Fate of Poland
The United Nations
German reparations
This article is part of our larger selection of posts about the Cold War. To learn more, click here for our comprehensive guide to the Cold War .
What was the iron curtain and how did it collapse, the origins of the cold war timeline, cold war detente — us/soviet enmity cools, when did china become communist, cite this article.
By: History.com Editors
Updated: June 26, 2023 | Original: October 27, 2009
The Cold War was a period of geopolitical tension marked by competition and confrontation between communist nations led by the Soviet Union and Western democracies including the United States. During World War II , the United States and the Soviets fought together as allies against Nazi Germany . However, U.S./Soviet relations were never truly friendly: Americans had long been wary of Soviet communism and Russian leader Joseph Stalin ’s tyrannical rule. The Soviets resented Americans’ refusal to give them a leading role in the international community, as well as America’s delayed entry into World War II, in which millions of Russians died.
These grievances ripened into an overwhelming sense of mutual distrust and enmity that never developed into open warfare (thus the term “cold war”). Soviet expansionism into Eastern Europe fueled many Americans’ fears of a Russian plan to control the world. Meanwhile, the USSR came to resent what they perceived as U.S. officials’ bellicose rhetoric, arms buildup and strident approach to international relations. In such a hostile atmosphere, no single party was entirely to blame for the Cold War; in fact, some historians believe it was inevitable.
By the time World War II ended, most American officials agreed that the best defense against the Soviet threat was a strategy called “containment.” In his famous “Long Telegram,” the diplomat George Kennan (1904-2005) explained the policy: The Soviet Union, he wrote, was “a political force committed fanatically to the belief that with the U.S. there can be no permanent modus vivendi [agreement between parties that disagree].” As a result, America’s only choice was the “long-term, patient but firm and vigilant containment of Russian expansive tendencies.”
“It must be the policy of the United States,” he declared before Congress in 1947, “to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation…by outside pressures.” This way of thinking would shape American foreign policy for the next four decades.
Did you know? The term 'cold war' first appeared in a 1945 essay by the English writer George Orwell called 'You and the Atomic Bomb.'
The containment strategy also provided the rationale for an unprecedented arms buildup in the United States. In 1950, a National Security Council Report known as NSC–68 had echoed Truman’s recommendation that the country use military force to contain communist expansionism anywhere it seemed to be occurring. To that end, the report called for a four-fold increase in defense spending.
In particular, American officials encouraged the development of atomic weapons like the ones that had ended World War II. Thus began a deadly “ arms race .” In 1949, the Soviets tested an atom bomb of their own. In response, President Truman announced that the United States would build an even more destructive atomic weapon: the hydrogen bomb, or “superbomb.” Stalin followed suit.
As a result, the stakes of the Cold War were perilously high. The first H-bomb test, in the Eniwetok atoll in the Marshall Islands, showed just how fearsome the nuclear age could be. It created a 25-square-mile fireball that vaporized an island, blew a huge hole in the ocean floor and had the power to destroy half of Manhattan. Subsequent American and Soviet tests spewed radioactive waste into the atmosphere.
The ever-present threat of nuclear annihilation had a great impact on American domestic life as well. People built bomb shelters in their backyards. They practiced attack drills in schools and other public places. The 1950s and 1960s saw an epidemic of popular films that horrified moviegoers with depictions of nuclear devastation and mutant creatures. In these and other ways, the Cold War was a constant presence in Americans’ everyday lives.
Now more than ever, terrorist groups are obtaining nuclear weapons. With increasing cases of theft and re-sale at dozens of Russian sites, it's becoming more and more likely for terrorists to succeed.
Space exploration served as another dramatic arena for Cold War competition. On October 4, 1957, a Soviet R-7 intercontinental ballistic missile launched Sputnik (Russian for “traveling companion”), the world’s first artificial satellite and the first man-made object to be placed into the Earth’s orbit. Sputnik’s launch came as a surprise, and not a pleasant one, to most Americans.
In the United States, space was seen as the next frontier, a logical extension of the grand American tradition of exploration, and it was crucial not to lose too much ground to the Soviets. In addition, this demonstration of the overwhelming power of the R-7 missile–seemingly capable of delivering a nuclear warhead into U.S. air space–made gathering intelligence about Soviet military activities particularly urgent.
In 1958, the U.S. launched its own satellite, Explorer I, designed by the U.S. Army under the direction of rocket scientist Wernher von Braun, and what came to be known as the Space Race was underway. That same year, President Dwight Eisenhower signed a public order creating the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), a federal agency dedicated to space exploration, as well as several programs seeking to exploit the military potential of space. Still, the Soviets were one step ahead, launching the first man into space in April 1961.
That May, after Alan Shepard become the first American man in space, President John F. Kennedy (1917-1963) made the bold public claim that the U.S. would land a man on the moon by the end of the decade. His prediction came true on July 20, 1969, when Neil Armstrong of NASA’s Apollo 11 mission , became the first man to set foot on the moon, effectively winning the Space Race for the Americans.
U.S. astronauts came to be seen as the ultimate American heroes. Soviets, in turn, were pictured as the ultimate villains, with their massive, relentless efforts to surpass America and prove the power of the communist system.
Meanwhile, beginning in 1947, the House Un-American Activities Committee ( HUAC ) brought the Cold War home in another way. The committee began a series of hearings designed to show that communist subversion in the United States was alive and well.
In Hollywood , HUAC forced hundreds of people who worked in the movie industry to renounce left-wing political beliefs and testify against one another. More than 500 people lost their jobs. Many of these “blacklisted” writers, directors, actors and others were unable to work again for more than a decade. HUAC also accused State Department workers of engaging in subversive activities. Soon, other anticommunist politicians, most notably Senator Joseph McCarthy (1908-1957), expanded this probe to include anyone who worked in the federal government.
Thousands of federal employees were investigated, fired and even prosecuted. As this anticommunist hysteria spread throughout the 1950s, liberal college professors lost their jobs, people were asked to testify against colleagues and “loyalty oaths” became commonplace.
The fight against subversion at home mirrored a growing concern with the Soviet threat abroad. In June 1950, the first military action of the Cold War began when the Soviet-backed North Korean People’s Army invaded its pro-Western neighbor to the south. Many American officials feared this was the first step in a communist campaign to take over the world and deemed that nonintervention was not an option. Truman sent the American military into Korea, but the Korean War dragged to a stalemate and ended in 1953.
In 1955, the United States and other members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) made West Germany a member of NATO and permitted it to remilitarize. The Soviets responded with the Warsaw Pact , a mutual defense organization between the Soviet Union, Albania, Poland, Romania, Hungary, East Germany, Czechoslovakia and Bulgaria that set up a unified military command under Marshal Ivan S. Konev of the Soviet Union.
Other international disputes followed. In the early 1960s, President Kennedy faced a number of troubling situations in his own hemisphere. The Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 and the Cuban missile crisis the following year seemed to prove that the real communist threat now lay in the unstable, postcolonial “Third World.”
Nowhere was this more apparent than in Vietnam , where the collapse of the French colonial regime had led to a struggle between the American-backed nationalist Ngo Dinh Diem in the south and the communist nationalist Ho Chi Minh in the north. Since the 1950s, the United States had been committed to the survival of an anticommunist government in the region, and by the early 1960s it seemed clear to American leaders that if they were to successfully “contain” communist expansionism there, they would have to intervene more actively on Diem’s behalf. However, what was intended to be a brief military action spiraled into a 10-year conflict .
Almost as soon as he took office, President Richard Nixon (1913-1994) began to implement a new approach to international relations. Instead of viewing the world as a hostile, “bi-polar” place, he suggested, why not use diplomacy instead of military action to create more poles? To that end, he encouraged the United Nations to recognize the communist Chinese government and, after a trip there in 1972, began to establish diplomatic relations with Beijing.
At the same time, he adopted a policy of “détente”—”relaxation”—toward the Soviet Union. In 1972, he and Soviet premier Leonid Brezhnev (1906-1982) signed the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT I), which prohibited the manufacture of nuclear missiles by both sides and took a step toward reducing the decades-old threat of nuclear war.
Despite Nixon’s efforts, the Cold War heated up again under President Ronald Reagan (1911-2004). Like many leaders of his generation, Reagan believed that the spread of communism anywhere threatened freedom everywhere. As a result, he worked to provide financial and military aid to anticommunist governments and insurgencies around the world. This policy, particularly as it was applied in the developing world in places like Grenada and El Salvador, was known as the Reagan Doctrine .
Even as Reagan fought communism in Central America, however, the Soviet Union was disintegrating. In response to severe economic problems and growing political ferment in the USSR, Premier Mikhail Gorbachev (1931-2022) took office in 1985 and introduced two policies that redefined Russia’s relationship to the rest of the world: “glasnost,” or political openness, and “ perestroika ,” or economic reform.
Soviet influence in Eastern Europe waned. In 1989, every other communist state in the region replaced its government with a noncommunist one. In November of that year, the Berlin Wall –the most visible symbol of the decades-long Cold War–was finally destroyed, just over two years after Reagan had challenged the Soviet premier in a speech at Brandenburg Gate in Berlin: “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall.” By 1991, the Soviet Union itself had fallen apart. The Cold War was over.
Just weeks before the match, Soviet tanks and troops brutally crushed the short‑lived Hungarian Revolution.
In the first half of the 20th century, U.S. educators shunned homework. The Soviet Union’s launch of Sputnik 1 changed that.
American and British pilots ferried some 2.3 million tons of supplies into West Berlin on a total of 277,500 flights, in what would be the largest air relief operation in history.
Get HISTORY’s most fascinating stories delivered to your inbox three times a week.
By submitting your information, you agree to receive emails from HISTORY and A+E Networks. You can opt out at any time. You must be 16 years or older and a resident of the United States.
More details : Privacy Notice | Terms of Use | Contact Us
Learn about the cause of the cold war between the u.s. and the soviet union and its impact.
Cold War , Open yet restricted rivalry and hostility that developed after World War II between the U.S. and the Soviet Union and their respective allies. The U.S. and Britain, alarmed by the Soviet domination of Eastern Europe, feared the expansion of Soviet power and communism in Western Europe and elsewhere. The Soviets were determined to maintain control of Eastern Europe, in part to safeguard against a possible renewed threat from Germany. The Cold War (the term was first used by Bernard Baruch during a congressional debate in 1947) was waged mainly on political, economic, and propaganda fronts and had only limited recourse to weapons. It was at its peak in 1948–53 with the Berlin blockade and airlift, the formation of NATO , the victory of the communists in the Chinese civil war, and the Korean War . Another intense stage occurred in 1958–62 with the Cuban missile crisis, which resulted in a weapons buildup by both sides. A period of détente in the 1970s was followed by renewed hostility. The Cold War ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.
In addition to specialized digital collections and historical news article databases, you can also use the Libraries' catalog to locate primary sources. Here are some search tips:
Written by: bill of rights institute, by the end of this section, you will:.
Use this decision point after students have read the introductory essay to introduce foreign policy milestones during Reagan’s presidency. This decision point can be used with The Iran-Contra Affair Narrative; the Ronald Reagan, “Tear Down this Wall” Speech, June 12, 1987 Primary Source; and the Cold War DBQ (1947–1989) Lesson.
In the wake of World War II, a Cold War erupted between the world’s two superpowers—the United States and the Soviet Union. During the postwar era, the contest between their respective capitalist and communist systems manifested itself in a nuclear arms race, a space race, and several proxy wars. In the 1960s and 1970s, as the United States fought the Vietnam War and struggled internally with its aftermath and a faltering economy, the Russians seemed ascendant. Increasing oil prices globally led to a revenue windfall for oil-rich Russia, which paid for a massive arms buildup and supported communist insurrections that Russia backed in Asia, Africa, and Latin America.
Eventually, the policy of détente decreased tensions between the two countries and led to their signing the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT) in 1972. SALT I, the first of two SALT agreements, limited the number of nuclear missiles either country could possess and banned the building of antiballistic missile (ABM) systems used to defend against nuclear strikes. The use of ABMs would have upset the stalemate represented by the possibility of mutual assured destruction (MAD)—the obliteration of both parties in a nuclear war—because it would allow one side to strike first and then defend itself against retaliation.
The December 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan to prop up a puppet communist regime led President Jimmy Carter to seek increased military budgets and to withdraw from Senate consideration the recently signed SALT II treaty, which would have reduced both countries’ nuclear missiles, bombers, and other delivery vehicles. When Ronald Reagan was elected president in 1980, he rejected détente and instituted a tough stance with Soviets designed to reverse their advances, topple communism in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, and win the Cold War. His administration supported freedom in Eastern Europe and the Polish resistance movement known as Solidarity; armed fighters resisting communism around the world, including the mujahideen in Afghanistan; and increased military spending to support peace through strength and to bankrupt the Soviet economy if it tried to match the increases. Reagan also launched an ideological crusade against the Soviet regime for violating inalienable rights and liberties.
For decades before coming into office, Reagan had criticized the spread of Soviet communism and the danger it posed. He compared communism to Nazism and totalitarianism, characterized by a powerful state that limited individual freedoms. In a 1964 televised speech, Reagan told the American people he believed there could be no accommodation with the Soviets.
We cannot buy our security, our freedom from the threat of the bomb by committing an immorality so great as saying to a billion human beings now in slavery behind the Iron Curtain, “Give up your dreams of freedom because to save our own skins, we are willing to make a deal with your slave-masters.”
Shortly before he became president, Reagan told an aide: “My idea of American policy toward the Soviet Union is simple, and some would say simplistic. It is this: We win and they lose.”
Reagan also specifically targeted the Berlin Wall, erected by communist East Germany in 1961 to separate East and West Berlin. In a 1967 televised town hall debate with Robert Kennedy, Reagan argued, “I think it would be very admirable if the Berlin Wall should . . . disappear.” He continued, “We just think that a wall that is put up to confine people, and keep them within their own country . . . has to be somehow wrong.” In 1978, he visited the wall and was disgusted to learn the story of Peter Fechter, one of the first among hundreds who were gunned down by East German police while trying to escape to freedom.
Americans knew Ronald Reagan was an uncompromising Cold War warrior when they elected him president in 1980. Over the heads of many in the State Department and the National Security Council, he instituted controversial policies that reversed détente because he thought it had strengthened and emboldened the Soviets during the 1970s. He joked that détente was “what a farmer has with his turkey—until Thanksgiving Day.”
Reagan also pressed an unrelenting ideological attack on communism in stark moral terms that pitted it against a free society. In 1981, he asserted at the University of Notre Dame that “The West won’t contain communism, it will transcend communism . . . it will dismiss it as some bizarre chapter in human history whose last pages are even now being written.” In a 1982 speech to the British Parliament, he said communism ran “against the tides of history by denying human freedom and human dignity” and predicted that the Soviet regime would end up “on the ash heap of history.” The Berlin Wall was “the signature of the regime that built it.” During that trip, Reagan visited the wall and said, “It’s as ugly as the idea behind it.” In a 1983 speech that made the supporters of a softer line toward the Soviets cringe, he called the Soviet Union an “evil empire.”
In June 1987, Reagan was in West Berlin to speak during a ceremony commemorating the 750th anniversary of the city and faced an important choice. The Berlin Wall was one of the most important symbols of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, and a symbol of communist oppression. He could confront the Soviets about the injustice of the wall, or he could deliver bland remarks that would satisfy the members of the American foreign policy establishment who wanted to avoid conflict. He decided to deliver a provocative speech demanding an end to the oppression of the wall and of communism.
Many officials in Reagan’s administration and in the allied West German government were strongly opposed to his delivering any provocative words or actions during the speech. The West Germans did not want the speech to be given anywhere near the wall and sought to avoid what might be perceived as an aggressive signal. The German Foreign Ministry appealed to the White House, but to no avail. Some members of the administration were even more concerned. At the time, the United States was in the midst of Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) negotiations with the U.S.S.R., and officials did not want to jeopardize the progress they had made by undermining the Soviet leader so close to home. As a result, Secretary of State George Shultz, Chief of Staff Howard Baker, and the U.S. Embassy in Bonn (the West German capital) read the drafts of Reagan’s speech and repeatedly implored the president and his speechwriters to tone down the language. Deputy National Security Advisor Colin Powell and other members of the National Security Council were particularly adamant and offered several revisions of the speech. Reagan listened to all the objections and unalterably decided, “I think we’ll leave it in.” He would not be deterred from challenging the Soviets and communism.
The stark moral difference between the systems on either side of the Berlin Wall was evident on June 12. Reagan and his team arrived in West Berlin and encountered some protesters who freely voiced their dissent at his appearance. He also spoke to reporters and nervous German officials who feared the fallout over an antagonistic speech. As he told them, “This is the only wall that has ever been built to keep people in, not keep people out.” In East Berlin, in contrast, the German secret police and Russian KGB agents cordoned off an area a thousand yards wide on the other side of the wall from where Reagan was to speak. They wanted to ensure that no one could hear his message of freedom.
Reagan stepped up to the podium to speak, with the Brandenburg Gate and the imposing wall in the background. He told the audience, “As long as this gate is closed, as long as this scar of a wall is permitted to stand, it is not the German question alone that remains open, but the question of freedom for all mankind.” In the middle of the speech, Reagan directly challenged Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev, who wanted to reform communism in an attempt to save it. He delivered the line that had caused so much consternation among American and German officials: “If you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization: Come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!” Reagan finished the speech by predicting the wall would not endure. “This wall will fall. For it cannot withstand faith; it cannot withstand truth. The wall cannot withstand freedom.” Reagan took responsibility for causing a diplomatic furor because he believed in universal ideals of freedom and self-government. And he understood the power of using a dramatic moment to promote American ideals.
A year later, Reagan addressed the students at Moscow State University. “The key is freedom,” he told them. It was an ideal that had been at the core of his political philosophy and public statements for 50 years, since the dawn of the Cold War. In a statement that reflected his own sense of responsibility for defeating communism and defending freedom, he told them: “It is the right to put forth an idea, scoffed at by the experts, and watch it catch fire among the people. It is the right to dream—to follow your dream or stick to your conscience, even if you’re the only one in a sea of doubters.”
In applying military, economic, moral, and ideological pressure against the system to facilitate its collapse, Reagan was joined by British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, Pope John Paul II, Soviet dissident Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Solidarity leader Lech Walesa, and others who fought for democracy and freedom. No one imagined the Berlin Wall would fall only two years later on November 9, 1989, as communism collapsed across Eastern Europe, or that the Soviet Union would formerly dissolve by the end of 1991.
1. The Cold War manifested itself through all the following except
2. The massive Soviet arms buildup during the 1960s and 1970s was financed by
3. Tensions between the United States and the U.S.S.R. increased in the 1970s with the
4. The president most often credited with advocating policies leading to the collapse of the Soviet Union was
5. The Reagan administration challenged Soviet influence by
6. For President Ronald Reagan, the “evil empire” confronting the world was
7. Events marking the end of the Cold War included all the following except
“But in the West today, we see a free world that has achieved a level of prosperity and well-being unprecedented in all human history. In the Communist world, we see failure, technological backwardness, declining standards of health, even want of the most basic kind —too little food. Even today, the Soviet Union still cannot feed itself. After these four decades, then, there stands before the entire world one great and inescapable conclusion: Freedom leads to prosperity. Freedom replaces the ancient hatreds among nations with comity and peace. Freedom is the victor. And now—now the Soviets themselves may, in a limited way, be coming to understand the importance of freedom. We hear much from Moscow about a new policy of reform and openness. . . . There is one sign the Soviets can make that would be unmistakable, that would advance dramatically the cause of freedom and peace. General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization: Come here to this gate. Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate. Mr. Gorbachev—Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!” Ronald Reagan, Remarks at the Brandenburg Gate, June 12, 1987
Refer to the excerpt provided.
1. The sentiments expressed in the excerpt contributed to which of the following?
2. The Soviet conditions referred to in this excerpt most directly resulted from
3. This excerpt was written in response to
Reagan, Ronald. “Remarks on East-West Relations at the Brandenburg Gate in West Berlin.” June 12, 1987. https://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/speech-at-brandenburg-gate/
Reagan, Ronald. “Remarks on East-West Relations at the Brandenburg Gate in West Berlin.” June 12, 1987. Reagan Foundation Video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MDFX-dNtsM
Brands, H. W. Reagan: The Life . New York: Doubleday, 2015.
Busch, Andrew E. Ronald Reagan and the Politics of Freedom . Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001.
Gaddis, John Lewis. The Cold War: A New History . New York: Penguin, 2005.
Hayward, Steven F. The Age of Reagan: The Conservative Counterrevolution, 1980–1989 . New York: Three Rivers Press, 2009.
Lettow, Paul. Ronald Reagan and His Quest to Abolish Nuclear Weapons . New York: Random House, 2005.
Ratnesar, Romesh. Tear Down This Wall: A City, A President, and the Speech that Ended the Cold War . New York: Simon and Schuster, 2009.
Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and Museum website. https://www.reaganfoundation.org/library-museum/
Schweizer, Peter. Reagan’s War: The Epic Story of His Forty-Year Struggle and Final Triumph Over Communism . New York: Doubleday, 2002.
In our resource history is presented through a series of narratives, primary sources, and point-counterpoint debates that invites students to participate in the ongoing conversation about the American experiment.
The post-cold war world.
Though it ended almost three decades ago, the Cold War continues to influence the modern world. The nation-building and internationalism of the Cold War, along with many of the political and military alliances forged during the period , continue to endure. Many Cold War ideas and attitudes still colour our political ideology and language. Proxy wars and meddling have profoundly affected the developing world and contributed to ongoing trouble in some areas. Cold War interventions in the Middle East and countries like Afghanistan have created destabilisation and contributed to the rise of separatist movements, Islamic fundamentalism and terrorism. Many of the Cold War’s tensions and divisions – such as the Sino-Soviet split and the United States-Cuba freeze – have faded into history, while some still remain. As major powers, the United States and Russia have charted their own foreign policy in recent times, leading to new tensions and difficulties . Meanwhile, China has emerged as a post-Cold War superpower while nations like Germany, Japan and India have grown and prospered.
Nuclear weapons post-Cold War
The most dangerous legacy of the Cold War is its vast arsenal of nuclear weapons . During the Cold War, nuclear-capable states manufactured around 130,000 nuclear warheads, more than half of these produced by the United States. The vast majority of these weapons have been decommissioned and deconstructed. Today, the US and Russia retain active stockpiles of 4,000-4,500 nuclear warheads apiece, of which 1,300-1,400 are strategic nuclear weapons. There are seven other nuclear-capable states (Britain, France, China, Israel, India, Pakistan and China) with stockpiles of between 120 and 300 nuclear warheads each. North Korea has successfully tested nuclear devices and may have up to 15 active warheads. Iran, Iraq and Lybia have undertaken secret research programs to develop nuclear weapons, though these programs are now believed to be defunct. South Africa is the only nation to have abandoned nuclear weapons, ordering the deconstruction of several nuclear warheads in 1989.
The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 raised questions about the fate of its 38,000 nuclear warheads. Experts pondered some dangerous and potentially catastrophic scenarios. The decentralisation of power could mean control of nuclear weapons passing to former Soviet republics with unstable or belligerent leaders. This situation was avoided with the signing of the signing of the Lisbon Protocol (May 1992) which surrendered all nuclear weapons in Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine to Russia. As a consequence, Russia remained the sole nuclear power in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). A more dangerous scenario was the possibility of the theft and sale of Soviet nuclear warheads to rogue states, dictators or non-state actors, such as terrorists or criminals. This situation was avoided through close cooperation and exchanges between American and Russian scientists, with the backing of their respective governments. Through this cooperation, all Soviet nuclear warheads were accounted for and decommissioned in large numbers.
Geopolitical changes
The decline of socialism and the end of the Cold War led to geopolitical change elsewhere. In central Europe, the election of a liberal government in Czechoslovakia coincided with rising Slovak nationalism in the country’s east. In July 1992 the Slovak parliament passed a declaration of independence and, six months later, Czechoslovakia separated into two sovereign nations: the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The dissolution of Yugoslavia was much less peaceful. Formed in 1945, the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was largely held together by the leadership of Marshal Josip Tito . After Tito’s death in 1980, Yugoslavia was beset by ethnic and nationalist tensions. Led by Slobodan Miloševic, Serbian nationalists sought to maintain and extend their control over the region. Four disgruntled regions (Croatia, Slovenia, Macedonia and Bosnia and Herzegovina) all declared their independence in 1991 and 1992. These changes triggered a decade-long war in Yugoslavia, marked by lawlessness, war crimes and claims of racial genocide. NATO intervened twice in this conflict, bombing targets in 1995 and 1999 to stop ethnic violence by Serbian and Bosnian-Serb forces. The NATO intervention was opposed by Russia and increased tensions between Washington and Moscow.
The 1990s also saw greater cooperation and unity between former rivals. In November 1990, 32 European nations, along with the US and Canada, signed the Paris Charter for a New Europe. This agreement, which facilitated greater consultation and collaboration between all European nations, is viewed by some historians as the peace treaty that formally ended the Cold War. The Paris Treaty led to the formation of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), an intergovernmental body sometimes described as the ‘European United Nations’. The OSCE investigates and deliberates on many issues including security and policing, counter-terrorism, border control, crisis management, conflict prevention, fair elections, human trafficking, freedom of the press and other human rights issues. More controversial is the ongoing role of NATO, which has continued despite the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact and the end of the Cold War. In recent years several former Soviet bloc nations have been admitted as member-states of NATO, including Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Romania and the Baltic states. Russian leaders like Vladimir Putin view the continuation and expansion of NATO as an unjustifiable threat to their country.
Islamic terrorism
“Fighting Islamic terrorism is perhaps the most important post-Cold War challenge faced by the West… [Islamic fundamentalism] dares to lock horns with the Western establishment, which has in its midst the unique superpower, the victor of the two World Wars and the Cold War, the conqueror of the bastion of world communism, the victor of almost all wars it has fought, and the citadel of world capitalism. Worse still, the challenge is not even from a classical superpower but from a group of disgruntled renegades from the Third World.” Al-amine Mohammed Abba Seid, author
As predicted by political theorist Samuel Huntington , the end of the Cold War coincided with an increase in radical Islamic movements in the Middle East and Asia. Cold War interventions contributed directly to this rise in Islamic radicalism. In 1953, Britain and the US orchestrated an coup d’état to replace the government of Iran. The Iranian prime minister, Mohammad Mosaddegh, was a nationalist who enacted policies to reduce foreign ownership and control of his country’s vast oil reserves. Mosaddegh was imprisoned and replaced by Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the incumbent Shah (monarch). The Shah governed Iran for the next 26 years, overseeing Western-style reforms, modernisation and infrastructure projects. An economic recession in the mid-1970s eroded his popularity, however, and left millions of young people unemployed. Numerous groups began to protest for political change. Among them was a coalition of religious groups led by Ruhollah Khomeini , better known as the Ayatollah (‘sign of God’). The Shah fled Iran in January 1979 and Khomeini and his followers gained control, establishing a theocratic government. The Islamic Republic of Iran has been hostile to the US and Western values ever since.
Islamic fundamentalism also took root in Afghanistan after the Cold War. The central Asian nation was governed by Mohammad Najibullah but the collapse of the Soviet Union left him without military or economic support. Najibullah resigned in 1992 and various tribal warlords and mujahideen groups began fighting for control of the capital Kabul. A group of radical Muslims backed by Pakistan and calling themselves the Taliban (‘students’) captured Kabul in September 1996. The Taliban ruled the vast majority of Afghanistan for the next five years, imposing laws based on their own warped interpretation of Islam. They conducted massacres of Harazas, Kurds and other non-Sunni Muslim groups. Afghan women were also subjected to religious oppression: they were banned from education, fraternising with men and appearing in public without a male relative. The Taliban also proved cover and support for al-Qaeda, an Islamic terrorist organisation headed by former mujahideen Osama bin Laden . When al-Qaeda carried out the September 11th terrorist attacks on the United States, a US-backed coalition invaded Afghanistan, overthrowing the Taliban and scattering remaining al-Qaeda members.
The rise of China
In the People’s Republic of China , the years after the Cold War produced significant reform and rapid economic growth. The death of Mao Zedong in 1976 saw the emergence of Deng Xiaoping as leader. While Mao was a communist idealist, Deng was a pragmatist who understood the need for economic growth and progress. In late 1978 he unveiled a series of reforms that abolished agricultural collectives and wound back government control of industry and manufacturing. Later reforms also allowed and encouraged greater foreign investment and trade. Over time, Deng’s economic liberalisation produced rapid growth, wage increases, improved standards of living and the formation of a large middle class in China’s cities. These improvements have been accompanied by a range of problems, such as excessive urbanisation, wide disparities of wealth and growing corruption. Despite difficult periods, such as the Asian financial crisis of 1997, the Chinese economy has continued to surge. Since Deng’s 1978 reforms, China’s gross domestic product has increased at an average of almost 10 percent each year. Today it has the world’s second-largest economy, with a gross domestic product exceeding $US10 trillion. China is the world’s largest trading power and houses the world’s largest bank and several of the world’s largest companies.
Despite embracing many aspects of capitalism, the People’s Republic remains a one-party state dominated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). While there has been some political reform and decentralisation, the CCP continues to exert rigid control over government, policy and appointments. State propaganda and censorship remain strong features of Chinese society; around two-thirds of Chinese have access to the internet but the government operates rigorous control systems, blocking foreign sites like Facebook and monitoring individual use. Human rights abuses in China are widespread, including persecution of minorities and dissidents, the use of torture and detention without trial, an excessive use of the death penalty, forced abortions, exploitation and underpayment of workers and impingements on freedom of speech and freedom of the press. China has the second-largest military in the world behind the US, with 2.2 million full-time personnel and an unknown number of reservists. It remains a nuclear power and in recent times has modernised and expanded its air force, naval and submarine assets. In the past decade, the Chinese military has occupied several contested islands in the South China Sea, as well as constructing seven artificial islands using sand and concrete. These activities are viewed with concern by the US, which believes the islands may serve as forward bases for military activities. Others see this expansion as China moving to protect and fortify its major shipping lanes.
North Korea and Cuba
While communism dwindled in the 1990s, several communist regimes survived into the 21st century. The most significant of these was North Korea . By the 1980s, North Korea had evolved into a fully-fledged Stalinist state, marked by rigid authoritarianism and a cult of personality around leader Kim Il-Sung . North Korea relied heavily on Soviet trade and financial aid so the dissolution of the USSR in 1991 had dire effects on its economy, triggering major shortages and widespread famine. Despite this, Kim and his advisors maintained a sizeable military and funded programs to develop nuclear weapons and missile delivery systems. This apparent breach of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty led to an international crisis in 1993. Kim Il-Sung died suddenly in July 1994, raising hopes of rapprochement with the West – but his successor, eldest son Kim Jong-il, continued to expand North Korea’s military and repeatedly provoke South Korea and the West. Today, North Korea is the only surviving Stalinist state, ruled by Kim Il-Sung’s grandson Kim Jong-un. It has conducted several nuclear tests since 2006 and is believed to have constructed at least a dozen nuclear warheads. North Korea has maintained a hostile position with regard to neighbouring South Korea, though Kim Jong-un’s visit to the South in April 2018 has raised hopes of improved relations in the future.
The events of late 1991 also created problems in Cuba which, like North Korea, was reliant on Soviet support. Cuba slipped into an economic depression after losing almost four-fifths of its trade, while the importation of oil, food and medicine slowed to a crawl. The island nation suffered critical shortages of petroleum, paralysing its transportation system. Famine was avoided, chiefly due to international humanitarian aid, but hunger and malnutrition were widespread. The Cuban economy began to recover slowly in the mid-1990s, aided by the government’s decision to allow foreign tourists onto the island. The US maintained its diplomatic freeze and trade embargo, hoping to force the overthrow of Fidel Castro and his regime. In 2008 Castro, by now in his 80s and in poor health, retired and handed the presidency to his brother. Under Raul Castro, relations between Cuba and the US began to thaw. Washington allowed limited exports to Cuba in 2012. The Cuban thaw was completed in 2015 with the restoration of diplomatic ties, the reopening of the US embassy in Havana and a visit to the island by US president Barack Obama.
1. After the Cold War, Russia signed treaties with several former Soviet republics, assuming control of all Soviet Union nuclear warheads. Today there are ten nuclear-capable states.
2. The end of the Cold War led to geopolitical changes in Europe, such as the division of Czechoslovakia and the dissolution of Yugoslavia, which led to a deadly civil war.
3. The Cold War also sparked changes in the Middle East, such as an Islamic revolution in Iran and the rise of Islamic radicals and terrorist groups in Afghanistan and elsewhere.
4. Since 1991, China has replaced the USSR as the world’s second-largest power. It is controlled by the Communist Party but has embraced elements of globalised capitalism.
5. Two socialist remnants of the Cold War are North Korea and Cuba. North Korea remains an authoritarian, Stalinist state isolated from the rest of the world. Since the death of Castro, Cuba has charted a more moderate course, restoring and improving relations with the nearby United States.
Content on this page is © Alpha History 2018-23. This content may not be republished or distributed without permission. For more information please refer to our Terms of Use . This page was written by Jennifer Llewellyn and Steve Thompson. To reference this page, use the following citation: J. Llewellyn & S. Thompson, “The post-Cold War world”, Alpha History, accessed [today’s date], https://alphahistory.com/coldwar/post-cold-war-world/.
Updated December 27, 2023
The Cold War, a geopolitical standoff that defined the second half of the 20th century, emerged due to the complex interplay between ideological, political, and economic forces in the aftermath of World War II. From the late 1940s to the early 1990s, the Cold War was characterized by a tense rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union, each representing contrasting political and economic systems. As the world witnessed the unfolding drama of competing superpowers, the repercussions of this ideological struggle reverberated globally, shaping the course of international relations and influencing the domestic policies of nations across the globe. This essay provides a nuanced understanding of the Cold War, exploring its origins, key players, significant events, and ultimate resolution and considering its enduring impact on the contemporary geopolitical landscape.
Watch our Demo Courses and Videos
Valuation, Hadoop, Excel, Mobile Apps, Web Development & many more.
The Cold War emerged after World War II, rooted in the ideological and geopolitical tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union. Key events and milestones in the historical context and timeline include:
The origins of the Cold War can be traced to a complex interplay of historical, ideological, and geopolitical factors. Understanding the causes is essential for grasping the dynamics that fueled this prolonged standoff between the United States and the Soviet Union.
The Cold War was characterized by key players’ actions and policies shaping the course of this geopolitical conflict. Understanding the roles of these influential figures is crucial to grasping the complexity of the Cold War.
The Cold War manifested in geopolitical hotspots worldwide, where ideological differences between the United States and the Soviet Union escalated into conflicts and crises. These hotspots reflected the global reach of the Cold War and the superpowers’ efforts to expand their influence.
The Space Race was a defining aspect of the Cold War, characterized by intense competition between the United States and the Soviet Union to achieve milestones in space exploration. This technological and ideological race significantly impacted scientific advancements, national prestige, and Cold War dynamics.
The period of detente marked a significant shift in the Cold War, characterized by a relaxation of tensions and an attempt at diplomatic, economic, and cultural cooperation between the United States and the Soviet Union. Several key events and initiatives contributed to the thawing of relations during this crucial phase.
The end of the Cold War marked a transformative period in world history, characterized by the collapse of the Soviet Union, the dissolution of the Eastern Bloc, and a reconfiguration of global power dynamics. Several significant events and factors contributed to resolving this prolonged ideological and geopolitical struggle.
The Cold War left a profound and enduring legacy that continues to shape contemporary geopolitics, international relations, and global dynamics. The impact of this ideological and geopolitical struggle is reflected in several key areas:
The Cold War’s enduring legacy resonates in today’s global landscape, shaping political, economic, and security dynamics. Its impact, evident in nuclear proliferation, regional conflicts, and geopolitical realignments, underscores the persistent influence of this historical period. As nations navigate a multipolar world, the lessons and consequences of the Cold War continue to inform diplomatic strategies, alliance structures, and discussions on peace and disarmament. Acknowledging this legacy is essential for understanding the complexities of contemporary international relations and fostering cooperation amid the ongoing echoes of a bygone era.
*Please provide your correct email id. Login details for this Free course will be emailed to you
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy .
Valuation, Hadoop, Excel, Web Development & many more.
Forgot Password?
This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy. By closing this banner, scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to our Privacy Policy
Explore 1000+ varieties of Mock tests View more
Submit Next Question
Early-Bird Offer: ENROLL NOW
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
THE SOVIET-AMERICAN CONFLICT FROM 1945 TO 1991
Priscilla Roberts
Articles: [“Churchill, Winston (1874-1965), 31-34; (with Christopher John Bright), “Committee on the Present Danger,” 39-40; “Cuban Missile Crisis,” 48-52; “Dulles, John Foster (1888-1959),” 56-59; “Eisenhower, Dwight David (1890-1969),” 61-64; “Kennan, George Frost (1904-2005),” 99-101; “Kissinger, Henry Alfred (1923-),” 107-108; “Nixon, Richard Milhous (1913-1994),” 151-153; “Reagan, Ronald Wilson (1911-2004),” 184-187; “United Nations,” 222-228.] The impact of the Cold War is still being felt around the world today. This insightful single-volume reference captures the events and personalities of the era, while also inspiring critical thinking about this still-controversial period. Cold War: The Essential Reference Guide is intended to introduce students to the tensions between the Soviet Union and the United States that dominated international affairs in the second half of the 20th century. A comprehensive overview essay, plus separate essays on the causes and consequences of the conflict, will provide readers with the necessary context to understand the many facets of this complex era. The guide's expert contributors cover all of the influential people and pivotal events of the period, encompassing the United States, the Soviet Union, Europe, Southeast Asia, China, the Middle East, Latin America, and Africa from political, military, and cultural perspectives. Reference entries offer valuable insight into the leaders and conflicts that defined the Cold War, while other essays promote critical thinking about controversial and significant Cold War topics, including whether Ronald Reagan was responsible for ending the Cold War, the impact of Sputnik on the Cold War, and the significance of the Prague Spring. Features •Several analytical essays by prominent historians, plus 85 additional A–Z reference entries about conflicts, incidents, leaders, and issues •35 examples of relevant primary source documents, including speeches, treaties, policy statements, and letters, such as the Marshall Plan and Winston Churchill's "Iron Curtain" speech •A detailed chronology of important events that occurred before, during, and after the Cold War •Numerous maps and images of key leaders and events •A comprehensive bibliography of print resources Highlights •Provides readers with a look inside the Cold War, pinpointing the main causes and consequences of this long-running conflict •Analyzes controversial Cold War topics that still generate widespread debate today to inspire critical thinking among readers •Supplements entries with a broad overview to help readers grasp the far-reaching implications of this worldwide conflict •Discusses key leaders and events in a scholarly, yet accessible manner
Tsotne Tchanturia , Dionysios Dragonas
Since 2010, the Cold War History Research Center has also organized an annual two-day English language international student conference on the history of the Cold War, with the participation of BA, MA and Ph.D. students. This volume publishes 29 papers selected from the 144 presentations from 14 countries of the first seven conferences between 2010 and 2016. Our Center proudly presents these excellent research results by motivated students and young would-be scholars.
proceedings of fourth annual conference on marxism and socialism in the 21st century: School of Marxism/Wuhan University
Norman Markowitz
The text of my paper to the fourth annual conference on Marxism and Socialism in the 21st Century, published in English and Chinese in the official proceeding of the conference
Nikolas Gvosdev and Christopher Marsh, Russian Foreign Policy: Interests, Vectors, and Sectors
Christopher Marsh , Nikolas Gvosdev
Muhammad Siddiq
Joseph Larsen
On April 12, 2012, in his last address to the State Duma as Russia’s prime minister, Vladimir Putin declared, “The post–Soviet period is over.” It is in a similar vein that we wrote this book as a study of Russian foreign policy, not Russia’s post-Soviet foreign policy. While it is undeniable that the legacy bequeathed by the USSR continues to have a powerful influence on contemporary Russia, Russian foreign policy today is not a continuation of Soviet policy. For one, the main problems that faced Soviet leaders—especially the ideological rivalry with the West and China—are no longer the ones that concern the Russian foreign policy establishment. Secondly, Moscow must deal with its former imperial possessions and Soviet siblings as independent states with their own foreign policy interests and strategies (which are often at odds with those of the Kremlin). Thirdly, and by no means finally, the contemporary international political, economic, and security environment is drastically different from that of the Soviet era—so much so, in fact, that even if the Soviet Union still existed, a contemporary Soviet foreign policy would scarcely resemble its predecessor in any way.
Tina Machingaidze
Ivana Veskovic
Jerry Landrum
From 1989 to 1999, the US had an opportunity to end its rivalry with Russia. However, a “loss aversion heuristic” dominated the decision-making processes of George Bush and Bill Clinton resulting in policies that provoked Russian fears of encirclement. This “loss aversion heuristic” manifested in four key security decisions: the reunification of Germany within NATO, NATO expansion to newly independent states, the Balkans interventions, and the nuclear non-proliferation regime. Although initially suspicious of Gorbachev, Bush eventually pursued a policy of supporting his reforms. However, as the administration came to terms with the inevitability of German reunification and increased European integration as outlined in the Single European Act of 1987, worries about the US leadership role in Europe emerged. By the fall of 1989, Bush backed German reunification to bolster pro-NATO political parties in Germany. As he assumed the presidency in 1993, Clinton wanted to increase financial assistance to Russia. However, when it came to security issues, Clinton’s fear of losing democratic gains in Eastern Europe to an emerging Russian nationalist movement made him less conciliatory to Russia. Despite Yeltsin’s dismay, Clinton pushed for NATO’s enlargement to protect the newly independent states. The same “loss aversion heuristic” was in play with the NATO interventions in the Balkans in 1995 and 1998. Criticisms of NATO’s ineffectiveness at preventing genocide on the continent called into question the necessity of a European security organization that could not provide security. Even though the interventions cemented a continued rivalry with Russia, the US backed them as a means of protecting the relevance of NATO. These decisions had implications to the US policy of protecting the nuclear non-proliferation regime. Instead of securing a nuclear security partner, US policy contributed to Russians selling technology to rogue regimes, and they resisted US attempts to create an Anti-Ballistic Missile Defense (ABM) system in Eastern Europe. In this way, US policy success in securing NATO resulted in decreased nuclear security. In the first three security decisions, the US overestimated the probability of loss making them unable to consider a more cooperative posture vis-à-vis Russian security concerns. The result of this loss aversion was the protection of NATO and the loss of cooperation on the nuclear non-proliferation regime.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
The Cold War: Interpreting Conflict Through Primary Documents
Békés, Csaba, Melinda Kamár (Ed.): Students on the Cold War. New Findings and Interpretations. Budapest
Torben Gülstorff
The Encyclopedia of the Cold War: A Political, Social, and Military History. 5 vols.
Martyna Weryńska
Robert R Kupiecki
Eleni Alexandratou
Bibliography of New Cold War History
Aigul Kazhenova , Tsotne Tchanturia , Marijn Mulder , Ahmet Ömer Yüce , Sergei Zakharov , Mirkamran Huseynli , Pınar Eldemir , Angela Aiello , Rastko Lompar
elena katyshevtseva
vinichhiey khlot
University Press
Akindele Boladale
Kees Van der Pijl
Vladimir Moss
Tsotne Tchanturia , Vajda Barnabás , Gökay Çınar , Barnabás Vajda , Lenka Thérová , Simon Szilvási , Irem Osmanoglu , Rastko Lompar , Aigul Kazhenova , Pınar Eldemir , Natalija Dimić Lompar , Sára Büki
The Bibliography of New Cold War History (second enlarged edition)
Tsotne Tchanturia , Aigul Kazhenova , Khatia Kardava
Kenneth Straus
KaMeLRo Siriwut
Luiz Carlos MB
Orrin Schwab
Antonio Fernandez
smokefilled room
Alunos PPGEF
Songyos Pongrojphaw
Fernando Araújo
Emanuel Copilaș
Guillermo Olvera
S3 Strategic Study Skills Skills
Neil Robinson
Alexandra Petrișor
Works cited.
One critical question that bogs the minds of most people when talking about the Cold War is the concern of securing the national interests of the United States. A substantial number of people argue that the Cold War, which lasted for four decades, was a contest of ideologies whereby the United States sought to spread its national interests across the globe. The development of the war had implications on the political and cultural standing of the United States.
The Cold War was an ideological war in which the United States and the Soviet Union were engaged in a war whereby each country sought to propagate its policies through the pursuance of different courses in different parts of the world. In this paper, it is argued that the nature of policy goals that were pursued in the Cold War period had implications on the political and cultural setup of the United States.
This paper discusses the Cold War. The paper seeks to explore issues surrounding the US foreign policy in the course of the war, as well as the implications of the war on the United States’ society and culture.
The Cold War marked a period in the world history after the Second World War. The two main countries that battled in the war are the United States and the Soviet Union. This war was not an actual physical battle between the two countries, but it entailed the utilization of foreign policy by both countries to advance national ideologies.
However, proxy wars were fought as the two countries applied their containment strategies in proxy nations in different regions of the world. The United States embraced the ideology of capitalism, while the Soviet Union embraced communism. At the end of the Second World War, the United States insisted on the pursuance of a course that was meant to see the world pursue self-determination and the continuity of free trade.
On the other hand, the Soviet Union focused on molding its influence on Eastern Europe and the restructuring of its economy to gain power and influence in the region and the world at large. The most critical question that rings in the mind of most people concerns the possibilities of avoiding the Cold War at that time, given the political status of the world during the post-World War II.
Most of the commentators argue that the war could not have been easily avoided, given that a political vacuum prevailed in the world after the Second World War. The United States and the Soviet Union, which were the two main powers in the bipolar world order, engaged in a battle that resulted in a unipolar state, with the United States becoming the key dominant power in the world.
According to Kennan (para. 4), one main thing in the Cold War was the application of containment strategies that were embedded in the foreign policy activities. The foreign policy of the United States, just after the end of the Second World War, was shifted to containing the Soviet Union. What ought to be asked is whether the containment strategy of the US was welcome by the citizens of the country.
The other question concerns the impact of the pursuance of the containment strategy by the United States during the Cold War on the American society. Several documents have been authored on the historical developments in the post-World War II period, which marked the period of the Cold War. Most of the documents point to the political discourse in the Cold War period. The Cold War was a political development, thus it is quite difficult to eliminate the question of political discourse when talking about the Cold War.
Arguing from the perspective of the world wars, the distribution of power was one of the main issues that shaped the developments at the international stage during the world wars. The cold war was, therefore, an extension of power politics in the international arena; only that this point in time, the power struggle shifted to two states in the world (Truman para. 1).
According to “NSC 68 and the Ideological Cold War” (591), both the United States and the Soviet Union, which were the main powers that presented a hegemonic state in the international arena, were involved in the pursuance of different policies that were aimed at consolidating power. The United States under its leaders presented issues in the foreign countries in the manner that presented the attention of its citizens and the search for support in implementing the foreign policies of the country.
An example that can be given here is the presentation of the situation in Greek by Harry Truman, the then US President. Truman argued that the situation that prevailed in Greece had implications on the national security of the United States as he addressed the US Congress. The address pointed out that the Greek government was being negatively affected by the communistic advancements, a situation that warranted the support of the United States (Truman para. 1-5).
According to Lippmann (para. 1), the policy of containment used during the Cold War period called for the use of different tactics by the players in the war. The United States was, therefore, forced to be strategic in terms of crafting and implementing its foreign policy to match the strategies of the Soviet Union.
There was an expansive pressure on the United States, which resulted from the policies of the Soviet Union. The main way through which the United States would respond to the pressure was, therefore, through the deployment of diplomatic tactics in containing the Soviet Union’s influence in the world. Foreign policies were vital in the planning and implementation of containment strategies since it authorized the actions of the US government.
This has shaped the culture of the United States in such a way that policies are often subjected to the public. The United States is highly organized based on the principles of participation and democracy. The question of policy support in the United States also came out during the Cold War in which the US was quite active in terms of the search for policy support locally.
The other aspect of culture and society in the United States as was depicted by the Cold War revolves around the question of freedom in terms of policy making and participation. Capitalism, which is an ideology that was fully backed by the United States, entails the embrace of diversities of people in diverse sectors.
The free trade of ideas is, therefore, one of the most critical components of a free market of ideas. While this ought to be the nature of the American society, there are still a lot of pointers to the embrace of absolutism in the country. A free society ought to give each individual a chance to exercise and pursue his or her goals, which is contrary to what the United States policy entailed during the Cold War (“NSC 68 and the Ideological Cold War” para 2-5).
The civil rights movement that was experienced in the United States in the course of the Cold War can be taken as one of the indicators of the lack of embrace of free ideas and the value of every individual course, which are core features of capitalism. The differences in terms of race came out strongly during the Cold War. While the United States struggled a lot to contain the actions of the Russians through policy, it did less in pursuing a domestic policy to contain racial segregation within the country.
The United States government concentrated a lot on the pursuance of foreign policy, rather than addressing the issue of civil rights in the country. The American society can be depicted as an expansionist society due to a lot of focus on foreign policy at the expense of addressing the domestic issues (President’s Commission on Civil Rights para. 1-4).
According to McCarthy (para. 2), the pacification of the world seemed to be the main Agenda of the United States. This was depicted by its efforts to see the establishment of the United Nations during the Second World War. However, the actions of hatred and the support of proxy battles was an order of the Cold War, which made it impossible to attain the goals of peaceful existence of people in the world.
This paper has explored the Cold War and how the domestic and foreign policy of the United States was shaped during the war. From the discussion, it has come out that the foreign policy goals of the United States during the early periods of the war were largely centered on containing Russia. This barred the US from pursuing domestic policies that were critical in addressing domestic issues.
Kennan, George, F. The Sources of Soviet Conduct , 1947. Web.
McCarthy, Joseph. Enemies from Within , 1950. Web. http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/6456/
NSC 68 and the Ideological Cold War , 1950.
President’s Commission on Civil Rights. To Secure These Rights , 1947.
Truman, Harry S. Excerpts from the Truman Doctrine , 1947.
Walter Lippmann. A Critique of Containment , 1947.
IvyPanda. (2018, December 19). The Cold War: US Foreign Policy. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-cold-war-2/
"The Cold War: US Foreign Policy." IvyPanda , 19 Dec. 2018, ivypanda.com/essays/the-cold-war-2/.
IvyPanda . (2018) 'The Cold War: US Foreign Policy'. 19 December.
IvyPanda . 2018. "The Cold War: US Foreign Policy." December 19, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-cold-war-2/.
1. IvyPanda . "The Cold War: US Foreign Policy." December 19, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-cold-war-2/.
Bibliography
IvyPanda . "The Cold War: US Foreign Policy." December 19, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-cold-war-2/.
Few historical periods have left as a profound a mark on American foreign policy as the Cold War. This prolonged period of geopolitical tension between the United States and the Soviet Union, accompanied by their respective allies, shaped not only global dynamics but also the U.S.'s approach to international relations.
The intricate chess game played out over nearly half a century left lasting legacies that reverberate even today.
Yet, what were the key events that defined this era, and how did they influence American foreign policy during the Cold War?
In what ways has the legacy of the Cold War continued to shape U.S. foreign policy in the post-Cold War era?
The Cold War, a term popularized by English writer George Orwell, paints a vivid picture of a global conflict in which two superpowers, the United States and the Soviet Union, engaged in a persistent yet indirect confrontation.
Spanning nearly five decades, from the end of World War II in 1945 until the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the Cold War was neither a 'hot' war marked by open military conflict nor a 'cold' peace characterized by harmony and cooperation.
Instead, it was an era of intense political and economic rivalry, punctuated by periods of heightened tension and moments of détente.
At the heart of this global standoff was an ideological battle: capitalism versus communism.
The United States, leading the capitalist bloc, touted the principles of free markets and individual liberty, while the Soviet Union, the figurehead of the communist bloc, advocated for state control and equality of outcome.
Both superpowers considered their own ideology superior and sought to spread it across the world.
This ideological war translated into a relentless pursuit of influence over non-aligned countries, with each power aiming to expand its own sphere and curtail the other's.
The Cold War played out on various fronts, including political (through alliances and diplomacy), military (via an arms race and proxy wars), economic (through aid and sanctions), and even cultural and scientific domains (such as the space race).
The bipolar structure of the world during this period, divided into the Western Bloc led by the United States and the Eastern Bloc led by the Soviet Union, set the stage for a complex global chessboard of moves and countermoves.
Both superpowers amassed considerable nuclear arsenals, leading to a precarious balance of power under the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), where each side was deterred from launching a first nuclear strike by the prospect of a retaliatory strike that would ensure total destruction.
The fear of nuclear annihilation, a pervasive undercurrent throughout the Cold War, was felt most acutely during the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, which brought the world to the brink of nuclear war.
The Cold War unfolded through a series of key events that influenced and shaped the U.S.'s foreign policy. These events, ranging from diplomatic standoffs to military conflicts, reflected the tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union and their respective allies.
Start of the Cold War and the Iron Curtain
The Cold War unofficially began with the division of Europe at the end of World War II. Winston Churchill's famous "Iron Curtain" speech in 1946 depicted a Europe divided into two ideological blocs. The imposition of Soviet-style communism in Eastern Europe and the formation of NATO and the Warsaw Pact hardened these divisions and set the stage for the geopolitical tug of war to follow.
The Korean and Vietnam Wars
The Korean War (1950-1953) and the Vietnam War (1955-1975) were two major hotspots of the Cold War, where the U.S. and the Soviet Union engaged in proxy conflicts. These wars, aimed at containing the spread of communism, had far-reaching implications on U.S. foreign policy, underscoring the commitment to the Truman Doctrine and raising significant questions about the costs and effectiveness of interventionism.
The Space Race
The Space Race was a technological competition between the U.S. and the Soviet Union that symbolized their rivalry and struggle for dominance. The launch of Sputnik by the Soviet Union in 1957 marked the start of this race, but the U.S. eventually claimed a symbolic victory with the Apollo moon landing in 1969.
The Cuban Missile Crisis
In 1962, the world stood on the brink of nuclear war during the Cuban Missile Crisis. The deployment of Soviet nuclear missiles in Cuba led to a 13-day confrontation, which ended with a Soviet agreement to remove the missiles in exchange for a U.S. promise not to invade Cuba and to remove its missiles from Turkey. This event underlined the potential catastrophic consequences of the Cold War tensions and led to some measures towards détente.
Détente and SALT treaties
The late 1960s and the 1970s were marked by a period of détente or easing of relations between the U.S. and the Soviet Union. The signing of the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) treaties during this period represented efforts to control the arms race and stabilize the balance of power.
The Reagan Era and End of the Cold War
The Reagan era witnessed renewed tensions with the 'evil empire' rhetoric, the Strategic Defense Initiative ('Star Wars'), and support for anti-communist movements. However, under Mikhail Gorbachev, the Soviet Union introduced reforms (glasnost and perestroika), which along with economic difficulties, led to its dissolution in 1991, marking the end of the Cold War.
During the Cold War, the United States devised and implemented a range of foreign policies reflecting its objective to contain the spread of Soviet communism and protect the free world. This phase of American diplomatic history was characterized by proactive engagement and, often, military interventionism.
Containment and the Truman Doctrine
The policy of containment, primarily articulated by diplomat George Kennan, became the cornerstone of America's Cold War strategy. This policy aimed at preventing the spread of communism by offering military and economic aid to countries at risk of Soviet influence. The Truman Doctrine, announced by President Harry Truman in 1947, reinforced this policy by pledging American support for "free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures."
The Marshall Plan
The Marshall Plan, officially known as the European Recovery Program, was a significant economic strategy employed by the United States to stabilize Western European economies devastated by World War II. By bolstering these economies, the U.S. sought to make communism less appealing to European nations, thereby containing Soviet influence.
NSC-68 and the Military-Industrial Complex
The National Security Council Report 68 (NSC-68) was a key Cold War document that advocated for a massive build-up of U.S. military capabilities to counter the Soviet threat. This policy led to the emergence of the military-industrial complex, an informal alliance between the military and defense industries, which President Eisenhower famously warned against in his farewell address.
The Role of NATO
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), established in 1949, was a significant aspect of American foreign policy aimed at deterring Soviet aggression in Europe. This military alliance, binding North America and Europe, reflected the U.S.'s commitment to collective security during the Cold War.
Arms Race and Deterrence
The arms race between the U.S. and the Soviet Union was a defining characteristic of the Cold War, with both nations building up large stockpiles of nuclear weapons. The resulting policy of deterrence, particularly Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), aimed to prevent a nuclear war by ensuring that any first strike would lead to the total destruction of the attacker by retaliation.
Covert Operations and the Role of the CIA
Covert operations conducted by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) were another critical aspect of American foreign policy. From Iran and Guatemala to Cuba and Afghanistan, these operations aimed at undermining communist regimes and movements worldwide, revealing a more clandestine side of the Cold War.
The Cold War's end did not conclude its influence on American foreign policy. The lessons, successes, failures, and traumas of this epoch continue to reverberate through the U.S.'s approach to international relations, shaping strategic choices and influencing national security doctrine.
The Cold War's arms race led to a significant build-up of the U.S. military-industrial complex, which persists today.
The emphasis on a strong defense as a deterrent against enemies remains a central tenet of American security policy.
Additionally, the policy of containment has found a new lease of life in the U.S.'s approach to emerging powers perceived as threats, notably China.
The interventionist approach that the U.S. adopted during the Cold War, driven by the desire to halt the spread of communism, has largely persisted.
This is evident from the U.S.'s involvement in various regional conflicts post-Cold War, from the Gulf War to interventions in the Balkans, Afghanistan, and Iraq.
The principle that the U.S. has a right, and at times an obligation, to intervene in specific circumstances, particularly where a threat to global security is perceived, is a direct legacy of Cold War thinking.
The end of the Cold War left the United States as the world's sole superpower, leading President George H.W. Bush to pronounce the emergence of a "New World Order."
This unipolar moment allowed the U.S. to shape global norms and institutions more unilaterally, reflecting a continuity of the leadership role the U.S. assumed during the Cold War.
While the Cold War's end brought initial hopes of a democratic Russia integrated into the international community, relations have remained challenging.
The U.S. has found itself grappling with how to address Russia's actions, such as its annexation of Crimea and alleged interference in U.S. elections, indicating that Cold War-era suspicions and rivalries have not entirely dissipated.
To better understand the enduring impact of the Cold War on American foreign policy, let's explore a few key examples from the post-Cold War era.
The Gulf War (1990-1991)
The Gulf War marked the first major conflict involving the U.S. following the end of the Cold War. When Iraq invaded Kuwait, the U.S. led a coalition of nations to liberate Kuwait in what was deemed a defense of international law and order. The interventionist approach demonstrated in this conflict, as well as the reliance on collective action and multilateralism, mirrored strategies adopted during the Cold War.
The Balkan Wars (1991-2001)
The conflicts in the Balkans during the 1990s presented another test for U.S. foreign policy in the post-Cold War era. From the war in Bosnia to the Kosovo conflict, the U.S. engaged in extensive diplomatic and military efforts to end violence and promote stability in the region. These actions demonstrated a continued willingness to intervene in global conflicts, a tendency born out of the Cold War era.
War on Terror (2001-Present)
In the wake of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the U.S. launched the global War on Terror. The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq reflected an extension of the Cold War's interventionist policy. The premise of 'preemptive defense,' especially evident in the Iraq War, also drew parallels with the Cold War-era domino theory, now applied to terrorism instead of communism.
U.S.-China Relations
The rise of China as a global economic and military power has presented a significant challenge to U.S. foreign policy in the post-Cold War era. Much like the containment policy against the Soviet Union during the Cold War, the U.S. has increasingly sought to counter China's growing influence, evident in its strategies in the Indo-Pacific region and the ongoing trade and technology disputes.
One significant trend in the contemporary international order is the apparent resurgence of great power competition, most prominently between the U.S., China, and Russia.
This is reminiscent of the geopolitical dynamics during the Cold War era. However, the ideological contest today is less about capitalism versus communism and more about democracy versus authoritarianism, especially concerning governance models and technology's role in society.
While the Cold War was characterized by a bipolar world, the current global order is increasingly multipolar, with emerging powers such as India, Brazil, and others assuming more prominent roles.
Additionally, non-state actors, including multinational corporations, international organizations, and even influential individuals, are playing a bigger part in global affairs.
This complicates the U.S.'s foreign policy strategy, demanding more multifaceted and nuanced approaches.
The Cold War saw competition in technology, most visibly in the space race. Today, technological competition continues in areas like artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and cyber capabilities.
The issue of cybersecurity, in particular, is emerging as a key battlefield, necessitating a reevaluation of defense and security policies for the digital age.
Global challenges such as climate change and pandemics demand a collective response and offer opportunities for cooperation rather than competition.
The COVID-19 pandemic and climate change have highlighted the need for global coordination, presenting a challenge to the traditional paradigms of American foreign policy formed during the Cold War.
Looking ahead, American foreign policy will continue to be influenced by the legacy of the Cold War.
However, it will also need to evolve to address the complexities of the 21st-century global order, blending lessons from the past with new approaches suited to a world marked by interdependence, rapid technological change, and shared global challenges.
The endurance of the Cold War's legacy will be tested by these new realities, as the U.S. navigates its path in the decades to come.
Download ready-to-use digital learning resources.
Copyright © History Skills 2014-2024.
Contact via email
Help inform the discussion
This archive, based at George Washington University, has a library and archive of declassified U.S. documents.
This project at Yale Law School contains a wide variety of document collections. This Cold War collection offers users groups of official US government documents through the 1960s.
This website, maintained by the Wilson Center, contains a wealth of resources, especially primary resources, from political leaders throughout the Cold War era. The most useful tools to researchers will probably be the Entire Document Collection and the Resources section, which has links to further reading.
These critical documents, made available through the Truman Library, show the pivotal moments in the early Cold War. The online archive includes presidential memos, letters, official government documents, and photographs.
This site contains aerial intelligence from the Cold War, digitized by the Dwight D. Eisenhower Presidential Library.
The John F. Kennedy Library maintains an online collection of personal correspondence as well as official government documents relating to national security.
View the once-top-secret National Security Council document of April 1950 that set in motion the massive military buildup of the Cold War.
This oral history website offers a case study of the impact of World War II and the domestic Cold War on student life at an urban public college campus. It is based on the narratives of Brooklyn College students that participated in Brooklyn College's World War II Farm Labor Project and the experiences of students who were involved in the student newspaper during the McCarthy Era. The site is maintained by The Center for Media and Learning/American Social History Project at the Graduate Center, CUNY.
This website, maintained by the San Fransisco Gate, holds many FBI documents to show the Bureau's "covert campaign to disrupt free speech." You'll find FBI documents, newspaper articles, photographs, and lots of commentary.
The transcripts and films from a C-SPAN special on the Army-McCarthy Hearings, including both historical commentary and audio from the hearings.
This site presents consumer culture from 1911 to 1955 through a wide variety of newspaper ads for products ranging from dental supplies to radio tubes.
This website, created in 1994 under the Office of Human Radiation Experiments, tells the agency's Cold War story of radiation research using human subjects with various multi-media sources from declassified government documents, films, soundclips, and photographs.
Learn about the development of the atomic bomb in American history. This site provides an archive of historical documents, films, and photographs.
This NASA website provides US and Russian documents chronicling the early policy decisions and reactions to the space race.
This archive, from Stanford University and the Silicon Valley Archives Project, describes the birth of Silicon Valley scientific research and development. Unfortunately, the site appears to hold few full-text primary resources.
A seminal essay by an architect of the Cold War science complex, Bush proposes a computerized information management system later realized by the Internet.
Home — Essay Samples — War — Cold War — The Cold War: an Era of Fear
About this sample
Words: 2483 |
13 min read
Published: Jul 17, 2018
Words: 2483 | Pages: 5 | 13 min read
Let us write you an essay from scratch
Get high-quality help
Dr. Karlyna PhD
Verified writer
+ 120 experts online
By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
6 pages / 2635 words
3 pages / 1481 words
4 pages / 2063 words
4 pages / 1646 words
Remember! This is just a sample.
You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.
121 writers online
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled
Alas, Babylon is a post-apocalyptic novel written by Pat Frank, published in 1959. The story takes place in the fictional town of Fort Repose, Florida, and follows the struggles of the townspeople in the aftermath of a nuclear [...]
The Truman Doctrine, announced by President Harry S. Truman in 1947, marked a pivotal moment in American foreign policy and set the stage for the Cold War. This doctrine represented a shift in U.S. strategy towards containment [...]
The Space Race, a pivotal moment in history that captivated the world's attention and fueled the rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union, is a topic shrouded in mystery and intrigue. From the launch of Sputnik in [...]
The Korean War, often referred to as the "Forgotten War," was a pivotal moment in the early years of the Cold War. Despite its lasting impact on the Korean peninsula and the global political landscape, the justification for the [...]
During the Cold War, the United States engaged in many aggressive policies both in America and abroad, in pursuance to fight communism and the spread of communist ideologies. Faced with a new challenge and global [...]
The assassination of Patrice Lumumba, the first democratically elected Prime Minister of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), remains a highly controversial and debated event in African history. This essay aims to provide a [...]
By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.
Where do you want us to send this sample?
By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.
Be careful. This essay is not unique
This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before
Download this Sample
Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts
Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.
Please check your inbox.
We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!
We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .
This essay about the Cold War outlines the key players and influences that shaped this period of geopolitical tension. It highlights the primary roles of the United States and the Soviet Union whose ideological clash between capitalism and communism drove the conflict. The essay also discusses the involvement of major European powers like the United Kingdom France and Germany as well as significant roles played by countries in Asia the Middle East Africa and Latin America. Additionally it touches on the impact of international organizations and alliances such as NATO and the United Nations in navigating Cold War dynamics. The essay emphasizes the global impact and lasting legacy of the Cold War on international relations.
How it works
The Cold War was like a heavyweight showdown that rocked the world from 1945 to 1991 pitting the United States against the Soviet Union in an epic clash of ideologies. This intense standoff didn’t just involve these two superpowers—it roped in a whole cast of nations and players each with their own agenda and strategies that shaped the course of history.
At the heart of it all were the USA and the USSR representing capitalism and communism locked in a battle of beliefs.
American presidents from Truman to Reagan played their hand using tactics like the Truman Doctrine to support anti-communist nations and the Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe after World War II. Meanwhile Soviet leaders like Stalin and Gorbachev pushed their socialist agenda backing communist movements worldwide.
Europe was a major stage for Cold War drama with key players like the UK and France stepping up. The UK led by Churchill helped form NATO to counter Soviet expansion while France under de Gaulle played it cool with its own nuclear power. Germany became ground zero with East and West split apart—West Germany thriving under US support East Germany under Soviet control and the infamous Berlin Wall standing tall as a symbol of global division.
Across Asia the Cold War played out in high-stakes games. China led by Mao flexed its communist muscle after the Chinese Civil War even though the Sino-Soviet split in the ’60s put them at odds despite their shared ideology. Korea and Vietnam became war zones—Korea split into North and South with US and Soviet/Chinese backing while Vietnam saw decades of conflict as North and South battled it out with similar international backing.
In the Middle East it was a geopolitical chessboard. The US and USSR vied for influence with Egypt Iran and Afghanistan becoming hotspots for proxy wars and power plays. Afghanistan in particular saw the Soviet invasion in ’79 countered by US-backed insurgents heating up one of the Cold War’s fiercest showdowns.
Africa and Latin America weren’t left out either. Newly independent African nations found themselves in the crossfire with conflicts like the Congo Crisis and Angolan Civil War fueled by superpower meddling. In Latin America Cuba’s alliance with the USSR brought the world to the brink during the Cuban Missile Crisis while US interventions in places like Nicaragua and Chile aimed to halt communist spread.
The Cold War wasn’t just about armies and battles—it played out in alliances too. NATO and the Warsaw Pact led the charge for the West and East while the United Nations tried to keep the peace even though US-Soviet tensions often put a wrench in things.
In the end the Cold War was a wild ride that involved a whole global cast beyond the US and USSR. Europe’s power plays Germany’s divide Asia’s conflicts the Middle East’s tensions Africa’s struggles and Latin America’s turmoil all stitched together the tapestry of this era. Its legacy still shapes how countries relate and strategize on the world stage today.
Key Players and Influences in the Cold War Era. (2024, Jul 06). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/key-players-and-influences-in-the-cold-war-era/
"Key Players and Influences in the Cold War Era." PapersOwl.com , 6 Jul 2024, https://papersowl.com/examples/key-players-and-influences-in-the-cold-war-era/
PapersOwl.com. (2024). Key Players and Influences in the Cold War Era . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/key-players-and-influences-in-the-cold-war-era/ [Accessed: 6 Sep. 2024]
"Key Players and Influences in the Cold War Era." PapersOwl.com, Jul 06, 2024. Accessed September 6, 2024. https://papersowl.com/examples/key-players-and-influences-in-the-cold-war-era/
"Key Players and Influences in the Cold War Era," PapersOwl.com , 06-Jul-2024. [Online]. Available: https://papersowl.com/examples/key-players-and-influences-in-the-cold-war-era/. [Accessed: 6-Sep-2024]
PapersOwl.com. (2024). Key Players and Influences in the Cold War Era . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/key-players-and-influences-in-the-cold-war-era/ [Accessed: 6-Sep-2024]
Hire a writer to get a unique paper crafted to your needs.
Our writers will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!
Please check your inbox.
You can order an original essay written according to your instructions.
Trusted by over 1 million students worldwide
1. Tell Us Your Requirements
2. Pick your perfect writer
3. Get Your Paper and Pay
Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!
Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.
short deadlines
100% Plagiarism-Free
Certified writers
COMMENTS
Hook Examples for Cold War Essays. The Tension-Building Anecdote Hook. Start your essay with a gripping anecdote from the Cold War era, such as a close encounter between opposing forces, a spy's daring mission, or a pivotal diplomatic negotiation.
The Cold War was an ongoing political rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union and their respective allies that developed after World War II.This hostility between the two superpowers was first given its name by George Orwell in an article published in 1945. Orwell understood it as a nuclear stalemate between "super-states": each possessed weapons of mass destruction and was ...
The Cold War dominated a rather long time period: between 1945, or the end of the World War II, and 1990, the collapse of the USSR. This period involved the relationships between two superpowers: the United States and the USSR. The Cold War began in Eastern Europe and Germany, according to the researchers of the Institute of Contemporary ...
The Cold War is a significant part of the world's history. Its term refers to the period between 1950 and late 1980, known for a great tension between the Soviet Union and the United States. We will write a custom essay specifically for you by our professional experts. 190 writers online.
The United States dropped the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima. August 8th 1945. Nagasaki. The United States dropped the second atomic bomb on Nagasaki. August 14th 1945. V J Day. The Japanese surrendered bringing World War Two to an end. September 2nd 1945. Vietnam Independence.
The term 'cold war' first appeared in a 1945 essay by the English writer George Orwell called 'You and the Atomic Bomb.' The Cold War: The Atomic Age .
The Cold War (the term was first used by Bernard Baruch during a congressional debate in 1947) was waged mainly on political, economic, and propaganda fronts and had only limited recourse to weapons. It was at its peak in 1948-53 with the Berlin blockade and airlift, the formation of NATO, the victory of the communists in the Chinese civil ...
The essay explores the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, tracing its origins to the aftermath of World War II and the historical backdrop of the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917. ... The Cold War: an Era of Fear Essay. Truman had just demonstrated the raw power of the nuclear bomb, in order to end World War II, in 1945. The ...
Harry S. Truman Presidential Library & Museum - Ideological Foundations of the Cold War. This collection focuses on the ideals that formed the basis of American policy toward the Soviet Union during the early years of the Cold War. The collection includes 57 documents totaling 681 pages covering the years 1945 through 1952.
At the end of World War II, English writer George Orwell used cold war, as a general term, in his essay "You and the Atomic Bomb", published 19 October 1945 in the British newspaper Tribune.Contemplating a world living in the shadow of the threat of nuclear warfare, Orwell looked at James Burnham's predictions of a polarized world, writing: . Looking at the world as a whole, the drift for many ...
In the wake of World War II, a Cold War erupted between the world's two superpowers—the United States and the Soviet Union. During the postwar era, the contest between their respective capitalist and communist systems manifested itself in a nuclear arms race, a space race, and several proxy wars.
The post-Cold War world. US president George Bush visits American troops in the Middle East, 1990. Though it ended almost three decades ago, the Cold War continues to influence the modern world. The nation-building and internationalism of the Cold War, along with many of the political and military alliances forged during the period, continue to ...
The Cold War, a geopolitical standoff that defined the second half of the 20th century, emerged due to the complex interplay between ideological, political, and economic forces in the aftermath of World War II. From the late 1940s to the early 1990s, the Cold War was characterized by a tense rivalry between the United States and the Soviet ...
THE SOVIET-AMERICAN CONFLICT FROM 1945 TO 1991. Since 2010, the Cold War History Research Center has also organized an annual two-day English language international student conference on the history of the Cold War, with the participation of BA, MA and Ph.D. students.
1 See, among the many possible examples, Prasenjit Duara, "The Cold War as a historical period: an interpretive essay", Journal of Global History, 6, no. 3 (November 2011): 457-480; Silvio Pons, The Global Revolution. A History of International Communism 1971-1991 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014); Michael H. Hunt, The American Ascendancy: How the United States Gained and Wielded ...
Get a custom essay on The Cold War: US Foreign Policy. The Cold War was an ideological war in which the United States and the Soviet Union were engaged in a war whereby each country sought to propagate its policies through the pursuance of different courses in different parts of the world. In this paper, it is argued that the nature of policy ...
The Cold War unfolded through a series of key events that influenced and shaped the U.S.'s foreign policy. These events, ranging from diplomatic standoffs to military conflicts, reflected the tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union and their respective allies. Start of the Cold War and the Iron Curtain.
The Cold War Files. This website, maintained by the Wilson Center, contains a wealth of resources, especially primary resources, from political leaders throughout the Cold War era. The most useful tools to researchers will probably be the Entire Document Collection and the Resources section, which has links to further reading.
The Cold War: an Era of Fear. Truman had just demonstrated the raw power of the nuclear bomb, in order to end World War II, in 1945. The cost of war had immediately changed; the world had seen that whole cites could be obliterated within seconds. This would send a paralyzing shock through the world. After World War II the world was split ...
The Cold War Era 3 clash made the whole world nervous, for it would have been no ordinary war. Eventually, to the world's great relief, both sides decided to avoid war. The Soviet ships slowed down and turned back. The Cuban Missile Crisis was a high point of what came to be known as the Cold War. The Cold War referred to the competition,
The United Nations in a Post-Cold War Order Download; XML; Challenge and Opportunity in the Post-Cold War Era:: Building an International Environment Supportive of Democracy Download; XML; The Post-Cold War Era:: "Facts and Prospects" Download; XML; Selective Engagement:: Principles for American Foreign Policy in a New Era Download; XML
Essay Example: The Cold War was like a heavyweight showdown that rocked the world from 1945 to 1991 pitting the United States against the Soviet Union in an epic clash of ideologies. This intense standoff didn't just involve these two superpowers—it roped in a whole cast of nations and players