- Analysis section writing
- Formatting lessons
- Thesis in a few days
- Conclusion templates
- 3rd grade papers
- Psychology paper
- Gun control paper
How To Write An Analysis Section Of An Academic Paper
The analysis section of an academic essay is extremely important. In this section, you main thoughts and ideas will come out in regards to the research that you have conducted for your work. In this article, we will discuss how to properly write an analysis section that ensures that your work receives much praise amongst your fellow academics.
17% OFF on your first order Type the code 17TUDENT
Academic Essays
Before we get onto the analysis section, we must take a quick look at academic papers. Academic papers are unlike any other types of essays you may have come across during college. For science students, they come across as a particular shock since they do not have much essay writing experience during college. Nevertheless, it is not impossible to become acquainted with the structure of an academic essay, and to write one to a high standard even if you have little essay writing experience.
To truly understand the analysis section of an academic paper, we must see the role it plays in your writing. As you probably already know, the structure of an academic piece of writing is as follows:
- Introduction: the introduction of your paper should tell the reader what they will be reading about during the course of your writing. You will also make your thesis statement in the introduction.
- Literature Review: In the literature review, you go through the previous research that has been conducted on the topic you are writing about.
- Methodology: The methodology discusses and analyzes the methods you will undertake for your paper.
- Results: The results section tells the reader the results of your research.
- Analysis: This is the section that we are concerned with. Here, you will analyze the results of the previous part of your paper.
- Conclusion: The conclusion should provide the reader with a summary of your results and analysis, telling the reader the overall result as well as whether or not your thesis statement has been met as a result of your research.
Once you know the structure of an academic essay, we can move on to discussing the analysis part of the paper.
As can be seen above, the analysis section of an academic essay is concerned with analyzing the results you have achieved through your research. The analysis should aim to answer questions such as:
- What do these results show?
- What are the possible consequences of these results?
- Has my thesis statement been satisfied by my research? If not, why not?
- How could these results be different if the methodology was adjusted?
The main purpose of the analysis is to see whether or not the thesis statement you made in your introduction has been satisfied. The pivotal part of your essay is the thesis statement, and so it is worth analyzing this in depth to ensure a high mark for your work.
As you can see, many students have a lot of misconceptions about the analysis part of an academic paper. However, by utilizing our guide, you can compose a high quality analysis section that will bring you a lot of success.
Recent posts
- College term papers
- Research paper writing
- MLA paper samples
- Writing jobs from home
Homework planning
One of the first things to do before you start doing your assignment is set up a detailed plan. Deadlines are essential if you want to get the best grades.
- Stats homework help
© weworkbettertogether.org. All rights reserved.
Research Paper Writing: 6. Results / Analysis
- 1. Getting Started
- 2. Abstract
- 3. Introduction
- 4. Literature Review
- 5. Methods / Materials
- 6. Results / Analysis
- 7. Discussion
- 8. Conclusion
- 9. Reference
Writing about the information
There are two sections of a research paper depending on what style is being written. The sections are usually straightforward commentary of exactly what the writer observed and found during the actual research. It is important to include only the important findings, and avoid too much information that can bury the exact meaning of the context.
The results section should aim to narrate the findings without trying to interpret or evaluate, and also provide a direction to the discussion section of the research paper. The results are reported and reveals the analysis. The analysis section is where the writer describes what was done with the data found. In order to write the analysis section it is important to know what the analysis consisted of, but does not mean data is needed. The analysis should already be performed to write the results section.
Written explanations
How should the analysis section be written?
- Should be a paragraph within the research paper
- Consider all the requirements (spacing, margins, and font)
- Should be the writer’s own explanation of the chosen problem
- Thorough evaluation of work
- Description of the weak and strong points
- Discussion of the effect and impact
- Includes criticism
How should the results section be written?
- Show the most relevant information in graphs, figures, and tables
- Include data that may be in the form of pictures, artifacts, notes, and interviews
- Clarify unclear points
- Present results with a short discussion explaining them at the end
- Include the negative results
- Provide stability, accuracy, and value
How the style is presented
Analysis section
- Includes a justification of the methods used
- Technical explanation
Results section
- Purely descriptive
- Easily explained for the targeted audience
- Data driven
Example of a Results Section
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association Sixth Ed. 2010
- << Previous: 5. Methods / Materials
- Next: 7. Discussion >>
- Last Updated: Nov 7, 2023 7:37 AM
- URL: https://wiu.libguides.com/researchpaperwriting
Apr 26, 2024
Everything You Need to Know about the Parts of a Research Paper
Not sure where to start with your research paper or how all the parts fit together? Don't worry! From crafting a compelling title page to compiling your references, we'll demystify each section of a research paper.
Learn how to write an attention-grabbing abstract, construct a powerful introduction, and confidently present your results and discussion. With this guide, you'll gain the tools to assemble a polished and impactful piece of work.
What Are Research Papers?
A research paper is a piece of academic writing that presents an original argument or analysis based on independent, in-depth investigation into a specific topic.
Key Characteristics:
Evidence-Driven: Research papers rely on data, analysis, and interpretation of credible sources.
Focused Argument: They develop a clear thesis that is defended with logical reasoning and evidence.
Structured: Research papers follow specific organizational formats and citation styles.
Contribution to Knowledge: They aim to add something new to the existing body of knowledge within a field.
Types of Research Papers
Research papers come in various forms across academic disciplines:
Argumentative Papers : Present a compelling claim and utilize evidence to persuade readers.
Analytical Papers : Break down complex subjects, ideas, or texts, examining their components and implications.
Empirical Studies: Involve collecting and analyzing original data (through experiments, surveys, etc.) to answer specific research questions.
Literature Reviews: Synthesize existing research on a topic, highlighting key findings, debates, and areas for future exploration.
And More! Depending on the field, you may encounter case studies, reports, theoretical proposals, etc.
Defining Research Papers
Here's how research papers stand apart from other forms of writing:
Originality vs. Summary: While essays might recap existing knowledge, research papers offer new insights, arguments, or data.
Depth of Inquiry: Research papers delve deeper, going beyond basic definitions or summaries into a systematic investigation.
Scholarly Audience: Research papers are often written with a specialized academic audience in mind, employing discipline-specific language and conventions.
Important Note: The specific requirements of research papers can vary depending on the subject area, level of study (undergraduate vs. graduate), and the instructor's instructions.
Importance of Research Paper Structure
Think of structure as the backbone of your research paper. Here's why it matters for academic success:
Clarity for the Reader: A logical structure guides the reader through your research journey. They understand your thought process, easily follow your arguments, and grasp the significance of your findings.
Author's Roadmap: Structure serves as your blueprint. It helps you maintain focus, ensures you address all essential elements, and prevents you from veering off-topic.
Enhanced Persuasion: A well-structured paper builds a convincing case. Your ideas flow logically, evidence supports your claims, and your conclusion feels grounded and impactful.
Demonstration of Competence: A clear structure signals to your instructor or peers that you have a thorough understanding of research practices and scholarly writing conventions.
Is a Structured Approach Critical for the Success of Research Papers?
Yes! It's difficult to overstate the importance of structure. Here's why:
Lost in Chaos: Rambling or disorganized papers leave the reader confused and frustrated. Even the most insightful findings risk being overlooked if presented poorly.
Missed Components: Without structure, you might forget to include critical aspects, like a clear methodology section or a thorough literature review, weakening your research.
Hindered Peer Review: Reviewers rely on a standard structure to quickly assess the research's merits. A deviation can make their job harder and might negatively affect how your work is evaluated.
Benefits of a Clear Structure
Enhanced Understanding: Readers can easily follow your chain of reasoning, grasp the connection between your evidence and claims, and critically evaluate your findings.
Efficient Peer Review: A standard structure makes peer review more efficient and focused. Reviewers can easily identify strong points, areas for improvement, and contributions to the field.
Streamlined Writing: Having a structure offers clarity and direction, preventing you from getting stuck mid-flow or overlooking important elements.
Variations of Research Papers
Here's a breakdown of some common types of research papers:
Analytical Papers
Focus: Dissect a complex subject, text, or phenomenon to understand its parts, implications, or underlying meanings.
Structure: Emphasizes a clear thesis statement, systematic analysis, and in-depth exploration of different perspectives.
Example: Examining the symbolism in a literary work or analyzing the economic impact of a policy change.
Argumentative Papers
Focus: Present and defend a specific claim using evidence and logical reasoning.
Structure: Emphasizes a well-defined thesis, persuasive examples, and the anticipation and refutation of counterarguments.
Example: Arguing for the superiority of a particular scientific theory or advocating for a specific social policy.
Experimental Studies (Empirical Research)
Focus: Collect and analyze original data through a designed experiment or methodology.
Structure: Follows scientific practices, including hypothesis, methods, results, discussion, and acknowledgment of limitations.
Example: Measuring the effects of a new drug or conducting psychological experiments on behavior patterns.
Survey-Based Research
Focus: Gather information from a sample population through surveys, questionnaires, or interviews.
Structure: Emphasizes sampling methods, data collection tools, statistical analysis, and cautious interpretation of results.
Example: Investigating public opinion on a political issue or studying consumer preferences for a product.
Do All Research Papers Fit Into Standard Categories?
No. Research is fluid and dynamic. Here's why categorization can get tricky:
Hybrids Exist: Many papers mix elements. An analytical paper might also incorporate arguments to strengthen its interpretation, or an experimental paper might include a review of existing literature to contextualize its findings.
Disciplinary Differences: Fields have specific conventions. A research paper in history differs vastly in style and structure from one in biology.
Innovation: Researchers sometimes develop new structures or methodologies best suited to their unique research questions.
Comparing Research Paper Types
Each type prioritizes different aspects of the research process:
An abstract is like a snapshot of your entire paper, providing a brief but informative overview of your research. It's often the first (and sometimes the only) section readers will engage with.
Key Functions: An effective abstract should:
Briefly state the research problem or topic
Outline your methods (briefly)
Summarize the main findings or results
Highlight the significance or implications of your work
Writing a Compelling Abstract
Here are some guidelines to make your abstract shine:
Concise and Clear: Aim for around 150-250 words. Use direct language and avoid unnecessary jargon.
Structured Approach: Even in its brevity, follow a logical flow (problem, methods, results, significance).
Keywords: Include keywords that accurately describe your research, aiding in discoverability within databases.
Self-Contained: The abstract should make sense on its own, without needing the reader to have read the full paper.
Engaging: While focused, pique the reader's interest and make them want to explore your research further.
Write it Last: Often, it's easiest to write your abstract once the rest of your paper is complete, as you can then distill the most essential elements.
Get Feedback: Ask a peer or instructor to read your abstract to ensure it's clear and accurately represents your research.
Introduction
Think of your introduction as the welcome mat for your research. Here's what it should accomplish:
Establish Context: Provide background information relevant to your specific research question. Orient the reader to the broader field or current debates surrounding the topic.
Define the Problem: Clearly outline the gap in knowledge, issue, or question your research aims to address.
State the Hypothesis: Concisely declare your research hypothesis or thesis statement – the central claim you aim to prove.
Significance: Briefly explain why your research matters. What potential contributions or implications does it hold?
Is the Introduction More Important Than Other Sections?
No. While the introduction plays a big role in initially capturing your reader's attention and setting the stage, it is just one piece of the puzzle. Here's why all sections matter:
Methodology Matters: A sound methodology section is essential for establishing the credibility of your findings. Readers need to trust your process.
Results are Key: The results section presents your hard-earned data. Without it, your research doesn't have a foundation to support your claims.
Discussion is Vital: Here's where you interpret your results, connect them back to your hypothesis, and explore the broader implications of your work.
Conclusion is the Culmination: Your conclusion reinforces your key findings, acknowledges limitations, and leaves the reader with a lasting understanding of your research contribution.
Engaging Your Audience Early
Here are some strategies to capture attention from the start:
Open with a Question: Pose a thought-provoking question directly related to your research.
Surprising Statistic: Share a relevant and eye-opening statistic that highlights the significance of your topic.
Brief anecdote: An illustrative anecdote or a vivid example can provide a compelling hook.
Challenge Assumptions: Question a common belief or assumption within your field to signal that your research offers fresh insights.
Tip: Your opening should be relevant and directly connected to your research topic. Avoid gimmicks that don't authentically lead into your core argument.
Literature Review
A literature review goes beyond simply listing past studies on a topic. It synthesizes existing knowledge, laying the foundation for your own research contribution.
Goals of a Strong Literature Review:
Demonstrate your understanding of the field and its key scholarly conversations.
Identify gaps in current knowledge that your research can address.
Position your research in relation to existing work, showing how it builds upon or challenges previous findings.
Provide theoretical context or support for your chosen methodological approach.
Synthesizing Relevant Studies
Don't just summarize – analyze! Here's how to engage with the literature critically:
Identify Trends: Look for patterns or themes across multiple studies. Are there consistent results or ongoing debates?
Note Inconsistencies: Highlight any contradictions or conflicting findings within the existing research.
Assess Methodology: Consider the strengths and limitations of different research methods used in prior studies. Can you improve upon them in your research?
Connections to Your Work: Show how each source directly relates to your research question. Explain how it supports, challenges, or informs your own study.
Tips for Effective Synthesis:
Organization is Key: Structure your literature review thematically or chronologically to present findings in a logical way.
Your Voice Matters: Avoid stringing together quotes. Analyze the literature and offer your own interpretation of the collective insights.
Cite Accurately: Follow the citation style required by your discipline to give credit and avoid plagiarism.
Methodology
Your methodology section details the step-by-step process of how you conducted your research. It allows others to understand and potentially replicate your study.
Components: A methodology section typically includes:
Research Design: The overall approach (experimental, survey-based, qualitative, etc.)
Data Collection: Description of the tools, procedures, and sources used (experiments, surveys, interviews, archival documents).
Sample Selection: Details on participants (if applicable) and how they were chosen.
Data Analysis: Methods used (statistical tests, qualitative analysis techniques).
Ethical considerations: Explain how you safeguarded participants or addressed any ethical concerns related to your research.
Designing a Robust Methodology
Here's how to make your methodology section shine:
Alignment with Research Question: Your methods should be directly chosen to answer your research question in the most effective and appropriate way.
Rigor: Demonstrate a meticulous approach, considering potential sources of bias or error and outlining steps taken to mitigate them.
Transparency: Provide enough detail for replication. Another researcher should be able to follow your method.
Justification: Explain why you chose specific methods. Connect them to established practices within your field or defend their suitability for your unique research.
Does Methodology Determine the Quality of Research Outcomes?
Absolutely! Here's why a robust methodology is important:
Reliability: A sound methodology ensures your results are consistent. If your study was repeated using your methods, similar results should be attainable.
Validity: Validity ensures you're measuring what you intend to. A strong methodology helps you draw accurate conclusions from your data that address your research question.
Credibility: Your paper will be evaluated based on the thoroughness of your procedures. A clear and rigorous methodology enhances trust in your findings.
Your results section is where you present the data collected from your research. This includes raw data, statistical analyses, summaries of observations, etc.
Key Considerations:
Clarity: Organize results logically. Use tables, graphs, or figures to enhance visual clarity when appropriate.
Objectivity: Present data without bias. Even if findings don't support your initial hypothesis, report them accurately.
Don't Interpret (Yet): Avoid discussing implications here. Focus on a clear presentation of your findings.
Interpreting Data Effectively
Your discussion or analysis section is where you make sense of your results. Here's how to ensure your interpretation is persuasive:
Connect Back to the Hypothesis: State whether your results support, refute, or partially support your hypothesis.
Use Evidence: Reference specific data points, statistics, or observations to back up your claims.
Explanatory Power: Don't merely describe what happened. Explain why you believe your data led to these results.
Context is Key: Relate your findings to the existing literature. Do they align with previous research, or do they raise new questions?
Be Transparent: Acknowledge any limitations of your data or unexpected findings, providing potential explanations.
Tips for Effective Data Discussion:
Visuals as Support: Continue using graphs or figures to illustrate trends or comparisons that reinforce your analysis.
Highlight What Matters: Don't over-discuss insignificant data points. Focus on the results that are most relevant to your research question and contribute to your overall argument.
Tell a Story: Data shouldn't feel disjointed. Weave it into a narrative that addresses your research problem and positions your findings within the broader field.
Your discussion section elevates your findings, moving from simply reporting what you discovered to exploring its significance and potential impact.
Interpret the results in relation to your research question and hypothesis.
Consider alternative explanations for unexpected findings and discuss limitations of the research.
Place your findings in the context of the broader field, connecting them to theories and the existing body of research.
Suggest implications for future research or practical applications.
Linking Results to Theory
Here's how to make your discussion section shine:
Return to the Literature Review: Did your results support a specific theory from your literature review? Challenge it? Offer a nuanced modification?
Contradictions Offer Insights: If your results contradict existing theories, don't dismiss them. Explain possible reasons for the discrepancies and how that pushes your field's understanding further.
Conceptual Contribution: How does your research add to the theoretical frameworks within your area of study?
Building Blocks: Frame your research as one piece of a larger puzzle. Explain how your work contributes to the ongoing scholarly conversation.
Tips for a Strong Discussion:
Avoid Overstating Significance: Maintain a scholarly tone and acknowledge the scope of your research. Don't claim your results revolutionize the field if it's not genuinely warranted.
Consider Future Directions: Responsible research isn't just about the past. Discuss what new questions arise based on your findings and offer avenues for potential future study.
Clarity Remains Key: Even when discussing complex ideas, use accessible language. Make your discussion meaningful to a wider audience within the field.
Conclusions
Your conclusion brings your research full circle. It's your chance to re-emphasize the most important takeaways of your work.
A Strong Conclusion Should:
Concisely restate the key research question or problem you sought to address.
Summarize your major findings and the most compelling evidence.
Briefly discuss the broader implications or contributions of your research.
Acknowledge limitations in the study (briefly).
Propose potential avenues for future research.
Can Conclusions Introduce New Research Questions?
Absolutely! Here's why this is valuable:
Sparking Curiosity: Ending with new questions emphasizes the ongoing nature of research and encourages further exploration beyond your own study.
Identifying Limitations: By highlighting where your work fell short, you guide future researchers toward filling those gaps.
Signaling Progress: Research is a continuous process of evolving knowledge. Your conclusion can be a springboard for others to expand upon your findings.
Crafting a Persuasive Conclusion
Here's how to make your conclusion impactful:
Reiterate, Don't Repeat: Remind the reader of your most significant findings, but avoid restating your thesis verbatim.
Confidence: Project a sense of conviction about the value of your work, without overstating its significance.
Clarity: Even in your conclusion, use direct language free of jargon. Leave the reader with a clear and lasting impression.
The Ripple Effect: Briefly highlight the broader relevance of your research. Why should readers beyond your niche field care?
Important: Your conclusion shouldn't introduce entirely new information or analyses. Rather, it should leave the reader pondering the implications of what you've already presented.
Giving Credit Where It's Due: Your references section lists the full details of every source you cited within your paper. This allows readers to locate those sources and acknowledges the intellectual work of others that you built upon.
Supporting Your Arguments: Credible references add weight to your claims, showing that your analysis is informed by established knowledge or reliable data.
Upholding Academic Standards: Accurate citations signal your commitment to scholarly practices and protect you from accusations of plagiarism.
Maintaining Citation Integrity
Here are the main practices to uphold:
Choose the Right Style: Follow the citation style mandated by your discipline (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.). They have strict rules on formatting and which elements to include.
Consistency is Key: Use your chosen citation style uniformly throughout your paper. Mixed styles look sloppy and unprofessional.
Accuracy Matters: Double-check the details of each citation (authors, title, publication year, page numbers, etc.). Errors undermine your credibility.
Citation Tools: Use reliable resources like:
Online citation generators
Reference management software (Zotero, EndNote, etc..)
University library guides for your required style
Important Notes:
In-Text vs. References: In-text citations (within your writing) point the reader to the full citation in your references list. Both are needed.
Citation ≠ Bibliography: A bibliography may include sources you consulted but didn't directly cite, while the references list is specifically for cited works.
Writing Effective Research Papers: A Guide
Research papers aren't merely about having brilliant ideas – they're about effectively communicating those ideas. Strong writing allows you to showcase the value and rigor of your work.
Is Effective Writing Alone Sufficient for a Successful Research Paper?
No. Strong writing is vital but not a substitute for the core components of research. Consider this:
Even brilliant findings get lost in poor writing: Disorganized papers, unclear sentences, or misuse of discipline-specific terms hinder the reader from grasping your insights.
Writing is intertwined with research: The process of writing helps you clarify your own thinking, refine your arguments, and identify potential weaknesses in your logic.
Tips for Academic Writing
Here's how to elevate your research paper writing:
Define Your Terms: especially if using specialized jargon or complex concepts.
Favor Active Voice: Use strong verbs and keep the subject of your sentences clear. (Example: "The study demonstrates..." rather than "It is demonstrated...")
Avoid Ambiguity: Choose precise language to leave no room for misinterpretation.
Transitions Are Your Friend: Guide the reader smoothly between ideas and sections using signpost words and phrases.
Logical Structure: Your paper's organization (introduction, methods, etc.) should have an intuitive flow.
One Idea per Paragraph: Avoid overly dense paragraphs. Break down complex points for readability.
Strong Argumentation
Thesis as Roadmap: Your central thesis should be apparent throughout the paper. Each section should clearly connect back to it.
Strong Evidence: Use reliable data and examples to support your claims.
Anticipate Counterarguments: Show you've considered alternative viewpoints by respectfully addressing and refuting them.
Additional Tips
Read widely in your field: Analyze how successful papers are structured and how arguments are developed.
Revise relentlessly: Give yourself time to step away from your draft and return with fresh eyes.
Seek Feedback: Ask peers, instructors, or a writing center tutor to review your work for clarity and logic.
Conclusion: Integrating the Components of Research Papers for Academic Excellence
The journey of writing a research paper is truly transformative. By mastering each component, from a rigorously crafted hypothesis to a meticulously compiled reference list, you develop the essential skills of critical thinking, communication, and scholarly inquiry. It's important to remember that these components are not isolated; they form a powerful, synergistic whole.
Let the process of writing research papers empower you. Embrace the challenge of synthesizing information, developing strong arguments, and communicating your findings with clarity and precision. Celebrate your dedication to the pursuit of knowledge and the contributions you make to your academic community and your own intellectual growth.
Start Writing With Jenni Today!
Sign up for a free Jenni AI account today. Unlock your research potential and experience the difference for yourself. Your journey to academic excellence starts here.
Try Jenni for free today
Create your first piece of content with Jenni today and never look back
Structure of a Research Paper
Structure of a Research Paper: IMRaD Format
I. The Title Page
- Title: Tells the reader what to expect in the paper.
- Author(s): Most papers are written by one or two primary authors. The remaining authors have reviewed the work and/or aided in study design or data analysis (International Committee of Medical Editors, 1997). Check the Instructions to Authors for the target journal for specifics about authorship.
- Keywords [according to the journal]
- Corresponding Author: Full name and affiliation for the primary contact author for persons who have questions about the research.
- Financial & Equipment Support [if needed]: Specific information about organizations, agencies, or companies that supported the research.
- Conflicts of Interest [if needed]: List and explain any conflicts of interest.
II. Abstract: “Structured abstract” has become the standard for research papers (introduction, objective, methods, results and conclusions), while reviews, case reports and other articles have non-structured abstracts. The abstract should be a summary/synopsis of the paper.
III. Introduction: The “why did you do the study”; setting the scene or laying the foundation or background for the paper.
IV. Methods: The “how did you do the study.” Describe the --
- Context and setting of the study
- Specify the study design
- Population (patients, etc. if applicable)
- Sampling strategy
- Intervention (if applicable)
- Identify the main study variables
- Data collection instruments and procedures
- Outline analysis methods
V. Results: The “what did you find” --
- Report on data collection and/or recruitment
- Participants (demographic, clinical condition, etc.)
- Present key findings with respect to the central research question
- Secondary findings (secondary outcomes, subgroup analyses, etc.)
VI. Discussion: Place for interpreting the results
- Main findings of the study
- Discuss the main results with reference to previous research
- Policy and practice implications of the results
- Strengths and limitations of the study
VII. Conclusions: [occasionally optional or not required]. Do not reiterate the data or discussion. Can state hunches, inferences or speculations. Offer perspectives for future work.
VIII. Acknowledgements: Names people who contributed to the work, but did not contribute sufficiently to earn authorship. You must have permission from any individuals mentioned in the acknowledgements sections.
IX. References: Complete citations for any articles or other materials referenced in the text of the article.
- IMRD Cheatsheet (Carnegie Mellon) pdf.
- Adewasi, D. (2021 June 14). What Is IMRaD? IMRaD Format in Simple Terms! . Scientific-editing.info.
- Nair, P.K.R., Nair, V.D. (2014). Organization of a Research Paper: The IMRAD Format. In: Scientific Writing and Communication in Agriculture and Natural Resources. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03101-9_2
- Sollaci, L. B., & Pereira, M. G. (2004). The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: a fifty-year survey. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA , 92 (3), 364–367.
- Cuschieri, S., Grech, V., & Savona-Ventura, C. (2019). WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): Structuring a scientific paper. Early human development , 128 , 114–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.09.011
Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts
Welcome to the Purdue OWL
This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.
Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.
Analysis is a type of primary research that involves finding and interpreting patterns in data, classifying those patterns, and generalizing the results. It is useful when looking at actions, events, or occurrences in different texts, media, or publications. Analysis can usually be done without considering most of the ethical issues discussed in the overview, as you are not working with people but rather publicly accessible documents. Analysis can be done on new documents or performed on raw data that you yourself have collected.
Here are several examples of analysis:
- Recording commercials on three major television networks and analyzing race and gender within the commercials to discover some conclusion.
- Analyzing the historical trends in public laws by looking at the records at a local courthouse.
- Analyzing topics of discussion in chat rooms for patterns based on gender and age.
Analysis research involves several steps:
- Finding and collecting documents.
- Specifying criteria or patterns that you are looking for.
- Analyzing documents for patterns, noting number of occurrences or other factors.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Create a heading for the analysis section of your paper. Specify the criteria you looked for in the data. For instance, a research paper analyzing the possibility of life on other planets may look for the weight of evidence supporting a particular theory, or the scientific validity of particular publications.
A research paper is a detailed academic document that presents the results of a study or investigation. It involves critical analysis, evidence-based arguments, and a thorough exploration of a specific topic.
The Structure of an Academic Paper. Academic papers are like hourglasses. The paper opens at its widest point; the introduction makes broad connections to the reader's interests, hoping they will be persuaded to follow along, then gradually narrows to a tight, focused, thesis statement. The argument stays relatively narrow and focused on the ...
how to write your own research papers and literature reviews. The summary section of your paper shows that you understood the basic facts of the research. The analysis shows that you can evaluate the evidence presented in the research and explain why the research could be important. Summary
Methodology: The methodology discusses and analyzes the methods you will undertake for your paper. Results: The results section tells the reader the results of your research. Analysis: This is the section that we are concerned with. Here, you will analyze the results of the previous part of your paper.
A results section is where you report the main findings of the data collection and analysis you conducted for your thesis or dissertation. You should report all relevant results concisely and objectively, in a logical order.
The results section should aim to narrate the findings without trying to interpret or evaluate, and also provide a direction to the discussion section of the research paper. The results are reported and reveals the analysis. The analysis section is where the writer describes what was done with the data found.
Analytical Papers: Break down complex subjects, ideas, or texts, examining their components and implications. Empirical Studies: Involve collecting and analyzing original data (through experiments, surveys, etc.) to answer specific research questions.
Home. Reports of research studies usually follow the IMRAD format. IMRAD (Introduction, Methods, Results, [and] Discussion) is a mnemonic for the major components of a scientific paper. These elements are included in the overall structure outlined below. Structure of a Research Paper: IMRaD Format. I. The Title Page.
Analysis is a type of primary research that involves finding and interpreting patterns in data, classifying those patterns, and generalizing the results. It is useful when looking at actions, events, or occurrences in different texts, media, or publications.