Coding Knowledge Unveiled: Empower Yourself
Harnessing the Power of Assignment Operator and Template Classes in C++
Introduction: In the realm of C++, template classes and assignment operators stand as pillars of flexibility and extensibility, enabling developers to create generic, reusable code that adapts to various data types and scenarios. Template classes provide a mechanism for defining classes that can work with any data type, while the assignment operator facilitates the assignment of one object to another, ensuring efficient memory management and resource utilization. In this blog post, we’ll explore the symbiotic relationship between template classes and assignment operators in C++, unraveling their capabilities, applications, and best practices.
Understanding Template Classes: Template classes in C++ enable the creation of generic data structures and algorithms that operate uniformly across different data types. By parameterizing classes with one or more type parameters, developers can define classes that are not tied to a specific data type, promoting code reuse and flexibility.
Template classes are defined using the template keyword followed by the class declaration, with one or more template parameters enclosed in angle brackets ( <> ). These parameters can be used within the class definition to specify the types of member variables, member functions, and constructors.
Template classes are instantiated by providing specific data types for the template parameters, allowing developers to create instances of the class tailored to their requirements.
Understanding Assignment Operator Overloading: The assignment operator ( operator= ) in C++ is a special member function that enables one object to be assigned the value of another object of the same type. It is invoked when an assignment statement is used to copy the contents of one object to another, ensuring that the destination object is properly initialized and any necessary resources are managed correctly.
By overloading the assignment operator, developers can customize the behavior of object assignment for user-defined types. This customization is particularly useful for classes that manage dynamic memory or contain complex data structures, ensuring proper copying and cleanup of resources.
Best Practices for Template Classes and Assignment Operator Overloading:
- Ensure Correctness : When defining template classes, ensure that the class’s functionality is correct and applicable to all supported data types. Test template classes with a variety of data types to validate their behavior and ensure correctness.
- Follow Resource Management Best Practices : If template classes manage dynamic memory or other resources, adhere to best practices for resource allocation, deallocation, and ownership transfer. Implement proper memory management techniques to avoid memory leaks and resource exhaustion.
- Implement Deep Copy Semantics : When overloading the assignment operator for classes with dynamic memory allocation, implement deep copy semantics to ensure that the destination object has its own copy of dynamically allocated resources. This prevents resource sharing and ensures proper cleanup.
- Document Assumptions and Constraints : Document any assumptions or constraints regarding the behavior of template classes and assignment operator overloading. Clearly specify the requirements for user-defined types and any restrictions on their usage to prevent misuse and ambiguity.
- Consider Efficiency and Performance : Strive for efficiency and performance when implementing template classes and assignment operator overloading. Minimize unnecessary copying and ensure that operations are performed in an optimal manner, especially for large or performance-critical applications.
Conclusion: Template classes and assignment operator overloading are powerful features of C++ that enable developers to create flexible, reusable code with minimal effort. By leveraging template classes, developers can design generic data structures and algorithms that adapt to diverse data types and use cases. Meanwhile, assignment operator overloading facilitates efficient and correct object assignment, ensuring proper resource management and memory cleanup.
Embrace the versatility and expressiveness offered by template classes and assignment operator overloading in your C++ projects. By adhering to best practices and considering efficiency, correctness, and maintainability, you can harness the full potential of these features to build robust, scalable software solutions.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
C++ Tutorial
C++ functions, c++ classes, c++ data s tructures, c++ reference, c++ examples, c++ templates.
Templates are a way to allow functions and classes to use the same code for many different data types.
To declare a template you use the template keyword followed by a list of template parameters in angle brackets :
Immediately after the template declaration, you write a function or class definition the normal way. The function or class will have access to special data types and values given by the template declaration.
Use a template to create a class that can use any data type:
Example explained
- The first line template <class MyType> declares the template
- class MyType is a template parameter that makes MyType possible to represent any data type. You will learn about template parameters in the next chapter.
- MyClass<string> stringObj( "Hello", "World" ); creates a MyClass object where MyType means string
- MyClass<int> stringObj( 4, 5 ); creates a MyClass object where MyType means int
C++ Template Parameters
Template parameters are how you specify how many data types and values a template has access to.
There are two kinds of template parameters: typed parameters and non-typed parameters.
Typed Parameters
Typed parameters allow you to specify a "wildcard" data type for a class or function.
A typed parameter uses the keyword class or typename followed by a name. There is no difference between the class and typename keywords, you can use any one of them.
The syntax of a template with typed parameters looks like this:
The following example declares two different typed parameters:
- The line template <class A, class B> indicates that there are two different data types which are assigned the names A and B
- A first; creates an attribute named first of type A
- B second; creates an attribute named second of type B
- The constructor MyClass(A f, B s) has two parameters: f is of type A and s is of type B
- The line MyClass<int,string> myObj( 15, "Some Text" ); creates a MyClass object where A means int and B means string .
Non-Typed Parameters
Non-typed parameters let you pass values directly to the class or function that is using the template.
To add a non-typed parameter, write the data type of the value followed by a name. The syntax looks like this:
This example declares a class with a non-typed parameter:
- The line template <int N> indicates that the parameter N contains an integer.
- string myStrings[N]; uses the value of N to set the size of an array of strings.
- MyClass<2> myObj; creates a MyClass object and sets the value of N to 2, which results in the myStrings array having 2 strings.
Another Example
This example illustrates how to use both typed and non-typed parameters in a template class:
Templates in
COLOR PICKER
Contact Sales
If you want to use W3Schools services as an educational institution, team or enterprise, send us an e-mail: [email protected]
Report Error
If you want to report an error, or if you want to make a suggestion, send us an e-mail: [email protected]
Top Tutorials
Top references, top examples, get certified.
cppreference.com
Assignment operators.
| (C++20) | ||||
| (C++20) | ||||
| (C++11) | ||||
| (C++20) | ||||
| (C++17) | ||||
| (C++11) | ||||
| (C++11) | ||||
| General topics | ||||
| (C++11) |
| - |
| -expression |
| - block |
| (C++11) | ||||
| (C++11) | ||||
| (C++11) |
| / | ||||
| (C++11) |
| (C++11) | ||||
| expression |
| pointer |
| specifier |
| specifier (C++11) | ||||
| specifier (C++11) |
| (C++11) | ||||
| (C++11) |
| (C++11) | ||||
| (C++11) |
| General | ||||
| (lvalue, rvalue, xvalue) | ||||
| (sequence points) | ||||
| (C++11) | ||||
| Literals | ||||
| including | ||||
| (C++11) | ||||
| (C++11) | ||||
| Operators | ||||
| : | ||||
| : | ||||
| : | ||||
| : | ||||
| : | ||||
| : | ||||
| : | ||||
| , , , , , , , , , , | ||||
| , , , | ||||
| , , , , , , , , , , , , | ||||
| , , | ||||
| , , , , , , (C++20) | ||||
| , , , , , , | ||||
| , , |
Assignment operators modify the value of the object.
| Operator name | Syntax | Prototype examples (for class T) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inside class definition | Outside class definition | |||
| simple assignment | Yes | T& T::operator =(const T2& b); | ||
| addition assignment | Yes | T& T::operator +=(const T2& b); | T& operator +=(T& a, const T2& b); | |
| subtraction assignment | Yes | T& T::operator -=(const T2& b); | T& operator -=(T& a, const T2& b); | |
| multiplication assignment | Yes | T& T::operator *=(const T2& b); | T& operator *=(T& a, const T2& b); | |
| division assignment | Yes | T& T::operator /=(const T2& b); | T& operator /=(T& a, const T2& b); | |
| remainder assignment | Yes | T& T::operator %=(const T2& b); | T& operator %=(T& a, const T2& b); | |
| bitwise AND assignment | Yes | T& T::operator &=(const T2& b); | T& operator &=(T& a, const T2& b); | |
| bitwise OR assignment | Yes | T& T::operator |=(const T2& b); | T& operator |=(T& a, const T2& b); | |
| bitwise XOR assignment | Yes | T& T::operator ^=(const T2& b); | T& operator ^=(T& a, const T2& b); | |
| bitwise left shift assignment | Yes | T& T::operator <<=(const T2& b); | T& operator <<=(T& a, const T2& b); | |
| bitwise right shift assignment | Yes | T& T::operator >>=(const T2& b); | T& operator >>=(T& a, const T2& b); | |
| this, and most also return *this so that the user-defined operators can be used in the same manner as the built-ins. However, in a user-defined operator overload, any type can be used as return type (including void). can be any type including | ||||
| Explanation Builtin direct assignment Example Builtin compound assignment Example Defect reports See also |
[ edit ] Explanation
copy assignment operator replaces the contents of the object a with a copy of the contents of b ( b is not modified). For class types, this is a special member function, described in copy assignment operator .
| operator replaces the contents of the object with the contents of , avoiding copying if possible ( may be modified). For class types, this is a special member function, described in . | (since C++11) |
For non-class types, copy and move assignment are indistinguishable and are referred to as direct assignment .
compound assignment operators replace the contents of the object a with the result of a binary operation between the previous value of a and the value of b .
[ edit ] Builtin direct assignment
The direct assignment expressions have the form
| lhs rhs | (1) | ||||||||
| lhs | (2) | (since C++11) | |||||||
| lhs rhs | (3) | (since C++11) | |||||||
For the built-in operator, lhs may have any non-const scalar type and rhs must be implicitly convertible to the type of lhs .
The direct assignment operator expects a modifiable lvalue as its left operand and an rvalue expression or a braced-init-list (since C++11) as its right operand, and returns an lvalue identifying the left operand after modification. The result is a bit-field if the left operand is a bit-field.
For non-class types, the right operand is first implicitly converted to the cv-unqualified type of the left operand, and then its value is copied into the object identified by left operand.
When the left operand has reference type, the assignment operator modifies the referred-to object.
If the left and the right operands identify overlapping objects, the behavior is undefined (unless the overlap is exact and the type is the same)
| If the right operand is a has scalar type, {} is equivalent to E1 = T{}, where is the type of . {E2} is equivalent to E1 = T{E2}, where is the type of . has class type, the syntax E1 = {args...} generates a call to the assignment operator with the as the argument, which then selects the appropriate assignment operator following the rules of . Note that, if a non-template assignment operator from some non-class type is available, it is preferred over the copy/move assignment in because to non-class is an , which outranks the user-defined conversion from to a class type. | (since C++11) |
| Using an lvalue of volatile-qualified non-class type as left operand of built-in direct assignment operator is deprecated, unless the assignment expression appears in an or is a . | (since C++20) |
In overload resolution against user-defined operators , for every type T , the following function signatures participate in overload resolution:
| & operator=(T*&, T*); | ||
| volatile & operator=(T*volatile &, T*); | ||
For every enumeration or pointer to member type T , optionally volatile-qualified, the following function signature participates in overload resolution:
| operator=(T&, T); | ||
For every pair A1 and A2, where A1 is an arithmetic type (optionally volatile-qualified) and A2 is a promoted arithmetic type, the following function signature participates in overload resolution:
| operator=(A1&, A2); | ||
[ edit ] Example
[ edit ] builtin compound assignment.
The compound assignment expressions have the form
| lhs op rhs | (1) | ||||||||
| lhs op | (2) | (since C++11) | |||||||
| lhs op rhs | (3) | (since C++11) | |||||||
| op | - | one of *=, /= %=, += -=, <<=, >>=, &=, ^=, |= |
| lhs | - | for the built-in operator, lhs may have any arithmetic type, except when op is += or -=, which also accept pointer types with the same restrictions as + and - |
| rhs | - | for the built-in operator, rhs must be implicitly convertible to lhs |
The behavior of every builtin compound-assignment expression E1 op = E2 (where E1 is a modifiable lvalue expression and E2 is an rvalue expression or a braced-init-list (since C++11) ) is exactly the same as the behavior of the expression E1 = E1 op E2 , except that the expression E1 is evaluated only once and that it behaves as a single operation with respect to indeterminately-sequenced function calls (e.g. in f ( a + = b, g ( ) ) , the += is either not started at all or is completed as seen from inside g ( ) ).
In overload resolution against user-defined operators , for every pair A1 and A2, where A1 is an arithmetic type (optionally volatile-qualified) and A2 is a promoted arithmetic type, the following function signatures participate in overload resolution:
| operator*=(A1&, A2); | ||
| operator/=(A1&, A2); | ||
| operator+=(A1&, A2); | ||
| operator-=(A1&, A2); | ||
For every pair I1 and I2, where I1 is an integral type (optionally volatile-qualified) and I2 is a promoted integral type, the following function signatures participate in overload resolution:
| operator%=(I1&, I2); | ||
| operator<<=(I1&, I2); | ||
| operator>>=(I1&, I2); | ||
| operator&=(I1&, I2); | ||
| operator^=(I1&, I2); | ||
| operator|=(I1&, I2); | ||
For every optionally cv-qualified object type T , the following function signatures participate in overload resolution:
| & operator+=(T*&, ); | ||
| & operator-=(T*&, ); | ||
| volatile & operator+=(T*volatile &, ); | ||
| volatile & operator-=(T*volatile &, ); | ||
Reason: no example
[ edit ] Defect reports
The following behavior-changing defect reports were applied retroactively to previously published C++ standards.
| DR | Applied to | Behavior as published | Correct behavior |
|---|---|---|---|
| C++11 | for assignments to class type objects, the right operand could be an initializer list only when the assignment is defined by a user-defined assignment operator | removed user-defined assignment constraint | |
| C++11 | E1 = {E2} was equivalent to E1 = T(E2) ( is the type of ), this introduced a C-style cast | it is equivalent to E1 = T{E2} | |
| C++20 | bitwise compound assignment operators for volatile types were deprecated while being useful for some platforms | they are not deprecated | |
| C++20 | compound assignment operators for volatile types were inconsistently deprecated | none of them is deprecated |
[ edit ] See also
Operator precedence
Operator overloading
| Common operators | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a = b | ++a | +a | !a | a == b | a[...] | function call |
| a(...) | ||||||
| comma | ||||||
| a, b | ||||||
| conditional | ||||||
| a ? b : c | ||||||
| Special operators | ||||||
| converts one type to another related type | ||||||
| for Assignment operators |
- Todo no example
- Recent changes
- Offline version
- What links here
- Related changes
- Upload file
- Special pages
- Printable version
- Permanent link
- Page information
- In other languages
- This page was last modified on 21 November 2022, at 04:25.
- This page has been accessed 357,612 times.
- Privacy policy
- About cppreference.com
- Disclaimers
Adaickalavan
If nothing goes right, go left!
- Ontario, Canada
- Schedule a Chat
- Custom Social Profile Link
C++ template operator overload for template class
less than 1 minute read
An example code to perform template operator overload for a template class in C++ is provided.
Run and consider the output of the example below.
The expected output is:
Leave a comment
You may also enjoy, idiosyncrasies of asyncio.
5 minute read
We take a look at the idiosyncrasies and inherent nature of asyncio library in Python. asyncio is a library to write coroutines which run asynchronously on a...
Guide to Kubernetes
I highly recommend the Golden Guide To Kubernetes Application Development book by Matthew Palmer for beginners to master Kubernetes. The book guides us step ...
Below, I have listed several helpful notes for installing and using Golang.
Setting up Scala sbt, Spark, Hadoop and IntelliJIdea in Windows
1 minute read
We briefly describe the steps to setup Scala sbt, Spark, Hadoop, and IntelliJ Idea in Windows computer.
22.3 — Move constructors and move assignment
This browser is no longer supported.
Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support.
Move Constructors and Move Assignment Operators (C++)
- 9 contributors
This topic describes how to write a move constructor and a move assignment operator for a C++ class. A move constructor enables the resources owned by an rvalue object to be moved into an lvalue without copying. For more information about move semantics, see Rvalue Reference Declarator: && .
This topic builds upon the following C++ class, MemoryBlock , which manages a memory buffer.
The following procedures describe how to write a move constructor and a move assignment operator for the example C++ class.
To create a move constructor for a C++ class
Define an empty constructor method that takes an rvalue reference to the class type as its parameter, as demonstrated in the following example:
In the move constructor, assign the class data members from the source object to the object that is being constructed:
Assign the data members of the source object to default values. This prevents the destructor from freeing resources (such as memory) multiple times:
To create a move assignment operator for a C++ class
Define an empty assignment operator that takes an rvalue reference to the class type as its parameter and returns a reference to the class type, as demonstrated in the following example:
In the move assignment operator, add a conditional statement that performs no operation if you try to assign the object to itself.
In the conditional statement, free any resources (such as memory) from the object that is being assigned to.
The following example frees the _data member from the object that is being assigned to:
Follow steps 2 and 3 in the first procedure to transfer the data members from the source object to the object that is being constructed:
Return a reference to the current object, as shown in the following example:
Example: Complete move constructor and assignment operator
The following example shows the complete move constructor and move assignment operator for the MemoryBlock class:
Example Use move semantics to improve performance
The following example shows how move semantics can improve the performance of your applications. The example adds two elements to a vector object and then inserts a new element between the two existing elements. The vector class uses move semantics to perform the insertion operation efficiently by moving the elements of the vector instead of copying them.
This example produces the following output:
Before Visual Studio 2010, this example produced the following output:
The version of this example that uses move semantics is more efficient than the version that does not use move semantics because it performs fewer copy, memory allocation, and memory deallocation operations.
Robust Programming
To prevent resource leaks, always free resources (such as memory, file handles, and sockets) in the move assignment operator.
To prevent the unrecoverable destruction of resources, properly handle self-assignment in the move assignment operator.
If you provide both a move constructor and a move assignment operator for your class, you can eliminate redundant code by writing the move constructor to call the move assignment operator. The following example shows a revised version of the move constructor that calls the move assignment operator:
The std::move function converts the lvalue other to an rvalue.
Rvalue Reference Declarator: && std::move
Was this page helpful?
Additional resources
- Windows Programming
- UNIX/Linux Programming
- General C++ Programming
- Overloaded assignment operator for class
Overloaded assignment operator for class template objects
| < dataType> myArray { : setArrayData(); print() ; dataType& []( index); dataType& []( index) ; myArray& =( myArray&); myArray( lowerBound = 0, upperBound = 0); myArray( myArray& rightArray); ~myArray(); : arrayLowerBound; arrayUpperBound; dataType* arrayPtr; }; |
| < dataType> myArray<dataType>& myArray<dataType>:: =( myArray<dataType>& rightArray) { i; ( != &rightArray) { [] arrayPtr; arrayLowerBound = rightArray.arrayLowerBound; arrayUpperBound = rightArray.arrayUpperBound; arrayPtr = dataType[arrayUpperBound - arrayLowerBound]; assert(arrayPtr != NULL); (i = arrayLowerBound; i < arrayUpperBound; i++) arrayPtr[i] = rightArray.arrayPtr[i]; } * ; } |
| main() { myArray< > list(5); myArray< > myList(2,13); myArray< > yourList(-5,9); myArray< > hisList(-1,8); myArray< > herList; cout<<showpoint<<fixed<<setprecision(2); list.setArrayData(); cout<<endl; cout<< ; list.print(); cout<<endl<<endl<<endl; myList.setArrayData(); cout<<endl; cout<< ; myList.print(); cout<<endl<<endl<<endl; yourList.setArrayData(); cout<<endl; cout<< ; yourList.print(); cout<<endl<<endl<<endl; hisList.setArrayData(); cout<<endl; cout<< ; hisList.print(); cout<<endl<<endl<<endl<<endl; myList = list; cout<< ; myList.print(); cout<<endl<<endl; myList = yourList; cout<< ; myList.print(); cout<<endl<<endl; list = hisList; cout<< ; list.print(); cout<<endl<<endl; yourList = hisList; cout<< ; yourList.print(); cout<<endl<<endl<<endl<<endl; system( ); 0; } |
| dataType[arrayUpperBound - arrayLowerBound]; (i = arrayLowerBound; i < arrayUpperBound; i++) |
| < dataType> myArray<dataType>::myArray( lowerBound, upperBound) { arraySize; (upperBound == 0) { arrayLowerBound = 0; arrayUpperBound = lowerBound; } { arrayLowerBound = lowerBound; arrayUpperBound = upperBound; } arraySize = arrayUpperBound - arrayLowerBound; arrayPtr = dataType[arraySize]; } < dataType> dataType& myArray<dataType>:: []( index) { (arrayLowerBound <= index && index < arrayUpperBound) arrayPtr[index]; { cout<< <<endl<<endl<<endl; system( ); abort(); } assert(arrayLowerBound <= index && index < arrayUpperBound); arrayPtr[index]; } |
| Did you mean to write 10 and not 100? |
| < dataType> myArray<dataType> & myArray<dataType>:: =( myArray<dataType> &rightArray ) { ( != &rightArray ) { dataType *newPtr = dataType[rightArray.arrayUpperBound - rightArray.arrayLowerBound]; assert( newPtr != NULL ); std::copy( rightArray.arrayPtr, rightArray.arrayPtr + rightArrat.arrayUpperBound - rightArray.arrayLowerBound, newPtr ); [] arrayPtr; arrayLowerBound = rightArray.arrayLowerBound; arrayUpperBound = rightArray.arrayUpperBound; arrayPtr = newPtr; } * ; } |
| newPtr ); |
| I wouldn't use copy, I'd use move instead |
| Still looking forward to any helpful insights. |
| I did not know what is your problem with the copy assignment operator because you did not say nothing about it. |
| I would guess that, since every function you've shown so far has handled indexing your array incorrectly (ie: not adjusting the index to be zero-based before using it to access the array), ... |
| wrote: |
|---|
| You probably intended to normalize your range and access underlying array as |
| (i = arrayLowerBound; i < arrayUpperBound; i++) arrayPtr[i] = rightArray.arrayPtr[i]; |
- C++ Classes and Objects
- C++ Polymorphism
- C++ Inheritance
- C++ Abstraction
- C++ Encapsulation
- C++ OOPs Interview Questions
- C++ OOPs MCQ
- C++ Interview Questions
- C++ Function Overloading
- C++ Programs
- C++ Preprocessor
- C++ Templates
Overloading Subscript or array index operator [] in C++
The Subscript or Array Index Operator is denoted by ‘[]’. This operator is generally used with arrays to retrieve and manipulate the array elements. This is a binary or n-ary operator and is represented in two parts:
- Postfix/Primary Expression
The postfix expression, also known as the primary expression, is a pointer value such as array or identifiers and the second expression is an integral value. In the second expression we can also include the enumerated values.
The primary-expression followed by the subscript operator is the pointer and it can be an integral value but the one must keep in mind that one of expression among two expressions must be a pointer value and it does not matter whether the second one is of an integral order or not.
Explanation:
In the above example both “cout” statement provides similar output due to the exclusive property of the subscript operator. The compiler reads both the statement in a similar way, so there is no difference between the *(name + 5) and the *(5 + name) .
Positive and Negative Subscripts
The first element of an array is stored at index 0. The range of a C++ array is from array[0] to array[size – 1]. However, C++ supports positive and negative subscripts. Negative subscripts must fall within array boundaries; if they do not, the results are unpredictable. The following code shows positive and negative array subscripts:
The negative subscript in the last line can produce a run-time error because it points to an address -256 positions which can be lower in memory than the origin of the array. The pointer midArray is initialized to the middle of intArray; it is therefore possible (but not recommended) to use both positive and negative array indices simultaneously. Array subscript errors do not generate compile-time errors, but they might yield unpredictable results. We have introduced Operator Overloading . In this post overloading of index operator [] is discussed. Following are some useful facts about overloading of [].
- Overloading of [] may be useful when we want to check for index out of bound.
- We must return by reference in function because an expression like “arr[i]” can be used an lvalue.
Following is C++ program to demonstrate overloading of array index operator [].
Const-Correctness
Overloading both const and non-const versions of the subscript operator ([]) ensures that elements can be accessed in a read-only manner when the object is const, preventing unintended modifications to const data types.
Implementing both versions of the subscript operator is a best practice in C++ to maintain clarity and adhere to const-correctness principles, enhancing code safety and predictability.
Please Login to comment...
Similar reads.
- cpp-operator-overloading
- cpp-overloading
- 105 Funny Things to Do to Make Someone Laugh
- Best PS5 SSDs in 2024: Top Picks for Expanding Your Storage
- Best Nintendo Switch Controllers in 2024
- Xbox Game Pass Ultimate: Features, Benefits, and Pricing in 2024
- #geekstreak2024 – 21 Days POTD Challenge Powered By Deutsche Bank
Improve your Coding Skills with Practice
What kind of Experience do you want to share?
- Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers
- Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand
- OverflowAI GenAI features for Teams
- OverflowAPI Train & fine-tune LLMs
- Labs The future of collective knowledge sharing
- About the company Visit the blog
Collectives™ on Stack Overflow
Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.
Q&A for work
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.
Get early access and see previews of new features.
Why is inline variable declaration not allowed for template structs in C++?
The wording of the title is a bit iffy but I couldn't come up with a better one. I hope to explain what I am talking about with these examples:
is a somewhat common pattern in C++. It declares a struct S and an instance s thereof.
not allowed?
I had expected this to declare a template class template<typename T> struct S and a variable template template<typename T> S<T> s . Instead it results in a compilation error.
The conventional way of doing this would of course be
but if the simplified syntax works for normal classes why not also for template classes?
If the proposed syntax were allowed one could also do this
to declare a variable template of an unnamed template class. AFAIK this pattern can't be emulated with the traditional approach of two independant declarations.
Admittedly, this is a very niche situation but to me it seems inconsistent to allow this syntax for conventional class declarations but not for class template declarations.
Is this an oversight or is there an actual reason for this syntax to be forbidden?
- struct S { } s; is got from C. template<typename T> struct S { } s; is C++ with own rules. What is template parameter? – 3CxEZiVlQ Commented yesterday
- It was probably just something that was "missed" or not asked for. I personally do not like the struct { } name; form as I like each variable declared on its own line. – NathanOliver Commented yesterday
- Try to instantiate the unnamed case. – molbdnilo Commented yesterday
- GCC says, "error: a class template declaration must not declare anything else." Anyway, it is not clear why you think it could work in principle. What would be the concrete type of s ? – alfC Commented yesterday
- 1 "why" For many of those kind of questions, the answer is: because it was not in standard, nobody propose it or it was rejected. – Jarod42 Commented yesterday
Why is template<typename T> struct S { } s; not allowed?
Language-lawyer Explanation
This is explicitly disallowed as per temp.pre :
In a template-declaration, explicit specialization, or explicit instantiation, the init-declarator-list in the declaration shall contain at most one declarator. When such a declaration is used to declare a class template, no declarator is permitted.
(emphasis mine)
Also related is CWG2862
Possible Rationale for disallowing `s` to be a variable template
While declaring a variable we need to specify a type but since S is a class template(not a type) and moreover s cannot make use of injected class name outside the class so the type of s cannot be interpreted as S<T> , so this is not allowed.
Note that one rationale for not considering s to be a variable template may be because a class template and a variable template are two different entities. When using the keyword struct or class it seems more intentional that the user wants a class template than a variable template. For example, consider the declaration
which looks more like a class template declaration than a variable template declaration imo. So having separate syntaxes for these two different things makes sense. If you want to declare a class template then just use struct or class and if you want to declare a variable template then don't use those two keywords. Mixing and allowing theses two things will be very confusing specially in a language like c++ where there are already too many complications.
Note that this is not a problem with an ordinary non-template class-type because it is a type and we don't need injected class name in that ordinary case and at the time due backward compatibility with c the non-template class case was to be allowed.
- I'm pretty sure that if that syntax would be wanted, injected class name would not be a problem. – Jarod42 Commented yesterday
- @Jarod42 There are two separate problems with it in the current standard as explained in the answer. 1) Whenever declaring/defining a variable we need to specify the type but while implementing a class template, it is not a type as it is a template. 2) Currently, class name injection is only allowed inside the class template. So even if we ignore problem 1, then also we somehow need to find a way to specify the type of s . If we assume the type to be S<T> , then to allow this rules in the standard would have to be changed. You already know this but this is for future readers. – user12002570 Commented yesterday
- @Jarod42 Also CWG2862 mentioned in the updated answer. – user12002570 Commented yesterday
- 1 Fair. Upvoted even if you are not editing them into the answer as I believe the comments are now clear enough as long as they are not deleted. – Weijun Zhou Commented 12 hours ago
- 1 @WeijunZhou Updated the answer. – user12002570 Commented 12 hours ago
Your Answer
Reminder: Answers generated by artificial intelligence tools are not allowed on Stack Overflow. Learn more
Sign up or log in
Post as a guest.
Required, but never shown
By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy .
Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged c++ templates or ask your own question .
- The Overflow Blog
- The evolution of full stack engineers
- One of the best ways to get value for AI coding tools: generating tests
- Featured on Meta
- User activation: Learnings and opportunities
- Site maintenance - Mon, Sept 16 2024, 21:00 UTC to Tue, Sept 17 2024, 2:00...
- Staging Ground Reviewer Motivation
- What does a new user need in a homepage experience on Stack Overflow?
Hot Network Questions
- How can I use the word 魅力的?
- What came of the Trump campaign's complaint to the FEC that Harris 'stole' (or at least illegally received) Biden's funding?
- Why are my empty files not being assigned the correct mimetype?
- How is switching of measurement ranges in instruments, like oscilloscopes, realized nowadays?
- Second cohomology of nonabelian finite simple group vanishes.
- For glacier winds to exist, are circulation cells needed?
- Spacing between mathrel and mathord same as between mathrel and mathopen
- Does hydrogen peroxide work as a rocket fuel oxidizer by itself?
- How can a D-lock be bent inward by a thief?
- How do elected politicians get away with not giving straight answers?
- Does my employer contributions count towards the Roth limit of $7k?Roth contributions
- How to prove that the Greek cross tiles the plane?
- How can I analyze the anatomy of a humanoid species to create sounds for their language?
- Why were there so many OSes that had the name "DOS" in them?
- Is it a correct rendering of Acts 1,24 when the New World Translation puts in „Jehovah“ instead of Lord?
- Extremely authentic and crystal clear hadiths on k!lling dogs - how do we come to peace with it?
- How do Protestants define what constitutes getting married?
- What does the phrase 'sons of God'/בני אלוהים mean throughout the Hebrew bible?
- How much could gravity increase before a military tank is crushed
- Would it be illegal for Companies House to require a response to a letter on registration?
- Was using an older version of a legal card from a nonlegal set ever not legal?
- Please help me identify my Dad's bike collection (80's-2000's)
- What about the other 35 children who were born in the same manner in The Umbrella Academy. Do we hear what happened to them in the comic or TV Show?
- What is the rationale behind 32333 "Technic Pin Connector Block 1 x 5 x 3"?
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
I have an implementation of a template class Triple, which is a container holding any three types. My problem is that, my class takes three const references to values as parameter, and the values have to be private (definition), however, I also have to implement the copy-constructor and overloaded assignment operator.
template <class U> Number<T>& operator=( const Number<U>& number ) { m_value = number.m_value; //I would also directly access the member variable! return *this; } I think, it is better to use explicit cast, if you want to use class type as template argument and whose constructor has been declared explicit:
Creating template classes works pretty much identically to creating template functions, so we'll proceed by example. Here's our array class, templated version: ... For example, the copy constructor and copy-assignment operator used Array rather than Array<T>. When the class name is used without template arguments inside of the class, the ...
What is an assignment operator? The assignment operator for a class is what allows you to use = to assign one instance to another. For example: 1 2: ... template<> MyArray<T>::operator=( const MyArray& rhs ) { // First, make a copy of the right-hand side MyArray tmp( rhs ); ...
In the realm of C++, template classes and assignment operators stand as pillars of flexibility and extensibility, enabling developers to create generic, reusable code that adapts to various data types and scenarios. Template classes provide a mechanism for defining classes that can work with any data type, while the assignment operator ...
The line template <class A, class B> indicates that there are two different data types which are assigned the names A and B; A first; creates an attribute named first of type A; B second; creates an attribute named second of type B; The constructor MyClass(A f, B s) has two parameters: f is of type A and s is of type B
21.12 — Overloading the assignment operator. Alex July 22, 2024. The copy assignment operator (operator=) is used to copy values from one object to another already existing object. As of C++11, C++ also supports "Move assignment". We discuss move assignment in lesson 22.3 -- Move constructors and move assignment.
Explanation. copy assignment operator replaces the contents of the object a with a copy of the contents of b (b is not modified). For class types, this is a special member function, described in copy assignment operator. move assignment operator replaces the contents of the object a with the contents of b, avoiding copying if possible (b may be ...
Overloading assignment operator in C++ copies all values of one object to another object. Only a non-static member function should be used to overload the assignment operator. In C++, the compiler automatically provides a default assignment operator for classes. This operator performs a shallow copy of each member of the class from one object ...
Class template: Function template: Template specialization: Parameter ... The return types are limited by the expressions in which the operator is expected to be used: for example, assignment operators return by reference to make it possible to write a ... The best known example of a canonical overloaded operator& is the Microsoft class ...
Correct behavior. CWG 1527. C++11. for assignments to class type objects, the right operand could be an initializer list only when the assignment is defined by a user-defined assignment operator. removed user-defined assignment constraint. CWG 1538. C++11. E1 ={E2} was equivalent to E1 = T(E2) (T is the type of E1), this introduced a C-style cast.
Website. C++ template operator overload for template class. less than 1 minute read. An example code to perform template operator overload for a template class in C++ is provided. Run and consider the output of the example below. #include<iostream> #include<vector>usingstd::ostream;usingstd::vector;usingstd::cout;template<classT>classList ...
The copy assignment operator is called whenever selected by overload resolution, e.g. when an object appears on the left side of an assignment expression. [] Implicitly-declared copy assignment operatoIf no user-defined copy assignment operators are provided for a class type, the compiler will always declare one as an inline public member of the class.
C++ compiler implicitly provides a copy constructor, if no copy constructor is defined in the class. A bitwise copy gets created, if the Assignment operator is not overloaded. Consider the following C++ program. Explanation: Here, t2 = t1; calls the assignment operator, same as t2.operator= (t1); and Test t3 = t1; calls the copy constructor ...
mainres = generateResource(); // this assignment will invoke the move assignment return 0; } The move constructor and move assignment operator are simple. Instead of deep copying the source object (a) into the implicit object, we simply move (steal) the source object's resources. This involves shallow copying the source pointer into the ...
This topic describes how to write a move constructor and a move assignment operator for a C++ class. A move constructor enables the resources owned by an rvalue object to be moved into an lvalue without copying. For more information about move semantics, see Rvalue Reference Declarator: &&. This topic builds upon the following C++ class ...
Matrix<DIM> and Matrix<OtherDim> are two distinct types. The first question to ask is, "Is there a logical operation of assigning a Matrix<4> to a Matrix<2>?". The answer is probably "no". But there probably is a valid assignment between Matrix<2> and Matrix<2>: template <std::size_t DIM>. class Matrix {.
Overloaded assignment operator for class template objects. Pages: 1 2. May 22, 2013 at 11:19pm. geeloso (147) I designed a class template to create unique arrays. I was able to successfully input data to and output data from my array objects, irrespective of the datatype. However, I can't for the life of me fathom why my overloaded assignment ...
It's understandable that C++ will delete the default assignment operator for a class with const member data. However, It doesn't then call the template assignment operator. Is this because the compiler actually deletes the assignment operator, or just doesn't define it? I'm using the GCC version 10.2.0 compiler. Example. Consider the code below
Prerequisite: Operator Overloading The assignment operator,"=", is the operator used for Assignment. It copies the right value into the left value. Assignment Operators are predefined to operate only on built-in Data types. Assignment operator overloading is binary operator overloading.Overloading assignment operator in C++ copies all values of one
That's because there is no int operator when your templated class is constructed with the templated type as char.. You actually don't have an assigment operator here, only a constructor and a type operator. This means your compiler would likely have put in a default one probably along the lines of:
I am trying to overload assignment operators for two different template classes but with the same template type: public: Foo<data_type>& operator=(Bar<data_type> const &bar); public: Bar<data_type>& operator=(Foo<data_type> const &foo); However when I try: I get the error: No viable conversion from 'Foo< int >' to 'Bar< int >'.
Im trying to use a variant to be able to store and access two different classes, Node and Nbody, for a barnes Hutt algorithm. However, I get the error: error: object of type 'std::variant<Nbody, Blank, std::unique_ptr>' cannot be assigned because its copy assignment operator is implicitly deleted. Here is the header file sections using that..
Possible Rationale for disallowing `s` to be a variable template. While declaring a variable we need to specify a type but since S is a class template(not a type) and moreover s cannot make use of injected class name outside the class so the type of s cannot be interpreted as S<T>, so this is not allowed.. Note that one rationale for not considering s to be a variable template may be because a ...