how to do null hypothesis in spss

Statitstical Inference

4.8 specifying null hypotheses in spss.

Figure 4.9: Flow chart for selecting a test in SPSS.

Statistics such as means, proportions, variances, and correlations are calculated on variables. For translating a research hypothesis into a statistical hypothesis, the researcher has to recognize the dependent and independent variables addressed by the research hypothesis and their variable types. The main distinction is between dichotomies (two groups), (other) categorical variables (three or more groups), and numerical variables. Once you have identified the variables, the flow chart in Figure 4.9 helps you to identify the right statistical test.

If possible, SPSS uses a theoretical probability distribution to approximate the sampling distribution. It will select the appropriate sampling distribution. In some cases, such as a test on a contingency table with two rows and two columns, SPSS automatically includes an exact test because the theoretical approximation cannot be relied on.

SPSS does not allow the user to specify the null hypothesis of a test if the test involves two or more variables. If you cannot specify the null hypothesis, SPSS uses the nil hypothesis that the population value of interest is zero. For example, SPSS tests the null hypothesis that males and females have the same average willingness to donate to a charity, that is, the mean difference is zero, if we apply an independent samples t test.

Imagine that we know from previous research that females tend to score one point higher on the willingness scale than males. It would not be very interesting to reject the nil hypothesis. Instead, we would like to test the null hypothesis that the average difference between females and males is 1.00. We cannot change the null hypothesis of a t test in SPSS, but we can use the confidence interval to test this null hypothesis as explained in Section 4.6.1 .

In SPSS, the analyst has to specify the null hypothesis in tests on one variable, namely tests on one proportion, one mean, or one categorical variable. The following instructions explain how to do this.

4.8.1 Specify null for binomial test

A proportion is the statistic best suited to test research hypotheses addressing the share of a category in the population. The hypothesis that a television station reaches half of all households in a country provides an example. All households in the country constitute the population. The share of the television station is the proportion or percentage of all households watching this television station.

If we have a data set for a sample of households containing a variable indicating whether or not a household watches the television station, we can test the research hypothesis with a binomial test. The statistical null hypothesis is that the proportion of households watching the television station is 0.5 in the population.

Figure 4.10: A binomial test on a single proportion in SPSS.

We can also be interested in more than one category, for instance, in which regions are the households located: in the north, east, south, and west of the country? This translates into a statistical hypothesis containing two or more proportions in the population. If 30% of households in the population are situated in the west, 25 % in the south and east, and 20% in the north, we would expect these proportions in the sample if all regions are equally well-represented. Our statistical hypothesis is actually a relative frequency distribution, such as, for instance, in Table 4.1 .

A test for this type of statistical hypothesis is called a one-sample chi-squared test. It is up to the researcher to specify the hypothesized proportions for all categories. This is not a simple task: What reasons do we have to expect particular values, say a region’s share of thirty per cent of all households instead of twenty-five per cent?

The test is mainly used if researchers know the true proportions of the categories in the population from which they aimed to draw their sample. If we try to draw a sample from all citizens of a country, we usually know the frequency distribution of sex, age, educational level, and so on for all citizens from the national bureau of statistics. With the bureau’s information, we can test if the respondents in our sample have the same distribution with respect to sex, age, or educational level as the population from which we tried to draw the sample; just use the official population proportions in the null hypothesis.

If the proportions in the sample do not differ more from the known proportions in the population than we expect based on chance, the sample is representative of the population in the statistical sense (see Section 1.2.6 ). As always, we use the p value of the test as the probability of obtaining our sample or a sample that is even more different from the null hypothesis, if the null hypothesis is true. Note that the null hypothesis now represents the (distribution in) the population from which we tried to draw our sample. We conclude that the sample is representative of this population in the statistical sense if we can not reject the null hypothesis, that is, if the p value is larger than .05. Not rejecting the null hypothesis means that we have sufficient probability that our sample was drawn from the population that we wanted to investigate. We can now be more confident that our sample results generalize to the population that we meant to investigate.

Figure 4.11: A chi-squared test on a frequency distribution in SPSS.

Finally, we have the significance test on one mean, which we have used in the example of average media literacy throughout this chapter. For a numeric (interval or ratio measurement level) variable such as the 10-point scale in this example, the mean is a good measure of the distribution’s center. Our statistical hypothesis would be that average media literacy score of all children in the population is (below) 5.5.

Figure 4.12: A one-sample t test in SPSS.

• Skip to secondary menu
• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar

Statistics By Jim

Making statistics intuitive

Null Hypothesis: Definition, Rejecting & Examples

By Jim Frost 6 Comments

What is a Null Hypothesis?

The null hypothesis in statistics states that there is no difference between groups or no relationship between variables. It is one of two mutually exclusive hypotheses about a population in a hypothesis test.

• Null Hypothesis H 0 : No effect exists in the population.
• Alternative Hypothesis H A : The effect exists in the population.

In every study or experiment, researchers assess an effect or relationship. This effect can be the effectiveness of a new drug, building material, or other intervention that has benefits. There is a benefit or connection that the researchers hope to identify. Unfortunately, no effect may exist. In statistics, we call this lack of an effect the null hypothesis. Researchers assume that this notion of no effect is correct until they have enough evidence to suggest otherwise, similar to how a trial presumes innocence.

In this context, the analysts don’t necessarily believe the null hypothesis is correct. In fact, they typically want to reject it because that leads to more exciting finds about an effect or relationship. The new vaccine works!

You can think of it as the default theory that requires sufficiently strong evidence to reject. Like a prosecutor, researchers must collect sufficient evidence to overturn the presumption of no effect. Investigators must work hard to set up a study and a data collection system to obtain evidence that can reject the null hypothesis.

Related post : What is an Effect in Statistics?

Null Hypothesis Examples

Null hypotheses start as research questions that the investigator rephrases as a statement indicating there is no effect or relationship.

After reading these examples, you might think they’re a bit boring and pointless. However, the key is to remember that the null hypothesis defines the condition that the researchers need to discredit before suggesting an effect exists.

Let’s see how you reject the null hypothesis and get to those more exciting findings!

When to Reject the Null Hypothesis

So, you want to reject the null hypothesis, but how and when can you do that? To start, you’ll need to perform a statistical test on your data. The following is an overview of performing a study that uses a hypothesis test.

The first step is to devise a research question and the appropriate null hypothesis. After that, the investigators need to formulate an experimental design and data collection procedures that will allow them to gather data that can answer the research question. Then they collect the data. For more information about designing a scientific study that uses statistics, read my post 5 Steps for Conducting Studies with Statistics .

After data collection is complete, statistics and hypothesis testing enter the picture. Hypothesis testing takes your sample data and evaluates how consistent they are with the null hypothesis. The p-value is a crucial part of the statistical results because it quantifies how strongly the sample data contradict the null hypothesis.

When the sample data provide sufficient evidence, you can reject the null hypothesis. In a hypothesis test, this process involves comparing the p-value to your significance level .

Rejecting the Null Hypothesis

Reject the null hypothesis when the p-value is less than or equal to your significance level. Your sample data favor the alternative hypothesis, which suggests that the effect exists in the population. For a mnemonic device, remember—when the p-value is low, the null must go!

When you can reject the null hypothesis, your results are statistically significant. Learn more about Statistical Significance: Definition & Meaning .

Failing to Reject the Null Hypothesis

Conversely, when the p-value is greater than your significance level, you fail to reject the null hypothesis. The sample data provides insufficient data to conclude that the effect exists in the population. When the p-value is high, the null must fly!

Note that failing to reject the null is not the same as proving it. For more information about the difference, read my post about Failing to Reject the Null .

That’s a very general look at the process. But I hope you can see how the path to more exciting findings depends on being able to rule out the less exciting null hypothesis that states there’s nothing to see here!

Let’s move on to learning how to write the null hypothesis for different types of effects, relationships, and tests.

Related posts : How Hypothesis Tests Work and Interpreting P-values

How to Write a Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis varies by the type of statistic and hypothesis test. Remember that inferential statistics use samples to draw conclusions about populations. Consequently, when you write a null hypothesis, it must make a claim about the relevant population parameter . Further, that claim usually indicates that the effect does not exist in the population. Below are typical examples of writing a null hypothesis for various parameters and hypothesis tests.

Related posts : Descriptive vs. Inferential Statistics and Populations, Parameters, and Samples in Inferential Statistics

Group Means

T-tests and ANOVA assess the differences between group means. For these tests, the null hypothesis states that there is no difference between group means in the population. In other words, the experimental conditions that define the groups do not affect the mean outcome. Mu (µ) is the population parameter for the mean, and you’ll need to include it in the statement for this type of study.

For example, an experiment compares the mean bone density changes for a new osteoporosis medication. The control group does not receive the medicine, while the treatment group does. The null states that the mean bone density changes for the control and treatment groups are equal.

• Null Hypothesis H 0 : Group means are equal in the population: µ 1 = µ 2 , or µ 1 – µ 2 = 0
• Alternative Hypothesis H A : Group means are not equal in the population: µ 1 ≠ µ 2 , or µ 1 – µ 2 ≠ 0.

Group Proportions

Proportions tests assess the differences between group proportions. For these tests, the null hypothesis states that there is no difference between group proportions. Again, the experimental conditions did not affect the proportion of events in the groups. P is the population proportion parameter that you’ll need to include.

For example, a vaccine experiment compares the infection rate in the treatment group to the control group. The treatment group receives the vaccine, while the control group does not. The null states that the infection rates for the control and treatment groups are equal.

• Null Hypothesis H 0 : Group proportions are equal in the population: p 1 = p 2 .
• Alternative Hypothesis H A : Group proportions are not equal in the population: p 1 ≠ p 2 .

Correlation and Regression Coefficients

Some studies assess the relationship between two continuous variables rather than differences between groups.

In these studies, analysts often use either correlation or regression analysis . For these tests, the null states that there is no relationship between the variables. Specifically, it says that the correlation or regression coefficient is zero. As one variable increases, there is no tendency for the other variable to increase or decrease. Rho (ρ) is the population correlation parameter and beta (β) is the regression coefficient parameter.

For example, a study assesses the relationship between screen time and test performance. The null states that there is no correlation between this pair of variables. As screen time increases, test performance does not tend to increase or decrease.

• Null Hypothesis H 0 : The correlation in the population is zero: ρ = 0.
• Alternative Hypothesis H A : The correlation in the population is not zero: ρ ≠ 0.

For all these cases, the analysts define the hypotheses before the study. After collecting the data, they perform a hypothesis test to determine whether they can reject the null hypothesis.

The preceding examples are all for two-tailed hypothesis tests. To learn about one-tailed tests and how to write a null hypothesis for them, read my post One-Tailed vs. Two-Tailed Tests .

Related post : Understanding Correlation

Neyman, J; Pearson, E. S. (January 1, 1933).  On the Problem of the most Efficient Tests of Statistical Hypotheses .  Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A .  231  (694–706): 289–337.

Share this:

Reader Interactions

January 11, 2024 at 2:57 pm

Thanks for the reply.

January 10, 2024 at 1:23 pm

Hi Jim, In your comment you state that equivalence test null and alternate hypotheses are reversed. For hypothesis tests of data fits to a probability distribution, the null hypothesis is that the probability distribution fits the data. Is this correct?

January 10, 2024 at 2:15 pm

Those two separate things, equivalence testing and normality tests. But, yes, you’re correct for both.

Hypotheses are switched for equivalence testing. You need to “work” (i.e., collect a large sample of good quality data) to be able to reject the null that the groups are different to be able to conclude they’re the same.

With typical hypothesis tests, if you have low quality data and a low sample size, you’ll fail to reject the null that they’re the same, concluding they’re equivalent. But that’s more a statement about the low quality and small sample size than anything to do with the groups being equal.

So, equivalence testing make you work to obtain a finding that the groups are the same (at least within some amount you define as a trivial difference).

For normality testing, and other distribution tests, the null states that the data follow the distribution (normal or whatever). If you reject the null, you have sufficient evidence to conclude that your sample data don’t follow the probability distribution. That’s a rare case where you hope to fail to reject the null. And it suffers from the problem I describe above where you might fail to reject the null simply because you have a small sample size. In that case, you’d conclude the data follow the probability distribution but it’s more that you don’t have enough data for the test to register the deviation. In this scenario, if you had a larger sample size, you’d reject the null and conclude it doesn’t follow that distribution.

I don’t know of any equivalence testing type approach for distribution fit tests where you’d need to work to show the data follow a distribution, although I haven’t looked for one either!

February 20, 2022 at 9:26 pm

Is a null hypothesis regularly (always) stated in the negative? “there is no” or “does not”

February 23, 2022 at 9:21 pm

Typically, the null hypothesis includes an equal sign. The null hypothesis states that the population parameter equals a particular value. That value is usually one that represents no effect. In the case of a one-sided hypothesis test, the null still contains an equal sign but it’s “greater than or equal to” or “less than or equal to.” If you wanted to translate the null hypothesis from its native mathematical expression, you could use the expression “there is no effect.” But the mathematical form more specifically states what it’s testing.

It’s the alternative hypothesis that typically contains does not equal.

There are some exceptions. For example, in an equivalence test where the researchers want to show that two things are equal, the null hypothesis states that they’re not equal.

In short, the null hypothesis states the condition that the researchers hope to reject. They need to work hard to set up an experiment and data collection that’ll gather enough evidence to be able to reject the null condition.

February 15, 2022 at 9:32 am

Dear sir I always read your notes on Research methods.. Kindly tell is there any available Book on all these..wonderfull Urgent

Comments and Questions Cancel reply

Hypothesis Testing (cont...)

Hypothesis testing, the null and alternative hypothesis.

In order to undertake hypothesis testing you need to express your research hypothesis as a null and alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis are statements regarding the differences or effects that occur in the population. You will use your sample to test which statement (i.e., the null hypothesis or alternative hypothesis) is most likely (although technically, you test the evidence against the null hypothesis). So, with respect to our teaching example, the null and alternative hypothesis will reflect statements about all statistics students on graduate management courses.

The null hypothesis is essentially the "devil's advocate" position. That is, it assumes that whatever you are trying to prove did not happen ( hint: it usually states that something equals zero). For example, the two different teaching methods did not result in different exam performances (i.e., zero difference). Another example might be that there is no relationship between anxiety and athletic performance (i.e., the slope is zero). The alternative hypothesis states the opposite and is usually the hypothesis you are trying to prove (e.g., the two different teaching methods did result in different exam performances). Initially, you can state these hypotheses in more general terms (e.g., using terms like "effect", "relationship", etc.), as shown below for the teaching methods example:

Depending on how you want to "summarize" the exam performances will determine how you might want to write a more specific null and alternative hypothesis. For example, you could compare the mean exam performance of each group (i.e., the "seminar" group and the "lectures-only" group). This is what we will demonstrate here, but other options include comparing the distributions , medians , amongst other things. As such, we can state:

Now that you have identified the null and alternative hypotheses, you need to find evidence and develop a strategy for declaring your "support" for either the null or alternative hypothesis. We can do this using some statistical theory and some arbitrary cut-off points. Both these issues are dealt with next.

Significance levels

The level of statistical significance is often expressed as the so-called p -value . Depending on the statistical test you have chosen, you will calculate a probability (i.e., the p -value) of observing your sample results (or more extreme) given that the null hypothesis is true . Another way of phrasing this is to consider the probability that a difference in a mean score (or other statistic) could have arisen based on the assumption that there really is no difference. Let us consider this statement with respect to our example where we are interested in the difference in mean exam performance between two different teaching methods. If there really is no difference between the two teaching methods in the population (i.e., given that the null hypothesis is true), how likely would it be to see a difference in the mean exam performance between the two teaching methods as large as (or larger than) that which has been observed in your sample?

So, you might get a p -value such as 0.03 (i.e., p = .03). This means that there is a 3% chance of finding a difference as large as (or larger than) the one in your study given that the null hypothesis is true. However, you want to know whether this is "statistically significant". Typically, if there was a 5% or less chance (5 times in 100 or less) that the difference in the mean exam performance between the two teaching methods (or whatever statistic you are using) is as different as observed given the null hypothesis is true, you would reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis. Alternately, if the chance was greater than 5% (5 times in 100 or more), you would fail to reject the null hypothesis and would not accept the alternative hypothesis. As such, in this example where p = .03, we would reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis. We reject it because at a significance level of 0.03 (i.e., less than a 5% chance), the result we obtained could happen too frequently for us to be confident that it was the two teaching methods that had an effect on exam performance.

Whilst there is relatively little justification why a significance level of 0.05 is used rather than 0.01 or 0.10, for example, it is widely used in academic research. However, if you want to be particularly confident in your results, you can set a more stringent level of 0.01 (a 1% chance or less; 1 in 100 chance or less).

One- and two-tailed predictions

When considering whether we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis, we need to consider the direction of the alternative hypothesis statement. For example, the alternative hypothesis that was stated earlier is:

The alternative hypothesis tells us two things. First, what predictions did we make about the effect of the independent variable(s) on the dependent variable(s)? Second, what was the predicted direction of this effect? Let's use our example to highlight these two points.

Sarah predicted that her teaching method (independent variable: teaching method), whereby she not only required her students to attend lectures, but also seminars, would have a positive effect (that is, increased) students' performance (dependent variable: exam marks). If an alternative hypothesis has a direction (and this is how you want to test it), the hypothesis is one-tailed. That is, it predicts direction of the effect. If the alternative hypothesis has stated that the effect was expected to be negative, this is also a one-tailed hypothesis.

Alternatively, a two-tailed prediction means that we do not make a choice over the direction that the effect of the experiment takes. Rather, it simply implies that the effect could be negative or positive. If Sarah had made a two-tailed prediction, the alternative hypothesis might have been:

In other words, we simply take out the word "positive", which implies the direction of our effect. In our example, making a two-tailed prediction may seem strange. After all, it would be logical to expect that "extra" tuition (going to seminar classes as well as lectures) would either have a positive effect on students' performance or no effect at all, but certainly not a negative effect. However, this is just our opinion (and hope) and certainly does not mean that we will get the effect we expect. Generally speaking, making a one-tail prediction (i.e., and testing for it this way) is frowned upon as it usually reflects the hope of a researcher rather than any certainty that it will happen. Notable exceptions to this rule are when there is only one possible way in which a change could occur. This can happen, for example, when biological activity/presence in measured. That is, a protein might be "dormant" and the stimulus you are using can only possibly "wake it up" (i.e., it cannot possibly reduce the activity of a "dormant" protein). In addition, for some statistical tests, one-tailed tests are not possible.

Rejecting or failing to reject the null hypothesis

Let's return finally to the question of whether we reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.

If our statistical analysis shows that the significance level is below the cut-off value we have set (e.g., either 0.05 or 0.01), we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis. Alternatively, if the significance level is above the cut-off value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and cannot accept the alternative hypothesis. You should note that you cannot accept the null hypothesis, but only find evidence against it.

• Flashes Safe Seven
• FlashLine Login
• Faculty & Staff Phone Directory
• Emeriti or Retiree
• All Departments
• Maps & Directions

• Building Guide
• Departments
• Directions & Parking
• Faculty & Staff
• Give to University Libraries
• Library Instructional Spaces
• Mission & Vision
• Newsletters
• Circulation
• Course Reserves / Core Textbooks
• Equipment for Checkout
• Interlibrary Loan
• Library Instruction
• Library Tutorials
• My Library Account
• Open Access Kent State
• Research Support Services
• Statistical Consulting
• Student Multimedia Studio
• Citation Tools
• Databases A-to-Z
• Databases By Subject
• Digital Collections
• Discovery@Kent State
• Government Information
• Journal Finder
• Library Guides
• Connect from Off-Campus
• Library Workshops
• Subject Librarians Directory
• Suggestions/Feedback
• Writing Commons
• Academic Integrity
• Jobs for Students
• International Students
• Meet with a Librarian
• Study Spaces
• University Libraries Student Scholarship
• Affordable Course Materials
• Copyright Services
• Selection Manager
• Suggest a Purchase

Library Locations at the Kent Campus

• Architecture Library
• Fashion Library
• Map Library
• Performing Arts Library
• Special Collections and Archives

Regional Campus Libraries

• East Liverpool
• College of Podiatric Medicine

• Kent State University
• SPSS Tutorials

One Sample t Test

Spss tutorials: one sample t test.

• The SPSS Environment
• The Data View Window
• Using SPSS Syntax
• Data Creation in SPSS
• Importing Data into SPSS
• Variable Types
• Date-Time Variables in SPSS
• Defining Variables
• Creating a Codebook
• Computing Variables
• Computing Variables: Mean Centering
• Computing Variables: Recoding Categorical Variables
• Computing Variables: Recoding String Variables into Coded Categories (Automatic Recode)
• rank transform converts a set of data values by ordering them from smallest to largest, and then assigning a rank to each value. In SPSS, the Rank Cases procedure can be used to compute the rank transform of a variable." href="https://libguides.library.kent.edu/SPSS/RankCases" style="" >Computing Variables: Rank Transforms (Rank Cases)
• Weighting Cases
• Sorting Data
• Grouping Data
• Descriptive Stats for One Numeric Variable (Explore)
• Descriptive Stats for One Numeric Variable (Frequencies)
• Descriptive Stats for Many Numeric Variables (Descriptives)
• Descriptive Stats by Group (Compare Means)
• Frequency Tables
• Working with "Check All That Apply" Survey Data (Multiple Response Sets)
• Chi-Square Test of Independence
• Pearson Correlation
• Paired Samples t Test
• Independent Samples t Test
• One-Way ANOVA
• How to Cite the Tutorials

Sample Data Files

Our tutorials reference a dataset called "sample" in many examples. If you'd like to download the sample dataset to work through the examples, choose one of the files below:

• Data definitions (*.pdf)
• Data - Comma delimited (*.csv)
• Data - Tab delimited (*.txt)
• Data - Excel format (*.xlsx)
• Data - SAS format (*.sas7bdat)
• Data - SPSS format (*.sav)
• SPSS Syntax (*.sps) Syntax to add variable labels, value labels, set variable types, and compute several recoded variables used in later tutorials.
• SAS Syntax (*.sas) Syntax to read the CSV-format sample data and set variable labels and formats/value labels.

The One Sample t Test examines whether the mean of a population is statistically different from a known or hypothesized value. The One Sample t Test is a parametric test.

This test is also known as:

• Single Sample t Test

The variable used in this test is known as:

• Test variable

In a One Sample t Test, the test variable's mean is compared against a "test value", which is a known or hypothesized value of the mean in the population. Test values may come from a literature review, a trusted research organization, legal requirements, or industry standards. For example:

• A particular factory's machines are supposed to fill bottles with 150 milliliters of product. A plant manager wants to test a random sample of bottles to ensure that the machines are not under- or over-filling the bottles.
• The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets clearance levels for the amount of lead present in homes: no more than 10 micrograms per square foot on floors and no more than 100 micrograms per square foot on window sills ( as of December 2020 ). An inspector wants to test if samples taken from units in an apartment building exceed the clearance level.

Common Uses

The One Sample  t  Test is commonly used to test the following:

• Statistical difference between a mean and a known or hypothesized value of the mean in the population.
• This approach involves creating a change score from two variables, and then comparing the mean change score to zero, which will indicate whether any change occurred between the two time points for the original measures. If the mean change score is not significantly different from zero, no significant change occurred.

Note: The One Sample t Test can only compare a single sample mean to a specified constant. It can not compare sample means between two or more groups. If you wish to compare the means of multiple groups to each other, you will likely want to run an Independent Samples t Test (to compare the means of two groups) or a One-Way ANOVA (to compare the means of two or more groups).

Data Requirements

Your data must meet the following requirements:

• Test variable that is continuous (i.e., interval or ratio level)
• There is no relationship between scores on the test variable
• Violation of this assumption will yield an inaccurate p value
• Random sample of data from the population
• Non-normal population distributions, especially those that are thick-tailed or heavily skewed, considerably reduce the power of the test
• Among moderate or large samples, a violation of normality may still yield accurate p values
• Homogeneity of variances (i.e., variances approximately equal in both the sample and population)
• No outliers

The null hypothesis ( H 0 ) and (two-tailed) alternative hypothesis ( H 1 ) of the one sample T test can be expressed as:

H 0 : µ =  µ 0   ("the population mean is equal to the [proposed] population mean") H 1 : µ ≠  µ 0   ("the population mean is not equal to the [proposed] population mean")

where µ is the "true" population mean and µ 0 is the proposed value of the population mean.

Test Statistic

The test statistic for a One Sample t Test is denoted t , which is calculated using the following formula:

$$ t = \frac{\overline{x}-\mu{}_{0}}{s_{\overline{x}}} $$

$$ s_{\overline{x}} = \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} $$

\(\mu_{0}\) = The test value -- the proposed constant for the population mean \(\bar{x}\) = Sample mean \(n\) = Sample size (i.e., number of observations) \(s\) = Sample standard deviation \(s_{\bar{x}}\) = Estimated standard error of the mean ( s /sqrt( n ))

The calculated t value is then compared to the critical t value from the t distribution table with degrees of freedom df = n - 1 and chosen confidence level. If the calculated t value > critical t value, then we reject the null hypothesis.

Data Set-Up

Your data should include one continuous, numeric variable (represented in a column) that will be used in the analysis. The variable's measurement level should be defined as Scale in the Variable View window.

Run a One Sample t Test

To run a One Sample t Test in SPSS, click  Analyze > Compare Means > One-Sample T Test .

The One-Sample T Test window opens where you will specify the variables to be used in the analysis. All of the variables in your dataset appear in the list on the left side. Move variables to the Test Variable(s) area by selecting them in the list and clicking the arrow button.

A Test Variable(s): The variable whose mean will be compared to the hypothesized population mean (i.e., Test Value). You may run multiple One Sample t Tests simultaneously by selecting more than one test variable. Each variable will be compared to the same Test Value. 

B Test Value: The hypothesized population mean against which your test variable(s) will be compared.

C Estimate effect sizes: Optional. If checked, will print effect size statistics -- namely, Cohen's d -- for the test(s). (Note: Effect sizes calculations for t tests were first added to SPSS Statistics in version 27, making them a relatively recent addition. If you do not see this option when you use SPSS, check what version of SPSS you're using.)

D Options: Clicking Options will open a window where you can specify the Confidence Interval Percentage and how the analysis will address Missing Values (i.e., Exclude cases analysis by analysis or Exclude cases listwise ). Click Continue when you are finished making specifications.

Click OK to run the One Sample t Test.

Problem Statement

According to the CDC , the mean height of U.S. adults ages 20 and older is about 66.5 inches (69.3 inches for males, 63.8 inches for females).

In our sample data, we have a sample of 435 college students from a single college. Let's test if the mean height of students at this college is significantly different than 66.5 inches using a one-sample t test. The null and alternative hypotheses of this test will be:

H 0 : µ Height = 66.5  ("the mean height is equal to 66.5") H 1 : µ Height ≠ 66.5  ("the mean height is not equal to 66.5")

Before the Test

In the sample data, we will use the variable Height , which a continuous variable representing each respondent’s height in inches. The heights exhibit a range of values from 55.00 to 88.41 ( Analyze > Descriptive Statistics > Descriptives ).

Let's create a histogram of the data to get an idea of the distribution, and to see if  our hypothesized mean is near our sample mean. Click Graphs > Legacy Dialogs > Histogram . Move variable Height to the Variable box, then click OK .

To add vertical reference lines at the mean (or another location), double-click on the plot to open the Chart Editor, then click Options > X Axis Reference Line . In the Properties window, you can enter a specific location on the x-axis for the vertical line, or you can choose to have the reference line at the mean or median of the sample data (using the sample data). Click Apply to make sure your new line is added to the chart. Here, we have added two reference lines: one at the sample mean (the solid black line), and the other at 66.5 (the dashed red line).

From the histogram, we can see that height is relatively symmetrically distributed about the mean, though there is a slightly longer right tail. The reference lines indicate that sample mean is slightly greater than the hypothesized mean, but not by a huge amount. It's possible that our test result could come back significant.

Running the Test

To run the One Sample t Test, click  Analyze > Compare Means > One-Sample T Test.  Move the variable Height to the Test Variable(s) area. In the Test Value field, enter 66.5.

If you are using SPSS Statistics 27 or later :

If you are using SPSS Statistics 26 or earlier :

Two sections (boxes) appear in the output: One-Sample Statistics and One-Sample Test . The first section, One-Sample Statistics , provides basic information about the selected variable, Height , including the valid (nonmissing) sample size ( n ), mean, standard deviation, and standard error. In this example, the mean height of the sample is 68.03 inches, which is based on 408 nonmissing observations.

The second section, One-Sample Test , displays the results most relevant to the One Sample t Test. 

A Test Value : The number we entered as the test value in the One-Sample T Test window.

B t Statistic : The test statistic of the one-sample t test, denoted t . In this example, t = 5.810. Note that t is calculated by dividing the mean difference (E) by the standard error mean (from the One-Sample Statistics box).

C df : The degrees of freedom for the test. For a one-sample t test, df = n - 1; so here, df = 408 - 1 = 407.

D Significance (One-Sided p and Two-Sided p): The p-values corresponding to one of the possible one-sided alternative hypotheses (in this case, µ Height > 66.5) and two-sided alternative hypothesis (µ Height ≠ 66.5), respectively. In our problem statement above, we were only interested in the two-sided alternative hypothesis.

E Mean Difference : The difference between the "observed" sample mean (from the One Sample Statistics box) and the "expected" mean (the specified test value (A)). The sign of the mean difference corresponds to the sign of the t value (B). The positive t value in this example indicates that the mean height of the sample is greater than the hypothesized value (66.5).

F Confidence Interval for the Difference : The confidence interval for the difference between the specified test value and the sample mean.

Decision and Conclusions

Recall that our hypothesized population value was 66.5 inches, the [approximate] average height of the overall adult population in the U.S. Since p < 0.001, we reject the null hypothesis that the mean height of students at this college is equal to the hypothesized population mean of 66.5 inches and conclude that the mean height is significantly different than 66.5 inches.

Based on the results, we can state the following:

• There is a significant difference in the mean height of the students at this college and the overall adult population in the U.S. ( p < .001).
• The average height of students at this college is about 1.5 inches taller than the U.S. adult population average (95% CI [1.013, 2.050]).
• << Previous: Pearson Correlation
• Next: Paired Samples t Test >>
• Last Updated: Jul 10, 2024 11:08 AM
• URL: https://libguides.library.kent.edu/SPSS

Street Address

Mailing address, quick links.

• How Are We Doing?
• Student Jobs

Information

• Accessibility
• Emergency Information
• For Our Alumni
• For the Media
• Jobs & Employment
• Life at KSU
• Privacy Statement
• Technology Support
• Website Feedback

Hypothesis Testing: SPSS (2.1)

Introduction: Hypothesis Testing: SPSS (2.1)

Recommendations

Woodworking Contest

Outdoor Life Contest

Art and Sculpture Contest

SPSS Shapiro-Wilk Test – Quick Tutorial with Example

Shapiro-wilk test - what is it, shapiro-wilk test - null hypothesis, running the shapiro-wilk test in spss, shapiro-wilk test - interpretation, reporting a shapiro-wilk test in apa style, limited usefulness of normality tests.

The Shapiro-Wilk test examines if a variable is normally distributed in some population. Like so, the Shapiro-Wilk serves the exact same purpose as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test . Some statisticians claim the latter is worse due to its lower statistical power . Others disagree. As an example of a Shapiro-Wilk test, let's say a scientist claims that the reaction times of all people -a population- on some task are normally distributed . He draws a random sample of N = 233 people and measures their reaction times. A histogram of the results is shown below.

This frequency distribution seems somewhat bimodal. Other than that, it looks reasonably -but not exactly- normal. However, sample outcomes usually differ from their population counterparts. The big question is: how likely is the observed distribution if the reaction times are exactly normally distributed in the entire population? The Shapiro-Wilk test answers precisely that.

How Does the Shapiro-Wilk Test Work?

A technically correct explanation is given on this Wikipedia page . However, a simpler -but not technically correct- explanation is this: the Shapiro-Wilk test first quantifies the similarity between the observed and normal distributions as a single number: it superimposes a normal curve over the observed distribution as shown below. It then computes which percentage of our sample overlaps with it: a similarity percentage .

Finally, the Shapiro-Wilk test computes the probability of finding this observed -or a smaller- similarity percentage. It does so under the assumption that the population distribution is exactly normal: the null hypothesis.

The null hypothesis for the Shapiro-Wilk test is that a variable is normally distributed in some population. A different way to say the same is that a variable’s values are a simple random sample from a normal distribution. As a rule of thumb, we reject the null hypothesis if p < 0.05. So in this case we conclude that our variable is not normally distributed. Why? Well, p is basically the probability of finding our data if the null hypothesis is true. If this probability is (very) small -but we found our data anyway- then the null hypothesis was probably wrong.

Shapiro-Wilk Test - SPSS Example Data

A sample of N = 236 people completed a number of speedtasks. Their reaction times are in speedtasks.sav , partly shown below. We'll only use the first five trials in variables r01 through r05.

I recommend you always thoroughly inspect all variables you'd like to analyze. Since our reaction times in milliseconds are quantitative variables, we'll run some quick histograms over them. I prefer doing so from the short syntax below. Easier -but slower- methods are covered in Creating Histograms in SPSS .

Note that some of the 5 histograms look messed up. Some data seem corrupted and had better not be seriously analyzed. An exception is trial 4 (shown below) which looks plausible -even reasonably normally distributed.

Descriptive Statistics - Skewness & Kurtosis

If you're reading this to complete some assignment, you're probably asked to report some descriptive statistics for some variables. These often include the median , standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis . Why? Well, for a normal distribution,

• skewness = 0 : it's absolutely symmetrical and
• kurtosis = 0 too: it's neither peaked (“leptokurtic”) nor flattened (“platykurtic”).

So if we sample many values from such a distribution, the resulting variable should have both skewness and kurtosis close to zero. You can get such statistics from FREQUENCIES but I prefer using MEANS : it results in the best table format and its syntax is short and simple.

Trials 2, 3 and 5 all have a huge skewness and/or kurtosis. This suggests that they are not normally distributed in the entire population. Skewness and kurtosis are closer to zero for trials 1 and 4. So now that we've a basic idea what our data look like, let's proceed with the actual test.

The screenshots below guide you through running a Shapiro-Wilk test correctly in SPSS . We'll add the resulting syntax as well.

Following these screenshots results in the syntax below.

Running this syntax creates a bunch of output. However, the one table we're looking for -“Tests of Normality”- is shown below.

We reject the null hypotheses of normal population distributions for trials 1, 2, 3 and 5 at α = 0.05. “Sig.” or p is the probability of finding the observed -or a larger- deviation from normality in our sample if the distribution is exactly normal in our population . If trial 1 is normally distributed in the population, there's a mere 0.01 -or 1%- chance of finding these sample data. These values are unlikely to have been sampled from a normal distribution. So the population distribution probably wasn't normal after all. We therefore reject this null hypothesis. Conclusion : trials 1, 2, 3 and 5 are probably not normally distributed in the population. The only exception is trial 4: if this variable is normally distributed in the population, there's a 0.075 -or 7.5%- chance of finding the nonnormality observed in our data. That is, there's a reasonable chance that this nonnormality is solely due to sampling error. So for trial 4, we retain the null hypothesis of population normality because p > 0.05. We can't tell for sure if the population distribution is normal. But given these data, we'll believe it. For now anyway.

For reporting a Shapiro-Wilk test in APA style , we include 3 numbers:

• the test statistic W -mislabeled “Statistic” in SPSS;
• its associated df -short for degrees of freedom and
• its significance level p -labeled “Sig.” in SPSS.

The screenshot shows how to put these numbers together for trial 1.

The Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test both examine if a variable is normally distributed in some population. But why even bother? Well, that's because many statistical tests -including ANOVA , t-tests and regression - require the normality assumption : variables must be normally distributed in the population. However, the normality assumption is only needed for small sample sizes of -say- N ≤ 20 or so. For larger sample sizes, the sampling distribution of the mean is always normal, regardless how values are distributed in the population. This phenomenon is known as the central limit theorem . And the consequence is that many test results are unaffected by even severe violations of normality. So if sample sizes are reasonable, normality tests are often pointless . Sadly, few statistics instructors seem to be aware of this and still bother students with such tests. And that's why I wrote this tutorial anyway.

Hey! But what if sample sizes are small, say N < 20 or so? Well, in that case, many tests do require normally distributed variables. However, normality tests typically have low power in small sample sizes. As a consequence, even substantial deviations from normality may not be statistically significant. So when you really need normality, normality tests are unlikely to detect that it's actually violated. Which renders them pretty useless.

Thanks for reading.

Tell us what you think!

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Null and Alternative Hypotheses | Definitions & Examples

Null & Alternative Hypotheses | Definitions, Templates & Examples

Published on May 6, 2022 by Shaun Turney . Revised on June 22, 2023.

The null and alternative hypotheses are two competing claims that researchers weigh evidence for and against using a statistical test :

• Null hypothesis ( H 0 ): There’s no effect in the population .
• Alternative hypothesis ( H a or H 1 ) : There’s an effect in the population.

Table of contents

Answering your research question with hypotheses, what is a null hypothesis, what is an alternative hypothesis, similarities and differences between null and alternative hypotheses, how to write null and alternative hypotheses, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions.

The null and alternative hypotheses offer competing answers to your research question . When the research question asks “Does the independent variable affect the dependent variable?”:

• The null hypothesis ( H 0 ) answers “No, there’s no effect in the population.”
• The alternative hypothesis ( H a ) answers “Yes, there is an effect in the population.”

The null and alternative are always claims about the population. That’s because the goal of hypothesis testing is to make inferences about a population based on a sample . Often, we infer whether there’s an effect in the population by looking at differences between groups or relationships between variables in the sample. It’s critical for your research to write strong hypotheses .

You can use a statistical test to decide whether the evidence favors the null or alternative hypothesis. Each type of statistical test comes with a specific way of phrasing the null and alternative hypothesis. However, the hypotheses can also be phrased in a general way that applies to any test.

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

The null hypothesis is the claim that there’s no effect in the population.

If the sample provides enough evidence against the claim that there’s no effect in the population ( p ≤ α), then we can reject the null hypothesis . Otherwise, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Although “fail to reject” may sound awkward, it’s the only wording that statisticians accept . Be careful not to say you “prove” or “accept” the null hypothesis.

Null hypotheses often include phrases such as “no effect,” “no difference,” or “no relationship.” When written in mathematical terms, they always include an equality (usually =, but sometimes ≥ or ≤).

You can never know with complete certainty whether there is an effect in the population. Some percentage of the time, your inference about the population will be incorrect. When you incorrectly reject the null hypothesis, it’s called a type I error . When you incorrectly fail to reject it, it’s a type II error.

Examples of null hypotheses

The table below gives examples of research questions and null hypotheses. There’s always more than one way to answer a research question, but these null hypotheses can help you get started.

*Note that some researchers prefer to always write the null hypothesis in terms of “no effect” and “=”. It would be fine to say that daily meditation has no effect on the incidence of depression and p 1 = p 2 .

The alternative hypothesis ( H a ) is the other answer to your research question . It claims that there’s an effect in the population.

Often, your alternative hypothesis is the same as your research hypothesis. In other words, it’s the claim that you expect or hope will be true.

The alternative hypothesis is the complement to the null hypothesis. Null and alternative hypotheses are exhaustive, meaning that together they cover every possible outcome. They are also mutually exclusive, meaning that only one can be true at a time.

Alternative hypotheses often include phrases such as “an effect,” “a difference,” or “a relationship.” When alternative hypotheses are written in mathematical terms, they always include an inequality (usually ≠, but sometimes < or >). As with null hypotheses, there are many acceptable ways to phrase an alternative hypothesis.

Examples of alternative hypotheses

The table below gives examples of research questions and alternative hypotheses to help you get started with formulating your own.

Null and alternative hypotheses are similar in some ways:

• They’re both answers to the research question.
• They both make claims about the population.
• They’re both evaluated by statistical tests.

However, there are important differences between the two types of hypotheses, summarized in the following table.

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

• Academic style
• Vague sentences
• Style consistency

See an example

To help you write your hypotheses, you can use the template sentences below. If you know which statistical test you’re going to use, you can use the test-specific template sentences. Otherwise, you can use the general template sentences.

General template sentences

The only thing you need to know to use these general template sentences are your dependent and independent variables. To write your research question, null hypothesis, and alternative hypothesis, fill in the following sentences with your variables:

Does independent variable affect dependent variable ?

• Null hypothesis ( H 0 ): Independent variable does not affect dependent variable.
• Alternative hypothesis ( H a ): Independent variable affects dependent variable.

Test-specific template sentences

Once you know the statistical test you’ll be using, you can write your hypotheses in a more precise and mathematical way specific to the test you chose. The table below provides template sentences for common statistical tests.

Note: The template sentences above assume that you’re performing one-tailed tests . One-tailed tests are appropriate for most studies.

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Normal distribution
• Descriptive statistics
• Measures of central tendency
• Correlation coefficient

Methodology

• Cluster sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Types of interviews
• Cohort study
• Thematic analysis

Research bias

• Implicit bias
• Cognitive bias
• Survivorship bias
• Availability heuristic
• Nonresponse bias
• Regression to the mean

Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics. It is used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses , by calculating how likely it is that a pattern or relationship between variables could have arisen by chance.

Null and alternative hypotheses are used in statistical hypothesis testing . The null hypothesis of a test always predicts no effect or no relationship between variables, while the alternative hypothesis states your research prediction of an effect or relationship.

The null hypothesis is often abbreviated as H 0 . When the null hypothesis is written using mathematical symbols, it always includes an equality symbol (usually =, but sometimes ≥ or ≤).

The alternative hypothesis is often abbreviated as H a or H 1 . When the alternative hypothesis is written using mathematical symbols, it always includes an inequality symbol (usually ≠, but sometimes < or >).

A research hypothesis is your proposed answer to your research question. The research hypothesis usually includes an explanation (“ x affects y because …”).

A statistical hypothesis, on the other hand, is a mathematical statement about a population parameter. Statistical hypotheses always come in pairs: the null and alternative hypotheses . In a well-designed study , the statistical hypotheses correspond logically to the research hypothesis.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Turney, S. (2023, June 22). Null & Alternative Hypotheses | Definitions, Templates & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved August 11, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/null-and-alternative-hypotheses/

Is this article helpful?

Shaun Turney

Other students also liked, inferential statistics | an easy introduction & examples, hypothesis testing | a step-by-step guide with easy examples, type i & type ii errors | differences, examples, visualizations, what is your plagiarism score.

Hypothesis test in SPSS

April 16, 2019

For the purpose of this tutorial, I’m gonna be using the sample data set demo.sav , available under installdir/IBM/SPSS/Statistics/[version]/Samples/[lang] , in my case, on Windows that would be C:\Program Files\IBM\SPSS\Statistics\25\Samples\English .

• If you haven’t already make sure to open the sample data set demo.sav (this data set is incidentally available in many different formats, such as txt and xlsx ).
• Click on Analyze>>Nonparametric Tests>>One Sample…
• In the resulting window, choose Automatically compare observed data to hypothesized .
• Click on the tab Fields .
• Depending on the version of SPSS, either all variables or just the categorical ones are available in the right column, Test Fields . However, for the purpose of this tutorial we’ll perform a one-sample binomial test so keep Gender which is a nominal variable and remove the rest (if the column Test Fields isn’t populated just add Gender and you’re good to go). The following hypothesis test will consequently answer the question What proportion of this sample is male or female?
• Under the next tab, Settings , there is the possibility to customize Significance level and Confidence interval. However the defaults are already at 0.05 and 95% respectively which will do just fine.
• Click Run .
• The result is a single nonparametric test. In the resulting table the null hypothesis is stated as The categories defined by Gender = Female and Male occur with probabilities 0.5 and 0.5 . The significance for this test SPSS calculated as 0.608 which is quite high and consequently the recommendation is to retain the null hypothesis (as the significance level is 0.05), which in this case means that the proportions male and female are about equal.