how to reduce e waste essay

Reducing Electronic Waste Sustainably: How to Reduce e-Waste and Minimize Environmental Impact

Johnny Bailey

In today’s ever-advancing digital age , we often find ourselves surrounded by an increasing number of electronic gadgets. While these devices offer countless benefits, they also contribute to a growing problem: electronic waste , or e-waste. Sustainable e-waste management is essential in reducing the environmental impact of our voracious appetite for new technology. By understanding the need for e-waste recycling and embracing eco-friendly practices, we can make a more significant impact on preserving our planet and its resources for future generations.

Table of Contents

As we navigate through the challenges of living in a technology-driven society, it’s crucial to be mindful of the consequences of our consumer habits. The choices we make in purchasing, utilizing, and disposing of our electronics have long-lasting effects on the environment and our communities. By incorporating sustainable habits into our daily lives and raising awareness about the importance of proper e-waste management , we can work together to create a more responsible, eco-conscious digital age .

Key Takeaways

• E-waste is an escalating global problem that requires urgent attention and sustainable solutions.
• Understanding the environmental impact of e-waste helps us make informed decisions about the electronics we choose to buy and how we discard them.
• Both consumers and corporations have a critical role in managing e-waste sustainably through responsible practices and recycling initiatives.
• Repairing, reusing, and recycling electronics can substantially reduce the volume of e-waste generated.
• Educating ourselves and others about proper e-waste disposal and recycling practices is essential for fostering widespread change and creating a greener, more sustainable future .

The Urgency of Addressing E-Waste in Our Digital Era

The global e-waste crisis is escalating, largely fueled by the acceleration of consumer electronics that usher in conveniences and capabilities previously unimagined. With the multitude of smartphones now outnumbering the world’s population and the volume of electronic waste becoming the fastest-growing waste stream

E-waste can be a source of recoverable valuable materials, which, if recycled, can conserve energy equivalent to powering thousands of homes and lower production costs for new devices. As we navigate this digital era, the impetus falls on us to adopt sustainable solutions that address the urgency of proper e-waste management—together, we can cultivate a future where technology works in harmony with our environmental goals .

As we navigate this digital era, the impetus falls on us to adopt sustainable solutions that address the urgency of proper e-waste management —together, we can cultivate a future where technology works in harmony with our environmental goals.

• Recognize the urgency of addressing the global e-waste crisis
• Promote sustainable solutions to manage the growing waste stream
• Seek ways to minimize the environmental footprint of consumer electronics

Understanding E-Waste and Its Environmental Effects

Electronic waste , often referred to as e-waste, spans a range of discarded electrical or electronic devices. These gadgets have become an embedded part of our everyday lives, yet they come with an expiry date, at which point they transition into a different, more problematic role. As our reliance on electronic devices amplifies, so does the potential for harm that discarding them improperly poses.

Defining E-Waste and Its Constituents

E-waste constituents frequently contain toxic chemicals such as lead , mercury , arsenic , and cadmium which, when mishandled, pose substantial dangers to the ecosystem and public health. The e-waste definition encompasses a wide array of devices that have reached the end of their useful life and have been discarded, often without proper consideration for their environmental and health impacts .

The Toxicity of E-Waste Components

Many e-waste components are classified as hazardous waste due to their potential to contaminate the environment with toxic chemicals . Lead , mercury , arsenic , and cadmium are prominent examples of hazardous substances found in various electronic devices. When e-waste is not recycled or handled properly, these substances can pose significant threats not only to the environment but also to human health.

Impact of E-Waste on Soil and Water Systems

When e-waste is not recycled or handled properly, the heavy metals and hazardous chemicals embedded within can leach into the soil and water systems. This contamination poses dire consequences for the environment and human health—drinking water supplies can become tainted, endangering communities and disrupting natural habitats. Properties near e-waste disposal sites may also experience increased presence of toxic runoff , negatively impacting local ecosystems and promoting harmful waste recycling practices.

It’s crucial for both individuals and corporations to understand the potential environmental and health impacts of electronic waste and to adopt sustainable practices to reduce both its production and improper disposal. This collective effort can help to mitigate the hazardous effects of e-waste on our planet and its inhabitants, paving the way towards a greener and more sustainable future .

Empowering Consumers: Strategies for Reducing Electronic Waste Sustainably

As consumers, we wield the power to instigate change and significantly reduce the stream of e-waste generated. Educating ourselves on product lifespans, making environmentally conscious purchases, and embracing recycling can fundamentally alter our patterns of consumption. By buying electronics with longer lifespans and acknowledging our role in a sustainable ecosystem, we can reduce our environmental impact and inspire others within our sphere to follow suit, acting as catalysts for broader societal transformation.

• Research before you purchase: Learn about the product lifecycle, company sustainability practices, and the availability of replacement parts to ensure you are making an ecologically responsible decision.
• Buy refurbished or pre-owned electronics: Purchasing second-hand devices not only saves money but also contributes to reducing the demand for new products, helping to curb the production of electronic waste.
• Maintain and repair your devices: Extend the life of your electronics through proper care, cleaning, and regular maintenance. Seek professional help or perform DIY repairs when necessary.
• Donate or sell working electronics: When upgrading to a new device, consider donating or selling the old one to extend its lifespan and reduce e-waste generation.
• Participate in recycling initiatives: Properly dispose of non-functional devices through certified electronics recyclers , ensuring hazardous materials are safely managed and valuable components are recovered.

Above all, embracing a sustainable mindset entails exercising restraint and assessing our true needs before adding another electronic device to our collection. This shift in consumer behavior is instrumental in promoting a greener and more responsible electronic landscape for future generations to enjoy.

Corporate E-Waste Management: A Responsible Approach

Corporations have a profound responsibility in managing e-waste sustainably. By instituting take-back programs , designing with sustainability in mind, and supporting consumer education , companies can greatly contribute to waste reduction and environmental stewardship .

Implementing Take-Back and Recycling Programs

Companies can encourage the return of outdated devices which can then be properly recycled or refurbished through take-back programs . These endeavors reduce the volume of electronic waste, support the cycle of sustainability , and showcase a company’s commitment to corporate responsibility and e-waste reduction .

Designing with the End-of-Life in Mind

Integrating sustainable engineering into product designs enables corporations to influence the e-waste narrative positively. Constructing long-lasting electronics with the end-of-life in mind ensures that once these devices have reached the end of their utility, they can enter recycling streams with greater ease, optimizing the opportunity to reclaim and repurpose valuable materials.

Corporate Stewardship and Consumer Education Initiatives

By spearheading educational initiatives, corporations play a pivotal role in nurturing a culture of environmental stewardship . Corporations that launch campaigns to illuminate the environmental impact of electronic waste contribute significantly to consumer awareness, driving them to engage in more ecologically sound disposal practices.

In summary, companies that embrace their responsibility to manage e-waste sustainably help foster a greener future for all. These efforts not only reduce electronic waste but also set a positive example for consumers and other businesses to follow.

From Purchase to Disposal: Making Smart Decisions to Reduce E-Waste

Electronic devices are ubiquitous in our daily lives, playing a pivotal role in work, education, communication, and entertainment. However, as these devices reach the end of their lifespan , it’s crucial to adopt sustainable e-waste management practices that lessen the environmental impact . From the moment we purchase a device to its eventual disposal, every decision we make contributes to this collective effort.

Before purchasing an electronic product, it’s essential to consider a few factors that will influence its lifespan . Opt for well-established brands or those with a reputation for long-lasting devices, and do some groundwork to gauge the product’s durability, repairability, and energy efficiency. This will help ensure you invest in a device that has a low environmental footprint and can serve you well for an extended period.

While using a device, apply proper maintenance practices to maximize its longevity . Regular updates, storage management, and cleaning can go a long way in extending the lifespan of electronics . By doing so, you not only delay the need for new device purchases but also contribute to combating the e-waste crisis.

When it’s finally time to part with an old device, it’s vital to make informed consumer decisions about its disposal. Contribute to sustainable e-waste practices by recycling at certified centers or donating to reputable organizations.

Understanding the environmental impact of our electronic devices empowers us to make savvy decisions throughout their lifecycle, fostering sustainable e-waste disposal practices that can have a lasting positive effect on our planet.

Becoming aware of relevant regulations and manufacturer take-back programs is also key to ensuring your e-waste is ethically and sustainably managed.

• Research local e-waste disposal regulations to determine proper disposal methods.
• Choose certified recycling centers to ensure that your device will be appropriately recycled or repurposed.
• Consider donating devices that are still functional to charities or schools in need.

As consumers, our choices reverberate along the entire supply chain, guiding industries and shaping the landscapes in which they operate. Adopting prudent consumer decisions and sustainable e-waste disposal practices positively impacts the environment, enabling us to enjoy the conveniences of our gadgets without jeopardizing the well-being of our planet.

Repair and Reuse: Extending the Life of Your Electronics

Emphasizing repair over replacement provides a sustainable alternative to the quick turnover of electronic devices. By mending existing electronics, we not only extend their useful life but also minimize the constant churn of resource-intensive production. In this section, we will explore various resources and strategies that can help us refurbish, reuse, and extend the lifespan of our electronic gadgets, reducing electronic waste and promoting sustainability.

The Case for Repair vs. Replacement

Repairing our devices contributes to their longevity and extends their lifespan , reducing the need to constantly purchase new electronics. This mindset encourages us to be more conscious of the lifetime value of our gadgets, promoting the reuse of electronics and reducing electronic waste. By choosing to repair our devices, we foster a sense of self-sufficiency and embrace sustainability, ultimately making a positive impact on our environment and resources .

Finding Resources for Refurbishment

There are various resources available for refurbishing our electronics, from manufacturers and authorized repair centers to local businesses offering repair and refurbishment services. These resources champion sustainable e-waste solutions and facilitate the extended use of devices, prolonging their functionality while countering the throwaway culture that leads to increased electronic waste. By opting to refurbish our devices, we support a circular economy by enabling their continued use and reducing environmental impact.

Community Workshops and DIY Repair

Community workshops and DIY repair sessions present opportunities for individuals to learn the skills necessary to extend the life of their electronics. These initiatives equip us with the knowledge and skills needed to perform simple repairs on our devices, fostering a sense of self-sufficiency and sustainability . Participating in community workshops and DIY repair events not only empowers us to tackle our own device issues but also encourages a culture of environmental conscientiousness and a shared commitment to reducing electronic waste.

Digital Decluttering: Reducing the Accumulation of Unused Gadgets

As technology advances, it’s easy to amass a collection of unused gadgets . To prevent contributing to the growing issue of e-waste, it’s important to practice digital decluttering , which involves being mindful of our electronic possessions and actively minimizing their accumulation. In this section, we’ll explore strategies for minimizing digital hoarding , responsibly recycling or donating old electronics, and creatively repurposing outdated technology .

Strategies for Minimizing Digital Hoarding

Minimizing digital hoarding starts by implementing organization and decluttering techniques specifically targeted at electronic devices. Develop an inventory of all your gadgets, regularly assess their usefulness, and be disciplined in disposing of devices you no longer need. Embrace a minimalist approach, reducing the number of devices you own, and prioritizing essentials that truly enhance your life.

How to Responsibly Recycle or Donate Old Electronics

One of the major steps in digital decluttering is donating or recycling old electronics instead of throwing them away. Research local organizations that accept device donations, or locate a certified e-waste management facility for responsible recycling . Be sure to follow proper recycling guidelines and data privacy measures by wiping personal data before parting with your devices.

Creative Ways to Repurpose Outdated Tech

Repurposing outdated technology means finding new life for old gadgets. Creative reuse not only averts unnecessary e-waste but also inspires innovation in sustainability efforts. Explore ways to transform your old devices into practical or artistic items, such as turning retired smartphones into security cameras, using idle tablets for digital picture frames, or incorporating electronic components into modern art pieces.

By engaging in digital decluttering, you can take an active role in reducing your electronic waste footprint and fostering a greener, more sustainable digital environment.

The Role of Legislation in Promoting Sustainable E-Waste Practices

Legislative initiatives can significantly impact the promotion of sustainable e-waste practices by establishing rigorous recycling policies and standards. These laws can drive the proper disposal of electronic products, both curbing hazardous waste and incentivizing the recovery of valuable materials.

Among the key elements of e-waste legislation are the enforcement of responsible recycling policy , promotion of sustainable e-waste laws , and upholding high electronics recycling standards . The main goal of these legislative measures is to ensure that e-waste is managed in a manner that mitigates environmental impacts and minimizes health risks for workers involved in recycling processes.

Here is an overview of several successful e-waste legislations around the globe:

Legislative initiatives can only be effective if there is strong compliance and awareness among stakeholders, including consumers, manufacturers, retailers, and recyclers. As individuals, it is our responsibility to be aware of existing e-waste legislation and support the proper disposal and recycling of electronic products to ensure a more sustainable future for all.

Remember, your electronic devices contain valuable resources that can be recovered and recycled. By adhering to your local e-waste laws and recycling policies, you help preserve our environment and contribute to a more sustainable world.

Recycling E-Waste: Navigating Challenges and Embracing Solutions

While e-waste recycling efforts have made significant strides in recent years, there are still numerous challenges that need to be addressed to accelerate their adoption and create a more sustainable approach to managing electronic waste. By raising awareness, identifying certified recyclers, and offering incentives, we can contribute to a better future for both our planet and future generations.

The Current State of E-Waste Recycling Efforts

Despite the progress made in e-waste recycling efforts , many obstacles continue to hinder the widespread adoption of sustainable practices. Disposal challenges and recycling infrastructure limitations are some of the primary barriers that need to be overcome to foster more responsible e-waste management . By acknowledging these challenges, we can begin to develop strategies that address the root causes and cultivate a more sustainable approach to e-waste reduction .

Identifying Certified Electronics Recyclers

One crucial aspect of proper e-waste disposal is working with certified electronics recyclers . These organizations have obtained e-recycling certification , which ensures they follow responsible practices that protect both the environment and human health. By supporting and promoting certified recyclers, we can help guarantee that our discarded electronics are being managed in a manner that aligns with our sustainability goals.

Improving Recycling Rates Through Awareness and Incentives

Education and incentives play a vital role in increasing e-waste recycling rates. By participating in awareness campaigns that highlight the importance of responsible e-waste management , we can equip individuals with the knowledge required to make informed decisions about their electronic waste disposal practices. Additionally, offering recycling incentives , such as discounts on new products, can further motivate individuals to adopt more eco-friendly habits and contribute to a greener future.

Personal Data and E-Waste: Ensuring Information Security

As our society becomes increasingly interconnected, the intersection of personal data protection and the management of e-waste has become more critical than ever. With the rapid turnover of electronic devices and the potential for sensitive information to be exposed, information security must remain a top priority when disposing of unwanted gadgets.

One of the primary concerns when managing the disposal of electronic devices is protecting personal data. Devices such as smartphones, tablets, and computers store a wealth of sensitive information that can easily fall into the wrong hands if not handled correctly. To ensure proper personal data protection , individuals and businesses alike must take steps to implement secure recycling practices and effective data destruction methods.

The process of data destruction is vital for maintaining information security when disposing of e-waste. This includes:

• Wiping hard drives and other storage media
• Destroying physical devices that contain sensitive data
• Engaging professional services for secure disposal

By employing these measures, individuals and businesses can safeguard their sensitive information from being compromised. This focus on data protection is particularly important when working with certified e- waste recycling companies. Utilizing secure recycling practices ensures the thorough destruction of any stored data on electronic devices, thereby minimizing the risk of data breaches and identity theft.

The growing prominence of e-waste in our digital age underscores the importance of proactive measures in protecting sensitive data. As we work towards a sustainable future, striking a balance between the efficient disposal of electronic waste and safeguarding personal information remains a critical task. By emphasizing information security , personal data protection , data destruction , and secure recycling practices , we can make great strides in managing e-waste responsibly.

Reducing Electronic Waste Sustainably

In our fast-paced world, reducing electronic waste starts with incorporating eco-friendly products into our daily routines and transitioning to a more sustainable lifestyle. By choosing environmentally designed gadgets, we can minimize our environmental footprint while enjoying the conveniences of the digital age.

Incorporating Eco-Friendly Products into Your Routine

One way to embrace a sustainable daily routine is to adopt eco-friendly products . Make conscious choices when purchasing electronic devices by considering their eco-design , energy efficiency, and recyclability. This not only reduces your environmental impact but also supports the development of sustainable technology .

Leveraging Technology for a Sustainable Future

As technology advances, we have the opportunity to harness future-oriented strategies that prioritize sustainability and promote green technology . Embracing tech innovation with environmental responsibility in mind can help create eco-conscious products that contribute to a greener future for our planet.

Balancing Tech Innovation with Environmental Responsibility

Maintaining a balance between technological innovation and environmental responsibility is crucial for achieving a sustainable relationship with our gadgets. By being mindful of the environmental impact of our electronic devices and supporting companies that advocate for sustainability, we can help to drive the growth of green technology and protect our planet for future generations.

Conclusion on Reducing Electronic Waste Sustainably

As we navigate the complex challenge of reducing electronic waste sustainably, it is crucial to remember that integrating sustainable habits into our everyday lives begins with personal responsibility and extends to  collective action . By adopting  green habits  and advocating for  environmental stewardship , we contribute to a ripple effect of sustainable practices that can transform our world.

Integrating Sustainable Habits into Everyday Life

Individual actions contribute to the larger collective effort to address e-waste sustainably. Encouraging dialogue and  community involvement  leads to more significant impacts that reverberate well beyond singular actions. By practicing  responsible e-waste management  and sharing our knowledge with others, we can create a community of environmental activists working towards a  greener digital landscape .

Encouraging Collective Action for Greater Impact

As environmental awareness grows, more people and organizations are realizing the importance of making  environmentally friendly technology  choices. Through collaboration and  collective action , we can make a  greater impact  on reducing electronic waste and steering towards a sustainable future. Maintaining open conversations and fostering partnerships between consumers, corporations, and legislators are essential in achieving  ecological sustainability .

Moving Towards a Greener Digital Landscape

Our journey towards a  greener digital landscape  is a shared responsibility, requiring the concerted efforts of consumers, corporations, and legislators alike. It is through the fusion of their initiatives that we can pave the way for a future where technology and  ecological sustainability  are interwoven, fostering a harmonious relationship between human progress and environmental preservation. Together, we can create a world where  technological advancements  coexist with our commitment to safeguarding the health of our planet and its inhabitants.

FAQ on Minimize Electronic Waste

Q: what is e-waste.

A: E-waste refers to electronic products that have been discarded, including anything with a battery or a cord.

Q: How does e-waste impact the environment and health?

A: E-waste can release toxic materials when improperly handled, leading to environmental pollution and health risks for those exposed to the toxins.

Q: What are the consequences of e-waste?

A: Consequences of e-waste include soil and water contamination, as well as negative impacts on human health due to exposure to hazardous materials.

Q: How can we reduce e-waste sustainably?

A: By extending the lifespan of electronic devices, responsibly recycling electronics, and supporting sustainable e-waste management practices, we can reduce e-waste sustainably.

Q: What are some sustainable approaches to e-waste management?

A: Sustainable e-waste management involves proper recycling, refurbishment, and reuse of electronic equipment, in addition to promoting responsible end-of-life practices.

Q: Why is it important to reduce e-waste?

A: Reducing e-waste is crucial to minimize environmental impact, decrease the release of greenhouse gas emissions, and preserve natural resources.

Q: What are some ways to reduce e-waste effectively?

A: Effective e-waste reduction methods include promoting electronics reuse, supporting recycling programs, adopting eco-friendly consumption habits, and advocating for e-waste regulations.

Q: What should I do with my old electronic gadgets?

A: You can consider donating, repurposing, or recycling your old electronic gadgets to extend their lifespan and prevent them from becoming waste.

Q: Where can I find certified e-waste recyclers?

A: Look for environmentally responsible e-waste recyclers certified by organizations such as the EPA to ensure proper and sustainable e-waste management.

Q: How can I get involved in sustainable e-waste initiatives?

A: You can participate in e-waste collection events, support initiatives aimed at reducing e-waste, and educate others about the importance of sustainable e-waste management.

Source Links

• https://www.ewaste1.com/how-to-reduce-e-waste/
• https://reelpaper.com/blogs/reel-talk/how-to-reduce-e-waste
• https://www.wcrecycler.com/blog/top-10-ways-to-reduce-e-waste

About the author

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Latest Posts

Embracing Sustainability: Advancing Labor Rights in Eco-Friendly Companies

As I delve into the world of sustainability, I find that it’s not just about environmental stewardship but is also much about upholding the dignity and well-being of employees. In my exploration, I’ve come to understand that sustainable labor practices are fundamental to eco-friendly companies. They incorporate fair wages, safe working environments, and boundless opportunities…

Enhancing Transparency in Sustainable Product Labor Through the Supply Chain

The importance of supply chain transparency has surged significantly in recent years, becoming a focal point for businesses worldwide. We are living in an era where sustainability is no longer a mere buzzword but a prerequisite for corporate success. As such, companies are making substantive strides in their sustainability efforts and setting ambitious sustainability goals.…

The Importance and Best Practices of Ethical Sourcing for Green Products in Businesses

When I think about ethical sourcing for green products, it reminds me that it is not just a growing trend, it is an essential component of contemporary business practices. Over the past few years, we’ve seen an escalation in the demand for ethical practices to protect workers and the environment, making ethical and sustainable sourcing…

News from the Columbia Climate School

What Can We Do About the Growing E-waste Problem?

When China banned 24 kinds of solid waste last September, countries such as the U.S., the United Kingdom, Australia, and Japan realized they had a big problem. Until last year, China accepted 70 percent of the world’s electronic waste—discarded computers, cell phones, printers, televisions, microwaves, smoke alarms, and other electronic equipment and parts. After China stopped accepting this e-waste out of concern for its environment, Europe and North America began shipping more of it to Southeast Asia—but now Vietnam and Thailand, whose ports have been overwhelmed, are curbing imported e-waste as well.

In 2016, the world’s population discarded 49 million tons of e-waste (equivalent to about 4,500 Eiffel Towers). It’s estimated that by 2021, that number will grow to more than 57 million tons.

Why the upsurge in e-waste?

Technology is becoming more and more integrated into every aspect of our lives. Semiconductors and sensors are being added to products that never before had them, creating wearable monitors, smart homes, TVs that can stream programming from the internet, and much more.

Meanwhile, the life span of devices is getting shorter—many products will be thrown away once their batteries die, to be replaced with new devices. Companies intentionally plan the obsolescence of their goods by updating the design or software and discontinuing support for older models, so that now it is usually cheaper and easier to buy a new product than to repair an old one. Meanwhile, the companies continue to profit from steady sales.

And because prices are dropping, electronic devices are in demand around the world as a growing middle class goes digital. Globally, half of all households now have internet access, and 7.7 billion people have cell phones.

What’s in e-waste?

Electronic devices are made of a complex mix of materials that include gold, silver, copper, platinum, palladium, lithium, cobalt and other valuable elements. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) says, “One metric ton of circuit boards can contain 40 to 800 times the amount of gold and 30 to 40 times the amount of copper mined from one metric ton of ore in the United States.” These precious materials can be reclaimed through recycling .

But electronic devices also comprise toxic heavy metals like lead, mercury, cadmium and beryllium, polluting PVC plastic, and hazardous chemicals, such as brominated flame retardants, which can harm human health and the environment.

In 2016, the estimated value of recoverable materials in global e-waste was $64.6 billion, but only 20 percent of it was properly recycled to enable recovery of the valuable materials. Much of the rest is dumped in landfills where toxic chemicals can leach from the e-waste and end up contaminating the water supply.

As more people buy electronic equipment, manufacturers are beginning to face shortages of the raw materials needed to make their products, so reclaiming and reusing the materials from discarded products and waste—a process called urban mining—makes economic and environmental sense. A recent study in China found that mining copper, gold and aluminum from ore costs 13 times more than recovering the metals through the urban mining of e-waste.

The state of e-waste recycling

Recycling e-waste is practiced both formally and informally.

Proper or formal e-waste recycling usually involves disassembling the electronics, separating and categorizing the contents by material and cleaning them.

Items are then shredded mechanically for further sorting with advanced separation technologies. Companies must adhere to health and safety rules and use pollution-control technologies that reduce the health and environmental hazards of handling e-waste. All this makes formal recycling expensive. As a result, many companies and countries illegally export their e-waste to developing countries where recycling is cheap.

The U.S., the second largest producer of e-waste after China, produced 10 million tons of e-waste in 2012, over 64 pounds per person. In 2012 (EPA data for more recent years are not yet available), only 29 percent of this was recycled—the rest is usually landfilled, incinerated or stuck in a closet. A study  done by the watchdog group Basel Action Network using trackers, however, found that 40 percent of the e-waste supposedly recycled in the U.S. was actually exported. Most of it ended up in developing countries—usually in Asia—where informal recycling is typically unlicensed and unregulated.

At these informal recycling workshops, men, women and children recover valuable materials by burning devices to melt away non-valuable materials, using mercury and acids to recover gold, and dismantling devices by hand to reclaim other materials of value.

Usually they do not wear protective equipment and lack any awareness that they are handling dangerous materials. Research has found that inhaling toxic chemicals and direct contact with hazardous e-waste materials (even in some formal e-waste recycling settings) result in increases in spontaneous abortions, stillbirths, premature births, reduced birth weights, mutations, congenital malformations, abnormal thyroid function, increased lead levels in blood, decreased lung function, and neurobehavioral disturbances. Moreover, e-waste toxins contaminate the air, soil and groundwater.

In the face of these health and environmental hazards, however, many people in developing countries earn a living by dismantling, refurbishing, repairing and reselling used electronic devices. Guiyu, China is often considered the e-waste capital of the world, with 75 percent of households involved in the recycling business. Informal recycling is also practiced in India, Nigeria, Ghana and the Philippines.

In addition to its health hazards, informal recycling can pose security risks, because while formal recyclers in the U.S. usually require wiping devices clean of data, informal recycling does not.

Criminals search e-waste for credit card numbers and other financial information. For example, government contracts and lucrative agreements with the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, the Transportation Security Administration and Homeland Security have been found on hard drives in Agbogbloshie, an e-waste center in Ghana.

Wealthy countries send about 23 percent of their e-waste to developing countries each year. This is ongoing despite the fact that the European Union and 186 states have ratified the Basel Convention , which works to minimize the transfer of hazardous waste from developed countries to developing countries. The U.S, the only developed country that has not ratified the Basel Convention, has agreements that allow it to ship hazardous waste to developing countries.

What U.S. laws govern e-waste?

There is no federal law in the U.S. that mandates the recycling of e-waste or forbids e-waste from being exported to developing countries. Twenty-eight states and the District of Columbia have their own electronic recycling laws, which vary in approach. Some states subcontract with companies to operate a statewide collection system; others require manufacturers to meet minimum recycling targets based on their sales.

The problem with a patchwork of laws is that no one state has enough market share to compel manufacturers to design greener or more durable products. By contrast, the European Union’s Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive represents the entire EU market and thus has the clout to set higher standards for all electronic products sold in the EU. Its laws requiring manufacturers to help pay for recycling have resulted in an e-waste recycling rate of 35 percent, higher than that of the U.S.

A federal law in the U.S. could help develop a more robust e-waste recycling infrastructure through setting targets and establishing financing schemes for collection systems and recycling plants. It could also offer a tax break or rebate to companies that process their used devices, and help prevent the export of e-waste to developing countries. However, a federal law is not likely to happen under this administration.

A problem requiring multiple solutions

With the flood of e-waste growing around the world, recycling alone will not be enough. Here are some other ideas and solutions that are being researched, considered or practiced around the world. Hopefully, they will inspire more adoption of best practices.

Designing better products

In order to reduce e-waste, manufacturers need to design electronics that are safer, and more durable, repairable and recyclable. Most importantly, this means using less toxic materials. Chemical engineers at Stanford University are developing the first fully biodegradable electronic circuit using natural dyes that dissolve in acid with a pH 100 times weaker than vinegar. One group of scientists is pulverizing e-waste into nanodust by cooling the various materials, then grinding them up into homogenous powders that are “easy to reuse.” Canada-based Ronin8  has developed a technology that uses minimal water and energy as it separates metals from non-metals through sonic vibrations in recycled water.

Today, it’s not a priority to design goods that can be reused or remanufactured, though for a few years, companies experimented with modular phones that enabled consumers to upgrade parts of their phones instead of having to entirely replace them. Google, LG and Motorola all released modular models, but they ultimately failed because they were clumsier and more costly, and because consumers expected their devices to come with every feature as standard. Perhaps as consumers become more aware of the e-waste problem, companies will be able to design a modular phone with more market appeal.

The right to repair

In addition to recycling, it’s also important to be able to repair and reuse the devices we have. But even if you know how to and want to repair your electronic device, you might be stymied because your product’s software is subject to copyright. The copyright often forbids consumers by law to tinker with or reverse-engineer the device or use an unauthorized repairer. Ifixit.org  demands the right to repair devices and teaches people how to do it.

Extended Producer Responsibility

Extended producer responsibility requires companies that make products to be responsible for the management and disposal of them at the end of their lives. The idea is to turn waste materials into a resource for producing new products. The New York State Electronic Equipment Recycling and Reuse Act  requires manufacturers to provide consumers with free and convenient e-waste recycling.

Hong Kong, a prime dumping ground for U.S. e-waste and a huge producer of e-waste itself, deals with 77,000 tons of e-waste yearly (80 percent of which is sent to Africa and Southeast Asia for recycling). It has just instituted a producer responsibility system that will require suppliers and sellers of electronic products to pay for the free removal, collection, handling and proper disposal of items.

More convenient recycling

EcoATM  provides a convenient and safe way to recycle and sell old cell phones, MP3 players and tablets. Consumers can bring their devices to one of 2,700 kiosks in the U.S. The EcoATM will evaluate it based on the model and condition, and pay you right there. The items are then either reused or responsibly recycled.

China’s largest internet company, Baidu, and the United Nations Development Programme developed a smartphone app called Baidu Recycle . Chinese users can indicate the item they want to recycle, enter its size, the date it’s to be picked up along with their name and address, then submit a photo of it. Within 24 hours, an accredited recycler comes to pick it up. In two months, 11,000 devices were recycled.

Better recycling

Nickolas Themelis, professor emeritus of earth and environmental engineering and director of the Earth Engineering Center at Columbia University, said that the best and only economical large-scale recycling being done in North America today uses a copper smelter in Canada. He explained that when e-waste is fed into the copper smelter, precious metals like silver, gold, platinum, palladium, selenium, and others dissolve in molten copper, which acts like a solvent at high temperatures. The impure copper (because it comprises other metals) that results is then sent to a refinery where pure copper is separated out and the other valuable metals can be collected. This integrated smelting process combined with refining, though it recovers only metals that dissolve in copper, is a relatively inexpensive method of reclaiming e-waste metals. The smelter , in Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, receives about 50,000 tons of e-waste each year. “The model of Noranda with a small [e-waste] collection company in the U.S. and a larger one in Canada and a big smelter, could be done in other countries,” said Themelis. “It could be done in China which already has copper smelters, as well as in America.”

To reduce health and environmental hazards while maintaining the informal recycling system that supports so many people, India and China are looking at ways to integrate the informal and formal recycling systems. One strategy would give informal recyclers financial incentives to divert e-waste to formal collection or recycling centers. For example, they could be paid more to deliver cathode ray tube screens to a formal collection center than they would get for dismantling it by hand themselves.

The goal of a circular economy

  A circular economy is one that aims to keep products and all their materials in circulation at their highest value at all times or for as long as possible. Stephanie Kersten-Johnston, an adjunct professor in the Sustainability Management program at Columbia University and director of sustainable business at Heineken USA, explained that “highest value” means what’s closest to the original product, in order to get the most out of the embedded value in the material and the labor that went into creating the product. Europe has made the circular economy a goal for the whole continent.

Using the example of cell phones, Kersten-Johnston explained how the electronics industry could move towards a circular economy. “Right now, over the length of the contract, you gradually buy outright the phone so the provider can recoup the cost of manufacturing that phone in the first place,” she said. “But at the end of the contract, you’re left with a phone that’s worth basically nothing, that you’ve had to pay for all that time and you can’t do anything with it. That’s a flawed model. But imagine a system where the provider or manufacturer retained ownership of the device through the contract so customers would pay a lower monthly fee and be expected to return the device for an upgrade. The value could be recaptured in the form of parts for remanufacture or materials for recycling, and customers would still get their upgrades.”

Kersten-Johnston believes it’s only a matter of time before this type of business model happens across the board because millennials and the younger generation don’t value ownership in the same way as previous generations, and they expect this type of responsible behavior from industry.

What you can do about e-waste

The best thing you can do is to resist buying a new device until you really need it. Try to get your old product repaired if possible and if it can’t be fixed, resell or recycle it responsibly.

Before you recycle your device, seal up any broken parts in separate containers so that hazardous chemicals don’t leak. Wear latex gloves and a mask if you’re handling something that’s broken.

Find a responsible recycler. Recyclers with the E-Steward label on their websites have been certified to meet the cleanest and most responsible standards for e-waste recycling. E-Steward recyclers also clear your data in their recycling process.

  60 Minutes: The Wasteland (e-waste in China)

Find places to recycle near you through Consumer Resources, Recycle Electronics 

All about e-waste in New York City

New York State e-waste collection sites

Best Buy and Staples recycle e-waste, as do Goodwill  and the Salvation Army .

Related Posts

Scaling the Mountains of Textile Waste in New York City

A Glimpse at the Columbia Climate School in the Green Mountains Program

Garbage, Product Design, and the Circular Economy

A humorous look at a not so funny problem. https://luprescott.myportfolio.com/factory-workers

How to recycle please I am living india

Visit http://www.cleantogreen.in

Growing e-waste problem is a paramount concern and most of the people are not aware of how they can contribute to reduce this problem. Your blog gives comprehensive details on what people can do to handle the e-waste growing issue. More and more readers can become familiar with the e-waste, its upsurge, the state of e-waste recycling and what they can do. Extremely informative blog.

it has become important, these days to rationalise electronic waste management systems for the environment to be preserved and health hazards to take a slump.

If you are 15 years old, emissions rose 30% in your lifetime.

If you are 30 years old, emissions rose 60% in your lifetime.

In the next 10 years, emissions will rise 10% at least.

After 30 years of trying, solar and wind are 2% of total world energy use.

To avoid 2 C, emissions must drop 50% in 10 years, and 100% in 20 years.

5 of 13 major tipping points are triggered like dominos below 2 C.

When these 5 tipping points begin, they reinforce each other and trigger the other 8.

Runaway hothouse earth cannot be stopped or reversed once started.

The earth will take many, many thousands of years to recover.

Runaway mass extinction cannot be stopped or reversed once started.

The earth will take many millions of years to recover.

Nobody wants to admit it.

There are 25 billion chickens on earth.

Humans and livestock are 98% of all land vertebrate biomass.

10,000 years ago, humans and livestock were 0.03% of all land vertebrate biomass.

All male vertebrates are being biologically emasculated, feminized, sterilized, stupified and crazyfied.

If you want tons of data on how and why, go to Loki’s Revenge Blog and read: The Withering Bones of Humanity

I think collaboration between the governments of developed and developing countries can help humanity get rid of e-waste. Researchers should also try their best to develop ways to significantly or completely reduce the inclusion of toxic materials in electronic devices.

Here is another possible resource that could be of use to you.

1-800-GOT-JUNK? offers an FAQ page on how to dispose of electronic waste. The resource goes over how to recycle electronics, the importance of properly disposing of electronic waste, and other need-to-know information before throwing away electronics.

Below is the URL to 1-800-GOT-JUNK?’s Electronic Waste FAQ page: https://www.1800gotjunk.com/us_en/what-we-take/electronics-recycling

I hope this helps!

I have some questions about e-waste if anybody could respond that would be great! It is for a school project and I want to learn more about it!

Is this Zachariah Chase? This is Adhwaith man!

Can anybody answer some questions about e-waste

What are your questions?

I can answer your questions!

Here, in Turkey also this is a big problem. Municipalities are top collectors but it’s not still on a good path. EcoATM seems a good action on that.

A majority of nations across the globe have regulated electronic scrap generation and their treatment procedures. For instance, the European Union (EU) has authorized all electronic goods manufacturers to undertake the responsibility for the treatment of end-of-life products. http://bit.ly/2QAM9l8

yes, you are right. e-waste is a huge problem for an environment and also for humans. We have to be aware of that. Thanks for sharing important knowledge to everyone.

Hi! I’m living in South Africa Enquirer for knowledge and tips on how to start e waste In my country.i resides in rural areas where we are not exposed to e waste,we end up throwing away recycleble items

This is a very good article, however, in Nigeria where i reside, not only is the awareness about the dangers of e-wastes low, there is also no known e-wastes recycling plant in the country, so you can imagine the situation of things here. As a PHD student with interest in this area, i’ll like to know what steps to take beyond writing. Thanks

Market competition makes a difference on how these gadgets have been made and sold in the market. Also, the needed infrastructure, working capital, and most importantly the skills required to recycle electronic gadgets are scarce in developing countries. Nonetheless, avenues for proper disposal of these wastes is non-negotiable. At Trashvocacy here is what we do at Trashvocacy https://www.trashvocacy.com/

It’s good to know that E-products need to be recycled responsibly in the event that they can’t be repaired. My husband and want to start cleaning out some of the junk in our garage, including an old desktop computer that’s too far gone to be fixed. I’m glad I read your article so I can do the responsible thing and look for a computer recycling service in our area to give it to.

Mabey to help this we can remake new stuff with these things like to make it again.

Goodday, I would like to know if I can make use of any of the photos for research article in my upcoming book chapter.

Hi Matthew, we do not own the images in this post — you’d have to reach out to the original creators, which are linked in the image captions. Best of luck with your book chapter!

The best option is to recycle those. Most of the e-waste has plastic, steel, copper, silver, and other metals that be reused.

If the device is “Made in China” it should GO BACK TO CHINA when it’s useful life is over! If China is not accepting e-waste back because they are concerned about their environment, maybe they should make things better quality so it lasts longer!

Too many products are failing prematurely because of profit hungry corporations not wanting to be responsible by making sure quality manufacturing which would greatly minimize what gets abandoned before it’s necessary!

Short life-cycles and premature failures can be addressed.

Reycling is great!

Get the Columbia Climate School Newsletter

How to Reduce Electronic Waste (E-Waste): 10 Simple Tips

Electronic waste (also known as e-waste) is discarded electrical or electronic devices. Improper disposal and processing of this waste can lead to adverse human and environmental damages. 

There are now more mobile phones than the number of people around the world ( source ). With our tendency to just throw away products and continually purchase new ones, this creates a global e-waste problem.

E-Waste’s Impact on the Environment

The environmental hazards caused by improper disposal of e-waste can be briefly described as follows: 

•  Air Pollution:  Burning of wires release hydrocarbons in the atmosphere. 
•  Water Pollution:  Electronic devices contain toxic metals like mercury, lead and lithium, which when disposed of improperly, mixes with ponds, lakes and groundwater. Communities that directly depend on these sources of water then consume it unknowingly. These heavy metals are hazardous for all forms of living beings. 
•  Soil Pollution:  These heavy metals enter the food chain as they are absorbed by plants from the soil. These metals not only destroy the plants, but also are then consumed by other living beings, leading to a poisonous food chain. 

Now, let’s get into some tips and ways that you can reduce e-waste.

Ways to Reduce E-Waste and its Hazards

The following are ten ways to curb these environmental hazards, reduce electronic waste, and save our planet: 

1. Sell old Electronics

One of the best and easiest methods of reducing the electronic waste footprint is to sell or donate your electronic gadgets to those in need. 

If you are planning on selling, you should be able to easily find a buyer as they will have the opportunity to purchase the same product at a much lower price than if it were new. You get easy money while the buyer gets a nice gadget; a win-win for both.

A good place to sell old electronics (without any fees) is Craigslist . You can sell unwanted devices by posting a local ad and meeting up with potential buyers. 

Another website you can use to sell old devices is Kijiji , which works similar to Craigslist. Kijiji is basically the Canadian version of Craigslist. 

2. Donate old Electronics

Donating electronics to the needy is also a practice followed by many. It not only gives the gadget a new life, but also makes you feel good about yourself.

If you decide to donate your old electronic devices when you don’t need them anymore, make sure to clear any information (like data in your laptop hard drive) before you donate it.

To learn more about donating gadgets safely and correctly, check out this  EPA guide  on donating and recycling electronics.

3. Recycle and Dispose of E-Waste Properly

Improperly disposed e-waste is becoming more and more hazardous, especially as the sheer volume of our e-waste increases.

For this reason, large brands like Apple, Samsung, and other companies have started giving options to its customers to recycle old electronics. Sometimes, you may even get financial compensation for recycling your old devices!

Recycling old electronics allows the expensive electronic parts inside to be reused. This can save a lot of energy and reduce the need for mining of new raw resources, or manufacturing new parts.

You can find electronic recycling programs in your local area by doing a Google search for “recycle electronics” and your city or area name.

4. Maintain your Electronics

One of the best ways to save your money and reduce e-waste is to keep your electronics well-maintained, to increase its life. Here are some tips to get you started.

Maintaining a Laptop or Computer:

• Make sure your PC’s hard drive or SSD doesn’t get completely full. This allows it to keep running smoothly and quickly for a long time.
• Clean your computer often so that it doesn’t get dirty.
• Whenever possible, try not to overcharge your battery. This means unplugging your charger  before your laptop hits 100%, which will improve your battery’s overall lifespan.

Maintaining a Mobile Phone:

• Use a phone case and screen protector so that your phone doesn’t break when you drop it.
• Similarly to laptops, keep your device clean and don’t always fully charge your battery if you don’t need to (This improves overall battery lifespan).

By maintaining your electronics, you save money on having to buy new gadgets when your old ones break down. You’re also keeping electronics out of landfills by increasing the total lifespan of your electronic devices.

5. Repurpose or Re-evaluate

Always think twice before upgrading or buying a new electronic device:

• Do you really need this new device?
• Is it a need , or more of a want ? 
• Will it add value to your personal or professional life in any way?

If you answered “no” to any of the above questions, then it might be best to re-evaluate your thoughts, and avoid buying it.

To add on to this, you can repurpose old electronics that aren’t useful anymore for their intended use .

For example : An old mobile phone can work as an mp3 player or even as a GPS device. Don’t throw it away, think wisely! 

6. Store Data Online

Cloud services  are much better than you would think in reducing your environmental impact.

By storing data online, you get to access your data from anywhere around the world, without the need to carry a storage device at all times. Cloud storage also gives you a large amount of storage, for free or for very cheap.

This not only offers convenience to you, but reduces the need for manufacturing of new storage devices .

This indirectly reduces your carbon footprint and curbs the amount of generated e-waste . 

7. Buy Energy Star Rated Electronics

Investing in environmental friendly electronics have interdependent benefits. 

A high Energy Star rated device consumes less energy, reducing your electricity bill significantly. In addition, because less energy is required, it keeps a check on resource (energy) depletion by avoiding over- utilization . It indirectly saves the environment by reducing the load on resources’ (energy) extraction and depletion. 

When purchasing, look for electronics and appliances with the Energy Star logo:

8. Learn to Repair Broken Electronics at Home

Some brands of modern electronic devices are only meant to last for a few years under regular use before failing.

However, along with maintaining your electronic devices by cleaning them regularly to help them last for longer, you could also learn how to fix hardware problems on your device.

Online sites such as iFixit provide free, step-by-step guides for fixing common issues across hundreds of different device models, along with pictures of the device and of the required tools for each repair job.

Nowadays, there are also many Youtube videos teaching you how to fix a broken laptop or do a phone screen replacement yourself. Many times, all it takes is a bit of time and patience before your gadget is good as new!

By learning to repair your electronics at home, you will gain more detailed knowledge and understanding of the hardware of your device.

You’ll also learn useful repair skills, and avoid having to travel to a professional repair shop and pay expensive fees for other people to fix your device.

Best of all, you will be able to continue using your device for longer and won’t have to throw it away.

9. Rent Electronic Equipment instead of Buying

If you are planning to use a specific piece of electronic equipment for a limited period of time, it would be a better idea to rent it instead of buying it.

For example, if you sparingly use industrial weighing scales for measuring, say, the weight of the electronic waste, rent the scales instead of buying them.

Renting equipment is both a cost-effective and environmentally friendly option, as you only have to pay for the duration you rent rather than buying the equipment outright and then letting it rot away after one or two uses.

10. Spread the Word!

Let’s say you’ve been faithful in your quest to reduce electronic waste. You’re buying less unnecessary electronics and donating your outdated ones, among other things.

You’re doing your part, and that’s great! Now, it’s time to share your knowledge with other folks who may be less aware about the hazards of e-waste. 

Next time you see a family member improperly disposing of an old computer or buying a new smartphone for no reason, take the time and share your knowledge on the detrimental effect of their actions.

Most importantly, give those people a reason to act on your advice. For example, if you know of a good place nearby to donate old electronics, make sure to let them know!

One honest discussion about responsible ways to reduce e-waste has the potential to make a measurable difference both in your community and on a global scale.

Take Action

Now you’ve seen ten ways to reduce the environmental effects of e-waste. It’s your turn to start taking action. 

We all need to take a stand to prevent the destruction of the environment we live in. 

About the Author: Rebecca Pryor

Rebecca Pryor is managing director of  A&A Skip Hire  –one of North London’s leading provider of domestic and commercial skips.

Other Contributors:

• Tip 8 (Repair Broken Electronics) was contributed by Cloe from  CloeWrites .
• Tip 9 (Rent Electronic Equipment) was contributed by Kevin from  Scalesu.com .
• Tip 10 (Spread the Word) was contributed by John from AllGreenRecycling.com .

Edited By: Hugh

Last Updated 2019-02-12

Share this post:

Similar posts.

Cost of Renewable Energy Vs. Non-Renewable Fossil Fuels (+Pros & Cons)

The cost of renewable energy has decreased significantly over the past decade. However, the idea that fossil fuels produce cheaper power is still very common. So, how does the cost of these two types of energy compare? And which is cheaper? Well, there are now solar and wind farms producing electricity at a lower cost…

Solar Power For Beginners: 7 Tips For Making the Switch

The use of solar power is on the rise, and it’s not a mystery why. Some people are taking the leap to solar to minimize their carbon footprints. Others are more motivated by the long-term financial savings at stake. Whether you’re opting for solar because of the green earth or the green dollar, it’s a…

10 Shocking E-Waste Facts Everyone Should Know

The United States produces the largest amount of e-waste in the entire world. There are dangerous consequences to simply throwing out your old phone, laptop, game system, even microwave. All of these devices can cause terrible damage to the planet if not disposed of correctly. We want to help you to become informed of the…

How Do Microplastics Affect The Environment?

Plastic contamination has become one of the world’s greatest challenges to solve. The world produces millions of tonnes of plastics each year, most of which is immediately discarded after only one use. When combined with our habit of littering, this means that huge amounts of plastic waste end up littered on the streets, or worse, in our oceans. Once plastic…

How Does Plastic Pollution Enter the Ocean? (Explained)

A large amount of the plastic that we produce ends up polluting the the environment, in particular our oceans. Much of the plastic that we use eventually reaches the ocean, collecting in garbage piles like the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. In fact, between 4.8 and 12.7 million metric tonnes of plastic ends up in the…

Can Electric Car Batteries Be Recycled?

Modern electric car batteries are massive lithium-ion batteries, which are recyclable. Depending on the recycling process, up to 100% of the lithium in the battery can be preserved. Most of the other battery components – metals like copper and iron – are also easy to recover, regardless of the recycling process. However, by the time…

One Comment

I would recommend to call professional junk removal service providers as they are well versed and equipped to dispose off junk in an eco-friendly manner.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

• Skip to main content
• Skip to secondary menu
• Skip to primary sidebar
• Skip to footer

A Plus Topper

Improve your Grades

E-Waste Essay | Essay on E-Waste for Students and Children in English

February 14, 2024 by sastry

E-Waste Essay:  In modern times, every household owns a computer, i-pad, television, cell phones. In short ‘screens’ of myriad sizes, are in front of our eyes all the time. Today, three out of four Indians possess mobile phones. One out of every five people has access to computers. The unavoidable consequence is that the nation of more than a billion individuals is generating tonnes of dangerous ‘electronic waste’.

You can read more  Essay Writing  about articles, events, people, sports, technology many more.

Long and Short Essays on E-Waste for Kids and Students in English

Given below are two essays in English for students and children about the topic of ‘E-Waste’ in both long and short form. The first essay is a long essay on E-Waste of 400-500 words. This long essay about E-Waste is suitable for students of class 7, 8, 9 and 10, and also for competitive exam aspirants. The second essay is a short essay on E-Waste of 150-200 words. These are suitable for students and children in class 6 and below.

Long Essay on E-Waste 500 Words in English

Below we have given a long essay on E-Waste of 500 words is helpful for classes 7, 8, 9 and 10 and Competitive Exam Aspirants. This long essay on the topic is suitable for students of class 7 to class 10, and also for competitive exam aspirants.

E- waste or electronic waste refers to discarded electronic products ranging from computers, equipment of Information and Communication Technology (ICT), home appliances and peripherals of these devices. The rapid boom in the IT industry has led to a surge in the usage of electronic gadgets. The latter get out-of-fashion and redundant at a fast pace, as a result of which they are discarded more frequently. This generates large amounts of toxic e-wastes.

E-wastes comprise a witch’s mix of hazardous chemicals like cadmium, lead, mercury, poly-chlorinated biphenyls, besides plastics and glass. These contents leach into the soil from landfills and contaminate water bodies. E-wastes when burnt, also release poisonous gases in air.

E-wastes if not handled properly, can cause serious health hazards. According to National Centre for Biotechnology Information, these risks include silicosis, cuts from Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) glass, inhalation of mercury, tin and lead compounds from circuit boards, acid contact with eyes and skin, and circulatory failure.

E-waste has woven a large informal sector in Indian cities that is involved in segregation and dismantling electronic items. Lamington road or Crawford market in Mumbai, SP market in Bengaluru and Nehru Place, Seelampur or Seemapuri in Delhi, all are hubs of e-waste disposal sites. Mumbai tops the list of e-waste generating cities, followed by Delhi and Bengaluru.

Ten states in India generate 70% of the total e-waste. Among developing nations, India is one of the largest producers of e-waste. Also, India is the destination for many developed nations to ship out their own e-wastes. However, it has been found that dismantling units in India are poorly equipped, as a result of which less than 5% of the e-waste gets recycled. Also, workers here work in dangerous conditions, without any protection or safety measures.

In 2012, Government passed the E-waste Management and Handling Rules Law, which states that agencies must have licenses and comply with pollution standards, and labour laws. A fine of upto ₹ 1 lakh and jail of upto 7 years would be announced on the violators.

Short Essay on E-Waste 200 Words in English

Below we have given a short essay on E-Waste is for Classes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. This short essay on the topic is suitable for students of class 6 and below.

The consumers must also take responsibility for their own old electronic goods. They must ensure that their e-waste is deposited at authorised collection centres, or recyclers certified by Central Pollution Control Board and Union Ministry of Environment and Forests.

Education, awareness and safety gears must be provided to the poor workers, who earn their livelihood in this sector. E-wastes is one of the most harmful of all wastes that we generate. It is the inevitable and unwelcome gift of modern technology. Let us pledge to dispose them in the most environment friendly way, so as to cause least damage to Mother Earth.

E-Waste Essay Word Meanings for Simple Understanding

• Myriad – of an indefinitely great number, innumerable
• Dismantle – to disassemble or pull down, take apart
• Consequence – the effect, result, or outcome of something occurring earlier
• Hub – a centre around which other things revolve or from which they radiate, a focus of activity, authority, commerce, transportation, etc
• Peripheral – near the surface or outside of, external
• Surge – rise
• Pledge – a solemn promise or agreement to do or refrain from doing something
• Redundant – being in excess
• Picture Dictionary
• English Speech
• English Slogans
• English Letter Writing
• English Essay Writing
• English Textbook Answers
• Types of Certificates
• ICSE Solutions
• Selina ICSE Solutions
• ML Aggarwal Solutions
• HSSLive Plus One
• HSSLive Plus Two
• Kerala SSLC
• Distance Education

Fact sheets

• Facts in pictures
• Publications
• Questions and answers
• Tools and toolkits
• Endometriosis
• Excessive heat
• Mental disorders
• Polycystic ovary syndrome
• All countries
• Eastern Mediterranean
• South-East Asia
• Western Pacific
• Data by country
• Country presence 
• Country strengthening 
• Country cooperation strategies 
• News releases
• Feature stories
• Press conferences
• Commentaries
• Photo library
• Afghanistan
• Cholera 
• Coronavirus disease (COVID-19)
• Greater Horn of Africa
• Israel and occupied Palestinian territory
• Disease Outbreak News
• Situation reports
• Weekly Epidemiological Record
• Surveillance
• Health emergency appeal
• International Health Regulations
• Independent Oversight and Advisory Committee
• Classifications
• Data collections
• Global Health Estimates
• Mortality Database
• Sustainable Development Goals
• Health Inequality Monitor
• Global Progress
• World Health Statistics
• Partnerships
• Committees and advisory groups
• Collaborating centres
• Technical teams
• Organizational structure
• Initiatives
• General Programme of Work
• WHO Academy
• Investment in WHO
• WHO Foundation
• External audit
• Financial statements
• Internal audit and investigations 
• Programme Budget
• Results reports
• Governing bodies
• World Health Assembly
• Executive Board
• Member States Portal
• Fact sheets /

Electronic waste (e-waste)

• E-waste is the fastest growing solid waste stream in the world (1) . 
• In 2019, an estimated 53.6 million tonnes of e-waste were produced globally, but only 17.4% was documented as formally collected and recycled (2) . 
• Lead is one of the common substances released into the environment if e-waste is recycled, stored or dumped using inferior activities, such as open burning (3) . 
• E-waste recycling activities may have several adverse impacts on human health. Children and pregnant women are particularly vulnerable. 
• ILO and WHO estimate that millions of women and child labourers working in the informal recycling sector around the world may be at risk of e-waste exposure (4) .

Every year millions of electrical and electronic devices are discarded as products break or become obsolete and are thrown away. These discarded devices are considered e-waste and can become a threat to the environment and to human health if they are not treated, disposed of, and recycled appropriately. Common items in e-waste streams include computers, mobile phones, and large household appliances, as well as medical equipment. Every year, millions of tonnes of e-waste are recycled using environmentally unsound techniques and are likely stored in homes and warehouses, dumped, exported or recycled under inferior conditions. When e-waste is treated using inferior activities, it can release as many as 1000 different chemical substances into the environment, including harmful neurotoxicants such as lead (3) . Pregnant women and children are particularly vulnerable due to their unique pathways of exposure and their developmental status. The International Labour Organization (ILO) estimates that 16.5 million children were working in the industrial sector in 2020, of which waste processing is a subsector (4) .

Scope of the problem 

Electronic waste (e-waste) is the fastest growing solid waste stream in the world, increasing 3 times faster than the world’s population (1) . Less than a quarter of e-waste produced globally in 2019 was known to be formally recycled; however, e-waste streams contain valuable and finite resources that can be reused if they are recycled appropriately. E-waste has therefore become an important income stream for individuals and even communities. However, people living in low- and middle-income (LMICs), particularly children, face the most significant risks from e-waste due to lack of appropriate regulations, recycling infrastructure and training. Despite international regulations targeting the control of the transport of e-waste from one country to another, the transboundary movement of e-waste to LMICs continues, frequently illegally. E-waste is considered hazardous waste as it contains toxic materials or can produce toxic chemicals when treated inappropriately. Many of these toxic materials are known or suspected to cause harm to human health, and several  are included in the 10 chemicals of public health concern , including dioxins, lead and mercury. Inferior recycling of e-waste is a threat to public health and safety.

Exposure to e-waste 

Electrical and electronic items contain many different toxic substances. While users are unlikely to have contact with any of these substances when the items are in use, when they become waste, these toxicants can be released into the environment if the devices are managed using environmentally unsound practices and activities. Several unsound practices have been observed at e-waste sites including: 

• scavenging   
• dumping on land or in water bodies 
• landfilling along with regular waste 
• opening burning or heating 
• acid baths or acid leaching   
• stripping and shredding plastic coatings  
• manual disassembly of equipment.  

These activities are considered hazardous to the environment and human health as they release toxic pollutants, contaminating the air, soil, dust, and water at recycling sites and in neighbouring communities. Burning or heating is considered one of the most hazardous activities due to the toxic fumes created. Once in the environment, toxic pollutants from e-waste or produced through unsound recycling activities can travel significant distances from the point of pollution, exposing people in faraway areas to health-damaging substances.  

Children are the most vulnerable  

A range of adverse health outcomes linked to e-waste recycling activities have been posed . 

Children and pregnant women are especially vulnerable to the effects of hazardous pollutants from informal e-waste recycling activities. Children are often involved in waste picking and scavenging, burning discarded e-waste and the manual dismantlement of items into component parts. In some countries, children may serve as a source of cheap labour and their small hands give them an advantage in taking apart the smallest items. These activities directly expose children to injury and high levels of hazardous chemicals. Working as a waste picker is hazardous labour and is considered one of the worst forms of child labour by the ILO. In 2020, the ILO estimated that as many as 16.5 million children globally were working in the industrial sector, of which waste processing is a subsector (4) . It is unknown how many child labourers participate in informal e-waste recycling.  

E-waste exposure may be linked to the following health effects during pregnancy and in infants and children: 

• adverse neonatal outcomes , including increased rates of stillbirth and premature birth; 
• neurodevelopment, learning and behaviour outcomes , especially associated with lead released through informal e-waste recycling activities; and
• reduced lung and respiratory function and increased asthma incidence , which may be linked to high levels of contaminated air pollution that characterize many e-waste recycling sites. 

Children and pregnant women are at higher risk than adults to contaminants released through informal e-waste recycling activities due to their unique vulnerabilities. Children have different exposures to e-waste recycling activities. E-waste recycling activities release toxic chemicals that can cross the placenta and may contaminate breastmilk, for example mercury. Additionally, children are highly sensitive to many of the pollutants released through e-waste recycling due to their rapidly developing bodies, including their respiratory, immune and central nervous systems. E-waste contains multiple known and suspected neurotoxicants, including lead and mercury, that may disrupt the development of the central nervous system during pregnancy, infancy, childhood and adolescence. Some harmful toxicants from e-waste may also impact the structural development and function of the lungs. Changes to children’s developing systems from e-waste may cause irreparable harm and affect them for the rest of their lives. 

Prevention and management 

National and international actions are essential to protect communities from dangerous e-waste recycling activities. Actions that can be taken include: 

• adopting and enforcing high-level international agreements; 
• developing and implementing national e-waste management legislation that protects public health; 
• incorporating health protection measures into national legislation; 
• monitoring e-waste sites and surrounding communities; 
• implementing and monitoring interventions that improve informal e-waste recycling activities, protect public health and ensure vital sources of community revenue; 
• educating health workers across all levels on e-waste-related child health issues; 
• eliminating child labour.  

International agreements 

The Basel Convention controls the transboundary movement of hazardous wastes and their disposal. It is a comprehensive environmental agreement that aims to tackle issues surrounding hazardous wastes, including e-waste and its management. In 2019, the Ban Amendment to the Basel Convention entered into force. It prohibits the movement of hazardous wastes, including e-waste, from countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the European Commission countries and Liechtenstein to other states that are party to the Convention. The Basel Convention runs programmes and workshops to develop and deliver guidance on environmentally sound management of e-waste. It also provides states with guidelines to distinguish between waste and non-waste and the transboundary movement of e-waste. Additionally, regional conventions also exist, such as the Bamako Convention and the Waigani Convention . Both these regional conventions have arisen in response to the Basel Convention and aim to further restrict the movement of hazardous wastes, including e-waste, in African and South Pacific countries, respectively. 

WHO response

WHO’s Initiative on E-waste and Child Health is contributing to a number of international e-waste programmes and pilot projects in countries in Latin America and Africa. These pilot projects are developing frameworks to protect children’s health from e-waste exposures that can be adapted and replicated in other countries and settings. The Initiative aims to: 

• increase access to evidence, knowledge and awareness of the health impacts of e-waste  
• improve health sector capacity to manage and prevent risks 
• facilitate monitoring of exposure to e-waste and interventions that protect public health. 

In 2021, WHO released its first global report on e-waste and child health , which called for greater effective and binding action to protect children from the growing threat. WHO has developed training tools for the health sector, such as the recently updated training package for health care providers , including a specific training module on lead and on e-waste and child health.  Additionally, WHO contributes to multi-agency capacity training tools including a MOOC and a joint course with PAHO .

• Tackling informality in e-waste management: the potential of cooperative enterprises. Geneva: International Labour Organization; 2014 ( https://www.ilo.org/sector/Resources/publications/WCMS_315228/lang--en/index.htm )
• Forti V, Balde CP, Kuehr R, Bel G. The Global E-waste Monitor 2020: quantities, flows and the circular economy potential. Bonn, Geneva, Vienna: United Nations University, International Telecommunication Union, International Solid Waste Association; 2020 ( https://ewastemonitor.info/ )
• Widmer R, Oswald-Krapf H, Sinha-Khetriwal D, Schnellmann M, Böni H. Global perspectives on e-waste. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2005;25(5):436-458. 
• Child labour: global estimates 2020, trends and the road forward. Geneva: International Labour Organization; 2021 ( https://www.ilo.org/ipec/ChildlabourstatisticsSIMPOC/lang--en/index.htm ). 

WHO's work on children's environmental health

WHO Initiative on E-waste and Child Health (leaflet)

Children and digital dumpsites: e-waste exposure and child health

Top 10 Ways to Reduce e-Waste

Since there are numerous ways to reduce e-waste, business managers must implement waste-cutting policies. You can start with this list, then add to it with your ideas for achieving sustainability.

1. Know a Product's Lifespan Before You Buy It

One of the most obvious ways to reduce e-waste is to check the product's lifespan before you buy it. Avoid trendy electronic products that go in and out of style quickly.

2. Set a Limit on Electronic Gadgets

Only allow yourself to purchase a few electronic gadgets at one time. Limiting your gadget purchases will help slow down the demand that triggers the production of electronic products.

3. Check the Packaging for an Environmental Seal

Another way to reduce e-waste is to focus on products that have an environmental-friendly seal on the package. Products made from recycled materials or recyclable materials may carry various environmental seals.

4. Spread the Word About E-Waste

The best way to raise awareness of the environmental consequences of e-waste is to spread the information you learn about it to people in your circle. Awareness campaigns have led many people to adopt sustainable measures such as recycling.

5. Learn About Electronic Components

Most consumers of electronic products need to learn more about how the products are engineered. Find out what materials are used to make specific components so that you know the risks of exposure to toxic chemicals such as mercury, lead, arsenic, and cadmium.

6. Make Recycling a Part of Your Lifestyle

The more people recycle, the less waste ends up in a landfill. Luckily, many states have passed laws restricting what type of trash can be thrown away in public. Prioritizing recycling as a part of your lifestyle will help you avoid fines and influence others to support sustainability.

7. Clean Your Hard Drive Before Recycling

You can reduce e-waste by taking your old computer to a recycler. Make sure you first clean the hard drive of all of its data. Protecting your privacy is essential, especially if the hard drive has previously stored confidential information.

8. Maintain Your Current Electronic Equipment

Adopting sustainability as a personal or business practice goes a long way. It can help you get the most out of your electronic equipment instead of replacing items every few years. Be aware that aggressive marketing trends help accelerate the lifespans of tech products.

9. Donate Unwanted Electronics to Charities

Instead of letting an old electronic gadget sit around and collect dust, put it to good use by donating it to a charity in your community. Keep in mind that not everyone can afford the latest gadgets.

10. Learn State Laws on Battery Disposal

Many places now require e-waste to go to a recycler or return to the original store where the item was purchased. California, for example, now prohibits people from throwing batteries away in public trash. Find out what your state requires since laws are changing rapidly to support sustainability.

Consider these various ways to reduce e-waste as a starting point for developing your strategy for reaching sustainable solutions. Contact us at West Coast Computer Recycler for more information on how to destroy computer data and properly recycle e-waste.

Blog archive

Recent posts.

Related Articles

Adapting to fast-paced tech advances, top ways to raise ewaste awareness, safeguarding data integrity.

• E-Waste Recycling
• Data Security
• Our Mission
• Certifications / Insurance
• Client References
• Privacy & Security

8 Simple Ways to Minimize E-Waste

Published by lisa wallace on june 2, 2023 june 2, 2023.

In today’s fast-paced digital world, electronic waste, or e-waste, has become a significant environmental concern. The rapid advancement of technology has led to a high turnover of electronic devices, resulting in a staggering amount of e-waste. The improper disposal of electronic devices poses serious environmental and health risks due to their hazardous components.

To combat this issue, it is crucial to adopt sustainable practices that minimize e-waste and reduce our carbon footprints. However, by adopting conscious consumption habits and making informed choices, we can minimize e-waste and reduce our carbon footprints.

This article presents practical strategies and tips to help you make a positive impact on the environment . By incorporating these ideas into your lifestyle, you can contribute to a sustainable future.

1. Understand the Impact of E-Waste

Before diving into solutions, it’s essential to understand the detrimental effects of e-waste on the environment and human health . To effectively minimize e-waste, it is essential to understand its definition and the consequences it brings.

E-waste refers to any discarded electronic device, ranging from smartphones and computers to household appliances. It contains hazardous substances such as lead, mercury, and cadmium, which can leach into soil and water bodies, polluting ecosystems.

Improper disposal methods like incineration or landfilling release toxic gases into the air, contributing to air pollution and climate change. The extraction and production processes of electronic devices contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions, adding to the global carbon footprint.

By minimizing e-waste, we can mitigate these adverse effects.

2. Choose Refurbished Electronics to Minimize E-Waste

Refurbished electronics, such as laptops and smartphones, offer a greener alternative to buying brand-new devices. Refurbished devices undergo thorough testing, repairs, and quality checks before being made available for sale.

These products work just as well as new ones but at a fraction of the cost and with a significantly lower environmental impact. Sustainable products don’t necessarily have to be more expensive . Look for reputable ITAD services that specialize in refurbishing electronics, as they ensure the devices meet quality standards and data security protocols.

By choosing refurbished devices, you not only reduce e-waste but also support the circular economy . And all of that while saving costs. This is especially interesting for those who want to encourage sustainability efforts at work .

3. Extend the Lifespan of Your Electronics

One of the most effective ways to save the planet and minimize e-waste is to extend the lifespan of your electronic devices. Making your electronic devices last longer is an effective way to reduce e-waste. Adopting proper maintenance practices, such as keeping devices clean and regularly updating software, can help extend their lifespan.

Additionally, using protective cases, screen protectors, and surge protectors can prevent physical damage and electrical surges that might lead to premature device failure. Take advantage of the warranty and repair services provided by manufacturers or authorized service centers to address any issues promptly. By following these tips, you can maximize their usage:

Responsible Purchasing

One effective way to reduce e-waste is to practice responsible consumption . Before buying a new device, evaluate your actual needs and consider purchasing high-quality products from reputable brands. Look for devices that are known for their durability and upgradability.

Extending the lifespan of your current device through repairs or upgrades is a sustainable choice. When buying new gadgets, opt for durable, high-quality products from reputable manufacturers with a commitment to sustainability.

Proper Maintenance

Take good care of your electronic devices by cleaning them regularly and protecting them from physical damage. Adhering to manufacturer recommendations for maintenance and usage can significantly extend their lifespan.

Refurbished Electronics

For instance, consider purchasing refurbished laptops from reliable sources. These laptops undergo thorough testing, repairs, and upgrades by an ITAD company to ensure they meet quality standards. Opting for refurbished laptops not only reduces e-waste but also helps in minimizing carbon emissions associated with the production of new devices.

4. Donate or Sell Unwanted Electronics

When you no longer need a functioning electronic device, consider donating it to someone in need or selling it to a reputable buyer. Many charitable organizations accept donations of electronics, and there are online platforms where you can sell your used gadgets . By giving your electronics a second life, you contribute to reducing e-waste and enable others to access affordable technology. Ensure that you properly wipe any personal data from the devices before donating or selling them to protect your privacy.

5. Properly Recycle E-Waste

When electronics reach the end of their usable life, it’s crucial to recycle them properly. Many countries and municipalities have designated e-waste recycling centers where you can drop off your old devices. These facilities ensure that valuable materials are recovered and hazardous substances are disposed of safely. Look for certified recyclers who follow responsible recycling practices and adhere to environmental regulations. Some ITAD companies offer e-waste recycling an even upcycling services as part of their comprehensive solutions. By recycling e-waste, you prevent valuable resources from going to waste, save water needed for the production of new devices, and reduce the environmental impact of improper disposal.

6. Educate Yourself and Others about E-Waste

Promoting awareness and educating others about the sustainability and importance of minimizing e-waste is vital for effecting change on a larger scale. Share information about e-waste and its impact on social media, organize awareness campaigns in your community, or participate in local recycling initiatives.

By fostering a culture of responsible e-waste management, we can collectively make a significant difference. Encourage your workplace or educational institution to implement e-waste recycling programs and support initiatives that promote sustainability.

If you want to go one step further, consider becoming an environmental activist .

7. Support Legislation & Advocacy Efforts for Minimizing E-Waste

Advocating for stronger e-waste management policies and supporting legislation that encourages responsible disposal and recycling practices can have a significant impact. Stay informed about local and national e-waste regulations and lend your voice to advocacy groups or campaigns that aim to improve e-waste management. By collectively pushing for better policies like some of the world’s famous environmental activists do, we can create a more sustainable future for generations to come.

8. Embrace Sustainable Habits to Avoid E-Waste

In addition to responsible device management, adopting sustainable habits can significantly reduce your carbon footprint:

Energy Efficiency

Optimize the energy consumption of your electronic devices by enabling power-saving features, adjusting brightness settings, and powering them off when not in use. Use energy-efficient chargers and power strips to minimize standby power.

Digital Minimalism

Streamline your digital life by decluttering and organizing your files, reducing unnecessary downloads and backups, and deleting unused applications. This practice not only saves storage space but also reduces energy consumption.

Repair Culture

Instead of discarding malfunctioning devices, consider repairing them. Many repair shops specialize in fixing electronic devices, extending their lifespan and reducing e-waste.

Minimizing e-waste and reducing our carbon footprints require a collective effort. By practicing responsible consumption, opting for refurbished electronics from reputable ITAD companies, extending the lifespan of our devices, donating or selling unwanted electronics, properly recycling e-waste, educating ourselves and others, and supporting legislation and advocacy efforts, we can make a tangible difference in preserving our planet’s resources and mitigating the harmful effects of e-waste. Together, we can build a more sustainable and environmentally conscious future.

How can reduce electronic waste?

To reduce electronic waste, choose refurbished electronics, extend device lifespan, donate/sell unwanted devices, properly recycle e-waste, and support legislation and advocacy efforts.

What are 3 ways to prevent e-waste?

Three ways to prevent e-waste are practicing responsible consumption, opting for refurbished electronics, and extending the lifespan of devices through maintenance and repairs.

How can we make e-waste more sustainable?

To make e-waste more sustainable, promote awareness, educate others, support recycling programs, advocate for stronger management policies, embrace energy efficiency, digital minimalism, and repair culture.

What are 5 examples of e-waste?

Examples of e-waste include old & unusable smartphones, computers, household appliances, TVs, and printers.

What is the most widely used method for e-waste disposal?

The most widely used method for e-waste disposal is landfilling, although it is not environmentally friendly.

Which country uses the most e-waste?

China is currently the country that generates and uses the most e-waste globally.

Lisa Wallace

Lisa is a dynamic social entrepreneur, successfully managing two innovative social start-ups. In addition to her entrepreneurial ventures, she is a prolific author, known for her high-value articles on green business and economics. Lisa’s work is at the forefront of sustainable development, combining her business acumen with a deep commitment to environmental and social impact. Her writings provide valuable insights into the integration of sustainability and economic practices, inspiring others to adopt green business models. Through her leadership and expertise, Lisa is dedicated to driving positive change and fostering a more sustainable and equitable economy.

Related Posts

Pros and Cons of Desalination

The pros and cons of desalination are not always straightforward. Whereas desalination is a reliable and abundant solution to freshwater scarcity, it has certain downsides, such as high energy consumption and costs, as well as Read more…

Upcycling vs Recycling – The Difference Explained

Upcycling vs recycling are two different approaches to waste management. Recycling breaks down materials to their raw form for remanufacturing, often reducing quality. Upcycling creatively repurposes items without degrading their quality, enhancing their value or Read more…

Are Orbeez Biodegradable?

Who doesn’t love orbeez? As a kid, I have had so many great days with orbeez. The joy of watching these tiny balls expand when we put them in water was enough to make our Read more…

Essay on E Waste

Students are often asked to write an essay on E Waste in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on E Waste

Understanding e-waste.

E-waste is discarded electronic devices. It includes items like computers, TVs, and mobile phones. These items often contain harmful substances, which can pollute the environment.

The Problem of E-Waste

The problem with e-waste is it’s growing rapidly due to the increasing use of electronics. Many people don’t know how to dispose of e-waste properly, leading to harmful effects on the environment.

How to Manage E-Waste

To manage e-waste, we can reuse, recycle, or donate old electronics. Some companies offer e-waste recycling programs. Proper disposal helps protect our environment.

250 Words Essay on E Waste

Introduction to e-waste.

Electronic waste, or E-Waste, is a rapidly growing global concern. It refers to discarded electronic devices or components which are not suitable for disposal in regular trash due to their hazardous constituents.

The Rising Problem of E-Waste

Environmental and health implications.

E-Waste poses significant environmental and health risks. It often contains toxic substances like lead, mercury, and cadmium, which can leach into the soil and groundwater, causing severe pollution. The informal processing of E-Waste can lead to health issues among workers, including respiratory ailments, neurological disorders, and even cancer.

Importance of E-Waste Management

Proper E-Waste management is critical to mitigate these risks. This includes the reduction of E-Waste through the promotion of recycling and reuse, safe and efficient collection and disposal methods, and the implementation of legislation to regulate E-Waste.

In conclusion, E-Waste is a pressing issue that requires urgent attention. By adopting sustainable practices and encouraging technological innovations in E-Waste management, we can protect our environment and health, contributing towards a more sustainable future.

500 Words Essay on E Waste

Electronic waste, commonly referred to as e-waste, encompasses discarded electronic devices, components, and accessories. In our digital age, the rapid technological advancements have resulted in an escalating e-waste problem, posing severe environmental and health threats.

The E-Waste Epidemic

The proliferation of electronic devices, coupled with their short lifespan, has led to a surge in e-waste. According to the Global E-Waste Monitor 2020, 53.6 million metric tons of e-waste was generated globally in 2019, a figure expected to grow by 21% by 2030. This statistic is alarming, considering that only 17.4% of 2019’s e-waste was officially documented as properly collected and recycled.

Economic Aspect of E-Waste

While e-waste poses considerable challenges, it also presents significant economic opportunities. The United Nations estimates that the raw materials contained in e-waste are worth at least $57 billion annually, a figure greater than the Gross Domestic Product of most countries. This value is often lost due to inadequate recycling and recovery infrastructure in many parts of the world.

Managing E-Waste: The Way Forward

Addressing the e-waste challenge necessitates a multi-pronged approach. Firstly, manufacturers should be encouraged to design products for longevity, repairability, and recyclability, reducing the amount of e-waste generated. Secondly, governments should enforce strict regulations for e-waste management, including the establishment of formal recycling systems. Lastly, consumers must be educated about the importance of proper e-waste disposal and the potential harm of improper handling.

If you’re looking for more, here are essays on other interesting topics:

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Save up to 20% with a subscription!

• 12 Count Box
• 24 Count Box
• 48 Count Box
• Little Lemurs Box
• All Toilet Paper
• Bamboo Paper Towels
• Recycled Paper Towels
• Find Us In-Store
• Give $10, Get $10
• Sustainability

Top Ways to Reduce E-Waste

October 23, 2023 - 7 min read

In today's fast-paced digital age, electronic devices have become an integral part of our lives. From sleek smartphones to powerful laptops, these gadgets have revolutionized the way we communicate, work, and entertain ourselves. However, with the rapid advancement of technology comes a growing concern: electronic waste, or e-waste. This article aims to shed light on the challenges posed by e-waste, its environmental and health impacts, and most importantly, how we can all play a part in reducing this global crisis. As we dive into practical steps and corporate initiatives, you'll discover effective strategies on ways to reduce waste , minimize electronic waste, and make a positive impact on our planet's future.

Understanding the Growing Challenge of E-Waste

An electronic device has a shorter lifespan than ever before, leading to a surge in e-waste production. As technology evolves, so does our appetite for the latest gadgets, resulting in a staggering amount of discarded electronics. This trend contributes to the mounting challenge of e waste recycling responsibly. It's a cycle driven by our desire for the newest, fastest, and most cutting-edge technology.

One of the main culprits is our consumer behavior. In a throwaway culture, we often replace our old devices, made by tech companies, with new ones without considering the environmental consequences. The rapid turnover of electronic products perpetuates this cycle of waste generation. The improper disposal of these electronics, whether through neglect or ignorance, further magnifies the problem, leading to overflowing landfills and environmental harm. It's imperative that we shift our mindset towards responsible consumption and disposal to combat this ever-growing challenge of this type of waste .

The Environmental and Health Impacts of E-Waste

E-waste poses significant threats to both the environment and human health. When discarded in landfills, electronic devices release toxic chemicals and hazardous substances. These pollutants can seep into the soil and water, posing risks to wildlife and human populations. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has identified e-waste as one of the fastest-growing segments of the solid waste stream, underscoring the urgency of finding sustainable solutions.

Furthermore, electronic devices contain valuable materials, including precious metals, that could be recovered through proper recycling. Failing to do so not only wastes valuable resources but also contributes to the depletion of raw materials, perpetuating a cycle of resource scarcity. Responsible e-waste management is not only an environmental imperative but also a step towards sustainable resource utilization.

Practical Steps to Minimize Electronic Waste

In the quest to minimize electronic waste, a pivotal starting point lies in a fundamental shift in our mindset and behavior. Embracing a few straightforward yet powerful practices can wield a significant impact. It's not just about disposal, but about conscious choices that extend the lifespan of our electronic devices, ensuring they serve us and the planet to their fullest potential. From responsible recycling to considering repairs before replacements, these practical steps empower individuals to play an active role in the global effort to combat the growing e-waste crisis. Let's explore these strategies that pave the way for a more sustainable electronic future.

Reducing e-waste begins with a shift in our mindset and behavior. By adopting a few simple practices, we can make a significant impact:

Properly Dispose of Old Electronics

Seek out certified electronics recyclers who responsibly handle e-waste. They have the expertise to dismantle and recycle electronic products safely. These certified professionals employ environmentally sound methods, ensuring that valuable materials are extracted while minimizing environmental impact. By entrusting your old devices to these experts, you contribute to a closed-loop system that prioritizes sustainability and responsible resource management.

Donate or Sell Usable Devices

Before tossing out old electronics, consider whether they can be refurbished or reused by others. Donating or selling functional devices extends their lifespan and offers an eco-conscious alternative to disposal. This act of generosity not only benefits individuals seeking affordable technology but also reduces the demand for new electronics. It's a small yet impactful step towards a more circular economy, where products are valued and utilized to their fullest potential, minimizing waste and maximizing resource efficiency.

Opt for Repair Before Replacement

In a society that often favors the new over the old, consider repairing malfunctioning devices rather than immediately replacing them. This practice not only conserves resources but also promotes a culture of sustainability. Engaging skilled technicians to diagnose and fix issues prolongs the life of your electronics, reducing the demand for new replacements. It's a mindful approach that not only saves you money but also contributes to a more sustainable, less wasteful future.

Buy Electronics with a Longer Lifespan

Prioritize quality over quantity when purchasing electronic products. Look for durable and well-built devices that are less likely to become obsolete quickly. Investing in electronics designed for longevity is an investment in both your wallet and the environment. Products built with robust materials and superior craftsmanship not only withstand the test of time but also lessen the frequency of replacements. By making informed choices, you not only acquire a reliable device but also play a vital role in reducing the overall environmental impact of electronic consumption.

Practice Safe E-Recycling

When it comes to e-recycling, exercising caution is paramount. Be discerning in your choice of electronics recyclers. Ensure they hold certifications and adhere to environmentally responsible practices. Certified recyclers employ stringent protocols to handle e-waste, mitigating potential harm to the environment and human health. By selecting reputable recyclers, you actively contribute to the proper disposal and recycling of electronic devices, playing a crucial role in mitigating the global e-waste crisis. Your conscientious choice makes a tangible difference in safeguarding our planet's well-being.

Corporate Responsibility in E-Waste Reduction

In the face of the escalating e-waste crisis, corporate social responsibility emerges as a linchpin in effecting meaningful change. Companies hold a pivotal role in combating this global challenge through a spectrum of impactful measures. From the design phase to end-of-life disposal, corporations can implement sustainable practices that mitigate the environmental impact of electronic products. Establishing take-back programs, where old devices are responsibly collected and recycled, exemplifies a commitment to waste reduction. Moreover, incorporating eco-conscious materials and manufacturing processes not only fosters product longevity but also curtails the demand for new, resource-intensive electronics.

By championing these initiatives, companies not only uphold their ethical obligations but also serve as trailblazers in a collective effort to foster a more sustainable and harmonious relationship between technology and the environment. As consumers increasingly gravitate towards environmentally conscious brands, this commitment to responsible e-waste management becomes a powerful driver of corporate integrity and market competitiveness.

Corporate social responsibility plays a crucial role in combating the e-waste crisis. Companies can contribute to waste reduction through several avenues:

Implementing Sustainable Practices

From product design to manufacturing processes, companies can prioritize eco-friendly materials and production methods. By opting for renewable resources, reducing waste in the production line, and employing energy-efficient technologies, corporations can significantly decrease their environmental footprint. Additionally, embracing circular economy principles, where products are designed for reuse and recycling, fosters a closed-loop system that minimizes waste.

These deliberate choices not only demonstrate a commitment to environmental stewardship but also contribute to the broader movement towards a more sustainable and resilient future. As companies lead the way in implementing these practices, they catalyze positive change across industries, setting a precedent for responsible business conduct.

Establishing Take-Back Programs

Companies can facilitate the return of old devices for proper disposal or refurbishment, ensuring that e-waste is managed responsibly. Implementing take-back programs encourages customers to participate in the circular economy, where products are reused or recycled at the end of their lifecycle. This not only diverts electronic waste from landfills but also reduces the demand for new, resource-intensive manufacturing.

It's a proactive step towards sustainable resource management, demonstrating a company's commitment to environmental preservation and responsible product stewardship. By offering convenient avenues for recycling, businesses empower consumers to make environmentally conscious choices, fostering a more sustainable future for all.

Encouraging E-Waste Education and Awareness in Communities

Creating a culture of responsible recycling starts with education and awareness. Communities can take proactive steps to reduce e-waste. By disseminating knowledge about proper disposal methods and the environmental impacts of electronic waste, individuals can make informed choices. Let's explore actionable steps for communities to become champions in the fight against e-waste:

• Organize E-Waste Collection Events : Community-driven initiatives can provide opportunities for residents to responsibly dispose of their old electronics. These events not only make e-waste disposal convenient but also promote a sense of collective responsibility towards the environment.
• Educate on Safe Disposal Methods : Raising awareness about the environmental hazards of improper e-waste disposal is crucial. Communities can provide resources and information on where and how to recycle electronic devices safely. By empowering individuals with knowledge, we pave the way for a more sustainable approach to managing electronic waste.

Reel Paper: A Sustainable Solution

Amidst the e-waste crisis, companies like Reel Paper are paving the way for a more sustainable future. By reimagining paper production, we offer products like Recyclable Paper Towels and Bamboo Toilet Paper that align with a circular economy. Through our innovative approach, we exemplify how businesses can make a positive impact on the planet.

The e-waste crisis is a global challenge that demands collective action. By adopting responsible recycling practices, advocating for corporate accountability, and spreading awareness in our communities, we can all contribute to a more sustainable future. Together, we can turn the tide on e-waste and pave the way for a greener, cleaner world. Let's be the change-makers our planet needs.

Ernie Atillo

Recent Articles

6 Types of Paper Towels to Know

July 29, 2024 - 4 min read

12 Unexpected Paper Towel Uses You Might've Never Considered

July 29, 2024 - 6 min read

Are Paper Towels Bad for the Environment?

Leave a comment.

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published

E-Waste Essay

Introduction to E-Waste

The proliferation of electronic devices in our modern society has led to a concerning surge in electronic waste, or e-waste. Defined by discarded electronic products, e-waste significantly threatens the environment, public health, and economies worldwide. The rapid pace of technological advancement and short product lifecycles exacerbate this issue. As electronic devices become integral to daily life, the environmental impact of improper disposal and inadequate recycling practices becomes more pronounced. This essay explores the multifaceted challenges and potential solutions surrounding e-waste, emphasizing the urgent need for collective action to mitigate its adverse effects on our planet and communities.

Significance of the Issue

The escalating issue of electronic waste (e-waste) carries profound significance, impacting various aspects of our global community.

Watch our Demo Courses and Videos

Valuation, Hadoop, Excel, Mobile Apps, Web Development & many more.

• Environmental Degradation: E-waste contributes to pollution by releasing hazardous substances like heavy metals and toxic chemicals into the soil, water, and air . This contamination severely threatens ecosystems, jeopardizing biodiversity and ecosystem services.
• Human Health Risks: Improper disposal and recycling of e-waste expose individuals to harmful substances, leading to adverse health effects. Vulnerable communities, often involved in informal recycling, face heightened health risks due to direct exposure to toxic materials.
• Resource Depletion: Electronic devices like rare earth metals contain valuable and scarce resources. Inadequate recycling means these resources are lost, perpetuating the need for environmentally damaging mining and extraction activities.
• Economic Implications: The mismanagement of e-waste results in lost economic opportunities. Recoverable materials are discarded, contributing to resource scarcity, while the costs of environmental remediation and healthcare burdens rise.
• Global Impact: E-waste is a global issue that transcends national borders. Exporting e-waste to developing countries exacerbates environmental and health challenges, creating an inequitable burden.
• Technological Innovation: The e-waste issue underscores the necessity for sustainable design and manufacturing practices, driving innovation in creating more environmentally friendly and easily recyclable electronic products.
• Policy and Regulatory Relevance: The escalating e-waste crisis necessitates robust policies and regulations at national and international levels to ensure responsible disposal, recycling, and extended producer responsibility (EPR) programs are in place.

Current Trends and Statistics

Understanding the current trends and statistics of electronic waste (e-waste) provides crucial insights into the magnitude of the problem and its implications for the environment and society.

• Global E-Waste Generation: In 2021, the world generated approximately 57 million metric tons of e-waste, a significant increase from previous years. E-waste is expected to grow by 21% by 2030, reaching an estimated 74 million metric tons annually.
• Per Capita E-Waste Generation: The average per capita e-waste generation is rising, with developed countries having higher rates. In 2021, the average was approximately 7.3 kg per person.
• Fast Technology Obsolescence: Rapid technological advancements contribute to shorter product lifecycles. The average lifespan of many electronic devices has decreased, leading to a higher turnover of products and increased e-waste.
• Composition of E-waste: E-waste comprises electronic devices such as smartphones , laptops, televisions , and household appliances. Small IT equipment, such as mobile phones and tablets, represents a significant portion.
• Informal E-Waste Recycling: Informal recycling, often conducted in developing countries, remains a prevalent practice. Workers, including children, engage in unsafe methods to extract valuable materials from electronic devices, exposing themselves to health risks.
• Resource Recovery Rates: The overall global rate of material recovery from e-waste remains low, with a significant amount of valuable materials, including precious metals and rare earth elements, ending up in landfills.
• E-Waste Trade and Illegal Dumping: Illegal e-waste trade, including the export of electronic waste from developed to developing countries, continues to be a challenge. This contributes to environmental degradation and health hazards in the receiving nations.
• Government Regulations and Policies: Countries increasingly recognize the importance of e-waste management, with many implementing or updating regulations to address the proper disposal, recycling, and extended producer responsibility (EPR) for electronic products.

Environmental Impact of E-Waste

The improper disposal and inadequate recycling practices of electronic waste (e-waste) have a multifaceted impact on the environment, encompassing various ecological consequences. The following points elucidate the environmental ramifications of e-waste:

• Toxic Substances in Electronic Devices: E-waste contains hazardous materials such as brominated flame retardants and heavy metals such as lead, mercury, and cadmium. When improperly discarded, these substances can leach into the soil and water.
• Soil Pollution: Improper disposal of e-waste can lead to soil contamination, affecting the fertility and composition of the land. Toxic substances seeping into the soil can disrupt ecosystems, harm plant life, and accumulate in the food chain.
• Water Pollution: Aquatic ecosystems are seriously threatened when dangerous elements from e-waste leak into water sources. When fish or other aquatic life are exposed to contaminated water , toxins can bioaccumulate and pose a risk to human health when ingested by humans through contaminated seafood or water.
• Air Pollution: Open burning of e-waste, a common practice in some regions, releases harmful pollutants into the air. This includes dioxins and furans, which contribute to air pollution and pose respiratory risks to nearby communities.
• Electronic Device Disposal in Landfills: E-waste often ends up in landfills where toxic substances can leach into the soil and groundwater. Traditional landfill management is insufficient to contain the environmental hazards associated with electronic waste.
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Electronic device production, transportation, and disposal contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. Mining for raw materials, manufacturing processes, and energy consumption in recycling further contribute to the carbon footprint associated with e-waste.
• Biodiversity Impact: The environmental impact of e-waste extends to biodiversity loss. Contaminated ecosystems may adversely affect plant and animal species, disrupting ecological balances and leading to long-term environmental degradation.
• Resource Depletion: Inadequate e-waste recycling means losing valuable and scarce resources, including rare earth metals. This perpetuates the need for resource-intensive extraction processes, contributing to further environmental degradation.

Human Health Risks

Improper disposal and inadequate recycling of electronic waste (e-waste) present substantial risks to human health, impacting individuals directly engaged in informal recycling activities and communities near e-waste disposal sites. The following points highlight the health hazards associated with e-waste:

• Exposure to Hazardous Substances: E-waste contains toxic materials, including heavy metals (lead, mercury, cadmium), brominated flame retardants, and other hazardous chemicals. Workers in informal recycling facilities are exposed to these substances during dismantling and recycling processes.
• Respiratory Issues: Open burning of e-waste, a common practice to extract valuable metals, releases toxic fumes and particulate matter into the air. Breathing in these pollutants can result in respiratory issues, including asthma, bronchitis, and other lung diseases.
• Skin and Eye Irritation: Direct contact with e-waste components can cause skin and eye irritation. Chemicals present in electronic devices may lead to dermatological issues and eye-related health problems among workers handling e-waste without proper protective equipment.
• Reproductive and Developmental Effects: Prolonged exposure to certain substances found in e-waste, such as lead, has been linked to reproductive and developmental issues. Pregnant women exposed to e-waste contaminants may experience complications, and there may be adverse effects on fetal development.
• Neurological Disorders: Some heavy metals in e-waste, like lead and mercury, have neurotoxic properties. Chronic exposure to these substances may lead to neurological disorders, affecting cognitive function, memory, and concentration.
• Cancer Risks: Long-term exposure to certain chemicals in e-waste, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and dioxins, has been associated with an increased risk of cancer. Workers and nearby communities may face elevated cancer risks due to environmental contamination.
• Occupational Hazards in E-Waste Recycling: Workers in informal e-waste recycling often need proper protective gear and work in unsafe conditions. This manual dismantling and processing of electronic devices increases the risk of accidents, injuries, and exposure to hazardous substances.
• Impact on Vulnerable Communities: Communities near e-waste disposal sites may experience adverse health effects. Contaminants leaching into the soil and water sources can lead to long-term health issues, particularly among vulnerable populations, including children and the elderly.

Economic Dimension

The economic dimension of electronic waste (e-waste) encompasses various aspects, from the lost opportunities for resource recovery to the financial burden associated with environmental remediation and healthcare. The following points highlight the economic implications of e-waste:

• Lost Resources and Economic Opportunities: E-waste contains valuable materials, including precious metals (gold, silver, copper) and rare earth elements. Inadequate recycling means these resources are lost, leading to increased dependence on mining and extraction activities, which are resource-intensive and environmentally damaging.
• Resource Scarcity and Increased Costs: As demand for electronic devices continues to rise, the depletion of finite resources becomes a significant concern. The scarcity of key materials can increase manufacturers’ production costs, affecting the overall economy.
• Environmental Remediation Costs: Improper disposal of e-waste contributes to environmental pollution, necessitating costly remediation efforts. Governments and local authorities often bear the financial burden of cleaning up contaminated soil, water, and air, impacting public budgets.
• Healthcare Costs: The health hazards associated with e-waste exposure increase healthcare costs. Communities affected by e-waste pollution may experience higher rates of respiratory illnesses, reproductive issues, and other health problems, leading to additional healthcare expenditures.
• Economic Disparities: Developing countries, often the recipients of illegally exported e-waste, face economic disparities due to the environmental and health burdens of improper e-waste disposal. The costs of mitigating these issues further strain limited resources.
• Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Costs: EPR programs, where manufacturers assume responsibility for the end-of-life management of their products, incur costs. While these programs contribute to responsible e-waste disposal, they may affect companies’ profit margins and consumer prices.
• Job Creation in the Recycling Industry: Developing a robust e-waste recycling industry can create job opportunities. Responsible recycling practices and technological innovation can contribute to the growth of a sustainable sector focused on e-waste management.
• Circular Economy Opportunities: Transitioning to a circular economy, where products are designed for longevity, repair, and recycling, presents economic opportunities. This shift can reduce the need for raw material extraction, create jobs in refurbishment and recycling, and contribute to a more sustainable economic model.
• Incentives for Sustainable Design: Governments and industries can provide economic incentives for sustainable design practices, encouraging manufacturers to create products with recyclability and environmental impact in mind.
• Green Innovation and Market Competitiveness: Companies embracing green innovation in their product life cycles may gain a competitive edge. Consumers increasingly favor environmentally conscious products, and businesses prioritizing sustainability can enhance their market share.

Global Perspectives on E-Waste Management

Global perspectives on electronic waste (e-waste) management vary widely, reflecting the diverse approaches countries take to address the growing challenges posed by this issue. The following points highlight different aspects of global perspectives on e-waste management:

• Varied Regulatory Frameworks: Countries worldwide have different regulatory frameworks governing e-waste management. Some nations have well-established policies that mandate proper disposal, recycling, and extended producer responsibility (EPR), while others may lack comprehensive regulations.
• Implementation of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR): EPR programs, where manufacturers bear the responsibility for the end-of-life management of their products, have gained traction in some regions. This approach encourages producers to design products with recycling in mind and invest in e-waste recycling infrastructure.
• Diverse Collection Systems: Collection systems for e-waste vary globally. Some countries have established efficient collection networks, including dedicated drop-off points and recycling centers, while others rely on informal systems or need more adequate infrastructure.
• International Collaboration Efforts: Global organizations, such as the United Nations and the Basel Convention, promote international collaboration on e-waste management. Agreements such as the Basel Convention aim to regulate the movement of hazardous waste, including electronic waste, across borders.
• Technological Disparities: Disparities in technological capabilities influence a country’s ability to manage e-waste. Advanced economies often have the technology and infrastructure for efficient recycling, while developing nations may need more methods and resources.
• Innovation in E-Waste Recycling Technologies: Some countries invest in innovative technologies to improve e-waste recycling processes. Advanced methods, including robotic sorting and environmentally friendly extraction techniques, contribute to more sustainable e-waste management practices.
• Success Stories in E-Waste Management Models: Certain countries have emerged as success stories in e-waste management. Examples include countries in Northern Europe, such as Norway and Switzerland, which have implemented effective recycling systems and promoted a circular economy approach.
• Challenges in Developing Countries: Developing countries often need help managing e-waste, including limited resources, inadequate infrastructure, and the influx of illegally exported e-waste. These challenges contribute to environmental and health hazards in these regions.
• Public Awareness and Education Initiatives: The public awareness and education level varies globally. Some countries actively engage in public awareness campaigns to promote responsible consumer behavior and the importance of recycling electronic devices, while others may lack such initiatives.
• Corporate Responsibility and Industry Initiatives: The role of electronics manufacturers in managing e-waste differs across regions. Some companies actively participate in industry initiatives and adopt sustainable practices, while others may lag in addressing their responsibility in the product lifecycle.

Challenges and Barriers

Addressing electronic waste (e-waste) poses numerous challenges and barriers that hinder effective management and mitigation efforts. The following points highlight some of the key challenges and barriers associated with e-waste:

• Lack of Awareness: Limited awareness among the general public regarding the environmental and health hazards of improper e-waste disposal remains a significant challenge. Many individuals may need to be made aware of the importance of recycling electronic devices or the potential consequences of e-waste mismanagement.
• Inadequate Recycling Infrastructure: Many regions, especially in developing countries, need more infrastructure for proper e-waste recycling. More recycling facilities, collection networks, and recycling technologies must be required to ensure effective electronic waste management .
• Limited Regulation and Enforcement: In some areas, weak or nonexistent e-waste management regulations contribute to improper disposal practices. Additionally, enforcing existing regulations allows for non-compliance by individuals and businesses.
• Informal E-Waste Recycling: Informal e-waste recycling, often carried out in developing countries, involves unsafe practices and exposes workers to hazardous materials without proper protective measures. The prevalence of this informal sector exacerbates environmental and health risks.
• Global Trade of E-Waste: There are difficulties associated with the uncontrolled or illicit export of e-waste from developed to underdeveloped nations. The transboundary movement of e-waste can lead to environmental degradation and health hazards in the receiving nations, often without proper oversight.
• Complexity of E-Waste Composition: The diverse and complex composition of electronic devices complicates recycling. Different materials and components within electronic products require specialized recycling techniques, making creating standardized and efficient recycling processes challenging.
• Costs of Recycling: The costs associated with advanced e-waste recycling technologies and proper disposal can be prohibitive for some regions. Lack of financial resources may impede the implementation of effective e-waste management practices.
• Data Security Concerns: The need for data security complicates e-waste management, particularly for electronic devices such as computers and smartphones. Ensuring the secure erasure of sensitive information before recycling adds a layer of complexity to the recycling process.
• Short Product Lifecycles: Rapid technological advancements contribute to short product lifecycles for electronic devices. The fast turnover of devices makes it challenging to keep pace with the volume of e-waste generated and implement effective recycling programs.
• Consumer Behavior: Consumer behavior, influenced by trends such as planned obsolescence and constant product upgrades, contributes to increased e-waste generation. Encouraging responsible consumer behavior and promoting sustainable product design are ongoing challenges.

Solutions and Best Practices

The implementation of effective solutions and adoption of best practices are vital to tackle the escalating issue of electronic waste (e-waste):

• Sustainable Design and Manufacturing: Encourage electronics manufacturers to adopt eco-friendly designs, emphasizing product longevity, ease of repair, and recyclability to reduce the environmental impact of electronic devices.
• Recycling Technologies: Invest in advanced recycling technologies that enable efficient and environmentally friendly e-waste processing. Innovations such as robotic sorting and environmentally safe extraction methods enhance the recovery of valuable materials.
• Consumer Education and Responsibility: It aims to increase consumer awareness about the negative impact of e-waste on the environment and human health. Promote responsible consumer behavior, including proper disposal practices, refurbishing, and donating electronic devices when possible.
• Corporate Responsibility and Industry Initiatives: Encourage electronics manufacturers to adopt corporate responsibility practices, including extended producer responsibility (EPR) programs. Support industry initiatives that prioritize sustainable production, recycling, and waste reduction.
• Governmental Policies and Legislation: Strengthen and enforce e-waste regulations at national and international levels. Implement Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) laws to ensure that manufacturers take responsibility for managing their products at the end of their life.
• International Collaboration: Encourage cooperation amongst nations to address the worldwide issue of e-waste. Share best practices, technology, and expertise to create a cohesive approach toward sustainable e-waste management.
• Circular Economy Approaches: Promote circular economy models that prioritize the reuse and recycling of materials. Encourage businesses to adopt circular product lifecycles, reducing waste and conserving resources.
• Certification Programs: Establish and support certification programs that verify environmentally responsible e-waste management practices. Certification can incentivize companies to adhere to high standards in recycling and disposal.
• Public Awareness Campaigns: In order to educate communities about the significance of appropriate e-waste management, start public awareness campaigns. Educate individuals about proper disposal methods and the benefits of recycling electronic devices.
• Government-Led Recycling Initiatives: Invest in and promote government-led e-waste recycling initiatives. Develop infrastructure for convenient e-waste collection and recycling centers, making it easier for individuals and businesses to dispose of their electronic devices responsibly.

Corporate Responsibility and Industry Initiatives

Corporate responsibility and industry initiatives are pivotal in mitigating the impact of electronic waste (e-waste) on the environment and society. Here are key points outlining the measures that companies can take:

• Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR): Manufacturers must use EPR programs to assume accountability for every stage of a product’s lifespan, from design to end-of-life disposal. This includes establishing take-back programs and responsible recycling.
• Sustainable Product Design: Prioritize sustainable product design, focusing on durability, reparability, and recyclability. Designing electronics for longevity and ease of disassembly reduces the environmental footprint of products.
• Recycling Infrastructure Investment: Invest in and support the development of advanced recycling infrastructure. Companies can work together to build or contribute to recycling facilities, making it simpler for customers to dispose of their electronic gadgets responsibly.
• Closed-Loop Supply Chains: Establish closed-loop supply chains to recycle and reuse materials from end-of-life products in new manufacturing processes. This approach minimizes the need for raw material extraction and reduces waste.
• Collaboration and Partnerships: Collaborate with industry peers, governments, and non-governmental organizations to share best practices, innovations, and resources. Industry-wide collaboration enhances the effectiveness of e-waste management efforts.
• Transparency and Reporting: Practice transparency in disclosing e-waste management practices and progress. Regularly publish reports detailing recycling rates, initiatives, and efforts to minimize the environmental impact of electronic products.
• Education and Awareness Programs: Implement educational initiatives for consumers and employees, raising awareness about the importance of responsible e-waste disposal. Encourage sustainable practices and promote the benefits of recycling electronic devices.
• Certification for Responsible Practices: Pursue and obtain certifications that verify adherence to environmentally responsible e-waste management practices. Certifications show a dedication to sustainability and lend credibility.
• Innovation in Recycling Technologies: Invest in research and development of innovative recycling technologies. Companies can contribute to advancing processes that improve the efficiency and sustainability of e-waste recycling.
• Customer Take-Back Programs: Implement customer take-back programs, allowing consumers to return end-of-life products for responsible disposal or recycling. This promotes a closed-loop system and ensures proper e-waste management.

Role of Technology in E-Waste Management

The proper management of electronic waste is dependent on the role of technology. Here are key points highlighting how technology contributes to effective e-waste management:

• Innovative Recycling Technologies: Advanced recycling technologies, such as automated sorting systems and robotic dismantling, enhance the efficiency and precision of e-waste recycling. These technologies allow for the extraction of valuable materials from electronic devices more sustainably and resource-efficiently.
• Blockchain for Traceability: Blockchain technology can be employed to establish transparent and traceable supply chains for electronic products. This ensures that the entire lifecycle of a device, from production to disposal, can be tracked, reducing the likelihood of illegal e-waste trade and improving accountability.
• Digital Solutions for Inventory Management: Digital inventory management systems enable organizations to track and manage electronic devices throughout their lifecycle. This helps maintain accurate records of the number and types of devices in circulation, facilitating better planning for recycling and disposal.
• Data Wiping and Secure Disposal: Technology is critical in ensuring secure data wiping from electronic devices before recycling. Advanced data erasure tools guarantee the protection of sensitive information, addressing concerns related to data security during the disposal process.
• Recycling Innovation for Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs): Innovations in recycling techniques for printed circuit boards, which often contain valuable metals and hazardous materials, contribute to more sustainable e-waste management. Technologies that can efficiently extract and separate components from PCBs minimize environmental impact.
• Digital Platforms for E-Waste Tracking: Digital platforms and databases can be employed to track the flow of e-waste, providing real-time information on the movement and disposal of electronic devices. This enhances transparency and accountability in the e-waste management process.
• Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Sorting: AI -driven sorting systems can streamline the categorization of different materials within electronic devices, improving the efficiency of recycling processes. AI technologies can enhance sorting accuracy and increase the recovery of valuable materials.
• Mobile Apps for Consumer Awareness: Mobile applications can raise consumer awareness about e-waste and provide information on responsible disposal methods. These apps can offer guidance on recycling locations, educate users about the environmental impact, and encourage sustainable consumer behavior.
• E-Waste Tracking and Reporting Software: Dedicated software solutions for e-waste tracking and reporting enable organizations to monitor their e-waste management practices comprehensively. These tools facilitate data collection, analysis, and reporting, supporting informed decision-making for sustainable e-waste practices.
• Digital Platforms for Resale and Reuse: Digital platforms and online marketplaces can promote the resale and reuse of electronic devices. By creating avenues for second-hand electronics, technology contributes to extending the lifespan of products and reducing overall e-waste generation.

Public Awareness and Advocacy

Public awareness and advocacy are critical in addressing e-waste challenges and promoting responsible consumer behavior. Here are key points highlighting the significance of public awareness and advocacy in e-waste management:

• Educating Consumers: Public awareness campaigns educate the public about the dangers of electronic trash to their health and the environment, stressing the need for recycling and proper disposal. Education helps individuals make informed decisions regarding the lifecycle of an electronic device.
• Promoting Responsible Consumer Behavior: Advocacy efforts encourage consumers to adopt sustainable and responsible behaviors, such as repairing, refurbishing, or recycling electronic devices instead of discarding them. Promoting a circular economy mindset fosters conscious consumption.
• Raising Awareness about Recycling Options: Public awareness initiatives highlight the availability of e-waste collection points, recycling centers, and take-back programs. Knowing where and how to dispose of electronic devices responsibly empowers individuals to make environmentally conscious choices.
• Informing about Data Security Measures: Awareness campaigns address concerns about data security during e-waste disposal. Advocacy efforts inform individuals about the importance of securely wiping personal data from devices before recycling, reducing the risk of privacy breaches.
• Community Engagement Programs: Localized community engagement programs facilitate direct interactions with individuals and communities. Workshops, seminars, and events create spaces for discussing e-waste issues, sharing knowledge, and providing practical solutions.
• Media Campaigns and Outreach: Utilizing various media channels, including social media, television, and print, increases the reach of awareness campaigns. Engaging and impactful messages can resonate with a broader audience, raising awareness about the consequences of improper e-waste disposal.
• Advocacy for Policy Change: Public support and advocacy can influence policymakers to enact and enforce stronger e-waste management policies. Grassroots movements and public pressure contribute to developing regulations promoting responsible e-waste practices.
• Supporting E-Waste Initiatives: Public awareness encourages support for e-waste initiatives, including community-led recycling programs, electronic waste drives, and initiatives by non-profit organizations. Community involvement strengthens the impact of such initiatives.
• Youth and Student Involvement: Engaging youth and students in e-waste awareness and advocacy initiatives fosters a sense of responsibility for the environment. Student-led campaigns, educational programs, and awareness events contribute to building a generation committed to sustainable practices.
• International Collaboration and Solidarity: Public advocacy extends beyond national borders, fostering international collaboration on e-waste issues. Awareness efforts can inspire global solidarity, encouraging shared responsibility for addressing the challenges posed by electronic waste.
• Promoting Ethical Consumption: Public awareness and advocacy emphasize the importance of ethical consumption, encouraging individuals to support companies that prioritize sustainable and environmentally responsible practices in their product lifecycle.

Addressing the electronic waste (e-waste) crisis demands collective efforts encompassing technological innovations, robust government policies, corporate responsibility, and heightened public awareness. Sustainable e-waste management requires a shift toward circular economies, where products are designed for longevity and recyclability. By integrating advanced recycling technologies, enforcing stringent regulations, and fostering a global commitment to responsible practices, we can mitigate the environmental, health, and economic impacts of e-waste. Governments, industries, and individuals must collaborate to create a sustainable future where electronic devices are responsibly produced, used, and recycled.

*Please provide your correct email id. Login details for this Free course will be emailed to you

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy .

Valuation, Hadoop, Excel, Web Development & many more.

Forgot Password?

This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy. By closing this banner, scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to our Privacy Policy

Explore 1000+ varieties of Mock tests View more

Submit Next Question

🇮🇳 🚀 Limited Time Offer! - 🎁 ENROLL NOW

How to prevent e-waste?

Circular economy

Self-paced courses

With certification

Welcome to: How to prevent e-waste?

A citizen’s approach to solving the e-waste crisis e-learning course.

Support climate change literacy

We want to continue our crucial journey to equip people with the skills and knowledge needed to make informed decisions, to act and to fight climate crisis.

Why take this course?

Can you imagine a world without e-waste? What will it look like? How do we achieve it?   This course aims to inspire, as much as educate. It dares learners to co-create a better tomorrow through individual and joint action.

More specifically, by the end of the course learners will be able to :

• Discuss what electronic waste is and the diverse impacts it has
• Describe the role individuals, companies, and authorities play in reducing e-waste
• Identify ways for consumers to support circularity, including by influencing industry players and lawmakers
• Highlight individual and community actions to tackle and prevent e-waste.

The course at a glance

1. the state of play.

An overview of the magnitude of the e-waste problem and its impact.

2. Recycling

This Module discusses challenges, opportunities, and best practices for e-waste recycling.

3. Reuse & Repair

Module 3 focuses on approaches to preparing and reusing electronic products so that their lifespan is prolonged

Ideas around achieving a zero e-waste society through social, technological, business, and political innovation.

This section hosts the final assessment test and additional resources.

Your Instructor

Dr. Keshav Parajuly

Associate Programme Officer – Sustainable Cycles (SCYCLE) Programme , UNITAR

Get your Certificate

After completing the course you will get a certificate. All you need to do is complete all videos, readings and activities, as well as choose your sustainable e-waste prevention pledge before the certificate becomes automatically available to download.

You can keep track of your progress and download your certificate under the "Certification" tab on the main course page. 

This course is a collaboration between UN CC:Learn and the Sustainable Cycles ( SCYCLE ) Programme at UNITAR. It has been made available with the generous support of the Swedish Government.

If you liked this course and other trainings on the platform, why not making a donation ? Every little bit helps to improve the platform, add more courses, and reach new learners! Thank you!

Share this course.

The website is not compatible for the version of the browser you are using. Not all the functionality may be available. Please upgrade your browser to the latest version.

• Social Media
• Access Points
• Print/Export Standards
• Standards Books
• Coding Scheme
• Standards Viewer App
• Course Descriptions
• Graduation Requirements
• Course Reports
• Gifted Coursework
• Career and Technical Education (CTE) Programs
• Browse/Search
• Original Student Tutorials
• MEAs - STEM Lessons
• Perspectives STEM Videos
• STEM Reading Resources
• Math Formative Assessments
• CTE Related Resources
• Our Review Process
• Professional Development Programs
• iCPALMS Tools
• Resource Development Programs
• Partnership Programs
• User Testimonials
• iCPALMS Account

• Not a member yet? SIGN UP
• Home of CPALMS
• Standards Info. & Resources
• Course Descriptions & Directory
• Resources Vetted by Peers & Experts
• PD Programs Self-paced Training
• About CPALMS Initiatives & Partnerships
• iCPALMS Florida's Platform

Planning Argument Writing: E-Waste (Part 1 of 4)

Learn how to create an outline to help you prepare to write an essay. You will read an informational text about technotrash, also called electronic waste or e-waste. Then, you will work on creating an outline that could help you write an argumentative essay about this topic. The outline will include a claim/thesis statement, main ideas, reasons, evidence, counterclaims, and rebuttals.  

This interactive tutorial is part 1 in a 4-part series about writing an argumentative essay. Click below to open the other tutorials in the series.

Part 1 - Planning Argument Writing: E-Waste

Part 2 - Introductions in Argument Writing: E-Waste  

Part 3 - Body Paragraphs in Argument Writing: E-Waste

Part 4 - Conclusions in Argument Writing: E-Waste

Attachments

General information, source and access information, aligned standards, related resources, congratulations, you have successfully created an account..

A verifications link was sent to your email at . Please check your email and click on the link to confirm your email address and fully activate your iCPALMS account. Please check your spam folder.

Did you enter an incorrect email address?

Did not receive an email, you have not completed your profile information. please take a few moments to complete the section below so we can customize your cpalms experience., there was an error creating your account. please contact support [email protected] for assistance., modal header, feedback form.

Please fill the following form and click "Submit" to send the feedback.

Your Email Address: *

Your comment : *, teacher rating, leave cpalms.

You are leaving the CPALMS website and will no longer be covered by our Terms and Conditions.

Stay in touch with CPALMS

Loading....

This website is trying to open a CPALMS page using an iFrame, which is against our terms of use . Click the link below to view the resource on CPALMS.org.

Shrink That Footprint

10 Ways To Reduce E Waste

By: Staff Writer

Introduction – Millions Of Tons Of E-Waste

Wastes are unwanted or unusable materials. Waste is any material the owner disposes of or intends to dispose of by abandonment, transfer, recycling, treatment, or disposal. E-waste means electrical and electronic equipment that is unwanted or no longer usable. Millions of tons of e-waste are generated globally each year. Most of it is sent to landfills where it can release harmful substances into the environment or is incinerated, resulting in air pollution.

E-waste contains various hazardous materials, including lead, mercury, and cadmium. These substances can pose risks to human health and the environment if not managed properly. Improper disposal of e-waste can also lead to pollution of soil and water.

Recycling e-waste can recover valuable materials, such as metals, and help reduce environmental pollution.

When e-waste is not recycled properly, it can seriously harm human health and the environment. While reusing plastic, glass, and metal from e-waste can reduce the need for mining and manufacturing new materials, it’s important to ensure that these materials are properly recycled to avoid pollution.

Ways ways to reduce e-waste

It’s important to know how to reduce your e-waste footprint because e-waste is one of the fastest-growing types of waste globally. There are many ways to reduce your e-waste; some are easier than you might think! Here are a few ways to get started:

1. Donate or Sell

Donating or selling working electronics helps to reduce e-waste. Electronics contain harmful chemicals that can pollute the environment if not disposed of properly. When you donate or sell working electronics, you ensure that you will properly recycle them and that the harmful chemicals will not end up in the environment. In addition, donating or selling working electronics helps to support charities and organizations that reuse and recycle electronics. These organizations often sell donated electronics to fund their important work. We suggest taking a look at this guide by the EPA on e-waste recycling and donating .

2. Consume Less

Consumers in developed countries purchase billions of dollars worth of new electronics every year and then discard their old devices in landfills. However, many of these devices contain toxic chemicals that can leach into the ground and contaminate groundwater supplies. In addition, manufacturing new electronics requires large amounts of energy and water. As a result, it’s important to think carefully before purchasing new electronics and to recycle or donate your old devices when possible. By reducing your consumption, you can help to reduce your environmental impact.

3. Return Them To The Store To Reduce E-Waste

Return them to the store to reduce e-waste- it’s a simple idea, but it can make a big difference. Every year, millions of tons of electrical and electronic equipment are discarded, ending up in a landfill. Much of this equipment still works perfectly well, but newer models have simply replaced it. Return them to the store to reduce e-waste, and you can help to keep these devices out of the landfill. And as a bonus, many stores will offer a discount on your next purchase if you return an old device. So don’t throw away your old electronics – return them to the store and help to reduce e-waste. For example Best Buy has a program for taking back e-waste, as does Apple for even very small items like chargers and cables.

4. Check E-Cycling Centers in Your State And City

Check your state’s e-cycling centers to help reduce electronic waste. There are both municipal centers as well as commercial for-profit centers who will take e-waste. Many people don’t realize that their state may have laws and regulations to help manage e-waste. Check your local e-cycling center’s website or call them to find out what electronics they accept and how to properly recycle them. You can also ask about what type of data destruction services they offer to ensure your personal information is secure. Not only will you be helping to reduce e-waste, but you’ll also be keeping harmful materials out of landfills where they can leak toxins into the ground and water. Helping to reduce e-waste is important for the environment and the future generations that will inherit it. 

5. Organize Your Possessions

Organizing your possessions may seem like a daunting task, but it can help to reduce e-waste. When you take the time to sort through your belongings and get rid of clutter, you’ll be surprised at how much easier it is to find things when needed. Plus, you’ll be able to recycle or donate items you no longer use, which helps keep them out of landfills. Moreover, by decluttering your space, you’ll be able to see what items you need and use, which can help you avoid purchasing unnecessary items in the future.

6. You Can Now Store Data In The Cloud

Thinking about getting a new portable hard drive to replace an old one, both of which inevitably will go into the garbage in a few years? You can now store data in the Cloud to reduce e-waste. In the past, organizations would have to store data on physical servers that took up space and required regular maintenance. But with the Cloud, data can be stored remotely, freeing up space and reducing the need for expensive hardware. Furthermore, because data is stored remotely, it’s more unlikely to be completely lost if something bad happens. The Cloud also makes it easy to share data and collaborate with others, which can help reduce paper waste. So by storing data in the Cloud, we can save space and money and help protect our environment. Finally, inherently using cloud storage means taking advantage of economies of scale. When you stop using that storage space, it’s available for another cloud customer to use immediately, thereby relieving everyone the burden of disposal.

7. Preserve What You Have

One way to reduce your electronic waste is to preserve what you have. This means keeping your electronic devices in good working condition and using them for as long as possible. One way to do this is regularly cleaning your devices and keeping them free of dust and debris. Another way to preserve your devices is to handle them carefully and avoid dropping or damaging them. Additionally, you can extend the life of your devices by properly caring for their batteries. For example, you should avoid overcharging laptops and phones and store batteries in a cool, dry place.

8. Use Your Old Mobile Phone

It’s important to remember that each time we get a new mobile phone, the old one becomes a waste. What can you do with your old mobile phone? You could give it to somebody who needs it or sell it. But what if it’s not worth anything? The answer is to recycle it. Mobile phones contain all sorts of harmful chemicals, like lead and cadmium. They shouldn’t just be thrown away with the normal trash. It would make a big difference if everyone recycled their old mobile phones.

9. Purchase Energy Star Rated Appliances

As any savvy shopper knows, there are many different ways to save money on appliances. However, few people realize that one of the best ways to save money and reduce waste is to buy Energy Star-rated appliances. Energy Star appliances are designed to be more efficient than standard models, which means they use less energy and generate less e-waste. In addition, Energy Star appliances often come with other benefits, like better warranty coverage and lower operating costs. So next time you’re in the market for a new appliance, look for the Energy Star label. It’s a simple way to save money and help reduce e-waste.

10. Teach Your Children

Teaching is one of the best ways to amplify your knowledge and spread the benefits of that knowledge. E-waste is any unwanted or broken electronic item, and it can devastate the environment. Not only does e-waste take up valuable space in landfills, but it also contains harmful toxins that can leach into the ground and contaminate soil and water. As a result, it’s super useful to teach our children how to responsibly dispose of e-waste. One way to do this is to encourage them to recycle their old electronic devices. Teaching our children about recycling e-waste can help reduce the amount of e-waste that ends up in landfills each year.

Wrapping Up

E-waste is a growing problem, but there are things we can do to reduce our impact. By following the tips in this article, we can all help to make a difference. Thanks for reading!

You can also read:

The Best Sterilizers For Food Jars: Top 7

7 Food Waste Facts That Will Change The Way You Eat

Supermarket Food Waste: Impact & Solutions

Going Zero Waste: A Guide to Getting Started – 2022

Staff Writer

• Staff Writer #molongui-disabled-link Estimating Pool Pump Electricity Costs
• Staff Writer #molongui-disabled-link Empowering Your Journey: Navigating the World of Range-Extended Electric Vehicles
• Staff Writer #molongui-disabled-link Choosing And Installing An Alexa Compatible Light Switch
• Staff Writer #molongui-disabled-link Average Microwave Wattage: How Many Watts Does A Microwave Use

Essay on Waste Management for Students and Teacher

500+ essay on waste management.

Essay on Waste Management -Waste management is essential in today’s society. Due to an increase in population, the generation of waste is getting doubled day by day. Moreover, the increase in waste is affecting the lives of many people.

For instance, people living in slums are very close to the waste disposal area. Therefore there are prone to various diseases. Hence, putting their lives in danger. In order to maintain a healthy life, proper hygiene and sanitation are necessary. Consequently, it is only possible with proper waste management .

The Meaning of Waste Management

Waste management is the managing of waste by disposal and recycling of it. Moreover, waste management needs proper techniques keeping in mind the environmental situations. For instance, there are various methods and techniques by which the waste is disposed of. Some of them are Landfills, Recycling , Composting, etc. Furthermore, these methods are much useful in disposing of the waste without causing any harm to the environment.

Get the huge list of more than 500 Essay Topics and Ideas

Methods for Waste Management

Recycling – Above all the most important method is the recycling of waste. This method does not need any resources. Therefore this is much useful in the management of waste . Recycling is the reusing of things that are scrapped of. Moreover, recycling is further converting waste into useful resources.

Landfills – Landfills is the most common method for waste management. The garbage gets buried in large pits in the ground and then covered by the layer of mud. As a result, the garbage gets decomposed inside the pits over the years. In conclusion, in this method elimination of the odor and area taken by the waste takes place.

Composting – Composting is the converting of organic waste into fertilizers. This method increases the fertility of the soil. As a result, it is helpful in more growth in plants. Furthermore it the useful conversion of waste management that is benefiting the environment.

Advantages of Waste Management

There are various advantages of waste management. Some of them are below:

Decrease bad odor – Waste produces a lot of bad odor which is harmful to the environment. Moreover, Bad odor is responsible for various diseases in children. As a result, it hampers their growth. So waste management eliminates all these problems in an efficient way.

Reduces pollution – Waste is the major cause of environmental degradation. For instance, the waste from industries and households pollute our rivers. Therefore waste management is essential. So that the environment may not get polluted. Furthermore, it increases the hygiene of the city so that people may get a better environment to live in.

Reduces the production of waste -Recycling of the products helps in reducing waste. Furthermore, it generates new products which are again useful. Moreover, recycling reduces the use of new products. So the companies will decrease their production rate.

It generates employment – The waste management system needs workers. These workers can do various jobs from collecting to the disposing of waste. Therefore it creates opportunities for the people that do not have any job. Furthermore, this will help them in contributing to society.

Produces Energy – Many waste products can be further used to produce energy. For instance, some products can generate heat by burning. Furthermore, some organic products are useful in fertilizers. Therefore it can increase the fertility of the soil.

Customize your course in 30 seconds

Which class are you in.

• Travelling Essay
• Picnic Essay
• Our Country Essay
• My Parents Essay
• Essay on Favourite Personality
• Essay on Memorable Day of My Life
• Essay on Knowledge is Power
• Essay on Gurpurab
• Essay on My Favourite Season
• Essay on Types of Sports

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Download the App

More From Forbes

How companies are addressing the e-waste problem.

• Share to Facebook
• Share to Twitter
• Share to Linkedin

How often do you purchase a new electronic device, such as a smartphone or a TV? Smartphone sales alone have reached an estimated 1.535 billion units worldwide, annually . This means that 1.535 billion phones need to be disposed of — and not all of them will be disposed of properly.

Despite receiving limited public attention, the world is in the midst of a massive crisis of “e-waste.” The main problem is that people haphazardly throw their old electronics away, causing significant environmental damage . Interestingly, the e-waste problem has opened the door to new market opportunities – and companies are stepping in to address the problem.

Despite receiving limited public attention, the world is in the midst of a massive crisis of ... [+] “e-waste.”

The e-Waste Problem

By some estimates, we collectively generate about 50 million tons of e-waste every year . This waste comes in many forms, with 31 percent generated by small electronics such as microwaves, shavers, and cameras. Approximately 28 percent is generated by large electronics such as washing machines and refrigerators. Smart devices, smartphones, computers, televisions, lamps, and other devices make up the rest.

The exact composition of any electronic device depends on its nature and level of sophistication. However, most modern high-tech devices require a variety of different elements to function properly. Many of these elements are toxic.

When e-waste is buried in landfills, these toxic chemicals can leach into the soil and contaminate local water supplies . This jeopardizes the health of any nearby communities and can lead to environmental catastrophes. In rarer, more severe cases, e-waste is burned. Burning releases these toxic chemicals into the air which then gets breathed in by the local population.

Best High-Yield Savings Accounts Of 2024

Best 5% interest savings accounts of 2024.

The magnitude of our e-waste problem is exacerbated by the fact that technology consumption levels are enormous and constantly growing. We’re purchasing electronic devices at a fast rate , especially in developing countries, and our waste disposal approach hasn’t yet evolved to handle that increased load.

Thankfully, there’s an emerging solution.

Market Opportunities: A Win-Win Solution?

Entrepreneurial innovators have identified this situation not just as a problem, but as an opportunity. There’s a way to mitigate the e-waste problem, incentivize electronics owners to make better decisions, and make money at the same time.

This is the model that companies such as Gizmogo are using. Instead of throwing your old phone, tablet, game console, or another device away, you can sell them . It doesn’t matter what condition your device is in; it could be new, completely broken, or any state in between. You’ll get an offer for the device based on its internal components and current condition. If you accept the offer, you can trade in the device for cash.

This is important as much of our e-waste problem is tied directly to consumer apathy.

Throwing a phone in the trash and taking it to a proper recycling facility take roughly the same amount of effort and provide roughly the same reward. In many cases, people decide that it’s easier to throw the phone away.

Now, with cash on the line, it literally pays to recycle your phone properly. If even a fraction of consumers adopted this practice, their participation could dramatically reduce the tonnage of e-waste generated every year.

Tech Companies and Sustainability

Major tech companies are also stepping in to address our growing e-waste problem.

For example, Apple now has trade-in and recycling programs operating in dozens of countries . Instead of throwing your old device away, you can trade it in for credit toward your next purchase or an Apple gift card — and Apple will take care of recycling it for free.

Microsoft, too, has begun to partner with recycling organizations and collection programs around the world to facilitate end-of-life management for electronic devices, batteries, and even packaging materials.

3 Innovative, Entrepreneurial Steps You Can Take

If you’re an entrepreneur, there are three steps you can take to mitigate the e-waste problem — and you don’t have to start an electronics recycling business to make a positive impact. Nor do you have to reinvent the exhaustive efforts that brands such as Apple and Microsoft have supported to raise awareness and facilitate the accessibility of recycling programs.

Instead, anyone with an innovative spirit can commit to three basic priorities:

There’s a good chance you buy more devices than you need. You might also be likely to upgrade more often than necessary. Start by addressing the problem at its root. Limit how often you make new technology purchases and consider buying used devices whenever you are able.

Don’t get rid of your current device simply because it’s no longer working perfectly. Instead, try to repair the device, replacing broken screen glass and other parts as necessary to keep it functional longer.

When your devices are truly at the end of their lifespan, recycle them — don’t simply throw them away . If you’re in a position of leadership, model this behavior for colleagues and employees. Consider adding an electronics recycling container to your office space.

• Editorial Standards
• Reprints & Permissions

Join The Conversation

One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts. 

Forbes Community Guidelines

Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space.

In order to do so, please follow the posting rules in our site's  Terms of Service.   We've summarized some of those key rules below. Simply put, keep it civil.

Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:

• False or intentionally out-of-context or misleading information
• Insults, profanity, incoherent, obscene or inflammatory language or threats of any kind
• Attacks on the identity of other commenters or the article's author
• Content that otherwise violates our site's  terms.

User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:

• Continuous attempts to re-post comments that have been previously moderated/rejected
• Racist, sexist, homophobic or other discriminatory comments
• Attempts or tactics that put the site security at risk
• Actions that otherwise violate our site's  terms.

So, how can you be a power user?

• Stay on topic and share your insights
• Feel free to be clear and thoughtful to get your point across
• ‘Like’ or ‘Dislike’ to show your point of view.
• Protect your community.
• Use the report tool to alert us when someone breaks the rules.

Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Please read the full list of posting rules found in our site's  Terms of Service.

• 888-392-7831
• Request a Quote

Simple Ideas on How to Reduce E-waste

Technology has improved so rapidly in the past few decades that today it’s hard to imagine what the world would be like without smartphones,  GPS maps, laptops and other electronic devices.

At the same time, the skyrocketing amount of used electronics being discarded has left environmental activists, state and local governments, and even the United Nations asking serious questions about how to reduce e-waste. There are now more mobile phones around the world than the number of people, and there are 7.5 billion people in the world. Reusing the precious metals and plastics in old cell phones instead of mining for brand new materials can save the energy equivalent to power up to 24,000 U.S. homes for a year, according to estimates by the Environmental Protection Agency

The obvious solution to this has been recycling, which takes the parts within electronics, even the broken ones, that still have value and makes them available for new products. But the recycling rates for e-waste remain stubbornly low, which is why proponents of recycling are doing what they can to educate people about the long-term environmental and economic benefits of the approach.

There are actually very simple ways that all of us can help reduce e-waste, which is especially important at a time when our ever-growing reliance on electronics has led to e-waste becoming the largest growing waste stream worldwide.

All it takes is a commitment from you to avoid either throwing away your used electronics or hoarding them in your closet or desk drawer.

And the strategies for reducing e-waste should also include an awareness of your personal security: namely, making sure you delete all personal information from your electronic device so it doesn’t fall into the wrong hands.

What Are Ideas for How to Reduce E-Waste?

The challenge of reducing e-waste is something everyone needs to become aware of and make a commitment to doing, and it starts with understanding why we don’t want our used electronics continuously flowing into community landfills.

Electronic waste is defined as discarded electrical or electronic devices that can lead to human and environmental damage if they get put in landfills. These devices contain toxic chemicals like mercury and lead, and while they’re safe to use once they get placed in a landfill those toxins can seep out into the soil and water, contaminating both. If those toxins get into your drinking water then that presents a health hazard for you and your family.

And this is no minor challenge. As technology evolves and keeps improving our electronics, giving us incentives to get rid of our current models for the newest one, there’s been a tendency to just throw away these products. This has created a serious global e-waste problem.

Reducing e-waste isn’t just about eliminating those environmental risks. Minimizing e-waste also helps us to conserve resources and reduces the amount of energy we need to make these products; recycling parts within e-waste uses considerably less energy than creating new ones.

We can also help keep down the cost of new consumer goods by using recycled parts to make new products. This is a far less expensive proposition for manufacturers than having to go mining for virgin ore to make new metals. This means that the cost of making a new smartphone, or any other electronic device, goes down once manufacturers are able to access the parts they need from the recycling industry.

So this is a win-win proposition all around. The challenge, of course, is that not enough people know that e-waste can be recycled.

That’s why one of the strongest and most effective ways on learning how to reduce e-waste is to help spread the word about recycling.

If you’re someone that already recycles your e-waste then it’s great that you’re already doing your part to reduce waste. Now it’s time to go the next step and share your knowledge with other people — family, friends, neighbors, coworkers — who may not be aware of the hazards that e-waste poses.

If you have a family member or friend that just got a new smartphone or laptop, or simply plans on disposing of their old ones, talk to them about recycling it with an experienced recycling firm like Great Lakes Electronics Corporation , which can make the parts within them available to new users and manufacturers.

It’s also important to share your knowledge on the detrimental impact of throwing those devices away, or even hoarding them, this gives people a reason to act on your advice. If your friends and family members appreciate recycling and faithfully toss their plastics, cans and papers in municipal bins, let them know how easy it is to recycle e-waste. They can easily call a recycling firm, like Great Lakes Electronics Corporation, and do the same with their e-waste.

What Other Ways Are There for Reducing E-Waste

Since it’s very likely that our appetite for new electronics will only increase in the coming years, we all need to be ready for the possible explosion of new devices — and the similar rush to discard older models.

And there are strategies we can also follow to help reduce the amount of e-waste. They include:

• Check Product Lifespan. Do some research when you’re ready to buy a new product. Make sure it’s one that won’t break easily or become damaged shortly after you purchase it. In other words, look for products likely to have a much longer lifespan so you won’t need to replace it within a few years, or even months. It’s known that this is a common practice in the electronics industry; to make products with shorter life spans so more money can be earned in the long run when they break or malfunction.
• Educate yourself on what gets put into your electronics.  Knowledge is power. Doing some research about the raw materials being used to manufacture your mobile phone or laptop helps you understand how harmful those materials and toxins can be if they’re tossed into a landfill. The more you educate yourself the more you can purchase items that won’t be harmful to the environment.
• Look for an environmentally friendly label. For example, see if the products you buy are labeled Energy Star, or have been certified by the Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool.
• Consider limiting the number of electronics you own. If you don’t really need an extra gadget, look for devices that have multiple functions
• Teach kids about e-waste. Children are our future, and it helps if we can instill within them at a young age a commit to e-waste recycling.
• Recycle, recycle, recycle. No matter what you have, it’s important to always dispose of your e-waste properly. That means recycling all of your used electronics, with the understanding that improperly disposing of e-waste is becoming more and more hazardous, particularly since the volume of e-waste has skyrocketed.
• Understand security issues. All of your personal information remains stored on your electronic devices even if you delete it, so that’s another reason not to throw it away. A recycling firm like Great Lakes Electronics Corporation can scrub your device clean before it gets recycled, so there is no opportunity for cyber thieves to get that information.
• Maintain what you have. Small moves help keep what you have working longer. Clean your computer often and don’t overcharge your battery so you can improve your battery’s overall lifespan.

Taking these moves and making those simple changes, and encouraging others to do the same, will help greatly reduce e-waste.

Great Lakes Electronics Corporation offers hardware Asset Management solutions that help companies do just that, offsetting the cost of office electronics no longer in use.

They can also help businesses identify the value of these items and reclaim some of their initial investment.

And the same is true for individuals who have used or old electronics they no longer want or use.

Great Lakes Electronics Corporation provides full, single-source and complete solutions for large organizations, small to midsize companies, government agencies, schools, and nonprofits. They can help you recycle in the Green Way.

Call us today at 888-392-7831 to request a quote.

• Recycle Electronics with GLEC |
• Consumer Services |
• Environmental Commitment |
• Get A Quote |
• Contact Us |
• Join Our Team |

Minimizing E-Waste Through Improved Virtualization

• Conference paper
• First Online: 21 October 2022
• pp 1038–1048
• Cite this conference paper

• Maimuna Akter Liza 14 ,
• Alfe Suny 14 ,
• Ryan Mohammad Bin Shahjahan 14 ,
• Ahmed Wasif Reza 14 &
• Mohammad Shamsul Arefin 15 , 16  

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 569))

Included in the following conference series:

• International Conference on Intelligent Computing & Optimization

871 Accesses

13 Citations

Consumption of electronics has increased in recent decades and become increasingly important. Consumer demand and ongoing technical advancement cause a serious problem as a consequence of this need and consumption. One of the issues now plaguing the world that is growing the quickest is E-waste. This article looks at how virtualization may abate the amount of e-waste produced and save resources. A comparison of E-waste management strategies and the optimal choice taking into account green computing has been shown. The model, which uses annual product sales data as well as historical and projected sales data as inputs, is a material flow analysis model. Future sales data are predicted using polynomial regression analysis for goods with increasing yearly sales and the sales rate for products with declining annual sales. Software that enables a single computer to perform several identical executions, each of which runs an operating system, is known as a hypervisor, or virtual machine monitor. By using those resources and the information from the models, the overall discussion on virtualization’s potential to reduce e-waste may be evaluated. As fewer portable computers and desktop computers are used, less electrical equipment is needed, which reduces the amount of power required. The hypervisor may also be set up to show how much less electronic waste results from virtualization. Therefore, even if virtualization won’t completely eradicate e-waste, it will significantly reduce it while having no negative effects on the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Extending Energetic Potentials of Data Centers by Resource Optimization to Improve Carbon Footprint

Existing Green Computing Techniques: An Insight

Green Computing: A Sustainable and Eco-friendly Approach for Conservation of Energy (A Contribution to Save Environment)

Mathew, B., Christos, E.R.B.: Minimizing electronic waste using infrastructure as a service. Int. J. Comput. Appl. (2011)

Google Scholar  

Roy, M.: Beyond greening: strategies for a sustainable economy. Sustain. Dev. Strategies 133–166 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818920-7.00007-4

Chang, S., Assumaning, G., Abdelwahab, Y.: Estimation of Future generated amount of E-waste in the United States. J. Environ. Prot. 06 , 902–928 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2015.68081

Article   Google Scholar  

Ansari, N., Ashraf, M., Malik, B., Grunfeld, H.: Green IT awareness and practices: results from a field study on mobile phone related e-waste in Bangladesh. In: 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/istas.2010.5514618

Anwar, S., Ghaffar, M., Razzaq, F., Bibi, B.: E-waste reduction via virtualization in green computing. Am. Acad. Sci. Res. J. Eng. Technol. Sci. 41 , 1–11 (2018)

Akther, T., Ahmed, I.: Review on E-waste management strategies for implementing green computing. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 177 , 45–52 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2020919975

Perkins, D.N., Drisse, M.B., Nxele, T., Sly, P.D.: E-waste: a global hazard. Ann. Glob. Health 80 , 286 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2014.10.001

Soaring e-waste affects the health of millions of children, WHO warns. In: Who.int (2022). https://www.who.int/news/item/15-06-2021-soaring-e-waste-affects-the-health-of-millions-of-children-who-warns . Accessed 21 Aug 2022

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, East West University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Maimuna Akter Liza, Alfe Suny, Ryan Mohammad Bin Shahjahan & Ahmed Wasif Reza

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Daffodil International University, Dhaka, 1341, Bangladesh

Mohammad Shamsul Arefin

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology, Chattogram, 4349, Bangladesh

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ahmed Wasif Reza or Mohammad Shamsul Arefin .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Modeling Evolutionary Algorithms Simulation and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Pandian Vasant

Faculty of Engineering Management, Poznan University of Technology, Poznań, Wielkopolskie, Poland

Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber

Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Mexico City, Mexico

José Antonio Marmolejo-Saucedo

Department of Business Statistics and Operations Research, School of Economic Sciences, North West University, Mahikeng, South Africa

Elias Munapo

Department of Computer Science, UOW Malaysia KDU Penang University Colle, George Town, Malaysia

J. Joshua Thomas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Cite this paper.

Liza, M.A., Suny, A., Shahjahan, R.M.B., Reza, A.W., Arefin, M.S. (2023). Minimizing E-Waste Through Improved Virtualization. In: Vasant, P., Weber, GW., Marmolejo-Saucedo, J.A., Munapo, E., Thomas, J.J. (eds) Intelligent Computing & Optimization. ICO 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 569. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19958-5_97

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19958-5_97

Published : 21 October 2022

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-031-19957-8

Online ISBN : 978-3-031-19958-5

eBook Packages : Intelligent Technologies and Robotics Intelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)

Share this paper

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

E-Waste Management for the Local Environment Essay

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Introduction

Promoting positive environmental behavior.

E-wastes have presented a serious challenge to concerns on environmental sustainability within the local community. Unlike the organic wastes, e-wastes do not decompose and can remain in the same state for several decades after the end of their usefulness. Thus, this reflective treatise attempts to present an e-waste management module for the local environment explicitly. The e-waste management focuses on the use of computers and other electronic home equipment.

The local council should purchase a container or a bin where used electronic equipment should be stored. Specifically, the council should roll out a comprehensive campaign on the need to dump the e-wastes in these bins. The campaign can be in the form of posters, the creation of a website, and partnership with the local environmental authority (Zhang, 2011).

Establishment of an environmental organization

The council should establish an environment organization or partner with an existing environmental lobby group within the region to offer a lesson on e-waste management. During such lessons, all the stakeholders will embrace the e-waste management and properly dispose of their used computers in the designated areas of e-waste collection (Luther, 2010).

Positive and negative consequences

The positive consequence, such as improved e-waste management awareness, will increase pro-environment behavior by igniting a sense of self-responsibility among the locals on the need to preserve the environment. For instance, the locals will be inspired to observe proper disposal of e-waste as part of self-responsibility. The negative consequence of poor e-waste management, such as poor e-waste disposal, might cue the thoughts of the locals on the need to improve on their environmental awareness, thus joining the local environmental organization proposed. For example, the locals may actually own the idea of environmental conservation upon empowerment by the environmental network (Luther, 2010).

Technological advances in the environment

Technological advancement in the form of computerization of the e-waste management system has made the process sustainable and centralized. For instance, the locals, in conjunction with the council, are in a position to track the recycling and disposal of any e-waste within the entire region. This has significantly reduced instances of e-waste gas poisoning (Prashant, 2008).

The negative impact of technological advancement has been an increase in the use of computers and other electronic products, which are disposed of after a short time. Despite the presence of the e-waste bins, the number of used computers being dumped has increased, thus an increase in exposure to dangerous e-waste gases (Prashant, 2008).

Influence of environmental policies

When designing environmental policies, it is imperative to review the basics of environmental waste management, such as the cost and sustainability elements. Reflectively, environmental policies have made it possible for different waste management initiatives to focus on the best practices and cost-effective ways of managing these wastes at the micro-level. Since the policies focus on encouraging sustainable living, waste management has been transformed into laws that must be obeyed by all citizens. Since the policies propose fines and rewards for waste management efforts, different agencies have been empowered to micromanage sustainability with the support of the major environmental stakeholders (Luther, 2010).

Conclusively, e-waste management involves recycling and awareness campaigns. Waste management strategies should be visible and easy to interpret. There is a need to concentrate on behavioral orientation among the stakeholders to ensure that the positive and negative impact of technological advancements functions within sustainable environmental management policy frameworks. The balance is achievable through the involvement of the locals to ignite a sense of self-responsibility and ownership of each initiative. The environmental laws should then be incorporated to restore disciple among the stakeholders.

Luther, L. (2010). Managing electronic waste: Issues with exporting e-waste. New York, NY: DIANE Publishing.

Prashant, N. (2008). Green technology . Norwalk, Connecticut: Wiley and Sons.

Zhang, K. (2011). Recycling of electronic waste ii: Proceedings of the second symposium. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons.

• Center for Climate and Energy Solutions: Mission
• Curb Plastic Waste: Intervention Stages
• E-Waste Problem and Cell Phones
• Electronic Waste and Recycling Fees
• Management of E-Waste
• Water Pollution and Management in the UAE
• Setting Up a Safari Zoo in the UAE
• Environmental Management and Human Impact
• Pollution Externalities Role in Management Economics
• America’s Major Environmental Challenges
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2020, June 12). E-Waste Management for the Local Environment. https://ivypanda.com/essays/e-waste-management-for-the-local-environment/

"E-Waste Management for the Local Environment." IvyPanda , 12 June 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/e-waste-management-for-the-local-environment/.

IvyPanda . (2020) 'E-Waste Management for the Local Environment'. 12 June.

IvyPanda . 2020. "E-Waste Management for the Local Environment." June 12, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/e-waste-management-for-the-local-environment/.

1. IvyPanda . "E-Waste Management for the Local Environment." June 12, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/e-waste-management-for-the-local-environment/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "E-Waste Management for the Local Environment." June 12, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/e-waste-management-for-the-local-environment/.

• Today's news
• Reviews and deals
• Climate change
• 2024 election
• Fall allergies
• Health news
• Mental health
• Sexual health
• Family health
• So mini ways
• Unapologetically
• Buying guides

Entertainment

• How to Watch
• My Portfolio
• Latest News
• Stock Market
• Biden Economy
• Stocks: Most Actives
• Stocks: Gainers
• Stocks: Losers
• Trending Tickers
• World Indices
• US Treasury Bonds Rates
• Top Mutual Funds
• Options: Highest Open Interest
• Options: Highest Implied Volatility
• Basic Materials
• Communication Services
• Consumer Cyclical
• Consumer Defensive
• Financial Services
• Industrials
• Real Estate
• Stock Comparison
• Advanced Chart
• Currency Converter
• Credit Cards
• Balance Transfer Cards
• Cash-back Cards
• Rewards Cards
• Travel Cards
• Credit Card Offers
• Best Free Checking
• Student Loans
• Personal Loans
• Car insurance
• Mortgage Refinancing
• Mortgage Calculator
• Morning Brief
• Market Domination
• Market Domination Overtime
• Asking for a Trend
• Opening Bid
• Stocks in Translation
• Lead This Way
• Good Buy or Goodbye?
• Financial Freestyle
• Capitol Gains
• Fantasy football
• Pro Pick 'Em
• College Pick 'Em
• Fantasy baseball
• Fantasy hockey
• Fantasy basketball
• Download the app
• Daily fantasy
• Scores and schedules
• GameChannel
• World Baseball Classic
• Premier League
• CONCACAF League
• Champions League
• Motorsports
• Horse racing
• Newsletters

New on Yahoo

• Privacy Dashboard

Yahoo Finance

Zoominfo wins 2024 trustradius tech cares award for reducing e-waste in landfills, donating electronics to those in need.

For the Second Year in a Row, ZoomInfo Was Honored for Its Sustainability and Environmental Efforts

ZoomInfo reduces e-waste in landfills by repurposing used electronics and donating them to those in need

The company was also recognized for its transition to a nearly paperless office worldwide

VANCOUVER, Wash., August 14, 2024 --( BUSINESS WIRE )-- ZoomInfo (NASDAQ: ZI), the go-to-market platform to find, acquire, and grow customers, has won the 2024 TrustRadius Tech Cares Award, which recognizes B2B technology companies that have gone above and beyond to support their communities and employees.

ZoomInfo, which won the award for the second consecutive year, supports the environment, local communities, and employees in a number of ways:

In addition to being a nearly paperless company worldwide, ZoomInfo reduces e-waste in landfills – and helps close the digital divide – by repurposing used electronics and donating them to those in need.

A shift to renewable energy sources has helped the company offset its carbon impact, reducing its net emissions per $1 million of revenue by 46%.

The company takes an active role in the equity, advancement, and empowerment of its employees by funding ZoomInclusion Employee Resource Groups . These groups host educational and philanthropic events to promote an inclusive workplace and community.

ZoomInfo donates platform access and partners with employees to contribute more than $1 million to worthy organizations positively impacting the communities where its employees live and work.

The company provides opportunities for employees to volunteer time to causes they care about.

TrustRadius , a buyer intelligence platform for business technology, determines recipients of the award by evaluating companies’ efforts across these categories:

Sustainability and the environment

Volunteerism

Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)

Generous donations

Community impact

Employee well-being and development

Support for women in technology

Education support

Read more about the 2024 TrustRadius Tech Cares Awards here .

For more information on how ZoomInfo supports its employees as well as its local and global communities, read the 2023 ZoomInfo Sustainability Report .

About ZoomInfo

ZoomInfo (NASDAQ: ZI) is the trusted go-to-market platform for businesses to find, acquire, and grow their customers. It delivers accurate, real-time data, insights, and technology to more than 35,000 companies worldwide. Businesses use ZoomInfo to increase efficiency, consolidate technology stacks, and align their sales and marketing teams — all in one platform. ZoomInfo is a recognized leader in data privacy, with industry-leading GDPR and CCPA compliance and numerous data security and privacy certifications . For more information about how ZoomInfo can help businesses grow their revenue at scale, please visit www.zoominfo.com .

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240814012379/en/

Media Rob Morse Senior Communications Manager [email protected]

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

JavaScript appears to be disabled on this computer. Please click here to see any active alerts .

Used Household Batteries

Find information about the types of batteries used in households and how to manage them when they are no longer needed.

Certain batteries should NOT go in household garbage or recycling bins. This page can inform you on how to manage these batteries safely. Waste batteries can always be recycled or taken to household hazardous waste collection points .

To prevent fires from lithium-ion batteries, tape battery terminals and/or place batteries in separate plastic bags and never put these batteries in household garbage or recycling bins.  

On this page:

Single-Use Batteries

Rechargeable batteries, automotive batteries, federal battery laws, state battery recycling laws.

• Call2Recycle  

Every year in the United States, millions of single use and rechargeable batteries are bought, used and recycled or disposed of in the trash. Batteries come in various chemistries, types and sizes to fit their use.

• Single-use batteries can generally be removed from the device when they stop powering the device.
• Rechargeable batteries may be removable or permanently attached to the device.

The increased demand for batteries can be traced largely to the rapid increase in use of small portable electronics, power tools, and other everyday items, as well as the increase in “smart” products, such as small and large appliances and automobiles.

Learn more about these batteries and their proper management.

Batteries are manufactured using different mixtures of chemical elements designed to meet customers’ power and performance needs. Batteries can contain metals such as mercury, lead, cadmium, nickel and silver, which can pose a threat to human health or the environment when improperly managed at the end of their service life. Battery types are identified by marking and labeling, not by the battery’s shape or the color of the label.

Some batteries may also contain materials such as cobalt, lithium and graphite that are considered critical minerals by the United States Geological Survey.  Critical minerals are raw materials that are economically and strategically important to the United States and have a high supply risk potential and for which there are no easy substitutes. Consequently, every effort should be made to recycle and recover these materials to ensure they will be available for generations to come.

Learn about infrastructure investments to improve the nation’s battery recycling programs.  

Once a battery is no longer useful, the type and chemistry of the battery determines which of the various waste management options to use. It is important to manage batteries correctly according to their type because some batteries can cause a risk to safety and health if mismanaged at the end of their lives. Batteries can have enough energy to injure or start fires even when used and when they appear to be discharged. For safety, remember that not all batteries are removable or serviceable by the user—heed battery and product markings regarding safety and use for all types of batteries.

There are several types and applications of batteries used in vehicles today. There are automotive starting batteries used with internal combustion engines, large electric vehicle battery packs that power the vehicle and small batteries that power accessories such as remote door locks or back up the computer’s memory.

• Public Law 104-142: The Mercury-Containing and Rechargeable Battery Management Act : This law was enacted to phase out the use of mercury-containing batteries and provide for the recycling of nickel cadmium, small sealed lead-acid batteries, and certain other rechargeable batteries.

Some states have enacted battery recycling laws for various types of consumer batteries. To see a map of state battery laws, go to the Call2Recycle website .

• Recycle Home
• Reduce and Reuse Basics
• Recycling Basics and Benefits
• Frequent Questions on Recycling
• How Do I Recycle...
• What You Can Do
• Used Electronics
• Used Batteries
• Food Waste Prevention
• Composting at Home
• Students and Educators

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Two decades of advancements in cold supply chain logistics for reducing food waste: a review with focus on the meat industry.

1. Introduction

Objective and scope of study.

• What is the current state of the art on beef CSCL in terms of management, sustainability, network design, and the use of information technologies for red meat waste reduction?
• To provide an overview of the current state of the art and to identify the gaps and contemporary challenges to red meat waste reduction;
• To identify key research themes and their potential role and associated elements in mitigating red meat waste reduction, especially across the beef CSCL systems;
• To pinpoint the directions in each theme that warrant further research advancement.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. literature retrieval and selection, 2.2. extracting the research themes, 3.1. the literature review identified themes and subjects, 3.2. the literature’s evolution and descriptive results, 3.3. management, 3.3.1. logistics management and chronological evolution, 3.3.2. management and regulations, 3.3.3. management and collaboration, 3.3.4. management and costs, 3.3.5. management and inventory, 3.3.6. management and decision-making, 3.3.7. management and risks, 3.3.8. management and waste reduction, 3.3.9. management and information, 3.3.10. management and cold chain deficiencies, 3.4. sustainability, 3.4.1. sustainability and closed-loop scs (clscs), 3.4.2. sustainability and business models, 3.4.3. sustainability and wastage hotspots, 3.4.4. sustainability and packing, 3.4.5. sustainability and information flow, 3.5. network design optimisation, 3.5.1. network design and decision levels, 3.5.2. network design and the location–inventory problem, 3.5.3. network design and routing-inventory problem, 3.5.4. network design and the location routing problem, 3.5.5. network design and the integrated location–inventory routing problem, 3.5.6. network design and sustainability, 3.5.7. network design and information flow, 3.6. information technologies, 3.6.1. it and meat sc transformation, 3.6.2. emerging information technologies and meat scs, technical instruments, technological systems, 4. discussion, 4.1. management, 4.2. sustainability, 4.3. network design, 4.4. information technology, 5. conclusions.

• Management: ◦ Effective management practices are crucial for addressing FLW in beef CSCL systems. ◦ There is a notable transition from LM to FLM and SFLM, with the potential for emerging technologies to create an “Intelligent Sustainable Food Logistics Management” phase. ◦ Suboptimal management practices continue to contribute significantly to FLW, underscoring the need for enhanced strategies and adherence to regulations and standards.
• Sustainability: ◦ Sustainability in beef CSCL involves addressing social, economic, and environmental benefits. ◦ Reducing FLW can lead to increased profits, improved customer satisfaction, public health, equity, and environmental conservation by minimising resource use and emissions. ◦ Comprehensive research integrating all sustainability dimensions is needed to fully understand and mitigate FLW. Current efforts often address only parts of sustainability. A more holistic approach is required to balance environmental, economic, and social dimensions effectively.
• Network Design: ◦ Effective network design and optimisation are pivotal in reducing FLW within beef CSCL systems. ◦ There is a necessity for integrating all three levels of management decisions in the logistics network design process. Decision levels in network design must be considered to understand trade-offs among sustainability components in this process. ◦ Future research should focus on integrating management decisions and network design, CSCL uncertainties, sustainability dimensions, and advanced technologies to enhance efficiency and reduce waste in beef CSCL systems.
• Information Technologies: ◦ Information technologies such as Digital Twins (DTs) and Blockchain (BC) play a significant role in improving efficiency and reducing FLW in beef CSCL. ◦ The integration of these technologies can enhance understanding of fluid dynamics, thermal exchange, and meat quality variations, optimising the cooling process and reducing energy usage. ◦ Challenges like data security and management efficiency need to be addressed to maximise the benefits of these technologies.

Author Contributions

Data availability statement, acknowledgments, conflicts of interest.

• Ren, Q.-S.; Fang, K.; Yang, X.-T.; Han, J.-W. Ensuring the quality of meat in cold chain logistics: A comprehensive review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022 , 119 , 133–151. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nastasijević, I.; Lakićević, B.; Petrović, Z. (Eds.) Cold chain management in meat storage, distribution and retail: A review. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science ; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brodribb, P. A Study of Waste in the Cold Food Chain and Opportunities for Improvement ; Expert Group: Hefei, China, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Castonguay, A.C.; Polasky, S.; Holden, M.H.; Herrero, M.; Mason-D’Croz, D.; Godde, C.; Chang, J.; Gerber, J.; Witt, G.B.; Game, E.T. Navigating sustainability trade-offs in global beef production. Nat. Sustain. 2023 , 6 , 284–294. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• FAO. FAOSTAT Online Database. 2021. Available online: http://faostat.fao.org/ (accessed on 20 September 2023).
• Australia, M.L. Global Beef Industry and Trade Report ; Meat & Livestock Australia: Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• Juan Ding, M.; Jie, F.; Parton, K.A.; Matanda, M.J. Relationships between quality of information sharing and supply chain food quality in the Australian beef processing industry. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2014 , 25 , 85–108. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, H.; Pan, P. (Eds.) Food waste in developed countries and cold chain logistics. In E3S Web of Conferences ; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2021. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ishangulyyev, R.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.H. Understanding food loss and waste—Why are we losing and wasting food? Foods 2019 , 8 , 297. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• National Food Waste Strategy: Halving Australia’s Food Waste by 2030. Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Canberra, Australia. 2024. Available online: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/protection/waste/food-waste#:~:text=Australia’s%20National%20Food%20Waste%20Strategy,the%20National%20Food%20Waste%20Strategy (accessed on 8 February 2024).
• Keegan, E.; Breadsell, J.K. Food waste and social practices in Australian households. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 3377. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Aschemann-Witzel, J.; De Hooge, I.; Amani, P.; Bech-Larsen, T.; Oostindjer, M. Consumer-related food waste: Causes and potential for action. Sustainability 2015 , 7 , 6457–6477. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gokarn, S.; Kuthambalayan, T.S. Analysis of challenges inhibiting the reduction of waste in food supply chain. J. Clean. Prod. 2017 , 168 , 595–604. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yan, H.; Song, M.-J.; Lee, H.-Y. A Systematic Review of Factors Affecting Food Loss and Waste and Sustainable Mitigation Strategies: A Logistics Service Providers’ Perspective. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 11374. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Brennan, A.; Browne, S. Food waste and nutrition quality in the context of public health: A scoping review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021 , 18 , 5379. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Neff, R.A.; Kanter, R.; Vandevijvere, S. Reducing food loss and waste while improving the public’s health. Health Aff. 2015 , 34 , 1821–1829. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Luo, N.; Olsen, T.; Liu, Y. A Conceptual Framework to Analyze Food Loss and Waste within Food Supply Chains: An Operations Management Perspective. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 927. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Parashar, S.; Sood, G.; Agrawal, N. Modelling the enablers of food supply chain for reduction in carbon footprint. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 275 , 122932. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ma, L.; Qin, W.; Garnett, T.; Zhang, F. Review on drivers, trends and emerging issues of the food wastage in China. Front. Agric. Sci. Eng. 2015 , 2 , 159–167. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lan, S.; Tseng, M.-L.; Yang, C.; Huisingh, D. Trends in sustainable logistics in major cities in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020 , 712 , 136381. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Farooque, M.; Zhang, A.; Liu, Y. Barriers to circular food supply chains in China. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2019 , 24 , 677–696. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Han, J.-W.; Zuo, M.; Zhu, W.-Y.; Zuo, J.-H.; Lü, E.-L.; Yang, X.-T. A comprehensive review of cold chain logistics for fresh agricultural products: Current status, challenges, and future trends. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021 , 109 , 536–551. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Martinez, M.G.; Fearne, A.; Caswell, J.A.; Henson, S. Co-regulation as a possible model for food safety governance: Opportunities for public–private partnerships. Food Policy 2007 , 32 , 299–314. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, K.Y.; Yip, T.L. Cold-chain systems in China and value-chain analysis. In Finance and Risk Management for International Logistics and the Supply Chain ; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 217–241. [ Google Scholar ]
• Liu, M.; Dan, B.; Zhang, S.; Ma, S. Information sharing in an E-tailing supply chain for fresh produce with freshness-keeping effort and value-added service. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2021 , 290 , 572–584. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• An, J.; Wang, L.; Lv, X. Research on agri-food cold chain logistics management system: Connotation, structure and operational mechanism. J. Serv. Sci. Manag. 2015 , 8 , 894–902. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, J.; Cao, W.; Park, M. Reliability analysis and optimization of cold chain distribution system for fresh agricultural products. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 3618. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, H.; Qiu, B.; Zhang, K. A new risk assessment model for agricultural products cold chain logistics. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2017 , 117 , 1800–1816. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chauhan, C.; Dhir, A.; Akram, M.U.; Salo, J. Food loss and waste in food supply chains. A systematic literature review and framework development approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2021 , 295 , 126438. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Luo, N.; Olsen, T.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, A. Reducing food loss and waste in supply chain operations. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2022 , 162 , 102730. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Broeze, J.; Guo, X.; Axmann, H. Trade-Off Analyses of Food Loss and Waste Reduction and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Food Supply Chains. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 8531. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kumar, A.; Mangla, S.K.; Kumar, P. An integrated literature review on sustainable food supply chains: Exploring research themes and future directions. Sci. Total Environ. 2022 , 821 , 153411. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Stindt, D. A generic planning approach for sustainable supply chain management-How to integrate concepts and methods to address the issues of sustainability? J. Clean. Prod. 2017 , 153 , 146–163. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 2003 , 14 , 207–222. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cerchione, R.; Esposito, E. A systematic review of supply chain knowledge management research: State of the art and research opportunities. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016 , 182 , 276–292. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ali, I.; Gölgeci, I. Where is supply chain resilience research heading? A systematic and co-occurrence analysis. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2019 , 49 , 793–815. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• VOSviewer. Available online: https://www.vosviewer.com/getting-started (accessed on 20 May 2023).
• Chopra, S. Designing the distribution network in a supply chain. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2003 , 39 , 123–140. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gunasekaran, A.; Lai, K.-h.; Cheng, T.E. Responsive supply chain: A competitive strategy in a networked economy. Omega 2008 , 36 , 549–564. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dabbene, F.; Gay, P.; Sacco, N. Optimisation of fresh-food supply chains in uncertain environments, Part I: Background and methodology. Biosyst. Eng. 2008 , 99 , 348–359. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Trienekens, J.; Zuurbier, P. Quality and safety standards in the food industry, developments and challenges. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2008 , 113 , 107–122. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lipinski, B.; Hanson, C.; Lomax, J.; Kitinoja, L.; Waite, R.; Searchinger, T. Reducing Food Loss and Waste ; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2013. [ Google Scholar ]
• van der Vorst, J.G.; van Kooten, O.; Luning, P.A. Towards a diagnostic instrument to identify improvement opportunities for quality controlled logistics in agrifood supply chain networks. Int. J. Food Syst. Dyn. 2011 , 2 , 94–105. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wognum, P.N.; Bremmers, H.; Trienekens, J.H.; Van Der Vorst, J.G.; Bloemhof, J.M. Systems for sustainability and transparency of food supply chains–Current status and challenges. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2011 , 25 , 65–76. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Soysal, M.; Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M.; Meuwissen, M.P.; van der Vorst, J.G. A review on quantitative models for sustainable food logistics management. Int. J. Food Syst. Dyn. 2012 , 3 , 136–155. [ Google Scholar ]
• Koberg, E.; Longoni, A. A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management in global supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 207 , 1084–1098. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Brandenburg, M.; Govindan, K.; Sarkis, J.; Seuring, S. Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2014 , 233 , 299–312. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bettley, A.; Burnley, S. Towards sustainable operations management integrating sustainability management into operations management strategies and practices. In Handbook of Performability Engineering ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 875–904. [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhong, R.; Xu, X.; Wang, L. Food supply chain management: Systems, implementations, and future research. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2017 , 117 , 2085–2114. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Van der Meulen, B.M. The structure of European food law. Laws 2013 , 2 , 69–98. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kayikci, Y.; Ozbiltekin, M.; Kazancoglu, Y. Minimizing losses at red meat supply chain with circular and central slaughterhouse model. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2020 , 33 , 791–816. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jedermann, R.; Nicometo, M.; Uysal, I.; Lang, W. Reducing food losses by intelligent food logistics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2014 , 372 , 20130302. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Yu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Sun, L.; Sun, S. (Eds.) Research on food safety and security of cold chain logistics. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science ; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2021; p. 012176. [ Google Scholar ]
• Centobelli, P.; Cerchione, R.; Ertz, M. Food cold chain management: What we know and what we deserve. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2021 , 26 , 102–135. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lee, J.C.; Daraba, A.; Voidarou, C.; Rozos, G.; Enshasy, H.A.E.; Varzakas, T. Implementation of food safety management systems along with other management tools (HAZOP, FMEA, Ishikawa, Pareto). The case study of Listeria monocytogenes and correlation with microbiological criteria. Foods 2021 , 10 , 2169. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Singh, R.K.; Luthra, S.; Mangla, S.K.; Uniyal, S. Applications of information and communication technology for sustainable growth of SMEs in India food industry. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019 , 147 , 10–18. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nayak, R.; Waterson, P. Global food safety as a complex adaptive system: Key concepts and future prospects. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019 , 91 , 409–425. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tseng, M.-L.; Ha, H.M.; Tran, T.P.T.; Bui, T.-D.; Lim, M.K.; Lin, C.-W.; Helmi Ali, M. Data-driven on sustainable food supply chain: A comparison on Halal and non-Halal food system. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 2022 , 39 , 430–457. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bortolini, M.; Faccio, M.; Ferrari, E.; Gamberi, M.; Pilati, F. Fresh food sustainable distribution: Cost, delivery time and carbon footprint three-objective optimization. J. Food Eng. 2016 , 174 , 56–67. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chan, F.T.; Wang, Z.; Goswami, A.; Singhania, A.; Tiwari, M.K. Multi-objective particle swarm optimisation based integrated production inventory routing planning for efficient perishable food logistics operations. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020 , 58 , 5155–5174. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fikar, C. A decision support system to investigate food losses in e-grocery deliveries. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2018 , 117 , 282–290. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Soysal, M.; Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M.; Haijema, R.; van der Vorst, J.G. Modeling a green inventory routing problem for perishable products with horizontal collaboration. Comput. Oper. Res. 2018 , 89 , 168–182. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liljestrand, K. Logistics solutions for reducing food waste. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2017 , 47 , 318–339. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Halloran, A.; Clement, J.; Kornum, N.; Bucatariu, C.; Magid, J. Addressing food waste reduction in Denmark. Food Policy 2014 , 49 , 294–301. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cattaneo, A.; Sánchez, M.V.; Torero, M.; Vos, R. Reducing food loss and waste: Five challenges for policy and research. Food Policy 2021 , 98 , 101974. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Wang, X. Research on Food Cold Chain Logistics System Collaboration. Carpathian J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016 , 8 , 131. [ Google Scholar ]
• Weng, X.; An, J.; Yang, H. The analysis of the development situation and trend of the city-oriented cold chain logistics system for fresh agricultural products. Open J. Soc. Sci. 2015 , 3 , 70–80. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dania, W.A.P.; Xing, K.; Amer, Y. Collaboration behavioural factors for sustainable agri-food supply chains: A systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018 , 186 , 851–864. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Seuring, S.; Brix-Asala, C.; Khalid, R.U. Analyzing base-of-the-pyramid projects through sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 212 , 1086–1097. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yu, Y.; Jaenicke, E.C. Estimating food waste as household production inefficiency. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2020 , 102 , 525–547. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Huang, H.; He, Y.; Li, D. Pricing and inventory decisions in the food supply chain with production disruption and controllable deterioration. J. Clean. Prod. 2018 , 180 , 280–296. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, X.; Zhou, K. Multi-objective cold chain logistic distribution center location based on carbon emission. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021 , 28 , 32396–32404. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Dai, J.; Che, W.; Lim, J.J.; Shou, Y. Service innovation of cold chain logistics service providers: A multiple-case study in China. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020 , 89 , 143–156. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Al Theeb, N.; Smadi, H.J.; Al-Hawari, T.H.; Aljarrah, M.H. Optimization of vehicle routing with inventory allocation problems in Cold Supply Chain Logistics. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020 , 142 , 106341. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhao, H.; Liu, S.; Tian, C.; Yan, G.; Wang, D. An overview of current status of cold chain in China. Int. J. Refrig. 2018 , 88 , 483–495. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tang, J.; Zou, Y.; Xie, R.; Tu, B.; Liu, G. Compact supervisory system for cold chain logistics. Food Control 2021 , 126 , 108025. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Badia-Melis, R.; Mc Carthy, U.; Ruiz-Garcia, L.; Garcia-Hierro, J.; Villalba, J.R. New trends in cold chain monitoring applications-A review. Food Control 2018 , 86 , 170–182. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liu, G.; Hu, J.; Yang, Y.; Xia, S.; Lim, M.K. Vehicle routing problem in cold Chain logistics: A joint distribution model with carbon trading mechanisms. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020 , 156 , 104715. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Esmizadeh, Y.; Bashiri, M.; Jahani, H.; Almada-Lobo, B. Cold chain management in hierarchical operational hub networks. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2021 , 147 , 102202. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, J.; Dan, B.; Shi, J. A variable neighborhood search approach for the multi-compartment vehicle routing problem with time windows considering carbon emission. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 277 , 123932. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wu, J.; Haasis, H.-D. The freight village as a pathway to sustainable agricultural products logistics in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2018 , 196 , 1227–1238. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tsamboulas, D.A.; Kapros, S. Freight village evaluation under uncertainty with public and private financing. Transp. Policy 2003 , 10 , 141–156. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pekkaya, M.; Keleş, N. Determining criteria interaction and criteria priorities in the freight village location selection process: The experts’ perspective in Turkey. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2022 , 34 , 1348–1367. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shashi, S.; Cerchione, R.; Singh, R.; Centobelli, P.; Shabani, A. Food cold chain management: From a structured literature review to a conceptual framework and research agenda. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2018 , 29 , 792–821. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Magalhães, V.S.; Ferreira, L.M.D.; da Silva César, A.; Bonfim, R.M.; Silva, C. Food loss and waste in the Brazilian beef supply chain: An empirical analysis. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2020 , 32 , 214–236. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hülsmann, M.; Brenner, V. Causes and Effects of Cold Chain Ruptures: Performance of Fragmented Versus Integrated Cold Chains ; Jacobs University, School of Engineering and Science, Internat. Logistics, Systems Management: Bremen, Germany, 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
• Buisman, M.; Haijema, R.; Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. Discounting and dynamic shelf life to reduce fresh food waste at retailers. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019 , 209 , 274–284. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kibler, K.M.; Reinhart, D.; Hawkins, C.; Motlagh, A.M.; Wright, J. Food waste and the food-energy-water nexus: A review of food waste management alternatives. Waste Manag. 2018 , 74 , 52–62. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Herron, C.B.; Garner, L.J.; Siddique, A.; Huang, T.-S.; Campbell, J.C.; Rao, S.; Morey, A. Building “First Expire, First Out” models to predict food losses at retail due to cold chain disruption in the last mile. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2022 , 6 , 1018807. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mendes, A.; Cruz, J.; Saraiva, T.; Lima, T.M.; Gaspar, P.D. (Eds.) Logistics strategy (FIFO, FEFO or LSFO) decision support system for perishable food products. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA), Sakheer, Bahrain, 8–9 November 2020; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 173–178. [ Google Scholar ]
• Plan, W.R.A. Reducing Food Waste through Retail Supply Chain Collaboration ; WRAP: Banbury, UK, 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nikolicic, S.; Kilibarda, M.; Maslaric, M.; Mircetic, D.; Bojic, S. Reducing food waste in the retail supply chains by improving efficiency of logistics operations. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 6511. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kaipia, R.; Dukovska-Popovska, I.; Loikkanen, L. Creating sustainable fresh food supply chains through waste reduction. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2013 , 43 , 262–276. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Govindan, K.; Kadziński, M.; Sivakumar, R. Application of a novel PROMETHEE-based method for construction of a group compromise ranking to prioritization of green suppliers in food supply chain. Omega 2017 , 71 , 129–145. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rahbari, M.; Hajiagha, S.H.R.; Mahdiraji, H.A.; Dorcheh, F.R.; Garza-Reyes, J.A. A novel location-inventory-routing problem in a two-stage red meat supply chain with logistic decisions: Evidence from an emerging economy. Kybernetes 2021 , 51 , 1498–1531. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yazdani, M.; Chatterjee, P.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Zolfani, S.H. Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection. J. Clean. Prod. 2017 , 142 , 3728–3740. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kieu, P.T.; Nguyen, V.T.; Nguyen, V.T.; Ho, T.P. A spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (SF-AHP) and combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) algorithm in distribution center location selection: A case study in agricultural supply chain. Axioms 2021 , 10 , 53. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mihajlović, J.; Rajković, P.; Petrović, G.; Ćirić, D. The selection of the logistics distribution center location based on MCDM methodology in southern and eastern region in Serbia. Oper. Res. Eng. Sci. Theory Appl. 2019 , 2 , 72–85. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zanoni, S.; Zavanella, L. Chilled or frozen? Decision strategies for sustainable food supply chains. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012 , 140 , 731–736. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Aravendan, M.; Panneerselvam, R. Literature review on network design problems in closed loop and reverse supply chains. Intell. Inf. Manag. 2014 , 6 , 104–117. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mejjaouli, S.; Babiceanu, R.F. Cold supply chain logistics: System optimization for real-time rerouting transportation solutions. Comput. Ind. 2018 , 95 , 68–80. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Titiyal, R.; Bhattacharya, S.; Thakkar, J.J. The distribution strategy selection for an e-tailer using a hybrid DANP VIKOR MCDM model. Benchmarking Int. J. 2019 , 26 , 395–433. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gallo, A.; Accorsi, R.; Baruffaldi, G.; Manzini, R. Designing sustainable cold chains for long-range food distribution: Energy-effective corridors on the Silk Road Belt. Sustainability 2017 , 9 , 2044. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yakavenka, V.; Mallidis, I.; Vlachos, D.; Iakovou, E.; Eleni, Z. Development of a multi-objective model for the design of sustainable supply chains: The case of perishable food products. Ann. Oper. Res. 2020 , 294 , 593–621. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sel, Ç.; Pınarbaşı, M.; Soysal, M.; Çimen, M. A green model for the catering industry under demand uncertainty. J. Clean. Prod. 2017 , 167 , 459–472. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Van Der Vorst, J.G.; Tromp, S.-O.; Zee, D.-J.v.d. Simulation modelling for food supply chain redesign; integrated decision making on product quality, sustainability and logistics. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2009 , 47 , 6611–6631. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bortolini, M.; Galizia, F.G.; Mora, C.; Botti, L.; Rosano, M. Bi-objective design of fresh food supply chain networks with reusable and disposable packaging containers. J. Clean. Prod. 2018 , 184 , 375–388. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, Q.; Yu, P.; Wu, X. Shelf life extending packaging, inventory control and grocery retailing. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2017 , 26 , 1369–1382. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Verghese, K.; Lewis, H.; Lockrey, S.; Williams, H. Packaging’s role in minimizing food loss and waste across the supply chain. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2015 , 28 , 603–620. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ghadge, A.; Kaklamanou, M.; Choudhary, S.; Bourlakis, M. Implementing environmental practices within the Greek dairy supply chain: Drivers and barriers for SMEs. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2017 , 117 , 1995–2014. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sajjad, A.; Eweje, G.; Tappin, D. Managerial perspectives on drivers for and barriers to sustainable supply chain management implementation: Evidence from New Zealand. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2020 , 29 , 592–604. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hien, D.N.; Thanh, N.V. Optimization of cold chain logistics with Fuzzy MCDM Model. Processes 2022 , 10 , 947. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Saaty, T.L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 2008 , 1 , 83–98. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Karanam, M.; Krishnanand, L.; Manupati, V.K.; Antosz, K.; Machado, J. Identification of the critical enablers for perishable food supply chain using deterministic assessment models. Appl. Sci. 2022 , 12 , 4503. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kutlu Gündoğdu, F.; Kahraman, C. A novel VIKOR method using spherical fuzzy sets and its application to warehouse site selection. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2019 , 37 , 1197–1211. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ali, S.M.; Rahman, M.H.; Tumpa, T.J.; Rifat, A.A.M.; Paul, S.K. Examining price and service competition among retailers in a supply chain under potential demand disruption. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018 , 40 , 40–47. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ali, S.M.; Nakade, K. Optimal ordering policies in a multi-sourcing supply chain with supply and demand disruptions-a CVaR approach. Int. J. Logist. Syst. Manag. 2017 , 28 , 180–199. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Singh, A.; Shukla, N.; Mishra, N. Social media data analytics to improve supply chain management in food industries. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2018 , 114 , 398–415. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tang, C.S. Perspectives in supply chain risk management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2006 , 103 , 451–488. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ali, S.M.; Moktadir, M.A.; Kabir, G.; Chakma, J.; Rumi, M.J.U.; Islam, M.T. Framework for evaluating risks in food supply chain: Implications in food wastage reduction. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 228 , 786–800. [ Google Scholar ]
• Govindan, K. Sustainable consumption and production in the food supply chain: A conceptual framework. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018 , 195 , 419–431. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• de Oliveira, U.R.; Marins, F.A.S.; Rocha, H.M.; Salomon, V.A.P. The ISO 31000 standard in supply chain risk management. J. Clean. Prod. 2017 , 151 , 616–633. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Khan, O.; Burnes, B. Risk and supply chain management: Creating a research agenda. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2007 , 18 , 197–216. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mangla, S.K.; Kumar, P.; Barua, M.K. An integrated methodology of FTA and fuzzy AHP for risk assessment in green supply chain. Int. J. Oper. Res. 2016 , 25 , 77–99. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bogataj, D.; Hudoklin, D.; Bogataj, M.; Dimovski, V.; Colnar, S. Risk mitigation in a meat supply chain with options of redirection. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 8690. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nguyen, A.H.T.; Singh, A.; Kumari, S.; Choudhary, S. Multi-agent architecture for waste minimisation in beef supply chain. Prod. Plan. Control 2023 , 34 , 1082–1096. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Deng, X.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Lu, Z. Risk propagation mechanisms and risk management strategies for a sustainable perishable products supply chain. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019 , 135 , 1175–1187. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Srivastava, S.K.; Chaudhuri, A.; Srivastava, R.K. Propagation of risks and their impact on performance in fresh food retail. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2015 , 26 , 568–602. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Amani, M.A.; Sarkodie, S.A. Mitigating spread of contamination in meat supply chain management using deep learning. Sci. Rep. 2022 , 12 , 5037. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Klein, A.Z.; Da Costa, E.G.; Vieira, L.M.; Teixeira, R. The use of mobile technology in management and risk control in the supply chain: The case of a Brazilian beef chain. J. Glob. Inf. Manag. (JGIM) 2014 , 22 , 14–33. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mohebi, E.; Marquez, L. Intelligent packaging in meat industry: An overview of existing solutions. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015 , 52 , 3947–3964. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Martins, C.; Melo, M.; Pato, M. Redesigning a food bank supply chain network in a triple bottom line context. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019 , 214 , 234–247. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kowalski, Z.; Kulczycka, J.; Makara, A.; Harazin, P. Quantification of material recovery from meat waste incineration–An approach to an updated food waste hierarchy. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021 , 416 , 126021. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Teigiserova, D.A.; Hamelin, L.; Thomsen, M. Towards transparent valorization of food surplus, waste and loss: Clarifying definitions, food waste hierarchy, and role in the circular economy. Sci. Total Environ. 2020 , 706 , 136033. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Beheshti, S.; Heydari, J.; Sazvar, Z. Food waste recycling closed loop supply chain optimization through renting waste recycling facilities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022 , 78 , 103644. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Aschemann-Witzel, J.; Jensen, J.H.; Jensen, M.H.; Kulikovskaja, V. Consumer behaviour towards price-reduced suboptimal foods in the supermarket and the relation to food waste in households. Appetite 2017 , 116 , 246–258. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Porpino, G. Household food waste behavior: Avenues for future research. J. Assoc. Consum. Res. 2016 , 1 , 41–51. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gholami-Zanjani, S.M.; Jabalameli, M.S.; Pishvaee, M.S. A resilient-green model for multi-echelon meat supply chain planning. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021 , 152 , 107018. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rijpkema, W.A.; Rossi, R.; van der Vorst, J.G. Effective sourcing strategies for perishable product supply chains. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2014 , 44 , 494–510. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Albrecht, A.; Ibald, R.; Raab, V.; Reichstein, W.; Haarer, D.; Kreyenschmidt, J. Implementation of time temperature indicators to improve temperature monitoring and support dynamic shelf life in meat supply chains. J. Packag. Technol. Res. 2020 , 4 , 23–32. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Ndraha, N.; Vlajic, J.; Chang, C.-C.; Hsiao, H.-I. Challenges with food waste management in the food cold chains. In Food Industry Wastes ; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 467–483. [ Google Scholar ]
• Thyberg, K.L.; Tonjes, D.J. Drivers of food waste and their implications for sustainable policy development. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2016 , 106 , 110–123. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Saeed, M.A.; Kersten, W. Drivers of sustainable supply chain management: Identification and classification. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 1137. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kumar, A.; Choudhary, S.; Garza-Reyes, J.A.; Kumar, V.; Rehman Khan, S.A.; Mishra, N. Analysis of critical success factors for implementing industry 4.0 integrated circular supply chain–Moving towards sustainable operations. Prod. Plan. Control 2023 , 34 , 984–998. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chauhan, A.; Debnath, R.M.; Singh, S.P. Modelling the drivers for sustainable agri-food waste management. Benchmarking Int. J. 2018 , 25 , 981–993. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jo, J.; Yi, S.; Lee, E.-k. Including the reefer chain into genuine beef cold chain architecture based on blockchain technology. J. Clean. Prod. 2022 , 363 , 132646. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kler, R.; Gangurde, R.; Elmirzaev, S.; Hossain, M.S.; Vo, N.V.; Nguyen, T.V.; Kumar, P.N. Optimization of Meat and Poultry Farm Inventory Stock Using Data Analytics for Green Supply Chain Network. Discret. Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2022 , 2022 , 8970549. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Handfield, R.B.; Cousins, P.D.; Lawson, B.; Petersen, K.J. How can supply management really improve performance? A knowledge-based model of alignment capabilities. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2015 , 51 , 3–17. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Qi, L.; Xu, M.; Fu, Z.; Mira, T.; Zhang, X. C2SLDS: A WSN-based perishable food shelf-life prediction and LSFO strategy decision support system in cold chain logistics. Food Control 2014 , 38 , 19–29. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Matta, V.; Moberg, C. Defining the Antecedents for Adoption of RFID in the Supply Chain. Issues Inf. Syst. 2007 , 8 , 449–454. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nychas, G.-J.E.; Skandamis, P.N.; Tassou, C.C.; Koutsoumanis, K.P. Meat spoilage during distribution. Meat Sci. 2008 , 78 , 77–89. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Papargyropoulou, E.; Lozano, R.; Steinberger, J.K.; Wright, N.; bin Ujang, Z. The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste. J. Clean. Prod. 2014 , 76 , 106–115. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Joshi, R.; Banwet, D.; Shankar, R.; Gandhi, J. Performance improvement of cold chain in an emerging economy. Prod. Plan. Control 2012 , 23 , 817–836. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sharma, S.; Pai, S.S. Analysis of operating effectiveness of a cold chain model using Bayesian networks. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2015 , 21 , 722–742. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cousins, P.D.; Menguc, B. The implications of socialization and integration in supply chain management. J. Oper. Manag. 2006 , 24 , 604–620. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Beulens, A.J.; Broens, D.-F.; Folstar, P.; Hofstede, G.J. Food safety and transparency in food chains and networks Relationships and challenges. Food Control 2005 , 16 , 481–486. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mangla, S.K.; Sharma, Y.K.; Patil, P.P.; Yadav, G.; Xu, J. Logistics and distribution challenges to managing operations for corporate sustainability: Study on leading Indian diary organizations. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 238 , 117620. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Balaji, M.; Arshinder, K. Modeling the causes of food wastage in Indian perishable food supply chain. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2016 , 114 , 153–167. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kuo, J.-C.; Chen, M.-C. Developing an advanced multi-temperature joint distribution system for the food cold chain. Food Control 2010 , 21 , 559–566. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Smigic, N.; Antic, D.; Blagojevic, B.; Tomasevic, I.; Djekic, I. The level of food safety knowledge among meat handlers. Br. Food J. 2016 , 118 , 9–25. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sander, F.; Semeijn, J.; Mahr, D. The acceptance of blockchain technology in meat traceability and transparency. Br. Food J. 2018 , 120 , 2066–2079. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Patel, S.; Dora, M.; Hahladakis, J.N.; Iacovidou, E. Opportunities, challenges and trade-offs with decreasing avoidable food waste in the UK. Waste Manag. Res. 2021 , 39 , 473–488. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Raak, N.; Symmank, C.; Zahn, S.; Aschemann-Witzel, J.; Rohm, H. Processing-and product-related causes for food waste and implications for the food supply chain. Waste Manag. 2017 , 61 , 461–472. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Wittstruck, D.; Teuteberg, F. Understanding the success factors of sustainable supply chain management: Empirical evidence from the electrics and electronics industry. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2012 , 19 , 141–158. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Paul, A.; Shukla, N.; Paul, S.K.; Trianni, A. Sustainable supply chain management and multi-criteria decision-making methods: A systematic review. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 7104. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Parfitt, J.; Barthel, M.; Macnaughton, S. Food waste within food supply chains: Quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2010 , 365 , 3065–3081. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pinto, J.; Boavida-Dias, R.; Matos, H.A.; Azevedo, J. Analysis of the food loss and waste valorisation of animal by-products from the retail sector. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 2830. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mota, B.; Gomes, M.I.; Carvalho, A.; Barbosa-Povoa, A.P. Towards supply chain sustainability: Economic, environmental and social design and planning. J. Clean. Prod. 2015 , 105 , 14–27. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mohammed, A.; Wang, Q. The fuzzy multi-objective distribution planner for a green meat supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2017 , 184 , 47–58. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, X.; Zhao, G.; Qi, Y.; Li, B. A robust fuzzy optimization model for closed-loop supply chain networks considering sustainability. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 5726. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ko, H.J.; Evans, G.W. A genetic algorithm-based heuristic for the dynamic integrated forward/reverse logistics network for 3PLs. Comput. Oper. Res. 2007 , 34 , 346–366. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mosallanezhad, B.; Arjomandi, M.A.; Hashemi-Amiri, O.; Gholian-Jouybari, F.; Dibaj, M.; Akrami, M.; Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M. Metaheuristic optimizers to solve multi-echelon sustainable fresh seafood supply chain network design problem: A case of shrimp products. Alex. Eng. J. 2023 , 68 , 491–515. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Accorsi, R.; Ferrari, E.; Gamberi, M.; Manzini, R.; Regattieri, A. A closed-loop traceability system to improve logistics decisions in food supply chains: A case study on dairy products. In Advances in Food Traceability Techniques and Technologies ; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 337–351. [ Google Scholar ]
• Alinezhad, M.; Mahdavi, I.; Hematian, M.; Tirkolaee, E.B. A fuzzy multi-objective optimization model for sustainable closed-loop supply chain network design in food industries. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2022 , 24 , 8779–8806. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sgarbossa, F.; Russo, I. A proactive model in sustainable food supply chain: Insight from a case study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2017 , 183 , 596–606. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, Y.; Che, A.; Chu, F. Improved model and efficient method for bi-objective closed-loop food supply chain problem with returnable transport items. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2022 , 60 , 1051–1068. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Amin, S.H.; Zhang, G.; Eldali, M.N. A review of closed-loop supply chain models. J. Data Inf. Manag. 2020 , 2 , 279–307. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• MahmoumGonbadi, A.; Genovese, A.; Sgalambro, A. Closed-loop supply chain design for the transition towards a circular economy: A systematic literature review of methods, applications and current gaps. J. Clean. Prod. 2021 , 323 , 129101. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tavana, M.; Kian, H.; Nasr, A.K.; Govindan, K.; Mina, H. A comprehensive framework for sustainable closed-loop supply chain network design. J. Clean. Prod. 2022 , 332 , 129777. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Martindale, W.; Duong, L.; Swainson, M. Testing the data platforms required for the 21st century food system using an industry ecosystem approach. Sci. Total Environ. 2020 , 724 , 137871. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Vlajic, J.V.; Mijailovic, R.; Bogdanova, M. Creating loops with value recovery: Empirical study of fresh food supply chains. Prod. Plan. Control 2018 , 29 , 522–538. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liu, Z.; de Souza, T.S.; Holland, B.; Dunshea, F.; Barrow, C.; Suleria, H.A. Valorization of food waste to produce value-added products based on its bioactive compounds. Processes 2023 , 11 , 840. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mangla, S.K.; Luthra, S.; Mishra, N.; Singh, A.; Rana, N.P.; Dora, M.; Dwivedi, Y. Barriers to effective circular supply chain management in a developing country context. Prod. Plan. Control 2018 , 29 , 551–569. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sehnem, S.; Jabbour, C.J.C.; Pereira, S.C.F.; de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L. Improving sustainable supply chains performance through operational excellence: Circular economy approach. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019 , 149 , 236–248. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wiskerke, J.S.; Roep, D. Constructing a sustainable pork supply chain: A case of techno-institutional innovation. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2007 , 9 , 53–74. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ilbery, B.; Maye, D. Alternative (shorter) food supply chains and specialist livestock products in the Scottish–English borders. Environ. Plan. A 2005 , 37 , 823–844. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mundler, P.; Laughrea, S. The contributions of short food supply chains to territorial development: A study of three Quebec territories. J. Rural Stud. 2016 , 45 , 218–229. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rucabado-Palomar, T.; Cuéllar-Padilla, M. Short food supply chains for local food: A difficult path. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2020 , 35 , 182–191. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vittersø, G.; Torjusen, H.; Laitala, K.; Tocco, B.; Biasini, B.; Csillag, P.; de Labarre, M.D.; Lecoeur, J.-L.; Maj, A.; Majewski, E. Short food supply chains and their contributions to sustainability: Participants’ views and perceptions from 12 European cases. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 4800. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Blanquart, C.; Gonçalves, A.; Vandenbossche, L.; Kebir, L.; Petit, C.; Traversac, J.-B. (Eds.) The logistic leverages of short food supply chains performance in terms of sustainability. In Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Transport Research, Lisbonne, Portugal, 11–15 July 2010. 10p. [ Google Scholar ]
• Majewski, E.; Komerska, A.; Kwiatkowski, J.; Malak-Rawlikowska, A.; Wąs, A.; Sulewski, P.; Gołaś, M.; Pogodzińska, K.; Lecoeur, J.-L.; Tocco, B. Are short food supply chains more environmentally sustainable than long chains? A life cycle assessment (LCA) of the eco-efficiency of food chains in selected EU countries. Energies 2020 , 13 , 4853. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Collison, M.; Collison, T.; Myroniuk, I.; Boyko, N.; Pellegrini, G. Transformation trends in food logistics for short food supply chains-what is new? Stud. Agric. Econ. 2019 , 121 , 102–110. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• De Bernardi, P.; Tirabeni, L. Alternative food networks: Sustainable business models for anti-consumption food cultures. Br. Food J. 2018 , 120 , 1776–1791. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Loiseau, E.; Colin, M.; Alaphilippe, A.; Coste, G.; Roux, P. To what extent are short food supply chains (SFSCs) environmentally friendly? Application to French apple distribution using Life Cycle Assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 276 , 124166. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, W.; Jafarzadeh, S.; Thakur, M.; Ólafsdóttir, G.; Mehta, S.; Bogason, S.; Holden, N.M. Environmental impacts of animal-based food supply chains with market characteristics. Sci. Total Environ. 2021 , 783 , 147077. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hill, A. Whole of Meat Supply Chain Food Loss and Waste Mapping and Interventions-Phase 1–Final Report ; Meat and Livestock Australia (MLA): Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2023. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bonou, A.; Colley, T.A.; Hauschild, M.Z.; Olsen, S.I.; Birkved, M. Life cycle assessment of Danish pork exports using different cooling technologies and comparison of upstream supply chain efficiencies between Denmark, China and Australia. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 244 , 118816. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, Q.; Qian, J.; Yang, H.; Wu, W. Sustainable food cold chain logistics: From microenvironmental monitoring to global impact. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2022 , 21 , 4189–4209. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Caldeira, C.; De Laurentiis, V.; Corrado, S.; van Holsteijn, F.; Sala, S. Quantification of food waste per product group along the food supply chain in the European Union: A mass flow analysis. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019 , 149 , 479–488. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Betz, A.; Buchli, J.; Göbel, C.; Müller, C. Food waste in the Swiss food service industry–Magnitude and potential for reduction. Waste Manag. 2015 , 35 , 218–226. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Apaiah, R.K.; Linnemann, A.R.; Van Der Kooi, H.J. Exergy analysis: A tool to study the sustainability of food supply chains. Food Res. Int. 2006 , 39 , 1–11. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Peters, G.M.; Rowley, H.V.; Wiedemann, S.; Tucker, R.; Short, M.D.; Schulz, M. Red meat production in Australia: Life cycle assessment and comparison with overseas studies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010 , 44 , 1327–1332. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Asem-Hiablie, S.; Battagliese, T.; Stackhouse-Lawson, K.R.; Alan Rotz, C. A life cycle assessment of the environmental impacts of a beef system in the USA. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2019 , 24 , 441–455. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tsakiridis, A.; O’Donoghue, C.; Hynes, S.; Kilcline, K. A comparison of environmental and economic sustainability across seafood and livestock product value chains. Mar. Policy 2020 , 117 , 103968. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gerbens-Leenes, P.W.; Mekonnen, M.M.; Hoekstra, A.Y. The water footprint of poultry, pork and beef: A comparative study in different countries and production systems. Water Resour. Ind. 2013 , 1 , 25–36. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bottani, E.; Vignali, G.; Mosna, D.; Montanari, R. Economic and environmental assessment of different reverse logistics scenarios for food waste recovery. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2019 , 20 , 289–303. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Omolayo, Y.; Feingold, B.J.; Neff, R.A.; Romeiko, X.X. Life cycle assessment of food loss and waste in the food supply chain. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021 , 164 , 105119. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lipińska, M.; Tomaszewska, M.; Kołożyn-Krajewska, D. Identifying factors associated with food losses during transportation: Potentials for social purposes. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 2046. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• León-Bravo, V.; Caniato, F.; Caridi, M.; Johnsen, T. Collaboration for sustainability in the food supply chain: A multi-stage study in Italy. Sustainability 2017 , 9 , 1253. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Accorsi, R.; Baruffaldi, G.; Manzini, R. A closed-loop packaging network design model to foster infinitely reusable and recyclable containers in food industry. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2020 , 24 , 48–61. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tonn, B.; Frymier, P.D.; Stiefel, D.; Skinner, L.S.; Suraweera, N.; Tuck, R. Toward an infinitely reusable, recyclable, and renewable industrial ecosystem. J. Clean. Prod. 2014 , 66 , 392–406. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pålsson, H.; Hellström, D. Packaging logistics in supply chain practice–current state, trade-offs and improvement potential. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2016 , 19 , 351–368. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mahmoudi, M.; Parviziomran, I. Reusable packaging in supply chains: A review of environmental and economic impacts, logistics system designs, and operations management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020 , 228 , 107730. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wikström, F.; Verghese, K.; Auras, R.; Olsson, A.; Williams, H.; Wever, R.; Grönman, K.; Kvalvåg Pettersen, M.; Møller, H.; Soukka, R. Packaging strategies that save food: A research agenda for 2030. J. Ind. Ecol. 2019 , 23 , 532–540. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Goossens, Y.; Berrens, P.; Custers, K.; Van Hemelryck, S.; Kellens, K.; Geeraerd, A. How origin, packaging and seasonality determine the environmental impact of apples, magnified by food waste and losses. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2019 , 24 , 667–687. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• McMillin, K.W. Advancements in meat packaging. Meat Sci. 2017 , 132 , 153–162. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Domínguez, R.; Barba, F.J.; Gómez, B.; Putnik, P.; Kovačević, D.B.; Pateiro, M.; Santos, E.M.; Lorenzo, J.M. Active packaging films with natural antioxidants to be used in meat industry: A review. Food Res. Int. 2018 , 113 , 93–101. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Fang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Warner, R.D.; Johnson, S.K. Active and intelligent packaging in meat industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017 , 61 , 60–71. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chowdhury, E.; Morey, A. Intelligent packaging for poultry industry. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2019 , 28 , 791–800. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Realini, C.E.; Marcos, B. Active and intelligent packaging systems for a modern society. Meat Sci. 2014 , 98 , 404–419. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Moustafa, H.; Youssef, A.M.; Darwish, N.A.; Abou-Kandil, A.I. Eco-friendly polymer composites for green packaging: Future vision and challenges. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019 , 172 , 16–25. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ocampo, L.A.; Villegas, Z.V.A.; Carvajal, J.-a.T.; Apas, C.-A.A. Identifying significant drivers for sustainable practices in achieving sustainable food supply chain using modified fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory approach. Int. J. Adv. Oper. Manag. 2018 , 10 , 51–89. [ Google Scholar ]
• Irani, Z.; Sharif, A.M. Sustainable food security futures: Perspectives on food waste and information across the food supply chain. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2016 , 29 , 171–178. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jeswani, H.K.; Figueroa-Torres, G.; Azapagic, A. The extent of food waste generation in the UK and its environmental impacts. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021 , 26 , 532–547. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shafiee-Jood, M.; Cai, X. Reducing food loss and waste to enhance food security and environmental sustainability. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016 , 50 , 8432–8443. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Kamble, S.S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Parekh, H.; Joshi, S. Modeling the internet of things adoption barriers in food retail supply chains. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019 , 48 , 154–168. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rejeb, A. Halal meat supply chain traceability based on HACCP, blockchain and internet of things. Acta Tech. Jaurinensis 2018 , 11 , 218–247. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Harvey, J.; Smith, A.; Goulding, J.; Illodo, I.B. Food sharing, redistribution, and waste reduction via mobile applications: A social network analysis. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020 , 88 , 437–448. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mishra, N.; Singh, A. Use of twitter data for waste minimisation in beef supply chain. Ann. Oper. Res. 2018 , 270 , 337–359. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Biuki, M.; Kazemi, A.; Alinezhad, A. An integrated location-routing-inventory model for sustainable design of a perishable products supply chain network. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 260 , 120842. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Alkaabneh, F.; Diabat, A.; Gao, H.O. Benders decomposition for the inventory vehicle routing problem with perishable products and environmental costs. Comput. Oper. Res. 2020 , 113 , 104751. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Elhedhli, S.; Merrick, R. Green supply chain network design to reduce carbon emissions. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2012 , 17 , 370–379. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Daskin, M.S.; Coullard, C.R.; Shen, Z.-J.M. An inventory-location model: Formulation, solution algorithm and computational results. Ann. Oper. Res. 2002 , 110 , 83–106. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liu, A.; Zhu, Q.; Xu, L.; Lu, Q.; Fan, Y. Sustainable supply chain management for perishable products in emerging markets: An integrated location-inventory-routing model. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2021 , 150 , 102319. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Diabat, A.; Dehghani, E.; Jabbarzadeh, A. Incorporating location and inventory decisions into a supply chain design problem with uncertain demands and lead times. J. Manuf. Syst. 2017 , 43 , 139–149. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bravo, J.J.; Vidal, C.J. Freight transportation function in supply chain optimization models: A critical review of recent trends. Expert Syst. Appl. 2013 , 40 , 6742–6757. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Javid, A.A.; Azad, N. Incorporating location, routing and inventory decisions in supply chain network design. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2010 , 46 , 582–597. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Benders, J.F. Partitioning procedures for solving mixed-variables programming problems. Comput. Manag. Sci. 2005 , 2 , 3–19. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Savelsbergh, M. A branch-and-price algorithm for the generalized assignment problem. Oper. Res. 1997 , 45 , 831–841. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Talkhestani, H.R.A.; Jahromi, M.H.M.A.; Keshavarzfard, R. A Location-Inventory Model for Multi-Product Supply Chain with Perishable Products and Price-Dependent Demand. Adv. Ind. Eng. 2023 , 56 , 1–12. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mohammadi, Z.; Barzinpour, F.; Teimoury, E. A location-inventory model for the sustainable supply chain of perishable products based on pricing and replenishment decisions: A case study. PLoS ONE 2023 , 18 , e0288915. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Tarantilis, C.; Kiranoudis, C. Distribution of fresh meat. J. Food Eng. 2002 , 51 , 85–91. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, G.; Habenicht, W.; Spieß, W.E.L. Improving the structure of deep frozen and chilled food chain with tabu search procedure. J. Food Eng. 2003 , 60 , 67–79. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, Y.; Yu, L.y. (Eds.) Optimization model of refrigerated food transportation. In Proceedings of the ICSSSM12, Shanghai, China, 2–4 July 2012; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 220–224. [ Google Scholar ]
• Neves-Moreira, F.; Almada-Lobo, B.; Cordeau, J.-F.; Guimarães, L.; Jans, R. Solving a large multi-product production-routing problem with delivery time windows. Omega 2019 , 86 , 154–172. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Govindan, K.; Jafarian, A.; Khodaverdi, R.; Devika, K. Two-echelon multiple-vehicle location–routing problem with time windows for optimization of sustainable supply chain network of perishable food. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2014 , 152 , 9–28. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mohammed, A.; Wang, Q. Developing a meat supply chain network design using a multi-objective possibilistic programming approach. Br. Food J. 2017 , 119 , 690–706. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Moreno, S.; Pereira, J.; Yushimito, W. A hybrid K-means and integer programming method for commercial territory design: A case study in meat distribution. Ann. Oper. Res. 2020 , 286 , 87–117. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rahbari, M.; Hajiagha, S.H.R.; Dehaghi, M.R.; Moallem, M.; Dorcheh, F.R. Modeling and solving a five-echelon location–inventory–routing problem for red meat supply chain: Case study in Iran. Kybernetes 2020 , 50 , 66–99. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Qu, S.; Zhou, Y.; Ji, Y.; Dai, Z.; Wang, Z. Robust maximum expert consensus modeling with dynamic feedback mechanism under uncertain environments. J. Ind. Manag. Optim. 2024 . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Soysal, M.; Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M.; Van Der Vorst, J.G. Modelling food logistics networks with emission considerations: The case of an international beef supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2014 , 152 , 57–70. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mohebalizadehgashti, F.; Zolfagharinia, H.; Amin, S.H. Designing a green meat supply chain network: A multi-objective approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020 , 219 , 312–327. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Aung, M.M.; Chang, Y.S. Traceability in a food supply chain: Safety and quality perspectives. Food Control 2014 , 39 , 172–184. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ketzenberg, M.; Bloemhof, J.; Gaukler, G. Managing perishables with time and temperature history. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2015 , 24 , 54–70. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bottani, E.; Casella, G.; Nobili, M.; Tebaldi, L. An analytic model for estimating the economic and environmental impact of food cold supply chain. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 4771. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vrat, P.; Gupta, R.; Bhatnagar, A.; Pathak, D.K.; Fulzele, V. Literature review analytics (LRA) on sustainable cold-chain for perishable food products: Research trends and future directions. Opsearch 2018 , 55 , 601–627. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• De Keizer, M.; Haijema, R.; Bloemhof, J.M.; Van Der Vorst, J.G. Hybrid optimization and simulation to design a logistics network for distributing perishable products. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2015 , 88 , 26–38. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Coelho, L.C.; Laporte, G. Optimal joint replenishment, delivery and inventory management policies for perishable products. Comput. Oper. Res. 2014 , 47 , 42–52. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hasani, A.; Zegordi, S.H.; Nikbakhsh, E. Robust closed-loop supply chain network design for perishable goods in agile manufacturing under uncertainty. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2012 , 50 , 4649–4669. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Song, B.D.; Ko, Y.D. A vehicle routing problem of both refrigerated-and general-type vehicles for perishable food products delivery. J. Food Eng. 2016 , 169 , 61–71. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• de Keizer, M.; Akkerman, R.; Grunow, M.; Bloemhof, J.M.; Haijema, R.; van der Vorst, J.G. Logistics network design for perishable products with heterogeneous quality decay. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2017 , 262 , 535–549. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mohammed, A.; Govindan, K.; Zubairu, N.; Pratabaraj, J.; Abideen, A.Z. Multi-tier supply chain network design: A key towards sustainability and resilience. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2023 , 182 , 109396. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tavakkoli Moghaddam, S.; Javadi, M.; Hadji Molana, S.M. A reverse logistics chain mathematical model for a sustainable production system of perishable goods based on demand optimization. J. Ind. Eng. Int. 2019 , 15 , 709–721. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mohammed, A.; Wang, Q.; Li, X. A cost-effective decision-making algorithm for an RFID-enabled HMSC network design: A multi-objective approach. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2017 , 117 , 1782–1799. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Alfian, G.; Syafrudin, M.; Farooq, U.; Ma’arif, M.R.; Syaekhoni, M.A.; Fitriyani, N.L.; Lee, J.; Rhee, J. Improving efficiency of RFID-based traceability system for perishable food by utilizing IoT sensors and machine learning model. Food Control 2020 , 110 , 107016. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Verghese, K.; Lewis, H.; Lockrey, S.; Williams, H. The Role of Packaging in Minimising Food Waste in the Supply Chain of the Future: Prepared for: CHEP Australia ; RMIT University Report: Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 2013. [ Google Scholar ]
• Singh, A.; Kumari, S.; Malekpoor, H.; Mishra, N. Big data cloud computing framework for low carbon supplier selection in the beef supply chain. J. Clean. Prod. 2018 , 202 , 139–149. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Thakur, M.; Forås, E. EPCIS based online temperature monitoring and traceability in a cold meat chain. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2015 , 117 , 22–30. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kittipanya-Ngam, P.; Tan, K.H. A framework for food supply chain digitalization: Lessons from Thailand. Prod. Plan. Control 2020 , 31 , 158–172. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Luo, H.; Zhu, M.; Ye, S.; Hou, H.; Chen, Y.; Bulysheva, L. An intelligent tracking system based on internet of things for the cold chain. Internet Res. 2016 , 26 , 435–445. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rodrigues, V.S.; Demir, E.; Wang, X.; Sarkis, J. Measurement, mitigation and prevention of food waste in supply chains: An online shopping perspective. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2021 , 93 , 545–562. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fung, F.; Wang, H.-S.; Menon, S. Food safety in the 21st century. Biomed. J. 2018 , 41 , 88–95. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Siems, E.; Land, A.; Seuring, S. Dynamic capabilities in sustainable supply chain management: An inter-temporal comparison of the food and automotive industries. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021 , 236 , 108128. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gholami-Zanjani, S.M.; Klibi, W.; Jabalameli, M.S.; Pishvaee, M.S. The design of resilient food supply chain networks prone to epidemic disruptions. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021 , 233 , 108001. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, J.; Yue, H. Food safety pre-warning system based on data mining for a sustainable food supply chain. Food Control 2017 , 73 , 223–229. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Esmaeilian, B.; Sarkis, J.; Lewis, K.; Behdad, S. Blockchain for the future of sustainable supply chain management in Industry 4.0. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020 , 163 , 105064. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• McKinna, D.; Wall, C. Commercial Application of Supply Chain Integrity and Shelf Life Systems ; Technical Report; Meat and Livestock Australia Limited: Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Jia, L.; Evans, S. Improving food allergen management in food manufacturing: An incentive-based approach. Food Control 2021 , 129 , 108246. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nyarugwe, S.P.; Linnemann, A.R.; Luning, P.A. Prevailing food safety culture in companies operating in a transition economy-Does product riskiness matter? Food Control 2020 , 107 , 106803. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sestino, A.; Prete, M.I.; Piper, L.; Guido, G. Internet of Things and Big Data as enablers for business digitalization strategies. Technovation 2020 , 98 , 102173. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Astill, J.; Dara, R.A.; Campbell, M.; Farber, J.M.; Fraser, E.D.; Sharif, S.; Yada, R.Y. Transparency in food supply chains: A review of enabling technology solutions. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019 , 91 , 240–247. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Singh, M.; Corradini, M.G. Big data and its role in mitigating food spoilage and quality deterioration along the supply chain. In Harnessing Big Data in Food Safety ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 93–112. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tiwari, S.; Wee, H.-M.; Daryanto, Y. Big data analytics in supply chain management between 2010 and 2016: Insights to industries. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2018 , 115 , 319–330. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, G.; Gunasekaran, A.; Ngai, E.W.; Papadopoulos, T. Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016 , 176 , 98–110. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Addo-Tenkorang, R.; Helo, P.T. Big data applications in operations/supply-chain management: A literature review. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2016 , 101 , 528–543. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Feng, H.; Wang, X.; Duan, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X. Applying blockchain technology to improve agri-food traceability: A review of development methods, benefits and challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 260 , 121031. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sanka, A.I.; Irfan, M.; Huang, I.; Cheung, R.C. A survey of breakthrough in blockchain technology: Adoptions, applications, challenges and future research. Comput. Commun. 2021 , 169 , 179–201. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Azzi, R.; Chamoun, R.K.; Sokhn, M. The power of a blockchain-based supply chain. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019 , 135 , 582–592. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Powell, W.; Foth, M.; Cao, S.; Natanelov, V. Garbage in garbage out: The precarious link between IoT and blockchain in food supply chains. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2022 , 25 , 100261. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Verboven, P.; Defraeye, T.; Datta, A.K.; Nicolai, B. Digital twins of food process operations: The next step for food process models? Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2020 , 35 , 79–87. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kuffi, K.D.; Defraeye, T.; Nicolai, B.M.; De Smet, S.; Geeraerd, A.; Verboven, P. CFD modeling of industrial cooling of large beef carcasses. Int. J. Refrig. 2016 , 69 , 324–339. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wu, W.; Beretta, C.; Cronje, P.; Hellweg, S.; Defraeye, T. Environmental trade-offs in fresh-fruit cold chains by combining virtual cold chains with life cycle assessment. Appl. Energy 2019 , 254 , 113586. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Agalianos, K.; Ponis, S.; Aretoulaki, E.; Plakas, G.; Efthymiou, O. Discrete event simulation and digital twins: Review and challenges for logistics. Procedia Manuf. 2020 , 51 , 1636–1641. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, Y.; Ma, X.; Liu, M.; Gong, K.; Liu, Y.; Xu, M.; Wang, Y. Cooperation and profit allocation in two-echelon logistics joint distribution network optimization. Appl. Soft Comput. 2017 , 56 , 143–157. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhu, Z.; Bai, Y.; Dai, W.; Liu, D.; Hu, Y. Quality of e-commerce agricultural products and the safety of the ecological environment of the origin based on 5G Internet of Things technology. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021 , 22 , 101462. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Osman, S.A.; Xu, C.; Akuful, M.; Paul, E.R. Perishable Food Supply Chain Management: Challenges and the Way Forward. Open J. Soc. Sci. 2023 , 11 , 349–364. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Verhoef, P.C.; Lemon, K.N. Successful customer value management: Key lessons and emerging trends. Eur. Manag. J. 2013 , 31 , 1–15. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tseng, M.-L. Modeling sustainable production indicators with linguistic preferences. J. Clean. Prod. 2013 , 40 , 46–56. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Derqui, B.; Fayos, T.; Fernandez, V. Towards a more sustainable food supply chain: Opening up invisible waste in food service. Sustainability 2016 , 8 , 693. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Heising, J.K.; Claassen, G.; Dekker, M. Options for reducing food waste by quality-controlled logistics using intelligent packaging along the supply chain. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2017 , 34 , 1672–1680. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Ravindran, R.; Jaiswal, A.K. Exploitation of food industry waste for high-value products. Trends Biotechnol. 2016 , 34 , 58–69. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lin, C.S.K.; Pfaltzgraff, L.A.; Herrero-Davila, L.; Mubofu, E.B.; Abderrahim, S.; Clark, J.H.; Koutinas, A.A.; Kopsahelis, N.; Stamatelatou, K.; Dickson, F. Food waste as a valuable resource for the production of chemicals, materials and fuels. Current situation and global perspective. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013 , 6 , 426–464. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Krishnan, R.; Arshinder, K.; Agarwal, R. Robust optimization of sustainable food supply chain network considering food waste valorization and supply uncertainty. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2022 , 171 , 108499. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cristóbal, J.; Castellani, V.; Manfredi, S.; Sala, S. Prioritizing and optimizing sustainable measures for food waste prevention and management. Waste Manag. 2018 , 72 , 3–16. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Karwowska, M.; Łaba, S.; Szczepański, K. Food loss and waste in meat sector—Why the consumption stage generates the most losses? Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 6227. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dani, S.; Deep, A. Fragile food supply chains: Reacting to risks. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2010 , 13 , 395–410. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Corrêa, H.L.; Xavier, L.H. Concepts, design and implementation of Reverse Logistics Systems for sustainable supply chains in Brazil. J. Oper. Supply Chain Manag. 2013 , 6 , 1. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pagell, M.; Shevchenko, A. Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2014 , 50 , 44–55. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Difrancesco, R.M.; Huchzermeier, A. Closed-loop supply chains: A guide to theory and practice. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2016 , 19 , 443–464. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Battini, D.; Bogataj, M.; Choudhary, A. Closed Loop Supply Chain (CLSC): Economics, Modelling, Management and Control ; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; Volume 183, pp. 319–321. [ Google Scholar ]
• Meneghetti, A.; Monti, L. Greening the food supply chain: An optimisation model for sustainable design of refrigerated automated warehouses. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2015 , 53 , 6567–6587. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Adekomaya, O.; Jamiru, T.; Sadiku, R.; Huan, Z. Sustaining the shelf life of fresh food in cold chain–A burden on the environment. Alex. Eng. J. 2016 , 55 , 1359–1365. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Benn, S.; Edwards, M.; Williams, T. Organizational Change for Corporate Sustainability ; Routledge: London, UK, 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
• Chopra, S.; Meindl, P. Supply Chain Management. Strategy, Planning & Operation ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007. [ Google Scholar ]
• Li, Q.; Liu, A. Big data driven supply chain management. Procedia CIRP 2019 , 81 , 1089–1094. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nagy, G.; Salhi, S. Location-routing: Issues, models and methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007 , 177 , 649–672. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kamariotou, M.; Kitsios, F.; Charatsari, C.; Lioutas, E.D.; Talias, M.A. Digital strategy decision support systems: Agrifood supply chain management in smes. Sensors 2021 , 22 , 274. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Trstenjak, M.; Opetuk, T.; Đukić, G.; Cajner, H. Logistics 5.0 Implementation Model Based on Decision Support Systems. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 6514. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cai, L.; Li, W.; Luo, Y.; He, L. Real-time scheduling simulation optimisation of job shop in a production-logistics collaborative environment. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2022 , 61 , 1373–1393. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Stijn, E.v.; Phuaphanthong, T.; Keretho, S.; Pikart, M.; Hofman, W.; Tan, Y.-H. Implementation Framework for e-solutions for Trade Facilitation. In Accelerating Global Supply Chains with IT-Innovation ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 285–317. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yavas, V.; Ozkan-Ozen, Y.D. Logistics centers in the new industrial era: A proposed framework for logistics center 4.0. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2020 , 135 , 101864. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zokaei, A.K.; Simons, D.W. Value chain analysis in consumer focus improvement: A case study of the UK red meat industry. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2006 , 17 , 141–162. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cox, A.; Chicksand, D.; Yang, T. The proactive alignment of sourcing with marketing and branding strategies: A food service case. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2007 , 12 , 321–333. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jie, F.; Gengatharen, D. Australian food retail supply chain analysis. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2019 , 25 , 271–287. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Knoll, S.; Marques, C.S.S.; Liu, J.; Zhong, F.; Padula, A.D.; Barcellos, J.O.J. The Sino-Brazilian beef supply chain: Mapping and risk detection. Br. Food J. 2017 , 119 , 164–180. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schilling-Vacaflor, A. Integrating human rights and the environment in supply chain regulations. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 9666. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Knoll, S.; Padula, A.D.; dos Santos, M.C.; Pumi, G.; Zhou, S.; Zhong, F.; Barcellos, J.O.J. Information flow in the Sino-Brazilian beef trade. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 2018 , 21 , 17–38. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• E-Fatima, K.; Khandan, R.; Hosseinian-Far, A.; Sarwar, D.; Ahmed, H.F. Adoption and Influence of Robotic Process Automation in Beef Supply Chains. Logistics 2022 , 6 , 48. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Storer, M.; Hyland, P.; Ferrer, M.; Santa, R.; Griffiths, A. Strategic supply chain management factors influencing agribusiness innovation utilization. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2014 , 25 , 487–521. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mangla, S.K.; Börühan, G.; Ersoy, P.; Kazancoglu, Y.; Song, M. Impact of information hiding on circular food supply chains in business-to-business context. J. Bus. Res. 2021 , 135 , 1–18. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Faisal, M.N. A study of inhibitors to transparency in red meat supply chains in Gulf cooperation council (GCC) countries. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2015 , 21 , 1299–1318. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shanoyan, A.; Schiavi Bankuti, S.M.; Colares-Santos, L. Analysis of incentive structures at producer–processor interface of beef supply chain in Brazil. J. Agribus. Dev. Emerg. Econ. 2019 , 9 , 159–174. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nakandala, D.; Lau, H.; Zhang, J. Cost-optimization modelling for fresh food quality and transportation. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2016 , 116 , 564–583. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ge, H.; Gómez, M.; Peters, C. Modeling and optimizing the beef supply chain in the Northeastern US. Agric. Econ. 2022 , 53 , 702–718. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hsiao, Y.-H.; Chen, M.-C.; Chin, C.-L. Distribution planning for perishable foods in cold chains with quality concerns: Formulation and solution procedure. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017 , 61 , 80–93. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Meksavang, P.; Shi, H.; Lin, S.-M.; Liu, H.-C. An extended picture fuzzy VIKOR approach for sustainable supplier management and its application in the beef industry. Symmetry 2019 , 11 , 468. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Taylor, D.H. Strategic considerations in the development of lean agri-food supply chains: A case study of the UK pork sector. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2006 , 11 , 271–280. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Erol, E.; Saghaian, S.H. The COVID-19 pandemic and dynamics of price adjustment in the US beef sector. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 4391. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Galuchi, T.P.D.; Rosales, F.P.; Batalha, M.O. Management of socioenvironmental factors of reputational risk in the beef supply chain in the Brazilian Amazon region. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 2019 , 22 , 155–171. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Silvestre, B.S.; Monteiro, M.S.; Viana, F.L.E.; de Sousa-Filho, J.M. Challenges for sustainable supply chain management: When stakeholder collaboration becomes conducive to corruption. J. Clean. Prod. 2018 , 194 , 766–776. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Eriksson, M.; Strid, I.; Hansson, P.-A. Waste of organic and conventional meat and dairy products—A case study from Swedish retail. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2014 , 83 , 44–52. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Accorsi, R.; Bortolini, M.; Gallo, A. Modeling by-products and waste management in the meat industry. In Sustainable Food Supply Chains ; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 339–349. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ersoy, P.; Börühan, G.; Kumar Mangla, S.; Hormazabal, J.H.; Kazancoglu, Y.; Lafcı, Ç. Impact of information technology and knowledge sharing on circular food supply chains for green business growth. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2022 , 31 , 1875–1904. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mahbubi, A.; Uchiyama, T. Assessing the sustainability of the Indonesian halal beef supply chain. Int. J. Food Syst. Dyn. 2020 , 11 , 468–481. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bragaglio, A.; Napolitano, F.; Pacelli, C.; Pirlo, G.; Sabia, E.; Serrapica, F.; Serrapica, M.; Braghieri, A. Environmental impacts of Italian beef production: A comparison between different systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2018 , 172 , 4033–4043. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zeidan, R.; Van Holt, T.; Whelan, T. Existence inductive theory building to study coordination failures in sustainable beef production. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 267 , 122137. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Santos, A.B.; Costa, M.H. Do large slaughterhouses promote sustainable intensification of cattle ranching in Amazonia and the Cerrado? Sustainability 2018 , 10 , 3266. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• E-Fatima, K.; Khandan, R.; Hosseinian-Far, A.; Sarwar, D. The Adoption of Robotic Process Automation Considering Financial Aspects in Beef Supply Chains: An Approach towards Sustainability. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 7236. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Huerta, A.R.; Güereca, L.P.; Lozano, M.d.l.S.R. Environmental impact of beef production in Mexico through life cycle assessment. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2016 , 109 , 44–53. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cox, A.; Chicksand, D.; Palmer, M. Stairways to heaven or treadmills to oblivion? Creating sustainable strategies in red meat supply chains. Br. Food J. 2007 , 109 , 689–720. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Teresa, H.; Áine, M.-W.; Olive, M.; Carol, P.; Maeve, H. Co-operation among Irish beef farmers: Current perspectives and future prospects in the context of new producer organisation (PO) legislation. Sustainability 2018 , 10 , 4085. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kyayesimira, J.; Wangalwa, R.; Kagoro Rugunda, G.; Lejju, J.B.; Matofari, J.W.; Andama, M. Causes of losses and the economic loss estimates at post-harvest handling points along the beef value chain in Uganda. J. Agric. Ext. Rural. Dev. 2019 , 11 , 176–183. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ranaei, V.; Pilevar, Z.; Esfandiari, C.; Khaneghah, A.M.; Dhakal, R.; Vargas-Bello-Pérez, E.; Hosseini, H. Meat value chain losses in Iran. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2021 , 41 , 16–33. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Wiedemann, S.; McGahan, E.; Murphy, C.; Yan, M.-J.; Henry, B.; Thoma, G.; Ledgard, S. Environmental impacts and resource use of Australian beef and lamb exported to the USA determined using life cycle assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 2015 , 94 , 67–75. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Martínez, C.I.P.; Poveda, A.C. Characterization of cooling equipment in the food industry: Case study of the Colombian meat, dairy, and fruit and vegetable sectors. Environ. Dev. 2022 , 41 , 100693. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fattahi, F.; Nookabadi, A.S.; Kadivar, M. A model for measuring the performance of the meat supply chain. Br. Food J. 2013 , 115 , 1090–1111. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Florindo, T.; Florindo, G.d.M.; Talamini, E.; da Costa, J.; de Léis, C.; Tang, W.; Schultz, G.; Kulay, L.; Pinto, A.; Ruviaro, C.F. Application of the multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach in the identification of Carbon Footprint reduction actions in the Brazilian beef production chain. J. Clean. Prod. 2018 , 196 , 1379–1389. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Diaz, F.; Vignati, J.A.; Marchi, B.; Paoli, R.; Zanoni, S.; Romagnoli, F. Effects of energy efficiency measures in the beef cold chain: A life cycle-based study. Environ. Clim. Technol. 2021 , 25 , 343–355. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schmidt, B.V.; Moreno, M.S. Traceability optimization in the meat supply chain with economic and environmental considerations. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2022 , 169 , 108271. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Domingues Zucchi, J.; Zeng, A.Z.; Caixeta-Filho, J.V. Optimum location for export-oriented slaughterhouses in Mato Grosso, Brazil: A dynamic mathematical model. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2011 , 14 , 135–148. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dorcheh, F.R.; Rahbari, M. Greenhouse gas emissions optimization for distribution and vehicle routing problem in a poultry meat supply chain in two phases: A case study in Iran. Process Integr. Optim. Sustain. 2023 , 7 , 1289–1317. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Javanmard, S.; Vahdani, B.; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. Solving a multi-product distribution planning problem in cross docking networks: An imperialist competitive algorithm. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2014 , 70 , 1709–1720. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dai, Z.; Aqlan, F.; Zheng, X.; Gao, K. A location-inventory supply chain network model using two heuristic algorithms for perishable products with fuzzy constraints. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2018 , 119 , 338–352. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Saragih, N.I.; Bahagia, N.; Syabri, I. A heuristic method for location-inventory-routing problem in a three-echelon supply chain system. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019 , 127 , 875–886. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hiassat, A.; Diabat, A.; Rahwan, I. A genetic algorithm approach for location-inventory-routing problem with perishable products. J. Manuf. Syst. 2017 , 42 , 93–103. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Le, T.; Diabat, A.; Richard, J.-P.; Yih, Y. A column generation-based heuristic algorithm for an inventory routing problem with perishable goods. Optim. Lett. 2013 , 7 , 1481–1502. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, X.; Wang, M.; Ruan, J.; Zhan, H. The multi-objective optimization for perishable food distribution route considering temporal-spatial distance. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2016 , 96 , 1211–1220. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rafie-Majd, Z.; Pasandideh, S.H.R.; Naderi, B. Modelling and solving the integrated inventory-location-routing problem in a multi-period and multi-perishable product supply chain with uncertainty: Lagrangian relaxation algorithm. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2018 , 109 , 9–22. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Singh, A.; Mishra, N.; Ali, S.I.; Shukla, N.; Shankar, R. Cloud computing technology: Reducing carbon footprint in beef supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015 , 164 , 462–471. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, Y.; Baker, D.; Griffith, G. Product quality information in supply chains: A performance-linked conceptual framework applied to the Australian red meat industry. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2020 , 31 , 697–723. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cao, S.; Powell, W.; Foth, M.; Natanelov, V.; Miller, T.; Dulleck, U. Strengthening consumer trust in beef supply chain traceability with a blockchain-based human-machine reconcile mechanism. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021 , 180 , 105886. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kassahun, A.; Hartog, R.J.; Tekinerdogan, B. Realizing chain-wide transparency in meat supply chains based on global standards and a reference architecture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2016 , 123 , 275–291. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ribeiro, P.C.C.; Scavarda, A.J.; Batalha, M.O. The application of RFID in brazilian harvest facilities: Two case studies. Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag. 2011 , 3 , 1–63. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cao, S.; Foth, M.; Powell, W.; Miller, T.; Li, M. A blockchain-based multisignature approach for supply chain governance: A use case from the Australian beef industry. Blockchain Res. Appl. 2022 , 3 , 100091. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wu, J.-Y.; Hsiao, H.-I. Food quality and safety risk diagnosis in the food cold chain through failure mode and effect analysis. Food Control 2021 , 120 , 107501. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Davoudi, S.; Stasinopoulos, P.; Shiwakoti, N. Two Decades of Advancements in Cold Supply Chain Logistics for Reducing Food Waste: A Review with Focus on the Meat Industry. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 6986. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166986

Davoudi S, Stasinopoulos P, Shiwakoti N. Two Decades of Advancements in Cold Supply Chain Logistics for Reducing Food Waste: A Review with Focus on the Meat Industry. Sustainability . 2024; 16(16):6986. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166986

Davoudi, Sina, Peter Stasinopoulos, and Nirajan Shiwakoti. 2024. "Two Decades of Advancements in Cold Supply Chain Logistics for Reducing Food Waste: A Review with Focus on the Meat Industry" Sustainability 16, no. 16: 6986. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166986

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals