, or even the paramount, factor in today’s inflation. Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics belie this belief. For the 12 months ending in March, the overall consumer price index rose by 3.5 percent, while the CPI for food-at-home items rose by only 1.2 percent.

Further, food-at-home items constitute only 8 percent of the overall CPI, with other items making up 92 percent. This means that if there had been no increase at all in food-at-home prices, overall inflation would have been 3.2 percent, only slightly less than the actual increase of 3.5 percent. So one must look at items other than food at home in breaking down the current rate of inflation.

Paul Manchester , Silver Spring

Give it up for giving up

As a psychoanalyst, I was pleased to read the April 21 Book World review, “ A psychoanalyst ponders what it truly means to be alive .” Dennis Duncan’s review of “ On Giving Up ,” by author and psychoanalyst Adam Phillips, thoughtfully and realistically captured the heart of the life, purpose and practice of psychoanalysis.

In his 1895 book, “ Studies in Hysteria ,” Sigmund Freud wrote that he frequently told patients , “I do not doubt that it would be easier for fate to take away your suffering than it would for me. But you will see for yourself that much has been gained if we succeed in turning your hysterical misery into common unhappiness. Having restored your inner life, you will be better able to arm yourself against that unhappiness.” That says it all, especially in combination with Socrates’ utterance that “the unexamined life is not worth living.”

One of Phillips’s essays, “On Not Believing in Anything,” speaks to how an unwavering belief can represent “the fear of curiosity.” I’ve offered to patients considering psychoanalysis that this is an opportunity to get to know everything about the most important person in their lives: themselves. Erik Carter’s illustration for the review, which depicted Albert Camus’s “ The Myth of Sisyphus ,” asked us to reconsider our defensive relationship with our own struggles and difficulties. These challenges are imbued with the historical value of who we are and can lead us to the freedom of being who we earnestly want to be.

Harmon Biddle , Chevy Chase

Give it up for never giving up

Thank you for the chillingly beautiful April 23 front-page article “ The day the mountain crumbled .” While incredibly sad, the story of Emily Franciose’s death by avalanche at 18 was somehow balanced by the descriptions of her loving parents and school friends, and of her exuberant passion for skiing and for life. The article masterfully wove together several threads: Franciose’s excitement about the chance to pursue her passion for backcountry skiing, her parents’ pride in her determination and independence, her friendships at the outdoors-oriented Swiss boarding school she attended, and the cautious approach taken to this trek by school officials — despite its terrible ending. The accompanying photos likewise brought out the allure of the territory along with the danger of her adventure, and the maps and chart provided a good understanding of how such calm-looking snow can turn deadly.

There were no villains in this painful story. Nature did what nature sometimes does.

Michael P. Fruitman , Ashburn

  • Opinion | Readers critique The Post: This widely used word makes no sense April 26, 2024 Opinion | Readers critique The Post: This widely used word makes no sense April 26, 2024
  • Opinion | Readers critique The Post: Here’s the beef with this minimum-wage cartoon April 19, 2024 Opinion | Readers critique The Post: Here’s the beef with this minimum-wage cartoon April 19, 2024
  • Opinion | Readers critique The Post: This power trip is one big guilt trip April 12, 2024 Opinion | Readers critique The Post: This power trip is one big guilt trip April 12, 2024

what is the thesis of in praise of the f word


  1. In Praise of the F Word第一单元_word文档在线阅读与下载_文档网

    what is the thesis of in praise of the f word

  2. In Praise of the F Word by Mary Sherry

    what is the thesis of in praise of the f word

  3. in praise of the f word questions

    what is the thesis of in praise of the f word

  4. In Praise of the F Word

    what is the thesis of in praise of the f word

  5. ⇉In Praise of the F Word Short Summary Essay Example

    what is the thesis of in praise of the f word

  6. 😱 Mary sherry in praise of the f word. In the essay in praise of the f

    what is the thesis of in praise of the f word


  1. "Worship Medley" Into Hymn

  2. The Shard Architecture to know. #architecture #theshard #design #londonarchitecture

  3. How to develop a culture of praise


  1. In Sherry's "In Praise of the F Word," what is the central issue and

    Sherry believes in the benefits of "flunking" students who have not mastered skills. Her central issue is that if "flunking is a regular policy," it can motivate students to "learn the material ...

  2. In Praise Of The F Word Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    In Mary Sherry's essay, "In Praise of the F Word," she praises the power of the f-word. She argues that the word is a source of strength and liberation for women. Sherry believes that the f-word can be used to empower women and to encourage them to take control of their lives. The use of ethos in Mary Sherry's essay is very effective.

  3. In Praise of the F Word Flashcards

    Use these NOTECARDS guide you through a CLOSE READING of "In Praise of the F Word". Who is the author? Mary Sherry. What is the F word? Failure. Who is the author referring to as "semiliterate"? High school students. In paragraph 2, who is cheated by the educational system? High school students.

  4. PDF In Praise F Word (Sherry)

    Select the introduction that works be and write a draft of your essay. praise of the F Word Mary Sherry Mary Sherry was born in Bay City, Michigan. She received a BA from Dominican Univer- sity and an MBA from the University of St. publishing company specializing in informa- tion for economic and development organi- zations.

  5. In Praise Of The F Word Analysis

    The essay "In Praise of the 'F' Word" by Mary Sherry explains some flaws Sherry has noticed in our education system. These observations are from her teaching perspective, and from her son's own experience in high school. Sherry claims that some students that have earned a high school degree should not have because they are "semi ...

  6. In Praise Of The F Word By Mary Sherry Analysis

    1046 Words. 5 Pages. Open Document. Failure to Success " In praise of the F word" by Mary Sherry, the author has her point that flunking students is a way that can help students do better in school. Flunking students can be helpful in getting them motivated and lead to success in their education. Students who don't want to put in effort ...

  7. Analysis Of Elizabeth Sherry 's ' Praise Of The F Word

    In "In Praise of the F Word" Mary Sherry focuses not on how the difficulties that the students have to face affect their performance in school, but how the "fear of failure" compels them to work. Sherry believes that diplomas are meaningless; because most passing students did not master the work. Additionally, some high school graduates ...

  8. Analysis Of Mary Sherry's In Praise Of The F Word

    In Mary Sherry's essay, "In Praise of the F Word", she writes about how in the American school system students get passed along without any consideration for their pace or skill level (Sherry, 564-566). Sherry also discusses how unprepared the American public is after high school and college (Sherry, 564). In, "In Praise of the F word ...

  9. Close Analysis and Annotation of 'In Praise Of The F Word'

    Figurative Language. Syntax: the arrangement of words and phrases to create well-formed sentences in a language. Nuance: a subtle difference in or shade of meaning, expression, or sound. Context: the circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea, and in terms of which it can be fully understood and assessed.

  10. Analysis Of In Praise Of The F Word By Mary Sherry

    6 Pages. Open Document. In the article "In Praise of the F word" written by Mary Sherry. Sherry encourages all parents and teachers to use failure as a form of encouragement. Sherry would like for them to use it as a way to motivate students to do better and want more when it comes to their education. Sherry believes that the threat of flunking ...

  11. Essay

    In the text "In the Praise of the"F " word", the author explains that schools should hold back failing students then instead of passing them along with the class. In my essay I am going to talk about why I disagree with the author. Students should have more material, free after school tutoring, and more to help students that are failing classes.


    2. What method does Sherry use to persuade her readers of her thesis?" 3. Is it effective or not? 4. What makes students in adult programs more successful than they were in high . school? 5. Why doesn't Sherry include expert opinion in her essay? ISSUES . 1. Is Sherry accurate in her assessment of public school education? 2.

  13. In Praise of the F Word by Mary Sherry Critical Analysis

    The article "In Praise of the F Word" by Mary Sherry calls attention to the problems that she has found in our school system. Being a teacher and parent of students, she discovered schools are allowing students to pass without proper knowledge of the material. The author successfully argues that having fear of failing will motivate them to put ...

  14. Mary Sherry In Praise Of The F Word Summary

    The essay "In Praise of the 'F' Word" by Mary Sherry explains some flaws Sherry has noticed in our education system. These observations are from her teaching perspective, and from her son's own experience in high school. Sherry claims that some students that have earned a high school degree should not have because they are "semi ...

  15. In Praise of the "F" Word, by Mary Sherry (Analysis ...

    Nick Courtright is the Executive Editor of Atmosphere Press, an author-friendly publisher, and an acclaimed English professor. Learn more at atmospherepress....

  16. In Praise of the F Word

    Free essays, homework help, flashcards, research papers, book reports, term papers, history, science, politics. ... Final Written Exam: For your final exam, you are write a 1 ½ to 2 page response essay to the article "In Praise of the F Word" by Mary Sherry. Follow the guidelines we have been using throughout the quarter.

  17. "In Praise of the F Word" Free Essay Example

    Views. 3380. In Mary Sherry's essay, "In Praise of the F Word," the author encourages all parents and teachers to use failure as a form of encouragement. Sherry would like for them to use it as a way to motivate students to do better and want more when it comes to their education. What Sherry believes in is that the threat of flunking is ...

  18. Summary Of In Praise Of The F Word By Mary Sherry

    1155 Words. 5 Pages. Open Document. Mary Sherry is the author of an article called "In Praise of The F Word". Before I get into the article there are a couple things to know about Mary. She teaches an adult literacy program, and is a writer who owns her own publishing company. The subjects she teaches in her program are basic grammar, and ...

  19. Analysis Of Mary Sherry's In Praise Of The F Word

    In the article, "In Praise of the 'F' Word", Mary Sherry states that students are not getting a good education and teachers should enforce the "F" word, meaning flunk. Sherry argues that students, especially high school seniors, are not getting the proper education they need to succeed, as many do not have the basic academic skills ...

  20. Response to In Praise of the F Word by Mary Sherry

    `'In Praise of the F word'', an article written by Mary Sherry, she talks about how many high school students graduate each year and get their diploma. ... The example essays in Kibin's library were written by real students for real classes. To protect the anonymity of contributors, we've removed their names and personal information from the ...

  21. In Praise of the F Word: Mary Sherry

    title of book = college writing skills with readings copyright 2005 for developmental writing

  22. Michigan's Graduation Is Disrupted by Pro-Palestinian Parade

    But the protests hardly brought universal praise. In a 1961 Gallup poll, 57 percent of respondents said that sit-ins and Freedom Rides would hurt, rather than help, the cause of integration.

  23. PDF In Praise Of The F Word In Praise Of The F Word Newsweek Magazine May 5, 1991 8:00 PM EDT Tens of thousands of 18-year-olds ...

  24. Opinion

    I find, to my consternation, that I often agree with George F. Will. But whom does he think he is writing for? The language he used in the first sentence of his April 25 op-ed, "112 House ...