The Journal of Law & Economics
The articles contained in the online journals below are available to FSU students, faculty and staff.
These E-journal articles are freely available on the web.
This work is licensed under a . |
The future of law and economics: essays by ten law school scholars, douglas g. baird.
Harry A. Bigelow Distinguished Service Professor of Law
When I was invited to join the faculty in 1980, I came as soon as I could. I feared that all the interesting work in law and economics might be done before I got to Chicago. Among other things, this showed how little I understood law and economics. It concerns itself with how changes in the law change the way people behave. As long as legal scholars have to worry about the consequences that a new law brings, we shall call upon the tools of law and economics. This is not to say, however, that law and economics remains the same.
Three decades ago, law and economics was a rough-and tumble discipline. People were still feeling their way. All presented their arguments with intense passion. Everyone fought for your soul.
Occasionally, you would go to a workshop and see the conventional wisdom in an entire area of the law overturned. But as often, you would see someone swinging for the fences and crash spectacularly. Sometimes an economist would start with an assumption that had the basic legal principle exactly backwards, or someone trained in law would get the economics completely wrong. Only five minutes into the 90-minute seminar, the error would be plain to everyone. Then an awkward silence. At this point, one of my colleagues would take a copy of the draft under discussion, throw it into the air, and say loudly, “Next paper, please!”
Work today is done with greater rigor, and seminars tend to be more civilized affairs. When revolutions succeed, they cease to be revolutions. The days when you could shoot from the hip and sometimes do great work (and more often fail) are gone. Law and economics today requires more discipline and better training.
But opportunities to do great work abound. The future of law and economics turns crucially on whether the next generation can take advantage of the resources available only now.
At its foundation, law and economics is an empirical discipline and always has been. As abstract as the paper might seem, Ronald Coase ’s “Nature of the Firm” paper began as an empirical study. Coase saw himself as laying out the conclusions he reached after spending a year visiting the major production plants throughout the United States.
For a long time, however, the empirical tools in law and economics lagged far behind. It was commonly said that there were only two different types of empirical questions—those you could answer and those worth answering. The future of law and economics is bright in large part because this piece of conventional wisdom is no longer true.
Information is accessible in a way that it has never been before. The PACER system allows us to access every document filed in every federal case from our desktops. Google’s digitization project has put nearly everything ever printed at our fingertips. The Social Science Research Network provides everyone with access to everyone else’s work long before it is published.
Moreover, tools exist today to analyze data that simply have not existed before. Multivariate regressions that required weeks or months of computer programming can be done on every laptop in a few minutes. Statistical techniques are available now that can tease out a few kernels of wheat from an enormous amount of chaff.
Such tools can be abused. Data, if tortured long enough, can be made to say anything. But the biggest danger may lie not so much in getting the wrong answers, but in asking the wrong questions.
Law and economics faces the same challenge that the prospect of a comfortable middle age poses for the most successful. After an exuberant and rebellious youth, it is very easy to fall into a complacent middle age. It is too easy to think it enough to say something new and correct. You also have to worry that you are boring, mechanical, and tendentious.
To avoid this danger, the current generation of law and economics scholars needs to be careful not to rest on technical proficiency. It requires retaining the radical and unconventional spirit that has long been part of law and economics at Chicago. The bright future of law and economics lies in the bold questions that still have not been asked.
Frank and Bernice J. Greenberg, Professor of Law and the Kearney Director of the University of Chicago Institute for Law and Economics
The most prevailing view among those who predict the future of law and economics is that it will become more technical, more rigorous, and more mathematical. Just like its mother discipline, economics.
It is also a misguided view. It predicts, in other words, that law and economics will become less accessible to its core audience, lawyers and policy makers, and will probably lose its relevance to legal practice (and to most of legal academia).
Because so many people believe that this high-tech trend is the inevitable direction of law and economics, let’s briefly understand the logic and the evidence supporting this prediction. The logic is the law of decreasing marginal returns. Having exhausted the pool of basic legal issues that law and economics can illuminate, scholars in the field now need fancy machinery to reach the higher-hanging fruit. Simple intuition will no longer suffice to harvest new discoveries; state-of-the-art social science is necessary.
There is some evidence consistent with the high-tech trend. For a while, law and economics did become more technical and methodologically sophisticated. More people with PhDs in economics were hired to teach in law schools, and some of the leading journals have gravitated towards scholarship written in math, not in English. The economics discipline has become more rigorous and technical, and as the engine of law and economics, it has been pulling the field to the dizzying heights of advanced math and statistics.
While the high-tech trend has been part of the story, I think the future of law and economics lies in increasing its audiences, not its rigor. The field’s meteoric success since its early days in Chicago is a result of the broad appeal it had among those not formally trained in economics. True, sophisticated economists reinforced the foundations of the field by combing through the earlier discoveries and separating the wheat from the chaff. This growing corps of social scientists will continue to refine and make more credible our body of incrementally growing knowledge.
But the future of law and economics is in taking its mature discipline and stock of ideas and exporting them to new frontiers.
The most important new frontier and the greatest challenge to American law and economics is the crossing of international boundaries. Outside the United States, law and economics is a curious esotery, mostly shunned with distaste by the legal community.Major legal transformations and reforms are occurring in many regions around the world, largely lacking the realism and analytics that good old law and economics would fashion. Seasoned scholars and lawyers view law and economics with anachronistic resentment. Young legal minds are intrigued, but are only minimally exposed to the organized tools of the field. Law and economics is beginning to unfold the map of the world, and it is finding vast opportunities for intellectual arbitrage. Chicago—“the headquarter in this area,” as a Chinese colleague echoed the popular image around the world—is already at the forefront of this imperialistic enterprise.
The other big challenge that law and economics has to conquer is to descend from the sterile academic debate and be more successful in informing actual lawmaking and lawyering—in connecting with audiences that have so far remained outside its scope of influence. It is beginning to expand to areas of law that have largely resisted it. I am thinking, for example, of immigration law, education law, local government, and even areas of international and human rights law. Many areas of recent legal reform—health law, food regulation, consumer law, privacy—have major pockets of laws and rules that are ripe for more informed attention from law and economics.
Not that sophisticated tools are unnecessary. On the contrary, more methods and better methods are likely to emerge.We are witnessing a rise of experimental law and economics, of sophisticated behavioral analysis, and of course of a mature empirical methodology examining a plethora of legal topics. But law and economics—Chicago law-and-economics in particular—has maintained a stronghold on American legal academia for over 30 years by being relevant, accessible, and relentless in luring new audiences.
Assistant Professor of Law
Over the last two decades, rational choice methods have advanced our understanding on many key international legal issues, including why states make international law and what type of legal instruments they choose to use. Scholars have also been able to explain when and why states comply, or fail to comply, with international law, as well as the tensions inherent in the establishment of international institutions and their ability to constrain state behavior in a world of increasing integration and mutual reliance.
However, the shifting geopolitical landscape is changing how we think about and model these interactions. The most direct implication this will have for international law and economics scholarship is the change in the number and the identity of countries whose preferences matter in interactions. The geopolitical structure of the world has until recently lent itself to simple models that focus on strategic interactions involving a handful of few key actors—the United States, Europe, and, at times, the former Soviet Union or Japan—while generally ignoring the preferences of the rest of the “developing” economies.
Today’s international sphere features a greater multiplicity of relevant actors. Emerging powers such as China and the other BRIC countries are able to advance, increasingly successfully, a much broader and diverse set of preferences in international interactions. This emergence of these new players with standing in the debate forces us to revisit the basic assumptions about countries’ utility functions that underlie all economic analysis of law.
Our understanding of what is meant by “welfare” becomes more elusive. For example, how does China define its fundamental interests in the international order? How does it trade off pursuit of greater wealth and security with a uniquely Chinese desire for social stability, political control, population management, and certain redistributive policies? The utility functions of many emerging actors are less straightforward than those of traditional liberal market-based democracies, and incorporating these into models of interaction requires more complex analytical frameworks.
This is also true for any public choice analysis. We may continue to assume that all governments seek to maximize their political welfare, but what this entails requires a careful examination of each relevant player’s political system. Thus, the two-level games that capture negotiations taking place simultaneously at the domestic and international levels will call for a more nuanced understanding of what kind of internal pressures different countries with vastly different constitutional systems face.
The heterogeneity characterizing the international system also entails that the pursuit of “grand theories” that can be generalized across countries and issue areas will yield less satisfying insights in the future. To capture the diversity of the strategic interactions, analytical frameworks will be tailored to specific countries and issues involved.
Further, the time and discounting in utility functions of international actors is becoming more difficult to manage. Governments have always struggled to balance their short- and long-term policy objectives, acknowledging the need to temper growth policies with measures that price in the long-term costs and externalities. This intertemporal tension is becoming more acute in issues ranging from aging workforces in both China and the West to energy policy and climate change everywhere. Incorporating these tensions into countries’ preference functions will be vital to understanding optimal legal frameworks.
The increasingly divergent interests among key actors will also raise new questions on how to accomplish mutually beneficial cooperation. Transfer payments will need to evolve to overcome complex collective action problems crucial to global welfare and security. Threats to global order will be more diverse and unpredictable. Economic protectionism will become more subtle and harder to detect under existing WTO frameworks. Multilateral cooperation will become increasingly difficult to achieve as Pareto efficiency will often be unobtainable and much of the bargaining will take place in the second-best world. All of these issues will lead scholars to address more intricate questions on how to design international institutions that can facilitate cooperation in situations where mutual gains may not exist and traditional transfer payment options have been exhausted.
These changes also make the limits of law and economics more pronounced. We are learning that good analytics cannot tell us how states should trade off various goals, but should be used to understand how to optimize across various legal strategies and instruments under various alternative definitions of what welfare maximization entails. Most valuable research will generate and evaluate alternative outcomes based on different possible combinations of preferences, strategic choices, and constraints, exposing the costs and benefits underlying each of these outcomes.
At the heart of these shifts lies the fundamental modeling challenge of balancing complexity and simplicity. The complexity of reality requires a more nuanced understanding of how states form preferences and what drives their behavior. This provides an avenue for richer and deeper, albeit inevitably less certain, insights. At the same time, generating meaningful insights out of the messy reality requires simplicity. Unearthing the very essential of the strategic situation is more important than ever to advance our understanding of the most multifaceted problems of international cooperation. Embracing this tension in a fast-changing global landscape will make international law and economics scholarship an increasingly challenging and, consequently, exciting field for scholars to be working on in the future.
Kirkland & Ellis Professor of Law and Aaron Director Research Scholar
The most distinctive and also troubling trend is the division of law and economics into two subdisciplines—an “economics law and economics” and a “law law and economics.” ELE (as I will call it) will be mathematical and descriptive in orientation. LLE will be verbal and normative in orientation. ELE will be practiced by economists and law professors with economics PhDs; LLE will be practiced by law professors without PhDs. ELE will mainly take place in economics departments. The law professors who engage in ELE will find themselves drawn to economics departments, where workshops and other academic institutions will be more congenial. LLE will take place only in law schools.
Law and economics started out as a collaboration between law professors, who supplied the legal knowledge, and economists, who supplied the economic concepts and the mathematical apparatus. Since then, economic ideas have spread through the law schools (some law professors have PhDs or other training), and economists interested in the law now have easier access to legal materials and a law and economics literature to draw on. Because the two groups depend less on each other for each other’s distinctive expertise, they have less reason to collaborate. Isolated in their subcommunities, their methods, jargons, and orientations will drift apart. Those doing ELE in economics departments will find themselves drawn to the questions and methods that economists in other fields use, while those doing LLE in law schools will find themselves drawn to the questions and methods that other law professors use. And so ELE will become increasingly mathematical and empirical, while LLE will become increasingly normative and doctrinal.
This divergence is already evident.To take one of many examples, economists who study contracts are doing something different from law professors who study contract law. Economists take contract law as a given and analyze how rational agents would design optimal contracts. Lawyers focus on how to design optimal contract law, not contracts. The two groups are aware of each other, but they exert less and less influence over each other.
The divergence is also apparent in certain institutional developments. Law and economics seminars are well established in the top law schools, but in recent years some law professors at those schools have peeled off, forming seminars devoted to more mathematical (ELE) law and economics scholarship. The American Law and Economics Association has become increasingly divided between ELE and LLE factions.There is no real hostility between the factions, to be sure, but LLE types have begun dropping out of the annual meeting as ELE types, who enjoy an advantage in numbers, increasingly take over.
This sort of specialization is inevitable in academic scholarship. It is troubling because both fields will suffer. But it may also portend a reintegration of law and economics (that is, LLE) with other fields in legal scholarship, notably public law, where until recently law and economics has made limited inroads. Today, economic thinking dominates contract, commercial, bankruptcy, antitrust, corporate, and securities law and related fields. It is also influential if not dominant in tort, criminal, and property law and civil procedure. It has made less progress in the major fields of public law, including constitutional, immigration, administrative, and international law. These areas of law are less closely connected with commercial behavior than most of the others, and so the off-the-shelf economic models do not as clearly apply to them. Economists have produced a large political economy literature, but the models in this literature are more controversial and less usable than models of commercial behavior. The main problem is that the models are pitched at the wrong scale—analyzing, for example, the differences between democracy and dictatorship, or parliamentary democracy and presidential democracy, but not the costs and benefits of the legislative veto or the preemption doctrine.
But this is changing. In the last few years, a new generation of law and economics (mostly LLE) scholarship has focused on these fields. Scholars see international law as the product of interaction among self-interested states. They analyze administrative law on the basis of agency models that emphasize the divergence of interest between the principal (such as the president) and the agent (such as the bureaucracy). Constitutional law can also be understood using agency models where the “people” are the principal and the government is the agent. Immigration law can be understood using screening models from the economic literature on labor markets.
In the short to medium term, there will be increasing methodological divergence even as the use of economic ideas spreads to the farthest reaches of the law. How these forces will play themselves out in the long term is beyond the ken of my crystal ball.
William B. Graham Distinguished Service Professor of Law
Twenty-five years ago, as an inexperienced faculty member, I was astounded to hear the leading law and economics scholar at Harvard assert that within a generation the entire faculty of every major law school would hold PhDs in economics. The prediction seemed (and was) outrageous, self-centered, and misguided. Movements in legal education and scholarship produce countervailing forces. More economics begets more philosophy; more interdisciplinary offerings generate practical legal clinics; more clinical education generates more theory; and more theory brings about more courses in business skills. The driving forces behind these developments include the rewards in the academy for novel, or “cutting-edge,” work, reactions from the bar and donors, and the very nature of academic work.
Similar forces operate within law and economics. The current explosion in empirical work, which is hard to overstate, will bring about its own reduction and renewed interest in modeling or in positive theorizing. (I note that these approaches are hardly dormant. A recent symposium on liquidated damages, for instance, was dominated by work that tried to “explain” cases with economic insights. This kind of work has been the bread and butter of law and economics since its inception.) In the course of the next two decades empiricists will surely expand their domain, favoring other empiricists in the hiring process for example, but eventually the forces already mentioned will take hold. There are other reasons to believe that empirical work will not completely dominate. It is more removed than other forms of law and economics from the practice of law; it creates a large divide—as great as that once observed with regard to critical legal studies—between what faculty members wish to write about and what needs to be taught; and, perhaps most important, there are signs that the judges who have been most interested in citing empirical work are being replaced with, or bolstered by, like-minded judges of similar influence.
Empirical work is likely less valuable in law than in medicine or other disciplines. Results are sensitive to context, and empirical findings in one year are often unlikely to hold true in later years. Contexts change because of new laws, demographic changes, education, and a host of other factors. An optimist would say that this explains why volumes of empirical work about important legal subjects do not seem to change hearts and minds. I am referring here to work on gun control and to work on the deterrent effect of long criminal sentences, as well as the death penalty. (There are counterexamples; important empirical work changed minds in corporate law’s race-to-the-bottom debate.) In contrast, though I concede that it is difficult to know what would make for a fair comparison, empirical work in public health regarding tobacco consumption has had a profound effect on beliefs, laws, and everyday behavior—so it is not as if strongly held views cannot be changed by data.
I turn next to two affirmative predictions about the future of law and economics; one pertains to scholarship and the other focuses on legal education. As we globalize, law and economics will turn with enthusiasm to comparative law. Economists are as mesmerized by the rise of China as anyone. They will turn their attention to the reality of remarkable economic growth in the presence of an unfamiliar conception of eminent domain, a near absence of fee simple ownership of real property, and a very different view of the so-called rule of law. Superficially, modern China is a puzzle to conventional law and economics, but economists love puzzles.
Meanwhile, in our law schools, and especially in the elite schools, law and economics will continue to grow in importance, despite the observations about countervailing forces with which I began. This is because we now have a generation of teachers and students familiar with the toolkit of this interdisciplinary field. Law and economics is now mainstream. When there are ten or more faculty members who think, teach, and write in law and economics terms, as there are now at Chicago, Yale, Harvard, NYU, Penn, and other schools, students cannot avoid learning such basic things as present value, cost-benefit analysis, moral hazards, and simple game theory. In turn, these concepts come into play in most classes in the curriculum, rather than in the occasional antitrust or other class where law and economics seems “natural” and might once have seemed properly isolated. Law and economics is now ubiquitous, and every faculty member learns to incorporate its central concepts by virtue of his or her own education, attendance at faculty workshops, and—at Chicago—immersion in roundtable lunches. (At Chicago, unsurprisingly, every faculty member recognizes the basic law and economics moves, and everyone can ask terrific questions at law and economics workshops, for example. That is not true elsewhere.) The same is true for our students; their facility with the language and ideas of economics has grown considerably over the last decade or two.
Law and economics once seemed rebellious. In the leading law schools, that is certainly no longer the case. In the coming twenty years, we will learn whether the movement and methodology is dominated by empirical work, in which case its primary audience may be regulators, or whether it becomes yet more relevant to judges and to practicing lawyers.
Lee and Brena Freeman Professor of Law
The future of law and economics is no different than the future of other applied microeconomics fields such as labor, health, and public economics: better identified empirical work with a solid connection to economic theory.
The questions law and economics asks are of course different than other fields. Our focus is on how and how much legal rules and process (whether imposed by courts or legislatures) affect welfare. Do legal rules affect welfare by controlling transactions costs (think optimal default rules)? Or do they do so simply by eliminating uncertainty and facilitating Coasian trade? Do they produce public goods such as information or take advantage of economies of scale such as with the substitution of police protection for self-protection of property? Or do they do so by redistributing income to those with higher marginal utilities?(1) But the theory we employ to model this behavior has much in common with other applied microeconomics fields.
The theoretical challenge going forward is twofold. First, the field must keep pace with advances in modeling from other fields. This includes advances in game theory (including contract theory and mechanism design), general equilibrium models, and assorted other smaller moves from fields such as industrial organization and finance. Second, theoretical work must be better connected to empirical work. Much of the law and economics scholarship in the first few decades (1965–1995) of the field was theoretical. That can be explained by the lack of technology (computers, storage) with which to conveniently conduct empirical research. In the last decade or so, we have seen an explosion of empirical work in law and economics. Unfortunately it is often unconnected to, or only loosely motivated by, theory. Going forward, theory must focus on generating practically testable predictions, and theory must test these predictions to estimate structural parameters from well-defined theoretical models. This process will ensure that the field stays disciplined and keeps making progress.
On the empirical side, law and economics suffers two problems. First, it is narrow. Too often the focus is merely showing that a legal rule affects some outcome, e.g., a three strikes law affects felonies; personal bankruptcy exemptions affect interest rates; tort reforms increase physician labor supply. Insufficient attention is paid to translating that outcome to welfare. What are the costs of enforcing a three strikes law? Do exemptions have some insurance benefits to be balanced against their effect on interest rates? Does equilibrium physician supply even affect consumer or producer surplus? This can partly be remedied by better connecting empirical work to theory.
Second, empirical law and economics lags behind (as do other fields) labor economics in the skill with which it demonstrates causal connections between legal rules and outcomes. The big problem here is that legal rules are not randomly assigned to populations. They are endogenous, e.g., high crime states tend to pass stricter criminal penalties, states that value insurance generally pass high exemptions, and states faced with physician flight pass tort reforms.
This means that simple correlations between a specific law and outcomes do not imply either that the law caused those outcomes in jurisdictions that already have the law or that the law would similarly cause such outcomes if other jurisdictions adopted that law.
The usual solutions to nonrandom assignment are either to model selection of laws and demonstrate that causal relationship can still be identified or to find instrumental variables (IVs) that causes changes in the law but are otherwise unrelated to the outcome in question. Although we have seen few papers that model both adoption of laws and the effects of those laws, we have seen some neat examples of IVs in use.(2) Hornbeck (2010) uses a technological advance—the invention of barbed wire—to test for the effects of enforceability of property rights on investment and development. Libecap and Lueck (2011) use the allocation of parts of Virginia to Ohio during the US Civil War to study the effects of different methods of drawing property lines (rectangular versus metes and bounds) on economic development.(3)
Even when a legal change is orthogonal to the outcome being studied, other problems frequently arise. One is that the legal change was itself caused by some other legal or non-legal change that is truly responsible for the observed change in outcome, e.g., a state may see a decline in crime after adoption of a truth-in-sentencing law, but the real cause of the change in crime is a move to a more law-and-order political culture that led to both the specific law studied and a more aggressive prosecutorial office. Another problem is that laws are frequently anticipated, especially in open, democratic societies that debate laws before adoption. In this case, a simple comparison of outcomes just before and just after a law is passed may underestimate the effect of the law, e.g., doctors may decide to retire at a lower rate in a state that is likely to adopt a damages cap in future years. Malani and Reif (2011) extend some techniques from macroeconometrics and empirical finance to show how the anticipation problem can be tackled with panel data.
It is essential that law and economics continue to make advances on the theoretical and empirical fronts I have laid out. They are necessary for the field to attract the brightest and talented new researchers and to remain normatively relevant. I am confident, however, that the faculty in residence at the University of Chicago—including the founding generation of Gary Becker , Bill Landes , and Richard Posner , current leaders of the field such as Saul Levmore and Eric Posner , and a new generation that includes Tom Miles and William Hubbard —and the faculty from other schools who have either trained or developed here (a list that includes such stars as Alan Sykes, Richard Craswell, Richard Brooks, Mark Ramseyer, and Stephen Choi) is equal to the task.
References Hornbeck, Richard. 2010. “Barbed Wire: Property Rights and Agricultural Development.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(2):767–810.
Levitt, Steven D. 1996. “The Effect of Prison Population Size on Crime Rates: Evidence from Prison Overcrowding Litigation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(2):319–51
Libecap, Gary, and Dean Lueck. 2011. “The Demarcation of Land and the Role of Coordinating Property Institutions.” Journal of Political Economy, 119(3):426–67.
Malani, Anup, and Julian Reif. 2011. “Accounting for Anticipation Effects: An Application to Medical Malpractice Tort Reform.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 16593.
1. It is questionable whether the last two questions belong to the domain of law and economics. Certainly scholars working in law and economics have tackled these questions, but an argument can be made that law and economics should focus either on reduction of uncertainty and transactions costs or on any value from procedure. The creation of public goods or capturing economies of scale belong to either generic applied microeconomics or defined fields such as public economics.
2. By this I mean instruments for legal change, not legal changes as instruments for nonlegal changes. A great example of the latter is Levitt’s use of prison overcrowding litigation as an instrument for the reduction of prison size.
3. There is also some scope for use of regression discontinuity designs at the borders of jurisdictions with different legal rules. Although communities across the border are exposed to different legal rules, the effect of any one rule can sometimes be identified by looking before and after a change in one particular rule on one side of the border.
Professor of Law and an editor of the Journal of Legal Studies
The University of Chicago economist and Nobel laureate George Stigler famously said that the division of labor is limited by the extent of the market.(1) In the “marketplace” of legal scholarship, law and economics has expanded vigorously and continuously since its emergence as a scholarly field in the 1970s. If this growth continues, Stigler’s aphorism suggests that in the future “labor” in law and economics will become more divided. That is, scholarship in law and economics will become more specialized.
But, will law and economics continue to grow? Or, has it reached a mature phase of stability and perhaps retreat? Both the supply and demand sides of the academic market portend continued growth of law and economics. On the supply side, law itself continues to expand its reach and complexity, presenting new questions requiring scholarly analysis. Many legal changes, such as the new financial regulations, seem naturally suited to economic analysis because they involve markets. Other subjects not involving explicit markets appear at first blush to be ill matched to economic analysis, but precisely because an economic perspective is novel, there are opportunities to make intellectual contributions.
On the demand side, a steady flow of new legal scholars is eager to employ the tools of economic analysis. Some of these scholars are PhD-trained economists who see law schools as an intellectual home because many economics departments have increasingly turned toward abstract theory and away from a nuanced study of institutions. A new cadre of political science PhDs is applying rational choice analysis (which is the essence of the economic approach) to topics in public law that until now have largely escaped the attention of law and economics scholars. For some young professors with more standard backgrounds in law (a JD, then clerkship and a stint in practice), economics is a preferred mode of analysis, and for others, many economic concepts are now a standard part of the legal academic’s analytical toolkit.
As law and economics continues to grow, it will become more specialized, according to the Stiglerian view. When a market is small, a producer must be a jack-of-all-trades, but when it is large, a narrow focus can earn high returns. Also, the acquisition of knowledge incurs a fixed cost, and once acquired, it is efficient to utilize the knowledge as much as possible. This implies that future scholars of law and economics are less likely to be generalists who hopscotch across legal fields applying economics with a broad brush. Instead, they are likely to focus on a limited number of related legal fields, say corporate and securities, and to use economics to understand their legal and institutional intricacies.
The methodological specialization occurring in economics departments reinforces this trend.With few exceptions, graduate students choose relatively early to become theorists (who write formal mathematical models of economic behavior) or empiricists (who test economic predictions against data). Just as PhDs in economics departments specialize in one of these methodologies, so too PhD/JDs in law and economics increasingly devote themselves to a single methodology.
The first decades of law and economics illustrate this pattern. Theoretical contributions dominated the first generation of law and economics.(2) Early theoretical models typically showed how under full information, rational decision making subject to resource constraints could yield efficient outcomes. The next wave of scholarship demonstrated how the introduction of a friction or market failure could qualify this conclusion. With these foundations in place, today’s theorists face a harder challenge. To make a contribution, they must explore the interaction of multiple frictions, increasing the complexity and sophistication of their mathematical models. Expertise has become a necessity.
In the past decade, empirical scholarship in law and economics has surged.With a saturation of theory, evidence confirming or refuting the theoretical predictions was needed. A technological shock also spurred empiricism. Innovations in computing and the rise of the Internet have dramatically lowered the cost of assembling large datasets and conducting statistical analyses. By its nature, empirical work is already relatively specialized, and it is likely to compose a greater share of law and economics scholarship in the future.
For many of us connected to the University of Chicago Law School, the prospect of scholarship becoming ever narrower and deeper is troubling. A great feature of the Law School has historically been its peripatetic intellectualism. More so than in other schools, our faculty teach and write in multiple legal fields, and this has been especially true of our law and economics faculty. The trend toward specialization seemingly presents a risk that single-minded hedgehogs burrowed in their own specialties will replace the nimble and wide-ranging foxes of our faculty. Is the narrowing of law and economics scholarship unstoppable?
Perhaps not. Two other University of Chicago economists, Gary S. Becker (also a Nobel laureate) and Kevin M.Murphy , identified in a 1992 article an important counterweight to specialization: coordination costs.(3) Coordination, the task of combining specialized knowledge, becomes more costly (which is to say, more valuable) as the number of specialties rises. Professors Becker and Murphy presciently noted in 1992, “Economists and lawyers working on the relation between law and economics can coordinate their research, but coordination costs are reduced when economists also become lawyers or lawyers also become economists, as with the increasing number of persons who take advanced degrees in both law and economics.”(4) The increase in PhD-JDs that professors Becker and Murphy predicted has occurred, and Chicago itself has produced a fair number of these new academics.
But, as the richness of law and economics scholarship grows, even a person possessing a PhD and a JD may lack the expertise needed to make a contribution. In Professors Becker and Murphy’s words, “limited human capacities tend to make it harder to pack more knowledge into a person without running into diminishing returns.”(5) A solution is to collaborate with another scholar. In a recent study, my colleague Professor Tom Ginsburg and I found that articles containing technical models or empirical studies have in the past twenty years come to compose nearly all of the articles appearing in The Journal of Legal Studies—a marquee journal in law and economics that the Law School has published since 1972 and a bellwether of scholarship in the field.We also found that these articles were far more likely to be coauthored rather than single-authored.(6) These trends suggest that the need for collaboration will prevent law and economics scholars, including those at Chicago, from laboring in isolation in their particular bailiwicks and will prompt them to immerse themselves in the ideas and work of their colleagues. More growth, more specialization, and more collaboration will mark the future of law and economics at Chicago.
1 George Stigler, The Division of Labor Is Limited by the Extent of the Market, 59 J. Pol.Econ. 185 (1951) (drawing on Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations [1776]).
2 A rare exception is Chicago’s Professor William M. Landes, who in addition to many theoretical contributions produced several early and influential empirical works.
3 Gary S. Becker and Kevin M. Murphy, The Division of Labor, Coordination Costs, and Knowledge, 107 Q.J.Econ. 1137 (1992).
4 Becker and Murphy, at 1143.
5 Becker and Murphy, at 1150.
6 Tom Ginsburg and Thomas J. Miles, Empiricism and the Rising Incidence of Co-authorship in Law, 2011 U.Ill.L.Rev . 101 (forthcoming).
Walter J. Blum Professor of Law and Senior Fellow, the Computation Institute of the University of Chicago and Argonne National Laboratory
It is perilous to predict the future. Twenty years from now, perhaps at my retirement party, we can pull out this essay and laugh at how ridiculous my predictions were. Worse, the person who gets it right will be celebrated as visionary even if their predictions were right purely by chance. I might as well buy a lottery ticket—if I lose, well, most predictions are wrong anyway, and if I win, I’ll claim it was vision and not luck.
Looking back 20 years, law and economics looked much as it does today. Today we have more economics PhDs, particularly scholars with joint degrees. The field is more empirical and the empirics are more sophisticated. It covers more areas of legal scholarship. But someone time traveling from 20 years ago into a law school today would not notice a lot of difference in the type of work being done.
The easiest prediction, then, is that the trends will continue. We will see more integration with economics departments, more professionalization of the field, better econometric techniques, and expansion into new areas and new legal problems. But things will pretty much continue as they are.
That is my safe bet, and it would not be a bad future. Let me venture out onto a limb, or more likely a twig, and say where I would like things to go and, perhaps being optimistic, where things will go. Law and economics developed as the study of the traditional first-year law school issues of torts, contracts, property, criminal law, and procedure. These are the first-year law school courses because they are the building blocks of other areas of law. It was a smart place to start.
The central problems facing society today, however, go well beyond these building blocks. They are highly complex, structural problems, and knowledge of the building blocks will not be sufficient for addressing them. If we were to list some of the central problems or areas of law facing us today, we would list areas like banking and finance, poverty and inequality, development, education, health care, and energy and the environment.
Studying these fields requires a somewhat different set of tools than most law and economics scholars are currently equipped with. Scholars need a deep understanding of the building blocks, but they also need to understand the institutional, economic, statutory, and political structures of these problems. Because of their complexity, the techniques we use to study them might be different. We will far more likely to have to work with experts in these fields. Coauthorship with people from other parts of campus may need to become the norm. Models will have to be more complex. Data requirements will be greater. The problems involve less law, in the sense of what courts do, and more policy, in the sense that statutes and legislatures will be central. There are, of course, people currently working in these areas equipped with all of these tools, but their numbers are limited. If law schools want to contribute to the great problems of the day, scholarship will have to move in this direction.
Let me illustrate with current a project of mine that maybe indicates this trend. (Perhaps this indicates that I can’t see beyond the tip of my nose, because this is my current work. What I’m working on is, of course, indicative of future trends . . . ) The question I wished to address involves climate change: there is strong international pressure for developed countries to start reducing emissions prior to any commitment from developing countries. Developed countries worry, however, that doing so will simply cause energy-intensive production to move abroad. We want to know the parameters of this issue—does it make sense for the developed countries to act alone, and what sort of legal rules might limit the bad side effects?
This problem cannot be understood with conventional techniques. Hard thinking and analytic models can give a sense of the direction but not the size or scope of the problem. Standard econometric techniques are not helpful because the predictions involve situations far from our experience. The solution we (my coauthors and I) turned to was large-scale computation. We simulate the problem with a computational model that allows us to run experiments with different policies to see their effects. It is necessarily interdisciplinary; I have coauthors from a variety of university departments.We are using computers at Argonne National Laboratories to run the model.
There are many criticisms and problems. Computation is not common in economics, not to speak of law and economics. Computational models are hard to understand. The data are uncertain. Results can depend on the model structure, which is driven in part by the modeler’s choices rather than empirics. Subtle and nonobvious changes to the model, such as particular solution algorithms, can change outcomes. There are also solutions. To avoid creating a black box, we use an analytic model to develop economic intuitions that are then tested in the big computer model. The code is open source so that anyone may run it; we also are making simplified versions of the model and code available to help users understand the modeling approach.We use the model to replicate prior studies so that differences in our results and other studies can be understood. To address uncertainty, we engage in a variety of robustness checks, including but not limited to studies of the sensitivity of the results to parameter and model-structure variation.
It is a very different view of legal analysis—it views problems as engineering problems that we model and test. It is empirical, practical, and solution-driven. The role of the legal scholar is to help frame problems, to think about how institutional structures affect the framing, to suggest solutions, and to help interpret and evaluate results.
I don’t think computation will become mainstream, although I hope it becomes more common. But interdisciplinary scholarship of this sort, where law and economics scholars work with experts in related fields to think about and devise solutions for the most important problems we face, is one possible future, and one I hope we move toward. It would require a huge shift in the type of things legal scholars do and are able to do. But to address big, structural problems, there is no choice. So there is my lottery ticket, although I would still take the safe bet.
POSNER: The future of an evolving academic field belongs to the young. They know what their elders know, and their careers depend on their being able to build on existing knowledge in creative ways. The old are likely to be in a defensive crouch, fearing that the young will build their careers in part on rejecting, or at best superseding, the work of their elders. So, in reading what follows: caveat emptor.
The modern field of “law and economics” (that is, of economic analysis of law) dates from the 1960s. Until then, Jeremy Bentham’s economic analysis of criminal law having been forgotten, economics was thought relevant to only a few fields of law, all commercial—antitrust law, public utility and common carrier regulation, and tax law. By the end of the 1960s, as a result of articles (and the occasional book) by William Baxter, Gary Becker, Guido Calabresi, Ronald Coase, Harold Demsetz,William Landes, Henry Manne, and others, economics was understood to be relevant to the entire domain of the law—relevant both to understanding the law (positive analysis) and to reforming it (normative analysis).
That was half a century ago. In the intervening period the evolution of law and economics has been shaped by a number of forces: the increased mathematization of economics (including advances in techniques of statistical analysis); the increased availability of statistical data usable in empirical analyses utilizing the latest statistical techniques, as a result of the computer revolution; the broadening of the scope of economics both conceptually (as in the rise of game theory and the advent of behavioral economics—the invasion of economics by psychology) and in the areas of human activity that are studied by economists (marriage and divorce, for example); the increased size and “academification” of the legal professoriat; and, related to a number of these developments, increased specialization of academic law.
The early contributors to the field of law and economics were economists and lawyers—not lawyer-economists—and they tended to write across legal domains. So Becker, for example, studied both racial discrimination and criminal law enforcement, and Coase both tort law and communications regulation, and Baxter both patent law and environmental law. Very little of the work of this early period was either mathematical or statistical (or empirical at all). But beginning in the 1970s economists such as Steven Shavell built increasingly sophisticated mathematical models of legal phenomena. It began to be felt that legal training alone would not enable a lawyer to do sophisticated economic analysis of law, and so economic analysis of law increasingly became the province of law professors who had a PhD in economics, as well as of economists specializing in the application of economics to law who did not have a law degree.
During the 1970s, economic analysis of law began to permeate legal teaching as well as scholarship, and economic consultants and expert witnesses became fixtures of commercial litigation in a variety of fields—in part because lawyers were learning in law school how economics could be used in legal analysis. Most of these consultants and witnesses were not and are not economic analysts of law, but rather analysts of business practices challenged in litigation.
The trend toward increased economic sophistication in the 1970s, which has continued ever since, has had a side effect of increasing the separation between academic economic analysis of law and the practice of law. The two-degree scholars generally don’t have time to engage in law practice to any significant extent (often no more than a one-year clerkship with a judge) before beginning their academic careers. The increased formalization of economics makes it difficult for lawyers who do not have training in economics to collaborate with economists or lawyer-economists. Increasingly, economic analysts of law write for each other, in specialized journals, rather than for the larger profession. Increasingly, indeed, they write not for economic analysts of law as a whole but for economic analysts of the writer’s subspecialty. The expansion of a field leads to the multiplication of its subspecialties.
These developments have increased, and will continue to increase, the rigor of economic analysis of law. The search for new worlds to conquer that is a hallmark of a progressive research program has already paid off. One example is increased attention to the economics of foreign and international law and, concomitantly, increased exploitation of the opportunities that cross-country comparison provides for empirical study. Another example is the empirical study of judicial behavior, where insights from labor economics and the economics of organizations are being used to interpret the large quantities of statistical data that are available (or readily obtainable) concerning the activities of courts and judges.
But the gap between academic law and economics and the law as it is practiced and administered and created and applied is troublesome. Economic analysis of law has intrinsic intellectual interest (like jurisprudence) and is an invaluable component of a modern legal education, but one would also like to see it contribute to the solution of legal problems and the reform of our costly and cumbersome legal institutions. And for that the economic analyst needs to understand law from the inside, which no one, however bright, can do without legal experience (though it might be acquired, on the side as it were, after one had begun an academic career) as well as legal training, for law is like a foreign language. And to avoid the amateurishness of underspecialization, there is a pressing need for greater collaboration between law professors with real legal experience and economists or lawyer-economists who have the analytic tools but not the insider’s understanding of the law in action and in its manifold institutional forms.
There is also need for economic analysts of law, whether they are lawyers or economists or lawyer-economists, to interact with, and sometimes collaborate with, economists in economic departments and business schools who may be interested in law and may have special economic skills to bring to its study, an example being Andrei Shleifer of the Harvard economics department.
The limited amount of such interaction and collaboration is reflected in the slow reaction of economic analysts of law to the financial crash of September 2008 and the ensuing downward spiral of the economy. The legal profession was deeply involved in the creation of the complex financial instruments that crashed and, of course, in the creation, un-creation, and administration of the regulatory laws and institutions governing finance. Yet about these instruments and practices and regulations—the Federal Reserve Act, for example, or the debt ceiling, or the eurozone—economic analysts of law have been largely silent (though not entirely—think of Lucian Bebchuk at Harvard Law School and the finance group at Columbia Law School), even though the economic crisis is about to enter its fourth year (fifth, if we count from December 2007, when GDP first began to dip).
Predictions of the future are almost always just extrapolations. I will conclude in that vein. I expect economic analysis of law to grow in rigor, expand in scope, and becoming increasingly empirical as statistical databases become ever easier to create and analyze. Up to now the ratio of theoretical to empirical economic analysis of law has been very high, in part because theoretical papers can be produced much more quickly than empirical studies, and (unfortunately) number of papers published is given undue weight in hiring and tenure decisions. That is a concern and another (which is related however to reluctance to undertake empirical studies) is that economic analysis of law may lose influence by becoming too esoteric, too narrow, too hermetic, too out of touch with the practices and institutions that it studies. BECKER: Posner gives an excellent discussion of the evolution of the field of law and economics, with the glaring omission of his own monumental contributions that fundamentally helped define the approaches, techniques, and scope of this field. I will go over some of the same ground as he does on its evolution and likely future, and I will also add brief comments on the emerging and exciting subfield of macro law and economics.
The first stage of research on law and economics was mainly theoretical. Economists and lawyers used and adapted concepts and analysis from economics to show that legal rules and doctrines often had a clear economic rationale, and to show how these concepts illuminated how laws and legal systems affect behavior and the efficiency of economic outcomes. These early studies had an enormous influence on how some lawyers and economists began to think about property, contracts, negotiations, trials and settlements, torts, antitrust, corporations and securities, crime, racial and gender discrimination, and other areas of the law. Yet it took a while for these ideas to spread into law schools since academic and other lawyers initially had little exposure to the economic way of thinking. Partly for this reason, considerable opposition developed to many of the ideas espoused by the economists and other pioneers in law and economics. Gradually, however, opposition weakened (although it has not disappeared) as newer generations of lawyers became better qualified to appreciate and evaluate the contributions of this new field.
At the same time, the gain from mainly arbitraging theoretical ideas from economics into the field of law began to lose steam. This was in good part because the early contributions were mainly theoretical, with only occasional support from legal cases, and with still less frequent support from quantitative analysis. Theory alone cannot keep a field vibrant, although it can substantially shift the approaches to different issues.
No field that deals with human behavior has ever remained exciting and innovative by relying on theoretical ideas alone, no matter how valuable these ideas are. A vibrant and creative field requires a continual dialogue between theory and evidence from the real world that not only helps test existing theories, but also suggests new theories that can then also be tested and extended, or rejected.
Fortunately, as the first theoretical stage was slowing down, perhaps because opportunities to arbitrage economic ideas into law were shrinking, a second stage began that collected and analyzed quantitative data. This quantitative approach uses statistical techniques also drawn mainly from economics to analyze antitrust cases, contracts, litigation, intellectual property, divorce, crime, discrimination, and many other areas of the law. Quantitative analysis has become one of the most exciting frontiers in law and economics, since extensive legal data exists, often in rudimentary forms. These data can test, discard, or help in the reformulation of the theories on the effects of laws and legal rulings on behavior.
Most participants in any field, including law and economics, specialize. Some are mainly theorists, while others are mainly empiricists. For a field to remain relevant, however, many researchers must be both, relating theories to real world data. Otherwise, theories become sterile as theorists mainly discuss what other theorists said, and empiricists become mainly number crunchers, with little effort to interpret the data in other than ad hoc ways.
This is why I believe an exciting further development in law and economics will involve extensive interactions between theory and empirical analysis. Some lawyers will cooperate with economists, but even then it would be valuable for the lawyers to acquire not only the rudiments of economic theory, but also basic econometric and other techniques for analyzing data. Economists involved in this research should also acquire some knowledge of legal opinions and how legal systems operate. Indeed, a growing number of individuals with both a law degree and a PhD in economics are beginning to bridge this gap.
The great majority of research in law and economics has been at the “micro” level in the sense of considering the behavior of parties to contracts, torts, crime, and other individual and business behavior. This research has been fundamental, but a newer and also important research focus considers the interactions between legal systems and the macro economy. This research, pioneered by economists Acemoglu and Andrei Shleifer, among others, analyzes the connections between legal systems and long-term rates of growth, the degree of economic inequality, aggregate investments, and other macroeconomic variables. To a lesser extent, this burgeoning literature also analyzes how macroeconomic developments affect the evolution of legal systems.
Scarcity of data often limits how much can be achieved empirically in understanding the macro interactions between laws and economics, although the creation of long time series for many countries on relevant legal and economic variables is widening the database. I expect the macro interaction between law and economics to become another major frontier as the discipline of law and economics pushes its boundaries and insights into uncharted territories.
1. Becker thanks William Landes and William Hubbard for helpful comments; Posner thanks Landes for helpful comments.
The choice of economic research topics depends on the topic that students want to study. You can write about microeconomic or macroeconomic factors, or describe the current problems of countries and individual enterprises. There are also many interesting sections on agriculture, industry and foreign economic relations.
In any case, economics topics are a chance to consider the main nuances of international countries' success or the peculiarities of a particular region's economy. Such studies require not only the search for reliable sources of information but also the authoritative research of economists. This will help you use the valuable economics papers topics in the context of your research activities.
After you have considered all economics research paper topics, you can proceed to the stage of preparation. It is worth taking real research, facts, and statistics as a basis. However, you need to be original and make your emphases in your research paper.
In some cases, you need the advice of experienced educators or watch interviews with the world's leading economists. Sometimes you can change the subject if you think you can't cope with the task at hand. There is nothing shameful about that.
After you do your research and empirical calculations, you can collect a scientific database and prepare a draft version. Once it's finished, you can clean up your materials and create a tentative bibliography. It is important in the context of the study of the chosen topic.
There is also a need to create strong theses and a definite purpose for your research work. You should answer the basic questions in your research paper that address a specific problem and its solution. Also, do not forget about the formatting that is relevant to your school. Economics research topics list lets you choose what works best for you.
Such research paper topics in economics are especially relevant because they allow us to consider the global processes of the financial well-being of many countries and the world trade. Students can prepare expert papers based on many studies and get high marks for considering microeconomic effects.
Choosing the economics thesis topic, you must be ready to consider the main issues of macroeconomics in the context of a particular state, company, or individual organization. This is a good example of how you can choose a narrow direction to study certain economic environment factors and relationships.
The choice of economics research topics for undergraduates may be related to the student's desire to study certain historical spheres of influence of countries and the moments of their formation on the world stage. It is also a good opportunity to study world trade and foreign economic research. A historical topic allows you to consider the structure of galloping inflation in developing countries and to study in detail the specifics of economic stagnation.
International trade is a good option to write a research paper. The fact is that this section includes many historical and current aspects of the interaction between countries and individual organizations. Such economic research paper topics are very popular among students because everyone can find reliable information and verified facts.
Environmental economics is full of interesting areas for your research papers. In particular, this applies to different countries and continents. Using economics term paper topics, you can create truly expert material that will get a high mark. A significant advantage is the relevance of the topic and many scientific studies that you can use as a basis.
Behavioral economics structures knowledge about many aspects of the interaction of countries and individual nations. You can use existing scientific research to trace people's behavioral patterns that affect the unemployment rate, fluctuations in the currency exchange, and other nuances. It is worth noting that economics research topics are very relevant in modern times since the information space contributes to the regular change in behavioral factors.
Choosing such economics research topics for students, you can rely on many countries' legal framework and the relationship with economic sectors. This will be especially interesting in the context of the United States or any other large state that conducts foreign trade and affects certain moments in the world. Legislation has a ton of interesting facts that you can explore in your paperwork.
Such a topic allows you to explore the nuances of labor law, taxation, and the reasons for demonstration in disadvantaged countries. This format allows you to maximize economic research geography and consider the main nuances of economic crises or new rounds of development.
Sometimes basic topics for economic research papers can be much better than narrow learning segments. The fact is that choosing such a free topic does not limit you to certain aspects, and you can consider the nuances of the economy in a broad sense. For example, your custom research paper may be about foreign trade, the risks of economic stagnation, or other nuances that apply to many countries.
Such a list cannot be attributed to a specific segment or division of the economy. You can choose this option if you have no idea at all about what your research paper should look like. In fact, it allows you to prepare and get a good grade without taking too long practical research. So, you can check these economic research paper topics ideas.
You should adhere to all the technical guidelines and requirements of your high school or college. Don't forget about the formatting and proper structure of your research papers. You should browse the Internet and head to your local library to find the information you need as a basis for future research. It is worth noting that not all economic topics for research papers can be found quickly in printed books.
Sometimes it is better to search for reputable scientific papers on the Internet, as this reduces the preparation time. Next, you need to make a plan, a strong introduction, and a clear message along with the main message you want to convey in your research paper. You should also rely on facts and figures to get a good estimate. Unfortunately, choosing a good economics essay topic is not always associated with a successful completion.
If you can't do it on your own, then it is easier and more profitable for students to delegate work to someone else. Our company can help any person who is in a difficult situation and cannot cope with the research paper on their own. Our team of specialists has enough experience to prepare a high-quality paper for you.
Constitutional law research paper topics.
Criminology research paper topics, cybercrime research paper topics, terrorism research paper topics, police brutality research paper topics.
List of research paper topics related to law and criminal justice.
Now you are familiar with our categories, let’s start with our research paper questions and topics list.
If you choose this category, you can pick a topic associated with hate crime, gender and crime, domestic violence, cultural criminology, mental illness and crime, and many more.
1. Topic: The Impact of Social Media on Criminal Behavior
Research Question: How has social media influenced criminal behavior and law enforcement practices? Overview: Explore the ways social media platforms have been used to both commit and solve crimes. Investigate specific cases and analyze law enforcement’s adaptation to these changes.
2. Topic: The Role of AI in Predictive Policing
Research Question: What are the benefits and ethical concerns of using artificial intelligence in predictive policing? Overview: Examine the use of AI algorithms in forecasting criminal activities. Discuss successful implementations, potential biases, and ethical implications.
3. Topic: Rehabilitation vs. Punishment: Which Works Better?
Research Question: Is rehabilitation more effective than punishment in reducing recidivism rates? Overview: Compare and contrast different criminal justice systems that emphasize rehabilitation over punishment. Analyze data on recidivism rates to determine effectiveness.
4. Topic: Racial Disparities in the Criminal Justice System
Research Question: How do racial disparities manifest in the criminal justice system, and what are the potential solutions? Overview: Investigate the presence of racial bias in arrests, sentencing, and incarceration. Propose policy changes based on successful models from various jurisdictions.
5. Topic: Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Challenges
Research Question: What challenges do law enforcement agencies face in combating cybercrime? Overview: Explore the evolving nature of cybercrime, including types of cybercrimes and the difficulties in tracking and prosecuting offenders.
6. Topic: The Effectiveness of Body-Worn Cameras in Policing
Research Question: Do body-worn cameras reduce instances of police misconduct and improve accountability? Overview: Analyze studies and data on the impact of body-worn cameras on police behavior and community relations. Discuss potential privacy concerns.
7. Topic: Mental Health and the Criminal Justice System
Research Question: How does the criminal justice system address the needs of individuals with mental health issues? Overview: Examine programs and policies aimed at supporting mentally ill offenders. Assess the effectiveness of mental health courts and diversion programs.
8. Topic: The Influence of Forensic Science on Criminal Investigations
Research Question: How has the advancement in forensic science techniques impacted criminal investigations and case outcomes? Overview: Discuss the role of DNA analysis, fingerprinting, and other forensic methods in solving crimes. Highlight landmark cases that were influenced by forensic evidence.
9. Topic: Juvenile Justice: Rehabilitation or Incarceration?
Research Question: What are the most effective approaches for handling juvenile offenders? Overview: Compare rehabilitation programs and traditional incarceration for juvenile offenders. Assess long-term outcomes for each approach.
10. Topic: The War on Drugs: Successes and Failures
Research Question: Has the War on Drugs been effective in reducing drug-related crimes and substance abuse? Overview: Evaluate the history, policies, and outcomes of the War on Drugs. Discuss alternative approaches such as decriminalization and harm reduction.
11. Topic: Human Trafficking: Prevention and Prosecution
Research Question: What are the most effective strategies for preventing and prosecuting human trafficking? Overview: Investigate the global and local efforts to combat human trafficking. Highlight successful prevention programs and legal frameworks.
12. Topic: Police Use of Force: Policy and Practice
Research Question: How do different policies regarding the use of force impact police behavior and community trust? Overview: Examine case studies of police use of force incidents. Discuss policy reforms and their effectiveness in reducing excessive use of force.
13. Topic: The Privatization of Prisons: Pros and Cons
Research Question: What are the impacts of privatizing prisons on the criminal justice system and inmate outcomes? Overview: Analyze the arguments for and against private prisons. Assess data on cost-effectiveness, inmate treatment, and recidivism rates.
14. Topic: Domestic Violence: Legal Responses and Victim Support
Research Question: How effective are current legal responses and support systems for victims of domestic violence? Overview: Review the laws and policies aimed at addressing domestic violence. Evaluate the effectiveness of shelters, counseling services, and legal protections for victims.
15. Topic: The Death Penalty: Deterrent or Obsolete?
Research Question: Is the death penalty an effective deterrent to crime, or should it be abolished? Overview: Examine the arguments for and against the death penalty. Analyze data on its deterrent effect and discuss alternative forms of punishment.
For those of you who are working on law coursework, we have awesome news. We have a great team of experienced law coursework writers who can handle almost any task.
Here, you can write about constitutional interpretation and judicial review, constitutions and religious freedom, crime and drugs connection, transgender rights and legal recognition, laws on capital punishment, etc.
1. Topic: The Impact of the First Amendment in the Digital Age
Research Question: How has the interpretation of the First Amendment evolved in response to digital communication and social media? Overview: Analyze how courts have addressed freedom of speech issues related to social media, internet censorship, and online expression. Include case studies and legal precedents.
2. Topic: The Second Amendment and Gun Control Legislation
Research Question: What are the constitutional challenges to recent gun control measures in the United States? Overview: Explore the legal debates surrounding the Second Amendment and various state and federal gun control laws. Assess key Supreme Court rulings and their implications.
3. Topic: The Right to Privacy in the Age of Surveillance
Research Question: How has the concept of the right to privacy been affected by government surveillance programs? Overview: Investigate the balance between national security and individual privacy rights. Examine key cases like Edward Snowden’s revelations and the implications for constitutional law.
4. Topic: The Role of Judicial Review in Modern Democracy
Research Question: How does judicial review shape the balance of power between the branches of government? Overview: Discuss the origins and evolution of judicial review. Analyze significant Supreme Court cases that have defined its role in American democracy.
5. Topic: Constitutional Challenges to Immigration Policy
Research Question: What constitutional issues arise from recent changes in U.S. immigration policy? Overview: Examine the legal battles over executive orders and legislative actions on immigration. Discuss the implications for due process and equal protection under the law.
6. Topic: The Erosion of Voting Rights in the United States
Research Question: How have recent legislative changes affected the protection of voting rights under the Constitution? Overview: Analyze the impact of laws like the Voting Rights Act and recent Supreme Court decisions. Discuss the effects on voter suppression and electoral integrity.
7. Topic: The Evolution of Equal Protection Under the Fourteenth Amendment
Research Question: How has the interpretation of the Equal Protection Clause changed over time? Overview: Explore landmark cases that have shaped the understanding of equal protection, including Brown v. Board of Education and Obergefell v. Hodges. Discuss current issues related to race, gender, and sexual orientation.
8. Topic: The Balance Between Religious Freedom and Anti-Discrimination Laws
Research Question: How do courts balance religious freedom with anti-discrimination protections? Overview: Investigate cases where religious beliefs conflict with anti-discrimination laws, such as in employment and public services. Analyze the legal reasoning and constitutional implications.
9. Topic: The Constitutionality of Executive Orders
Research Question: What are the constitutional limits on the President’s power to issue executive orders? Overview: Examine the history and use of executive orders in the United States. Discuss significant legal challenges and Supreme Court rulings on their constitutionality.
10. Topic: The Right to Health Care: A Constitutional Perspective
Research Question: Is there a constitutional right to health care in the United States? Overview: Explore arguments for and against recognizing health care as a constitutional right. Analyze relevant case law and the potential for future legal developments.
11. Topic: Free Speech vs. Hate Speech: Where to Draw the Line
Research Question: How do constitutional protections of free speech apply to hate speech? Overview: Examine the legal definitions and limits of hate speech in the context of the First Amendment. Discuss significant court cases and the challenges of regulating hate speech.
12. Topic: The Impact of the Patriot Act on Civil Liberties
Research Question: How has the Patriot Act affected constitutional protections of civil liberties? Overview: Investigate the balance between national security and individual rights under the Patriot Act. Analyze key provisions and their constitutional challenges.
13. Topic: Constitutional Issues in Environmental Regulation
Research Question: How do constitutional principles affect environmental regulation and policy-making? Overview: Discuss the interplay between federal and state powers in environmental law. Examine significant Supreme Court cases related to environmental regulation.
14. Topic: The Role of the Supreme Court in Shaping Social Policy
Research Question: How has the Supreme Court influenced social policy through its interpretation of the Constitution? Overview: Explore landmark Supreme Court decisions that have impacted social policy, such as Roe v. Wade and Obergefell v. Hodges. Discuss the Court’s role in societal change.
15. Topic: The Constitutionality of Affirmative Action Policies
Research Question: What are the constitutional arguments for and against affirmative action in education and employment? Overview: Analyze key Supreme Court cases on affirmative action, such as Grutter v. Bollinger and Fisher v. University of Texas. Discuss the legal and social implications of these policies.
This category also includes a variety of topics that range from factors influencing juvenile delinquency and developmental paths of delinquency to juvenile crime solutions and social media promotion of juvenile delinquency.
1. Topic: The Impact of Social Media on Adolescent Mental Health
Research Question: How does social media usage affect the mental health of adolescents? Overview: Explore the relationship between social media activity and mental health issues such as anxiety, depression, and self-esteem. Analyze studies and data, and discuss potential interventions.
2. Topic: Juvenile Delinquency and Family Structure
Research Question: How does family structure influence juvenile delinquency rates? Overview: Investigate the impact of single-parent households, divorce, and family dynamics on juvenile crime. Use case studies and statistical analysis to draw conclusions.
3. Topic: The Effectiveness of Juvenile Rehabilitation Programs
Research Question: Are rehabilitation programs effective in reducing recidivism among juvenile offenders? Overview: Examine various rehabilitation programs, their methodologies, and outcomes. Compare their success rates with traditional punitive measures.
4. Topic: The Role of Education in Preventing Juvenile Crime
Research Question: How can education be used as a tool to prevent juvenile delinquency? Overview: Analyze the effectiveness of educational programs and interventions in schools aimed at reducing juvenile crime. Discuss case studies and data on program success.
5. Topic: The Influence of Peer Pressure on Juvenile Behavior
Research Question: What role does peer pressure play in shaping juvenile behavior and delinquency? Overview: Investigate how peer groups influence decision-making and behavior in adolescents. Discuss strategies to mitigate negative peer pressure.
6. Topic: Juvenile Justice System Reform: Challenges and Opportunities
Research Question: What are the key challenges and opportunities in reforming the juvenile justice system? Overview: Explore current issues within the juvenile justice system, including racial disparities, sentencing practices, and rehabilitation efforts. Propose potential reforms based on successful models.
7. Topic: The Impact of Trauma on Juvenile Delinquency
Research Question: How does exposure to trauma affect the likelihood of juvenile delinquency? Overview: Examine the relationship between childhood trauma, such as abuse or neglect, and subsequent delinquent behavior. Discuss therapeutic interventions and support systems.
8. Topic: Cyberbullying and its Consequences on Youth
Research Question: What are the psychological and social consequences of cyberbullying on adolescents? Overview: Analyze the prevalence of cyberbullying, its impact on victims, and the effectiveness of anti-bullying policies and programs.
9. Topic: Juvenile Substance Abuse: Causes and Prevention
Research Question: What are the primary causes of substance abuse among juveniles, and how can it be prevented? Overview: Investigate factors contributing to juvenile substance abuse, such as peer influence, family environment, and socioeconomic status. Discuss prevention programs and their effectiveness.
10. Topic: The Legal Rights of Juveniles in the Justice System
Research Question: How are the legal rights of juveniles protected within the justice system? Overview: Explore the constitutional and legal protections afforded to juveniles, including the right to counsel, fair trials, and protections against cruel and unusual punishment.
11. Topic: The Role of Mentoring Programs in Supporting At-Risk Youth
Research Question: How effective are mentoring programs in reducing juvenile delinquency among at-risk youth? Overview: Examine the structure and impact of various mentoring programs. Analyze data on their effectiveness in reducing delinquency and improving life outcomes for participants.
12. Topic: Juvenile Crime and Socioeconomic Factors
Research Question: How do socioeconomic factors influence juvenile crime rates? Overview: Investigate the relationship between poverty, education, neighborhood environment, and juvenile delinquency. Discuss potential policy interventions to address these issues.
13. Topic: The Impact of Media Representation on Juvenile Perceptions of Crime
Research Question: How does media representation of crime influence juvenile perceptions and behavior? Overview: Analyze the portrayal of crime in media and its effect on adolescents’ attitudes toward law and justice. Discuss the potential for media literacy programs to mitigate negative impacts.
14. Topic: Juvenile Recidivism: Causes and Solutions
Research Question: What are the primary causes of juvenile recidivism, and how can it be reduced? Overview: Explore factors that contribute to repeat offenses among juveniles. Discuss effective interventions and programs aimed at reducing recidivism rates.
15. Topic: The Role of Restorative Justice in Juvenile Crime
Research Question: How effective is restorative justice in addressing juvenile crime and supporting victims? Overview: Investigate the principles and practices of restorative justice. Analyze case studies and data on its effectiveness in reducing recidivism and promoting healing for victims.
BTW…we have a team of excellent pros at psychology essay writing help . Make sure to check them out if you are looking for professional assistance.
Here, you can write about principles of criminal sentencing, death penalty law for human slaughter, how gender influences crime, restorative justice approaches, and more.
1. Topic: The Effectiveness of Mandatory Minimum Sentences
Research Question: How do mandatory minimum sentences impact crime rates and the criminal justice system? Overview: Analyze the history and purpose of mandatory minimum sentences. Examine statistical data on their effectiveness in reducing crime and their impact on prison populations.
2. Topic: The Insanity Defense: Legal and Ethical Considerations
Research Question: How is the insanity defense applied in criminal cases, and what are the ethical implications? Overview: Explore the criteria and application of the insanity defense in various jurisdictions. Discuss notable cases and the debate over its fairness and effectiveness.
3. Topic: The Role of DNA Evidence in Criminal Convictions
Research Question: How has DNA evidence transformed criminal investigations and convictions? Overview: Investigate the use of DNA evidence in solving crimes. Highlight cases where DNA evidence has exonerated wrongfully convicted individuals and discuss challenges in its application.
4. Topic: Cybercrime Laws: Challenges and Developments
Research Question: What are the key challenges in enforcing cybercrime laws, and how have they evolved? Overview: Examine the development of cybercrime legislation globally. Discuss the difficulties in enforcement and propose potential improvements.
5. Topic: The Death Penalty: Legal Perspectives and Human Rights
Research Question: What are the legal arguments for and against the death penalty, and how do they align with human rights? Overview: Explore the legal framework of the death penalty in different countries. Discuss the human rights implications and recent trends in abolition or retention.
6. Topic: White-Collar Crime: Prosecution and Penalties
Research Question: How effective are current laws and penalties in deterring white-collar crime? Overview: Analyze notable white-collar crime cases and the penalties imposed. Evaluate the effectiveness of legal measures in preventing and prosecuting such crimes.
7. Topic: Drug Courts: A Solution to the War on Drugs?
Research Question: How effective are drug courts in reducing drug-related offenses and recidivism? Overview: Investigate the structure and outcomes of drug courts. Compare them to traditional criminal courts in terms of recidivism rates and overall effectiveness.
8. Topic: The Impact of Body-Worn Cameras on Police Accountability
Research Question: Do body-worn cameras improve police accountability and reduce instances of misconduct? Overview: Examine studies on the use of body-worn cameras by law enforcement. Discuss their impact on police behavior, accountability, and community trust.
9. Topic: Criminal Liability of Corporations
Research Question: How are corporations held criminally liable for illegal activities, and what are the challenges? Overview: Explore the concept of corporate criminal liability. Analyze notable cases and discuss the legal and practical challenges in holding corporations accountable.
10. Topic: The Role of Forensic Psychology in Criminal Law
Research Question: How does forensic psychology contribute to the criminal justice system? Overview: Investigate the applications of forensic psychology in criminal cases, including assessments of competency, risk, and criminal responsibility. Highlight significant cases and developments.
11. Topic: Hate Crimes: Legal Definitions and Enforcement
Research Question: How are hate crimes legally defined and prosecuted, and what challenges exist in enforcement? Overview: Examine the legal definitions and criteria for hate crimes in different jurisdictions. Discuss the challenges in identifying, reporting, and prosecuting hate crimes.
12. Topic: Human Trafficking Laws: International and Domestic Approaches
Research Question: How effective are international and domestic laws in combating human trafficking? Overview: Compare the legal frameworks for addressing human trafficking in various countries. Discuss international cooperation and the effectiveness of current laws.
13. Topic: The Use of Plea Bargaining in Criminal Cases
Research Question: What are the pros and cons of plea bargaining in the criminal justice system? Overview: Analyze the prevalence and impact of plea bargaining on case outcomes, defendants’ rights, and the efficiency of the criminal justice system. Discuss potential reforms.
14. Topic: The Legal Implications of Stand Your Ground Laws
Research Question: How do Stand Your Ground laws affect legal outcomes in self-defense cases? Overview: Investigate the origins and applications of Stand Your Ground laws. Examine case studies and discuss the controversies and legal implications surrounding these laws.
15. Topic: Juvenile Justice: Should Juveniles Be Tried as Adults?
Research Question: What are the legal and ethical considerations of trying juveniles as adults in criminal cases? Overview: Explore the criteria and outcomes of cases where juveniles are tried as adults. Discuss the implications for rehabilitation, recidivism, and the justice system.
If you are searching for expert help in writing legal brief , Writing Metier is the place to go.
When choosing this category, you can pick anything from crime propaganda on social media and organized crime to situational crime prevention and contemporary theories in criminology.
1. Topic: The Evolution of Criminological Theories
Research Question: How have criminological theories evolved over the past century, and what are their current applications? Overview: Explore the development of major criminological theories, such as classical, positivist, and critical criminology. Discuss how these theories are applied in contemporary criminological research.
2. Topic: The Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on Crime Rates
Research Question: How do socioeconomic factors influence crime rates in urban vs. rural areas? Overview: Investigate the relationship between poverty, education, employment, and crime. Compare crime rates and contributing factors in different types of communities.
3. Topic: The Role of Mental Health in Criminal Behavior
Research Question: What is the relationship between mental health issues and criminal behavior? Overview: Examine the prevalence of mental health disorders among offenders. Discuss the implications for criminal justice policies and rehabilitation programs.
4. Topic: Gender Differences in Criminal Behavior
Research Question: How do gender differences manifest in patterns of criminal behavior? Overview: Analyze statistical data on male and female offending rates. Discuss theories that explain gender differences in crime and how the criminal justice system addresses these differences.
5. Topic: The Effectiveness of Crime Prevention Programs
Research Question: How effective are community-based crime prevention programs in reducing crime rates? Overview: Evaluate various crime prevention programs, such as neighborhood watch, community policing, and youth intervention programs. Analyze their success rates and best practices.
6. Topic: The Influence of Media on Public Perception of Crime
Research Question: How does media representation of crime affect public perception and fear of crime? Overview: Investigate the impact of news coverage, TV shows, and movies on the public’s understanding of crime. Discuss the implications for policy and community relations.
7. Topic: The Relationship Between Drug Use and Crime
Research Question: What is the correlation between drug use and criminal activity? Overview: Examine the types of crimes associated with different substances. Discuss the effectiveness of drug policies and intervention programs in reducing drug-related crime.
8. Topic: The Impact of Technology on Criminal Behavior
Research Question: How has technology influenced the nature and frequency of criminal behavior? Overview: Explore the rise of cybercrime, digital fraud, and other technology-related offenses. Discuss law enforcement challenges and strategies to combat these crimes.
9. Topic: Recidivism and Rehabilitation: What Works?
Research Question: What are the most effective methods for reducing recidivism among ex-offenders? Overview: Analyze rehabilitation programs, reentry initiatives, and support services for released prisoners. Evaluate their impact on reducing repeat offenses.
10. Topic: White-Collar Crime: Causes and Consequences
Research Question: What are the primary causes of white-collar crime, and what are its societal impacts? Overview: Investigate the motivations behind white-collar crime and its economic and social consequences. Discuss regulatory and enforcement challenges.
11. Topic: The Role of Environmental Criminology in Crime Prevention
Research Question: How can environmental criminology principles be applied to prevent crime? Overview: Explore concepts such as crime mapping, situational crime prevention, and the design of public spaces. Analyze case studies where these principles have been successfully implemented.
12. Topic: Juvenile Delinquency: Risk Factors and Prevention Strategies
Research Question: What are the key risk factors for juvenile delinquency, and how can they be mitigated? Overview: Examine family, school, and community influences on juvenile offending. Discuss effective prevention and intervention strategies.
13. Topic: Crime and Migration: Patterns and Implications
Research Question: How does migration influence crime rates in host countries? Overview: Investigate the relationship between immigration and crime. Analyze data on crime rates among immigrant populations and discuss policy implications.
14. Topic: The Impact of Policing Strategies on Crime Rates
Research Question: How do different policing strategies affect crime rates and community relations? Overview: Evaluate the effectiveness of strategies such as community policing, zero-tolerance policing, and hot spots policing. Discuss their impact on crime reduction and public trust.
15. Topic: The Role of Cultural Factors in Criminal Behavior
Research Question: How do cultural factors influence patterns of criminal behavior? Overview: Explore the role of cultural norms, values, and practices in shaping criminal behavior. Discuss examples from various cultural contexts and their implications for criminological research.
Slash 15% OFF using the coupon code: BLG15WM
The topics that fall under this category are diverse indeed, which means that you can choose to write about cybercrime and espionage, various kinds of cybercrime, cybercrime victimization and cyberbullying, ransomware attacks, or anything else.
1. Topic: The Evolution of Cybercrime Techniques
Research Question: How have cybercrime techniques evolved over the past decade? Overview: Explore the development of cybercrime methods, including hacking, phishing, and ransomware. Analyze key trends and notable cases that illustrate these changes.
2. Topic: The Impact of Cybercrime on Global Economies
Research Question: What is the economic impact of cybercrime on global economies? Overview: Investigate the financial costs of cybercrime, including data breaches, fraud, and intellectual property theft. Discuss how businesses and governments respond to these threats.
3. Topic: The Role of Cryptocurrency in Cybercrime
Research Question: How do cryptocurrencies facilitate cybercrime, and what measures can mitigate this? Overview: Examine the use of cryptocurrencies in illegal activities such as money laundering and ransomware payments. Discuss regulatory responses and technological solutions.
4. Topic: Cybersecurity Measures in Protecting Personal Data
Research Question: How effective are current cybersecurity measures in protecting personal data from cybercriminals? Overview: Evaluate various cybersecurity practices, such as encryption, multi-factor authentication, and network security. Assess their effectiveness in preventing data breaches.
5. Topic: The Legal Frameworks for Combatting Cybercrime
Research Question: How do international legal frameworks address the challenge of cybercrime? Overview: Explore existing laws and treaties designed to combat cybercrime. Analyze their effectiveness and the challenges of enforcing laws across borders.
6. Topic: Social Engineering Attacks: Tactics and Prevention
Research Question: What are the most common tactics used in social engineering attacks, and how can they be prevented? Overview: Investigate different types of social engineering attacks, such as phishing and pretexting. Discuss strategies for raising awareness and preventing these attacks.
7. Topic: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Cybersecurity
Research Question: How can artificial intelligence be leveraged to enhance cybersecurity and prevent cybercrime? Overview: Examine the applications of AI in detecting and mitigating cyber threats. Discuss potential benefits and challenges associated with AI-driven cybersecurity.
8. Topic: The Psychology of Cybercriminals
Research Question: What psychological factors motivate individuals to engage in cybercrime? Overview: Explore the psychological profiles of cybercriminals, including motivations and behavioral patterns. Discuss how this understanding can inform prevention and intervention strategies.
9. Topic: The Dark Web and Its Role in Cybercrime
Research Question: How does the dark web facilitate cybercrime, and what measures can be taken to counteract it? Overview: Investigate the use of the dark web for illegal activities, such as drug trafficking, weapons sales, and human trafficking. Discuss law enforcement strategies for monitoring and dismantling dark web marketplaces.
10. Topic: Cybercrime and National Security
Research Question: What are the implications of cybercrime for national security? Overview: Analyze the impact of cyberattacks on critical infrastructure, government agencies, and military operations. Discuss strategies for enhancing national cybersecurity.
11. Topic: Identity Theft: Causes, Effects, and Prevention
Research Question: What are the main causes and effects of identity theft, and how can it be prevented? Overview: Examine how cybercriminals steal personal information and the consequences for victims. Discuss measures individuals and organizations can take to prevent identity theft.
12. Topic: Cyber Espionage: Techniques and Countermeasures
Research Question: What techniques are used in cyber espionage, and how can organizations protect themselves? Overview: Investigate the methods used in cyber espionage, including malware, phishing, and advanced persistent threats (APTs). Discuss strategies for detecting and mitigating espionage activities.
13. Topic: The Impact of Cybercrime on Small Businesses
Research Question: How does cybercrime affect small businesses, and what can they do to protect themselves? Overview: Explore the vulnerabilities of small businesses to cyberattacks and the financial and operational impacts. Discuss cost-effective cybersecurity solutions for small enterprises.
14. Topic: The Future of Cybercrime: Emerging Threats and Trends
Research Question: What are the emerging threats and trends in cybercrime, and how can they be addressed? Overview: Analyze new and evolving cyber threats, such as IoT vulnerabilities, AI-powered attacks, and quantum computing. Discuss proactive measures to stay ahead of these threats.
15. Topic: Cybercrime and Ethical Hacking
Research Question: How can ethical hacking contribute to combating cybercrime? Overview: Examine the role of ethical hackers in identifying and addressing security vulnerabilities. Discuss the ethical and legal considerations of hacking for defensive purposes.
Here, you can talk about terrorism ideologies and tactics, common types of terrorism, social aspects of terrorism, peculiarities of international terrorism, and more.
1. Topic: The Evolution of Terrorist Tactics in the 21st Century
Research Question: How have terrorist tactics evolved in the 21st century? Overview: Explore the changes in terrorist methods, including the use of technology, social media, and unconventional weapons. Discuss case studies that highlight these evolutions.
2. Topic: The Role of Social Media in Radicalization and Recruitment
Research Question: How do terrorist organizations use social media for radicalization and recruitment? Overview: Investigate the strategies used by terrorist groups to leverage social media platforms. Analyze the effectiveness of counter-radicalization efforts on these platforms.
3. Topic: The Impact of Terrorism on Global Security Policies
Research Question: How has terrorism influenced global security policies and practices? Overview: Examine the changes in international security measures and policies post major terrorist attacks. Discuss the balance between security and civil liberties.
4. Topic: The Psychology of Terrorism: Motivations and Mindsets
Research Question: What psychological factors motivate individuals to engage in terrorism? Overview: Explore the psychological profiles and mindsets of terrorists. Discuss theories related to radicalization and the appeal of extremist ideologies.
5. Topic: Counterterrorism Strategies: Effectiveness and Challenges
Research Question: What are the most effective counterterrorism strategies, and what challenges do they face? Overview: Evaluate various counterterrorism approaches, such as military intervention, intelligence operations, and community engagement. Analyze their successes and limitations.
6. Topic: The Financing of Terrorism: Sources and Disruption Techniques
Research Question: How do terrorist organizations finance their activities, and what measures can disrupt these financial networks? Overview: Investigate the sources of funding for terrorist groups, including illegal activities and state sponsorship. Discuss strategies for disrupting these financial networks.
7. Topic: Homegrown Terrorism: Causes and Prevention
Research Question: What are the primary causes of homegrown terrorism, and how can it be prevented? Overview: Examine the factors that contribute to the radicalization of individuals within their home countries. Discuss effective prevention and intervention programs.
8. Topic: The Role of International Cooperation in Combating Terrorism
Research Question: How effective is international cooperation in the fight against terrorism? Overview: Analyze the importance of international alliances and collaborative efforts in counterterrorism. Highlight successful examples and areas for improvement.
9. Topic: The Use of Technology in Modern Terrorism
Research Question: How do terrorist organizations utilize technology to enhance their operations? Overview: Explore the use of technology, including encryption, drones, and cyberattacks, by terrorist groups. Discuss the implications for counterterrorism efforts.
10. Topic: The Impact of Terrorism on Refugee Movements and Policies
Research Question: How does terrorism affect refugee movements and international refugee policies? Overview: Investigate the relationship between terrorism, conflict, and displacement. Discuss the challenges and responses of host countries to refugee influxes linked to terrorism.
11. Topic: State-Sponsored Terrorism: Definition and Implications
Research Question: What constitutes state-sponsored terrorism, and what are its implications for international relations? Overview: Define state-sponsored terrorism and examine historical and contemporary examples. Discuss the political and diplomatic consequences for implicated states.
12. Topic: The Role of Women in Terrorist Organizations
Research Question: What roles do women play in terrorist organizations, and how does their involvement impact these groups? Overview: Explore the participation of women in terrorist activities, from combatants to recruiters. Discuss the motivations and societal implications of their involvement.
13. Topic: Terrorism and Media: A Symbiotic Relationship?
Research Question: How does media coverage of terrorism influence public perception and terrorist strategies? Overview: Analyze the relationship between media and terrorism, including the role of sensationalism and propaganda. Discuss the ethical responsibilities of the media in reporting terrorism.
14. Topic: Terrorism in the Cyber Domain: Threats and Countermeasures
Research Question: What are the emerging threats of cyber terrorism, and how can they be countered? Overview: Investigate the potential for cyber terrorism, including attacks on critical infrastructure and digital espionage. Discuss strategies for protecting against and responding to cyber threats.
15. Topic: The Impact of Terrorism on Tourism and Global Travel
Research Question: How does terrorism affect the tourism industry and global travel patterns? Overview: Examine the economic and psychological impact of terrorist attacks on tourism. Discuss measures taken by the industry and governments to restore confidence and ensure safety.
This one is also an interesting category that allows you to research police brutality and racism, police officers and cultural differences, police deviance, defunding the police, and more.
1. Topic: The Impact of Body-Worn Cameras on Police Brutality
Research Question: How effective are body-worn cameras in reducing instances of police brutality? Overview: Investigate the implementation of body-worn cameras across various police departments. Analyze data on changes in reported incidents of police brutality and community trust.
2. Topic: Racial Disparities in Police Use of Force
Research Question: How do racial disparities manifest in police use of force incidents? Overview: Examine statistical data on police use of force incidents involving different racial groups. Discuss contributing factors and potential reforms to address these disparities.
3. Topic: The Role of Police Unions in Cases of Police Brutality
Research Question: How do police unions influence the handling and outcomes of police brutality cases? Overview: Analyze the role of police unions in protecting officers accused of misconduct. Discuss the impact of union contracts on accountability and disciplinary processes.
4. Topic: Psychological Factors Contributing to Police Brutality
Research Question: What psychological factors contribute to instances of police brutality? Overview: Explore the psychological stressors and personality traits that may lead to excessive use of force. Discuss training programs aimed at mitigating these factors.
5. Topic: The Effectiveness of De-escalation Training in Preventing Police Brutality
Research Question: How effective is de-escalation training in reducing police brutality? Overview: Investigate the implementation of de-escalation training programs. Evaluate their impact on reducing the use of force in various police departments.
6. Topic: The Influence of Media Coverage on Public Perception of Police Brutality
Research Question: How does media coverage influence public perception and policy changes regarding police brutality? Overview: Analyze the role of media in shaping public opinion on police brutality. Discuss the effects of high-profile cases and media campaigns on policy reforms.
7. Topic: The Legal Framework for Addressing Police Brutality
Research Question: How effective are current legal frameworks in holding police officers accountable for brutality? Overview: Examine existing laws and legal procedures for prosecuting police brutality cases. Discuss potential reforms to enhance accountability and justice for victims.
8. Topic: Community Policing and Its Impact on Reducing Police Brutality
Research Question: How does community policing influence the incidence of police brutality? Overview: Explore the principles and practices of community policing. Analyze case studies where community policing has been implemented and its effects on reducing brutality.
9. Topic: The Role of Civilian Oversight in Police Accountability
Research Question: How effective are civilian oversight bodies in ensuring police accountability for brutality? Overview: Investigate the structure and functions of civilian oversight boards. Evaluate their success in investigating and addressing complaints of police misconduct.
10. Topic: The Intersection of Mental Health and Police Brutality
Research Question: How do interactions between police and individuals with mental health issues contribute to incidents of brutality? Overview: Examine cases involving police interactions with mentally ill individuals. Discuss training and policy changes needed to improve these interactions and reduce violence.
11. Topic: The Impact of Qualified Immunity on Police Brutality Cases
Research Question: How does the doctrine of qualified immunity affect the prosecution of police brutality cases? Overview: Analyze the legal concept of qualified immunity and its application in police brutality cases. Discuss arguments for and against its reform or abolition.
12. Topic: The Role of Technology in Documenting and Preventing Police Brutality
Research Question: How can technology be utilized to document and prevent police brutality? Overview: Explore the use of technologies such as smartphones, surveillance cameras, and AI in monitoring police behavior. Discuss their effectiveness and potential privacy concerns.
13. Topic: Comparative Analysis of Police Brutality in Different Countries
Research Question: How does police brutality in the United States compare to other countries? Overview: Conduct a comparative analysis of police brutality incidents, policies, and reforms in various countries. Highlight best practices and lessons that can be learned.
14. Topic: The Impact of Police Militarization on Incidents of Brutality
Research Question: How does the militarization of police forces influence the frequency and severity of police brutality? Overview: Investigate the effects of providing military-grade equipment and training to police departments. Discuss the correlation between militarization and use of force incidents.
15. Topic: The Effectiveness of Implicit Bias Training in Reducing Police Brutality
Research Question: Can implicit bias training reduce instances of police brutality? Overview: Examine the implementation of implicit bias training programs for police officers. Evaluate their impact on reducing bias-related use of force and improving community relations.
No need to search for boring death penalty essays ; let’s talk 4th Amendment. These topics can be anything, including wiretaps and the Fourth Amendment, understanding and the importance of the 4 th Amendment, the pros and the cons of the 4 th Amendment, etc.
1. Topic: The Impact of Digital Technology on Fourth Amendment Protections
Research Question: How has digital technology challenged traditional interpretations of the Fourth Amendment? Overview: Explore how advancements in technology, such as smartphones and cloud storage, have influenced Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. Analyze key Supreme Court cases like Riley v. California and Carpenter v. United States.
2. Topic: The Fourth Amendment and Government Surveillance Programs
Research Question: How do government surveillance programs align with Fourth Amendment protections? Overview: Investigate the balance between national security and privacy rights under the Fourth Amendment. Discuss programs like PRISM and their constitutional implications.
3. Topic: The Use of Drones in Law Enforcement and Fourth Amendment Concerns
Research Question: What are the Fourth Amendment implications of using drones for law enforcement purposes? Overview: Examine the legal and ethical issues surrounding drone surveillance by police. Discuss court rulings and potential regulatory frameworks.
4. Topic: The Role of the Exclusionary Rule in Fourth Amendment Cases
Research Question: How effective is the exclusionary rule in upholding Fourth Amendment rights? Overview: Analyze the application of the exclusionary rule in suppressing illegally obtained evidence. Discuss its impact on law enforcement practices and judicial outcomes.
5. Topic: The Fourth Amendment and Body-Worn Cameras
Research Question: How do body-worn cameras influence Fourth Amendment rights during police encounters? Overview: Explore the implications of body-worn cameras for privacy and evidence collection. Discuss policies and court cases related to their use.
6. Topic: The Fourth Amendment in the Age of Big Data
Research Question: How does the collection and analysis of big data affect Fourth Amendment protections? Overview: Investigate the impact of big data analytics on privacy rights. Discuss legal challenges and potential reforms to address these concerns.
7. Topic: The Fourth Amendment and Biometric Surveillance
Research Question: What are the Fourth Amendment implications of biometric surveillance technologies? Overview: Examine the use of facial recognition, fingerprint scanning, and other biometric tools by law enforcement. Discuss privacy concerns and regulatory approaches.
8. Topic: Racial Profiling and the Fourth Amendment
Research Question: How does racial profiling by law enforcement intersect with Fourth Amendment protections? Overview: Investigate cases of racial profiling and their constitutional implications. Discuss legal strategies and policy reforms to address these issues.
9. Topic: The Fourth Amendment and Border Searches
Research Question: What are the limits of Fourth Amendment protections at U.S. borders? Overview: Explore the legal standards for searches and seizures at international borders and airports. Discuss relevant case law and the balance between security and privacy.
10. Topic: The Fourth Amendment and Traffic Stops
Research Question: How do Fourth Amendment rights apply during traffic stops by police? Overview: Analyze the legal principles governing searches and seizures during traffic stops. Discuss Supreme Court cases such as Whren v. United States and Arizona v. Gant.
11. Topic: The Fourth Amendment and School Searches
Research Question: How do Fourth Amendment protections apply to searches conducted in schools? Overview: Examine the balance between student privacy and school safety. Discuss key cases like New Jersey v. T.L.O. and their impact on school search policies.
12. Topic: The Fourth Amendment and Emerging Technologies in Law Enforcement
Research Question: How do emerging technologies like AI and predictive policing affect Fourth Amendment rights? Overview: Investigate the use of advanced technologies by police and their constitutional implications. Discuss legal challenges and potential regulatory measures.
13. Topic: The Fourth Amendment and Consent Searches
Research Question: What are the legal standards and challenges associated with consent searches under the Fourth Amendment? Overview: Explore the principles governing consent searches and the issues of voluntariness and coercion. Analyze relevant case law and policy recommendations.
14. Topic: The Fourth Amendment and Data Privacy in the Workplace
Research Question: How do Fourth Amendment protections apply to employee data privacy in the workplace? Overview: Examine the extent of Fourth Amendment rights for employees regarding employer surveillance and data collection. Discuss legal precedents and regulatory guidelines.
15. Topic: The Fourth Amendment and Electronic Communications
Research Question: How are electronic communications, such as emails and text messages, protected under the Fourth Amendment? Overview: Investigate the legal standards for accessing electronic communications. Discuss significant cases and the implications for privacy in the digital age.
Here, you can write about conditions favoring human trafficking, celebrity influences on human trafficking, human trafficking and psychological impacts, fighting the sex trafficking industry, and more.
1. Topic: The Role of Technology in Facilitating and Combating Human Trafficking
Research Question: How is technology used by traffickers and what are the technological solutions to combat human trafficking? Overview: Explore how traffickers use the internet and social media for recruitment and exploitation. Analyze technological tools and platforms used for detection and prevention.
2. Topic: The Impact of COVID-19 on Human Trafficking Trends
Research Question: How has the COVID-19 pandemic affected human trafficking patterns and enforcement efforts? Overview: Investigate changes in trafficking methods, victim vulnerabilities, and law enforcement challenges during the pandemic. Discuss policy responses and adaptations.
3. Topic: Human Trafficking and Immigration Policies
Research Question: How do immigration policies affect the prevalence and prevention of human trafficking? Overview: Examine the link between restrictive immigration policies and increased vulnerability to trafficking. Analyze case studies and propose policy reforms.
4. Topic: The Role of NGOs in Human Trafficking Prevention and Victim Support
Research Question: How effective are non-governmental organizations in preventing human trafficking and supporting victims? Overview: Investigate the programs and strategies implemented by NGOs. Evaluate their success and challenges in different regions.
5. Topic: Human Trafficking in the Supply Chain: Corporate Responsibility
Research Question: How can corporations ensure their supply chains are free from human trafficking and forced labor? Overview: Analyze the role of corporate social responsibility in combating trafficking. Discuss auditing practices, transparency initiatives, and regulatory compliance.
6. Topic: Psychological Impact of Human Trafficking on Victims
Research Question: What are the long-term psychological effects of human trafficking on survivors, and what support mechanisms are effective? Overview: Explore the mental health challenges faced by trafficking survivors. Evaluate therapeutic interventions and support programs.
7. Topic: Legal Frameworks and Their Effectiveness in Combating Human Trafficking
Research Question: How effective are current legal frameworks in addressing human trafficking, and what improvements are needed? Overview: Examine national and international laws targeting human trafficking. Discuss enforcement challenges and potential legal reforms.
8. Topic: The Role of Education in Preventing Human Trafficking
Research Question: How can educational initiatives contribute to the prevention of human trafficking? Overview: Investigate the effectiveness of awareness and prevention programs in schools and communities. Highlight successful education-based interventions.
9. Topic: Human Trafficking and Gender: A Comparative Analysis
Research Question: How do gender dynamics influence the experience and prevalence of human trafficking? Overview: Explore the specific vulnerabilities and experiences of men, women, and non-binary individuals in trafficking. Analyze gender-specific intervention strategies.
10. Topic: Human Trafficking and Organized Crime Networks
Research Question: What is the relationship between human trafficking and organized crime networks? Overview: Examine how organized crime groups are involved in trafficking operations. Discuss law enforcement strategies to dismantle these networks.
11. Topic: The Economic Drivers of Human Trafficking
Research Question: What economic factors contribute to the prevalence of human trafficking? Overview: Analyze the socio-economic conditions that make individuals vulnerable to trafficking. Discuss macroeconomic policies that could mitigate these risks.
12. Topic: The Role of International Cooperation in Combatting Human Trafficking
Research Question: How effective is international cooperation in addressing human trafficking? Overview: Investigate the role of international organizations, treaties, and cross-border collaborations. Discuss successful case studies and areas for improvement.
13. Topic: Human Trafficking in Conflict Zones
Research Question: How does armed conflict exacerbate human trafficking, and what can be done to prevent it? Overview: Explore the link between conflict, displacement, and trafficking. Analyze the role of international aid and peacekeeping efforts.
14. Topic: The Impact of Cultural Practices on Human Trafficking
Research Question: How do cultural practices and beliefs contribute to the prevalence of human trafficking? Overview: Examine how certain cultural norms and practices, such as child marriage, can lead to trafficking. Discuss culturally sensitive prevention strategies.
15. Topic: The Role of Media in Shaping Public Perception of Human Trafficking
Research Question: How does media coverage influence public awareness and policy responses to human trafficking? Overview: Analyze media portrayals of human trafficking and their impact on public opinion and policy. Discuss the role of advocacy journalism and awareness campaigns.
Writing about law and criminal justice research paper topics is very interesting and incredibly important for students. The thing is that it helps them understand the different aspects of the criminal justice system and develop skills, such as research and critical thinking .
If you manage to pick the right law and criminal justice research paper topic, it will be easier for you to set the direction for the work. By choosing the topic you are passionate about, you can make the most of your learning experience and even provide new insights into the legal field.
However, if you are stuck at some point, you can always count on Writing Metier. Our professionals will help you choose the engaging law and criminal justice research paper topic or even write the entire assignment for you from scratch. Our writing company guarantees high quality of content, which means that you will receive the best research paper possible.
Need a Dope Paper Written? We've Got Your Back!
Laura Orta is an avid author on Writing Metier's blog. Before embarking on her writing career, she practiced media law in one of the local media. Aside from writing, she works as a private tutor to help students with their academic needs. Laura and her husband share their home near the ocean in northern Portugal with two extraordinary boys and a lifetime collection of books.
We rely on cookies to give you the best experince on our website. By browsing, you agree to it. Read more
This paper documents several facts about graduate program graduation rates using administrative data covering public and nonprofit graduate students in Texas. Despite conventional wisdom that most graduate students complete their programs, only 58 percent of who started their program in 2004 graduated within 6 years. Between the 2004 and 2013 entering cohorts, graduate student completion rates grew by 10 percentage points. Graduation rates vary widely by field of study--ranging from an average of 81 percent for law programs to 53 percent for education programs. We also find large differences in graduation rates across institutions. On average, 72 percent of students who entered programs in flagship public universities graduated in 6 years compared to only 57 percent of those who entered programs in non-research intensive (non-R1) institutions. Graduate students who do not complete may face negative consequences due to lower average earnings and substantial levels of student debt.
The conclusions of this research do not necessarily reflect the opinion or official position of the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, the Texas Workforce Commission, the State of Texas, or the National Bureau of Economic Research. This work was generously funded by Arnold Ventures.
MARC RIS BibTeΧ
Download Citation Data
More from nber.
In addition to working papers , the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter , the NBER Digest , the Bulletin on Retirement and Disability , the Bulletin on Health , and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports , video lectures , and interviews .
COMMENTS
Established in 1958, the Journal of Law and Economics publishes research on a broad range of topics, including the economic analysis of law, the economic analysis of regulation and the behavior of regulated firms, industrial organization and antitrust policy, the political economy of legislation and legislative processes, law and finance, and ...
Read the latest issue. Established in 1958, The Journal of Law and Economics publishes research on a broad range of topics including the economic analysis of regulation and the behavior of regulated firms, the political economy of legislation and legislative processes, law and finance, corporate finance and governance, and industrial organization.
American Law & Economics Association. American Law and Economics Review is published on behalf of the American Law and Economics Association. Since 1991, ALEA has been dedicated to the advancement of economic understanding of law and related areas of public policy and regulation. To learn more, click here.
Papers from 2018. PDF. Proposal for a Non-Subsidized, Non-Retirement-Plan, Employee-Owned Investment Vehicle to Replace the ESOP, Sean M. Anderson and Andrew Stumpff Morrison. 1. 2. 3. Total Papers Total Downloads Downloads in the past year. <p>This collection houses law and economics working papers, sometimes cross-posted on SSRN. For more ...
Vol. 132 No. 2 December 2018 Recent research indicates that labor market power has contributed to wage inequality and economic stagnation. Although the antitrust laws prohibit firms from restricting competition... Read the latest content about Law and Economics at Harvard Law Review.
The International Review of Law and Economics provides a forum for interdisciplinary research at the interface of law and economics.IRLE is international in scope and audience and particularly welcomes both theoretical and empirical papers on comparative law and economics, globalization and legal …. View full aims & scope $3060
Research in Law and Economics, Volume 19. Data, Power, and Competition Law: The (Im)possible Mission of the DMA? Is the Digital Markets Act the Cure for Europe's Platform Ills? Evidence From the European Commission's Impact Assessment. With the Naked Eye - Diverging Perspectives on the Evaluation of Democracy in the European Union.
The JLE publishes research on a broad range of topics including the economic analysis of regulation and the behavior of regulated firms, the political economy of legislation and legislative processes, law and finance, corporate finance and governance, and industrial organization. ... Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics Research Paper ...
In this chapter, written for the book 'Law and Method. Interdisciplinary Research info Law', we describe the methodology of Law and Economics. We start by discussing the mainstream economic approach to law, including the topics of rationality, the use of (sometimes unrealistic) assumptions, the distinction between positive and normative Law and ...
We study the effect of incarceration on wages, self-employment, and taxes and transfers in North Carolina and Ohio using two quasi-experimental research designs: discontinuities in sentencing guidelines and random assignment to judges. Across both states, incarceration generates short-term drops in ...
Founded in 1920, the NBER is a private, non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to conducting economic research and to disseminating research findings among academics, public policy makers, and business professionals.
We review an empirical literature that studies how political polarization affects financial decisions. We first discuss the degree of partisan segregation in finance and corporate America, the mechanisms through which partisanship may influence financial decisions, and available data sources to infer individuals' partisan leanings.
This Collection includes working papers for the Law and Economics series, sometimes cross-posted to SSRN. Prior to the institutional repository being implemented, we had a working paper series with Bepress; due to import issues, we opted to create two series under this collection. One archives the papers posted to the working paper series from ...
Law & Economics Research Paper Series ... economists to a degree few other topics in corporate law or securities regulation can match. As a result, it attracts scholars in fields ranging from pure legal doctrine to empirical analysis to complex economic theory. This volume collects cutting-edge
Tax Law Thesis Topics. Comparative analysis of international tax treaties and their impact on global trade. The legality of digital taxation and its implications for multinational corporations. Legal challenges in implementing a global minimum tax for corporations. The role of tax law in economic development and foreign direct investment.
Law and Economics in a Nutshell. Call Number: K487.E3 H37 2020. Provides an introduction to many of the fundamental concepts of Law & Economics including basic price theory, efficiency, the Coase Theorem, and applications of Law & Economics principles to torts, criminal law, regulation, antitrust, and intellectual property.
This interdisciplinary journal provides a forum for scholarship in law and economics, public choice and constitutional political economy. Its approach is broad ranging and articles consist of explicit or implicit economic reasoning for the analysis of legal issues, with special attention to Supreme Court decisions, judicial process, and institutional design.
In addition to working papers, the NBER disseminates affiliates' latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter, the NBER Digest, the Bulletin on Retirement and Disability, the Bulletin on Health, and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports, video lectures, and interviews.
On the contrary, more methods and better methods are likely to emerge.We are witnessing a rise of experimental law and economics, of sophisticated behavioral analysis, and of course of a mature empirical methodology examining a plethora of legal topics. But law and economics—Chicago law-and-economics in particular—has maintained a ...
The Law and Economics Program studies the economic causes and consequences of specific legal rules as well as the impact of the broader legal system. It encompasses the behavior of firms and individuals, and considers property rights, deterrence, and the effects of law enforcement. Read summaries of presentations at the latest program meeting ...
130 Best Economic Research Topics For Students. The choice of economic research topics depends on the topic that students want to study. You can write about microeconomic or macroeconomic factors, or describe the current problems of countries and individual enterprises. There are also many interesting sections on agriculture, industry and ...
Constitutional law research paper topics. Here, you can write about constitutional interpretation and judicial review, constitutions and religious freedom, crime and drugs connection, transgender rights and legal recognition, laws on capital punishment, etc. 1. Topic: The Impact of the First Amendment in the Digital Age
Founded in 1920, the NBER is a private, non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to conducting economic research and to disseminating research findings among academics, public policy makers, and business professionals.
Since the 2000s, economists across fields have increasingly used consumer credit reporting data for research. We introduce readers to the economics of and the institutional details of these data. Using examples from the literature, we provide practical guidance on how to use these data to construct economic measures of borrowing, consumption ...
This paper documents several facts about graduate program graduation rates using administrative data covering public and nonprofit graduate students in Texas. ... Graduation rates vary widely by field of study--ranging from an average of 81 percent for law programs to 53 percent for education programs. We also find large differences in ...