what are the sources of literature review in research pdf

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

Published on January 2, 2023 by Shona McCombes . Revised on September 11, 2023.

What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research that you can later apply to your paper, thesis, or dissertation topic .

There are five key steps to writing a literature review:

• Search for relevant literature
• Evaluate sources
• Identify themes, debates, and gaps
• Outline the structure
• Write your literature review

A good literature review doesn’t just summarize sources—it analyzes, synthesizes , and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

What is the purpose of a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1 – search for relevant literature, step 2 – evaluate and select sources, step 3 – identify themes, debates, and gaps, step 4 – outline your literature review’s structure, step 5 – write your literature review, free lecture slides, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions, introduction.

• Quick Run-through
• Step 1 & 2

When you write a thesis , dissertation , or research paper , you will likely have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives you a chance to:

• Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and its scholarly context
• Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
• Position your work in relation to other researchers and theorists
• Show how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate
• Evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of the scholarly debates around your topic.

Writing literature reviews is a particularly important skill if you want to apply for graduate school or pursue a career in research. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below.

Don't submit your assignments before you do this

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. Free citation check included.

Try for free

Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging! A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.

• Example literature review #1: “Why Do People Migrate? A Review of the Theoretical Literature” ( Theoretical literature review about the development of economic migration theory from the 1950s to today.)
• Example literature review #2: “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines” ( Methodological literature review about interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition and production.)
• Example literature review #3: “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Thematic literature review about the effects of technology on language acquisition.)
• Example literature review #4: “Learners’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Chronological literature review about how the concept of listening skills has changed over time.)

You can also check out our templates with literature review examples and sample outlines at the links below.

Download Word doc Download Google doc

Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic .

If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research problem and questions .

Make a list of keywords

Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research question. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list as you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.

• Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok
• Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
• Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth

Search for relevant sources

Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some useful databases to search for journals and articles include:

• Your university’s library catalogue
• Google Scholar
• Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
• Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)
• EconLit (economics)
• Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science)

You can also use boolean operators to help narrow down your search.

Make sure to read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.

You likely won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on your topic, so it will be necessary to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your research question.

For each publication, ask yourself:

• What question or problem is the author addressing?
• What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
• What are the key theories, models, and methods?
• Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach?
• What are the results and conclusions of the study?
• How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?

Make sure the sources you use are credible , and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.

You can use our template to summarize and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using. Click on either button below to download.

Take notes and cite your sources

As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.

It is important to keep track of your sources with citations to avoid plagiarism . It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography , where you compile full citation information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process.

To begin organizing your literature review’s argument and structure, be sure you understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:

• Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time?
• Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
• Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
• Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field?
• Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed?

This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge.

• Most research has focused on young women.
• There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media.
• But there is still a lack of robust research on highly visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat—this is a gap that you could address in your own research.

There are various approaches to organizing the body of a literature review. Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).

Chronological

The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order.

Try to analyze patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.

If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.

For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access.

Methodological

If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods , you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. For example:

• Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
• Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources

Theoretical

A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework . You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.

You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.

Like any other academic text , your literature review should have an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion . What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review.

The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.

Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach.

As you write, you can follow these tips:

• Summarize and synthesize: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
• Analyze and interpret: don’t just paraphrase other researchers — add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
• Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transition words and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts

In the conclusion, you should summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance.

When you’ve finished writing and revising your literature review, don’t forget to proofread thoroughly before submitting. Not a language expert? Check out Scribbr’s professional proofreading services !

This article has been adapted into lecture slides that you can use to teach your students about writing a literature review.

Scribbr slides are free to use, customize, and distribute for educational purposes.

Open Google Slides Download PowerPoint

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Sampling methods
• Simple random sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Cluster sampling
• Likert scales
• Reproducibility

 Statistics

• Null hypothesis
• Statistical power
• Probability distribution
• Effect size
• Poisson distribution

Research bias

• Optimism bias
• Cognitive bias
• Implicit bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Anchoring bias
• Explicit bias

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .

It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation , or research paper , in order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge.

There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:

• To familiarize yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
• To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
• To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
• To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
• To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic

Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.

The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your thesis or dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .

A literature review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations , theses, and research papers . Literature reviews give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant theories and methods, as well as gaps in existing research. Literature reviews are set up similarly to other  academic texts , with an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion .

An  annotated bibliography is a list of  source references that has a short description (called an annotation ) for each of the sources. It is often assigned as part of the research process for a  paper .  

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, September 11). How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved September 9, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/literature-review/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, what is a theoretical framework | guide to organizing, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, how to write a research proposal | examples & templates, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Writing a Literature Review

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and plays). When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about the research ( scholarship ) in a given field. You will often see the terms “the research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably.

Where, when, and why would I write a lit review?

There are a number of different situations where you might write a literature review, each with slightly different expectations; different disciplines, too, have field-specific expectations for what a literature review is and does. For instance, in the humanities, authors might include more overt argumentation and interpretation of source material in their literature reviews, whereas in the sciences, authors are more likely to report study designs and results in their literature reviews; these differences reflect these disciplines’ purposes and conventions in scholarship. You should always look at examples from your own discipline and talk to professors or mentors in your field to be sure you understand your discipline’s conventions, for literature reviews as well as for any other genre.

A literature review can be a part of a research paper or scholarly article, usually falling after the introduction and before the research methods sections. In these cases, the lit review just needs to cover scholarship that is important to the issue you are writing about; sometimes it will also cover key sources that informed your research methodology.

Lit reviews can also be standalone pieces, either as assignments in a class or as publications. In a class, a lit review may be assigned to help students familiarize themselves with a topic and with scholarship in their field, get an idea of the other researchers working on the topic they’re interested in, find gaps in existing research in order to propose new projects, and/or develop a theoretical framework and methodology for later research. As a publication, a lit review usually is meant to help make other scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing, synthesizing, and analyzing existing research on a topic. This can be especially helpful for students or scholars getting into a new research area, or for directing an entire community of scholars toward questions that have not yet been answered.

What are the parts of a lit review?

Most lit reviews use a basic introduction-body-conclusion structure; if your lit review is part of a larger paper, the introduction and conclusion pieces may be just a few sentences while you focus most of your attention on the body. If your lit review is a standalone piece, the introduction and conclusion take up more space and give you a place to discuss your goals, research methods, and conclusions separately from where you discuss the literature itself.

Introduction:

• An introductory paragraph that explains what your working topic and thesis is
• A forecast of key topics or texts that will appear in the review
• Potentially, a description of how you found sources and how you analyzed them for inclusion and discussion in the review (more often found in published, standalone literature reviews than in lit review sections in an article or research paper)
• Summarize and synthesize: Give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
• Analyze and interpret: Don’t just paraphrase other researchers – add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
• Critically Evaluate: Mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: Use transition words and topic sentence to draw connections, comparisons, and contrasts.

Conclusion:

• Summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance
• Connect it back to your primary research question

How should I organize my lit review?

Lit reviews can take many different organizational patterns depending on what you are trying to accomplish with the review. Here are some examples:

• Chronological : The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time, which helps familiarize the audience with the topic (for instance if you are introducing something that is not commonly known in your field). If you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order. Try to analyze the patterns, turning points, and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred (as mentioned previously, this may not be appropriate in your discipline — check with a teacher or mentor if you’re unsure).
• Thematic : If you have found some recurring central themes that you will continue working with throughout your piece, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic. For example, if you are reviewing literature about women and religion, key themes can include the role of women in churches and the religious attitude towards women.
• Qualitative versus quantitative research
• Empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the research by sociological, historical, or cultural sources
• Theoretical : In many humanities articles, the literature review is the foundation for the theoretical framework. You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts. You can argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach or combine various theorical concepts to create a framework for your research.

What are some strategies or tips I can use while writing my lit review?

Any lit review is only as good as the research it discusses; make sure your sources are well-chosen and your research is thorough. Don’t be afraid to do more research if you discover a new thread as you’re writing. More info on the research process is available in our "Conducting Research" resources .

As you’re doing your research, create an annotated bibliography ( see our page on the this type of document ). Much of the information used in an annotated bibliography can be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting your lit review as you research, but also developing your sense of the larger conversation going on among scholars, professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic.

Usually you will need to synthesize research rather than just summarizing it. This means drawing connections between sources to create a picture of the scholarly conversation on a topic over time. Many student writers struggle to synthesize because they feel they don’t have anything to add to the scholars they are citing; here are some strategies to help you:

• It often helps to remember that the point of these kinds of syntheses is to show your readers how you understand your research, to help them read the rest of your paper.
• Writing teachers often say synthesis is like hosting a dinner party: imagine all your sources are together in a room, discussing your topic. What are they saying to each other?
• Look at the in-text citations in each paragraph. Are you citing just one source for each paragraph? This usually indicates summary only. When you have multiple sources cited in a paragraph, you are more likely to be synthesizing them (not always, but often
• Read more about synthesis here.

The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all situations). Often, the literature review is where you can establish your research as filling a particular gap or as relevant in a particular way. You have some chance to do this in your introduction in an article, but the literature review section gives a more extended opportunity to establish the conversation in the way you would like your readers to see it. You can choose the intellectual lineage you would like to be part of and whose definitions matter most to your thinking (mostly humanities-specific, but this goes for sciences as well). In addressing these points, you argue for your place in the conversation, which tends to make the lit review more compelling than a simple reporting of other sources.

Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library

• Collections
• Research Help

YSN Doctoral Programs: Steps in Conducting a Literature Review

• Biomedical Databases
• Global (Public Health) Databases
• Soc. Sci., History, and Law Databases
• Grey Literature
• Trials Registers
• Data and Statistics
• Public Policy
• Google Tips
• Recommended Books
• Steps in Conducting a Literature Review

What is a literature review?

A literature review is an integrated analysis -- not just a summary-- of scholarly writings and other relevant evidence related directly to your research question.  That is, it represents a synthesis of the evidence that provides background information on your topic and shows a association between the evidence and your research question.

A literature review may be a stand alone work or the introduction to a larger research paper, depending on the assignment.  Rely heavily on the guidelines your instructor has given you.

Why is it important?

A literature review is important because it:

• Explains the background of research on a topic.
• Demonstrates why a topic is significant to a subject area.
• Discovers relationships between research studies/ideas.
• Identifies major themes, concepts, and researchers on a topic.
• Identifies critical gaps and points of disagreement.
• Discusses further research questions that logically come out of the previous studies.

APA7 Style resources

APA Style Blog - for those harder to find answers

1. Choose a topic. Define your research question.

Your literature review should be guided by your central research question.  The literature represents background and research developments related to a specific research question, interpreted and analyzed by you in a synthesized way.

• Make sure your research question is not too broad or too narrow.  Is it manageable?
• Begin writing down terms that are related to your question. These will be useful for searches later.
• If you have the opportunity, discuss your topic with your professor and your class mates.

2. Decide on the scope of your review

How many studies do you need to look at? How comprehensive should it be? How many years should it cover? 

• This may depend on your assignment.  How many sources does the assignment require?

3. Select the databases you will use to conduct your searches.

Make a list of the databases you will search. 

Where to find databases:

• use the tabs on this guide
• Find other databases in the Nursing Information Resources web page
• More on the Medical Library web page
• ... and more on the Yale University Library web page

4. Conduct your searches to find the evidence. Keep track of your searches.

• Use the key words in your question, as well as synonyms for those words, as terms in your search. Use the database tutorials for help.
• Save the searches in the databases. This saves time when you want to redo, or modify, the searches. It is also helpful to use as a guide is the searches are not finding any useful results.
• Review the abstracts of research studies carefully. This will save you time.
• Use the bibliographies and references of research studies you find to locate others.
• Check with your professor, or a subject expert in the field, if you are missing any key works in the field.
• Ask your librarian for help at any time.
• Use a citation manager, such as EndNote as the repository for your citations. See the EndNote tutorials for help.

Review the literature

Some questions to help you analyze the research:

• What was the research question of the study you are reviewing? What were the authors trying to discover?
• Was the research funded by a source that could influence the findings?
• What were the research methodologies? Analyze its literature review, the samples and variables used, the results, and the conclusions.
• Does the research seem to be complete? Could it have been conducted more soundly? What further questions does it raise?
• If there are conflicting studies, why do you think that is?
• How are the authors viewed in the field? Has this study been cited? If so, how has it been analyzed?

Tips: 

• Review the abstracts carefully.  
• Keep careful notes so that you may track your thought processes during the research process.
• Create a matrix of the studies for easy analysis, and synthesis, across all of the studies.
• << Previous: Recommended Books
• Last Updated: Jun 20, 2024 9:08 AM
• URL: https://guides.library.yale.edu/YSNDoctoral

Literature Reviews

• What is a Literature Review?
• Steps for Creating a Literature Review
• Providing Evidence / Critical Analysis
• Challenges when writing a Literature Review
• Systematic Literature Reviews

Developing a Literature Review

1. Purpose and Scope

To help you develop a literature review, gather information on existing research, sub-topics, relevant research, and overlaps. Note initial thoughts on the topic - a mind map or list might be helpful - and avoid unfocused reading, collecting irrelevant content.  A literature review serves to place your research within the context of existing knowledge. It demonstrates your understanding of the field and identifies gaps that your research aims to fill. This helps in justifying the relevance and necessity of your study.

To avoid over-reading, set a target word count for each section and limit reading time. Plan backwards from the deadline and move on to other parts of the investigation. Read major texts and explore up-to-date research. Check reference lists and citation indexes for common standard texts. Be guided by research questions and refocus on your topic when needed. Stop reading if you find similar viewpoints or if you're going off topic.

You can use a "Synthesis Matrix" to keep track of your reading notes. This concept map helps you to provide a summary of the literature and its connections is produced as a result of this study. Utilizing referencing software like RefWorks to obtain citations, you can construct the framework for composing your literature evaluation.

2. Source Selection

Focus on searching for academically authoritative texts such as academic books, journals, research reports, and government publications. These sources are critical for ensuring the credibility and reliability of your review. 

• Academic Books: Provide comprehensive coverage of a topic.
• Journal Articles: Offer the most up-to-date research and are essential for a literature review.
• Research Reports: Detailed accounts of specific research projects.
• Government Publications: Official documents that provide reliable data and insights.

3. Thematic Analysis

Instead of merely summarizing sources, identify and discuss key themes that emerge from the literature. This involves interpreting and evaluating how different authors have tackled similar issues and how their findings relate to your research.

4. Critical Evaluation

Adopt a critical attitude towards the sources you review. Scrutinize, question, and dissect the material to ensure that your review is not just descriptive but analytical. This helps in highlighting the significance of various sources and their relevance to your research.

Each work's critical assessment should take into account:

Provenance:  What qualifications does the author have? Are the author's claims backed up by proof, such as first-hand accounts from history, case studies, stories, statistics, and current scientific discoveries? Methodology:  Were the strategies employed to locate, collect, and evaluate the data suitable for tackling the study question? Was the sample size suitable? Were the findings properly reported and interpreted? Objectivity : Is the author's viewpoint impartial or biased? Does the author's thesis get supported by evidence that refutes it, or does it ignore certain important facts? Persuasiveness:  Which of the author's arguments is the strongest or weakest in terms of persuasiveness? Value:  Are the author's claims and deductions believable? Does the study ultimately advance our understanding of the issue in any meaningful way?

5. Categorization

Organize your literature review by grouping sources into categories based on themes, relevance to research questions, theoretical paradigms, or chronology. This helps in presenting your findings in a structured manner.

6. Source Validity

Ensure that the sources you include are valid and reliable. Classic texts may retain their authority over time, but for fields that evolve rapidly, prioritize the most recent research. Always check the credibility of the authors and the impact of their work in the field.

7. Synthesis and Findings

Synthesize the information from various sources to draw conclusions about the current state of knowledge. Identify trends, controversies, and gaps in the literature. Relate your findings to your research questions and suggest future directions for research.

Practical Tips

• Use a variety of sources, including online databases, university libraries, and reference lists from relevant articles. This ensures a comprehensive coverage of the literature.
• Avoid listing sources without analysis. Use tables, bulk citations, and footnotes to manage references efficiently and make your review more readable.
• Writing a literature review is an ongoing process. Start writing early and revise as you read more. This iterative process helps in refining your arguments and identifying additional sources as needed.  

Brown University Library (2024) Organizing and Creating Information. Available at: https://libguides.brown.edu/organize/litreview (Accessed: 30 July 2024).

Pacheco-Vega, R. (2016) Synthesizing different bodies of work in your literature review: The Conceptual Synthesis Excel Dump (CSED) technique . Available at: http://www.raulpacheco.org/2016/06/synthesizing-different-bodies-of-work-in-your-literature-review-the-conceptual-synthesis-excel-dump-technique/ (Accessed: 30 July 2024).

Study Advice at the University of Reading (2024) Literature reviews . Available at: https://libguides.reading.ac.uk/literaturereview/developing (Accessed: 31 July 2024).

Further Reading

Frameworks for creating answerable (re)search questions  How to Guide

Literature Searching How to Guide

• << Previous: Steps for Creating a Literature Review
• Next: Providing Evidence / Critical Analysis >>
• Last Updated: Sep 4, 2024 11:43 AM
• URL: https://library.lsbu.ac.uk/literaturereviews

Literature Review - what is a Literature Review, why it is important and how it is done

• Strategies to Find Sources

Evaluating Literature Reviews and Sources

Reading critically, tips to evaluate sources.

• Tips for Writing Literature Reviews
• Writing Literature Review: Useful Sites
• Citation Resources
• Other Academic Writings
• Useful Resources

A good literature review evaluates a wide variety of sources (academic articles, scholarly books, government/NGO reports). It also evaluates literature reviews that study similar topics. This page offers you a list of resources and tips on how to evaluate the sources that you may use to write your review.

• A Closer Look at Evaluating Literature Reviews Excerpt from the book chapter, “Evaluating Introductions and Literature Reviews” in Fred Pyrczak’s Evaluating Research in Academic Journals: A Practical Guide to Realistic Evaluation , (Chapter 4 and 5). This PDF discusses and offers great advice on how to evaluate "Introductions" and "Literature Reviews" by listing questions and tips. First part focus on Introductions and in page 10 in the PDF, 37 in the text, it focus on "literature reviews".
• Tips for Evaluating Sources (Print vs. Internet Sources) Excellent page that will guide you on what to ask to determine if your source is a reliable one. Check the other topics in the guide: Evaluating Bibliographic Citations and Evaluation During Reading on the left side menu.

To be able to write a good Literature Review, you need to be able to read critically. Below are some tips that will help you evaluate the sources for your paper.

Reading critically (summary from How to Read Academic Texts Critically)

• Who is the author? What is his/her standing in the field.
• What is the author’s purpose? To offer advice, make practical suggestions, solve a specific problem, to critique or clarify?
• Note the experts in the field: are there specific names/labs that are frequently cited?
• Pay attention to methodology: is it sound? what testing procedures, subjects, materials were used?
• Note conflicting theories, methodologies and results. Are there any assumptions being made by most/some researchers?
• Theories: have they evolved overtime?
• Evaluate and synthesize the findings and conclusions. How does this study contribute to your project?

Useful links:

• How to Read a Paper (University of Waterloo, Canada) This is an excellent paper that teach you how to read an academic paper, how to determine if it is something to set aside, or something to read deeply. Good advice to organize your literature for the Literature Review or just reading for classes.

Criteria to evaluate sources:

• Authority : Who is the author? what is his/her credentials--what university he/she is affliliated? Is his/her area of expertise?
• Usefulness : How this source related to your topic? How current or relevant it is to your topic?
• Reliability : Does the information comes from a reliable, trusted source such as an academic journal?

Useful site - Critically Analyzing Information Sources (Cornell University Library)

• << Previous: Strategies to Find Sources
• Next: Tips for Writing Literature Reviews >>
• Last Updated: Jul 3, 2024 10:56 AM
• URL: https://lit.libguides.com/Literature-Review

The Library, Technological University of the Shannon: Midwest

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Review Article
• Published: 08 September 2024

Peering into the mind: unraveling schizophrenia’s secrets using models

• João V. Nani   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4336-1709 1 , 2 ,
• Alysson R. Muotri 3 &
• Mirian A. F. Hayashi   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6437-4923 1 , 2  

Molecular Psychiatry ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

• Biological techniques
• Neuroscience

Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a complex mental disorder characterized by a range of symptoms, including positive and negative symptoms, as well as cognitive impairments. Despite the extensive research, the underlying neurobiology of SCZ remain elusive. To overcome this challenge, the use of diverse laboratory modeling techniques, encompassing cellular and animal models, and innovative approaches like induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neuronal cultures or brain organoids and genetically engineered animal models, has been crucial. Immortalized cellular models provide controlled environments for investigating the molecular and neurochemical pathways involved in neuronal function, while iPSCs and brain organoids, derived from patient-specific sources, offer significant advantage in translational research by facilitating direct comparisons of cellular phenotypes between patient-derived neurons and healthy-control neurons. Animal models can recapitulate the different psychopathological aspects that should be modeled, offering valuable insights into the neurobiology of SCZ. In addition, invertebrates’ models are genetically tractable and offer a powerful approach to dissect the core genetic underpinnings of SCZ, while vertebrate models, especially mammals, with their more complex nervous systems and behavioral repertoire, provide a closer approximation of the human condition to study SCZ-related traits. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the diverse modeling approaches, critically evaluating their strengths and limitations. By synthesizing knowledge from these models, this review offers a valuable source for researchers, clinicians, and stakeholders alike. Integrating findings across these different models may allow us to build a more holistic picture of SCZ pathophysiology, facilitating the exploration of new research avenues and informed decision-making for interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

251,40 € per year

only 20,95 € per issue

Buy this article

• Purchase on SpringerLink
• Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Opportunities and limitations for studying neuropsychiatric disorders using patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells

Advancing preclinical models of psychiatric disorders with human brain organoid cultures

Human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC) and organoid models of autism: opportunities and limitations

Reynolds EH, Kinnier Wilson JV. Psychoses of epilepsy in Babylon: the oldest account of the disorder. Epilepsia. 2008;49:1488–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01614.x .

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Evans K, McGrath J, Milns R. Searching for schizophrenia in ancient Greek and Roman literature: a systematic review. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003;107:323–30. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00053.x .

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Falkai P, Rossner MJ, Schulze TG, Hasan A, Brzózka MM, Malchow B, et al. Kraepelin revisited: schizophrenia from degeneration to failed regeneration. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;20:671–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2015.35 .

Jablensky A. The diagnostic concept of schizophrenia: its history, evolution, and future prospects. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2010;12:271–87. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2010.12.3/ajablensky .

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Rössler W, Riecher-Rössler A, Meise U. Wilhelm Griesinger and the concept of community care in 19th-century Germany. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1994;45:818–22. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.45.8.818 .

Glucksman ML. Freud’s “Project”: The Mind-Brain Connection Revisited. Psychodyn Psychiatry. 2016;44:69–90. https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2016.44.1.69 .

Tran The J. Freud, Griesinger and Foville: the influence of the nineteenth-century psychiatric tradition in the Freudian concept of delusion as an ‘attempt at recovery. Hist Psychiatry. 2021;32:323–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957154X211013726 .

Kane JM, Correll CU. Past and present progress in the pharmacologic treatment of schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71:1115–24. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.10r06264yel .

Kesby JP, Eyles DW, McGrath JJ, Scott JG. Dopamine, psychosis and schizophrenia: the widening gap between basic and clinical neuroscience. Transl Psychiatry. 2018;8:30 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-017-0071-9 .

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Jauhar S, Johnstone M, McKenna PJ. Schizophrenia. Lancet. 2022;399:473–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01730-X .

Haijma SV, Van Haren N, Cahn W, Koolschijn PC, Hulshoff Pol HE, Kahn RS. Brain volumes in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis in over 18 000 subjects. Schizophr Bull. 2013;39:1129–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbs118 .

Ban TA. Neuropsychopharmacology and the genetics of schizophrenia: a history of the diagnosis of schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2004;28:753–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2004.05.021 .

Janoutová J, Janácková P, Serý O, Zeman T, Ambroz P, Kovalová M, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of schizophrenia. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2016;37:1–8.

PubMed   Google Scholar  

Radua J, Ramella-Cravaro V, Ioannidis JPA, Reichenberg A, Phiphopthatsanee N, Amir T, et al. What causes psychosis? An umbrella review of risk and protective factors. World Psychiatry. 2018;17:49–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20490 .

Tandon R, Gaebel W, Barch DM, Bustillo J, Gur RE, Heckers S, et al. Definition and description of schizophrenia in the DSM-5. Schizophr Res. 2013;150:3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2013.05.028 .

Hjorthøj C, Stürup AE, McGrath JJ, Nordentoft M. Years of potential life lost and life expectancy in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4:295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30078-0 .

Correll CU, Schooler NR. Negative symptoms in schizophrenia: a review and clinical guide for recognition, assessment, and treatment. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020;16:519–34. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S225643 .

Leucht S, Cipriani A, Spineli L, Mavridis D, Orey D, Richter F, et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 15 antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Lancet. 2013;382:951–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60733-3 .

Maric NP, Jovicic MJ, Mihaljevic M, Miljevic C. Improving current treatments for schizophrenia. Drug Dev Res. 2016;77:357–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.21337 .

Nucifora FC Jr, Woznica E, Lee BJ, Cascella N, Sawa A. Treatment resistant schizophrenia: clinical, biological, and therapeutic perspectives. Neurobiol Dis. 2019;131:104257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2018.08.016 .

Kane J, Honigfeld G, Singer J, Meltzer H. Clozapine for the treatment-resistant schizophrenic. A double-blind comparison with chlorpromazine. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45:789–96. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800330013001 .

Leucht S, Corves C, Arbter D, Engel RR, Li C, Davis JM. Second-generation versus first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009;373:31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61764-X .

Fonseca M, Carmo F, Martel F. Metabolic effects of atypical antipsychotics: molecular targets. J Neuroendocrinol. 2023;35:e13347. https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.13347 .

Ribeiro ELA, de Mendonça Lima T, Vieira MEB, Storpirtis S, Aguiar PM. Efficacy and safety of aripiprazole for the treatment of schizophrenia: an overview of systematic reviews. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;74:1215–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-018-2498-1 .

Gaitonde SA, Avet C, de la Fuente Revenga M, Blondel-Tepaz E, Shahraki A, Pastor AM, et al. Pharmacological fingerprint of antipsychotic drugs at the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor. Mol Psychiatry. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-024-02531-7 .

Korth C, Fangerau H. Blood tests to diagnose schizophrenia: self-imposed limits in psychiatry. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:911–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30058-4 .

Owen MJ, Sawa A, Mortensen PB. Schizophrenia. Lancet. 2016;388:86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01121-6 .

Ferrer I, Martinez A, Boluda S, Parchi P, Barrachina M. Brain banks: benefits, limitations and cautions concerning the use of post-mortem brain tissue for molecular studies. Cell Tissue Bank. 2008;9:181–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-008-9077-0 .

Abashkin DA, Kurishev AO, Karpov DS, Golimbet VE. Cellular models in schizophrenia research. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:8518. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168518 .

Strickland JC. Guide to research techniques in neuroscience. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2014;13:R1–2.

PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Maqsood MI, Matin MM, Bahrami AR, Ghasroldasht MM. Immortality of cell lines: challenges and advantages of establishment. Cell Biol Int. 2013;37:1038–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbin.10137 .

Wiatrak B, Kubis-Kubiak A, Piwowar A, Barg E. PC12 cell line: cell types, coating of culture vessels, differentiation and other culture conditions. Cells. 2020;9:958. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9040958 .

Westerink RH, Ewing AG. The PC12 cell as model for neurosecretion. Acta Physiol. 2008;192:273–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.2007.01805.x .

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Wang L, Chen Q, Ma R, Zhang B, Yang P, Cao T, et al. Insight into mitochondrial dysfunction mediated by clozapine-induced inhibition of PGRMC1 in PC12 cells. Toxicology. 2023;491:153515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2023.153515 .

Jankowska U, Skupien-Rabian B, Swiderska B, Prus G, Dziedzicka-Wasylewska M, Kedracka-Krok S. Proteome analysis of PC12 cells reveals alterations in translation regulation and actin signaling induced by clozapine. Neurochem Res. 2021;46:2097–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-021-03348-4 .

Zhuo C, Xu Y, Hou W, Chen J, Li Q, Liu Z, et al. Mechanistic/mammalian target of rapamycin and side effects of antipsychotics: insights into mechanisms and implications for therapy. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12:13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01778-w .

Xiong YJ, Song YZ, Zhu Y, Zuo WQ, Zhao YF, Shen X, et al. Neuroprotective effects of olanzapine against rotenone-induced toxicity in PC12 cells. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2020;41:508–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-020-0378-6 .

Wei Z, Bai O, Richardson JS, Mousseau DD, Li XM. Olanzapine protects PC12 cells from oxidative stress induced by hydrogen peroxide. J Neurosci Res. 2003;73:364–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.10668 .

Magliaro BC, Saldanha CJ. Clozapine protects PC-12 cells from death due to oxidative stress induced by hydrogen peroxide via a cell-type specific mechanism involving inhibition of extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation. Brain Res. 2009;1283:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.063 .

Wang H, Xu H, Dyck LE, Li XM. Olanzapine and quetiapine protect PC12 cells from beta-amyloid peptide(25-35)-induced oxidative stress and the ensuing apoptosis. J Neurosci Res. 2005;81:572–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.20570 .

Ishizuka K, Paek M, Kamiya A, Sawa A. A review of disrupted-in-schizophrenia-1 (DISC1): neurodevelopment, cognition, and mental conditions. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;59:1189–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.065 .

Dahoun T, Trossbach SV, Brandon NJ, Korth C, Howes OD. The impact of disrupted-in-schizophrenia 1 (DISC1) on the dopaminergic system: a systematic review. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7:e1015. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2016.282 .

Kamiya A, Tomoda T, Chang J, Takaki M, Zhan C, Morita M, et al. DISC1-NDEL1/NUDEL protein interaction, an essential component for neurite outgrowth, is modulated by genetic variations of DISC1. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:3313–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddl407 .

Taya S, Shinoda T, Tsuboi D, Asaki J, Nagai K, Hikita T, et al. DISC1 regulates the transport of the NUDEL/LIS1/14-3-3epsilon complex through kinesin-1. J Neurosci. 2007;27:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3826-06.2006 .

Pletnikov MV, Xu Y, Ovanesov MV, Kamiya A, Sawa A, Ross CA. PC12 cell model of inducible expression of mutant DISC1: new evidence for a dominant-negative mechanism of abnormal neuronal differentiation. Neurosci Res. 2007;8:234–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2007.03.003 .

Pezzini F, Bettinetti L, Di Leva F, Bianchi M, Zoratti E, Carrozzo R, et al. Transcriptomic profiling discloses molecular and cellular events related to neuronal differentiation in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2017;37:665–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-016-0403-y .

Kovalevich J, Langford D. Considerations for the use of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells in neurobiology. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1078:9–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-640-5_2 .

Shin JH, Park SJ, Kim ES, Jo YK, Hong J, Cho DH. Sertindole, a potent antagonist at dopamine D 2 receptors, induces autophagy by increasing reactive oxygen species in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Biol Pharm Bull. 2012;35:1069–75. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.b12-00009 .

Lee JG, Cho HY, Park SW, Seo MK, Kim YH. Effects of olanzapine on brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene promoter activity in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2010;34:1001–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.05.013 .

Goldie BJ, Barnett MM, Cairns MJ. BDNF and the maturation of posttranscriptional regulatory networks in human SH-SY5Y neuroblast differentiation. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2014.00325 .

Svoboda J, Stankova A, Entlerova M, Stuchlik A. Acute administration of MK-801 in an animal model of psychosis in rats interferes with cognitively demanding forms of behavioral flexibility on a rotating arena. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015;9:75. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00075 .

Zhu D, Zhang J, Wu J, Li G, Yao W, Hao J, et al. Paliperidone protects SH-SY5Y cells against MK-801-induced neuronal damage through inhibition of Ca(2+) influx and regulation of SIRT1/miR-134 signal pathway. Mol Neurobiol. 2016;53:2498–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-015-9217-z .

Unal G, Dokumaci AH, Ozkartal CS, Yerer MB, Aricioglu F. Famotidine has a neuroprotective effect on MK-801 induced toxicity via the Akt/GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling pathway in the SH-SY5Y cell line. Chem Biol Interact. 2019;314:108823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2019.108823 .

Mellios N, Sur M. The emerging role of microRNAs in schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders. Front Psychiatry. 2012;3:39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00039 .

Ryskalin L, Limanaqi F, Frati A, Busceti CL, Fornai F. mTOR-related brain dysfunctions in neuropsychiatric disorders. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:2226. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19082226 .

Kruse AO, Bustillo JR. Glutamatergic dysfunction in schizophrenia. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12:500. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-02253-w .

Eastwood SL, Walker M, Hyde TM, Kleinman JE, Harrison PJ. The DISC1 Ser704Cys substitution affects centrosomal localization of its binding partner PCM1 in glia in human brain. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:2487–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddq130 .

Piñero-Martos E, Ortega-Vila B, Pol-Fuster J, Cisneros-Barroso E, Ruiz-Guerra L, Medina-Dols A, et al. Disrupted in schizophrenia 1 (DISC1) is a constituent of the mammalian mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system (MICOS) complex, and is essential for oxidative phosphorylation. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25:4157–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddw250 .

Ramos A, Rodríguez-Seoane C, Rosa I, Gorroño-Etxebarria I, Alonso J, Veiga S, et al. Proteomic studies reveal disrupted in schizophrenia 1 as a player in both neurodevelopment and synaptic function. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;20:119. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20010119 .

Trossbach SV, Bader V, Hecher L, Pum ME, Masoud ST, Prikulis I, et al. Misassembly of full-length Disrupted-in-Schizophrenia 1 protein is linked to altered dopamine homeostasis and behavioral deficits. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21:1561–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2015.194 .

Pertile RA, Cui X, Eyles DW. Vitamin D signaling and the differentiation of developing dopamine systems. Neuroscience. 2016;333:193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.07.020 .

Sei Y, Li Z, Song J, Ren-Patterson R, Tunbridge EM, Iizuka Y, et al. Epistatic and functional interactions of catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT) and AKT1 on neuregulin1-ErbB signaling in cell models. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e10789. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010789 .

Wu S, Wang P, Tao R, Yang P, Yu X, Li Y, et al. Schizophrenia associated microRNA 148b 3p regulates COMT and PRSS16 expression by targeting the ZNF804A gene in human neuroblastoma cells. Mol Med Rep. 2020;22:1429–39. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11230 .

Khavari B, Mahmoudi E, Geaghan MP, Cairns MJ. Oxidative stress impact on the transcriptome of differentiating neuroblastoma cells: implication for psychiatric disorders. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:9182. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21239182 .

Larouche A, Berube P, Sarret P, Grignon S. Subacute H2O2, but not poly(IC), upregulates dopamine D2 receptors in retinoic acid differentiated SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma. Synapse. 2008;62:70–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.20458 .

Deslauriers J, Lefrançois M, Larouche A, Sarret P, Grignon S. Antipsychotic-induced DRD2 upregulation and its prevention by α-lipoic acid in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Synapse. 2011;65:321–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.20851 .

Sato T, Okumura F, Kano S, Kondo T, Ariga T, Hatakeyama S. TRIM32 promotes neural differentiation through retinoic acid receptor-mediated transcription. J Cell Sci. 2011;124:3492–502. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.088799 .

Yap MY, Lo YL, Talbot K, Ong WY. Oxidative stress reduces levels of dysbindin-1A via its PEST domain. Neurochem Int. 2014;79:65–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2014.10.001 .

Jäkel S, Dimou L. Glial cells and their function in the adult brain: a journey through the history of their ablation. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017;11:24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00024 .

Silver J, Schwab ME, Popovich PG. Central nervous system regenerative failure: role of oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, and microglia. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;7:a020602. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a020602 .

Almeida PGC, Nani JV, Oses JP, Brietzke E, Hayashi MAF. Neuroinflammation and glial cell activation in mental disorders. Brain Behav Immun Health. 2019;2:100034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbih.2019.100034 .

Nani JV, Almeida PGC, Noto C, Bressan RA, Brietzke E, Hayashi MAF. Unraveiling the correlation among neurodevelopmental and inflammatory biomarkers in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Nord J Psychiatry. 2022;76:559–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2021.2023217 .

Gadelha A, Yonamine CM, Nering M, Rizzo LB, Noto C, Cogo-Moreira H, et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme activity is positively associated with IL-17a levels in patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2015;229:702–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.08.018 .

Hartmann SM, Heider J, Wüst R, Fallgatter AJ, Volkmer H. Microglia-neuron interactions in schizophrenia. Front Cell Neurosci. 2024;18:1345349. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2024.1345349 .

Goldsmith DR, Rapaport MH. Inflammation and negative symptoms of schizophrenia: implications for reward processing and motivational deficits. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:46. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00046 .

De Vries GH, Boullerne AI. Glial cell lines: an overview. Neurochem Res. 2010;35:1978–2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-010-0318-9 .

Blasi E, Barluzzi R, Bocchini V, Mazzolla R, Bistoni F. Immortalization of murine microglial cells by a v-raf/v-myc carrying retrovirus. J Neuroimmunol. 1990;27:229–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-5728(90)90073-v .

Horvath RJ, Nutile-McMenemy N, Alkaitis MS, Deleo JA. Differential migration, LPS-induced cytokine, chemokine, and NO expression in immortalized BV-2 and HAPI cell lines and primary microglial cultures. J Neurochem. 2008;107:557–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05633.x .

Sarapultsev A, Gusev E, Komelkova M, Utepova I, Luo S, Hu D. JAK-STAT signaling in inflammation and stress-related diseases: implications for therapeutic interventions. Mol Biomed. 2023;4:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43556-023-00151-1 .

Long Y, Wang Y, Shen Y, Huang J, Li Y, Wu R, et al. Minocycline and antipsychotics inhibit inflammatory responses in BV-2 microglia activated by LPS via regulating the MAPKs/ JAK-STAT signaling pathway. BMC Psychiatry. 2023;23:514. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05014-1 .

Zheng LT, Hwang J, Ock J, Lee MG, Lee WH, Suk K. The antipsychotic spiperone attenuates inflammatory response in cultured microglia via the reduction of proinflammatory cytokine expression and nitric oxide production. J Neurochem. 2008;107:1225–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05675.x .

Racki V, Marcelic M, Stimac I, Petric D, Kucic N. Effects of haloperidol, risperidone, and aripiprazole on the immunometabolic properties of BV-2 microglial cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:4399. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094399 .

Ng BG, Xu G, Chandy N, Steyermark J, Shinde DN, Radtke K, et al. Biallelic mutations in FUT8 cause a congenital disorder of glycosylation with defective fucosylation. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;102:188–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.12.009 .

Fukuda T, Hashimoto H, Okayasu N, Kameyama A, Onogi H, Nakagawasai O, et al. Alpha1,6-fucosyltransferase-deficient mice exhibit multiple behavioral abnormalities associated with a schizophrenia-like phenotype: importance of the balance between the dopamine and serotonin systems. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:18434–43. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.172536 .

Lu X, Zhang D, Shoji H, Duan C, Zhang G, Isaji T, et al. Deficiency of α1,6-fucosyltransferase promotes neuroinflammation by increasing the sensitivity of glial cells to inflammatory mediators. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2019;1863:598–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2018.12.008 .

Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126:663–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 .

McKinney CE. Using induced pluripotent stem cells derived neurons to model brain diseases. Neural Regen Res. 2017;12:1062–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.211180 .

Heider J, Vogel S, Volkmer H, Breitmeyer R. Human iPSC-derived glia as a tool for neuropsychiatric research and drug development. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:10254. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910254 .

Page SC, Sripathy SR, Farinelli F, Ye Z, Wang Y, Hiler DJ, et al. Electrophysiological measures from human iPSC-derived neurons are associated with schizophrenia clinical status and predict individual cognitive performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119:e2109395119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109395119 .

Hribkova H, Svoboda O, Bartecku E, Zelinkova J, Horinkova J, Lacinova L, et al. Clozapine reverses dysfunction of glutamatergic neurons derived from clozapine-responsive schizophrenia patients. Front Cell Neurosci. 2022;16:830757. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2022.830757 .

Brennand KJ, Simone A, Jou J, Gelboin-Burkhart C, Tran N, Sangar S, et al. Modelling schizophrenia using human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2011;473:221–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09915 .

Hook V, Brennand KJ, Kim Y, Toneff T, Funkelstein L, Lee KC. Human iPSC neurons display activity-dependent neurotransmitter secretion: aberrant catecholamine levels in schizophrenia neurons. Stem Cell Rep. 2014;3:531–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.08.001 .

Zuccoli GS, Nascimento JM, Moraes-Vieira PM, Rehen SK, Martins-de-Souza D. Mitochondrial, cell cycle control and neuritogenesis alterations in an iPSC-based neurodevelopmental model for schizophrenia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-023-01605-x .

Tay SH, Winanto, Khong ZJ, Koh YH, Ng SY. Generation of cortical, dopaminergic, motor, and sensory neurons from human pluripotent stem cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2549:359–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/7651_2021_399 .

Ni P, Noh H, Park GH, Shao Z, Guan Y, Park JM, et al. iPSC-derived homogeneous populations of developing schizophrenia cortical interneurons have compromised mitochondrial function. Mol Psychiatry. 2020;25:3103–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0423-3 .

Kathuria A, Lopez-Lengowski K, Watmuff B, McPhie D, Cohen BM, Karmacharya R. Synaptic deficits in iPSC-derived cortical interneurons in schizophrenia are mediated by NLGN2 and rescued by N-acetylcysteine. Transl Psychiatry. 2019;9:321. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-019-0660-x .

Park JM, Liu D, Park GH, Noh H, Ni P, Yin C, et al. Migratory cortical interneuron-specific transcriptome abnormalities in schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res. 2021;137:111–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.02.054 .

Shao Z, Noh H, Bin Kim W, Ni P, Nguyen C, Cote SE, et al. Dysregulated protocadherin-pathway activity as an intrinsic defect in induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cortical interneurons from subjects with schizophrenia. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22:229–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0313-z .

Farrelly LA, Zheng S, Schrode N, Topol A, Bhanu NV, Bastle RM, et al. Chromatin profiling in human neurons reveals aberrant roles for histone acetylation and BET family proteins in schizophrenia. Nat Commun. 2022;13:2195. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29922-0 .

Nascimento JM, Saia-Cereda VM, Zuccoli GS, Reis-de-Oliveira G, Carregari VC, Smith BJ, et al. Proteomic signatures of schizophrenia-sourced iPSC-derived neural cells and brain organoids are similar to patients’ postmortem brains. Cell Biosci. 2022;12:189. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-022-00928-x .

Hoffman GE, Hartley BJ, Flaherty E, Ladran I, Gochman P, Ruderfer DM, et al. Transcriptional signatures of schizophrenia in hiPSC-derived NPCs and neurons are concordant with post-mortem adult brains. Nat Commun. 2017;8:2225. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02330-5 .

Lin M, Pedrosa E, Hrabovsky A, Chen J, Puliafito BR, Gilbert SR, et al. Integrative transcriptome network analysis of iPSC-derived neurons from schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder patients with 22q11.2 deletion. BMC Syst Biol. 2016;10:105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12918-016-0366-0 .

Li J, Ryan SK, Deboer E, Cook K, Fitzgerald S, Lachman HM, et al. Mitochondrial deficits in human iPSC-derived neurons from patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and schizophrenia. Transl Psychiatry. 2019;9:302. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-019-0643-y .

Kim NS, Wen Z, Liu J, Zhou Y, Guo Z, Xu C, et al. Pharmacological rescue in patient iPSC and mouse models with a rare DISC1 mutation. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1398. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21713-3 .

Kikuchi M, Nakazawa T, Kinoshita M, Yamamori H, Yasuda Y, Fujimoto M, et al. Methylation analysis in monozygotic twins with treatment-resistant schizophrenia and discordant responses to clozapine. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:734606. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.734606 .

Kathuria A, Lopez-Lengowski K, Roffman JL, Karmacharya R. Distinct effects of interleukin-6 and interferon-γ on differentiating human cortical neurons. Brain Behav Immun. 2022;103:97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2022.04.007 .

Guennewig B, Bitar M, Obiorah I, Hanks J, O’Brien EA, Kaczorowski DC, et al. THC exposure of human iPSC neurons impacts genes associated with neuropsychiatric disorders. Transl Psychiatry. 2018;8:89. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-018-0137-3 .

Trindade P, Nascimento JM, Casas BS, Monteverde T, Gasparotto J, Ribeiro CT, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived astrocytes from patients with schizophrenia exhibit an inflammatory phenotype that affects vascularization. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28:871–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01830-1 .

Koskuvi M, Lehtonen Š, Trontti K, Keuters M, Wu YC, Koivisto H, et al. Contribution of astrocytes to familial risk and clinical manifestation of schizophrenia. Glia. 2022;70:650–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.24131 .

Couch ACM, Solomon S, Duarte RRR, Marrocu A, Sun Y, Sichlinger L, et al. Acute IL-6 exposure triggers canonical IL6Ra signaling in hiPSC microglia, but not neural progenitor cells. Brain Behav Immun. 2023;110:43–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2023.02.007 .

Qian X, Song H, Ming GL. Brain organoids: advances, applications and challenges. Development. 2019;146:dev166074. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.166074 .

Trujillo CA, Muotri AR. Brain organoids and the study of neurodevelopment. Trends Mol Med. 2018;24:982–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2018.09.005 .

Trujillo CA, Gao R, Negraes PD, Gu J, Buchanan J, Preissl S, et al. Complex oscillatory waves emerging from cortical organoids model early human brain network development. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;25:558–69.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2019.08.002 .

Tan HY, Cho H, Lee LP. Human mini-brain models. Nat Biomed Eng. 2021;5:11–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-020-00643-3 .

Bagley JA, Reumann D, Bian S, Lévi-Strauss J, Knoblich JA. Fused cerebral organoids model interactions between brain regions. Nat Methods. 2017;14:743–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4304 .

Kathuria A, Lopez-Lengowski K, Jagtap SS, McPhie D, Perlis RH, Cohen BM, et al. Transcriptomic landscape and functional characterization of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cerebral organoids in schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020;77:745–54. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0196 .

Benson CA, Powell HR, Liput M, Dinham S, Freedman DA, Ignatowski TA, et al. Immune factor, TNFα, disrupts human brain organoid development similar to schizophrenia-schizophrenia increases developmental vulnerability to TNFα. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14:233. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2020.00233 .

Notaras M, Lodhi A, Dündar F, Collier P, Sayles NM, Tilgner H, et al. Schizophrenia is defined by cell-specific neuropathology and multiple neurodevelopmental mechanisms in patient-derived cerebral organoids. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;27:1416–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01316-6 .

Notaras M, Lodhi A, Fang H, Greening D, Colak D. The proteomic architecture of schizophrenia iPSC-derived cerebral organoids reveals alterations in GWAS and neuronal development factors. Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11:541. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01664-5 .

Bradshaw NJ, Hayashi MA. NDE1 and NDEL1 from genes to (mal)functions: parallel but distinct roles impacting on neurodevelopmental disorders and psychiatric illness. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017;74:1191–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-016-2395-7 .

Dal Mas C, Nani JV, Noto C, Yonamine CM, da Cunha GR, Mansur RB, et al. Ndel1NDEL1 oligopeptidase activity as a potential biomarker of early stages of schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2019;208:202–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2019.02.021 .

Gadelha A, Machado MF, Yonamine CM, Sato JR, Juliano MA, Oliveira V, et al. Plasma Ndel1NDEL1 enzyme activity is reduced in patients with schizophrenia—a potential biomarker? J Psychiatr Res. 2013;47:657–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.01.009 .

Ye F, Kang E, Yu C, Qian X, Jacob F, Yu C, et al. DISC1 regulates neurogenesis via modulating kinetochore attachment of Ndel1NDEL1/Nde1 during mitosis. Neuron. 2017;96:1041–-54.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.10.010 .

Papes F, Camargo AP, de Souza JS, Carvalho VMA, Szeto RA, LaMontagne E, et al. Transcription Factor 4 loss-of-function is associated with deficits in progenitor proliferation and cortical neuron content. Nat Commun. 2022;13:2387. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29942-w .

Goo BS, Mun DJ, Kim S, Nhung TTM, Lee SB, Woo Y, et al. Schizophrenia-associated mitotic arrest deficient-1 (MAD1) regulates the polarity of migrating neurons in the developing neocortex. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28:856–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01856-5 .

Robinson NB, Krieger K, Khan FM, Huffman W, Chang M, Naik A, et al. The current state of animal models in research: a review. Int J Surg. 2019;72:9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.015 .

Suo S, Ishiura S, Van Tol HH. Dopamine receptors in C. elegans . Eur J Pharmacol. 2004;500:159–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.07.021 .

Furukubo-Tokunaga K. Modeling schizophrenia in flies. Prog Brain Res. 2009;179:107–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17912-8 .

Beauchamp A, Yee Y, Darwin BC, Raznahan A, Mars RB, Lerch JP. Whole-brain comparison of rodent and human brains using spatial transcriptomics. Elife. 2022;11:e79418. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79418 .

Semple BD, Blomgren K, Gimlin K, Ferriero DM, Noble-Haeusslein LJ. Brain development in rodents and humans: Identifying benchmarks of maturation and vulnerability to injury across species. Prog Neurobiol. 2013;106-107:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.04.001 .

Nani JV, Rodríguez B, Cruz FC, Hayashi MAF. Animal models in psychiatric disorder studies. Animal models in medicine and biology. IntechOpen. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89034 .

Nagy S, Maurer GW, Hentze JL, Rose M, Werge TM, Rewitz K. AMPK signaling linked to the schizophrenia-associated 1q21.1 deletion is required for neuronal and sleep maintenance. PLoS Genet. 2018;14:e1007623. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007623 .

Mullin AP, Sadanandappa MK, Ma W, Dickman DK, VijayRaghavan K, Ramaswami M, et al. Gene dosage in the dysbindin schizophrenia susceptibility network differentially affect synaptic function and plasticity. J Neurosci. 2015;35:325–38. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3542-14.2015 .

Hidalgo S, Castro C, Zárate RV, Valderrama BP, Hodge JJL, Campusano JM. The behavioral and neurochemical characterization of a Drosophila dysbindin mutant supports the contribution of serotonin to schizophrenia negative symptoms. Neurochem Int. 2020;138:104753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2020.104753 .

Lu B, Shao L, Feng S, Wang T, Zhong Y. The β-alanyl-monoamine synthase ebony is regulated by schizophrenia susceptibility gene dysbindin in Drosophila. Sci China Life Sci. 2014;57:46–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-013-4595-9 .

Sawamura N, Ando T, Maruyama Y, Fujimuro M, Mochizuki H, Honjo K, et al. Nuclear DISC1 regulates CRE-mediated gene transcription and sleep homeostasis in the fruit fly. Mol Psychiatry. 2008;13:1138–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2008.101 .

Shao L, Lu B, Wen Z, Teng S, Wang L, Zhao Y, et al. Disrupted-in-Schizophrenia-1 (DISC1) protein disturbs neural function in multiple disease-risk pathways. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26:2634–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddx147 .

Ferguson L, Petty A, Rohrscheib C, Troup M, Kirszenblat L, Eyles DW, et al. Transient dysregulation of dopamine signaling in a developing drosophila arousal circuit permanently impairs behavioral responsiveness in adults. Front Psychiatry. 2017;8:22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00022 .

Moulin TC, Stojanovic T, Rajesh RP, Pareek T, Donzelli L, Williams MJ, et al. Effects of transient administration of the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 in drosophila melanogaster activity, sleep, and negative geotaxis. Biomedicines. 2023;11:192. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11010192 .

Navrotskaya V, Wnorowski A, Turski W, Oxenkrug G. Effect of kynurenic acid on pupae viability of drosophila melanogaster cinnabar and cardinal eye color mutants with altered tryptophan-kynurenine metabolism. Neurotox Res. 2018;34:324–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12640-018-9891-5 .

Christensen EL, Beasley A, Radchuk J, Mielko ZE, Preston E, Stuckett S, et al. ngn-1/neurogenin activates transcription of multiple terminal selector transcription factors in the Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system. G3. 2020;10:1949–62. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.120.401126 .

Chen SY, Huang PH, Cheng HJ. Disrupted-in-Schizophrenia 1-mediated axon guidance involves TRIO-RAC-PAK small GTPase pathway signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:5861–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018128108 .

Monte GG, Nani JV, de Almeida Campos MR, Dal Mas C, Marins LAN, Martins LG, et al. Impact of nuclear distribution element genes in the typical and atypical antipsychotics effects on nematode Caenorhabditis elegans : Putative animal model for studying the pathways correlated to schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019;92:19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.12.010 .

Pedrini M, Cao B, Nani JVS, Cerqueira RO, Mansur RB, Tasic L, et al. Advances and challenges in development of precision psychiatry through clinical metabolomics on mood and psychotic disorders. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019;93:182–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.03.010 .

Molina JD, Avila S, Rubio G, López-Muñoz F. Metabolomic connections between schizophrenia, antipsychotic drugs and metabolic syndrome: a variety of players. Curr Pharm Des. 2021;27:4049–61. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612827666210804110139 .

Rodríguez B, Nani JV, Almeida PGC, Brietzke E, Lee RS, Hayashi MAF. Neuropeptides and oligopeptidases in schizophrenia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020;108:679–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.024 .

Campeiro JD, Nani JV, Monte GG, Almeida PGC, Mori MA, Hayashi MAF. Regulation of monoamine levels by typical and atypical antipsychotics in Caenorhabditis elegans mutant for nuclear distribution element genes. Neurochem Int. 2021;147:105047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2021.105047 .

Karmacharya R, Lynn SK, Demarco S, Ortiz A, Wang X, Lundy MY, et al. Behavioral effects of clozapine: involvement of trace amine pathways in C. elegans and M. musculus . Brain Res. 2011;1393:91–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2011.04.010 .

Osuna-Luque J, Rodríguez-Ramos Á, Gámez-Del-Estal MDM, Ruiz-Rubio M. Behavioral mechanisms that depend on dopamine and serotonin in Caenorhabditis elegans interact with the antipsychotics risperidone and aripiprazole. J Exp Neurosci. 2018;12:1179069518798628. https://doi.org/10.1177/1179069518798628 .

Refai O, Blakely RD. Blockade and reversal of swimming-induced paralysis in C. elegans by the antipsychotic and D2-type dopamine receptor antagonist azaperone. Neurochem Int. 2019;123:59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2018.05.013 .

Maior RS, Nishijo H, Caixeta FV. Editorial: Non-human primate models of psychiatric disorders. Front Behav Neurosci. 2021;15:774064. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.774064 .

Fedigan LM. Ethical issues faced by field primatologists: asking the relevant questions. Am J Primatol. 2010;72:754–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20814 .

Campbell PD, Granato M. Zebrafish as a tool to study schizophrenia-associated copy number variants. Dis Model Mech. 2020;13:dmm043877. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.043877 .

Carlsson A, Lindqvist M. Effect of chlorpromazine or haloperidol on formation of 3methoxytyramine and normetanephrine in mouse brain. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol. 1963;20:140–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0773.1963.tb01730.x .

McCutcheon RA, Abi-Dargham A, Howes OD. Schizophrenia, dopamine and the striatum: from biology to symptoms. Trends Neurosci. 2019;42:205–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2018.12.004 .

Canetta S, Kellendonk C. Can we use mice to study schizophrenia? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018;373:20170032. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0032 .

Wang P, Li M, Zhao A, Ma J. Application of animal experimental models in the research of schizophrenia. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2021;186:209–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32863 .

Winship IR, Dursun SM, Baker GB, Balista PA, Kandratavicius L, Maia-de-Oliveira JP, et al. An overview of animal models related to schizophrenia. Can J Psychiatry. 2019;64:5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743718773728 .

Sato K. Why is prepulse inhibition disrupted in schizophrenia? Med Hypotheses. 2020;143:109901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109901 .

Nikiforuk A. Assessment of cognitive functions in animal models of schizophrenia. Pharmacol Rep. 2018;70:639–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharep.2018.01.009 .

Jones CA, Watson DJ, Fone KC. Animal models of schizophrenia. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164:1162–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01386.x .

van den Buuse M. Modeling the positive symptoms of schizophrenia in genetically modified mice: pharmacology and methodology aspects. Schizophr Bull. 2010;36:246–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbp132 .

Blot K, Bai J, Otani S. The effect of non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 on neuronal activity in rodent prefrontal cortex: an animal model for cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. J Physiol Paris. 2013;107:448–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2013.04.003 .

Cadinu D, Grayson B, Podda G, Harte MK, Doostdar N, Neill JC. NMDA receptor antagonist rodent models for cognition in schizophrenia and identification of novel drug treatments, an update. Neuropharmacology. 2018;142:41–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.11.045 .

Featherstone RE, Kapur S, Fletcher PJ. The amphetamine-induced sensitized state as a model of schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2007;31:1556–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.08.025 .

Weidenauer A, Bauer M, Sauerzopf U, Bartova L, Praschak-Rieder N, Sitte HH, et al. Making sense of: sensitization in schizophrenia. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016;20:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyw081 .

Peleg-Raibstein D, Knuesel I, Feldon J. Amphetamine sensitization in rats as an animal model of schizophrenia. Behav Brain Res. 2008;191:190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2008.03.037 .

Wearne TA, Mirzaei M, Franklin JL, Goodchild AK, Haynes PA, Cornish JL. Methamphetamine-induced sensitization is associated with alterations to the proteome of the prefrontal cortex: implications for the maintenance of psychotic disorders. J Proteome Res. 2015;14:397–410. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr500719f .

Abekawa T, Ito K, Nakagawa S, Nakato Y, Koyama T. Effects of aripiprazole and haloperidol on progression to schizophrenia-like behavioural abnormalities and apoptosis in rodents. Schizophr Res. 2011;125:77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2010.08.011 .

Herrera AS, Casanova JP, Gatica RI, Escobar F, Fuentealba JA. Clozapine pre-treatment has a protracted hypolocomotor effect on the induction and expression of amphetamine sensitization. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013;47:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.07.023 .

Almey A, Arena L, Oliel J, Shams WM, Hafez N, Mancinelli C, et al. Interactions between estradiol and haloperidol on perseveration and reversal learning in amphetamine-sensitized female rats. Horm Behav. 2017;89:113–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.12.010 .

Jaaro-Peled H. Gene models of schizophrenia: DISC1 mouse models. Prog Brain Res. 2009;179:75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17909-8 .

Nani JV, Fonseca MC, Engi SA, Perillo MG, Dias CS, Gazarini ML, et al. Decreased nuclear distribution nudE-like 1 enzyme activity in an animal model with dysfunctional disrupted-in-schizophrenia 1 signaling featuring aberrant neurodevelopment and amphetamine-supersensitivity. J Psychopharmacol. 2020;34:467–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881119897562 .

Nason MW Jr, Adhikari A, Bozinoski M, Gordon JA, Role LW. Disrupted activity in the hippocampal-accumbens circuit of type III neuregulin 1 mutant mice. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011;36:488–96. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2010.180 .

Schneider S, Götz K, Birchmeier C, Schwegler H, Roskoden T. Neuregulin-1 mutant mice indicate motor and sensory deficits, indeed few references for schizophrenia endophenotype model. Behav Brain Res. 2017;322:177–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.01.022 .

Tomiyama K, O’Tuathaigh CM, O’Sullivan GJ, Kinsella A, Lai D, Harvey RP, et al. Phenotype of spontaneous orofacial dyskinesia in neuregulin-1 ‘knockout’ mice. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2009;33:330–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.12.010 .

Benedetti A, Molent C, Barcik W, Papaleo F. Social behavior in 16p11.2 and 22q11.2 copy number variations: insights from mice and humans. Genes Brain Behav. 2022;21:e12787. https://doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12787 .

Stark KL, Xu B, Bagchi A, Lai WS, Liu H, Hsu R, et al. Altered brain microRNA biogenesis contributes to phenotypic deficits in a 22q11-deletion mouse model. Nat Genet. 2008;40:751–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.138 .

Horev G, Ellegood J, Lerch JP, Son YE, Muthuswamy L, Vogel H, et al. Dosage-dependent phenotypes in models of 16p11.2 lesions found in autism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:17076–81. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114042108 .

Kimber WL, Hsieh P, Hirotsune S, Yuva-Paylor L, Sutherland HF, Chen A, et al. Deletion of 150 kb in the minimal DiGeorge/velocardiofacial syndrome critical region in mouse. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8:2229–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/8.12.2229 .

Estes ML, McAllister AK. Maternal immune activation: implications for neuropsychiatric disorders. Science. 2016;353:772–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag3194 .

Haddad FL, Patel SV, Schmid S. Maternal immune activation by poly I:C as a preclinical model for neurodevelopmental disorders: a focus on autism and schizophrenia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020;113:546–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.04.012 .

Guerrin CGJ, Doorduin J, Sommer IE, de Vries EFJ. The dual hit hypothesis of schizophrenia: evidence from animal models. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;131:1150–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.10.025 .

Uzuneser TC, Speidel J, Kogias G, Wang AL, de Souza Silva MA, Huston JP, et al. Disrupted-in-schizophrenia 1 (DISC1) overexpression and juvenile immune activation cause sex-specific schizophrenia-related psychopathology in rats. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:222. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00222 .

Feigenson KA, Kusnecov AW, Silverstein SM. Inflammation and the two-hit hypothesis of schizophrenia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;38:72–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.11.006 .

Giovanoli S, Engler H, Engler A, Richetto J, Feldon J, Riva MA, et al. Preventive effects of minocycline in a neurodevelopmental two-hit model with relevance to schizophrenia. Transl Psychiatry. 2016;6:e772. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2016.38 .

Liu R, Meng X, Yu X, Wang G, Dong Z, Zhou Z, et al. From 2D to 3D co-culture systems: a review of co-culture models to study the neural cells interaction. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:13116. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113116 .

Dixon TA, Muotri AR. Advancing preclinical models of psychiatric disorders with human brain organoid cultures. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28:83–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01708-2 .

Mateos-Aparicio P, Bello SA, Rodríguez-Moreno A. Challenges in physiological phenotyping of hiPSC-derived neurons: from 2D cultures to 3D brain organoids. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:797. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00797 .

Ardhanareeswaran K, Mariani J, Coppola G, Abyzov A, Vaccarino FM. Human induced pluripotent stem cells for modelling neurodevelopmental disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13:265–78. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2017.45 .

Volpato V, Webber C. Addressing variability in iPSC-derived models of human disease: guidelines to promote reproducibility. Dis Model Mech. 2020;13:dmm042317. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.042317 .

Birey F, Andersen J, Makinson CD, Islam S, Wei W, Huber N, et al. Assembly of functionally integrated human forebrain spheroids. Nature. 2017;545:54–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22330 .

Pham MT, Pollock KM, Rose MD, Cary WA, Stewart HR, Zhou P, et al. Generation of human vascularized brain organoids. Neuroreport. 2018;29:588–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000001014 .

Sloan SA, Andersen J, Pașca AM, Birey F, Pașca SP. Generation and assembly of human brain region-specific three-dimensional cultures. Nat Protoc. 2018;13:2062–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0032-7 .

Jeziorski J, Brandt R, Evans JH, Campana W, Kalichman M, Thompson E, et al. Brain organoids, consciousness, ethics and moral status. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2023;144:97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.03.020 .

Dwyer DS. Crossing the worm-brain barrier by using Caenorhabditis elegans to explore fundamentals of human psychiatric illness. Mol Neuropsychiatry. 2018;3:170–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000485423 .

van Alphen B, van Swinderen B. Drosophila strategies to study psychiatric disorders. Brain Res Bull. 2013;92:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.09.007 .

Cannarozzi G, Schneider A, Gonnet G. A phylogenomic study of human, dog, and mouse. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007;3:e2. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030002 .

Forrest AD, Coto CA, Siegel SJ. Animal models of psychosis: current state and future directions. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. 2014;1:100–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40473-014-0013-2 .

Białoń M, Wąsik A. Advantages and limitations of animal schizophrenia models. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:5968. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23115968 .

Liang SG, Greenwood TA. The impact of clinical heterogeneity in schizophrenia on genomic analyses. Schizophr Res. 2015;161:490–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2014.11.019 .

Chandra A, Miller BJ, Goldsmith DR. Predictors of successful anti-inflammatory drug trials in patients with schizophrenia: a meta-regression and critical commentary. Brain Behav Immun. 2023;114:154–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2023.08.001 .

Khandaker GM, Cousins L, Deakin J, Lennox BR, Yolken R, Jones PB. Inflammation and immunity in schizophrenia: implications for pathophysiology and treatment. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2:258–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00122-9 .

Borbély E, Scheich B, Helyes Z. Neuropeptides in learning and memory. Neuropeptides. 2013;47:439–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npep.2013.10.012 .

Perez-Bonilla P, Santiago-Colon K, Leinninger GM. Lateral hypothalamic area neuropeptides modulate ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons and feeding. Physiol Behav. 2020;223:112986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.112986 .

Griebel G. Neuropeptide receptor ligands for the treatment of schizophrenia: focus on neurotensin and tachykinins. Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21:3807–12. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612821666150605105859 .

LaCrosse AL, Olive MF. Neuropeptide systems and schizophrenia. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2013;12:619–32. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871527311312050010 .

Harrow M, Jobe TH, Tong L. Long-term effectiveness of antipsychotics. Psychol Med. 2023;53:1129–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721001732 .

Telias M. Neural differentiation protocols: how to choose the correct approach. Neural Regen Res. 2023;18:1273–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.360171 .

Martino M, Magioncalda P. A three-dimensional model of neural activity and phenomenal-behavioral patterns. Mol Psychiatry. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-023-02356-w .

Howes OD, Onwordi EC. The synaptic hypothesis of schizophrenia version III: a master mechanism. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28:1843–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-023-02043-w .

Ye H, Fussenegger M. Optogenetic Medicine: Synthetic Therapeutic Solutions Precision-Guided by Light. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2019;9:a034371. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a034371 .

Qiao C, Li D, Guo Y, Liu C, Jiang T, Dai Q, et al. Evaluation and development of deep neural networks for image super-resolution in optical microscopy. Nat Methods. 2021;18:194–202. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-01048-5 .

Lopez-Lengowski K, Kathuria A, Gerlovin K, Karmacharya R. Co-culturing microglia and cortical neurons differentiated from human induced pluripotent stem cells. J Vis Exp. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3791/62480 .

Tan SY, Feng X, Cheng LKW, Wu AR. Vascularized human brain organoid on-chip. Lab Chip. 2023;23:2693–709. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2lc01109c .

Cheng C, Chen W, Jin H, Chen X. A Review of Single-Cell RNA-Seq Annotation, Integration, and Cell-Cell Communication. Cells. 2023;12:1970. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12151970 .

Wu Y, Zhang CY, Wang L, Li Y, Xiao X. Genetic insights of schizophrenia via single cell RNA-sequencing analyses. Schizophr Bull. 2023;49:914–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbad002 .

Chilla GS, Yeow LY, Chew QH, Sim K, Prakash KNB. Machine learning classification of schizophrenia patients and healthy controls using diverse neuroanatomical markers and Ensemble methods. Sci Rep. 2022;12:2755. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06651-4 .

Santos Febles E, Ontivero Ortega M, Valdés Sosa M, Sahli H. Machine Learning Techniques for the Diagnosis of Schizophrenia Based on Event-Related Potentials. Front Neuroinform. 2022;16:893788. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2022.893788 .

Montazeri M, Montazeri M, Bahaadinbeigy K, Montazeri M, Afraz A. Application of machine learning methods in predicting schizophrenia and bipolar disorders: a systematic review. Health Sci Rep. 2022;6:e962. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.962 .

Hauser TU, Skvortsova V, De Choudhury M, Koutsouleris N. The promise of a model-based psychiatry: building computational models of mental ill health. Lancet Digit Health. 2022;4:e816–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00152-2 .

Lally J, Watkins R, Nash S, Shetty H, Gardner-Sood P, Smith S, et al. The representativeness of participants with severe mental illness in a psychosocial clinical trial. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:654. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00654 .

Huxley P, Krayer A, Poole R, Prendergast L, Aryal S, Warner R. Schizophrenia outcomes in the 21st century: a systematic review. Brain Behav. 2021;11:e02172. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2172 .

Levy N. The use of animal as models: ethical considerations. Int J Stroke. 2012;7:440–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00772.x .

Qureshi MNI, Oh J, Cho D, Jo HJ, Lee B. Multimodal discrimination of schizophrenia using hybrid weighted feature concatenation of brain functional connectivity and anatomical features with an extreme learning machine. Front Neuroinform. 2017;11:59. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2017.00059 .

Download references

Acknowledgements

All figures were created with BioRender.com. We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive and helpful comments, which have significantly improved the quality and clarity of our manuscript.

This work was supported by FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo) [Nos. 2022/00527-8; 2020/01107-7; 2019/13112-8; 2019/08287-3; 2017/02413-1; 2014/50891-1 (INCT 2014 - TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE)], CAPES and CNPq. MAFH is also a recipient of a fellowship from CNPq [39337/2016-0]. JVN is recipient of a Fellowship from FAPESP Nos. 2022/03297-3 and 2019/09207-3).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Pharmacology, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil

João V. Nani & Mirian A. F. Hayashi

National Institute for Translational Medicine (INCT-TM, CNPq/FAPESP/CAPES), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil

Department of Pediatrics and Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA

Alysson R. Muotri

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

JVN was responsible for the literature review, writing, and figure preparation. JVN, MAFH, and ARM contributed equally to the conceptualization, editing, and revision of the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to João V. Nani or Mirian A. F. Hayashi .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

ARM is a co-founder and has an equity interest in TISMOO, a company dedicated to genetic analysis and human brain organogenesis, focusing on therapeutic applications customized for autism spectrum disorders and other neurological disorders origin genetics. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by the University of California, San Diego, following its conflict-of-interest policies.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Nani, J.V., Muotri, A.R. & Hayashi, M.A.F. Peering into the mind: unraveling schizophrenia’s secrets using models. Mol Psychiatry (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-024-02728-w

Download citation

Received : 23 August 2023

Revised : 21 August 2024

Accepted : 27 August 2024

Published : 08 September 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-024-02728-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

INTEGRATING THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) TO PROMOTE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY: THE EFFECTS ON LIFESTYLE AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. A LITERATURE REVIEW INTEGRAZIONE DELL'USO DELL'INTELLIGENZA ARTIFICIALE (AI) PER PROMUOVERE L'ATTIVITÀ FISICA: GLI EFFETTI SULLO STILE DI VITA E SUL RENDIMENTO ACCADEMICO DEGLI STUDENTI UNIVERSITARI. UNA REVISIONE DELLA LETTERATURA

• Università degli studi di Foggia

• This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations

• Kelly Jean Thomas Craig

• BMC MED INFORM DECIS

• J MED INTERNET RES

• Xiaoling Xiang
• Xiaoling Zhan

• Han Joo Chae
• Ji Been Kim
• Gwanmo Park
• Jung Jun Park
• Adham El Sherbini

• Philip J Clare
• HEALTH EDUC BEHAV

• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up