![review of literature in research papers review of literature in research papers](https://cdn.paperpal.com/assets/images/paperpal_editage_logo.webp)
![](http://serviteca.online/777/templates/cheerup2/res/banner1.gif)
What is a Literature Review? How to Write It (with Examples)
![review of literature in research papers literature review](https://pp-blog.paperpal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/literature-review-1170x780.jpeg)
A literature review is a critical analysis and synthesis of existing research on a particular topic. It provides an overview of the current state of knowledge, identifies gaps, and highlights key findings in the literature. 1 The purpose of a literature review is to situate your own research within the context of existing scholarship, demonstrating your understanding of the topic and showing how your work contributes to the ongoing conversation in the field. Learning how to write a literature review is a critical tool for successful research. Your ability to summarize and synthesize prior research pertaining to a certain topic demonstrates your grasp on the topic of study, and assists in the learning process.
Table of Contents
- What is the purpose of literature review?
- a. Habitat Loss and Species Extinction:
- b. Range Shifts and Phenological Changes:
- c. Ocean Acidification and Coral Reefs:
- d. Adaptive Strategies and Conservation Efforts:
How to write a good literature reviewÂ
- Choose a Topic and Define the Research Question:
- Decide on the Scope of Your Review:
- Select Databases for Searches:
- Conduct Searches and Keep Track:
- Review the Literature:
- Organize and Write Your Literature Review:
- How to write a literature review faster with Paperpal?
- Frequently asked questions
What is a literature review?
A well-conducted literature review demonstrates the researcher’s familiarity with the existing literature, establishes the context for their own research, and contributes to scholarly conversations on the topic. One of the purposes of a literature review is also to help researchers avoid duplicating previous work and ensure that their research is informed by and builds upon the existing body of knowledge.
![review of literature in research papers](https://pp-blog.paperpal.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/image.png)
What is the purpose of literature review?
A literature review serves several important purposes within academic and research contexts. Here are some key objectives and functions of a literature review: 2 Â
1. Contextualizing the Research Problem: The literature review provides a background and context for the research problem under investigation. It helps to situate the study within the existing body of knowledge.Â
2. Identifying Gaps in Knowledge: By identifying gaps, contradictions, or areas requiring further research, the researcher can shape the research question and justify the significance of the study. This is crucial for ensuring that the new research contributes something novel to the field.Â
Find academic papers related to your research topic faster. Try Research on Paperpal Â
3. Understanding Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks: Literature reviews help researchers gain an understanding of the theoretical and conceptual frameworks used in previous studies. This aids in the development of a theoretical framework for the current research.Â
4. Providing Methodological Insights: Another purpose of literature reviews is that it allows researchers to learn about the methodologies employed in previous studies. This can help in choosing appropriate research methods for the current study and avoiding pitfalls that others may have encountered.Â
5. Establishing Credibility: A well-conducted literature review demonstrates the researcher’s familiarity with existing scholarship, establishing their credibility and expertise in the field. It also helps in building a solid foundation for the new research.Â
6. Informing Hypotheses or Research Questions: The literature review guides the formulation of hypotheses or research questions by highlighting relevant findings and areas of uncertainty in existing literature.Â
Literature review example
Letâs delve deeper with a literature review example: Let’s say your literature review is about the impact of climate change on biodiversity. You might format your literature review into sections such as the effects of climate change on habitat loss and species extinction, phenological changes, and marine biodiversity. Each section would then summarize and analyze relevant studies in those areas, highlighting key findings and identifying gaps in the research. The review would conclude by emphasizing the need for further research on specific aspects of the relationship between climate change and biodiversity. The following literature review template provides a glimpse into the recommended literature review structure and content, demonstrating how research findings are organized around specific themes within a broader topic.
Literature Review on Climate Change Impacts on Biodiversity:
Climate change is a global phenomenon with far-reaching consequences, including significant impacts on biodiversity. This literature review synthesizes key findings from various studies:
a. Habitat Loss and Species Extinction:
Climate change-induced alterations in temperature and precipitation patterns contribute to habitat loss, affecting numerous species (Thomas et al., 2004). The review discusses how these changes increase the risk of extinction, particularly for species with specific habitat requirements.
b. Range Shifts and Phenological Changes:
Observations of range shifts and changes in the timing of biological events (phenology) are documented in response to changing climatic conditions (Parmesan & Yohe, 2003). These shifts affect ecosystems and may lead to mismatches between species and their resources.
c. Ocean Acidification and Coral Reefs:
The review explores the impact of climate change on marine biodiversity, emphasizing ocean acidification’s threat to coral reefs (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2007). Changes in pH levels negatively affect coral calcification, disrupting the delicate balance of marine ecosystems.
d. Adaptive Strategies and Conservation Efforts:
Recognizing the urgency of the situation, the literature review discusses various adaptive strategies adopted by species and conservation efforts aimed at mitigating the impacts of climate change on biodiversity (Hannah et al., 2007). It emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary approaches for effective conservation planning.
![review of literature in research papers](https://pp-blog.paperpal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Banner1-2-1024x410.png)
Strengthen your literature review with factual insights. Try Research on Paperpal for free! Â Â
Writing a literature review involves summarizing and synthesizing existing research on a particular topic. A good literature review format should include the following elements.
Introduction: The introduction sets the stage for your literature review, providing context and introducing the main focus of your review.
- Opening Statement: Begin with a general statement about the broader topic and its significance in the field.
- Scope and Purpose: Clearly define the scope of your literature review. Explain the specific research question or objective you aim to address.
- Organizational Framework: Briefly outline the structure of your literature review, indicating how you will categorize and discuss the existing research.
- Significance of the Study: Highlight why your literature review is important and how it contributes to the understanding of the chosen topic.
- Thesis Statement: Conclude the introduction with a concise thesis statement that outlines the main argument or perspective you will develop in the body of the literature review.
Body: The body of the literature review is where you provide a comprehensive analysis of existing literature, grouping studies based on themes, methodologies, or other relevant criteria.
- Organize by Theme or Concept: Group studies that share common themes, concepts, or methodologies. Discuss each theme or concept in detail, summarizing key findings and identifying gaps or areas of disagreement.Â
- Critical Analysis: Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each study. Discuss the methodologies used, the quality of evidence, and the overall contribution of each work to the understanding of the topic.Â
- Synthesis of Findings: Synthesize the information from different studies to highlight trends, patterns, or areas of consensus in the literature.Â
- Identification of Gaps: Discuss any gaps or limitations in the existing research and explain how your review contributes to filling these gaps.Â
- Transition between Sections: Provide smooth transitions between different themes or concepts to maintain the flow of your literature review.Â
Write and Cite as you go with Paperpal Research. Start now for free. Â Â
Conclusion: The conclusion of your literature review should summarize the main findings, highlight the contributions of the review, and suggest avenues for future research.
- Summary of Key Findings: Recap the main findings from the literature and restate how they contribute to your research question or objective.
- Contributions to the Field: Discuss the overall contribution of your literature review to the existing knowledge in the field.
- Implications and Applications: Explore the practical implications of the findings and suggest how they might impact future research or practice.
- Recommendations for Future Research: Identify areas that require further investigation and propose potential directions for future research in the field.
- Final Thoughts: Conclude with a final reflection on the importance of your literature review and its relevance to the broader academic community.
![review of literature in research papers what is a literature review](https://pp-blog.paperpal.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/blog-banner_audio-streaming.png)
Conducting a literature review
Conducting a literature review is an essential step in research that involves reviewing and analyzing existing literature on a specific topic. Itâs important to know how to do a literature review effectively, so here are the steps to follow: 1
Choose a Topic and Define the Research Question:
- Select a topic that is relevant to your field of study.
- Clearly define your research question or objective. Determine what specific aspect of the topic do you want to explore?
Decide on the Scope of Your Review:
- Determine the timeframe for your literature review. Are you focusing on recent developments, or do you want a historical overview?
- Consider the geographical scope. Is your review global, or are you focusing on a specific region?
- Define the inclusion and exclusion criteria. What types of sources will you include? Are there specific types of studies or publications you will exclude?
Select Databases for Searches:
- Identify relevant databases for your field. Examples include PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar.
- Consider searching in library catalogs, institutional repositories, and specialized databases related to your topic.
Conduct Searches and Keep Track:
- Develop a systematic search strategy using keywords, Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT), and other search techniques.
- Record and document your search strategy for transparency and replicability.
- Keep track of the articles, including publication details, abstracts, and links. Use citation management tools like EndNote, Zotero, or Mendeley to organize your references.
Review the Literature:
- Evaluate the relevance and quality of each source. Consider the methodology, sample size, and results of studies.
- Organize the literature by themes or key concepts. Identify patterns, trends, and gaps in the existing research.
- Summarize key findings and arguments from each source. Compare and contrast different perspectives.
- Identify areas where there is a consensus in the literature and where there are conflicting opinions.
- Provide critical analysis and synthesis of the literature. What are the strengths and weaknesses of existing research?
Organize and Write Your Literature Review:
- Literature review outline should be based on themes, chronological order, or methodological approaches.Â
- Write a clear and coherent narrative that synthesizes the information gathered.Â
- Use proper citations for each source and ensure consistency in your citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).Â
- Conclude your literature review by summarizing key findings, identifying gaps, and suggesting areas for future research.Â
Whether you’re exploring a new research field or finding new angles to develop an existing topic, sifting through hundreds of papers can take more time than you have to spare. But what if you could find science-backed insights with verified citations in seconds? That’s the power of Paperpalâs new Research feature! Â
How to write a literature review faster with Paperpal?
Paperpal, an AI writing assistant, integrates powerful academic search capabilities within its writing platform. With the Research feature, you get 100% factual insights, with citations backed by 250M+ verified research articles, directly within your writing interface with the option to save relevant references in your Citation Library. By eliminating the need to switch tabs to find answers to all your research questions, Paperpal saves time and helps you stay focused on your writing.
Hereâs how to use the Research feature:
- Ask a question: Get started with a new document on paperpal.com. Click on the “Research” feature and type your question in plain English. Paperpal will scour over 250 million research articles, including conference papers and preprints, to provide you with accurate insights and citations.Â
- Review and Save: Paperpal summarizes the information, while citing sources and listing relevant reads. You can quickly scan the results to identify relevant references and save these directly to your built-in citations library for later access.
- Cite with Confidence: Paperpal makes it easy to incorporate relevant citations and references into your writing, ensuring your arguments are well-supported by credible sources. This translates to a polished, well-researched literature review.
The literature review sample and detailed advice on writing and conducting a review will help you produce a well-structured report. But remember that a good literature review is an ongoing process, and it may be necessary to revisit and update it as your research progresses. By combining effortless research with an easy citation process, Paperpal Research streamlines the literature review process and empowers you to write faster and with more confidence. Try Paperpal Research now and see for yourself. Â
Frequently asked questions
A literature review is a critical and comprehensive analysis of existing literature (published and unpublished works) on a specific topic or research question and provides a synthesis of the current state of knowledge in a particular field. A well-conducted literature review is crucial for researchers to build upon existing knowledge, avoid duplication of efforts, and contribute to the advancement of their field. It also helps researchers situate their work within a broader context and facilitates the development of a sound theoretical and conceptual framework for their studies.
Literature review is a crucial component of research writing, providing a solid background for a research paperâs investigation. The aim is to keep professionals up to date by providing an understanding of ongoing developments within a specific field, including research methods, and experimental techniques used in that field, and present that knowledge in the form of a written report. Also, the depth and breadth of the literature review emphasizes the credibility of the scholar in his or her field. Â
Before writing a literature review, it’s essential to undertake several preparatory steps to ensure that your review is well-researched, organized, and focused. This includes choosing a topic of general interest to you and doing exploratory research on that topic, writing an annotated bibliography, and noting major points, especially those that relate to the position you have taken on the topic.Â
Literature reviews and academic research papers are essential components of scholarly work but serve different purposes within the academic realm. 3 A literature review aims to provide a foundation for understanding the current state of research on a particular topic, identify gaps or controversies, and lay the groundwork for future research. Therefore, it draws heavily from existing academic sources, including books, journal articles, and other scholarly publications. In contrast, an academic research paper aims to present new knowledge, contribute to the academic discourse, and advance the understanding of a specific research question. Therefore, it involves a mix of existing literature (in the introduction and literature review sections) and original data or findings obtained through research methods.Â
Literature reviews are essential components of academic and research papers, and various strategies can be employed to conduct them effectively. If you want to know how to write a literature review for a research paper, here are four common approaches that are often used by researchers. Chronological Review: This strategy involves organizing the literature based on the chronological order of publication. It helps to trace the development of a topic over time, showing how ideas, theories, and research have evolved. Thematic Review: Thematic reviews focus on identifying and analyzing themes or topics that cut across different studies. Instead of organizing the literature chronologically, it is grouped by key themes or concepts, allowing for a comprehensive exploration of various aspects of the topic. Methodological Review: This strategy involves organizing the literature based on the research methods employed in different studies. It helps to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of various methodologies and allows the reader to evaluate the reliability and validity of the research findings. Theoretical Review: A theoretical review examines the literature based on the theoretical frameworks used in different studies. This approach helps to identify the key theories that have been applied to the topic and assess their contributions to the understanding of the subject. It’s important to note that these strategies are not mutually exclusive, and a literature review may combine elements of more than one approach. The choice of strategy depends on the research question, the nature of the literature available, and the goals of the review. Additionally, other strategies, such as integrative reviews or systematic reviews, may be employed depending on the specific requirements of the research.
The literature review format can vary depending on the specific publication guidelines. However, there are some common elements and structures that are often followed. Here is a general guideline for the format of a literature review: Introduction:  Provide an overview of the topic. Define the scope and purpose of the literature review. State the research question or objective. Body:  Organize the literature by themes, concepts, or chronology. Critically analyze and evaluate each source. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the studies. Highlight any methodological limitations or biases. Identify patterns, connections, or contradictions in the existing research. Conclusion:  Summarize the key points discussed in the literature review. Highlight the research gap. Address the research question or objective stated in the introduction. Highlight the contributions of the review and suggest directions for future research.
Both annotated bibliographies and literature reviews involve the examination of scholarly sources. While annotated bibliographies focus on individual sources with brief annotations, literature reviews provide a more in-depth, integrated, and comprehensive analysis of existing literature on a specific topic. The key differences are as follows:Â
Annotated Bibliography | Literature Review | |
Purpose | List of citations of books, articles, and other sources with a brief description (annotation) of each source. | Comprehensive and critical analysis of existing literature on a specific topic. |
Focus | Summary and evaluation of each source, including its relevance, methodology, and key findings. | Provides an overview of the current state of knowledge on a particular subject and identifies gaps, trends, and patterns in existing literature. |
Structure | Each citation is followed by a concise paragraph (annotation) that describes the source’s content, methodology, and its contribution to the topic. | The literature review is organized thematically or chronologically and involves a synthesis of the findings from different sources to build a narrative or argument. |
Length | Typically 100-200 words | Length of literature review ranges from a few pages to several chapters |
Independence | Each source is treated separately, with less emphasis on synthesizing the information across sources. | The writer synthesizes information from multiple sources to present a cohesive overview of the topic. |
References
- Denney, A. S., & Tewksbury, R. (2013). How to write a literature review.⯠Journal of criminal justice education ,⯠24 (2), 218-234.
- Pan, M. L. (2016).⯠Preparing literature reviews: Qualitative and quantitative approaches . Taylor & Francis.
- Cantero, C. (2019). How to write a literature review.⯠San José State University Writing Center .
Paperpal is an AI writing assistant that help academics write better, faster with real-time suggestions for in-depth language and grammar correction. Trained on millions of research manuscripts enhanced by professional academic editors, Paperpal delivers human precision at machine speed.
Try it for free or upgrade to⯠Paperpal Prime , which unlocks unlimited access to premium features like academic translation, paraphrasing, contextual synonyms, consistency checks and more. Itâs like always having a professional academic editor by your side! Go beyond limitations and experience the future of academic writing.⯠Get Paperpal Prime now at just US$19 a month!
Related Reads:
- Empirical Research: A Comprehensive Guide for AcademicsÂ
- How to Write a Scientific Paper in 10 StepsÂ
- How Long Should a Chapter Be?
- How to Use Paperpal to Generate Emails & Cover Letters?
6 Tips for Post-Doc Researchers to Take Their Career to the Next Level
Self-plagiarism in research: what it is and how to avoid it, you may also like, academic integrity vs academic dishonesty: types & examples, dissertation printing and binding | types & comparison , what is a dissertation preface definition and examples , the ai revolution: authors’ role in upholding academic..., the future of academia: how ai tools are..., how to write a research proposal: (with examples..., how to write your research paper in apa..., how to choose a dissertation topic, how to write a phd research proposal, how to write an academic paragraph (step-by-step guide).
Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWLÂź College of Liberal Arts
Writing a Literature Review
![review of literature in research papers OWL logo](https://owl.purdue.edu/images/logos/owllogo_black.png)
Welcome to the Purdue OWL
This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.
Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.
A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and plays). When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about the research ( scholarship ) in a given field. You will often see the terms “the research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably.
Where, when, and why would I write a lit review?
There are a number of different situations where you might write a literature review, each with slightly different expectations; different disciplines, too, have field-specific expectations for what a literature review is and does. For instance, in the humanities, authors might include more overt argumentation and interpretation of source material in their literature reviews, whereas in the sciences, authors are more likely to report study designs and results in their literature reviews; these differences reflect these disciplines’ purposes and conventions in scholarship. You should always look at examples from your own discipline and talk to professors or mentors in your field to be sure you understand your discipline’s conventions, for literature reviews as well as for any other genre.
A literature review can be a part of a research paper or scholarly article, usually falling after the introduction and before the research methods sections. In these cases, the lit review just needs to cover scholarship that is important to the issue you are writing about; sometimes it will also cover key sources that informed your research methodology.
Lit reviews can also be standalone pieces, either as assignments in a class or as publications. In a class, a lit review may be assigned to help students familiarize themselves with a topic and with scholarship in their field, get an idea of the other researchers working on the topic they’re interested in, find gaps in existing research in order to propose new projects, and/or develop a theoretical framework and methodology for later research. As a publication, a lit review usually is meant to help make other scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing, synthesizing, and analyzing existing research on a topic. This can be especially helpful for students or scholars getting into a new research area, or for directing an entire community of scholars toward questions that have not yet been answered.
What are the parts of a lit review?
Most lit reviews use a basic introduction-body-conclusion structure; if your lit review is part of a larger paper, the introduction and conclusion pieces may be just a few sentences while you focus most of your attention on the body. If your lit review is a standalone piece, the introduction and conclusion take up more space and give you a place to discuss your goals, research methods, and conclusions separately from where you discuss the literature itself.
Introduction:
- An introductory paragraph that explains what your working topic and thesis is
- A forecast of key topics or texts that will appear in the review
- Potentially, a description of how you found sources and how you analyzed them for inclusion and discussion in the review (more often found in published, standalone literature reviews than in lit review sections in an article or research paper)
- Summarize and synthesize: Give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
- Analyze and interpret: Don’t just paraphrase other researchers – add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
- Critically Evaluate: Mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
- Write in well-structured paragraphs: Use transition words and topic sentence to draw connections, comparisons, and contrasts.
Conclusion:
- Summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance
- Connect it back to your primary research question
How should I organize my lit review?
Lit reviews can take many different organizational patterns depending on what you are trying to accomplish with the review. Here are some examples:
- Chronological : The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time, which helps familiarize the audience with the topic (for instance if you are introducing something that is not commonly known in your field). If you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order. Try to analyze the patterns, turning points, and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred (as mentioned previously, this may not be appropriate in your discipline — check with a teacher or mentor if you’re unsure).
- Thematic : If you have found some recurring central themes that you will continue working with throughout your piece, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic. For example, if you are reviewing literature about women and religion, key themes can include the role of women in churches and the religious attitude towards women.
- Qualitative versus quantitative research
- Empirical versus theoretical scholarship
- Divide the research by sociological, historical, or cultural sources
- Theoretical : In many humanities articles, the literature review is the foundation for the theoretical framework. You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts. You can argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach or combine various theorical concepts to create a framework for your research.
What are some strategies or tips I can use while writing my lit review?
Any lit review is only as good as the research it discusses; make sure your sources are well-chosen and your research is thorough. Don’t be afraid to do more research if you discover a new thread as you’re writing. More info on the research process is available in our "Conducting Research" resources .
As you’re doing your research, create an annotated bibliography ( see our page on the this type of document ). Much of the information used in an annotated bibliography can be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting your lit review as you research, but also developing your sense of the larger conversation going on among scholars, professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic.
Usually you will need to synthesize research rather than just summarizing it. This means drawing connections between sources to create a picture of the scholarly conversation on a topic over time. Many student writers struggle to synthesize because they feel they don’t have anything to add to the scholars they are citing; here are some strategies to help you:
- It often helps to remember that the point of these kinds of syntheses is to show your readers how you understand your research, to help them read the rest of your paper.
- Writing teachers often say synthesis is like hosting a dinner party: imagine all your sources are together in a room, discussing your topic. What are they saying to each other?
- Look at the in-text citations in each paragraph. Are you citing just one source for each paragraph? This usually indicates summary only. When you have multiple sources cited in a paragraph, you are more likely to be synthesizing them (not always, but often
- Read more about synthesis here.
The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all situations). Often, the literature review is where you can establish your research as filling a particular gap or as relevant in a particular way. You have some chance to do this in your introduction in an article, but the literature review section gives a more extended opportunity to establish the conversation in the way you would like your readers to see it. You can choose the intellectual lineage you would like to be part of and whose definitions matter most to your thinking (mostly humanities-specific, but this goes for sciences as well). In addressing these points, you argue for your place in the conversation, which tends to make the lit review more compelling than a simple reporting of other sources.
Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
- Knowledge Base
Methodology
- How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates
How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates
Published on January 2, 2023 by Shona McCombes . Revised on September 11, 2023.
What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research that you can later apply to your paper, thesis, or dissertation topic .
There are five key steps to writing a literature review:
- Search for relevant literature
- Evaluate sources
- Identify themes, debates, and gaps
- Outline the structure
- Write your literature review
A good literature review doesnât just summarize sourcesâit analyzes, synthesizes , and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.
Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text
Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes
![review of literature in research papers upload-your-document-ai-proofreader](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/grammar-check.webp)
Table of contents
What is the purpose of a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1 – search for relevant literature, step 2 – evaluate and select sources, step 3 – identify themes, debates, and gaps, step 4 – outline your literature reviewâs structure, step 5 – write your literature review, free lecture slides, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions, introduction.
- Quick Run-through
- Step 1 & 2
When you write a thesis , dissertation , or research paper , you will likely have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives you a chance to:
- Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and its scholarly context
- Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
- Position your work in relation to other researchers and theorists
- Show how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate
- Evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of the scholarly debates around your topic.
Writing literature reviews is a particularly important skill if you want to apply for graduate school or pursue a career in research. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below.
![review of literature in research papers Literature review guide](https://www.scribbr.nl/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Literature-review-guide.webp)
Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting
Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:
- Academic style
- Vague sentences
- Style consistency
See an example
![review of literature in research papers review of literature in research papers](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/dissertation-proofreading-service.png)
Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging! A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.
- Example literature review #1: “Why Do People Migrate? A Review of the Theoretical Literature” ( Theoretical literature review about the development of economic migration theory from the 1950s to today.)
- Example literature review #2: “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines” ( Methodological literature review about interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition and production.)
- Example literature review #3: “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Thematic literature review about the effects of technology on language acquisition.)
- Example literature review #4: “Learnersâ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Chronological literature review about how the concept of listening skills has changed over time.)
You can also check out our templates with literature review examples and sample outlines at the links below.
Download Word doc Download Google doc
Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic .
If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research problem and questions .
Make a list of keywords
Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research question. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list as you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.
- Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok
- Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
- Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth
Search for relevant sources
Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some useful databases to search for journals and articles include:
- Your universityâs library catalogue
- Google Scholar
- Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
- Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)
- EconLit (economics)
- Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science)
You can also use boolean operators to help narrow down your search.
Make sure to read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.
You likely wonât be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on your topic, so it will be necessary to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your research question.
For each publication, ask yourself:
- What question or problem is the author addressing?
- What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
- What are the key theories, models, and methods?
- Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach?
- What are the results and conclusions of the study?
- How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge?
- What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?
Make sure the sources you use are credible , and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.
You can use our template to summarize and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using. Click on either button below to download.
Take notes and cite your sources
As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.
It is important to keep track of your sources with citations to avoid plagiarism . It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography , where you compile full citation information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process.
Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.
To begin organizing your literature reviewâs argument and structure, be sure you understand the connections and relationships between the sources youâve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:
- Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time?
- Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
- Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
- Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field?
- Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed?
This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge.
- Most research has focused on young women.
- There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media.
- But there is still a lack of robust research on highly visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchatâthis is a gap that you could address in your own research.
There are various approaches to organizing the body of a literature review. Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).
Chronological
The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order.
Try to analyze patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.
If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.
For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access.
Methodological
If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods , you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. For example:
- Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
- Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
- Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources
Theoretical
A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework . You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.
You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.
Like any other academic text , your literature review should have an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion . What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review.
The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.
Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach.
As you write, you can follow these tips:
- Summarize and synthesize: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
- Analyze and interpret: donât just paraphrase other researchers â add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
- Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
- Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transition words and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts
In the conclusion, you should summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance.
When you’ve finished writing and revising your literature review, don’t forget to proofread thoroughly before submitting. Not a language expert? Check out Scribbr’s professional proofreading services !
This article has been adapted into lecture slides that you can use to teach your students about writing a literature review.
Scribbr slides are free to use, customize, and distribute for educational purposes.
Open Google Slides Download PowerPoint
If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
- Sampling methods
- Simple random sampling
- Stratified sampling
- Cluster sampling
- Likert scales
- Reproducibility
 Statistics
- Null hypothesis
- Statistical power
- Probability distribution
- Effect size
- Poisson distribution
Research bias
- Optimism bias
- Cognitive bias
- Implicit bias
- Hawthorne effect
- Anchoring bias
- Explicit bias
A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .
It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation , or research paper , in order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge.
There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:
- To familiarize yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
- To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
- To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
- To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
- To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic
Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.
The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your thesis or dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .
A literature review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations , theses, and research papers . Literature reviews give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant theories and methods, as well as gaps in existing research. Literature reviews are set up similarly to other academic texts , with an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion .
An annotated bibliography is a list of source references that has a short description (called an annotation ) for each of the sources. It is often assigned as part of the research process for a paper . Â
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the âCite this Scribbr articleâ button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
McCombes, S. (2023, September 11). How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved August 26, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/literature-review/
Is this article helpful?
Shona McCombes
Other students also liked, what is a theoretical framework | guide to organizing, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, how to write a research proposal | examples & templates, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".
I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”
- Privacy Policy
![review of literature in research papers Research Method](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/logo.png)
Home » Literature Review – Types Writing Guide and Examples
Literature Review – Types Writing Guide and Examples
Table of Contents
![review of literature in research papers Literature Review](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Literature_Review-1024x576.jpg)
Literature Review
Definition:
A literature review is a comprehensive and critical analysis of the existing literature on a particular topic or research question. It involves identifying, evaluating, and synthesizing relevant literature, including scholarly articles, books, and other sources, to provide a summary and critical assessment of what is known about the topic.
Types of Literature Review
Types of Literature Review are as follows:
- Narrative literature review : This type of review involves a comprehensive summary and critical analysis of the available literature on a particular topic or research question. It is often used as an introductory section of a research paper.
- Systematic literature review: This is a rigorous and structured review that follows a pre-defined protocol to identify, evaluate, and synthesize all relevant studies on a specific research question. It is often used in evidence-based practice and systematic reviews.
- Meta-analysis: This is a quantitative review that uses statistical methods to combine data from multiple studies to derive a summary effect size. It provides a more precise estimate of the overall effect than any individual study.
- Scoping review: This is a preliminary review that aims to map the existing literature on a broad topic area to identify research gaps and areas for further investigation.
- Critical literature review : This type of review evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the existing literature on a particular topic or research question. It aims to provide a critical analysis of the literature and identify areas where further research is needed.
- Conceptual literature review: This review synthesizes and integrates theories and concepts from multiple sources to provide a new perspective on a particular topic. It aims to provide a theoretical framework for understanding a particular research question.
- Rapid literature review: This is a quick review that provides a snapshot of the current state of knowledge on a specific research question or topic. It is often used when time and resources are limited.
- Thematic literature review : This review identifies and analyzes common themes and patterns across a body of literature on a particular topic. It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature and identify key themes and concepts.
- Realist literature review: This review is often used in social science research and aims to identify how and why certain interventions work in certain contexts. It takes into account the context and complexities of real-world situations.
- State-of-the-art literature review : This type of review provides an overview of the current state of knowledge in a particular field, highlighting the most recent and relevant research. It is often used in fields where knowledge is rapidly evolving, such as technology or medicine.
- Integrative literature review: This type of review synthesizes and integrates findings from multiple studies on a particular topic to identify patterns, themes, and gaps in the literature. It aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current state of knowledge on a particular topic.
- Umbrella literature review : This review is used to provide a broad overview of a large and diverse body of literature on a particular topic. It aims to identify common themes and patterns across different areas of research.
- Historical literature review: This type of review examines the historical development of research on a particular topic or research question. It aims to provide a historical context for understanding the current state of knowledge on a particular topic.
- Problem-oriented literature review : This review focuses on a specific problem or issue and examines the literature to identify potential solutions or interventions. It aims to provide practical recommendations for addressing a particular problem or issue.
- Mixed-methods literature review : This type of review combines quantitative and qualitative methods to synthesize and analyze the available literature on a particular topic. It aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the research question by combining different types of evidence.
Parts of Literature Review
Parts of a literature review are as follows:
Introduction
The introduction of a literature review typically provides background information on the research topic and why it is important. It outlines the objectives of the review, the research question or hypothesis, and the scope of the review.
Literature Search
This section outlines the search strategy and databases used to identify relevant literature. The search terms used, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and any limitations of the search are described.
Literature Analysis
The literature analysis is the main body of the literature review. This section summarizes and synthesizes the literature that is relevant to the research question or hypothesis. The review should be organized thematically, chronologically, or by methodology, depending on the research objectives.
Critical Evaluation
Critical evaluation involves assessing the quality and validity of the literature. This includes evaluating the reliability and validity of the studies reviewed, the methodology used, and the strength of the evidence.
The conclusion of the literature review should summarize the main findings, identify any gaps in the literature, and suggest areas for future research. It should also reiterate the importance of the research question or hypothesis and the contribution of the literature review to the overall research project.
The references list includes all the sources cited in the literature review, and follows a specific referencing style (e.g., APA, MLA, Harvard).
How to write Literature Review
Here are some steps to follow when writing a literature review:
- Define your research question or topic : Before starting your literature review, it is essential to define your research question or topic. This will help you identify relevant literature and determine the scope of your review.
- Conduct a comprehensive search: Use databases and search engines to find relevant literature. Look for peer-reviewed articles, books, and other academic sources that are relevant to your research question or topic.
- Evaluate the sources: Once you have found potential sources, evaluate them critically to determine their relevance, credibility, and quality. Look for recent publications, reputable authors, and reliable sources of data and evidence.
- Organize your sources: Group the sources by theme, method, or research question. This will help you identify similarities and differences among the literature, and provide a structure for your literature review.
- Analyze and synthesize the literature : Analyze each source in depth, identifying the key findings, methodologies, and conclusions. Then, synthesize the information from the sources, identifying patterns and themes in the literature.
- Write the literature review : Start with an introduction that provides an overview of the topic and the purpose of the literature review. Then, organize the literature according to your chosen structure, and analyze and synthesize the sources. Finally, provide a conclusion that summarizes the key findings of the literature review, identifies gaps in knowledge, and suggests areas for future research.
- Edit and proofread: Once you have written your literature review, edit and proofread it carefully to ensure that it is well-organized, clear, and concise.
Examples of Literature Review
Here’s an example of how a literature review can be conducted for a thesis on the topic of “ The Impact of Social Media on Teenagers’ Mental Health”:
- Start by identifying the key terms related to your research topic. In this case, the key terms are “social media,” “teenagers,” and “mental health.”
- Use academic databases like Google Scholar, JSTOR, or PubMed to search for relevant articles, books, and other publications. Use these keywords in your search to narrow down your results.
- Evaluate the sources you find to determine if they are relevant to your research question. You may want to consider the publication date, author’s credentials, and the journal or book publisher.
- Begin reading and taking notes on each source, paying attention to key findings, methodologies used, and any gaps in the research.
- Organize your findings into themes or categories. For example, you might categorize your sources into those that examine the impact of social media on self-esteem, those that explore the effects of cyberbullying, and those that investigate the relationship between social media use and depression.
- Synthesize your findings by summarizing the key themes and highlighting any gaps or inconsistencies in the research. Identify areas where further research is needed.
- Use your literature review to inform your research questions and hypotheses for your thesis.
For example, after conducting a literature review on the impact of social media on teenagers’ mental health, a thesis might look like this:
“Using a mixed-methods approach, this study aims to investigate the relationship between social media use and mental health outcomes in teenagers. Specifically, the study will examine the effects of cyberbullying, social comparison, and excessive social media use on self-esteem, anxiety, and depression. Through an analysis of survey data and qualitative interviews with teenagers, the study will provide insight into the complex relationship between social media use and mental health outcomes, and identify strategies for promoting positive mental health outcomes in young people.”
Reference: Smith, J., Jones, M., & Lee, S. (2019). The effects of social media use on adolescent mental health: A systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 65(2), 154-165. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.03.024
Reference Example: Author, A. A., Author, B. B., & Author, C. C. (Year). Title of article. Title of Journal, volume number(issue number), page range. doi:0000000/000000000000 or URL
Applications of Literature Review
some applications of literature review in different fields:
- Social Sciences: In social sciences, literature reviews are used to identify gaps in existing research, to develop research questions, and to provide a theoretical framework for research. Literature reviews are commonly used in fields such as sociology, psychology, anthropology, and political science.
- Natural Sciences: In natural sciences, literature reviews are used to summarize and evaluate the current state of knowledge in a particular field or subfield. Literature reviews can help researchers identify areas where more research is needed and provide insights into the latest developments in a particular field. Fields such as biology, chemistry, and physics commonly use literature reviews.
- Health Sciences: In health sciences, literature reviews are used to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments, identify best practices, and determine areas where more research is needed. Literature reviews are commonly used in fields such as medicine, nursing, and public health.
- Humanities: In humanities, literature reviews are used to identify gaps in existing knowledge, develop new interpretations of texts or cultural artifacts, and provide a theoretical framework for research. Literature reviews are commonly used in fields such as history, literary studies, and philosophy.
Role of Literature Review in Research
Here are some applications of literature review in research:
- Identifying Research Gaps : Literature review helps researchers identify gaps in existing research and literature related to their research question. This allows them to develop new research questions and hypotheses to fill those gaps.
- Developing Theoretical Framework: Literature review helps researchers develop a theoretical framework for their research. By analyzing and synthesizing existing literature, researchers can identify the key concepts, theories, and models that are relevant to their research.
- Selecting Research Methods : Literature review helps researchers select appropriate research methods and techniques based on previous research. It also helps researchers to identify potential biases or limitations of certain methods and techniques.
- Data Collection and Analysis: Literature review helps researchers in data collection and analysis by providing a foundation for the development of data collection instruments and methods. It also helps researchers to identify relevant data sources and identify potential data analysis techniques.
- Communicating Results: Literature review helps researchers to communicate their results effectively by providing a context for their research. It also helps to justify the significance of their findings in relation to existing research and literature.
Purpose of Literature Review
Some of the specific purposes of a literature review are as follows:
- To provide context: A literature review helps to provide context for your research by situating it within the broader body of literature on the topic.
- To identify gaps and inconsistencies: A literature review helps to identify areas where further research is needed or where there are inconsistencies in the existing literature.
- To synthesize information: A literature review helps to synthesize the information from multiple sources and present a coherent and comprehensive picture of the current state of knowledge on the topic.
- To identify key concepts and theories : A literature review helps to identify key concepts and theories that are relevant to your research question and provide a theoretical framework for your study.
- To inform research design: A literature review can inform the design of your research study by identifying appropriate research methods, data sources, and research questions.
Characteristics of Literature Review
Some Characteristics of Literature Review are as follows:
- Identifying gaps in knowledge: A literature review helps to identify gaps in the existing knowledge and research on a specific topic or research question. By analyzing and synthesizing the literature, you can identify areas where further research is needed and where new insights can be gained.
- Establishing the significance of your research: A literature review helps to establish the significance of your own research by placing it in the context of existing research. By demonstrating the relevance of your research to the existing literature, you can establish its importance and value.
- Informing research design and methodology : A literature review helps to inform research design and methodology by identifying the most appropriate research methods, techniques, and instruments. By reviewing the literature, you can identify the strengths and limitations of different research methods and techniques, and select the most appropriate ones for your own research.
- Supporting arguments and claims: A literature review provides evidence to support arguments and claims made in academic writing. By citing and analyzing the literature, you can provide a solid foundation for your own arguments and claims.
- I dentifying potential collaborators and mentors: A literature review can help identify potential collaborators and mentors by identifying researchers and practitioners who are working on related topics or using similar methods. By building relationships with these individuals, you can gain valuable insights and support for your own research and practice.
- Keeping up-to-date with the latest research : A literature review helps to keep you up-to-date with the latest research on a specific topic or research question. By regularly reviewing the literature, you can stay informed about the latest findings and developments in your field.
Advantages of Literature Review
There are several advantages to conducting a literature review as part of a research project, including:
- Establishing the significance of the research : A literature review helps to establish the significance of the research by demonstrating the gap or problem in the existing literature that the study aims to address.
- Identifying key concepts and theories: A literature review can help to identify key concepts and theories that are relevant to the research question, and provide a theoretical framework for the study.
- Supporting the research methodology : A literature review can inform the research methodology by identifying appropriate research methods, data sources, and research questions.
- Providing a comprehensive overview of the literature : A literature review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on a topic, allowing the researcher to identify key themes, debates, and areas of agreement or disagreement.
- Identifying potential research questions: A literature review can help to identify potential research questions and areas for further investigation.
- Avoiding duplication of research: A literature review can help to avoid duplication of research by identifying what has already been done on a topic, and what remains to be done.
- Enhancing the credibility of the research : A literature review helps to enhance the credibility of the research by demonstrating the researcher’s knowledge of the existing literature and their ability to situate their research within a broader context.
Limitations of Literature Review
Limitations of Literature Review are as follows:
- Limited scope : Literature reviews can only cover the existing literature on a particular topic, which may be limited in scope or depth.
- Publication bias : Literature reviews may be influenced by publication bias, which occurs when researchers are more likely to publish positive results than negative ones. This can lead to an incomplete or biased picture of the literature.
- Quality of sources : The quality of the literature reviewed can vary widely, and not all sources may be reliable or valid.
- Time-limited: Literature reviews can become quickly outdated as new research is published, making it difficult to keep up with the latest developments in a field.
- Subjective interpretation : Literature reviews can be subjective, and the interpretation of the findings can vary depending on the researcher’s perspective or bias.
- Lack of original data : Literature reviews do not generate new data, but rather rely on the analysis of existing studies.
- Risk of plagiarism: It is important to ensure that literature reviews do not inadvertently contain plagiarism, which can occur when researchers use the work of others without proper attribution.
About the author
Muhammad Hassan
Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer
You may also like
![review of literature in research papers Research Paper](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Research_Paper-145x100.png)
Research Paper – Structure, Examples and Writing...
![review of literature in research papers Research Techniques](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Research_Techniques-145x100.png)
Research Techniques – Methods, Types and Examples
![review of literature in research papers Delimitations](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Delimitations_in_Research-145x100.png)
Delimitations in Research – Types, Examples and...
![review of literature in research papers Research Methods](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Research_Methods-145x100.png)
Research Methods – Types, Examples and Guide
![review of literature in research papers Research Findings](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Research_Findings-145x100.png)
Research Findings – Types Examples and Writing...
![review of literature in research papers Ethical Considerations](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Ethical_Considerations-145x100.png)
Ethical Considerations – Types, Examples and...
Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.
- Knowledge Base
- Dissertation
- What is a Literature Review? | Guide, Template, & Examples
What is a Literature Review? | Guide, Template, & Examples
Published on 22 February 2022 by Shona McCombes . Revised on 7 June 2022.
What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research.
There are five key steps to writing a literature review:
- Search for relevant literature
- Evaluate sources
- Identify themes, debates and gaps
- Outline the structure
- Write your literature review
A good literature review doesnât just summarise sources â it analyses, synthesises, and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.
Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text
Be assured that you'll submit flawless writing. Upload your document to correct all your mistakes.
![review of literature in research papers upload-your-document-ai-proofreader](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/grammar-check.webp)
Table of contents
Why write a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1: search for relevant literature, step 2: evaluate and select sources, step 3: identify themes, debates and gaps, step 4: outline your literature reviewâs structure, step 5: write your literature review, frequently asked questions about literature reviews, introduction.
- Quick Run-through
- Step 1 & 2
When you write a dissertation or thesis, you will have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives you a chance to:
- Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and scholarly context
- Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
- Position yourself in relation to other researchers and theorists
- Show how your dissertation addresses a gap or contributes to a debate
You might also have to write a literature review as a stand-alone assignment. In this case, the purpose is to evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of scholarly debates around a topic.
The content will look slightly different in each case, but the process of conducting a literature review follows the same steps. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below.
![review of literature in research papers Literature review guide](https://www.scribbr.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Literature-review-guide.webp)
Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.
Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging! A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.
- Example literature review #1: “Why Do People Migrate? A Review of the Theoretical Literature” ( Theoretical literature review about the development of economic migration theory from the 1950s to today.)
- Example literature review #2: “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines” ( Methodological literature review about interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition and production.)
- Example literature review #3: “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Thematic literature review about the effects of technology on language acquisition.)
- Example literature review #4: “Learnersâ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Chronological literature review about how the concept of listening skills has changed over time.)
You can also check out our templates with literature review examples and sample outlines at the links below.
Download Word doc Download Google doc
Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic .
If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research objectives and questions .
If you are writing a literature review as a stand-alone assignment, you will have to choose a focus and develop a central question to direct your search. Unlike a dissertation research question, this question has to be answerable without collecting original data. You should be able to answer it based only on a review of existing publications.
Make a list of keywords
Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research topic. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list if you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.
- Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok
- Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
- Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth
Search for relevant sources
Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some databases to search for journals and articles include:
- Your universityâs library catalogue
- Google Scholar
- Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
- Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)
- EconLit (economics)
- Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science)
You can use boolean operators to help narrow down your search:
Read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.
To identify the most important publications on your topic, take note of recurring citations. If the same authors, books or articles keep appearing in your reading, make sure to seek them out.
You probably wonât be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on the topic â you’ll have to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your questions.
For each publication, ask yourself:
- What question or problem is the author addressing?
- What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
- What are the key theories, models and methods? Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach?
- What are the results and conclusions of the study?
- How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge?
- How does the publication contribute to your understanding of the topic? What are its key insights and arguments?
- What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?
Make sure the sources you use are credible, and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.
You can find out how many times an article has been cited on Google Scholar â a high citation count means the article has been influential in the field, and should certainly be included in your literature review.
The scope of your review will depend on your topic and discipline: in the sciences you usually only review recent literature, but in the humanities you might take a long historical perspective (for example, to trace how a concept has changed in meaning over time).
Remember that you can use our template to summarise and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using!
Take notes and cite your sources
As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.
It’s important to keep track of your sources with references to avoid plagiarism . It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography, where you compile full reference information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process.
You can use our free APA Reference Generator for quick, correct, consistent citations.
To begin organising your literature reviewâs argument and structure, you need to understand the connections and relationships between the sources youâve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:
- Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time?
- Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
- Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
- Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field?
- Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed?
This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge.
- Most research has focused on young women.
- There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media.
- But there is still a lack of robust research on highly-visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat â this is a gap that you could address in your own research.
There are various approaches to organising the body of a literature review. You should have a rough idea of your strategy before you start writing.
Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).
Chronological
The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarising sources in order.
Try to analyse patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.
If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organise your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.
For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access.
Methodological
If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods , you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. For example:
- Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
- Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
- Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources
Theoretical
A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework . You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.
You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.
Like any other academic text, your literature review should have an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion . What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review.
The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.
If you are writing the literature review as part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate your central problem or research question and give a brief summary of the scholarly context. You can emphasise the timeliness of the topic (âmany recent studies have focused on the problem of xâ) or highlight a gap in the literature (âwhile there has been much research on x, few researchers have taken y into considerationâ).
Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach.
As you write, make sure to follow these tips:
- Summarise and synthesise: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole.
- Analyse and interpret: donât just paraphrase other researchers â add your own interpretations, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole.
- Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources.
- Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transitions and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts.
In the conclusion, you should summarise the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasise their significance.
If the literature review is part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate how your research addresses gaps and contributes new knowledge, or discuss how you have drawn on existing theories and methods to build a framework for your research. This can lead directly into your methodology section.
A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .
It is often written as part of a dissertation , thesis, research paper , or proposal .
There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:
- To familiarise yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
- To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
- To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
- To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
- To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic
Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.
The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your  dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the âCite this Scribbr articleâ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.
McCombes, S. (2022, June 07). What is a Literature Review? | Guide, Template, & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 26 August 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/thesis-dissertation/literature-review/
Is this article helpful?
Shona McCombes
Other students also liked, how to write a dissertation proposal | a step-by-step guide, what is a theoretical framework | a step-by-step guide, what is a research methodology | steps & tips.
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
- View all journals
- Explore content
- About the journal
- Publish with us
- Sign up for alerts
- CAREER FEATURE
- 04 December 2020
- Correction 09 December 2020
How to write a superb literature review
Andy Tay is a freelance writer based in Singapore.
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
![review of literature in research papers Colourful bookmarks on note pads](https://media.nature.com/lw767/magazine-assets/d41586-020-03422-x/d41586-020-03422-x_18645256.jpg)
Credit: Getty
Literature reviews are important resources for scientists. They provide historical context for a field while offering opinions on its future trajectory. Creating them can provide inspiration for oneâs own research, as well as some practice in writing. But few scientists are trained in how to write a review â or in what constitutes an excellent one. Even picking the appropriate software to use can be an involved decision (see âTools and techniquesâ). So Nature asked editors and working scientists with well-cited reviews for their tips.
WENTING ZHAO: Be focused and avoid jargon
Assistant professor of chemical and biomedical engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
When I was a research student, review writing improved my understanding of the history of my field. I also learnt about unmet challenges in the field that triggered ideas.
For example, while writing my first review 1 as a PhD student, I was frustrated by how poorly we understood how cells actively sense, interact with and adapt to nanoparticles used in drug delivery. This experience motivated me to study how the surface properties of nanoparticles can be modified to enhance biological sensing. When I transitioned to my postdoctoral research, this question led me to discover the role of cell-membrane curvature, which led to publications and my current research focus. I wouldnât have started in this area without writing that review.
![review of literature in research papers](https://media.nature.com/w400/magazine-assets/d41586-020-03422-x/d41586-020-03422-x_17947370.jpg)
Collection: Careers toolkit
A common problem for students writing their first reviews is being overly ambitious. When I wrote mine, I imagined producing a comprehensive summary of every single type of nanomaterial used in biological applications. It ended up becoming a colossal piece of work, with too many papers discussed and without a clear way to categorize them. We published the work in the end, but decided to limit the discussion strictly to nanoparticles for biological sensing, rather than covering how different nanomaterials are used in biology.
My advice to students is to accept that a review is unlike a textbook: it should offer a more focused discussion, and itâs OK to skip some topics so that you do not distract your readers. Students should also consider editorial deadlines, especially for invited reviews: make sure that the reviewâs scope is not so extensive that it delays the writing.
A good review should also avoid jargon and explain the basic concepts for someone who is new to the field. Although I trained as an engineer, Iâm interested in biology, and my research is about developing nanomaterials to manipulate proteins at the cell membrane and how this can affect ageing and cancer. As an âoutsiderâ, the reviews that I find most useful for these biological topics are those that speak to me in accessible scientific language.
![review of literature in research papers A man in glasses looking at the camera.](https://media.nature.com/lw767/magazine-assets/d41586-020-03422-x/d41586-020-03422-x_18645262.jpg)
Bozhi Tian likes to get a variety of perspectives into a review. Credit: Aleksander Prominski
BOZHI TIAN: Have a process and develop your style
Associate professor of chemistry, University of Chicago, Illinois.
In my lab, we start by asking: what is the purpose of this review? My reasons for writing one can include the chance to contribute insights to the scientific community and identify opportunities for my research. I also see review writing as a way to train early-career researchers in soft skills such as project management and leadership. This is especially true for lead authors, because they will learn to work with their co-authors to integrate the various sections into a piece with smooth transitions and no overlaps.
After we have identified the need and purpose of a review article, I will form a team from the researchers in my lab. I try to include students with different areas of expertise, because it is useful to get a variety of perspectives. For example, in the review âAn atlas of nano-enabled neural interfacesâ 2 , we had authors with backgrounds in biophysics, neuroengineering, neurobiology and materials sciences focusing on different sections of the review.
After this, I will discuss an outline with my team. We go through multiple iterations to make sure that we have scanned the literature sufficiently and do not repeat discussions that have appeared in other reviews. It is also important that the outline is not decided by me alone: students often have fresh ideas that they can bring to the table. Once this is done, we proceed with the writing.
I often remind my students to imagine themselves as âartists of scienceâ and encourage them to develop how they write and present information. Adding more words isnât always the best way: for example, I enjoy using tables to summarize research progress and suggest future research trajectories. Iâve also considered including short videos in our review papers to highlight key aspects of the work. I think this can increase readership and accessibility because these videos can be easily shared on social-media platforms.
ANKITA ANIRBAN: Timeliness and figures make a huge difference
Editor, Nature Reviews Physics .
One of my roles as a journal editor is to evaluate proposals for reviews. The best proposals are timely and clearly explain why readers should pay attention to the proposed topic.
It is not enough for a review to be a summary of the latest growth in the literature: the most interesting reviews instead provide a discussion about disagreements in the field.
![review of literature in research papers](https://media.nature.com/w400/magazine-assets/d41586-020-03422-x/d41586-020-03422-x_17834270.jpg)
Careers Collection: Publishing
Scientists often centre the story of their primary research papers around their figures â but when it comes to reviews, figures often take a secondary role. In my opinion, review figures are more important than most people think. One of my favourite review-style articles 3 presents a plot bringing together data from multiple research papers (many of which directly contradict each other). This is then used to identify broad trends and suggest underlying mechanisms that could explain all of the different conclusions.
An important role of a review article is to introduce researchers to a field. For this, schematic figures can be useful to illustrate the science being discussed, in much the same way as the first slide of a talk should. That is why, at Nature Reviews, we have in-house illustrators to assist authors. However, simplicity is key, and even without support from professional illustrators, researchers can still make use of many free drawing tools to enhance the value of their review figures.
![review of literature in research papers A woman wearing a lab coat smiles at the camera.](https://media.nature.com/lw767/magazine-assets/d41586-020-03422-x/d41586-020-03422-x_18645264.jpg)
Yoojin Choi recommends that researchers be open to critiques when writing reviews. Credit: Yoojin Choi
YOOJIN CHOI: Stay updated and be open to suggestions
Research assistant professor, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon.
I started writing the review âBiosynthesis of inorganic nanomaterials using microbial cells and bacteriophagesâ 4 as a PhD student in 2018. It took me one year to write the first draft because I was working on the review alongside my PhD research and mostly on my own, with support from my adviser. It took a further year to complete the processes of peer review, revision and publication. During this time, many new papers and even competing reviews were published. To provide the most up-to-date and original review, I had to stay abreast of the literature. In my case, I made use of Google Scholar, which I set to send me daily updates of relevant literature based on key words.
Through my review-writing process, I also learnt to be more open to critiques to enhance the value and increase the readership of my work. Initially, my review was focused only on using microbial cells such as bacteria to produce nanomaterials, which was the subject of my PhD research. Bacteria such as these are known as biofactories: that is, organisms that produce biological material which can be modified to produce useful materials, such as magnetic nanoparticles for drug-delivery purposes.
![review of literature in research papers](https://media.nature.com/w400/magazine-assets/d41586-020-03422-x/d41586-020-03422-x_18649438.jpg)
Synchronized editing: the future of collaborative writing
However, when the first peer-review report came back, all three reviewers suggested expanding the review to cover another type of biofactory: bacteriophages. These are essentially viruses that infect bacteria, and they can also produce nanomaterials.
The feedback eventually led me to include a discussion of the differences between the various biofactories (bacteriophages, bacteria, fungi and microalgae) and their advantages and disadvantages. This turned out to be a great addition because it made the review more comprehensive.
Writing the review also led me to an idea about using nanomaterial-modified microorganisms to produce chemicals, which Iâm still researching now.
PAULA MARTIN-GONZALEZ: Make good use of technology
PhD student, University of Cambridge, UK.
Just before the coronavirus lockdown, my PhD adviser and I decided to write a literature review discussing the integration of medical imaging with genomics to improve ovarian cancer management.
As I was researching the review, I noticed a trend in which some papers were consistently being cited by many other papers in the field. It was clear to me that those papers must be important, but as a new member of the field of integrated cancer biology, it was difficult to immediately find and read all of these âseminal papersâ.
That was when I decided to code a small application to make my literature research more efficient. Using my code, users can enter a query, such as âovarian cancer, computer tomography, radiomicsâ, and the application searches for all relevant literature archived in databases such as PubMed that feature these key words.
The code then identifies the relevant papers and creates a citation graph of all the references cited in the results of the search. The software highlights papers that have many citation relationships with other papers in the search, and could therefore be called seminal papers.
My code has substantially improved how I organize papers and has informed me of key publications and discoveries in my research field: something that would have taken more time and experience in the field otherwise. After I shared my code on GitHub, I received feedback that it can be daunting for researchers who are not used to coding. Consequently, I am hoping to build a more user-friendly interface in a form of a web page, akin to PubMed or Google Scholar, where users can simply input their queries to generate citation graphs.
Tools and techniques
Most reference managers on the market offer similar capabilities when it comes to providing a Microsoft Word plug-in and producing different citation styles. But depending on your working preferences, some might be more suitable than others.
Reference managers
Attribute | EndNote | Mendeley | Zotero | Paperpile |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cost | A one-time cost of around US$340 but comes with discounts for academics; around $150 for students | Free version available | Free version available | Low and comes with academic discounts |
Level of user support | Extensive user tutorials available; dedicated help desk | Extensive user tutorials available; global network of 5,000 volunteers to advise users | Forum discussions to troubleshoot | Forum discussions to troubleshoot |
Desktop version available for offline use? | Available | Available | Available | Unavailable |
Document storage on cloud | Up to 2 GB (free version) | Up to 2 GB (free version) | Up to 300 MB (free version) | Storage linked to Google Drive |
Compatible with Google Docs? | No | No | Yes | Yes |
Supports collaborative working? | No group working | References can be shared or edited by a maximum of three other users (or more in the paid-for version) | No limit on the number of users | No limit on the number of users |
Here is a comparison of the more popular collaborative writing tools, but there are other options, including Fidus Writer, Manuscript.io, Authorea and Stencila.
Collaborative writing tools
Attribute | Manubot | Overleaf | Google Docs |
---|---|---|---|
Cost | Free, open source | $15â30 per month, comes with academic discounts | Free, comes with a Google account |
Writing language | Type and write in Markdown* | Type and format in LaTex* | Standard word processor |
Can be used with a mobile device? | No | No | Yes |
References | Bibliographies are built using DOIs, circumventing reference managers | Citation styles can be imported from reference managers | Possible but requires additional referencing tools in a plug-in, such as Paperpile |
*Markdown and LaTex are code-based formatting languages favoured by physicists, mathematicians and computer scientists who code on a regular basis, and less popular in other disciplines such as biology and chemistry.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03422-x
Interviews have been edited for length and clarity.
Updates & Corrections
Correction 09 December 2020 : An earlier version of the tables in this article included some incorrect details about the programs Zotero, Endnote and Manubot. These have now been corrected.
Hsing, I.-M., Xu, Y. & Zhao, W. Electroanalysis 19 , 755â768 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar Â
Ledesma, H. A. et al. Nature Nanotechnol. 14 , 645â657 (2019).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar Â
Brahlek, M., Koirala, N., Bansal, N. & Oh, S. Solid State Commun. 215â216 , 54â62 (2015).
Choi, Y. & Lee, S. Y. Nature Rev. Chem . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-020-00221-w (2020).
Download references
Related Articles
![review of literature in research papers review of literature in research papers](https://media.nature.com/lw100/magazine-assets/d41586-020-03422-x/d41586-020-03422-x_16726000.jpg)
- Research management
![review of literature in research papers How to harness AIâs potential in research â responsibly and ethically](https://images.nature.com/w140h79/magazine-assets/d41586-024-02762-2/d41586-024-02762-2_27488588.jpg)
How to harness AIâs potential in research â responsibly and ethically
Career Feature 23 AUG 24
![review of literature in research papers Partners in drug discovery: how to collaborate with non-governmental organizations](https://images.nature.com/w140h79/magazine-assets/d41586-024-02774-y/d41586-024-02774-y_27484556.jpg)
Partners in drug discovery: how to collaborate with non-governmental organizations
![review of literature in research papers Time to refocus for South Korean science](https://images.nature.com/w140h79/magazine-assets/d41586-024-02684-z/d41586-024-02684-z_27484580.jpg)
Time to refocus for South Korean science
Nature Index 21 AUG 24
Binning out-of-date chemicals? Somebody think about the carbon!
Correspondence 27 AUG 24
![review of literature in research papers No more hunting for replication studies: crowdsourced database makes them easy to find](https://images.nature.com/w140h79/magazine-assets/d41586-024-02598-w/d41586-024-02598-w_27469906.jpg)
No more hunting for replication studies: crowdsourced database makes them easy to find
Nature Index 27 AUG 24
![review of literature in research papers South Korean science on the global stage](https://images.nature.com/w140h79/magazine-assets/d41586-024-02686-x/d41586-024-02686-x_27484598.jpg)
South Korean science on the global stage
![review of literature in research papers How South Korea can build better gender diversity into research](https://images.nature.com/w140h79/magazine-assets/d41586-024-02688-9/d41586-024-02688-9_27484604.jpg)
How South Korea can build better gender diversity into research
Lecturer/Senior Lecturer at the Dyson School of Design Engineering
About the role: Do you want to change the world for the better, and do you believe this can be done through research and education? If so, grab you...
South Kensington, London (Greater) (GB)
Imperial College London (ICL)
Faculty Positions in Westlake University
Founded in 2018, Westlake University is a new type of non-profit research-oriented university in Hangzhou, China, supported by public a...
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Westlake University
Call for Global Talents, Recruitment Information of Nankai University
Nankai University welcomes global outstanding talents to join for common development.
Tianjin, China
Nankai University
Director for Signature Research Programme in Cancer and Stem Cell Biology, DukeNUS Medical School &
The successful candidate will demonstrate their ability of growing, leading and mentoring faculty as well as developing and operationalising strategy.
Singapore (SG)
DukeNUS Medical School
Scientist / Postdoc (m/f/d): Analysis of Microscopic BIOMedical Images (AMBIOM)
A new project area in the institute is the development of artificial intelligence (AI)
Dortmund, Nordrhein-Westfalen (DE)
Leibniz-Institut fĂŒr Analytische Wissenschaften â ISAS â e.V.
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter â what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.
Quick links
- Explore articles by subject
- Guide to authors
- Editorial policies
![review of literature in research papers](https://gradcoach.com/wp-content/uploads/GC-Logo-Registered.png)
How To Write An A-Grade Literature Review
3 straightforward steps (with examples) + free template.
By: Derek Jansen (MBA) | Expert Reviewed By: Dr. Eunice Rautenbach | October 2019
Quality research is about building onto the existing work of others , âstanding on the shoulders of giantsâ, as Newton put it. The literature review chapter of your dissertation, thesis or research project is where you synthesise this prior work and lay the theoretical foundation for your own research.
Long story short, this chapter is a pretty big deal, which is why you want to make sure you get it right . In this post, Iâll show you exactly how to write a literature review in three straightforward steps, so you can conquer this vital chapter (the smart way).
Overview: The Literature Review Process
- Understanding the “ why “
- Finding the relevant literature
- Cataloguing and synthesising the information
- Outlining & writing up your literature review
- Example of a literature review
But first, the âwhyââŠ
Before we unpack how to write the literature review chapter, weâve got to look at the why . To put it bluntly, if you donât understand the function and purpose of the literature review process, thereâs no way you can pull it off well. So, what exactly is the purpose of the literature review?
Well, there are (at least) four core functions:
- For you to gain an understanding (and demonstrate this understanding) of where the research is at currently, what the key arguments and disagreements are.
- For you to identify the gap(s) in the literature and then use this as justification for your own research topic.
- To help you build a conceptual framework for empirical testing (if applicable to your research topic).
- To inform your methodological choices and help you source tried and tested questionnaires (for interviews ) and measurement instruments (for surveys ).
Most students understand the first point but donât give any thought to the rest. To get the most from the literature review process, you must keep all four points front of mind as you review the literature (more on this shortly), or youâll land up with a wonky foundation.
Okay â with the why out the way, letâs move on to the how . As mentioned above, writing your literature review is a process, which Iâll break down into three steps:
- Finding the most suitable literature
- Understanding , distilling and organising the literature
- Planning and writing up your literature review chapter
Importantly, you must complete steps one and two before you start writing up your chapter. I know itâs very tempting, but donât try to kill two birds with one stone and write as you read. Youâll invariably end up wasting huge amounts of time re-writing and re-shaping, or youâll just land up with a disjointed, hard-to-digest mess . Instead, you need to read first and distil the information, then plan and execute the writing.
![lit-review-webinar-2024 Free Webinar: Literature Review 101](https://gradcoach.com/wp-content/uploads/lit-review-webinar-2024.png)
Step 1: Find the relevant literature
Naturally, the first step in the literature review journey is to hunt down the existing research thatâs relevant to your topic. While you probably already have a decent base of this from your research proposal , you need to expand on this substantially in the dissertation or thesis itself.
Essentially, you need to be looking for any existing literature that potentially helps you answer your research question (or develop it, if thatâs not yet pinned down). There are numerous ways to find relevant literature, but Iâll cover my top four tactics here. Iâd suggest combining all four methods to ensure that nothing slips past you:
Method 1 – Google Scholar Scrubbing
Googleâs academic search engine, Google Scholar , is a great starting point as it provides a good high-level view of the relevant journal articles for whatever keyword you throw at it. Most valuably, it tells you how many times each article has been cited, which gives you an idea of how credible (or at least, popular) it is. Some articles will be free to access, while others will require an account, which brings us to the next method.
Method 2 â University Database Scrounging
Generally, universities provide students with access to an online library, which provides access to many (but not all) of the major journals.
So, if you find an article using Google Scholar that requires paid access (which is quite likely), search for that article in your universityâs database â if itâs listed there, youâll have access. Note that, generally, the search engine capabilities of these databases are poor, so make sure you search for the exact article name, or you might not find it.
Method 3 â Journal Article Snowballing
At the end of every academic journal article, youâll find a list of references. As with any academic writing, these references are the building blocks of the article, so if the article is relevant to your topic, thereâs a good chance a portion of the referenced works will be too. Do a quick scan of the titles and see what seems relevant, then search for the relevant ones in your universityâs database.
![](http://serviteca.online/777/templates/cheerup2/res/banner1.gif)
Method 4 â Dissertation Scavenging
Similar to Method 3 above, you can leverage other studentsâ dissertations. All you have to do is skim through literature review chapters of existing dissertations related to your topic and you’ll find a gold mine of potential literature. Usually, your university will provide you with access to previous students’ dissertations, but you can also find a much larger selection in the following databases:
- Open Access Theses & Dissertations
- Stanford SearchWorks
Keep in mind that dissertations and theses are not as academically sound as published, peer-reviewed journal articles (because theyâre written by students, not professionals), so be sure to check the credibility of any sources you find using this method. You can do this by assessing the citation count of any given article in Google Scholar. If you need help with assessing the credibility of any article, or with finding relevant research in general, you can chat with one of our Research Specialists .
Alright â with a good base of literature firmly under your belt, itâs time to move onto the next step.
Need a helping hand?
Step 2: Log, catalogue and synthesise
Once youâve built a little treasure trove of articles, itâs time to get reading and start digesting the information – what does it all mean?
While I present steps one and two (hunting and digesting) as sequential, in reality, it’s more of a back-and-forth tango â youâll read a little , then have an idea, spot a new citation, or a new potential variable, and then go back to searching for articles. This is perfectly natural â through the reading process, your thoughts will develop , new avenues might crop up, and directional adjustments might arise. This is, after all, one of the main purposes of the literature review process (i.e. to familiarise yourself with the current state of research in your field).
As youâre working through your treasure chest, itâs essential that you simultaneously start organising the information. There are three aspects to this:
- Logging reference information
- Building an organised catalogue
- Distilling and synthesising the information
Iâll discuss each of these below:
2.1 â Log the reference information
As you read each article, you should add it to your reference management software. I usually recommend Mendeley for this purpose (see the Mendeley 101 video below), but you can use whichever software youâre comfortable with. Most importantly, make sure you load EVERY article you read into your reference manager, even if it doesnât seem very relevant at the time.
2.2 â Build an organised catalogue
In the beginning, you might feel confident that you can remember who said what, where, and what their main arguments were. Trust me, you wonât. If you do a thorough review of the relevant literature (as you must!), youâre going to read many, many articles, and itâs simply impossible to remember who said what, when, and in what context . Also, without the birdâs eye view that a catalogue provides, youâll miss connections between various articles, and have no view of how the research developed over time. Simply put, itâs essential to build your own catalogue of the literature.
I would suggest using Excel to build your catalogue, as it allows you to run filters, colour code and sort â all very useful when your list grows large (which it will). How you lay your spreadsheet out is up to you, but Iâd suggest you have the following columns (at minimum):
- Author, date, title â Start with three columns containing this core information. This will make it easy for you to search for titles with certain words, order research by date, or group by author.
- Categories or keywords â You can either create multiple columns, one for each category/theme and then tick the relevant categories, or you can have one column with keywords.
- Key arguments/points â Use this column to succinctly convey the essence of the article, the key arguments and implications thereof for your research.
- Context â Note the socioeconomic context in which the research was undertaken. For example, US-based, respondents aged 25-35, lower- income, etc. This will be useful for making an argument about gaps in the research.
- Methodology â Note which methodology was used and why. Also, note any issues you feel arise due to the methodology. Again, you can use this to make an argument about gaps in the research.
- Quotations â Note down any quoteworthy lines you feel might be useful later.
- Notes â Make notes about anything not already covered. For example, linkages to or disagreements with other theories, questions raised but unanswered, shortcomings or limitations, and so forth.
If you’d like, you can try out our free catalog template here (see screenshot below).
![literature-review-template-excel Excel literature review template](https://gradcoach.com/wp-content/uploads/literature-review-template-excel.png)
2.3 â Digest and synthesise
Most importantly, as you work through the literature and build your catalogue, you need to synthesise all the information in your own mind â how does it all fit together? Look for links between the various articles and try to develop a bigger picture view of the state of the research. Some important questions to ask yourself are:
- What answers does the existing research provide to my own research questions ?
- Which points do the researchers agree (and disagree) on?
- How has the research developed over time?
- Where do the gaps in the current research lie?
To help you develop a big-picture view and synthesise all the information, you might find mind mapping software such as Freemind useful. Alternatively, if youâre a fan of physical note-taking, investing in a large whiteboard might work for you.
![mind-map Mind mapping is a useful way to plan your literature review.](https://gradcoach.com/wp-content/uploads/mind-map.png)
Step 3: Outline and write it up!
Once youâre satisfied that you have digested and distilled all the relevant literature in your mind, itâs time to put pen to paper (or rather, fingers to keyboard). There are two steps here â outlining and writing:
3.1 â Draw up your outline
Having spent so much time reading, it might be tempting to just start writing up without a clear structure in mind. However, itâs critically important to decide on your structure and develop a detailed outline before you write anything. Your literature review chapter needs to present a clear, logical and an easy to follow narrative â and that requires some planning. Donât try to wing it!
Naturally, you wonât always follow the plan to the letter, but without a detailed outline, youâre more than likely going to end up with a disjointed pile of waffle , and then youâre going to spend a far greater amount of time re-writing, hacking and patching. The adage, âmeasure twice, cut onceâ is very suitable here.
In terms of structure, the first decision youâll have to make is whether youâll lay out your review thematically (into themes) or chronologically (by date/period). The right choice depends on your topic, research objectives and research questions, which we discuss in this article .
Once thatâs decided, you need to draw up an outline of your entire chapter in bullet point format. Try to get as detailed as possible, so that you know exactly what youâll cover where, how each section will connect to the next, and how your entire argument will develop throughout the chapter. Also, at this stage, itâs a good idea to allocate rough word count limits for each section, so that you can identify word count problems before youâve spent weeks or months writing!
PS – check out our free literature review chapter template…
3.2 â Get writing
With a detailed outline at your side, it’s time to start writing up (finally!). At this stage, itâs common to feel a bit of writerâs block and find yourself procrastinating under the pressure of finally having to put something on paper. To help with this, remember that the objective of the first draft is not perfection â itâs simply to get your thoughts out of your head and onto paper, after which you can refine them. The structure might change a little, the word count allocations might shift and shuffle, and you might add or remove a section â thatâs all okay. Donât worry about all this on your first draft â just get your thoughts down on paper.
![start-writing start writing](https://gradcoach.com/wp-content/uploads/start-writing.png)
Once youâve got a full first draft (however rough it may be), step away from it for a day or two (longer if you can) and then come back at it with fresh eyes. Pay particular attention to the flow and narrative â does it fall fit together and flow from one section to another smoothly? Nowâs the time to try to improve the linkage from each section to the next, tighten up the writing to be more concise, trim down word count and sand it down into a more digestible read.
Once youâve done that, give your writing to a friend or colleague who is not a subject matter expert and ask them if they understand the overall discussion. The best way to assess this is to ask them to explain the chapter back to you. This technique will give you a strong indication of which points were clearly communicated and which werenât. If you’re working with Grad Coach, this is a good time to have your Research Specialist review your chapter.
Finally, tighten it up and send it off to your supervisor for comment. Some might argue that you should be sending your work to your supervisor sooner than this (indeed your university might formally require this), but in my experience, supervisors are extremely short on time (and often patience), so, the more refined your chapter is, the less time theyâll waste on addressing basic issues (which you know about already) and the more time theyâll spend on valuable feedback that will increase your mark-earning potential.
Literature Review Example
In the video below, we unpack an actual literature review so that you can see how all the core components come together in reality.
Let’s Recap
In this post, weâve covered how to research and write up a high-quality literature review chapter. Letâs do a quick recap of the key takeaways:
- It is essential to understand the WHY of the literature review before you read or write anything. Make sure you understand the 4 core functions of the process.
- The first step is to hunt down the relevant literature . You can do this using Google Scholar, your university database, the snowballing technique and by reviewing other dissertations and theses.
- Next, you need to log all the articles in your reference manager , build your own catalogue of literature and synthesise all the research.
- Following that, you need to develop a detailed outline of your entire chapter â the more detail the better. Donât start writing without a clear outline (on paper, not in your head!)
- Write up your first draft in rough form â donât aim for perfection. Remember, done beats perfect.
- Refine your second draft and get a laymanâs perspective on it . Then tighten it up and submit it to your supervisor.
![course Literature Review Course](https://gradcoach.com/wp-content/uploads/course.png)
Psst⊠thereâs more!
This post is an extract from our bestselling short course, Literature Review Bootcamp . If you want to work smart, you don't want to miss this .
38 Comments
Thank you very much. This page is an eye opener and easy to comprehend.
This is awesome!
I wish I come across GradCoach earlier enough.
But all the same I’ll make use of this opportunity to the fullest.
Thank you for this good job.
Keep it up!
You’re welcome, Yinka. Thank you for the kind words. All the best writing your literature review.
Thank you for a very useful literature review session. Although I am doing most of the steps…it being my first masters an Mphil is a self study and one not sure you are on the right track. I have an amazing supervisor but one also knows they are super busy. So not wanting to bother on the minutae. Thank you.
You’re most welcome, Renee. Good luck with your literature review đ
This has been really helpful. Will make full use of it. đ
Thank you Gradcoach.
Really agreed. Admirable effort
thank you for this beautiful well explained recap.
Thank you so much for your guide of video and other instructions for the dissertation writing.
It is instrumental. It encouraged me to write a dissertation now.
Thank you the video was great – from someone that knows nothing thankyou
an amazing and very constructive way of presetting a topic, very useful, thanks for the effort,
It is timely
It is very good video of guidance for writing a research proposal and a dissertation. Since I have been watching and reading instructions, I have started my research proposal to write. I appreciate to Mr Jansen hugely.
I learn a lot from your videos. Very comprehensive and detailed.
Thank you for sharing your knowledge. As a research student, you learn better with your learning tips in research
I was really stuck in reading and gathering information but after watching these things are cleared thanks, it is so helpful.
Really helpful, Thank you for the effort in showing such information
This is super helpful thank you very much.
Thank you for this whole literature writing review.You have simplified the process.
I’m so glad I found GradCoach. Excellent information, Clear explanation, and Easy to follow, Many thanks Derek!
You’re welcome, Maithe. Good luck writing your literature review đ
Thank you Coach, you have greatly enriched and improved my knowledge
Great piece, so enriching and it is going to help me a great lot in my project and thesis, thanks so much
This is THE BEST site for ANYONE doing a masters or doctorate! Thank you for the sound advice and templates. You rock!
Thanks, Stephanie đ
This is mind blowing, the detailed explanation and simplicity is perfect.
I am doing two papers on my final year thesis, and I must stay I feel very confident to face both headlong after reading this article.
thank you so much.
if anyone is to get a paper done on time and in the best way possible, GRADCOACH is certainly the go to area!
This is very good video which is well explained with detailed explanation
Thank you excellent piece of work and great mentoring
Thanks, it was useful
Thank you very much. the video and the information were very helpful.
Good morning scholar. I’m delighted coming to know you even before the commencement of my dissertation which hopefully is expected in not more than six months from now. I would love to engage my study under your guidance from the beginning to the end. I love to know how to do good job
Thank you so much Derek for such useful information on writing up a good literature review. I am at a stage where I need to start writing my one. My proposal was accepted late last year but I honestly did not know where to start
Like the name of your YouTube implies you are GRAD (great,resource person, about dissertation). In short you are smart enough in coaching research work.
This is a very well thought out webpage. Very informative and a great read.
Very timely.
I appreciate.
Very comprehensive and eye opener for me as beginner in postgraduate study. Well explained and easy to understand. Appreciate and good reference in guiding me in my research journey. Thank you
Thank you. I requested to download the free literature review template, however, your website wouldn’t allow me to complete the request or complete a download. May I request that you email me the free template? Thank you.
Submit a Comment Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
- Print Friendly
Reference management. Clean and simple.
What is a literature review? [with examples]
![review of literature in research papers Literature review explained](https://cdn.paperpile.com/guides/img/what-is-literature-review-400x400.png)
What is a literature review?
The purpose of a literature review, how to write a literature review, the format of a literature review, general formatting rules, the length of a literature review, literature review examples, frequently asked questions about literature reviews, related articles.
A literature review is an assessment of the sources in a chosen topic of research.
In a literature review, youâre expected to report on the existing scholarly conversation, without adding new contributions.
If you are currently writing one, you've come to the right place. In the following paragraphs, we will explain:
- the objective of a literature review
- how to write a literature review
- the basic format of a literature review
Tip: Itâs not always mandatory to add a literature review in a paper. Theses and dissertations often include them, whereas research papers may not. Make sure to consult with your instructor for exact requirements.
The four main objectives of a literature review are:
- Studying the references of your research area
- Summarizing the main arguments
- Identifying current gaps, stances, and issues
- Presenting all of the above in a text
Ultimately, the main goal of a literature review is to provide the researcher with sufficient knowledge about the topic in question so that they can eventually make an intervention.
The format of a literature review is fairly standard. It includes an:
- introduction that briefly introduces the main topic
- body that includes the main discussion of the key arguments
- conclusion that highlights the gaps and issues of the literature
âĄïžÂ Take a look at our guide on how to write a literature review to learn more about how to structure a literature review.
First of all, a literature review should have its own labeled section. You should indicate clearly in the table of contents where the literature can be found, and you should label this section as âLiterature Review.â
âĄïžÂ For more information on writing a thesis, visit our guide on how to structure a thesis .
There is no set amount of words for a literature review, so the length depends on the research. If you are working with a large amount of sources, it will be long. If your paper does not depend entirely on references, it will be short.
Take a look at these three theses featuring great literature reviews:
- School-Based Speech-Language Pathologist's Perceptions of Sensory Food Aversions in Children [ PDF , see page 20]
- Who's Writing What We Read: Authorship in Criminological Research [ PDF , see page 4]
- A Phenomenological Study of the Lived Experience of Online Instructors of Theological Reflection at Christian Institutions Accredited by the Association of Theological Schools [ PDF , see page 56]
Literature reviews are most commonly found in theses and dissertations. However, you find them in research papers as well.
There is no set amount of words for a literature review, so the length depends on the research. If you are working with a large amount of sources, then it will be long. If your paper does not depend entirely on references, then it will be short.
No. A literature review should have its own independent section. You should indicate clearly in the table of contents where the literature review can be found, and label this section as âLiterature Review.â
The main goal of a literature review is to provide the researcher with sufficient knowledge about the topic in question so that they can eventually make an intervention.
![review of literature in research papers academic search engines](https://cdn.paperpile.com/guides/img/academic-search-engines-illust-400x400.png)
Libraries | Research Guides
Literature reviews, what is a literature review, learning more about how to do a literature review.
- Planning the Review
- The Research Question
- Choosing Where to Search
- Organizing the Review
- Writing the Review
A literature review is a review and synthesis of existing research on a topic or research question. A literature review is meant to analyze the scholarly literature, make connections across writings and identify strengths, weaknesses, trends, and missing conversations. A literature review should address different aspects of a topic as it relates to your research question. A literature review goes beyond a description or summary of the literature you have read.
- Sage Research Methods Core This link opens in a new window SAGE Research Methods supports research at all levels by providing material to guide users through every step of the research process. SAGE Research Methods is the ultimate methods library with more than 1000 books, reference works, journal articles, and instructional videos by world-leading academics from across the social sciences, including the largest collection of qualitative methods books available online from any scholarly publisher. â Publisher
- Next: Planning the Review >>
- Last Updated: Jul 8, 2024 11:22 AM
- URL: https://libguides.northwestern.edu/literaturereviews
- Resources Home đ
- Try SciSpace Copilot
- Search research papers
- Add Copilot Extension
- Try AI Detector
- Try Paraphraser
- Try Citation Generator
- April Papers
- June Papers
- July Papers
![review of literature in research papers SciSpace Resources](https://typeset.io/resources/content/images/2023/01/Scispace--600---72-px---1-.png)
How To Write A Literature Review - A Complete Guide
![review of literature in research papers Deeptanshu D](https://typeset.io/resources/content/images/2021/08/1585503406514.jpg)
Table of Contents
A literature review is much more than just another section in your research paper. It forms the very foundation of your research. It is a formal piece of writing where you analyze the existing theoretical framework, principles, and assumptions and use that as a base to shape your approach to the research question.
Curating and drafting a solid literature review section not only lends more credibility to your research paper but also makes your research tighter and better focused. But, writing literature reviews is a difficult task. It requires extensive reading, plus you have to consider market trends and technological and political changes, which tend to change in the blink of an eye.
Now streamline your literature review process with the help of SciSpace Copilot. With this AI research assistant, you can efficiently synthesize and analyze a vast amount of information, identify key themes and trends, and uncover gaps in the existing research. Get real-time explanations, summaries, and answers to your questions for the paper you're reviewing, making navigating and understanding the complex literature landscape easier.
![review of literature in research papers Perform Literature reviews using SciSpace Copilot](https://typeset.io/resources/content/images/2023/06/Research-methodology-using-SciSpace-Copilot-1.png)
In this comprehensive guide, we will explore everything from the definition of a literature review, its appropriate length, various types of literature reviews, and how to write one.
What is a literature review?
A literature review is a collation of survey, research, critical evaluation, and assessment of the existing literature in a preferred domain.
Eminent researcher and academic Arlene Fink, in her book Conducting Research Literature Reviews , defines it as the following:
âA literature review surveys books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation of these works in relation to the research problem being investigated.
Literature reviews are designed to provide an overview of sources you have explored while researching a particular topic, and to demonstrate to your readers how your research fits within a larger field of study.â
Simply put, a literature review can be defined as a critical discussion of relevant pre-existing research around your research question and carving out a definitive place for your study in the existing body of knowledge. Literature reviews can be presented in multiple ways: a section of an article, the whole research paper itself, or a chapter of your thesis.
![review of literature in research papers A literature review paper](https://typeset.io/resources/content/images/2023/06/Literature-review.png)
A literature review does function as a summary of sources, but it also allows you to analyze further, interpret, and examine the stated theories, methods, viewpoints, and, of course, the gaps in the existing content.
As an author, you can discuss and interpret the research question and its various aspects and debate your adopted methods to support the claim.
What is the purpose of a literature review?
A literature review is meant to help your readers understand the relevance of your research question and where it fits within the existing body of knowledge. As a researcher, you should use it to set the context, build your argument, and establish the need for your study.
What is the importance of a literature review?
The literature review is a critical part of research papers because it helps you:
- Gain an in-depth understanding of your research question and the surrounding area
- Convey that you have a thorough understanding of your research area and are up-to-date with the latest changes and advancements
- Establish how your research is connected or builds on the existing body of knowledge and how it could contribute to further research
- Elaborate on the validity and suitability of your theoretical framework and research methodology
- Identify and highlight gaps and shortcomings in the existing body of knowledge and how things need to change
- Convey to readers how your study is different or how it contributes to the research area
How long should a literature review be?
Ideally, the literature review should take up 15%-40% of the total length of your manuscript. So, if you have a 10,000-word research paper, the minimum word count could be 1500.
Your literature review format depends heavily on the kind of manuscript you are writing â an entire chapter in case of doctoral theses, a part of the introductory section in a research article, to a full-fledged review article that examines the previously published research on a topic.
Another determining factor is the type of research you are doing. The literature review section tends to be longer for secondary research projects than primary research projects.
What are the different types of literature reviews?
All literature reviews are not the same. There are a variety of possible approaches that you can take. It all depends on the type of research you are pursuing.
Here are the different types of literature reviews:
Argumentative review
It is called an argumentative review when you carefully present literature that only supports or counters a specific argument or premise to establish a viewpoint.
Integrative review
It is a type of literature review focused on building a comprehensive understanding of a topic by combining available theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence.
Methodological review
This approach delves into the ''how'' and the ''what" of the research question â Â you cannot look at the outcome in isolation; you should also review the methodology used.
Systematic review
This form consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant research and collect, report, and analyze data from the studies included in the review.
Meta-analysis review
Meta-analysis uses statistical methods to summarize the results of independent studies. By combining information from all relevant studies, meta-analysis can provide more precise estimates of the effects than those derived from the individual studies included within a review.
Historical review
Historical literature reviews focus on examining research throughout a period, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory, or phenomenon emerged in the literature, then tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline. The purpose is to place research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and identify future research's likely directions.
Theoretical Review
This form aims to examine the corpus of theory accumulated regarding an issue, concept, theory, and phenomenon. The theoretical literature review helps to establish what theories exist, the relationships between them, the degree the existing approaches have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested.
Scoping Review
The Scoping Review is often used at the beginning of an article, dissertation, or research proposal. It is conducted before the research to highlight gaps in the existing body of knowledge and explains why the project should be greenlit.
State-of-the-Art Review
The State-of-the-Art review is conducted periodically, focusing on the most recent research. It describes what is currently known, understood, or agreed upon regarding the research topic and highlights where there are still disagreements.
Can you use the first person in a literature review?
When writing literature reviews, you should avoid the usage of first-person pronouns. It means that instead of "I argue that" or "we argue that," the appropriate expression would be "this research paper argues that."
Do you need an abstract for a literature review?
Ideally, yes. It is always good to have a condensed summary that is self-contained and independent of the rest of your review. As for how to draft one, you can follow the same fundamental idea when preparing an abstract for a literature review. It should also include:
- The research topic and your motivation behind selecting it
- A one-sentence thesis statement
- An explanation of the kinds of literature featured in the review
- Summary of what you've learned
- Conclusions you drew from the literature you reviewed
- Potential implications and future scope for research
Here's an example of the abstract of a literature review
Is a literature review written in the past tense?
Yes, the literature review should ideally be written in the past tense. You should not use the present or future tense when writing one. The exceptions are when you have statements describing events that happened earlier than the literature you are reviewing or events that are currently occurring; then, you can use the past perfect or present perfect tenses.
How many sources for a literature review?
There are multiple approaches to deciding how many sources to include in a literature review section. The first approach would be to look level you are at as a researcher. For instance, a doctoral thesis might need 60+ sources. In contrast, you might only need to refer to 5-15 sources at the undergraduate level.
The second approach is based on the kind of literature review you are doing â whether it is merely a chapter of your paper or if it is a self-contained paper in itself. When it is just a chapter, sources should equal the total number of pages in your article's body. In the second scenario, you need at least three times as many sources as there are pages in your work.
Quick tips on how to write a literature review
To know how to write a literature review, you must clearly understand its impact and role in establishing your work as substantive research material.
You need to follow the below-mentioned steps, to write a literature review:
- Outline the purpose behind the literature review
- Search relevant literature
- Examine and assess the relevant resources
- Discover connections by drawing deep insights from the resources
- Structure planning to write a good literature review
1. Outline and identify the purpose of  a literature review
As a first step on how to write a literature review, you must know what the research question or topic is and what shape you want your literature review to take. Ensure you understand the research topic inside out, or else seek clarifications. You must be able to the answer below questions before you start:
- How many sources do I need to include?
- What kind of sources should I analyze?
- How much should I critically evaluate each source?
- Should I summarize, synthesize or offer a critique of the sources?
- Do I need to include any background information or definitions?
Additionally, you should know that the narrower your research topic is, the swifter it will be for you to restrict the number of sources to be analyzed.
2. Search relevant literature
Dig deeper into search engines to discover what has already been published around your chosen topic. Make sure you thoroughly go through appropriate reference sources like books, reports, journal articles, government docs, and web-based resources.
You must prepare a list of keywords and their different variations. You can start your search from any libraryâs catalog, provided you are an active member of that institution. The exact keywords can be extended to widen your research over other databases and academic search engines like:
- Google Scholar
- Microsoft Academic
- Science.gov
Besides, it is not advisable to go through every resource word by word. Alternatively, what you can do is you can start by reading the abstract and then decide whether that source is relevant to your research or not.
Additionally, you must spend surplus time assessing the quality and relevance of resources. It would help if you tried preparing a list of citations to ensure that there lies no repetition of authors, publications, or articles in the literature review.
3. Examine and assess the sources
It is nearly impossible for you to go through every detail in the research article. So rather than trying to fetch every detail, you have to analyze and decide which research sources resemble closest and appear relevant to your chosen domain.
While analyzing the sources, you should look to find out answers to questions like:
- What question or problem has the author been describing and debating?
- What is the definition of critical aspects?
- How well the theories, approach, and methodology have been explained?
- Whether the research theory used some conventional or new innovative approach?
- How relevant are the key findings of the work?
- In what ways does it relate to other sources on the same topic?
- What challenges does this research paper pose to the existing theory
- What are the possible contributions or benefits it adds to the subject domain?
Be always mindful that you refer only to credible and authentic resources. It would be best if you always take references from different publications to validate your theory.
Always keep track of important information or data you can present in your literature review right from the beginning. It will help steer your path from any threats of plagiarism and also make it easier to curate an annotated bibliography or reference section.
4. Discover connections
At this stage, you must start deciding on the argument and structure of your literature review. To accomplish this, you must discover and identify the relations and connections between various resources while drafting your abstract.
A few aspects that you should be aware of while writing a literature review include:
- Rise to prominence: Theories and methods that have gained reputation and supporters over time.
- Constant scrutiny: Concepts or theories that repeatedly went under examination.
- Contradictions and conflicts: Theories, both the supporting and the contradictory ones, for the research topic.
- Knowledge gaps: What exactly does it fail to address, and how to bridge them with further research?
- Influential resources: Significant research projects available that have been upheld as milestones or perhaps, something that can modify the current trends
Once you join the dots between various past research works, it will be easier for you to draw a conclusion and identify your contribution to the existing knowledge base.
5. Structure planning to write a good literature review
There exist different ways towards planning and executing the structure of a literature review. The format of a literature review varies and depends upon the length of the research.
Like any other research paper, the literature review format must contain three sections: introduction, body, and conclusion. The goals and objectives of the research question determine what goes inside these three sections.
Nevertheless, a good literature review can be structured according to the chronological, thematic, methodological, or theoretical framework approach.
Literature review samples
1. Standalone
2. As a section of a research paper
How SciSpace Discover makes literature review a breeze?
SciSpace Discover is a one-stop solution to do an effective literature search and get barrier-free access to scientific knowledge. It is an excellent repository where you can find millions of only peer-reviewed articles and full-text PDF files. Hereâs more on how you can use it:
Find the right information
Find what you want quickly and easily with comprehensive search filters that let you narrow down papers according to PDF availability, year of publishing, document type, and affiliated institution. Moreover, you can sort the results based on the publishing date, citation count, and relevance.
Assess credibility of papers quickly
When doing the literature review, it is critical to establish the quality of your sources. They form the foundation of your research. SciSpace Discover helps you assess the quality of a source by providing an overview of its references, citations, and performance metrics.
Get the complete picture in no time
SciSpace Discoverâs personalized suggestion engine helps you stay on course and get the complete picture of the topic from one place. Every time you visit an article page, it provides you links to related papers. Besides that, it helps you understand whatâs trending, who are the top authors, and who are the leading publishers on a topic.
Make referring sources super easy
To ensure you don't lose track of your sources, you must start noting down your references when doing the literature review. SciSpace Discover makes this step effortless. Click the 'cite' button on an article page, and you will receive preloaded citation text in multiple styles â all you've to do is copy-paste it into your manuscript.
Final tips on how to write a literature review
A massive chunk of time and effort is required to write a good literature review. But, if you go about it systematically, you'll be able to save a ton of time and build a solid foundation for your research.
We hope this guide has helped you answer several key questions you have about writing literature reviews.
Would you like to explore SciSpace Discover and kick off your literature search right away? You can get started here .
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. how to start a literature review.
• What questions do you want to answer?
• What sources do you need to answer these questions?
• What information do these sources contain?
• How can you use this information to answer your questions?
2. What to include in a literature review?
• A brief background of the problem or issue
• What has previously been done to address the problem or issue
• A description of what you will do in your project
• How this study will contribute to research on the subject
3. Why literature review is important?
The literature review is an important part of any research project because it allows the writer to look at previous studies on a topic and determine existing gaps in the literature, as well as what has already been done. It will also help them to choose the most appropriate method for their own study.
4. How to cite a literature review in APA format?
To cite a literature review in APA style, you need to provide the author's name, the title of the article, and the year of publication. For example: Patel, A. B., & Stokes, G. S. (2012). The relationship between personality and intelligence: A meta-analysis of longitudinal research. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(1), 16-21
5. What are the components of a literature review?
• A brief introduction to the topic, including its background and context. The introduction should also include a rationale for why the study is being conducted and what it will accomplish.
• A description of the methodologies used in the study. This can include information about data collection methods, sample size, and statistical analyses.
• A presentation of the findings in an organized format that helps readers follow along with the author's conclusions.
6. What are common errors in writing literature review?
• Not spending enough time to critically evaluate the relevance of resources, observations and conclusions.
• Totally relying on secondary data while ignoring primary data.
• Letting your personal bias seep into your interpretation of existing literature.
• No detailed explanation of the procedure to discover and identify an appropriate literature review.
7. What are the 5 C's of writing literature review?
• Cite - the sources you utilized and referenced in your research.
• Compare - existing arguments, hypotheses, methodologies, and conclusions found in the knowledge base.
• Contrast - the arguments, topics, methodologies, approaches, and disputes that may be found in the literature.
• Critique - the literature and describe the ideas and opinions you find more convincing and why.
• Connect - the various studies you reviewed in your research.
8. How many sources should a literature review have?
When it is just a chapter, sources should equal the total number of pages in your article's body. if it is a self-contained paper in itself, you need at least three times as many sources as there are pages in your work.
9. Can literature review have diagrams?
• To represent an abstract idea or concept
• To explain the steps of a process or procedure
• To help readers understand the relationships between different concepts
10. How old should sources be in a literature review?
Sources for a literature review should be as current as possible or not older than ten years. The only exception to this rule is if you are reviewing a historical topic and need to use older sources.
11. What are the types of literature review?
• Argumentative review
• Integrative review
• Methodological review
• Systematic review
• Meta-analysis review
• Historical review
• Theoretical review
• Scoping review
• State-of-the-Art review
12. Is a literature review mandatory?
Yes. Literature review is a mandatory part of any research project. It is a critical step in the process that allows you to establish the scope of your research, and provide a background for the rest of your work.
But before you go,
- Six Online Tools for Easy Literature Review
- Evaluating literature review: systematic vs. scoping reviews
- Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review
- Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples
You might also like
![review of literature in research papers Consensus GPT vs. SciSpace GPT: Choose the Best GPT for Research](https://typeset.io/resources/content/images/size/w1000/2024/02/scispace-gpt-vs-consensus-gpt.png)
Consensus GPT vs. SciSpace GPT: Choose the Best GPT for Research
Literature Review and Theoretical Framework: Understanding the Differences
![review of literature in research papers Nikhil Seethi](https://typeset.io/resources/content/images/size/w100/2023/11/NIKHILS.png)
Types of Essays in Academic Writing - Quick Guide (2024)
- UConn Library
- Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide
- Introduction
Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide — Introduction
- Getting Started
- How to Pick a Topic
- Strategies to Find Sources
- Evaluating Sources & Lit. Reviews
- Tips for Writing Literature Reviews
- Writing Literature Review: Useful Sites
- Citation Resources
- Other Academic Writings
What are Literature Reviews?
So, what is a literature review? "A literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. In writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries." Taylor, D. The literature review: A few tips on conducting it . University of Toronto Health Sciences Writing Centre.
Goals of Literature Reviews
What are the goals of creating a Literature Review? A literature could be written to accomplish different aims:
- To develop a theory or evaluate an existing theory
- To summarize the historical or existing state of a research topic
- Identify a problem in a field of research
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews . Review of General Psychology , 1 (3), 311-320.
What kinds of sources require a Literature Review?
- A research paper assigned in a course
- A thesis or dissertation
- A grant proposal
- An article intended for publication in a journal
All these instances require you to collect what has been written about your research topic so that you can demonstrate how your own research sheds new light on the topic.
Types of Literature Reviews
What kinds of literature reviews are written?
Narrative review: The purpose of this type of review is to describe the current state of the research on a specific topic/research and to offer a critical analysis of the literature reviewed. Studies are grouped by research/theoretical categories, and themes and trends, strengths and weakness, and gaps are identified. The review ends with a conclusion section which summarizes the findings regarding the state of the research of the specific study, the gaps identify and if applicable, explains how the author's research will address gaps identify in the review and expand the knowledge on the topic reviewed.
- Example : Predictors and Outcomes of U.S. Quality Maternity Leave: A Review and Conceptual Framework: 10.1177/08948453211037398
Systematic review : "The authors of a systematic review use a specific procedure to search the research literature, select the studies to include in their review, and critically evaluate the studies they find." (p. 139). Nelson, L. K. (2013). Research in Communication Sciences and Disorders . Plural Publishing.
- Example : The effect of leave policies on increasing fertility: a systematic review: 10.1057/s41599-022-01270-w
Meta-analysis : "Meta-analysis is a method of reviewing research findings in a quantitative fashion by transforming the data from individual studies into what is called an effect size and then pooling and analyzing this information. The basic goal in meta-analysis is to explain why different outcomes have occurred in different studies." (p. 197). Roberts, M. C., & Ilardi, S. S. (2003). Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology . Blackwell Publishing.
- Example : Employment Instability and Fertility in Europe: A Meta-Analysis: 10.1215/00703370-9164737
Meta-synthesis : "Qualitative meta-synthesis is a type of qualitative study that uses as data the findings from other qualitative studies linked by the same or related topic." (p.312). Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta-synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts . Journal of Advanced Nursing , 53 (3), 311-318.
- Example : Women’s perspectives on career successes and barriers: A qualitative meta-synthesis: 10.1177/05390184221113735
Literature Reviews in the Health Sciences
- UConn Health subject guide on systematic reviews Explanation of the different review types used in health sciences literature as well as tools to help you find the right review type
- << Previous: Getting Started
- Next: How to Pick a Topic >>
- Last Updated: Sep 21, 2022 2:16 PM
- URL: https://guides.lib.uconn.edu/literaturereview
![review of literature in research papers Creative Commons](https://s3.amazonaws.com/libapps/customers/757/images/by-nc.png)
- USC Libraries
- Research Guides
Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper
- 5. The Literature Review
- Purpose of Guide
- Design Flaws to Avoid
- Independent and Dependent Variables
- Glossary of Research Terms
- Reading Research Effectively
- Narrowing a Topic Idea
- Broadening a Topic Idea
- Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
- Academic Writing Style
- Applying Critical Thinking
- Choosing a Title
- Making an Outline
- Paragraph Development
- Research Process Video Series
- Executive Summary
- The C.A.R.S. Model
- Background Information
- The Research Problem/Question
- Theoretical Framework
- Citation Tracking
- Content Alert Services
- Evaluating Sources
- Primary Sources
- Secondary Sources
- Tiertiary Sources
- Scholarly vs. Popular Publications
- Qualitative Methods
- Quantitative Methods
- Insiderness
- Using Non-Textual Elements
- Limitations of the Study
- Common Grammar Mistakes
- Writing Concisely
- Avoiding Plagiarism
- Footnotes or Endnotes?
- Further Readings
- Generative AI and Writing
- USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
- Bibliography
A literature review surveys prior research published in books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation of these works in relation to the research problem being investigated. Literature reviews are designed to provide an overview of sources you have used in researching a particular topic and to demonstrate to your readers how your research fits within existing scholarship about the topic.
Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper . Fourth edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2014.
Importance of a Good Literature Review
A literature review may consist of simply a summary of key sources, but in the social sciences, a literature review usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories . A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in a way that informs how you are planning to investigate a research problem. The analytical features of a literature review might:
- Give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations,
- Trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates,
- Depending on the situation, evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant research, or
- Usually in the conclusion of a literature review, identify where gaps exist in how a problem has been researched to date.
Given this, the purpose of a literature review is to:
- Place each work in the context of its contribution to understanding the research problem being studied.
- Describe the relationship of each work to the others under consideration.
- Identify new ways to interpret prior research.
- Reveal any gaps that exist in the literature.
- Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly contradictory previous studies.
- Identify areas of prior scholarship to prevent duplication of effort.
- Point the way in fulfilling a need for additional research.
- Locate your own research within the context of existing literature [very important].
Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Jesson, Jill. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques . Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2011; Knopf, Jeffrey W. "Doing a Literature Review." PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (January 2006): 127-132; Ridley, Diana. The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students . 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2012.
Types of Literature Reviews
It is important to think of knowledge in a given field as consisting of three layers. First, there are the primary studies that researchers conduct and publish. Second are the reviews of those studies that summarize and offer new interpretations built from and often extending beyond the primary studies. Third, there are the perceptions, conclusions, opinion, and interpretations that are shared informally among scholars that become part of the body of epistemological traditions within the field.
In composing a literature review, it is important to note that it is often this third layer of knowledge that is cited as "true" even though it often has only a loose relationship to the primary studies and secondary literature reviews. Given this, while literature reviews are designed to provide an overview and synthesis of pertinent sources you have explored, there are a number of approaches you could adopt depending upon the type of analysis underpinning your study.
Argumentative Review This form examines literature selectively in order to support or refute an argument, deeply embedded assumption, or philosophical problem already established in the literature. The purpose is to develop a body of literature that establishes a contrarian viewpoint. Given the value-laden nature of some social science research [e.g., educational reform; immigration control], argumentative approaches to analyzing the literature can be a legitimate and important form of discourse. However, note that they can also introduce problems of bias when they are used to make summary claims of the sort found in systematic reviews [see below].
Integrative Review Considered a form of research that reviews, critiques, and synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated. The body of literature includes all studies that address related or identical hypotheses or research problems. A well-done integrative review meets the same standards as primary research in regard to clarity, rigor, and replication. This is the most common form of review in the social sciences.
Historical Review Few things rest in isolation from historical precedent. Historical literature reviews focus on examining research throughout a period of time, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory, phenomena emerged in the literature, then tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline. The purpose is to place research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and to identify the likely directions for future research.
Methodological Review A review does not always focus on what someone said [findings], but how they came about saying what they say [method of analysis]. Reviewing methods of analysis provides a framework of understanding at different levels [i.e. those of theory, substantive fields, research approaches, and data collection and analysis techniques], how researchers draw upon a wide variety of knowledge ranging from the conceptual level to practical documents for use in fieldwork in the areas of ontological and epistemological consideration, quantitative and qualitative integration, sampling, interviewing, data collection, and data analysis. This approach helps highlight ethical issues which you should be aware of and consider as you go through your own study.
Systematic Review This form consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect, report, and analyze data from the studies that are included in the review. The goal is to deliberately document, critically evaluate, and summarize scientifically all of the research about a clearly defined research problem . Typically it focuses on a very specific empirical question, often posed in a cause-and-effect form, such as "To what extent does A contribute to B?" This type of literature review is primarily applied to examining prior research studies in clinical medicine and allied health fields, but it is increasingly being used in the social sciences.
Theoretical Review The purpose of this form is to examine the corpus of theory that has accumulated in regard to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena. The theoretical literature review helps to establish what theories already exist, the relationships between them, to what degree the existing theories have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested. Often this form is used to help establish a lack of appropriate theories or reveal that current theories are inadequate for explaining new or emerging research problems. The unit of analysis can focus on a theoretical concept or a whole theory or framework.
NOTE: Most often the literature review will incorporate some combination of types. For example, a review that examines literature supporting or refuting an argument, assumption, or philosophical problem related to the research problem will also need to include writing supported by sources that establish the history of these arguments in the literature.
Baumeister, Roy F. and Mark R. Leary. "Writing Narrative Literature Reviews." Review of General Psychology 1 (September 1997): 311-320; Mark R. Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper . 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Kennedy, Mary M. "Defining a Literature." Educational Researcher 36 (April 2007): 139-147; Petticrew, Mark and Helen Roberts. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide . Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 2006; Torracro, Richard. "Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples." Human Resource Development Review 4 (September 2005): 356-367; Rocco, Tonette S. and Maria S. Plakhotnik. "Literature Reviews, Conceptual Frameworks, and Theoretical Frameworks: Terms, Functions, and Distinctions." Human Ressource Development Review 8 (March 2008): 120-130; Sutton, Anthea. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review . Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2016.
Structure and Writing Style
I. Thinking About Your Literature Review
The structure of a literature review should include the following in support of understanding the research problem :
- An overview of the subject, issue, or theory under consideration, along with the objectives of the literature review,
- Division of works under review into themes or categories [e.g. works that support a particular position, those against, and those offering alternative approaches entirely],
- An explanation of how each work is similar to and how it varies from the others,
- Conclusions as to which pieces are best considered in their argument, are most convincing of their opinions, and make the greatest contribution to the understanding and development of their area of research.
The critical evaluation of each work should consider :
- Provenance -- what are the author's credentials? Are the author's arguments supported by evidence [e.g. primary historical material, case studies, narratives, statistics, recent scientific findings]?
- Methodology -- were the techniques used to identify, gather, and analyze the data appropriate to addressing the research problem? Was the sample size appropriate? Were the results effectively interpreted and reported?
- Objectivity -- is the author's perspective even-handed or prejudicial? Is contrary data considered or is certain pertinent information ignored to prove the author's point?
- Persuasiveness -- which of the author's theses are most convincing or least convincing?
- Validity -- are the author's arguments and conclusions convincing? Does the work ultimately contribute in any significant way to an understanding of the subject?
II. Development of the Literature Review
Four Basic Stages of Writing 1. Problem formulation -- which topic or field is being examined and what are its component issues? 2. Literature search -- finding materials relevant to the subject being explored. 3. Data evaluation -- determining which literature makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the topic. 4. Analysis and interpretation -- discussing the findings and conclusions of pertinent literature.
Consider the following issues before writing the literature review: Clarify If your assignment is not specific about what form your literature review should take, seek clarification from your professor by asking these questions: 1. Roughly how many sources would be appropriate to include? 2. What types of sources should I review (books, journal articles, websites; scholarly versus popular sources)? 3. Should I summarize, synthesize, or critique sources by discussing a common theme or issue? 4. Should I evaluate the sources in any way beyond evaluating how they relate to understanding the research problem? 5. Should I provide subheadings and other background information, such as definitions and/or a history? Find Models Use the exercise of reviewing the literature to examine how authors in your discipline or area of interest have composed their literature review sections. Read them to get a sense of the types of themes you might want to look for in your own research or to identify ways to organize your final review. The bibliography or reference section of sources you've already read, such as required readings in the course syllabus, are also excellent entry points into your own research. Narrow the Topic The narrower your topic, the easier it will be to limit the number of sources you need to read in order to obtain a good survey of relevant resources. Your professor will probably not expect you to read everything that's available about the topic, but you'll make the act of reviewing easier if you first limit scope of the research problem. A good strategy is to begin by searching the USC Libraries Catalog for recent books about the topic and review the table of contents for chapters that focuses on specific issues. You can also review the indexes of books to find references to specific issues that can serve as the focus of your research. For example, a book surveying the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict may include a chapter on the role Egypt has played in mediating the conflict, or look in the index for the pages where Egypt is mentioned in the text. Consider Whether Your Sources are Current Some disciplines require that you use information that is as current as possible. This is particularly true in disciplines in medicine and the sciences where research conducted becomes obsolete very quickly as new discoveries are made. However, when writing a review in the social sciences, a survey of the history of the literature may be required. In other words, a complete understanding the research problem requires you to deliberately examine how knowledge and perspectives have changed over time. Sort through other current bibliographies or literature reviews in the field to get a sense of what your discipline expects. You can also use this method to explore what is considered by scholars to be a "hot topic" and what is not.
III. Ways to Organize Your Literature Review
Chronology of Events If your review follows the chronological method, you could write about the materials according to when they were published. This approach should only be followed if a clear path of research building on previous research can be identified and that these trends follow a clear chronological order of development. For example, a literature review that focuses on continuing research about the emergence of German economic power after the fall of the Soviet Union. By Publication Order your sources by publication chronology, then, only if the order demonstrates a more important trend. For instance, you could order a review of literature on environmental studies of brown fields if the progression revealed, for example, a change in the soil collection practices of the researchers who wrote and/or conducted the studies. Thematic [“conceptual categories”] A thematic literature review is the most common approach to summarizing prior research in the social and behavioral sciences. Thematic reviews are organized around a topic or issue, rather than the progression of time, although the progression of time may still be incorporated into a thematic review. For example, a review of the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics could focus on the development of online political satire. While the study focuses on one topic, the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics, it would still be organized chronologically reflecting technological developments in media. The difference in this example between a "chronological" and a "thematic" approach is what is emphasized the most: themes related to the role of the Internet in presidential politics. Note that more authentic thematic reviews tend to break away from chronological order. A review organized in this manner would shift between time periods within each section according to the point being made. Methodological A methodological approach focuses on the methods utilized by the researcher. For the Internet in American presidential politics project, one methodological approach would be to look at cultural differences between the portrayal of American presidents on American, British, and French websites. Or the review might focus on the fundraising impact of the Internet on a particular political party. A methodological scope will influence either the types of documents in the review or the way in which these documents are discussed.
Other Sections of Your Literature Review Once you've decided on the organizational method for your literature review, the sections you need to include in the paper should be easy to figure out because they arise from your organizational strategy. In other words, a chronological review would have subsections for each vital time period; a thematic review would have subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue. However, sometimes you may need to add additional sections that are necessary for your study, but do not fit in the organizational strategy of the body. What other sections you include in the body is up to you. However, only include what is necessary for the reader to locate your study within the larger scholarship about the research problem.
Here are examples of other sections, usually in the form of a single paragraph, you may need to include depending on the type of review you write:
- Current Situation : Information necessary to understand the current topic or focus of the literature review.
- Sources Used : Describes the methods and resources [e.g., databases] you used to identify the literature you reviewed.
- History : The chronological progression of the field, the research literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not already a chronology.
- Selection Methods : Criteria you used to select (and perhaps exclude) sources in your literature review. For instance, you might explain that your review includes only peer-reviewed [i.e., scholarly] sources.
- Standards : Description of the way in which you present your information.
- Questions for Further Research : What questions about the field has the review sparked? How will you further your research as a result of the review?
IV. Writing Your Literature Review
Once you've settled on how to organize your literature review, you're ready to write each section. When writing your review, keep in mind these issues.
Use Evidence A literature review section is, in this sense, just like any other academic research paper. Your interpretation of the available sources must be backed up with evidence [citations] that demonstrates that what you are saying is valid. Be Selective Select only the most important points in each source to highlight in the review. The type of information you choose to mention should relate directly to the research problem, whether it is thematic, methodological, or chronological. Related items that provide additional information, but that are not key to understanding the research problem, can be included in a list of further readings . Use Quotes Sparingly Some short quotes are appropriate if you want to emphasize a point, or if what an author stated cannot be easily paraphrased. Sometimes you may need to quote certain terminology that was coined by the author, is not common knowledge, or taken directly from the study. Do not use extensive quotes as a substitute for using your own words in reviewing the literature. Summarize and Synthesize Remember to summarize and synthesize your sources within each thematic paragraph as well as throughout the review. Recapitulate important features of a research study, but then synthesize it by rephrasing the study's significance and relating it to your own work and the work of others. Keep Your Own Voice While the literature review presents others' ideas, your voice [the writer's] should remain front and center. For example, weave references to other sources into what you are writing but maintain your own voice by starting and ending the paragraph with your own ideas and wording. Use Caution When Paraphrasing When paraphrasing a source that is not your own, be sure to represent the author's information or opinions accurately and in your own words. Even when paraphrasing an author’s work, you still must provide a citation to that work.
V. Common Mistakes to Avoid
These are the most common mistakes made in reviewing social science research literature.
- Sources in your literature review do not clearly relate to the research problem;
- You do not take sufficient time to define and identify the most relevant sources to use in the literature review related to the research problem;
- Relies exclusively on secondary analytical sources rather than including relevant primary research studies or data;
- Uncritically accepts another researcher's findings and interpretations as valid, rather than examining critically all aspects of the research design and analysis;
- Does not describe the search procedures that were used in identifying the literature to review;
- Reports isolated statistical results rather than synthesizing them in chi-squared or meta-analytic methods; and,
- Only includes research that validates assumptions and does not consider contrary findings and alternative interpretations found in the literature.
Cook, Kathleen E. and Elise Murowchick. “Do Literature Review Skills Transfer from One Course to Another?” Psychology Learning and Teaching 13 (March 2014): 3-11; Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper . 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Jesson, Jill. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques . London: SAGE, 2011; Literature Review Handout. Online Writing Center. Liberty University; Literature Reviews. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. and Rebecca Frels. Seven Steps to a Comprehensive Literature Review: A Multimodal and Cultural Approach . Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2016; Ridley, Diana. The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students . 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2012; Randolph, Justus J. “A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review." Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. vol. 14, June 2009; Sutton, Anthea. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review . Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2016; Taylor, Dena. The Literature Review: A Few Tips On Conducting It. University College Writing Centre. University of Toronto; Writing a Literature Review. Academic Skills Centre. University of Canberra.
Writing Tip
Break Out of Your Disciplinary Box!
Thinking interdisciplinarily about a research problem can be a rewarding exercise in applying new ideas, theories, or concepts to an old problem. For example, what might cultural anthropologists say about the continuing conflict in the Middle East? In what ways might geographers view the need for better distribution of social service agencies in large cities than how social workers might study the issue? You don’t want to substitute a thorough review of core research literature in your discipline for studies conducted in other fields of study. However, particularly in the social sciences, thinking about research problems from multiple vectors is a key strategy for finding new solutions to a problem or gaining a new perspective. Consult with a librarian about identifying research databases in other disciplines; almost every field of study has at least one comprehensive database devoted to indexing its research literature.
Frodeman, Robert. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity . New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Another Writing Tip
Don't Just Review for Content!
While conducting a review of the literature, maximize the time you devote to writing this part of your paper by thinking broadly about what you should be looking for and evaluating. Review not just what scholars are saying, but how are they saying it. Some questions to ask:
- How are they organizing their ideas?
- What methods have they used to study the problem?
- What theories have been used to explain, predict, or understand their research problem?
- What sources have they cited to support their conclusions?
- How have they used non-textual elements [e.g., charts, graphs, figures, etc.] to illustrate key points?
When you begin to write your literature review section, you'll be glad you dug deeper into how the research was designed and constructed because it establishes a means for developing more substantial analysis and interpretation of the research problem.
Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1 998.
Yet Another Writing Tip
When Do I Know I Can Stop Looking and Move On?
Here are several strategies you can utilize to assess whether you've thoroughly reviewed the literature:
- Look for repeating patterns in the research findings . If the same thing is being said, just by different people, then this likely demonstrates that the research problem has hit a conceptual dead end. At this point consider: Does your study extend current research? Does it forge a new path? Or, does is merely add more of the same thing being said?
- Look at sources the authors cite to in their work . If you begin to see the same researchers cited again and again, then this is often an indication that no new ideas have been generated to address the research problem.
- Search Google Scholar to identify who has subsequently cited leading scholars already identified in your literature review [see next sub-tab]. This is called citation tracking and there are a number of sources that can help you identify who has cited whom, particularly scholars from outside of your discipline. Here again, if the same authors are being cited again and again, this may indicate no new literature has been written on the topic.
Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. and Rebecca Frels. Seven Steps to a Comprehensive Literature Review: A Multimodal and Cultural Approach . Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2016; Sutton, Anthea. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review . Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2016.
- << Previous: Theoretical Framework
- Next: Citation Tracking >>
- Last Updated: Aug 21, 2024 8:54 AM
- URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide
Research Methods
- Getting Started
- Literature Review Research
- Research Design
- Research Design By Discipline
- SAGE Research Methods
- Teaching with SAGE Research Methods
Literature Review
- What is a Literature Review?
- What is NOT a Literature Review?
- Purposes of a Literature Review
- Types of Literature Reviews
- Literature Reviews vs. Systematic Reviews
- Systematic vs. Meta-Analysis
Literature Review is a comprehensive survey of the works published in a particular field of study or line of research, usually over a specific period of time, in the form of an in-depth, critical bibliographic essay or annotated list in which attention is drawn to the most significant works.
Also, we can define a literature review as the collected body of scholarly works related to a topic:
- Summarizes and analyzes previous research relevant to a topic
- Includes scholarly books and articles published in academic journals
- Can be an specific scholarly paper or a section in a research paper
The objective of a Literature Review is to find previous published scholarly works relevant to an specific topic
- Help gather ideas or information
- Keep up to date in current trends and findings
- Help develop new questions
A literature review is important because it:
- Explains the background of research on a topic.
- Demonstrates why a topic is significant to a subject area.
- Helps focus your own research questions or problems
- Discovers relationships between research studies/ideas.
- Suggests unexplored ideas or populations
- Identifies major themes, concepts, and researchers on a topic.
- Tests assumptions; may help counter preconceived ideas and remove unconscious bias.
- Identifies critical gaps, points of disagreement, or potentially flawed methodology or theoretical approaches.
- Indicates potential directions for future research.
All content in this section is from Literature Review Research from Old Dominion University
Keep in mind the following, a literature review is NOT:
Not an essay
Not an annotated bibliography in which you summarize each article that you have reviewed. A literature review goes beyond basic summarizing to focus on the critical analysis of the reviewed works and their relationship to your research question.
Not a research paper where you select resources to support one side of an issue versus another. A lit review should explain and consider all sides of an argument in order to avoid bias, and areas of agreement and disagreement should be highlighted.
A literature review serves several purposes. For example, it
- provides thorough knowledge of previous studies; introduces seminal works.
- helps focus one’s own research topic.
- identifies a conceptual framework for one’s own research questions or problems; indicates potential directions for future research.
- suggests previously unused or underused methodologies, designs, quantitative and qualitative strategies.
- identifies gaps in previous studies; identifies flawed methodologies and/or theoretical approaches; avoids replication of mistakes.
- helps the researcher avoid repetition of earlier research.
- suggests unexplored populations.
- determines whether past studies agree or disagree; identifies controversy in the literature.
- tests assumptions; may help counter preconceived ideas and remove unconscious bias.
As Kennedy (2007) notes*, it is important to think of knowledge in a given field as consisting of three layers. First, there are the primary studies that researchers conduct and publish. Second are the reviews of those studies that summarize and offer new interpretations built from and often extending beyond the original studies. Third, there are the perceptions, conclusions, opinion, and interpretations that are shared informally that become part of the lore of field. In composing a literature review, it is important to note that it is often this third layer of knowledge that is cited as "true" even though it often has only a loose relationship to the primary studies and secondary literature reviews.
Given this, while literature reviews are designed to provide an overview and synthesis of pertinent sources you have explored, there are several approaches to how they can be done, depending upon the type of analysis underpinning your study. Listed below are definitions of types of literature reviews:
Argumentative Review This form examines literature selectively in order to support or refute an argument, deeply imbedded assumption, or philosophical problem already established in the literature. The purpose is to develop a body of literature that establishes a contrarian viewpoint. Given the value-laden nature of some social science research [e.g., educational reform; immigration control], argumentative approaches to analyzing the literature can be a legitimate and important form of discourse. However, note that they can also introduce problems of bias when they are used to to make summary claims of the sort found in systematic reviews.
Integrative Review Considered a form of research that reviews, critiques, and synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated. The body of literature includes all studies that address related or identical hypotheses. A well-done integrative review meets the same standards as primary research in regard to clarity, rigor, and replication.
Historical Review Few things rest in isolation from historical precedent. Historical reviews are focused on examining research throughout a period of time, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory, phenomena emerged in the literature, then tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline. The purpose is to place research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and to identify the likely directions for future research.
Methodological Review A review does not always focus on what someone said [content], but how they said it [method of analysis]. This approach provides a framework of understanding at different levels (i.e. those of theory, substantive fields, research approaches and data collection and analysis techniques), enables researchers to draw on a wide variety of knowledge ranging from the conceptual level to practical documents for use in fieldwork in the areas of ontological and epistemological consideration, quantitative and qualitative integration, sampling, interviewing, data collection and data analysis, and helps highlight many ethical issues which we should be aware of and consider as we go through our study.
Systematic Review This form consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect, report, and analyse data from the studies that are included in the review. Typically it focuses on a very specific empirical question, often posed in a cause-and-effect form, such as "To what extent does A contribute to B?"
Theoretical Review The purpose of this form is to concretely examine the corpus of theory that has accumulated in regard to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena. The theoretical literature review help establish what theories already exist, the relationships between them, to what degree the existing theories have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested. Often this form is used to help establish a lack of appropriate theories or reveal that current theories are inadequate for explaining new or emerging research problems. The unit of analysis can focus on a theoretical concept or a whole theory or framework.
* Kennedy, Mary M. "Defining a Literature." Educational Researcher 36 (April 2007): 139-147.
All content in this section is from The Literature Review created by Dr. Robert Larabee USC
Robinson, P. and Lowe, J. (2015), Literature reviews vs systematic reviews. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 39: 103-103. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12393
What's in the name? The difference between a Systematic Review and a Literature Review, and why it matters . By Lynn Kysh from University of Southern California
Systematic review or meta-analysis?
A systematic review answers a defined research question by collecting and summarizing all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria.
A meta-analysis is the use of statistical methods to summarize the results of these studies.
Systematic reviews, just like other research articles, can be of varying quality. They are a significant piece of work (the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination at York estimates that a team will take 9-24 months), and to be useful to other researchers and practitioners they should have:
- clearly stated objectives with pre-defined eligibility criteria for studies
- explicit, reproducible methodology
- a systematic search that attempts to identify all studies
- assessment of the validity of the findings of the included studies (e.g. risk of bias)
- systematic presentation, and synthesis, of the characteristics and findings of the included studies
Not all systematic reviews contain meta-analysis.
Meta-analysis is the use of statistical methods to summarize the results of independent studies. By combining information from all relevant studies, meta-analysis can provide more precise estimates of the effects of health care than those derived from the individual studies included within a review. More information on meta-analyses can be found in Cochrane Handbook, Chapter 9 .
A meta-analysis goes beyond critique and integration and conducts secondary statistical analysis on the outcomes of similar studies. It is a systematic review that uses quantitative methods to synthesize and summarize the results.
An advantage of a meta-analysis is the ability to be completely objective in evaluating research findings. Not all topics, however, have sufficient research evidence to allow a meta-analysis to be conducted. In that case, an integrative review is an appropriate strategy.
Some of the content in this section is from Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: step by step guide created by Kate McAllister.
- << Previous: Getting Started
- Next: Research Design >>
- Last Updated: Jul 15, 2024 10:34 AM
- URL: https://guides.lib.udel.edu/researchmethods
![review of literature in research papers University of Texas](https://s3.amazonaws.com/libapps/accounts/78733/images/shield_texas_white_transparent.png)
- University of Texas Libraries
Literature Reviews
- What is a literature review?
- Steps in the Literature Review Process
- Define your research question
- Determine inclusion and exclusion criteria
- Choose databases and search
- Review Results
- Synthesize Results
- Analyze Results
- Librarian Support
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools
What is a Literature Review?
A literature or narrative review is a comprehensive review and analysis of the published literature on a specific topic or research question. The literature that is reviewed contains: books, articles, academic articles, conference proceedings, association papers, and dissertations. It contains the most pertinent studies and points to important past and current research and practices. It provides background and context, and shows how your research will contribute to the field.
A literature review should:
- Provide a comprehensive and updated review of the literature;
- Explain why this review has taken place;
- Articulate a position or hypothesis;
- Acknowledge and account for conflicting and corroborating points of view
From S age Research Methods
Purpose of a Literature Review
A literature review can be written as an introduction to a study to:
- Demonstrate how a study fills a gap in research
- Compare a study with other research that's been done
Or it can be a separate work (a research article on its own) which:
- Organizes or describes a topic
- Describes variables within a particular issue/problem
Limitations of a Literature Review
Some of the limitations of a literature review are:
- It's a snapshot in time. Unlike other reviews, this one has beginning, a middle and an end. There may be future developments that could make your work less relevant.
- It may be too focused. Some niche studies may miss the bigger picture.
- It can be difficult to be comprehensive. There is no way to make sure all the literature on a topic was considered.
- It is easy to be biased if you stick to top tier journals. There may be other places where people are publishing exemplary research. Look to open access publications and conferences to reflect a more inclusive collection. Also, make sure to include opposing views (and not just supporting evidence).
Source: Grant, Maria J., and Andrew Booth. “A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies.” Health Information & Libraries Journal, vol. 26, no. 2, June 2009, pp. 91–108. Wiley Online Library, doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
Librarian Assistance
For help, please contact the librarian for your subject area. We have a guide to library specialists by subject .
- Last Updated: Aug 26, 2024 5:59 AM
- URL: https://guides.lib.utexas.edu/literaturereviews
![review of literature in research papers Creative Commons License](https://mirrors.creativecommons.org/presskit/buttons/88x31/png/by-nc.png)
![review of literature in research papers U.S. flag](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/coreutils/uswds/img/favicons/favicon-57.png)
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means itâs official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure youâre on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
- Advanced Search
- Journal List
- Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS
- v.35(2); Jul-Dec 2014
Reviewing literature for research: Doing it the right way
Shital amin poojary.
Department of Dermatology, K J Somaiya Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Jimish Deepak Bagadia
In an era of information overload, it is important to know how to obtain the required information and also to ensure that it is reliable information. Hence, it is essential to understand how to perform a systematic literature search. This article focuses on reliable literature sources and how to make optimum use of these in dermatology and venereology.
INTRODUCTION
A thorough review of literature is not only essential for selecting research topics, but also enables the right applicability of a research project. Most importantly, a good literature search is the cornerstone of practice of evidence based medicine. Today, everything is available at the click of a mouse or at the tip of the fingertips (or the stylus). Google is often the Go-To search website, the supposed answer to all questions in the universe. However, the deluge of information available comes with its own set of problems; how much of it is actually reliable information? How much are the search results that the search string threw up actually relevant? Did we actually find what we were looking for? Lack of a systematic approach can lead to a literature review ending up as a time-consuming and at times frustrating process. Hence, whether it is for research projects, theses/dissertations, case studies/reports or mere wish to obtain information; knowing where to look, and more importantly, how to look, is of prime importance today.
Literature search
Fink has defined research literature review as a “systematic, explicit and reproducible method for identifying, evaluating, and synthesizing the existing body of completed and recorded work produced by researchers, scholars and practitioners.”[ 1 ]
Review of research literature can be summarized into a seven step process: (i) Selecting research questions/purpose of the literature review (ii) Selecting your sources (iii) Choosing search terms (iv) Running your search (v) Applying practical screening criteria (vi) Applying methodological screening criteria/quality appraisal (vii) Synthesizing the results.[ 1 ]
This article will primarily concentrate on refining techniques of literature search.
Sources for literature search are enumerated in Table 1 .
Sources for literature search
![An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g001.jpg An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g001.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553858/bin/IJSTD-35-85-g001.jpg)
PubMed is currently the most widely used among these as it contains over 23 million citations for biomedical literature and has been made available free by National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), U.S. National Library of Medicine. However, the availability of free full text articles depends on the sources. Use of options such as advanced search, medical subject headings (MeSH) terms, free full text, PubMed tutorials, and single citation matcher makes the database extremely user-friendly [ Figure 1 ]. It can also be accessed on the go through mobiles using “PubMed Mobile.” One can also create own account in NCBI to save searches and to use certain PubMed tools.
![An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g002.jpg An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g002.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553858/bin/IJSTD-35-85-g002.jpg)
PubMed home page showing location of different tools which can be used for an efficient literature search
Tips for efficient use of PubMed search:[ 2 , 3 , 4 ]
Use of field and Boolean operators
When one searches using key words, all articles containing the words show up, many of which may not be related to the topic. Hence, the use of operators while searching makes the search more specific and less cumbersome. Operators are of two types: Field operators and Boolean operators, the latter enabling us to combine more than one concept, thereby making the search highly accurate. A few key operators that can be used in PubMed are shown in Tables Tables2 2 and and3 3 and illustrated in Figures Figures2 2 and and3 3 .
Field operators used in PubMed search
![An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g003.jpg An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g003.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553858/bin/IJSTD-35-85-g003.jpg)
Boolean operators used in PubMed search
![An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g004.jpg An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g004.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553858/bin/IJSTD-35-85-g004.jpg)
PubMed search results page showing articles on donovanosis using the field operator [TIAB]; it shows all articles which have the keyword “donovanosis” in either title or abstract of the article
![An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g006.jpg An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g006.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553858/bin/IJSTD-35-85-g006.jpg)
PubMed search using Boolean operators ‘AND’, ‘NOT’; To search for articles on treatment of lepra reaction other than steroids, after clicking the option ‘Advanced search’ on the home page, one can build the search using ‘AND’ option for treatment and ‘NOT’ option for steroids to omit articles on steroid treatment in lepra reaction
Use of medical subject headings terms
These are very specific and standardized terms used by indexers to describe every article in PubMed and are added to the record of every article. A search using MeSH will show all articles about the topic (or keywords), but will not show articles only containing these keywords (these articles may be about an entirely different topic, but still may contain your keywords in another context in any part of the article). This will make your search more specific. Within the topic, specific subheadings can be added to the search builder to refine your search [ Figure 4 ]. For example, MeSH terms for treatment are therapy and therapeutics.
![An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g007.jpg An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g007.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553858/bin/IJSTD-35-85-g007.jpg)
PubMed search using medical subject headings (MeSH) terms for management of gonorrhea. Click on MeSH database ( Figure 1 ) →In the MeSH search box type gonorrhea and click search. Under the MeSH term gonorrhea, there will be a list of subheadings; therapy, prevention and control, click the relevant check boxes and add to search builder →Click on search →All articles on therapy, prevention and control of gonorrhea will be displayed. Below the subheadings, there are two options: (1) Restrict to medical subject headings (MeSH) major topic and (2) do not include MeSH terms found below this term in the MeSH hierarchy. These can be used to further refine the search results so that only articles which are majorly about treatment of gonorrhea will be displayed
Two additional options can be used to further refine MeSH searches. These are located below the subheadings for a MeSH term: (1) Restrict to MeSH major topic; checking this box will retrieve articles which are majorly about the search term and are therefore, more focused and (2) Do not include MeSH terms found below this term in the MeSH hierarchy. This option will again give you more focused articles as it excludes the lower specific terms [ Figure 4 ].
Similar feature is available with Cochrane library (also called MeSH), EMBASE (known as EMTREE) and PsycINFO (Thesaurus of Psychological Index Terms).
Saving your searches
Any search that one has performed can be saved by using the ‘Send to’ option and can be saved as a simple word file [ Figure 5 ]. Alternatively, the ‘Save Search’ button (just below the search box) can be used. However, it is essential to set up an NCBI account and log in to NCBI for this. One can even choose to have E-mail updates of new articles in the topic of interest.
![An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g008.jpg An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g008.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553858/bin/IJSTD-35-85-g008.jpg)
Saving PubMed searches. A simple option is to click on the dropdown box next to ‘Send to’ option and then choose among the options. It can be saved as a text or word file by choosing ‘File’ option. Another option is the “Save search” option below the search box but this will require logging into your National Center for Biotechnology Information account. This however allows you to set up alerts for E-mail updates for new articles
Single citation matcher
This is another important tool that helps to find the genuine original source of a particular research work (when few details are known about the title/author/publication date/place/journal) and cite the reference in the most correct manner [ Figure 6 ].
![Click on image to zoom An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g009.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553858/bin/IJSTD-35-85-g009.jpg)
Single citation matcher: Click on “Single citation matcher” on PubMed Home page. Type available details of the required reference in the boxes to get the required citation
Full text articles
In any search clicking on the link “free full text” (if present) gives you free access to the article. In some instances, though the published article may not be available free, the author manuscript may be available free of charge. Furthermore, PubMed Central articles are available free of charge.
Managing filters
Filters can be used to refine a search according to type of article required or subjects of research. One can specify the type of article required such as clinical trial, reviews, free full text; these options are available on a typical search results page. Further specialized filters are available under “manage filters:” e.g., articles confined to certain age groups (properties option), “Links” to other databases, article specific to particular journals, etc. However, one needs to have an NCBI account and log in to access this option [ Figure 7 ].
![An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g010.jpg An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g010.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553858/bin/IJSTD-35-85-g010.jpg)
Managing filters. Simple filters are available on the ‘search results’ page. One can choose type of article, e.g., clinical trial, reviews etc. Further options are available in the “Manage filters” option, but this requires logging into National Center for Biotechnology Information account
The Cochrane library
Although reviews are available in PubMed, for systematic reviews and meta-analysis, Cochrane library is a much better resource. The Cochrane library is a collection of full length systematic reviews, which can be accessed for free in India, thanks to Indian Council of Medical Research renewing the license up to 2016, benefitting users all over India. It is immensely helpful in finding detailed high quality research work done in a particular field/topic [ Figure 8 ].
![An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g011.jpg An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g011.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553858/bin/IJSTD-35-85-g011.jpg)
Cochrane library is a useful resource for reliable, systematic reviews. One can choose the type of reviews required, including trials
An important tool that must be used while searching for research work is screening. Screening helps to improve the accuracy of search results. It is of two types: (1) Practical: To identify a broad range of potentially useful studies. Examples: Date of publication (last 5 years only; gives you most recent updates), participants or subjects (humans above 18 years), publication language (English only) (2) methodological: To identify best available studies (for example, excluding studies not involving control group or studies with only randomized control trials).
Selecting the right quality of literature is the key to successful research literature review. The quality can be estimated by what is known as “The Evidence Pyramid.” The level of evidence of references obtained from the aforementioned search tools are depicted in Figure 9 . Systematic reviews obtained from Cochrane library constitute level 1 evidence.
![An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g012.jpg An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJSTD-35-85-g012.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553858/bin/IJSTD-35-85-g012.jpg)
Evidence pyramid: Depicting the level of evidence of references obtained from the aforementioned search tools
Thus, a systematic literature review can help not only in setting up the basis of a good research with optimal use of available information, but also in practice of evidence-based medicine.
Source of Support: Nil.
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library
- Collections
- Research Help
YSN Doctoral Programs: Steps in Conducting a Literature Review
- Biomedical Databases
- Global (Public Health) Databases
- Soc. Sci., History, and Law Databases
- Grey Literature
- Trials Registers
- Data and Statistics
- Public Policy
- Google Tips
- Recommended Books
- Steps in Conducting a Literature Review
What is a literature review?
A literature review is an integrated analysis -- not just a summary-- of scholarly writings and other relevant evidence related directly to your research question. That is, it represents a synthesis of the evidence that provides background information on your topic and shows a association between the evidence and your research question.
A literature review may be a stand alone work or the introduction to a larger research paper, depending on the assignment. Rely heavily on the guidelines your instructor has given you.
Why is it important?
A literature review is important because it:
- Explains the background of research on a topic.
- Demonstrates why a topic is significant to a subject area.
- Discovers relationships between research studies/ideas.
- Identifies major themes, concepts, and researchers on a topic.
- Identifies critical gaps and points of disagreement.
- Discusses further research questions that logically come out of the previous studies.
APA7 Style resources
APA Style Blog - for those harder to find answers
1. Choose a topic. Define your research question.
Your literature review should be guided by your central research question. The literature represents background and research developments related to a specific research question, interpreted and analyzed by you in a synthesized way.
- Make sure your research question is not too broad or too narrow. Is it manageable?
- Begin writing down terms that are related to your question. These will be useful for searches later.
- If you have the opportunity, discuss your topic with your professor and your class mates.
2. Decide on the scope of your review
How many studies do you need to look at? How comprehensive should it be? How many years should it cover?
- This may depend on your assignment. How many sources does the assignment require?
3. Select the databases you will use to conduct your searches.
Make a list of the databases you will search.
Where to find databases:
- use the tabs on this guide
- Find other databases in the Nursing Information Resources web page
- More on the Medical Library web page
- ... and more on the Yale University Library web page
4. Conduct your searches to find the evidence. Keep track of your searches.
- Use the key words in your question, as well as synonyms for those words, as terms in your search. Use the database tutorials for help.
- Save the searches in the databases. This saves time when you want to redo, or modify, the searches. It is also helpful to use as a guide is the searches are not finding any useful results.
- Review the abstracts of research studies carefully. This will save you time.
- Use the bibliographies and references of research studies you find to locate others.
- Check with your professor, or a subject expert in the field, if you are missing any key works in the field.
- Ask your librarian for help at any time.
- Use a citation manager, such as EndNote as the repository for your citations. See the EndNote tutorials for help.
Review the literature
Some questions to help you analyze the research:
- What was the research question of the study you are reviewing? What were the authors trying to discover?
- Was the research funded by a source that could influence the findings?
- What were the research methodologies? Analyze its literature review, the samples and variables used, the results, and the conclusions.
- Does the research seem to be complete? Could it have been conducted more soundly? What further questions does it raise?
- If there are conflicting studies, why do you think that is?
- How are the authors viewed in the field? Has this study been cited? If so, how has it been analyzed?
Tips:
- Review the abstracts carefully.
- Keep careful notes so that you may track your thought processes during the research process.
- Create a matrix of the studies for easy analysis, and synthesis, across all of the studies.
- << Previous: Recommended Books
- Last Updated: Jun 20, 2024 9:08 AM
- URL: https://guides.library.yale.edu/YSNDoctoral
AI tools for literature searching
Overview of ai tools for literature searching, selected tools, how to use these tools safely.
There are many new AI tools available to researchers and students which focus on academic sources (rather than general AI tools such as Copilot or ChatGPT). These tools offer a powerful new method of discovering academic literature and can be a great complement to traditional methods of searching the literature in your field.
For thorough or comprehensive searching such as for a research paper or thesis, you should still search the major academic databases in your field . These AI tools use freely available or negotiated underlying datasets. These datasets do not necessarily contain the important journals in any field, however academic databases are produced specifically to provide this coverage. You can find the databases in your field in our Subject Guides .
Some of the more popular tools you might like to explore are below. Note that there are many more, and new developments are happening all the time. You can search the web to investigate what is available.
An account is required to use Elicit. There is a free basic plan, and paid plans for extra features and capabilities | . Elicit can base answers on abstracts, plus the full text of open access papers | Enter your topic or question in natural language | |
Scite requires a login and payment to use Scite Assistant, or to see the full Scite Search results | Agreements with . | Scite has two main components. Scite Search lets you explore citation links between papers, and whether citations are positive, negative etc. Scite Assistant is the AI research assistant | |
You can use SciSpace without creating an account. There is a free basic plan, and paid plans for extra features and capabilities | Unknown | Enter your topic or question in natural language | |
You can search Consensus without creating an account, although certain features do require an account. There is a free basic plan, and paid plans for extra features and capabilities | Enter your topic or question in natural language. Turning the Copilot feature on enables you to give conversational commands such as 'Write a 3 paragraph literature review on...' or 'Give me a two sentence summary in simple language on...' | ||
You can use Keenious without creating an account. There is a free basic plan, and paid plans for extra features and capabilities | Keenious offers you recommendations of papers and topics, based on the text you're writing. You can write straight into the box on the Keenious website, or add the Keenious addon into Word or Google Docs on your personal device |
- Use these tools as an extra technique for research and not to replace a thorough search.
- Verify any information provided by generative AI tools with credible sources and check for missing information.
- Note that most of these tools do not have access to the full text of papers - they base their answers on titles and abstracts only. You should always access, read and cite the full papers that you use in your work.
- Don't upload materials from Library resources such as databases. This is in breach of copyright, and license agreements
- Don't upload your own sensitive or private documents. It's possible another user of the tool might retrieve your information from the underlying software
- You should acknowledge your use of AI tools to complete your work. See our guide on using Generative AI tools for assignments for more information.
- Last Updated: Aug 26, 2024 11:33 AM
- URL: https://guides.library.uq.edu.au/research-techniques/ai-tools-for-literature-searching
![review of literature in research papers CQUniversity](https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/876az-branding-figshare/cqu/logo_header.png)
Nexus between business process management (BPM) and accounting: A literature review and future research directions
Number of pages, publisher doi.
- https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-12-2016-0235
Full Text URL
- https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/BPMJ-12-2016-0235/full/html
Additional Rights
Peer reviewed, open access, acceptance date, era eligible, usage metrics.
![review of literature in research papers CQUniversity](https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/876az-branding-figshare/cqu/logo.png)
- Accounting, auditing and accountability not elsewhere classified
- Business process management
![review of literature in research papers CC BY-NC 4.0](https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/staticfigassets/images/CC-BY-NC.png)
Integrating Microservices and Microfrontends: A Comprehensive Literature Review on Architecture, Design Patterns, and Implementation Challenges
- This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.
Discover the world's research
- 25+ million members
- 160+ million publication pages
- 2.3+ billion citations
No full-text available
![review of literature in research papers Request Full-text Paper PDF](https://www.researchgate.net/images/symbols/publication/publication_pdf_icon.png)
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.
- Neha Kaushik
![review of literature in research papers Harish Kumar](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/11431281273338876-1724471802896_Q64/Harish-Kumar-194.jpg)
- Olena Nikulina
![review of literature in research papers Nataliia Khatsko](https://c5.rgstatic.net/m/4671872220764/images/template/default/profile/profile_default_m.jpg)
- Software Eng Notes
![review of literature in research papers Davide Taibi](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/642768061870081-1530259256904_Q64/Davide-Taibi.jpg)
- Luca Mezzalira
![review of literature in research papers Davide Berardi](https://c5.rgstatic.net/m/4671872220764/images/template/default/profile/profile_default_m.jpg)
- MarĂa-Luz Polo-Luque
- EMPIR SOFTW ENG
- Yingying Wang
- Harshavardhan Kadiyala
- Julia Rubin
![review of literature in research papers Martin Kleehaus](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/701191306637312-1544188443691_Q64/Martin-Kleehaus.jpg)
- Florian Matthes
![review of literature in research papers Luciano Baresi](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/959187169329153-1605699450139_Q64/Luciano-Baresi.jpg)
- J SYST SOFTWARE
![review of literature in research papers Paolo Di Francesco](https://c5.rgstatic.net/m/4671872220764/images/template/default/profile/profile_default_m.jpg)
- COMPUT GRAPH-UK
- Bruno SimÔes
![review of literature in research papers Maria del Puy Carretero](https://c5.rgstatic.net/m/4671872220764/images/template/default/profile/profile_default_m.jpg)
- Jorge MartĂnez
![review of literature in research papers Nieves AlcaĂn](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/272775587823618-1442046176161_Q64/Nieves-Alcain.jpg)
- Angeliki Aktypi
- Dimitris Karnikis
- Nikos Vasilakis
- Kasper Rasmussen
- Zhipeng Jia
![review of literature in research papers Emmett Witchel](https://c5.rgstatic.net/m/4671872220764/images/template/default/profile/profile_default_m.jpg)
- Lorenzo De Lauretis
- Baskaran Jambunathan
![review of literature in research papers Kalpana Y.](https://c5.rgstatic.net/m/4671872220764/images/template/default/profile/profile_default_m.jpg)
- Kasun Indrasiri
- Prabath Siriwardena
- Kapil Bakshi
- O Al-Mashhadani
- N S Elgheriani
- D V C Soares
- L Mezzalira
- Recruit researchers
- Join for free
- Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up
Information
- Author Services
Initiatives
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editorâs Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
- Active Journals
- Find a Journal
- Proceedings Series
- For Authors
- For Reviewers
- For Editors
- For Librarians
- For Publishers
- For Societies
- For Conference Organizers
- Open Access Policy
- Institutional Open Access Program
- Special Issues Guidelines
- Editorial Process
- Research and Publication Ethics
- Article Processing Charges
- Testimonials
- Preprints.org
- SciProfiles
- Encyclopedia
![Applied Sciences applsci-logo](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/img/journals/applsci-logo.png?8600e93ff98dbf14)
Article Menu
![review of literature in research papers review of literature in research papers](https://www.mdpi.com/bundles/mdpisciprofileslink/img/unknown-user.png)
- Subscribe SciFeed
- Recommended Articles
- Google Scholar
- on Google Scholar
- Table of Contents
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
JSmol Viewer
Additive manufacturing of ph 13-8 mo family: a review.
![ORCID review of literature in research papers](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/img/design/orcid.png?0465bc3812adeb52?1724334283)
1. Introduction
PH 13-8 Mo Family | Fe | C | Si | Mn | Cr | Ni | Mo | Al | S | N | Reference (Data from) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH 13-8 Mo | Bal. | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 12.25â13.25 | 7.5â8.5 | 2â2.5 | 0.9â1.35 | 0.01 | 0.01 | Ghaffari et al. [ ] |
EOS StainlessSteel CX | Bal. | â€0.05 | â€0.40 | â€0.40 | 11.00â13.00 | 8.40â10.00 | 1.10â1.70 | 1.20â2.00 | - | - | Chang et al. [ ] |
Uddeholm AM Corrax | Bal. | 0.03 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 12 | 9.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 | - | - | Krakhmalev et al. [ ] |
Material | Ref. (Data from) | Material Form | Solution Treatment (ST) + Aging (A) | Cooling | Building Direction | Ultimate Tensile Strength (MPa) | Yield Strength (MPa) | Elongation (%) | Hardness | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH 13-8 Mo | [ ] | Wrought | ST: 927 ± 15 °C | A: 510 ± 6 °C for 4 h | ST: Cool to below 60 °C A: Air cooling | - | 1515 | 1410 | 10 | 45 HRC |
EOS StainlessSteel CX | [ ] | Additive Manufacturing | ST: 850 ± 10 °C for 30 min | A: 525 ± 10 °C for 2 h | ST: Rapid air cooling below 32 °C A: Air cooling | Vertical | 1740 | 1670 | 6 | 50 HRC |
Horizontal | 1720 | 1650 | 7 | |||||||
Uddeholm AM Corrax | [ ] | Additive Manufacturing | ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 4 h | ST: Cool in air A: Cool in air to room temperature | - | 1700 | 1600 | 10 | 50 HRC |
2. PBF-LB of PH 13-8 Mo Family
2.1. as-built microstructure, 2.2. post-processing heat treatments: microstructure, 2.3. material properties, 2.3.1. tensile properties and hardness.
Material | Reference (Data from) | Process/Machine | Process Parameters LP * (W) HS * (ÎŒm) SS * (mm/s) LT * (ÎŒm) | Condition | Building Direction | Tensile Test Direction | Ultimate Tensile Strength (MPa) | Yield Strength (MPa) | Elongation (%) | Hardness | Cooling | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EOS Stainless Steel CX | Asgari et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/EOS M290 | LP: 258.7 HS: 100 SS: 1066.7 LT: 30 | As-built | H * | - | 1113 | 1036 | 21.7 | 35 ± 1 HRC | - | ||||
Yan et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/EOS M290 | LP: 260 HS: 100 SS: 1060 LT: 30 | As-built | - | - | 1043 ± 7 | 694 ± 6.5 | 16.3 ± 0.06 | 350 ± 8.5 HV0.2 | - | |||||
ST *: 900 °C for 1 h | 926 ± 5.7 | 784 ± 5.3 | 14.4 ± 0.07 | 325 ± 12.7 HV0.2 | Air cooling | ||||||||||
A *: 530 °C for 3 h | 1510 ± 8.5 | 1395 ± 5.8 | 9.3 ± 0.11 | 500 ± 9.8 HV0.2 | |||||||||||
ST: 900 °C for 1 h | A: 530 °C for 3 h | 1601 ± 5.2 | 1528 ± 8.1 | 7.3 ± 0.18 | 510 ± 10.5 HV0.2 | ||||||||||
Chang et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/EOS M290 | LP: 260 HS: 100 SS: 1060 LT: 30 | As-built | - | - | - | - | - | 357 HV0.2 | - | |||||
ST: 900 °C for 1 h | - | - | - | 326 HV0.2 | |||||||||||
A: 530 °C for 3 h | - | - | - | 504 HV0.2 | |||||||||||
ST: 900 °C for 1 h | A: 530 °C for 3 h | - | - | - | 514 HV0.2 | ||||||||||
Hadadzadeh et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/EOS M290 | LP: 258.7 HS: 100 SS: 1066.7 LT: 30 | As-built | - | - | - | - | - | 336 ± 5 HV0.3 | - | |||||
ST: 900 °C for 1 h | - | - | - | 296 ± 6 HV0.3 | Rapid air cooling | ||||||||||
A: 530 °C for 3 h | - | - | - | 502 ± 15 HV0.3 | - | ||||||||||
ST: 900 °C for 1 h | A: 530 °C for 3 h | - | - | - | 301 ± 3 HV0.3 | ST: Rapid air cooling | |||||||||
Dong et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/EOS M290 | HS: 100 LT: 30 | LED * = 182 J/m | As-built | - | - | 1033 ± 4.4 | 892 ± 10.7 | 11.1 ± 0.55 | 325 ± 3.5 HV0.05 | - | ||||
LED = 245 J/m | As-built | 1068 ± 5.9 | 889 ± 7.3 | 15.7 ± 0.26 | 351 ± 4.8 HV0.05 | - | |||||||||
LED = 333 J/m | As-built | 1059 ± 2.8 | 886 ± 12.3 | 14.7 ± 0.26 | 342 ± 4.2 HV0.05 | - | |||||||||
Zhang et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/HBD-280 | LP: 340 HS: 100 SS: 850 LT: 50 | As-built | H | - | 1058 ± 2 | 992 ± 6 | 18.4 ± 0.9 | 38.1 ± 0.5 HRC | - | |||||
ST: 900 °C for 1 h | 982 ± 9 | 819 ± 11 | 12.7 ± 0.4 | 29.7 ± 0.6 HRC | Air cooling | ||||||||||
A: 530 °C for 3 h | 1648 ± 1 | 1503 ± 21 | 11.6 ± 0.5 | 49.4 ± 0.2 HRC | Furnace cooling | ||||||||||
ST: 900 °C for 1 h | A: 530 °C for 3 h | 1683 ± 10 | 1563 ± 56 | 8.4 ± 1.6 | 50.4 ± 0.5 HRC | ST: Air cooling A: Furnace cooling | |||||||||
Turnier Trottier et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/EOS M280 | LP: 260 HS: 100 SS: 1067 LT: 60 | As-built | H | P * | 1098.3 ± 2.5 | 874.8 ± 23.6 | 16.06 ± 0.19 | XY: 36 ± 0.7 HRC | XZ: 33.3 ± 1.9 HRC | - | ||||
V * | PL * | 1079.5 ± 1.2 | 793.7 ± 62.3 | 10.76 ± 0.51 | |||||||||||
ST: 850 °C for 30 min | H | P | 1029.3 ± 1.0 | 781.7 ± 33.8 | 12.93 ± 0.26 | XY: 31.5 ± 0.7 HRC | XZ: 30.6 ± 0.7 HRC | Forced air cooling | |||||||
V | PL | 1051.8 ± 5.8 | 853.4 ± 6.6 | 10.99 ± 0.76 | |||||||||||
ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 1 h | - | - | - | - | - | XY: 47.8 ± 0.5 HRC | XZ: 48.7 ± 0.3 HRC | |||||||
ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 2 h | H | P | 1719.5 ± 15.0 | 1647.3 ± 8.3 | 8.22 ± 0.54 | XY: 50.7 ± 0.8 HRC | XZ: 50.4 ± 1.0 HRC | |||||||
V | PL | 1698.1 ± 10.4 | 1617.2 ± 45.0 | 6.31 ± 0.22 | |||||||||||
ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 3 h | - | - | - | - | - | XY: 49.1 ± 0.2 HRC | XZ: 49.1 ± 0.2 HRC | |||||||
ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 4 h | - | - | - | - | - | XY: 48.7 ± 0.3 HRC | XZ: 48.7 ± 0.2 HRC | |||||||
ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 6 h | - | - | - | - | - | XY: 48.6 ± 0.2 HRC | XZ: 48.1 ± 0.3 HRC | |||||||
Fang et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/FARSOON FS121M | LP: 190 HS: 90 SS: 1100 LT: 30 | As-built | - | - | 1084 ± 3 | 946 ± 7.3 | 17.64 ± 0.18 | 374.2 ± 6.5 HV0.2 | - | |||||
ÄiriÄ-KostiÄ et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/EOSINT M290 | LT: 30 | As-built | - | - | - | - | - | 31.0 ± 1.5 HRC | - | |||||
ST: 900 °C for 45 min | A: 530 °C for 3 h | - | - | - | - | - | 47.0 ± 0.9 HRC | ST: Rapid cooling in air A: Cooling in a furnace | |||||||
Chang et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/EOS M290 | LP: 260 HS: 100 SS: 1060 LT: 30 | As-built | - | - | - | - | - | 354.9 ± 8.8 HV0.2 | - | |||||
ST: 900 °C for 1 h | A: 530 °C for 3 h | - | - | - | - | - | 533.4 ± 9.7 HV0.2 | Argon cooled | |||||||
Chang et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/EOS M290 | LP: 260 HS: 100 SS: 1060 LT: 30 | As-built | - | - | - | - | - | 356 ± 14.3 HV0.2 | - | |||||
AS *: 900 °C for 1 h | - | - | - | - | - | 320 ± 7.2 HV0.2 | Argon cooled | ||||||||
T *: 530 °C for 3 h | - | - | - | - | - | 515 ± 6.8 HV0.2 | |||||||||
AS: 900 °C for 1 h | T: 530 °C for 3 h | - | - | - | - | - | 527 ± 5.2 HV0.2 | ||||||||
Afkhami et al. [ , ] | PBF-LB/EOS M290-Not machined | LP: 260 HS: 100 SS: 1000 LT: 30 | As-built | V | PL | 1081.2 | 899.3 | 13.3 | - | - | |||||
ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 2 h | V | PL | 1641.5 | 1556.3 | 8.1 | - | Air cooled | |||||||
PBF-LB/EOS M290-Machined | As-built | H | P | 1170.4 | 1006.0 | 16.6 | BP *: 318 HV3 | SP *: 336 HV3 | - | ||||||
ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 2 h | H | P | 1680.1 | 1533.4 | 11.2 | BP: 467 HV3 | SP: 462 HV3 | Air cooled | ||||||
As-built | V | PL | 1090.2 | 919.2 | 10.5 | BP: 324 HV3 | SP: 322 HV3 | - | |||||||
ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 2 h | V | PL | 1682.7 | 1600.9 | 5.9 | BP: 477 HV3 | SP: 472 HV3 | Air cooled | ||||||
Afkhami et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/EOS M290 | LP: 260 HS: 100 SS: 1000 LT: 30 | As-built | - | - | - | - | - | 320 HV3 | - | |||||
ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 2 h | - | - | - | - | - | 460 HV3 | Air cooled | |||||||
Sanjari et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/EOS M290 | LP: 258.7 HS: 100 SS: 1066.7 LT: 30 | As-built | H | P | 1092 ± | 807 ± | 21.2 ± | - | - | |||||
V | PL | 1085 ± | 1036 ± | 5.7 ± | - | - | |||||||||
Fabian et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/EOS M290 | LP: 258.7 HS: 100 SS: 1067 LT: 30 | As-built | - | - | 1032 | 929 | 15.3 | 39.9 ± 2.9 HRC | - | |||||
A: 400 °C for 1667 min | - | - | - | 48.6 ± 0.1 HRC | - | ||||||||||
A: 460 °C for 1078 min | - | - | - | 50.8 ± 0.3 HRC | - | ||||||||||
A: 495 °C for 424 min | - | - | - | 50.9 ± 0.2 HRC | - | ||||||||||
A: 530 °C for 180 min | - | - | - | 50.4 ± 0.5 HRC | - | ||||||||||
A: 550 °C for 115 min | 1738 | 1659 | 14.7 | 51.2 ± 1.9 HRC | - | ||||||||||
A: 600 °C for 40 min | - | - | - | 43.4 ± 0.4 HRC | - | ||||||||||
Zhou et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/FARSOON FS121M | LP: 170 HS: 90 SS: 900 LT: 30 | As-built | - | - | 1084 ± 3 | 946 ± 7 | 14.6 ± 0.9 | 362 ± 7 HV0.2 | - | |||||
ST: 850 °C for 1 h | - | - | 875 ± 10 | 784 ± 13 | 12.2 ± 0.5 | 339.2 HV0.2 | Air cooling | ||||||||
ST: 875 °C for 1 h | - | - | 808 ± 13 | 781± 16 | 11.8 ± 0.8 | 330.0 HV0.2 | |||||||||
ST: 900 °C for 1 h | - | - | 893 ± 8 | 832 ± 11 | 11.1 ± 0.5 | 325.6 HV0.2 | |||||||||
ST: 925 °C for 1 h | - | - | 836 ± 12 | 722 ± 15 | 11.9 ± 0.7 | 316.2 HV0.2 | |||||||||
ST: 950 °C for 1 h | - | - | 672 ± 13 | 511 ± 17 | 11.0 ± 0.7 | 307.9 HV0.2 | |||||||||
ST: 900 °C for 0.5 h | - | - | 870 ± 10 | 717 ± 13 | 11.6 ± 0.5 | 327.8 HV0.2 | |||||||||
ST: 900 °C for 0.75 h | - | - | 779 ± 13 | 600 ± 16 | 11.8 ± 0.8 | 326.3 HV0.2 | |||||||||
ST: 900 °C for 1.25 h | - | - | 788 ± 12 | 612 ± 15 | 11.9 ± 0.7 | 321.2 HV0.2 | |||||||||
ST: 900 °C for 1.5 h | - | - | 806 ± 9 | 710 ± 17 | 11.7 ± 0.6 | 318.2 HV0.2 | |||||||||
ST: 900 °C for 1 h | A: 430 °C for 3 h | - | - | 1500 ± 21 | 1398 ± 43 | 10.9 ± 1.3 | 389.3 HV0.2 | ||||||||
ST: 900 °C for 1 h | A: 480 °C for 3 h | - | - | 1493 ± 15 | 1400 ± 36 | 10.6 ± 0.9 | 454.9 HV0.2 | ||||||||
ST: 900 °C for 1 h | A: 530 °C for 3 h | - | - | 1598 ± 10 | 1486 ± 19 | 9.6 ± 0.8 | 526.3 HV0.2 | ||||||||
ST: 900 °C for 1 h | A: 580 °C for 3 h | - | - | 1305 ± 12 | 1196 ± 24 | 11.1 ± 1.0 | 432.6 HV0.2 | ||||||||
ST: 900 °C for 1 h | A: 630 °C for 3 h | - | - | 1132 ± 13 | 912 ± 33 | 17.4 ± 1.6 | 396.4 HV0.2 | ||||||||
Uddeholm AM Corrax | Oikonomou et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/TruPrint 1000 | LP: 175 HS: 50 SS: 800 LT: 20 | As-built | - | - | - | - | - | 35 HRC | - | ||||
ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 4 h | V | - | 1667 ± 7 | 1595 ± 12 | 1.7 ± 0.6 | 50 HRC | - | |||||||
ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 4 h | H | - | 1624 ± 13.7 | 1518 ± 14.2 | 3.68 ± 1.3 | - | ||||||||
PBF-LB/EOS M290 | LP: 170 HS: 100 SS: 1250 LT: 30 | As-built | - | - | - | - | - | 35 HRC | - | ||||||
ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 4 h | V | - | 1701 ± 4 | 1640 ± 12 | 8.6 ± 0.3 | 50 HRC | - | |||||||
ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 4 h | H | - | 1653 ± 6 | 1560 ± 18 | 9.7 ± 0.3 | - | ||||||||
Krakhmalev et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/EOS M290 | LP: 170 HS: 100 SS: 1250 LT: 30 | ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 4 h | - | - | - | - | - | 49.4 HRC | Air cooling | ||||
HIP-ST: 850 °C for 30 min, 150 MPa | HIP-A: 525 °C for 4 h, 150 MPa | - | - | - | - | - | 45.9 HRC | After ST cooled down from 850 °C to 60 °C in 60 s | |||||||
Chang et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/EOS M290 | LSP *: 170 Όm | As-built | - | - | 1065.7 ± 6.7 | 911.0 ± 9.2 | 8.4 ± 0.2 | 31.6 ±1.4 HRC | - | |||||
HIP *: 1300 °C, 100 min, 175 MPa | - | - | 928.8 ± 38.9 | 844.5 ± 57.1 | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 30.7 ± 2.1 HRC | Cooling in N2 gas | ||||||||
HIP: 1300 °C, 100 min, 175 MPa | A: 525 °C for 4 h | - | - | 1330.4 ± 104.2 | 1150.7 ± 42.3 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 47.5 ± 1.3 HRC | ||||||||
HIP: 1300 °C, 100 min, 175 MPa | ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 4 h | - | - | 1245.3 ± 198.1 | 1052.5 ± 25.9 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 48.8 ± 0.5 HRC | |||||||
Maistro et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/EOS M290 | Non-optimized parameters | ST: 850 °C for 30 min in vacuum | A: 525 °C for 4 h in vacuum | - | - | 1711 ± 2 | 1633 ± 9 | - | 49 HRC | - | ||||
URQ-HIP *: 850 °C, 30 min | URQ-HIP: 525 °C for 4 h | - | - | - | - | - | 43 HRC | - | |||||||
PBF-LB | Optimized parameters | ST: 850 °C for 30 min in vacuum | A: 525 °C for 4 h | - | - | - | - | - | 49.9 HRC | - | |||||
URQ-HIP: 850 °C, 30 min | A: 525 °C for 4 h | - | - | - | - | - | 51.4 HRC | A: Air cooled | |||||||
Chadha et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/EOS M290 | - | ST: 900 °C for 1 h | A: 530 °C for 3 h | - | PL | 1724 ± 14 | 1666 ± 12 | 6 ± 1 | 50 ± 1 HRC | - | ||||
- | P | 1702 ± 16 | 1628 ± 13 | 7 ± 1 | 50 ± 1 HRC | - | |||||||||
Wu et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/EOS M290 | LP: 170 HS: 100 SS: 1250 LT: 30 | As-built | H | - | 1168 ± 16 | 476 ± 8 | 16.6 ± 0.1 | - | - | |||||
As-built | V | - | 1145 ± 8 | 728 ± 45 | 14.2 ± 0.2 | ||||||||||
ST: 850 °C for 30 min | H | - | 1118 ± 21 | 664 ± 13 | 13.5 ± 0.2 | - | ST: Quenched in N | ||||||||
ST: 850 °C for 30 min | V | - | 1129 ± 14 | 717 ± 16 | 12.9 ± 0.2 | ||||||||||
ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 4 h | H | - | 1589 ± 24 | 1335 ± 127 | 12.4 ± 1.2 | - | ST: Quenched in N A: Air cooled | |||||||
ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 4 h | V | - | 1578 ± 47 | 1386 ± 73 | 11.7 ± 1.5 |
2.3.2. Impact Toughness
2.3.3. corrosion properties, 2.3.4. fatigue properties, 2.3.5. tribological performance, 3. ded-arc of ph 13-8 mo family, 3.1. as-built: microstructure, 3.2. post-processing heat treatments: microstructure, 3.3. material properties, 3.3.1. tensile properties and hardness, 3.3.2. corrosion resistance, 3.3.3. tribological performance, 4. comparison of pbf-lb and ded-arc of ph 13-8 mo family, 5. ded-lb of ph 13-8 mo family, 6. summary and outlook, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
- Lippold, J.C.; Kotecki, D.J. Welding Metallurgy and Weldability of Stainless Steels ; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005; ISBN 9780471473794. [ Google Scholar ]
- Guo, Z.; Sha, W.; Wilson, E.A.; Grey, R.W. Improving Toughness of PH13-8 Stainless Steel through Intercritical Annealing. ISIJ Int. 2003 , 43 , 1622â1629. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Schnitzer, R.; Zickler, G.A.; Lach, E.; Clemens, H.; Zinner, S.; Lippmann, T.; Leitner, H. Influence of Reverted Austenite on Static and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of a PH 13-8 Mo Maraging Steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2010 , 527 , 2065â2070. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Smith, R.; Wyche, E.H.; Gorr, W.W. A Precipitation-Hardening Stainless Steel of the 18 Percent Chromium, 8 Percent Nickel Type. Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Pet. Eng. 1946 , 167 , 77. [ Google Scholar ]
- Ludwigson, D.C.; Hall, A.M. The Physical Metallurgy of Precipitation-Hardenable Stainless Steels ; Defense Metals Information Center, Battelle Memorial Institute: Columbus, OH, USA, 1959; Volume 111. [ Google Scholar ]
- Mukherjee, T.; Elmer, J.W.; Wei, H.L.; Lienert, T.J.; Zhang, W.; Kou, S.; DebRoy, T. Control of Grain Structure, Phases, and Defects in Additive Manufacturing of High-Performance Metallic Components. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2023 , 138 , 101153. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Garrison, W.M.; Brooks, J.A. The Thermal and Mechanical Stability of Austenite in the Low Carbon Martensitic Steel PH 13-8. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 1991 , 149 , 65â72. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Fox, C.; Tilton, C.; Rousseau, C.-E.; Shukla, A.; Sheeley, C.; Hebert, R. Dynamic Constitutive Behavior of Additively Manufactured 17-4PH Stainless Steel. J. Dyn. Behav. Mater. 2022 , 8 , 242â254. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Murray, G.T. Hydrogen Embrittlement Of 15-5 PH Stainless Steels. Metall. Trans. A 1981 , 12 , 2138â2141. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Hoenie, A.F.; Roach, D.B. New Developments in High-Strength Stainless Steels ; Defense Metals Information Center, Battelle Memorial Institute: Columbus, OH, USA, 1966; Volume 223. [ Google Scholar ]
- Campbell, C.; Stoudt, M.; Zhang, F. Additive Manufacturing of Steels and Stainless Steels. In Additive Manufacturing Processes ; ASM International: Materials Park, OH, USA, 2020; Volume 24. [ Google Scholar ]
- Habibi-Bajguirani, H.R.; Jenkins, M.L. High-Resolution Electron Microscopy Analysis of the Structure of Copper Precipitates in a Martensitic Stainless Steel of Type PH 15-5. Philos. Mag. Lett. 1996 , 73 , 155â162. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Pepi, M.S.; Grendahl, S.M.; Champagne, V.K. Effect of Prior Processing on the Performance of PH 13-8 Mo Stainless Steel Helicopter Components. Pract. Fail. Anal. 2001 , 1 , 65â76. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Slunder, C.J.; Hoenie, A.F.; Hall, A.M. Thermal and Mechanical Treatment for Precipitation-Hardening Stainless Steels ; Battelle Memorial Institute: Columbus, OH, USA, 1968. [ Google Scholar ]
- Rosenauer, A.; Brandl, D.; Ressel, G.; Lukas, S.; Monschein, S.; Stockinger, M.; Schnitzer, R. Influence of Delta Ferrite on the Impact Toughness of a PH 13-8 Mo Maraging Steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2022 , 856 , 144024. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Carrouge, D.; Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H.; Woollin, P. Effect of ÎŽ-Ferrite on Impact Properties of Supermartensitic Stainless Steel Heat Affected Zones. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 2004 , 9 , 377â389. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Li, X.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J.; Shen, S.; Yang, G.; Wang, T.; Song, X. Effect of Aging Treatment on Hydrogen Embrittlement of PH 13-8 Mo Martensite Stainless Steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2016 , 651 , 474â485. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Ping, D.H.; Ohnuma, M.; Hirakawa, Y.; Kadoya, Y.; Hono, K. Microstructural Evolution in 13Cr-8Ni-2.5Mo-2Al Martensitic Precipitation-Hardened Stainless Steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005 , 394 , 285â295. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Schnitzer, R.; Radis, R.; Nöhrer, M.; Schober, M.; Hochfellner, R.; Zinner, S.; Povoden-Karadeniz, E.; Kozeschnik, E.; Leitner, H. Reverted Austenite in PH 13-8 Mo Maraging Steels. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2010 , 122 , 138â145. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Cieslak, M.J.; Hills, C.R.; Hlava, P.F.; David, S.A. An Investigation of the High-Temperature and Solidification Microstructures of PH 13-8 Mo Stainless Steel. Metall. Trans. A 1990 , 21 , 2465â2475. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Hamlin, R.J.; DuPont, J.N. Microstructural Evolution and Mechanical Properties of Simulated Heat-Affected Zones in Cast Precipitation-Hardened Stainless Steels 17-4 and 13-8+Mo. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2017 , 48 , 246â264. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Mittra, J.; Dey, G.K.; Sen, D.; Patra, A.K.; Mazumder, S.; De, P.K. Solution Quenched Structure of Wrought PH 13â8 Mo Stainless Steel. Scr. Mater. 2004 , 51 , 349â353. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Niessen, F.; Tiedje, N.S.; Hald, J. Kinetics Modeling of Delta-Ferrite Formation and Retainment during Casting of Supermartensitic Stainless Steel. Mater. Des. 2017 , 118 , 138â145. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Seetharaman, V.; Sundararaman, M.; Krishnan, R. Precipitation Hardening in a PH 13-8 Mo Stainless Steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1981 , 47 , 1â11. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Guo, Z.; Sha, W.; Vaumousse, D. Microstructural Evolution in a PH13-8 Stainless Steel after Ageing. Acta Mater. 2003 , 51 , 101â116. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Hochanadel, P.W.; Edwards, G.R.; Robino, C.V.; Cieslak, M.J. Heat Treatment of Investment Cast PH 13-8 Mo Stainless Steel: Part I. Mechanical Properties and Microstructure. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 1994 , 25 , 789â798. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- ASTM A693-16 ; Standard Specification for Precipitation-Hardening Stainless and Heat-Resisting Steel Plate, Sheet, and Strip. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2016.
- Ghaffari, M.; Vahedi Nemani, A.; Nasiri, A. Microstructure and Mechanical Behavior of PH 13â8Mo Martensitic Stainless Steel Fabricated by Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 2022 , 49 , 102374. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Chang, C.; Yan, X.; Bolot, R.; Gardan, J.; Gao, S.; Liu, M.; Liao, H.; Chemkhi, M.; Deng, S. Influence of Post-Heat Treatments on the Mechanical Properties of CX Stainless Steel Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting. J. Mater. Sci. 2020 , 55 , 8303â8316. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Krakhmalev, P.; Fredriksson, G.; Thuvander, M.; Ă sberg, M.; Vilardell, A.M.; Oikonomou, C.; Maistro, G.; Medvedeva, A.; Kazantseva, N. Influence of Heat Treatment under Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) on Microstructure of Intermetallic-Reinforced Tool Steel Manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2020 , 772 , 138699. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- EOS StainlessSteel CX-Material Data Sheet. Available online: Https://Www.Eos.Info/03_system-Related-Assets/Material-Related-Contents/Metal-Materials-and-Examples/Metal-Material-Datasheet/Stainlesssteel/Material_datasheet_eos_stainlesssteel_cx_premium_en_web.Pdf (accessed on 18 February 2024).
- Uddeholm AM Corrax Âź-Material Data Sheet. Available online: https://www.uddeholm.com/app/uploads/sites/36/2017/08/AM-Corrax-english_1705_e1.pdf (accessed on 18 February 2024).
- ISO/ASTM 52900 ; Additive ManufacturingâGeneral PrinciplesâFundamentals and Vocabulary. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.
- DebRoy, T.; Wei, H.L.; Zuback, J.S.; Mukherjee, T.; Elmer, J.W.; Milewski, J.O.; Beese, A.M.; Wilson-Heid, A.; De, A.; Zhang, W. Additive Manufacturing of Metallic ComponentsâProcess, Structure and Properties. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018 , 92 , 112â224. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Svetlizky, D.; Zheng, B.; Vyatskikh, A.; Das, M.; Bose, S.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Schoenung, J.M.; Lavernia, E.J.; Eliaz, N. Laser-Based Directed Energy Deposition (DED-LB) of Advanced Materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2022 , 840 , 142967. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Svetlizky, D.; Das, M.; Zheng, B.; Vyatskikh, A.L.; Bose, S.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Schoenung, J.M.; Lavernia, E.J.; Eliaz, N. Directed Energy Deposition (DED) Additive Manufacturing: Physical Characteristics, Defects, Challenges and Applications. Mater. Today 2021 , 49 , 271â295. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Wu, B.; Pan, Z.; Ding, D.; Cuiuri, D.; Li, H.; Xu, J.; Norrish, J. A Review of the Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing of Metals: Properties, Defects and Quality Improvement. J. Manuf. Process. 2018 , 35 , 127â139. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Bajaj, P.; Hariharan, A.; Kini, A.; KĂŒrnsteiner, P.; Raabe, D.; JĂ€gle, E.A. Steels in Additive Manufacturing: A Review of Their Microstructure and Properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2020 , 772 , 138633. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Attaran, M. The Rise of 3-D Printing: The Advantages of Additive Manufacturing over Traditional Manufacturing. Bus. Horiz. 2017 , 60 , 677â688. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Singh, R.P.; Suman, R.; Rab, S. Role of Additive Manufacturing Applications towards Environmental Sustainability. Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 2021 , 4 , 312â322. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Haghdadi, N.; Laleh, M.; Moyle, M.; Primig, S. Additive Manufacturing of Steels: A Review of Achievements and Challenges. J. Mater. Sci. 2021 , 56 , 64â107. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Asgari, H.; Mohammadi, M. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Stainless Steel CX Manufactured by Direct Metal Laser Sintering. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2018 , 709 , 82â89. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Shahriari, A.; Khaksar, L.; Nasiri, A.; Hadadzadeh, A.; Amirkhiz, B.S.; Mohammadi, M. Microstructure and Corrosion Behavior of a Novel Additively Manufactured Maraging Stainless Steel. Electrochim. Acta 2020 , 339 , 135925. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Shahriari, A.; Sanjari, M.; Pirgazi, H.; Fazeli, F.; Shalchi Amirkhiz, B.; Kestens, L.A.I.; Mohammadi, M. Microstructural Evolution in Additively Manufactured Fe-Cr-Ni Maraging Stainless Steel. Met. Mater. Trans. A 2022 , 53 , 1771â1792. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Pirgazi, H.; Sanjari, M.; Tamimi, S.; Shalchi Amirkhiz, B.; Kestens, L.A.I.; Mohammadi, M. Texture Evolution in Selective Laser Melted Maraging Stainless Steel CX with Martensitic Transformation. J. Mater. Sci. 2021 , 56 , 844â853. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Fang, R.; Deng, N.; Zhang, H.; Wang, G.; Su, Y.; Zhou, H.; Gao, K.; Gu, L. Effect of Selective Laser Melting Process Parameters on the Microstructure and Properties of a Precipitation Hardening Stainless Steel. Mater. Des. 2021 , 212 , 110265. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Yan, X.; Chen, C.; Chang, C.; Dong, D.; Zhao, R.; Jenkins, R.; Wang, J.; Ren, Z.; Liu, M.; Liao, H.; et al. Study of the Microstructure and Mechanical Performance of C-X Stainless Steel Processed by Selective Laser Melting (SLM). Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2020 , 781 , 139227. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Hadadzadeh, A.; Shahriari, A.; Amirkhiz, B.S.; Li, J.; Mohammadi, M. Additive Manufacturing of an FeâCrâNiâAl Maraging Stainless Steel: Microstructure Evolution, Heat Treatment, and Strengthening Mechanisms. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2020 , 787 , 139470. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Zhang, J.; Wang, M.; Niu, L.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Shi, Z. Effect of Process Parameters and Heat Treatment on the Properties of Stainless Steel CX Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting. J. Alloys Compd. 2021 , 877 , 160062. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Oikonomou, C.; Karamchedu, S.; Heino, S.; Sjöström, J. Material Properties and Quality Considerations for Tool Steels Made with AM Technology. BHM Berg-Und HĂŒttenmĂ€nnische Monatshefte 2017 , 162 , 188â191. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Dong, D.; Chang, C.; Wang, H.; Yan, X.; Ma, W.; Liu, M.; Deng, S.; Gardan, J.; Bolot, R.; Liao, H. Selective Laser Melting (SLM) of CX Stainless Steel: Theoretical Calculation, Process Optimization and Strengthening Mechanism. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021 , 73 , 151â164. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Kok, Y.; Tan, X.P.; Wang, P.; Nai, M.L.S.; Loh, N.H.; Liu, E.; Tor, S.B. Anisotropy and Heterogeneity of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties in Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Critical Review. Mater. Des. 2018 , 139 , 565â586. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Sanjari, M.; Mahmoudiniya, M.; Pirgazi, H.; Tamimi, S.; Ghoncheh, M.H.; Shahriairi, A.; Hadadzadeh, A.; Amirkhiz, B.S.; Purdy, M.; de Araujo, E.G.; et al. Microstructure, Texture, and Anisotropic Mechanical Behavior of Selective Laser Melted Maraging Stainless Steels. Mater. Charact. 2022 , 192 , 112185. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Sanjari, M.; Hadadzadeh, A.; Pirgazi, H.; Shahriari, A.; Amirkhiz, B.S.; Kestens, L.A.I.; Mohammadi, M. Selective Laser Melted Stainless Steel CX: Role of Built Orientation on Microstructure and Micro-Mechanical Properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2020 , 786 , 139365. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Afkhami, S.; Javaheri, V.; Dabiri, E.; Piili, H.; Björk, T. Effects of Manufacturing Parameters, Heat Treatment, and Machining on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of 13Cr10Ni1·7Mo2Al0·4Mn0·4Si Steel Processed by Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2022 , 832 , 142402. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Wu, M.W.; Ku, S.W.; Yen, H.W.; Ku, M.H.; Chang, S.H.; Ni, K.; Shih, Z.S.; Tsai, C.; Hsu, T.W.; Li, C.L.; et al. The Synergic Effects of Heat Treatment and Building Direction on the Microstructure and Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Corrax Maraging Stainless Steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2023 , 887 , 145744. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Chadha, K.; Tian, Y.; Jiang, L.; Dorin, T.; Spray, J.; Aranas, C. Strengthening Mechanisms in a New Precipitation Hardening Stainless Steel Fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion. MRS Commun. 2022 , 12 , 365â369. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Chang, S.H.; Liu, Y.M.; Huang, K.T.; Wang, S.C. Effects of Mechanical Properties on Precipitation Hardening Stainless Steel by Selective Laser Melting, Hot Isostatic Pressing, Solid-Solution and Aging Treatments. Powder Metall. 2020 , 63 , 19â26. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Turnier Trottier, W.; Kreitcberg, A.; Brailovski, V. Structure and Mechanical Properties of Laser Powder Bed-Fused and Wrought Ph13-8mo-Type Precipitation Hardening Stainless Steels: Comparative Study. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2021 , 5 , 67. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Afkhami, S.; Javaheri, V.; Dabiri, E.; Piili, H.; Björk, T. Data Related to the Microstructural Identification and Analyzing the Mechanical Properties of Maraging Stainless Steel 13Cr10Ni1.7Mo2Al0.4Mn0.4Si (Commercially Known as CX) Processed by Laser Powder Bed Fusion Method. Data Brief 2022 , 41 , 107856. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Zhou, H.; Wang, Z.; Huang, Y.; Han, Z.; Zhang, H.; Chen, S.; Qin, S.; Gu, L. Effect of Heat Treatment on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of a Precipitation-Hardened Stainless Steel Prepared by Selective Laser Melting. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2024 . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Fabian, R.; Hadadzadeh, A. Breaking Strength-Ductility Trade-off in Laser-Powder Bed Fused FeâCrâNiâAl Maraging Stainless Steel: Controlled Precipitation and Preserved Dislocations. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2023 , 868 , 144761. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Afkhami, S.; Javaheri, V.; LipiÀinen, K.; Amraei, M.; Dabiri, E.; Björk, T. Fatigue Performance of Stainless Tool Steel CX Processed by Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2022 , 841 , 143031. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Maistro, G.; Oikonomou, C.; Hosseini, S.B.; Brorson, S. Quenching and Hot Isostatic Pressing of Additively Manufactured Tool Steel. SSRN Electron. J. 2021 . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- ÄiriÄ-KostiÄ, S.; Croccolo, D.; De Agostinis, M.; Fini, S.; Olmi, G.; Paiardini, L.; Robusto, F.; Ć oĆĄkiÄ, Z.; BogojeviÄ, N. Fatigue Response of Additively Manufactured Maraging Stainless Steel CX and Effects of Heat Treatment and Surface Finishing. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 2022 , 45 , 482â499. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Chang, C.; Yan, X.; Deng, Z.; Chu, Q.; Deng, S.; Bolot, R.; Chemkhi, M.; Liu, M.; Liao, H.; Gardan, J. Effect of Heat Treatment on Residual Stress and Wear Resistance of CX Stainless Steel Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting. Procedia CIRP 2021 , 104 , 738â743. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Chang, C.; Yan, X.; Deng, Z.; Lu, B.; Bolot, R.; Gardan, J.; Deng, S.; Chemkhi, M.; Liu, M.; Liao, H. Heat Treatment Induced Microstructural Evolution, Oxidation Behavior and Tribological Properties of Fe-12Cr-9Ni-2Al Steel (CX Steel) Prepared Using Selective Laser Melting. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2022 , 429 , 127982. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Lu, Z.; Zhang, C.; Fang, R.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, H.; Deng, N.; Guo, Z.; Gu, L. Microstructure Evolution and Corrosion Behavior of the Novel Maraging Stainless Steel Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting. Mater. Charact. 2022 , 190 , 112078. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Vahedi Nemani, A.; Ghaffari, M.; Salahi, S.; Nasiri, A. On the Microstructural Characteristics and Corrosion Performance of As-Printed and Heat-Treated PH 13â8Mo Martensitic Stainless Steel Fabricated by Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing. Mater. Today Commun. 2023 , 34 , 105477. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Vahedi Nemani, A.; Ghaffari, M.; Nasiri, A. On the Nucleation Site and Formation Sequence of Secondary Phases during Isothermal High-Temperature Aging of Wire Arc Additively Manufactured PH13â8Mo Stainless Steel. Vacuum 2022 , 201 , 111076. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Ghaffari, M.; Vahedi Nemani, A.; Nasiri, A. Microstructural Evolution and Mechanical Performance after Precipitation Hardening of PH 13-8Mo Martensitic Stainless Steel Fabricated by Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing. Materialia 2022 , 24 , 101507. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Moniruzzaman, F.M.; Nasiri, A.; Hadadzadeh, A. Evading Strength-Ductility Trade-off in Directed Energy Deposited Precipitation Hardenable Stainless Steels: A Pathway through Precipitation Kinetics Modeling, Design of Heat Treatment, and Evolution of Clusters. Mater. Today Commun. 2023 , 35 , 105934. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Afshari, E.; Ghaffari, M.; Vahedi Nemani, A.; Nasiri, A. Effect of Heat Treatment on Microstructure and Tribological Performance of PH 13-8Mo Stainless Steel Fabricated via Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing. Wear 2023 , 526â527 , 204947. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Benoit, M.J.; Tabaie, S.; Waqar, T.; Ganton, T.; Amirkhiz, B.S.; Hadadzadeh, A.; Nasiri, A. Effects of Additive Manufacturing Processes and Isothermal Aging on the Microstructure and Properties of 13-8 Mo Precipitation Hardening Martensitic Stainless Steel. Addit. Manuf. 2023 , 72 , 103615. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Moniruzzaman, F.M.; Shakil, S.I.; Shaha, S.K.; Kacher, J.; Nasiri, A.; Haghshenas, M.; Hadadzadeh, A. Study of Direct Aging Heat Treatment of Additively Manufactured PH13â8Mo Stainless Steel: Role of the Manufacturing Process, Phase Transformation Kinetics, and Microstructure Evolution. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023 , 24 , 3772â3787. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Muslim, T.; Karagoz, T.; Ozkok, R.; Yilmaz, O.; Kas, M. Influence of Laser Energy Density on Geometrical Forms Produced by Laser Metal Deposition of PH 13-8 Mo Stainless Steel. J. Addit. Manuf. Technol. 2021 , 1 , 591. [ Google Scholar ]
- Aydin, G.; Valiente Bermejo, M.A.; Högström, M.; Ćelte, A.; Oikonomou, C.; Andersson, J. Influence of Laser Metal Deposition Process Parameters on a Precipitation Hardening Stainless Steel. Weld. World 2023 , 67 , 1067â1080. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Aydin, G.; Ćelte, A.; Andersson, J.; Valiente Bermejo, M.A. Towards Laser Metal Deposition of Modified PH 13-8Mo Powder. Key Eng. Mater. 2023 , 964 , 85â90. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Kas, M.; Muslim, T.; Yilmaz, O.; Karagoz, T.; Turedi, E.; Gumus, S.; Bayram, A. Directed Energy Deposition of PH 13â8 Mo Stainless Steel: Microstructure and Mechanical Property Analysis. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2024 , 132 , 701â715. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Zheng, B.; Smugeresky, J.E.; Zhou, Y.; Lavernia, E.J. Microstructure and Properties of PH13-8Mo Steel Fabricated by LENSÂź. USA. 2006. Available online: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1264589 (accessed on 18 February 2024).
- Rabiey, M.; Schiesser, P.; Maerchy, P. Direct Metal Deposition (DMD) for Tooling Repair of DIN 1.2343 Steel. Procedia CIRP 2020 , 95 , 23â28. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Click here to enlarge figure
Material | Reference (Data from) | Process | Condition | Direction | Notched Impact Toughness (J) | Unnotched Impact Toughness (J) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EOS StainlessSteel CX | Chang et al. [ ] | PBF-LB | As-built | - | 83.8 | - | |
ST *: 900 °C for 1 h | - | 73.5 | - | ||||
A *: 530 °C for 3 h | - | 5.5 | - | ||||
ST: 900 °C for 1 h | A: 530 °C for 3 h | - | 5.3 | - | |||
Zhang et al. [ ] | PBF-LB | As-built | - | 57.7 ± 2.5 | - | ||
ST: 900 °C for 1 h | - | 66.3 ± 3.2 | - | ||||
A: 530 °C for 3 h | - | 10.3 ± 0.6 | - | ||||
ST: 900 °C for 1 h | ST: 900 °C for 1 h | - | 8.7 ± 0.6 | - | |||
Afkhami et al. [ , ] | PBF-LB | As-built | Vertical | 128 | - | ||
Horizontal | 139 | ||||||
ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 2 h | Vertical | 22 | - | |||
Horizontal | 29 | ||||||
Uddeholm AM Corrax | Oikonomou et al. [ ] | PBF-LB (TruPrint 1000) | ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 4 h | Vertical | 6.22 ± 0.53 | - |
Horizontal | 11.17 ± 0.68 | - | |||||
PBF-LB (EOS M290) | ST: 850 °C for 30 min | A: 525 °C for 4 h | Vertical | 18.70 ± 2.16 | - | ||
Horizontal | 22.06 ± 2.54 | - | |||||
Maistro et al. [ ] | PBF-LB (non-optimized parameters) | ST: 850 °C for 30 min in vacuum | A: 525 °C for 4 h in vacuum | - | 9.8 ± 1.1 | - | |
URQ-HIP *: 850 °C, 30 min | URQ-HIP: 525 °C for 4 h | - | 11.4 ± 1.2 | 156 ± 26 | |||
PBF-LB (optimized parameters) | ST: 850 °C for 30 min in vacuum | A: 525 °C for 4 h | - | - | ~240 | ||
URQ-HIP: 850 °C, 30 min | A: 525 °C for 4 h | - | - | ~210 | |||
URQ-HIP: 1140 °C, 30 min | A: 525 °C for 4 h | - | - | ~175 |
Material | Ref. (Data from) | Process | Process Parameters | Condition | Building Direction | Ultimate Tensile Strength (MPa) | Yield Strength (MPa) | Elongation (%) | Hardness | Cooling | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH 13-8 Mo | Ghaffari et al. [ ] | DED-Arc | AAC *: 135 A AV *: 28 V WFS *: 67 mm/s TS *: 4 mm/s | As-built | H * | 1115 ± 17 | - | 11.4 ± 1.8 | 35.4 ± 0.8 HRC | - | |
V * | 1120 ± 15 | - | 6.1 ± 1.1 | ||||||||
Ghaffari et al. [ ] | DED-Arc | AAC: 135 A AV: 28 V WFS: 67 mm/s TS: 4 mm/s | As-built | H | ~1114 | - | ~11.4 | 326 ± 11 HV0.5 | - | ||
V | ~1121 | - | ~6.3 | ||||||||
ST *: 900 °C for 1 h | - | - | - | - | 339 ± 8 HV0.5 | Still-air-cooling | |||||
ST: 950 °C for 1 h | - | - | - | - | 351 ± 5 HV0.5 | ||||||
ST: 1050 °C for 1 h | - | - | - | - | 396 ± 2 HV0.5 | ||||||
ST: 1150 °C for 1 h | - | - | - | - | 311 ± 7 HV0.5 | ||||||
ST: 1050 °C for 1 h | A *: 400 °C for 4 h | - | ~1203 | - | ~9.9 | 373 ± 2 HV0.5 | ST: Still-air cooling | ||||
ST: 1050 °C for 1 h | A: 450 °C for 4 h | - | ~1420 | - | ~9.3 | 507 ± 4 HV0.5 | |||||
ST: 1050 °C for 1 h | A: 500 °C for 4 h | - | ~1510 | - | ~9 | 538 ± 3 HV0.5 | |||||
ST: 1050 °C for 1 h | A: 550 °C for 4 h | - | ~1350 | - | ~9.7 | 474 ± 4 HV0.5 | |||||
ST: 1050 °C for 1 h | A: 600 °C for 4 h | - | ~910 | - | ~12.1 | 294 ± 6 HV0.5 | |||||
Moniruzzaman et al. [ ] | DED-Arc | AAC: 135 A AV: 28 V WFS: 67 mm/s TS: 4 mm/s | As-Built | V | 1046 | 860 | 14 | 33.6 HRC | - | ||
A: 400 °C for 312 min | - | - | - | - | 41.9 HRC | - | |||||
A: 460 °C for 77 min | - | - | - | - | 41.1 HRC | ||||||
A: 495 °C for 45 min | V | 1363 | 911 | 16.3 | 46.4 HRC | ||||||
A: 510 °C for 25 min | - | - | - | - | 42.4 HRC | ||||||
A: 530 °C for 10 min | - | - | - | - | 39.8 HRC |
Material | Reference (Data from) | Process | Process Parameters | Condition | Ultimate Tensile Strength (MPa) | Yield Strength (MPa) | Elongation (%) | Hardness | Cooling |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EOS Stainless Steel CX | Benoit et al. [ ] | PBF-LB/EOS M290 | * LP: 259 W * HS: 100 ÎŒm * SS: 1067 mm/s * LT: 30 ÎŒm | As-Built | - | - | - | 347.7 HV1 | - |
A *: 530 °C for 3 h | - | - | - | 508.3 HV1 | Water quenching | ||||
PH 13-8 Mo | DED-Arc | * AAC: 135 A * AV: 28 V * WFS: 67 mm/s * TS: 4 mm/s | As-Built | - | - | - | 401 HV1 | - | |
A: 530 °C for 3 h | - | - | - | 428.3 HV1 | Water quenching | ||||
PH 13-8 Mo | Moniruzzaman et al. [ ] | DED-Arc | AAC: 135 A AV: 28 V WFS: 67 mm/s TS: 4 mm/s | As-Built | 1046 | 860 | 14 | 33.6 ± 1.2 HRC | - |
A: 495 °C for 45 min | 1363 | 911 | 16.3 | 46.4 ± 0.5 HRC | - | ||||
PBF-LB/EOS M290 | LP: 258.7 W HS: 100 Όm SS: 1067 mm/s LT: 30 Όm | As-Built | 1032 | 929 | 15.3 | 34.9 ± 2.9 HRC | - | ||
A: 550 °C for 115 min | 1738 | 1659 | 14.7 | 51.2 ± 0.4 HRC | - |
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Share and Cite
Aydin, G.; Andersson, J.; Valiente Bermejo, M.A. Additive Manufacturing of PH 13-8 Mo Family: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2024 , 14 , 7572. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177572
Aydin G, Andersson J, Valiente Bermejo MA. Additive Manufacturing of PH 13-8 Mo Family: A Review. Applied Sciences . 2024; 14(17):7572. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177572
Aydin, Gökçe, Joel Andersson, and Maria Asuncion Valiente Bermejo. 2024. "Additive Manufacturing of PH 13-8 Mo Family: A Review" Applied Sciences 14, no. 17: 7572. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177572
Article Metrics
Further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
![MDPI Open Access Journals MDPI](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/img/design/mdpi-pub-logo-white-small.png?71d18e5f805839ab?1724334283)
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
![](http://serviteca.online/777/templates/cheerup2/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
COMMENTS
A literature review is a critical analysis and synthesis of existing research on a particular topic. It provides an overview of the current state of knowledge, identifies gaps, and highlights key findings in the literature. 1 The purpose of a literature review is to situate your own research within the context of existing scholarship ...
A literature review can be a part of a research paper or scholarly article, usually falling after the introduction and before the research methods sections. In these cases, the lit review just needs to cover scholarship that is important to the issue you are writing about; sometimes it will also cover key sources that informed your research ...
Examples of literature reviews. Step 1 - Search for relevant literature. Step 2 - Evaluate and select sources. Step 3 - Identify themes, debates, and gaps. Step 4 - Outline your literature review's structure. Step 5 - Write your literature review.
This paper discusses literature review as a methodology for conducting research and offers an overview of different types of reviews, as well as some guidelines to how to both conduct and evaluate a literature review paper. It also discusses common pitfalls and how to get literature reviews published. 1.
Writing a literature review requires a range of skills to gather, sort, evaluate and summarise peer-reviewed published data into a relevant and informative unbiased narrative. Digital access to research papers, academic texts, review articles, reference databases and public data sets are all sources of information that are available to enrich ...
Types of Literature Review are as follows: Narrative literature review: This type of review involves a comprehensive summary and critical analysis of the available literature on a particular topic or research question. It is often used as an introductory section of a research paper. Systematic literature review: This is a rigorous and ...
A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research. There are five key steps to writing a literature review: Search for relevant literature. Evaluate sources. Identify themes, debates and gaps.
One of my favourite review-style articles 3 presents a plot bringing together data from multiple research papers (many of which directly contradict each other). This is then used to identify broad ...
Quality research is about building onto the existing work of others, "standing on the shoulders of giants", as Newton put it.The literature review chapter of your dissertation, thesis or research project is where you synthesise this prior work and lay the theoretical foundation for your own research.. Long story short, this chapter is a pretty big deal, which is why you want to make sure ...
Most research papers include a literature review. By assessing the available sources in your field of research, you will be able to make a more confident argument about the topic. đ„š What type of papers include literature reviews? Literature reviews are most commonly found in theses and dissertations. However, you find them in research papers ...
Definition. A literature review is an assessment of the sources in a chosen topic of research. In a literature review, you're expected to report on the existing scholarly conversation, without adding new contributions. If you are currently writing one, you've come to the right place. In the following paragraphs, we will explain: the objective ...
Mapping the gap. The purpose of the literature review section of a manuscript is not to report what is known about your topic. The purpose is to identify what remains unknownâwhat academic writing scholar Janet Giltrow has called the 'knowledge deficit'âthus establishing the need for your research study [].In an earlier Writer's Craft instalment, the Problem-Gap-Hook heuristic was ...
A literature review is a review and synthesis of existing research on a topic or research question. A literature review is meant to analyze the scholarly literature, make connections across writings and identify strengths, weaknesses, trends, and missing conversations. A literature review should address different aspects of a topic as it ...
A literature review is much more than just another section in your research paper. It forms the very foundation of your research. It is a formal piece of writing where you analyze the existing theoretical framework, principles, and assumptions and use that as a base to shape your approach to the research question.
Example: Predictors and Outcomes of U.S. Quality Maternity Leave: A Review and Conceptual Framework: 10.1177/08948453211037398 ; Systematic review: "The authors of a systematic review use a specific procedure to search the research literature, select the studies to include in their review, and critically evaluate the studies they find." (p. 139).
Literature reviews are in great demand in most scientific fields. Their need stems from the ever-increasing output of scientific publications .For example, compared to 1991, in 2008 three, eight, and forty times more papers were indexed in Web of Science on malaria, obesity, and biodiversity, respectively .Given such mountains of papers, scientists cannot be expected to examine in detail every ...
A literature review may consist of simply a summary of key sources, but in the social sciences, a literature review usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories.A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in a way that ...
A literature review is a surveys scholarly articles, books and other sources relevant to a particular. issue, area of research, or theory, and by so doing, providing a description, summary, and ...
Literature Review is a comprehensive survey of the works published in a particular field of study or line of research, usually over a specific period of time, in the form of an in-depth, critical bibliographic essay or annotated list in which attention is drawn to the most significant works.. Also, we can define a literature review as the collected body of scholarly works related to a topic:
A literature or narrative review is a comprehensive review and analysis of the published literature on a specific topic or research question. The literature that is reviewed contains: books, articles, academic articles, conference proceedings, association papers, and dissertations. It contains the most pertinent studies and points to important ...
Selecting the right quality of literature is the key to successful research literature review. The quality can be estimated by what is known as "The Evidence Pyramid.". The level of evidence of references obtained from the aforementioned search tools are depicted in Figure 9. Systematic reviews obtained from Cochrane library constitute ...
A literature review is an integrated analysis-- not just a summary-- of scholarly writings and other relevant evidence related directly to your research question.That is, it represents a synthesis of the evidence that provides background information on your topic and shows a association between the evidence and your research question.
Steps for Conducting a Lit Review; Finding "The Literature" Organizing/Writing; APA Style This link opens in a new window; Chicago: Notes Bibliography This link opens in a new window; MLA Style This link opens in a new window; Sample Literature Reviews. Sample Lit Reviews from Communication Arts; Have an exemplary literature review? Get Help!
The keyword search resulted in 1353 articles including research article, conference paper, review article, conference review, book chapter, and book as shown in Table 1. Table 1. Search results of the keywords used in the study. ... The last research objective of the literature review, determines that additive manufacturing gets over the ...
These tools offer a powerful new method of discovering academic literature and can be a great complement to traditional methods of searching the literature in your field. For thorough or comprehensive searching such as for a research paper or thesis, you should still search the major academic databases in your field. These AI tools use freely ...
This article employs a systematic literature review of a total of 111 publications from 2016 to 2023 on the consumer adoption/acceptance of FinTech products and services. It identifies seven research clusters from the extant literature to note the trends in adoption and enlist the challenges faced by the usage of FinTech along with emerging ...
A review of the efficacy of the use of AR and VR (together known as XR) within criminology is now required to guide the further development of this field.MethodsWe employed a scoping review, which after screening, incorporated 41 papers for review.ResultsWe uncovered three important characteristics for the papers: research topics for which XR ...
However, research which addresses a relationship between BPM and accounting is scarce. The purpose of this paper is to provide a detailed synthesis of the current literature that has integrated accounting aspects with BPM. The authors profile and thematically describe existing research, and derive evidence-based directions to guide future research.
Originality/Value: Therefore, this paper has reviewed and presented an updated literature review of microservices andmicrofrontends integration, together with the current trends for future studies.
This review paper presents the existing literature on the topic and provides an overview. The review starts by presenting information about the PH 13-8 Mo family, including microstructure, chemical compositions, heat treatments, and mechanical properties. ... Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for ...