- PRO Courses Guides New Tech Help Pro Expert Videos About wikiHow Pro Upgrade Sign In
- EDIT Edit this Article
- EXPLORE Tech Help Pro About Us Random Article Quizzes Request a New Article Community Dashboard This Or That Game Happiness Hub Popular Categories Arts and Entertainment Artwork Books Movies Computers and Electronics Computers Phone Skills Technology Hacks Health Men's Health Mental Health Women's Health Relationships Dating Love Relationship Issues Hobbies and Crafts Crafts Drawing Games Education & Communication Communication Skills Personal Development Studying Personal Care and Style Fashion Hair Care Personal Hygiene Youth Personal Care School Stuff Dating All Categories Arts and Entertainment Finance and Business Home and Garden Relationship Quizzes Cars & Other Vehicles Food and Entertaining Personal Care and Style Sports and Fitness Computers and Electronics Health Pets and Animals Travel Education & Communication Hobbies and Crafts Philosophy and Religion Work World Family Life Holidays and Traditions Relationships Youth
- Browse Articles
- Learn Something New
- Quizzes Hot
- Happiness Hub
- This Or That Game
- Train Your Brain
- Explore More
- Support wikiHow
- About wikiHow
- Log in / Sign up
- Education and Communications
![](http://serviteca.online/777/templates/cheerup2/res/banner1.gif)
How to Do Research
Last Updated: March 13, 2023 References
This article was co-authored by Matthew Snipp, PhD and by wikiHow staff writer, Jennifer Mueller, JD . C. Matthew Snipp is the Burnet C. and Mildred Finley Wohlford Professor of Humanities and Sciences in the Department of Sociology at Stanford University. He is also the Director for the Institute for Research in the Social Science’s Secure Data Center. He has been a Research Fellow at the U.S. Bureau of the Census and a Fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences. He has published 3 books and over 70 articles and book chapters on demography, economic development, poverty and unemployment. He is also currently serving on the National Institute of Child Health and Development’s Population Science Subcommittee. He holds a Ph.D. in Sociology from the University of Wisconsin—Madison. This article has been viewed 229,551 times.
The idea of doing research may seem daunting, but as long as you keep yourself organized and focus on the question you want to answer, you'll be fine. If you're curious and interested in the topic, you might even find it fun! We here at wikiHow have gathered answers to all your most common questions about how to do research, from finding a good topic to identifying the best sources and writing your final paper.
How do I find a topic to research?
![how do we research Preliminary research in your field of study helps you find a topic.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/a/af/Do-Research-Step-1-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Do-Research-Step-1-Version-2.jpg)
- For example, if you're researching in the political science field, you might be interested in determining what leads people to believe that the 2020 US presidential election was illegitimate.
![how do we research Matthew Snipp, PhD](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/e/e4/Matthew_Snipp.png/-crop-100-100-99px-Matthew_Snipp.png)
How do I get started on my research?
![how do we research Look for overview articles to gain a better understanding of your topic.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/7/71/Do-Research-Step-4-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Do-Research-Step-4-Version-2.jpg)
- For example, if you're researching the 2020 election, you might find that "absentee ballots" and "voting by mail" come up frequently. Those are issues you could look into further to figure out how they impacted the final election results.
- You don't necessarily have to use the overview articles you look at as resources in your actual paper. Even Wikipedia articles can be a good way to learn more about a topic and you can check the references for more reputable sources that might work for your paper.
What's the best way to keep track of my sources?
![how do we research Use index cards to take notes and record citation information for each source.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/1/13/Do-Research-Step-5-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Do-Research-Step-5-Version-2.jpg)
- Research papers typically discuss 2 or 3 separate things that work together to answer the research question. You might also want to make a note on the front of which thing that source relates to. That'll make it easier for you to organize your sources later.
- For example, if you're researching the 2020 election, you might have a section of your paper discussing voting by mail. For the sources that directly address that issue, write "voting by mail" in the corner.
What kind of notes should I be taking as I research?
![how do we research Try to put ideas in your own words rather than copying from the source.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/9/9b/Do-Research-Step-6-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Do-Research-Step-6-Version-2.jpg)
- If you find something that you think would make a good quote, copy it out exactly with quote marks around it, then add the page number where it appears so you can correctly cite it in your paper without having to go back and hunt for it again.
How do I evaluate the quality of a source?
![how do we research Check into the background of the author and the publication.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/6/6d/Do-Research-Step-7-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Do-Research-Step-7-Version-2.jpg)
- Does the article discuss or reference another article? (If so, use that article instead.)
- What expertise or authority does the author have?
- When was the material written? (Is it the most up-to-date reference you could use?)
- Why was the article published? (Is it trying to sell you something or persuade you to adopt a certain viewpoint?)
- Are the research methods used consistent and reliable? (Appropriate research methods depend on what was studied.)
What if I'm having a hard time finding good sources?
![how do we research If there aren't enough sources, broaden your topic.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/c/c5/Do-Research-Step-8-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Do-Research-Step-8-Version-2.jpg)
- For example, if you're writing about the 2020 election, you might find tons of stories online, but very little that is reputable enough for you to use in your paper. Because the election happened so recently, it might be too soon for there to be a lot of solid academic research on it. Instead, you might focus on the 2016 election.
- You can also ask for help. Your instructor might be able to point you toward good sources. Research librarians are also happy to help you.
How do I organize my research for my paper?
![how do we research Start making a rough outline of your paper while you're researching.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/8/85/Do-Research-Step-9-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Do-Research-Step-9-Version-2.jpg)
- For example, if you're researching the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the 2020 election, you might have sections on social distancing and cleaning at in-person voting locations, the accessibility of mail-in ballots, and early voting.
What's the best way to start writing my paper?
![how do we research Start writing the middle, or body, of your paper.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/0/0a/Do-Research-Step-10-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Do-Research-Step-10-Version-2.jpg)
- Include an in-text citation for everything that needs one, even in your initial rough draft. That'll help you make sure that you don't inadvertently misattribute or fail to cite something as you work your way through substantive drafts.
- Write your introduction and conclusion only after you're satisfied that the body of your paper is essentially what you want to turn in. Then, you can polish everything up for the final draft.
How can I make sure I'm not plagiarizing?
![how do we research Include a citation for every idea that isn't your original thought.](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/0/08/Do-Research-Step-11-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Do-Research-Step-11-Version-2.jpg)
- If you have any doubt over whether you should cite something, go ahead and do it. You're better off to err on the side of over-citing than to look like you're taking credit for an idea that isn't yours.
- ↑ https://www.nhcc.edu/student-resources/library/doinglibraryresearch/basic-steps-in-the-research-process
- ↑ Matthew Snipp, PhD. Sociology Professor, Stanford University. Expert Interview. 26 March 2020.
- ↑ https://library.taylor.edu/eng-212/research-paper
- ↑ http://www.butte.edu/departments/cas/tipsheets/research/research_paper.html
- ↑ https://www.potsdam.edu/sites/default/files/documents/support/tutoring/cwc/6-Simple-Steps-for-Writing-a-Research-Paper.pdf
- ↑ https://www.umgc.edu/current-students/learning-resources/writing-center/online-guide-to-writing/tutorial/chapter4/ch4-05.html
Expert Q&A
You might also like.
![how do we research Do Internet Research](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/e/ea/Get-a-New-Birth-Certificate-Step-18-Version-2.jpg/-crop-342-184-245px-Get-a-New-Birth-Certificate-Step-18-Version-2.jpg)
About This Article
![how do we research Matthew Snipp, PhD](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/e/e4/Matthew_Snipp.png/-crop-100-100-99px-Matthew_Snipp.png)
If you need to do research on a particular topic, start by searching the internet for any information you can find on the subject. In particular, look for sites that are sourced by universities, scientists, academic journals, and government agencies. Next, visit your local library and use the electric card catalog to research which books, magazines, and journals will have information on your topic. Take notes as you read, and write down all of the information you’ll need to cite your sources in your final project. To learn how interviewing a first-hand source can help you during your research, read on! Did this summary help you? Yes No
- Send fan mail to authors
Reader Success Stories
![how do we research Shenuka Ranawaka](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/b/b0/CommunityAvatar2.png/-crop-72-72-72px-CommunityAvatar2.png)
Shenuka Ranawaka
Sep 16, 2016
Did this article help you?
![how do we research how do we research](https://www.wikihow.com/images/1/1f/Cont_v02_0728x0180.jpg)
Ismail El Omari
Mar 3, 2022
![how do we research Do I Have a Dirty Mind Quiz](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/7/72/Dirty_mind_test.png/-crop-127-140-127px-Dirty_mind_test.png)
Featured Articles
![how do we research Protect Yourself from Predators (for Kids)](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/6/6f/Categories_Header_Personal.jpg/-crop-127-140-127px-Categories_Header_Personal.jpg)
Trending Articles
![how do we research Reading Women’s Body Language: Signs & Signals That She’s Flirting](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/e/e0/Read-Women%27s-Body-Language-for-Flirting-Step-18.jpg/-crop-127-140-127px-Read-Women%27s-Body-Language-for-Flirting-Step-18.jpg)
Watch Articles
![how do we research Wear a Headband](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/a/a5/Wear-a-Headband-Step-6-Version-8.jpg/-crop-127-140-127px-Wear-a-Headband-Step-6-Version-8.jpg)
- Terms of Use
- Privacy Policy
- Do Not Sell or Share My Info
- Not Selling Info
wikiHow Tech Help Pro:
Develop the tech skills you need for work and life
15 Steps to Good Research
- Define and articulate a research question (formulate a research hypothesis). How to Write a Thesis Statement (Indiana University)
- Identify possible sources of information in many types and formats. Georgetown University Library's Research & Course Guides
- Judge the scope of the project.
- Reevaluate the research question based on the nature and extent of information available and the parameters of the research project.
- Select the most appropriate investigative methods (surveys, interviews, experiments) and research tools (periodical indexes, databases, websites).
- Plan the research project. Writing Anxiety (UNC-Chapel Hill) Strategies for Academic Writing (SUNY Empire State College)
- Retrieve information using a variety of methods (draw on a repertoire of skills).
- Refine the search strategy as necessary.
- Write and organize useful notes and keep track of sources. Taking Notes from Research Reading (University of Toronto) Use a citation manager: Zotero or Refworks
- Evaluate sources using appropriate criteria. Evaluating Internet Sources
- Synthesize, analyze and integrate information sources and prior knowledge. Georgetown University Writing Center
- Revise hypothesis as necessary.
- Use information effectively for a specific purpose.
- Understand such issues as plagiarism, ownership of information (implications of copyright to some extent), and costs of information. Georgetown University Honor Council Copyright Basics (Purdue University) How to Recognize Plagiarism: Tutorials and Tests from Indiana University
- Cite properly and give credit for sources of ideas. MLA Bibliographic Form (7th edition, 2009) MLA Bibliographic Form (8th edition, 2016) Turabian Bibliographic Form: Footnote/Endnote Turabian Bibliographic Form: Parenthetical Reference Use a citation manager: Zotero or Refworks
Adapted from the Association of Colleges and Research Libraries "Objectives for Information Literacy Instruction" , which are more complete and include outcomes. See also the broader "Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education."
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
![how do we research National Institutes of Health (NIH) - Turning Discovery into Health](https://www.nih.gov/sites/all/themes/nih/images/nih-logo-color.png)
- Virtual Tour
- Staff Directory
- En Español
You are here
Science, health, and public trust.
September 8, 2021
Explaining How Research Works
![Understanding Research infographic Understanding Research infographic](https://www.nih.gov/sites/default/files/styles/floated_media_breakpoint-medium/public/about-nih/public-trust/20210902-understanding-research-full.jpg?itok=EnZglhYa×tamp=1630512049)
We’ve heard “follow the science” a lot during the pandemic. But it seems science has taken us on a long and winding road filled with twists and turns, even changing directions at times. That’s led some people to feel they can’t trust science. But when what we know changes, it often means science is working.
![Expaling How Research Works Infographic en español Expaling How Research Works Infographic en español](https://www.nih.gov/sites/default/files/styles/floated_media_breakpoint-medium/public/about-nih/public-trust/20210902-understanding-research-508-spanish.jpg?itok=ADuWJ5jY×tamp=1630526793)
Explaining the scientific process may be one way that science communicators can help maintain public trust in science. Placing research in the bigger context of its field and where it fits into the scientific process can help people better understand and interpret new findings as they emerge. A single study usually uncovers only a piece of a larger puzzle.
Questions about how the world works are often investigated on many different levels. For example, scientists can look at the different atoms in a molecule, cells in a tissue, or how different tissues or systems affect each other. Researchers often must choose one or a finite number of ways to investigate a question. It can take many different studies using different approaches to start piecing the whole picture together.
Sometimes it might seem like research results contradict each other. But often, studies are just looking at different aspects of the same problem. Researchers can also investigate a question using different techniques or timeframes. That may lead them to arrive at different conclusions from the same data.
Using the data available at the time of their study, scientists develop different explanations, or models. New information may mean that a novel model needs to be developed to account for it. The models that prevail are those that can withstand the test of time and incorporate new information. Science is a constantly evolving and self-correcting process.
Scientists gain more confidence about a model through the scientific process. They replicate each other’s work. They present at conferences. And papers undergo peer review, in which experts in the field review the work before it can be published in scientific journals. This helps ensure that the study is up to current scientific standards and maintains a level of integrity. Peer reviewers may find problems with the experiments or think different experiments are needed to justify the conclusions. They might even offer new ways to interpret the data.
It’s important for science communicators to consider which stage a study is at in the scientific process when deciding whether to cover it. Some studies are posted on preprint servers for other scientists to start weighing in on and haven’t yet been fully vetted. Results that haven't yet been subjected to scientific scrutiny should be reported on with care and context to avoid confusion or frustration from readers.
We’ve developed a one-page guide, "How Research Works: Understanding the Process of Science" to help communicators put the process of science into perspective. We hope it can serve as a useful resource to help explain why science changes—and why it’s important to expect that change. Please take a look and share your thoughts with us by sending an email to [email protected].
Below are some additional resources:
- Discoveries in Basic Science: A Perfectly Imperfect Process
- When Clinical Research Is in the News
- What is Basic Science and Why is it Important?
- What is a Research Organism?
- What Are Clinical Trials and Studies?
- Basic Research – Digital Media Kit
- Decoding Science: How Does Science Know What It Knows? (NAS)
- Can Science Help People Make Decisions ? (NAS)
Connect with Us
- More Social Media from NIH
How to Do Research: A Step-By-Step Guide: Get Started
- Get Started
- 1a. Select a Topic
- 1b. Develop Research Questions
- 1c. Identify Keywords
- 1d. Find Background Information
- 1e. Refine a Topic
- 2a. Search Strategies
- 2d. Articles
- 2e. Videos & Images
- 2f. Databases
- 2g. Websites
- 2h. Grey Literature
- 2i. Open Access Materials
- 3a. Evaluate Sources
- 3b. Primary vs. Secondary
- 3c. Types of Periodicals
- 4a. Take Notes
- 4b. Outline the Paper
- 4c. Incorporate Source Material
- 5a. Avoid Plagiarism
- 5b. Zotero & MyBib
- 5c. MLA Formatting
- 5d. MLA Citation Examples
- 5e. APA Formatting
- 5f. APA Citation Examples
- 5g. Annotated Bibliographies
Related Guides
- Elmira College Writing Center Get one-on-one assistance for all types of writing.
Recommended Websites
- Purdue University's Online Writing Lab (OWL)
Research Process Overview
Step 1. Develop a topic Select a Topic | Develop Research Questions | Identify Keywords | Find Background Information | Refine a Topic
Step 2. Locate information Search Strategies | Books | eBooks | Articles | Videos & Images | Databases | Websites | Grey Literature
Step 3. Evaluate and analyze information Evaluate Sources | Primary vs Secondary | Types of Periodicals
Step 4. Write, organize, and communicate information Take Notes | Outline the Paper | Incorporate Source Material
Step 5. Cite sources Avoid Plagiarism | Zotero & MyBib | MLA | APA | Chicago Style | Annotated Bibliographies
For research help, use one of the following options:
Ask the GTL
![how do we research GTL Phone](https://libapps.s3.amazonaws.com/accounts/13676/images/phone.png)
- Next: Step 1: Develop a Topic >>
- Last Updated: Aug 13, 2024 3:10 PM
- URL: https://libguides.elmira.edu/research
WashU Libraries
Conducting research.
- The Process
- Step 1: Exploring an idea
- Step 2: Finding background info.
- Step 3: Finding Print/E-Books
- Step 4: Finding Articles (Current Research)
- Step 5: Evaluating your sources
- Step 6: Citing your sources
- FAQs This link opens in a new window
- Library Vocabulary
- Research in the Humanities
- Research in the Social Sciences
- Research in the Sciences
The Research Process
If you have any questions, please reach out to a Subject Librarian.
The Research Process can be broken up into many steps. For the purposes of this guide, it has been broken into six (6) steps:
- Exploring an Idea
- Finding Background Information
- Gathering More Information
- Locating Current Research
- Evaluating your Sources
- Citing your Sources
Additionally, the guide also provides information on conducting research in the Humanities, Social Sciences, and Sciences.
- Next: Step 1: Exploring an idea >>
- Last Updated: Aug 14, 2024 7:12 AM
- URL: https://libguides.wustl.edu/research
![how do we research Banner](https://d2jv02qf7xgjwx.cloudfront.net/sites/4659/banner/LIBRARIES_horiz_lockup_2019.png)
* Research Basics *
- Introduction
So What Do We Mean By “Formal Research?”
- Guide License
- Types of Research
- Secondary Research | Literature Review
- Developing Your Topic
- Using and Evaluating Sources
- Ethics & Responsible Conduct of Research
- More Information
Paul V. Galvin Library
![how do we research](https://d2jv02qf7xgjwx.cloudfront.net/customers/2848/images/2012-08-08_1246.png)
email: [email protected]
Chat with us:
Make a research appointment:, search our faq:.
![how do we research Research is formalized curiosity. It is poking and prying with a purpose. - Zora Neale Hurston](https://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-research-is-formalized-curiosity-it-is-poking-and-prying-with-a-purpose-zora-neale-hurston-13-95-28.jpg)
A good working definition of research might be:
Research is the deliberate, purposeful, and systematic gathering of data, information, facts, and/or opinions for the advancement of personal, societal, or overall human knowledge.
Based on this definition, we all do research all the time. Most of this research is casual research. Asking friends what they think of different restaurants, looking up reviews of various products online, learning more about celebrities; these are all research.
Formal research includes the type of research most people think of when they hear the term “research”: scientists in white coats working in a fully equipped laboratory. But formal research is a much broader category that just this. Most people will never do laboratory research after graduating from college, but almost everybody will have to do some sort of formal research at some point in their careers.
Casual research is inward facing: it’s done to satisfy our own curiosity or meet our own needs, whether that’s choosing a reliable car or figuring out what to watch on TV. Formal research is outward facing. While it may satisfy our own curiosity, it’s primarily intended to be shared in order to achieve some purpose. That purpose could be anything: finding a cure for cancer, securing funding for a new business, improving some process at your workplace, proving the latest theory in quantum physics, or even just getting a good grade in your Humanities 200 class.
What sets formal research apart from casual research is the documentation of where you gathered your information from. This is done in the form of “citations” and “bibliographies.” Citing sources is covered in the section "Citing Your Sources."
Formal research also follows certain common patterns depending on what the research is trying to show or prove. These are covered in the section “Types of Research.”
![how do we research Creative Commons License](https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
- Next: TL;DR >>
- Last Updated: Jul 24, 2024 4:33 PM
- URL: https://guides.library.iit.edu/research_basics
What Is Research and Why We Do It
- First Online: 23 June 2020
Cite this chapter
- Carlo Ghezzi 2
3058 Accesses
1 Citations
2 Altmetric
The notions of science and scientific research are discussed and the motivations for doing research are analyzed. Research can span a broad range of approaches, from purely theoretical to practice-oriented; different approaches often coexist and fertilize each other. Research ignites human progress and societal change. In turn, society drives and supports research. The specific role of research in Informatics is discussed. Informatics is driving the current transition towards the new digital society in which we will live in the future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save.
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
- Available as EPUB and PDF
- Read on any device
- Instant download
- Own it forever
- Compact, lightweight edition
- Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
- Free shipping worldwide - see info
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
In [ 34 ], P.E. Medawar discusses what he calls the “snobismus” of pure versus applied science. In his words, this is one of the most damaging forms of snobbism, which draws a class distinction between pure and applied science.
Originality, rigor, and significance have been defined and used as the key criteria to evaluate research outputs by the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) [ 46 ]. A research evaluation exercise has been performed periodically since 1986 on UK higher education institutions and their research outputs have been rated according to their originality, rigor, and significance.
The importance of realizing that “we don’t know” was apparently first stated by Socrates, according to Plato’s account of his thought. This is condensed in the famous paradox “I know that I don’t know.”
This view applies mainly to natural and physical sciences.
Roy Amara was President of the Institute for Future, a USA-based think tank, from 1971 until 1990.
The Turing Award is generally recognized as the Nobel prize of Informatics.
See http://uis.unesco.org/apps/visualisations/research-and-development-spending/ .
Israel is a very good example. Investments in research resulted in a proliferation of new, cutting-edge enterprises. The term start-up nation has been coined by Dan Senor and Saul Singer in their successful book [ 51 ] to characterize this phenomenon.
https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/societal-challenges .
https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/cross-cutting-activities-focus-areas .
This figure has been adapted from a presentation by A. Fuggetta, which describes the mission of Cefriel, an Italian institution with a similar role of Fraunhofer, on a smaller scale.
The ERC takes an ecumenical approach and calls the research sector “Computer Science and Informatics.”
I discuss here the effect of “big data” on research, although most sectors of society—industry, finance, health, …—are also deeply affected.
Carayannis, E., Campbell, D.: Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. In: E. Carayannis, D. Campbell (eds.) Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: 21st-Century Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Development. SpringerBriefs in Business, New York, NY (2012)
Google Scholar
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L.: The triple helix – university-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review 14 (1), 14–19 (1995)
Harari, Y.: Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. Random House (2014). URL https://books.google.it/books?id=1EiJAwAAQBAJ
Harari, Y.: Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. Random House (2016). URL https://books.google.it/books?id=dWYyCwAAQBAJ
Hopcroft, J.E., Motwani, R., Ullman, J.D.: Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation (3rd Edition). Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., USA (2006)
MATH Google Scholar
Medawar, P.: Advice To A Young Scientist. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation series. Basic Books (2008)
OECD: Frascati Manual. OECD Publishing (2015). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012-en . URL https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/9789264239012-en
REF2019/2: Panel criteria and working methods (2019). URL https://www.ref.ac.uk/media/1084/ref-2019_02-panel-criteria-and-working-methods.pdf
Senor, D., Singer, S.: Start-Up Nation: The Story of Israel’s Economic Miracle. McClelland & Stewart, Toronto, Canada (2011)
Stokes, D.E.: Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C. (1997)
Thurston, R.H.: The growth of the steam engine. Popular Science Monthly 12 (1877)
Vardi, M.Y.: The long game of research. Commun. ACM 62 (9), 7–7 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3352489 . URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3352489
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
Carlo Ghezzi
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Carlo Ghezzi .
Rights and permissions
Reprints and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Ghezzi, C. (2020). What Is Research and Why We Do It. In: Being a Researcher. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45157-8_1
Download citation
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45157-8_1
Published : 23 June 2020
Publisher Name : Springer, Cham
Print ISBN : 978-3-030-45156-1
Online ISBN : 978-3-030-45157-8
eBook Packages : Computer Science Computer Science (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Publish with us
Policies and ethics
- Find a journal
- Track your research
College Info Geek
How to Do Research in 7 Simple Steps
C.I.G. is supported in part by its readers. If you buy through our links, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.
![how do we research how do we research](https://collegeinfogeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/how-to-do-research-featured.jpg)
It’s 2 am, and you’re on your fifth cup of coffee (or was it your sixth?). You’re crouched at a table in some dark corner of the library surrounded by fifteen open books. Equally as many tabs are open on your laptop, and you still haven’t written a word of the paper that’s due in 7 hours.
Many things can explain how you got to this point, including procrastination , poor organization , and a messy schedule .
Very often, however, the problem is a lack of research skills .
And it’s not your fault. High school does a poor job of teaching you how to do research, and most college classes do little better. It feels like you’re expected to figure it out through trial and error.
I think we can do better than that, however. In this guide, I’m going to show you the 7-step process for researching everything from a 10-page term paper to a final presentation. Not only will you learn how to do better research; you’ll also learn how to research more efficiently.
What Is Research?
Before we go any further, what is research?
At its core, research is an attempt to answer a question. This could be anything from “How can we reduce infant mortality rates?” to “Why does salt make food taste good?”
To answer your question, you consult books, academic papers, newspaper articles, historical records, or anything else that could be helpful. The broad term for these things is “sources.”
And, usually, once you’ve done the research, you present or summarize it in some way. In many cases, this means writing an essay or another type of scholarly paper, but it could also mean giving a presentation or even creating a YouTube video.
Even if you have no interest in academia, research is an extremely useful skill to learn. When you know how to do research, it’s much easier to improve your life and work more effectively . Instead of having to ask someone every time you have a question, research will help you solve problems yourself (and help others in turn).
Note: Research can also mean conducting surveys, performing experiments, or going on archaeological digs. While these activities are crucial for advancing human knowledge, I won’t be discussing them here. This article focuses on the research you can do with only a library and an internet connection.
The 7 Steps of the Research Process
Research can feel overwhelming, but it’s more manageable when you break it down into steps. In my experience, the research process has seven main steps:
- Find a topic
- Refine your topic
- Find key sources
- Take notes on your sources
- Create your paper or presentation
- Do additional research as necessary
- Cite your sources
Let’s look at each of these steps in more detail.
1. Find a Topic
If you don’t have a topic, your research will be undirected and inefficient. You’ll spend hours reading dozens of sources, all because you didn’t take a few minutes to develop a topic.
How do you come up with a topic? My number one suggestion is to create a mind map.
A mind map is a visual way to generate ideas. Here’s how it works:
- Get a piece of paper and a pen. Make sure the paper isn’t too small — you want lots of room for your ideas.
- Draw an oval in the center of the paper.
- Inside that oval, write a super vague topic. Start with whatever your professor has assigned you.
- Draw lines from the oval towards the edges of the paper.
- Draw smaller ovals connected to each of these lines.
- Inside the smaller ovals, write more specific ideas/topics related to the central one.
- Repeat until you’ve found 3-5 topic ideas.
When I write it out step by step, it sounds kind of strange. But trust me, it works . Anytime I’m stuck on a writing assignment, this method is my go-to. It’s basically magic.
To see what mind mapping looks like in practice, check out this clip:
Want to create a digital mind map like the one Thomas uses in the video? Check out Coggle .
2. Refine Your Topic
Okay, so now you have a list of 3-5 topics. They’re all still pretty general, and you need to narrow them down to one topic that you can research in depth.
To do this, spend 15 minutes doing some general research on each topic. Specifically, take each topic and plug it into your library’s catalog and database search tools.
The details of this process will vary from library to library. This is where consulting a librarian can be super helpful. They can show you how to use the tools I mentioned, as well as point you to some you probably don’t know about.
Furthermore, I suggest you ask your professor for recommendations. In some cases, they may even have created a resource page specifically for your assignment.
Once you’ve found out where to search, type in your topic. I like to use a mixture of the library catalog, a general academic database like EBSCO Host , and a search on Google Scholar .
![how do we research google-scholar-screenshot](https://collegeinfogeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Google_Scholar_screenshot.jpg)
What exactly are you trying to find? Basically, you’re trying to find a topic with a sufficient quantity and variety of sources.
Ideally, you want something with both journal articles and books, as this demonstrates that lots of scholars are seriously engaging with the topic.
Of course, in some cases (if the topic is very cutting edge, for example), you may be only able to find journal articles. That’s fine, so long as there are enough perspectives available.
Using this technique, you’ll be able to quickly eliminate some topics. Be ruthless. If you’re not finding anything after 15 minutes, move on. And don’t get attached to a topic.
Tip: If you find two topics with equal numbers of sources available, ask your professor to help you break the tie. They can give you insight into which topic is super common (and thus difficult to write about originally), as well as which they find more interesting.
Now that you have your topic, it’s time to narrow down your sources.
3. Find Key Sources
If you’ve picked a good topic, then you probably have lots of sources to work with. This is both a blessing and a curse. A variety of sources shows that there’s something worth saying about your topic, and it also gives you plenty of material to cite.
But this abundance can quickly turn into a nightmare in which you spend hours reading dense, mind-numbing material without getting any closer to actually producing a paper.
How do you keep this from happening? Choose 3–5 key sources and focus on them intently. Sure, you may end up needing more sources, especially if this is a long paper or if the professor requires it. But if you start out trying to read 15 sources, you’re likely to get overwhelmed and frustrated.
Focusing on a few key sources is powerful because it:
- Lets you engage deeply with each source.
- Gives you a variety of perspectives.
- Points you to further resources.
- Keeps you focused.
4. Read and Take Notes
But what do you do with these sources, exactly? You need to read them the right way . Follow these steps to effectively read academic books and articles:
Go through the article and look at the section headings. If any words or terms jump out at you, make note of them. Also, glance at the beginning sentences of each section and paragraph to get an overall idea of the author’s argument.
The goal here isn’t to comprehend deeply, but to prime your mind for effective reading .
Write down any questions you have after skimming the article, as well as any general questions you hope the article can answer. Always keep your topic in mind.
Read Actively
Now, start reading. But don’t just passively go through the information like you’re scrolling through Tumblr. Read with a pen or pencil in hand , underlining any unfamiliar terms or interesting ideas.
Make notes in the margins about other sources or concepts that come to mind. If you’re reading a library book, you can make notes on a separate piece of paper.
Once you’ve finished reading, take a short break. Have a cup of tea or coffee. Go for a walk around the library. Stretch. Just get your mind away from the research for a moment without resorting to distracting, low-density fun .
Now come back to the article and look at the things you underlined or noted. Gather these notes and transfer them to a program like Evernote .
If you need to look up a term, do that, and then add that definition to your notes. Also, make note of any sources the author cites that look helpful.
But what if I’m reading a book? Won’t this take forever? No, because you’re not going to read the entire book.
For most research you’ll do in college, reading a whole academic book is overkill . Just skim the table of contents and the book itself to find chapters or sections that look relevant.
Then, read each of those in the same way you would read an article. Also, be sure to glance at the book’s bibliography, which is a goldmine for finding additional sources.
Note: The above method is a variation on the classic SQ3R method , adapted slightly since we’re not interested in taking notes from textbooks .
5. Create Your Paper or Presentation
“You can’t turn in raw research.”
Research is crucial to crafting a great paper or presentation, but it’s also a great way to procrastinate. I had classmates in college who would spend 8 hours researching a 5-page paper. That’s way too much!
At some point, you need to stop researching and start writing (or whatever method you’re using to present your research).
How do you decide when to stop researching? There’s no strict rule, but in general I wouldn’t spend more than 30 minutes per page of the final paper.
So if the final paper is supposed to be 10 pages, don’t spend more than 5 hours researching it.
6. Do Additional Research (As Necessary)
Once you’ve started writing the draft of your paper, you’ll probably find a few gaps. Maybe you realize that one scholar’s argument isn’t relevant to your paper, or that you need more information for a particular section. In this case, you are free to return to researching as necessary.
But again, beware the trap of procrastination masquerading as productivity! Only do as much additional research as you need to answer your question. Don’t get pulled into rabbit holes or dragged off on tangents. Get in there, do your research, and get back to writing .
To keep yourself focused, I suggest keeping a separate document or piece of paper nearby to note points that need additional research.
Every time you encounter such a point, make note of it in the document and then keep writing. Only stop when you can’t get any further without additional research.
It’s much better to get a full draft done first. Otherwise, you risk suffering a cognitive switching penalty , making it harder to regain your focus.
7. Cite Your Sources
Whether you’re creating an oral presentation, essay, or video, you’ll need to cite your sources. Plagiarism is a serious offense, so don’t take any chances.
How to cite your sources depends on the subject and the professor’s expectations. Chicago, MLA, and APA are the most common citation formats to use in college, but there are thousands more.
Luckily, you don’t need to painstakingly type each of your citations by hand or slog through a style manual. Instead, you can use a tool like Zotero to track and generate your citations. To make things even easier, install the Zotero Connector browser extension. It can automatically pull citation information from entries in an online library catalog.
Once you’ve collected all of your sources, Zotero can generate a properly formatted works cited page or bibliography at just the click of a button.
For help setting up and using Zotero, read this guide . If you need further assistance, ask a librarian.
Go Research With Confidence
I hope you now understand how to do research with more confidence. If you follow the procedures I’ve covered in this article, you’ll waste less time, perform more effective research, and ultimately have the material for a winning essay.
Curious about how to use your research to write a great research paper? Check out this guide .
Image Credits: picking book from shelf
Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts
Research: Where to Begin
![how do we research OWL logo](https://owl.purdue.edu/images/logos/owllogo_black.png)
Welcome to the Purdue OWL
This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.
Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.
Research isn't something that only scientists and professors do. Any time you use sources to investigate claims or reach new conclusions, you are performing research. Research happens in virtually all fields, so it’s vitally important to know how to conduct research and navigate through source material regardless of your professional or academic role.
Choosing and Narrowing Your Research Topic
Before beginning the process of looking for sources, it’s important to choose a research topic that is specific enough to explore in-depth. If your focus is too broad, it will be difficult to find sources that back up what you’re trying to say.
If your instructor gives you the flexibility to choose your own research topic, you might begin by brainstorming a list of topics that interest you ( click here to visit an OWL page that can help you get started brainstorming or prewriting ). Once you find something that grabs your attention, the next step is to narrow your topic to a manageable scope. Some ways to narrow your focus are by sub-topic, demographic, or time period.
For example, suppose that you want to research cancer treatments. Cancer treatment is a fairly broad topic, so you would be wise to at least consider narrowing your scope. For example, you could focus on a sub-topic of cancer treatment, such as chemotherapy or radiation therapy. However, these are still broad topics, so you might also narrow your topic to a narrower sub-topic or even examine how these topics relate to a specific demographic or time period. In the end, you might decide to research how radiation therapy for women over fifty has changed in the past twenty years. In sum, having a specific idea of what you want to research helps you find a topic that feels more manageable.
Writing Your Research Question
Writing your research topic as a question helps you focus your topic in a clear and concise way. It ensure that your topic is arguable. While not all research papers have to offer an explicit argument, many do.
For the above example, you might phrase your research question like this: "How has radiation therapy changed in the past twenty years for women over fifty?" Of course, phrasing this topic as a question assumes that the research has, in fact, changed. Reading your sources (or, to begin with, at least summaries and abstracts of those sources) will help you formulate a research question that makes sense.
Knowing What Types of Sources You Need
Depending on the type of research you’re doing, you may need to use different types of sources. Research is usually divided into scholarly and popular, and primary and secondary. For more information on specific details about these types of sources, visit our "Where to Begin" page in our "Evaluating Sources" subsection. This subsection contains additional pages that explore various kinds of sources (like, e.g., internet sources) in more detail.
Asking Productive Questions
Before you begin your research, you should ask yourself questions that help narrow your search parameters.
What kind of information are you looking for?
Different types of research will require different sources. It’s important to know what kinds of sources your research demands. Ask whether you need facts or opinions, news reports, research studies, statistics and data, personal reflections, archival research, etc. Restricting yourself to only the most relevant kinds of sources will make the research process seem less daunting.
Where do you need to look for your research?
Your research topic will also dictate where you find your sources. This extends beyond simply whether you use the internet or a print source. For example, if you are searching for information on a current event, a well-regarded newspaper like the New York Times or Wall Street Journal could be a useful source. If you are searching for statistics on some aspect of the U.S. population, then you might want to start with government documents, such as census reports. While much high-level academic research relies mainly on the sorts of academic journal articles and scholarly books that can be found in university libraries, depending the nature of your research project, you may need to look elsewhere.
How much information do you need?
Different research projects require different numbers of sources. For example, if you need to address both sides of a controversial issue, you may need to find more sources than if you were pursuing a non-controversial topic. Be sure to speak with your instructor if you are unclear on how many sources you will be expected to use.
How timely does your research need to be?
Depending on your research topic, the timeliness of your source may or may not matter. For example, if you are looking into recent changes in a specific scientific field, you would want the most up-to-date research. However, if you were researching the War of 1812, you might benefit from finding primary sources written during that time period.
Basic Steps in the Research Process
The following steps outline a simple and effective strategy for writing a research paper. Depending on your familiarity with the topic and the challenges you encounter along the way, you may need to rearrange these steps.
Step 1: Identify and develop your topic
Selecting a topic can be the most challenging part of a research assignment. Since this is the very first step in writing a paper, it is vital that it be done correctly. Here are some tips for selecting a topic:
- Select a topic within the parameters set by the assignment. Many times your instructor will give you clear guidelines as to what you can and cannot write about. Failure to work within these guidelines may result in your proposed paper being deemed unacceptable by your instructor.
- Select a topic of personal interest to you and learn more about it. The research for and writing of a paper will be more enjoyable if you are writing about something that you find interesting.
- Select a topic for which you can find a manageable amount of information. Do a preliminary search of information sources to determine whether existing sources will meet your needs. If you find too much information, you may need to narrow your topic; if you find too little, you may need to broaden your topic.
- Be original. Your instructor reads hundreds of research papers every year, and many of them are on the same topics (topics in the news at the time, controversial issues, subjects for which there is ample and easily accessed information). Stand out from your classmates by selecting an interesting and off-the-beaten-path topic.
- Still can't come up with a topic to write about? See your instructor for advice.
Once you have identified your topic, it may help to state it as a question. For example, if you are interested in finding out about the epidemic of obesity in the American population, you might pose the question "What are the causes of obesity in America ?" By posing your subject as a question you can more easily identify the main concepts or keywords to be used in your research.
Step 2 : Do a preliminary search for information
Before beginning your research in earnest, do a preliminary search to determine whether there is enough information out there for your needs and to set the context of your research. Look up your keywords in the appropriate titles in the library's Reference collection (such as encyclopedias and dictionaries) and in other sources such as our catalog of books, periodical databases, and Internet search engines. Additional background information may be found in your lecture notes, textbooks, and reserve readings. You may find it necessary to adjust the focus of your topic in light of the resources available to you.
Step 3: Locate materials
With the direction of your research now clear to you, you can begin locating material on your topic. There are a number of places you can look for information:
If you are looking for books, do a subject search in One Search . A Keyword search can be performed if the subject search doesn't yield enough information. Print or write down the citation information (author, title,etc.) and the location (call number and collection) of the item(s). Note the circulation status. When you locate the book on the shelf, look at the books located nearby; similar items are always shelved in the same area. The Aleph catalog also indexes the library's audio-visual holdings.
Use the library's electronic periodical databases to find magazine and newspaper articles. Choose the databases and formats best suited to your particular topic; ask at the librarian at the Reference Desk if you need help figuring out which database best meets your needs. Many of the articles in the databases are available in full-text format.
Use search engines ( Google , Yahoo , etc.) and subject directories to locate materials on the Internet. Check the Internet Resources section of the NHCC Library web site for helpful subject links.
Step 4: Evaluate your sources
See the CARS Checklist for Information Quality for tips on evaluating the authority and quality of the information you have located. Your instructor expects that you will provide credible, truthful, and reliable information and you have every right to expect that the sources you use are providing the same. This step is especially important when using Internet resources, many of which are regarded as less than reliable.
Step 5: Make notes
Consult the resources you have chosen and note the information that will be useful in your paper. Be sure to document all the sources you consult, even if you there is a chance you may not use that particular source. The author, title, publisher, URL, and other information will be needed later when creating a bibliography.
Step 6: Write your paper
Begin by organizing the information you have collected. The next step is the rough draft, wherein you get your ideas on paper in an unfinished fashion. This step will help you organize your ideas and determine the form your final paper will take. After this, you will revise the draft as many times as you think necessary to create a final product to turn in to your instructor.
Step 7: Cite your sources properly
Give credit where credit is due; cite your sources.
Citing or documenting the sources used in your research serves two purposes: it gives proper credit to the authors of the materials used, and it allows those who are reading your work to duplicate your research and locate the sources that you have listed as references. The MLA and the APA Styles are two popular citation formats.
Failure to cite your sources properly is plagiarism. Plagiarism is avoidable!
Step 8: Proofread
The final step in the process is to proofread the paper you have created. Read through the text and check for any errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Make sure the sources you used are cited properly. Make sure the message that you want to get across to the reader has been thoroughly stated.
Additional research tips:
- Work from the general to the specific -- find background information first, then use more specific sources.
- Don't forget print sources -- many times print materials are more easily accessed and every bit as helpful as online resources.
- The library has books on the topic of writing research papers at call number area LB 2369.
- If you have questions about the assignment, ask your instructor.
- If you have any questions about finding information in the library, ask the librarian.
Contact Information
Craig larson.
Librarian 763-424-0733 [email protected] Zoom: myzoom Available by appointment
Get Started
![how do we research Library Homepage](https://libapps.s3.amazonaws.com/accounts/187009/images/ntlc_header.jpg)
Research Process Guide
- Step 1 - Identifying and Developing a Topic
- Step 2 - Narrowing Your Topic
- Step 3 - Developing Research Questions
- Step 4 - Conducting a Literature Review
- Step 5 - Choosing a Conceptual or Theoretical Framework
- Step 6 - Determining Research Methodology
- Step 6a - Determining Research Methodology - Quantitative Research Methods
- Step 6b - Determining Research Methodology - Qualitative Design
- Step 7 - Considering Ethical Issues in Research with Human Subjects - Institutional Review Board (IRB)
- Step 8 - Collecting Data
- Step 9 - Analyzing Data
- Step 10 - Interpreting Results
- Step 11 - Writing Up Results
Step 1: Identifying and Developing a Topic
![how do we research](https://libapps.s3.amazonaws.com/accounts/362858/images/May2022-Student-Blogpost-FNL.jpg)
Whatever your field or discipline, the best advice to give on identifying a research topic is to choose something that you find really interesting. You will be spending an enormous amount of time with your topic, you need to be invested. Over the course of your research design, proposal and actually conducting your study, you may feel like you are really tired of your topic, however, your interest and investment in the topic will help you persist through dissertation defense. Identifying a research topic can be challenging. Most of the research that has been completed on the process of conducting research fails to examine the preliminary stages of the interactive and self-reflective process of identifying a research topic (Wintersberger & Saunders, 2020). You may choose a topic at the beginning of the process, and through exploring the research that has already been done, one’s own interests that are narrowed or expanded in scope, the topic will change over time (Dwarkadas & Lin, 2019). Where do I begin? According to the research, there are generally two paths to exploring your research topic, creative path and the rational path (Saunders et al., 2019). The rational path takes a linear path and deals with questions we need to ask ourselves like: what are some timely topics in my field in the media right now?; what strengths do I bring to the research?; what are the gaps in the research about the area of research interest? (Saunders et al., 2019; Wintersberger & Saunders, 2020).The creative path is less linear in that it may include keeping a notebook of ideas based on discussion in coursework or with your peers in the field. Whichever path you take, you will inevitably have to narrow your more generalized ideas down. A great way to do that is to continue reading the literature about and around your topic looking for gaps that could be explored. Also, try engaging in meaningful discussions with experts in your field to get their take on your research ideas (Saunders et al., 2019; Wintersberger & Saunders, 2020). It is important to remember that a research topic should be (Dwarkadas & Lin, 2019; Saunders et al., 2019; Wintersberger & Saunders, 2020):
- Interesting to you.
- Realistic in that it can be completed in an appropriate amount of time.
- Relevant to your program or field of study.
- Not widely researched.
Dwarkadas, S., & Lin, M. C. (2019, August 04). Finding a research topic. Computing Research Association for Women, Portland State University. https://cra.org/cra-wp/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2019/04/FindingResearchTopic/2019.pdf
Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.
Wintersberger, D., & Saunders, M. (2020). Formulating and clarifying the research topic: Insights and a guide for the production management research community. Production, 30 . https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20200059
- Last Updated: Jun 29, 2023 1:35 PM
- URL: https://libguides.kean.edu/ResearchProcessGuide
![how do we research U.S. flag](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/coreutils/uswds/img/favicons/favicon-57.png)
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
- Advanced Search
- Journal List
- Community Eye Health
- v.35(117); 2022
- PMC10061254
Why does research matter?
Victor h hu.
Assistant Clinical Professor: International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and Consultant Ophthalmologist: Mid Cheshire NHS Hospitals, UK.
A working knowledge of research – both how it is done, and how it can be used – is important for everyone involved in direct patient care and the planning & delivery of eye programmes.
![Click on image to zoom An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is jceh_35_117_001_f01.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061254/bin/jceh_35_117_001_f01.jpg)
A research coordinator collecting data from a health extension worker. ethiopia
The mention of ‘research’ can be off-putting and may seem irrelevant in the busy environment of a clinic or hospital. However, research is central to all aspects of eye care delivery – both inside and outside the clinic.
Whether we are health workers, public health practitioners, managers, policy makers, or editors – all of us ‘stand on the shoulders of giants’: we rely on the research done by others before us. This can be as simple – and profound – as hand washing between patients; a habit that only became common practice in the 1870s, following the work of the Hungarian physician Ignaz Semmelweis and Scottish surgeon Joseph Lister. Or it can be as complex as making a diagnosis of glaucoma and knowing what treatment to give. All current eye care practice is based on research. Clinical, operational (eye care delivery) and public health practice will continue to be profoundly shaped by new research developments.
![](http://serviteca.online/777/templates/cheerup2/res/banner1.gif)
What is research?
In its simplest form, research is about investigating the world around us to increase our knowledge, so we can work out how to do things better.
In health care, we use a scientific approach to carry out research; there is a set way of doing things that ensures research is done in a logical way, and that results are published widely, so that other people can scrutinise what has been done. This gives us confidence that the results will be useful in everyday practice.
It is important to critically evaluate research and research findings, including checking that research has been carried out in the proper way, and whether the conclusions that have been made are reasonable and justified. One of the ways in which the scientific community ensures the quality of research is through the process of peer review. Before research papers are accepted for publication in a scientific journal, they are reviewed by other researchers (peer reviewed) to check the quality of the research and the validity of the results and conclusions. Even so, the quality of published research can vary.
This is why systematic reviews and meta-analyses are so valuable: they answer important questions by identifying, evaluating, and summarising good quality evidence from a range of published research papers. Often, systematic reviews conclude that there is not enough evidence to answer a question with absolute certainty, or to produce an answer that will be applicable in different countries or health care settings. This is useful, as it gives researchers guidance about where more research is needed (see article on page 13).
But this can be a challenge for clinicians – how can we make good decisions in the absence of definitive evidence? Clinical experience is very important, but where possible this should be informed by good research – see page 6 for practical tips.
Health care practitioners and managers can also use guidance from professional bodies such as the World Health Organization. The article on page 8 explains the process by which guidelines are developed and shows why we can rely on them.
In conclusion, research is fundamental to the everyday practice of health care professionals, including eye care workers. Research allows us to find out new things and to provide better care for patients. There are many different types of research that can be carried out and these can vary enormously. It is important to ask the right question, as this will determine the type of research that is done (see page 5).
All of us can participate in research: it starts with asking questions and then going to find out the answers. The article on page 10 offers practical suggestions for carrying out small-scale research that is relevant and useful to eye care.
Types of health research
Basic science research, such as in molecular genetics or cell biology, fills the gaps in our understanding of disease mechanisms (pathogenesis).
Clinical research addresses how diseases in individuals can present and be diagnosed, and how a condition progresses and can be managed.
Epidemiological research , which is at the population level (as opposed to the individual level), answers questions about the number of people in the population who have a condition, what factors (called exposures) are causing the condition, and how it can be treated or prevented at the population level.
Going beyond epidemiology, there is also operational and health systems research , which focuses on how best to deliver health interventions, clinical and rehabilitation services, or behaviour change initiatives.
Other types of research , which are also important for public health, include health economics, social science, and statistical modelling.
Finally, systematic literature reviews can be very useful, as they identify and summarise the available evidence on a specific topic.
By Clare Gilbert and GVS Murthy
Examples of research questions and how they have been answered
Can povidone iodine prevent endophthalmitis.
In many eye departments, cataract surgery is a frequently preformed operation. One of the most serious complications is infection within the eye (endophthalmitis) which can lead to loss of vision. Several well conducted randomised controlled clinical trials have shown that instilling 0.5% aqueous povidone iodine eye drops, an antiseptic agent, before surgery reduces the risk of this devastating infection, with the first trial undertaken in 1991. 1
What is the best treatment for primary open-angle glaucoma?
Chronic glaucoma can be a very difficult condition to manage, particularly when patients often only present to eye departments once they have already had significant vision loss. Eye drops which lower intraocular pressure are often prescribed; however, patients may not use the eyedrops because they are expensive, can be difficult to instil, and do not improve their vision. Surgery is an option, but patients can be reluctant to undergo surgery on their only good eye, and there can be postoperative complications. Laser treatment is another option. In a recent study in Tanzania, patients were randomly allocated to Timolol 0.5% eye drops or a form of laser called Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT). 2 After one year, SLT was found to be superior to drops for high-pressure glaucoma.
Why don't older adults in England have their eyes examined?
Focus group discussions among older adults in England revealed that, despite most participants being eligible for state-funded check-ups, wearing spectacles was associated with the appearance of being frail. They were also afraid of appearing to ‘fail’ tests, and had concerns about the cost of spectacles. 3
How cost effective is a diabetic retinopathy screening programme?
An economic evaluation in South Africa compared alternative interventions. Screening using non-mydriatic retinal photographs taken by a technician supervised by an ophthalmic nurse and read by a general medical officer was cost-effective and the savings made allowed the government to fund disability grants for people who went blind. 4
Acknowledgements
Stephen Gichuhi and Nyawira Mwangi contributed to preliminary work on this article.
Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
- Knowledge Base
Methodology
Research Methods | Definitions, Types, Examples
Research methods are specific procedures for collecting and analyzing data. Developing your research methods is an integral part of your research design . When planning your methods, there are two key decisions you will make.
First, decide how you will collect data . Your methods depend on what type of data you need to answer your research question :
- Qualitative vs. quantitative : Will your data take the form of words or numbers?
- Primary vs. secondary : Will you collect original data yourself, or will you use data that has already been collected by someone else?
- Descriptive vs. experimental : Will you take measurements of something as it is, or will you perform an experiment?
Second, decide how you will analyze the data .
- For quantitative data, you can use statistical analysis methods to test relationships between variables.
- For qualitative data, you can use methods such as thematic analysis to interpret patterns and meanings in the data.
Table of contents
Methods for collecting data, examples of data collection methods, methods for analyzing data, examples of data analysis methods, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about research methods.
Data is the information that you collect for the purposes of answering your research question . The type of data you need depends on the aims of your research.
Qualitative vs. quantitative data
Your choice of qualitative or quantitative data collection depends on the type of knowledge you want to develop.
For questions about ideas, experiences and meanings, or to study something that can’t be described numerically, collect qualitative data .
If you want to develop a more mechanistic understanding of a topic, or your research involves hypothesis testing , collect quantitative data .
Qualitative | to broader populations. . | |
---|---|---|
Quantitative | . |
You can also take a mixed methods approach , where you use both qualitative and quantitative research methods.
Primary vs. secondary research
Primary research is any original data that you collect yourself for the purposes of answering your research question (e.g. through surveys , observations and experiments ). Secondary research is data that has already been collected by other researchers (e.g. in a government census or previous scientific studies).
If you are exploring a novel research question, you’ll probably need to collect primary data . But if you want to synthesize existing knowledge, analyze historical trends, or identify patterns on a large scale, secondary data might be a better choice.
Primary | . | methods. |
---|---|---|
Secondary |
Descriptive vs. experimental data
In descriptive research , you collect data about your study subject without intervening. The validity of your research will depend on your sampling method .
In experimental research , you systematically intervene in a process and measure the outcome. The validity of your research will depend on your experimental design .
To conduct an experiment, you need to be able to vary your independent variable , precisely measure your dependent variable, and control for confounding variables . If it’s practically and ethically possible, this method is the best choice for answering questions about cause and effect.
Descriptive | . . | |
---|---|---|
Experimental |
Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services
Discover proofreading & editing
Research method | Primary or secondary? | Qualitative or quantitative? | When to use |
---|---|---|---|
Primary | Quantitative | To test cause-and-effect relationships. | |
Primary | Quantitative | To understand general characteristics of a population. | |
Interview/focus group | Primary | Qualitative | To gain more in-depth understanding of a topic. |
Observation | Primary | Either | To understand how something occurs in its natural setting. |
Secondary | Either | To situate your research in an existing body of work, or to evaluate trends within a research topic. | |
Either | Either | To gain an in-depth understanding of a specific group or context, or when you don’t have the resources for a large study. |
Your data analysis methods will depend on the type of data you collect and how you prepare it for analysis.
Data can often be analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. For example, survey responses could be analyzed qualitatively by studying the meanings of responses or quantitatively by studying the frequencies of responses.
Qualitative analysis methods
Qualitative analysis is used to understand words, ideas, and experiences. You can use it to interpret data that was collected:
- From open-ended surveys and interviews , literature reviews , case studies , ethnographies , and other sources that use text rather than numbers.
- Using non-probability sampling methods .
Qualitative analysis tends to be quite flexible and relies on the researcher’s judgement, so you have to reflect carefully on your choices and assumptions and be careful to avoid research bias .
Quantitative analysis methods
Quantitative analysis uses numbers and statistics to understand frequencies, averages and correlations (in descriptive studies) or cause-and-effect relationships (in experiments).
You can use quantitative analysis to interpret data that was collected either:
- During an experiment .
- Using probability sampling methods .
Because the data is collected and analyzed in a statistically valid way, the results of quantitative analysis can be easily standardized and shared among researchers.
Research method | Qualitative or quantitative? | When to use |
---|---|---|
Quantitative | To analyze data collected in a statistically valid manner (e.g. from experiments, surveys, and observations). | |
Meta-analysis | Quantitative | To statistically analyze the results of a large collection of studies. Can only be applied to studies that collected data in a statistically valid manner. |
Qualitative | To analyze data collected from interviews, , or textual sources. To understand general themes in the data and how they are communicated. | |
Either | To analyze large volumes of textual or visual data collected from surveys, literature reviews, or other sources. Can be quantitative (i.e. frequencies of words) or qualitative (i.e. meanings of words). |
Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting
Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:
- Academic style
- Vague sentences
- Style consistency
See an example
![how do we research how do we research](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/dissertation-proofreading-service.png)
If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
- Chi square test of independence
- Statistical power
- Descriptive statistics
- Degrees of freedom
- Pearson correlation
- Null hypothesis
- Double-blind study
- Case-control study
- Research ethics
- Data collection
- Hypothesis testing
- Structured interviews
Research bias
- Hawthorne effect
- Unconscious bias
- Recall bias
- Halo effect
- Self-serving bias
- Information bias
Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings.
Quantitative methods allow you to systematically measure variables and test hypotheses . Qualitative methods allow you to explore concepts and experiences in more detail.
In mixed methods research , you use both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods to answer your research question .
A sample is a subset of individuals from a larger population . Sampling means selecting the group that you will actually collect data from in your research. For example, if you are researching the opinions of students in your university, you could survey a sample of 100 students.
In statistics, sampling allows you to test a hypothesis about the characteristics of a population.
The research methods you use depend on the type of data you need to answer your research question .
- If you want to measure something or test a hypothesis , use quantitative methods . If you want to explore ideas, thoughts and meanings, use qualitative methods .
- If you want to analyze a large amount of readily-available data, use secondary data. If you want data specific to your purposes with control over how it is generated, collect primary data.
- If you want to establish cause-and-effect relationships between variables , use experimental methods. If you want to understand the characteristics of a research subject, use descriptive methods.
Methodology refers to the overarching strategy and rationale of your research project . It involves studying the methods used in your field and the theories or principles behind them, in order to develop an approach that matches your objectives.
Methods are the specific tools and procedures you use to collect and analyze data (for example, experiments, surveys , and statistical tests ).
In shorter scientific papers, where the aim is to report the findings of a specific study, you might simply describe what you did in a methods section .
In a longer or more complex research project, such as a thesis or dissertation , you will probably include a methodology section , where you explain your approach to answering the research questions and cite relevant sources to support your choice of methods.
Is this article helpful?
Other students also liked, writing strong research questions | criteria & examples.
- What Is a Research Design | Types, Guide & Examples
- Data Collection | Definition, Methods & Examples
More interesting articles
- Between-Subjects Design | Examples, Pros, & Cons
- Cluster Sampling | A Simple Step-by-Step Guide with Examples
- Confounding Variables | Definition, Examples & Controls
- Construct Validity | Definition, Types, & Examples
- Content Analysis | Guide, Methods & Examples
- Control Groups and Treatment Groups | Uses & Examples
- Control Variables | What Are They & Why Do They Matter?
- Correlation vs. Causation | Difference, Designs & Examples
- Correlational Research | When & How to Use
- Critical Discourse Analysis | Definition, Guide & Examples
- Cross-Sectional Study | Definition, Uses & Examples
- Descriptive Research | Definition, Types, Methods & Examples
- Ethical Considerations in Research | Types & Examples
- Explanatory and Response Variables | Definitions & Examples
- Explanatory Research | Definition, Guide, & Examples
- Exploratory Research | Definition, Guide, & Examples
- External Validity | Definition, Types, Threats & Examples
- Extraneous Variables | Examples, Types & Controls
- Guide to Experimental Design | Overview, Steps, & Examples
- How Do You Incorporate an Interview into a Dissertation? | Tips
- How to Do Thematic Analysis | Step-by-Step Guide & Examples
- How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates
- How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Steps & Examples
- Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria | Examples & Definition
- Independent vs. Dependent Variables | Definition & Examples
- Inductive Reasoning | Types, Examples, Explanation
- Inductive vs. Deductive Research Approach | Steps & Examples
- Internal Validity in Research | Definition, Threats, & Examples
- Internal vs. External Validity | Understanding Differences & Threats
- Longitudinal Study | Definition, Approaches & Examples
- Mediator vs. Moderator Variables | Differences & Examples
- Mixed Methods Research | Definition, Guide & Examples
- Multistage Sampling | Introductory Guide & Examples
- Naturalistic Observation | Definition, Guide & Examples
- Operationalization | A Guide with Examples, Pros & Cons
- Population vs. Sample | Definitions, Differences & Examples
- Primary Research | Definition, Types, & Examples
- Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research | Differences, Examples & Methods
- Quasi-Experimental Design | Definition, Types & Examples
- Questionnaire Design | Methods, Question Types & Examples
- Random Assignment in Experiments | Introduction & Examples
- Random vs. Systematic Error | Definition & Examples
- Reliability vs. Validity in Research | Difference, Types and Examples
- Reproducibility vs Replicability | Difference & Examples
- Reproducibility vs. Replicability | Difference & Examples
- Sampling Methods | Types, Techniques & Examples
- Semi-Structured Interview | Definition, Guide & Examples
- Simple Random Sampling | Definition, Steps & Examples
- Single, Double, & Triple Blind Study | Definition & Examples
- Stratified Sampling | Definition, Guide & Examples
- Structured Interview | Definition, Guide & Examples
- Survey Research | Definition, Examples & Methods
- Systematic Review | Definition, Example, & Guide
- Systematic Sampling | A Step-by-Step Guide with Examples
- Textual Analysis | Guide, 3 Approaches & Examples
- The 4 Types of Reliability in Research | Definitions & Examples
- The 4 Types of Validity in Research | Definitions & Examples
- Transcribing an Interview | 5 Steps & Transcription Software
- Triangulation in Research | Guide, Types, Examples
- Types of Interviews in Research | Guide & Examples
- Types of Research Designs Compared | Guide & Examples
- Types of Variables in Research & Statistics | Examples
- Unstructured Interview | Definition, Guide & Examples
- What Is a Case Study? | Definition, Examples & Methods
- What Is a Case-Control Study? | Definition & Examples
- What Is a Cohort Study? | Definition & Examples
- What Is a Conceptual Framework? | Tips & Examples
- What Is a Controlled Experiment? | Definitions & Examples
- What Is a Double-Barreled Question?
- What Is a Focus Group? | Step-by-Step Guide & Examples
- What Is a Likert Scale? | Guide & Examples
- What Is a Prospective Cohort Study? | Definition & Examples
- What Is a Retrospective Cohort Study? | Definition & Examples
- What Is Action Research? | Definition & Examples
- What Is an Observational Study? | Guide & Examples
- What Is Concurrent Validity? | Definition & Examples
- What Is Content Validity? | Definition & Examples
- What Is Convenience Sampling? | Definition & Examples
- What Is Convergent Validity? | Definition & Examples
- What Is Criterion Validity? | Definition & Examples
- What Is Data Cleansing? | Definition, Guide & Examples
- What Is Deductive Reasoning? | Explanation & Examples
- What Is Discriminant Validity? | Definition & Example
- What Is Ecological Validity? | Definition & Examples
- What Is Ethnography? | Definition, Guide & Examples
- What Is Face Validity? | Guide, Definition & Examples
- What Is Non-Probability Sampling? | Types & Examples
- What Is Participant Observation? | Definition & Examples
- What Is Peer Review? | Types & Examples
- What Is Predictive Validity? | Examples & Definition
- What Is Probability Sampling? | Types & Examples
- What Is Purposive Sampling? | Definition & Examples
- What Is Qualitative Observation? | Definition & Examples
- What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples
- What Is Quantitative Observation? | Definition & Examples
- What Is Quantitative Research? | Definition, Uses & Methods
Get unlimited documents corrected
✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts
- Skip to main content
- Skip to primary sidebar
- Skip to footer
- QuestionPro
![how do we research survey software icon](https://www.questionpro.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/surveys-cube-80px.png)
- Solutions Industries Gaming Automotive Sports and events Education Government Travel & Hospitality Financial Services Healthcare Cannabis Technology Use Case AskWhy Communities Audience Contactless surveys Mobile LivePolls Member Experience GDPR Positive People Science 360 Feedback Surveys
- Resources Blog eBooks Survey Templates Case Studies Training Help center
![how do we research how do we research](https://www.questionpro.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/flags/us.png)
Home Market Research
What is Research: Definition, Methods, Types & Examples
![how do we research What is Research](https://www.questionpro.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/What-is-Research.jpg)
The search for knowledge is closely linked to the object of study; that is, to the reconstruction of the facts that will provide an explanation to an observed event and that at first sight can be considered as a problem. It is very human to seek answers and satisfy our curiosity. Let’s talk about research.
Content Index
What is Research?
What are the characteristics of research.
- Comparative analysis chart
Qualitative methods
Quantitative methods, 8 tips for conducting accurate research.
Research is the careful consideration of study regarding a particular concern or research problem using scientific methods. According to the American sociologist Earl Robert Babbie, “research is a systematic inquiry to describe, explain, predict, and control the observed phenomenon. It involves inductive and deductive methods.”
Inductive methods analyze an observed event, while deductive methods verify the observed event. Inductive approaches are associated with qualitative research , and deductive methods are more commonly associated with quantitative analysis .
Research is conducted with a purpose to:
- Identify potential and new customers
- Understand existing customers
- Set pragmatic goals
- Develop productive market strategies
- Address business challenges
- Put together a business expansion plan
- Identify new business opportunities
- Good research follows a systematic approach to capture accurate data. Researchers need to practice ethics and a code of conduct while making observations or drawing conclusions.
- The analysis is based on logical reasoning and involves both inductive and deductive methods.
- Real-time data and knowledge is derived from actual observations in natural settings.
- There is an in-depth analysis of all data collected so that there are no anomalies associated with it.
- It creates a path for generating new questions. Existing data helps create more research opportunities.
- It is analytical and uses all the available data so that there is no ambiguity in inference.
- Accuracy is one of the most critical aspects of research. The information must be accurate and correct. For example, laboratories provide a controlled environment to collect data. Accuracy is measured in the instruments used, the calibrations of instruments or tools, and the experiment’s final result.
What is the purpose of research?
There are three main purposes:
- Exploratory: As the name suggests, researchers conduct exploratory studies to explore a group of questions. The answers and analytics may not offer a conclusion to the perceived problem. It is undertaken to handle new problem areas that haven’t been explored before. This exploratory data analysis process lays the foundation for more conclusive data collection and analysis.
LEARN ABOUT: Descriptive Analysis
- Descriptive: It focuses on expanding knowledge on current issues through a process of data collection. Descriptive research describe the behavior of a sample population. Only one variable is required to conduct the study. The three primary purposes of descriptive studies are describing, explaining, and validating the findings. For example, a study conducted to know if top-level management leaders in the 21st century possess the moral right to receive a considerable sum of money from the company profit.
LEARN ABOUT: Best Data Collection Tools
- Explanatory: Causal research or explanatory research is conducted to understand the impact of specific changes in existing standard procedures. Running experiments is the most popular form. For example, a study that is conducted to understand the effect of rebranding on customer loyalty.
Here is a comparative analysis chart for a better understanding:
Approach used | Unstructured | Structured | Highly structured |
Conducted through | Asking questions | Asking questions | By using hypotheses. |
Time | Early stages of decision making | Later stages of decision making | Later stages of decision making |
It begins by asking the right questions and choosing an appropriate method to investigate the problem. After collecting answers to your questions, you can analyze the findings or observations to draw reasonable conclusions.
When it comes to customers and market studies, the more thorough your questions, the better the analysis. You get essential insights into brand perception and product needs by thoroughly collecting customer data through surveys and questionnaires . You can use this data to make smart decisions about your marketing strategies to position your business effectively.
To make sense of your study and get insights faster, it helps to use a research repository as a single source of truth in your organization and manage your research data in one centralized data repository .
Types of research methods and Examples
![how do we research what is research](https://www.questionpro.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Research-Methods_without-logo.jpg)
Research methods are broadly classified as Qualitative and Quantitative .
Both methods have distinctive properties and data collection methods .
Qualitative research is a method that collects data using conversational methods, usually open-ended questions . The responses collected are essentially non-numerical. This method helps a researcher understand what participants think and why they think in a particular way.
Types of qualitative methods include:
- One-to-one Interview
- Focus Groups
- Ethnographic studies
- Text Analysis
Quantitative methods deal with numbers and measurable forms . It uses a systematic way of investigating events or data. It answers questions to justify relationships with measurable variables to either explain, predict, or control a phenomenon.
Types of quantitative methods include:
- Survey research
- Descriptive research
- Correlational research
LEARN MORE: Descriptive Research vs Correlational Research
Remember, it is only valuable and useful when it is valid, accurate, and reliable. Incorrect results can lead to customer churn and a decrease in sales.
It is essential to ensure that your data is:
- Valid – founded, logical, rigorous, and impartial.
- Accurate – free of errors and including required details.
- Reliable – other people who investigate in the same way can produce similar results.
- Timely – current and collected within an appropriate time frame.
- Complete – includes all the data you need to support your business decisions.
Gather insights
![how do we research What is a research - tips](https://www.questionpro.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/22-8-tips-for-conductiong-accurate-research-min.jpg)
- Identify the main trends and issues, opportunities, and problems you observe. Write a sentence describing each one.
- Keep track of the frequency with which each of the main findings appears.
- Make a list of your findings from the most common to the least common.
- Evaluate a list of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats identified in a SWOT analysis .
- Prepare conclusions and recommendations about your study.
- Act on your strategies
- Look for gaps in the information, and consider doing additional inquiry if necessary
- Plan to review the results and consider efficient methods to analyze and interpret results.
Review your goals before making any conclusions about your study. Remember how the process you have completed and the data you have gathered help answer your questions. Ask yourself if what your analysis revealed facilitates the identification of your conclusions and recommendations.
LEARN MORE ABOUT OUR SOFTWARE FREE TRIAL
MORE LIKE THIS
![how do we research age gating](https://www.questionpro.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/age-gating.jpg)
Age Gating: Effective Strategies for Online Content Control
Aug 23, 2024
![how do we research](https://www.questionpro.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/CX-TCXT-Meta_images-10.jpg)
Customer Experience Lessons from 13,000 Feet — Tuesday CX Thoughts
Aug 20, 2024
![how do we research insight](https://www.questionpro.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/what-is-an-insight.jpg)
Insight: Definition & meaning, types and examples
Aug 19, 2024
![how do we research employee loyalty](https://www.questionpro.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/employee-loyalty.jpg)
Employee Loyalty: Strategies for Long-Term Business Success
Other categories.
- Academic Research
- Artificial Intelligence
- Assessments
- Brand Awareness
- Case Studies
- Communities
- Consumer Insights
- Customer effort score
- Customer Engagement
- Customer Experience
- Customer Loyalty
- Customer Research
- Customer Satisfaction
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Engagement
- Employee Retention
- Friday Five
- General Data Protection Regulation
- Insights Hub
- Life@QuestionPro
- Market Research
- Mobile diaries
- Mobile Surveys
- New Features
- Online Communities
- Question Types
- Questionnaire
- QuestionPro Products
- Release Notes
- Research Tools and Apps
- Revenue at Risk
- Survey Templates
- Training Tips
- Tuesday CX Thoughts (TCXT)
- Uncategorized
- What’s Coming Up
- Workforce Intelligence
![how do we research how do we research](https://insights.jabroyd.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/3dlogo.png)
How to Conduct Effective Research: Tips and Tricks for Beginners
- 11 July 2023
![how do we research how do we research](https://insights.jabroyd.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/fraud-audit-auditor-detective-business-paper-glass.jpg)
Introduction
Research serves as the foundation for advances in every conceivable subject and is the cornerstone of progress. Starting a research journey can be intimidating for novices. But if you have the correct tools and approaches, it may be a worthwhile endeavor. This blog article seeks to instruct new researchers on how to conduct fruitful research by offering helpful advice and strategies to help them become productive researchers.
1. Define Your Research Question
Determining your research question is the first stage in conducting successful research. A well-crafted question gives you direction and helps you focus your efforts on a certain objective. Ask a question that is as specific as you can. A better inquiry may be, “How is climate change affecting crop production in California?” rather than, “What are the effects of climate change?”
2. Develop a Research Plan
A roadmap is essential for effective research. Describe your strategy while considering the type of information you require, potential sources, and a rough time frame. You can effectively manage your time by taking this step, which will also give your research structure and keep you on track.
3. Understand the Types of Research
There are two basic categories of research: primary and secondary. Primary research is when you collect your own first-hand information, such as through surveys or experiments. Using information gathered by another person, such as data from books, papers, or scholarly articles, is known as secondary research. Knowing the difference can help you choose the approach that best fits your research issue and available resources.
4. Use a Variety of Sources
Your research’s scope and depth are constrained if you rely solely on one type of source. Utilize a variety of credible websites, books, scholarly articles, podcasts, and even multimedia sources like documentaries. Remember that the trustworthiness of your study is influenced by the caliber of your sources.
5. Learn How to Use Databases Effectively
Your time will be much reduced if you learn how to use databases. Scholarly articles can be found in abundance in databases like JSTOR, PubMed, and Google Scholar, among others. Recall that various databases have various advantages; thus, investigate a few to determine which ones best meet your requirements.
6. Master Effective Search Techniques
The research process can be significantly sped up by using excellent search techniques. Learn how to broaden or narrow your search using Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT), phrase searching using quotation marks, and truncation symbols. You can quickly uncover additional pertinent sources using these methods.
7. Evaluate Your Sources
Information is not all created equal. Always assess the trustworthiness and veracity of your sources. Verify the author’s credentials, the publishing date, and the veracity of the information. Websites with the.edu,.gov, or.org extensions are usually more trustworthy than those with the.com extension.
8. Keep Track of Your Sources
To properly reference your sources and prevent plagiarism, keeping track of them is crucial. Making a system (such as a spreadsheet) where you enter all the relevant citation data as you go is an excellent practice. Also very beneficial are reference management programs like EndNote, Mendeley, or Zotero..
9. Take Effective Notes
Making thorough notes can help you remember knowledge and draw connections across sources. To improve understanding, try to summarise the main ideas in your own words. To show the data and connections, you can also utilize charts, mind maps, or colors.
10. Analyze and Synthesize Your Findings
Making meaning of the information you have gathered involves analysis and synthesis. You must comprehend the situation, evaluate many points of view, spot trends, and reach conclusions. The development of your arguments or the development of your hypotheses depends on this step.
11. Don’t Be Afraid to Ask for Help
Finally, if you are stuck, don’t be afraid to seek for assistance. Teachers, classmates with more expertise, and librarians can all offer helpful advice. Keep in mind that even experienced researchers occasionally require help.
One size does not fit all when it comes to research. Different projects call for various approaches and plans. However, you can become a successful researcher by defining your question, creating a plan, utilizing a variety of sources, learning efficient search strategies, evaluating your sources, keeping track of references, taking good notes, analyzing and synthesizing data, and asking for assistance when necessary. The most crucial advice is to always be curious and to keep learning. Enjoy your research!
It’s important to keep in mind that understanding how to perform excellent research is a journey that requires constant practice, learning, and development. Research can be a fulfilling and enlightening experience as you gain experience and get more familiar with the procedure. Wishing you well as you pursue your research!
Share This Post:
Leave feedback about this cancel reply.
- Quality 5 4 3 2 1
- Price 5 4 3 2 1
- Service 5 4 3 2 1
![how do we research how do we research](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/cropped-DiscoverPhDs-Logo-Light-v1-2.png)
Community Blog
Keep up-to-date on postgraduate related issues with our quick reads written by students, postdocs, professors and industry leaders.
What is Research? – Purpose of Research
![how do we research Picture of DiscoverPhDs](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/DiscoverPhDs_Profile-Icon.png)
- By DiscoverPhDs
- September 10, 2020
![What is Research – Purpose of Research Purpose of Research - What is Research](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/elementor/thumbs/What-is-Research-Purpose-of-Research-phul4s3cbwe0xam190dnc4kz3z616ajmfkygodcdqg.png)
The purpose of research is to enhance society by advancing knowledge through the development of scientific theories, concepts and ideas. A research purpose is met through forming hypotheses, collecting data, analysing results, forming conclusions, implementing findings into real-life applications and forming new research questions.
What is Research
Simply put, research is the process of discovering new knowledge. This knowledge can be either the development of new concepts or the advancement of existing knowledge and theories, leading to a new understanding that was not previously known.
As a more formal definition of research, the following has been extracted from the Code of Federal Regulations :
![how do we research](https://gao.az.gov/sites/default/files/code_federal_regulations_logo.jpg)
While research can be carried out by anyone and in any field, most research is usually done to broaden knowledge in the physical, biological, and social worlds. This can range from learning why certain materials behave the way they do, to asking why certain people are more resilient than others when faced with the same challenges.
The use of ‘systematic investigation’ in the formal definition represents how research is normally conducted – a hypothesis is formed, appropriate research methods are designed, data is collected and analysed, and research results are summarised into one or more ‘research conclusions’. These research conclusions are then shared with the rest of the scientific community to add to the existing knowledge and serve as evidence to form additional questions that can be investigated. It is this cyclical process that enables scientific research to make continuous progress over the years; the true purpose of research.
What is the Purpose of Research
From weather forecasts to the discovery of antibiotics, researchers are constantly trying to find new ways to understand the world and how things work – with the ultimate goal of improving our lives.
The purpose of research is therefore to find out what is known, what is not and what we can develop further. In this way, scientists can develop new theories, ideas and products that shape our society and our everyday lives.
Although research can take many forms, there are three main purposes of research:
- Exploratory: Exploratory research is the first research to be conducted around a problem that has not yet been clearly defined. Exploration research therefore aims to gain a better understanding of the exact nature of the problem and not to provide a conclusive answer to the problem itself. This enables us to conduct more in-depth research later on.
- Descriptive: Descriptive research expands knowledge of a research problem or phenomenon by describing it according to its characteristics and population. Descriptive research focuses on the ‘how’ and ‘what’, but not on the ‘why’.
- Explanatory: Explanatory research, also referred to as casual research, is conducted to determine how variables interact, i.e. to identify cause-and-effect relationships. Explanatory research deals with the ‘why’ of research questions and is therefore often based on experiments.
Characteristics of Research
There are 8 core characteristics that all research projects should have. These are:
- Empirical – based on proven scientific methods derived from real-life observations and experiments.
- Logical – follows sequential procedures based on valid principles.
- Cyclic – research begins with a question and ends with a question, i.e. research should lead to a new line of questioning.
- Controlled – vigorous measures put into place to keep all variables constant, except those under investigation.
- Hypothesis-based – the research design generates data that sufficiently meets the research objectives and can prove or disprove the hypothesis. It makes the research study repeatable and gives credibility to the results.
- Analytical – data is generated, recorded and analysed using proven techniques to ensure high accuracy and repeatability while minimising potential errors and anomalies.
- Objective – sound judgement is used by the researcher to ensure that the research findings are valid.
- Statistical treatment – statistical treatment is used to transform the available data into something more meaningful from which knowledge can be gained.
Finding a PhD has never been this easy – search for a PhD by keyword, location or academic area of interest.
Types of Research
Research can be divided into two main types: basic research (also known as pure research) and applied research.
Basic Research
Basic research, also known as pure research, is an original investigation into the reasons behind a process, phenomenon or particular event. It focuses on generating knowledge around existing basic principles.
Basic research is generally considered ‘non-commercial research’ because it does not focus on solving practical problems, and has no immediate benefit or ways it can be applied.
While basic research may not have direct applications, it usually provides new insights that can later be used in applied research.
Applied Research
Applied research investigates well-known theories and principles in order to enhance knowledge around a practical aim. Because of this, applied research focuses on solving real-life problems by deriving knowledge which has an immediate application.
Methods of Research
Research methods for data collection fall into one of two categories: inductive methods or deductive methods.
Inductive research methods focus on the analysis of an observation and are usually associated with qualitative research. Deductive research methods focus on the verification of an observation and are typically associated with quantitative research.
![how do we research Research definition](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Purpose-of-the-Study.jpg)
Qualitative Research
Qualitative research is a method that enables non-numerical data collection through open-ended methods such as interviews, case studies and focus groups .
It enables researchers to collect data on personal experiences, feelings or behaviours, as well as the reasons behind them. Because of this, qualitative research is often used in fields such as social science, psychology and philosophy and other areas where it is useful to know the connection between what has occurred and why it has occurred.
Quantitative Research
Quantitative research is a method that collects and analyses numerical data through statistical analysis.
It allows us to quantify variables, uncover relationships, and make generalisations across a larger population. As a result, quantitative research is often used in the natural and physical sciences such as engineering, biology, chemistry, physics, computer science, finance, and medical research, etc.
What does Research Involve?
Research often follows a systematic approach known as a Scientific Method, which is carried out using an hourglass model.
A research project first starts with a problem statement, or rather, the research purpose for engaging in the study. This can take the form of the ‘ scope of the study ’ or ‘ aims and objectives ’ of your research topic.
Subsequently, a literature review is carried out and a hypothesis is formed. The researcher then creates a research methodology and collects the data.
The data is then analysed using various statistical methods and the null hypothesis is either accepted or rejected.
In both cases, the study and its conclusion are officially written up as a report or research paper, and the researcher may also recommend lines of further questioning. The report or research paper is then shared with the wider research community, and the cycle begins all over again.
Although these steps outline the overall research process, keep in mind that research projects are highly dynamic and are therefore considered an iterative process with continued refinements and not a series of fixed stages.
![how do we research Are Elements Capitalized?](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Are-Elements-Capitalized-300x200.jpg)
When you should and shouldn’t capitalise the names of chemical compounds and their abbreviations is not always clear.
![how do we research Significance of the Study](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Untitled-design-3-300x169.jpg)
In this post you’ll learn what the significance of the study means, why it’s important, where and how to write one in your paper or thesis with an example.
![how do we research What is Tenure Track?](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/What-is-Tenure-Track-300x168.jpg)
Tenure is a permanent position awarded to professors showing excellence in research and teaching. Find out more about the competitive position!
Join thousands of other students and stay up to date with the latest PhD programmes, funding opportunities and advice.
![how do we research](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/DiscoverPhDs_PhD-Student-Interviews-e1645021663377.webp)
Browse PhDs Now
![how do we research PhD Research Fieldwork](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/PhD-Research-Fieldwork-300x127.jpg)
Fieldwork can be essential for your PhD project. Use these tips to help maximise site productivity and reduce your research time by a few weeks.
![how do we research Carlos González Díaz Profile](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Carlos-González-Díaz-300x300.jpg)
Carlos is a third year PhD student at the Centre for Doctoral Training in Intelligent Games and Games Intelligence (IGGI), as part of the University of York and Goldsmiths, University of London.
![how do we research how do we research](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Theanne-Griffith-300x300.jpg)
Dr Griffith gained her PhD in Neuroscience from Northwestern University in 2015. She is now a neuroscientist and children’s book author and will be opening her own lab in the Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology at the University of California Davis later this year (2020).
Join Thousands of Students
![Nick Kabrél MA Nick Kabrél MA](https://cdn2.psychologytoday.com/assets/styles/profile_teaser_small/public/2024-06/Photo-removebg-preview%281%29.jpg?itok=rwqsNkwK)
- Neuroscience
How Do We Explore Ourselves? Here's What Science Has to Say
Exploring our internal world by mentally navigating cognitive maps..
Updated August 3, 2024 | Reviewed by Margaret Foley
- Often, the process of exploring ourselves resembles navigation in a physical environment.
- Research has found that the same brain regions that work during spatial navigation support mental navigation.
- It can be argued that self-exploration consists of mental navigation of our internal conceptual space.
Socrates famously stated, “The unexamined life is not worth living.” The Delphic maxims urged, "Know yourself.” Modern psychotherapists, coaches, and spiritual teachers advise us to explore ourselves to gain greater self-awareness. Clearly, the concept of self-exploration occupies a huge part of psychological growth, but the talk about it largely remains on the folk level. So, what does modern neuroscience have to say about it?
Recent findings from cognitive neuroscience suggest conceptualizing our internal exploration as mental navigation [1]. Broadly, mental navigation is our ability to map and navigate our cognitive space, which consists of memories, concepts, ideas, and their interconnections. The word navigation in this context is used similarly to how navigation happens in our physical environment [2].
![Source: Pexels/Pixabay Source: Pexels/Pixabay](https://cdn2.psychologytoday.com/assets/styles/article_inline_half_caption/public/field_blog_entry_images/2024-08/compass-1850673.jpg?itok=0wn4-9H3)
Although the concept of mental navigation is novel in the scientific discourse, the idea of exploring our mind as if it were a physical space is not a new one. Take the memory palace technique, for example, which originated in ancient Greece. This method involves using familiar physical spaces to enhance memory. By associating information with specific locations within these spaces, we can mentally "walk through" them to recall what we've learned more effectively.
Moreover, different philosophers, writers, and early psychologists were also influenced by this idea. Rainer Maria Rilke wrote, “The only journey is the one within,” and William James compared our search in memory to the search for a lost object in our house [3]. Indeed, why does the way we explore our minds so much resemble the way we navigate our physical environment? Why does this idea of an inner journey intuitively makes so much sense?
Links Between Mental and Spatial Navigation
Recent research into exploratory behavior has uncovered interesting similarities between how we navigate physical spaces and how we search for information in our minds [4]. One theory suggests that we've developed effective algorithms for locating resources in our physical environment, and we now use these same patterns to search for information within our minds [4].
What is even more interesting is that findings on the brain level support the similarity of spatial and mental navigation. Already in 1948, psychologist Edward Tolman suggested the concept of a “cognitive map” [5]. He argued that to facilitate our wayfinding, we build structured and abstract representations in the brain to reflect the environment —cognitive maps.
Later, researchers found the so-called place and grid cells in the hippocampal-entorhinal system of the brain [6]. Place cells, for example, encode particular places in the environment. To illustrate, if a rat stands in one place, a corresponding place cell will fire, and if it moves to a different place, another place cell will activate. It was suggested that this brain mapping mechanism forms the so-called cognitive maps [7].
Strikingly, it has recently been found that the same mechanism encodes not only physical spaces but also abstract concepts. For example, when people engage in a role-playing game where they need to interact with other individuals in a social space, researchers can see that the grid cells form a kind of cognitive map of social space to reflect the relationships, hierarchy, and intimacy between different characters in the social space [8]. Many more papers show a similar phenomenon in different tasks: cognitive maps of social space, musical sounds, odors, narratives, word meanings, etc. (reviewed in [1]).
A New View of Cognitive Maps
These findings reconceptualized the way researchers view cognitive maps. Perhaps, besides cognitive maps for navigating our physical environment, we also possess "conceptual maps" for mapping and navigating the space of abstract concepts in our minds (see the figure below).
![title= how do we research](https://cdn2.psychologytoday.com/assets/styles/manual_crop_1_1_75x75/public/teaser_image/blog_entry/2024-07/shutterstock_2441988119.jpg?itok=iG7tLbJs)
After all, the cells that fire to physical space encode a concept of this place and not a place itself. Similarly, when we learn new information, we learn a conceptual abstraction. For this reason, it should not be too surprising that the same system might encode the information from different domains of our experience and structure them in cognitive maps for future use. What is interesting, though, is that our ability to navigate in space is much more ancient.
Therefore, it was suggested that our ability to construct abstract cognitive maps and navigate them mentally is the so-called recycling or reuse of the system that was previously designed for the navigation of physical environments [9]. If this hypothesis is true, then we indeed structure and navigate our mind similarly to the physical world in which we live.
Updating Our Conceptual Maps
Building on this realization, two intriguing papers have developed theories centered on mental navigation. The first paper proposes that insights or sudden "Aha!" moments occur during the mental navigation of conceptual spaces [2]. The fascinating part is that when we experience insight, it can be compared to finding a shortcut in our physical environment. This can occur, for example, when you find a link between two previously unconnected ideas.
Another research group has taken the idea of mental navigation further to explore its application in psychotherapy [10]. They suggest that people seek therapy to organize and update their conceptual maps, much like correcting or expanding an outdated physical map. According to this view, our conceptual maps might sometimes be maladaptive, and mental navigation during therapy helps identify these issues and restructure them.
Interestingly, a key aspect of psychotherapy is fostering positive change by increasing the client’s awareness. This moment of enhanced awareness can be seen as broadening one's conceptual map, similar to how a physical map is expanded when new territories are discovered.
We truly live in remarkable times where neuroscience, paired with creative thinking , can offer scientific explanations for some very ancient concepts.
1. Behrens, T. E., Muller, T. H., Whittington, J. C., Mark, S., Baram, A. B., Stachenfeld, K. L., & Kurth-Nelson, Z. (2018). What is a cognitive map? Organizing knowledge for flexible behavior. Neuron , 100 (2), 490-509.
2. Aru, J., Drüke, M., Pikamäe, J., & Larkum, M. E. (2023). Mental navigation and the neural mechanisms of insight. Trends in Neurosciences , 46 (2), 100-109.
3. James, W., Burkhardt, F., Bowers, F., & Skrupskelis, I. K. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1, No. 2). London: Macmillan.
4. Hills, T. T., & Dukas, R. (2012). The evolution of cognitive search. Cognitive search: Evolution, algorithms, and the brain , 11-24.
5. Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological review , 55 (4), 189.
6. Fyhn, M., Molden, S., Witter, M. P., Moser, E. I., & Moser, M. B. (2004). Spatial representation in the entorhinal cortex. Science , 305 (5688), 1258-1264.
7. O'Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map . Oxford University Press.
8. Tavares, R. M., Mendelsohn, A., Grossman, Y., Williams, C. H., Shapiro, M., Trope, Y., & Schiller, D. (2015). A Map for Social Navigation in the Human Brain. Neuron , 87 (1), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.011
9. Buzsáki, G., & Moser, E. I. (2013). Memory, navigation and theta rhythm in the hippocampal-entorhinal system. Nature neuroscience , 16 (2), 130-138.
10. Kabrel, M., Tulver, K., & Aru, J. (2024). The journey within: mental navigation as a novel framework for understanding psychotherapeutic transformation. BMC psychiatry , 24 (1), 91.
![Nick Kabrél MA Nick Kabrél MA](https://cdn2.psychologytoday.com/assets/styles/thumbnail_115x140/public/2024-06/Photo-removebg-preview%281%29.jpg?itok=fG3f_JjI)
Nick Kabrél, MA, is a psychology researcher at the University of Zurich.
- Find a Therapist
- Find a Treatment Center
- Find a Psychiatrist
- Find a Support Group
- Find Online Therapy
- United States
- Brooklyn, NY
- Chicago, IL
- Houston, TX
- Los Angeles, CA
- New York, NY
- Portland, OR
- San Diego, CA
- San Francisco, CA
- Seattle, WA
- Washington, DC
- Asperger's
- Bipolar Disorder
- Chronic Pain
- Eating Disorders
- Passive Aggression
- Personality
- Goal Setting
- Positive Psychology
- Stopping Smoking
- Low Sexual Desire
- Relationships
- Child Development
- Self Tests NEW
- Therapy Center
- Diagnosis Dictionary
- Types of Therapy
![Stand Up For Yourself July 2024 magazine cover](https://cdn2.psychologytoday.com/assets/styles/magazine_384x504/public/magazine/2024-06/2024-07.png.jpg?itok=pCeLoQbs)
Sticking up for yourself is no easy task. But there are concrete skills you can use to hone your assertiveness and advocate for yourself.
- Emotional Intelligence
- Gaslighting
- Affective Forecasting
Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World
Read our research on:
Full Topic List
Regions & Countries
- Publications
- Our Methods
- Short Reads
- Tools & Resources
Read Our Research On:
Race and LGBTQ Issues in K-12 Schools
What teachers, teens and the u.s. public say about current curriculum debates, table of contents.
- What do teachers think students should learn about slavery and gender identity?
- Should parents be able to opt their children out of learning about certain topics?
- How often do topics related to race and LGBTQ issues come up in the classroom?
- How do teachers’ views differ by party?
- What teachers think students should learn about slavery and gender identity
- Should parents be able to opt their children out of learning about race and LGBTQ issues?
- Influence over curriculum
- What teens want to learn about slavery
- What teens want to learn about gender identity
- 4. Public views on parents opting their children out of learning about race and LGBTQ issues
- Acknowledgments
- Teacher survey methodology
- Teen survey methodology
- General public survey methodology
![how do we research Demonstrators outside a school board meeting in Glendale, California, on June 20, 2023. (David McNew/Getty Images)](https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2024/02/ST_24.02.22_lgbtq-race-in-schools_feature.png?w=640)
Pew Research Center conducted this study to better understand how public K-12 teachers, teens and the American public see topics related to race, sexual orientation and gender identity playing out in the classroom.
The bulk of the analysis in this report is based on an online survey of 2,531 U.S. public K-12 teachers conducted from Oct. 17 to Nov. 14, 2023. The teachers surveyed are members of RAND’s American Teacher Panel, a nationally representative panel of public school K-12 teachers recruited through MDR Education. Survey data is weighted to state and national teacher characteristics to account for differences in sampling and response to ensure they are representative of the target population.
For the questions for the general public, we surveyed 5,029 U.S. adults from Nov. 9 to Nov. 16, 2023. The adults surveyed are members of the Ipsos KnowledgePanel, a nationally representative online survey panel. Panel members are randomly recruited through probability-based sampling, and households are provided with access to the Internet and hardware if needed. To ensure that the results of this survey reflect a balanced cross section of the nation, the data is weighted to match the U.S. adult population by gender, age, education, race and ethnicity and other categories.
For questions for teens, we conducted an online survey of 1,453 U.S. teens from Sept. 26 to Oct. 23, 2023, through Ipsos. Ipsos recruited the teens via their parents, who were part of its KnowledgePanel. The survey was weighted to be representative of U.S. teens ages 13 to 17 who live with their parents by age, gender, race and ethnicity, household income, and other categories. The survey on teens was reviewed and approved by an external institutional review board (IRB), Advarra, an independent committee of experts specializing in helping to protect the rights of research participants.
Here are the questions used for this report , along with responses, and the survey methodology .
Throughout the report, references to White, Black and Asian adults include those who are not Hispanic and identify as only one race. Hispanics are of any race. The views and experiences of teachers and teens who are Asian American or part of other racial and ethnic groups are not analyzed separately in this report due to sample limitations. Data for these groups is incorporated into the general population figures throughout the report.
All references to party affiliation include those who lean toward that party. Republicans include those who identify as Republicans and those who say they lean toward the Republican Party. Democrats include those who identify as Democrats and those who say they lean toward the Democratic Party.
Political leaning of school districts is based on whether the majority of those residing in the school district voted for Republican Donald Trump or Democrat Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election.
Amid national debates about what schools are teaching , we asked public K-12 teachers, teens and the American public how they see topics related to race, sexual orientation and gender identity playing out in the classroom.
![how do we research A pie chart showing that about 4 in 10 teachers say current debates about K-12 education have had a negative impact on their job.](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/02/ST_24.02.22_lgbtq-race-in-schools_00_01.png?w=620)
A sizeable share of teachers (41%) say these debates have had a negative impact on their ability to do their job. Just 4% say these debates have had a positive impact, while 53% say the impact has been neither positive nor negative or that these debates have had no impact.
And 71% of teachers say teachers themselves don’t have enough influence over what’s taught in public schools in their area.
In turn, a majority of teachers (58%) say their state government has too much influence over this. And more say the federal government, the local school board and parents have too much influence than say they don’t have enough.
Most of the findings in this report come from a survey of 2,531 U.S. public K-12 teachers conducted Oct. 17-Nov. 14, 2023, using the RAND American Teacher Panel. 1 The survey looks at teachers’ views on:
- Race and LGBTQ issues in the classroom ( Chapter 1 )
- Current debates over what schools should be teaching and the role of key groups ( Chapter 2 )
It follows a fall 2022 survey of K-12 parents that explored similar topics.
This report also includes some findings from a survey of U.S. teens ages 13 to 17 ( Chapter 3 ) and a survey of U.S. adults ( Chapter 4 ). For details about these surveys, refer to the Methodology section of this report. Among the key findings:
- 38% of teens say they feel comfortable when topics related to racism or racial inequality come up in class (among those who say these topics have come up). A smaller share (29%) say they feel comfortable when topics related to sexual orientation or gender identity come up.
- Among the American public , more say parents should be able to opt their children out of learning about LGBTQ issues than say the same about topics related to race (54% vs. 34%).
![how do we research A diverging bar chart showing that most teachers think students should learn that the legacy of slavery still affects Black Americans today.](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/02/ST_24.02.22_lgbtq-race-in-schools_00_02.png?w=640)
We asked public K-12 teachers what they think students should learn in school about two topics in particular:
- Whether the legacy of slavery still affects the position of Black people in American society today.
- Whether a person’s gender can be different from or is determined by their sex at birth.
For these questions, elementary, middle and high school teachers were asked about elementary, middle and high school students, respectively.
The legacy of slavery
Most teachers (64%) say students should learn that the legacy of slavery still affects the position of Black people in American society today.
About a quarter (23%) say students should learn that slavery is part of American history but no longer affects the position of Black people in American society. Just 8% say students shouldn’t learn about this topic in school at all.
Majorities of elementary, middle and high school teachers say students should learn that the legacy of slavery still has an impact on the lives of Black Americans.
Gender identity
![how do we research A diverging bar chart showing that most elementary school teachers say students shouldn’t learn about gender identity at school.](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/02/ST_24.02.22_lgbtq-race-in-schools_00_03.png?w=640)
When it comes to teaching about gender identity – specifically whether a person’s gender can be different from or is determined by their sex assigned at birth – half of public K-12 teachers say students shouldn’t learn about this in school.
A third of teachers think students should learn that someone can be a boy or a girl even if that is different from the sex they were assigned at birth.
A smaller share (14%) say students should learn that whether someone is a boy or a girl is determined by their sex at birth.
Views differ among elementary, middle and high school teachers. But teachers across the three levels are more likely to say students should learn that a person’s gender can be different from their sex at birth than to say students should learn gender is determined by sex at birth.
Most elementary school teachers (62%) say students shouldn’t learn about gender identity in school. This is much larger than the shares of middle and high school teachers who say the same (45% and 35%).
What parents and teens say
Parents of K-12 students are more divided on what their children should learn in school about these topics.
In the 2022 survey , 49% of parents said they’d rather their children learn that the legacy of slavery still affects the position of Black people in American society today, while 42% said they’d rather their children learn that slavery no longer affects Black Americans.
When it comes to gender identity, 31% of parents said they’d rather their children learn that gender can be different from sex at birth. An identical share said they would rather their children learn gender is determined by sex at birth. Another 37% of parents said their children shouldn’t learn about gender identity in school.
Teens, like parents, are more divided than teachers on these questions. About half of teens (48%) say they’d rather learn that the legacy of slavery still affects the position of Black Americans today. Four-in-ten would prefer to learn that slavery no longer affects Black Americans.
And teens are about evenly divided when it comes to what they prefer to learn about gender identity. A quarter say they’d rather learn that a person’s gender can be different from their sex at birth; 26% would prefer to learn that gender is determined by sex at birth. About half (48%) say they shouldn’t learn about gender identity in school.
For more on teens’ views about what they prefer to learn in school about each of these topics, read Chapter 3 of this report.
Most public K-12 teachers (60%) say parents should not be able to opt their children out of learning about racism or racial inequality in school, even if the way these topics are taught conflicts with the parents’ beliefs. A quarter say parents should be able to opt their children out of learning about these topics.
In contrast, more say parents should be able to opt their children out of learning about sexual orientation or gender identity (48%) than say parents should not be able to do this (33%).
On topics related to both race and LGBTQ issues, elementary and middle school teachers are more likely than high school teachers to say parents should be able to opt their children out.
How teachers’ views compare with the public’s views
![how do we research A diverging bar chart showing that 54% of Americans say parents should be able to opt their children out of learning about LGBTQ issues.](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/02/ST_24.02.22_lgbtq-race-in-schools_00_04.png?w=620)
Like teachers, Americans overall are more likely to say parents should be able to opt their children out of learning about sexual orientation or gender identity (54%) than to say they should be able to opt their children out of learning about racism or racial inequality (34%).
Across both issues, Americans overall are somewhat more likely than teachers to say parents should be able to opt their children out.
For more on the public’s views, read Chapter 4 of this report.
![how do we research A horizontal stacked bar chart showing that topics related to racism and racial inequality come up in the classroom more often than LGBTQ issues.](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/02/ST_24.02.22_lgbtq-race-in-schools_00_05.png?w=640)
Most teachers who’ve been teaching for more than a year (68%) say the topics of sexual orientation and gender identity rarely or never came up in their classroom in the 2022-23 school year. About one-in-five (21%) say these topics came up sometimes, and 8% say they came up often or extremely often.
Topics related to racism or racial inequality come up more frequently. A majority of teachers (56%) say these topics came up at least sometimes in their classroom, with 21% saying they came up often or extremely often.
These topics are more likely to come up in secondary school than in elementary school classrooms.
As is the case among parents of K-12 students and the general public, teachers’ views on how topics related to race and LGBTQ issues should play out in the classroom differ by political affiliation.
- What students should learn about slavery: 85% of Democratic and Democratic-leaning teachers say students should learn that the legacy of slavery still affects the position of Black people in American society today. This compares with 35% of Republican and Republican-leaning teachers who say the same.
![how do we research A diverging bar chart showing that teachers’ views on parents opting their children out of learning about race, LGBTQ issues differ widely by party.](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/02/ST_24.02.22_lgbtq-race-in-schools_00_06.png?w=620)
- What students should learn about gender identity: Democratic teachers are far more likely than Republican teachers to say students should learn that a person’s gender can be different from the sex they were assigned at birth (53% vs. 5%). Most Republican teachers (69%) say students shouldn’t learn about gender identity in school.
- Parents opting their children out of learning about these topics: 80% of Republican teachers say parents should be able to opt their children out of learning about LGBTQ issues, compared with 30% of Democratic teachers. And while 47% of Republican teachers say parents should be able to opt their children out of learning about racism and racial inequality, just 11% of Democratic teachers say this.
A majority of public K-12 teachers (58%) identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party. About a third (35%) identify with or lean toward the GOP. Americans overall are more evenly divided: 47% are Democrats or Democratic leaners, and 45% are Republicans or Republican leaners .
- For details, refer to the Methodology section of the report. ↩
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Fresh data delivery Saturday mornings
Sign up for The Briefing
Weekly updates on the world of news & information
- Education & Gender
- LGBTQ Acceptance
- Race & Ethnicity
Who Are You? The Art and Science of Measuring Identity
Facts about the u.s. black population, 22 states have ever elected a black woman to congress, trust in america: do americans trust the police, black americans have made gains in u.s. political leadership, but gaps remain, most popular, report materials.
901 E St. NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20004 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 | Media Inquiries
Research Topics
- Email Newsletters
ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts .
© 2024 Pew Research Center
This device is too small
If you're on a Galaxy Fold, consider unfolding your phone or viewing it in full screen to best optimize your experience.
What Will Savings Account Interest Rates Be in 2025? Here's What We Know
Published on Aug. 24, 2024
![how do we research Matt Frankel, CFP®](https://m.foolcdn.com/media/affiliates/original_images/author_avatarsmatt-frankel-cfp_Ur9vpMf_r0kydJe.jpeg?width=128&height=128)
By: Matt Frankel, CFP®
Writer, Analyst
- The Federal Reserve is expected to start cutting interest rates at its September meeting, and continue throughout 2025.
- High-yield savings account interest rates don't have a direct link to the federal funds rate, but tend to move in the same direction.
- If the Fed cuts rates as expected, it could significantly reduce the interest you receive from your savings account.
The Federal Reserve is widely expected to start lowering benchmark interest rates at its September meeting, and to continue reducing them at least through 2025. According to the latest data, the median expectation priced into the financial markets is for a total of 2.25 percentage points of rate cuts in the federal funds rate between now and next September. The voting members of the Federal Reserve also expect rates to steadily decline through at least 2026.
Savings accounts -- especially those offered by online banks -- are paying some of their most competitive interest rates in years. It wasn't long ago that it was difficult to find an online savings account that paid more than 1.00% APY, but in the current environment, yields of 4.50%, 5.00%, or even higher are readily available.
What would Fed rate cuts mean for savings account interest rates?
Our picks for the best high-yield savings accounts of 2024.
Rate info See Capital One website for most up-to-date rates. Advertised Annual Percentage Yield (APY) is variable and accurate as of April 11, 2024. Rates are subject to change at any time before or after account opening. On Capital One's Secure Website. Member FDIC. | Rate info See Capital One website for most up-to-date rates. Advertised Annual Percentage Yield (APY) is variable and accurate as of April 11, 2024. Rates are subject to change at any time before or after account opening. | |
Rate info 4.25% annual percentage yield as of August 24, 2024 On American Express's Secure Website. Member FDIC. | Rate info 4.25% annual percentage yield as of August 24, 2024 | |
Rate info To ensure you keep getting the highest rate at UFB, you'll need to keep an eye on their rates. Occasionally, the bank launches new accounts with higher rates. Existing accounts need to contact the bank to request being moved to one of these new accounts. On UFB's Secure Website. Member FDIC. | Rate info To ensure you keep getting the highest rate at UFB, you'll need to keep an eye on their rates. Occasionally, the bank launches new accounts with higher rates. Existing accounts need to contact the bank to request being moved to one of these new accounts. |
The Fed's rate moves don't directly impact savings account interest rates in most cases. This is why even though the federal funds rate has increased by more than 5 percentage points since the beginning of 2022, many branch-based savings accounts still pay interest rates in the 0.01%-0.10% ballpark. There is no rule that says a bank must raise or lower interest rates in accordance with what the Fed does.
The interest rates paid by the top online banks tend to track the federal funds rate rather closely. It isn't a coincidence that the current federal funds rate target range is 5.25%-5.50% and the highest-paying savings account on our radar has a 5.31% APY as of this writing. It isn't a perfect relationship, but if the Fed lowered rates by a full percentage point, I would expect banks offering the top online savings accounts to lower their rates by a similar amount.
Finally, interest rates on high-yield savings accounts can change without notice. If the Fed lowers rates, you can be reasonably certain that high-yield savings account rates will fall very soon after.
The point is that if the Federal Reserve lowers the federal funds rate by 2.25 percentage points as the financial markets seem to expect, I expect the highest-yielding online savings accounts to offer interest rates in the 3.00% range. If you have money in savings, the interest payments you receive could start to get significantly smaller.
The bottom line
One big takeaway is that we don't actually know a whole lot about what savings account interest rates will be in 2025. We can use the best information available to make predictions, but it's important to realize that there's no way to know for sure what the Federal Reserve will do -- especially when we're talking about a timeframe of over a year.
Having said that, the most likely direction for savings account interest rates between now and the end of 2025 is lower. If you're worried about income, and there is a portion of your savings that you're unlikely to need anytime soon, it could be a smart idea to shift some of your money into certificates of deposit , or CDs, to lock in today's elevated interest rates while you still can.
Two of our top online savings account picks:
Advertisement | |
Member FDIC. | Member FDIC. |
Our ratings are based on a 5 star scale. 5 stars equals Best. 4 stars equals Excellent. 3 stars equals Good. 2 stars equals Fair. 1 star equals Poor. We want your money to work harder for you. Which is why our ratings are biased toward offers that deliver versatility while cutting out-of-pocket costs. | Our ratings are based on a 5 star scale. 5 stars equals Best. 4 stars equals Excellent. 3 stars equals Good. 2 stars equals Fair. 1 star equals Poor. We want your money to work harder for you. Which is why our ratings are biased toward offers that deliver versatility while cutting out-of-pocket costs. |
On Capital One's Secure Website. | On American Express's Secure Website. |
APY: 4.25% Rate info See Capital One website for most up-to-date rates. Advertised Annual Percentage Yield (APY) is variable and accurate as of April 11, 2024. Rates are subject to change at any time before or after account opening. | APY: 4.25% Rate info 4.25% annual percentage yield as of August 24, 2024 |
Min. to earn APY: $0 | Min. to earn APY: $1 |
Our Research Expert
![how do we research Matt Frankel, CFP®](https://m.foolcdn.com/media/affiliates/original_images/author_avatarsmatt-frankel-cfp_Ur9vpMf_r0kydJe.jpeg?width=128&height=128)
Matt is a Certified Financial Planner™ and investment advisor based in Columbia, South Carolina, and has been writing about personal finance since 2011.
Share this page
We're firm believers in the Golden Rule, which is why editorial opinions are ours alone and have not been previously reviewed, approved, or endorsed by included advertisers. The Ascent, a Motley Fool service, does not cover all offers on the market. The Ascent has a dedicated team of editors and analysts focused on personal finance, and they follow the same set of publishing standards and editorial integrity while maintaining professional separation from the analysts and editors on other Motley Fool brands.
Related Articles
![how do we research Cole Tretheway](https://m.foolcdn.com/media/affiliates/original_images/picofme_-_Cole_Tretheway_OFMtGpe.png?width=128&height=128)
By: Cole Tretheway | Published on June 7, 2024
![how do we research Lyle Daly](https://m.foolcdn.com/media/affiliates/original_images/lyle-daly_y5dJ7I6.jpg?width=128&height=128)
By: Lyle Daly | Published on June 5, 2024
![how do we research Christy Bieber](https://m.foolcdn.com/media/affiliates/original_images/christy-bieber-crop_deoRUNY.jpg?width=128&height=128)
By: Christy Bieber | Published on June 5, 2024
By: Lyle Daly | Published on June 4, 2024
The Ascent is a Motley Fool service that rates and reviews essential products for your everyday money matters.
Copyright © 2018 - 2024 The Ascent. All rights reserved.
- Israel-Gaza War
- War in Ukraine
- US Election
- US & Canada
- UK Politics
- N. Ireland Politics
- Scotland Politics
- Wales Politics
- Latin America
- Middle East
- In Pictures
- Executive Lounge
- Technology of Business
- Women at the Helm
- Future of Business
- Science & Health
- Artificial Intelligence
- AI v the Mind
- Film & TV
- Art & Design
- Entertainment News
- Destinations
- Australia and Pacific
- Caribbean & Bermuda
- Central America
- North America
- South America
- World’s Table
- Culture & Experiences
- The SpeciaList
- Natural Wonders
- Weather & Science
- Climate Solutions
- Sustainable Business
- Green Living
How Raygun made it to the Olympics and divided breaking world
![how do we research how do we research](https://www.bbc.com/bbcx/grey-placeholder.png)
When breaker Rachael Gunn – aka Raygun – bombed out of the Paris Olympics, the shockwaves hit a tiny hip-hop scene on the other side of the world.
In a Sydney warehouse-turned-community centre, breakers warm up with ab exercises that would make a Pilates teacher cry, before taking to the floor with acrobatic moves so intricate you can barely make them out.
It is one of the most important events of the year – a qualifier for the Red Bull BC One World Finals – and the past week weighs heavy.
A few people nervously glance at the handful of cameras lining the dance circle, their minds no doubt flashing to images of Gunn which have set the internet alight.
“I feel like it's just pushed our scene in Australia into the Dark Ages,” Australian hip-hop pioneer Spice told the BBC.
Gunn, a 36-year-old university lecturer, lost all three of her Olympic battles in viral fashion, her green tracksuit and unorthodox routine – which included the sprinkler and kangaroo-inspired hopping – generating waves of memes and abuse.
The fallout has divided and disappointed the Australian breaking community.
“It made a mockery of the Australian scene and I think that's why a lot of us are hurting,” Spice says.
Many have rushed to defend Raygun against the onslaught.
Others are ready to admit there are questions to be answered over her qualification and performance, but say the global bullying has undermined any attempt to fairly analyse what went down in Paris.
Gunn's unlikely beginnings
Gunn was always a dancer - albeit in jazz, tap and ballroom first - but it was her husband and coach Samuel Free that introduced her to the world of breaking when she was 20.
She says it took years to find her place in the male-dominated scene.
“There were times that I would go into the bathroom crying because I was so embarrassed at how terrible I was at this,” she told The Guardian Australia ahead of the Olympics.
Eventually though, Gunn became the face of breaking in Australia – a top-ranked B-girl and an academic with a PhD in the cultural politics of the sport.
And at an Olympics qualifying event in Sydney last October, where 15 women from across Oceania competed, Raygun emerged triumphant and booked her ticket to Paris.
Like Gunn, breaking was perhaps a surprising candidate for the Olympics. Born in the cultural melting pot of the Bronx in the 1970s, the street dance quickly became a global phenomenon.
And in recent years it caught the eye of Olympics chiefs desperate to attract new and younger audiences.
Some argued it didn’t deserve Olympic attention, while others insisted a competition like that could not capture breaking’s essence and would only further divorce the artform from the street culture it came from.
All eyes were on the event in Paris to see if the Olympic Committee’s gamble would pay off.
Hottest topic on the planet
![how do we research Reuters A breaker in action](https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/480/cpsprodpb/cd32/live/deabb720-5c96-11ef-b190-15342701cc9e.jpg.webp)
From the moment the final B-girl battle at the Olympics wrapped up, it was clear that breaking had indeed captured global attention – or, more specifically, Raygun had.
Rumours and criticism of her performance spread like wildfire, particularly online.
Gunn received a torrent of violent messages, and an anonymous petition demanding she apologise was signed by 50,000 people.
She was accused - without evidence - of manipulating her way onto the world’s biggest stage at the expense of other talent in the Australian hip-hop scene.
Some people shared a conspiracy that she had created the governing body which ran the Oceania qualifiers, and a lie that her husband - who is also a prominent breaker and a qualified judge - was on the panel that selected her.
Australian factchecking organisations and AUSBreaking, the national organisation for breaking, quickly tried to correct the record, but that didn’t stop the flood.
Then there were those arguing that she had mocked and appropriated hip-hop culture.
"It just looked like somebody who was toying with the culture and didn't know how culturally significant it was,” Malik Dixon told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
In a series of statements, AUSBreaking stressed that judges were “trained to uphold the highest standards of impartiality” and that not a single person on the nine-person panel for the Oceania qualifiers was Australian.
And while AUSBreaking has had many “interactions” with Raygun since its conception in 2019, at no point has she ever held a leadership position or been involved in “any decision making over events, funding, strategy, judge selection or athlete selection”.
Taking to Instagram to rubbish all the “crackpot theories”, Te Hiiritanga Wepiha - a Kiwi judge on the Oceania qualifying panel - said Raygun won fair and square.
“All us judges talked about how she was going to get smashed, absolutely smashed [at the Olympics]… She knew it was going to be rough, so it's actually courageous of her," Wepiha – also known as Rush – said in a livestream
Some of the country’s most decorated athletes and highest Olympic officials also loudly defended Gunn.
"The petition has stirred up public hatred without any factual basis. It's appalling," the Australian Olympic Committee’s Matt Carroll said.
Gunn herself had previously said she was “never” going to be able to beat her powerful competitors, so had “wanted to move differently, be artistic and creative”.
In a video posted to social media in the eye of the public storm, Gunn added that she had taken the competition “very seriously”.
“I worked my butt off preparing for the Olympics and I gave my all. Truly.”
She had only been trying to “bring some joy”, she said. "I didn't realize that that would also open the door to so much hate, which has frankly been pretty devastating.”
Community split
![how do we research Bek Rushby Spice points to a graffiti art jacket that says Russ](https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/480/cpsprodpb/6f84/live/57977010-5d1a-11ef-851f-05c59070309a.jpg.webp)
Some within the Australian hip-hop community admit the response to Raygun’s routine initially elicited “a chuckle” - but it quickly got out of hand.
Everyone was unequivocal in condemning the sheer volume of abuse, ridicule and misinformation that has targeted Raygun and the broader Australian B-girl community.
But beyond that, the feeling is somewhat split.
Many B-girls say Raygun’s performance does not reflect the standard in Australia.
“When I first saw it, I was so embarrassed,” Spice – who retired from breaking years ago – says.
On any other stage, Raygun would have been encouraged and supported for “having a go”, Spice says, but people representing the country need to be at a certain level. “It’s the Olympics for God's sake!
“In hip-hop we have this thing, you step up or you step off… You need to know your place.”
She stresses, though, that the “bullying is just disgusting” - and many like herself have been reluctant to speak up out of fear of adding to Gunn's anguish.
![how do we research Photography.jny B-girl Tinylock battles in 2022](https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/480/cpsprodpb/95ba/live/68d43e70-5c94-11ef-98e1-11c4cd57c2c5.jpg.webp)
But the impact of the controversy on local Australian B-girls has also been "devastating", Tinylocks told the BBC.
Like some others the BBC spoke to, she did not want her full name published because of the scale of abuse that is circulating.
B-girl’s videos are being trolled, their DMs inundated with insults and violent threats. Young dancers are being harassed at school, and many now feel unsafe practising in public.
"Telling us to be positive and supportive while we are being harmed is unacceptable... [we’re] allowed to be angry,” she said in a statement.
Tinylocks – who herself has battled Raygun – thinks Gunn simply had a terrible day, but says there are questions about her preparation and routine that need answering.
“We know you're capable of more… Were you set up for success?”
According to Wepiha, Gunn's victory in qualifying reflects the size of the “tiny” breaking scene in Australia, and the even tinier public and government support for it.
"I mean, we had to actually get people out of retirement to make up the numbers," he said.
"That's how small the scene is."
Others says there were rules which may have made a small talent pool even shallower – like the requirement that potential qualifiers be a member of AUSBreaking and that they have a valid passport, in line with rules put forward by the World Dance Sport Federation.
AUSBreaking did not respond to the BBC’s queries about Raygun’s selection, the financial support it receives or how it seeks out the country’s best breaking talent.
But Steve Gow, the group’s secretary and long-time b-boy Stevie G, tells the BBC the size and isolation of Australia inhibits the growth and development of the scene.
Being so distant from other, bigger hip-hop communities abroad can make it hard – both in terms of time and money – to learn from them.
“It can be very insular,” he says.
As if proving the point, he regularly pauses to greet almost everyone who walks into the Red Bull competition, which he is judging.
He insists there is still a high quality of breaking in Australia.
![how do we research Red Bull Australia/Ken Leanfore A b-girl competes to qualify for the Red Bull BC One World Final](https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/480/cpsprodpb/a571/live/22cae720-5c95-11ef-98e1-11c4cd57c2c5.jpg.webp)
Ultimately, the community is bitterly hurt by the world’s response.
They feel breaking isn’t truly understood, and that people have piled on without knowledge or context.
“It’s a big disappointment because they’re not talking about the winners… they’re all talking about Raygun’s memes, and they’re not even seeing her full set,” Samson Smith – a member of hip-hop group Justice Crew – told Network 10.
But many hope a silver lining may yet emerge.
"She might actually bring enough attention to get resources,” Wepiha said.
“At the end of the day, Australia has the most famous Olympian of 2024 and she might actually save the scene here."
Long-doubted by Democrats, Kamala Harris faces her biggest political moment
Phone taps, sabotage and an assassination plot: is germany in cold war 2.0, meet the people whose hearts age more slowly.
![how do we research Democratic National Convention (DNC) in Chicago](https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2024/08/2024-08-20T010515Z_1802364784_HP1EK8K01ZN0S_RTRMADP_3_USA-ELECTION-DEMOCRATS-1024x683.jpg)
Samantha Putterman, PolitiFact Samantha Putterman, PolitiFact
Leave your feedback
- Copy URL https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/fact-checking-warnings-from-democrats-about-project-2025-and-donald-trump
Fact-checking warnings from Democrats about Project 2025 and Donald Trump
This fact check originally appeared on PolitiFact .
Project 2025 has a starring role in this week’s Democratic National Convention.
And it was front and center on Night 1.
WATCH: Hauling large copy of Project 2025, Michigan state Sen. McMorrow speaks at 2024 DNC
“This is Project 2025,” Michigan state Sen. Mallory McMorrow, D-Royal Oak, said as she laid a hardbound copy of the 900-page document on the lectern. “Over the next four nights, you are going to hear a lot about what is in this 900-page document. Why? Because this is the Republican blueprint for a second Trump term.”
Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee, has warned Americans about “Trump’s Project 2025” agenda — even though former President Donald Trump doesn’t claim the conservative presidential transition document.
“Donald Trump wants to take our country backward,” Harris said July 23 in Milwaukee. “He and his extreme Project 2025 agenda will weaken the middle class. Like, we know we got to take this seriously, and can you believe they put that thing in writing?”
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, Harris’ running mate, has joined in on the talking point.
“Don’t believe (Trump) when he’s playing dumb about this Project 2025. He knows exactly what it’ll do,” Walz said Aug. 9 in Glendale, Arizona.
Trump’s campaign has worked to build distance from the project, which the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, led with contributions from dozens of conservative groups.
Much of the plan calls for extensive executive-branch overhauls and draws on both long-standing conservative principles, such as tax cuts, and more recent culture war issues. It lays out recommendations for disbanding the Commerce and Education departments, eliminating certain climate protections and consolidating more power to the president.
Project 2025 offers a sweeping vision for a Republican-led executive branch, and some of its policies mirror Trump’s 2024 agenda, But Harris and her presidential campaign have at times gone too far in describing what the project calls for and how closely the plans overlap with Trump’s campaign.
PolitiFact researched Harris’ warnings about how the plan would affect reproductive rights, federal entitlement programs and education, just as we did for President Joe Biden’s Project 2025 rhetoric. Here’s what the project does and doesn’t call for, and how it squares with Trump’s positions.
Are Trump and Project 2025 connected?
To distance himself from Project 2025 amid the Democratic attacks, Trump wrote on Truth Social that he “knows nothing” about it and has “no idea” who is in charge of it. (CNN identified at least 140 former advisers from the Trump administration who have been involved.)
The Heritage Foundation sought contributions from more than 100 conservative organizations for its policy vision for the next Republican presidency, which was published in 2023.
Project 2025 is now winding down some of its policy operations, and director Paul Dans, a former Trump administration official, is stepping down, The Washington Post reported July 30. Trump campaign managers Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita denounced the document.
WATCH: A look at the Project 2025 plan to reshape government and Trump’s links to its authors
However, Project 2025 contributors include a number of high-ranking officials from Trump’s first administration, including former White House adviser Peter Navarro and former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson.
A recently released recording of Russell Vought, a Project 2025 author and the former director of Trump’s Office of Management and Budget, showed Vought saying Trump’s “very supportive of what we do.” He said Trump was only distancing himself because Democrats were making a bogeyman out of the document.
Project 2025 wouldn’t ban abortion outright, but would curtail access
The Harris campaign shared a graphic on X that claimed “Trump’s Project 2025 plan for workers” would “go after birth control and ban abortion nationwide.”
The plan doesn’t call to ban abortion nationwide, though its recommendations could curtail some contraceptives and limit abortion access.
What’s known about Trump’s abortion agenda neither lines up with Harris’ description nor Project 2025’s wish list.
Project 2025 says the Department of Health and Human Services Department should “return to being known as the Department of Life by explicitly rejecting the notion that abortion is health care.”
It recommends that the Food and Drug Administration reverse its 2000 approval of mifepristone, the first pill taken in a two-drug regimen for a medication abortion. Medication is the most common form of abortion in the U.S. — accounting for around 63 percent in 2023.
If mifepristone were to remain approved, Project 2025 recommends new rules, such as cutting its use from 10 weeks into pregnancy to seven. It would have to be provided to patients in person — part of the group’s efforts to limit access to the drug by mail. In June, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a legal challenge to mifepristone’s FDA approval over procedural grounds.
WATCH: Trump’s plans for health care and reproductive rights if he returns to White House The manual also calls for the Justice Department to enforce the 1873 Comstock Act on mifepristone, which bans the mailing of “obscene” materials. Abortion access supporters fear that a strict interpretation of the law could go further to ban mailing the materials used in procedural abortions, such as surgical instruments and equipment.
The plan proposes withholding federal money from states that don’t report to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention how many abortions take place within their borders. The plan also would prohibit abortion providers, such as Planned Parenthood, from receiving Medicaid funds. It also calls for the Department of Health and Human Services to ensure that the training of medical professionals, including doctors and nurses, omits abortion training.
The document says some forms of emergency contraception — particularly Ella, a pill that can be taken within five days of unprotected sex to prevent pregnancy — should be excluded from no-cost coverage. The Affordable Care Act requires most private health insurers to cover recommended preventive services, which involves a range of birth control methods, including emergency contraception.
Trump has recently said states should decide abortion regulations and that he wouldn’t block access to contraceptives. Trump said during his June 27 debate with Biden that he wouldn’t ban mifepristone after the Supreme Court “approved” it. But the court rejected the lawsuit based on standing, not the case’s merits. He has not weighed in on the Comstock Act or said whether he supports it being used to block abortion medication, or other kinds of abortions.
Project 2025 doesn’t call for cutting Social Security, but proposes some changes to Medicare
“When you read (Project 2025),” Harris told a crowd July 23 in Wisconsin, “you will see, Donald Trump intends to cut Social Security and Medicare.”
The Project 2025 document does not call for Social Security cuts. None of its 10 references to Social Security addresses plans for cutting the program.
Harris also misleads about Trump’s Social Security views.
In his earlier campaigns and before he was a politician, Trump said about a half-dozen times that he’s open to major overhauls of Social Security, including cuts and privatization. More recently, in a March 2024 CNBC interview, Trump said of entitlement programs such as Social Security, “There’s a lot you can do in terms of entitlements, in terms of cutting.” However, he quickly walked that statement back, and his CNBC comment stands at odds with essentially everything else Trump has said during the 2024 presidential campaign.
Trump’s campaign website says that not “a single penny” should be cut from Social Security. We rated Harris’ claim that Trump intends to cut Social Security Mostly False.
Project 2025 does propose changes to Medicare, including making Medicare Advantage, the private insurance offering in Medicare, the “default” enrollment option. Unlike Original Medicare, Medicare Advantage plans have provider networks and can also require prior authorization, meaning that the plan can approve or deny certain services. Original Medicare plans don’t have prior authorization requirements.
The manual also calls for repealing health policies enacted under Biden, such as the Inflation Reduction Act. The law enabled Medicare to negotiate with drugmakers for the first time in history, and recently resulted in an agreement with drug companies to lower the prices of 10 expensive prescriptions for Medicare enrollees.
Trump, however, has said repeatedly during the 2024 presidential campaign that he will not cut Medicare.
Project 2025 would eliminate the Education Department, which Trump supports
The Harris campaign said Project 2025 would “eliminate the U.S. Department of Education” — and that’s accurate. Project 2025 says federal education policy “should be limited and, ultimately, the federal Department of Education should be eliminated.” The plan scales back the federal government’s role in education policy and devolves the functions that remain to other agencies.
Aside from eliminating the department, the project also proposes scrapping the Biden administration’s Title IX revision, which prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. It also would let states opt out of federal education programs and calls for passing a federal parents’ bill of rights similar to ones passed in some Republican-led state legislatures.
Republicans, including Trump, have pledged to close the department, which gained its status in 1979 within Democratic President Jimmy Carter’s presidential Cabinet.
In one of his Agenda 47 policy videos, Trump promised to close the department and “to send all education work and needs back to the states.” Eliminating the department would have to go through Congress.
What Project 2025, Trump would do on overtime pay
In the graphic, the Harris campaign says Project 2025 allows “employers to stop paying workers for overtime work.”
The plan doesn’t call for banning overtime wages. It recommends changes to some Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or OSHA, regulations and to overtime rules. Some changes, if enacted, could result in some people losing overtime protections, experts told us.
The document proposes that the Labor Department maintain an overtime threshold “that does not punish businesses in lower-cost regions (e.g., the southeast United States).” This threshold is the amount of money executive, administrative or professional employees need to make for an employer to exempt them from overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
In 2019, the Trump’s administration finalized a rule that expanded overtime pay eligibility to most salaried workers earning less than about $35,568, which it said made about 1.3 million more workers eligible for overtime pay. The Trump-era threshold is high enough to cover most line workers in lower-cost regions, Project 2025 said.
The Biden administration raised that threshold to $43,888 beginning July 1, and that will rise to $58,656 on Jan. 1, 2025. That would grant overtime eligibility to about 4 million workers, the Labor Department said.
It’s unclear how many workers Project 2025’s proposal to return to the Trump-era overtime threshold in some parts of the country would affect, but experts said some would presumably lose the right to overtime wages.
Other overtime proposals in Project 2025’s plan include allowing some workers to choose to accumulate paid time off instead of overtime pay, or to work more hours in one week and fewer in the next, rather than receive overtime.
Trump’s past with overtime pay is complicated. In 2016, the Obama administration said it would raise the overtime to salaried workers earning less than $47,476 a year, about double the exemption level set in 2004 of $23,660 a year.
But when a judge blocked the Obama rule, the Trump administration didn’t challenge the court ruling. Instead it set its own overtime threshold, which raised the amount, but by less than Obama.
Support Provided By: Learn more
Educate your inbox
Subscribe to Here’s the Deal, our politics newsletter for analysis you won’t find anywhere else.
Thank you. Please check your inbox to confirm.
![how do we research how do we research](https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/assets/images/placeholder.jpg)
![](http://serviteca.online/777/templates/cheerup2/res/banner1.gif)
COMMENTS
Learn how to choose a topic, identify a problem, formulate research questions, create a research design, and write a research proposal for your thesis or dissertation. Scribbr offers tips, examples, and resources to help you with each step of the research process.
Start writing the middle, or body, of your paper. Get your ideas down, then see if you need to do any research. Since your introduction and conclusion summarize your paper, it's best to write those last. [8] Include an in-text citation for everything that needs one, even in your initial rough draft.
Judge the scope of the project. Reevaluate the research question based on the nature and extent of information available and the parameters of the research project. Select the most appropriate investigative methods (surveys, interviews, experiments) and research tools (periodical indexes, databases, websites). Plan the research project.
Placing research in the bigger context of its field and where it fits into the scientific process can help people better understand and interpret new findings as they emerge. A single study usually uncovers only a piece of a larger puzzle. Questions about how the world works are often investigated on many different levels.
Writing. Teaches Space Exploration. Teaches Scientific Thinking and Communication. Teaches Conservation. Teaches the Science of Better Sleep. Teaches Science and Problem-Solving. Teaches Mathematical Thinking. Teaches How to Think Like an FBI Profiler. Teaches Electronic Music Production.
How to do research. For research help, use one of the following options: Ask the GTL General Information & Research Help Phone: (607) 735-1862 Research Help Email: [email protected] For help registering a device, password reset and more: EC IT Resources and Services
For the purposes of this guide, it has been broken into six (6) steps: Exploring an Idea. Finding Background Information. Gathering More Information. Locating Current Research. Evaluating your Sources. Citing your Sources. Additionally, the guide also provides information on conducting research in the Humanities, Social Sciences, and Sciences.
Research is the deliberate, purposeful, and systematic gathering of data, information, facts, and/or opinions for the advancement of personal, societal, or overall human knowledge. Based on this definition, we all do research all the time. Most of this research is casual research. Asking friends what they think of different restaurants, looking ...
Abstractspiepr Abs1. Every day people do research as they gather information to learn about something of interest. In the scientific world, however, research means something different than simply gathering information. Scientific research is characterized by its careful planning and observing, by its relentless efforts to understand and explain ...
Research ignites human progress and societal change. In turn, society drives and supports research. The specific role of research in Informatics is discussed. Informatics is driving the current transition towards the new digital society in which we will live in the future. Download chapter PDF.
How to do research. The jump from problem sets to research can be hard. We sometimes see students who ace their classes struggle with their research. In little bites, here is what I think is important for succeeding in research as a graduate student. The first advice can go on a bumper sticker: "Slow down to speed up".
Research is defined as a meticulous and systematic inquiry process designed to explore and unravel specific subjects or issues with precision. This methodical approach encompasses the thorough collection, rigorous analysis, and insightful interpretation of information, aiming to delve deep into the nuances of a chosen field of study.
Do additional research as necessary. Cite your sources. Let's look at each of these steps in more detail. 1. Find a Topic. If you don't have a topic, your research will be undirected and inefficient. You'll spend hours reading dozens of sources, all because you didn't take a few minutes to develop a topic.
Research in the humanities involves different methods such as for example hermeneutics and semiotics. Humanities scholars usually do not search for the ultimate correct answer to a question, but instead, explore the issues and details that surround it. Context is always important, and context can be social, historical, political, cultural, or ...
Research: Where to Begin. Research isn't something that only scientists and professors do. Any time you use sources to investigate claims or reach new conclusions, you are performing research. Research happens in virtually all fields, so it's vitally important to know how to conduct research and navigate through source material regardless of ...
Step 8: Proofread. The final step in the process is to proofread the paper you have created. Read through the text and check for any errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Make sure the sources you used are cited properly. Make sure the message that you want to get across to the reader has been thoroughly stated.
The rational path takes a linear path and deals with questions we need to ask ourselves like: what are some timely topics in my field in the media right now?; what strengths do I bring to the research?; what are the gaps in the research about the area of research interest? (Saunders et al., 2019; Wintersberger & Saunders, 2020).The creative ...
In its simplest form, research is about investigating the world around us to increase our knowledge, so we can work out how to do things better. In health care, we use a scientific approach to carry out research; there is a set way of doing things that ensures research is done in a logical way, and that results are published widely, so that ...
Research methods are specific procedures for collecting and analyzing data. Developing your research methods is an integral part of your research design. When planning your methods, there are two key decisions you will make. First, decide how you will collect data. Your methods depend on what type of data you need to answer your research question:
Research is the careful consideration of study regarding a particular concern or research problem using scientific methods. According to the American sociologist Earl Robert Babbie, "research is a systematic inquiry to describe, explain, predict, and control the observed phenomenon. It involves inductive and deductive methods.".
2. Develop a Research Plan. A roadmap is essential for effective research. Describe your strategy while considering the type of information you require, potential sources, and a rough time frame. You can effectively manage your time by taking this step, which will also give your research structure and keep you on track.
The purpose of research is to further understand the world and to learn how this knowledge can be applied to better everyday life. It is an integral part of problem solving. Although research can take many forms, there are three main purposes of research: Exploratory: Exploratory research is the first research to be conducted around a problem ...
Recent research into exploratory behavior has uncovered interesting similarities between how we navigate physical spaces and how we search for information in our minds [4].
Amid national debates about what schools are teaching, we asked public K-12 teachers, teens and the American public how they see topics related to race, sexual orientation and gender identity playing out in the classroom.. A sizeable share of teachers (41%) say these debates have had a negative impact on their ability to do their job. Just 4% say these debates have had a positive impact, while ...
Additionally, freelancers have the flexibility to set their own work hours. While 77% of freelancers report working consistently, they do so according to schedules that align with their lifestyles, providing a level of work-life balance that traditional employment often lacks. Key reasons people choose to freelance include: Flexibility in schedule.
The Fed's rate moves don't directly impact savings account interest rates in most cases. This is why even though the federal funds rate has increased by more than 5 percentage points since the ...
We talked to two experts at UC Davis Health: Stuart Cohen, the chief of the Division of Infectious Diseases, and Dean Blumberg, the chief of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. They answered common questions about the new COVID-19 vaccine, including when it will be available, who should get the vaccine and why.
How to Improve Your Research Skills: 6 Research Tips. Written by MasterClass. Last updated: Aug 18, 2021 • 3 min read. Whether you're writing a blog post or a short story, you'll likely reach a point in your first draft where you don't have enough information to go forward—and that's where research comes in.
In a series of statements, AUSBreaking stressed that judges were "trained to uphold the highest standards of impartiality" and that not a single person on the nine-person panel for the Oceania ...
PolitiFact researched Harris' warnings about how the plan would affect reproductive rights, federal entitlement programs and education, just as we did for President Joe Biden's Project 2025 ...