essay on negative effect of social media

• Negative Effects of Social Media on Health Words: 1166
• Social Media in Moderation Words: 1444
• Effects of Social Media and Internet Words: 601
• Impact of Social Media in Education Words: 1988
• The Power of Social Media Words: 2322
• The Impact of Social Media on Teenagers Words: 562
• Social Media and Modern Society Words: 1281
• Social Media Impact on Activism Words: 1152
• Social Media: Annotated Bibliography Words: 1064
• The Effects of Social Media on People Words: 869
• Social Media in Business Across the Globe Words: 1399
• The Impact of Social Media on Mental Health Words: 1367
• Becoming Distant on Social Media Words: 572
• Social Media and Traditional News Media Words: 600
• Impact of Social Media on Adolescence Words: 372
• Effect of Social Media on Adolescent Mental Health Words: 3538
• Social Media Impact on Teenagers in the UAE Words: 2242
• Social Media’s Multifaceted Impact on Mental Health Words: 1270
• Social Media Nature and Influence Words: 638

Social Media: Negative Impacts

Introduction, intrusive advertising, bullying/harassment, privacy threats, works cited.

Social media is a natural phenomenon of modern hi-tech life. The impact of virtual communication is significant as people are often willing to pay more attention to online interaction. Besides, due to the development of technology, social media plays the role of platforms not only for communication but also fir effective advertising and entertainment. Digital content that is published in various groups has a large target audience, which allows influencing people and providing demand for specific goods or services. However, the controversy of the benefits of social media lies in the potentially negative impacts they have. In addition to using specialized web resources for communication, many Internet users utilize them as tools for bullying, intimidation, humiliation, and even violence. An opportunity to remain anonymous opens up significant prospects for cybercriminals, which complicates the task for law enforcement agencies. As a counterargument, today, there are various means of account verification and support services that are ready to ensure the safety of communication on social media and provide users with protection from scammers or blackmailers. Nevertheless, people who are well versed in the digital field can bypass such locks easily. Among the real negative effects that social media have, one can note intrusive advertising, bullying and harassment, privacy threats, fake news, and violence. Social media are gradually losing the function of communication tools and gaining the status of platforms that allow posting any content, including illegal and immoral materials.

Advertising on social media has become so intrusive and widespread that it has ceased to have its promotional function and often causes users more negative emotions than interest. At the same time, it is hard to get rid of advertising completely since many creators of digital content sign contracts with advertisers, and profit depends directly on the activity of the public. However, in case of excess advertising, people feel annoyed and ignore certain offers deliberately. According to Shareef et al., “irritation due to any advertisement can distract consumers from receiving the intended meaning of the statement, and thus can have a negative effect on the value of the advertising” (p. 61). Such a statement is logical because, in their quest for profit, advertisers provoke a natural reaction from the target audience to condemn the excess of promoting content. Customer perception largely depends not only on the essence of specific offers but also on the way marketers deliver them. Therefore, in case of intrusiveness, advertising content on social media causes rejection and is often blocked by users. Shareef et al. confirm this and argue that the context of marketing materials may be more important as a driver to convince the public of the value of specific goods or services (p. 66). The objectivity of such an idea is due to the fact that initially, social media were not intended for advertising, and only the creativity of marketers can be an effective way to attract public attention. Finally, Shareef et al. mention viral marketing as one of the methods of intrusive advertising on social media and note that this form of promotion are relevant only among a narrow target audience. In other words, the more annoying the advertisement is, the lower is the chance to attract a wide range of new consumers. Nevertheless, intrusive advertising is significantly less dangerous than bullying or harassment, which are found in modern social media.

The anonymity factor that may persist when interacting on social media is one of the reasons for bullying that some Internet users are forced to experience. A sense of impunity for aggressive behavior and insults towards another person exacerbate the situation. Moreover, bullying is a trend that is common in children’s communication on social media, which poses a serious threat to the fragile psyche of young users. According to Canty et al., online bullying is a unique phenomenon that has expanded in the virtual space due to the emergence of means to preserve anonymity and, in particular, the ability to go unpunished (p. 52). These factors are most obvious reasons why children, who are often humiliated by their peers on social media, become self-absorbed and cannot figure out the wrongdoers. Harassment is a similar problem, which, however, is characteristic of the adult population and often has a sexual background. Chadha et al. state that modern digital technologies “amplify attacks on gender-based and sexual minorities,” thereby acting as negative consequences of progress (p. 241). This statement assumes that the context of harassment is not limited to one topic. In addition, as findings show, virtual space is a favorable environment for this phenomenon:

Online communities and social media platforms offer many benefits, but they also have become breeding grounds for an assortment of sexist and misogynist behaviors. Importantly, the harassment behaviors evident today differ from off-line and pre-social media-era harassment, given the affordances of these networked spaces, including – but not limited to – the visibility and persistence of content, the anonymity/pseudonymity of users, the spreadability of content, and the multimediality of smartphones (Chadha et al, p. 250).

As a result, the openness of online communication creates a favorable environment for harassment and affects user behavior. Chadha et al. mention requests for personal data and addresses as easy consequences of harassment and note that people who have faced with real threats see this phenomenon as an extremely dangerous and aggressive trend (p. 243). This conclusion is logical because, despite different environments, online and real-life harassment have a common background. In this regard, the issues of privacy and accompanying risks are negative consequences of social media.

Privacy threats are fraught not only with identity theft but also with other problems that may entail anonymous bullying or blackmail. Today, for users of social media, communication options are not limited solely to correspondence. Interlocutors can comment on each other, share links, and perform other actions that go beyond a particular platform. As a result, as Aghasian et al. note, “the distribution of information in real world is almost local, the publically shared information in online social media can be retrieved on the internet anytime, anywhere and by anyone” (p. 13118). The significance of this statement is that virtually no one can be fully protected, and precautions should be taken. Aghasian et al. argue that users should be able to protect their personal data not only from intruders but also from familiar people who can become intermediaries in the leak of information (p. 13118). Those people who face privacy threats may lose their money or valuable digital content through negligence by providing their data to third parties. Due to the widespread use of virtual interaction, various leakage channels are discussed:

For example, a user normally share his/her personal information in Facebook which may pose a privacy risk. This user may share his/her occupation history and background in another site such as LinkedIn. His/her job information has again its own privacy risk, but a combination of the information from two social media accounts can pose the user to higher risk as more information is revealed. Consequently, by considering the overall information from multiple source, a more accurate quantification of the privacy disclosure score can be obtained. (Aghasian et al, p. 13118)

In addition to individual data leakage channels, the forms of privacy risks themselves are numerous. Aghasian et al. mention the threat of government data theft, the disclosure of confidential information about trade transactions, and even religious secrets (13119). Such a variety of risks explains the need for comprehensive protection. Social media, in turn, are a favorable environment for such fraud since the predominant number of Internet users have accounts at least at one specialized site. Wherein, according to Aghasian et al., “one of the challenges in addressing privacy concerns is how to measure the privacy of a user participating in multiple social networks” (p. 13129). The increasing role of social media in people’s lives inevitably leads to threats to personal data, especially if they are stored on different platforms. However, not all negative aspects of virtual communication are aimed at interacting with a particular person, and the example of fake news distributed online is a confirmation.

Social media are becoming the most common sources of news, including both entertaining content and serious political and economic reports, which, however, are not always reliable. One of the main reasons is the desire to attract a large target audience. The greater the news resonance is, the greater is the potential success of a particular media platform. For example, Shu et al. give the following statistics: “62 percent of U.S. adults get news on social media in 2016, while in 2012, only 49 percent reported seeing news on social media” (p. 22). This ratio proves that even the adult population of the country began to use virtual platforms more often. In addition, this growth may be due to the wider use of social media by numerous agencies that have individual accounts. The authors emphasize that fake news as a negative consequence of digital communication is disseminated most actively through social media due to an opportunity to create a public outcry quickly (Shu et al, p. 23). News groups fight for the target audience in any way possible, which entails publications based on unverified or false facts. Spohr explains the reasons and argues that “the producers and curators of fake news content are able to monetize their content through advertising platforms from Facebook and Google” (p. 156). This conclusion is logical since material gain is the most objective explanation for such publications. In addition, the researcher notes that fake news creates a resonance that, regardless of whether it is positive or negative, serves as a means of popularization (Spohr, p. 150). Therefore, the ability to influence the masses opens up prospects for fraudulent actions, although fake news cannot do such harm as violence, which is another negative effect of social media.

Despite the fact that violence in its natural sense cannot be realized online, the manifestations of violent acts through social media are possible. This phenomenon is similar to cyberbullying, but it involves strict measures of intimidation or harassment, while bullying can be superficial. Today, particular attention is paid to youth virtual violence, as children and adolescents are vulnerable groups. As Tripathi notes, “most children and adolescents (65-91%) report little or no involvement in violence over social media platforms” (2). At the same time, the author argues that time spent online is one of the factors on which the risk of violence depends (Tripathi, p. 3). In other words, the longer and more actively a child interacts with other users, the higher is the threat of psychological violence. This statement is reasonable and carries an open message about the need to reduce the access of young users to free online communication. Also, gender-based online violence is another form of bullying, and its consequences can be extremely dangerous from a social perspective:

Gender-based violence online is rampant, ranging from harassment of women who are public figures on social media to stalking intimate partners using purpose-built apps. This is not an issue that can be addressed by individual states alone, nor can it be addressed satisfactorily through legal means. The normalization of misogyny and abuse online both reflects and reinforces systemic inequalities. (Suzor et al, p. 84)

This position on gender-based violence proves the effect that indifference to this problem may cause. According to Suzor et al., most modern social media promote themselves as platforms for expressing individuality and personal opinions, which can be dangerous in conditions of the freedom of speech and anonymity (p. 89). Not only women but also other vulnerable groups can experience the effects of virtual violence, and impunity is one of the most dangerous consequences. The authors are convinced that “deeply entrenched structural features of existing social media platforms often exacerbate the effects of online harassment and abuse” (Suzor et al, p. 94). Thus, social media carry many negative implications, and an opportunity to go unpunished for aggressive or annoying behavior is a severe social omission.

• Aghasian, Erfan, et al. “Scoring Users’ Privacy Disclosure Across Multiple Online Social Networks.” IEEE Access , vol. 5, 2017, pp. 13118-13130.
• Canty, Justin, et al. “The Trouble with Bullying – Deconstructing the Conventional Definition of Bullying for a Child‐Centred Investigation into Children’s Use of Social Media.” Children & Society , vol. 30, no. 1, 2016, pp. 48-58.
• Chadha, Kalyani, et al. “Women’s Responses to Online Harassment.” International Journal of Communication , vol. 14, 2020, pp. 239-257.
• Shareef, Mahmud Akhter, et al. “Social Media Marketing: Comparative Effect of Advertisement Sources.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services , vol. 46, 2019, pp. 58-69.
• Shu, Kai, et al. “Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective.” ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter , vol. 19, no. 1, 2017, pp. 22-36.
• Spohr, Dominic. “Fake News and Ideological Polarization: Filter Bubbles and Selective Exposure on Social Media.” Business Information Review , vol. 34, no. 3, 2017, pp. 150-160.
• Suzor, Nicolas, et al. “Human Rights by Design: The Responsibilities of Social Media Platforms to Address Gender‐Based Violence Online.” Policy & Internet , vol. 11, no. 1, 2019, pp. 84-103.
• Tripathi, Vivek. “Youth Violence and Social Media.” Journal of Social Sciences , vol. 52, no. 1-3, 2017, pp. 1-7.

Cite this paper

• Chicago (N-B)
• Chicago (A-D)

StudyCorgi. (2022, March 10). Social Media: Negative Impacts. https://studycorgi.com/social-media-negative-impacts/

"Social Media: Negative Impacts." StudyCorgi , 10 Mar. 2022, studycorgi.com/social-media-negative-impacts/.

StudyCorgi . (2022) 'Social Media: Negative Impacts'. 10 March.

1. StudyCorgi . "Social Media: Negative Impacts." March 10, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/social-media-negative-impacts/.

Bibliography

StudyCorgi . "Social Media: Negative Impacts." March 10, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/social-media-negative-impacts/.

StudyCorgi . 2022. "Social Media: Negative Impacts." March 10, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/social-media-negative-impacts/.

This paper, “Social Media: Negative Impacts”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: May 25, 2022 .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal . Please use the “ Donate your paper ” form to submit an essay.

Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World

Read our research on:

Full Topic List

Regions & Countries

• Publications
• Our Methods
• Short Reads
• Tools & Resources

Read Our Research On:

64% of Americans say social media have a mostly negative effect on the way things are going in the U.S. today

About two-thirds of Americans (64%) say social media have a mostly negative effect on the way things are going in the country today, according to a Pew Research Center survey of U.S. adults conducted July 13-19, 2020. Just one-in-ten Americans say social media sites have a mostly positive effect on the way things are going, and one-quarter say these platforms have a neither positive nor negative effect.

Those who have a negative view of the impact of social media mention, in particular, misinformation and the hate and harassment they see on social media. They also have concerns about users believing everything they see or read – or not being sure about what to believe. Additionally, they bemoan social media’s role in fomenting partisanship and polarization, the creation of echo chambers, and the perception that these platforms oppose President Donald Trump and conservatives.

This is part of a series of posts on Americans’ experiences with and attitudes about the role of social media in politics today. Pew Research Center conducted this study to understand how Americans think about the impact of social media on the way things are currently going in the country. To explore this, we surveyed 10,211 U.S. adults from July 13 to 19, 2020. Everyone who took part is a member of the Center’s American Trends Panel (ATP), an online survey panel that is recruited through national, random sampling of residential addresses. This way nearly all U.S. adults have a chance of selection. The survey is weighted to be representative of the U.S. adult population by gender, race, ethnicity, partisan affiliation, education and other categories. Read more about the ATP’s methodology .

Here are the questions used for this report, along with responses, and its methodology.

The public’s views on the positive and negative effect of social media vary widely by political affiliation and ideology. Across parties, larger shares describe social media’s impact as mostly negative rather than mostly positive, but this belief is particularly widespread among Republicans.

Roughly half of Democrats and independents who lean toward the Democratic Party (53%) say social media have a largely negative effect on the way things are going in the country today, compared with 78% of Republicans and leaners who say the same. Democrats are about three times as likely as Republicans to say these sites have a mostly positive impact (14% vs. 5%) and twice as likely to say social media have neither a positive nor negative effect (32% vs. 16%).

Among Democrats, there are no differences in these views along ideological lines. Republicans, however, are slightly more divided by ideology. Conservative Republicans are more likely than moderate to liberal Republicans to say social media have a mostly negative effect (83% vs. 70%). Conversely, moderate to liberal Republicans are more likely than their conservative counterparts to say social media have a mostly positive (8% vs. 4%) or neutral impact (21% vs. 13%).

Younger adults are more likely to say social media have a positive impact on the way things are going in the country and are less likely to believe social media sites have a negative impact compared with older Americans. For instance, 15% of those ages 18 to 29 say social media have a mostly positive effect on the way things are going in the country today, while just 8% of those over age 30 say the same. Americans 18 to 29 are also less likely than those 30 and older to say social media have a mostly negative impact (54% vs. 67%).

However, views among younger adults vary widely by partisanship. For example, 43% of Democrats ages 18 to 29 say social media have a mostly negative effect on the way things are going, compared with about three-quarters (76%) of Republicans in the same age group. In addition, these youngest Democrats are more likely than their Republican counterparts to say social media platforms have a mostly positive (20% vs. 6%) or neither a positive nor negative effect (35% vs. 18%) on the way things are going in the country today. This partisan division persists among those 30 and older, but most of the gaps are smaller than those seen within the younger cohort.

Views on the negative impact of social media vary only slightly between social media users (63%) and non-users (69%), with non-users being slightly more likely to say these sites have a negative impact. However, among social media users, those who say some or a lot of what they see on social media is related to politics are more likely than those who say a little or none of what they see on these sites is related to politics to think social media platforms have a mostly negative effect on the way things are going in the country today (65% vs. 50%).

Past Pew Research Center studies have drawn attention to the complicated relationships Americans have with social media. In 2019, a Center survey found that 72% of U.S. adults reported using at least one social media site. And while these platforms have been used for political and social activism and engagement , they also raise concerns among portions of the population. Some think political ads on these sites are unacceptable, and many object to the way social media platforms have been weaponized to spread made-up news and engender online harassment . At the same time, a share of users credit something they saw on social media with changing their views about a political or social issue. And growing shares of Americans who use these sites also report feeling worn out by political posts and discussions on social media.

Those who say social media have negative impact cite concerns about misinformation, hate, censorship; those who see positive impact cite being informed

When asked to elaborate on the main reason why they think social media have a mostly negative effect on the way things are going in this country today, roughly three-in-ten (28%) respondents who hold that view mention the spreading of misinformation and made-up news. Smaller shares reference examples of hate, harassment, conflict and extremism (16%) as a main reason, and 11% mention a perceived lack of critical thinking skills among many users – voicing concern about people who use these sites believing everything they see or read or being unsure about what to believe.

In written responses that mention misinformation or made-up news, a portion of adults often include references to the spread, speed and amount of false information available on these platforms. (Responses are lightly edited for spelling, style and readability.) For example:

“They allow for the rampant spread of misinformation.” –Man, 36

“False information is spread at lightning speed – and false information never seems to go away.” –Woman, 71

“Social media is rampant with misinformation both about the coronavirus and political and social issues, and the social media organizations do not do enough to combat this.” –Woman, 26

“Too much misinformation and lies are promoted from unsubstantiated sources that lead people to disregard vetted and expert information.” –Woman, 64

People’s responses that centered around hate, harassment, conflict or extremism in some way often mention concerns that social media contributes to incivility online tied to anonymity, the spreading of hate-filled ideas or conspiracies, or the incitement of violence.

“People say incendiary, stupid and thoughtless things online with the perception of anonymity that they would never say to someone else in person.” –Man, 53

“Promotes hate and extreme views and in some cases violence.” –Man, 69

“People don’t respect others’ opinions. They take it personally and try to fight with the other group. You can’t share your own thoughts on controversial topics without fearing someone will try to hurt you or your family.” –Woman, 65

“Social media is where people go to say some of the most hateful things they can imagine.” –Man, 46

About one-in-ten responses talk about how people on social media can be easily confused and believe everything they see or read or are not sure about what to believe.

“People believe everything they see and don’t verify its accuracy.” –Man, 75

“Many people can’t distinguish between real and fake news and information and share it without doing proper research …” –Man, 32

“You don’t know what’s fake or real.” –Man, 49

“It is hard to discern truth.” –Woman, 80

“People cannot distinguish fact from opinion, nor can they critically evaluate sources. They tend to believe everything they read, and when they see contradictory information (particularly propaganda), they shut down and don’t appear to trust any information.” –Man, 42

Smaller shares complain that the platforms censor content or allow material that is biased (9%), too negative (7%) or too steeped in partisanship and division (6%).

“Social media is censoring views that are different than theirs. There is no longer freedom of speech.” –Woman, 42

“It creates more divide between people with different viewpoints.” –Man, 37

“Focus is on negativity and encouraging angry behavior rather than doing something to help people and make the world better.” –Woman, 66

Far fewer Americans – 10% – say they believe social media has a mostly positive effect on the way things are going in the country today. When those who hold these positive views were asked about the main reason why they thought this, one-quarter say these sites help people stay informed and aware (25%) and about one-in-ten say they allow for communication, connection and community-building (12%).

“We are now aware of what’s happening around the world due to the social media outlet.” –Woman, 28

“It brings awareness to important issues that affect all Americans.” –Man, 60

“It brings people together; folks can see that there are others who share the same/similar experience, which is really important, especially when so many of us are isolated.” –Woman, 36

“Helps people stay connected and share experiences. I also get advice and recommendations via social media.” –Man, 32

“It keeps people connected who might feel lonely and alone if there did not have social media …” – Man, 65

Smaller shares tout social media as a place where marginalized people and groups have a voice (8%) and as a venue for activism and social movements (7%).

“Spreading activism and info and inspiring participation in Black Lives Matter.” –Woman, 31

“It gives average people an opportunity to voice and share their opinions.” –Man, 67

“Visibility – it has democratized access and provided platforms for voices who have been and continue to be oppressed.” –Woman, 27

Note: This is part of a series of blog posts leading up to the 2020 presidential election that explores the role of social media in politics today. Here are the questions used for this report, along with responses, and its methodology.

Other posts in this series:

• 23% of users in U.S. say social media led them to change views on an issue; some cite Black Lives Matter
• 54% of Americans say social media companies shouldn’t allow any political ads
• 55% of U.S. social media users say they are ‘worn out’ by political posts and discussions
• Americans think social media can help build movements, but can also be a distraction
• Misinformation
• Misinformation Online
• National Conditions
• Political Discourse
• Politics Online
• Social Media

Brooke Auxier is a former research associate focusing on internet and technology at Pew Research Center .

Majorities in most countries surveyed say social media is good for democracy

­most americans favor restrictions on false information, violent content online, as ai spreads, experts predict the best and worst changes in digital life by 2035, social media seen as mostly good for democracy across many nations, but u.s. is a major outlier, the role of alternative social media in the news and information environment, most popular.

901 E St. NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20004 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 |  Media Inquiries

Research Topics

• Email Newsletters

ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER  Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of  The Pew Charitable Trusts .

© 2024 Pew Research Center

Warning: The NCBI web site requires JavaScript to function. more...

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it's official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• Browse Titles

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Office of the Surgeon General (OSG). Social Media and Youth Mental Health: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory [Internet]. Washington (DC): US Department of Health and Human Services; 2023.

Social Media and Youth Mental Health: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory [Internet].

Social media has both positive and negative impacts on children and adolescents.

The influence of social media on youth mental health is shaped by many complex factors, including, but not limited to, the amount of time children and adolescents spend on platforms, the type of content they consume or are otherwise exposed to, the activities and interactions social media affords, and the degree to which it disrupts activities that are essential for health like sleep and physical activity. 6 Importantly, different children and adolescents are affected by social media in different ways, based on their individual strengths and vulnerabilities, and based on cultural, historical, and socio-economic factors. 7 , 8 There is broad agreement among the scientific community that social media has the potential to both benefit and harm children and adolescents. 6 , 9

Brain development is a critical factor to consider when assessing the risk for harm. Adolescents, ages 10 to 19, are undergoing a highly sensitive period of brain development. 10 , 11 This is a period when risk-taking behaviors reach their peak, when well-being experiences the greatest fluctuations, and when mental health challenges such as depression typically emerge. 12 , 13 , 14 Furthermore, in early adolescence, when identities and sense of self-worth are forming, brain development is especially susceptible to social pressures, peer opinions, and peer comparison. 11 , 13 Frequent social media use may be associated with distinct changes in the developing brain in the amygdala (important for emotional learning and behavior) and the prefrontal cortex (important for impulse control, emotional regulation, and moderating social behavior), and could increase sensitivity to social rewards and punishments. 15 , 16 As such, adolescents may experience heightened emotional sensitivity to the communicative and interactive nature of social media. 16 Adolescent social media use is predictive of a subsequent decrease in life satisfaction for certain developmental stages including for girls 11–13 years old and boys 14–15 years old. 17 Because adolescence is a vulnerable period of brain development, social media exposure during this period warrants additional scrutiny.

• The Potential Benefits of Social Media Use Among Children and Adolescents

Social media can provide benefits for some youth by providing positive community and connection with others who share identities, abilities, and interests. It can provide access to important information and create a space for self-expression. 9 The ability to form and maintain friendships online and develop social connections are among the positive effects of social media use for youth. 18 , 19 These relationships can afford opportunities to have positive interactions with more diverse peer groups than are available to them offline and can provide important social support to youth. 18 The buffering effects against stress that online social support from peers may provide can be especially important for youth who are often marginalized, including racial, ethnic, and sexual and gender minorities. 20 , 21 , 22 For example, studies have shown that social media may support the mental health and well-being of lesbian, gay, bisexual, asexual, transgender, queer, intersex and other youths by enabling peer connection, identity development and management, and social support. 23 Seven out of ten adolescent girls of color report encountering positive or identity-affirming content related to race across social media platforms. 24 A majority of adolescents report that social media helps them feel more accepted (58%), like they have people who can support them through tough times (67%), like they have a place to show their creative side (71%), and more connected to what’s going on in their friends’ lives (80%). 25 In addition, research suggests that social media-based and other digitally-based mental health interventions may also be helpful for some children and adolescents by promoting help-seeking behaviors and serving as a gateway to initiating mental health care. 8 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29

• The Potential Harms of Social Media Use Among Children and Adolescents

Over the last decade, evidence has emerged identifying reasons for concern about the potential negative impact of social media on children and adolescents.

A longitudinal cohort study of U.S. adolescents aged 12–15 (n=6,595) that adjusted for baseline mental health status found that adolescents who spent more than 3 hours per day on social media faced double the risk of experiencing poor mental health outcomes including symptoms of depression and anxiety. 30

As of 2021, 8th and 10th graders now spend an average of 3.5 hours per day on social media. 31 In a unique natural experiment that leveraged the staggered introduction of a social media platform across U.S. colleges, the roll-out of the platform was associated with an increase in depression (9% over baseline) and anxiety (12% over baseline) among college-aged youth (n = 359,827 observations). 32 The study’s co-author also noted that when applied across the entirety of the U.S. college population, the introduction of the social media platform may have contributed to more than 300,000 new cases of depression. 32 , 33 If such sizable effects occurred in college-aged youth, these findings raise serious concerns about the risk of harm from social media exposure for children and adolescents who are at a more vulnerable stage of brain development.

Limits on the use of social media have resulted in mental health benefits for young adults and adults. A small, randomized controlled trial in college-aged youth found that limiting social media use to 30 minutes daily over three weeks led to significant improvements in depression severity. 34 This effect was particularly large for those with high baseline levels of depression who saw an improvement in depression scores by more than 35%. 35 Another randomized controlled trial among young adults and adults found that deactivation of a social media platform for four weeks improved subjective well-being (i.e., self-reported happiness, life satisfaction, depression, and anxiety) by about 25–40% of the effect of psychological interventions like self-help therapy, group training, and individual therapy. 36

In addition to these recent studies, correlational research on associations between social media use and mental health has indicated reason for concern and further investigation. These studies point to a higher relative concern of harm in adolescent girls and those already experiencing poor mental health, 37 , 38 , 39 as well as for particular health outcomes like cyberbullying-related depression, 40 body image and disordered eating behaviors, 41 and poor sleep quality linked to social media use. 42 For example, a study conducted among 14-year-olds (n = 10,904) found that greater social media use predicted poor sleep, online harassment, poor body image, low self-esteem, and higher depressive symptom scores with a larger association for girls than boys. 43 A majority of parents of adolescents say they are somewhat, very, or extremely worried that their child’s use of social media could lead to problems with anxiety or depression (53%), lower self-esteem (54%), being harassed or bullied by others (54%), feeling pressured to act a certain way (59%), and exposure to explicit content (71%). 44

Unless otherwise noted in the text, all material appearing in this work is in the public domain and may be reproduced without permission. Citation of the source is appreciated.

• Cite this Page Office of the Surgeon General (OSG). Social Media and Youth Mental Health: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory [Internet]. Washington (DC): US Department of Health and Human Services; 2023. Social Media Has Both Positive and Negative Impacts on Children and Adolescents.
• PDF version of this title (1005K)

In this Page

Other titles in this collection.

• Publications and Reports of the Surgeon General

Recent Activity

• Social Media Has Both Positive and Negative Impacts on Children and Adolescents ... Social Media Has Both Positive and Negative Impacts on Children and Adolescents - Social Media and Youth Mental Health

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

Connect with NLM

National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894

Web Policies FOIA HHS Vulnerability Disclosure

Help Accessibility Careers

Is social media use bad for young people’s mental health? It’s complicated.

July 17, 2023 – On May 23, U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy issued an advisory warning about the potential dangers of social media for the mental health of children and teens . Laura Marciano , postdoctoral research fellow at the Lee Kum Sheung Center for Health and Happiness and in the  Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, says that social media use might be detrimental for young people’s well-being but can also have positive effects.

Q: What are your thoughts on the Surgeon General’s advisory?

A: The advisory highlighted compelling evidence published during the last decade on the potential harmful impact of social media on children and adolescents. Some of what young people experience online—including cyberbullying, online harassment and abuse, predatory behaviors, and exposure to violent, sexual, and hate-based content—can undoubtedly be negative. But social media experiences are not limited to these types of content.

Much of the scientific literature on the effects of social media use has focused on negative outcomes. But the link between social media use and young people’s mental health is complicated. Literature reviews show that study results are mixed: Associations between social media use and well-being can be positive, negative, and even largely null when advanced data analyses are carried out, and the size of the effects is small. And positive and negative effects can co-exist in the same individual. We are still discovering how to compare the effect size of social media use with the effects of other behavioral habits—such as physical activity, sleep, food consumption, life events, and time spent in offline social connections—and psychological processes happening offline. We are also still studying how social media use may be linked positively with well-being.

It’s important to note that many of the existing studies relied on data from people living in so-called WEIRD countries (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic), thus leaving out the majority of the worldwide population living in the Global South. In addition, we know that populations like minorities, people experiencing health disparities and chronic health conditions , and international students can find social media extremely helpful for creating and maintaining social communities to which they feel they belong.

A number of large cohort studies have measured social media use according to time spent on various platforms. But it’s important to consider not just time spent, but whether that time is displacing time for other activities promoting well-being, like physical activity and sleep. Finally, the effects of social media use are idiosyncratic, meaning that each child and adolescent might be affected differently, which makes it difficult to generalize about the effects.

Literature reviews on interventions limiting social media use present a more balanced picture. For example, one comprehensive review on the effects of digital detox—refraining from using devices such as smartphones—wasn’t able to draw any clear conclusions about whether such detox could be effective at promoting a healthy way of life in the digital era, because the findings were mixed and contradictory.

Q: What has your research found regarding the potential risks and benefits of social media use among young people?

A: In my work with Prof. Vish Viswanath , we have summarized all the papers on how social media use is related to positive well-being measures, to balance the ongoing bias of the literature on negative outcomes such as depression and anxiety. We found both positive and negative correlations between different social media activities and well-being. The most consistent results show a link between social media activities and hedonic well-being (positive emotions) and social well-being. We also found that social comparison—such as comparing how many likes you have with how many someone else has, or comparing yourself to digitally enhanced images online—drives the negative correlation with well-being.

Meanwhile, I am working on the “ HappyB ” project, a longitudinal project based in Switzerland, through which I have collected data from more than 1,500 adolescents on their smartphone and social media use and well-being. In a recent study using that cohort, we looked at how social media use affects flourishing , a construct that encompasses happiness, meaning and purpose, physical and mental health, character, close social relationships, and financial stability. We found that certain positive social media experiences are associated with flourishing. In particular, having someone to talk to online when feeling lonely was the item most related to well-being. That is not surprising, considering that happiness is related to the quality of social connections.

Our data suggest that homing in on the psychological processes triggered during social media use is key to determining links with well-being. For example, we should consider if a young person feels appreciated and part of a group in a particular online conversation. Such information can help us shed light on the dynamics that shape young people’s well-being through digital activities.

In our research, we work to account for the fact that social media time is a sedentary behavior. We need to consider that any behavior that risks diminishing the time spent on physical activity and sleep—crucial components of brain development and well-being—might be detrimental. Interestingly, some studies suggest that spending a short amount of time using social media, around 1-2 hours, is beneficial, but—as with any extreme behavior—it can cause harm if the time spent online dominates a child’s or adolescent’s day.

It’s also important to consider how long the effects of social media last. Social media use may have small ephemeral effects that can accumulate over time. A step for future research is to disentangle short- versus long-term effects and how long each last. In addition, we should better understand how digital media usage affects the adolescent brain. Colleagues and I have summarized existing neuroscientific studies on the topic, but more multidisciplinary research is needed.

Q: What are some steps you’d recommend to make social media use safer for kids?

A: I’ll use a metaphor to answer this question. Is a car safe for someone that is not able to drive? To drive safely, we need to learn how to accelerate, recognize road signs, make safe decisions according to certain rules, and wear safety belts. Similarly, to use social media safely, I think we as a society—including schools, educators, and health providers—should provide children and families with clear, science-based information on both its positive and negative potential impacts.

We can also ask social media companies to pay more attention to how some features—such as the number of “likes”—can modulate adolescent brain activity, and to think about ways to limit negative effects. We might even ask adolescents to advise designers on how to create social media platforms specifically for them. It would be extremely valuable to ask them which features would be best for them and which ones they would like to avoid. I think that co-designing apps and conducting research with the young people who use the platforms is a crucial step.

For parents, my suggestion is to communicate with your children and promote a climate of safety and empathy when it comes to social media use. Try to use these platforms along with them, for example by explaining how a platform works and commenting on the content. Also, I would encourage schools and parents to collaborate on sharing information with young people about social media and well-being.

Also, to offset children’s sedentary time spent on social media, parents could offer them alternative extracurricular activities to provide some balance. But it’s important to remember that social well-being depends on the quality of social connections, and that social media can help to promote this kind of well-being. So I’d recommend trying to keep what is good—according to my research that would include instant messaging, the chance to talk to people when someone is feeling lonely, and funny or inspirational content—and minimizing what’s negative, such as too much sedentary time or too much time spent on social comparison.

– Karen Feldscher

Feb 15, 2023

6 Example Essays on Social Media | Advantages, Effects, and Outlines

Got an essay assignment about the effects of social media we got you covered check out our examples and outlines below.

Social media has become one of our society's most prominent ways of communication and information sharing in a very short time. It has changed how we communicate and has given us a platform to express our views and opinions and connect with others. It keeps us informed about the world around us. Social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn have brought individuals from all over the world together, breaking down geographical borders and fostering a genuinely global community.

However, social media comes with its difficulties. With the rise of misinformation, cyberbullying, and privacy problems, it's critical to utilize these platforms properly and be aware of the risks. Students in the academic world are frequently assigned essays about the impact of social media on numerous elements of our lives, such as relationships, politics, and culture. These essays necessitate a thorough comprehension of the subject matter, critical thinking, and the ability to synthesize and convey information clearly and succinctly.

But where do you begin? It can be challenging to know where to start with so much information available. Jenni.ai comes in handy here. Jenni.ai is an AI application built exclusively for students to help them write essays more quickly and easily. Jenni.ai provides students with inspiration and assistance on how to approach their essays with its enormous database of sample essays on a variety of themes, including social media. Jenni.ai is the solution you've been looking for if you're experiencing writer's block or need assistance getting started.

So, whether you're a student looking to better your essay writing skills or want to remain up to date on the latest social media advancements, Jenni.ai is here to help. Jenni.ai is the ideal tool for helping you write your finest essay ever, thanks to its simple design, an extensive database of example essays, and cutting-edge AI technology. So, why delay? Sign up for a free trial of Jenni.ai today and begin exploring the worlds of social networking and essay writing!

Want to learn how to write an argumentative essay? Check out these inspiring examples!

We will provide various examples of social media essays so you may get a feel for the genre.

6 Examples of Social Media Essays

Here are 6 examples of Social Media Essays:

The Impact of Social Media on Relationships and Communication

Introduction:.

The way we share information and build relationships has evolved as a direct result of the prevalence of social media in our daily lives. The influence of social media on interpersonal connections and conversation is a hot topic. Although social media has many positive effects, such as bringing people together regardless of physical proximity and making communication quicker and more accessible, it also has a dark side that can affect interpersonal connections and dialogue.

Positive Effects:

Connecting People Across Distances

One of social media's most significant benefits is its ability to connect individuals across long distances. People can use social media platforms to interact and stay in touch with friends and family far away. People can now maintain intimate relationships with those they care about, even when physically separated.

Improved Communication Speed and Efficiency

Additionally, the proliferation of social media sites has accelerated and simplified communication. Thanks to instant messaging, users can have short, timely conversations rather than lengthy ones via email. Furthermore, social media facilitates group communication, such as with classmates or employees, by providing a unified forum for such activities.

Negative Effects:

Decreased Face-to-Face Communication

The decline in in-person interaction is one of social media's most pernicious consequences on interpersonal connections and dialogue. People's reliance on digital communication over in-person contact has increased along with the popularity of social media. Face-to-face interaction has suffered as a result, which has adverse effects on interpersonal relationships and the development of social skills.

Decreased Emotional Intimacy

Another adverse effect of social media on relationships and communication is decreased emotional intimacy. Digital communication lacks the nonverbal cues and facial expressions critical in building emotional connections with others. This can make it more difficult for people to develop close and meaningful relationships, leading to increased loneliness and isolation.

Increased Conflict and Miscommunication

Finally, social media can also lead to increased conflict and miscommunication. The anonymity and distance provided by digital communication can lead to misunderstandings and hurtful comments that might not have been made face-to-face. Additionally, social media can provide a platform for cyberbullying , which can have severe consequences for the victim's mental health and well-being.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the impact of social media on relationships and communication is a complex issue with both positive and negative effects. While social media platforms offer many benefits, such as connecting people across distances and enabling faster and more accessible communication, they also have a dark side that can negatively affect relationships and communication. It is up to individuals to use social media responsibly and to prioritize in-person communication in their relationships and interactions with others.

The Role of Social Media in the Spread of Misinformation and Fake News

Social media has revolutionized the way information is shared and disseminated. However, the ease and speed at which data can be spread on social media also make it a powerful tool for spreading misinformation and fake news. Misinformation and fake news can seriously affect public opinion, influence political decisions, and even cause harm to individuals and communities.

The Pervasiveness of Misinformation and Fake News on Social Media

Misinformation and fake news are prevalent on social media platforms, where they can spread quickly and reach a large audience. This is partly due to the way social media algorithms work, which prioritizes content likely to generate engagement, such as sensational or controversial stories. As a result, false information can spread rapidly and be widely shared before it is fact-checked or debunked.

The Influence of Social Media on Public Opinion

Social media can significantly impact public opinion, as people are likelier to believe the information they see shared by their friends and followers. This can lead to a self-reinforcing cycle, where misinformation and fake news are spread and reinforced, even in the face of evidence to the contrary.

The Challenge of Correcting Misinformation and Fake News

Correcting misinformation and fake news on social media can be a challenging task. This is partly due to the speed at which false information can spread and the difficulty of reaching the same audience exposed to the wrong information in the first place. Additionally, some individuals may be resistant to accepting correction, primarily if the incorrect information supports their beliefs or biases.

In conclusion, the function of social media in disseminating misinformation and fake news is complex and urgent. While social media has revolutionized the sharing of information, it has also made it simpler for false information to propagate and be widely believed. Individuals must be accountable for the information they share and consume, and social media firms must take measures to prevent the spread of disinformation and fake news on their platforms.

The Effects of Social Media on Mental Health and Well-Being

Social media has become an integral part of modern life, with billions of people around the world using platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter to stay connected with others and access information. However, while social media has many benefits, it can also negatively affect mental health and well-being.

Comparison and Low Self-Esteem

One of the key ways that social media can affect mental health is by promoting feelings of comparison and low self-esteem. People often present a curated version of their lives on social media, highlighting their successes and hiding their struggles. This can lead others to compare themselves unfavorably, leading to feelings of inadequacy and low self-esteem.

Cyberbullying and Online Harassment

Another way that social media can negatively impact mental health is through cyberbullying and online harassment. Social media provides a platform for anonymous individuals to harass and abuse others, leading to feelings of anxiety, fear, and depression.

Social Isolation

Despite its name, social media can also contribute to feelings of isolation. At the same time, people may have many online friends but need more meaningful in-person connections and support. This can lead to feelings of loneliness and depression.

Addiction and Overuse

Finally, social media can be addictive, leading to overuse and negatively impacting mental health and well-being. People may spend hours each day scrolling through their feeds, neglecting other important areas of their lives, such as work, family, and self-care.

In sum, social media has positive and negative consequences on one's psychological and emotional well-being. Realizing this, and taking measures like reducing one's social media use, reaching out to loved ones for help, and prioritizing one's well-being, are crucial. In addition, it's vital that social media giants take ownership of their platforms and actively encourage excellent mental health and well-being.

The Use of Social Media in Political Activism and Social Movements

Social media has recently become increasingly crucial in political action and social movements. Platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram have given people new ways to express themselves, organize protests, and raise awareness about social and political issues.

Raising Awareness and Mobilizing Action

One of the most important uses of social media in political activity and social movements has been to raise awareness about important issues and mobilize action. Hashtags such as #MeToo and #BlackLivesMatter, for example, have brought attention to sexual harassment and racial injustice, respectively. Similarly, social media has been used to organize protests and other political actions, allowing people to band together and express themselves on a bigger scale.

Connecting with like-minded individuals

A second method in that social media has been utilized in political activity and social movements is to unite like-minded individuals. Through social media, individuals can join online groups, share knowledge and resources, and work with others to accomplish shared objectives. This has been especially significant for geographically scattered individuals or those without access to traditional means of political organizing.

Challenges and Limitations

As a vehicle for political action and social movements, social media has faced many obstacles and restrictions despite its many advantages. For instance, the propagation of misinformation and fake news on social media can impede attempts to disseminate accurate and reliable information. In addition, social media corporations have been condemned for censorship and insufficient protection of user rights.

In conclusion, social media has emerged as a potent instrument for political activism and social movements, giving voice to previously unheard communities and galvanizing support for change. Social media presents many opportunities for communication and collaboration. Still, users and institutions must be conscious of the risks and limitations of these tools to promote their responsible and productive usage.

The Potential Privacy Concerns Raised by Social Media Use and Data Collection Practices

With billions of users each day on sites like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, social media has ingrained itself into every aspect of our lives. While these platforms offer a straightforward method to communicate with others and exchange information, they also raise significant concerns over data collecting and privacy. This article will examine the possible privacy issues posed by social media use and data-gathering techniques.

Data Collection and Sharing

The gathering and sharing of personal data are significant privacy issues brought up by social media use. Social networking sites gather user data, including details about their relationships, hobbies, and routines. This information is made available to third-party businesses for various uses, such as marketing and advertising. This can lead to serious concerns about who has access to and uses our personal information.

Lack of Control Over Personal Information

The absence of user control over personal information is a significant privacy issue brought up by social media usage. Social media makes it challenging to limit who has access to and how data is utilized once it has been posted. Sensitive information may end up being extensively disseminated and may be used maliciously as a result.

Personalized Marketing

Social media companies utilize the information they gather about users to target them with adverts relevant to their interests and usage patterns. Although this could be useful, it might also cause consumers to worry about their privacy since they might feel that their personal information is being used without their permission. Furthermore, there are issues with the integrity of the data being used to target users and the possibility of prejudice based on individual traits.

Government Surveillance

Using social media might spark worries about government surveillance. There are significant concerns regarding privacy and free expression when governments in some nations utilize social media platforms to follow and monitor residents.

In conclusion, social media use raises significant concerns regarding data collecting and privacy. While these platforms make it easy to interact with people and exchange information, they also gather a lot of personal information, which raises questions about who may access it and how it will be used. Users should be aware of these privacy issues and take precautions to safeguard their personal information, such as exercising caution when choosing what details to disclose on social media and keeping their information sharing with other firms to a minimum.

The Ethical and Privacy Concerns Surrounding Social Media Use And Data Collection

Our use of social media to communicate with loved ones, acquire information, and even conduct business has become a crucial part of our everyday lives. The extensive use of social media does, however, raise some ethical and privacy issues that must be resolved. The influence of social media use and data collecting on user rights, the accountability of social media businesses, and the need for improved regulation are all topics that will be covered in this article.

Effect on Individual Privacy:

Social networking sites gather tons of personal data from their users, including delicate information like search history, location data, and even health data. Each user's detailed profile may be created with this data and sold to advertising or used for other reasons. Concerns regarding the privacy of personal information might arise because social media businesses can use this data to target users with customized adverts.

Additionally, individuals might need to know how much their personal information is being gathered and exploited. Data breaches or the unauthorized sharing of personal information with other parties may result in instances where sensitive information is exposed. Users should be aware of the privacy rules of social media firms and take precautions to secure their data.

Responsibility of Social Media Companies:

Social media firms should ensure that they responsibly and ethically gather and use user information. This entails establishing strong security measures to safeguard sensitive information and ensuring users are informed of what information is being collected and how it is used.

Many social media businesses, nevertheless, have come under fire for not upholding these obligations. For instance, the Cambridge Analytica incident highlighted how Facebook users' personal information was exploited for political objectives without their knowledge. This demonstrates the necessity of social media corporations being held responsible for their deeds and ensuring that they are safeguarding the security and privacy of their users.

Better Regulation Is Needed

There is a need for tighter regulation in this field, given the effect, social media has on individual privacy as well as the obligations of social media firms. The creation of laws and regulations that ensure social media companies are gathering and using user information ethically and responsibly, as well as making sure users are aware of their rights and have the ability to control the information that is being collected about them, are all part of this.

Additionally, legislation should ensure that social media businesses are held responsible for their behavior, for example, by levying fines for data breaches or the unauthorized use of personal data. This will provide social media businesses with a significant incentive to prioritize their users' privacy and security and ensure they are upholding their obligations.

In conclusion, social media has fundamentally changed how we engage and communicate with one another, but this increased convenience also raises several ethical and privacy issues. Essential concerns that need to be addressed include the effect of social media on individual privacy, the accountability of social media businesses, and the requirement for greater regulation to safeguard user rights. We can make everyone's online experience safer and more secure by looking more closely at these issues.

In conclusion, social media is a complex and multifaceted topic that has recently captured the world's attention. With its ever-growing influence on our lives, it's no surprise that it has become a popular subject for students to explore in their writing. Whether you are writing an argumentative essay on the impact of social media on privacy, a persuasive essay on the role of social media in politics, or a descriptive essay on the changes social media has brought to the way we communicate, there are countless angles to approach this subject.

However, writing a comprehensive and well-researched essay on social media can be daunting. It requires a thorough understanding of the topic and the ability to articulate your ideas clearly and concisely. This is where Jenni.ai comes in. Our AI-powered tool is designed to help students like you save time and energy and focus on what truly matters - your education. With Jenni.ai , you'll have access to a wealth of examples and receive personalized writing suggestions and feedback.

Whether you're a student who's just starting your writing journey or looking to perfect your craft, Jenni.ai has everything you need to succeed. Our tool provides you with the necessary resources to write with confidence and clarity, no matter your experience level. You'll be able to experiment with different styles, explore new ideas , and refine your writing skills.

So why waste your time and energy struggling to write an essay on your own when you can have Jenni.ai by your side? Sign up for our free trial today and experience the difference for yourself! With Jenni.ai, you'll have the resources you need to write confidently, clearly, and creatively. Get started today and see just how easy and efficient writing can be!

Start Writing With Jenni Today

Sign up for a free Jenni AI account today. Unlock your research potential and experience the difference for yourself. Your journey to academic excellence starts here.

24/7 writing help on your phone

To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”

The Impact of Social Media on Society: Addiction and Self-Esteem

Save to my list

Remove from my list

The Rise of Social Media Addiction

Self-Esteem and Social Media

The perils of cyberbullying, treatment and mitigation.

The Impact of Social Media on Society: Addiction and Self-Esteem. (2016, Feb 28). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/negative-effects-of-social-media-essay

"The Impact of Social Media on Society: Addiction and Self-Esteem." StudyMoose , 28 Feb 2016, https://studymoose.com/negative-effects-of-social-media-essay

StudyMoose. (2016). The Impact of Social Media on Society: Addiction and Self-Esteem . [Online]. Available at: https://studymoose.com/negative-effects-of-social-media-essay [Accessed: 18 Aug. 2024]

"The Impact of Social Media on Society: Addiction and Self-Esteem." StudyMoose, Feb 28, 2016. Accessed August 18, 2024. https://studymoose.com/negative-effects-of-social-media-essay

"The Impact of Social Media on Society: Addiction and Self-Esteem," StudyMoose , 28-Feb-2016. [Online]. Available: https://studymoose.com/negative-effects-of-social-media-essay. [Accessed: 18-Aug-2024]

StudyMoose. (2016). The Impact of Social Media on Society: Addiction and Self-Esteem . [Online]. Available at: https://studymoose.com/negative-effects-of-social-media-essay [Accessed: 18-Aug-2024]

• Social Media, Self-Esteem, and Teen Suicide Pages: 6 (1706 words)
• Drug Addiction Alcohol Addiction and Traumatising Effects of Addiction Pages: 5 (1346 words)
• Expanding the Exploration of Self-Concept and Self-Esteem Pages: 3 (785 words)
• The Negative Influence of Media on Body Image and Self-Esteem in Women Pages: 7 (1999 words)
• The Social and Psychological Effects of Social Media Addiction on Adolescents Pages: 2 (577 words)
• Body Image, Self Esteem and Personality Factors in Males and Females Pages: 4 (919 words)
• Cyberbullying and Self-Esteem Pages: 2 (427 words)
• Grades and Self-Esteem by Mandy Moore Pages: 3 (700 words)
• Confidence and Self-esteem Pages: 3 (627 words)
• The Concept of Netiquette and It`s Effect on Self-esteem Pages: 2 (581 words)

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

Pardon Our Interruption

As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

• You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.
• You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
• You've disabled cookies in your web browser.
• A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article .

To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.

Essay on Social Media for School Students and Children

500+ words essay on social media.

Social media is a tool that is becoming quite popular these days because of its user-friendly features. Social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and more are giving people a chance to connect with each other across distances. In other words, the whole world is at our fingertips all thanks to social media. The youth is especially one of the most dominant users of social media. All this makes you wonder that something so powerful and with such a massive reach cannot be all good. Like how there are always two sides to a coin, the same goes for social media. Subsequently, different people have different opinions on this debatable topic. So, in this essay on Social Media, we will see the advantages and disadvantages of social media.

Advantages of Social Media

When we look at the positive aspect of social media, we find numerous advantages. The most important being a great device for education . All the information one requires is just a click away. Students can educate themselves on various topics using social media.

Moreover, live lectures are now possible because of social media. You can attend a lecture happening in America while sitting in India.

Furthermore, as more and more people are distancing themselves from newspapers, they are depending on social media for news. You are always updated on the latest happenings of the world through it. A person becomes more socially aware of the issues of the world.

In addition, it strengthens bonds with your loved ones. Distance is not a barrier anymore because of social media. For instance, you can easily communicate with your friends and relatives overseas.

Most importantly, it also provides a great platform for young budding artists to showcase their talent for free. You can get great opportunities for employment through social media too.

Another advantage definitely benefits companies who wish to promote their brands. Social media has become a hub for advertising and offers you great opportunities for connecting with the customer.

Get the huge list of more than 500 Essay Topics and Ideas

Disadvantages of Social Media

Despite having such unique advantages, social media is considered to be one of the most harmful elements of society. If the use of social media is not monitored, it can lead to grave consequences.

Thus, the sharing on social media especially by children must be monitored at all times. Next up is the addition of social media which is quite common amongst the youth.

This addiction hampers with the academic performance of a student as they waste their time on social media instead of studying. Social media also creates communal rifts. Fake news is spread with the use of it, which poisons the mind of peace-loving citizens.

In short, surely social media has both advantages and disadvantages. But, it all depends on the user at the end. The youth must particularly create a balance between their academic performances, physical activities, and social media. Excess use of anything is harmful and the same thing applies to social media. Therefore, we must strive to live a satisfying life with the right balance.

FAQs on Social Media

Q.1 Is social media beneficial? If yes, then how?

A.1 Social media is quite beneficial. Social Media offers information, news, educational material, a platform for talented youth and brands.

Q.2 What is a disadvantage of Social Media?

A.2 Social media invades your privacy. It makes you addicted and causes health problems. It also results in cyberbullying and scams as well as communal hatred.

Customize your course in 30 seconds

Which class are you in.

• Travelling Essay
• Picnic Essay
• Our Country Essay
• My Parents Essay
• Essay on Favourite Personality
• Essay on Memorable Day of My Life
• Essay on Knowledge is Power
• Essay on Gurpurab
• Essay on My Favourite Season
• Essay on Types of Sports

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Download the App

Impacts of Social Media on Students

Teenagers spend an average of 4.8 hours on social media each day, which means platforms like YouTube and TikTok have a significant impact on their lives. Researchers believe social media has both positive and negative impacts , ranging from the ability to form strong relationships with others to the prevalence of cyberbullying. 

It’s important to take a comprehensive look at the effects of social media on students. Large-scale trends can highlight the opportunities and risks that come with using these platforms. 

Negative Impacts of Social Media on Students

According to research from Aura, two-thirds of parents say their kids have experienced negative effects from social media. Despite these concerns, 35 percent of parents say their kids were on social media before they turned 7, and 64 percent said their kids were on social media before they turned 10. 

Excessive use of social media can increase the chances that kids experience the negative effects of being online. This can have ripple effects on their academic performance and day-to-day life. Here are a few concerns that parents are worried about. 

Mental Health

The  U.S. Surgeon General recently published a detailed advisory on the effects of social media on adolescent mental health . An estimated 95 percent of children ages 13 to 17 use social media, but researchers are still trying to understand the effects of near-constant online engagement on developing brains.

The Surgeon General reports that adolescents aged 12 to 15 who spend more than three hours on social media each day face “double the risk of experiencing poor mental health outcomes,” which include symptoms of anxiety and depression. 

The Surgeon General recommends limiting online time to help adolescents step away from the world of social media. Parents should also be involved in what their kids are looking at. Explicit photos and videos aren’t the only harmful content on the web. Kids could be engaging with material that hurts their body image or self-worth. 

Academic Performance

Excessive social media use can distract kids from important activities, including schoolwork and spending time with family, according to the Mayo Clinic. Essentially, some kids spend so much time scrolling and watching videos that they stop doing their homework and give up their favorite hobbies, sports and games. 

This can be harmful for kids in younger grades who are learning foundational concepts they will apply throughout their educational careers. Older students can also jeopardize their college futures because of social media addiction. 

Teachers with an advanced education can do their part to help students step away from social media. Many accredited schools are preparing educators to address screen addictions. Teachers learn how to impart digital literacy skills that help with research and learning while also teaching students to set boundaries. They balance digital with traditional lesson plans. 

Cyberbullying

Cyberbullying can occur over text, social media, gaming apps and other online forums. It involves hurtful or false messages that are meant to negatively affect the recipient. For example, cyberbullying could involve spreading rumors about a fellow student or sharing sexual or unflattering photos.

Nearly half of teens have experienced cyberbullying of some kind. Bullies often choose digital platforms because they can be anonymous and share hateful information with large audiences. Students who are cyberbullied could be bullied in person at school or feel distressed to the point where it harms their mental health and academic performance. 

Fortunately, there are resources educators and parents can turn to. Check your local school for anti-bullying resources and counseling services. StopBullying.gov is also a valuable resource, along with SchoolSafety.gov . 

Body Image and Self-Esteem

Social media also has a direct impact on the self-esteem of students. One study found teens and young adults who cut back on social media use by 50 percent saw “a significant improvement in how they felt about both their weight and their overall appearance.”

Social media can be overwhelming because of the sheer number of photos and videos. It’s hard not to compare yourself to others. However, it gets even more toxic with the rise of filters and Photoshop, which give young people unrealistic expectations of how they should look. One report found that 90 percent of young people use filters on Snapchat . 

Educators can do their best to promote positive body images by highlighting a diverse range of body types in curriculum materials. Parents can also set good examples by avoiding filters themselves and having open discussions about body acceptance. 

Distorted Perceptions of Reality

Social media often creates an unrealistic view of how people live. Few people share their day-to-day lives; instead, they post beautiful vacation photos or extravagant weddings and events. Teens aren’t exempt from these reels and can experience feelings of inadequacy as a result. For example, the rise of promposals can make teens feel left out if they aren’t invited to prom in a dramatic fashion that goes viral. 

Researchers have found the fear of missing out (FOMO) can have detrimental effects on mental and emotional health. People feel sad or ashamed because they cannot keep up with online expectations. 

Educators can help students avoid the pressure to live like online influencers. They can teach critical thinking to help teens see beyond the posts. They can also create AI lesson plans to show kids how to spot fake or misleading content.  

Positive Impacts of Social Media on Students

Despite the significant drawbacks that social media has on the lives of students, online worlds aren’t entirely bad. Parents and educators have noticed a few good things to come from social media that give them hope for the future. 

Increasing Diversity and Inclusion

Social media allows teens to connect with others with similar backgrounds and personalities beyond their classrooms and neighborhoods. For example, a teenager in a small town who is neurodivergent or who recently came out as gay can talk with other teens with similar experiences across the country. One study found that 58 percent of teens feel more accepted because of social media , while 67 percent say they have a community they can turn to during difficult times. 

Social media also exposes kids and teens to other cultures and perspectives, broadening their horizons.

Enhancing Digital Literacy

Students can also develop digital literacy skills by spending time online. Research shows that kids ages 18 to 29 are more aware of digital topics like online privacy and generative AI. This means they can better navigate the web and avoid potential threats. This research is also reflected in European studies , which show younger adults have higher rates of basic digital skills.   

When students have higher rates of digital literacy, they can be more critical of the content they engage with. They can also be smarter about choosing the information they consume and the sources that promote them. 

The Role of Educators in Addressing Social Media’s Impact on Students

Many people believe parents are responsible for teaching healthy social media habits in kids, but teachers also play a valuable role. Educators often incorporate social media and other tech-based platforms into their lesson plans , which means they are responsible for ensuring students use these platforms safely. Even teachers who don’t use social media in the classroom can set aside time to discuss issues like cyberbullying and screen addiction, which can directly harm academic performance. 

Social media has changed society and teachers aren’t exempt from this evolution. Getting a master’s degree in education from an accredited school can give teachers the tools they need to incorporate social media in the classroom while helping students develop safe habits. Social media is a valuable tool in the right hands, but parents and teachers alike need to know the risks that come with using it.  

Request Information

Step 1 of 2

Step 2 of 2

• Weird But True
• Sex & Relationships
• Viral Trends
• Human Interest
• Fashion & Beauty
• Food & Drink

trending now in Lifestyle

These airports make passengers walk the longest distances...

The terrifying reason why you should never run your dishwasher at...

I'm a Gen Z travel influencer who's been to 190 countries —...

Here are the best sandwiches in every state, according to Yelp...

I make almost $1M a year from my dream restaurant — but I...

The dodo bird’s dummy reputation is being rewritten by...

My dad murdered my mom then killed himself -- now I'm turning it...

I live in the Long Island spot where Beyoncé vacations — it's...

Why 3 in 4 gen zers blame social media for their mental health decline.

Three in four Gen Zers are putting the blame on social media for having a negative impact on their mental health, according to a new study.

The poll of 2,000 Gen Z Americans who use social media found Instagram (20%), TikTok (20%) and Facebook (13%) have all had a negative impact on their wellbeing. 

Many said the reasons they use social media are because they’re bored (66%), want to laugh (59%), want to see what’s happening in the world (49%) and to see what their friends are up to (44%).

However, this social media scrolling leaves nearly half of Gen Zers (49%) feeling some kind of negative emotion like stress and anxiety (30%).  

Commissioned by  LG Electronics  and conducted by Talker Research, the study found those who experience negative emotions report that it only takes them 38 minutes on social media before they start to feel bad.

Respondents attribute these feelings to consuming upsetting content (51%), feeling unproductive with how they spent their time (49%) and/or experiencing FOMO (36%).

The average person spends five and a half hours on social media apps per day, and 45% believe they spend more time on social media than their friends.

“We spend a significant portion of our lives online and often these experiences may leave us feeling drained and not mentally stimulated,” said Louis Giagrande, head of U.S. marketing at LG Electronics. “We encourage everyone to be more conscious about the social media content they choose to engage with, bringing stronger balance, inspiration and happiness to their lives. If we focus on optimism, we will be better equipped to deal with life’s challenges and build a happier life.”

Results also found, not surprisingly, 62% of Gen Zers wish they could “reset” their social media feeds and start over again.

Over half (53%) report feeling frustrated that content on their feed doesn’t match what they want to see.

Just as many (54%) believe they have either “some,” “little,” or “no control at all” over what they see on their social media feeds. In fact, only 16% believe they have total control over what they see.

While many said they associate platforms with negative emotions, the study also found 80% claimed they also associate social media with a positive impact on their mood.

Content reported to evoke positive emotions are comedy (65%), animals (48%), beauty (40%) and prank videos (34%). Meanwhile, content exhibiting physical violence (50%), politics (40%), and sexually explicit content (32%) tends to lead to negative emotions.

Two-thirds (65%) have turned a bad day into a good one because of what they’ve seen on social media. Adding to this, respondents were 70% more likely to use social media when they are in a good mood compared to a bad mood and 44% believe social media has a positive impact on their outlook on life.

Over the course of the next five years, 38% believe social media platforms can improve their impact on mental health.

“Algorithms play a significant role in the content we see on social media, but there are simple actions people can take to ‘reset’ their feeds, so they can enjoy more of the positive content they’re craving,” continued Giagrande. “When you come across content that makes you smile, give it some extra attention. ‘Like it’ and leave a comment. Giving that post some engagement can help inspire more positive posts like it to show up on your feed.”  

WHAT’S CAUSING GEN Z TO USE SOCIAL MEDIA DAILY?

Boredom – 66%

I want to laugh/smile – 59%

Need a distraction/break – 55%

I want to see what is happening in the world – 49%

I want to see what my friends are doing – 44%

I want to connect with others – 42%

I want to disengage/need downtime – 33%

Looking for specific information – 32%

Survey methodology:

Talker Research surveyed 2,000 Gen Z Americans who use social media; the survey was commissioned by LG Electronics and administered and conducted online by Talker Research between June 20 and June 24, 2024.

We are sourcing from a non-probability frame and the two main sources we use are:

• Traditional online access panels — where respondents opt-in to take part in online market research for an incentive
• Programmatic — where respondents are online and are given the option to take part in a survey to receive a virtual incentive usually related to the online activity they are engaging in

Those who did not fit the specified sample were terminated from the survey. As the survey is fielded, dynamic online sampling is used, adjusting targeting to achieve the quotas specified as part of the sampling plan.

Regardless of which sources a respondent came from, they were directed to an Online Survey, where the survey was conducted in English; a link to the questionnaire can be shared upon request. Respondents were awarded points for completing the survey. These points have a small cash-equivalent monetary value.

Cells are only reported on for analysis if they have a minimum of 80 respondents, and statistical significance is calculated at the 95% level. Data is not weighted, but quotas and other parameters are put in place to reach the desired sample.

Interviews are excluded from the final analysis if they failed quality-checking measures. This includes:

• Speeders: Respondents who complete the survey in a time that is quicker than one-third of the median length of interview are disqualified as speeders
• Open ends: All verbatim responses (full open-ended questions as well as other please specify options) are checked for inappropriate or irrelevant text
• Bots: Captcha is enabled on surveys, which allows the research team to identify and disqualify bots
• Duplicates: Survey software has “deduping” based on digital fingerprinting, which ensures nobody is allowed to take the survey more than once

It is worth noting that this survey was only available to individuals with internet access, and the results may not be generalizable to those without internet access.

Advertisement

More From Forbes

How social media impacts consumer buying.

• Share to Facebook
• Share to Twitter
• Share to Linkedin

Vice President, Digital at Clearbridge Branding Agency, overseeing clients’ digital and social media efforts.

The powerful effects of social media on businesses and brands have been proven. Over the past decade, the adoption of social media as an awareness, selling and customer relationship management tool has moved from large brands to Main Street mom-and-pop stores.

As marketers, we know that we need to be where our target audience is online, but do you truly understand how social media usage plays a role in the consumer buying process? With seven in 10 Americans using social media, it is very likely that the vast majority of your customers (or potential customers) are already online. It is important to take into consideration how that affects your current and potential customers so that you can craft social strategies that align with both consumer expectations of the brand and, of course, sales for your business.

While some people create an account on these mediums to simply connect with friends or loved ones, social media is now more intertwined with business than ever. Popular social media platforms have integrated a wide variety of options for consumers to conjugate with brands and companies alike, even offering the ability to make purchases of goods or services directly on an app.

For example, Facebook first implemented a “buy” call-to-action button on ads and page posts back in 2014. Adopting this feature gives users the opportunity to make a purchase of a product without interrupting their scrolling. Many other mediums have followed suit, and other marketplaces, like Instagram Shopping, are more popular than ever. Listing products in the dedicated “Shop” tab gives your items exposure to a wide breadth of audiences that were previously inaccessible if you were a brick-and-mortar location that required consumer foot traffic to make a purchase.

Setting the focus of your social selling strategy toward advertising your products or services on these apps is one of the ways to bridge the gap between future customers and the long-standing issue of “ how do I share what my business offers to fresh eyes? ” Consider social selling as part of your overall sales strategy.

The algorithms of social platforms with buying options help to expose your brand’s services or items to relevant audiences dictated by triggers such as demographics, geographics and interest, all with the help of paid promotion. Set aside a monthly budget for promoted posts or product ads to increase sales, and utilize costless tactics such as including relevant and popular hashtags on posts to drive up organic reach.

It’s also important to recognize the effect of social media on consumer buying choices when considering the power of recommendations. Most modern consumers carry their purchasing power in their pockets, and when they’re not buying, they utilize social networks for reviews about a product and where to (or not to) shop from. With 80% of consumers making buying decisions based on a friend’s social media post, the era of virtual word-of-mouth recommendations is in full effect.

Consumers gravitate to brands that are hospitable, humanized and relatable, and expect companies to interact with them in a meaningful way that goes beyond an advertisement or product listing. Taking steps, such as answering Facebook or Instagram inquiries, or even something as simple as responding to a tweet showing excitement about your product or service, can boost your brand’s reputation and increase the likelihood of a consumer recommending you to others. Build a relationship with followers and customers to increase consumer satisfaction and bolster the likelihood of those coveted positive social media recommendations to peers.

On the other hand, a negative recommendation of any kind can be detrimental to your brand. Thankfully, consumers have entered a new dimension of two-way engagement with brands on social media. The days of latency on the phone while seeking a customer service representative have passed, and an era of contactless, voiceless assistance has entered. Social listening, active community management and, well, being social on social media, can help keep that negativity at bay.

Consumers seek honesty and rely on other sources such as influencers when it comes to making buying decisions. Hiring a popular influencer in your brand’s niche to put a spotlight on your product or service can make a difference if handled correctly. Just one positive review conducted by a recognizable influencer has the capability of causing an influx in popularity and, more importantly, sales. Many larger influencers, like the mega- and macro-influencers can be hired through an agency, while smaller influencers, like nanos, can be reached by sending a direct message or email to create a line of communication and begin the process of getting your brand in front of their audiences. The benefits of a positive recommendation to a large audience typically will greatly outweigh the monetary value of an item, so don’t be hesitant to give out a promotional product at no cost.

Social media has created a level playing ground for brands and consumers, unlocking a never-before-seen type of relationship between the two. Social platforms are modern era storefronts and serve as the liaison between customers and your products.

Forbes Agency Council is an invitation-only community for executives in successful public relations, media strategy, creative and advertising agencies. Do I qualify?

• Editorial Standards
• Reprints & Permissions

Essay on Effects Of Social Media On Mental Health

Students are often asked to write an essay on Effects Of Social Media On Mental Health in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Effects Of Social Media On Mental Health

Introduction.

Social media is a tool that lets us communicate and share with people around the world. It’s very popular, especially with young people. But, it can also affect our mental health in different ways.

Positive Impact

Social media can have a good effect on our mental health. It allows us to connect with friends and family, even if they live far away. It can also help us find groups of people who share our interests. This can make us feel less alone and more understood.

Negative Impact

On the other hand, social media can also have a bad effect on our mental health. Seeing other people’s “perfect” lives can make us feel bad about our own. It can also lead to cyberbullying, which can hurt our self-esteem and cause stress.

Importance of Balance

Like most things, balance is key when using social media. Spending too much time online can make us feel isolated in real life. It’s important to take breaks and spend time doing other things we enjoy.

250 Words Essay on Effects Of Social Media On Mental Health

Social media is a powerful tool that connects people from all corners of the world. It is a platform where we share our thoughts, ideas, and daily life activities. But, it also has a great impact on our mental health.

Impacts on Self-Esteem

One of the main effects of social media on mental health is on our self-esteem. When we see our friends having fun, achieving things, or looking happy, we often compare ourselves with them. This comparison can make us feel less confident and happy about our own lives.

Loneliness and Isolation

Another effect is the feeling of loneliness and isolation. Even though we are connected with many people online, we can still feel alone. This is because social media interactions are not the same as real-life interactions. This feeling can lead to sadness and depression.

Anxiety and Fear

Social media can also cause anxiety and fear. We often worry about what others will think of our posts. We fear negative comments and judgments. This constant worry can lead to stress and anxiety.

In conclusion, while social media has its benefits, it can also have negative effects on our mental health. It can affect our self-esteem, make us feel lonely, and cause anxiety. Therefore, it is important to use social media wisely and not let it control our lives. We need to remember that what we see on social media is not always the full picture of someone’s life.

500 Words Essay on Effects Of Social Media On Mental Health

Positive effects.

First, let’s talk about the good things. Social media can make us feel connected. It allows us to keep in touch with friends and family, even if they live far away. This can make us feel less lonely. It can also help us find people who share our interests. For example, if you love painting, you can join an art group online. This can boost your confidence and make you feel part of a community.

Negative Effects

Now, let’s look at the negative side. Spending too much time on social media can make us feel sad or anxious. This is because we often compare our lives to the perfect ones we see online. This can make us feel like we are not good enough.

Another problem is cyberbullying. Some people use social media to hurt others by sending mean messages or spreading rumors. This can lead to stress, anxiety, and even depression.

Impact on Sleep

Social media can also affect our sleep. Many of us check our phones before bed. The bright screen can make it harder for us to fall asleep. Lack of sleep can lead to mood swings, trouble focusing, and feeling tired all the time.

Ways to Stay Healthy

The good news is there are ways to use social media without hurting our mental health. One way is to limit our time online. We can set a timer or use an app that reminds us to take a break.

We should also remember that what we see online is not always real. Many people only share the best parts of their lives, not the hard parts.

If someone is being mean to us online, we should tell a trusted adult. We can also block or report the person.

In conclusion, social media has both good and bad effects on our mental health. It can make us feel connected, but it can also make us feel sad, anxious, and tired. To stay healthy, we need to use social media in a balanced way, remember that what we see online is not always real, and speak up if someone is being mean to us.

That’s it! I hope the essay helped you.

Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .

Happy studying!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Social Media and Interpersonal Relationships

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Social media has become popular with the Internet’s increased influence on communication. Naturally, this change has both negative and positive impacts on society and the way we interact with each other. So, what effect does social media have on interpersonal relationships? This essay will try to answer this question.

Today, the number of social networks is growing drastically. The developers of social networks like Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter, among others, have been competing to offer excellent features.

This can be categorised in terms of privacy, interaction, socialization as well as entertainment. Through the use of wide range of communication platform, the sites can be accessed from laptops, mobile phones, iPhones, and iPads. This has made it easy for people to interact freely anytime given that they have internet connections.

The social media has made it easy for people to communicate without need for face to face interactions. However, the concern has been whether social media is eradicating the essence of interpersonal relationship. Interpersonal relationships involve the association between people for a long period, where the association is based emotional feelings, social commitments as well as regular interactions.

The relationships can occur in different situations, such as friends, clubs, acquaintances, family, workplaces, and churches among others. The difference between the two is that interpersonal relations are determined and regulated by society, law and customs that are shared. Social media has both the negative and positive impacts to individuals’ relationships that affect daily activities.

The social media has both negative and positive impacts on relationships. However, the social media is expected to have more positive than negative impacts because of lowered constraints of traditional communication (Anderson, 1). This has made it possible for people to connect more rapidly with more zeal and zest. According to Jain (1) the social media enables people connect easily with many other people from different parts of life far more than the people we meet in the street.

This is true because people share what they have in common and they make a relation out of it. However, this is degrading the traditional ways in which relationships were initiated and accomplished. But the social media has that ability of bringing people from different social and cultural backgrounds more easily than the traditional mode of communication. Therefore, social media can help one meet many friends than they could ever meet in their life thus enriching their relationships.

Introverts have the chance of strengthening their relations through the social media. Relations in the workplace can be strengthened through the social media and it has been made easy for employees to exchange ideas (Conlin and MacMillan 1). Through the social media brands can be enriched through the wider range of friends and followers. However, it also ruins the relationships in the workplace and reduces productivity. This is because a lot of time is spent and hate and hatred can be spread over through social networks.

In a negative way, social media is ruining some of the relationships based on the comments made by other people. For instance, intimate relationships can ruined because of some post like in face book or twitter. Meraji (1) note that some posts made on face book or tweets made can lead to resentment that generates hate and hatred.

This can ruin closer relationship because of some comments made on your wall. Some forgotten relationships can no longer be forgotten and escaped if one is using the social media. This is because it has become a platform where everybody meets and friends of friends are on it. Social media can be detrimental to relationships because of the negativity it may arouse. For example, negative or moody response can affect the real time relationships.

Social media and the internet are robbing off people the time that can be used in a more constructive and intimate face to face communication (Anderson 2). This is because most of the friends in the social media use fake names, give wrong information about themselves, and even create the aspect of intolerance and impatient. This harms the real relations more and it is happening in the real world.

The communication that creates the feeling of remorse when wrong is done, is not present in the social media relationships. Social media interactions can now strengthen far away relationships. This is because the people can easily communicate and according to Anderson (2) geographical distance is no longer a hindrance to relationship. This has made some of the relations blossom

It can be concluded that social media has both positive and negative effects on relationships. The mode in which they are necessitated consumes a lot of people time that could have been applied in a more face to face communication. This has endangered the traditional mode of communication and can be detrimental to relationships.

However, it has made it possible to enhance the communication and keep long distanced relationships in check. It has also made it easy for people to interact more easily and one can make friends online rapidly than it can occur in real life. Contrary, the social media can break relationships and create aspects like intolerance and impatient. It is believed that social media would be having more positive impacts on relationships as time goes on.

Works Cited

Anderson, Jenna. Q. “The Future of Social Relations”. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project . 2010. Web.

Conlin, Michelle and Douglas, MacMillan. Web 2.0: Managing Corporate Reputations . 2009. Web.

Jain, Rachana . 4 Ways Social Media is Changing Your Relationships . 2010. Web.

Meraji, Shereen. In The Age Of Social Media, Can You Escape Your Ex? . 2010. Web.

• Human Trafficking: Social Media
• Facebook Addiction in the Modern Society
• Hate Crime Among Juveniles
• The Jamestown Ruins as an Archaeological Site
• The Concept of Change in Organization
• The Impact of Media Bias
• Social Media Networks: Staying Neutral?
• Teen Fashion Advertisement
• Culture Artifact Film "Into the Great Pyramid"
• Facebook's Primary Activity
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2018, October 12). Social Media and Interpersonal Relationships. https://ivypanda.com/essays/social-media-and-interpersonal-relationships/

"Social Media and Interpersonal Relationships." IvyPanda , 12 Oct. 2018, ivypanda.com/essays/social-media-and-interpersonal-relationships/.

IvyPanda . (2018) 'Social Media and Interpersonal Relationships'. 12 October.

IvyPanda . 2018. "Social Media and Interpersonal Relationships." October 12, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/social-media-and-interpersonal-relationships/.

1. IvyPanda . "Social Media and Interpersonal Relationships." October 12, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/social-media-and-interpersonal-relationships/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Social Media and Interpersonal Relationships." October 12, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/social-media-and-interpersonal-relationships/.

• Systematic Review
• Open access
• Published: 17 August 2024

Direct and indirect effects of economic sanctions on health: a systematic narrative literature review

• Vahid Yazdi-Feyzabadi 1 ,
• Atefeh Zolfagharnasab 2 ,
• Soheila Naghavi 3 ,
• Anahita Behzadi 1 ,
• Maysam Yousefi 4 &
• Mohammad Bazyar   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2543-1862 5  

BMC Public Health volume  24 , Article number:  2242 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

Economic sanctions are defined as restrictions imposed by other countries against individuals, groups, or governments of other countries. These sanctions have a detrimental impact on the economies of countries and can also limit access to healthcare services for people as a secondary consequence. This study aims to systematically review the literature to examine the direct and indirect effects of economic sanctions on health through a narrative synthesis.

This systematic literature review was limited to papers published between January 1990 and July 2023. Relevant documents published in English and Persian were searched for in databases including Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, SID, Magiran, and Irandoc. The direct and indirect effects of sanctions on health were classified using two frameworks proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO): the Health System Building Blocks and “Social Determinants of Health”.

Out of a total of 18,219 articles, 59 were selected based on inclusion criteria. The effects of sanctions were divided into direct and indirect groups. Direct effects encompassed seven main themes: access to essential medicine, medical products, vaccines and technologies; financing; health workforce; service delivery; research and health information systems; health outcomes; and financial risk protection. Indirect effects also were classified into six main themes: socioeconomic status; food and agricultural products; stress; early life conditions; high-risk behaviors and addiction; and transport. Most studies focused on the access to medicines, food, economic and social status.

Conclusions

Economic sanctions have had profoundly negative impacts on all aspects of the healthcare system. The international community must address these effects on health and take necessary measures to prevent or mitigate them, particularly in ensuring the provision of basic and essential healthcare needs for individuals and communities.

Peer Review reports

Sanctions are purposeful and determined restrictions imposed by one or more countries against another individual, group or countries’ government. Sanctions are usually imposed by international organizations as a pressure tool for responding to the course of actions of any country that opposes them [ 1 ].

Economic sanctions are the most common type of these restrictions. The two main types of these sanctions are trade and financial restrictions. Trade sanctions restrict imports to and exports from the countries under sanctions while financial sanctions are closely related to economic ones, but their focus is on banning the money flows and financial resources into or out of the country. These sanctions can include blocking government assets, restricting access to financial markets, loans and credits limitations, restricting international financial exchange, and also sales and trade abroad [ 2 ].

Economic sanctions reduce people’s access to basic necessities of life by debilitating the economic situation, decreasing welfare and weakening the functions of the target country’s social systems. One of the most important areas affected through these boycotts is health. Due to the expansion of health scope, these limitations affect different parts of health system itself and as a result endanger people’s life [ 3 , 4 ].

Studies in various countries, including Iran, Iraq, Cuba, Yugoslavia and Haiti, discussed the effects of sanctions on health. In Haiti, economic sanctions have reduced incomes, increased unemployment and poverty along with mortality by 1 to 4 years, and destroyed families [ 5 ]. In Iran, especially in healthcare area, sanctions have resulted in increasing the cost of essential procedures and drugs such as diagnostic procedures for cancers and chemotherapy drugs. The difficulties in getting required licenses for financial transactions and transportation insurance due to sanctions has left the country with a shortage of drugs and health equipment [ 6 ].

Sanctions have devastating effects on the health of vulnerable patients or health systems customers too. Patients who are suffering from diseases such as asthma, thalassemia, hemophilia, chronic diseases, blood disorders, multiple sclerosis and HIV/AIDS have limited access to drugs [ 7 ]. While comparing, in developed countries mortality rates decreased using appropriate drugs [ 8 , 9 ].

Different countries may use broad policies to prevent or adjust the negative effects of economic problems on health systems, although these policies may not be successful in ensuring continued access to health services [ 10 , 11 ].

Although sanctions may be designed for excluding medical products from the list, they can still have an inevitable impact on access to health services. Thus, the imposition of economic sanctions can threaten public health directly [ 12 ].

Furthermore, economic sanctions suppress the health indirectly by adversely impacting on other related parts known as social determinants of health (SDH) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Economic sanctions impact all aspects of the social determinants of health (SDH) framework, leading to negative effects on health equity and well-being. Sanctions can alter social and political systems, such as governance, labor markets, education, trade, housing, and redistributive policies, influencing people’s health. Structural determinants like income, education, and occupation are affected by sanctions, changing health opportunities and status, especially for the economically disadvantaged. Intermediary determinants, including material and psychosocial circumstances, are also influenced negatively by sanctions. For instance, housing quality declines post-sanctions due to increased costs of land and materials, while food consumption patterns shift towards cheaper, less nutritious options. Sanctions create psychosocial stressors like job insecurity and uncertainty, leading to frustration and stress [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ].

Continued sanctions may hinder countries’ progress towards achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG-3 for healthy lives and well-being. Economic stability is crucial for meeting health-related SDGs, and any failures in this regard would disproportionately impact citizens in targeted countries. In the context of developing countries, where progress toward SDGs is often hindered by limited resources and systemic disparities, the impact of economic sanctions on health systems and overall well-being is profound. SDGs, with their emphasis on health (Goal 3) and the overarching aim of leaving no one behind, seek to address disparities and ensure equitable access to healthcare services. Economic sanctions, however, disrupt this delicate balance, exacerbating existing inequalities and impeding the ability of nations to meet the health-related targets outlined in the SDGs [ 13 ].

Given that, the effects of sanctions depend on the situation of countries and vary from one to another, there is no complete evidence of a comprehensive impact of sanctions on different part of society’s system especially in health despite of its importance. To comprehensively address these issues, a rigorous examination of evidence through narrative systematic reviews becomes imperative. This study aims to provide a detailed narrative synthesis of the direct and indirect effects of economic sanctions on health system building blocks and public health focusing on social determinants of health, thereby contributing to a better understanding of the broader consequences of such measures.

The following steps were taken to review literature systematically [ 17 , 18 ].

Research question

The main question that we wanted to answer in this study was to investigate and categorize the effects that economic sanctions impose on health directly and indirectly.

Search strategy and identifying literature

This systematic review was carried out according to the latest version of PRISMA guidelines [ 19 , 20 ]. For the purposes of the study, following databases were searched by one of the authors experienced in systematic research: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, SID, Magiran, Irandoc. The search strategy (see Additional file 1 for an example) was first devised for use in PubMed and subsequently adapted for the other databases. The search was limited to papers published between January 1990 and July 2023 and to studies involving economic sanctions independently as a hard power exercise. Other hard power exercises to achieve foreign policy goals such as war and conflicts were excluded. We selected the appropriate keywords from studying similar studies, discussion among research team and intended frameworks for extracting the data. The search term “sanctions” and “public health” were used for PubMed; terms associated with “economic sanctions” and “public health” were used for the title or abstract in the other databases if required (MeSH term; major focus and/or exploded depending on the database). In brief the following terms were searched using Boolean operators: sanction, embargo, health, human resource, medical instrument, medicine, pharmaceutics, disease, mortality, medical equipment, medical devices, drug, health care, Taskforce, health personnel, health workers, morbidity, illness, and food.

Screening and article selection criteria

Duplicate results were removed after searching the databases using Endnote software version X8. After removing the duplications, a screening of publications, based on titles and abstracts was performed by two researchers independently. In second screening, then, the suspected documents were re-examined by a third person from the research team to decide whether to enter or not.

As the final step of screening, the full texts of the remaining publications were independently assessed for inclusion by pairs of reviewers once more and any potential disagreements were resolved through consensus and if necessary by the third opinion from the research team.

The articles not meeting the below criteria were excluded:

Articles published in languages other than English and Persian.

Articles available in preprint servers.

Articles did not match the question and objectives of the research like those related to the effects of wars and conflict on health.

Conference abstracts, books, reports and dissertations.

Records not in line with the quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method original articles including letter to Editor, commentary, opinion/viewpoint/perspective.

Articles published before 1990.

After reaching the final list of studies to be reviewed thoroughly, we supplemented our database search by screening bibliographic of chosen articles to identify any additional relevant publications. The bibliographic of other relevant systematic articles were also searched actively for retrieving other missing articles.

Data extraction

After finalizing the final list of articles, the full text of the selected articles were studied precisely and required information was extracted. In order to capture the maximum available evidence regarding the effects of economic sanctions, no quality assessment was employed in our systematic literature review. This approach allowed us to include a wide range of studies, regardless of their methodological quality, thus providing a comprehensive overview of the existing literature. This method is consistent with approaches used in narrative synthesis where the primary aim is to summarize broad evidence on a topic rather than critically appraise each study’s quality. The extracted information was divided into two sections. The first one, consisting the bibliographic information included the title of article, the year of publication, the first author, and the title of the journal and the second section reports the frequency of articles according to the main topics addressed in their results.

Data analysis and presenting results

For identifying key concepts and main themes, each of selected articles studied carefully. After completing the data extraction table, the researchers shared the concepts with other members of the research team, and agreement was reached. As many other factors outside the borders of health system affects the health, generally known as social determinants of health (SDH), we applied two common popular frameworks to categorize the direct and indirect effects impacts of sanctions on health system and public health. To address the direct impact of sanctions on health, Health System Building Blocks framework proposed by World Health Organization (WHO) was proposed which consists of six key components including “service delivery”, “health workforce”, “health information systems”, “access to essential medicines”, “financing” and “government/ leadership”. This framework also covers intermediate (e.g. access, coverage, quality and safety) and four final goals including Improved health (level and equity), Responsiveness, Social and financial risk protection, and Improved efficiency [ 21 , 22 ].

To cover other effects of sanctions occurring in other sections beyond the health system but affecting health indirectly, the approach of “Social Determinants of Health” was applied which comprises of the following 10 elements, “The social gradient”, “Stress”, “Early life conditions”, “Social exclusion”, “Work”, “Unemployment”, “Social support”, “Addiction”, “Food”, and “Transport“ [ 23 ].

Search process

A total number of 18,219 articles were identified, which after removing the overlaps, 12,838 articles remained. Following the initial review of the title and abstract of all retrieved articles, a further 12,439 articles were excluded. Out of 399 records, the full text of 390 articles were retrieved and evaluated for eligibility.

After a final review, 331 articles were excluded due to not intended study design or not addressing the question and aims of the current research. Finally 59 research articles were included in the study (Fig.  1 ). A summary of included studies’ features is reported in Table  1 .

The PRISMA algorithm of study selection process

Study features

The study information collected from 11 countries which included Iran, Iraq, Cuba, Syria, Haiti, Yugoslavia, Lebanon, Serbia, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Russia and South Africa. Iraq [ 4 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ] and Iran [ 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ] had the maximum number of studies. Most of the studies were descriptive or analytical. Four were qualitative and also three studies were designed as a mix-method. The share of different regions from economic sanctions studies is shown in Fig.  2 .

The different regions share of economic sanctions studies

Study areas

Included studies have examined the impact of sanctions in various areas. The amount of available and accessible information about the effect of sanctions varied from one area to another. Most studies addressed the impact of economic sanctions on access to medicine or food and also socioeconomic status.

Almost half of studies mentioned the effect of sanctions on access to drugs, these studies covered approximately all countries targeted by sanctions. More than a quarter, discussed the socioeconomic situation. Food access and malnutrition were also explained in about another quarter of the articles. According to studies, the vulnerable groups which affected most by sanctions were the poor, patients, women and children. The proportion of different parts of health system and different social health determinants affected by economic sanctions is reported in Table  2 ; Fig.  3 .

The proportion of different parts of health system and social determinants of health mentioned in retrieved studies which are affected by economic sanctions

The Table  2 provides an overview of the frequency of direct and indirect effects of sanctions on health, based on findings from 59 selected articles. The data is categorized into direct effects on the health system and indirect effects on population/public health, highlighting both the immediate and broader consequences of sanctions. The most frequently mentioned direct effect was the impact on access to essential medicine, medical products, vaccines, and technologies, with 22 documents, accounting for 37.3% of the papers. On the other hand, the most frequently cited indirect effect was on the socioeconomic situation, mentioned in 9 documents (15.2%).

Themes and sub-themes

The effects of sanctions on health were categorized into two broad direct and indirect groups. Following the WHO’ Health System Building Blocks, direct effects include 7 main themes as followed: access to essential medicine, medical products, vaccines and technologies; financing; health workforce; service delivery; research and health information systems; health outcomes; and financial risk protection (Table  3 ). Indirect effects also were summarized in 6 main themes consisting: socioeconomic status; food and agricultural products; stress; early life conditions; high-risk behaviors and addiction; and transportation (Table  4 ).

Direct effects

Access to medicines, medical products, vaccines, and technologies.

Access to medicine is one of the main goals of health systems. Numerous studies have been reported on drug shortages and public concerns about patients’ difficulties for getting their essential’s [ 46 ]. The findings related to access to medicine were divided further into three sub-themes: reduced access to imported raw materials, decreased access to imported or foreign drugs, and increased drug prices.

There are some findings indicated that sanctions prevent the import of essential medical supplies [ 29 , 36 , 44 , 47 , 48 ]. Therefore, the manufacture of local drugs is affected and access to them is reduced.

For example, Iran experienced a significant decrease in access to asthma drugs which produced locally in Iran, because of local producers relied on imported raw materials [ 36 ]. In Yugoslavia, as a result of imposing restrictions on pharmaceutical industry, the available essential drugs decreased by more than 50% [ 47 ]. Syria also faced a shortage of raw materials for producing domestic drugs for heart disease, cancer and diabetes [ 48 ]. In a similar way, in Iraq, the provision of laboratory services reduced because of raw chemicals shortage [ 29 ].

Limited access to imported drugs was another direct effect [ 49 ]. The shortage of essential medicines in countries suffering from sanctions was a main concern and access to such medicines including chemotherapy, chronically illness treatments, psychiatric services, MS and antiepileptic drugs was limited considerably [ 29 , 31 , 36 , 37 , 40 , 42 , 44 , 47 , 50 ]. Access to hemophilia and thalassemia drugs was severely affected too [ 39 ]. Problems caused by economic sanctions also affected the pharmaceutical market which as a result, lead to an sharp increase in the prices [ 5 , 42 , 51 ].

Studies showed that economic sanctions reduced the import of and access to medical equipment to great extent [ 3 , 24 , 29 , 52 ]. In Cuba, the number of X-rays decreased by 75% [ 3 ]. Many American companies refused to sell drugs or medical equipment assigned for Nicaragua. Severe shortage of medical products in health system became apparent in 1985 and worsened in 1986 [ 24 ].

Also, studies revealed that economic sanctions have reduced access to vaccines and caused less immunization against infectious diseases [ 25 , 53 ].

In case of Cuba, the country’s ability to produce chlorine decreased and the number of populations with no access to safe drinking water increased, therefore population covered by chlorine water systems decreased from 98% in 1988 to 26% in 1994 [ 3 ].

Health financing

Health financing counts as essential ability of health systems to maintain and improve the community well-being. The economic crisis is affecting the financial capacity of health care system and has hampered the financial support for providing health services [ 52 , 54 ]. During the economic sanctions, budget constraints also prevented some health care programs from being fully implemented [ 31 ].

Health workforce

A study done in Iraq showed that economic sanctions resulted in widespread expulsions of health care professionals, while many of them were belong to foreign nationals. Also, physicians had to do a lot of extra work, along with increasing pressures which caused them.

leave their jobs behind [ 29 , 31 ].

Health services delivery

The imposition of economic sanctions, resulted in labor shortages, limited access to medical equipment, affecting the process of providing health services and made it worse. This imposed much more pressure on the ability of health system as whole particularly during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic [ 55 ]. Meanwhile various studies showed a reduction in quantity and quality of provided services too [ 5 , 29 , 31 , 52 , 56 , 57 ]. A study in Iran showed that due to economic sanctions, from 18 brachytherapy centers in 2018, only two centers were usable since 2015 and also the gap between Iran’s available facilities for radiation therapy and international standards deepened [ 58 ]. According to the Program of Action for Cancer Therapy, sanctions have disrupted Iran’s National Cancer Control Program (NCCP) as they have influenced all phases of treatment from prevention, to diagnosis/treatment, palliative care, monitoring, and also technology and drug availability [ 59 ].

Research and health information systems

The effects of economic sanctions on research and health information systems were divided into three sub-themes: reduced access to scientific resources and virtual sites, disruption of international interactions and conferences, and restricted research activities. Sanctions also limited access to scientific magazines and books [ 29 , 52 ]. Specialists were unable to get visas and travel abroad to attend international conferences, which reduced scientific exchanges [ 52 ].

The severe financial pressure of sanctions intensified restrictions of scientific travels and communications with the outside world led to a lack of access to educational materials and global medical advances [ 31 ].

Economic sanctions also had negative effects on both research and science production activities, including smaller scientific communication, difficulties in research processes, and consequently, decline in the quality along with quantity of research and science development activities [ 14 , 45 , 60 ].

Health outcomes and financing risk protection

International evidence about the UN sanctions indicates that they reduces life expectancy by about 1.2–1.4 years on average. It was also shown that this reduction is much more severe in vulnerable groups of society like women. This lower life expectancy in the studied countries occurred to great extent due to higher child mortality and Cholera deaths and also spending less amount of public budget on health care [ 61 , 62 ]. Studies from Iran show that multiple sclerosis patients faced higher out-of-pocket payments, catastrophic health expenditures and the poverty index [ 63 ]. Similarly, studies from other countries show higher mortality rate from infectious diseases and more difficulties for optic and neuropathic patients [ 64 , 65 ]. Physical rehabilitation experts in Iran also concern about high price that people with physical problems have to pay for prostheses which in turn have negative consequences for practitioners themselves [ 66 ].

Indirect effects

The effects of economic sanctions are not targeted and they also influence sectors other than health which can affect general health indirectly. These effects can be categorized under a general concept as social determinants of health (SDH). The main SDHs extracted from the retrieved studies are as follows:

Economic and social status

The main target of economic sanctions is the economy and money flows of countries which had negative consequences for countries’ economy themselves and other related areas [ 67 ]. The indirect outcomes in the area of Economic and Social Status were categorized into 6 sub-themes including: rising unemployment, decreasing income, declining welfare, increasing poverty, trade barriers, rising prices and decreasing purchasing power.

Majority of studies in Iran, Iraq, Cuba, Haiti, Syria, South Africa addressed the effects of sanctions on the socioeconomic situation [ 4 , 5 , 29 , 44 , 47 , 48 , 52 , 68 ]. These sanctions banned and reduced the exports of products which in turn caused unemployment among those who relied on importing such products to make money. Unemployment rose sharply in Haiti with the cessation of mango exports, on which many poor people depended [ 47 ]. Also, in this country some of factories such as clothing, sports and assembly, reduced the number of workers, which was accompanied by rising the rate of job loss [ 5 ].

Continuing this situation, economic problems became more and more prevalent. In Haiti, many people lost their main source of income [ 5 ]. In Iraq, wage fell and there was hardly enough to buy the necessities of daily life [ 29 ]. A review of studies during this period revealed that the reason of increasing social problems and the disintegration of many family structures was the fall in incomes [ 5 , 44 ].

On the other hand, poverty increased as soon as economic problems intensified. Some of the middle classes’ families were forced to sell their houses and apartments [ 29 ]. Also, school enrollment declined due to the poverty [ 5 ].

Another important effect was trade barriers so that reduced the rate of investment and the number of foreign companies. The number of active American companies in South Africa fell from 267 in 1986 to 104 in 1991 [ 47 ]. Loss of markets, credits, and favorable trade conditions, devaluation of the national currency against the US dollar, the oil exports stoppage, alongside the reduction of basic goods imports were among the other effects [ 29 , 47 , 48 ]. On the other hand, prices increased while purchasing power decreased [ 4 , 5 , 48 , 52 ].

Food and agriculture

Numerous studies in Iran, Cuba, Iraq, and Haiti have shown that economic sanctions reduced food imports while increased their prices, and restricted proper diet 41) [ 3 , 5 , 24 , 29 , 47 ]. In Cuba, food imports decreased by almost 50% from 1989 to 1993 as a result of falling rate of imports while shifting to low-quality protein products which posed serious threats on population’s health. In Haiti, staple food prices increased fivefold from 1991 to 1993 [ 47 ]. Likewise, the prices of all food groups increased significantly in Iran in 2018 due to the limitations in international financial exchanges, right after the re-imposition of sanctions. The price increase was higher in vegetable, meat, and fruit groups which made it nearly impossible to follow a healthy diet [ 69 ].

Prices of basic commodities such as wheat, rice and sugar rose in Iraq, too [ 29 ]. On the other hand, the lack of foods containing B vitamins group in Cuba led to the epidemic of neuropathy [ 47 ]. Poor nutrition among pregnant women in Iraq increased anemia [ 24 ]. Meal and per capita protein intake decreased [ 3 , 5 ]. At the same time malnutrition also increased during restrictions [ 5 , 35 , 47 , 70 ] and furthermore caused reduction in crop production and agricultural support [ 5 , 71 ]. Other studies also revealed that availability and stability were the most affected dimensions of food security following imposing economic sanctions [ 72 ]. A study about the impact of the UN and US economic sanctions on the environment in Iran found that while these sanctions initially improved Iran’s environment in the short term, they had long-term damaging effects [ 73 ].

Economic sanctions exacerbate stressful conditions. According to studies, increased fear and uncertainty, and increased mental health problems are among the negative effects of sanctions in this category [ 5 , 31 , 48 , 53 , 74 ].

Early life conditions

A good start in life means supporting mothers and young children. A study found the exposure to adverse economic conditions in infancy and early childhood was effective in long-term negative health outcomes [ 75 ].

High-risk and addictive behaviors

People turning to high-risk behaviors and addiction along with their consumption patterns can be affected and intensified by economic and social conditions. According to the findings, the effects of economic sanctions in case of risky and addictive behavior were categorized into two sub-groups consist of increasing high-risk behaviors and addiction.

As evidences revealed, economic sanctions increased suicide and violence. Studies shown that the rate of deaths caused by violence and suicides have increased in Yugoslavia and Cuba during limitation periods [ 3 , 47 ]. In Haiti, charges against children, criminal conspiracy, robbery, and drug use were much more serious [ 5 ] and this happened along with another important result which was changing in drug use patterns and increased drug abuse problems.

The common use of syringes for drug injection has increased, posing a risk to abusers. Due to economic problems, people entered mass drug distribution networks and drug trafficking to make money; tried steal or other illegal ways to earn money for buying or supplying drugs. Rising drug prices have led to the neglect family economic basket and reduced attention to the factors such as education and health care, which have resulted in low quality of life for consumers and their families [ 41 ].

According to the studies, economic sanctions in different countries affected communities’ health in different ways. Economic sanctions are supposed to force a country’s government to reconsider its policies by putting and imposing economic pressure. Although they should not target humanitarian goods, studies in various countries have revealed their direct and indirect effects on community’s health and threats for people’s right to health. The most important effects were found in the access to medicine and change in socio-economic conditions, while ensuring access to medicines for people who needed them, is one of the most emphasized goals of health systems all around the world [ 76 ]. Clearly economic sanctions suppress economic growth of the targeted countries in different ways and the lower economic situation can influence all aspects of the whole community and people’ life including their health status directly and indirectly. The World Bank data confirm that sanctions reduced Iran’s economic growth by 38% within three years, as GDP per capita dropped from US$ 7833 in 2012 to US$ 4862 in 2015. Moreover, unemployment increased from 10.4% in 2013 to 13.1% in 2017, and the economic inequality in household expenditure, measured by Gini coefficient, increased from 37 to 41%, since 2012, due to economic sanction. Clearly this economic inequality can lead to health inequity in population [ 77 ]. When the economic situation worsens in general, the financial capacity of health system and also the financial power of people will be affected. Evidence from different studies proved that the general budget of health decreased and out-of-pocket payments increased especially for those patients who depend on foreign and imported drugs [ 54 , 63 ].

In the present study, surveys in different countries showed that economic sanctions through devaluing the national currency, affected access to health goods and services, including drugs and medical equipment. Countries depending on drug technology, requiring the imported raw materials, experienced a severe restriction for accessing to medicine and drugs. On the other hand, these limitations caused a sudden increase or inflation in the prices of medicine and equipment. This effect would be worse for people who suffer from chronic diseases and are unable to purchase or use health care services [ 16 ]. For example, sanctions in 2011 caused a 14 times increase in the price of formula in Iran for infants suffering from food allergies. Besides that, uncertainty about the availability of drugs following sanctions also changes the behavior of people as the stored formula for infants not needing a specific formula which was enough for 2 months was distributed only within 4 days in September, 2018 [ 78 ].

This is while the economic sanctions reducing the power of supporting health services by limiting budgets and funds. Health financing is essential for the ability of health systems to maintain and improve human health through keeping them capable to fund and provide health services. Without the necessary funding, no health workers will be hired, no medication will be available, and as the same way, no health promotion or prevention will take place [ 23 ]. As a result, considering the negative impact of sanctions, the financing system faces serious problems in three main functions of resource collection, pooling, and purchasing. The ability of countries to achieve health system’s goals largely depends on the knowledge, skills, motivation and deployment of individuals to organize and provide health services [ 23 ]. Numerous studies showed evidence of a direct relationship between health human resource and population outcomes [ 79 , 80 ].

Sanctions made it impossible to strengthen service delivery for achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) related to health by reducing the rate of occupied health workforce and forcing them to migrate. Studies assessed the impact of economic crises shown that these restrictions affected the health sector by increasing public vulnerability as same as the inability to meet public needs and expectations due to limited resources [ 81 , 82 , 83 ]. The findings from Iran show that sanctions can influence health care delivery adversely during health pandemics like COVID-19 disease in various direct and indirect ways [ 55 ]. Therefore, if sanctions continue, the reduction of inputs will hinder the improvement of service delivery and access to them. On the other hand, they disrupt access to health services even though with minimum quality standards.

About the research, sanctions limited and disqualified research activities by banning the access to most scientific and valid resources and disrupting international interactions and conferences. The small and isolated scientific communication has slowed down the health promotion progresses and limited the access to standards and protocols for promoting public health based on scientific evidence [ 31 , 45 ].

At the same time, economic sanctions affected on social determinants of health in various dimensions. Loss of markets, credits and favorable trading conditions reduces the value of the national currency and the ability to import goods. While, the cost of basic goods is strongly affected and prices increased [ 47 , 48 ]. Thus, sanctions forced severe negative effects on people’s health status by reduction of income, welfare, along with increasing unemployment and poverty [ 5 , 29 , 84 ]. This negative impact is more evident on the poor. These people cannot access or buy high or even sometimes low quality health care services.

Another effect of sanctions is reducing access to the food. Sanctions will restrict access to enough food for countries which import their agricultural products. Countries producing their own food products have better resilience. Limitation on access to basic material and food, as well as the economic pressures and declining incomes, affect the pattern of food consumption. Increasing the price of all kinds of food, turning to poor quality and unhealthy foods, as well as buying cheaper, low-nutrient ones, exacerbate malnutrition and make following a healthy diet impossible [ 69 , 70 , 85 ]. It should be noted that imposing sanctions are not always bad and sometimes they force countries to redesign their internal processes. The experience of Russian shows that although sanctions adversely influence agriculture to some extent but instead they played as the new momentum and help its dairy and milk sector to devise positive changes and increase the volume of inter-regional trade in milk and dairy products [ 86 ].

From a psychological point of view, the poor and fragile economic situation reduces the value of assets as same as the loss of purchasing power, which leads to increased frustration and stress in people. Frustration and despair cause and exacerbate various diseases [ 87 ]. Stressful situations also make people feel anxious, worried and unable to cope with. Psychosocial risks accumulate throughout life and increase the likelihood of poor mental health and premature death [ 23 ]. Findings from Iran proved that sanctions also affect mental health adversely. According to the WHO’ data, sanctions led to an increase in death due to self-harm and interpersonal violence in Iran (from 5.9 to 6.1 and from an average of 2.0 to 2.7 per 100,000 persons respectively) during the 2011–2014 period. Interestingly the self-harm related death reduced again in 2016, a year after lifting the sanctions [ 77 ].

Risky behaviors and addiction are taking as new behaviors patterns as a result of economic hardships and raised prices. Drug abuse has devastating effects on human health, while increase the rates of crime and mortality [ 88 ]. The highest incidence rate of HIV is among drug abusers and their sexual partners [ 89 ]. Thus, sanctions intensify these behaviors and patterns with a growing trend, which counts as a great threat to society and especially health system. A review of literature provides many evidence of sanctions effects on health while evidence was provided for most affected areas.

Many studies looked at the effects on access to medicines and medical equipment, research and health information systems, the socioeconomic situation, food and agriculture, and provided a clear picture of consequences. Although some others, focused on one specific area, the others discussed about the issues such as government or leadership, early life conditions, social isolation, social support, transportation which were less in number with no complete and clear evidence that needs further investigation. The most studies in our review examined the effects of sanctions using data and their analysis, or the pre- and post-sanctions situation. Therefore, according to our methodology and included studies, the extracted evidence is very valuable and reliable.

Understanding the impact of economic sanctions on health systems and social determinants of health is crucial for policymakers, highlighting the importance of collaborative global health governance. To address these challenges, a comprehensive approach is needed to minimize harm to vulnerable populations and promote a more equitable and resilient global health environment. Policymakers must reevaluate the effectiveness and unintended consequences of sanctions on health systems, prioritizing humanitarian concerns and ensuring that public health is not disproportionately affected. It is essential to explore alternative diplomatic strategies that allow for humanitarian exemptions within sanctions to guarantee the continued access to essential medical supplies for affected populations. Global health diplomacy should be leveraged to advocate for the removal or modification of sanctions hindering progress towards health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Dialogue and negotiation should be prioritized to address underlying tensions while safeguarding the health and well-being of impacted communities. Establishing robust monitoring systems to track the impact of sanctions on health outcomes and social determinants is crucial. Strengthening multilateral collaborations and partnerships to address the health effects of sanctions is imperative, with international organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations (UN) playing a pivotal role in promoting global cooperation and finding solutions.

Strengths and limitations of the study

One of our limitations was the lack of access to the full text of some articles due to their publication time. Other studies may have been published in other languages about sanctions are excluded because of inclusion criteria. Other limitations may include losing articles about the impact of sanctions on various aspects of the health system that have lost their chance to be published due to political reasons.

Although the present study examined the impact of sanctions on the health system based on the Health System Building Blocks framework of the World Health Organization and using the approach of European SDH, it seems that in some areas the effects are not clear and further studies need to be done. However, given that the impact of sanctions varies from one country to another, the study has provided comprehensive evidence of the impacts along with consequences on health. The present evidence provides guide and helps with the adoption of international policies considering the goals of the WHO and the promotion of peace all around the world.

The results showed that economic sanctions imposed on different countries, directly and indirectly have strong negative impacts on health. Escalation of sanctions will be a severe threat and barrier for achieving the goal of global health coverage for everyone and everywhere. The international communities must work and focus on reducing the negative effects of these restrictions. They must anticipate the human effects and use whatever means are needed to prevent them. Some of these negative effects like disability and death, are irreversible. Therefore, it seems better for decision makers to recommend an international prescriptive to prevent such irreparable effects on the population of target countries before imposing sanctions.

Data availability

All data generated during the current study would be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

Social Determinants of Health

Sustainable Development Goals

World Health Organization

Davis L, Engerman S. History lessons sanctions: neither war nor peace. J Economic Perspect. 2003;17(2):187–97.

Article   Google Scholar  

M E. Effect of Economic Security sanctions on the Organization United Nations in the enjoyment of human rights. Q J Foreign Policy. 2012;21(1).

Garfield R, Santana S. The impact of the economic crisis and the US embargo on health in Cuba. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(1):15–20.

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Peksen D. Economic sanctions and human security: the public health effect of economic sanctions. Foreign Policy Anal. 2011;7(3):237–51.

Gibbons E, Garfield R. The impact of economic sanctions on health and human rights in Haiti, 1991–1994. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(10):1499–504.

Hassani M. Impact of sanctions on cancer care in Iran. Archives Bone Joint Surg. 2018;6(4):248.

Google Scholar  

Gorji A. Sanctions against Iran: the impact on health services. 2014.

Shen J, Oraka E. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among children with current asthma. Prev Med. 2012;54(1):27–31.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Adams R, Smith B, Ruffin R. Factors associated with hospital admissions and repeat emergency department visits for adults with asthma. Thorax. 2000;55(7):566.

Kheirandish M, Rashidian A, Kebriaeezade A, Cheraghali AM, Soleymani F. A review of pharmaceutical policies in response to economic crises and sanctions. J Res Pharm Pract. 2015;4(3):115.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Vogler S, Zimmermann N, Leopold C, de Joncheere K. Pharmaceutical policies in European countries in response to the global financial crisis. South med Rev. 2011;4(2):69.

Ahmadi AM, Meskarpour_amiri M. The public health effects of economic sanctions as a global concern in 21th century: why the economic sanctions is a cruel strategy. J Health Policy Sustainable Health. 2015;2(1).

Lim S. The paradox of unsustainability in UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): the North Korean case in the context of accountability and the fragile states under sanctions. J Peace Unification. 2021;11(1):55–78.

Kokabisaghi F, Miller AC, Bashar FR, Salesi M, Zarchi AA, Keramatfar A et al. Impact of United States political sanctions on international collaborations and research in Iran. BMJ Global Health. 2019;4(5).

Solar O, Irwin A. A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. WHO Document Production Services; 2010.

Yazdi-Feyzabadi V, Amini-Rarani M, Delavari S. The health consequences of economic sanctions: call for health diplomacy and international collaboration. Arch Iran Med. 2020;23(pecial):S51.

Khan KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G. Five steps to conducting a systematic review. J R Soc Med. 2003;96(3):118–21.

Dehkordi AH, Mazaheri E, Ibrahim HA, Dalvand S, Gheshlagh RG. How to write a systematic review: a narrative review. Int J Prev Med. 2021;12.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group* P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372.

Manyazewal T. Using the World Health Organization health system building blocks through survey of healthcare professionals to determine the performance of public healthcare facilities. Archives Public Health. 2017;75(1):1–8.

Organization WH. Everybody’s business–strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO’s framework for action. 2007.

Wilkinson RG, Marmot M. Social determinants of health: the solid facts. World Health Organization; 2003.

Abbas WAK, Azar NG, Haddad LG, Umlauf MG. Preconception health status of Iraqi women after trade embargo. Public Health Nurs. 2008;25(4):295–303.

Ali H. Hepatitis B infection among Iraqi children: the impact of sanctions. EMHJ-Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 10 (1–2), 6–11, 2004. 2004.

Al-Ani ZR, Al-Hiali SJ, Al-Farraji HH. Secular trend of infant mortality rate during wars and sanctions in Western Iraq. Saudi Med J. 2011;32(12):1267–73.

PubMed   Google Scholar  

Daponte BO, Garfield R. The effect of economic sanctions on the mortality of Iraqi children prior to the 1991 Persian Gulf War. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(4):546.

Ali MM, Shah IH. Sanctions and childhood mortality in Iraq. Lancet. 2000;355(9218):1851–7.

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Akunjee M, Ali A. Healthcare under sanctions in Iraq: an elective experience. Med Confl Survival. 2002;18(3):249–57.

Ascherio A, Chase R, Cote T, Dehaes G, Hoskins E, Laaouej J, et al. Effect of the Gulf War on infant and child mortality in Iraq. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(13):931–6.

Younis MS, Aswad AM. The impact of war and economic sanctions on the mental health system in Iraq from 1990 to 2003: a preliminary report. Intervention J Mental Health Psychosocial Support Confl Affected Areas. 2018;16(1):54–8.

Al-Taee IKS, Al-Shamaa I. Long term follow-up of renal transplant patients-A single center experience in Iraq. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplantation. 2005;16(1):40–5.

Garfield R, Leu C-S. A multivariate method for estimating mortality rates among children under 5 years from health and social indicators in Iraq. Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29(3):510–5.

Dewachi O, Rizk A, Singh NV. (Dis) connectivities in wartime: the therapeutic geographies of Iraqi healthcare–seeking in Lebanon. Glob Public Health. 2018;13(3):288–97.

Awqati NA, Ali MM, Al-Ward NJ, Majeed FA, Salman K, Al-Alak M, et al. Causes and differentials of childhood mortality in Iraq. BMC Pediatr. 2009;9:1–9.

Ghiasi G, Rashidian A, Kebriaeezadeh A, Salamzadeh J. The impact of the sanctions made against Iran on availability to asthma medicines in Tehran. Iran J Pharm Research: IJPR. 2016;15(3):567.

PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Kheirandish M, Rashidian A, Bigdeli M. A news media analysis of economic sanction effects on access to medicine in Iran. J Res Pharm Pract. 2015;4(4):199.

Rad EH, Delavari S, Aeenparast A, Afkar A, Farzadi F, Maftoon F. Does economic instability affect healthcare provision? Evidence based on the urban family physician program in Iran. Korean J Family Med. 2017;38(5):296.

Karimi M, Haghpanah S. The effects of economic sanctions on disease specific clinical outcomes of patients with thalassemia and hemophilia in Iran. Health Policy. 2015;119(2):239–43.

Kheirandish M, Varahrami V, Kebriaeezade A, Cheraghali AM. Impact of economic sanctions on access to noncommunicable diseases medicines in the Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2018;24(1):42–51.

Deilamizade A, Esmizade S. Economic sanctions against Iran, and drug use in Tehran, Iran: a 2013 pilot study. Subst Use Misuse. 2015;50(7):859–68.

Asadi-Pooya AA, Tavana B, Tavana B, Emami M. Drug adherence of patients with epilepsy in Iran: the effects of the international economic sanctions. Acta Neurol Belgica. 2016;116:151–5.

Asadi-Pooya AA, Azizimalamiri R, Badv RS, Yarali B, Asadollahi M, Homayoun M, et al. Impacts of the international economic sanctions on Iranian patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2019;95:166–8.

Hosseini S, Rashtchi V, Kamali K, Moghimi M. Epidemiology and outcome of 2,590 burned patients in Northwest Iran. Annals Burns fire Disasters. 2017;30(2):85.

CAS   Google Scholar  

Almasi K, Jamali Mahmouie H, Yousefi A. Analysis of Razi Vaccin and Serum Scientific Institute re-earchers’ viewpoint on impact of Foreign Sanctions on Scientific Communications and Research activities. Scientometrics Res J. 2016;2(1):27–42.

Setayesh S, Mackey TK. Addressing the impact of economic sanctions on Iranian drug shortages in the joint comprehensive plan of action: promoting access to medicines and health diplomacy. Globalization Health. 2016;12(1):1–14.

Garfield R, Devin J, Fausey J. The health impact of economic sanctions. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1995;72(2):454.

CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Sen K, Al-Faisal W, AlSaleh Y. Syria: effects of conflict and sanctions on public health. J Public Health. 2013;35(2):195–9.

Moret ES. Humanitarian impacts of economic sanctions on Iran and Syria. Eur Secur. 2015;24(1):120–40.

Sahraian MA, Moghadasi AN, Eskandarieh S. Economic sanctions against Iran as an important factor in threatening the health of patients with multiple sclerosis. Curr J Neurol. 2021;20(1):15.

Bastani P, Dehghan Z, Kashfi SM, Dorosti H, Mohammadpour M, Mehralian G. Challenge of politico-economic sanctions on pharmaceutical procurement in Iran: a qualitative study. Iran J Med Sci. 2022;47(2):152.

Nayeri K, López-Pardo CM. Economic crisis and access to care: Cuba’s health care system since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Int J Health Serv. 2005;35(4):797–816.

Allen SH, Lektzian DJ. Economic sanctions: a blunt instrument? J Peace Res. 2013;50(1):121–35.

Faraji Dizaji S, Ghadamgahi ZS. The impact of smart and non-smart sanctions on government health expenditures: evidence from developing resource-based countries. 2021.

Abdoli A. Iran, sanctions, and the COVID-19 crisis. J Med Econ. 2020;23(12):1461–5.

Kim Y. Economic sanctions and child HIV. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2019;34(2):693–700.

Whitehall J. Snake bites in north east Sri Lanka. Rural Remote Health. 2007;7(4):1–6.

Ameri A, Barzegartahamtan M, Ghavamnasiri M, Mohammadpour R, Dehghan H, Sebzari A, et al. Current and future challenges of radiation oncology in Iran: a report from the Iranian society of clinical oncology. Clin Oncol. 2018;30(4):262–8.

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Shahabi S, Fazlalizadeh H, Stedman J, Chuang L, Shariftabrizi A, Ram R. The impact of international economic sanctions on Iranian cancer healthcare. Health Policy. 2015;119(10):1309–18.

Bezuidenhout L, Karrar O, Lezaun J, Nobes A. Economic sanctions and academia: overlooked impact and long-term consequences. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(10):e0222669.

Ha LT, Nam PX. An investigation of relationship between global economic sanction and life expectancy: do financial and institutional system matter? Dev Stud Res. 2022;9(1):48–66.

Gutmann J, Neuenkirch M, Neumeier F. Sanctioned to death? The impact of economic sanctions on life expectancy and its gender gap. J Dev Stud. 2021;57(1):139–62.

Gharibi F, Imani A, Haghi M, Dalal K. Relationship between political-economic sanctions and catastrophic health costs in multiple sclerosis patients in Iran. Iran J War Public Health. 2022;14(4):455–64.

Vlajinac HD, Marinković J, Kocev NI, Adanja BJ, Pekmezović T, Sipetić S, et al. Infectious diseases mortality in central Serbia. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 1997;51(2):172.

Hedges TR III, Hirano M, Tucker K, Caballero B. Epidemic optic and peripheral neuropathy in Cuba: a unique geopolitical public health problem. Surv Ophthalmol. 1997;41(4):341–53.

Shahabi S, Teymourlouy AA, Shabaninejad H, Kamali M, Lankarani KB, Mojgani P. Physical rehabilitation in Iran after international sanctions: explored findings from a qualitative study. Globalization Health. 2020;16(1):1–10.

Afesorgbor SK, Mahadevan R. The impact of economic sanctions on income inequality of target states. World Dev. 2016;83:1–11.

De Vos P, García-Fariñas A, Álvarez‐Pérez A, Rodríguez‐Salvá A, Bonet‐Gorbea M, Van der Stuyft P. Public health services, an essential determinant of health during crisis. Lessons from Cuba, 1989–2000. Tropical Med Int Health. 2012;17(4):469–79.

Hejazi J, Emamgholipour S. The effects of the re-imposition of US sanctions on food security in Iran. Int J Health Policy Manage. 2022;11(5):651.

Reid BC, Psoter WJ, Gebrian B, Wang MQ. The effect of an international embargo on malnutrition and childhood mortality in rural Haiti. Int J Health Serv. 2007;37(3):501–13.

Lv Z, Xu T. Do economic sanctions affect protectionism? Evidence from agricultural support. Econ Politics. 2019;31(1):27–42.

Afesorgbor SK. 23. Sanctioned to starve? The impact of economic sanctions on food security in targeted states. Research Handbook on Economic Sanctions. 2021:438.

Fotourehchi Z, Are. UN and US economic sanctions a cause or cure for the environment: empirical evidence from Iran. Environ Dev Sustain. 2020;22:5483–501.

Mladenovich D, Langeggen I. The impact of war and economic sanction on the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity in Serbia. J Visual Impairment Blindness. 2009;103(3):162–72.

van der Werff SD, Polman K, Ponce MC, Twisk JW, Díaz RJ, Gorbea MB, et al. Childhood atopic diseases and early life circumstances: an ecological study in Cuba. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(6):e39892.

Organization WH. Health and the millennium development goals. World Health Organization; 2005.

Aloosh M, Salavati A, Aloosh A. Economic sanctions threaten population health: the case of Iran. Public Health. 2019;169:10–3.

Danaei G, Harirchi I, Sajadi HS, Yahyaei F, Majdzadeh R. The harsh effects of sanctions on Iranian health. Lancet. 2019;394(10197):468–9.

Anand S, Bärnighausen T. Health workers and vaccination coverage in developing countries: an econometric analysis. Lancet. 2007;369(9569):1277–85.

Speybroeck N, Kinfu Y, Dal Poz MR, Evans DB. Reassessing the relationship between human resources for health, intervention coverage and health outcomes. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2006:1–14.

Rechel B, Suhrcke M, Tsolova S, Suk JE, Desai M, McKee M, et al. Economic crisis and communicable disease control in Europe: a scoping study among national experts. Health Policy. 2011;103(2–3):168–75.

Karanikolos M, Mladovsky P, Cylus J, Thomson S, Basu S, Stuckler D, et al. Financial crisis, austerity, and health in Europe. Lancet. 2013;381(9874):1323–31.

Kastanioti C, Kontodimopoulos N, Stasinopoulos D, Kapetaneas N, Polyzos N. Public procurement of health technologies in Greece in an era of economic crisis. Health Policy. 2013;109(1):7–13.

Abhari B, Aleemran R, Aghajani H. The effect of sanctions on Iran’s health system using provincial data and spatial panel methods from 2009 to 2016. J Health Adm. 2020;23(1):58–73.

Gillespie S, van den Bold M. Agriculture, food systems, and nutrition: meeting the challenge. Global Challenges. 2017;1(3):1600002.

Krivko M, Smutka L. Trade sanctions and agriculture support in milk and dairy industry: case of Russia. Sustainability. 2020;12(24):10325.

Griggs S. Hope and mental health in young adult college students: an integrative review. J PsychoSoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2017;55(2):28–35.

Njuho P, Davids A. Extent and influence of recreational drug use on men and women aged 15 years and older in South Africa. Afr J Drug Alcohol Stud. 2010;9(1).

Ali F, Nooshin K, Kianoosh N, Hengameh S, Abbas G. Modelling of HIV/AIDS in Iran up to 2014. J AIDS HIV Res Vol. 2011;3(12):231–9.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Kerman University of medical Sciences for preparing the required fund to do the study.

This study was supported financially by Institute for Futures Studies in Health, affiliated with Vice-Chancellery for Research and Technology of Kerman University of Medical Sciences.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Health Services Management Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman City, Iran

Vahid Yazdi-Feyzabadi & Anahita Behzadi

Faculty of Management and Medical Information Sciences, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman City, Iran

Atefeh Zolfagharnasab

Soheila Naghavi

Research Center of Tropical and Infectious Diseases, Kerman University of medical sciences, Kerman, Iran

Maysam Yousefi

Faculty of Health, Health Management and Economics Department, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam City, Iran

Mohammad Bazyar

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

VYF proposed the topic, VYF and MB designed the study; AZ did the search strategy and identified articles. MB and SN screened the articles and extracted and classified the data; AB and MY supervised and contributed in classifications of findings. VYF and AB supervised the whole process of study from literature review to data extraction. MB and AB prepared and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Bazyar .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

The registration number of proposal is 97001030 and this study was approved by the ethics committee of Kerman University of Medical Sciences with the code of ethics IR.KMU.REC.1397.564.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Yazdi-Feyzabadi, V., Zolfagharnasab, A., Naghavi, S. et al. Direct and indirect effects of economic sanctions on health: a systematic narrative literature review. BMC Public Health 24 , 2242 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19750-w

Download citation

Received : 22 February 2024

Accepted : 09 August 2024

Published : 17 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19750-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Economic sanctions
• Social determinants of health
• Health system
• Systematic review

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

• General enquiries: [email protected]

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Diagnostic evaluation of the contribution of complementary training subjects in the self-perception of competencies in ethics, social responsibility, and sustainability in engineering students.

1. Introduction

2. theoretical framework, 3. review of related research, 4. materials and methods, 4.1. study population, 4.2. instrument, 4.3. data analysis technique, 5.1. descriptive statistics, 5.2. analysis of competencies in ers vs. courses taken, 5.3. relationship of ers competencies with sociodemographic variables, 6. discussion, 7. conclusions, 8. future work, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Abad-Segura, E.; González-Zamar, M.D.; Infante-Moro, J.C.; García, G.R. Sustainable management of digital transformation in higher education: Global research trends. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 2107. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Candanedo, G.U. Tendencias globales en Educación. Prospectiva, visión y desafíos. Rev. Anu. 2019 , 44 , 177–199. [ Google Scholar ]
• Børsen, T.; Serreau, Y.; Reifschneider, K.; Baier, A.; Pinkelman, R.; Smetanina, T.; Zandvoort, H. Initiatives, experiences and best practices for teaching social and ecological responsibility in ethics education for science and engineering students. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 2021 , 46 , 186–209. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Grimson, J. Re-engineering the curriculum for the 21st century. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 2002 , 27 , 31–37. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Davidson, C.I.; Hendrickson, C.T.; Matthews, H.S.; Bridges, M.W.; Allen, D.T.; Murphy, C.F.; Allenby, B.R.; Crittenden, J.C.; Austin, S. Preparing future engineers for challenges of the 21st century: Sustainable engineering. J. Clean. Prod. 2010 , 18 , 698–701. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• UNESCO. Preparing Learners for the Challenges of the 21st Century ; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lozano, R.; Carpenter, A. Developing Sustainability Competences through Pedagogical Approaches ; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [ Google Scholar ]
• Domínguez, V.B.; Lizarraga, L.M.P. Construction and validation of an instrument to evaluate the characteristics of university social responsibility in university students. Rev. Int. Educ. Justicia Soc. 2019 , 8 , 79–96. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vallaeys, F. Las diez falacias de la Responsabilidad Social Universitaria. Rev. Digit. Investig. Docencia Univ. 2018 , 12 , 34–58. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Reig-Aleixandre, N.; Ramos, J.M.G.; De la Calle Maldonado, C. Formación en la responsabilidad social del profesional en el ámbito universitario. Rev. Complut. Educ. 2022 , 33 , 517–528. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Boatwright, J.R.; Slate, J.R. Development of an Instrument to Assess Work Ethics. JITE-J. Ind. Teach. Educ. 2002 , 39 , 4. Available online: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JITE/v39n4/boatwright.html (accessed on 18 April 2024).
• Martin, D.A. The Ethics of Engineering ; RTE Brainstorm: Dublin, Ireland, 2019; Volume 9, p. 48. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Serna, E.; Serna, A. Realidad de Una Disciplina ; Editorial IAI: Medellín, Colombia, 2018; pp. 106–139. [ Google Scholar ]
• Davis, M. Thinking Like an Engineer. In Ethics, Politics, and Whistleblowing in Engineering ; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; pp. 79–82. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hirsch, A. Construccción de una escala de actitudes sobre ética profesional. Rev. Electrónica Investig. Educ. 2005 , 7 , 1–15. [ Google Scholar ]
• Alexandre, N.R. Formación de la Responsabilidad Social en la Universidad y Práctica Profesional: Un Estudio con Egresados ; Universidad Complutense de Madrid: Madrid, Spain, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Jones, A.; Parker, B. Ethical considerations in engineering practice. Eng. Ethics J. 2016 , 10 , 45–60. [ Google Scholar ]
• Smith, C.; Doe, J. Integrating ethics and sustainability in engineering education. J. Eng. Educ. 2018 , 25 , 112–125. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brown, D.; Green, E. The role of engineering programs in promoting social responsibility. Eng. Soc. J. 2017 , 5 , 78–89. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lozano, R. Incorporation and institutionalization of SD into universities: Breaking through barriers to change. J. Clean. Prod. 2006 , 14 , 787–796. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• García, A.; López, M.; Martínez, P. Integrating sustainability competencies in engineering education. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 215 , 345–358. [ Google Scholar ]
• Smith, R.; Johnson, T. Enhancing sustainability skills in engineering curricula. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 2017 , 33 , 712–725. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brown, S.; Lee, E. Sustainability integration in engineering programs: A case study. Sustain. Sci. 2018 , 10 , 189–202. [ Google Scholar ]
• Demssie, Y.N.; Wesselink, R.; Biemans, H.J.A.; Mulder, M. Think outside the European box: Identifying sustainability competencies for a base of the pyramid context. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 221 , 828–838. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Albareda-Tiana, S.; Goded, P.A.; Muñoz-Rodríguez, J.M.; Valderrama-Hernández, R.; Ruiz-Morales, J. Assessing competences in sustainability in teaching degrees and post-degrees: A proposal of a tool. Ensen. Cienc. 2019 , 37 , 11–29. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chiang, M.; Chen, P. Education for sustainable development in the business programme to develop international Chinese college students’ sustainability in Thailand. J. Clean. Prod. 2022 , 374 , 134045. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Michel, A.L.P. La Enseñanza de la Ética Profesional a Ingenieros: Un Caso de Estudio. INNOVUS 2020 , 20 , 125–146. Available online: https://www.ipn.mx/innovacion/numeros-anteriores/innovacion-educativa-84.html (accessed on 18 April 2024).
• Mendoza, D.J.E.; Ramírez, E.L.; Soto, Y.M. Procesos y Contextos en Los Proyectos de Intervención Educativa , 1st ed.; Comunicación Científica: Ciudad de México, Mexico, 2020; pp. 96–118. [ Google Scholar ]
• Alcazar, A.; Castillo, M.; Cogley, G.; Lakhani, R.; Batista, L. Perspectiva de la ética en los alumnos de Ingeniería Logística y Cadena de Suministro de la Universidad Tecnológica de Panamá. Rev. Iniciación Científica 2024 , 10 , 53–57. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pegalajar-Palomino, M.C.; Martínez-Valdivia, E.; Burgos-García, A. Analysis of social responsibility in university education students. Form. Univ. 2021 , 14 , 95–104. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• de Jesús, C.F.N. Perception of engineering students regarding sustainable development. In An Analysis from the Economic, Social and Environmental Dimensions in a Developing Country ; Universidad de Córdoba: Córdoba, Spain, 2024. [ Google Scholar ]
• Obrecht, M.; Feodorova, Z.; Rosi, M. Assessment of environmental sustainability integration into higher education for future experts and leaders. J. Environ. Manag. 2022 , 316 , 115223. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• da Silva Junior, A.; de Oliveira Martins-Silva, P.; de Araújo Vasconcelos, K.C.; da Silva, V.C.; de Brito, S.L.M.S.; Monteiro, J.M.R. Sustainability and corporate social responsibility in the opinion of undergraduate students in management programs: Between the concrete and the abstract. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 207 , 600–617. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• LFonseca, M.; Portela, A.R.; Duarte, B.; Queirós, J.; Paiva, L. Mapping higher education for sustainable development in Portugal. Manag. Mark. 2018 , 13 , 1064–1075. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• LaPatin, M.; Roy, A.; Poleacovschi, C.; Padgett-Walsh, K.; Feinstein, S.; Rutherford, C.; Nguyen, L.; Faust, K.M. Measuring ethical development of engineering students across universities and class years. Int. J. Ethics Educ. 2023 , 8 , 49–65. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sánchez-Carracedo, F.; Sureda, B.; Moreno-Pino, F.M.; Romero-Portillo, D. Education for Sustainable Development in Spanish engineering degrees. Case study. J. Clean. Prod. 2021 , 294 , 126322. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Finelli, C.J.; Holsapple, M.A.; Ra, E.; Bielby, R.M.; Burt, B.A.; Carpenter, D.D.; Harding, T.S.; Sutkus, J.A. An Assessment of Engineering Students’ Curricular and Co-Curricular Experiences and Their Ethical Development. J. Eng. Educ. 2012 , 101 , 469–494. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Donald, D.C.; Trevor, S.H.; Janel, A.S.; Cynthia, J.F. Assessing the Ethical Development of Civil Engineering Undergraduates in Support of the ASCE. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 2014 , 140 , A4014001. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, A. An empirical analysis on social responsibility education of college students in four universities in Shandong Province during COVID-19 Response. In Procedia Computer Science ; Elsevier B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 221–228. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Galvão, A.; Mendes, L.; Marques, C.; Mascarenhas, C. Factors influencing students’ corporate social responsibility orientation in higher education. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 215 , 290–304. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Warshawski, S. First-year nursing students’ perceptions of health activism and social. Nurse Educ. Today 2024 , 132 , 106019. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Miñano, R. Formación En Competencias de Sostenibilidad, Responsabilidad Social y Ética Profesional: Estudio de Casos en Ingeniería Industrial e Ingeniería Informática. Ph.D. Thesis, ETSII, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan, Malaysia, 2019. Available online: https://oa.upm.es/55789/1/RAFAEL_MINANO_RUBIO.pdf (accessed on 18 April 2024).
• Setó-Pamies, D.; Papaoikonomou, E. A Multi-level Perspective for the Integration of Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability (ECSRS) in Management Education. J. Bus. Ethics 2016 , 136 , 523–538. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kolb, M.; Fröhlich, L.; Schmidpeter, R. Implementing sustainability as the new normal: Responsible management education—From a private business school’s perspective. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 2017 , 15 , 280–292. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pérez-Foguet, A.; Lazzarini, B. Continuing professional education in engineering faculties: Transversal integration of sustainable human development in basic engineering sciences courses. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 218 , 772–781. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jordan, R.; Agi, K.; Arora, S.; Christodoulou, C.G.; Schamiloglu, E.; Koechner, D.; Schuler, A.; Howe, K.; Bidram, A.; Martinez-Ramon, M.; et al. Peace engineering in practice: A case study at the University of New Mexico. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021 , 173 , 121113. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pugh, G.; Lozano-Rodríguez, A. El desarrollo de competencias genéricas en la educación técnica de nivel superior: Un estudio de caso. Calid. Educ. 2019 , 50 , 143–170. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pizzutilo, F.; Venezia, E. On the maturity of social responsibility and sustainability integration in higher education institutions: Descriptive criteria and conceptual framework. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 2021 , 19 , 100515. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Harris, C.E.; Pritchard, M.S.; James, R.W.; Englehardt, E.E.; Rabins, M.J. Concepts and Cases Engineering Ethics , 6th ed.; Cengage: Boston, MA, USA, 2019; p. 306. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ariza, S.M.B.; Guerrero, M.I.M. El Desarrollo Sostenible y la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial ; Universidad Católica de Colombia: Bogotá, Colombia, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Garay, P.J.P.; Oliver, Z.J.M.; Contreras, C.V.; Flores, D.S.A.; Baca, R.L.S. Social Responsibility in University Students According to Gender and Age. Health Educ. Health Promot. 2021 , 9 , 513–519. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kirk, B.A.; Schutte, N.S.; Hine, D.W. Development and preliminary validation of an emotional self-efficacy scale. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2008 , 45 , 432–436. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bernardi, R.A.; Nash, J. The importance and efficacy of controlling for social desirability response bias. Ethics Behav. 2023 , 33 , 413–429. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Stedham, Y.; Yamamura, J.H.; Beekun, R.I. Gender differences in business ethics: Justice and relativist perspectives. Bus. Ethics A Eur. Rev. 2007 , 16 , 163–174. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Share and Cite

Yepes, S.M.; Montes, W.F.; Herrera, A. Diagnostic Evaluation of the Contribution of Complementary Training Subjects in the Self-Perception of Competencies in Ethics, Social Responsibility, and Sustainability in Engineering Students. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 7069. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167069

Yepes SM, Montes WF, Herrera A. Diagnostic Evaluation of the Contribution of Complementary Training Subjects in the Self-Perception of Competencies in Ethics, Social Responsibility, and Sustainability in Engineering Students. Sustainability . 2024; 16(16):7069. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167069

Yepes, Sara María, Willer Ferney Montes, and Andres Herrera. 2024. "Diagnostic Evaluation of the Contribution of Complementary Training Subjects in the Self-Perception of Competencies in Ethics, Social Responsibility, and Sustainability in Engineering Students" Sustainability 16, no. 16: 7069. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167069

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals