- Search Search Please fill out this field.
- Permanent Income Hypothesis
- How It Works
- Spending Habits Under the Hypothesis
The Bottom Line
Permanent income hypothesis: definition, how it works, and impact.
Julia Kagan is a financial/consumer journalist and former senior editor, personal finance, of Investopedia.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(webp)/Julia_Kagan_BW_web_ready-4-4e918378cc90496d84ee23642957234b.jpg "development of permanent income hypothesis")
Yarilet Perez is an experienced multimedia journalist and fact-checker with a Master of Science in Journalism. She has worked in multiple cities covering breaking news, politics, education, and more. Her expertise is in personal finance and investing, and real estate.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(webp)/YariletPerez-d2289cb01c3c4f2aabf79ce6057e5078.jpg "development of permanent income hypothesis")
Investopedia / Jiaqi Zhou
What Is the Permanent Income Hypothesis?
The permanent income hypothesis is a theory of consumer spending stating that people will spend money at a level consistent with their expected long-term average income . The level of expected long-term income then becomes thought of as the level of “permanent” income that can be safely spent. A worker will only save if their current income is higher than the anticipated level of permanent income, in order to guard against future declines in income.
Key Takeaways
- The permanent income hypothesis states that individuals will spend money at a level that is consistent with their expected long-term average income.
- Milton Friedman developed the permanent income hypothesis, believing that consumer spending is a result of estimated future income as opposed to consumption that is based on current after-tax income.
- Under the theory, if economic policies result in increased income, it will not necessarily translate into increased consumer spending.
- An individual's liquidity is a factor in their management of income and spending.
Understanding the Permanent Income Hypothesis
The permanent income hypothesis was formulated by the Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman in 1957. The hypothesis implies that changes in consumption behavior are not predictable because they are based on individual expectations. This has broad implications concerning economic policy.
According to this theory, even if economic policies are successful in increasing income, the policies may not kick off a multiplier effect in regards to increased consumer spending. Rather, the theory predicts that there will not be an uptick in consumer spending until workers reform expectations about their future incomes.
Milton believed that people will consume based on an estimate of their future income as opposed to Keynesian economics, which proposes that people will consume based on their after-tax income at that moment. Milton's basis was that individuals prefer to smooth their consumption rather than let it bounce around as a result of short-term fluctuations in income.
Spending Habits Under the Permanent Income Hypothesis
If a worker is aware that they are likely to receive an income bonus at the end of a particular pay period, it is plausible that the worker’s spending in advance of that bonus may change in anticipation of the additional earnings. However, it is also possible that workers may choose not to increase their spending based solely on a short-term windfall. They may instead make efforts to increase their savings, based on the expected boost in income.
Something similar can be said of individuals who are informed that they are to receive an inheritance . Their personal expenditures could change to take advantage of the anticipated influx of funds, but per this theory, they may maintain their current spending levels in order to save the supplemental assets. Or, they may seek to invest those supplemental funds to provide long-term growth of their money rather than spend it immediately on disposable products and services.
Liquidity and the Permanent Income Hypothesis
The liquidity of the individual can play a role in future income expectations. Individuals with no assets may already be in the habit of spending without regard to their income; current or future.
Changes over time, however—through incremental salary raises or the assumption of new long-term jobs that bring higher, sustained pay—can lead to changes in permanent income. With their expectations elevated, employees may allow their expenditures to scale up in turn.
What Is the Difference Between Life Cycle Income Hypothesis and Permanent Income Hypothesis?
The life cycle hypothesis focuses on how the spending and saving habits of an individual changes within their lifetime, or life cycle, as they grow older. On the other hand, the permanent income hypothesis examines an individual's spending habits based on expected income, and it applies at any point during their lifetimes.
What Is the Difference Between Permanent Income and Transitory Income?
As the name suggests, transitory income is a temporary, unexpected change in income generally from inconsistent sources. Meanwhile, permanent income is the expected average income of an individual that remains stable over a long period of time.
How Much Does the Average American Spend on Non-essentials?
According to a survey conducted by OnePoll, the average American spends around $1,497 a month on non-essentials, totaling nearly $18,000 a year.
The permanent income hypothesis, by Milton Friedman, states that consumers spend money based on their expected long-term average income, meaning that economic policies aiming to increase consumer spending may not be successful at first due to the stability of individual expectations.
University of Chicago, Harris School of Public Policy. " Permanent Income ."
Ladder. " National Life Insurance Day Survey 2019 ."
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(webp)/INV_PCE_Grocery_Shopping_GettyImages-1929703375-ddee0de8b562455fa6dc9b69227d6e75.jpg "development of permanent income hypothesis")
- Terms of Service
- Editorial Policy
- Privacy Policy
- Your Privacy Choices
The Permanent Income Hypothesis
MARC RIS BibTeΧ
Download Citation Data
More from NBER
In addition to working papers , the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter , the NBER Digest , the Bulletin on Retirement and Disability , the Bulletin on Health , and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports , video lectures , and interviews .
- Feldstein Lecture
- Presenter: Cecilia E. Rouse
- Methods Lectures
- Presenter: Susan Athey
- Panel Discussion
- Presenters: Karen Dynan , Karen Glenn, Stephen Goss, Fatih Guvenen & James Pearce
Walker Professor of Economics and International Finance
- Princeton University
- [email protected]
- Custom Social Profile Link
Permanent Income Hypothesis
PDF – Journal link
Aguiar, Mark and Erik Hurst (2008): “Permanent Income Hypothesis,” New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics , Palgrave Macmillan, 2008 (online 2016).
The permanent income hypothesis (PIH) is a theory that links an individual’s consumption at any point in time to that individual’s total income earned over his or her lifetime. The hypothesis is based on two simple premises: (1) that individuals wish to equate their expected marginal utility of consumption across time and (2) that individuals are able to respond to income changes by saving and dis-saving. In this article we present the intuition and empirical implications of the PIH in several standard contexts.
BibTeX Cite:
IMAGES
COMMENTS
The permanent income hypothesis is a theory of consumer spending stating that people will spend money at a level consistent with their expected long-term average income. The level of...
The Income Hypothesis THE magnitudes termed "permanent income" and "permanent con-sumption" that play such a critical role in the theoretical analysis cannot be observed directly for any individual consumer unit. The most that can be observed are actual receipts and expenditures during some finite period, supplemented, perhaps, by some verbal ...
The permanent income hypothesis (PIH) is a model in the field of economics to explain the formation of consumption patterns. It suggests consumption patterns are formed from future expectations and consumption smoothing.
The Permanent Income Hypothesis, as developed by Friedman (1957), contrasts with the simple Keynesian consumption theory, which postulates that consumption depends on current income only and is equal to a nonincreasing fraction of current income.
Friedman developed and tested the permanent income hypothesis during the 1950s to address a very specific set of problems, the apparent contradiction between evidence from time-series and cross-sectional responses to changes in income.
The permanent income hypothesis (PIH) posits that individuals spend money based on their expected long-term average income, challenging traditional Keynesian economic theories. Developed by Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman, PIH has profound implications for economic policy and consumer behavior.
The Permanent Income Hypothesis. Milton Friedman. Published Date January 1957. Copyright 1957. ISBN 0-691-04182-2. Book: A Theory of the Consumption Function. Book author: Milton Friedman. PUBLISHER: Princeton University Press. Download Purchase Book. Download Citation. More from NBER.
The Permanent Income Hypothesis (PIH) is a theory that links an individual’s consumption at any point in time to that individual’s total income earned over their lifetime. The hypothesis is based on two simple premises: 1) that individuals wish to equate their expected marginal utility of consumption across time and 2) that individuals
This article reexamines the consistency of the permanent-income hypothesis with aggregate postwar U.S. data. The permanent-income hypothesis is nested within a more general model in which a fraction of income accrues to individuals who consume their current income rather than their permanent income.
The permanent income hypothesis (PIH) is a theory that links an individual’s consumption at any point in time to that individual’s total income earned over his or her lifetime. The hypothesis is based on two simple premises: (1) that individuals wish to equate their expected marginal utility of consumption across time and (2) that ...