critical thinking skills in reading listening and writing

Module 1: Success Skills

Critical thinking, introduction, learning objectives.

• define critical thinking
• identify the role that logic plays in critical thinking
• apply critical thinking skills to problem-solving scenarios
• apply critical thinking skills to evaluation of information

Consider these thoughts about the critical thinking process, and how it applies not just to our school lives but also our personal and professional lives.

“Thinking Critically and Creatively”

Critical thinking skills are perhaps the most fundamental skills involved in making judgments and solving problems. You use them every day, and you can continue improving them.

The ability to think critically about a matter—to analyze a question, situation, or problem down to its most basic parts—is what helps us evaluate the accuracy and truthfulness of statements, claims, and information we read and hear. It is the sharp knife that, when honed, separates fact from fiction, honesty from lies, and the accurate from the misleading. We all use this skill to one degree or another almost every day. For example, we use critical thinking every day as we consider the latest consumer products and why one particular product is the best among its peers. Is it a quality product because a celebrity endorses it? Because a lot of other people may have used it? Because it is made by one company versus another? Or perhaps because it is made in one country or another? These are questions representative of critical thinking.

The academic setting demands more of us in terms of critical thinking than everyday life. It demands that we evaluate information and analyze myriad issues. It is the environment where our critical thinking skills can be the difference between success and failure. In this environment we must consider information in an analytical, critical manner. We must ask questions—What is the source of this information? Is this source an expert one and what makes it so? Are there multiple perspectives to consider on an issue? Do multiple sources agree or disagree on an issue? Does quality research substantiate information or opinion? Do I have any personal biases that may affect my consideration of this information?

It is only through purposeful, frequent, intentional questioning such as this that we can sharpen our critical thinking skills and improve as students, learners and researchers.

—Dr. Andrew Robert Baker,  Foundations of Academic Success: Words of Wisdom

Defining Critical Thinking

Thinking comes naturally. You don’t have to make it happen—it just does. But you can make it happen in different ways. For example, you can think positively or negatively. You can think with “heart” and you can think with rational judgment. You can also think strategically and analytically, and mathematically and scientifically. These are a few of multiple ways in which the mind can process thought.

What are some forms of thinking you use? When do you use them, and why?

As a college student, you are tasked with engaging and expanding your thinking skills. One of the most important of these skills is critical thinking. Critical thinking is important because it relates to nearly all tasks, situations, topics, careers, environments, challenges, and opportunities. It’s not restricted to a particular subject area.

Critical thinking is clear, reasonable, reflective thinking focused on deciding what to believe or do. It means asking probing questions like, “How do we know?” or “Is this true in every case or just in this instance?” It involves being skeptical and challenging assumptions, rather than simply memorizing facts or blindly accepting what you hear or read.

Imagine, for example, that you’re reading a history textbook. You wonder who wrote it and why, because you detect certain assumptions in the writing. You find that the author has a limited scope of research focused only on a particular group within a population. In this case, your critical thinking reveals that there are “other sides to the story.”

Who are critical thinkers, and what characteristics do they have in common? Critical thinkers are usually curious and reflective people. They like to explore and probe new areas and seek knowledge, clarification, and new solutions. They ask pertinent questions, evaluate statements and arguments, and they distinguish between facts and opinion. They are also willing to examine their own beliefs, possessing a manner of humility that allows them to admit lack of knowledge or understanding when needed. They are open to changing their mind. Perhaps most of all, they actively enjoy learning, and seeking new knowledge is a lifelong pursuit.

This may well be you!

No matter where you are on the road to being a critical thinker, you can always more fully develop your skills. Doing so will help you develop more balanced arguments, express yourself clearly, read critically, and absorb important information efficiently. Critical thinking skills will help you in any profession or any circumstance of life, from science to art to business to teaching.

Critical Thinking in Action

The following video, from Lawrence Bland, presents the major concepts and benefits of critical thinking.

Critical Thinking and Logic

Critical thinking is fundamentally a process of questioning information and data. You may question the information you read in a textbook, or you may question what a politician or a professor or a classmate says. You can also question a commonly-held belief or a new idea. With critical thinking, anything and everything is subject to question and examination.

Logic’s Relationship to Critical Thinking

The word logic comes from the Ancient Greek logike , referring to the science or art of reasoning. Using logic, a person evaluates arguments and strives to distinguish between good and bad reasoning, or between truth and falsehood. Using logic, you can evaluate ideas or claims people make, make good decisions, and form sound beliefs about the world. [1]

Questions of Logic in Critical Thinking

Let’s use a simple example of applying logic to a critical-thinking situation. In this hypothetical scenario, a man has a PhD in political science, and he works as a professor at a local college. His wife works at the college, too. They have three young children in the local school system, and their family is well known in the community.

The man is now running for political office. Are his credentials and experience sufficient for entering public office? Will he be effective in the political office? Some voters might believe that his personal life and current job, on the surface, suggest he will do well in the position, and they will vote for him.

In truth, the characteristics described don’t guarantee that the man will do a good job. The information is somewhat irrelevant. What else might you want to know? How about whether the man had already held a political office and done a good job? In this case, we want to ask, How much information is adequate in order to make a decision based on logic instead of assumptions?

The following questions, presented in Figure 1, below, are ones you may apply to formulating a logical, reasoned perspective in the above scenario or any other situation:

• What’s happening? Gather the basic information and begin to think of questions.
• Why is it important? Ask yourself why it’s significant and whether or not you agree.
• What don’t I see? Is there anything important missing?
• How do I know? Ask yourself where the information came from and how it was constructed.
• Who is saying it? What’s the position of the speaker and what is influencing them?
• What else? What if? What other ideas exist and are there other possibilities?

Problem-Solving With Critical Thinking

For most people, a typical day is filled with critical thinking and problem-solving challenges. In fact, critical thinking and problem-solving go hand-in-hand. They both refer to using knowledge, facts, and data to solve problems effectively. But with problem-solving, you are specifically identifying, selecting, and defending your solution. Below are some examples of using critical thinking to problem-solve:

• Your roommate was upset and said some unkind words to you, which put a crimp in your relationship. You try to see through the angry behaviors to determine how you might best support your roommate and help bring your relationship back to a comfortable spot.

• Your final art class project challenges you to conceptualize form in new ways. On the last day of class when students present their projects, you describe the techniques you used to fulfill the assignment. You explain why and how you selected that approach.
• Your math teacher sees that the class is not quite grasping a concept. She uses clever questioning to dispel anxiety and guide you to new understanding of the concept.
• You have a job interview for a position that you feel you are only partially qualified for, although you really want the job and you are excited about the prospects. You analyze how you will explain your skills and experiences in a way to show that you are a good match for the prospective employer.
• You are doing well in college, and most of your college and living expenses are covered. But there are some gaps between what you want and what you feel you can afford. You analyze your income, savings, and budget to better calculate what you will need to stay in college and maintain your desired level of spending.

Problem-Solving Action Checklist

Problem-solving can be an efficient and rewarding process, especially if you are organized and mindful of critical steps and strategies. Remember, too, to assume the attributes of a good critical thinker. If you are curious, reflective, knowledge-seeking, open to change, probing, organized, and ethical, your challenge or problem will be less of a hurdle, and you’ll be in a good position to find intelligent solutions.

Evaluating Information With Critical Thinking

Evaluating information can be one of the most complex tasks you will be faced with in college. But if you utilize the following four strategies, you will be well on your way to success:

• Read for understanding by using text coding
• Examine arguments
• Clarify thinking

1. Read for Understanding Using Text Coding

When you read and take notes, use the text coding strategy . Text coding is a way of tracking your thinking while reading. It entails marking the text and recording what you are thinking either in the margins or perhaps on Post-it notes. As you make connections and ask questions in response to what you read,  you monitor your comprehension and enhance your long-term understanding of the material.

With text coding, mark important arguments and key facts. Indicate where you agree and disagree or have further questions. You don’t necessarily need to read every word, but make sure you understand the concepts or the intentions behind what is written. Feel free to develop your own shorthand style when reading or taking notes. The following are a few options to consider using while coding text.

See more text coding from PBWorks and Collaborative for Teaching and Learning .

2. Examine Arguments

When you examine arguments or claims that an author, speaker, or other source is making, your goal is to identify and examine the hard facts. You can use the spectrum of authority strategy for this purpose. The spectrum of authority strategy assists you in identifying the “hot” end of an argument—feelings, beliefs, cultural influences, and societal influences—and the “cold” end of an argument—scientific influences. The following video explains this strategy.

3. Clarify Thinking

When you use critical thinking to evaluate information, you need to clarify your thinking to yourself and likely to others. Doing this well is mainly a process of asking and answering probing questions, such as the logic questions discussed earlier. Design your questions to fit your needs, but be sure to cover adequate ground. What is the purpose? What question are we trying to answer? What point of view is being expressed? What assumptions are we or others making? What are the facts and data we know, and how do we know them? What are the concepts we’re working with? What are the conclusions, and do they make sense? What are the implications?

4. Cultivate “Habits of Mind”

“Habits of mind” are the personal commitments, values, and standards you have about the principle of good thinking. Consider your intellectual commitments, values, and standards. Do you approach problems with an open mind, a respect for truth, and an inquiring attitude? Some good habits to have when thinking critically are being receptive to having your opinions changed, having respect for others, being independent and not accepting something is true until you’ve had the time to examine the available evidence, being fair-minded, having respect for a reason, having an inquiring mind, not making assumptions, and always, especially, questioning your own conclusions—in other words, developing an intellectual work ethic. Try to work these qualities into your daily life.

• "logic." Wordnik . n.d. Web. 16 Feb 2016 . ↵
• "Student Success-Thinking Critically In Class and Online."  Critical Thinking Gateway . St Petersburg College, n.d. Web. 16 Feb 2016. ↵
• Outcome: Critical Thinking. Provided by : Lumen Learning. License : CC BY: Attribution
• Self Check: Critical Thinking. Provided by : Lumen Learning. License : CC BY: Attribution
• Foundations of Academic Success. Authored by : Thomas C. Priester, editor. Provided by : Open SUNY Textbooks. Located at : http://textbooks.opensuny.org/foundations-of-academic-success/ . License : CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
• Image of woman thinking. Authored by : Moyan Brenn. Located at : https://flic.kr/p/8YV4K5 . License : CC BY: Attribution
• Critical Thinking. Provided by : Critical and Creative Thinking Program. Located at : http://cct.wikispaces.umb.edu/Critical+Thinking . License : CC BY: Attribution
• Critical Thinking Skills. Authored by : Linda Bruce. Provided by : Lumen Learning. Project : https://courses.lumenlearning.com/lumencollegesuccess/chapter/critical-thinking-skills/. License : CC BY: Attribution
• Image of critical thinking poster. Authored by : Melissa Robison. Located at : https://flic.kr/p/bwAzyD . License : CC BY: Attribution
• Thinking Critically. Authored by : UBC Learning Commons. Provided by : The University of British Columbia, Vancouver Campus. Located at : http://www.oercommons.org/courses/learning-toolkit-critical-thinking/view . License : CC BY: Attribution
• Critical Thinking 101: Spectrum of Authority. Authored by : UBC Leap. Located at : https://youtu.be/9G5xooMN2_c . License : CC BY: Attribution
• Image of students putting post-its on wall. Authored by : Hector Alejandro. Located at : https://flic.kr/p/7b2Ax2 . License : CC BY: Attribution
• Image of man thinking. Authored by : Chad Santos. Located at : https://flic.kr/p/phLKY . License : CC BY: Attribution
• Critical Thinking.wmv. Authored by : Lawrence Bland. Located at : https://youtu.be/WiSklIGUblo . License : All Rights Reserved . License Terms : Standard YouTube License

Tips on How to Use Critical Thinking in Reading and Writing

Examples of Critical Reading

Critical reading is the use of critical thinking in reading. You’ll have most likely encountered this during your school years, when an exam lets you read a passage or essay and then asks you questions about the text you’ve just read.

But using critical thinking in reading, you would know that: 1) There’s a person named John, 2) it’s raining outside, 3) he didn’t have an umbrella or raincoat.

Why is Critical Thinking Important in Reading and Writing?

Critical thinking is important because you’ll need it to decipher the nuances that are hidden within a simple text. Or, if you are writing to someone, you can tell something in a not-so straightforward manner. In creative fiction, this makes for a more unique and dynamic storytelling, which will be more enjoyable to the reader.

How to Use Critical Thinking in Reading?

How to use critical thinking in writing.

Try the tips mentioned above the next time you read or write a piece. See if it makes you think critically!

You may also like

Best sports for critical thinking: enhancing mental agility through athletics, best approach to problem solving: efficient strategies for success, using critical thinking to find your strengths and passions, critical thinking skills in the workplace, download this free ebook.

• LEARNING SKILLS
• Study Skills
• Critical Reading

Search SkillsYouNeed:

Learning Skills:

• A - Z List of Learning Skills
• What is Learning?
• Learning Approaches
• Learning Styles
• 8 Types of Learning Styles
• Understanding Your Preferences to Aid Learning
• Lifelong Learning
• Decisions to Make Before Applying to University
• Top Tips for Surviving Student Life
• Living Online: Education and Learning
• 8 Ways to Embrace Technology-Based Learning Approaches
• Critical Thinking Skills
• Critical Thinking and Fake News
• Understanding and Addressing Conspiracy Theories
• Critical Analysis
• Top Tips for Study
• Staying Motivated When Studying
• Student Budgeting and Economic Skills
• Getting Organised for Study
• Finding Time to Study
• Sources of Information
• Assessing Internet Information
• Using Apps to Support Study
• What is Theory?
• Styles of Writing
• Effective Reading
• Note-Taking from Reading
• Note-Taking for Verbal Exchanges
• Planning an Essay
• How to Write an Essay
• The Do’s and Don’ts of Essay Writing
• How to Write a Report
• Academic Referencing
• Assignment Finishing Touches
• Reflecting on Marked Work
• 6 Skills You Learn in School That You Use in Real Life
• Top 10 Tips on How to Study While Working
• Exam Skills

Get the SkillsYouNeed Study Skills eBook

Part of the Skills You Need Guide for Students .

• Writing a Dissertation or Thesis
• Research Methods
• Teaching, Coaching, Mentoring and Counselling
• Employability Skills for Graduates

Subscribe to our FREE newsletter and start improving your life in just 5 minutes a day.

You'll get our 5 free 'One Minute Life Skills' and our weekly newsletter.

We'll never share your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Critical Reading and Reading Strategy

What is critical reading.

Reading critically does not, necessarily, mean being critical of what you read.

Both reading and thinking critically don’t mean being ‘ critical ’ about some idea, argument, or piece of writing - claiming that it is somehow faulty or flawed.

Critical reading means engaging in what you read by asking yourself questions such as, ‘ what is the author trying to say? ’ or ‘ what is the main argument being presented? ’

Critical reading involves presenting a reasoned argument that evaluates and analyses what you have read.  Being critical, therefore - in an academic sense - means advancing your understanding , not dismissing and therefore closing off learning.

See also: Listening Types to learn about the importance of critical listening skills.

To read critically is to exercise your judgement about what you are reading – that is, not taking anything you read at face value.

When reading academic material you will be faced with the author’s interpretation and opinion.  Different authors will, naturally, have different slants. You should always examine what you are reading critically and look for limitations, omissions, inconsistencies, oversights and arguments against what you are reading.

In academic circles, whilst you are a student, you will be expected to understand different viewpoints and make your own judgements based on what you have read.

Critical reading goes further than just being satisfied with what a text says, it also involves reflecting on what the text describes, and analysing what the text actually means, in the context of your studies.

As a critical reader you should reflect on:

• What the text says:  after critically reading a piece you should be able to take notes, paraphrasing - in your own words - the key points.
• What the text describes: you should be confident that you have understood the text sufficiently to be able to use your own examples and compare and contrast with other writing on the subject in hand.
• Interpretation of the text: this means that you should be able to fully analyse the text and state a meaning for the text as a whole.

Critical reading means being able to reflect on what a text says, what it describes and what it means by scrutinising the style and structure of the writing, the language used as well as the content.

Critical Thinking is an Extension of Critical Reading

Thinking critically, in the academic sense, involves being open-minded - using judgement and discipline to process what you are learning about without letting your personal bias or opinion detract from the arguments.

Critical thinking involves being rational and aware of your own feelings on the subject – being able to reorganise your thoughts, prior knowledge and understanding to accommodate new ideas or viewpoints.

Critical reading and critical thinking are therefore the very foundations of true learning and personal development.

See our page: Critical Thinking for more.

Developing a Reading Strategy

You will, in formal learning situations, be required to read and critically think about a lot of information from different sources. 

It is important therefore, that you not only learn to read critically but also efficiently.

The first step to efficient reading is to become selective.

If you cannot read all of the books on a recommended reading list, you need to find a way of selecting the best texts for you. To start with, you need to know what you are looking for.  You can then examine the contents page and/or index of a book or journal to ascertain whether a chapter or article is worth pursuing further.

Once you have selected a suitable piece the next step is to speed-read.

Speed reading is also often referred to as skim-reading or scanning.  Once you have identified a relevant piece of text, like a chapter in a book, you should scan the first few sentences of each paragraph to gain an overall impression of subject areas it covers.  Scan-reading essentially means that you know what you are looking for, you identify the chapters or sections most relevant to you and ignore the rest.

When you speed-read you are not aiming to gain a full understanding of the arguments or topics raised in the text.  It is simply a way of determining what the text is about. 

When you find a relevant or interesting section you will need to slow your reading speed dramatically, allowing you to gain a more in-depth understanding of the arguments raised.  Even when you slow your reading down it may well be necessary to read passages several times to gain a full understanding.

See also: Speed-Reading for Professionals .

Following SQ3R

SQ3R is a well-known strategy for reading. SQ3R can be applied to a whole range of reading purposes as it is flexible and takes into account the need to change reading speeds.

SQ3R is an acronym and stands for:

This relates to speed-reading, scanning and skimming the text.  At this initial stage you will be attempting to gain the general gist of the material in question.

It is important that, before you begin to read, you have a question or set of questions that will guide you - why am I reading this?  When you have a purpose to your reading you want to learn and retain certain information.  Having questions changes reading from a passive to an active pursuit.  Examples of possible questions include:

• What do I already know about this subject?
• How does this chapter relate to the assignment question?
• How can I relate what I read to my own experiences?

Now you will be ready for the main activity of reading.  This involves careful consideration of the meaning of what the author is trying to convey and involves being critical as well as active.

Regardless of how interesting an article or chapter is, unless you make a concerted effort to recall what you have just read, you will forget a lot of the important points.  Recalling from time to time allows you to focus upon the main points – which in turn aids concentration. Recalling gives you the chance to think about and assimilate what you have just read, keeping you active.  A significant element in being active is to write down, in your own words, the key points. 

The final step is to review the material that you have recalled in your notes.  Did you understand the main principles of the argument?  Did you identify all the main points?  Are there any gaps?   Do not take for granted that you have recalled everything you need correctly – review the text again to make sure and clarify.

Continue to: Effective Reading Critical Thinking

See also: Critical Analysis Writing a Dissertation Critical Thinking and Fake News

Writing to Think: Critical Thinking and the Writing Process

“Writing is thinking on paper.” (Zinsser, 1976, p. vii)

Google the term “critical thinking.” How many hits are there? On the day this tutorial was completed, Google found about 65,100,000 results in 0.56 seconds. That’s an impressive number, and it grows more impressively large every day. That’s because the nation’s educators, business leaders, and political representatives worry about the level of critical thinking skills among today’s students and workers.

What is Critical Thinking?

Simply put, critical thinking is sound thinking. Critical thinkers work to delve beneath the surface of sweeping generalizations, biases, clichés, and other quick observations that characterize ineffective thinking. They are willing to consider points of view different from their own, seek and study evidence and examples, root out sloppy and illogical argument, discern fact from opinion, embrace reason over emotion or preference, and change their minds when confronted with compelling reasons to do so. In sum, critical thinkers are flexible thinkers equipped to become active and effective spouses, parents, friends, consumers, employees, citizens, and leaders. Every area of life, in other words, can be positively affected by strong critical thinking.

Released in January 2011, an important study of college students over four years concluded that by graduation “large numbers [of American undergraduates] didn’t learn the critical thinking, complex reasoning and written communication skills that are widely assumed to be at the core of a college education” (Rimer, 2011, para. 1). The University designs curriculum, creates support programs, and hires faculty to help ensure you won’t be one of the students “[showing]no significant gains in . . . ‘higher order’ thinking skills” (Rimer, 2011, para. 4). One way the University works to help you build those skills is through writing projects.

Writing and Critical Thinking

Say the word “writing” and most people think of a completed publication. But say the word “writing” to writers, and they will likely think of the process of composing. Most writers would agree with novelist E. M. Forster, who wrote, “How can I know what I think until I see what I say?” (Forster, 1927, p. 99). Experienced writers know that the act of writing stimulates thinking.

Inexperienced and experienced writers have very different understandings of composition. Novice writers often make the mistake of believing they have to know what they’re going to write before they can begin writing. They often compose a thesis statement before asking questions or conducting research. In the course of their reading, they might even disregard material that counters their pre-formed ideas. This is not writing; it is recording.

In contrast, experienced writers begin with questions and work to discover many different answers before settling on those that are most convincing. They know that the act of putting words on paper or a computer screen helps them invent thought and content. Rather than trying to express what they already think, they express what the act of writing leads them to think as they put down words. More often than not, in other words, experienced writers write their way into ideas, which they then develop, revise, and refine as they go.

What has this notion of writing to do with critical thinking? Everything.

Consider the steps of the writing process: prewriting, outlining, drafting, revising, editing, seeking feedback, and publishing. These steps are not followed in a determined or strict order; instead, the effective writer knows that as they write, it may be necessary to return to an earlier step. In other words, in the process of revision, a writer may realize that the order of ideas is unclear. A new outline may help that writer re-order details. As they write, the writer considers and reconsiders the effectiveness of the work.

The writing process, then, is not just a mirror image of the thinking process: it is the thinking process. Confronted with a topic, an effective critical thinker/writer

• asks questions
• seeks answers
• evaluates evidence
• questions assumptions
• tests hypotheses
• makes inferences
• employs logic
• draws conclusions
• predicts readers’ responses
• creates order
• drafts content
• seeks others’ responses
• weighs feedback
• criticizes their own work
• revises content and structure
• seeks clarity and coherence

Example of Composition as Critical Thinking

“Good writing is fueled by unanswerable questions” (Lane, 1993, p. 15).

Imagine that you have been asked to write about a hero or heroine from history. You must explain what challenges that individual faced and how they conquered them. Now imagine that you decide to write about Rosa Parks and her role in the modern Civil Rights movement. Take a moment and survey what you already know. She refused to get up out of her seat on a bus so a White man could sit in it. She was arrested. As a result, Blacks in Montgomery protested, influencing the Montgomery Bus Boycott. Martin Luther King, Jr. took up leadership of the cause, and ultimately a movement was born.

Is that really all there is to Rosa Parks’s story? What questions might a thoughtful writer ask? Here a few:

• Why did Rosa Parks refuse to get up on that particular day?
• Was hers a spontaneous or planned act of defiance?
• Did she work? Where? Doing what?
• Had any other Black person refused to get up for a White person?
• What happened to that individual or those individuals?
• Why hadn’t that person or those persons received the publicity Parks did?
• Was Parks active in Civil Rights before that day?
• How did she learn about civil disobedience?

Even just these few questions could lead to potentially rich information.

Factual information would not be enough, however, to satisfy an assignment that asks for an interpretation of that information. The writer’s job for the assignment is to convince the reader that Parks was a heroine; in this way the writer must make an argument and support it. The writer must establish standards of heroic behavior. More questions arise:

• What is heroic action?
• What are the characteristics of someone who is heroic?
• What do heroes value and believe?
• What are the consequences of a hero’s actions?
• Why do they matter?

Now the writer has even more research and more thinking to do.

By the time they have raised questions and answered them, raised more questions and answered them, and so on, they are ready to begin writing. But even then, new ideas will arise in the course of planning and drafting, inevitably leading the writer to more research and thought, to more composition and refinement.

Ultimately, every step of the way over the course of composing a project, the writer is engaged in critical thinking because the effective writer examines the work as they develop it.

Why Writing to Think Matters

Writing practice builds critical thinking, which empowers people to “take charge of [their] own minds” so they “can take charge of [their] own lives . . . and improve them, bringing them under [their] self command and direction” (Foundation for Critical Thinking, 2020, para. 12). Writing is a way of coming to know and understand the self and the changing world, enabling individuals to make decisions that benefit themselves, others, and society at large. Your knowledge alone – of law, medicine, business, or education, for example – will not be enough to meet future challenges. You will be tested by new unexpected circumstances, and when they arise, the open-mindedness, flexibility, reasoning, discipline, and discernment you have learned through writing practice will help you meet those challenges successfully.

Forster, E.M. (1927).  Aspects of the novel . Harcourt, Brace & Company.

The Foundation for Critical Thinking. (2020, June 17).  Our concept and definition of critical thinking . https://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/our-concept-of-critical-thinking/411

Lane, B. (1993).  After the end: Teaching and learning creative revision . Heinemann.

Rimer, S. (2011, January 18).  Study: Many college students not learning to think critically . The Hechinger Report. https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article24608056.html

Zinsser, W. (1976).  On writing well: The classic guide to writing nonfiction . HarperCollins.

Share this:

• Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
• Click to print (Opens in new window)

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive email notifications of new posts.

Email Address

• RSS - Posts
• RSS - Comments
• COLLEGE WRITING
• USING SOURCES & APA STYLE
• EFFECTIVE WRITING PODCASTS
• LEARNING FOR SUCCESS
• PLAGIARISM INFORMATION
• FACULTY RESOURCES
• Student Webinar Calendar
• Academic Success Center
• Writing Center
• About the ASC Tutors
• DIVERSITY TRAINING
• PG Peer Tutors
• PG Student Access

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

• College Writing
• Using Sources & APA Style
• Learning for Success
• Effective Writing Podcasts
• Plagiarism Information
• Faculty Resources
• Tutor Training

Twitter feed

Effective reading skills: Critical thinking

• What's in this Guide

Critical thinking

• Effective reading skills
• Effective reading for note making
• Working through an example
• Additional resources

Critical thinking is essential for learning.

As a student, you will be expected to critically  appraise all of your reading, writing, listening and discussing. Basically this involves

The word ‘critical’ is commonly thought to have a negative meaning – finding fault with something.

At university ‘critical’ has a broader meaning.

Being critical involves making judgements and evaluations , based on evidence gained from reading widely and thinking deeply .

Pathways and Academic Learning Support

• << Previous: What's in this Guide
• Next: Effective reading skills >>
• Last Updated: Apr 27, 2023 4:27 PM
• URL: https://libguides.newcastle.edu.au/effective_reading_skills

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

4 – Critical Writing

Critical writing depends on critical thinking. Your writing will involve reflection on written texts: that is, critical reading.

[Source: Lane, 2021, Critical Thinking for Critical Writing ]

Critical writing entails the skills of critical thinking and reading. At college, the three skills are interdependent, reflected in the kinds of assignments you have to do.

Now let’s look at some real university-level assignments across different majors. Pay attention to the highlighted words used in the assignment descriptions.

As you can tell, all the assignments have both critical reading and writing components. You have to read a lot (e.g., “Use at least 5 current Economics research articles,” “refer to 2 other documents,” and “Select 4-5 secondary sources”) and critically before you form your own opinions and then start to write. Sometimes reading is for ideas and evidence (i.e., reasons, examples, and information from sources), and other times reading is to provide an evaluation of information accuracy (e.g., research designs, statistics). Without critical thinking and reading, critical writing will have no ground. Critical thinking and reading are the prerequisites for critical writing. A clear definition of critical writing is provided below.

What is Critical Writing?

Critical writing is writing which analyses and evaluates information, usually from multiple sources, in order to develop an argument. A mistake many beginning writers make is to assume that everything they read is true and that they should agree with it, since it has been published in an academic text or journal. Being part of the academic community, however, means that you should be critical of (i.e. question) what you read, looking for reasons why it should be accepted or rejected, for example by comparing it with what other writers say about the topic, or evaluating the research methods to see if they are adequate or whether they could be improved.

[Source: Critical Writing ]

If you are used to accepting the ideas and opinions stated in a text, you have to relearn how to be critical in evaluating the reliability of the sources, particularly in the online space as a large amount of online information is not screened. In addition, critical writing is different from the types of writing (e.g., descriptive writing) you might have practiced in primary and secondary education.

The following table gives some examples to show the difference between descriptive and critical writing (adapted from the website ). Pay attention to the different verbs used in the Table for the comparisons.

You might feel familiar with the verbs used in the column describing critical writing. If you still remember, those words are also used to depict the characteristics of critical thinking and reading.

ACTIVITY #1:

Read the two writing samples, identify which one is descriptive writing and which one is critical writing, and explain your judgment.

Sample 1: Recently, President Jacob Zuma made the decision to reshuffle the parliamentary cabinet, including the firing of finance minister, Pravin Gordhan. This decision was not well received by many South Africans.

Sample 2: President Zuma’s firing of popular finance minister, Gordhan drastically impacted investor confidence. This led to a sharp decrease in the value of the Rand. Such devaluation means that all USD-based imports (including petrol) will rise in cost, thereby raising the cost of living for South Africans, and reducing disposable income. This puts both cost and price pressure on Organisation X as an importer of USD-based goods Y, requiring it to consider doing Z. Furthermore, political instability has the added impact of encouraging immigration, particularly amongst skilled workers whose expertise is valued abroad (brain drain).

[Source: Jansen, 2017, Analytical Writing vs Descriptive Writing ]

Further, to write critically, you also have to pay attention to the rhetorical and logical aspects of writing:

Writing critically involves:

• Providing appropriate and sufficient arguments and examples
• Choosing terms that are precise, appropriate, and persuasive
• Making clear the transitions from one thought to another to ensure the overall logic of the presentation
• Editing for content, structure, and language

An increased awareness of the impact of choices of content, language, and structure can help you as a writer to develop habits of rewriting and revision.

Regarding the content, when writing critically, you cannot just rely on your own ideas, experiences, and/or one source. You have to read a wide range of sources on the specific topic you are exploring to get a holistic picture of what others have discussed on the topic, from which you further make your own judgment. Through reading other sources, you not only form your own judgment and opinions but also collect evidence to support your arguments. Evidence is so important in critical writing. In addition to the collection of evidence, you also need to use different ways (e.g., quoting, paraphrasing, and synthesizing) to integrate the evidence into your writing to increase your critical analysis.

Using quotes is always an issue. Some students like to quote a lot and/or too long throughout their papers, and others do not know why they quote. Remember that when you use direct quotations, you are using others’ ideas, not yours. You should limit the use of quotes to the minimum because readers are always interested in your opinions. In other words, you need to use quotes critically.

When you quote directly from a source, use the quotation critically. This means that you should not substitute the quotation for your own articulation of a point. Rather, introduce the quotation by laying out the judgments you are making about it, and the reasons why you are using it. Often a quotation is followed by some further analysis.

[Source: Knott , n.d., Critical Reading Towards Critical Writing ]

Barna (2017) stated that “A good rule of thumb is that the evidence should only be about 5-10% of the piece.” Further, according to the EAP Foundation.org , you need to avoid doing a laundry list in critical writing:

You cannot just string quotes together (A says this, B says that, C says something else), without looking more deeply at the information and building on it to support your own argument.

This means you need to break down the information from other sources to determine how the parts relate to one another or to an overall structure or purpose [analysing], and then make judgements about it, identifying its strengths and weaknesses, and possibly ‘grey areas’ in between, which are neither strengths nor weaknesses [evaluating]. Critical reading skills will help you with this, as you consider whether the source is reliable, relevant, up-to-date, and accurate.

When and Why do you quote?

When should you use quotes?

Using quotations is the easiest way to include source material, but quotations should be used carefully and sparingly. While paraphrasing and summarizing provide the opportunity to show your understanding of the source material, quoting may only show your ability to type it.

Having said that, there are a few very good reasons that you might want to use a quote rather than a paraphrase or summary:

• Accuracy: You are unable to paraphrase or summarize the source material without changing the author’s intent.
• Authority: You may want to use a quote to lend expert authority for your assertion or to provide source material for analysis.
• Conciseness: Your attempts to paraphrase or summarize are awkward or much longer than the source material.
• Unforgettable language: You believe that the words of the author are memorable or remarkable because of their effectiveness or historical flavor. Additionally, the author may have used a unique phrase or sentence, and you want to comment on words or phrases themselves.

When you decide to quote, be careful of relying too much upon one source or quoting too much of a source and make sure that your use of the quote demonstrates an understanding of the source material. Essentially, you want to avoid having a paper that is a string of quotes with occasional input from you.

[Source: Decide when to Quote, Paraphrase and Summarize ]

How do you quote?

• With a complete sentence
• With “according to”
• With a reporting verb
• With a “that” clause
• As part of your sentence

Citing the islands of Fiji as a case in point, Bordo notes that “until television was introduced in 1995, the islands had no reported cases of eating disorders. In 1998, three years after programs from the United States and Britain began broadcasting there, 62 percent of the girls surveyed reported dieting” (149-50). Bordo’s point is that the Western cult of dieting is spreading even to remote places across the globe.

[Source: Lane, 2020, Quoting: When and How to Use Quotations ]

The firm belief which has been widely advertised is that “international students should be given equal rights and respect while studying abroad” (Lane, 2020, p. 19).

Smith, an agent working at an international company, put forward the seriousness of economic recession brought by the COVID-19 pandemic: “our economy will soon collapse, followed by business failures, elevated unemployment, and social turbulence ” (2021, p. 87).

Dominguez (2002) suggested, “teachers should reflect on their teaching constantly and proactively” to avoid teacher burnout and attrition (pp. 76-79).

According to the IEP student manual, “To study in the IEP you must be 18 years old and your English level must be ‘high beginner’ or higher” (p. 6).

[Source: Five Ways to Introduce Quotations ]

Now move on to the language aspect of critical writing, you should pay attention to the analytical verbs used in critical writing.

Analytical verbs are verbs that indicate critical thinking. They’re used in essays to dissect a text and make interpretive points, helping you to form a strong argument and remain analytical. If you don’t use analytical verbs, you may find yourself simply repeating plot points, and describing a text, rather than evaluating and exploring core themes and ideas.

[Source: What are Analytical Verbs? ]

The use of analytical verbs is also important to show your precision and appropriateness in language use. For example, instead of using says and talks, replace those verbs with states, discusses, or claims. Not only does it enhance the formality of the language, but also it helps to create the tone of writing. This further means that you have to understand the specific meaning, purpose, and function of each verb in a specific context as shown in the table below.

[Source: Impressive Verbs to use in your Research Paper ]

The verbs listed under each category are NOT synonyms and are different based on context. Please ensure that the selected verb conveys your intended meaning.

It is recommended that you check out Academic Phrasebank for more advanced and critical language use.

The accuracy of language use that is important for critical writing is also reflected in the use of hedges .

Hedging is the use of linguistic devices to express hesitation or uncertainty as well as to demonstrate politeness and indirectness.

People use hedged language for several different purposes but perhaps the most fundamental are the following:

• to minimize the possibility of another academic opposing the claims that are being made
• to conform to the currently accepted style of academic writing
• to enable the author to devise a politeness strategy where they are able to acknowledge that there may be flaws in their claims

[Source: What Is Hedging in Academic Writing?]

There are different types of hedges used in writing to make your claim less certain but more convincing. For example, what is the difference between the two sentences as shown below?

No hedging: We already know all the animals in the world.

With hedging: It’s possible that we may already know most animals in the world.

[Source: Hedges and Boosters ]

Check this table for different types of hedges.

[Source: Features of academic writing]

Practice how to tone down the arguments.

ACTIVITY #2

Add hedges to the following arguments.

Except for the content and language aspects of critical writing, the last aspect is the organization, including both the overall structure and the paragraph level.

Here is one example of a critical writing outline.

One easy-to-follow outline format is alphanumeric, which means it uses letters of the alphabet and numbers to organize text.

For example:

• Hook: _____________________
• Transition to thesis: _____________________
• Thesis statement with three supporting points:_____________________
• Topic sentence: _____________________
• Evidence (data, facts, examples, logical reasoning): _____________________
• Connect evidence to thesis: _____________________
• Restate thesis: _____________________
• Summarize points: _____________________
• Closure (prediction, comment, call to action): _____________________

[Source: Academic Writing Tip: Making an Outline ]

1. Introduction

• Thesis statement

2. Topic one

• First piece of evidence
• Second piece of evidence

3. Topic two

4. Topic three

5. Conclusion

• Summary/synthesis
• Importance of topic
• Strong closing statement

[Source: Caulfield, 2021, How to Write an Essay Outline]

ACTIVITY #3:

The following essay was adapted from a student’s writing. Please identify the components of each paragraph.

Artificial Intelligence: An Irreplaceable Assistant in Policy-making

Do you understand artificial intelligence (AI)? Are you excited that humans can create these machines that think like us? Do you ever worry that they develop too advanced to replace humans? If you have thought about these questions, you are already in the debate of the century. AI is a term used to describe machine artifacts with digital algorithms that have the ability to perceive contexts for action and the capacity to associate contexts to actions (Bryson & Winfield, 2017). The 21st century has witnessed a great number of changes in AI. As AI shows its great abilities in decision-making, humans are relying more on AI to make policies. Despite some concerns about the overuse of AI, AI is no longer to be replaced in policy-making because it has the capabilities that humans cannot achieve, such as transparent decision-making and powerful data processing.

AI has the capacity to use algorithms or systems to make the decision-making process more transparent (Walport & Sedwill, 2016). Many decisions made by humans are based upon their intuition rather than the direct result of the deliberate collection and processing of information (Dane et al., 2012). Intuition is useful in business when considering the outcome of an investment or a new product. However, in politics, the public would often question whether the policy is biased, so a transparent decision-making process should be used instead of intuition. AI can make political decisions more transparent by visualizing digital records (Calo, 2017). AI can make decisions without any discrimination and can have the public better understand of the policies.

In addition, AI can process a large amount of information at a speed faster than the cognitive ability of the most intelligent human policymakers (Jarrahi, 2018). A qualified policy must be based on facts reflected by data, so researching data is an essential part of policy-making. There are two main challenges for the human decision-makers in this area: (1) The amount of data is too large and (2) the relationship between data is too complex. Handling these two problems is where AI is superior. The high computing power of AI makes it an effective tool for retrieving and analyzing large amounts of data, thus reducing the complexity of the logic between problems (Jarrahi, 2018). Without AI, the policymakers would be overwhelmed by tons of data in this modern information age. It is almost impossible for them to convert those data into useful information. For example, data provided to the politician who is responsible for health care is mostly from the electronic health record (HER). HER is just the digital record transported from paper-based forms (Bennett et al., 2012). AI can analyze the data to generate clinical assessments, symptoms, and patient behavior and then link that information with social factors such as education level and economic status. According to the information from AI, the policy maker can make policies for healthcare improvement (Bennett et al., 2012). With the assistance of AI, the government can not only collect data easier but also utilize those data as operable Information.

However, while AI shows its great abilities in policy-making, it also brings considerable risks to contemporary society, and the most significant one is privacy. The only source for AI systems to learn human behavior is data, so AI needs to collect enormous quantities of information about users in order to perform better. Some scholars claim that the main problem with AI data collection is the use of data for unintended purposes. The data is likely to be processed, used, or even sold without the users’ permission (Bartneck et al, 2021). The 2018 Cambridge Analytica scandal showed how private data collected through Facebook can be used to manipulate elections (Bartneck et al, 2021). While privacy is a crucial problem, this is a handleable problem and we cannot deny the benefits brought by using AI. The most appropriate way to solve this problem is to establish a complete regulatory system. In fact, many policies have been made to protect user privacy in AI data collection. One of safeguard in this area is to restrict the centralized processing of data. Researchers are also conducting a lot of research in this area and have achieved some technological breakthroughs. For example, open-source code and open data formats will allow a more transparent distinction between private and transferable information, blockchain-based technologies will allow data to be reviewed and tracked, and “smart contracts” will provide transparent control over how data is used without the need for centralized authority (Yuste & Goering, 2017).

In conclusion, although there may be some privacy-related issues with AI policies, the powerful data collection capabilities and transparent decision-making process of AI will bring many benefits to humans. In the future, AI is more likely to continue to serve as an assistant to humans when making policies under a complete and strict regulatory system.

Bartneck, Christoph. Lütge, Christoph. Wagner, Alan. Welsh, Sean. (2021). Privacy Issues of AI, pp.61-70. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-51110-4_8.

Bennett C, Doub T, Selove R (2012) EHRs Connect Research and Practice: Where Predictive Modeling, Artificial Intelligence, and Clinical Decision Support Intersect https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.4927.pdf. Accessed 1 April 2021.

Bryson J and Winfield A (2017) Standardizing Ethical Design Considerations for Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems. http://www.cs.bath.ac.uk/~jjb/ftp/BrysonWinfield17-oa.pdf. Accessed 1 April 2021.

Calo, R (1993) Artificial Intelligence Policy: A Primer and Roadmap. https://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/issues/51/2/Symposium/51-2_Calo.pdf , Accessed 1 April 2021.

Dane, Erik., Rockmann, Kevin. W., & Pratt, Michael G. (2012). When should I trust my gut? Linking domain expertise to intuitive decision-making effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(2), 187—194.

Jarrahi, M. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making, Business Horizons, Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages 577-586, ISSN 0007-6813, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007.

Walport M, & Sedwill M. (2016). Artificial intelligence: opportunities and implications for the future of decision making. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attach ment_data/file/566075/gs-16-19-artificial-intelligence-ai-report.pdf, Accessed 1 April 2021.

Rafael, Y., & Sara, G. (2017). Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies an AI https://www.nature.com/news/four-ethical-priorities-for-neurotechnologies-and-ai 1.22960. Accessed 1 April 2022.

Apart from the overall structure of critical writing, it is also important to pay attention to the paragraph-level structure. There are different paragraph models for critical writing.

Model 1: TED model for writing critical paragraphs

Paragraph model for critical writing

Often in assignments, you are expected to critically evaluate – this means to assess the relevance and significance of concepts relating to a specific topic or assignment question. Introduce your point. Give examples from reading. Is there support for your argument or can you identify weaknesses? Are there different perspectives to compare and contrast? Build your explanation and create your objective, reasoned argument (case or thesis) based on the evaluation from different perspectives. You will include your conclusion and point of view, communicating your stance, having made a judgment on research you have found and its significance in contributing to answering your assignment question.

Use the TED model to integrate critical thinking into your writing:

Each example of evidence in your writing should have a clear purpose or function. Be explicit and tell the reader what it contributes to your reasoning.

Professional practice is more complex than simply applying theory to practice, since it involves a professional juggling of situational demands, intuition, experiences and knowledge (Schön, 1991). Practitioners do not apply research findings in a simple deductive process; they need time to think, translate and relate the research findings to their particular setting. The extent to which a given piece of evidence is utilised by an individual in practice depends on their sense of the situation and this inevitably involves professional judgement.

Topic (in red); Evidence (in orange); Further explanation (in blue); Discussion (in green)

Model 2: WEED model for writing critical paragraphs

This is a model for writing critical paragraphs. It’s taken from Godwin’s book called ‘Planning your Essay’. Each paragraph should be on a single topic, making a single point. A paragraph is usually around a third of a page.

W is for What

You should begin your paragraph with the topic or point that you’re making so that it’s clear to your lecturer. Everything in the paragraph should fit in with this opening sentence.

E is for Evidence

The middle of your paragraph should be full of evidence – this is where all your references should be incorporated. Make sure that your evidence fits in with your topic.

E is for Examples

Sometimes it’s useful to expand on your evidence. If you’re talking about a case study, the example might be how your point relates to the particular scenario being discussed.

D is for Do

You should conclude your paragraph with the implications of your discussion. This gives you the opportunity to add your commentary, which is very important in assignments that require you to use critical analysis. So, in effect, each paragraph is like a mini-essay, with an introduction, main body, and conclusion.

Example: a good critical paragraph

Exposure to nature and green spaces has been found to increase health, happiness, and wellbeing. Whilst trees and greenery improve air quality by reducing air pollutants, green spaces facilitate physical activity, reduce stress, and provide opportunities for social interaction (Kaplan, 1995; Lachowycz,and Jones, 2011; Ward Thompson et al., 2012; Hartig et al., 2014; Anderson et al., 2016). Older adults have described increased feelings of wellbeing while spending time in green spaces and walking past street greenery (Finaly et al., 2015; Orr et al., 2016). They are more likely to walk on streets which are aesthetically pleasing (Lockett, Willis and Edwards, 2005) while greenery such as flowers and trees play an important role in improving the aesthetics of the environment (Day, 2008). Therefore, greater integration of urban green spaces and street greenery in cities may have the potential to increase physical activity and wellbeing in older adults.

What (in red), Evidence (in orange), Do (in blue).

[Source: Learning Hub, 2021 ]

Please identify the paragraph-level components in the following paragraphs. You can use different colors to indicate different components.

Social Media plays a key role in slowing the spread of vaccine misinformation. According to Nikos-Rose (2021) from the University of California, individuals’ attitudes towards vaccination can negatively be influenced by social media. They can simply post a piece of misleading information to the public, and the deceived ones will share it with their families and friends. The role of media can also help boost the public’s confidence in the vaccination. The media can provide valuable information for the public to know that the vaccine is safe. Almost everyone in the modern era lives with a cell phone now. People on social media can also share their experiences after getting vaccinated. Influences can help boost the public’s confidence. Just as voters would receive “I voted” after casting their ballots, vaccination distribution sites can provide “I got vaccinated” stickers. This can encourage individuals to post on the media that they have received the vaccine (Milkman, 2020). Furthermore, those who spread misleading information should be fined by the authorities. This punishment would be sufficient for them to learn their lesson. People who oversee data and information in social media should be concerned about the spread of misleading information on social media. After deleting the false information, they should put up a notice stating that is fake. This will help the public to understand which information should be trusted or not. Moreover, people who find misleading information online should report it to the administration. This could help prevent false info from circulating on the internet.

Recent studies showed that the contamination of land and water can also negatively affect the production of crops and the food systems as the safety of products can be compromised by the chemicals used by fracking. In addition, the amount of freshwater required for the mixture of the fracking fluids can generate a lack of water supply to the local agricultural industries. The fresh water is the 90-97 % of the fracking fluids, and the water deployed is not possible to recycle efficiently. In fact, the wastewater became a further challenge to the agricultural sector as it can make the soil dry and unusable for crops (Pothukuchi et al. 2018). The challenges faced by the agricultural sector are reflected in the farmlands and livestocks as well. For example, in Pennsylvania, the Dairy farming is one of the major agricultural sectors. This particular sector requires unpolluted water and pasturelands to enable the cows to produce milk. Since 1996 this sector began to fail, but the largest decrease in cows that produce milk took place between 2007 and 2011. It was the exact same period when the fracking industries reached their peak in this area (Pothukuchi et al. 2018). Another piece of evidence is related to the air pollution caused by fracking, specifically, the pollution of agricultural pollinators such as bees. The population of air caused by fracking has led to a huge degradation of that volatiles endangering the local and global food production. Those outcomes are closely related to the low level of planning abilities in rural areas, where fracking usually takes place. Particularly, the gap between fracking industry actors and local officials didn’t allow the development of a proper level of policies and regulations.

References:

Academic writing tip: Making an outline. (2020, December 8). The International Language Institute of Massachusetts. Retrieved July 22, 2022, from https://ili.edu/2020/12/08/academic-writing-tip-making-an-outline/

Caulfield, J. (2021, December 6). How to Write an Essay Outline | Guidelines & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved July 22, 2022, from https://www.scribbr.com/academic-essay/essay-outline/

Choudhary, A. (n.d.). Impressive Verbs to use in your Research Paper. Editage. Retrieved July 22, 2022, from https://www.editage.com/all-about-publication/research/impressive-Verbs-to-use-in-your-Research-Paper.html

Critical reading towards critical writing. (n.d.). University of Toronto. Retrieved July 22, 2022, from https://advice.writing.utoronto.ca/researching/critical-reading/

Critical writing. (n.d.). Teesside University. Retrieved July 22, 2022, from https://libguides.tees.ac.uk/ld.php?content_id=33286287

Critical writing. (n.d.-b). EAP FOUNDATION.COM. Https://www.eapfoundation.com/writing/critical/

Decide when to quote, paraphrase and summarize. (n.d.). University of Houston-Victoria. Retrieved July 22, 2022, from https://www.uhv.edu/curriculum-and-student-achievement/student-success/tutoring/student-resources/a-d/decide-when-to-quote-paraphrase-and-summarize/

Features of academic writing. (n.d.). UEFAP. Retrieved July 22, 2022, from http://www.uefap.com/writing/feature/hedge.htm

Five ways to introduce quotations. (n.d.). University of Georgia. Retrieved July 22, 2022, from https://dae.uga.edu/iep/handouts/Five-Ways-to-Introduce-Quotations.pdf

Jansen, D. (2017, April). Analytical writing vs descriptive writing. GRADCOACH. Retrieved July 22, 2022, from https://gradcoach.com/analytical-vs-descriptive-writing/

Hedges and Boosters. (n.d.). The Nature of Writing. Retrieved July 22, 2022, from https://natureofwriting.com/courses/introduction-to-rhetoric/lessons/hedges-and-boosters/topic/hedges-and-boosters

How to write critically. (n.d.). Teesside University. Retrieved July 22, 2022, from https://libguides.tees.ac.uk/ld.php?content_id=31275168

Lane, J. (2021, July 9). Critical thinking for critical writing. Simon Fraser University. Retrieved July 22, 2022, from https://www.lib.sfu.ca/about/branches-depts/slc/writing/argumentation/critical-thinking-writing

LibGuides: Critical Writing: Online study guide. (n.d.). Sheffield Hallam University. Retrieved July 22, 2022, from https://libguides.shu.ac.uk/criticalwriting

What are analytical verbs? (n.d.). Twinkl. Retrieved July 22, 2022, from https://www.twinkl.com/teaching-wiki/analytical-verbs

What is hedging in academic writing? (2022, May 3). Enago Academy. Retrieved July 22, 2022, from https://www.enago.com/academy/hedging-in-academic-writing/

Critical Reading, Writing, and Thinking Copyright © 2022 by Zhenjie Weng, Josh Burlile, Karen Macbeth is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

We’re reviewing our resources this spring (May-August 2024). We will do our best to minimize disruption, but you might notice changes over the next few months as we correct errors & delete redundant resources. 

Reading and Listening Critically

Critical reading and listening are activities that require communicators to   move beyond superficial engagement   and   analysis   with a text or speaker. This handout is designed to explain the benefits of developing critical reading and listening skills, and it provides concrete strategies you can use in the classroom or during research.

Critical reading

Critical reading is an important activity in   evaluating   written arguments. It helps with the following activities:

• Examining   the evidence and logic
• Assessing   external influences on the argument
• Investigating   the limitations of the study or text
• Evaluating   the interpretation and facts presented
• Deciding   to what extent you accept the validity of the argument and conclusion

While many people undertake reading as a passive activity (by simply scanning the text), you can get more from your readings when you   actively engage   with the presented material. Critical reading offers the following benefits:

• It promotes   comprehension and absorption   of material
• It provides a   context   for facts, events, and people
• It ensures that knowledge is judged on its   merits
• It improves   concentration
• It demonstrates your ability to perform an   essential academic skill

Passive reading vs. critical (active) reading

Passive reading.

Purpose:   basic grasp of a text

Activity:   absorbing; understanding

Focus:   what a text says

Questions:   What information does the text have? What information can I get out of the text?

Direction:   accepting the text

Purpose:   restatement; summary

Active reading

Purpose:   judgments about how a text works

Activity:   analyzing; interpreting; evaluating

Focus:   what a text does and means

Questions:   How does the text work? How is it argued? What choices does the author make? What patterns are present? What kinds of reasoning and evidence are used? What are the underlying assumptions? What does the text mean?

Direction:   challenging the text

Purpose:   description; interpretation; evaluation

Steps in critical reading

• Review   text prior to class
• Look at   key words ,   titles ,   headings ,   phrases ,   dates , and   places
• Read actively : talk back to the text
• Write   notes   in the margins
• Underline   important ideas
• Highlight   memorable images
• Mark   thesis   and   key words
• Underline   sources
• Identify   confusing sections
• Paraphrase   the overall idea
• Select   key words   from the text
• Outline the writer's   arguments
• Determine the overall   meaning   of the text
• Consider whether and how   evidence   relates to the overall message
• Evaluate   the significance of the evidence
• Pair your   analysis   with   examples/evidence
• Judge the   credibility   of the text and its author(s)
• First reading:   skim   for main ideas
• Second reading:   reflect   on text
• Third reading:   answer   questions

Critical listening

It is as important to listen critically as it is to read critically. Critical listening is a process for   understanding   what is said and   evaluating ,   judging , and   forming an opinion   on what you hear. The listener   assesses   the strengths and weaknesses of the content,   agrees   or   disagrees   with the information, and   analyzes   and   synthesizes   material.

Critical listening strategies

• Find   areas of interest   in the material you're listening to
• Reserve judgment: recognize your   emotional biases
• Work at listening:   mentally summarize   and   review   what is being said,   organize   information, and find   connections   to what you already know
• Avoid   distractions   (internal or external)
• Listen for and note   main ideas ; focus on   central themes

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Critical thinking in reading comprehension: fine tuning the simple view of reading.

1. Introduction

2. executive function, 3. critical thinking, 4. belief systems, 5. reading comprehension, 6. conceptual framework, 7. the present study, 8.1. participants, 8.2. assessments, 8.3. encoding, 8.4. vocabulary, 8.5. reading fluency, 8.6. critical thinking, 8.7. listening comprehension, 8.8. silent reading comprehension, 8.9. assessment administration, 9.1. research question 1, 9.2. research question 2, 9.3. research question 3, 10. discussion, 11. conclusions, 11.1. limitations, 11.2. future research, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. 2023. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20.pdf (accessed on 5 April 2018).
• Peng, P.; Kievit, R.A. The Development of Academic Achievement and Cognitive Abilities: A Bidirectional Perspective. Child Dev. Perspect. 2020 , 14 , 15–20. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sparks, R.L.; Patton, J.; Murdoch, A. Early reading success and its relationship to reading achievement and reading volume: Replication of ‘10 years later’. Read. Writ. 2013 , 27 , 189–211. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kahneman, D. Thinking Fast and Slow ; Farrer, Straus, and Giroux: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
• Evans, J.S.B.T. Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2008 , 59 , 255–278. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Huber, C.R.; Kuncel, N.R. Does College Teach Critical Thinking? A Meta-Analysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 2016 , 86 , 431–468. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Oaksford, M.; Chater, N.; Hahn, U. Human reasoning and argumentation: The probabilistic approach. In Reasoning: Studies of Human Inference and Its Foundations ; Adler, J., Rips, L., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2008; pp. 383–413. [ Google Scholar ]
• Diamond, A. Want to optimize executive functions and academic outcomes? In Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology: Developing Cognitive Processes: Mechanisms, Implications, and Interventions ; Zelazo, P.D., Sera, M.D., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; Volume 37, pp. 203–230. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Paul, R.W.; Elder, L. Critical Thinking: The Nature of Critical and Creative Thought. J. Dev. Educ. 2006 , 30 , 2–7. [ Google Scholar ]
• Baddeley, A.D.; Hitch, G.J. Developments in the concept of working memory. Neuropsychology 1994 , 8 , 485–493. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Smith, E.E.; Jonides, J. Storage and Executive Processes in the Frontal Lobes. Science 1999 , 283 , 1657–1661. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Zelazo, P.D.; Mϋller, U. Executive function in typical and atypical development. In Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development ; Goswami, U., Ed.; Blackwell Publisher: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002; pp. 445–469. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lizarraga, M.L.S.d.A.; Baquedano, M.T.S.d.A.; Villanueva, O.A. Critical thinking, executive functions and their potential relationship. Think. Ski. Creativity 2012 , 7 , 271–279. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gilbert, S.J.; Burgess, P.W. Executive function. Curr. Biol. 2008 , 18 , R110–R114. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Arum, R.; Roksa, J. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses ; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
• Baron, J.; Granato, L.; Spranca, M.; Teubal, E. Decision making biases in children and early adolescence: Exploratory studies. Merrill-Palmer Q. 1993 , 39 , 22–46. [ Google Scholar ]
• Erikson, M.G.; Erikson, D. Learning outcomes and critical thinking – good intentions in conflict. Stud. High. Educ. 2019 , 44 , 2293–2303. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Halpern, D.F. Assessing the Effectiveness of Critical Thinking Instruction. J. Gen. Educ. 2001 , 50 , 270–286. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kahneman, D.; Tversky, A. Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cogn. Psychol. 1972 , 3 , 430–454. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kuhn, D. Connecting scientific and informal reasoning. Merrill-Palmer Q. 1993 , 39 , 74–103. [ Google Scholar ]
• Perkins, D.N. Postprimary education has little impact on informal reasoning. J. Educ. Psychol. 1985 , 77 , 562–571. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ennis, R.H. A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice ; Baron, J., Sternberg, R., Eds.; Freeman: New York, NY, USA, 1987; pp. 9–26. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bensley, D.A. Critical thinking and the rejection of unsubstantiated claims. In Critical Thinking in Psychology , 2nd ed.; Sternberg, R.J., Halpern, D.F., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2020; pp. 68–102. [ Google Scholar ]
• Facione, P. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations ; American Philosophical Association: Newark, DE, USA, 1990; Available online: https://philarchive.org/archive/faccta (accessed on 1 December 2023).
• Sternberg, R.J. Thinking Styles ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sternberg, R.J. Wisdom, Intelligence, and Creativity Synthesized ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2003. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pithers, R.T.; Soden, R. Critical Thinking in Education: A Review. Educ. Res. 2000 , 42 , 237–249. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Abrami, P.C.; Bernard, R.M.; Borokhovski, E.; Wadem, A.; Surkes, M.A.; Tamim, R.; Zhang, D. Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 2008 , 78 , 1102–1134. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kintsch, W. Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1998. [ Google Scholar ]
• McCarthy, K.S.; McNamara, D.S. The multidimensional knowledge in text comprehension framework. Educ. Psychol. 2021 , 56 , 196–214. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• McNamara, D.S.; Magliano, J. Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. 2009 , 51 , 297–384. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Black, B. Critical Thinking—A Tangible Construct? Res. Matters A Camb. Assess. Publ. 2007 , 3 , 2–4. Available online: https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/our-research/all-published-resources/research-matters/rm-03/ (accessed on 1 December 2023).
• Klaczynski, P.A.; Gordon, H.D.; Fauth, J. Goal-oriented critical reasoning and individual differences in critical reasoning biases. J. Educ. Psychol. 1997 , 89 , 470–485. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Macpherson, R.; Stanovich, K.E. Cognitive ability, thinking dispositions, and instructional set as predictors of critical thinking. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2007 , 17 , 115–127. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• de Bruin, W.B.; Parker, A.M.; Fischhoff, B. Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2007 , 92 , 938–956. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Halpern, D.F. Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking , 5th ed.; Psychology Press: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
• Davies, M. Critical Thinking and the Disciplines Reconsidered. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2013 , 32 , 529–544. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Linn, M.C. Designing the knowledge integration environment. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2000 , 22 , 781–796. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Philley, J. Critical thinking concepts. Prof. Safety 2005 , 50 , 26–32. [ Google Scholar ]
• Haverty, L.A.; Koedinger, K.A.; Klahr, D.; Alibali, M.W. Solving inductive reasoning problems in mathematics. Not-so-trivial pursuit. Cogn. Sci. 2000 , 24 , 249–298. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sternberg, R.J.; Sternberg, K. Cognitive Psychology ; Wadsworth-Cengage: Boston, MA, USA, 2012. [ Google Scholar ]
• Capó, B. The Development of Inductive Reasoning: Cross-sectional Assessments in an Educational Context. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 1997 , 20 , 609–626. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Goswami, U. Inductive and deductive reasoning. In Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development ; Goswami, U., Ed.; Blackwell Publisher: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002; pp. 282–302. [ Google Scholar ]
• Johnson-Laird, P.N. Deductive reasoning. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1999 , 50 , 109–135. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Baron, J. Thinking and Deciding , 3rd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sternberg, R.J. Why schools should teach for wisdom: The balance theory of wisdom in educational settings. Educ. Psychol. 2001 , 36 , 227–245. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• West, R.F.; Toplak, M.E.; Stanovich, K.E. Heuristics and biases as measures of critical thinking: Associations with cognitive ability and thinking dispositions. J. Educ. Psychol. 2008 , 100 , 930–941. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bassok, M.; Holyoak, K.J. Interdomain transfer between isomorphic topics in algebra and physics. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1989 , 15 , 153–166. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bransford, J.D.; Stein, B.S. The Ideal Problem Solver , 2nd ed.; Freeman: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [ Google Scholar ]
• Chi, M.T.H.; Feltovich, P.J.; Glaser, R. Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cogn. Sci. 1981 , 5 , 121–152. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gibson, J.J.; Gibson, E.J. Perceptual learning: Differentiation or enrichment? Psychol. Rev. 1955 , 62 , 32–41. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Greeno, J.G.; Smith, D.R.; Moore, J.L. Transfer of situated learning. In Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition, and Instruction ; Detterman, D.K., Sternberg, R.J., Eds.; Ablex: Norwood, NJ, USA, 1993; pp. 99–167. [ Google Scholar ]
• Marton, F.; Booth, S. Learning and Awareness ; Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1997. [ Google Scholar ]
• National Research Council (NRC); Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning with additional material from the Committee on Learning, Research and Educational Practice; Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition ; Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R., Eds.; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2000. [ Google Scholar ]
• Schuyler, D. Cognitive Therapy: A Practical Guide ; WW Norton and Company: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [ Google Scholar ]
• Evans, J.S.B.T.; Stanovich, K.W. Dual process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2013 , 8 , 223–241. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Stanovich, K.E. What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought ; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
• Stanovich, K.E. Rationality and the Reflective Mind ; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
• Carey, S. Cognitive science and science education. Am. Psychol. 1986 , 41 , 247–265. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kardash, C.M.; Scholes, R.J. Effects of pre-existing beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. J. Educ. Psychol. 1996 , 88 , 260–271. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Klaczynski, P.A.; Gordon, D.H. Self-serving influences on adolescents’ evaluations of belief-relevant evidence. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 1996 , 62 , 317–339. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Stanovich, K.E.; West, R.F. Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. J. Educ. Psychol. 1997 , 89 , 342–357. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• van den Broek, P.; Lorch, R.F.; Linderholm, T.; Gustafson, M. The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Mem. Cogn. 2001 , 29 , 1081–1087. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Graesser, A.C.; Millis, K.K.; Zwann, R.A. Discourse comprehension. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001 , 48 , 163–189. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• van Dijk, T.A.; Kintsch, W. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension ; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1983; pp. 189–221. [ Google Scholar ]
• Baron, J.; Sternberg, R.J. Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice ; Freeman: Dallas, TX, USA, 1987. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sternberg, R.J.; Roediger, H.L., III; Halpern, D.F. (Eds.) Critical Thinking in Psychology ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007. [ Google Scholar ]
• Perfetti, C.A.; Stafura, J. Word Knowledge in a Theory of Reading Comprehension. Sci. Stud. Read. 2013 , 18 , 22–37. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Willson, V.L.; Rupley, W.H. A structural equation model for reading comprehension based on background, phonemic, and strategy knowledge. Sci. Stud. Read. 1997 , 1 , 45–63. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Diakido, I.N.; Ioanno, M.C.; Christodoulou, S.A. Reading argumentative texts: Comprehension and evaluation goals and outcomes. Read. Writ. 2017 , 30 , 1869–1890. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Duke, N.K.; Cartwright, K.B. The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Read. Res. Q. 2021 , 56 , S25–S44. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hoover, W.A.; Gough, P.B. The simple view of reading. Read. Writ. 1990 , 2 , 127–160. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kearns, D.M.; Al Ghanem, R. The role of semantic information in children’s word reading: Does meaning affect readers’ ability to say polysyllabic words aloud? J. Educ. Psychol. 2019 , 111 , 933–956. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kendeou, P.; Savage, R.; Broek, P.v.D. Revisiting the simple view of reading. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 2009 , 79 , 353–370. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Lonigan, C.J.; Burgess, S.R.; Schatschneider, C. Examining the Simple View of Reading with Elementary School Children: Still Simple After All These Years. Remedial Spec. Educ. 2018 , 39 , 260–273. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mitchell, A.M.; Brady, S.A. The effect of vocabulary knowledge on novel word identification. Ann. Dyslexia 2013 , 63 , 201–216. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Coté, N.; Goldman, S.R.; Saul, E.U. Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation. Discourse Process. 1998 , 25 , 1–53. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cain, K.; Oakhill, J.V.; Barnes, M.A.; Bryant, P.E. Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Mem. Cogn. 2001 , 29 , 850–859. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Carretti, B.; Caldarola, N.; Tencatti, C.; Cornoldi, C. Improving reading comprehension in reading and listening settings: The effect of two training programmes focusing on metacognition and working memory. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 2014 , 84 , 194–210. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Elbro, C.; Buch-Iversen, I. Activation of background knowledge for inference making: Effects on reading comprehension. Sci. Stud. Read. 2013 , 17 , 435–452. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Peng, P.; Barnes, M.; Wang, C.; Wang, W.; Li, S.; Swanson, H.L.; Dardick, W.; Tao, S. A meta-analysis on the relation between reading and working memory. Psychol. Bull. 2018 , 144 , 48–76. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Perfetti, C.A. Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Sci. Stud. Read. 2007 , 11 , 357–383. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pérez, A.I.; Paolieri, D.; Macizo, P.; Bajo, T. The role of working memory in inferential sentence comprehension. Cogn. Process. 2014 , 15 , 405–413. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Dilip, C. Public–Private Partnership to Meet the Skills Challenges in India ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; ISBN 978-94-007-5936-7. [ Google Scholar ]
• Banerji, R.; Chavan, M. Improving literacy and math instruction at scale in India’s primary schools: The case of Pratham’s Read India program. J. Educ. Chang. 2016 , 17 , 453–475. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ganske, K. Developmental Spelling Analysis: A Diagnostic Measure for Instruction and Research. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA, 1994, unpublished. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ehri, L.C. How English orthography influences phonological knowledge as children learn to read and spell. In Literacy and Language Analysis ; Scales, R.J., Ed.; Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1993; pp. 21–43. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ganske, K. Word Journeys: Assessment-Guided Phonics, Spelling, and Vocabulary Instruction , 2nd ed.; Guildford: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
• Henderson, E.H.; Templeton, S. A developmental perspective of formal spelling instruction through alphabet, pattern, and meaning. Elem. Sch. J. 1986 , 86 , 314–316. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Paige, D.D.; Smith, G.S. Academic vocabulary and reading fluency: Unlikely bedfellows in the quest for textual meaning. Educ. Sci. 2018 , 8 , 165. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Coxhead, A. A new academic word list. TESOL Q. 2000 , 34 , 213. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Paige, D.D.; Rupley, W.S. Revisiting complex text instruction: A study of 11th-grade history students. Psychol. Sch. 2023 , 60 , 3633–3647. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zutell, J.; Rasinski, T.V. Training teachers to attend to their students’ oral reading fluency. Theory Into Pract. 1991 , 30 , 211–217. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Smith, G.S.; Paige, D.D. A Study of Reliability Across Multiple Raters When Using the NAEP and MDFS Rubrics to Measure Oral Reading Fluency. Read. Psychol. 2019 , 40 , 34–69. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ennis, R.H.; Millman, J.; Tomko, T.N. Cornell Critical Thinking Test , 5th ed.; The Critical Thinking Company: North Bend, OR, USA, 2005; Available online: www.criticalthinking.com (accessed on 4 December 2023).
• Carrow-Woolfolk, E. Oral and Written Language Scales-Second Edition (OWLS-II) ; Western Psychological Services: Torrance, CA, USA, 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brown, V.L.; Widerholt, J.L.; Hammill, D.D. Test of Reading Comprehension , 4th ed.; Pro-Ed: Austin, TX, USA, 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
• Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Lang, A.-G.; Buchner, A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 2007 , 39 , 175–191. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Buchner, A.; Lang, A.-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 2009 , 41 , 1149–1160. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cirino, P.T.; Romain, M.A.; Barth, A.E.; Tolar, T.D.; Fletcher, J.M.; Vaughn, S. Reading skill components and impairments in middle school struggling readers. Read. Writ. 2012 , 26 , 1059–1086. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Hjetland, H.N.; Lervåg, A.; Lyster, S.-A.H.; Hagtvet, B.E.; Hulme, C.; Melby-Lervåg, M. Pathways to reading comprehension: A longitudinal study from 4 to 9 years of age. J. Educ. Psychol. 2019 , 111 , 751–763. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tighe, E.L.; Schatschneider, C. A dominance analysis approach to determining predictor importance in third, seventh, and tenth grade reading comprehension skills. Read. Writ. 2013 , 27 , 101–127. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Diamond, A. Executive Functions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2013 , 64 , 135–168. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Dawson, P.; Guare, R. Executive Skills in Children and Adolescents ; Guilford: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [ Google Scholar ]
• Zelazo, P.D.; Blair, C.B.; Willoughby, M.T. Executive Function: Implications for Education (NCER, 2017-2020) ; National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wang, Z.; Sabatini, J.; O’Reilly, T.; Weeks, J. Decoding and reading comprehension: A test of the decoding threshold hypothesis. J. Educ. Psychol. 2019 , 111 , 387–401. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hasbrouck, J.; Tindal, G. An Update to Compiled ORF Norms ; Technical Report No. 1702; Behavioral Research and Teaching, University of Oregon: Eugene, OR, USA, 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ehri, L. Learning To Read and Learning to Spell: Two Sides of a Coin. Top. Lang. Disord. 2000 , 20 , 19–36. Available online: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=ovftd&NEWS=N&AN=00011363-200020030-00005 (accessed on 1 December 2023).
• McGuinness, D. Early Reading Instruction: What Science Really Tells Us About How to Teach Reading ; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2004. [ Google Scholar ]
• Perfetti, C. Reading acquisition and beyond: Decoding includes cognition. Am. J. Educ. 1984 , 93 , 40–60. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mancilla-Martinez, J.; Kieffer, M.J.; Biancarosa, G.; Christodoulou, J.A.; Snow, C.E. Investigating English comprehension growth in adolescent language minority learners: Some insights from the simple view. Read. Writ. 2011 , 24 , 339–354. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Storch, S.A.; Whitehurst, G.J. Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Dev. Psychol. 2002 , 38 , 934–947. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nagy, W.; Townsend, D. Words as Tools: Learning Academic Vocabulary as Language Acquisition. Read. Res. Q. 2012 , 47 , 91–108. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chaffee, J. Thinking Critically ; Houghton Mifflin: Boston, MS, USA, 1988. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cox, S.R.; Freisner, D.; Khayum, M. Do reading skills courses help underprepared readers achieve academic success in college. J. Coll. Read. Learn. 2003 , 33 , 170–196. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• McCabe, R.H. No One to Waste: A Report to Public Decision-Makers and Community College Leaders ; Community College Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2000. [ Google Scholar ]
• Oudenhoven, B. Remediation at the community college: Pressing issues, uncertain solutions. New Dir. Community Coll. 2002 , 2002 , 35–44. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Clark, C.; Teravainen-Goff, A. Children and Young People’s Reading in 2020: Findings from Our Annual Literacy Survey ; National Literacy Trust: London, UK, 2019. [ Google Scholar ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Paige, D.; Rupley, W.H.; Ziglari, L. Critical Thinking in Reading Comprehension: Fine Tuning the Simple View of Reading. Educ. Sci. 2024 , 14 , 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030225

Paige D, Rupley WH, Ziglari L. Critical Thinking in Reading Comprehension: Fine Tuning the Simple View of Reading. Education Sciences . 2024; 14(3):225. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030225

Paige, David, William H. Rupley, and Leily Ziglari. 2024. "Critical Thinking in Reading Comprehension: Fine Tuning the Simple View of Reading" Education Sciences 14, no. 3: 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030225

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

• Publishing Policies
• For Organizers/Editors
• For Authors
• For Peer Reviewers

Reading And Writing For Critical Thinking

The article touches upon the issue of applying the technology of development of critical thinking through reading and writing in foreign language methodology. The paper studies the peculiarities of this learning strategy, its interactive and democratic nature. The pedagogical technology is based on the involvement of students in the educational process and their active participation in it as subjects of learning. When using this strategy, it is necessary to focus on the development of students’ intellectual abilities; the ability to analyze and systematize information; the formation of universal learning activities, skills of self-control, self-analysis and self-learning to minimize the role of the teacher. In addition, it is important to concentrate on students’ creative abilities, their unconventional thinking, personal inclinations and strengths to increase motivation and interest in learning a foreign language. Moreover, when implementing this technology, it is crucial to create an effective educational environment that has to be as close to the authentic linguistic and cultural community as possible and not abstracted from reality. This is facilitated by the organization of the learning process in accordance with the concept of "Challenge ‒ Comprehension ‒ Reflection", which allows a teacher to get and keep all the students involved in the lesson. Therefore, such a clear structure of the educational process implies both the use of modern technical means and traditional learning methods, which leads to high efficiency of critical thinking technology in teaching a foreign language. Keywords: Critical thinking reading writing dare comprehension reflection

Introduction

Critical thinking is high-level intellectually disciplined process requiring mental effort. In a narrow sense, this phenomenon is interpreted as the identification and data evaluation for making decisions, conclusions and summarize a particular event or object of reality ( Pupovci & Taylor, 2003 ).

Critical reading as a subspecies of an active analytical reading is to be carried out by person’s the maximum attention and immersion into the text.

Analytical concepts and study results during the whole learning process are achieved through critical thinking, since it contributes the formation of an independent, energetic, creative and responsible thinker. A critical thinker knows how to relate existing experience with new experiences, able to evaluate and develop an individual learning strategy ( Pupovci & Taylor, 2003 ).

A student who knows how to correctly receive and process information will success and show great results in studying foreign languages. So, the student’s critical thinking helps to be an active participant in the educational process ( Tereshchenko, 2017 ).

The critical thinker and critical reader use a deep and multifaceted analysis of facts to find the answer to the question put before them, generate ideas, reach a verdict, clearly and accurately consolidate beliefs and ideas about the surrounding reality. Critical thinking ability is necessary for the development of literacy skills ( Tereshchenko, 2017 ).

Consequently, the introduction of measures and activities in the educational process aimed at helping students learning foreign languages to develop critical thinking skills, as well as the use of special pedagogical technologies, actually contribute to the development of their critical reading and writing. To reach these goals Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking technology was introduced into the pedagogical practice.

Problem Statement

Modern methodology of teaching foreign languages includes different new technologies such as learning in cooperation, student-centered learning, language portfolio of a student, methodology portfolio of a teacher, Case-study, computational, distance and project learning, Internet use strategy in the educational process, problematic and intensive teaching, interactive teaching methods (which include the technology of critical thinking), and many others ( Devterova, 2009 ).

The critical thinking technology in teaching a foreign language, presented in the Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking (RWCT) program, is positioned as an interactive learning strategy. It is based on the concept of interaction, which involves the active interaction of participants in educational activities, understanding each other's educational actions and adapting their own behavioral model in accordance with situational norms and rules ( Devterova, 2009 ).

Research Questions

The introduction of activities in the learning process aimed at helping students of foreign languages to develop critical thinking skills, as well as the use of special pedagogical technologies, actually contribute to the development of their critical reading and writing skills. Introducing Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking technology into pedagogical practice was one of the main issues of modern methodology.

The main idea of the critical thinking technology in teaching a foreign language is that democratic practices in educational organizations become important when transiting to a more open perception of information free from stereotypes and prejudices about representatives of various linguistic and cultural communities. Developed by American educators J. Steele, C. Meredis, C. Temple in 1996 and still in active use today, the RWCT is currently operating around the world, including Central and Eastern Europe, the territory of the former USSR and Latin America ( as cited in Abdrafikova & Ieshenko, 2016 ).

Purpose of the Study

The central goal of this technology is the development of critical thinking skills in the implementation of such types of speech activities as reading and writing, and not just when speaking and listening. This poses certain tasks for both teachers and students. When applying RWCT, it is necessary to focus on the development of students' intellectual abilities ( Sokolova & Plisov, 2019 ), the formation of universal educational actions ( Ryabova & Terletskaya, 2018 ), self-control and self-testing skills that allow students to learn independently, without monitoring from the teacher ( Ariyan & Shamov, 2017 ). Moreover, the level of independence of students from teachers in search creative activities is growing ( Avdeeva & Alexandrov, 2018 ; Buyskikh & Zadorozhnaya, 2003 ).

The next thing to pay attention to when introducing this technology is the organization of the educational environment as close as possible to the authentic language, the creation of comfortable and favorable conditions for learning ( Galskova, 2017 ). Encouragement from the teacher in response to bold comments and creative considerations of students leads to an increase in the latter's interest in acquiring new ones and motivates them to demonstrate existing knowledge ( Avdeeva & Alexandrov, 2018 ; Buyskikh & Zadorozhnaya, 2003 ).

In addition, it should be remembered that the educational process should not occur in isolation from reality ( Ilyashenko et al., 2019 ; Bim, 1999 ). Each new lexical or grammatical material introduced by a foreign language teacher in a lesson, each task of speaking, reading, listening or writing - all this should be presented in a context familiar and understandable to students ( Runova et al., 2019 ).

From this follows the formation of a reading culture. The text ceases to be just an integral part of the task; working with him is no longer limited to searching for a few details, formulating the main idea and voicing answers to special questions - what he reads leads to reasoning, a thorough analysis of the problem, broadening the horizons and creating logically consistent conclusions ( Voronova, 2015 ).

Research Methods

This teaching technology is introduced by a set of research methods designed to teach students to reflect, think in a structured way, take responsibility for self-education, understand the logic of arguments, listen carefully, do not be afraid to argue and be able to defend their point of view and continue learning throughout their life. The most important thing is that the critical thinking technology can be used not only in teaching foreign languages, but in all classes within any educational program ( Abdrafikova & Ieshenko, 2016 ).

Significantly, critical thinking technology is implemented through the organization of the learning process based on the concept of Challenge – Comprehension – Reflection, which acts as an example of the structure of a typical lesson. The typical lesson consists of three stages: challenge, comprehension and reflection. However, sometimes ‘reflection’ is experienced primarily after the second and before the final steps, although most teachers consider it to be an integral part of class work. Each stage implies the inclusion of all students in educational activities, their work with each other in pairs and groups and with a mentor teacher (coordinator), therefore it is important to use certain techniques that are most effective for a particular phase of the lesson ( Nizovskaya, 2003 ).

Moreover, Reading and Writing as an integral part of Critical Thinking involves the use of partial search and research teaching methods in the introduction, development and consolidation of language. Consequently, students are encouraged to become independent and creative in the process of language acquisition, and their knowledge and skills are activated through the competent use of role-playing games, staging, design techniques and other forms of individual work ( Buyskikh & Zadorozhnaya, 2003 ; Voronova, 2015 ; Halpern, 2000 ).

The ‘challenge’ in this case becomes more difficult: a question that needs to be resolved and requires a certain set of actions to search for an answer. It is designed to perform stimulating, relevant, communication functions. The main tasks of the “challenge” are the creation of positive motivation among students, the formation of their interest in learning, the setting of the main objectives of the lesson, the determination of the central topic and the activation of students to be included in the work.

At this stage, it is important to encourage students to manifest a reaction and start exercises using such critical thinking methods as a blitz survey, questionnaire, cluster / connection diagram / mind mapping, brainstorming, ideas, key words, true or false statements, cinquain, tree of assumptions, forecasting by illustration, ‘thin and thick’ questions, etc.

Interestingly, all of the above mentioned techniques are highly effective exercises – “icebreakers” / icebreakers (if the audience is not yet sufficiently cohesive) and warm-ups used in an already worked out team. They help to draw students' attention into the topic, actualize the knowledge in this field, schematically build a personal attitude to the material being studied, structure it and make up their own opinion. It also worth to note that almost every method will act at the stages of ‘comprehension’ and ‘reflection’, which allows you to maintain the integrity of the lesson, its logical structure and smooth development ( Tereshchenko, 2017 ).

The ‘understanding’ stage performs two main functions: information and systematizing, i.e. During this part of the lesson, students receive new material for them and work with it. Students' activities are carried out both in group and pair, as well as in an individual form – the main thing is that a collective discussion is preceded by independent research and analysis. The role of the teacher is minimized: the teacher controls the course of the lesson, coordinates the actions of students, monitors their participation in the learning process.

Information can be represented in various ways:

text from the textbook;

text written by a teacher;

excerpt from a literary work;

a fragment of a magazine or newspaper article;

table or diagram ( Halpern, 2000 ).

These types of text organization are related to tasks aimed at developing reading skills. However, the data necessary for writing exercises are also entered through films, audio recordings, pictures and photographs, reports, etc.

However, in most cases, the use of critical thinking technology in teaching a foreign language through reading and writing involves the use of the text in its usual sense, since this is the most effective way of presenting information. Consequently, the methods and techniques of active reading are already in use: Zigzag reading scheme, INSERT (Interactive Noting System for Reading and Thinking; is a type of reading marked with symbols and filling the table; it is often positioned as “effective reading technology”), IDEAL strategy (Identify, Define, Explore, Act, Look), Fishbone, Bloom cube, generators and critics, mutual learning, ranking, logbook, table of findings (know – want to find out – found out in the lesson), table of arguments, the Euler – Venn diagram, Jockeys and horses, etc.

It is important to note that the teacher should not give preference to any one technique or method of teaching, since the critical thinking technology in teaching a foreign language is a holistic system that requires regularity, structure and a specific order. The main thing is that all the Reading and Writing in Critical Thinking strategies used by the teacher should be adapted in accordance with the classroom space to promote students' cognitive inquiry and initiative, develop problem-solving skills, joint learning, reading and writing as types of speech activity and alternative assessment methods ( Abdrafikova & Ieshenko, 2016 ; Avdeeva & Alexandrov, 2018 ; Buyskikh & Zadorozhnaya, 2003 ).

The stage of reflection is the final part of the lesson and involves summing the work up with information during the reflection, evaluating the results, one’s own activities, emotions and feelings in connection with newfound knowledge, skills and abilities. The following techniques and methods are considered the most productive: questionnaires, surveys, round tables, discussions or discussions; compilation of a cynquain, graph, or flow chart. Performing creative tasks such as writing an essay or reviewing. All this stimulates the student to express personal opinion, helps him to form a certain attitude to the text, his position on the issue raised in it ( Tereshchenko, 2017 ).

Often ignored by many educators, the reflective phase is an integral part of the lesson and, according to the Federal State Educational Standard, is mandatory for its responsibility for evaluating, stimulating, and communicating functions. It is during the reflection phase that the student becomes aware of the perfect progress in learning a foreign language, as he or she can compare fresh personal results with previous indicators.

Consequently, a clear lesson construction, a conscious transition from one stage to another, a teacher's knowledge of various methods and techniques and the ability to implement them in class work, as well as an understanding of the critical thinking technology in teaching foreign languages through reading and writing, guarantee the following achievements of students:

development of foreign-language communicative competence – “the ability and willingness to carry out foreign-language interpersonal and intercultural communication with native speakers within the limits specified by the standard program” ( Bim, 1999 ; Ilyashenko et al., 2019 ).

ability to use the learned theoretical material in practice;

perception of new information;

interest in the educational process and activity in the classroom;

improving the quality of education;

the acquisition of cooperation and collaboration skills when interacting with other students;

increasing the level of creativity of foreign language learners, their creative desire in expressing individuality ( Galskova, 2017 ; Pupovci & Taylor, 2003 ).

Such a high productivity of this technology is provided by several factors. First of all, the learning process takes place in the classroom, when students have a real opportunity to communicate with the interlocutor (as opposed to completing tasks at home, i.e. outside the school). Moreover, the learning itself is not static – it is inherent in flexibility, variability. Its details – both methodological and technical – are easily modernized and adapted to the age of the students, their level of language proficiency and the conditions of the educational organization. Due to the features of their presentation, the topics and materials studied in the lessons are easily acquired and memorized for subsequent practical use.

Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking technology is one of the most effective modern teaching strategies, since the program positions the general development of students as the main guideline of their work, and not only the transfer of knowledge about the rules and patterns of studied foreign languages. In accordance with this, the methodological concept is cross-subject in nature and effective in relation to any educational discipline.

In addition, it is important to note that this technology does not imply the mandatory use of technical means, and therefore can be implemented in the format of traditional training. Focusing on the acquisition by students of critical thinking skills, the development of universal educational actions and existing knowledge, skills and a variety of methods and techniques that the teacher operates with the introduction of new material – all these aspects indicate the progressive orientation of the critical thinking technology in learning through reading and writing.

Thus, this technology contributes to the development of not only critical thinking, but also foreign communicative competence – the main goal of the entire process of teaching foreign languages.

• Abdrafikova, A.R., Ieshenko, E.U. (2016). Some Consequences of the Use of the Technology for the Development of Critical Thinking at English Lessons. Chelyab. State Univer. Bull., 8, 9–15.
• Ariyan, M.A., Shamov, A.N. (2017) Fundamentals of General Methods of Teaching Foreign Languages: Theoretical and Practical Aspects: a Tutorial. Moscow, Flinta Publishment: Science.
• Avdeeva, I. V., & Alexandrov, A. V. (2018). Modern Technologies of Teaching a Foreign Language in Higher Educational Schools. In The TACA Reports: the Int. Sci. Conf. Reports (pp. 555–557). Moscow.
• Bim, I. L. (1999). Obyazatel'nyj minimum soderzhaniya osnovnyh obrazovatel'nyh programm. Moscow.
• Buyskikh, T. M., & Zadorozhnaya, P. P. (2003). Critical Thinking in Teaching of Social Disciplines: a Methodological Guide for University Teachers. OFTSIR.
• Devterova, Z. R. (2009). Modern technologies of Teaching a Foreign Language at the University. Maikop State Technol. Univer. Bull., 3, 105–111.
• Galskova, N. D. (2017). Methods of teaching foreign languages. A tutorial. Phoenix.
• Halpern, D. (2000). Psychology of critical thinking. Peter.
• Ilyashenko, L. I., Vaganova, O. I., Smirnova, Z. V., Bystrova, N. V., & Kaznacheeva, S. N. (2019). Students' creative abilities development in higher educational institution. Amazonia Investiga, 8(22), 701–710.
• Ilyashenko, L. K., Gladkova, M. N., Kutepov, M. M., Vaganova, O. I., & Smirnova, Z. V. (2019). Development of communicative competencies of students in the context of blended learning. Amazonia Investiga, 8(18), 313-322.
• Nizovskaya, I. A. (2003). Dictionary of the Program “Development of Critical Thinking through Reading and Writing”. A Tutorial. OFTSIR.
• Pupovci, D., & Taylor, A. (2003). Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking. Kosova Education Center.
• Runova, T. A., Gutsu, E. G., & Nyagolova, M. A. (2019). The Study of the Formation of Relations of Educational Cooperation of Younger Schoolchildren. Vestnik of Minin University, 7(3), 12-30.
• Ryabova, N. V., & Terletskaya, O. V. (2018). The Experience of Formation of Communicative Universal Learning Activities of Junior Pupils. Vestnik of Minin University, 6(2), 10-29.
• Sokolova, M., & Plisov, E. (2019) Cross-linguistic transfer classroom L3 acquisition in university setting. Vestnik of Minin University, 7(1), 6.
• Tereshchenko, O. N. (2017). Techniques for Developing Critical Thinking through Reading and Writing in the 6th Grade. APA Taganrog Instit. Bull., 25–29.
• Voronova, E. N. (2015). Modern Technologies and Methods of Teaching a Foreign Language at the University. Sci. and Ed. Prospects, 1(7), 189–194.

Copyright information

About this article

Publication date.

31 October 2020

Article Doi

https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.10.05.22

978-1-80296-091-4

European Publisher

Print ISBN (optional)

Edition number.

1st Edition

Sociolinguistics, linguistics, semantics, discourse analysis, translation, interpretation

Cite this article as:

Belova, E. E., Arkhipova, M. V., Gavrikova, Y. A., Kosareva, A. E., & Nikolskaya, T. E. (2020). Reading And Writing For Critical Thinking. In D. K. Bataev (Ed.), Social and Cultural Transformations in the Context of Modern Globalism» Dedicated to the 80th Anniversary of Turkayev Hassan Vakhitovich, vol 92. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 159-165). European Publisher. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.10.05.22

We care about your privacy

We use cookies or similar technologies to access personal data, including page visits and your IP address. We use this information about you, your devices and your online interactions with us to provide, analyse and improve our services. This may include personalising content or advertising for you. You can find out more in our privacy policy and cookie policy and manage the choices available to you at any time by going to ‘Privacy settings’ at the bottom of any page.

Manage My Preferences

You have control over your personal data. For more detailed information about your personal data, please see our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy .

These cookies are essential in order to enable you to move around the site and use its features, such as accessing secure areas of the site. Without these cookies, services you have asked for cannot be provided.

Third-party advertising and social media cookies are used to (1) deliver advertisements more relevant to you and your interests; (2) limit the number of times you see an advertisement; (3) help measure the effectiveness of the advertising campaign; and (4) understand people’s behavior after they view an advertisement. They remember that you have visited a site and quite often they will be linked to site functionality provided by the other organization. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit.

Translate this page from English...

*Machine translated pages not guaranteed for accuracy. Click Here for our professional translations.

Diversity: Making Sense of It Through Critical Thinking

How to cite ChatGPT

Use discount code STYLEBLOG15 for 15% off APA Style print products with free shipping in the United States.

We, the APA Style team, are not robots. We can all pass a CAPTCHA test , and we know our roles in a Turing test . And, like so many nonrobot human beings this year, we’ve spent a fair amount of time reading, learning, and thinking about issues related to large language models, artificial intelligence (AI), AI-generated text, and specifically ChatGPT . We’ve also been gathering opinions and feedback about the use and citation of ChatGPT. Thank you to everyone who has contributed and shared ideas, opinions, research, and feedback.

In this post, I discuss situations where students and researchers use ChatGPT to create text and to facilitate their research, not to write the full text of their paper or manuscript. We know instructors have differing opinions about how or even whether students should use ChatGPT, and we’ll be continuing to collect feedback about instructor and student questions. As always, defer to instructor guidelines when writing student papers. For more about guidelines and policies about student and author use of ChatGPT, see the last section of this post.

Quoting or reproducing the text created by ChatGPT in your paper

If you’ve used ChatGPT or other AI tools in your research, describe how you used the tool in your Method section or in a comparable section of your paper. For literature reviews or other types of essays or response or reaction papers, you might describe how you used the tool in your introduction. In your text, provide the prompt you used and then any portion of the relevant text that was generated in response.

Unfortunately, the results of a ChatGPT “chat” are not retrievable by other readers, and although nonretrievable data or quotations in APA Style papers are usually cited as personal communications , with ChatGPT-generated text there is no person communicating. Quoting ChatGPT’s text from a chat session is therefore more like sharing an algorithm’s output; thus, credit the author of the algorithm with a reference list entry and the corresponding in-text citation.

When prompted with “Is the left brain right brain divide real or a metaphor?” the ChatGPT-generated text indicated that although the two brain hemispheres are somewhat specialized, “the notation that people can be characterized as ‘left-brained’ or ‘right-brained’ is considered to be an oversimplification and a popular myth” (OpenAI, 2023).

OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (Mar 14 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/chat

You may also put the full text of long responses from ChatGPT in an appendix of your paper or in online supplemental materials, so readers have access to the exact text that was generated. It is particularly important to document the exact text created because ChatGPT will generate a unique response in each chat session, even if given the same prompt. If you create appendices or supplemental materials, remember that each should be called out at least once in the body of your APA Style paper.

When given a follow-up prompt of “What is a more accurate representation?” the ChatGPT-generated text indicated that “different brain regions work together to support various cognitive processes” and “the functional specialization of different regions can change in response to experience and environmental factors” (OpenAI, 2023; see Appendix A for the full transcript).

Creating a reference to ChatGPT or other AI models and software

The in-text citations and references above are adapted from the reference template for software in Section 10.10 of the Publication Manual (American Psychological Association, 2020, Chapter 10). Although here we focus on ChatGPT, because these guidelines are based on the software template, they can be adapted to note the use of other large language models (e.g., Bard), algorithms, and similar software.

The reference and in-text citations for ChatGPT are formatted as follows:

• Parenthetical citation: (OpenAI, 2023)
• Narrative citation: OpenAI (2023)

Let’s break that reference down and look at the four elements (author, date, title, and source):

Author: The author of the model is OpenAI.

Date: The date is the year of the version you used. Following the template in Section 10.10, you need to include only the year, not the exact date. The version number provides the specific date information a reader might need.

Title: The name of the model is “ChatGPT,” so that serves as the title and is italicized in your reference, as shown in the template. Although OpenAI labels unique iterations (i.e., ChatGPT-3, ChatGPT-4), they are using “ChatGPT” as the general name of the model, with updates identified with version numbers.

The version number is included after the title in parentheses. The format for the version number in ChatGPT references includes the date because that is how OpenAI is labeling the versions. Different large language models or software might use different version numbering; use the version number in the format the author or publisher provides, which may be a numbering system (e.g., Version 2.0) or other methods.

Bracketed text is used in references for additional descriptions when they are needed to help a reader understand what’s being cited. References for a number of common sources, such as journal articles and books, do not include bracketed descriptions, but things outside of the typical peer-reviewed system often do. In the case of a reference for ChatGPT, provide the descriptor “Large language model” in square brackets. OpenAI describes ChatGPT-4 as a “large multimodal model,” so that description may be provided instead if you are using ChatGPT-4. Later versions and software or models from other companies may need different descriptions, based on how the publishers describe the model. The goal of the bracketed text is to briefly describe the kind of model to your reader.

Source: When the publisher name and the author name are the same, do not repeat the publisher name in the source element of the reference, and move directly to the URL. This is the case for ChatGPT. The URL for ChatGPT is https://chat.openai.com/chat . For other models or products for which you may create a reference, use the URL that links as directly as possible to the source (i.e., the page where you can access the model, not the publisher’s homepage).

Other questions about citing ChatGPT

You may have noticed the confidence with which ChatGPT described the ideas of brain lateralization and how the brain operates, without citing any sources. I asked for a list of sources to support those claims and ChatGPT provided five references—four of which I was able to find online. The fifth does not seem to be a real article; the digital object identifier given for that reference belongs to a different article, and I was not able to find any article with the authors, date, title, and source details that ChatGPT provided. Authors using ChatGPT or similar AI tools for research should consider making this scrutiny of the primary sources a standard process. If the sources are real, accurate, and relevant, it may be better to read those original sources to learn from that research and paraphrase or quote from those articles, as applicable, than to use the model’s interpretation of them.

We’ve also received a number of other questions about ChatGPT. Should students be allowed to use it? What guidelines should instructors create for students using AI? Does using AI-generated text constitute plagiarism? Should authors who use ChatGPT credit ChatGPT or OpenAI in their byline? What are the copyright implications ?

On these questions, researchers, editors, instructors, and others are actively debating and creating parameters and guidelines. Many of you have sent us feedback, and we encourage you to continue to do so in the comments below. We will also study the policies and procedures being established by instructors, publishers, and academic institutions, with a goal of creating guidelines that reflect the many real-world applications of AI-generated text.

For questions about manuscript byline credit, plagiarism, and related ChatGPT and AI topics, the APA Style team is seeking the recommendations of APA Journals editors. APA Style guidelines based on those recommendations will be posted on this blog and on the APA Style site later this year.

Update: APA Journals has published policies on the use of generative AI in scholarly materials .

We, the APA Style team humans, appreciate your patience as we navigate these unique challenges and new ways of thinking about how authors, researchers, and students learn, write, and work with new technologies.

American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000

Related and recent

Comments are disabled due to your privacy settings. To re-enable, please adjust your cookie preferences.

APA Style Monthly

Subscribe to the APA Style Monthly newsletter to get tips, updates, and resources delivered directly to your inbox.

Welcome! Thank you for subscribing.

APA Style Guidelines

Browse APA Style writing guidelines by category

• Abbreviations
• Bias-Free Language
• Capitalization
• In-Text Citations
• Italics and Quotation Marks
• Paper Format
• Punctuation
• Research and Publication
• Spelling and Hyphenation
• Tables and Figures

Full index of topics