Research Misconduct PowerPoint Presentation Slides
COMMENTS
Research Misconduct: Reasons and Types of Research Misconduct
Research misconduct can dilute research results, leading to misinterpretations, and even erode trust in the work done by the scientific community. Read this article to know what is research misconduct, common reasons for unethical research, and types of research misconduct.
Definition of Research Misconduct
Definition of Research Misconduct. Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. (a) Fabricationis making up data or results and recording or reporting them. (b) Falsificationis manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or ...
Addressing Research Misconduct and Detrimental Research Practices
Synopsis:Research misconduct and detrimental research practices are addressed in several ways. Addressing misconduct and detrimental research practices through the implementation of standards and best practices, such as effective mentoring at the lab level, requirements for data and code sharing at the disciplinary level, and implementation of greater transparency in reporting results, can ...
Incidence and Consequences
Synopsis:Research misconduct and detrimental research practices constitute serious threats to science in the United States and around the world. The incidence of research misconduct is tracked by official statistics, survey results, and analysis of retractions, and all of these indicators have shown increases over time.
PDF Handling of Research Misconduct Allegations
A finding of research misconduct made under the PHS Regulations and the Policy requires that: (a) there be a significant departure from accepted practices of the relevant research community; and (b) the misconduct be committed intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly; and (c) the allegation be proven by a preponderance of the evidence.
Should research misconduct be criminalized?
Abstract For more than 25 years, research misconduct (research fraud) is defined as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism (FFP)—although other research misbehaviors have been also added in codes of conduct and legislations. A critical issue in deciding whether research misconduct should be subject to criminal law is its definition, because not all behaviors labeled as research misconduct ...
What is research misconduct?
As noted above, a definition of research misconduct implies intent and/or recklessness in the behaviour, or a repeated pattern. A good general definition of research misconduct is in the Concordat to Support Research Integrity, under Commitment 4. Poor behaviour outside this definition is known as 'questionable research practice', in that ...
Research ethics
Find resources on research misconduct, publication ethics, protecting research participants, ethics of online research, and guidance from various agencies and organizations, such as the NIH.
Fostering Integrity in Research
Synopsis: Research misconduct and detrimental research practices constitute serious threats to science in the United States and around the world. The incidence of research misconduct is tracked by official statistics, survey results, and analysis of retractions, and all of these indicators have shown increases over time.
Frequently Asked Questions
The Office of Research Integrity (ORI) oversees and directs U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) research integrity activities on behalf of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. (link is external) This includes oversight of research misconduct inquiries and investigations, as well as of institutional compliance.
Understanding the Causes
Synopsis:Improving understanding of why researchers commit misconduct and detrimental research practices (DRPs) is important because this understanding should inform the responses of the research enterprise and its stakeholders. For instance, if the only perpetrators of research misconduct and DRPs are a very small number of bad people engaged in self-interested deception and shortcuts, then ...
Process for Handling Allegations of Research Misconduct
Process for Handling Allegations of Research Misconduct Learn about NIH's process for handling allegations of research misconduct, and what happens if findings are made.
Research Misconduct: Policy on Allegations, Investigations, and
A. Research Misconduct. "Research misconduct" is defined as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. Fabrication means making up data or results, and recording or reporting them. Falsification means manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or ...
Research Misconduct
Research misconduct is the failure to apply, in a coherent and consistent manner, the values and principles essential to encouraging and achieving excellence in the search for knowledge. These values include honesty, fairness, trust, accountability and openness. (Council of Canadian Academies 2010: 5)
Best Practices For Preventing Research Misconduct
Research practices necessarily vary across disciplines. To minimize the risk of unethical behavior in research and scholarship, the general practices outlined below, which come from a variety of sources, are recommended as an open framework for the development and discussion of best field-specific research practices within respective departments, centers, and laboratories at MIT.
What is research misconduct?
Research Misconduct can be characterised as actions or questionable research practices that fall short of the standards of ethics, research and scholarship required to ensure that the integrity of research is upheld. It can cause harm to people and the environment, wastes resources, undermines the research record and damages the credibility of ...
PDF Code of Conduct for Misconduct in Research
Recognizing the importance and sensitivity of research activities, the Policy on Misconduct in Research outlines the procedures for reporting (through the Integrity Hotline) and examining wrongdoing in research, as well as the measures to be taken in response.
RCR Casebook: Research Misconduct
Instances of research misconduct continue to receive public attention and scrutiny as researchers who act dishonestly may harm the public's health and safety, waste public funds, compromise the integrity of the research process, and distort the research record. 13 Even when journals publish retractions that correct the scientific record, the impact of FFP is sometimes extensive and difficult ...
Leading the charge to address research misconduct
The field of psychology is vulnerable to fabrication, falsification, and poor research practices, but psychologists are leading the charge for change
PDF Research Misconduct Brochure FY12
Overview The research community and the community at large rightly expect adherence to exemplary standards of intellectual honesty in the formulation, conduct, and reporting of scientific research. Allegations of research misconduct are taken seriously by the NIH. The process of investigating allegations must be balanced by equal concern for protecting the integrity of the research as well as ...
3-29 Research Integrity and Misconduct
This policy emphasizes CMU's commitment to research integrity, laying out procedures and guidelines for unethical behavior and research misconduct.
Where Data-Driven Decision-Making Can Go Wrong
And you need to look for—or undertake—other research that might confirm or contradict the evidence. ... What leaders need to do instead is conduct rigorous discussions that assess any findings ...
Developing a Guide for Transporting Freight in Emergencies: Conduct of
Access Transportation Research Board Publications Our peer-reviewed reports present the evidence-based consensus of committees of experts. Published proceedings record the presentations and discussions that take place at hundreds of conferences, workshops, symposia, forums, roundtables, and other gatherings every year.
RESEARCH MISCONDUCT
A statement developed by the U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy, which has been adopted by most research-funding agencies, defines misconduct as "fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results.". According to the statement, the three elements of ...
Call for nominations: Responsible and Ethical Conduct of Research Award
The Office of Research at Purdue is accepting nominations for the newly established Responsible and Ethical Conduct of Research (RECR) Award. To advance Purdue's drive toward research excellence…
Federal Research Misconduct Policy
An NSTC interagency research misconduct policy implementation group has been established to help achieve uniformity across the Federal agencies in implementation of the research misconduct policy. In some cases, this may require agencies to amend or replace extant regulations addressing research misconduct.
Wright Electric to conduct battery research for the US Air Force
The US electric aircraft startup Wright Electric has been awarded a contract by the US Air Force to develop high-performance batteries for use in multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).
Higher electricity bills? It's not just you, AP-NORC poll finds
A poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research finds that around 7 in 10 Americans say extreme heat has had a major or minor impact on their electricity bills in the past year, and a majority have seen a similar impact on their outdoor activities.
Research Misconduct Definitions Adopted by U.S. Research Institutions
In 2000, the US federal government adopted a uniform definition of research misconduct as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism (FFP), which became effective in 2001. Institutions must apply this definition of misconduct to federally-funded research ...
Product Research 2024 Guide: How to Find Profitable Products
Learn how to find profitable products to sell on Amazon, Shopify, Walmart, and more marketplaces in 2024 with this product research guide.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Research misconduct can dilute research results, leading to misinterpretations, and even erode trust in the work done by the scientific community. Read this article to know what is research misconduct, common reasons for unethical research, and types of research misconduct.
Definition of Research Misconduct. Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. (a) Fabricationis making up data or results and recording or reporting them. (b) Falsificationis manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or ...
Synopsis:Research misconduct and detrimental research practices are addressed in several ways. Addressing misconduct and detrimental research practices through the implementation of standards and best practices, such as effective mentoring at the lab level, requirements for data and code sharing at the disciplinary level, and implementation of greater transparency in reporting results, can ...
Synopsis:Research misconduct and detrimental research practices constitute serious threats to science in the United States and around the world. The incidence of research misconduct is tracked by official statistics, survey results, and analysis of retractions, and all of these indicators have shown increases over time.
A finding of research misconduct made under the PHS Regulations and the Policy requires that: (a) there be a significant departure from accepted practices of the relevant research community; and (b) the misconduct be committed intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly; and (c) the allegation be proven by a preponderance of the evidence.
Abstract For more than 25 years, research misconduct (research fraud) is defined as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism (FFP)—although other research misbehaviors have been also added in codes of conduct and legislations. A critical issue in deciding whether research misconduct should be subject to criminal law is its definition, because not all behaviors labeled as research misconduct ...
As noted above, a definition of research misconduct implies intent and/or recklessness in the behaviour, or a repeated pattern. A good general definition of research misconduct is in the Concordat to Support Research Integrity, under Commitment 4. Poor behaviour outside this definition is known as 'questionable research practice', in that ...
Find resources on research misconduct, publication ethics, protecting research participants, ethics of online research, and guidance from various agencies and organizations, such as the NIH.
Synopsis: Research misconduct and detrimental research practices constitute serious threats to science in the United States and around the world. The incidence of research misconduct is tracked by official statistics, survey results, and analysis of retractions, and all of these indicators have shown increases over time.
The Office of Research Integrity (ORI) oversees and directs U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) research integrity activities on behalf of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. (link is external) This includes oversight of research misconduct inquiries and investigations, as well as of institutional compliance.
Synopsis:Improving understanding of why researchers commit misconduct and detrimental research practices (DRPs) is important because this understanding should inform the responses of the research enterprise and its stakeholders. For instance, if the only perpetrators of research misconduct and DRPs are a very small number of bad people engaged in self-interested deception and shortcuts, then ...
Process for Handling Allegations of Research Misconduct Learn about NIH's process for handling allegations of research misconduct, and what happens if findings are made.
A. Research Misconduct. "Research misconduct" is defined as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. Fabrication means making up data or results, and recording or reporting them. Falsification means manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or ...
Research misconduct is the failure to apply, in a coherent and consistent manner, the values and principles essential to encouraging and achieving excellence in the search for knowledge. These values include honesty, fairness, trust, accountability and openness. (Council of Canadian Academies 2010: 5)
Research practices necessarily vary across disciplines. To minimize the risk of unethical behavior in research and scholarship, the general practices outlined below, which come from a variety of sources, are recommended as an open framework for the development and discussion of best field-specific research practices within respective departments, centers, and laboratories at MIT.
Research Misconduct can be characterised as actions or questionable research practices that fall short of the standards of ethics, research and scholarship required to ensure that the integrity of research is upheld. It can cause harm to people and the environment, wastes resources, undermines the research record and damages the credibility of ...
Recognizing the importance and sensitivity of research activities, the Policy on Misconduct in Research outlines the procedures for reporting (through the Integrity Hotline) and examining wrongdoing in research, as well as the measures to be taken in response.
Instances of research misconduct continue to receive public attention and scrutiny as researchers who act dishonestly may harm the public's health and safety, waste public funds, compromise the integrity of the research process, and distort the research record. 13 Even when journals publish retractions that correct the scientific record, the impact of FFP is sometimes extensive and difficult ...
The field of psychology is vulnerable to fabrication, falsification, and poor research practices, but psychologists are leading the charge for change
Overview The research community and the community at large rightly expect adherence to exemplary standards of intellectual honesty in the formulation, conduct, and reporting of scientific research. Allegations of research misconduct are taken seriously by the NIH. The process of investigating allegations must be balanced by equal concern for protecting the integrity of the research as well as ...
This policy emphasizes CMU's commitment to research integrity, laying out procedures and guidelines for unethical behavior and research misconduct.
And you need to look for—or undertake—other research that might confirm or contradict the evidence. ... What leaders need to do instead is conduct rigorous discussions that assess any findings ...
Access Transportation Research Board Publications Our peer-reviewed reports present the evidence-based consensus of committees of experts. Published proceedings record the presentations and discussions that take place at hundreds of conferences, workshops, symposia, forums, roundtables, and other gatherings every year.
A statement developed by the U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy, which has been adopted by most research-funding agencies, defines misconduct as "fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results.". According to the statement, the three elements of ...
The Office of Research at Purdue is accepting nominations for the newly established Responsible and Ethical Conduct of Research (RECR) Award. To advance Purdue's drive toward research excellence…
An NSTC interagency research misconduct policy implementation group has been established to help achieve uniformity across the Federal agencies in implementation of the research misconduct policy. In some cases, this may require agencies to amend or replace extant regulations addressing research misconduct.
The US electric aircraft startup Wright Electric has been awarded a contract by the US Air Force to develop high-performance batteries for use in multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).
A poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research finds that around 7 in 10 Americans say extreme heat has had a major or minor impact on their electricity bills in the past year, and a majority have seen a similar impact on their outdoor activities.
In 2000, the US federal government adopted a uniform definition of research misconduct as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism (FFP), which became effective in 2001. Institutions must apply this definition of misconduct to federally-funded research ...
Learn how to find profitable products to sell on Amazon, Shopify, Walmart, and more marketplaces in 2024 with this product research guide.