tok essay about human sciences

Extended Essay Writers

TOK Areas of Knowledge – The Human Sciences

Luke MacQuoid

Learning the Theory of Knowledge within the International Baccalaureate program, I’ve always found the human sciences AOK fascinating. From my extensive experience as an IB writer, I’ve come to appreciate the intricate ways in which this Area of Knowledge helps us understand ourselves and the societies we inhabit.

Understanding the Human Sciences AOK

When we talk about the human sciences in the context of TOK, we’re referring to a broad Area of Knowledge that includes disciplines such as psychology, sociology, and anthropology. These subjects collectively aim to study and understand human behavior and the structures of societies. In my view, the significance of the human sciences lies in their capacity to shed light on the intricacies of human nature and our interactions within societies.

The human sciences are particularly notable for their unique perspectives on how individuals and groups function. Employing various research methods, from detailed case studies to extensive research, these disciplines offer insights into the forces shaping behavior and culture. Moreover, they prompt students to think critically about the ethical aspects of research, cultivating a heightened sense of duty toward the subjects of their studies.

One of the most rewarding aspects of engaging with the human sciences is the opportunity to apply these insights in different real-world contexts . For example, knowing the psychological aspects that drive decision-making can substantially improve our capacity to negotiate personal and professional obstacles. Similarly, insights from sociology may help us contribute more effectively to our communities by recognizing and tackling the underlying causes of social challenges.

Furthermore, the human sciences promote interdisciplinary thinking, which helps to provide a well-rounded education. Anthropological methods and theories, for example, can supplement historical and literary studies, offering a more complete knowledge of many cultures and communities. This multidisciplinary approach broadens students’ knowledge and promotes a more empathic and inclusive perspective.

Key Concepts in the Human Sciences AOK

The human sciences AOK’s main ideas serve as the foundation for the TOK curriculum , providing students with various techniques, ethical issues, theories, and models to study. As an experienced IB writer, I can relate to the transforming power of engaging thoroughly with these themes.

Methodological Diversity and Complexity

You must recognize that the human sciences methodology is diverse and complex. According to the general IB criteria, students must thoroughly understand these methodologies. This knowledge enables them to evaluate studies and theories within this Area of Knowledge critically and prepares them for their research. In my experience, experimenting with various research methodologies — from qualitative interviews to quantitative surveys—helps students appreciate the breadth of tools available for scientific inquiry in the human sciences.

Ethical Considerations in Research

Furthermore, dealing with ethical issues in human-science research teaches students invaluable lessons about respect and integrity. Moral dilemmas frequently arise when conducting research with human subjects, requiring researchers to balance scientific inquiry with participants’ rights and well-being. From my perspective, discussions about consent, anonymity, and the potential impact of research findings are critical. They instill a sense of responsibility and ethical behavior in students, which is crucial in their development as conscientious scholars.

The Role of Theories and Models

Furthermore, theories and models in the human sciences provide critical frameworks for interpreting complex social phenomena. In my opinion, these conceptual tools are crucial for students as they go through the vast field of human knowledge. Students can understand human behavior and societal structures by studying theories such as Maslow’s hierarchy of needs in psychology or Durkheim’s theory of social integration in sociology. Furthermore, these models encourage students to question and critique the principles that govern human interactions and social organization.

Application and Impact

The use and impact of theories and models in the human sciences go beyond academic research. They have practical implications for addressing real-world issues like social inequality and mental health care. Integrating these theories into problem-solving processes allows students to approach problems more analytically and informally. It emphasizes the importance of the human sciences in everyday life and the power of this knowledge to effect positive change in society.

Interdisciplinary Connections

Finally, the interdisciplinary nature of the human sciences enriches students’ education by connecting this AOK to others, such as the natural sciences, arts, and ethics. It highlights the difficulties of knowledge and the need for a broad approach to comprehending human experiences. For example, behavioral economics combines ideas from psychology and economics to create a more comprehensive understanding of decision-making processes.

Comparing the Human Sciences with Other AOKs

One fascinating aspect of the TOK curriculum is comparing the human sciences with other AOKs, such as the natural sciences. From my perspective, this comparison is incredibly relevant to students’ broader learning experience.

The human sciences and natural sciences share a foundational commitment to empirical research. Both areas rely on observation and experimentation to gather evidence. This shared methodology underscores the unity of the scientific approach, regardless of the subject matter.

However, the paths diverge when we consider the predictability and subjectivity inherent in their studies. The natural sciences, as I know, often deal with phenomena that can be consistently measured and predicted, thanks to the universality of natural laws. On the other hand, the human sciences face the challenge of accounting for human behavior and social structures, which are far less predictable and more influenced by subjective perspectives.

Here’s a brief comparison that highlights these differences:

Empirical Research . Both utilize empirical methods, but their applications vary significantly due to the nature of their subjects.
Predictability . Natural sciences benefit from more predictable phenomena, while human sciences deal with the complexities of human behavior and social constructs.
Subjectivity . The human sciences must consider the individual’s perspective, making their research inherently more subjective.

In my experience, this comparison highlights the distinguishing features of each AOK and increases students’ understanding of the breadth and depth of information. It teaches them the value of scientific discipline, whether working with the laws of physics or the intricacies of human society. Furthermore, knowing these distinctions encourages tolerance for the many approaches to knowledge across fields.

Implementing Human Sciences AOK in the TOK Essay

Drawing on my extensive experience as an IB writer, I recognize that the human sciences offer perspectives that can deepen your exploration of knowledge questions. Here, I’ll share some key tips on effectively incorporating this AOK into your TOK essay.

Choose a Relevant Knowledge Question

Selecting a knowledge question (KQ) that naturally intersects with the human sciences is crucial. Your KQ should allow you to dig into the methodologies, ethical considerations, and theoretical frameworks unique to this AOK. In my view, questions that explore the nature of human understanding, the construction of social realities, or the implications of cultural perspectives are particularly well-suited.

Use Diverse Methodologies

A wide array of research methodologies characterizes the human sciences. In your essay, highlight how different approaches — from quantitative studies to qualitative ethnographies — offer varied insights into human phenomena. Discussing these methods will enrich your essay and demonstrate your understanding of the complexities involved in human sciences research.

Address Ethical Considerations

Ethical dilemmas are at the heart of the human sciences. When integrating this AOK, it’s essential to consider the ethical implications of research on human subjects. From my experience, reflecting on issues of consent, anonymity, and potential harm can add depth to your essay, showcasing your ability to engage with complex moral questions.

Compare and Contrast with Other AOKs

Drawing comparisons between the human sciences and other AOKs can significantly improve your TOK essay. For example, you might compare the empirical methods used in the human sciences with those in the natural sciences, or you could explore how cultural understanding in the human sciences contrasts with the aesthetic appreciation in the arts. Such comparisons help illustrate the unique contributions and limitations of the human sciences.

Need help with your IB TOK essay?

From research and analysis to structuring and editing, our skilled mentors will be by your side, helping you write an exceptional TOK essay that meets the word count and stringent IB criteria.

Discuss Real-World Applications

The human sciences have profound real-world applications, from informing public policy to enhancing our understanding of consumer behavior. In your essay, consider discussing how theories and models from this AOK have been applied to solve practical problems. It will demonstrate the relevance of the human sciences and your ability to link theoretical knowledge with real-world outcomes. This way, you can write a good TOK essay and get the highest grade.

Reflect on Personal and Shared Knowledge

Finally, consider the interplay between personal and shared knowledge within the human sciences. How does individual experience influence our understanding of social phenomena? Conversely, how does shared knowledge shape individual behaviors and beliefs? Reflecting on these questions can provide a rich concluding analysis for your TOK essay, underscoring the dynamic relationship between the individual and society in constructing knowledge.

The human sciences AOK provides IB students with a comprehensive, varied investigation of human behavior and society. Throughout my years of writing and teaching in the IB framework, I’ve seen how this AOK may shift students’ perspectives and understanding. I hope future generations of IB students will continue to find value in the human sciences and use the insights obtained.

So, keep learning and exploring TOK Areas of Knowledge. Also, remember that we have a team of IB experts who can help you write a TOK essay if you need any guidance.

Luke MacQuoid has extensive experience teaching English as a foreign language in Japan, having worked with students of all ages for over 12 years. Currently, he is teaching at the tertiary level. Luke holds a BA from the University of Sussex and an MA in TESOL from Lancaster University, both located in England. As well to his work as an IB Examiner and Master Tutor, Luke also enjoys sharing his experiences and insights with others through writing articles for various websites, including extendedessaywriters.com blog

EXPLAINED: May 2024 TOK Essay Prescribed Titles

What happened to this post? HackIB has been acquired by MyIBTutor . All content is now available on the MyIBTutor Blog with more exciting IB content to come! Click here to see it for yourself!

Looking for November 2024 Session TOK Essay titles? Click here.

TOK Essay Titles – May 2024 Examination Session

The titles for May 2024 are released! Here they are below:

Make sure to bookmark this page as I explain and provide examples for each of these titles in depth! UPDATE: Title 1, 2, 5 and 6 are now available. Stay tuned for more! For general guidance on how to write a good TOK essay, check out my TOK Essay advice collection .

Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history? Discuss with reference to the arts and history.

How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Do we need custodians of knowledge? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

This title attempts to challenge students on the main school of thought that you learn over the TOK course. The gist of your TOK teaching on both of these AOKs probably boiled down to something like: everything is art and it’s just whatever the artist wants to create, while history is always biased because the winners always write all of history. However, this eliminates much of the nuance in each of these AOKs that are worth exploring. That’s what makes this prompt interesting.

Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts? I will be honest, I never thought we really ‘celebrated’ subjectivity. It just, was. Inherently, art is a subjective exercise – you can think about this point a little further. You will find some heated discussion on whether art is subjective or could it be objective on the internet and I won’t delve into that here, because it isn’t the point of this title. The key here is to focus on the EXTENT of subjectivity and is it to the detriment of the area of knowledge itself. Then, we have to consider, whose subjectivity are we talking about: is it the artist’s subjectivity, or the audience’s subjectivity. For example, the Mona Lisa wasn’t that well known when it was first painted. I’m sure the Da Vinci thought it was quite a nice piece, but it seems like we didn’t really celebrate his subjectivity. It wasn’t until a certain audience found it subjectively good, that we accepted it as one of the greatest pieces of art in the world! That is an example of how subjectivity is relevant in the dissemination of artistic knowledge. For a more modern example, what about your favourite YouTuber? Do they truly make what they want? NO! They are often beholden to sponsors, and you – the audience! What you want to see, is what they will make! So it is YOUR subjectivity that drives their decision to produce art, not necessarily purely their subjectivity. Subjectivity by definition is just a person’s opinions, emotions, thoughts. This connects well with the TOK concept of values. What VALUES and WHOSE values are determining what art is created (in a variety of contexts), how art is perceived, and how art changes in its reception over time? These are all good questions to ponder. For more unconventional examples about art, think about how museums choose what art to display, what constitutes good art for prizes like the Nobel Prize for Literature, or why some art is considered more expensive than others? Are there systematic ways to think about our subjectivity and how we apply it to art? Is it really overly celebrating subjectivity or simply a necessity to make sense of the abundance of artistic knowledge in a sea of information today?

History gets a bad rep in the TOK classroom. Students like to trash on History calling it biased and unreliable. In this prompt, I don’t want you to refute these claims, but just think about how they aren’t necessarily catastrophic as we might think. We aren’t denying that biases in history could be problematic. I would be suspicious too, if the only accounts of the Rohingya Genocide came from the Myanmar military. However, the word condemned in the title suggests that we might be too harsh on historians when they get things wrong. We should focus on how the historical method recovers itself from failures in biases from its sources. Yes, it might be biased, but is it better than no history? Furthermore, does subjectivity actually ADD value to the way we produce, and interpret historical knowledge? While I’m sure a completely objective, news story like report of what happened in 1886 would be a historian’s dream, that isn’t the case! No matter how objective we try to be, we colour the events we experience by our own opinions, feelings and emotions. But isn’t that history in itself? In an almost cliched way, history’s subjectivity tells us more about what happened in the past and their beliefs and values more than words could ever say.

In both the historical and artistic discussions, you should focus more on the methodologies of these AOKs and how they achieve their AOK’s purpose. Subjectivity manifests in different ways in these AOKs and their methodology reflects that. In the overt awareness of subjectivity in the Arts, its method to produce knowledge is characteristically defined by subjectivity. In History, the method is to identify the covert influences of subjectivity, then to produce the most truthful knowledge possible. You can see that the goals of these two are different, and hence they deal with subjectivity differently. Don’t fall in the trap of focusing your discussion too much on your examples, but generalise to the patterns of how subjectivity manifest in your AOKs and whether their treatment of it is problematic.

It is crucial, when writing the essay for this prompt, to clearly define in your introduction what specialisation and generalisation means. DO NOT use the dictionary definitions here – since this is a TOK Essay, you want to make a TOK version of specialisation and generalisation, in terms of how these two things differ in the production of knowledge. Clearly defining the two in this way will form a solid foundation for you to have a nuanced discussion on this process of reconciliation between the two. The prompt hints at the competing demands on knowledge of specialisation and generalisation – i.e. you might not be able to produce knowledge in the same way if you were aiming for specialisation versus generalisation. So, this provides a point of contrast for you to choose examples and frame your discussion. Remember, the idea of competing demands is an ASSUMPTION, not an argument posed by the question. You should focus on how your chosen examples demonstrate a way to balance the interests of both and reach a ‘middle-ground’ rather than arguing that specialisation or generalisation are compatible with each other. TLDR: Don’t challenge the assumption.

For the first AOK of Mathematics, you should have encountered many personal examples just from your study of IB Maths. Most of your learning has been on generalisation, and the application of such generalisations. For instance, you learn about Calculus, a general topic within Mathematics, and then apply it in various contexts. Mathematicians love generalisations – that Calculus you learned? Well, the definition of a derivative generalised for all functions could be summarised by the first principles of derivatives function that HL AA students learn. You would have less interaction with specialisation of Mathematical knowledge. In a broader sense, the specific components of mathematics, cannot be separated from the general. You can’t solve calculus problems without the fundamental theorem of calculus. However, you could argue that the fundamental theorem of calculus didn’t need calculus problems to exist. Thus, an interesting dilemma arises in Mathematics – the generalisation could be produced, without a particular need for specialisation, but specialisation often calls for generalisation to first exist.

Looking at the latest mathematics research, you will find that applied mathematics is most common. Rarely do you see people get excited by new discoveries of solutions to elliptical curves, but more do when you tell them a new mathematical model to improve our prediction of the weather. We may place greater value on specialisation of knowledge, because we could see its usefulness more immediately, but, the Area of Knowledge does not require such specialisation to produce knowledge. So, do we encourage people to produce knowledge with the goal of specialisation in mind, or do we tell them to produce whatever theoretical generalised mathematical knowledge they can? Look to how mathematics is applied to Quantitative Finance, Econometrics, and Actuarial Science. They specialise mathematical knowledge and provide for some of the most lucrative careers. Does that speak to our preference and demand for specialised knowledge? But then again, what of the interdependence between generalisation and specialisation? How do we balance the two and how does the methodologies of the AOK contribute to this balancing act?

For the second, complimentary AOK, you could have discussions with all of the AOKs. For the Sciences, you could present a similar argument about needing to have some general theories before you could specialise. The scientific method is essentially one big generalisation process – you take specific observations and you make inferences so that you can generalise about some natural process. However, the knowledge that produces need not be general, it can still be specific. If we take specialisation as the goal, then we could pose narrow hypotheses to test. If we take generalisation as the goal, then we might need multiple of these narrow hypotheses to form a full picture, testing each individual case. Thus, specialisation could lead to specialisation alone, but more often, generalisation is the result of many specialisations.

One last question you might want to consider and attempt to answer in your essay is, do you want to know something about everything or everything about something? The answer to that will depend on your AOK. While we want to know about everything on everything, that is simply not reality. So, what trade offs do we make in each AOK, and how does each AOK decide on what we need to know more on?

You might be able to appreciate how long it takes ideas to actually be implemented in reality by looking at the recent Nobel Prize winners for Economic Sciences. The winner of the 2017 prize was Richard H. Thaler, for his contributions to behavioural economics. He explored the impacts of limited rationality, social preferences and the lack of individual self-control on economic decision making on an individual and market level. He started these findings from the 1980s, but it is only recently, in the 2022 revision of the IB syllabus that Economics students learn about the field of Behavioural economics in any detail! So why is it so?

To some extent, it is hard to criticise things for moving slowly. After all, new discoveries like behavioural economics represents a fundamental paradigm shift towards the way research is conducted in the particular AOK. Often times, fresh ideas are left to “ferment” so that their truthfulness can be tested with time. Nothing is more embarrassing than going down a rabbit hole only to find that your assumptions turned out to be monumentally incorrect. Even if we are making a big shift in light of new ideas towards the way we produce knowledge, doing so takes time! For many years and still now, we rely on strong assumptions of rationality to make economic models function. While the psychology of such behaviours are well researched, applying them to an Economic setting may not be. That is to say, it is important to consider how these new ideas arise, and what effect it has on existing knowledge, and the way we produce future knowledge. New ideas is simply new knowledge, but with the added implication that it has some effect on the existing knowledge within an AOK. It could potentially change how we view current knowledge, or how we conduct research given a particular discovery.

In the AOK of the human sciences, which broadly follows the scientific method, you could drawn some inspiration from the philosopher Thomas Kuhn’s view of scientific progress. He argues that within a period of “normal science” where we make incremental progress under the assumption of an overarching model, but there comes a point where we notice accumulation of imperfections with such a model that leads to new paradigms – new ideas, that fundamentally change how we do science. Then we undergo a sort of scientific revolution, where there are debates and decisions made over what sort of model we need to follow, until everyone eventually accepts the new paradigm and returns to a normal science period so that continual small improvements are made to knowledge, until another paradigm shift happens again. While you are not expected to demonstrate such strong philosophy knowledge within the TOK Essay, it is helpful to consider how each AOK handles such ‘revolutions’. For instance, it is harder to irrefutably find falsities in human sciences given the difficulty in replicability and corroborative studies compared to natural sciences.

As for complimentary AOKs, any would suit here, as each AOK has a very different way to handle new ideas. Many factors influence the way new ideas is accepted. For this title, we need to take the assumption that their acceptance is slow, not argue with it. Instead, you should consider what factors influence this slowness, and how different AOKs have different factors in mind when deciding how to accept new ideas. This relates to the nature of the AOK (what is its purpose) and the methodology guiding knowledge production in them.

Have you ever said something that sounds very weird out of context? That might have just been something silly with no real consequences, but in the realm of knowledge, we need to be careful about the consequences of knowledge taken out of their original context. This article highlights how the context of medical treatment matters a lot! As you can imagine, something that works in one field, doesn’t always apply in a straightforward manner to another. This is why there are whole research teams dedicated to what we call “translational research”. That is, trying to “translate” what you get from something like a lab setting, into actual products, like life-saving medications.

The obvious links to AOKs here are the Natural and Human Sciences. For Natural Sciences, we often start off knowledge production in a lab setting, or in a controlled environment. However, the application of such knowledge is rarely as controlled! So an interesting point to consider is how natural scientists have to account for the fact that their findings won’t ever be used in as perfect a setting as their research. Sure, you might have developed bullet proof wood , but how is that going to work in practically when it comes to mass manufacturing it for the army or the police? This is one of the biggest challenges that natural scientists face. It’s not that we aren’t trying to produce exciting knowledge, but that the application of such knowledge in a practical and appreciable context is often very difficult. Something like the mRNA technology (which recently was awarded a Nobel) took a long time to be developed into actual vaccines. The question then is, do we underestimate this process? Often it depends on the goal of the scientist. If the knowledge producer set out with an idea to commercialise in mind, then they would often consider the practical implications of findings. However, people studying theoretical physics for example, would struggle to immediately find very accessible real life implications. That doesn’t mean the knowledge is worthless, but certainly, the challenges are there.

What about non-scientific disciplines? Recently, I went to an art exhibition that trend Van Gough’s paintings into a 3D digital display. There was a Banksy exhibition that took the original murals he painted on the street, into this museum environment. Does changing the context of how art work is shown, and the manipulation of artistic knowledge change its meaning? What is the goal of transforming art into a different context? There are many reasons. Sometimes, it is to create satire (have a look at the parodies of the Mona Lisa), bringing old art onto a new audience (like VR exhibitions of Da Vinci), or simply making it more accessible to people (by making art works digitally available). The producers of these adapted forms of knowledge take great care in considering how this impacts the meaning of the art in its changed form. When artwork is so subjective, the context of art is often required to understand the artist’s meaning and intention, to ‘interpret’ works accordingly. At the same time, as we know art is quite subjective, is a ‘correct interpretation’ always required? If we are to remain artistic purists, then many of the joys of art could be lost! Imagine if you were admonished for listening to Taylor Swift through Spotify on your AirPods because it isn’t the original uncompressed music file with all the details, and you aren’t listening to it on the exact set of thousand dollar speakers it was created with? It would be ludicrous to assume that artistic knowledge is always going to be disseminated in the same context. Thus, this must be a consideration of artists. Is this consideration more or less difficult for different types of art? How is this consideration different to science considering there is no ‘right’ answer to interpreting art?

When thinking about this title, we aren’t arguing whether it is difficult. I think we all agree it is. However, it is about whether we underestimate just how difficult it is! Center your focus on how each AOK’s methodology highlights the consideration of being able to change contexts, and whether that affects the interpretation of the knowledge in question.

The term ‘custodians of knowledge’ is not something TOK students have likely heard of before, but this concept is relatively simple to understand. If you think positively about it, it could be protectors of knowledge, people who preserve knowledge, keeping it for generations to come – for example, some people might consider the Indigenous Peoples’ in Australia to be custodians of their unique cultural knowledge and what they call dreamtime stories. In this way, they keep culture alive, even if most people nowadays speak English and don’t readily tell their history. However, thought about negatively, it could also mean “gatekeepers’ (pardon the Gen Z language) of knowledge. The idealogical “protection” of knowledge could also be seen as a way to prevent some forms of knowledge from becoming knowledge in the first place. Talk to any university academic, and they will tell you how many times their research papers have been rejected. That’s why there is a bias towards statistically significant results, while research that showed that nothing significant has happened doesn’t often get published. Thus, these two contrasts provide for interesting discussion, particularly when considering how each AOK has different forms of custodians of knowledge and how they “gatekeep” or “protect” knowledge in different ways.

Take the AOK of the arts as an example. The career of artists are laughed upon because it is so hard to “break in” to the fine world of art. Many artists aren’t acclaimed until they are long dead. Perhaps most famously, the Mona Lisa wasn’t very well known until several hundred years after it was made. Thus, artists are often at the mercy of custodians of artistic knowledge like art curators and critics, who decide what merits acknowledgement as knowledge. After all, knowledge is only knowledge when there is consensus it is. And if the big wigs in the art industry doesn’t think it’s worth a mention, your art, however brilliant it seems to you, would not reach the consensus required to be considered knowledge. Of course, there are debates on the necessity of custodians in such a subjective AOK. After all, there were many times I questioned how some “artworks” even made it into the modern art museum when it’s literally splashes of paint on a canvas. I digress. However, there is something to be said about maintaining some form of standard to art. We judge whether some art is good or bad, but not in a very rigorous way. Custodians of knowledge supposedly have a framework to make such judgement in a way which preserves the nature of the AOK, and the knowledge within it. Therefore, discussion about the necessity of the custodians should focus on how they contribute to the purpose of the AOK, and whether it is compatible with the nature and methodologies of the AOK.

To further illustrate what I mean, you could see that Natural Sciences might present a stronger argument to the necessity of such custodians. We implicitly “trust” science, for better or for worse, because we know that there is a level of credibility imbued by the scientific method. It is the custodians’ role to maintain the standard of adherence to the scientific method that keeps this credibility alive. This is why, when flat earthers argue that they can’t see the curvature of the earth from the horizon, that it doesn’t get published in a scientific journal as fact! This is why, when research emerges that denies the existence of climate change, custodians have a responsibility to retract such research . However, at the same time, it also places much pressure on producers of such knowledge to create something worthy in the eyes of custodians. You might have heard of the data manipulation scandal that forced Stanford’s president to resign. Thus, custodians do appear quite important in this AOK, when we value the truthfulness of knowledge so much, but that isn’t without its consequences.

I recommend picking two contrasting AOKs that value much different things when writing the essay. While comparison is not a requirement for the essay, it gives you a more nuanced understanding of the question and thus a more reflective piece. For instance, we have just demonstrated that art is relatively subjective, while the sciences are less so. Thus, this influences the role which custodians need to play in each AOK.

The framework to answering this title for many students will follow a similar structure: an example of when novel evidence was accepted and had groundbreaking impacts, and another example where such evidence was problematic and disputed. Repeat this for the second AOK you choose and you’ll have 4 contrasting examples. This is not the only way to approach this title, but is my personal preference considering the structure I suggest to most students that ensures firstly, you will pass the basic criteria of a TOK Essay, and secondly, you will have a strong foundation to succeed. However, since everyone will have a similar style and collection of examples, it is even more important for this title, that you tease out the meaning and the effect on each area of knowledge, and knowledge in general, that your examples represent.

To demonstrate what I mean, let’s focus on two natural sciences examples. First, consider the case of “Cold Fusion”, a theory that you could supposedly have nuclear fusion at room temperature, discovered and subsequently debunked in 1989. A contrasting example, could be recent Nobel Prize winner of Medicine and Physiology, for the research on mRNA vaccines. Immediately, it is obvious that one shows where recent evidence isn’t the strongest, while the latter shows that it could be. But the focus should be on are we TOO QUICK in assuming so, not whether we should or not. Well, what are the reactions and timelines for each example? While Cold Fusion was met with excitement from the general public for the potential it holds for energy production, I wouldn’t say we ‘assumed’ it to be strong. Looking at the news reports from that time, you can see that there was great anticipation about the discovery, leading to lots of sudden funding and interest to investigate it and replicate it. As for mRNA, that discovery took a long time! First the technology, and the getting it to not appear foreign to the human body was very tricky. Even after it was discovered, we waited quite a while, with many people’s first experience with mRNA to be their COVID 19 vaccine. What you need to draw from these two examples is the methodological similarities and differences which reflect the NATURE of Science, and thus, the purpose of science. You see in both how there is an emphasis on replication which corroborates or falsifies, and only after doing so for a long time do we accept it to be true, otherwise it is debunked. So yes, there are moments where Natural Sciences provides strong compelling evidence that ends up false, there are many hurdles with in the methodology of the Natural Science that prevents us from being TOO QUICK to assume it to be true.

For this prompt, it is too easy to fall into the debate of why something was true or why something was false and tricked the population. This is not the point of the essay. You should avoid talking about the specifics of your examples at length. You need to demonstrate how your examples reflect the wider methodologies of the Natural Sciences (and similarly, for your second AOK) that either encourages or discourages our assumptions that novel evidence is always best. As you can see from my examples above, I focused on how such assumption does not happen too quickly because there are many ways we verify scientific knowledge to be true. I don’t discuss the specifics of the actual science behind Cold Fusion or mRNA as that isn’t required. You are better off focusing on the methodologies behind the AOKs themselves and answering the question.

Some interesting complements to the Natural Science AOK could be History (particularly focusing on revisionism and how historical events could be interpreted differently over time), Mathematics (how could the methodologies differ and are there ‘mistakes’ in Maths), or even Human Sciences (replication is a bit more difficult with that!).

HS Theory of Knowledge: TOK Essay

General Information
TOK Exhibition
ISZL Online Subscription Sources
TOK Books in the Library
Open Access Resources
NoodleTools
Citation Assistance
Annotated Bibliography
Academic Honesty
Understanding Turnitin
Understanding Source Types
HS Library Homepage This link opens in a new window

TOK Essay titles May 2024

1. Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history? Discuss with reference to the arts and history.

2. How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

3. Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.

4. Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

5. Do we need custodians of knowledge? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

6. Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

An essay outline writing guide

Essay example

Example Final TOK Essay.pdf

Essay Guidelines - Word Count

The TOK Essay must be written in standard 12 type size and be double spaced.

The maximum length of the essay is 1,600 words . Extended footnotes or appendices are not appropriate for the TOK essay.

The word count includes: • the main part of the essay • any quotations.

The word count does not include: • any acknowledgments • the references (whether given in footnotes, endnotes or in-text) and bibliography • any maps, charts, diagrams, annotated illustrations or tables.

If an essay exceeds the word limit, then examiners are instructed to stop reading after 1,600 words and to base their assessment on just the first 1,600 words. Students are required to indicate the number of words when the essay is uploaded during the submission process.

TOK Talk Podcast (Essay titles)

1. Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history?

2. How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge?

3. Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them?

5. Do we need custodians of knowledge?

6. Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest?

What is the TOK essay?

Essay unpacking tools

Essay Unpacking_Outline Tool.docx

Prescribed Titles Unpacking and Essay structure form.docx

Essay Rubric

The assessment instrument provided describes five levels of performance in response to this driving question. These levels are to be seen as holistic descriptors rather than as a checklist of characteristics.

Does the student provide a clear, coherent and critical exploration of the essay title?

The discussion has a sustained focus on the title and is linked effectively to areas of knowledge. Arguments are clear, coherent, and effectively supported by specific examples. The implications of arguments are considered. There is clear awareness and evaluation of different points of view.	The discussion is focused on the title and is linked effectively to areas of knowledge. Arguments are clear, coherent and supported by examples. There is awareness and some evaluation of different points of view.	The discussion is focused on the title and is developed with some links to areas of knowledge. Arguments are offered and are supported by examples. There is some awareness of different points of view.	The discussion is connected to the title and makes superficial or limited links to areas of knowledge. The discussion is largely descriptive. Limited arguments are offered but they are unclear and are not supported by effective examples.	The discussion is weakly connected to the title. While there may be links to the areas of knowledge, any relevant points are descriptive or consist only of unsupported assertions.	The discussion does not reach the standard described by the other levels or is not a response to one of the prescribed titles for the correct examination session.

Insightful Convincing Accomplished Lucid	Pertinent Relevant Analytical Organized	Acceptable Mainstream Adequate Competent	Underdeveloped Basic Superficial Limited	Ineffective Descriptive Incoherent Formless

Refer to the offical IB guide P. 48 for more information

<< Previous: General Information
Next: TOK Exhibition >>
Last Updated: Aug 16, 2024 11:47 AM
URL: https://iszl.libguides.com/TOK

TOK RESOURCE.ORG

Andrew Brown evoking the TOK Exhibition—standing with Gao Qipei’s Zhong Kui, the Demon Queller at BAMPFA, the UC Berkeley Art Museum and Pacific Film Archive.

350 THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE class activities SHARED in a spirit of collegiality

Welcome to TOKresource.org

Beginning and experienced IB Theory of Knowledge teachers are invited to appropriate, borrow directly, or adapt freely any of this tried and trusted TOK content. The various class activities evolve. They are tweaked each time they are tested in the classroom. Activities that fall flat or prove otherwise unsuccessful with my own students are dropped from the site.

TOKresource.org is a non-commercial resource for TOK teachers around the world. There are no subscriptions, ads, or clickbait. Nor does the site provide quick-fix assessment help for students. Instead, the focus is on the essential recurring challenge for every TOK teacher—when it’s time for class, what are my students actually going to do?*

Andrew Brown

Critical limitations of the site

This website does one thing well. It shares lesson plans and ideas from the perspective of an experienced, individual classroom teacher. TOKResource.org aligns with copyrighted IBO materials—but stops short of addressing specific Essay titles. Strategies proposed for both the Exhibition and the TOK Essay serve any prompt.

The official IB Diploma Programme Resource Centre is the one and only foundational reference point for all TOK teachers. The Theory of Knowledge Guide (first assessment 2022) together with teacher support and assessment materials are downloadable after login. IB approved workshops (offered at three levels according to experience) should be the very next priority for both novice and veteran TOK teachers.

Young Bonobo—a very smart ape! Photo credit: Anup Shah via Getty Images.

“ *Yes, that’s all good... but what are your students actually going to do? ”

Updated — July 30, 2024

Human infant spoon fed by an AI drone in Plato’s Cave (2024) —Oil painting by the author.

TOK Resource Briefing

Sign up here to receive my non-commercial, occasional newsletter created for beginning and experienced TOK teachers. The TOK Resource Briefing discombobulates and suggests novel class activities. It also aims to please the eye!

Never any ads or clickbait. I respect your privacy.

How To Write A ToK Essay - Updated 2023

Ace your ToK Essay with our expert tips & tricks! Get the latest and greatest techniques on "How To Write A ToK Essay" and impress the IB examiners.📝💡

Table of content

Introduction

Purpose Of ToK

Assessment of tok, the game plan, execution of the gameplan, planning for tok essay, structure of tok essay, conclusions, bibliography.

Introduce your topic accurately and state your thesis statement for the essay carefully. A thesis statement is like a teaser to your entire essay wherein you define your key terms and introduce your interpretation of the question. Make sure that you do not reword the prescribed title in your thesis. Instead, it needs to, as the word says, INTRODUCE your readers to what your essay is about. A strong introduction allows the reader to deduce what knowledge question(s) you are trying to answer.

So, in a nutshell

Write interesting things about the given TOK essay title .
Define key terms
Narrow in on the particularly interesting aspect
State your thesis statement . This will be your short answer to your given title if you don't know how to write a killer thesis statement check out this blog from SparkNotes .
State your Roadmap. This will help the readers in understanding the direction of your essay.

How to write a TOK Essay?

To answer that, you must familiarise yourself with what a TOK Essay is about.

Before you start reading this article, Amanda has some excellent TOK tips for you!

Theory of Knowledge is one of the most meta subjects that IB offers. Despite its complexity, TOK helps in providing a base for holistic learning and allows students to have a multidisciplinary experience.

To understand TOK is to understand the essence of IB, a task that most people consider unattainable.

But not for you!

Thank your lucky stars who made you land on Nail IB. How exactly will Nail IB help you?

Well, nailing International Baccalaureate is something we will discuss later.

Let's focus on cracking your TOK essay, shall we?

TOK demonstrates how students can apply their knowledge with greater awareness and credibility .

Big words, huh?

Now that we know that we cannot just slide through the Theory of Knowledge, let's understand how we can conquer this battle all guns blazing.

ToK essay’s primary objective is to answer the why behind our studies.

It makes one aware of the real-life implications of their subjects. The students gain greater awareness of their personal and ideological assumptions and appreciate the diversity of different perspectives. It helps the students find their unique perception, a prerequisite for excelling in the IB TOK essays.

Before we dive into our gameplan, let’s overview the rules of the game.

There are two assessment tasks in the TOK: an essay and a presentation . While a presentation encourages students to explore a real-life situation through the lens of TOK, an essay is written on the basis of the various questions provided by the International Baccalaureate Organisation.

The presentation is to assess a student’s ability to apply TOK thinking to a real-life situation whereas IB TOK essay is more conceptual.
The essay is externally assessed by IB and must be on any one of the prescribed TOK essay titles issued by the IB for each examination session.
Word limit of a TOK essay is 1600 words ( excludes extended notes, footnotes, bibliography).

Now that we have unleashed the game, let’s move ahead towards the gameplan of acing both, your presentation and your essay.

One of the fundamental tasks of TOK is to examine different areas of knowledge and find out their similarities and differences.

The TOK essay requires the students to investigate two Areas of Knowledge (AOK) and two Ways of Knowing (WOK) . AOKs and WOKs are investigated via questions such as:

How do we know what we know? (WOK)
What counts as evidence for X? (AOK)
How do we judge which is the best model of Y? (WOK)
What does theory Z mean in the real world? (AOK + WOK)

The aforementioned are Knowledge Questions which help combine the Areas of Knowledge and the Ways of Knowing that they are using. This eliminates the superficial way of learning and makes an individual sensitive to the nature of the information. Our acquisition of Knowledge can be broadly divided into Shared Knowledge and Personal Knowledge.

Shared knowledge: What WE know It is the product of more than one individual. Although individuals contribute to it, shared knowledge does not solely depend upon the contributions of a particular individual—there are possibilities for others to check and amend individual contributions and add to the body of knowledge that already exists.

Personal knowledge: What I know It is essentially dependent on the experiences of a particular individual. Also known as procedural knowledge, it is gained through experience, practice and personal involvement and is intimately bound up with the particular local circumstances of the individual such as biography, interests, values, and so on.

The best hack to ace TOK essay is to develop a habit of making connections between the construction of knowledge, its acquisition and its relevance in the real world.

After that one needs to develop an interest in understanding the difference between diversity and cultural perspectives and personal assumptions.

One also needs to critically reflect on their own beliefs and assumptions, leading to more thoughtful, responsible and purposeful lives.

Yes, this is what you signed up for. It may sound a little intimidating but once you get the hang of it you will be able to see the matrix and understand this beautiful world a little better.

Understand that to provide the best version of your writing, it will take you more than one or two drafts. First and foremost, you need to pick your essay topic diligently. Try to choose an essay topic that best interests you. The topic should also allow you to explore the Areas of Knowledge towards which you are naturally inclined. Here are a few sample questions:

a) 'Ways of knowing are a check on our instinctive judgments.' To what extend do you agree with this statement?

b) With reference to two areas of knowledge discuss the way in which shared knowledge can shape their personal knowledge.

c) How can we know if knowledge is produced more through 'Passive Observation' or 'Active-Experiment' within the Human and Natural-sciences under a Mathematical-Perspective?

d) "The whole point of knowledge is to produce both meaning and purpose in our personal lives". Assess the validity of this statement.

Great things take time. It took me more than a couple of weeks to finalize this TOK essay guide. It is completely okay if the first few drafts may not look pleasing or award-winning to you. You will require sharpening your perspective towards the topic each time you polish your draft. Your writing journey from a dull draft to a masterpiece will be a whole process that you will have to be patient with. Have faith in yourself and proceed stepwise.

You need to consider the opinions of others who have devoted hours of research and a lifetime of dedicated studying the topic that surrounds your writing. Unravelling the realms of your mind palace is so Sherlock but let’s not deny the fact that at times, Watson is the one whose expertise helps Sherlock through pretty difficult times. I mean even Batman needs a Robin. In support of my awesome sauce examples, the point I am trying to make is that finding support for our claims and counterclaims through research is a good thing .

Use real-life examples to support your claims and counterclaims. These examples need to be documented researched examples like studies, experiments, articles, presentations by well-known people, etc. Examples that stem from your diploma subjects are highly encouraged, but those will need to be supported by research as well.

It is suggested that you choose a title, stick to it, tackle it and not be afraid. Do not change your mind unless there is a good reason. Also, try choosing Areas of knowledge that you truly enjoy. You know slaying a known devil is much easier than an unknown one. Allot a TIMELINE to your essay. Start with creating an outline of your essay. This will help you to track your progress and accomplish your goals

You can use tools like Trello to organize your ideas and plan your TOK essay.

Areas of Knowledge (AOKs): TOK distinguishes between eight areas of knowledge. They are mathematics, the natural sciences, the human sciences, the arts, history, ethics, religious knowledge systems, and indigenous knowledge systems. It is suggested that students study and explore six of these eight.

Ways of knowing (WOKs): TOK identifies eight specific WOKs- language, sense perception, emotion, reason, imagination, faith, intuition, and memory. It is suggested that studying four of these eight in-depth would be appropriate. WOKs underlie the methodology of the areas of knowledge and provide a basis for personal knowledge.

Moving ahead, let us discuss the structure of your TOK essay.

Your essay will consist of 4 broad segregations

Before breaking down further on the pillars, keep the following in mind

Please note what the TOK essay title is asking you. (Read it a couple of times. We highly recommend that you brainstorm ideas with your TOK coordinator)
Make sure you understand the command term and the question it is asking.
What kind of knowledge is being elicited?
When choosing your areas of knowledge (AoK) and ways of knowing (WoK) make sure that you are able to draw contrasts and comparisons, that is, you are able to find evidence that supports as well as challenges your claims.
Identify key terms in your TOK essay title. Make sure you define them. Your essay will gravitate around them. Key terms/words in your titles are your essay anchors. Your response should be built around them.
Your writing skills come in handy while you work on your IB TOK essay. Like any other essay make sure you have proper thesis statements and topic sentences to guide the evaluator through your work.
Respect the TOK essay title. Rephrasing the topic is not encouraged . Your main job is to address the title.

The body can be mainly divided into 3 segments.

Body (1st Segment)

AoK Claim: Here you investigate your first Area of Knowledge and draw parallels between your AoK and the question. This is done by stating your claim. Claims can be general in nature and need not reference a particular area of knowledge. They help you shape your essay and investigate the question further.
Evidence: Example of a real-life situation, describe thoroughly and accurately, which supports your stated claim. (AoK)
Counter-Claim: State your counter-claim: like claims, those can be general and need not reference a particular area of knowledge. Counterclaim helps you show the other side the coin and gives your essay a holistic nature.
Evidence: A referenced real-life situation/example. Describe thoroughly and accurately, show how this supports your counterclaim (AoK ).
Don’t forget to weave in your WoKs: You need to take into account the source of your knowledge. Here you can also investigate if your nature of acquiring the knowledge has, in any way, affected it. It is good practice to question if your knowledge would be different had it been acquired through a different source/method
Mini-conclusion: Here you analyze your examples in reference to your claims and counterclaims. You must connect to your thesis statement and the prescribed title. How does your proposed argument, in this particular part of the body, connect to the prescribed title and the knowledge questions you are trying to answer?

Body (2): Follow the above process for your second AOK.

Use this part of your essay to compare and contrast your varying AoKs. You need to connect them to your thesis and your prescribed title clearly showing how your arguments respond to the PT.

Your conclusion section will make your essay come together. It is the glue that will make your essay stick together. Herein, you need to

Reiterate your thesis (initial response).
Use your mini conclusions to write a final conclusion.
Tell the reader what the significance is for knowing what we know in this particular PT.
Discuss implications as well.
Offer another perspective, how will the perspective of a different person affect the claims/counterclaims you make in the essay?
Don’t forget to make the end strong.

We recommend all the ib students use the citation machine (It's FREE) to organize or generate a bibliography for your TOK essay. Please go through this extensive guide provided by the IB before you start working on your citations.

If you are still struggling heaps with your TOK essay feel free to subscribe to our tok notes bundles or get access to more than 500+ IBDP notes and past papers here .

Nail IB is your virtual companion that helps you hustle through your diploma and provide you with the right resources at the right time. To know more about acing IB, click here .

I hope this article will become the foundation for figuring out how to write a TOK Essay.

Remember to have faith in yourself.

I hope you NAIL your TOK essay!

Quoting the great Napolean Hill

"Whatever the mind of a man can conceive and believe, it can achieve."

IB Resources you will love!

The May 2024 TOK Essay Titles

Below are the Theory of Knowledge Essay prescribed titles for the May 2024 session.

The video analysis of these titles is available in the member's area --which you can watch using a free trial. (Just click the " subscribe " tab at the top of this page). Click here to watch it now (just login first).

Our just updated TOK Essay Video Course (11 helpful videos) is ready for you as well .

The May 2024 TOK Essay Prescribed Titles

Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history? Discuss with reference to the arts and history.

How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Do we need custodians of knowledge? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Tim is available for private tutoring , almost every day, to support you in writing your best TOK Essay and exhibition. He's an expert Theory of Knowledge teacher (a fully IB-trained teacher, marker and IB teacher-trainer) with over 20 years of teaching experience . 🚀 Click here to meet with Tim on Zoom and talk through your work. 🚀

Tim also helps students with IB Business Management, IB Global Politics, IB Economics, IB History, IB English and College Admissions essays.

Artist Credit: Mike Lathrop

Theory of Knowledge

IB Business Management

IB Economics

IB Global Politics

Extended Essay

General Resources

TOK - Essay: Class of 2024 Essay Topics

Natural Science
Human Science
Mathematics
Class of 2024 Essay Topics

1: Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history?

2: How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization & generalization in the production of knowledge? (Discuss with reference to mathematics & one other Area of Knowledge )

3: Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge so slow to adopt them? (Discuss with reference to the human sciences & one other Area of Knowledge )

4: Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context? (Discuss with reference to two Areas of Knowledge )

5: Do we need custodians of knowledge? (Discuss with reference to two Areas of Knowledge )

6: Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? (Discuss with reference to the natural sciences & one other Area of Knowledge )

<< Previous: Chicago
Last Updated: May 24, 2024 3:51 PM
URL: https://nist.libguides.com/tok_essay

Pardon Our Interruption

As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.
You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
You've disabled cookies in your web browser.
A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article .

To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.

Get 1 on 1 Exclusive Help In Your TOK ESSAYS & TOK EXHIBITION!!!

HOW WE TEACH?

What will you learn, testimonials, maximize your tok essay and exhibition grade with our expert certified teachers, dive into the realm of tok essays and tok exhibition, unlocking a gateway to diverse perspectives and profound wisdom., tok essay titles 2024, tok essay title 1 may 2024.

Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history? Discuss with reference to the arts and history.

TOK ESSAY TITLE 2 MAY 2024

How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

TOK ESSAY TITLE 3 MAY 2024

Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.

TOK ESSAY TITLE 4 MAY 2024

Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

TOK ESSAY TITLE 5 MAY 2024

Do we need custodians of knowledge? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

TOK ESSAY TITLE 6 MAY 2024

Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Get Started on Your TOK Journey Today!

+91 9878797000.

Fill out the form, and our team will be in touch with you shortly to discuss how we can best support you.

TOK ESSAY & EXHIBITION

Essay topic breakdown.

Each year we breakdown the essay titles with Real life examples and arguments for student’s benefit.

Prompt Breakdown

For all TOK Exhibition prompts we have specific guidelines and aspects to explore.

TOK Concepts

The TOK concepts and vocabulary are very important to incorporate in your essay and exhibition documents.

WOK, AOK and Themes

The TOK assessments are deeply integrated around multiple components to produce an intricate document.

Interactive Classes

We conduct interactive classes where students actively participate in discussions, debates, and collaborative activities.

Socratic Method

We employ the Socratic method to stimulate critical thinking and promote deeper understanding.

Formative Assessment

We incorporate formative assessments, such as quizzes, essays, and presentations, to gauge students' understanding and progress.

Research and Analysis

You will learn how to conduct in-depth research and analyze complex knowledge claims, using evidence and examples from various areas of knowledge.

Essay Structure and Organization

You will learn to structure your essays in a coherent and organized manner, ensuring that your ideas flow logically and your arguments are presented effectively.

Integration of TOK Concepts

You will learn to integrate TOK concepts such as ways of knowing, areas of knowledge, and knowledge questions into your essays to deepen your analysis.

Creative Expression

You will explore creative ways to express your understanding of TOK through visual displays, performances.

Presentation Skills

You will develop presentation skills to effectively communicate your TOK ideas, engage your audience, and create a meaningful experience during your TOK exhibition.

Critical Reflection

You will engage in critical reflection on your own TOK journey, analyzing the process of creating and presenting your exhibition, and gaining insights into the nature and implications of knowledge.

When I first approached the TOK exhibition, I felt so overwhelmed. But thanks to the team's guidance, not only did I get a clearer understanding, but I also managed to present my ideas in a way that felt truly 'me'. I can't thank you enough!

I was stuck in a rut with my TOK essay, feeling like I was going around in circles. But after working with these experts, I found my voice and was able to express my thoughts more coherently. The feedback sessions were a game-changer. Highly recommend!

I wasn't sure how to connect real-world situations with TOK themes for my exhibition. The team's patient guidance helped me see connections I'd never considered before. The result? An exhibition that not only scored well but also resonated with many of my peers.

Writing a TOK essay felt like trying to solve a puzzle with missing pieces. The team here provided the clarity and guidance I needed, helping me shape my arguments and refine my thesis. So grateful for the support and understanding they showed throughout.

I came in feeling lost about TOK as a whole, but the team's structured approach to the exhibition made the process feel so much more manageable. I appreciated the way they valued my input and helped me integrate my personal experiences into the project.

The one-on-one sessions for my TOK essay were invaluable. Not only did they help me understand complex ideas, but they also gave me the confidence to express my viewpoints. The end result? A well-structured essay that I was proud to submit.

Request a Callback?

Learn more from, frequently asked questions.

Theory of Knowledge (TOK) is an interdisciplinary course offered as part of the International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma Programme. It delves into the nature of knowledge, how it is acquired, and the ways in which it is justified. TOK fosters critical thinking, reflection, and exploration of different ways of knowing and areas of knowledge.

TOK offers invaluable skills for intellectual and personal growth. It enhances critical thinking, nurtures an appreciation for diverse perspectives, and encourages curiosity. By engaging with TOK, students develop abilities that are highly beneficial for higher education, such as analyzing arguments, evaluating evidence, and constructing well-reasoned viewpoints.

TOK is assessed through an externally moderated essay and an oral presentation. The TOK essay requires students to critically analyze a prescribed title or develop a self-chosen title related to TOK. The oral presentation provides an opportunity for students to explore a real-life situation from a TOK perspective and engage in a thoughtful discussion.

TOK equips students with critical thinking skills that can be applied to everyday life. It enables individuals to navigate complex issues, evaluate sources of information, and make informed decisions. The skills and perspectives cultivated in TOK are highly transferable, benefiting students in university studies, career paths, and active engagement with the world.

Absolutely! TOK emphasizes the importance of effective communication in conveying ideas and arguments. It encourages students to express themselves clearly, develop coherent arguments, and support them with evidence. Through the oral presentation component and essay writing, TOK hones students’ communication skills, enabling them to articulate their thoughts with precision and clarity.

Human sciences mini-lessons

TOK Home > TOK resources > TOK mini-lessons > Human sciences mini-lessons

The TOK mini-lessons and knowledge journeys are designed to help you explore human sciences in the context of recent real-world events, introduce key thinkers and ideas to students, and encourage authentic critical thinking .

We publish 15 new mini-lessons every month, which you can access here, via the newsletter , or within the different pages of the DP integration section .

Join us to access the mini-lessons!

Members receive 15 mini-lessons every month, which can be used by any teacher to develop authentic critical thinking , link lessons to the latest global issues, and explore epistemological issues related to their subject.

Here are a few of our latest mini-lessons, which you can download for free. They show how we use real contexts to help learners confront – rather than confirm – their assumptions about the world. Join us here !

Help your learners to exit their echo chambers!

Our online and in-person workshops offer the usual support for students writing the essay and exhibition, and TOK departments designing great courses.

But our training sessions go much further than this: by focusing on authentic critical thinking , they demonstrate how to help learners confront, rather than confirm, their biases and assumptions, and exit their echo chambers. This makes them accessible and relevant for all teachers, whatever their subject or programme. Read more here .

Skip to Main Landmark (Press Enter)

Spartan Alert

Mid-career, musician returns to uncg for degree .

Posted on August 16, 2024

Lynn Blakey playing with The Broken Crayons in 1983

Lynn Blakey has an accomplished career as a musician. But she’s always felt like something was missing. In August, she will return to UNCG to earn a degree in Peace and Conflict Studies.

Blakey, 61, was enrolled in classes at UNCG more than three decades ago, working toward a degree in communications. She planned to be a documentary filmmaker. While at the University, Blakey learned how to play a guitar and started a band.

Her junior year, she was asked by “Let’s Active,” to join them, and left school at age 24. That led to the start of her career, being part of the band while it toured as an opening act for R.E.M. Blakey was later a part of the female-trio Tres Chicas, and toured the U.S. and Europe. She now has a solo career, and often performs with her husband, a violinist.

“Music has been my life since I made the decision (to leave school),” Blakey said. “It’s a life of touring and recording and learning about the world. I’ve made six records in various bands and sung on more than 50 others.”

Her career, which she describes as an “amazing experience,” still left her wanting more.

“All this time, I thought about going back to school,” Blakey said.

In 2022, she was diagnosed with cancer. After chemotherapy and surgery, Blakey slowly felt like her old self and was ready to return to singing and songwriting. But she also looked at other jobs, and saw that a bachelor’s degree was required for most of them.

“I looked to see what UNCG had online, and the first thing that popped up was Peace and Conflict Studies. I never knew that was a career. I thought, ‘That’s my thing: Helping to solve problems,’” Blakey said. “I read more about the program and it was what I wanted.”

She contacted Gina Ingraham , the stop out prevention and re-entry coordinator in Enrollment Management, and Blakey began the process of applying to school. UNCG is allowing most of her previous credits to transfer upon her return to school.

“I feel committed to doing this and am excited,” Blakey said. “This is important and will change my life in a good way. I’m excited about my major. I hope to be part of the solution.”

Blakey still plans to sing and perform, but said she now thinks of school as her primary job.

“I’m glad this program is online. I love the flexibility that gives me,” she said.

I looked to see what UNCG had online, and the first thing that popped up was Peace and Conflict Studies. I never knew that was a career. I thought, ‘That’s my thing: Helping to solve problems,’. I read more about the program and it was what I wanted. Lynn Blakey, Professional Musician

Blakey, who lives in Chapel Hill, is still trying to decide what she will do with her degree once she graduates.

“I want to start with a beginner’s mind approach. As I go, I think paths might come to me. I see mediation or teaching with kids, and still staying in my community,” she said. “I can support people fleeing conflict and resolution in my neighborhood. There’s a need for this kind of thinking and approach to life: In politics, schools, businesses, non-profits, everything. I want to use this degree to make the world better.”

Blakey said she hopes her story inspires others.

“I would just like more people to believe this is possible. Going back to school, you appreciate things differently as an older person,” she said. “I’m not planning on retiring any time soon.”

Article by Sarah Newell

Black and white photos by Rusty Moore

IMAGES

Human Sciences: TOK by Richard Kalu on Prezi
Human Sciences
TOK Presentation: Human Sciences by Pia Malinen on Prezi
The Human Sciences AOK in TOK: Exploring the Wonders
The human sciences
TOK ESSAY.docx

COMMENTS

Human Science Notes
Human Sciences Definitions. "A branch of study which deals with people or their actions, including the social sciences and the humanities, as contrasted with the natural sciences or physical sciences" (Oxford). The study of the reality of being human--the social, cultural, biological and behavioural aspects of human existence.
Human sciences
The Human Sciences is one of the areas of knowledge for the 2022 TOK course. Explore it via our brilliant quotes, notes, and real-life situations. Search for: ... Subscribe to our free newsletter, and collect fantastic examples to help you understand the key TOK ideas, support your essay and exhibition, and make you an authentic critical thinker.
2. the Human Sciences
Written assignment. " Alas, the human race is not a single, rational entity. It is composed of nasty, envy-driven, irrational, inconsistent, unstable, computationally limited, complex, evolving, heterogeneous entities. Loads and loads of them. These issues are the staple diet—perhaps even raisons d'être—of the social sciences.
IB TOK Essay examples
High scoring IB Theory of Knowledge Essay examples. See what past students did and make your TOK Essay perfect by learning from examiner commented examples! Exemplars. Review. Login. ... Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.‬ TOK Essay A. Want to get full marks for your TOK Essay?
Example essays
Example essays. Last updated: 06 June 2023. As part of theory of knowledge (TOK), each student chooses one essay title from six issued by International Baccalaureate® (IB). The titles change in each examination session. Upcoming and past questions include:
Human Sciences AOK in TOK: Insights & Tips
Drawing comparisons between the human sciences and other AOKs can significantly improve your TOK essay. For example, you might compare the empirical methods used in the human sciences with those in the natural sciences, or you could explore how cultural understanding in the human sciences contrasts with the aesthetic appreciation in the arts.
EXPLAINED: May 2024 TOK Essay Prescribed Titles
Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge. ... DO NOT use the dictionary definitions here - since this is a TOK Essay, you want to make a TOK version of specialisation and generalisation, in terms of how these two things differ in the production of knowledge. Clearly defining the two in this way will form a ...
Unpacking the 2024 November TOK Titles: A Comprehensive IB Solved Guide
Unpacking the 2024 November TOK Titles: A Comprehensive IB Solved Guide. The November 2024 IB Theory of Knowledge (TOK) Essay Titles are out! Let's be honest - tackling the TOK essay can be a daunting task. With so many ideas, concepts and topics at our disposal and a myriad of ideas swirling around, it's easy to feel overwhelmed at the outset.
TOK Essay
Essay Guidelines - Word Count. The TOK Essay must be written in standard 12 type size and be double spaced. The maximum length of the essay is 1,600 words. Extended footnotes or appendices are not appropriate for the TOK essay. The word count includes: • the main part of the essay. • any quotations.
Tok Resource.org
Strategies proposed for both the Exhibition and the TOK Essay serve any prompt. The official IB Diploma Programme Resource Centre is the one and only foundational reference point for all TOK teachers. The Theory of Knowledge Guide (first assessment 2022) together with teacher support and assessment materials are downloadable after login.
IB TOK examples
High scoring IB Theory of Knowledge examples. See what past students did and make your TOK perfect by learning from examiner commented examples! ... TOK Essay A. Are visual representations always helpful in the communication of knowledge? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and mathematics. TOK Essay A. For artists and natural ...
Classic human sciences lessons
Classic human sciences lessons. Our classic human sciences lessons are classroom-ready, driven by real-life situations, and filled with the ideas of the most influential thinkers from the past and present. Our classic lessons are perfect for teachers who want a straightforward TOK structure, or those who want to augment the BQs with materials ...
Human Science
The mission of the Humanities, Arts and Society Project is to establish a worldwide movement of artists, scholars and project holders whose creative work and ideas will demonstrate the impact of the arts and of creativity on society, promote global understanding and collaboration, and contribute to the debate within the humanities regarding universal issues.
TOK essay guidance
1 The TOK essay is an individual task. 2 It represents two thirds of the overall mark for TOK. 3 It is externally marked. 4 You choose your title from a list of six prescribed titles, which change every exam session. 5 The word count for the essay is 1600 words. 6 You'll meet your teacher for 3 interactions to discuss your essay.
How To Write A ToK Essay
Introduce your topic accurately and state your thesis statement for the essay carefully. A thesis statement is like a teaser to your entire essay wherein you define your key terms and introduce your interpretation of the question. Make sure that you do not reword the prescribed title in your thesis. Instead, it needs to, as the word says ...
IB TOK Essay example: Are visual representations always helpful in the
Discuss with reference to the human sciences and mathematics" at the beginning of the work, ensuring clarity for the TOK examiner. Throughout the essay, the focus remains on the helpfulness of visual representations in knowledge communication, with relevant examples and arguments from both the human sciences and mathematics.
The May 2024 TOK Essay Titles
Here are the Theory of Knowledge Essay prescribed titles for the May 2024 session. The video analysis (with topics, tips and ideas to consider for each title) will be available this will in the IBMastery members' area and our discussions on these titles can be found in our private community. ... Discuss with reference to the human sciences and ...
LibGuides: TOK
TOK - Essay: Class of 2024 Essay Topics. Home; History; Natural Science; Human Science; Mathematics; The Arts; MLA9; APA; Chicago; ... (Discuss with reference to the human sciences & one other Area of Knowledge) 4: Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context?
TOK Human Sciences Essay.docx
In TOK however, I further able to understand the repercussions of experimentation in the human sciences. This essay will discuss how my perception of the AOK of human sciences, specifically psychology has morphed throughout my TOK class. This essay will focus mainly on the theory of psychoanalysis by Sigmund Freud.
Landing Page
TESTIMONIALS Maximize Your TOK Essay and Exhibition Grade with Our Expert Certified Teachers Dive into the realm of TOK Essays and TOK Exhibition, unlocking a gateway to diverse perspectives and profound wisdom. WhatsApp ... Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge. TOK ESSAY TITLE 3. ... Theory of Knowledge ...
Is philosophy considered a human science in ToK? : r/IBO
The Tok Kognity textbook places philosophy in human science but I wouldn't be surprised to hear some examiners might not agree. My suggestion is to explicitly mention why philosophy is part of human sciences by referencing the human sciences knowledge framework. Talk about how phil as if it belongs in human sciences by referencing how its scope ...
Planning and structuring the TOK essay
Once you've grasped the essay rubric, and chosen your title, you can start planning and structuring your TOK essay. You base this around the 3 interactions with your teacher, which are one-on-one meetings discussing your progress, and receiving feedback. As well as the interactions, you can also ask your teacher specific questions about your ...
Human sciences mini-lessons
The TOK mini-lessons and knowledge journeys are designed to help you explore human sciences in the context of recent real-world events, introduce key thinkers and ideas to students, and encourage authentic critical thinking. We publish 15 new mini-lessons every month, which you can access here, via the newsletter, or within the different pages ...
Mid-career, musician returns to UNCG for degree
In 2022, she was diagnosed with cancer. After radiation and surgery, Blakey slowly felt like her old self and was ready to return to singing and songwriting.

Extended Essay Writers

TOK Areas of Knowledge – The Human Sciences

Understanding the Human Sciences AOK

Key Concepts in the Human Sciences AOK

Methodological Diversity and Complexity

Ethical Considerations in Research

The Role of Theories and Models

Application and Impact

Interdisciplinary Connections

Comparing the Human Sciences with Other AOKs

Implementing Human Sciences AOK in the TOK Essay

Choose a Relevant Knowledge Question

Use Diverse Methodologies

Address Ethical Considerations

Compare and Contrast with Other AOKs

Need help with your IB TOK essay?

Discuss Real-World Applications

Reflect on Personal and Shared Knowledge

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

EXPLAINED: May 2024 TOK Essay Prescribed Titles

Share this:

Leave a comment Cancel reply

HS Theory of Knowledge: TOK Essay

TOK Essay titles May 2024

An essay outline writing guide

Essay example

Essay Guidelines - Word Count

TOK Talk Podcast (Essay titles)

What is the TOK essay?

Essay unpacking tools

Essay Rubric

TOK RESOURCE.ORG

350 THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE class activities SHARED in a spirit of collegiality

Critical limitations of the site

TOK Resource Briefing

How To Write A ToK Essay - Updated 2023

Table of content

Purpose Of ToK

IB Resources you will love!

The May 2024 TOK Essay Titles

The May 2024 TOK Essay Prescribed Titles

TOK - Essay: Class of 2024 Essay Topics

Pardon Our Interruption

Get 1 on 1 Exclusive Help In Your TOK ESSAYS & TOK EXHIBITION!!!

HOW WE TEACH?

TOK ESSAY TITLE 2 MAY 2024

TOK ESSAY TITLE 3 MAY 2024

TOK ESSAY TITLE 4 MAY 2024

TOK ESSAY TITLE 5 MAY 2024

TOK ESSAY TITLE 6 MAY 2024

Get Started on Your TOK Journey Today!

TOK ESSAY & EXHIBITION

Prompt Breakdown

TOK Concepts

WOK, AOK and Themes

Interactive Classes

Socratic Method

Formative Assessment

Research and Analysis

Essay Structure and Organization

Integration of TOK Concepts

Creative Expression

Presentation Skills

Critical Reflection

Request a Callback?

Human sciences mini-lessons

Join us to access the mini-lessons!

Help your learners to exit their echo chambers!

Spartan Alert

IMAGES

COMMENTS