write an essay on gandhian concept of satyagraha

Your Article Library

Satyagraha: essay on gandhi’s concept of satyagraha.

ADVERTISEMENTS:

Satyagraha: Essay on Gandhi’s Concept of Satyagraha!

Gandhi’s Concept of Satyagraha is an exceptional and novel way to resist evil. This is the heart and soul of the entire Gandhian theory and philosophy, and his exclu­sive contribution to the modern Indian political thought. Through this mechanism, Gandhi aimed at resisting any kind of unjust, impure or untruthful acts.

This concept also aims at furtherance of love and self-purification. Satyagraha can be regarded as a vindication of truth by taking self-suffering in the form of love. It is the weapon of the bravest and the strongest. It is an antidote for coercion. It was believed that Satyagraha enables elevation of spiritual and moral qualities of an individual.

The main function of a Satyagraha is not to injure the enemy by any means. It is an appeal to the enemy either through reason or by a gentle rational argument. It is something like a sacrifice of the self. Satyagraha has two positive features, viz., it showers blessings on those who practice it and secondly, it blesses those individuals against whom Satyagraha is practiced.

The concept of Satyagraha advocates that it is through suffering that there are achievements. For instance, just like a mother who takes all the suffering for the sake of a child, Satyagraha also takes all the pain for the cause of the fellow citizens.

This ideal also expounded that there is a direct relationship between the purity of the suffering and the extent of progress. It believes that the purer the suffering, the greater the material and spiritual progress. The theory of Satyagraha has three main purposes firstly, it purifies the sufferer; secondly, it intensifies favorable public opinion; and thirdly, makes a direct appeal to the soul of the oppressor.

Gandhi differentiated between the terms Satyagraha and Passive resistance. The former, according to him, is a moral weapon and the latter is a political weapon. The victory of the soul power over the physical force is reflected in the idea of Satyagraha. The former is dynamic, while the latter is static.

The ultimate aim of Satyagraha is to achieve success, despite his extreme sufferings, with cheerfulness and love unlike passive resistance that is undertaken in a situation of weakness and despair. Ultimately, Satyagraha offers a substantial and effective opposition to injustice and tyranny in comparison to passive resistance.

Techniques of Satyagraha:

Some of the major techniques of Satyagraha are non-cooperation, civil disobedience, Hijrat, fasting and strike.

The following is a brief explanation of each of the techniques:

Non-cooperation:

Gandhi was of the opinion that injustice prevails in the society only when both, the government perpetuates and the people extend their cooperation. Once this cooperation is withdrawn, then the entire system paralyses. It is widely accepted that even the most despotic leader cannot continue for long if he lacks the consent of his subjects.

However, a despot seeks the consent through force. But if the people are firm in revolting against the despot, he remains nowhere. Non-cooperation is, therefore, one of the weapons of Satyagraha to force the unjust and immoral power to rectify his mistakes. The main goal of non-cooperation is to strike the imagination of people as well as the social ostracism or picketing.

Hartal should be occasionally used based on the non-violent and voluntary measures. The social ostracism is a kind of social boycott against those who defy public opinion. Gandhi suggested in a limited sense, picketing as another weapon that relies on the force of public opinion. Non-cooperation cannot be regarded as a negative creed, but it is very much a positive philosophy of constructive and social development.

Civil Disobedience:

According to Gandhi, civil disobedience is an effective and blood­less substitute for the armed revolt. This is another method of violating the established order of the state in a non-violent and peaceful fashion. However, necessary care has to be taken to make the entire act more sincere, respectful and principled.

It should never be carried out with ill-will and hatred. It needs careful planning and practice and without this the entire act might lose its vitality and significance. Those who practice civil disobedience, according to Gandhi, must ensure that the violence and general lawlessness would not break out as it could disturb the peaceful environment in society.

Etymologically, the term implies voluntary exile from ones permanent place of habitation. One of the main reasons for the people to resort to Hijrat is when they feel oppressed either due to loss of self-respect or honourable living; they attempt to migrate permanently to other places. In simple terms, it is a protest against the oppressor. Gandhi suggested this measure to the Harijans mainly due to their oppression, especially by the dominant classes in some places.

The Chaura Chauri incident prior to independence was a valid example of the Harijans and the Dalits who have taken the route of permanent exile as a form of their protest. Hijrat is, therefore, another non-violent method of protest that attempts to make the oppressor realize his inhuman and unjust acts of behaviour against the poor, the weak, just and innocent people.

This was another strong weapon suggested by Gandhi in his non-violent struggle for freedom. However, he was clear that this act of fasting must not be used as and when, and at every occasion. He stated that unwarranted use of the device would lose its importance, and for this reason he suggested that it must be sparingly used.

Gandhi was of the opinion that those who are spiritually fit and have purity of mind and thought, humility, discipline and faith should alone undertake fasting. It should not be viewed as the physical stamina, but the spiritual content of fasting that gives it greater significance and credibility.

Gandhi also expressed the opinion that if those who have no moral character undertake fast for either legitimate or illegitimate purpose, they would only devalue the act. He, therefore, suggested that the technique must be used with great caution and restraint.

The last device a Satyagraha uses is the strike demanding justice for legitimate cause as well as the redressal of grievances. Strike is considered a voluntary suffering undertaken for the transformation of the erring opponent. Gandhi was not in favor of Marxist principle of class war and forceful takeover of the means of production from the bourgeoisie.

He was of the opinion that a firm or an industry is like a trust either under the capitalists and the labour. A strike is meant to end injustice, inefficiency, corruption and short-sightedness of the capitalists. However, in strikes adequate care has to be taken to ensure that it remains non-violent as well as peaceful and makes their demands meaningful, just and feasible.

Therefore, it can be stated that Satyagraha is a weapon for justifying individual rights as against the oppressive, coercive attitude of the Britishers. Gandhi initially used this weapon in South Africa and owing to its success there, he applied the same in India during the freedom struggle. His firm belief in two mighty weapons, namely, Satya and Ahimsa, made it clear to the entire world that the path of righteousness and justice would one day make anybody or any nation powerful on the earth.

Related Articles:

• Essay on Gandhi’s Early Activism in India
• Satyagraha: Meaning of Satyagraha as Explained by Gandhi!

No comments yet.

Leave a reply click here to cancel reply..

You must be logged in to post a comment.

• History & Society
• Science & Tech
• Biographies
• Animals & Nature
• Geography & Travel
• Arts & Culture
• Games & Quizzes
• On This Day
• One Good Fact
• New Articles
• Lifestyles & Social Issues
• Philosophy & Religion
• Politics, Law & Government
• World History
• Health & Medicine
• Browse Biographies
• Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
• Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
• Environment
• Fossils & Geologic Time
• Entertainment & Pop Culture
• Sports & Recreation
• Visual Arts
• Demystified
• Image Galleries
• Infographics
• Top Questions
• Britannica Kids
• Saving Earth
• Space Next 50
• Student Center

• What did Gandhi try to accomplish with his activism?
• What were Gandhi’s religious beliefs?
• What other social movements did Gandhi’s activism inspire?
• What was Gandhi’s personal life like?
• What were contemporary opinions of Gandhi?

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

• Indian National Congress - Satyagraha
• Academia - Satyagraha
• South African History Online - Gandhi explains ‘satyagraha’
• Maps of India - Mahatma Gandhi's Satyagraha Movement
• Bombay Sarvodaya Mandal and Gandhi Research Foundation - What is Satyagraha?
• CORE - Satyagraha: Ghandhian Principle of Non-Violence Non-Cooperation
• International Journal of Innovative Studies in Sociology and Humanities - Gandhi’s Satyagraha: Concept and Methods
• satyagraha - Student Encyclopedia (Ages 11 and up)

satyagraha , concept introduced in the early 20th century by Mahatma Gandhi to designate a determined but nonviolent resistance to evil. Gandhi’s satyagraha became a major tool in the Indian struggle against British imperialism and has since been adopted by protest groups in other countries.

According to this philosophy, satyagrahi s—practitioners of satyagraha—achieve correct insight into the real nature of an evil situation by observing a nonviolence of the mind, by seeking truth in a spirit of peace and love, and by undergoing a rigorous process of self-scrutiny. In so doing, the satyagrahi encounters truth in the absolute. By refusing to submit to the wrong or to cooperate with it in any way, the satyagrahi asserts that truth. Throughout the confrontation with evil, the satyagrahi must adhere to nonviolence, for to employ violence would be to lose correct insight. Satyagrahi s always warn their opponents of their intentions; satyagraha forbids any tactic suggesting the use of secrecy to one’s advantage. Satyagraha includes more than civil disobedience . Its full range of application extends from the details of correct daily living to the construction of alternative political and economic institutions. Satyagraha seeks to conquer through conversion: in the end, there is neither defeat nor victory but rather a new harmony.

Satyagraha draws from the ancient Indian ideal of ahimsa (“noninjury”), which is pursued with particular rigour by Jains , many of whom live in Gujurat, where Gandhi grew up. In developing ahimsa into a modern concept with broad political consequences, as satyagraha, Gandhi also drew from the writings of Leo Tolstoy and Henry David Thoreau , from the Bible , and from the Bhagavadgita , on which he wrote a commentary. Gandhi first conceived satyagraha in 1906 in response to a law discriminating against Asians that was passed by the British colonial government of the Transvaal in South Africa . In 1917 the first satyagraha campaign in India was mounted in the indigo-growing district of Champaran. During the following years, fasting and economic boycotts were employed as methods of satyagraha in India, until the British left the country in 1947.

Critics of satyagraha, both in Gandhi’s time and subsequently, have argued that it is unrealistic and incapable of universal success, since it relies upon a high standard of ethical conduct in the opponent, the representative of evil, and demands an unrealistically strong level of commitment from those struggling for social amelioration. Nonetheless, satyagraha played a significant role in the civil rights movement led by Martin Luther King, Jr. , in the United States and has spawned a continuing legacy in South Asia itself.

Satyagraha: Gandhi’s Civil Disobedience and Nonviolent Resistance

In each country represented by adherents to truth or devotees of satyagraha—Gandhi’s concept of civil disobedience—their nonviolent efforts helped achieve seismic change and movement toward justice, all without resort to war. Their influence, and that of satyagraha, continues to cascade and ripple across the world incalculably.

“I’m more convinced than ever before that nonviolence is the way. I’m more convinced than ever before that violence is impractical as well as immoral. If we are to build right here a better America, we have a method as old as the insights of Jesus of Nazareth and as modern as the techniques of Mohandas K. Gandhi.” —Martin Luther King, Jr., Sermon on “The American Dream,” July 4, 1965

Satyagraha combines two Sanskrit words—satya, meaning truth, and agraha, meaning firm adherence or insistence. As Gandhi later wrote in his work Satyagraha in South Africa : “Truth (Satya) implies love, and firmness (agraha) engenders and therefore serves as a synonym for force. I thus began to call the Indian movement ‘Satyagraha’, that is to say, the Force which is born of Truth and Love or non-violence.” (See ch. 12.) Elsewhere, he wrote: “Its root meaning is holding on to truth, hence truth-force. I have also called it love-force or soul-force.”[1] Thus, Gandhi and others began using the term satyagraha, rather than the term they had earlier employed—“passive resistance”—which seemed to imply weakness and an exclusively English derivation.

The Advent of Satyagraha in South Africa

Satyagraha—the term and the first implementation of it as such—developed in South Africa out of resistance to the government’s proposed Asiatic Registration Act of 1906. Gandhi was a lawyer in South Africa at the time. He later wrote, “I have never known legislation of this nature being directed against free men in any part of the world.” ( Satyagraha in South Africa , ch. 11.) The act, as proposed, would have required fingerprinting and registration of every individual of Asian descent eight years or older living in the Transvaal region of South Africa. Severe penalties accompanied the act. As Gandhi explained the law:

The certificate of registration issued to an applicant must be produced before any police officer whenever and wherever he may be required to do so. Failure thus to produce the certificate would be held to be an offence for which the defaulter could be fined or sent to prison. Even a person walking on public thoroughfares could be required to produce his certificate. Police officers could enter private houses in order to inspect certificates. Indians entering the Transvaal from some place outside it must produce their certificates before the inspector on duty. Certificates must be produced on demand in courts which the holder attended on business, and in revenue offices which issued to him a trading or bicycle licence. That is to say, if an Indian wanted any government office to do for him something within its competence, the officer could ask to see his certificates before granting his request. Refusal to produce the certificate or to supply such particulars or means of identification as may be prescribed by regulation would be also held to be an offence for which the person refusing could be fined or sent to prison. ( Satyagraha in South Africa , ch. 11.)

The day after reading the proposed law, Gandhi and others began organizing opposition. Understanding the critical need for solidarity, at a meeting of nearly 3,000 members of the Indian community, “all present, standing with upraised hands, took an oath with God as witness not to submit to the Ordinance if it became law.” ( Satyagraha in South Africa , ch. 12.)[2]

Nevertheless, a revised version of the law, substantively the same but exempting women, was enacted and implemented in 1907. In response, the Indian community pursued a path of nonviolent resistance against the law, as well as related unjustly discriminatory laws, for nearly seven years. Gandhi was arrested and briefly imprisoned in January 1908. Many others were arrested and imprisoned or deported. He was arrested again in November 1913, after marching with a group of over 2,000 from Newcastle to Charlestown, and then crossing the border into the Transvaal province in violation of another law. This time he was sentenced to nine months imprisonment.

However, with workers going on strike and the world increasingly watching, after serving only six weeks of his nine-month sentence, Gandhi was released from prison, and the South African government agreed to the appointment of a commission to consider the grievances of the Indian community. In early 1914, the commission ruled in favor of all the Indians’ demands. Notably, the registration act was repealed, Hindu marriages would be recognized again, an annual £3 tax was repealed, and an immigration law was moderated.[3]

The Salt March in India

Gandhi returned to India in 1915 where he would protest British rule until India was granted independence in 1947. The Salt March was an act of civil disobedience in March and April 1930 designed to reveal the injustice of Britain’s Salt Act of 1882 and, by extension, of British claims to India more broadly. The Act prohibited Indians from collecting or selling salt. Instead, they had to purchase it from British merchants, with a heavy tax added as well.

On March 2, 1930, Gandhi sent a letter to British Viceroy Lord Irwin announcing his intention to initiate a campaign of civil disobedience unless his requests, including abolition of the Salt Tax, were granted. His letter explained, “My ambition is no less than to convert the British people through nonviolence and thus make them see the wrong they have done to India.”

Receiving no response, on March 12, 1930, Gandhi began the march from his ashram near Ahmedabad some 240 miles to Dandi on the Arabian Sea where he would illegally harvest salt that deposited naturally on the shore. He was accompanied by almost eighty others from the start. However, by the time he reached Dandi on April 5, 1930, tens of thousands had joined the march. On the beach, Gandhi defied the Salt Act by reaching down and lifting up a lump of natural salt from the mud. “With this,” he said, “I am shaking the foundations of the British Empire.”

Civil disobedience soon spread to other parts of India, and over 60,000 people were arrested. Gandhi was arrested on May 5. But peaceful demonstrations continued. Peaceful protesters marched on the Dharasana Salt Works 150 miles north of Bombay where they were assaulted and beaten by police. Reports of the assaults by American journalist Webb Miller led to international condemnation.

Gandhi was released from prison in January 1931. In exchange for agreeing to call off the satyagraha, he was given a role in negotiations at a London conference considering the future of India.

Principles of Satyagraha

Gandhi’s teaching and example yield several principles associated with satyagraha. Various enumerations have been suggested. But a few basic principles can be discerned at a minimum.

First, satyagraha seeks to remedy not trivial errors but specific laws or power exercises that are significantly and demonstrably unjust. Second, satyagraha is designed to reveal truth, to reveal the presence of injustice resulting from application of unjust law. Third, satyagraha is not passive, but active, firm, and courageous, willing to bring about “creative tension” and face risk. Fourth, satyagraha is nonviolent in method, anticipating and even accepting punishment for civil disobedience.[4] Fifth, satyagraha refuses to treat opponents as enemies, as it seeks to convert opponents and foster a reconciled relationship.

Martin Luther King Jr. was famously influenced by Gandhi. In his “Palm Sunday Sermon on Mohandas K. Gandhi” on March 22, 1959, describing the revelatory nature of satyagraha, he noted that through the Salt March “Gandhi got all of the people of India to see the injustice” of the Salt Act. Likewise, emphasizing the nonviolent element of satyagraha, Dr. King quoted or paraphrased Gandhi as saying, “If you are hit, don’t hit back; even if they shoot at you, don’t shoot back; if they curse you, don’t curse back, but just keep moving. Some of us might have to die before we get there; some of us might be thrown in jail before we get there, but let us just keep moving.”

Finally, stressing the reconciling nature of satyagraha, Dr. King said:

And the significant thing is that when you follow this way, when the battle is almost over, and a new friendship and reconciliation exists between the people who have been the oppressors and the oppressed. There is no greater friendship anywhere in the world today than between the Indian people and the British people. If you ask the Indian people today who they love more, what people, whether they love Americans more, British more, they will say to you immediately that they love the British people more.

In his sermon on “The American Dream,” Dr. King made a similar point. “‘One day we will win our freedom, but we will not only win freedom for ourselves, we will so appeal to your heart and your conscience that we will win you in the process.’ And our victory will be a double victory.”

And in his speech, “Birth of a New Nation,” Dr. King said, “The aftermath of nonviolence is the creation of the beloved community. The aftermath of nonviolence is redemption. The aftermath of nonviolence is reconciliation. The aftermath of violence is emptiness and bitterness.”

Echoes of Satyagraha

The influence of Gandhi’s concept has been broad but immeasurable. His influence on Martin Luther King, Jr. has already been mentioned above. Beyond Dr. King, echoes can be heard in the words of other prominent figures of the last century.

Russian Nobel laureate Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn alluded to Gandhi’s example in his historic 1974 essay “Live Not by Lies.” He admits that in the totalitarian system of the Soviet Union (where freedom of association and the traditions of English constitutional law did not exist) people were too afraid, too controlled, to rise to the level of “the sort of civil disobedience that Gandhi advocated.” However, appealing to an element of the concept of satyagraha, he writes:

Let us admit it: we have not matured enough to march into the squares and shout the truth out loud or to express aloud what we think. It is not necessary. It’s dangerous. But let us refuse to say what we do not think. This is our path, the easiest and the most accessible one, which allows for our inherent, well-rooted cowardice.

Further, he writes:

[S]ince violence can conceal itself with nothing except lies, and the lies can be maintained only by violence. Violence does not lay its paw on every shoulder every day: it demands from us only obedience to lies and daily participation in lies. And this submissiveness is the crux of the matter. The simplest and most accessible key to our self-neglected liberation is this: personal non-participation in lies. Though lies may conceal everything, though lies may control everything, we should be obstinate about this one small point: let them be in control but without any help from any of us. This opens a breach in the imaginary encirclement caused by our inaction. It is the easiest thing for us to do and the most destructive for the lies. Because when people renounce lies it cuts short their existence. Like a virus, they can survive only in a living organism.

The manuscript of “Live Not by Lies” was dated February 12, 1974, the same day he was arrested by secret police. The next day he was expelled from the Soviet Union. The essay was published in The Washington Post on February 18, 1974.

Four years later, in his 1978 essay “The Power of the Powerless,” the Czech playwright Václav Havel echoed Solzhenitsyn’s essay when he wrote on the theme of “living in truth.” He wrote in the context of what he called a post-totalitarian system in communist Czechoslovakia. The essay explicitly references Solzhenitsyn and calls to mind “Live Not by Lies.” Havel wrote:

Why was Solzhenitsyn driven out of his own country? Certainly not because he represented a unit of real power, that is, not because any of the regime’s representatives felt he might unseat them and take their place in government. Solzhenitsyn’s expulsion was something else: a desperate attempt to plug up the dreadful wellspring of truth, a truth which might cause incalculable transformations in social consciousness, which in turn might one day produce political debacles unpredictable in their consequences. And so the post-totalitarian system behaved in a characteristic way: it defended the integrity of the world of appearances in order to defend itself. For the crust presented by the life of lies is made of strange stuff. As long as it seals off hermetically the entire society, it appears to be made of stone. But the moment someone breaks through in one place, when one person cries out, ‘The emperor is naked!’—when a single person breaks the rules of the game, thus exposing it as a game-everything suddenly appears in another light and the whole crust seems then to be made of a tissue on the point of tearing and disintegrating uncontrollably.

Even in his use of metaphor, Havel echoes Solzhenitsyn, who had written: “If we did not paste together the dead bones and scales of ideology, if we did not sew together rotting rags, we would be astonished how quickly the lies would be rendered helpless and would subside. That which should be naked would then really appear naked before the whole world ” (emphasis added).

In apparent agreement with Gandhi, Havel wrote of the exemplary, luminous, centrifugal power of living within truth. He speaks of living in truth as an act with “moral dimension” and “singular, explosive, incalculable political power.”

[A]s long as appearance is not confronted with reality, it does not seem to be appearance. As long as living a lie is not confronted with living the truth, the perspective needed to expose its mendacity is lacking. As soon as the alternative appears, however, it threatens the very existence of appearance and living a lie in terms of what they are, both their essence and their all-inclusiveness. And at the same time, it is utterly unimportant how large a space this alternative occupies: its power does not consist in its physical attributes but in the light it casts on those pillars of the system and on its unstable foundations. After all, the greengrocer [who began living in truth] was a threat to the system not because of any physical or actual power he had, but because his action went beyond itself, because it illuminated its surroundings and, of course, because of the incalculable consequences of that illumination. In the post-totalitarian system, therefore, living within the truth has more than a mere existential dimension (returning humanity to its inherent nature), or a noetic dimension (revealing reality as it is), or a moral dimension (setting an example for others). It also has an unambiguous political dimension. If the main pillar of the system is living a lie, then it is not surprising that the fundamental threat to it is living the truth. This is why it must be suppressed more severely than anything else.

After arrest and imprisonment, Václav Havel would soon become President of the newly free Czech Republic, following the Velvet Revolution.

Significantly, in each country represented by these adherents to truth or devotees of satyagraha—India, the Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia, and the United States—their nonviolent efforts helped achieve seismic change and movement toward justice, all without resort to war. Their influence, and that of satyagraha, continues to cascade and ripple outward, across the world, incalculably.

Republished with gracious permission from  Encomia .

The Imaginative Conservative  applies the principle of appreciation to the discussion of culture and politics—we approach dialogue with magnanimity rather than with mere civility. Will you help us remain a refreshing oasis in the increasingly contentious arena of modern discourse? Please consider  donating now .

[1] Statement to Disorders Inquiry Committee Jan. 5, 1920 ( The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi vol. 19, p. 206), quoted in “Satyagraha,” Wikipedia.

[2] In reference to God, Gandhi said, “We all believe in one and the same God, the differences of nomenclature in Hinduism and Islam notwithstanding.” Satyagraha in South Africa , ch. 12. In his collection The Way to God , he elaborated, stating, “God is certainly one…. I dispute the description that Hindus believe in many gods and are idolaters. They do say that there are many gods, but they also declare unmistakably that there is one god, the god of gods. It is not, therefore, proper to suggest that Hindus believe in many gods. They certainly believe in many worlds. Just as there is a world inhabited by men and another by beast, so also, is there one inhabited by superior beings called gods, whom we do not see but who nevertheless exist. The whole mischief is created by the English rendering of the word deva or devata , for which you have not found a better term than ‘god.’ But God is Ishwara, Devadhideva, god of gods. So you see it is the word ‘god’ used to describe different divine beings that has given rise to such confusion. I believe that I am a thorough Hindu but I never believe in many gods. Never even in my childhood did I hold that belief and no one ever taught me to do so.” The Way to God (Berkeley: North Atlantic Books, 2009), 5-6.

[3] A more detailed, but still summary, account of satyagraha during these years can be found here .

[4] Gandhi seems to have been essentially or largely a pacifist in his own life, though it’s not clear that he expected total pacifism of others. In any case, satyagraha—holding firmly to truth—may not necessarily rule out self-defense or just war in limited, appropriate circumstances. Indeed, it could be argued that satyagraha would entail, in a classic example, defensive just war to stop a genocidal, invasive regime such as Nazi Germany. George Orwell discusses some of these concerns in connection with Gandhi in his essay, “Reflections on Gandhi,” available here . A brief summary of just war principles can be found here .

The featured image is courtesy of Pixabay .

All comments are moderated and must be civil, concise, and constructive to the conversation. Comments that are critical of an essay may be approved, but comments containing ad hominem criticism of the author will not be published. Also, comments containing web links or block quotations are unlikely to be approved. Keep in mind that essays represent the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Imaginative Conservative or its editor or publisher.

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

About the author: jonathan english.

Related Posts

Are All Ideologies Evil?

HBO’s “Chernobyl” & Solzhenitsyn

Conservative Humanism & the Challenge of the Post-Humanist Age

Freedom Under God

Oh, Say! Can You Secede?

Leave a comment cancel reply.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Skip to main content

• Select your language English हिंदी

The Practice of Satyagraha (Essay by Mahatma Gandhi)

After the arrival of Mahatma Gandhi, who hailed from the Porbandar district in present-day Gujarat, the Indian national movement attained a new shape and structure. In his essay titled The Practice of Satyagraha, Gandhi explains the objectives and motives behind using satyagraha as a weapon against the mighty British empire. The term ‘satyagraha’ was coined by Gandhiji when he was in South Africa to distinguish his movement from the ones that were going on in the U.K. and South Africa under the name ‘passive resistance.’ According to him, passive resistance is conceived as the weapon of the weak. It could include the use of violence to meet one’s end. In contrast, Satyagraha could be pursued only by the strongest and completely excludes violence. Gandhiji states that the satyagraha largely appears to the public as civil disobedience or civil resistance. However, unlike a lawbreaker, a civil resister will not try to avoid the penalty for disobeying the law, as he believes laws are for the welfare of society. His action is a protest against the injustice committed by the lawgivers. Gandhiji affirms that the swaraj established by non-violent means would be different from the freedom attained through armed rebellion, as the former is achieved through love there is no place for brutality in it. With his adherence to non-violence and mutual love, Gandhiji provided a new outlook to a world that relied on violence to attain power.

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay

• Phone . [email protected]
• Email . +54 356 945234

Indian Culture App

The Indian Culture Portal is a part of the National Virtual Library of India project, funded by the Ministry of Culture, Government of India. The portal has been created and developed by the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Data has been provided by organisations of the Ministry of Culture.

Email Id : [email protected]

The Principles and Techniques of Satyagraha: Gandhi’s Methodology for Change

Table of Contents

Imagine a world where conflicts are resolved not through violence or coercion, but through the power of empathy, truth, and moral persuasion. This is the essence of Satyagraha , a philosophy and technique of nonviolent resistance developed by Mahatma Gandhi . It’s not merely a political strategy but a holistic approach to life and problem-solving that has the potential to transform individuals and societies. Let’s delve into the principles and techniques of Satyagraha that have inspired movements worldwide and explore how they could be applied in today’s context for lasting change.

The Bedrock of Satyagraha: Truth and Nonviolence

At the heart of Satyagraha lies the unwavering commitment to truth (satya) and nonviolence (ahimsa). Gandhi believed that truth is absolute and resides in every human being. The quest for truth requires one to be nonviolent in thought, word, and deed. Nonviolence is not just the absence of physical aggression but encompasses compassion and understanding towards one’s opponent. The Satyagrahi , or practitioner of Satyagraha, thus, seeks to combat injustice not by inflicting suffering but by willingly enduring it.

Tools of Transformation: Empathy and Moral Persuasion

How does one bring about change without force? Satyagraha offers a unique answer: through empathy and moral persuasion. By refusing to dehumanize the opponent, the Satyagrahi aims to appeal to their conscience. The belief is that every human has the capacity for goodness, and by bearing witness to self-suffering, the oppressor can be awakened to the truth and prompted to change. This process of conversion is neither passive nor weak; it requires immense strength and courage.

The Unity of Life : A Vision of Connectedness

Satyagraha is deeply rooted in the principle of the unity of life—the idea that all life is interconnected and each individual is part of a larger whole. Gandhi’s vision extended beyond the individual, encompassing society, nature, and the cosmos. In this interconnectedness, the wellbeing of one is inextricably linked to the wellbeing of all. This perspective fosters a sense of responsibility and encourages the Satyagrahi to work towards the collective good.

Nonviolent Resistance : A Powerful Force for Change

Nonviolent resistance, the practical application of Satyagraha, is a method that seeks to resist injustice and oppression without resorting to violence. It’s a powerful force that has the ability to dismantle the most entrenched systems of power. Through acts such as civil disobedience, boycotts, and peaceful protests, the Satyagrahi creates a moral dilemma for the oppressor, making it increasingly difficult to maintain the status quo.

Stages of Satyagraha

• Negotiation : Begin with open communication, seeking to resolve the conflict through dialogue.
• Preparation : Train in the philosophy and practice of nonviolence, building solidarity and community support.
• Action : Implement nonviolent interventions, such as protests or strikes, with discipline and commitment.
• Constructive Program : Work towards positive change by building alternative systems and institutions.

The Contemporary Relevance of Satyagraha

In an age marked by division and conflict, Satyagraha remains profoundly relevant. The principles of nonviolence and truth can inform our responses to personal, societal, and global challenges. Whether it’s advocating for social justice, combating climate change, or promoting peace, the spirit of Satyagraha can guide us towards constructive solutions. By embracing empathy, fostering unity, and committing to nonviolent action, we can create ripples of change that resonate through our communities and beyond.

Satyagraha, Gandhi’s gift to the world, is not an artifact of history but a living philosophy that offers a path to profound transformation. Its principles and techniques challenge us to look beyond short-term victories to long-term reconciliation and harmony. As we reflect on the power of Satyagraha, let us ask ourselves: How can we apply these principles in our lives? Can the practice of nonviolence and truth bring about the change we wish to see in the world?

What do you think? Are there situations in your life where Satyagraha’s principles could be applied? How can we collectively create a society that embodies the values of truth and nonviolence?

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Submit Comment

Gandhian Philosophy

1 Context and Emergence of Gandhian Philosophy

• Gandhi in the Indian Political Arena
• Emergence as an All India Leader

2 Gandhi’s Metaphysical World-View

• Gandhi’s Notion of Truth
• Concept of God
• Critical View

3 Gandhian Understanding of Man

• Human Nature
• Philosophy of Man
• Implications

4 Ethical Teachings of Gandhi

• Non-Violence
• Non-stealing
• Non-possessiveness
• Life Moral Teachings

5 Gandhian Concept of God

• Gandhian Concept of God
• Influences that Shaped Gandhi’s Idea of God
• Gandhi’s Theism
• God as Truth and Truth as God
• Proofs for the Existence of God
• God and Evil
• The Way to God

6 Religious Experience and Ashram Life

• Gandhi’s Religious Experience in its Preparatory Phase
• Religious Experience in its Maturity
• The Ashram Life: A Historical Overview
• Ashram Life in the Rules

7 Religious Tolerance and Religious Harmony

• Religions in India
• Religious Tolerance in India: A Historical Overview
• Religious Harmony

8 Ahimsa and Satyagraha

• The Meaning of Ahimsa and Satyagraha
• The Dynamic Meaning of Ahimsa and Satyagraha
• The Goal of Ahimsa and Satyagraha
• The Socio-political Significance of Ahimsa and Satyagraha
• The Principles of Satyagraha Technique
• The Application of Satyagraha Technique
• Criticism on Gandhian Concept of Ahimsa and Satyagraha

9 Swaraj and Swadeshi

• Basic Notions
• Hind Swaraj
• Swaraj and Swadeshi: Village as a Republic
• Education and Upliftment of All
• Swaraj in Swadeshi: in Gandhi’s Own Words

10 Sarvodaya

• The Meaning of Sarvodaya
• The Philosophical Foundations of Sarvodaya
• The Goals of Sarvodaya
• The Main Features of Sarvodaya
• Socio-political Philosophy of Sarvodaya
• Political Implications of Sarvodaya
• Socialism, Communism, and Sarvodaya
• Drawbacks of Gandhian Sarvodaya

11 Caste and Social Order

• Caste System in India
• Varna System
• Gandhian Social Thought
• Gandhi’s Concept of Varna System
• Gandhi’s Views on Caste System and Untouchability

12 Relevance of Non-violence

• Concept of Non-violence
• Non-violence and Satyagraha
• Limitations

13 Holistic Vision of Life

• Interpretation of Purusharthas
• Morality and Religion
• The Political and the Spiritual
• Critique of Civilization

14 Social Egalitarianism and Gandhi

• Gandhi and the problem of Untouchability
• Empowerment of Women
• Secularism and Religion

15 Towards Peace and Harmony

• Gandhi and World Peace
• Tolerance in Gandhism
• Peace Education

Share on Mastodon

Some men changed their times... One man changed the World for all times!

Comprehensive website on the life and works of, mahatma gandhi.

+91-23872061 +91-9022483828 [email protected]

• Satyagraha/Civil Disobedience
• Satyagraha: Gandhi's approach to peacemaking

Satyagraha Movement: Essay & Important Notes

The duties of satyagrahis.

In practicing satyagraha, the satyagrahis have to fulfill the following duties:

• Observe non-violence in mind.
• Observe the root cause of a situation.
• Seek truth.
• Undergo a process of self-scrutiny.
• Adhere to non-violence.

Gandhiji’s Idea of Satyagraha

When Mahatma Gandhi started the Satyagraha Movement in India in 1915, he had little idea of how popular the movement will become and eventually help India gain independence. Gandhiji’s idea of satyagraha included the following:

• Satyagraha was a mass agitation that did not use any violence and was based on facts.
• Gandhiji believed that if the cause of the issue was true and the fight was against injustice, the fight would definitely be won.
• Satyagraha involved winning the battle by appealing to the oppressors and avoid non-violent means.

Satyagraha emphasized the power of truth and the need to fight for the truth.

Movements where Satyagraha was used

Satyagraha became one of the most important and detrimental tools in India’s fight against the British and the national movements based on this idea shook the Britishers. The most prominent movements where satyagraha was used as the main weapon were:

• 1917 Champaran Satyagraha
• 1918 Ahmedabad Satyagraha
• 1918 Kheda Satyagraha

During this movement, Gandhiji teamed up with Sardar Vallabhbai Patel to fight for the peasants who were in distress because of low crop production. According to the revenue code, the peasants were entitled to a full concession, but the government did not want to let go of the revenue. Gandhiji asked the peasants to fight against injustice and also asked the rich farmers to not pay revenue. When the British government asked the rich farmers to pay revenue, they did not agree and the government had to let go of the revenue to help the peasants.

• 1919 Rowlatt Satyagraha

The Rowlatt Satyagraha was launched to protest an act that the British government had introduced. This law allowed the government to arrest any protesting Indian without a warrant and detain the person for two years. Gandhiji called for a nationwide strike by fasting and praying. However, there were many violent outbreaks and the movement was called off.

• 1930 Salt Satyagraha

The idea of Gandhiji’s Satyagraha in many ways helped India win its independence. Satyagraha was adopted as a tool by many to fight for their cause. The Norwegians, for example, adopted an effective non-violent resistance against the Germans during the Second World War. Even today, the idea of Satyagraha can be seen adopted by many people in different parts of the world to fight against injustice.

Related Posts

Slave Society in Ancient Greece

Chipko Movement: Essay, Important Notes

Reign of Terror in France

Khilafat Movement: Essay & Important Notes

Industrial Revolution, Definition, Causes, and Impacts

Civil Disobedience Movement: Essay & Important Notes

One response.

Bharat mein rashtriyavad

Add Comment Cancel Reply

Mahatma Gandhi’s Satyagraha and Swaraj Concepts Essay

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Bibliography

This paper is aimed at analyzing Mahatma Gandhi’s ideas of satyagraha (form of non-violent resistance) and swaraj (self-governance). In particular, the work focuses on major ethical and philosophical principles, which lie at the core of Gandhi’s doctrine. In addition to that, the applicability of his ideas to the problems of international community is discussed.

The ideas, expressed by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi have always been a subject of heated sociological debate. The main reason for it is their complexity and even contradictoriness. The spiritual leader of Indian Independence Movement attempted to develop non-violent method of resistance to the British Rule. This form of protest was called satyagraha. Gandhi defined it in the following way “ Satyagraha is literally holding on to Truth and it means, therefore, Truth-force. Truth is soul or spirit. It is, therefore, known as soul-force. It excludes the use of violence because man is not capable of knowing the absolute truth and, therefore, not competent to punish” (Gandhi, 1961). This form of struggle involved civil disobedience and non-cooperation with the British government. The purpose of satyagraha is not to destroy the enemy but to find the solution which can suit both. It is worth mentioning that his principles were once violated, the riot in Chauri Chaura left twenty British soldiers dead. Naturally, Gandhi condemned this act of violence (Gandhi. 1996).

As it has already been mentioned, Gandhi wanted India to achieve independence from Britain; however, his concept of state was rather unorthodox. He emphasized the idea that state, itself could only detrimental effects on a human being. The word “Swaraj” can be translated into English as self-governance (or even anarchy). Such ideology practically eliminates the notion of state machine.

To a certain degree Gandhis ideas of non-violent resistance and self-government are intertwined. In his opinion, a human being cannot know all the truth, thus he or she does not have a right to punish other people. If we draw an analogy this person cannot rule over other people, because he is not omniscient. Gandhi was firmly convinced that any man of power might turn into a tyrant or despot. Therefore, no one can be entrusted with such dangerous gift as power. However, the idea of society implies some points of contacts, some principles that every member of the given society adheres to. Thus, there should be people or public bodies, making sure that these principles are not violated. Gandhi’s philosophy, according to which, a person cannot know all the truth is quite understandable, but every society tends to be hierarchical, because people are not created equal. Therefore, those, who stand higher at this social ladder, are entrusted with power. Additionally, Gandhi’s philosophy does not take into account the fact that some people prefer to be governed by someone else, whom they consider competent for this task.

Gandhis philosophy can be a plausible solution to the problems that the international community is currently having. However, there is one indispensable condition; every person (not only political leaders) must understand that he or she can be mistaken. The Latin proverb “to err is human” becomes crucial in this case. Judging from the present day situation, humankind is very far from such approach to problem solving. Perhaps, this is the underlying cause of international conflicts (for instance, Israeli-Palestinian War) is failure to understand this simple truth. Gandhi showed that inability to make compromises could eventually lead humanity to its own destruction. Only a great shift in public and social thought can put his ideology into practice.

Naturally, Gandhis idea of self-governance is rather controversial, because the concept of state implies the presence of authority (or authorities), that can protect rights of the citizens, otherwise society will collapse into the state of anarchy. However, some principles of satyagraha and swaraj can be successfully applied to the modern American society. Gandhi could never approve of capital punishment. Even the best judge can be prejudiced or biased in his judgment; additionally, his mistake can prove fatal. Naturally, this idea was expressed long before Gandhi, but he was the first to put it into execution.

Now, that we have discussed Mahatma Gandhis principles of swaraj and satyagraha, it is quite possible for us to arrive at the conclusion that some of his ideas can be successfully used to solve the problems of the international community and the society (not only the American society). However, it is necessary to adopt Gandhi’s principles, especially the idea that no one can know absolute truth.

• Mahatma Gandhi, Dennis Dalton (1996). Selected Political Writings. Hackett Publishing, pp. 32-35.
• M. K. Gandhi. Thomas Merton (1965). Gandhi on Non-Violence. New Directions Pub, pp. 23-27.
• M. K. Gandhi (1961). Non-Violent Resistance (Satyagraha). Schocken Books pp. 3-6.
• Enlightenment Period and Jean-Jacques Rousseau
• Ambiguity in Diplomatic Discourse: Pros and Cons
• "Gandhi: His Life and Message for the World" by Louis Fischer
• Nonviolent Action Protests: Civil Disobedience
• The Salt March in India
• The Theory of Justice Need a Theory of Citizenship
• Equality or Priority in the Ideal of Equality
• Rousseau’s the Social Contract vs. Martin Luther King
• Political Science: Aristotle's View on Human Nature
• Philosophy: Is Patriotism a Virtue?
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2021, October 20). Mahatma Gandhi’s Satyagraha and Swaraj Concepts. https://ivypanda.com/essays/mahatma-gandhis-satyagraha-and-swaraj-concepts/

"Mahatma Gandhi’s Satyagraha and Swaraj Concepts." IvyPanda , 20 Oct. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/mahatma-gandhis-satyagraha-and-swaraj-concepts/.

IvyPanda . (2021) 'Mahatma Gandhi’s Satyagraha and Swaraj Concepts'. 20 October.

IvyPanda . 2021. "Mahatma Gandhi’s Satyagraha and Swaraj Concepts." October 20, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/mahatma-gandhis-satyagraha-and-swaraj-concepts/.

1. IvyPanda . "Mahatma Gandhi’s Satyagraha and Swaraj Concepts." October 20, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/mahatma-gandhis-satyagraha-and-swaraj-concepts/.

IvyPanda . "Mahatma Gandhi’s Satyagraha and Swaraj Concepts." October 20, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/mahatma-gandhis-satyagraha-and-swaraj-concepts/.

Explain Any Five Points About Gandhi's Idea Of Satyagraha

The idea of satyagraha was successfully organised by gandhiji in 1915. satyagraha was successfully organised in a number of places including ahmedabad, bihar, kheda and also in south africa. the word satyagraha refers to following the path of truth and non-violence to attain freedom and fight against injustice. five points about gandhi’s idea of satyagraha are: according to gandhi, satyagraha was a unique weapon to fight injustice. the idea of satyagraha highlighted the power of truth and the need to search for the truth. satyagraha was a novel method of mass agitation, which stressed the principle of truth, tolerance, non-violence and peaceful protests. satyagraha supported that for true cause and struggle against injustice, physical force is not required to fight with the oppressor. gandhi believed that the satyagraha battle will be won and this battle also unite the indians by this dharma of truth and non-violence.

The experiment with swadeshi gave mahatma gandhi important ideas about using cloth as a symbolic weapon against british rule.support this statement with any five stable facts

why did gandhi ji launched satyagraha

Gandhian Ethics: Principles and Relevance in Modern Conflict Resolution | Sociology UPSC | Triumph IAS

Table of Contents

Gandhian Ethics

(relevant for ethics, integrity and aptitude ).

The aim of Gandhian philosophy is to bring about a simultaneous transformation in both the individual and society. This philosophy draws inspiration from various sources such as the Bhagavad Gita, Jainism, Buddhism, the Bible, Thoreau, Gopal Krishna Gokhale, Tolstoy, John Ruskin, and many others.

Gandhian thought is intrinsically linked with ethics; it cannot be fully detached from it. His concepts are typically articulated using moral concepts and language. Ethical theories serve as the foundation for Gandhian thought across various domains.

Major Principles of Gandhian Ethics:

Satyagraha: This concept involves a continuous pursuit of truth. It primarily encompasses self-sacrifice, peace, and non-violence. Following satyagraha requires strong willpower and determination.

Trusteeship : Gandhi ethics advocated that wealthy individuals should act as trustees of resources that are meant for the welfare of the people.

Ends and Means : Gandhi ethics consistently stressed the importance of the purity of means. In his view, improper methods should not be employed to achieve legitimate goals. Just as a wrong path cannot lead to the right destination, unethical means cannot bring about ethical ends.

Concept of seven sins: Gandhi ethics identified seven sins in society that need correction: Wealth without work, Pleasure without conscience, Knowledge without character, Commerce without morality, Science without Humanity, Religion without Sacrifice, and Politics without Principle.

Sarvodaya : This term signifies the universal upliftment of all members of society. By embracing inclusivity, many societal ills can be eliminated.

Dignity of Labor: Gandhi promoted the idea of equality among all by making honest labor, such as bread labor, mandatory for everyone.

Role of Gandhian Ethics in conflict resolution:

• The Gandhian approach to conflict resolution relies on satyagraha, which has been described as passive resistance or nonviolent resistance. According to Gandhi, satyagraha is the commitment to Truth.
• A person practicing satyagraha attains a level of freedom that others may find elusive, as they become truly fearless individuals. Once fear is eradicated from their mind, they will never consent to be enslaved by another. With this state of mind, they will never yield to any arbitrary actions.
• Satyagraha transcends being merely a conflict resolution technique that can be scientifically analyzed. It is, in essence, an ethical framework that places significant importance on the quality of relationships between individuals.
• In Gandhian ethics , emphasizing mutual satisfaction with the resolution outcome is crucial for conflict resolution.
• Nonviolent action is the primary method in the conflict resolution process. This technique involves protest, resistance, and intervention without resorting to physical violence.

In today’s world conflict is complex and further, incorporates the utilization of physical and psychological violent instruments. The Gandhian approach addresses conflict at the individual level. Gandhi’s approach is still highly important in modern complicated conflict resolution, and there is a need to revitalise and resurrect the concept at the level of conflict resolution institutions.

Sample Question for UPSC Sociology Optional Paper:

Question 1: What is the essence of Satyagraha in Gandhian ethics? Answer: The essence of Satyagraha in Gandhian ethics is the continuous pursuit of truth through non-violence and self-sacrifice, emphasizing strong willpower and determination.

Question 2: How does the concept of Trusteeship function in Gandhian ethics? Answer: In Gandhian ethics , Trusteeship advocates that wealthy individuals should act as trustees of resources, using them for the welfare of society at large.

Question 3: How does Gandhi’s principle of ‘Ends and Means’ relate to ethical decision-making? Answer: Gandhi emphasized the purity of means in achieving any end, positing that unethical means can never achieve ethical ends.

Question 4: What are the ‘Seven Sins’ identified by Gandhi, and how do they relate to societal issues? Answer: Gandhi identified seven societal sins: Wealth without work, Pleasure without conscience, Knowledge without character, Commerce without morality, Science without humanity, Religion without sacrifice, and Politics without principle. These sins serve as a cautionary framework for individual and societal behavior.

Question 5: How is Gandhian ethics relevant in modern conflict resolution? Answer: Gandhian ethics , particularly the concept of Satyagraha , provides an ethical framework for conflict resolution that emphasizes non-violence, truth, and mutual satisfaction, making it highly relevant in addressing modern complex conflicts.

Related Blogs …

To master these intricacies and fare well in the Sociology Optional Syllabus , aspiring sociologists might benefit from guidance by the Best Sociology Optional Teacher and participation in the Best Sociology Optional Coaching . These avenues provide comprehensive assistance, ensuring a solid understanding of sociology’s diverse methodologies and techniques.

Gandhian ethics, Gandhian ethics upsc, Gandhian ethics sociology, Gandhian ethics essay, Gandhian ethics economic, Gandhian ethics book, Gandhian ethics what are gandhian values, ethics of gandhiji, what is gandhian approach, Gandhian Ethics, Satyagraha, Trusteeship, Ends and Means, Seven Sins, Sarvodaya, Dignity of Labor, Conflict Resolution, Nonviolence, Moral Philosophy, Indian Ethics

Choose T he Best Sociology Optional Teacher for IAS Preparation?

At the beginning of the journey for Civil Services Examination preparation, many students face a pivotal decision – selecting their optional subject. Questions such as “ which optional subject is the best? ” and “ which optional subject is the most scoring? ” frequently come to mind. Choosing the right optional subject, like choosing the best sociology optional teacher , is a subjective yet vital step that requires a thoughtful decision based on facts. A misstep in this crucial decision can indeed prove disastrous.

Ever since the exam pattern was revamped in 2013, the UPSC has eliminated the need for a second optional subject. Now, candidates have to choose only one optional subject for the UPSC Mains , which has two papers of 250 marks each. One of the compelling choices for many has been the sociology optional. However, it’s strongly advised to decide on your optional subject for mains well ahead of time to get sufficient time to complete the syllabus. After all, most students score similarly in General Studies Papers; it’s the score in the optional subject & essay that contributes significantly to the final selection.

“ A sound strategy does not rely solely on the popular Opinion of toppers or famous YouTubers cum teachers. ”

It requires understanding one’s ability, interest, and the relevance of the subject, not just for the exam but also for life in general. Hence, when selecting the best sociology teacher, one must consider the usefulness of sociology optional coaching in General Studies, Essay, and Personality Test.

The choice of the optional subject should be based on objective criteria, such as the nature, scope, and size of the syllabus, uniformity and stability in the question pattern, relevance of the syllabic content in daily life in society, and the availability of study material and guidance. For example, choosing the best sociology optional coaching can ensure access to top-quality study materials and experienced teachers. Always remember, the approach of the UPSC optional subject differs from your academic studies of subjects. Therefore, before settling for sociology optional , you need to analyze the syllabus, previous years’ pattern, subject requirements (be it ideal, visionary, numerical, conceptual theoretical), and your comfort level with the subject.

This decision marks a critical point in your UPSC – CSE journey , potentially determining your success in a career in IAS/Civil Services. Therefore, it’s crucial to choose wisely, whether it’s the optional subject or the best sociology optional teacher . Always base your decision on accurate facts, and never let your emotional biases guide your choices. After all, the search for the best sociology optional coaching is about finding the perfect fit for your unique academic needs and aspirations.

To master these intricacies and fare well in the Sociology Optional Syllabus , aspiring sociologists might benefit from guidance by the Best Sociology Optional Teacher and participation in the Best Sociology Optional Coaching . These avenues provide comprehensive assistance, ensuring a solid understanding of sociology’s diverse methodologies and techniques. Sociology, Social theory, Best Sociology Optional Teacher, Best Sociology Optional Coaching, Sociology Optional Syllabus. Best Sociology Optional Teacher, Sociology Syllabus, Sociology Optional, Sociology Optional Coaching, Best Sociology Optional Coaching, Best Sociology Teacher, Sociology Course, Sociology Teacher, Sociology Foundation, Sociology Foundation Course, Sociology Optional UPSC, Sociology for IAS,

Follow us :

🔎 https://www.instagram.com/triumphias

🔎 www.triumphias.com

🔎https://www.youtube.com/c/TriumphIAS

https://t.me/VikashRanjanSociology

Find More Blogs

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gandhian Philosophy for Living in the Modern World: Lessons from the Psychology of Satyagraha

• First Online: 26 June 2018

Cite this chapter

• Vinod K. Kool 3 &
• Rita Agrawal 4  

1426 Accesses

3 Citations

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, through his nonviolent technique ( Satyagraha), attempted to shape human behavior, revealing in the process, the human capacity to be able to rise above adversity, for hardiness and resiliency, qualities recognized by psychology to be the very ingredients for coping with stress and wellbeing. With his incessant focus on self-control, a hitherto neglected topic of study in psychology and other social sciences, and which he demonstrated through his nonviolent movement, he was able to forge courage and commitment leading to both social and emotional maturity. In this chapter, we focus, briefly, on a few selected concepts to highlight the usefulness of his work in promoting our understanding of human behavior in particular and its relevance for the mental health issues facing the world of today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

More than Happiness: A Stoic Guide to Human Flourishing

The Concept of Tri-Guna: A Working Model

Agrawal, R. (2001). Stress in life and at work . New Delhi: Sage-Response.

Google Scholar  

Ainslie, G. (2001). Breakdown of will . New York: Cambridge University Press.

Book   Google Scholar  

Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63 (7), 602–614. Retrieved September 6, 2017, from http://www.jeffreyarnett.com/neglected95arnettap2008.pdf .

Article   Google Scholar  

Baumeister, R. F., & Tierney, J. (2011). Willpower: Rediscovering the greatest human strength . New York: Penguin Press.

Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: Its causes, control and consequences . New York: McGraw Hill.

Bhatt, E. R. (2015). Anubandh . Ahmedabad: Navjivan Publishing House.

Bhushan, L. I. (1996). Asakti-Anasakti: A model of mental health. Yoga. Retrieved September 6, 2017, from http://www.yogamag.net/archives/1996/ajan96/menhelth.shtml .

Bondurant, J. V. (1965). Conquest of nonviolence: The Gandhian philosophy of conflict . Berkeley: University of California Press.

Coleman, P. T. (1997). Redefining ripeness: A social psychological perspective. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 3, 81–103.

Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis . New York: Norton.

Erikson, E. H. (1969). Gandhi’s truth . New York: Norton.

Gandhi, M. K. (1927). An autobiography or the story of my experiments with truth . Ahmedabad: Navajivan Mudralaya.

Gangrade, K. D. (2004). Moral lessons from Gandhi’s autobiography and other essays . New Delhi: Concept Publishing.

Gregg, R. B. (1941). A discipline for nonviolence . Ahmedabad: Navjivan.

Hofmann, W., Luhmann, M., Fisher, R. R., et al. (2014). Yes, but are they happy? Effects of trait self-control on affective well-being and life satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 82, 265–277.

Iyer, R. (1983). Moral and political thought of Mahatma Gandhi . New York: Concord Grove Press.

Joseph, S. (2012). Gandhi, religion and multiculturalism: An appraisal. Gandhi Marg, 33 (4), 409–425.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow . New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kirby, K. N. (2014). Gandhi, vows, and the psychology of self control. Gandhi Marg, 35 (4), 519–540.

Kool, V. K. (Ed.). (1993). Nonviolence: Social and psychological issues . Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

Kool, V. K. (2008). The Psychology of nonviolence and aggression . New York: Palgrave.

Kool, V. K., & Agrawal, R. (2011). From empathy to Altruism: Is there an evolutionary basis of nonkilling. In D. Christie & J. Pim (Eds.), Nonkilling psychology . Honolulu: Center for Global Nonkilling.

Kool, V. K., & Agrawal, R. (2014). Whither Skinner’s science of behavior, his assessment of Gandhi, and its aftermath? Gandhi Marg, 35 (4), 487–518.

Kripalani, K. (2011). All men are brothers . New York: Continuum.

Langer, E. (2012, August 1). George A. Miller dies at 92: Psychologist helped lead cognitive science revolution. The Washington Post . Retrieved September 6, 2017, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/george-a-miller-dies-at-92-psychologist-helped-lead-cognitive-science-revolution/2012/08/01/gJQALGHJQX_story.html?utm_term=.701d76cee773 .

Leotti, L. A., Iyengar, S. S., & Ochsner, K. N. (2010). Born to choose: The origins and value of the need for control. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14 (10), 457–463.

Lorenz, K. (1966). On aggression . New York: Hartcourt, Bruce, & World.

Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality . New York: Harper.

Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56, 227–238.

Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority . New York: Harper.

Opotow, S. (2014). Gandhi’s inclusionary trajectory in South Africa. Gandhi Marg, 35 (4), 541–560.

Opotow, S., Gerson, J., & Woodside, S. (2010). From moral exclusion to moral inclusion: Theory for teaching peace. Theory Into Practice, 44 (4), 303–318. Retrieved September 6, 2017, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip .

Prabhu, R. K., & Rao, U. R. (1966). The mind of Mahatma Gandhi . Ahmedabad: Navjiwan Press.

Sanghvi, N. (2006). The agony of arrival, Gandhi, the South African years . New Delhi: Rupa.

Sanghvi, N. (2016). Personal communication, Mumbai.

Schwagerl, C. (2013). ‘A huge variety of possibilities’: Interview with Nobel Laureate Paul Crutzen on his life, his career in research, and his views on the Anthropocene idea. Environment & Society Portal. Retrieved November 10, 2017, from http://www.environmentandsociety.org/exhibitions/anthropocene/huge-variety-possibilities-interview-nobel-laureate-paul-crutzen-his-life .

Stricker, G. (2000). The scientist practitioner model: Gandhi was right again. American Psychologist, 55, 202–254.

Tendulkar, D. G. (1954). Mahatma: Life of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (Vol. 5). Delhi: Publication Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Govt. of India.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

SUNY Polytechnic Institute, Utica, NY, USA

Vinod K. Kool

Harish Chandra Post Graduate College, Varanasi, India

Rita Agrawal

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom

Suman Fernando

Applied Psychology and Human Development, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Roy Moodley

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Kool, V.K., Agrawal, R. (2018). Gandhian Philosophy for Living in the Modern World: Lessons from the Psychology of Satyagraha . In: Fernando, S., Moodley, R. (eds) Global Psychologies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95816-0_14

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95816-0_14

Published : 26 June 2018

Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, London

Print ISBN : 978-1-349-95815-3

Online ISBN : 978-1-349-95816-0

eBook Packages : Behavioral Science and Psychology Behavioral Science and Psychology (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Gandhi's Philosophy of Ahimsa and Satyagraha

Related Papers

IJAR Indexing

This paper demonstrates that the political theory of Mahatma Gandhi provides us a novel way to understand and arbitrate the conflict among moral projects. Gandhi offers us a vision of political action that insists on the viability of the search for truth and the implicit possibility of adjudicating among competing claims to truth. His vision also presents a more complex and realistic understanding, than some other contemporary pluralists, of political philosophy and of political life itself. In an increasingly multicultural world, political theory is presented with perhaps it’s most vigorous challenge yet. As radically different moral projects confront one another, the problem of competing claims of truth arising from particular views of the human good remains crucial for political philosophy and political action. Recent events have demonstrated that the problem is far from being solved and that its implications are more far-reaching than the domestic politics of industrialized nations. As the problem of violence has also become coterminous with issues of pluralism, many have advocated the banishing of truth claims from politics altogether. Political theorists have struggled to confront this problem through a variety of conceptual lenses. Debates pertaining to the politics of multiculturalism, tolerance, or recognition have all been concerned with the question of pluralism as one of the most urgent facts of political life, in need of both theoretical and practical illumination.

IOSR Journals

SMART M O V E S J O U R N A L IJELLH

Abstract The present paper discusses the philosophy of ‘nonviolence’ (ahimsa) of Mahatma Gandhi, which he devised as a weapon to fight the brute forces of violence and hatred, hailing it as the only way to peace. Gandhi based his philosophy of nonviolence on the principle of love for all and hatred for none. He thought violence as an act caused to a person directly or indirectly, denying him his legitimate rights in the society by force, injury or deception. Gandhi’s nonviolence means avoiding violent means to achieve one’s end, howsoever, lofty it might be, as he firmly believed that the use of violence, even if in the name of achieving a justifiable end was not good, as it would bring more violence. He firmly adhered to the philosophy of Gita that preaches to follow the rightful path, remaining oblivious of its outcome. Gandhi used nonviolence in both his personal and political life and used it first in South Africa effectively and back home he applied it in India against the British with far more astounding success, as it proved supremely useful and efficacious in liberating the country from the British servitude. However, he never tried to use it as a political tactic to embarrass the opponent or to take undue advantage of his adversity. Keywords: Nonviolence, Truth, Gita, Acharanga Sutra, Disobedience Movement, South

American Political Science Review

Karuna Mantena

Although Gandhi is often taken to be an exemplary moral idealist in politics, this article seeks to demonstrate that Gandhian nonviolence is premised on a form of political realism, specifically a contextual, consequentialist, and moral-psychological analysis of a political world understood to be marked by inherent tendencies toward conflict, domination, and violence. By treating nonviolence as the essential analog and correlative response to a realist theory of politics, one can better register the novelty of satyagraha(nonviolent action) as a practical orientation in politics as opposed to a moral proposition, ethical stance, or standard of judgment. The singularity of satyagraha lays in its self-limiting character as a form of political action that seeks to constrain the negative consequences of politics while working toward progressive social and political reform. Gandhian nonviolence thereby points toward a transformational realism that need not begin and end in conservatism, moral equivocation, or pure instrumentalism.

Saskia L E Van Goelst Meijer

This dissertation studies nonviolence in the context of Humanistic Studies, a multi-disciplinary academic field that criticallly explores issues of (existential) meaning and humanization; the personal and social aspects of 'good living'. From this background this study focusses on contemporary nonviolence, using this term not only to point to the absence of violence, but to that which can take its place. Nonviolence is thus understood as a substantive method to create societal and interpersonal change, and even as a paradigm. The aim of the study is twofold. Firstly to descern if it is possible to understand nonviolence a concept independent from specific cultural, religious or practical context. Secondly to see if from such an independent notion it is possible to develop a framework for analysis and practice. The Gandhian understanding of nonviolence is the startingpoint ot this study. However, many developments in nonviolence theory and practice have taken place after Gandhi. This dissertation studies the way Gandhian concepts have caried over, and are changed and expanded by other thinkers and practitioners and what remains the same. From this search it is concluded that five basic elements form the core of contemporary nonviolence: satya (truthseeking), ahimsa (non-harming), tapasya (self-suffering), sarvodaya (the welfare of all) and swadeshi/swaraj (relational autonomy). Together they point to a specific way of wielding power called integrative power, which lies at the heart of nonviolence.

SUNIT KUMAR NATH

The relation between The Ideological View of Gandhi Ji and Geography (specially in sustainability of our Environment)

Pragya Markandey

comparative study of gandhi and marx

Though it is clear that in Gandhi’s mind nonviolence and love are equivalent to one another, it is not so difficult to think of situations indicative of a real tension between these two concepts. This is the case given common understandings we have of love. I argue that for Gandhi these apparent tensions are resolved when we consider the degree to which certain necessary conditions are present in any given acts of love. Thus I show that Gandhi’s view regarding the equivalence of nonviolence and love is capable of withstanding problems that arise from supposing there are different types of love.

BEST Journals

Mahatma Gandhi has interpreted various concepts of metaphysics, political and social philosophy together with moral and religious philosophy. Although Gandhi has not given any new doctrine his interpretations on various concepts of philosophy like truth, God, non-violence, satyagraha etc. are enough to call him a philosopher and Gandhism as a philosophy. Metaphysical concept of Ganghiji is revealed in his views on truth, God, soul or mind. Truth is not an attribute of God but God is Truth. So Gandhi asserted that “Truth is God”. Mahatma Gandhi is a humanist and he believes that man is the best creations of God. God is within man. Gandhi’s philosophy of religion gives us a new way of thinking about religion. Gandhi shows his religious tolerance and belief in all religions. Gandhi prescribes certain moral principles for the development of man’s ethical personality. For Gandhiji, Satyagraha is the truth- force or soul-force. Gandhi used the word ‘Swaraj’ for political freedom. This paper is a humble attempt to highlight Gandhi’s contributions towards philosophy from purely philosophical and logical point of view.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

ARTI NIRMAL

Religion Compass

veena howard

Peace, conflict, and …

rohan jindal

Aaron Hahn Tapper

JMRA Publication

Journal ijmr.net.in(UGC Approved)

M Abdur Malik

Aishwary Kumar

susan carew

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

• Classroom Programme
• Interview Guidance
• Online Programme
• Drishti Store
• My Bookmarks
• My Progress
• Change Password
• From The Editor's Desk
• How To Use The New Website
• Help Centre

Achievers Corner

• Topper's Interview
• About Civil Services
• UPSC Prelims Syllabus
• GS Prelims Strategy
• Prelims Analysis
• GS Paper-I (Year Wise)
• GS Paper-I (Subject Wise)
• CSAT Strategy
• Previous Years Papers
• Practice Quiz
• Weekly Revision MCQs
• 60 Steps To Prelims
• Prelims Refresher Programme 2020

Mains & Interview

• Mains GS Syllabus
• Mains GS Strategy
• Mains Answer Writing Practice
• Essay Strategy
• Fodder For Essay
• Model Essays
• Drishti Essay Competition
• Ethics Strategy
• Ethics Case Studies
• Ethics Discussion
• Ethics Previous Years Q&As
• Papers By Years
• Papers By Subject
• Be MAINS Ready
• Awake Mains Examination 2020
• Interview Strategy
• Interview Guidance Programme

Current Affairs

• Daily News & Editorial
• Daily CA MCQs
• Sansad TV Discussions
• Monthly CA Consolidation
• Monthly Editorial Consolidation
• Monthly MCQ Consolidation

Drishti Specials

• To The Point
• Important Institutions
• Learning Through Maps
• PRS Capsule
• Summary Of Reports
• Gist Of Economic Survey

Study Material

• NCERT Books
• NIOS Study Material
• IGNOU Study Material
• Yojana & Kurukshetra
• Chhatisgarh
• Uttar Pradesh
• Madhya Pradesh

Test Series

• UPSC Prelims Test Series
• UPSC Mains Test Series
• UPPCS Prelims Test Series
• UPPCS Mains Test Series
• BPSC Prelims Test Series
• RAS/RTS Prelims Test Series
• Daily Editorial Analysis
• YouTube PDF Downloads
• Strategy By Toppers
• Ethics - Definition & Concepts
• Mastering Mains Answer Writing
• Places in News
• UPSC Mock Interview
• PCS Mock Interview
• Interview Insights
• Prelims 2019
• Product Promos

Drishti IAS Blog

• Relevance of Gandhian Principles in the 21st Century

Relevance of Gandhian Principles in the 21st Century  Blogs Home

• 04 Oct 2023

In today's fast-paced and ever-changing world, the relevance of timeless wisdom often gets lost in the shuffle. However, the principles advocated by Mahatma Gandhi , also known as the Father of the Indian Nation, continue to shine as beacons of hope and wisdom in the 21st century.

With simplicity, non-violence , truthfulness, self-reliance , and compassion at their core, Gandhian principles offer valuable insights into addressing contemporary global challenges. In this comprehensive exploration, we will delve deeply into why these principles remain essential and how they can contribute to a more harmonious and sustainable world.

The Essence of Gandhian Principles

Before we delve into their contemporary relevance , let's briefly understand the essence of Gandhian principles.

• Non-violence (Ahimsa) : Gandhi's unwavering commitment to non-violence goes beyond physical harm; it extends to avoiding emotional, psychological, and societal violence. It emphasises resolving conflicts through dialogue and understanding rather than resorting to aggression.
• Truthfulness (Satya): Truthfulness forms the bedrock of Gandhian philosophy. Embracing honesty and transparency in our personal and public lives can help build trust and promote genuine dialogue.
• Simplicity (Simplicity) : Gandhi's advocacy for simplicity reminds us to live with fewer possessions and a smaller ecological footprint, reducing stress and promoting meaningful experiences.
• Self-Reliance (Swaraj): Gandhi championed self-reliance as a means of empowerment. It encourages us to take charge of our own destinies and be resilient in the face of challenges.
• Compassion and Service (Seva): Compassion and service to others lie at the heart of Gandhi's teachings. Embracing these principles can foster empathy and unity.

Non-violence (Ahimsa)

"In a gentle way, you can shake the world." - Mahatma Gandhi

Historical Significance:

The Indian independence movement led by Gandhi serves as a monumental example of non-violence as a powerful force. Through peaceful protests, boycotts, and civil disobedience , India gained independence from British rule in 1947. This event showcased the transformative potential of non-violent resistance on a global scale.

Contemporary Relevance:

Think of the global protests for peace and social justice, where peaceful resistance and non-violent civil disobedience have sparked change. Movements like Black Lives Matter and Extinction Rebellion exemplify the enduring power of Ahimsa. The words of Martin Luther King Jr. echo Gandhi's principles when he said, "Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that."

Truthfulness (Satya)

"Truth stands, even if there be no public support. It is self-sustained." - Mahatma Gandhi

Gandhi's own life was a testament to truthfulness. Acts of civil disobedience, including the famous Salt March in 1930, exposed the injustices of the time, grounded in truth.

In today's world, where misinformation and fake news proliferate, Gandhi's emphasis on truth is more relevant than ever. Responsible journalism, with its rigorous fact-checking standards, embodies the commitment to truthfulness.

These institutions have learned from Gandhi that the truth must always prevail.

Simplicity (Simplicity)

"Live simply so that others may simply live." - Mahatma Gandhi

During the Indian independence movement, Gandhi famously lived a simple life, wearing khadi (handspun cloth) and promoting self-sufficiency through local production. His personal commitment to simplicity inspired millions to follow suit.

The Tiny House Movement , where people downsize their living spaces to reduce their environmental impact, is a modern expression of simplicity. It echoes Gandhi's belief in living with only what is essential. Embracing simplicity can also lead to a more sustainable and less consumer-driven society.

Self-Reliance (Swaraj)

"Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes." - Mahatma Gandhi

Gandhi's call for self-reliance extended to economic self-sufficiency. He promoted cottage industries and self-sustaining rural communities , emphasising the importance of local production.

In an era marked by globalisation and technological advancements, Gandhi's principle of self-reliance takes on new meaning. The open-source software movement, with its emphasis on collaboration and community-driven development, reflects the spirit of self-reliance. It's a modern echo of Gandhi's call for individuals and communities to be self-sufficient.

Compassion and Service (Seva)

"The simplest acts of kindness are by far more powerful than a thousand heads bowing in prayer." - Mahatma Gandhi

Gandhi's commitment to service extended to the upliftment of the marginalised. He dedicated his life to fighting untouchability and promoting social justice, showing that true leadership involves serving those in need.

In a world marked by social inequality and division, embracing compassion and service can foster empathy and unity. Charitable organisations like Doctors Without Borders exemplify the spirit of compassion and service. They provide medical care to those in need, regardless of their background, embodying the Gandhian idea of selfless service.

The Modern Challenge: Embracing Gandhian Principles

While these principles remain as relevant as ever, the challenge lies in their application in today's complex and interconnected world. How can we, as individuals and societies, embrace Gandhian principles to address the pressing issues of our time?

1. Non-violence in a Digital Age

In the digital age, non-violence extends beyond physical actions to online interactions. The rise of cyberbullying , online harassment, and the spread of hate speech calls for a renewed commitment to Ahimsa. Social media platforms can play a role in fostering respectful discourse by enforcing policies against hate speech and promoting positive online interactions.

2. Truthfulness in the Era of Disinformation

The battle against disinformation and fake news requires a collective effort. Media literacy education, critical thinking skills, and fact-checking initiatives are essential to upholding the value of truthfulness. Responsible journalism remains a cornerstone in this fight, emphasising accurate reporting and ethical standards.

3. Simplicity and Sustainable Living

Gandhi's call for simplicity finds resonance in the global movement towards sustainable living. From reducing single-use plastics to embracing minimalism, individuals are making conscious choices to reduce their environmental footprint. Governments and businesses can support these efforts through policies that promote sustainable practices and eco-friendly products.

4. Self-Reliance in a Globalised World

The principle of self-reliance takes on new dimensions in a globalised world. While international cooperation is essential, encouraging local entrepreneurship and supporting small businesses can enhance self-reliance at the community level. The open-source movement and collaborative innovation demonstrate that self-reliance can coexist with global interconnectedness.

5. Compassion and Service as a Unifying Force

In an increasingly polarised world, compassion and service can bridge divides. Community service programs play a pivotal role.

Volunteer initiatives and empathy-building education can foster a sense of unity and shared humanity. Leaders in politics, business, and civil society can set an example by prioritising social responsibility and inclusive policies.

As we navigate the complexities of the 21st century, Mahatma Gandhi's principles of non-violence, truthfulness, simplicity, self-reliance, and compassion remain not only relevant but also essential. They offer a roadmap towards a more peaceful, sustainable, and harmonious world. Historical events and modern examples demonstrate that these principles are not confined to the past; they continue to shape our present and future.

Gandhi's wisdom resonates through time, urging us to strive for a better world. Let us heed his call to action, embracing these principles as guiding lights in our journey towards progress and harmony. In doing so, we honour the legacy of a man whose vision transcends generations.

"Be the change that you wish to see in the world." - Mahatma Gandhi

https://www.mkgandhi.org/main.htm

https://indiaculture.gov.in/gandhian-heritage

https://amritmahotsav.nic.in/district-reopsitory-detail.htm?4159

Harsh Raj, a Mechanical Engineer and dedicated blogger, possesses a passion for modern art. Alongside his creative pursuits, he is steadfastly preparing for the UPSC examination, driven by a commitment to public service and governance.

Comments (0)