Full-Time
Yes | Yes, if PI or Co-PI | Professional Staff Full-Time With PI Status | Yes | Yes |
- Applicants must hold an eligible rank that is active in Workday at the time of submission.
- Proposals from senior faculty are funded only when they a) support a genuinely new direction in the applicant’s research and/or career development, b) provide a unique opportunity (competing for subsequent one-time or infrequently-offered funding, undertaking research that is inherently time-sensitive/time-limited), or c) originate in a discipline for which external funding opportunities are minimal.
- If a UW faculty member holds an eligible rank but is based at another institution (e.g. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center), all of their extramural grants must be run through the UW in order to be eligible for an RRF award.
Role | | |
Faculty with any of the following appointments: non-professorial, part-time, temporary, acting, clinical (annual term), affiliate, visiting | No | No |
Professional Staff Without PI Status or Part-Time | No | Yes |
Postdoctoral Scholars | No | Yes |
Graduate Students | No | Yes |
- Those with postdoctoral appointments are ineligible to serve as PI or Co-PI but may be included in the budget for the project team.
- This fund does not support independent research projects undertaken by graduate students or postdoctoral scholars.
Duplication: A PI or Co-PI may submit one proposal per round. Our policy precludes PIs and Co-PIs from having multiple funded proposals within the same period. There are no restrictions on participating faculty or staff who are not PIs or Co-PIs.
Matching: The RRF may not be proposed as matching funds for another grant. (See the Office of Research Matching Funds Request page for information and to make a request.)
Overlap: Applications can be made for external support of the same project, but an RRF award will not be given if an external award has been made. Support will not be provided merely to supplement or extend an ongoing funded research project.
Startup or Bridge Funding: The RRF is not intended to provide or supplement start-up funds for new faculty. RRF awards are not intended to serve as bridge funding when external sources of research support have been lost. The University program that supports faculty bridge funds is the Bridge Funding Program . Acceptance of an RRF award of $30,000 or more will make an individual ineligible for a Bridge Fund award. Applicants who apply to both programs simultaneously may receive one or the other award. If an individual holds a Bridge Fund award and subsequently accepts an RRF award of $30,000 or more, any remaining Bridge Fund monies must be returned.
2 Year Waiting Period: If you have already received an RRF award, you may apply again two years after the previous RRF award was formally terminated and the final report received.
For Applicants
- Application Instructions
- Eligibility & Guidelines
- SAGE for RRF Applications
For Awardees
- List of Awardees
- Post-Award Instructions
- Scholar Budget Instructions
Peer-Review Committees
- Current Committee Members
- Committee Pages (*restricted)
Contact Info for Royalty Research Fund
New applicants:.
Peter A. Wilsnack Administrative Specialist 206.685.9316
Existing Awardees:
Karen H. Luetjen Manager of Internal Research Funding 206.616.9089
Program Chair:
Patricia Kramer Professor of Anthropology 206.616.2449
University of Washington Office of Research
Or support offices.
- Human Subjects Division (HSD)
- Office of Animal Welfare (OAW)
- Office of Research (OR)
- Office of Research Information Services (ORIS)
- Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP)
OR Research Units
- Applied Physics Laboratory (APL-UW)
- WA National Primate Research Center (WaNPRC)
Research Partner Offices
- Corporate and Foundation Relations (CFR)
- Enivronmental Health and Safety (EH&S)
- Grant and Contract Accounting (GCA)
- Institute of Translational Health Sciences (ITHS)
- Management Accounting and Analysis (MAA)
- Post Award Fiscal Compliance (PAFC)
Collaboration
- Centers and Institutes
- Collaborative Proposal Development Resources
- Research Fact Sheet
- Research Annual Report
- Stats and Rankings
- Honors and Awards
- Office of Research
© 2024 University of Washington | Seattle, WA
![](//serviteca.online/777/templates/cheerup2/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Simple hypothesis. A simple hypothesis is a statement made to reflect the relation between exactly two variables. One independent and one dependent. Consider the example, "Smoking is a prominent cause of lung cancer." The dependent variable, lung cancer, is dependent on the independent variable, smoking. 4.
A research hypothesis (or scientific hypothesis) is a statement about an expected relationship between variables, or explanation of an occurrence, that is clear, specific and testable. ... At a simple level, the null hypothesis is the counter-proposal to the original hypothesis. For example, if the hypothesis predicts that there is a ...
6. Write a null hypothesis. If your research involves statistical hypothesis testing, you will also have to write a null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the default position that there is no association between the variables. The null hypothesis is written as H 0, while the alternative hypothesis is H 1 or H a.
A research hypothesis is a statement that proposes a possible explanation for an observable phenomenon or pattern. It guides the direction of a study and predicts the outcome of the investigation. A research hypothesis is testable, i.e., it can be supported or disproven through experimentation or observation. Characteristics of a good hypothesis
A hypothesis is a tentative statement about the relationship between two or more variables. It is a specific, testable prediction about what you expect to happen in a study. It is a preliminary answer to your question that helps guide the research process. Consider a study designed to examine the relationship between sleep deprivation and test ...
A hypothesis is a testable statement that predicts the relationship between variables in your research. Clarity and precision are crucial for a strong hypothesis, ensuring that it is understandable and specific. A good hypothesis must be testable and falsifiable, meaning it can be supported or refuted through experimentation or observation.
A research hypothesis is your proposed answer to your research question. The research hypothesis usually includes an explanation ('x affects y because …'). A statistical hypothesis, on the other hand, is a mathematical statement about a population parameter. Statistical hypotheses always come in pairs: the null and alternative hypotheses.
A research hypothesis is more specific than a general hypothesis. It is an educated, expected prediction of the outcome of a study that is testable. What makes an effective research hypothesis? A good research hypothesis is a clear statement of the relationship between a dependent variable(s) and independent variable(s) relevant to the study ...
A research hypothesis, in its plural form "hypotheses," is a specific, testable prediction about the anticipated results of a study, established at its outset. It is a key component of the scientific method. Hypotheses connect theory to data and guide the research process towards expanding scientific understanding.
A hypothesis (from the Greek, foundation) is a logical construct, interposed between a problem and its solution, which represents a proposed answer to a research question. It gives direction to the investigator's thinking about the problem and, therefore, facilitates a solution. Unlike facts and assumptions (presumed true and, therefore, not ...
The steps to write a research hypothesis are: 1. Stating the problem: Ensure that the hypothesis defines the research problem. 2. Writing a hypothesis as an 'if-then' statement: Include the action and the expected outcome of your study by following a 'if-then' structure.
An effective hypothesis in research is clearly and concisely written, and any terms or definitions clarified and defined. Specific language must also be used to avoid any generalities or assumptions. Use the following points as a checklist to evaluate the effectiveness of your research hypothesis: Predicts the relationship and outcome.
Definition: Hypothesis is an educated guess or proposed explanation for a phenomenon, based on some initial observations or data. It is a tentative statement that can be tested and potentially proven or disproven through further investigation and experimentation. Hypothesis is often used in scientific research to guide the design of experiments ...
What is a research proposal? Simply put, a research proposal is a structured, formal document that explains what you plan to research (your research topic), why it's worth researching (your justification), and how you plan to investigate it (your methodology).. The purpose of the research proposal (its job, so to speak) is to convince your research supervisor, committee or university that ...
Step 8: Test your Hypothesis. Design an experiment or conduct observations to test your hypothesis. Example: Grow three sets of plants: one set exposed to 2 hours of sunlight daily, another exposed to 4 hours, and a third exposed to 8 hours. Measure and compare their growth after a set period.
Identifying Research Questions. The first step in formulating a hypothesis is to identify the research questions you aim to answer. These questions should be specific and focused, guiding your investigation. A well-defined research question sets the stage for a clear and testable hypothesis. Consider what you want to discover and why it matters ...
Essentially, a hypothesis is a tentative statement that predicts the relationship between two or more variables in a research study. It is usually derived from a theoretical framework or previous ...
Hypotheses. A hypothesis (plural hypotheses) is a precise, testable statement of what the researchers predict will be the outcome of the study. This usually involves proposing a possible relationship between two variables: the independent variable (what the researcher changes) and the dependant variable (what the research measures).
INTRODUCTION. Scientific research is usually initiated by posing evidenced-based research questions which are then explicitly restated as hypotheses.1,2 The hypotheses provide directions to guide the study, solutions, explanations, and expected results.3,4 Both research questions and hypotheses are essentially formulated based on conventional theories and real-world processes, which allow the ...
Your hypothesis is what you propose to "prove" by your research. As a result of your research, you will arrive at a conclusion, a theory, or understanding that will be useful or applicable beyond the research itself. 3. Avoid judgmental words in your hypothesis. Value judgments are subjective and are not appropriate for a hypothesis.
A research design is a strategy for answering your research question using empirical data. Creating a research design means making decisions about: Your overall research objectives and approach. Whether you'll rely on primary research or secondary research. Your sampling methods or criteria for selecting subjects. Your data collection methods.
In the history of scientific research, there are abundant examples of well-defined questions, development of theories, generation of hypotheses, and instruction of experimental design to test the hypothesis. We can learn scientific method from them, write a well-formed hypothesis in our research proposal, and make a good study design to test it.
Research studies have a research question, research hypothesis, and one or more research objectives. A research question is what a study aims to answer, and a research hypothesis is a predictive statement about the relationship between two or more variables, which the study sets out to prove or disprove.
A research proposal is a highly structured document that describes your study's topic and explains how you plan to investigate a specific inquiry. It typically provides an in-depth analysis of the theories that support your hypothesis, which is a projected answer to this inquiry.
Research Question: How do childhood adverse experiences (ACEs) predict the severity of suicidal ideation (SI) in adolescents, and to what extent is this relationship moderated by family ... Hypothesis 1b: Subcategories of ACEs will correspond with SI severity in adolescents, such that those adolescents with a history of each ACE ...
The US government just hired a researcher who thinks we can beat aging with fresh cloned bodies and brain updates. A US agency pursuing moonshot health breakthroughs has hired a researcher ...
Applicants must hold an eligible rank that is active in Workday at the time of submission. Proposals from senior faculty are funded only when they a) support a genuinely new direction in the applicant's research and/or career development, b) provide a unique opportunity (competing for subsequent one-time or infrequently-offered funding, undertaking research that is inherently time-sensitive ...