research paper on police brutality

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• NEWS FEATURE
• 19 June 2020
• Update 26 May 2021

What the data say about police brutality and racial bias — and which reforms might work

• Lynne Peeples 0

Lynne Peeples is a science journalist in Seattle, Washington.

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

For 9 minutes and 29 seconds, Derek Chauvin pressed his knee into the neck of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man. This deadly use of force by the now-former Minneapolis police officer has reinvigorated a very public debate about police brutality and racism.

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

$29.99 / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 583 , 22-24 (2020)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01846-z

Updates & Corrections

Update 26 May 2021 : On 20 April 2021, Derek Chauvin was convicted of causing the death of George Floyd. The text has been modified to include updated information on how long Chauvin knelt on Floyd’s neck.

Edwards, F., Hedwig, L. & Esposito, M. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116 , 16793-16798 (2019).

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Nix, J., Campbell, B. A., Byers, E. H. & Alpert, G. P. Criminol. Public Policy 16 , 309–340 (2017).

Article   Google Scholar  

Knox, D., Lowe, W. & Mummolo, J. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev . https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000039 (2020).

Hoekstra, M. & Sloan, C. W. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 26774 (2020).

Goff, P. A. & Rau, H. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 687 , 67–88 (2020).

Ridgeway, G. Stat. Public Policy 3 , 1–6 (2016).

Zhao, L. & Papachristos, A. V. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 687 , 89–112 (2020).

Dharmapala, D., McAdams, R. H. & Rappaport, J. University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 831 (2018).

Grunwald, B. & Rappaport, J. Yale Law J. 129 , 6 (2020).

Google Scholar  

Baude, W. 106 California Law Review 45; University of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 610 (2018).

Stephens, D. W. Officer Involved Shootings: Incident Executive Summary (National Police Foundation, 2019).

Jennings, J. T. & Rubado, M. E. Public Adm. Rev. 77 , 217–226 (2017).

Ariel, B., Farrar, W. A. & Sutherland, A. J. Quant. Criminol. 31 , 509–535 (2015).

Braga, A., Coldren, J. R., Sousa, W., Rodriguez, D. & Alper, O. The Benefits of Body-Worn Cameras: New Findings from a Randomized Controlled Trial at the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (National Criminal Justice Reference Service, 2017).

Wood, G., Tyler T. R., Papachristos, A. V. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117 , 9815–9821 (2020).

O’Brien, T. C., Meares, T. L. & Tyler, T. R. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 687 , 202–215 (2020).

Sherman, L. W. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 1 , 421–449 (2018).

Del Toro, J. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116 , 8261–8268 (2019).

Download references

Reprints and permissions

Related Articles

Regulate to protect fragile Antarctic ecosystems from growing tourism

Correspondence 09 JUL 24

Scientists relieved by far-right defeat in French election — but they still face uncertainty

News 08 JUL 24

COVID tsar Patrick Vallance appointed UK science minister

The geneticist who uses science to free parents wrongly convicted of killing their children

Career Feature 16 JUL 24

Is your research a trade secret? South Korean data-sharing case is a wake-up call

World View 03 JUL 24

‘Vindicated’: Embattled misinformation researchers celebrate key US Supreme Court decision

News 26 JUN 24

Maggie Aderin-Pocock on diversity: ‘It’s hard to find an argument against it’

Career Q&A 12 JUL 24

What Twisters gets right — and wrong — about tornado science

News 12 JUL 24

Harrowing trends: how endangered-species researchers find hope in the dark

Career Feature 08 JUL 24

2 PhD Student Positions and 1 Post-Doctoral Position

The DFG-funded Collaborative Research Center CRC 1644 “Phenotypic plasticity in plants - mechanisms, constraints and evolution”, hosted at the Un...

Potsdam, Brandenburg (DE)

Universität Potsdam

Fully-funded PhD positions on perovskite and tandem solar cell - ANU - world's top 30 university

Join a world-class photovoltaics research group, contribute to the development of the next generation of solar cells at ANU- world's top 30 university

Canberra, Australian Capital Territory (AU)

The Australian National University- School of Engineering

Assistant Professor

The Division of Immunobiology within the Department of Pathology and Immunology at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis is seeking...

Saint Louis, Missouri

Washington University in Saint Louis Division of Immunobiology

Become a Harvard Radcliffe Institute Fellow

Harvard Radcliffe Institute fellows are exceptional scientists, writers, s...

Cambridge, Massachusetts

Harvard Radcliffe Institute

Associate or Senior Editor

Position: Associate or Senior Editor Location: NYC or Berlin - Hybrid working model Deadline: August 27th, 2024   JOB SUMMARY: Nature, the internat...

New York City, New York (US)

Springer Nature Ltd

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Am J Public Health
• v.107(5); May 2017

Police Brutality and Black Health: Setting the Agenda for Public Health Scholars

S. Alang conceptualized the commentary and wrote the first draft. D. McAlpine framed the message and edited the commentary. E. McGreedy assisted with the review of studies. E. McGreedy and R. Hardeman assisted with editing. R. Hardeman contextualized the message within structural racism and health scholarship.

We investigated links between police brutality and poor health outcomes among Blacks and identified five intersecting pathways: (1) fatal injuries that increase population-specific mortality rates; (2) adverse physiological responses that increase morbidity; (3) racist public reactions that cause stress; (4) arrests, incarcerations, and legal, medical, and funeral bills that cause financial strain; and (5) integrated oppressive structures that cause systematic disempowerment.

Public health scholars should champion efforts to implement surveillance of police brutality and press funders to support research to understand the experiences of people faced with police brutality. We must ask whether our own research, teaching, and service are intentionally antiracist and challenge the institutions we work in to ask the same.

To reduce racial health inequities, public health scholars must rigorously explore the relationship between police brutality and health, and advocate policies that address racist oppression.

Police brutality toward Blacks in the United States is not new. However, in the absence of a standard definition or good data, the extent of police brutality remains difficult to quantify. Historical evidence of public harming of Black bodies by police dates back at least to the era of slavery, when police disciplined Blacks and recaptured those who escaped enslavement. 1 With current technology, police killing of Black people is recorded for public scrutiny and consumption. Access to these videos has led to unprecedented public discourse on what constitutes brutality, its connections to White supremacy, and the consequences for Black lives.

Certainly, excessive use of physical violence constitutes brutality. But as others have noted, brutality goes beyond physical force. It includes emotional and sexual violence as well as verbal assault and psychological intimidation. 2–4 Bandes argues that the term “brutality” conveys more than police misconduct: “It is police conduct that is not merely mistaken, but taken in bad faith, with the intent to dehumanize and degrade its target.” 2 (p1276) We argue for these more expansive definitions of brutality but also believe that police actions that constitute brutality and that dehumanize and degrade occur even in the absence of conscious intent.

Blacks are significantly more likely to experience police brutality than are Whites, and whiteness affords protection against police use of force. 5,6 Racially disparate use of force indicates that White supremacy—the systematic positive assessments of whiteness that go hand-in-hand with the devaluation of blackness 7 —permeates the US law enforcement system. White supremacy and structural racism (norms, laws, and policies that operate in institutions to limit life chances for communities of color) 8 negatively affect health. 4,8 We argue that police brutality is a social determinant of health, although it has not received sufficient attention from the public health community. To date, little empirical work has linked police brutality to poor health among populations who disproportionately experience brutality. To generate discourse and more research on this subject, we propose five intersecting mechanisms through which police brutality is linked to excess morbidity among Blacks at both the individual and the community level:

• fatal injuries that increase population-specific mortality rates;
• adverse physiological responses that increase morbidity;
• racist public reactions that cause stress;
• arrests, incarcerations, and legal, medical, and funeral bills that cause financial strain; and
• integrated oppressive structures that cause systematic disempowerment.

PHYSICAL INJURIES AND DEATH

A direct pathway between police brutality and health is through injury and death. The most comprehensive information about the connection between race and death during police encounters comes from data collected by a UK newspaper, The Guardian . 9 Analysis of those data concluded that in 2015, “young Black men were nine times more likely than other Americans to be killed by police officers.” 6

For some victims of police brutality, death is not immediate but results from repeated physical injury while in police custody. In 2005, Dondi Johnson was arrested in Baltimore, Maryland, for public urination and placed in a police vehicle. 10 Mr. Johnson entered the police vehicle in otherwise good health and left a quadriplegic, later dying from injuries sustained in the vehicle. Other high-profile cases of death as a result of maltreatment in police custody include Freddie Gray (Baltimore, MD, 2015) and Sandra Bland (Waller County, TX, 2015). 10

Police killings increase Black-specific mortality rates. Even though only two percent of injuries from police interventions that require treatment in the emergency department or hospital result in death, 11 Blacks are almost five times more likely than are Whites to have a police intervention-related injury. 12 Little is known about the prevalence of nonlethal police violence that results in injury or disability. This is an area for further investigation.

PSYCHOLOGICAL STRESS

Each episode of police brutality has emotional and physiological effects on individuals and communities. Witnessing or experiencing harassment, routine unwarranted searches, and deaths that go unpunished send a message to Black communities that their bodies are police property, disposable, and undeserving of dignity and justice. 3 Videos such as that of Eric Garner (New York, NY, 2014) saying, “I can’t breathe” 11 times until he lost consciousness or that of Diamond Reynolds (the girlfriend of Philando Castile, who was killed by police in Falcon Heights, MN, 2016) stating to the police officer, “You shot four bullets into him, sir. He was just getting his license and registration, sir” might elicit historical memories of lynching 13 and can bring about collective anger, grief, and hopelessness. Defending the character of loved ones after the police have killed them can also be excruciating, eliciting more negative emotions. Although warranted, these emotions might be damaging to individual mental health and might elevate distress at the population level. 14

Experiencing or witnessing police brutality, hearing stories of friends who have experienced brutality, and having to worry about becoming a victim are all stressors. When faced with a threat, the body produces hormones and other signals that turn on the systems that are necessary for survival in the short term. 15 These changes include accelerated heart rate and increased respiratory rate. But when the threat becomes reoccurring and persistent—as is the case with police brutality—the survival process becomes dangerous and causes rapid wear and tear on body organs and elevated allostatic load. 15 Deterioration of organs and systems caused by increased allostatic load occurs more frequently in Black populations and can lead to conditions such as diabetes, stroke, ulcers, cognitive impairment, autoimmune disorders, accelerated aging, and death. 15,16

RACIST PUBLIC REACTIONS

Black people often have the task of explaining to non-Black friends, co-workers, and strangers the connection between structural racism and the latest police shooting. This is a profoundly stressful process to undergo while grieving these deaths. One example of a racist public reaction that might cause stress is arguing that victims were somehow responsible for their own untimely murders—dissecting the guilt or innocence of the murdered persons versus understanding how White supremacy might have caused this. Another example is when protests that call for systemic change and accountability come under the scrutiny of the police, media, and other predominantly White institutions that judge the manner of protest as unacceptable.

Society’s predominant underreaction to incidents of police brutality can be stressful as well. Black women, men, and children wake up to another incident of a police killing on the morning news or on social media and are expected to go about their daily activities as though it does not affect them. But exposure to such videos can be traumatic and can affect well-being over the life course. In addition, it is painful for Black people to go to work and see business as usual while they are feeling devalued. The expectation of business as usual, the profound scrutiny of Black people’s reaction to police brutality, and the justification of police killings are potential sources of racial stress that we know to be directly and indirectly linked to poor health. 17

ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL STRAIN

Police brutality affects individual and community health through its toll on productivity and on the economy. In addition to job loss after incarceration, survivors of brutality may have to deal with disabilities resulting from police use of excessive force. 11 Disability decreases productivity and the ability to accumulate financial resources.

Police brutality also affects the economic productivity of Black communities because loved ones take time away from paid work to grieve, plan and attend funerals, and organize protests. These events result from police brutality, and they take away resources that are already limited in Black communities as a result of structural racism. Financial strain and poverty affect the health of Blacks by limiting access to healthy food, exposing families to environmental hazards and poor housing conditions, and making it harder to access health services. 18

BLACK COMMUNITIES’ SYSTEMATIC DISEMPOWERMENT

The impact of police brutality is much broader than simply affecting the individuals who have experienced racialized violence. It is a constant reminder of the historic and current devaluing of Black lives. 13 It sends a signal that there is little hope for justice. Excessive police force and inadequate prosecution of perpetrators might increase feelings of powerlessness in the Black community, diminishing perceptions of gains made by the civil rights movement.

Frequently, the only semblance of justice for victims of police brutality is to gain sympathizers in the court of public opinion. To do this, Black people seemingly have no other option than to make public the videos or photographs that show the private and last moments of loved ones’ lives. The perceived lack of justice can breed mistrust in law enforcement, further hurting the relationship between the police and Black communities. This might limit access to appropriate and necessary law enforcement services such as protection from violent crime and timely intervention during emergencies and disasters.

The impact of police brutality on the well-being of the Black community parallels the effects of the racism that exists in so many other aspects of everyday life: education, housing, employment, and health care. 8,17 That Black people can be harassed and even killed by police is sadly not inconsistent with a system that gives some children, but not others, a high-quality education and that allows skin color to dictate employment opportunity or chances of dying from a preventable disease. Understanding how police brutality affects health requires seeing it both as the action of individual police officers and as part of a system of structural racism that operates to sustain White supremacy. A silver lining is that police brutality has given rise to movements, such as Black Lives Matter and Blacktivist, that resist systemic oppression of Blacks and advocate their rights to live freely and with dignity. However, the existence of these movements does not erase the feelings of powerlessness that affect well-being in Black communities.

AGENDA FOR PUBLIC HEALTH SCHOLARS

At the forefront of public health are discussions of preventable causes of death, illness, and disease. Police brutality is highly preventable. As public health scholars, our agenda should include generating evidence of the causal relationship between police brutality and health inequities and seeking solutions.

A primary challenge in understanding the impact of police brutality on health is the lack of data. The fact that the best data to date come from newspapers such as The Guardian and The Washington Post is humbling. The National Violent Death Reporting System offers some estimates of deaths linked to police intervention, but not all states participate. 19 Treating law enforcement–related deaths as we would notifiable conditions may be useful for identifying strategies to prevent mortality from police brutality. 9 It is encouraging that recent Bureau of Justice Statistics efforts are focused on collecting more comprehensive data about arrest-related deaths. 20 The Bureau of Justice Statistics and other federal agencies such as the National Center for Health Statistics should continue to invest in active and passive surveillance of police use of force, perhaps collaboratively, as an issue of fair policing, justice, and population health.

We must require national surveys that collect data about health and stress to include stressors that are pertinent to all individuals. Simple questions about how often respondents have been pulled over by police (Philando Castile was reportedly pulled over 49 times in 13 years), how often respondents are followed in stores, and so on can be powerful indicators of the types of everyday stressors that are the products of racism. We must also press funders to support qualitative research that seeks to understand the lived experiences of people faced with police brutality.

Ethnographies, case studies, and interviews might help us better understand the nature of police brutality, the context in which it is experienced, and how it affects well-being. Qualitative work has described how frequent adverse encounters have led Blacks to be negatively disposed toward police. 21 Qualitative work might help us understand the extent to which poor health among Blacks is similarly grounded in everyday experiences of police intimidation, violence, and brutality.

The absence of perfect data is not an excuse for our neglect. Public health scholars can use publicly available data from sources such as the Police–Public Contact Survey conducted by the Bureau of Justice Statistics and the New York City Stop and Frisk program. With these data they can begin documenting evidence by assessing whether people who report experiencing excessive use of force also belong to groups that are more likely to have negative health outcomes. One study using these data found higher rates of adverse health conditions such as high blood pressure among Blacks living in highly and inequitably policed areas regardless of their individual negative contact with police. 22 More studies like this are needed. Partnerships with police departments may enable researchers to extract information from available event reports and summaries to generate useful data sets.

We will be limited in our ability to achieve health equity if all our measures of social inequality and determinants of health are racially coded. Public health has prided itself on its strong focus on social justice and equity. Public health readily examines consequences and by-products of racism such as poverty, lower health literacy, environmental pollutants, and lack of access to services among Blacks. We encourage scholars to purposefully go beyond these by-products and highlight racism and White supremacy as the issues that underlie racial health inequities. 17 Black Lives Matter and similar movements play a role in exposing White supremacy and dismantling racism. It might be useful to explore the impact of these contemporary movements on the social, economic, and political empowerment and well-being of Black communities.

In addition to research, our work in advocacy and policy development should confront oppression in all its forms. At the 2016 Annual Meeting in Denver, Colorado, the American Public Health Association resolved to bring the issue of police violence to the forefront of public policy. Among several advocacy action steps in a policy statement, the American Public Health Association urges federal, state, and local governments to demilitarize police, decriminalize behaviors such as loitering and minor traffic violations, end racialized stop and frisk, and invest in addressing root causes of instability among Black communities. 23 An understudied issue that also requires the attention of public health practitioners and health care workers is how police brutality might breed distrust in health care institutions, especially if institutional policies require health care workers to identify suspects of behaviors considered criminal.

Finally, we must ask ourselves if our own research, teaching, and service are fundamentally and unapologetically antiracist. For example, our schools and programs must include systematic ongoing training on skills for navigating racial bias (explicit and implicit) in and outside of the classroom. This requires critical self-consciousness so faculty and practitioners become comfortable with the language and concepts of antiracist praxis and naming racism and White supremacy. 24 We must also hold our institutions, programs, and departments of health accountable to centering at the margins and deliberately taking the perspectives of marginalized groups. 24,25

Confronting ourselves and the institutions that pay us is uncomfortable—for us, our collaborators, the administration, and our students. But discomfort can produce the best scholarship. We cannot champion efforts to eradicate racial health inequities without interrogating how our own scholarship might be influenced by structural racism and its consequences in the Black community.

Even though we focus on Blacks in this commentary, the pathways we have specified and the agenda we have proposed should be used to explore health inequities across a range of marginalized populations, including Native Americans and Latinos, who experience police brutality at alarmingly high rates. We must continue to assemble evidence that will move us closer to dismantling the systems that maintain excess morbidity and mortality, especially among historically oppressed groups.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the editor and reviewers for their thoughtful comments. We acknowledge the suffering of families that have been directly affected by police brutality, a few of whose experiences we cite.

• Search Menu
• Sign in through your institution
• Author Guidelines
• Why Publish
• Submission Site
• Reviewer guidelines
• Open Access
• About Policing
• Editorial Board
• Advertising and Corporate Services
• Journals Career Network
• Dispatch Dates
• Journals on Oxford Academic
• Books on Oxford Academic

Article Contents

Current state of police accountability in the usa, obstacles to police accountability, where do we go from here.

• < Previous

Police Accountability in the USA: Gaining Traction or Spinning Wheels?

• Article contents
• Figures & tables
• Supplementary Data

Carol A Archbold, Police Accountability in the USA: Gaining Traction or Spinning Wheels?, Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice , Volume 15, Issue 3, September 2021, Pages 1665–1683, https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paab033

• Permissions Icon Permissions

Police accountability has long been a topic of discussion and debate among police practitioners, politicians, and scholars. This topic re-emerges every time there is highly publicized police shooting or incident of police misconduct. This article provides an overview of the current state of police accountability in the USA. This overview includes several examples of the ways in which police accountability has been enhanced in recent years at the local, state, and federal levels. Next, several obstacles to the progression of police accountability in the USA are discussed including a lack of ‘buy-in’ by some police personnel; limited research on the efficacy of common police accountability tools; lack of financial resources; lack of support and guidance by the federal government in recent years; and police unions. Finally, the article concludes with suggestions for overcoming some of the impediments associated with police accountability in the USA.

The last 5 years have been marred with violent police–citizen encounters that have resulted in the deaths of many Americans. According to the Washington Post , there have been 5,929 fatal shootings of people by on-duty police officers since 2015, with approximately 1,000 of those shootings occurring in 2020 ( Washington Post, 2021 ). While half of the people shot and killed by the police are White, people of colour are killed by the police at a disproportionately high rate ( Washington Post, 2021 ). Non-lethal acts of police misconduct have also drawn public attention in recent years. In June 2020, USA Today published an article detailing the contents of a national database of approximately 200,000 cases of police misconduct based on records from police agencies, prosecutors’ offices, and other state agencies. While many of the cases involve minor infractions, a portion of the cases involves more serious acts including 22,924 cases of excessive force; 3,145 allegations of rape, child molestation, and other acts of sexual misconduct; and 2,307 cases of domestic violence ( Kelly and Nichols, 2020 ). Even though the previously described police–citizen encounters represent a small fraction of the millions of police–citizen contacts that occur annually in the USA, the actions of police officers during those encounters resulted in serious injuries, death, as well as an unquantifiable amount of diminished trust and legitimacy in the eyes of the public.

Many deadly shootings and acts of police misconduct have been recorded by officer body cameras or people using their personal cell phones. These recordings have been made available for public consumption through various social media platforms and media outlets. Increased media attention focused on these encounters has led to peaceful protests and social unrest in cities across the USA, along with a renewed call for accountability-based police reform.

Accountability occurs when police officers and police organizations are held responsible for effectively delivering services to their community, while treating people fairly, with dignity, and within the boundaries of formal law ( Walker and Archbold, 2020 ). This issue is important to citizens because they expect the police to act in a manner that reflects their purpose in society—that is, to promote public safety and uphold the rule of law. When officers fail to meet public expectations and take actions that fall outside of what formal law dictates, citizens must have some process available to them to report such behaviours. Accountability also has important implications for police personnel. Police officers need to feel confident that their colleagues will conduct their work in a lawful manner that does not jeopardize their safety or the safety of others; that does not result in people questioning their professional integrity or expose them or their police agency to costly litigation, and that allows them to maintain a trusting, cooperative relationship with the community they serve. Thus, it is in the best interest of both citizens and the police to make police accountability a priority in the USA.

During the last decade, there has been some effort to increase police accountability at the local, state, and federal levels in the USA. For example, many municipalities have implemented civilian review boards to increase police accountability. Review boards vary in composition, size, and function; however, a shared element across all civilian review boards is that citizens are actively involved in the oversight of the police. Over half (61%) of the 100 most populated cities in the USA have a civilian review board, with 22 boards created since 2014 ( Fairley, 2020 ). In December 2020, the National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement Website (2020) listed 131 civilian review boards located in cities across the USA (this count does not include jurisdictions that utilize police auditors/monitors). The number of civilian oversight boards fluctuates over time as new boards are created and others are revamped, suspended, or abandoned.

Many municipal police agencies have also employed body cameras to increase officer accountability. The Bureau of Justice Statistics reports that 47% of police agencies utilized body camera technology in 2016 ( Hyland, 2018 ). Early intervention (EI) systems are another common accountability tool used by some police agencies. EI systems are data-driven programmes that track problematic performance by police officers so that supervisors can intervene before officers’ problematic behaviours result in citizen complaints, costly litigation, incidents resulting in serious physical harm or death to citizens or officers, or police officers losing their jobs ( Walker et al., 2000 ). Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS) data indicate that 44% of all reporting police agencies utilized EI systems in 2007, with larger police agencies adopting EI systems at twice the rate as small police agencies ( Shjarback, 2015 ).

Many police executives across the USA have changed use of force policies, and now provide specialized training to reduce the likelihood that officers will use (or misuse) deadly force. A recent study using shooting data from the Dallas (TX) Police Department found that a policy which requires mandatory reporting of firearm ‘pointing’ was associated with a reduction in ‘threat perception failure’ shootings (when officers mistakenly shoot someone because they believed that the person had a weapon) ( Shjarback et al. , 2021 ). In addition to the use of force policy changes, some police agencies provide officers with de-escalation training to reduce the use of force during encounters with community members. In 2017, 16 states across the USA had mandated de-escalation training for police officers; however, many states have no minimum number of hours set for this type of training ( Gilbert, 2017 ). The statistics associated with each of the previously mentioned accountability strategies indicate that some municipal-level community leaders and police executives are taking steps to increase accountability within their organizations and communities.

Many state political leaders are also responding to the renewed call for police reform by passing legislation meant to increase police accountability. According to the Vera Institute of Justice, 34 states and the District of Columbia passed 79 bills, executive orders, and resolutions making changes to laws associated with police accountability in 2015 and 2016 ( Subramanian and Skrzypiec, 2017 ). This is a notable increase as there were approximately 20 changes made to laws associated with police accountability from 2012 to 2014.

Some recent examples of state-level police reform include the following: In July 2020, Connecticut passed a police reform law that makes it easier for citizens to file lawsuits against individual officers in state court ( Polansky, 2020 ). The catch is that officers will only be held financially liable if it can be proven that they knowingly broke the law. This law does not erase qualified immunity; instead, it creates a more thorough review process, which can result in the decertification of officers involved in misconduct. In December 2020, Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker, signed legislation that included the creation of a new civilian-based panel that can revoke officers’ licenses for involvement in misconduct, and requires police officers to intervene if they witness fellow officers using unnecessary or excessive force ( Stout, 2020 ). In January 2021, the Illinois General Assembly passed legislation that requires every police officer in the state to eventually be equipped with a body camera ( Petrella, 2021 ).

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo initiated state-wide police reform when he issued an Executive Order in June 2020 requiring all 500 police departments across the state to create and submit accountability plans by spring 2021 ( Villeneuve, 2020 ). Each agency must create a formal accountability plan using guidelines provided by the Governor’s Office which includes changes related to community engagement; increasing transparency by making agency data and policies accessible to the public; civilian oversight of the police; utilization of accountability-based technology within police agencies (such as EI systems and body cameras); strategies to reduce racial disparities in police–citizen interactions; and changing the culture within New York police agencies, to name a few ( New York State Police Reform and Reinvention Collaborative: Resources and Guide for Public Officials and Citizens, 2020 ). Any police agency that does not submit an accountability plan to the state will no longer be eligible for future funding ( New York State Governor’s Website, 2020 ). This executive order increases the likelihood that police agencies will take the necessary steps to increase accountability because their funding is contingent upon it. Another benefit resulting from this executive order is that police reform will occur within hundreds of police agencies all at once, instead of just a few agencies choosing to make changes.

During the last decade, the most significant step taken to increase police accountability at the federal level took place in 2014, when President Barrack Obama created the President’s Task Force on 21stCentury Policing. The purpose of this Task Force was to examine police-related problems and recommend actions resulting in police reform. The Task Force made several recommendations aimed at repairing fractured police–community relationships. Specifically, they recommend that police officers utilize procedural justice strategies when interacting with residents in their communities. Procedural justice involves police officers treating citizens in a way that makes them believe that they have been treated fairly, with respect, and that they were given an opportunity to explain their actions during encounters with the police ( Tyler, 1988 ). This strategy is based on the idea that citizens will view the police as a legitimate group if they believe that the police treated them fairly.

De-escalation training and changes to department use of force policies are also specifically mentioned in the action steps of the Task Force Report. Even though there is no consensus on a definition of de-escalation within the context of the policing profession; in general, it has been described as training that teaches officers to slow down, create space between themselves and the citizen involved in the interaction, and to use communication strategies to defuse volatile situations that could otherwise result in some use of force ( Engel et al. , 2020 ). The Task Force report also advises police agencies to change department policies to mandate that officers use de-escalation techniques when they encounter potentially dangerous situations. Some police agencies now require officers to file formal reports describing how they utilized de-escalation techniques during volatile situations. After the death of George Floyd during the summer 2020, the Minneapolis (MN) Police Department changed its use of force reporting policy to require all police officers to document how they utilized de-escalation techniques during dangerous encounters, regardless if they ended up using force or not ( Forliti, 2020 ).

In addition to procedural justice and de-escalation, the Task Force recommends that police agencies operate in an open and transparent manner to increase trust and legitimacy with the public. An example of this includes the police providing public access to information, such as citizen complaints filed against officers, police–citizen contact data, arrest data, as well as public access to department policies (including use of lethal and non-lethal force policies). A simple way that transparency can be achieved is by police agencies posting this information on department websites (perhaps included in annual reports), where it is easily accessible to community members. Furthermore, the Task Force suggests that police agencies involve citizens in the development and alteration of department policies. This collaborative effort allows public voices to be heard and it also signals to the public that the police value their input.

Another central theme found within the Task Force report includes increasing police accountability. Task Force members believe that increased accountability contributes to police legitimacy by ensuring that officers will do their job based on police training, department policies, and taking actions based on formal law. Increased accountability also means that officers will be properly supervised while on duty, by police supervisors on the streets and in some cases, also by virtual supervision using technology, such as body cameras and EI systems to monitor officer performance.

Despite efforts to increase accountability at the local, state, and federal levels, we continue to see media accounts of police-involved shootings and acts of police misconduct. These incidents also continue to involve people of colour at a disproportionately high rate. It would be naïve to think that these incidents would completely stop after police agencies begin utilizing accountability strategies; however, it is reasonable to expect that we would see fewer of these incidents over time.

Currently, it is difficult to identify specific trends associated with acts of non-lethal police misconduct on a national level, because police agencies are not required to track and report these incidents in any systematic way. In addition, American police agencies only recently started reporting police-involved shootings to the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBIs) in 2019. Unfortunately, only 41% of all federal, state, local, and tribal police agencies voluntarily submitted shooting data for 2019, and participation only increased to 42% in 2020 ( Federal Bureau of Investigations Website, 2021 ). To be able to accurately assess how and if police accountability strategies influence the prevalence of police-involved shootings and acts of police misconduct, all American police agencies would have to be required to report these incidents to the FBI annually. In addition to the lack of systematically collected data, there are several factors that may impede the progression of police accountability efforts in the USA.

The decentralized nature of American policing, which consists of over 18,000 independent local and state police agencies, makes police reform on a national level difficult and slows the progress of reform down to a snail’s pace. It is likely that we are not yet seeing any significant changes related to police accountability on a national level because some police executives have not taken any steps to make accountability a priority in their organizations. The police executives that have taken steps to increase accountability or are planning to take those steps in the future, face several barriers both before and after implementation that can hinder the success of these accountability strategies.

Lack of ‘buy-in’ by police personnel

A lack of ‘buy in’ by police personnel is a potential roadblock to increasing accountability within American police agencies. Some patrol-level officers and supervisors may not support the use of accountability strategies and technology. For example, research conducted on police officers’ perceptions of body cameras has generally found that officers have positive or neutral feelings towards the use of body cameras, and in some cases, officers’ perceptions of this technology became positive over time ( Maskaly et al., 2017 ; Lum et al., 2019 ). There are also studies that found some officers are resistant to the use of body cameras as they believe it will increase the likelihood of them being disciplined for minor policy violations, reduce their ability to use discretion, and create issues regarding officer safety and privacy ( Headley et al., 2017 ; White et al., 2018 ; Young and Ready, 2018 ). There is also some evidence that command staff and police supervisors do not fully support the use of body cameras ( Smykla et al., 2016 ; Snyder et al., 2019 ). To increase ‘buy-in’ for any police reform strategy, officers and supervisors should be given an opportunity to provide input prior to implementation, and police leaders should be prepared to answer questions that police personnel have regarding proposed changes within their organization ( Rosenbaum and McCarty, 2017 ).

The lack of ‘buy in’ by police personnel may also be influenced by the culture found within police organizations. Police culture involves officers’ attitudes associated with cynicism and mistrust of citizens and supervisors, authoritarianism, loyalty to fellow officers, resistance to change, aggressive enforcement of the law, and secrecy ( Paoline, 2003 ). Many of the Task Force recommendations, such as an increase in the oversight and accountability of officers, transparency of organizational data and operations, and increased collaboration with members of the public, diametrically conflict with many of the attitudes associated with police culture.

Limited research on the efficacy of police accountability strategies/tools

When making the decision to implement strategies to increase officer accountability, police executives should seek out practices and technology that have been deemed effective through scientific evaluation. Unfortunately, police executives will find limited research (and in some cases conflicting research) on the effectiveness of many of the accountability tools/strategies recommended by the Task Force.

For example, limited research has been conducted on the efficacy of EI systems. The few evaluations that have been conducted on this accountability tool produced mixed findings. A systematic review of research on EI systems identified only seven studies conducted in the USA during the last two decades ( Gullion and King, 2020 ). Walker et al. (2000) conducted one of the earliest evaluations of EI systems in police agencies in Minneapolis (MN), Miami-Dade (FL), and New Orleans (LA). All three police agencies reported reductions in use of force and citizen complaints filed against officers after the implementation of an EI system. An evaluation in the Pittsburgh (PA) Police Bureau found a reduction in use of force and search and seizures a year after the EI system was implemented as part of a consent decree agreement ( Davis et al., 2005 ). Similar findings emerged from an evaluation within the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department. Researchers discovered a reduction in use of force, citizen complaints, officer-involved shootings, and litigation related to use of force ( Bobb et al., 2009 ). Research in a northeastern police department found a reduction in citizen complaints, but also discovered that arrests (including proactive arrests) also decreased after an EI system was utilized, suggesting that police officers may have been avoiding contact with citizens ( Worden et al., 2013 )—this is sometimes referred to as de-policing or no contact, no complaints policing.

Two of the seven evaluations reviewed by Gullion and King (2020) discovered problems with the accuracy of EI systems. Specifically, an EI system in a southern police department did not flag police officers with the highest number of force incidents ( Lersch et al., 2006 ). This is problematic as the purpose of an EI system is to identify officers exhibiting poor work performance, and alert police supervisors so they can intervene before officers’ behaviours result in something more serious (such as serious injuries or death, or loss of employment for officers). Another study analysed LEMAS data from 2003 and 2007 to see if police agencies that utilize EI systems experienced a change in rates of citizen complaints of force ( Shjarback, 2015 ). This study also looked for any differences in the success of EI systems in police agencies that voluntarily use EI systems compared with agencies that were mandated to use this technology as part of a consent decree agreement. The findings revealed no statistical differences in the mean rates of citizen use of force complaints after EI systems were utilized by police agencies or differences in the mean rate of force complaints when comparing police agencies that voluntarily implemented EI systems with agencies that were mandated to do so.

A study published shortly after the review by Gullion and King (2020) also found problems with the effectiveness of an EI system. James et al . (2020 ) analysed a random sample of police–citizen incident reports for officers who were flagged by an EI system, along with reports for officers who were not flagged by the EI system to determine if there were differences in officer performance. In general, they discovered that officer performance was similar when comparing the two groups. This means that the EI system was not able to distinguish officers with problematic performance from those who were not flagged by the EI system. The only differences found between the two groups of officers were that officers flagged by the EI system performed slightly better during the ‘observe and assess’ phase of crisis situations, and were slightly more likely to use reasonable force against suspects when compared with officers who had not been flagged by the EI system (James et al. , 2020). Also, women were over-represented in the group of officers flagged by the EI system in this police agency.

When considering the mixed results produced from the limited number of EI system studies, police executives may be left wondering if EI systems will help them increase accountability within their organizations, and if implementing an EI system is worth the financial investment. Additional research is needed to better understand the complexities associated with this accountability tool.

The Task Force report also recommends that police executives provide de-escalation training for officers to reduce the use of physical force, keeping both citizens and officers safe. But, does this training influence officers’ attitudes and behaviours during dangerous encounters with citizens? Robin Engel et al. (2020) recently conducted a systematic literature review of published evaluations of de-escalation training. They identified 64 publications that fit the criteria for inclusion in their review. They discovered that there are no publications featuring an evaluation of the efficacy of de-escalation training in the criminal justice discipline. Most of the evaluations were conducted on de-escalation training in the professions of nursing and psychiatry, and only 3 of the 64 evaluations used adequate research designs that could draw out any meaningful conclusions regarding the impact of the training ( Engel et al. , 2020 ). The fact that there is no scientific research on the efficacy of de-escalation training within the context of policing leaves police executives in a situation where they must make decisions about utilizing this type of training without any real evidence that it will work.

Civilian oversight boards are also mentioned in the action steps of the Task Force report as a mechanism to increase police accountability. Community leaders will struggle to find research on the effectiveness of oversight boards, even though they have existed in the USA as far back as the 1920s ( De Angelis et al., 2016 ). Researchers have struggled with evaluations of civilian oversight boards because there are several types of boards with varying composition, structure, and operational differences ( Ferdik et al., 2013 ). There is also difficulty in deciding which outcome measures to use to determine effectiveness.

A few researchers have examined the impact of civilian review boards on police outcomes using sustained complaints against police officers as a measure of effectiveness. In 2006, Matthew Hickman analysed citizen complaints of police use of force drawn from the 2003 LEMAS dataset. He discovered that police agencies located in jurisdictions with civilian review boards had a higher rate of force complaints (11.9 per 100 officers) compared with police agencies in jurisdictions without civilian review boards (6.6 per 100 officers). He also found that the overall percentage of sustained complaints was lower in jurisdictions with civilian oversight (6%) compared with jurisdictions that did not have civilian oversight (11%) ( Hickman, 2006 ). Police agencies that used internal affairs to investigate complaints of force had a slightly higher percentage of sustained complaints (8–9%) compared with police agencies in jurisdictions with civilian review boards (6%). This finding is surprising since a common reason that jurisdictions implement civilian review boards is because of the perception that citizen complaints will less likely be sustained if the police (internal affairs) are policing themselves.

Several years later, Terrill and Ingram (2016) analysed citizen complaint data from eight cities across the USA. They found that citizen complaints were 78% more likely to be sustained in jurisdictions where the disposition decisions of complaints made by internal affairs were also reviewed by an external civilian oversight board ( Terrill and Ingram, 2016 ). There are many contextual factors that could explain the differences in the findings from the Hickman (2006) and Terrill and Ingram (2016) studies including the local political climate within individual jurisdictions, the composition and structure of the oversight boards, and the presence and strength of police unions, to name a few. Additional research is needed to better understand the impact of civilian oversight boards on the accountability of officers.

There is one accountability tool that has received a significant amount of attention from researchers—police body cameras. A recent study identified 119 published reports and peer-reviewed studies on police body cameras as of the end of December 2019 ( Gaub and White, 2020 ). Many of these studies examine the extent to which body cameras influence the behaviours and attitudes of officers and citizens. The early studies looked for behavioural changes using outcome measures such as use of force incidents and citizen complaints. Many of the early studies found positive results—specifically, a reduction in the use of force and citizen complaints (see Maskaly et al., 2017 for an overview of early literature).

Two recent reviews by Cynthia Lum et al. (2019 , 2020 ) produced less positive assessments of this technology. After conducting a review of 70 studies, Lum et al. (2019 : 93) concluded that body cameras ‘have not had statistically significant or consistent effects on most measures of officer and citizen behavior or citizens’ views of the police’. Lum reviewed 30 body camera studies for her 2020 publication—this time only including studies that utilized randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental research designs, and that measured police and citizen behavioural outcomes ( Lum et al. , 2020 ). They concluded that body cameras do not have significant effects on officers’ behaviours including use of force, making arrests, and other activities. However, they did find that body cameras reduced citizen complaints filed against police officers, but were unsure why complaints declined ( Lum et al. , 2020 ).

The conflicting assessments of the efficacy of body cameras could leave some police executives wondering if they should invest or continue to invest in this technology. A recent report by the Police Executive Research Forum (2018) noted that the most common reason given by police leaders to deploy body cameras was to promote accountability, transparency, and legitimacy. If police executives are unsure that body cameras will help their agency promote these items, their decision to implement body cameras becomes difficult.

Limited resources

Police executives interested in utilizing accountability strategies within their organizations must find resources to pay for that expense. Changes made to department policies and training often require additional expenditures of agency resources. All the accountability tools/strategies previously discussed in this article require a significant financial commitment. For example, in a June 2020 memo, Police Chief Williams of the Phoenix (AZ) Police Department stated that ‘costs for a new EI system ranged from $952,000 to $2.08 million, which does not include personnel or additional hardware costs needed to support a new system’ ( City of Phoenix - Office of the Police Chief, 2020 ). A report by the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) lists the total annual cost for one body camera ranging from $1,125 up to $2,883, which includes the cost of the camera, data storage, equipment maintenance, and staff ( PERF, 2018 : 52). These prices may be manageable for police agencies employing a small number of officers; however, the costs will add up quickly as the size of the police agency increases.

It has been suggested that local and county-level governments could cover the costs (or some of the costs) associated with accountability-based police reform by using resources that are otherwise used to pay for costly litigation. Some municipalities and counties across the USA include a line item in their annual budgets devoted to anticipated payments for liability and litigation cases involving police personnel ( Archbold, 2005 ). In New York City, the Office of Management and Budget set aside $697 million in 2019 and $733 million in 2020 to pay for liability and litigation-based payouts associated with city employees ( Carrega, 2020 ). Payouts specifically associated withNew York Police Department (NYPD) officers include $237.4 million in 2018 and $220.1 million in 2019 ( Carrega, 2020 ). Los Angeles (CA) county also sets aside funds for anticipated litigation and liability payouts annually. For fiscal year 2018–19, the budget included $148.5 million for anticipated litigation/liability claims; $91.5 million of that was used to pay for settlements and judgements involving employees of the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department ( Carrega, 2020 ). It could be argued that the resources set aside for anticipated litigation and liability payouts should be used to invest in accountability strategies that could ultimately reduce litigation and liability incidents involving officers in the future.

There is limited information on the cost-savings resulting from the implementation of accountability-based strategies and technology, and most of this research focuses on body cameras. A 2017 study conducted within the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department revealed a cost-savings associated with the use of body cameras. Specifically, the researchers discovered an annual estimated cost savings of $2,909–$3,178 per user, due to fewer complaints of misconduct and having to use fewer resources to investigate allegations of misconduct ( Braga et al., 2017 ). The Police Executive Research Forum (2018) conducted a cost–benefit analysis looking at lawsuits and body cameras. They found a reduction in litigation costs after body cameras were implemented in Mesa (AZ), Phoenix (AZ), but not in Dallas (TX). The researchers noted that caution should be taken when interpreting these findings because litigation data are sensitive to outliers and the outliers may be independent from effects of body cameras ( Police Executive Research Forum, 2018 ). Additional research is needed to fully understand the extent to which accountability strategies and tools reduce liability and litigation costs.

Finding extra resources to cover the expense associated with the implementation of accountability tools is likely to be a challenge in most jurisdictions across the USA and would likely be even more challenging in jurisdictions where local governments are defunding the police. In the past, the federal government has made resources available to police agencies to ease the financial burden associated with police reform. In 2015, President Obama worked with the Department of Justice to provide $20 million in competitive grants to police agencies interested in utilizing body cameras ( Fritze, 2015 ). In 2016, the Department of Justice provided $12 million to support the Collaborative Reform Initiative for Technical Assistance (CRITA) programme. The CRITA programme was a voluntary process by which law enforcement agencies could request help from the federal government to evaluate and suggest changes to policies and practices with the goal of improving their relationship with their community and ultimately increasing accountability, without the worry of financial costs ( Charles, 2017 ). Unfortunately, the focus of the CRITA programme dramatically shifted away from accountability and towards crime control in 2017 after the change in presidential administration ( Barrett, 2017 ). Fewer resources directed towards accountability-based police reform by the federal government in recent years have likely contributed to the slow progression of police accountability in the USA.

Lack of support from the federal government

Earlier in this article, the creation of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing (2015) was identified as one of the most influential steps taken by the federal government to increase police accountability in the USA. The Task Force report continues to serve as a valuable guide for police executives interested in making changes within their organizations today. In addition to creating the Task Force, the Obama administration also provided financial resources for police agencies interested in implementing technology meant to increase accountability (such as body cameras), and also supported federal oversight of police agencies involved in controversial shootings and that have been accused of civil rights violations ( Faturechi, 2020 ). The federal government played a significant role in leading the effort to reform policing in the USA from 2008 to 2016.

With the change in administration in 2017, many of the accountability-focused reform efforts that started during the Obama administration were radically altered or discontinued. As discussed in an earlier section of this article, significant changes were made to the CRITA programme in 2017 when the accountability-based focus of that programme was redirected towards crime control ( Barrett, 2017 ). The decision to shift the focus of the CRITA programme was heavily criticized by people involved in police reform during the Obama administration. Ronald Davis, former head of the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) Office, suggested that the changes to the CRITA programme no longer make it collaborative reform as there would no longer be any in-depth assessment of police policies and practices by a neutral third party ( Mallonee and Watkins, 2017 ). Instead, police agencies receive training and strategies centred on crime reduction, which is something that the COPS Office already provides police agencies.

Another accountability-based practice that receded under the Trump administration is the use of pattern or practice investigations by the Department of Justice. Pattern or practice investigations are used to reform consistent practices of excessive force, biased policing, and other unconstitutional practices by police officers ( Civil Rights Division—US Department of Justice, 2017 ). These investigations are conducted to ensure that police agencies lawfully and fairly provide services to people in their communities. In instances where there is evidence of a pattern of police misconduct, police agencies work to resolve the issues using an order enforced by a federal court called a consent decree. Twenty-five consent decrees were initiated during the Obama administration, while just one investigation was initiated during the 4 years of the Trump administration ( Valverde, 2020 ). The lack of interest in federal oversight of police agencies was confirmed when then US Attorney General Jeffrey Sessions proclaimed that ‘it is not the federal government’s responsibility to manage non-federal law enforcement’ ( Valverde, 2020 ).

With the most recent change in administration at the federal level in 2021, the pendulum could swing back to the place where police accountability is held at a high level of importance by the federal government. While on the campaign trail, Joe Biden hinted at this change when he committed to properly funding the COPS programme so that it can play a role in the reformation of American police departments, and he vowed to empower the US Department of Justice to hold police agencies accountable for abuses or acts of misconduct ( Joebiden.com, 2021 ). We will likely learn more about President Biden’s plan to reform American policing in the near future.

Police unions

Prior to the 1960s, police unions had little influence in police governance in the USA. An increase in public criticism directed towards the police during the 1960s led to the emergence of legally recognized police unions ( Walker, 2016 ). Early on, the work of police unions centred on activities typical to most unions, such as securing fair salaries, benefits, and safe working conditions. As police unions gained strength in the 1970s by increasing their membership and creating strong political connections, the scope of their work expanded beyond the typical activities of unions.

Today, police unions are considered an influential force in many American police agencies. They influence operational elements within police organizations, which in turn, limit the authority of police leaders. Some police unions have become deeply entrenched in politics. This involvement is demonstrated by them creating political action committees to make financial contributions to candidates running in elections at the local, state, and federal levels ( Perkins, 2020 ). Records from the US House and Senate indicate that police unions have spent approximately $47.3 million at the federal level for lobbying and campaign contributions in recent elections ( Perkins, 2020 ). Campaign contributions provide police unions with leverage to influence decisions made regarding city charters and state legislation, which ultimately impact the work of police officers. Police unions also use their resources to shape public perceptions of political candidates. For example, some police unions sponsor advertisements which suggest that a candidate is ‘soft’ on crime, which in turn, can influence whether the candidate will win his/her political race ( McCorkel, 2020 ). The ability of police unions to influence political leaders has led to the creation of contractual and legislative barriers that can thwart police reform efforts. As a result, police unions have been identified as a major impediment to the progression of police accountability in the USA ( Walker, 2012 ).

Police unions use the collective bargaining process to negotiate contracts that include myriad restrictions related to investigations and disciplinary actions involving police officers, as well as general oversight of the police ( Rushin, 2017 ). It is common for union contracts to contain requirements allowing officers to challenge adverse personnel decisions made by their superiors ( Rushin, 2017 ). In some jurisdictions, union contracts override city charters, state laws, and have even stalled the enforcement of federal consent decrees in several cities across the USA ( Emmanuel, 2016 ; Barker et al., 2020 ). Police union contracts are negotiated in private settings in all but eight states in the USA, which leaves no opportunity for scrutiny or feedback from the media or community members ( McCorkel, 2020 ).

Police leaders struggle to hold officers accountable when restrictions are placed on the procedures used to investigate officers accused of misconduct. Collective bargaining agreements dictate how investigations will be conducted including the time of day that officers can be questioned, how long officers are questioned, as well as the number of investigators that can be present during questioning ( Bellisle, 2020 ). It is also common for police officers to review all the evidence against them prior to them being questioned ( McCorkel, 2020 ). In some jurisdictions, police officers involved in deadly force incidents are given a specified period before they can be questioned about the incident and can have a union representative or attorney present during questioning ( McCorkel, 2020 ). Many collective bargaining agreements include restrictions requiring that only sworn police personnel can be involved in the investigation of police officers. This means that it would be next to impossible to create a civilian oversight board in these jurisdictions, or the oversight board would be severely limited in its involvement in the investigation of officer misconduct (which defeats the purpose of having an oversight board).

Police unions also have a say in the process citizens use to file formal complaints against police officers. Some jurisdictions require citizens to notarize their complaints before they are turned in for investigation, and in some cases, citizens are required to provide sworn statements or videotaped testimony to accompany formal complaints ( Honolulu Police Department Website, 2021 ). Union contracts also determine how long citizens have to file a complaint after an incident has occurred. If they fail to file a complaint within the specified period, their complaint will not be investigated ( Levinson, 2017 ).

Collective bargaining agreements also influence the use and handling of officer employment records, including disciplinary records and recordings of officers on duty. ‘Purge clauses’ make it difficult to identify which officers have a history of misconduct allegations because police unions require police agencies to destroy disciplinary records after a specified period of time (typically 2–5 years; McCorkel, 2020 ). Purge clauses also make it difficult for police agencies to implement EI systems, as it is typical to use a variety of officer records as measures to track problematic work performance. Also, police departments interested in utilizing body cameras would have to negotiate who would have access to body camera footage, and how long the footage will be stored by the police agency.

Another way that police unions exert control over accountability efforts of police leaders is to require that police officers have the right to appeal decisions made in disciplinary cases to an arbitrator or arbitration board. In some jurisdictions, police unions get to choose which arbitrators are included in a pool that is used when officers file appeals of decisions made by their superiors ( Burger, 2017 ). This has led to some police chiefs choosing not to take any disciplinary action against officers who deserve it, or allowing officers to resign (instead of being punished or fired), which means that officers leave the agency with a clean record allowing them to seek employment in another police agency without any problems ( Barker et al. , 2020 ).

Arbitration can also lead to the rehiring of police officers who have been previously fired, often with retro-active pay ( Bellisle, 2020 ). This makes it difficult for police leaders to permanently remove officers involved in acts of misconduct and misuse of force. This issue was highlighted during the summer of 2020 after the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis, MN. The Star Tribune revealed that over the last 20 years, approximately half of the 80 police officers who were fired by police agencies across the state of Minnesota were rehired after they appealed to an arbitration board ( Bjorhus, 2020 ). Rehiring fired police officers is not just a problem in Minnesota. In 2017, the Washington Post reported that police chiefs from 37 of the largest police agencies across the USA were required to rehire approximately one-quarter of the officers they previously fired ( Kelly et al., 2017 ). The Washington Post article noted that officers who were rehired after being fired were involved in serious acts of misconduct including sexual abuse, lying, being drunk on duty, and driving a gunman from the scene of a shooting where someone died. Police leaders also have the option to negotiate a financial settlement to convince previously fired officers not to return to their position. This was the case for a St Anthony (MN) police officer who fatally shot Philando Castille during a traffic stop in July 2016. After the officer was acquitted of criminal charges, the city agreed to pay the officer $50,000 not to return to his position in the St Anthony Police Department ( Barker et al., 2020 ). These are just a few examples that demonstrate how police leaders face many restrictions resulting from police union contracts when they try to hold police officers accountable for their actions.

Much of what is known about American police unions is the result of investigative reporting by media outlets. In general, there has been limited research on police unions in the USA ( National Academy of Sciences, 2004 ). This is surprising given the level of influence that police unions have had in American police agencies for decades. Some of the research on police unions focuses on the content of collective bargaining agreements/contracts and how those provisions restrict police leaders from holding officers accountable.

Campaign Zero, is a non-profit group that analyses police practices in the USA to identify solutions to end police violence, increase police accountability, and develop legislation to reform the police ( Campaign Zero Website, 2021 ). In 2016, this group reviewed police union contracts in 81 of the 100 most populated US cities and discovered that 72 cities allow police officers to appeal disciplinary decisions to an arbitrator or arbitration board. This review also found that union contracts in 63 cities have three or more provisions that act as barriers to accountability.

In 2017, Reuters conducted a similar analysis of 82 police union contracts in large US cities and found that most of the contracts require police departments to erase officer disciplinary records (in some jurisdictions after 6 months; Levinson, 2017 ). The review also discovered that in 18 cities, records of officer suspensions are purged after 3 years (in some places less than 3 years). Approximately half of the union contracts allow officers being investigated for misconduct to review the entire contents of their investigative file prior to their interrogation ( Levinson, 2017 ). Written consent provided by police officers is required before police agencies can provide public access to documents associated with internal investigations and prior disciplinary actions taken against police officers in 18 cities. Union contracts set time limits for citizens to file complaints of misconduct against officers in 17 cities.

Stephen Rushin (2017) analysed 178 police union contracts from the largest police departments across the USA and discovered that 88% of the contracts included at least one provision that limits police leaders’ ability to hold officers accountable. His review revealed that many contracts ban civilian oversight of the police; place restrictions on interrogation of officers facing allegations of misconduct; require police agencies to destroy officers’ disciplinary records; prohibit the collection and investigation of anonymous citizen complaints; and limit the timeframe of internal investigations ( Rushin, 2017 ).

Most recently, Harris and Sweeney (2021) examined police union contracts from 47 of the largest cities in the USA. They discovered that all 47 contracts had at least one provision that would impede the investigations of officers involved in acts of misconduct. Restrictions are placed on citizen complaints of misconduct in 39 union contracts. The restrictions include time limits on filing complaints, the names of complainants are provided to officers who are named in complaints, not allowing anonymous complaints to be filed, and the legal penalties for filing false complaints are printed on complaint forms. Provisions related to police interrogations were included in 29 union contracts. The restrictions include a mandatory waiting period prior to interrogations, as well as restrictions on the length of interrogations before officers are allowed a break. Finally, 45 of the union contracts include provisions related to discipline, such as expungement of records after a specified period, the use of sick leave days to offset suspension, and impose statutes of limitation on discipline ( Harris and Sweeney, 2021 ). All the provisions found within police union contracts in this study are threats to police accountability. All of the previously mentioned obstacles to police accountability create challenges for police executives and community leaders who want to increase accountability within their organizations and communities. Many of the impediments can be overcome if police executives, community leaders, and political leaders work together to come up with feasible solutions.

The title of this article includes a question regarding the progression of police accountability in the USA—gaining traction or spinning wheels? On one hand, it could be argued that police accountability is gaining traction in the USA as several police leaders are taking steps to increase accountability within their organizations, whether it be changing policies, increasing and improving training, or implementing strategies and technology meant to hold officers accountable. It could also be argued that we currently have the highest level of police accountability in the USA than any other time in our country’s history. On the other hand, there is also some evidence of spinning wheels, as there is currently limited research on the efficacy of most of the police accountability tools and strategies suggested by the Task Force report; there is a lack of systematic data collection of police misconduct incidents (on a national level); there has been less support and leadership provided by the federal government in recent years to advance police accountability forward; police unions continue to negotiate contracts that contain provisions that stymie accountability efforts of police leaders, and there are still many police leaders who have not taken any steps to make accountability a priority in their organizations.

So, where do we go from here? Based on the assessment of the current state of police accountability in the USA presented in this article, we still have work to do. Advancing police accountability further in this country will only be possible through the actions and commitment of political leaders, police leaders and police personnel, researchers, and American citizens. This is a complex issue that warrants input and action from a variety of groups—this is not something that police leaders can do on their own.

The US federal government must step back into a leadership role by providing support and resources to help police agencies make changes that will enhance accountability. Government leaders must require police executives that have not taken any steps to increase accountability to do so now. It has been said that making meaningful changes within American police organizations is challenging—in fact, it has been compared to ‘bending granite’ ( Guyot, 1979 ). However, resources and support from federal and state government could make this process less difficult.

Results from a recent survey indicate that some police leaders are looking to the federal government for help. In November 2020, the PERF analysed surveys completed by 375 police executives asking about their views of priorities for the next presidential administration. Here are some significant findings from this survey:

Police executives identified the top two concerns for the next presidential administration as increasing public trust in the police and addressing the call for police reform. This finding suggests that some police leaders are thinking about issues (such as strengthening police-community relationships) that can be partially solved by enhancing police accountability within their organizations.

When asked which areas they would like to see federal grant assistance available in the future, the top three answers included training, research on ‘what works’ in policing, and grants for police equipment. Police executives identified de-escalation training, bias-free policing/community engagement, and training to help officers respond to mental health calls as the top three choices of training. Body cameras and less than lethal technologies were the top two types of technologies they would like to see government funding for in the near future (EI systems also made the list but was mentioned less frequently by police executives).

When asked which strategies they consider to be most effective in improving the police-community relationship, police leaders identified increased face-to-face contact with citizens; educating the public about policing; utilizing strategies associated with transparency, accountability, and legitimacy; and holding listening sessions on difficult topics with community members.

When asked about their greatest hopes for help from the next presidential administration, the most common responses included federal support for law enforcement; reform measures (many identified reforms listed in the Task Force report); healing the current divide in our society between democrats and republicans, as well as between the police and their communities; become more educated about how the police conduct their work; and enhancing accountability by giving police executives the power to fire officers involved in acts of misconduct. They mentioned that they would like to see limitations placed on police unions and arbitrators, so that these groups cannot reverse their decisions related to the discipline or firing of problematic officers ( PERF, 2020 ).

The findings from this survey create a list for the Biden administration identifying specific resources and support that police executives need to strengthen relationships with their communities and to advance police accountability in this country.

Another way that political leaders can help police executives increase accountability within their organizations is to work with police unions to remove provisions within union contracts that prohibit police leaders from holding their officers accountable. As noted earlier in this article, collective bargaining agreements often usurp city charters, state legislation, and in some cases court orders that are enforced at the federal level (consent decrees).

In the past, police unions have been unwilling to give up the protections that come along with provisions typically included in collective bargaining agreements (such as provisions that restrict police executives’ ability to discipline or fire officers involved in misconduct). A recent article in the University of Chicago Law Review proposes federal legislation that would encourage police unions to make much-needed changes to collective bargaining agreements. Specifically, Mogck (2020 : 4) proposes that ‘police unions should receive tax-exempt status only if they implement certain indispensable accountability measures in their collective bargaining agreements. Tax exempt status is important to unions: because union dues, donations, and investment income would otherwise be taxable income, losing tax-exempt status would dramatically shrink unions’ operating budgets’. This legislation would give police unions 1 year to renegotiate collective bargaining agreements. Police unions that are unwilling to renegotiate union contracts would forfeit their tax-exempt status ( Mogck, 2020 ). To some, this proposed legislation may appear to be a bit extreme. However, it is important to remember all the ways that provisions within collective bargaining agreements can hamstring police leaders who try to hold their officers accountable.

Currently, American police agencies are not required to track and report incidents of police misconduct in any systematic way. This means that there are no national statistics on police misconduct. There is no way to know the extent of officer involvement in such acts, which in turn, means that it would be difficult to determine if accountability strategies/technology influence or change officer behaviour in any way. It is impossible to come up with potential solutions to the problem of police misconduct if we do not know the scope of this problem. Most of what is known about police misconduct in the USA is currently generated by media outlets or independent groups. It is time for the government to play a central role in the systematic collection of police misconduct data. Similar to the collection of police shootings, federal and state government officials must encourage police leaders to collect and submit police misconduct data (annually) to a national depository (such as the FBI).

Police executives ultimately determine how important police accountability is in their organizations. There are some who have taken several steps to enhance accountability by implementing strategies and technology meant to monitor officers’ work performance, increase transparency, and hold officers accountable if they choose to become involved in misconduct. These individuals need to continue their efforts. There are, however, other police leaders who have not done anything to make accountability a priority in their organizations. It is critical that these leaders act now. Police leaders should include police personnel from all ranks in the decision-making process related to the adoption of technology and strategies meant to hold officers accountable. This collaborative effort with others in the police organization could increase police personnel buy-in.

To study how and if police officers are being held accountable for their actions, police leaders need to be open to building collaborative partnerships with researchers. The only way to figure out which police accountability strategies are effective is if researchers are allowed access to data. The Police Data Initiative (PDI) is a good example of collaboration between police agencies and researchers. PDI was launched in response to recommendations in the Task Force report. This initiative is a cooperative effort by the Police Foundation, the US Department of Justice/Office of COPS and 130 law enforcement agencies across the USA ( Police Data Initiative Website, 2021 )). This website contains datasets provided by law enforcement agencies across the country, which are accessible to the public. There are datasets that include citizen complaints, use of force incidents, assaults on officers, traffic stops, citations, and arrest, to name a few. Police agencies voluntarily upload their data to this portal. By providing data to this initiative, police agencies are demonstrating their commitment to transparency and accountability. The Police Open Data Census is another website where police agencies make their data available to researchers. This website contains datasets on a variety of topics including response time, use of force, citizen complaints, officer involved shootings, pursuits, traffic and pedestrian stops, and citations ( Police Open Data Census, 2021 ). More police agencies need to be willing to participate in open data projects. And it is critical for researchers to take advantage of the access to datasets to continue to study a variety of issues associated with police accountability. As noted earlier in this article, additional research is desperately needed on this topic.

People living in the USA also play a critical role in the progression of police accountability in this country. Many Americans want police reform, officer accountability, and stronger community–police relationships. A survey distributed a month after the death of George Floyd revealed that many (74%) Americans supported the peaceful protests and demonstrations occurring in response to that incident ( Ipsos, 2020 ). That survey also revealed that most (over 90%) Americans support the ideas that police officers need to intervene when they witness acts of police misconduct by their peers, that police officers should be required to wear body cameras, and that there should be independent investigations of police agencies that exhibit patterns of misconduct ( Ipsos, 2020 ). It is imperative that people living in the USA continue to push for police reform. They must continue to vocalize their concerns regarding the lack of police accountability by participating in peaceful protests and demonstrations. They must empower and encourage police leaders in their communities to implement accountability-based strategies and technology. And finally, they must encourage political leaders to draft legislation that will create optimal conditions for real police reform to occur.

Archbold C. A. ( 2005 ). ‘ Managing the Bottom Line: Risk Management in Policing ’. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 28 ( 1 ): 30 – 48 .

Google Scholar

Barker K. , Keller M. , Eder S. ( 2020 ). How Cities Lost Control of Police Discipline . The New York Times , December 22. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/22/us/police-misconduct-discipline.html (accessed 7 February 2021).

Barrett D. ( 2017 ). Justice Department Ends Program Scrutinizing Local Police Forces. The Washington Post , September 15. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/justice-department-ends-program-scrutinizing-local-police-forces/2017/09/15/ee88d02e-9a3d-11e7-82e4-f1076f6d6152_story.html?utm_term=.6004b488ce89 (accessed 5 February 2021).

Bellisle M. ( 2020 ). Collective Bargaining Agreements for Police Officers Provide Protections that Stand in the Way of Accountability, Experts Say. Denver Post , July 19. https://www.denverpost.com/2020/07/19/police-accountability-punishment-contracts-racism-force/ (accessed 12 February 2021).

Bjorhus J. ( 2020 ). Fired Minnesota Officers Have a Proven Career Saver: Arbitration. Star Tribune , June 21. https://www.startribune.com/minnesota-cops-fired-then-rehired/571392702/ (accessed 12 February 2021).

Bobb M. , Barge M. , Mazar Y. , Naguib C. , Shugrue T. ( 2009 ). Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department: 27th Semiannual Report . Los Angeles, CA : Police Assessment Resource Center . . https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5498b74ce4b01fe317ef2575/t/54fc7497e4b0ecb31a5ddc16/1425831063576/27thþSemiannualþReport.pdf (accessed 16 January 2021).

Google Preview

Braga A. , Coldren J. , Sousa W. , Rodriguez D. , Alper O. ( 2017 ). The Las Vegas Body-Worn Camera Experiment: Research Summary . Center for Crime and Justice Policy, University of Nevada Las Vegas . https://www.cna.org/cna_files/pdf/LV-BWC-RIB-2017.pdf (accessed 8 February 2021).

Burger B. ( 2017 ). Columbus Police Union Wins Most Arbitration Cases. The Columbus Dispatch , July 21. https://www.the-daily-record.com/news/20170721/columbus-police-union-wins-most-arbitration-cases (accessed 12 February 2021).

Campaign Zero Website. ( 2021 ). Police Union Contracts And Police Bill of Rights Analysis. https://www.joincampaignzero.org/#vision ; see also https://static1.squarespace.com/static/559fbf2be4b08ef197467542/t/5773f695f7e0abbdfe28a1f0/1467217560243/Campaign+Zero+Police+Union+Contract+Report.pdf (accessed 13 February 2021).

Carrega C. ( 2020 ). Millions in Lawsuit Settlements are Another Hidden Cost of Police Misconduct, Legal Experts Say. ABC News , June 14. https://abcnews.go.com/US/millions-lawsuit-settlements-hidden-cost-police-misconduct-legal/story?id=70999540#:∼:text=Los%20Angelesandtext=The%20county%20budgeted%20%24148.5%20million,the%20annual%20litigation%20cost%20report (accessed 6 February 2021).

Charles J. ( 2017 ). Justice Department Ends Era of Pushing Police Reform. Governing the States and Localities , September 28. http://www.governing.com/topics/public-justice-safety/lc-sessions-justice-police-reforms-trump-doj-milwaukee.html (accessed 5 February 2021).

City of Phoenix—Office of the Police Chief ( 2020 ). Memo. https://www.phoenix.gov/policesite/Documents/PD%20Efforts%20to%20Enhance%20Community%20Trust%20FY%202019-20.pdf (accessed 5 February 2021).

Civil Rights Division—U.S. Department of Justice. ( 2017 ). The Civil Rights Division’s Pattern and Practice Police Reform Work : 1994-Present. https://www.justice.gov/crt/file/922421/download (accessed 6 February 2021).

Davis R. C. , Henderson N. J. , Mandelstam J. , Ortiz C. W. , Miller J. ( 2005 ). Federal Intervention in Local Policing: Pittsburgh’s Experience with a Consent Decree . Washington, DC : Office of Community Oriented Policing Services . https://www.hsdl.org/?viewanddid5463256 (accessed 16 January 2021).

De Angelis J. , Rosenthal R. , Buchner B. ( 2016 ). Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement: Assessing the Evidence . Washington, DC : Office of Justice Programs (OJP ).

Emmanuel A. ( 2016 ). How Union Contracts Shield Police Departments from DOJ Reforms. In These Times , June 21. https://inthesetimes.com/features/police-killings-union-contracts.html (accessed 7 February 2021).

Engel R. , McManus H. , Herold T. ( 2020 ). ‘ Does De‐Escalation Training Work? A Systematic Review and Call for Evidence in Police Use‐of‐Force Reform ’. Criminology and Public Policy 19 ( 3 ): 721 – 759 .

Fairley S. R. ( 2020 ). ‘ Survey Says? US Cities Double down on Civilian Oversight of Police despite Challenges and Controversy ’. Cardozo Law Review De-Novo 1 : 1 – 55 .

Faturechi R. ( 2020 ). The Obama Justice Department Had a Plan to Hold Police Accountable for Abuses. The Trump DOJ Has Undermined It. ProPublica , September 29. https://www.propublica.org/article/the-obama-justice-department-had-a-plan-to-hold-police-accountable-for-abuses-the-trump-doj-has-undermined-it (accessed 24 January 2021).

Federal Bureau of Investigations Website. ( 2021 ). Federal Bureau of Investigation Crime Data Explorer. https://crime-data-explorer.app.cloud.gov/officers/national/united-states/uof (accessed 23 January 2021).

Ferdik F. , Rojek J. , Alpert G. ( 2013 ). ‘ Citizen Oversight in the United States and Canada: An Overview ’. Police Practice and Research 14 ( 2 ): 104 – 116 .

Forliti A. ( 2020 ). Minneapolis Cops Required to Report De-Escalation Efforts. ABC News , July 14. https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/minneapolis-cops-required-report-de-escalation-efforts-71785360 (accessed 18 January 2021).

Fritze J. ( 2015 ). Obama Administration to Spend $20M on Body Cameras. The Baltimore Sun , May 1. https://www.baltimoresun.com/politics/bal-obama-administration-to-spend-20m-on-body-cameras-20150501-story.html (accessed 5 February 2021).

Gaub J. , White M. ( 2020 ). ‘ Open to Interpretation: Confronting the Challenges of Understanding the Current State of Body-Worn Camera Research ’. American Journal of Criminal Justice 45 ( 5 ): 899 – 913 .

Gilbert C. ( 2017 ). Not Trained to Not Kill: Most States Neglect Ordering Police to Learn De-Escalation Tactics to Avoid Shootings. APM Reports , May 5. https://www.apmreports.org/story/2017/05/05/police-de-escalation-training (accessed 13 February 2021).

Gullion C. L. , King W. R. ( 2020 ). ‘ Early Intervention Systems for Police: A State-of-the-Art Review ’. Policing: An International Journal 43 ( 4 ): 643 – 658 .

Guyot D. ( 1979 ). ‘ Bending Granite: Attempts to Change the Rank Structure of American Police Departments ’. Journal of Police Science and Administration 7 : 253 – 284 .

Harris C. , Sweeney M. ( 2021 ). ‘ Police Union Contracts: An Analysis of Large Cities ’. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 15, 1: 622-634 .

Headley A. M. , Guerette R. T. , Shariati A. ( 2017 ). ‘ A Field Experiment of the Impact of Body-Worn Cameras (BWCs) on Police Officer Behavior and Perceptions ’. Journal of Criminal Justice 53 : 102 – 109 .

Hickman M. ( 2006 ). Citizen Complaints about Police Use of Force . Washington, DC : US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics .

Honolulu Police Department Website. ( 2021 ). Complaints against HPD employees. https://www.honolulupd.org/complaints-against-hpd-employees/ (accessed 12 February 2021).

Hyland S. ( 2018 ). Body-Worn Cameras in Law Enforcement Agencies, 2016 . Washington, DC : US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics . https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/bwclea16.pdf (accessed 8 December 2020).

Ipsos ( 2020 ). Americans Supportive of Peaceful Protests and Bipartisan Support for Police Reform. Ipsos , June 12. https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/reuters-ipsos-data-police-reform-george-floyd-2020-06-12 (accessed 15 February 2021).

James S. , , James L. , and , Dotson L. ( 2020 ). ‘ Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Police Department’s Early Intervention System ’ . Journal of Experimental Criminology 1 – 15 .

Joebiden.com ( 2021 ). Official Campaign Website . https://joebiden.com/justice/ (accessed 6 February 2021).

Kelly K. , Lowery W. , Rich S. ( 2017 ). Fired/Rehired: Police Chiefs Are Often Forced to Put Fired Officers Back on the Streets. The Washington Post , August 3. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2017/investigations/police-fired-rehired/ (accessed 13 February 2021).

Kelly J. , Nichols M. ( 2020 ). TARNISHED BRASS: We Found 85,000 Cops Who’ve Been Investigated for Misconduct. Now You Can Read Their Records. USA TODAY , June 11. https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/investigations/2019/04/24/usa-today-revealing-misconduct-records-police-cops/3223984002/ (accessed 18 January 2021).

Lersch K. , Bazley T. , Mieczkowski T. ( 2006 ). ‘ Early Intervention Programs: An Effective Police Accountability Tool, or Punishment of the Productive?’ . Policing: An International Journal 29 ( 1 ): 58 – 76 .

Levinson R. ( 2017 ). Across the U.S., Police Contracts Shield Officers from Scrutiny and Discipline. Reuters , January 13. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-police-unions/ (accessed 12 February 2021).

Lum C. , Stoltz M. , Koper C. S. , Scherer J. A. ( 2019 ). ‘ Research on Body-Worn Cameras: What We Know, What We Need to Know ’. Criminology and Public Policy 18 ( 1 ): 93 – 118 .

Lum C. , Koper C. , Wilson D. et al. , ( 2020 ). ‘ Body‐Worn Cameras’ Effects on Police Officers and Citizen Behavior: A Systematic Review ’. Campbell Systematic Reviews 16 ( 3 ): e1112 .

Mallonee M. K. , Watkins E. ( 2017 ). DOJ Scaling Back Program to Reform Police Departments. CNN Politics , September 15. https://www.cnn.com/2017/09/15/politics/doj-police-program/index.html (accessed 6 February 2021).

Maskaly J. , Donner C. , Jennings W. G. , Ariel B. , Sutherland A. ( 2017 ). ‘ The Effects of Body-Worn Cameras (BWCs) on Police and Citizen Outcomes: A State-of-the-Art Review’ . Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 40 ( 4 ): 672 – 688 .

McCorkel J. ( 2020 ). Police Unions Are One of the Biggest Obstacles to Transforming Policing. The Conversation , June 12. https://theconversation.com/police-unions-are-one-of-the-biggest-obstacles-to-transforming-policing-140227 (accessed 7 February 2021).

Mogck B. ( 2020 ). A Proposal for Police Reform: Require Effective Accountability Measures in Police Union Contracts as a Condition of Tax-Exempt Status. University of Chicago Law Review , 1 . https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/uchidial88&div=55&id=&page= (accessed 14 February 2021).

National Academy of Sciences. ( 2004 ). Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing: The Evidence . Washington, DC : National Academy Press .

New York State Governor’s Website. ( 2020 ). Guidance Offers Framework, Resources for 'New York State Police Reform and Reinvention Collaborative' Established by Governor's Executive Order in June; Localities Must Adopt a Plan by April 1, 2021 to Be Eligible for Future State Funding. https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/governor-cuomo-announces-new-guidance-police-reform-collaborative-reinvent-and-modernize (accessed 7 December 2020).

New York State Police Reform and Reinvention Collaborative: Resources and Guide for Public Officials and Citizens ( 2020 ). New York State Police Reform And Reinvention Collaborative: Resources & Guide for Public Officials and Citizens. https://www.governor.ny.gov/sites/governor.ny.gov/files/atoms/files/Police_Reform_Workbook81720.pdf (accessed 7 December 2020).

National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement Website. ( 2020 ). Police Oversight By Jurisdiction (USA). https://www.nacole.org/police_oversight_by_jurisdiction_usa (accessed 8 December 2020).

Paoline E. ( 2003 ). ‘ Taking Stock: Toward a Richer Understanding of Police Culture ’. Journal of Criminal Justice 31 ( 3 ): 199 – 214 .

Perkins T. ( 2020 ). Revealed: Police Unions Spend Millions to Influence Policy in Biggest U.S. Cities. The Guardian , June 23. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/23/police-unions-spending-policy-reform-chicago-new-york-la#:∼:text=Revealed%3A%20police%20unions%20spend%20millions%20to%20influence%20policy%20in%20biggest%20US%20cities,-This%20article%20isandtext=That%20includes%20at%20least%20%2464.8,dramatically%20increased%20in%20most%20jurisdictions (accessed 8 February 2021).

Petrella D. ( 2021 ). Illinois General Assembly Approves Sweeping Criminal Justice Overhaul That Would End Cash Bail, Require Cops to Wear Body Cameras. The Chicago Tribune , January 13. https://www.chicagotribune.com/politics/ct-illinois-legislature-criminal-justice-20210113-rr6bt2x6jndxff5ttnwhz6qhay-story.html?outputType=ampand__twitter_impression=true (accessed 15 January 2021).

Polansky R. ( 2020 ). Controversial Police Accountability Law Goes into Effect Today. WFSB News , October 1. https://www.wfsb.com/news/controversial-police-accountability-law-goes-into-effect-today/article_8cfde84a-03f2-11eb-a6e0-8b1e10ca9e56.html (accessed 7 December 2020).

Police Data Initiative Website. ( 2021 ). Police Data Initiative. https://www.policedatainitiative.org/ (accessed 15 February 2021).

Police Executive Research Forum. ( 2018 ). Cost and Benefits of Body-Worn Camera Deployments—Final Report , April. Washington, DC . https://www.policeforum.org/assets/BWCCostBenefit.pdf (accessed 27 January 2021).

Police Executive Research Forum. ( 2020 ). Critical Issues, December . https://www.policeforum.org/criticalissuesdec34 (accessed 14 February 2021).

Police Open Data Census. ( 2021 ). Police Open Data. https://codeforamerica.github.io/PoliceOpenDataCensus/# (accessed 15 February 2021).

President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing, Final Report . ( 2015 ). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

Rosenbaum D. P. , McCarty W. P. ( 2017 ). ‘ Organizational Justice and Officer “Buy in” in American Policing ’. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 40 ( 1 ): 71 – 85 .

Rushin S. ( 2017 ). ‘ Police Union Contracts ’. Duke Law Journal 66 ( 6 ): 1191 – 1253 .

Shjarback J. A. ( 2015 ). ‘ Emerging Early Intervention Systems: An Agency-Specific Pre-Post Comparison of Formal Citizen Complaints of Use of Force ’. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 9 ( 4 ): 314 – 325 .

Shjarback J. , White M. , Bishopp S. (forthcoming, 2021 ). ‘ Can Police Shootings Be Reduced by Requiring Officers to Document When They Point Firearms at Citizens? ’. Injury Prevention Published Online First January 4 .

Smykla J. , Crow M. , Crichlow J. , Snyder J. ( 2016 ). ‘ Police Body-Worn Cameras: Perceptions of Law Enforcement Leadership ’. American Journal of Criminal Justice 41 ( 3 ): 424 – 443 .

Snyder J. A. , Crow M. S. , Smykla J. O. ( 2019 ). ‘ Police Officer and Supervisor Perceptions of Body-Worn Cameras Pre-and-Post-Implementation: The Importance of Officer Buy-In ’. Criminal Justice Review 44 ( 3 ): 322 – 338 .

Stout M. ( 2020 ). House Accepts Revised Police Accountability Bill, Putting it on the Verge of Becoming Law: Governor Baker Has Already Pledged to Sign Bill Once it Hits His Desk. Boston Globe , December 22. https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/12/22/metro/house-accepts-revised-police-accountability-bill-putting-it-verge-becoming-law/?outputType=ampand__twitter_impression=true (accessed 22 December 2020) .

Subramanian R. , Skrzypiec L. ( 2017 ). To Protect and Serve: New Trends in State-Level Policing Reform, 2015-2016 . The Vera Institute . https://www.vera.org/downloads/publications/041417-PolicingTrendsReport-web.pdf (accessed 16 January 2021).

Terrill W. , Ingram J. ( 2016 ). ‘ Citizen Complaints against the Police: An Eight-City Examination ’. Police Quarterly 19 ( 2 ): 150 – 179 .

Tyler T. R. ( 1988 ). ‘ What is Procedural Justice-Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures ’. Law and Society Review 22 ( 1 ): 103 – 135 .

Valverde M. ( 2020 ). Fact-Checking Kamala Harris’ Claim About Donald Trump and Investigations of Police Misconduct. Politifact , June 4. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/jun/04/kamala-harris/fact-checking-kamala-harris-claim-about-trump-and-/#sources (accessed 6 February 2021).

Villeneuve M. ( 2020 ). New York Governor Signs Police Accountability Legislation. Associated Press , June 12. https://apnews.com/article/069d91bea55098286fe920b6378eea4a (accessed 15 January 2021).

Walker S. ( 2012 ). ‘ Institutionalizing Police Accountability Reforms: The Problem of Making Police Reforms Endure ’. St. Louis University Public Law Review 32 : 57 – 91 .

Walker S. ( 2016 ). ‘ Governing the American Police: Wrestling with the Problems of Democracy ’. The University of Chicago Legal Forum 15 : 615 – 660 .

Walker S. , Archbold C. ( 2020 ). The New World of Police Accountability , 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications .

Walker S. , Alpert G. , Kenney D. ( 2000 ). Responding to the problem police officer: a national evaluation of early warning systems. Final Report to the National Institute of Justice.

Washington Post ( 2021 ). Police Shootings Database. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/investigations/police-shootings-database/ (accessed 3 January 2021) .

White M. D. , Todak N. , Gaub J. E. ( 2018 ). ‘ Examining Body-Worn Camera Integration and Acceptance among Police Officers, Citizens, and External Stakeholders ’. Criminology and Public Policy 17 ( 3 ): 649 – 677 .

Worden R. , Kim M. , Harris C. et al.  ( 2013 ). ‘ Intervention with Problem Officers: An Outcome Evaluation of an EIS Intervention ’. Criminal Justice and Behavior 40 ( 4 ): 409 – 437 .

Young J. T. , Ready J. T. ( 2018 ). ‘ A Longitudinal Analysis of the Relationship between Administrative Policy, Technological Preferences, and Body-Worn Camera Activation among Police Officers ’. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 12 ( 1 ): 27 – 42 .

Email alerts

Citing articles via.

• Recommend to your Library

Affiliations

• Online ISSN 1752-4520
• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• About Oxford Academic
• Publish journals with us
• University press partners
• What we publish
• New features  
• Open access
• Institutional account management
• Rights and permissions
• Get help with access
• Accessibility
• Advertising
• Media enquiries
• Oxford University Press
• Oxford Languages
• University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• Cookie settings
• Cookie policy
• Privacy policy
• Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

What works to reduce police brutality

Psychologists’ research is pinpointing the factors that lead to overly aggressive, biased policing—and intervention that can prevent it

Vol. 51, No. 7 Print version: page 30

• Physical Abuse and Violence
• Forensics, Law, and Public Safety
• Racism, Bias, and Discrimination

When the Las Vegas Police Department applied a psychology-informed “hands off” policy for officers involved in foot chases, use of force dropped by 23%. In Seattle, officers trained in a “procedural justice” intervention designed in part by psychologists used force up to 40% less. These are just a few examples of the work the field is doing to address police brutality.

“There’s much more openness to the idea of concrete change among police departments,” says Joel Dvoskin, PhD, ABPP, a clinical and forensic psychologist and past president of APA’s Div. 18 (Psychologists in Public Service).

That shift is backed by support from the public. Since 2016, the share of Americans who say that police use the right amount of force, treat racial and ethnic groups equally and hold officers accountable for misconduct has declined substantially, according to the Pew Research Center ( Majority of Public Favors Giving Civilians the Power to Sue Officers for Misconduct , 2020).

Psychologists have already played a critical role in the reform process—from collecting data on biased police stops, searches and use of force to designing and delivering interventions that reduce the chances that police will rely on stereotypes, for instance by limiting the amount of discretion officers have during searches.

Now, psychologists are promoting those interventions to more police departments, conducting research to determine how well they work and continuing to collect and organize data on police behavior and department culture.

“Criminal justice—police, courts, prisons—has been called an evidence-free zone,” says Tom Tyler, PhD, a professor of psychology at Yale Law School and an expert in the psychology of justice. “People in positions of power tend to make policy decisions based on intuition and common sense—presumptions that we as psychologists recognize are often in error.”

“What’s really needed is an evidence-informed model of criminal justice,” he says. “And a lot of that evidence can come from psychologists.”

Psychological research in action

In 2015, President Obama’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing reviewed scientific data on policing, recommending major policy changes at the federal level to improve oversight, training, officer wellness and more ( Final Report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing , 2015).

Federal efforts have slowed in recent years, with most changes happening at the local level. But with around 18,000 police departments nationwide, that response has been fragmented and inconsistent ( National Sources of Law Enforcement Employment Data , Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2016).

Still, psychologists have forged ahead with efforts that are making a difference. One key contribution involves spurring policy changes and interventions based on psychological insights.

“One of the most influential approaches coming from psychology is training in procedurally just policing,” says Calvin Lai, PhD, an assistant professor of psychological and brain sciences at Washington University in St. Louis.

That approach aims to increase the public’s trust in police by drawing on psychological research on justice and fairness. It involves teaching officers strategies such as explaining to citizens why they’ve been stopped and how it will benefit public safety ( Principles of Procedurally Just Policing , The Justice Collaboratory at Yale Law School, 2018).

“We know that the policing model of using force to compel compliance lowers the crime rate but does not build trust,” says Tyler, who has developed and studied models of procedurally just policing. “The crime rate has declined about 75% in the last 30 years, but public trust in the police hasn’t increased at all.”

His research has shown that what community members really want is for police to treat them with respect and to give them a voice—a chance to explain their situation before action is taken. People also want to know that police are sincere, care about the well-being of their community, and act in an unbiased and consistent way—for example, by explaining the rules they use and how they’re applying them.

A study in Seattle randomly assigned officers to receive training in procedurally just policing, leading to a reduction in use of force of between 15% and 40%, depending on the situation (Owens, E., et al., Criminology & Public Policy , Vol. 17 , No. 1, 2018).

“It seems to be doing what we’d hope in terms of promoting better relationships between police officers and community members,” says Lai.

The Center for Policing Equity (CPE), led by psychologist Phillip Atiba Goff, PhD, of Yale University, has also led a number of psychology-driven policy changes in police departments around the country. In an effort to cut down on high-adrenaline encounters—where police officers are more likely to rely on stereotypes—Goff urged the Las Vegas Police Department to bar officers involved in a foot pursuit from handling suspects when the chase ends. The policy led to a 23% drop in use of force at the department, an 11% reduction in officer injury and a simultaneous drop in racial disparities in use of force data. CPE has also pioneered efforts to recruit racially and ethnically diverse officer candidates and to make immigration enforcement more consistent.

Another key area that psychological interventions target is implicit bias, which has been documented across a range of domains and populations ( State of the Science: Implicit Bias Review , Kirwan Institute, 2017). One study led by Jennifer Eberhardt, PhD, professor of psychology at Stanford University, reviewed body camera footage and found that police officers in Oakland, California, treated Black people with less respect than whites (Voigt, R., et al., PNAS , Vol. 114, No. 25, 2017).

Eberhardt and others, including Lorie Fridell, PhD, a professor of criminology at the University of South Florida, have designed and begun to deliver training programs on implicit bias to law enforcement agencies around the country (“ Producing Bias-Free Policing: A Science-Based Approach ,” Springer Publishing, 2017).

Those programs, which typically mix instruction, discussion and role-playing, aim to help agencies reduce high-discretion policing and hold officers accountable for biased practices. But there’s no standardized curriculum—and experts say more research is needed to determine whether implicit bias training has a lasting impact and how such training can work alongside other agency reform efforts.

“There seem to be some forms of training that are effective, but the studies on these interventions are still pretty limited,” says Lai. “We just don’t know that much one way or the other.”

The power of peer intervention

Another intervention that has shown promise for reducing violence among police is known as  Project ABLE , or Active Bystandership for Law Enforcement. Based on the work of psychologist Ervin Staub, PhD, an emeritus professor at the University of Massachusetts Amherst and past president of APA’s Div. 48 (Society for the Study of Peace, Conflict and Violence), the program promotes a culture of peer intervention. It teaches officers to prevent their peers from perpetrating unnecessary violence, which can save both lives and careers. Developed by the New Orleans Police Department in 2014 and originally named Ethical Policing Is Courageous (EPIC), Project ABLE is now being adopted by all police departments in New Hampshire and Washington state, as well as those in Baltimore, Boston, Philadelphia, several other cities and the FBI National Academy.

When an officer commits an act of unnecessary violence, his colleagues face a tough choice, Dvoskin says. Report the act and get a reputation as a “rat”—which may mean your next call for backup goes unanswered—or lie, which is a crime.

“What if, instead, you can prevent the bad thing from happening in the first place?” he says. “What if you manifested your loyalty to a fellow officer by helping him or her stay out of trouble?”

Staub says minor interventions can be highly effective. During recent protests of confederate monuments in New Orleans, an officer stopped a peer from attacking demonstrators by putting an arm around his shoulder. Trainees also apply strategies taught by the program to themselves. One officer in New Orleans reported using EPIC to avoid retaliating against a protester who had spit in her face.

That sort of behavior requires culture change. Police officers need to get comfortable both giving and receiving such interventions—and that culture must be modeled and supported by the highest levels of leadership within an organization, Dvoskin says.

To test his model of active bystandership, Staub studied examples of group violence, such as genocide, observing how hostility and violence evolve progressively. He has also conducted experimental research to understand how people respond to emergencies depending on the actions of those around them. In one study, participants’ helping behavior in response to a simulated emergency ranged from 25% to 100% of the time depending on a confederate’s response to the emergency. He also found that those who are asked to help once are more likely to volunteer later (Staub, E., “ The Roots of Goodness and Resistance to Evil ,” Oxford University Press, 2015).

Now, Project ABLE has support from Georgetown University and the international law firm Sheppard Mullin, which will help fund free training in active bystandership for any interested U.S. police department—and they’ve had hundreds of inquiries since June. Dvoskin, Staub and their team are now working to standardize lesson plans and policy guidelines.

“If this training is introduced in many police departments and done effectively, I believe that policing in America will be transformed,” Staub says.

Understanding and changing officer behavior

Psychologists are also helping agencies collect, report and understand data on their officers’ behavior—data that can point to further policy changes to reduce unnecessary violence and racial bias.

Simply changing the definition of a “police stop,” for instance, can help identify patterns of racial profiling that might otherwise be missed, says social psychologist Jack Glaser, PhD, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley’s Goldman School of Public Policy. Glaser has advised the California attorney general’s office on how to collect policing data, including revising the regulations on police stop reporting.

“Some police-civilian encounters are very casual and are not typically recognized as stops—but they are done with investigatory intent and can escalate to a detention,” he says.

For example, a pedestrian might voluntarily speak with a police officer who says, “Hi, can I ask you a question?”—but that conversation could lead to a search and even an arrest. Those stops typically aren’t reported, so racial bias in such practices could go unchecked.

Glaser has also partnered with CPE for a nationwide effort to aggregate data on police behavior with the  National Justice Database , which draws from nearly 100 police departments representing more than a third of the U.S. population. He has worked to standardize and harmonize that data—which includes hundreds of thousands of entries on police stops, searches and use of force and can vary a lot from one agency to the next—so that researchers can start making comparisons and looking for larger trends.

Glaser says reporting officer behavioral data in different ways can paint a very different picture about whether racial disparities exist—so it’s important to get it right. For example, some departments consider officer presence or unholstering a weapon instances of police use of force, while others do not.

Goff, Glaser and their team delved into police use of force data to explore why some researchers, such as economist Roland Fryer, PhD, of Harvard University, have reported no racial differences in officer-involved shootings (Fryer, R.G.,  Journal of Political Economy   , Vol. 127, No. 3, 2019). Their preliminary analysis shows that racial disparities may not exist in all officer-involved shootings, but that there’s a clear bias against African Americans when the victim is unarmed.

“Given that the protest movement is overwhelmingly about unarmed people getting killed by police, that seems to be the most important data point—but it seems to be getting lost,” Glaser says.

One major takeaway from the National Justice Database so far is that police are more likely to display racial bias when they conduct a “high-discretion search”—usually done on a hunch in ambiguous circumstances—versus a “low-discretion search,” a more routine activity, for instance when a person has already been detained for a crime. When the California Highway Patrol banned high-discretion searches, racial disparities began to level off (   Racial & Identity Profiling Advisory Board Annual Report   , 2020).

“The obvious implication there is to try and minimize high-discretion searches,” Glaser says. “The tremendous amount of discretion given to police promotes decision-making under ambiguity and uncertainty, which psychologists know is ripe for stereotype influence.”

Screening officer candidates

Other psychologists have worked to adapt the police selection process to address the issue of implicit bias. Portland-based forensic psychologist David Corey, PhD, ABPP, has urged departments to add “cultural competence” as a criterion for screening law enforcement officers. “On the surface, the implicit bias literature is dismally depressing, because it tells us that everybody has automatic stereotypes that operate unconsciously and affect behavior,” says Corey, who also founded the  American Board of Police and Public Safety Psychology .

Because of measurement issues, it’s not practical to screen candidates for policing jobs based on their implicit biases. But studies show that some personality dimensions can help officers temper those biases (Ben-Porath, Y.S., “ Interpreting the MMPI-2-RF ,” University of Minnesota Press, 2012). Specifically, people high in executive functioning, emotional regulation skills and metacognitive abilities are better able to prevent implicit biases from affecting their behavior. A capacity for theory of mind formation—the ability to anticipate how others will behave based on their actions or tone of voice—also helps officers learn to bypass their initial instincts.

“Those competencies render implicit bias more malleable,” says Corey. “So, my focus, and that of a growing number of colleagues around the country, is to evaluate applicants for those qualities.”

The Portland Police Bureau, as well as several other agencies in the Pacific Northwest, have added such measures to their selection battery.

Answering more questions

Looking ahead, psychologists are working to address gaps in the data in crucial areas such as use of force, says Shauna Laughna, PhD, ABPP, a Florida-based police and public safety psychologist and chair of APA Div. 18’s Police and Public Safety section. She adds that recruitment, training, discipline and retention of personnel can vary greatly across the 18,000 law enforcement agencies in the United States. That points to a need for more data, standardized measures—for instance, what constitutes excessive use of force—and a comprehensive national database on policing incidents.

“Attempting to generalize from data gathered at one agency to another may not always be prudent,” she says.

As reform efforts continue at the local and state levels, there’s one other essential thing the field can do, says Colby Mills, PhD, a clinical psychologist who works with the Fairfax County Police Department in Virginia: Provide more formal training opportunities for police psychologists, including during graduate school and in the form of continuing education. The limited police psychology coursework currently available within forensic psychology programs often does not include adequate training on the culture, ethics and special skills required to do such work, he says.

“It takes a lot of courage for a police officer to reach out to a mental health professional, because of the stigmas and the pressures they experience,” Mills says. “But once they do it, we owe it to them to provide a qualified professional who knows what they face and understands their culture.”

Critical incident response

In addition to their involvement with department-wide training efforts, psychologists are also increasingly providing ongoing mental health services, for instance after an officer-involved shooting occurs, says Colby Mills, PhD, a clinical psychologist who contracts with the Fairfax County Police Department in Virginia.

Along with peer support officers and the station’s police chaplain, Mills deploys immediately after a critical incident occurs and delivers Stress First Aid, a model developed for the military that can support officers in processing emotions ( Stress First Aid for Law Enforcement , National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, 2016).

“We want to strike a balance where we offer support without implying that an officer will automatically need help to recover,” Mills says.

The Fairfax County Police Department works with about a dozen psychologists who provide critical incident response, therapy, psychoeducation, consultations and pre-employment screenings.

“In general, police and public safety agencies are starting to embrace these sorts of psychological services more and more,” Mills says.

Further reading

A Meta-Analysis of Procedures to Change Implicit Measures Forscher, P.S., et al. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 2019

The Science of Justice: Race, Arrests and Police Use of Force Goff, P.A., et al. Center for Policing Equity, 2016

Preventing Violence and Promoting Active Bystandership and Peace: My Life in Research and Applications Staub, E., Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 2018

Recommended Reading

Apa’s recommendations for police reform.

• Promote community policing
• Ban chokeholds and strangleholds
• Invest in crisis intervention teams
• Increase the number of mental health professionals in law enforcement agencies
• Involve psychologists in multidisciplinary teams to implement police reforms
• Encourage partnerships between mental health organizations and local law enforcement
• Discourage police management policies and practices that can trigger implicit and explicit biases
• Strengthen data collection
• Bolster research

Read more about APA’s recommendations online .

Contact APA

You may also like.

• Utility Menu

Roland G. Fryer, Jr.

• An Empirical Analysis of Racial Differences in Police Use of Force

Date Published:

This paper explores racial differences in police use of force. On non-lethal uses of force, blacks and Hispanics are more than fifty percent more likely to experience some form of force in interactions with police. Adding controls that account for important context and civilian behavior reduces, but cannot fully explain, these disparities. On the most extreme use of force –officer-involved shootings – we find no racial differences in either the raw data or when contextual factors are taken into account. We argue that the patterns in the data are consistent with a model in which police officers are utility maximizers, a fraction of which have a preference for discrimination, who incur relatively high expected costs of officer-involved shootings.

• Biography & CV
• Publications

Recent Publications

• Charter Schools and Labor Market Outcomes
• High-Dosage Tutoring and Reading Achievement: Evidence from New York City∗
• Updating Beliefs when Evidence is Open to Interpretation: Implications for Bias and Polarization
• Reconciling Results on Racial Differences in Police Shootings
• The ‘Pupil’ Factory: Specialization and the Production of Human Capital in Schools.
• Self-Selection and Comparative Advantage in Social Interactions
• Two-Armed Restless Bandits with Imperfect Information: Stochastic Control and Indexability
• Information, Non-Financial Incentives, and Student Achievement: Evidence from a Text Messaging Experiment
• The Impact of Voluntary Youth Service on Future Outcomes: Evidence from Teach For America

Publications by Year

• Working Paper (6)
• Forthcoming (8)

Effects of Police Brutality on Society

• Affiliation: University of Dhaka

• University of Dhaka

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations

• Gary Kynoch
• Wilbert B. L. Kapinga
• Brian L. Thompson
• James Daniel Lee
• M K Wambali
• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

87 Police Brutality Topics and Essay Examples

🏆 best police brutality topics for essays, 📌 most interesting police brutality essay topics, 👍 good research topics about police brutality, ❓ research questions about police brutality.

• Police Deviance For the sake of this paper, the scope of this paper will only examine the code of conduct in reference to the relationship between the police force and the society.
• Police Brutality: Causes and Solutions If the criminal is armed and firing at the police, the use of force is acceptable. However, when the actions of the police are disproportionate to the committed crimes, the necessity of such measures is […]
• Police Brutality: Dissoi Logoi Argumentation Under the influence of societal views, the majority of the representatives of the general public tend to perceive police officers as a safeguarding force that gathers individuals who perform their duties to ensure that the […]
• Police Misconduct Actually, prosecutors are always reluctant to try these victims in the court of law for the following reasons; police officers, in most cases, are protected by the prosecutors.
• Police Brutality: Graham vs. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 In this essay, a summary of the Graham and Connor case and the decision of the court will be introduced. In case this suggestion is correct, Connor appears as a police officer who failed to […]
• Impact of Police Brutality on the Society in the United States The issue of racism is one that has led to police brutality that has been witnessed in the American society for a long time.
• Excessive Force and Deviance, Police Brutality The events highlighting racial injustice could positively influence our society, maintaining an appropriate level of awareness regarding the issues encountered by African-Americans and prompting a change in police behaviors.
• History of Police Brutality: The Murder of George Floyd Police officers strive to maintain order and ensure adherence to the laws of the state. The standards observed the right to democracy and addressed the need for representation.
• Body-Worn Cameras Against Police Brutality in New York There is often a legal foundation to such a privileged position; the laws control the oppressed class and mitigate threats to the power of the ruling class.
• Police Brutality: Social Issue This paper explores the issue of police brutality and seeks to shed light on the perceptions of the public, especially the black minority.
• Social Psychology: Police Brutality The first group of solutions to the problem of police brutality includes technical measures, such as the use of body cameras and dashboard cameras. Finally, another potential solution to police brutality is the diversification of […]
• Technology Influences on Police Brutality Modern platforms such as Facebook and Twitter can be used to inform and educate more people about the nature of police brutality.
• Police Brutality in the USA This paper aims to discuss the types of police brutality, the particularities of psychological harm inflicted by the police, and its consequences for the population affected by these forms of violence.
• Public Administration Issue: Police Brutality The trend is ongoing and is not expected to end any time soon because of the social structure and the culture that does not value the contributions of minorities and people of color.
• Police Misconduct: What Can Be Done? Police officers are the individuals charged with the task of maintaining law and order and ensuring the security of the population.
• Excessive Force by the Police On the other hand, the media reported on the severity of misconduct by police officers and cited the Blue code of silence as the key setback against the fight against police torture.
• Police in Law Enforcement Misconduct This creates a rift between the community and the police leading to further misconduct in the process of enforcing the law.
• The Incidents Involving Police Brutality
• The Infringement of Natural Human Rights Because of Police Brutality in the United States
• Police Brutality and Its Effects on the United States
• The Flaws of Police Officers and the Issue of Police Brutality on an Individual
• The Suffering and Fight of African-Americans Against Police Brutality
• The Image Serving as a Reminder of Police Brutality
• The Negative Effects of Police Brutality
• The Changing Patterns of Racism and Police Brutality in the United States
• Police Brutality and the Death of Freddie Gray
• The Issue of Police Brutality and Injustice in the Story of Kalief Browder
• The Relation Between Police Brutality and Race in the United States of America
• Police Brutality and Racism Against African Americans
• The High Prevalence of Police Brutality Towards African America
• The US Government Faces Different Challenges with Police Brutality
• The Truth About Police Brutality Against Minorities
• The Importance of Body Cameras for Solving the Problem of Police Brutality
• Protesting Protest Against Police Brutality
• The Solutions to the Issue of Police Brutality in the United States
• Racism: Police Brutality and Racial Profiling
• Prejudice, Police Brutality, Racism: The Three Things We Are Trying to Get Rid Off
• Problems Caused by Police Brutality
• Police Misconduct and Police Brutality
• The Issue of Police Brutality Against People of Color in the United States
• The Issue of Police Brutality Against the Colored People in the United States
• The Effects of Violence on Police Brutality
• The Deaths Caused by Hurricane Katrina and Police Brutality in America
• Social Media Activism, Centered on Police Brutality
• The Effects of Police Brutality on the Relationship
• The Long Problem of Police Brutality in the United States
• The Police Brutality Against Minorities
• Race, Police Brutality, Crime, Education and Poverty
• The Issue of Police Brutality in the United States and the Solutions to Curb Police Misconduct
• The Influence of the Media and Social Class in Police Brutality
• The Dangers of Racial Profiling and Police Brutality
• The Effects of Police Brutality on Minority Communities
• The Effects of Police Brutality and Racism English
• The Drug Trade as the Cause of Police Brutality in Brazil
• Police Brutality and Their Power Caught on Video by Bystanders
• How to Deal with the Problem of Police Brutality in the United States?
• What is the Relations Police Brutality and Its Contributors?
• How Repressive Laws and Police Brutality Against Mexican Americans Stigmatized the Race as a Whole?
• How Race and Ethnicity Affects Police Brutality Term?
• Police Brutality Ends Here?
• What Does the Media Cover up the Police Brutality?
• How Does Police Brutality on Children Affect How Society?
• Does Police Brutality Distort the Way People View Law Enforcement?
• How Can We Help Prevent Police Brutality?
• How to Stop Police Brutality Against Minority’s?
• Has Been Police Brutality Alive for Too Many Years?
• Has Police Brutality Increased Throughout the United?
• What Is Wrong with Police?
• How Police Corruption Remains a Tainted Reminder of Police Brutality in the US?
• Does Police Brutality Affect the Mental Health of Black Youth?
• Why Isn’t Outrage over Police Brutality Enough?
• Are the Police Taking Advantage of People by Using Police Brutality?
• Has Been Police Brutality Around for Decades?
• Should There Be Direct Laws Against Police Brutality?
• Can You Trust the Law?
• What Is the Police Brutality Effect on African American Males?
• When the Police Duty to Protect Fails Police Brutality?
• Religious Profiling and Police Brutality: How They Affect Operations?
• What Are the Effects of Police Brutality?
• Police Brutality: What’s Really Going on?
• What is the New York City Police Brutality?
• How Does the Body Camera Increase Police Brutality?
• The Causes of Police Brutality in America: Is It Due to Police Behavior?
• When Excessive Force Becomes Police Brutality Sociology?
• What is the Link Between Police Brutality and the Law Enforcement Officers?
• Corruption Ideas
• Gun Control Titles
• Racial Profiling Essay Topics
• Economic Inequality Questions
• Government Regulation Titles
• Accountability Titles
• Prejudice Essay Topics
• Constitution Research Ideas
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2023, November 30). 87 Police Brutality Topics and Essay Examples. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/police-brutality-essay-examples/

"87 Police Brutality Topics and Essay Examples." IvyPanda , 30 Nov. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/topic/police-brutality-essay-examples/.

IvyPanda . (2023) '87 Police Brutality Topics and Essay Examples'. 30 November.

IvyPanda . 2023. "87 Police Brutality Topics and Essay Examples." November 30, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/police-brutality-essay-examples/.

1. IvyPanda . "87 Police Brutality Topics and Essay Examples." November 30, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/police-brutality-essay-examples/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "87 Police Brutality Topics and Essay Examples." November 30, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/police-brutality-essay-examples/.