research on capital budgeting in oman

One hundred and twelve managers participated in the pilot survey conducted in different parts of Muscat, Oman, from September 2020 to January 2021. The managers responded to questions set on a 5-Likert scale bordering on aspects of managerial and organisational attributes, the rationale for selecting specific capital budgeting techniques, the impediments to the use of advanced capital budgeting techniques (ACBTs), and the traction of non-financial, environmental, social, and governmental (ESG) factors. IBM SPSS v.23 and analysis of moment structure (AMOS) v.20, descriptive analysis, correlation, and multiple regressions were used. SEM was applied to determine the strength of the relationship between the latent capital budgeting variables tested in the model.

The results show that the model has an acceptable fit that meets the recommended values. Specifically, the use of advanced capital budgeting methods (ACBMs) relative to financial and non-financial factors in the capital investment decision model is the most influencing path in this SEM model; The rest of the observed relationships are insignificant at a 5% significance level.

Using relatively more advanced capital budgeting approaches such as real options could significantly impact financial and non-financial factors, thereby opening the prospects for more integrated project appraisal approaches. Cash flow, net present value (NPV), environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations, top management role, and clarity of business policy are among the determinants of sustainable capital budgeting. This is perhaps the first study that has applied the SEM approach to generating more insights into capital budgeting factors than previous studies emphasizing the Omani non-oil sector.

Empirical

Advanced capital budgeting methods (ACBMs); Confirmatory factor analysis; Exploratory factor analysis; Investment decisions; Oman, Real options; Structural equation modelling.

G11, G31

107 – 121

KPMG Personalization

• Analysis of Oman’s State Budget 2024

KPMG review and insight

• Share Share close
• Download Analysis of Oman’s State Budget 2024 pdf Opens in a new window
• 1000 Save this article to my library
• View Print friendly version of this article Opens in a new window
• Go to bottom of page
• Home ›
• Insights ›

The 2024 budget is prepared in accordance with Oman Vision 2040 and the Tenth Five-Year Development Plan (2021-2025), which aims to ensure financial, economic and social stability. 

It is based on a set of economic and social objectives such as achieving economic growth of not less than 3%, maintaining the inflation rate at moderate levels (around 3%), achieving financial sustainability, stimulating the investment climate, enhancing the role of Development Bank in financing valueadded projects, operating Oman Future Fund and starting its financing activities, maintaining spending on basic social services provided by the government, developing incomegenerating sources for governorates and continuing to implement national programs. It also acknowledges various financial and economic risks such as oil price volatility, higher interest rates, geopolitical tensions, global inflationary pressures, and climate change and natural disasters. 

Highlights of Oman’s 2024 budget

• Oil and gas revenues represent 68% of total government revenues
• Non-oil and gas revenues represent 32% of total government revenues
• Development expenditure cut by 18% compared to the 2023 preliminary results
• Expenses for servicing public debt cut by 12.5% compared to the 2023 budge
• Electricity subsidy cut by 5% compared to the 2023 budget
• Allocation for Social Protection System increased by 46% compared to the 2023 budget
• Allocation for projects of development impact increased by 20% as compared to the 2023 budget
• New expense item included in the 2024 budget
• Budget deficit estimated at 6% of revenue and 1.5% of GDP
• 2024 budget vis-à-vis 2024 projections in the Tenth-Five Year Development Plan

Analysis of Oman's State Budget 2024

Download full PDF ⤓

Additional contacts

Anuradha venkatkrishnan.

Director | Audit

Sumit Bansal

Director | Tax

Irshard Marikar

Waseem khan yousafzai.

• My Favorites

You have successfully logged in but...

... your login credentials do not authorize you to access this content in the selected format. Access to this content in this format requires a current subscription or a prior purchase. Please select the WEB or READ option instead (if available). Or consider purchasing the publication.

OECD Journal on Budgeting

Capital budgeting and procurement practices.

• Discontinued
• Is continued by :
• OECD Papers on Budgeting

The OECD Journal on Budgeting is published three times per year. It draws on the best of the recent work of the OECD Committee of Senior Budget Officials (SBO), as well as special contributions from finance ministries, academics and experts in the field and makes it available to a wider community in an accessible format. The journal provides insight on leading-edge institutional arrangements, systems and instruments for the allocation and management of resources in the public sector.

English Also available in: French

• 3 times a year
• ISSN: 16812336 (online)
• https://doi.org/10.1787/16812336
• Subscribe to the RSS feed Subscribe to the RSS feed
• Editorial Board Editorial Board

Capital investment is a key function of government. However, for a number of reasons it has proven difficult for governments to ensure that capital investment represents value for money, is affordable, and is budgeted and accounted for in a prudent and transparent manner. This article discusses these challenges facing governments. Using the findings of a survey conducted among OECD countries and enhanced engagement countries in 2012, this article provides an overview of what governments are doing with respect to planning and prioritisation, procurement, construction, operation and management, monitoring and evaluation, and budgeting and accounting for capital projects. The article concludes with a number of recommendations for capital budgeting and procurement.

JEL classification: H400, H540, H570 Keywords: Capital investment, capital budgeting, capital projects, value for money, budgeting systems, accounting systems, transparency, procurement, public-private partnerships, PPPs, TIP, traditional infrastructure procurement

• Finance and Investment
• Click to access:
• Click to download PDF - 445.12KB PDF

Cite this content as:

Author(s) Philippe Burger and Ian Hawkesworth

29 Nov 2013

Pages: 57 - 104

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Structural Equation Modelling Approach to Evaluating Capital Budgeting Factors in Oman

Objective-This study aims to critically evaluate capital budgeting factors in Oman's manufacturing sector using the structural equation modelling (SEM) approach. Methodology-One hundred and twelve managers participated in the pilot survey conducted in different parts of Muscat, Oman, from September 2020 to January 2021. The managers responded to questions set on a 5-Likert scale bordering on aspects of managerial and organisational attributes, the rationale for selecting specific capital budgeting techniques, the impediments to the use of advanced capital budgeting techniques (ACBTs), and the traction of nonfinancial, environmental, social, and governmental (ESG) factors. IBM SPSS v.23 and analysis of moment structure (AMOS) v.20, descriptive analysis, correlation, and multiple regressions were used. SEM was applied to determine the strength of the relationship between the latent capital budgeting variables tested in the model. Findings-The results show that the model has an acceptable fit that meets the recommended values. Specifically, the use of advanced capital budgeting methods (ACBMs) relative to financial and non-financial factors in the capital investment decision model is the most influencing path in this SEM model; The rest of the observed relationships are insignificant at a 5% significance level. Novelty-Using relatively more advanced capital budgeting approaches such as real options could significantly impact financial and non-financial factors, thereby opening the prospects for more integrated project appraisal approaches. Cash flow, net present value (NPV), environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations, top management role, and clarity of business policy are among the determinants of sustainable capital budgeting. This is perhaps the first study that has applied the SEM approach to generating more insights into capital budgeting factors than previous studies emphasizing the Omani non-oil sector.

Related Papers

Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis

Ibrahim Ahmed

Market Forces

The study explores the different stages of the capital investment decision process and empirically investigates these stages’ mediating role. We have used firms, managers, and economic attributes as independent variables. Likewise, ROA, ROE, and EPS are used as proxies for measuring firm performance, which is the dependent variable. A survey was conducted through a self-developed questionnaire for non-financial listed firms of the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). The questionnaire comprises of two parts. The first part is related to managers and firm attributes. The second part covers the nine steps of the Capex Appraisal Model (CAM). PLS-SEM was used to investigate the objectives of the study. Moreover, the results support the applicability of CAM in the corporate sector of Pakistan. For this purpose, 27 hypotheses were empirically tested, of which 21 were found to be significant. However, 6 hypotheses were not supported. The findings suggest that the “Capex Appraisal Model” is a use...

Molly Chong

This study presents the capital budgeting practices of Malaysian companies through 4 stages: Identification, Development, Selection and Control. It is based on a questionnaire sent to 240 Malaysian companies of various industries and sizes, which received a response rate of 15%. The main purpose of the study is to examine the capital budgeting practices of Malaysian companies and to identify possible gaps between theory and practice. The study shows that Malaysian companies have a structured investment appraisal process to support long term objectives and are progressively moving towards sophisticated capital budgeting practices such as the use of Discounted Cash Flow method, probabilistic type of risk assessment tools, and Real Options. However, a theory-practice gap remains. Payback method is still the most frequent tool used by Malaysian companies to evaluate potential investments. Among the Discounted Cash Flow method, Internal Rate of Return is preferred over the theoretical superior Net Present Value. The study also aims to investigate the determinants of sophisticated capital budgeting practices. In the context of this study, sophistication is assessed in totality with respect to capital budgeting process. Three sophistication indexes are constructed to regress on company characteristics using a robust ordered probit model. Results indicate that the type of industry that a company operates in and its management structure are related to the sophistication of capital budgeting practices. A significant higher level of sophistication is found for companies in the service industry and those that appoint non-owners executives to manage the company. Similar with other empirical research, this study has its limitations, such as the sampling method, sample size, and response bias. A wider set of data and determinants including top management characteristics could have perhaps enhance the findings of this study. Nevertheless, the findings of this study can be utilized to encourage better capital budgeting practices and to improve overall decision making of Malaysian companies.

Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies

Sh. Khurram Abid

Purpose: Regardless matter whether it is a commercial or public enterprise, every business would have a capital budgeting procedure in residence. The supply of Public goods is the major force on Public sector institutions, and one means to do this is complete the execution of huge progress schemes. With the current state of affairs in Pakistan, major cost and time overruns have occurred on Public sector setup ventures. One of the most likely reasons of cost overruns is a lack of or insufficient cost and benefit ventures, as well as general venture management since the documentation period through the stage after installation period. This study used capital budgeting decision-making methodologies to assess Pakistan's present technological ambitions. Design/Methodology/Approach: In Pakistan, one of the top corporations did a postal survey and a cross-sectional data analysis. Although empirical data suggests a shift toward genuine conceptions and discounted cash flow (DCF) approach...

Abreham Meo

Tenaye Tamiru

SSRN Electronic Journal

Axel Pierru

yuwanswang swang

Pradeep Brijlal

George Ekegey Ekeha

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Weerakoon Banda Yatiwelle Koralalage

Bassey I Ibor

Tarun Mukherjee

International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues

Mawih Al Ani

Rama Murthy BM

QUEST JOURNALS

ASIAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND ACCOUNTING (AJBA)

International Journal of Science & Research

Sivanathan Sivaruban

Chuvej Chansa-ngavej

Available at SSRN:< http://ssrn. com/abstract

Carlo Alberto Magni

Journal of Risk and Financial Management

Antonio C Moreira

Fredrik Hartwig

Asian Journal of Business and Accounting

Suneeta Sathye

American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research in Africa

Olanrewaju Ogundojutimi , Kabiru Agboola

Modern Applied Science

Ahmad Anabtawi

KCA Journal of Business Management

Isaya Jairo

International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies

Jahangir Siddikee

Pooja Baheti

Global Disclosure of Economics and Business

Dakito Alemu

International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting

Lingesiya Kengatharan

Review of Economics and Finance

Ijaems Journal

Research Journal of Finance and Accounting

SANI K SAIDU

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection

Corporate social responsibility budgeting and spending during COVID–19 in Oman: A humanitarian response to the pandemic

Saeed rabea baatwah.

a Department of Accounting, College of Business Administration, Shaqra University, Afif, Saudi Arabia

b Department of Accounting, College of Administrative Sciences, Seiyun University, Seiyun, Yemen

Adel Ali Al-Qadasi

c Department of Accounting, College of Science and Humanities, Shaqra University, Aldwadmi, Saudi Arabia

d Department of Accounting, Faculty of Commerce & Economics, Hodeidah University, Hodeidah, Yemen

Amer Mohammed Al-Shehri

e Department of Accounting, College of Business, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia

Imen Derouiche

f Centre for Research in Economics and Management (CREA), Faculty of Law Economics and Finance, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

Associated Data

Research data are publicly available in sources identified in the text.

COVID–19 is causing economic panic among people, governments, and businesses, requiring greater corporate social responsibility (CSR). Using a sample of Omani-listed firms, this study shows that CSR budgeting and spending have increased considerably during the pandemic. It also shows that CSR budgeting is positively affected by the increase in COVID–19 deaths. CSR spending increases with the number of COVID–19 confirmed and fatal cases. These findings suggest that firms resort to CSR to reduce the negative consequences of the pandemic.

1. Introduction

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a major policy for businesses to build a solid relationship with their stakeholders and ensure survivability ( Bruna and Lahouel, 2021 ; Bruna and Nicolò, 2020 ). The payoff of this policy is more noticeable during crises where firms with established CSR practices receive support from their stakeholders and attain more privileges than their counterparts ( Bae et al., 2021 ; Boubaker et al., 2020 ; Garel and Petit-Romec, 2021 ; Lins et al., 2017 ; Qiu et al., 2021 ). However, during crises, stakeholders expect firms to initiate CSR activities that are genuinely congruent with their demands ( Bae et al., 2021 ). Thus, CSR is defined as activities carried out by firms that are beneficial to some segment of society at a given point in time according to their economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary expectations ( Carroll, 2021 ). COVID–19 is an unprecedented crisis that has put firms in extraordinary situations requiring from them strong CSR commitments and innovative CSR strategies and initiatives ( Carroll, 2021 ; Lawton et al., 2020 ).

In this study, we investigate the role of the pandemic on CSR budgeting and spending in Oman, focusing on whether the pandemic influences budgets and the actual spending related to CSR activities and whether the confirmed and fatal cases affect these activities. Following Bhattacharya et al. (2009) , we define CSR spending as the total amount of money spent by a firm toward CSR initiatives during the year. This definition has been adopted by more recent research on CSR spending ( Dutta et al., 2021 ; Malik et al., 2019 ). We define CSR budgeting as the total amount of money determined by the firm to be spent during the year on CSR activities. 1 These two CSR dimensions are of particular interest in this study compared to standard measures such as CSR indices as CSR monetary investments are direct measures of CSR and better gauge firm CSR performance ( Lee et al., 2013 ). Monetary CSR measures are more appropriate and direct measures of CSR performance during the COVID–19 pandemic because firms face real challenges concerning their CSR activities at this period ( He and Harris, 2020 ).

Oman provides an excellent setting to study CSR. First, the Omani capital market authority incorporated new corporate governance (CG) principles related to CSR in the revised version of the code in 2015, requiring all listed firms from 2016 to set CSR objectives and disclose their CSR activities in their annual reports (e.g., the amount spent and the impact on sustainability) ( Capital Market Authority, 2016 ). This is a longstanding vision of the Omani government calling private businesses to develop their local community and practice good citizenship ( Salemi, 2017 ). To the best of our knowledge, no country has such a requirement except India, where companies must disclose the amount spent on CSR activities in their annual report ( Dutta et al., 2021 ). Second, the government has taken many measures to combat the pandemic since the first two confirmed cases on February 24th, 2020, calling for support from corporate businesses. Despite presenting several CSR challenges, this call has received a positive response from many large firms fighting the pandemic consequences ( Younas et al., 2021 ). Third, the requirement of disclosing information related to CSR budgeting and spending in Oman provides unique data that is rarely available in other markets. This information, particularly on budgeting, is seldom disclosed to the public. Thus, Oman represents a unique context to examine issues related to CSR and suggests policy implications beyond the Omani market.

The COVID–19 pandemic is causing humanitarian and economic panic. For example, there were more than 221 million infected cases and 4.5 million fatalities in 222 countries as of September 04th, 2021 ( World Health Organization, 2021 ). Many economies are struggling and businesses have collapsed from its adverse consequences ( Carroll, 2021 ; Sharif et al., 2020 ; Zhang et al., 2020 ). Unfortunately, this pandemic is still frightening people and threatening businesses, as more waves are expected in the coming months ( Pitofsky, 2020 ) with unclear economic consequences ( Zhang et al., 2020 ). Carroll (2021) raises interesting questions about what firms should do and how they can contribute to alleviating the harmful effects of the pandemic in this challenging time for business.

The COVID–19 outbreak has urged researchers from different fields to look at its impact. The literature shows that the pandemic has dramatically affected stock returns ( Al-Awadhi et al., 2020 ; Ashraf, 2020 ), investors’ sentiment ( Sun et al., 2021 ), risk ( Zhang et al., 2020 ), and stock volatility ( Sharif et al., 2020 ). However, little is known about the effect of COVID–19 on corporate CSR initiatives ( Carroll, 2021 ; He and Harris, 2020 ). This paper fills this gap and extends the literature that is so far limited to CSR supporting actions (e.g., Gürlek and Kılıç, 2021 , Talbot and Ordonez-Ponce, 2020 ) and environmental issues ( Akhtaruzzaman et al., 2021 ; Guérin and Suntheim, 2021 ). It extends research by studying the economics of CSR activities during COVID–19.

In the spirit of Garriga and Melé (2004) , we propose the stakeholder theory to explain the effect of COVID–19 on CSR budgeting and spending. The authors argue that firms are affected or affect various stakeholders and must show a high level of commitment not only to primary stakeholders (e.g., shareholders) but also to other stakeholders such as customers, employees, and social communities. 2 He and Harris (2020) note that COVID–19 is a significant challenge to test firms’ commitment to ethical business conduct and CSR. Manuel and Herron (2020) argue that firms may increase investment in socially responsible actions during COVID–19 to meet stakeholders’ expectations. Mahmud et al. (2021) suggest that firms should support society and vital stakeholders such as employees, customers, and communities during the pandemic.

Based on these arguments, we hypothesize that CSR budgeting and spending in socially difficult times would be economically substantial. Individuals during COVID–19 suffer economically and socially from the negative consequences of the pandemic, showing the need for substantial help from other community members. Firms at this time should be more responsible and their CSR contributions are expected to be more significant. With the rapid spread and severity of the epidemic, the budgeting and spending associated with CSR activities should be significantly higher than beforehand. This contribution should continue as the pandemic will return in future waves ( Pitofsky, 2020 ). However, COVID–19 has severe effects on firms themselves, affecting their supply chains and customer demand, leading to lower profitability ( Zhang et al., 2020 ) and significantly affecting the monetary resources available for CSR.

Our empirical results show a positive and significant relationship between COVID–19 and CSR budgeting and spending. Firms devoted large budgets following high growth of confirmed cases, while they substantially increased their spending following a growth in the death rate and the number of confirmed cases. Moreover, we show that the allocated CSR budget is not driven by the growth in confirmed and fatal cases of COVID–19 on the day of the annual general meeting (AGM) or by the number of confirmed and fatal cases on the previous day. Using a difference-in-differences design, we provide strong evidence of the causal nature of the relationship between COVID–19 and CSR budgeting and spending. Overall, our findings indicate that the pandemic gives corporate businesses incentives to act in a socially responsible manner.

The contribution of this study to the literature is fourfold. First, it supplements the nascent literature by examining the effect of COVID–19 on CSR. Most concurrent studies show that firms initiate several actions to combat the negative consequences of the pandemic, but they are mainly descriptive and focus on large US firms. Studying large firms, Manuel and Herron (2020) and Carroll (2021) observe numerous innovative CSR strategies and initiatives devoted to alleviating the economic and social impact of the pandemic. He and Harris (2020) observe that, while COVID19 forced many firms to adopt irresponsible business activities, many examples of proactive CSR activities have been observed. For instance, García-Sánchez and García-Sánchez (2020) find that the 100 largest Spanish firms developed strategies and actions helping several stakeholders to survive during this unseen challenge, although Talbot and Ordonez-Ponce (2020) report that banks generally do little to support their clients and community. More recently, Mahmud et al. (2021) and Gürlek and Kılıç (2021) provide evidence that firms showed more respect for their employees, customers, and communities and carried out many CSR activities to reduce the negative effect of COVID–19. Unlike these studies, we empirically test how and when the pandemic motivates firms to contribute monetarily to reducing the harmful effects of the pandemic.

Second, this study contributes to previous works on the effect of COVID–19 on CSR performance indices. For instance, Akhtaruzzaman et al. (2021) report a significant role of media coverage on ESG leader indices during COVID–19, as evidenced by the transmission of contagion between capital markets during March–April 2020. Guérin and Suntheim (2021) investigate how COVID–19 affects environmental performance and find that constraints and adverse economic conditions resulting from COVID–19 reduce environmental performance. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to expand this research by providing evidence on CSR monetary aspects in COVID–19 time and how these monetary measures of CSR are sensitive to the number of confirmed and fatal cases. This evidence answers questions He and Harris (2020) put forward about whether firms invest more or succumb to financial conditions during COVID–19 and, thus, invest less in CSR.

Third, this study relates to the fast-growing literature on how a firm's performance depends on the severity of COVID–19. For example, Ashraf (2020) finds that an increase in the number of confirmed cases (fatal cases) is associated with low (no) stock market returns in several capital markets. Zhang et al. (2020) observe high stock market risks in countries with a high number of confirmed cases. Al-Awadhi et al. (2020) find that the growth in daily death and confirmed cases of COVID–19 leads to negative stock returns of Chinese firms. Our results provide evidence supporting the view that firms are under pressure to monitor stakeholder expectations and develop effective strategies and initiatives towards CSR during the pandemic.

Finally, it contributes to the rare CSR studies in emerging markets by examining the issue in Oman. Previous CSR studies during COVID–19 focus on developed economies. Future research should explore the topic in emerging economies ( Boubakri et al., 2021 ).

The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. Section 2 describes the sample, data, and methodology. Section 3 reports the empirical results. Section 4 concludes.

2. Methodology

2.1. sample and data.

This study aims to explore the effect of COVID–19 on CSR budgeting and spending in Oman. Our sample starts with all Omani firms listed over 2018–2021. 3 We eliminate financial firms (146 observations) as they behave differently with respect to CSR initiatives. We also drop firms with no data on CSR budgeting (36 observations), CSR spending (128 observations), and control variables (2 observations), reducing the final sample to 261 observations for CSR budgeting analysis and to 169 observations for CSR spending analysis. Data on daily confirmed and fatal cases of COVID–19 are from Worldometer 4 and data on CSR budgeting and the date of the AGM are from AGM resolutions published on the capital market website. We use annual reports for data on CSR spending and financial data. 5 It is worth noting that data on CSR monetary investments is not a requirement in most capital markets and is seldom available in the annual reports ( Dutta et al., 2021 ). Omani-listed firms have to provide data on the planned and actual amounts of money used for CSR activities, particularly, directed to philanthropic activities (e.g., donations) and community relations activities (e.g., sponsoring religious or community activities).

2.2. Empirical models

We use a fixed effects panel data methodology with robust standard errors to estimate our equations and help control for unobservable heterogeneity that may affect CSR budgeting and spending. 6 The empirical specifications are as follows.

where CSRB is the CSR budget allocated and approved at the AGM for CSR activities in the current year. CSRS is the CSR spending measured as the total amount spent for CSR activities in the current year. COVID–19 represents the COVID–19 event and is given the value one for March, 11th 2020 onwards, and zero otherwise. This date corresponds to the day the World Health Organization declared COVID–19 as a global pandemic. 1DAYGCC ( 1DAYGDC ) is one day before the AGM growth rate in the number of confirmed (fatal) cases. It proxies for the severity of the COVID–19 situation ( Al-Awadhi et al., 2020 ; Ashraf, 2020 ). YENDCC ( YENDDC ) proxies the total number of confirmed (fatal) cases at the firm's fiscal year-end. We calculate these cases as the total number of confirmed (fatal) cases from one day after the AGM to the fiscal year-end date. This reflects how COVID–19 drives CSR activities throughout the year. We use a natural logarithmic transformation of the total number of confirmed (fatal) cases to mitigate the effects of outlier observations. 7

To avoid isolating the effect of COVID–19, we introduce a set of firm-level control variables that are deemed to affect CSR budgeting and spending ( Leong and Yang, 2021 ): firm size ( Size ), leverage ( Leverage ), operational cash flow ( Cashflow ), return on assets ( ROA ), sales growth ( Growth ), and geographical segments ( Geographicsegments ). Appendix A details the definitions of all the variables. The regressions include year dummies to control for the time-fixed effects. All controls in Eqs. (1) and 2 are measured at the beginning of the fiscal year since CSR budgets are set in the AGM during the first months of the fiscal year.

3. Empirical findings

Table 1 presents the descriptive statistics and univariate analyses. The average value of CSRB ( CSRS ) is 54,696.86 (85,697.79), with a high standard deviation, suggesting significant differences in the contributions of Omani firms to CSR activities. 8 Panel B shows differences in the mean (median) for CSRB and CSRS depending on the period, before or after the outbreak. The results suggest that CSR budgeting and spending are more significant during the pandemic than before. The empirical results in Panel C show that the average daily growth in COVID–19 confirmed and fatal cases one day before the AGM ( 1DAYGCC and 1DAYGDC ) is 3 and 2 percent, respectively. Similarly, the average number (log) of confirmed and fatal cases on the date of company year-end since the date of AGM ( YENDCC and YENDDC ) is 18,558 (5.15) and 15,519 (4.99), respectively.

Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis.

This table summarizes the statistics for the variables of interest. It also provides the mean (median) comparison for the CSR budgeting and spending prior and post COVID–19. The sample includes all non-financial firms listed on the Omani stock market with available data on CSR budgeting and spending over 2018–2021. a, b and c denote statistical significance at the 1, 5, and 10% levels, respectively. The definition of all variables is in Appendix A .

Tables 2 and ​ and3 report 3 report the main results for the overall effect of COVID–19 and the cases of infection and death on CSR budgeting and spending. 9 For brevity, we discuss the findings for the variables of interest, leaving aside the interpretation of the control variables. In all columns of Table 2 , the coefficients on COVID–19 are positive and statistically significant at the conventional levels, indicating that the pandemic has led to a considerable increase in the amounts allocated to and spent on CSR activities. Turning to the economic significance of COVID–19, CSRB and CSRS have increased more during the pandemic by 13 and 23 percent, respectively. 10 This increase is considerable, given the significant decline in profitability that firms experienced during COVID–19 ( Zhang et al., 2020 ). Consistent with CSR stakeholder theories ( Garriga and Melé, 2004 ), our results suggest that firms react actively during health disasters to relieve the damaging effects on society. This evidence supports the view that firms have adapted their CSR strategies and commitments to accommodate the expectations of stakeholders during COVID–19 and that they are aware of the crucial linkage between social problems such as the pandemic and the survivability of businesses ( Carroll, 2021 ). It also coincides with He and Harris (2020) argument that firms can relieve social and environmental challenges during the COVID–19 crisis by adopting genuine and authentic CSR initiatives. Although the pandemic poses operational and financial challenges to firms, the evidence in this study suggests that crises such as COVID–19 do not reduce firms’ investment in CSR activities by allocating and spending a large amount on these activities to genuinely reduce the economic shocks to major stakeholders such as employees, customers, and communities. This is also in line with Sakunasingha et al. (2018) who document that the financial crisis of 2008 did not force firms to deviate from their CSR commitment.

Regression results for the effect of COVID–19 on CSR budgeting and spending.

This table reports the results of fixed effect regressions of COVID–19 on CSR budgeting ( CSRB ) and spending ( CSRS ). All continuous variables are winsorized at the 1st and 99th percentiles. The robust standard errors control for the potential influence of heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation. Column 1 (2) shows the corresponding results for the effect of COVID–19 on CSR ( CSRS ). T–values are in parentheses. a, b and c denote statistical significance at the 1, 5, and 10% levels, respectively. The definition of all variables is in Appendix A .

Regression results of the effect of COVID–19 confirmed and death growth on CSR budgeting and spending.

This table presents the results of fixed effect regressions of the growth of COVID–19 confirmed cases ( 1DAYGCC and YENDCC ) and death cases ( 1DAYGDC and YENDDC ) on CSR budgeting ( CSRB ) and spending ( CSRS ). Columns (1) and (2) report the results for the effect of 1DAYGCC and 1DAYGDC on CSRB , respectively, while columns (3) and (4) portray the results for the effect of YENDCC and YENDDC on CSRS , respectively. All continuous variables are winsorized at the 1st and 99th percentiles. The robust standard errors control for the potential influence of heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation. T–values are in parentheses. a, b and c denote statistical significance at the 1, 5, and 10% levels, respectively. The definition of all variables is in Appendix A .

Table 3 (Columns 1 and 2) shows that the coefficient on 1DAYGCC is negative but statistically insignificant whereas that on 1DAYGDC is positive and statistically significant in the CSRB equations (at the 1% threshold level), implying that the growth in the number of COVID–19 fatalities is associated with more significant budgets for CSR activities. However, this result does not hold for confirmed cases. In economic terms, a one standard deviation increase in 1DAYGDC leads to an increase in CSR budgeting of 15 percent. The coefficients on YENDCC and YENDDC (Columns 3 and 4) affect positively and significantly CSRS (at the 1% level), suggesting that COVID–19 confirmed and fatal cases significantly drive the amount of money spent on CSR activities. As for the economic significance, a one standard deviation increase in YENDCC ( YENDDC ) is associated with an increase in CSR spending by 19 (18) percent. These findings suggest that the number of fatal cases affects only CSR budgeting whereas the number of confirmed and fatal cases affects CSR spending. CSR spending –effective present-decision of investment– varies depending on intertemporal considerations based on confirmed (past and present) and fatal cases (past). CSR budgeting is a prospective decision that seems to be mainly shaped by past factors (fatal cases). This evidence intuitively explains the increased CSR budgeting and spending during COVID–19 as a response to the severity of the pandemic and meeting stakeholders’ demand for CSR. The numbers of confirmed and fatal cases caused by the pandemic have materialized the current epidemiological issue and shown the need for genuine CSR. This is in line with stock market studies showing that the severity of an outbreak, in terms of confirmed and fatal cases, drives investors’ decisions related to trading stocks ( Al-Awadhi et al., 2020 ; Ashraf, 2020 ). Overall, our findings confirm the importance of CSR in the strategic planning of firms and their social behavior during this challenging pandemic period.

We conduct additional analyses to gain further insights. Table 4 re-estimates Eqs. (1) and 3 after performing a natural logarithmic transformation of CSRB and CSRS . Columns 1 and 2 (Panel A) show consistent positive and statistically significant coefficients on COVID–19 as in Table 2 . Using these new dependent variables for Eqs. (2) and 4 (untabulated), we find qualitatively similar results to those in Table 3 . Second, we explore the sensitivity of our results related to COVID–19 confirmed and fatal cases by using the growth in the number of these cases on the date of the AGM ( SDAYGCC and SDAYGDC ) and by using the natural logarithm of the total number of cases ( 1DAYNCC and 1DAYNDC ). Columns 3 – 6 (Panel A) show that the only significant coefficient is for SDAYGDC , suggesting that firms are more sensitive to the confirmed (fatal) cases on the day before the AGM when determining their CSR budgets. These findings, (untabulated) are qualitatively similar when we use cases for two, three, and four days before the AGM.

Robust analysis.

Panel A presents different regression results with alternative measures of the main variables. Columns (1) and (2) for the effect of the COVID–19 ( COVID–19 ) on the natural logarithm of CSR budgeting ( LNCSRB ) and spending ( LNCSRS ); columns (3) and (4) for the effect of the growth of COVID–19 confirmed cases (SDAYGDC) and death cases (SDAYGDC) on CSR budgeting ( CSRB ); and columns (5) and (6) for the effect of the natural logarithm of the number of COVID–19 confirmed cases ( 1DAYNCC ) and death cases ( 1DAYNDC ) on CSR budgeting ( CSRB ). Panel B reports the results of the difference-in-differences analysis: Columns (1) and (2) for the effect of the TREAT1 and TREAT2 on the change in CSR budgeting ( ∆CSRB ); and columns (3) and (4) for the effect of the TREAT3 and TREAT4 on the change in CSR spending ( ∆CSRS ); Controls refers to control variables: Size, Leverage, Cashflow, ROA, Growth, and Geographicsegments. All continuous variables are winsorized at the 1st and 99th percentiles. The robust standard errors control for the potential influence of heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation. T–values are in parentheses. a, b and c denote statistical significance at the 1, 5, and 10% levels, respectively. The definition of all variables is in Appendix A .

Finally, we adopt a difference-in-differences (DID) approach by taking advantage of the exogenous effect of the pandemic shock. Following Flammer and Ioannou (2021) , we use a quasi-experimental setting to test the effects of COVID–19 confirmed and fatal cases on CSR budgeting and spending. In this setting, we set observations with growth in the confirmed (fatal) cases before the AGM as treatment groups TREAT1 ( TREAT2 ) in the context of CSR budgeting. For CSR spending, we assign firms with a number of confirmed (fatal) cases higher than the sample means as treatment groups TREAT3 ( TREAT4 ). To relate these groups to CSR budgeting and spending, we use the changes in CSR budgeting ( ∆CSRB ) and spending ( ∆CSRB ) in replacing our main outcome variables. 11 Table 4 (Panel B) shows the treatment groups (e.g., TREAT1 ) have positive and highly statistically significant coefficients, indicating that results reported in Table 3 are more likely to be causal rather than simple association.

4. Conclusion

The COVID–19 pandemic has urged researchers to explore the influence of this unprecedented health shock on various economic outcomes. However, little research has examined its effect on CSR and none its influence on monetary aspects of CSR. Using data from an emerging market, Oman, our findings show that the pandemic results in a considerable increase in CSR budgeting and spending. They also suggest that CSR budgeting is influenced by the number of fatal cases, while confirmed and fatal cases influence CSR spending. These findings suggest that corporate businesses practice responsible citizenship, which motivates them to be among the first in helping society when facing challenging situations. The chief novelty of this study is that it considers the monetary aspects of CSR (budgeting and spending) in general and particularly in a time of crisis, where most studies look at CSR ratings or indices to explore CSR's antecedents and consequences. It is also the first study to provide empirical evidence on the effect of COVID–19 cases and fatalities on CSR activities.

At the onset of COVID–19, CSR scholars speculated on “what firms are going to do to respond to this worldwide crisis” ( Carroll, 2021 ) and “what drives some firms to be more ethical and socially responsible” ( He and Harris, 2020 ). Our evidence addresses these crucial questions and asserts that firms do not always extract the benefits for their shareholders but also consider CSR as necessary for their sustainability. Thus, our study has implications for governments, policymakers, investors, and other stakeholders. For example, governments have expended considerable economic and social costs to relieve the unprecedented negative consequences of COVID–19 on their people. In many cases, they have called on businesses to support them in combating the pandemic, and this call has received a response from large and brand-name firms ( He and Harris, 2020 ; Manuel and Herron, 2020 ; Younas et al., 2021 ). Our sample includes various types of firms, valuable evidence for governments in efficiently planning for future pandemics ( Pitofsky, 2020 ).

Although the pandemic resulted in a shortage of CSR resources, managers, directors, and shareholders remain CSR orientated, supporting genuine and authentic CSR throughout. The evidence from this study may inform these people that, to some extent, they have passed the CSR tests during the COVID–19 ( Carroll, 2021 ; He and Harris, 2020 ). However, these policy makers should note that COVID–19 expands stakeholders’ expectation that firms will be more socially responsible, and that green-wash, pink-wash, and lip-service CSR activities will not be sufficient in the post-COVID–19 period to ensure long-term survival and development of businesses ( He and Harris, 2020 ). Thus, policy makers must respond to this new trend by upgrading their CSR strategies, or at least maintaining those strategies practiced during the pandemic. Finally, our evidence can assure investors about the perspective of firms to succeed in the short and long run. During COVID–19, investors were afraid of business failure, putting their investments at risk. Our evidence documents that firms strategically compensated for falling profitability by investing in genuine CSR activities during the pandemic. This strategy has been proven to increase stock returns during and after crisis ( Lins et al., 2017 ; Qiu et al., 2021 ).

Although our study adds new evidence to the CSR literature, we encourage future studies to enlarge our understanding, because our study limits its analysis to the direct effect of COVID–19 on budgeting and spending on CSR activities. This effect may be influenced by corporate governance characteristics, such as the board of directors and ownership structure. 12 Also, we encourage future studies to expand our understating of CSR budgeting and spending by examining how they are offset by high performance post-COVID–19. The existing evidence is dominated by CSR ratings, which do not necessarily reflect the actual CSR endeavors of firms ( Bae et al., 2021 ). The evidence on this issue may encourage firms and regulators to adopt budgeting and spending disclosure.

No grant or fund supporting this research was received at the time of submission.

Availability of data and material

Credit authorship contribution statement.

Saeed Rabea Baatwah: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Adel Ali Al-Qadasi: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Amer Mohammed Al-Shehri: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. Imen Derouiche: Writing – review & editing.

Conflicts of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the guest-editor Professor Maria Bruna and the three anonymous referees for their constructive comments and suggestions that have dramatically improved the paper.

1 It is worth noting that there is no obligation to spend the total budget on CSR activities (Dutta, et al., 2021). Some of our sample firms have spent the exact planned budget, whereas others have (not) exceeded the budget.

2 This perspective is dominant in CSR studies to explain why firms invest in CSR activities (e.g., Hunjra et al., 2021 ; Manita et al., 2018 ). It has been widely used in recent CSR studies during the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., Manuel and Herron, 2020; Mahmud, et al., 2021). We note that stakeholder engagement (Lawton et al., 2020) and insurance-like benefits perspectives ( Dumitrescu and Zakriya, 2021 ) may provide further explanation for CSR activities during COVID-19. Both suggest that long-term value of CSR activities for socially responsible firms motivates them to get involved in more CSR initiatives in social crisis time to protect themselves against adverse future events.

3 Some firms do not fully respect the requirements of the CG code by disclosing matters related to CSR activities and initiatives in their annual reports, omitting to report the monetary costs and budgets of these activities.

4 https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/?utm_campaign=homeAdvegas1?.

5 Appendices B and C provide examples related to the disclosure on CSR budgeting and amounts spent for CSR activities during the pandemic.

6 The F-test and Hausman tests support the use of the fixed effects model. This methodology is widely used in similar COVID-19 studies (Al-Awadhi et al., 2020, Sun et al., 2021).

7 Untabulated results show that the use of the total number of confirmed (fatal) cases instead of the logarithmic transformation does not qualitatively affect our results.

8 The exchange rate for 1 Omani Rial is, on average, 2.6 USD.

9 Table 3 includes one variable of interest at once to mitigate the problem of multicollinearity due to high correlation between them. Moreover, we winsorize all continuous variables at the 1st and 99th percentiles to reduce the effect of outliers.

10 The economic significance is measured by multiplying the coefficient on COVID–19 by its standard deviation (e.g., for CSRB 13717.73*0.50=6858.87) and then dividing it by mean of CSRB ( CSRS ) (e.g., for CSRB 6858.87/54696.86=0.13).

11 We have obtained data for 2017 on CSRB and CSRS to compute the differences for the first year of the sampled period (2018). This will ensure that the sample size is not changed.

12 See Boubaker and Nguyen (2012) for more details on the role of corporate governance (e.g., board of directors and ownership structure) in CSR decisions.

Appendix A. Definitions of variables

This appendix shows the definitions for all variables used in the paper.

Appendix B. Examples of AGMs approving CSR budgeting

This appendix shows examples of AGM resolutions regarding the budgeting CSR activities.

Appendix C. Examples of disclosed CSR spending in the annual reports

This appendix shows examples of firms’ disclosure in their annual reports regarding actual spendings on CSR activities for the current year.

• Akhtaruzzaman M., Boubaker S., Umar Z. COVID–19 media coverage and ESG leader indices. Finance Research Letters. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2021.102170. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Al-Awadhi A.M., Alsaifi K., Al-Awadhi A., Alhammadi S. Death and contagious infectious diseases: impact of the COVID–19 virus on stock market returns. J. Behav. Exp. Finance. 2020; 27 doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100326. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ashraf B.N. Stock markets’ reaction to COVID–19: cases or fatalities? Res. International Business Finance. 2020; 54 doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101249. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bae K.-.H., El Ghoul S., Gong Z., Guedhami O. Does CSR matter in times of crisis? Evidence from the COVID–19 pandemic. J. Corporate Finance. 2021; 67 doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101876. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bhattacharya C.B., Korschun D., Sen S. Strengthening stakeholder–company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. J. Bus. Ethics. 2009; 85 :257–272. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9730-3. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Boubaker S., Cellier A., Manita R., Saeed A. Does corporate social responsibility reduce financial distress risk? Econ. Model. 2020; 91 :835–851. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.05.012. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Boubaker S., Nguyen D. Palgrave Macmillan; UK: 2012. Board Directors and Corporate Social Responsibility; p. 274. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Boubakri N., El Ghoul S., Guedhami O., Wang H. Corporate social responsibility in emerging market economies: determinants, consequences, and future research directions. Emerging Markets Review. 2021; 46 doi: 10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100758. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bruna M.G., Lahouel B.B. CSR & financial performance: facing methodological and modeling issues commentary paper to the eponymous FRL article collection. Finance Research Letters. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2021.102036. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bruna M.G., Nicolò D. Corporate reputation and social sustainability in the early stages of start-ups: a theoretical model to match stakeholders' expectations through corporate social commitment. Finance Research Letters. 2020; 35 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101508. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Capital Market Authority . In: Code of Corporate Governance For Public Listed Companies. Authority C.M., editor. Capital Market Authority; Muscat, Oman: 2016. https://www.cma.gov.om/Home/DecisionsCirculars/DecisionsCirculars?page=1&yearFilter=2016&typeFilter=3. [ Google Scholar ]
• Carroll A.B. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the COVID–19 pandemic: organizational and managerial implications. J. Strategy and Management ahead-of-print. 2021 doi: 10.1108/JSMA-07-2021-0145. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dumitrescu A., Zakriya M. Stakeholders and the stock price crash risk: what matters in corporate social performance? J. Corporate Finance. 2021; 67 doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101871. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dutta S., Katti S., Phani B.V., Zhu P. Corporate social responsibility spending as a building block for sustainable corporate ethical identity: lessons from Indian business groups. Managerial Decision Economics n/a. 2021 doi: 10.1002/mde.3412. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Flammer C., Ioannou I. Strategic management during the financial crisis: how firms adjust their strategic investments in response to credit market disruptions. Strategic Management J. 2021; 42 :1275–1298. doi: 10.1002/smj.3265. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• García-Sánchez I.-.M., García-Sánchez A. Corporate social responsibility during COVID–19 pandemic. J. Open Innovation: Technology, Market, Complexity. 2020; 6 :126. https://www.mdpi.com/2199-8531/6/4/126 [ Google Scholar ]
• Garel A., Petit-Romec A. Investor rewards to environmental responsibility: evidence from the COVID–19 crisis. J. Corporate Finance. 2021; 68 doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101948. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Garriga E., Melé D. Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. J. Bus. Ethics. 2004; 53 :51–71. doi: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Guérin P., Suntheim F. Firms’ environmental performance and the COVID–19 crisis. Econ. Lett. 2021; 205 doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109956. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gürlek M., Kılıç İ. A true friend becomes apparent on a rainy day: corporate social responsibility practices of top hotels during the COVID–19 pandemic. Current Issues Tourism. 2021; 24 :905–918. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2021.1883557. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• He H., Harris L. The impact of Covid–19 pandemic on corporate social responsibility and marketing philosophy. J. Bus. Res. 2020; 116 :176–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.030. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hunjra A.I., Boubaker S., Arunachalam M., Mehmood A. How does CSR mediate the relationship between culture, religiosity and firm performance? Finance Research Letters. 2021; 39 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101587. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lawton T.C., Dorobantu S., Rajwani T.S., Sun P. The implications of COVID–19 for nonmarket strategy research. J. Management Studies. 2020; 57 :1732–1736. doi: 10.1111/joms.12627. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lee S., Singal M., Kang K.H. The corporate social responsibility–financial performance link in the U.S. restaurant industry: do economic conditions matter? Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2013; 32 :2–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.03.007. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Leong C.K., Yang Y.C. Constraints on “Doing Good”: financial constraints and corporate social responsibility. Finance Research Letters. 2021; 40 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101694. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lins K.V., Servaes H., Tamayo A. Social capital, trust, and firm performance: the value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. J. Finance. 2017; 72 :1785–1824. doi: 10.1111/jofi.12505. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mahmud A., Ding D., Hasan M.M. Vol. 11. SAGE Open; 2021. (Corporate Social responsibility: Business responses to Coronavirus (COVID–19) Pandemic). [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Malik M., Al Mamun M., Amin A. Peer pressure, CSR spending, and long-term financial performance. Asia-Pacific J. Accounting Economics. 2019; 26 :241–260. doi: 10.1080/16081625.2018.1493933. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Manita R., Bruna M.G., Dang R., Houanti L.H. Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: evidence from the USA. J. Applied Accounting Research. 2018; 19 :206–224. doi: 10.1108/JAAR-01-2017-0024. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Manuel T., Herron T.L. An ethical perspective of business CSR and the COVID–19 pandemic. Society Business Review. 2020; 15 :235–253. doi: 10.1108/SBR-06-2020-0086. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pitofsky M. The Hill; Washington, USA: 2020. Infectious Disease Research Warns Coronavirus Pandemic Could Last Two Years. https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/495623-infectious-disease-research-warns-coronavirus-pandemic-could-last-two-years [ Google Scholar ]
• Qiu S., Jiang J., Liu X., Chen M.-.H., Yuan X. Can corporate social responsibility protect firm value during the COVID-19 pandemic? Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2021; 93 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102759. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sakunasingha B., Jiraporn P., Uyar A. Which CSR activities are more consequential? Evidence from the Great Recession. Finance Research Letters. 2018; 27 :161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2018.02.003. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Salemi A.A. As part of his participation in the Omani Forum for Partnership and Social Responsibility. Capital Market Authority, Muscat, Oman. 2017 https://www.cma.gov.om/Home/SearchNews/18?newsId=7298&year=2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sharif A., Aloui C., Yarovaya L. COVID–19 pandemic, oil prices, stock market, geopolitical risk and policy uncertainty nexus in the U.S. economy: fresh evidence from the wavelet-based approach. International Rev. Financial Analysis. 2020; 70 doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101496. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sun Y., Wu M., Zeng X., Peng Z. The impact of COVID–19 on the Chinese stock market: sentimental or substantial? Finance Research Letters. 2021; 38 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101838. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Talbot D., Ordonez-Ponce E. Canadian banks’ responses to COVID–19: a strategic positioning analysis. J. Sustainable Finance Investment. 2020:1–8. doi: 10.1080/20430795.2020.1771982. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• World Health Organization . World Health Organization; 2021. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID–19) Dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/table [ Google Scholar ]
• Younas A., Kassim A.A.M., Bhuiyan A.B. In: Co-creating the Post covid–19 world: Exploring sustainable Paths. Haziazi M.A., Hajri A.A., Subramanian K.P., Muthuraman S., editors. Arab Open University; Muscat, Oman: 2021. Empirical review of COVID–19 pandemic effect's on the corporate social responsibility in Oman: challenges and opportunities; pp. 67–81. www.aou.edu.om [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhang D., Hu M., Ji Q. Financial markets under the global pandemic of COVID–19. Finance Research Letters. 2020; 36 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101528. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]